In reality, he was a traitor to all he stood for; both to Protestant Christianity and to Ireland.

Paisley worked for British MI5 and surrounded himself with pedophiles.

The Catholic Church has dominated Ireland for centuries and it steers any agenda that could bring the Irish freedom from either Rome or London.

As Norther Ireland has continued to be a flashpoint for Irish independence from England, British Intelligence (and, ultimately, Rome) has manipulated it into becoming a separate region and placing her agents like Ian Paisley as both, at varying times, “First Minister” and “Deputy Minister”.

Today the destruction of Irish independence is complete with “Northern Ireland” being managed by two corrupt Leftist females: Arlene Foster (who, for show, attends the Protestant-in-name-only “Church of Ireland”) and strongly-Catholic Michelle O’Neill.  As with all Catholics in key positions, O’Neill’s Leftist dogma is virulently pro-abortion.  With access to abortion “clinics” being mildly curtailed as a result of the world-wide “coronavirus” false flag, O’Neill has encouraged the women of Ireland to kill their babies themselves.

Ian Paisley was never a threat to Rome; he never alerted his parishioners and constituents to the grievous crimes the Vatican perpetrates through to this day.

The below article has been struck from the internet but it proves that Paisley was, at best, a protector of pedophiles and, at worst, one himself.

Whenever Paisley is promoted as a Protestant, it is with the single event of his heckling then-Pope John Paul II (who has since been “beatified”), Karol Józef Wojtyła.

The event provided nothing of substance except to humiliate Protestants and garner sympathy for a Nazi concentration camp cyanide salesman.¹

The brutal terrorist organization Sinn Féin was the Vatican’s key organization to controlling and destroying Irish independence.  It was given legitimacy as a “political party” with devout Catholics like Martin McGuinness at it’s head.  McGuinness and his family were so devout they honored “Hitler’s Pope”² Eugenio Pacelli by giving him “Pacelli” as a second middle name.

The “miraculous” or “strange” friendship between McGuinness and Paisley was further mythologized with a 2016 movie.

There is nothing “strange” nor “miraculous” about Paisley selling out Ireland to Rome and London.

Village Magazine

Kincora Survivor

The stolen life of Richard Kerr, including his account of how Ian Paisley strove to cover up child abuse.

by Joseph de Búrca
13 November, 2017, 1:50 pm 2 Comments

The Threat to “Destroy” a Whistle-Blower

The Reverend Ian Paisley, who served as First Minister of Northern Ireland (NI ), 2007-2008, was aware of the sexual abuse of boys which took place at Kincora Boys Home during the 1970s.  Paisley learnt about it from Valerie Shaw, who served as secretary of the “missionary council” of his church, on 28 October 1973.

Shaw denounced Paisley at a press conference in 1982: “I approached Dr. Paisley on at least seven occasions”, she said.  “I asked him time and time again what he intended to do about this.  My concern all along was very much for the fact that there were young boys under the threat of this man’s corruption”.

The man she was referring to was William McGrath, the “Housefather” at Kincora, and a long-time associate of Paisley before they fell out in the 1970s.  Some of the RUC officers who investigated Kincora came to refer to him as “The Beast”.  What has now emerged is that Paisley also participated in the cover-up of the scandal in the early 1980s.  Many of the residents at Kincora were raped by McGrath, Joseph Mains and Raymond Semple, all of whom were convicted in December 1981.  Others got away.  These included Paisley’s former bodyguard, John Dunlop McKeague, a sadistic Loyalist paramilitary serial killer.  Another was Pastor Willie Mullan, an Evangelical friend of Paisley.  Paisley conceded that Valerie Shaw had informed him about McGrath’s reign of terror, although not that he worked at Kincora.  “Yes, she did say – she made accusations against Mr. McGrath – and she based these on the evidence of Mr. ‘X’.  When I met Mr. ‘X’, he would not meet Mr. McGrath and I of course did the only thing I could do: I put (sic) Mr. McGrath from taking part in an Orange [Order] service in my church.  He wasn’t a member of my church but I took that discipline immediately; and I regret Miss Shaw didn’t go to police”.

Ian Paisley

Shaw, however, had gone to the RUC but had recieved no help.

Shaw also informed two senior figures at the Church who warned her Paisley would “destroy” her if she persisted in her campaign.

Shaw’s efforts to engage Paisley lasted a year and a half, after which she left his church in disgust.

Belying the distance Paisley alleged he placed between himself and McGrath, Paisley went on to officiate at the wedding of McGrath’s daughter, Elizabeth, on 22 January 1976.  It should be stressed that Ian Paisley was not a child abuser.  However, his actions were motivated by other factors, none of which can have been benign.

Mr. “X”

Mr. “X” was Roy Garland, who had served in Tara, a paramilitary organisation led by McGrath.  As part of his mission to expose McGrath, Roy Garland also informed Brian Gemmell, a conscientious British military intelligence officer about Kincora.  The information was passed along the line to Ian Cameron of MI5 who ordered Gemmell to abandon his inquiries.  Cameron gave this order because MI5 was blackmailing some of the Kincora abusers and exploiting the heinous behaviour there in other ways.³

Richard Kerr, the Witness Who Joins All the Dots

Richard Kerr is the key figure in appreciating the full extent of the scandal.  His horrific experience joins the dots between all of the key figures and developments involved in it.

Kerr was born on 12 May 1961, and lived with his family off the Botanic Gardens in Belfast until he was placed into care at Williamstown House (WH) in North Belfast on 16 December, 1966.  WH catered for Catholic and Protestant children.  Kerr was abused by Eric Witchell from the age of 8, starting one night after Witchell visited his bed.

“I was on my side, I had a teddy bear.  I was biting into that while he had his hand down my backside and fumbled around”.  Full rape commenced later.  Years later, Witchell was jailed for abusing other boys at WH.

Richard Kerr

Kerr has informed Village that Witchell became the head of WH “for the Catholics’ side in early 1975 while I was there.  Before that he was visiting it and from my memory he was working part-time.  He was living in Liverpool at a church, but had his own place in Belfast that he would go to when he would visit Williamson House”.  Witchell, he adds, arranged “for me to meet him in the Liverpool at a church; then he abused me there.  I was still in care, living in Belfast.

But please realise there were others who came to WH who abused us”.  One of the “others” who abused the children at WH was Dr. Morris Fraser.  Both Witchell and Fraser are alive and there is no sign yet that either of them will ever be prosecuted by the PSNI for the abuse of Kerr.

“My school records from Mount Vernon”, Kerr has also told Village, “were destroyed because it contained information indicating that I was being abused at Williamson House.  The staff at the school suspected I was being abused but, when asked, I would not answer their questions because I was afraid of my abusers”.

Her Majesty’s Child Brothel at Kincora

In 1975 Kerr was sent to Kincora.  He was only 14 and became its youngest resident.  He was forced to have sex with Joseph Mains, the Warden of Kincora, in the shed at the back of the home which “had a chair and a mattress in it, that’s about all”, and in a hotel and a guesthouse.  Witchell continued to abuse him.  “Eric was a good friend of Mains” and they were often on the phone together.  “Eric would call Mains and I would speak to him on the phone when I was in Kincora and [he would ask] me to come over to Williamson House; then he would abuse me.  His room was on the top floor”.  Kerr had no choice but to submit to Witchell if he wanted to see his sister at WH.

At the age of 15 Kerr was taken to the Whip and Saddle bar at the Europa Hotel by Mains and others who supplied him to men staying at the hotel.

The deeply flawed conclusion of the 2017 Hart Report was that abuse at Kincora was an isolated aberration limited to a handful of miscreants on its staff.  Significantly, while Kerr was at Kincora, he was spirited out of Ireland to Manchester, London and elsewhere.  He has supplied Village with a photograph taken of him aged 16 in London.  This photograph alone sinks the central finding of the Hart Report.

Witchell introduced him to two men who exploited him in Manchester.  Abuse took place at the Rembrandt Hotel and elsewhere.  The two men “had other boys living with them.  They took photographs of us tied up with our clothes off to put in boys’ magazines.  They said they were sending some to Amsterdam”.

Richard Kerr in England aged 16.

The Whip and Saddle Bar at the Europa Hotel

In June 1977, when he was 16, Joe Mains secured a job for Kerr at the Europa Hotel.  He was rostered to work in the “late evening”.  This was an excuse to make him available to abusers, many of whom congregated at the Whip and Saddle bar.

Harper Brown, the manager of the Europa Hotel, 1971-84, was a “very, very good friend” of Mains’ and Kerr has no doubt he “knew what was going on there”.  Kerr’s employment lasted until October 1977.

“I met Englishmen and Americans at the Europa Hotel where I was abused.  Some of these men arranged for me to meet them in England.  I was also taken to Larne many times where I was abused at the Harbour Inn Hotel.  I was also transported to Scotland from Larne and taken to the North of England and London.  This happened quite a bit.  I was taken there many times by men who were in the Orange Order.  They would come up to Kincora.  Two of these men did not abuse me but would take me to meet men that did”.  Kerr knew they were Orangemen from discussions with Mains.  “When I was in Mains’ room in the late evening and he was drinking he would tell me about his membership in the B Specials, and also about the men he knew in the Orange Order.  I met one of these men before Kincora and I met the other two when they came to Kincora.  They would take me out to places and they would become intoxicated and would have conversations about the Orange Order.  I remember one of them said that he was a member of the club behind the West Circular Road.  Mains would write down a false address of where I had been to cover-up where they would take me”.

Joe Mains and Sir Maurice Oldfield of MI6

In 1980 MI5 (which is attached to the British Home Office) carried out an inquiry into the conduct of the former Chief of MI6, Sir Maurice Oldfield, 1973-78.  MI6 is attached to the Foreign Office.  This happened because Oldfield had been caught lying about his homosexuality.  Oldfield was also an abuser of ‘rent boys’, underage male prostitutes.  MI6 reviewed their files relating to the matter in 2011.  According to the Hart Report, “Officer G” of MI6 “examined four ring binders with material relating to Sir Maurice Oldfield, including the 1980 MI5 investigation”.

Joe Mains, warden of Kincora

Officer G proceeded to describe a “relationship” Oldfield had “had with Kincora boys’ home (KBH) in Belfast”.  Oldfield was linked to Kincora “through his friendship with the KBH Head”.  Hart concluded that this was not evidence of MI6 involvement in Kincora because Officer G had made a mistake and was apparently merely referring to allegations about a relationship.  However, neither MI6 nor the Hart Report quoted a single contemporaneous report alleging a friendship between Oldfield and Joseph Mains, the only man who fits the description of “KBH Head”.  Indeed, Village can find no trace anywhere of such a report, nor one about a friendship with any of the other staff members at Kincora.

Hart Failure

There is an error at paragraph 607 of Chapter 29 of the Hart Report which was published in 2017 where it is stated that: “As we have explained, Richard Kerr has alleged that he was sexually abused by Sir Maurice Oldfield”.  This is not accurate.  Indeed, at paragraph 159 of Chapter 26 of the Report, the following appears: “Kerr did not know at the time who Oldfield was, he says, and does not suggest that he abused Kincora boys”.

Mains Makes Trouble With the RUC Vanish

Kerr came to the attention of the police in October 1977 over an incident involving a car.  He had been in the company of some older men who had left it behind, possibly after it had suffered damage to a bumper.  After they departed, Kerr was picked up by the RUC.  An investigation into the events of that night threatened to unravel the vice ring.  “I was taken to the police station in October 1977.  They allowed me to privately speak to Joseph Mains but the police officers were not in the same room.  Joseph Mains told me as long as I kept my mouth quiet about what was going on, he would get me out of the situation I was in.  There was a statement that was meant to be signed; I could not read so if I signed the statement, I did not know what I was signing.  Joseph Mains ended up signing the statement as well”.

The statement Kerr signed made him appear a full year older than he was.  Mains knew Kerr’s date of birth perfectly well, as of course did Kerr.  Kerr believes “they were trying to cover-up by saying I was the driver of the car but it was actually the older men.  I was 16, and back then you could only drive when you were 17”.

The Chairman of Belfast Corporation Welfare Committee

Two of Richard Kerr’s social workers became aware of what was going on and tried to get the authorities in Belfast to intervene but they met a blank wall because of abusers like Joshua Cardwell.  He was Chairman of Belfast Corporation’s Welfare Committee which was responsible for Kincora.  He was also a friend of Mains.  Another key figure was a legal official who helped suppress the scandal, also an associate of Mains.

Kerr knew Cardwell as “Joseph” Cardwell and recalls that he wore a “funny” hat and drove a blue minivan.  He does not believe that he “owned the minivan but one was provided for him and others as transportation for outings out of Kincora”.  Cardwell took his victims to the Adelphi Hotel in Portrush.  Kerr recalls the “evening bar” was “down the stairs back then”.  He was plied with alcohol by abusers, there.

Cardwell committed suicide in March 1982 after being interviewed by the RUC about Kincora.

John Dunlop McKeague

The Sadistic Paramilitary Serial Killer

The Park Avenue Hotel was another venue of abuse for Kerr.  Mains “went there a lot”, according to Kerr.  RUC men frequented it too, he recalls.  Significantly, Kerr has revealed that “John McKeague and other men” were patrons too.  McKeague’s group would occupy the “red seats in the bar area”.  Kerr would be sent to a room to await abuse.

McKeague was born in 1930, and originally hailed from Bushmills, County Antrim.  He came to Belfast after his parents, Isabella and Thomas, moved him and his sisters there from Portrush where they had run a guesthouse.

Over time McKeague became a sadistic sectarian serial killer, with a penchant for torturing victims before finishing them off.  He was also obsessed by the Occult, and particularly by one of its practitioners, Evan Frederick Moran, the second Viscount Tredegar.  Tredegar, who often visited Ireland, was even reputed to have been an enthusiastic and willing plaything for paedophiles at Buckingham Palace while serving there as a pageboy.  Tredegar visited Lord Louis Mountbatten in Classiebawn, County Donegal, during some of his yachting holidays.  Gemma O’Doherty speculates as to Mountbatten’s implication in paedophile rings, elsewhere in this edition.  The renowned long-serving-BBC journalist and author Martin Dillon has written that McKeague was “lean, sleazy and snake-like, his eyes slightly sunken.  When he spoke, the menace was wrapped in slyness but there was no missing his capacity for sadism”.

McKeague would become close to another UVF man, Lenny Murphy, who later achieved infamy as the leader of the Shankill Butchers.

MI5 Makes a Partial Admission About the Recruitment of John McKeague

Brian Gemmell, the conscientious British military intelligence officer mentioned earlier, attended a meeting with MI5 officers in a hotel at Buckingham Palace Road, London, in the mid- 1970s where he was told MI5 possessed a compromising film of McKeague engaged in homosexual acts.  The meeting discussed the possibility of recruiting McKeague through blackmail.  If the “compromising film” MI5 had was not shot at the Park Avenue Hotel, it means MI5 must have had McKeague under surveillance elsewhere.

MI5 acknowledged to the Hart Inquiry that a meeting had indeed taken place and that Gemmell had been at it.  They even provided a date: 10 May 1976.  MI5 also conceded that a suggestion had been made to blackmail McKeague.  Another meeting took place on 7 September 1976.  MI5 sought to place the focus firmly on London, not Belfast.  It told Hart that “one MI5 officer did put forward an operational proposal (which was never endorsed) which involved using McKeague’s homosexual activities in London in an attempt to recruit him”.

MI5 has denied possession of any actual blackmail material concerning McKeague.  This is implausible.

A Honeytrap that Ended in Fiasco

On another occasion an incident took place which looks suspiciously like it was a paedophile ‘honeytrap’ that went wrong.  Kerr was taken to a hotel.  “There was a fight [between two men].  We were outside [the hotel]…Two cars came up to the front of the hotel.  I was directed away from the two guys.  Those two guys were put into a car.  I was put into another car with three men.  I was sitting right in the middle.  One was to my right.  One was to my left and then you have the driver and then they took off.  They brought me back to Kincora by the side door.  Mr. Mains knew about this because he had [received] a telephone call.  He knew that I was coming back.  I knocked on the door and Mr. Mains opened up.  He told me to go to my room and he said not to say anything”.

Sir Maurice Oldfield (centre, with glasses), in 1974.

Two of Kerr’s close friends and fellow victims were to die young.  One of them, Stephen Waring, couldn’t take any more of the brutality and horror, and committed suicide in 1977 by jumping into the sea during a trip on the Liverpool-Belfast Monarch Ferry.  There were other victims who died.

The Anglo-Irish Vice Ring

Kerr’s social workers – who are still alive – furnished details about the abuse to Peter McKenna of the Irish Independent.  It took a while but he eventually exposed the scandal in January 1980.  By this time, Kerr had been trafficked to England by Eric Witchell.

The notorious paedophile, Sir Cyril Smith MP, was one of those who abused Kerr in Manchester.  In London he was abused at the Philbeach Hotel in Earl’s Court; raped at Dolphin Square; and brought to Elm Guest House (EGH) which was frequented by Cyril Smith, Jimmy Savile and others.  He was abused by a barrister at EGH.  Hilton Tims, Editor of the Surrey Comet, 1980- 1988, has revealed that in the 1980s one of his journalists made inquiries about EGH only to receive a national security D-Notice injunction which shut his probe down.  What possible “national security” threat was there in a story exposing a child brothel?  Why did a judge issue the D-Notice?

Sir Peter Hayman, the Deputy Chief^{4, 5, 6} of MI6

From Johnny: For more on Hayman and the trafficking of children for “Intelligence” read my book Eaters of Children.

Sir Peter Hayman, KCMG, CVO, MBE was another of Richard Kerr’s abusers.  Hayman rose to become High Commissioner to Canada and also worked for MI6.⁷  According to a slew of reports, he served as MI6’s Deputy Chief for a spell.  He was also a member of the notorious Paedophile Information Network.

Sir Peter Hayman

In October 1978 London detectives discovered his collection of child pornography: 45 of his diaries describing six years of “sexual fantasies” about children; and that he was a member of a group which swapped photographs.  One of them shared fantasies about torturing children to death, with yet another paedophile.  The police prosecuted two of them while Hayman was given a warning not to send obscene material through the post.  In March 1981, Geoffrey Dickens, a Tory MP, named him in the House of Commons.  Margaret Thatcher’s Attorney-General, Sir Michael Havers, argued that Hayman’s collection was not of an extreme nature and hence he had not warranted prosecution.

Despite all the chances he was given, Hayman failed to curb his impulses and was arrested in a public lavatory in London in 1984 with a boy and convicted of gross indecency – but let off with a caution.

The RUC Perverts the Course of Justice

Kerr has told Village how, “detectives from the RUC also interviewed me in January of 1980 in Preston, Lancaster.  I was taken out of the place and threatened when they got me to the police station.  Because of their threats I was scared to tell them anything.  I kept my mouth shut knowing that the abusers I met were still in contact with me, and the police put me in a cell and made me feel that I was responsible for what happened as if I was the guilty person”.

Kerr later moved to London where other detectives – this time not from the RUC – visited his home, “and did the same thing.  They intimidated me and wanted me to not speak any more about what happened.  So you can understand why I was scared because they always tried to make me feel I was responsible.  I knew too much about what was going on, and the people that were involved – who I became afraid of”.

A Bell Hop Who Was Able to Live Beyond His Means

In London, Kerr secured work as a “bell hop” at the Cumberland Hotel near Marble Arch in London.  As the pressure built up around the Kincora scandal in the early 1980s, the people behind the cover-up adopted a policy of carrot and stick to contain Kerr.  By way of carrot, his financial security was assured: he was able to afford to live in Flat Number 1, 44 Baker St, around the corner from Oxford Street.  Kerr has furnished Village with documentation which confirms he lived there.  There was no conceivable way a teenage “bell hop” from Belfast could have afforded such a desirable residence without considerable financial assistance.

By way of stick, the intimidation continued: a group of men came to his flat at 44 Baker St.  Some were in police uniform, others in civilian clothing.  They knocked him to the ground, told him that they were from the British “Secret Service” and that he was to keep quiet about what he knew or they would arrest him as a ‘terrorist’.

The hard-cop-soft-cop routine was also deployed: the next day he received an apology for the rough treatment he had experienced.

Paisley Throws His Weight About at The Cumberland Hotel

One evening Kerr was at the bell hops’ station at the Cumberland Hotel when a colleague from the hotel’s café strolled across and told him someone was looking for him.  The visitor turned out to be Ian Paisley.  Kerr’s recollection of what would unfold is vivid and sharp: Paisley was seated on his own at a table “near a glass area” and was “wearing a suit with a hat that was placed on the table”.  He also “carried a newspaper” which he “placed on the table”.  A pair of men sat adjacent to him “in professional dress”.  While Kerr recognised Paisley, he did not know the others.  They would not address him at any stage during the encounter that ensued.  “They created space between themselves and others”.  As Kerr recalls it: “Paisley spoke with them; they were in earshot of our conversation.  I was unable to discern if they spoke in an English accent.  I do know that they were accompanying Paisley because they joined him after our conversation was complete”.

Paisley asked Kerr “to be seated after I was speaking with him standing up”.  At the start “of the conversation I did not feel intimidated, yet as the meeting continued, I did begin to feel uneasy”, Kerr recalls.

Paisley knew he had been at Kincora and instructed him that if he was questioned by the police, he was not to “mention anything about Englishmen at Kincora”.  Kerr was dumbfounded and responded “What?” Paisley repeated the instruction and added that he was “not [to] speak of other events that occurred in Belfast”.

“I nodded my head.  No verbal communication was made”.  The encounter only lasted about ten minutes.  Paisley left with the two men.  “I then went back to the bell station slightly disturbed and I did not respond to another bell boy’s question of the encounter”.

Kerr’s impression of the other men was that they had behaved “normally [and] they didn’t appear to be threatening”.  Initially he had not been frightened by them as “they did not speak to me.  It wasn’t until later that evening after the meeting [had ended] did I begin to feel concerned as to their intentions”.

• How did Paisley know that Kerr had been in Kincora?
• Who told him Kerr was working at the Cumberland?
• Who told Paisley “Englishmen” had abused children at Kincora?
• Why was Paisley prepared to help protect English paedophiles?
• Who were the men who accompanied him?

The following week a white envelope arrived at the hotel.  It contained black-and-white photographs of Kerr, naked.  The manager of the hotel, a Mr. Gardner, showed them to Kerr who was deeply embarrassed and made an excuse that they must have been posted by a jealous ex-girlfriend.  Gardiner let Kerr know that he was not pleased but didn’t dismiss him.

Who Were the Englishmen Paisley Strove To Protect?

Clint Massey, another Kincora survivor, revealed in 2015 that “there were loads of people over from London.  I have always assumed they were senior figures from Whitehall.  I certainly heard English accents”.

The whistle-blower Robin Bryans (See Village October 2017) knew a lot of them, including Anthony Blunt of MI5.  Another was a “decidedly gay-looking” man called Peter England.  Bryans told this author in 1990 that while he knew England “very well” he “didn’t like him much”.

England was a former boyfriend of Sir Samuel Knox Cunningham QC MP and had also had a relationship with the Irish publisher, Charles Monteith, both members of the Anglo-Irish Vice Ring.

Peter England lived in London, had served in the Royal Navy during WWII and later went to work at the Ministry of Defence (MoD).  He transferred to the Northern Ireland Office in the 1970s.  Declassified files furnished to the Hart Inquiry demonstrated that some of his work involved oversight of the black propaganda activities of

the Army and intelligence services.  According to Bryans, “the main thing to do with covering up for Kincora” related to England.  This analysis makes perfect sense because England: 1) had died in 1978 and therefore could be named without fear of a libel action; 2) had a criminal record: he had been arrested and convicted for obscene behaviour in a London toilet; 3) his exposure would have blown the Kincora cover-up wide apart, for it would have demonstrated knowledge of the scandal at the highest level of the NI O and made a nonsense of the claim that Kincora was an isolated aberration.

The late Merlyn Rees, a former Secretary of State for NI , worked with England at the NI O.  In his NI memoirs, Rees described how England was: “a man of wide experience at the [MoD], whose work over the next three years [in Belfast] was to prove invaluable, though the physical stress of the job may have contributed to his tragically early death in 1978”.  Moreover, he said that England “was a hard task master but at the same time he always showed concern for those working in the office”.

Clearly, England showed more “concern” for his staff than for the children he abused.  By the time of his death, Bryans recalled that England had let himself go and had become “scruffy”.

There is more: on 23 January 2015 the late journalist Liam Clarke reported in the Belfast Telegraph that two RUC officers had told him that a Tory MP had “visited Kincora during the 1970s”.  Both officers, he reported, were “willing to help any inquiry into Kincora either here or in England.  They revealed that the MP died before they could arrange to interview him”.  There are only two MPs who match this description.  One of the officers revealed that the MP had visited NI “quite regularly…We were told by criminal records in Scotland Yard, London, that he had a conviction many years ago for indecent behaviour or something in a gen ts’ loo against another boy, but his death meant we never got a chance to question him”.

The teenaged Richard Kerr in front of Westminster.

MPs, VIPs and Celebrity Child Molesters in London

While Kerr was living in London, he continued to suffer abuse.  At the time he was a teenager, but it mattered little to the abusers that he had been groomed, brutalised and desensitised since the age of eight.

Kerr has supplied Village with the name and address of a high-profile celebrity abuser who is alive and still enjoys public acclaim and affection.  He has appeared in many successful British TV programmes, including one watched by millions of viewers in recent years.

There were other VIP abusers of Kerr including a Tory MP who, although no longer serving in Parliament, maintains a high profile.  He has endeavoured to cast doubt about the existence of a VIP vice ring during the last few years.  Village believes it is highly likely he is one of the main protagonists behind the ongoing cover-up and is acting in tandem with a dubious journalist who has done a lot to introduce misleading information to the public, all of which tends to undermine the credibility of genuine victims, like Kerr.

Returning to the 1980s: Kerr had become a serious threat to the cover-up of the truth about Kincora.  One solution would have been to have had him murdered.  Howard Smith, the then Director General of MI5, was – according to UK declassified files – an advocate of political assassination (See Village July 2017).  John McKeague would have been an ideal choice as a hit man.  However, by then Kerr’s murder would have caused too many waves because he had crossed paths with too many VIPs who hardly wanted the police knocking on their doors.  In the end the conspirators opted to spirit him out of the country.

Who Were Paisley’s Ultimate Puppet Masters?

McGrath had multiple connections to Paisley – as had McKeague.  McKeague had converted to the Paisley brand of Free Presbyterianism in 1966, and acted as Paisley’s bodyguard for a time.  He was pivotal to the UVF bombing campaign that helped topple NI PM Terence O’Neill in 1968.  He was also involved in the Ulster Protestant Volunteers, an organisation Paisley helped to set up in the 1960s.

During the 1960s while they were close to Paisley, McGrath and McKeague were involved 1) in the UVF; 2) the anti-O’Neill bomb campaign; 3) arms procurement; and 4) no end of hate crimes, not to mention child abuse.

The Cumberland Hotel incident seems to demonstrate that Paisley had been got at, most likely by incriminating information possessed by McGrath and McKeague.  Since they were British assets, it is legitimate to ask: did one or both of them turn the screws on Paisley to get him to intimidate Kerr; moreover, did they do so with the support of Ian Cameron; Sir Howard Smith, D-G of MI5 1979-81; his deputy Sir John Jones (who became D-G, 1981-85); and others in MI5; not to mention Sir Maurice Oldfield and his MI6 cronies?

The Tip of A Chilling Iceberg

For a while Richard Kerr co-operated with the Hart Inquiry to which he was a central witness.  However, in the end he withdrew.  His solicitors KRW Law said: “The State bodies/agencies that are Core Participants to the inquiry appear to have been provided with bundles of documents of up to 16,000 pages.  In contrast, Mr. Kerr was provided with around 740 pages.

“It is not clear why the inquiry wish to conceal these documents from Mr. Kerr or his legal representatives.  In the context of an inquiry that is investigating allegations that the British security forces and security services knew that abuse was and would be perpetrated on the children in Kincora and covered this up, this is inherently unreasonable”.

Richard Kerr now lives in Dallas.  He is angry at his former abusers, and the mind games they played with him as a child.  He has benefited from years of counselling and is now determined to tell his story.  Above all else he wants to achieve “a little justice” for those who died.  He has a lot more to reveal.  What appears in these pages is merely the beginning.

What is Just War?

CCC 2302-2317

The Catechism of the Catholic Church, in paragraphs 2302-2317, authoritatively teaches what constitutes the just defense of a nation against an aggressor. Called the Just War Doctrine, it was first enunciated by St. Augustine of Hippo (354-430 AD). Over the centuries it was taught by Doctors of the Church, such as St. Thomas Aquinas, and formally embraced by the Magisterium, which has also adapted it to the situation of modern warfare. The following explanation of Just War Doctrine follows the schema given in the Catechism.

Righteous versus Unrighteous Anger (2302-3)

Anger is a desire for revenge. Anger is the passion (emotion) by which a man reacts to evil, real or apparent, and seeks vindication of his rights, that is, justice. By itself the passion is neither moral or immoral, but becomes so by reason or its being ordered or disordered – that is, reasonable according to the circumstances. An ordered anger is directed to a legitimate object, and, with an appropriate degree of vehemence. An inordinate anger is directed either to an illegitimate object, or, with an unreasonable vehemence. As St. Thomas Aquinas notes, vice may be by defect, as well as excess. So, the presence of evil should provoke a righteous anger, which if absent constitutes a sinful insensibility.

Consider the just anger of the Lord to the presence in the Temple of the money-changers and the action He took (John 2:13-17). Provoked by this offense against His Father, Jesus formed whips and drove them from the Temple. Righteous anger, and the acts which flow from it, intend the correction of vice (both for the good of the individual sinner and the common good), the restoring of the order of justice disturbed by sin, and the restraint of further evil.

On the other hand, unjust anger seeks to do evil to another for its own sake, the harm to body or soul that it entails. While one may desire, and employ, physical force for the sake of correction, restraint of evil and restoring justice, even if it entails injury and death, one may never desire it for its own sake. To desire some slight injury for an evil motive  would be venially sinful. To desire grave injury or death would be gravely sinful. A Christian may never, of course, desire the damnation of the evil doer. Charity requires that we will the good, especially the ultimate good, salvation, for every human being. Unfortunately, the entertainment media often promotes an image of anger and vengeance which is closer to blood lust than to justice.
Peace – the Work of Justice and the Tranquility of Order (2304-6)

Whether it is justice within society, or the interior justice of holiness, peace is its fruit.  Righteous anger, and the means it employs, should not knowingly produce less justice and less peace than existed before evil intervened. Human prudence, however, is fallible. It cannot necessarily predict the ploys of the adversary, both human and demonic. In addition, fallen human nature is inclined to sin, and thus prone to respond with excess to provocation. Thus, even virtue and a well-formed conscience can fail to produce the desired result of justice and peace. Great restraint must be shown, therefore, in the use of violence to achieve justice. In addition to the efforts of those who work assiduously for peace, “the peacemakers”, society needs the example of those who renounce violence altogether. Their “witness to the gravity of the physical and moral risks of recourse to violence, with all its destruction and death” should serve to restrain the use of even justified force. Such conscientious objection is a valuable service to society. As the Catechismmakes clear, it must be accompanied by the willingness to serve in other capacities (cf. 2311), however.

Just War (2307-17)

All citizens and all governments are obliged to work for the avoidance of war.Despite this admonition of the Church, it sometimes becomes necessary to use force to obtain the end of justice. This is the right, and the duty, of those who have responsibilities for others, such as civil leaders and police forces. While individuals may renounce all violence those who must preserve justice may not do so, though it should be the last resort, “once all peace efforts have failed.” [Cf. Vatican II, Gaudium et spes 79, 4]

As with all moral acts the use of force to obtain justice must comply with three conditions to be morally good. First, the act must be good in itself. The use of force to obtain justice is morally licit in itself. Second, it must be done with a good intention, which as noted earlier must be to correct vice, to restore justice or to restrain evil, and not to inflict evil for its own sake. Thirdly, it must be appropriate in the circumstances. An act which may otherwise be good and well motivated can be sinful by reason of imprudent judgment and execution.

In this regard Just War doctrine gives certain conditions for the legitimate exercise of force, all of which must be met:

1. “the damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or community of nations must be lasting, grave, and certain;
2. all other means of putting an end to it must have been shown to be impractical or ineffective;
3. there must be serious prospects of success;
4. the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated. The power of modern means of destruction weighs very heavily in evaluating this condition” [CCC 2309].

The responsibility for determining whether these conditions are met belongs to “the prudential judgment of those who have responsibility for the common good.” The Church’s role consists in enunciating clearly the principles, in forming the consciences of men and in insisting on the moral exercise of just war.

The Church greatly respects those who have dedicated their lives to the defense of their nation. “If they carry out their duty honorably, they truly contribute to the common good of the nation and the maintenance of peace. [Cf. Gaudium et spes79, 5]” However, she cautions combatants that not everything is licit in war. Actions which are forbidden, and which constitute morally unlawful orders that may not be followed, include:

– attacks against, and mistreatment of, non-combatants, wounded soldiers, and prisoners;

– genocide, whether of a people, nation or ethnic minorities;

– indiscriminate destruction of whole cities or vast areas with their inhabitants.

Given the modern means of warfare, especially nuclear, biological and chemical, these crimes against humanity must be especially guarded against.

In the end it is not enough to wage war to achieve justice without treating the underlying causes. “Injustice, excessive economic or social inequalities, envy, distrust, and pride raging among men and nations constantly threaten peace and cause wars. Everything done to overcome these disorders contributes to building up peace and avoiding war” [CCC 2317]. The Church has no illusions that true justice and peace can be attained before the Coming of the Lord. It is the duty of men of good will to work towards it, nonetheless. In the words of the spiritual dictum, we should work as if everything depended upon our efforts, and pray as if everything depended upon God.

Answered by Colin B. Donovan, STL

Colin B. Donovan, STL
Colin Donovan is Vice President for Theology at EWTN and host of the Friday edition of Open Line (3-5 pm ET) on the EWTN Global Catholic Radio Network. He moderates, as well, the EWTN Theology Roundtable, a monthly series on EWTN television. In addition, he co-hosted, with author Desmond Birch, Last Things: In Time and Eternity, a series on Eschatology and the End Times (EWTN Religious Catalogue item HDLT).

A layman, Mr. Donovan has the Licentiate in Sacred Theology, with a specialization in moral theology, from the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum) in Rome, where he wrote on the Donation of the Spouses in Marriage. He earned the B.Th. from the Seminary of Christ the King in Mission, BC, Canada, and the BA in Biological Science from Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. Prior to coming to EWTN in 1995, he taught Theology at Aquinas College in Nashville, as well as served in the U.S. Navy as a shipboard Communications Officer.

EWTN
5817 Old Leeds Rd.
Birmingham, AL 35210
Phone: (205) 271-2900

https://www.ewtn.com/faith/QA/expertslist.htm

Licentiate of Sacred Theology (STL) is the second cycle of studies of a faculty of theology offered by pontifical universities or Ecclesiastical Faculties of sacred theology.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Licentiate_of_Sacred_Theology

Background

Born the middle child of three in Munich, Germany to devout Catholics Joseph Gebhard Himmler and Anna Maria Himmler (née Heyder).  His father Joseph, was a teacher and principal of the prestigious Wittelsbacher Gymnasium.

Himmler was named after his godfather, Prince Heinrich of Bavaria of the Royal House of Wittelsbach.  A gifted student, but socially introspective and poor at sport— a fact that would have deeply upset his father—Instead, young Himmler’s hobbies were chess, stamp collecting, gardening and playing the harpsichord.

Obsessed in the nature of war and politics, Himmler convinced his father to get him into the officer training school in spite of his failure at physical standards for such a role.  He graduated within a short period before the end of World War I in 1918 and never saw action.

In 1919, at the age of 19, Himmler decided to become a Jesuit priest enrolling at the Munich Technische Hochschule during the troubles of the brief Bavarian Soviet State and subsequent street battles.  It is during this time that Himmler through his influential Catholic family would have come in close contact with Archbishop Pacelli (Pope Pius XII), the Papal Nuncio in Munich.

In 1923, it is alleged that Himmler took part in the failed Beer Hall Putsch but managed to escape arrest.  Given his lack of physical strength, it is highly doubtful Himmler was ever one of the Sturmabteilung “Brownshirts” in 1923, but almost certainly an enthusiastic onlooker.

The Sturmabteilung along with the NSDAP were banned as outlaw organizations upon the arrest of Hitler, Hess and the others.  While the ban on the NSDAP continued until 1927, incredibly Hitler was released on December 20, 1924 after senior Catholic intervention — having served less than 12 months of the serious (often capital crime) of treason.  Of all the great revolutionary leaders of the early-mid 20th century, only Fr. Joseph Stalin S.J. is recorded as being so lucky as Hitler with having escaped possible execution and extraordinarily light punishment.

Upon his release, Hitler focused his attention to publicity and the launch of “his” new book Mein Kampf “My Life”.  Contrary to deliberate revisionist history, neither the NSDAP, nor the Schutzstaffel (a single German word for “Squadron”) existed until May 1927 —after the ban on the party had been officially lifted.  Instead, Hitler was surrounded by a powerful and small group of indivduals each providing key skills such as Rudolf Hess-personal private secretary, Ernst Hanfstaengl-media, Hans Frank-Lawyer and Julius Schreck-personal security.

After graduating as a full Jesuit Priest no later than 1925, there is no precise evidence as to exactly the activities of Himmler until his arrival on the scene in 1929 as deputy of Erhard Heiden.

The Arrival of Fr. Himmler S.J. and the Nazis

One of (several) absurd mythologies accepted by eminent historians and academics is the proposition that the Schutzstaffel (German for “Squadron” and the same concept as the Italian “Blackshirt Squadrons” of Catholic Mussolini) was formed in 1925 as the personal bodyguard of Hitler following his release from prison.

Some audacious writers have even “revised history” to claim the Schutzstaffel (frequently cut in half to try and get two S’s our of the single word for squadron) had already started to use the SS and skull and bones symbols, including calling their head the Reichführer-SS and the Roman Salute (straight arm) to their allegiance to the Vatican, Rome.

The ridiculous nature of these lies are easily exposed when the facts are considered that Hitler’s main claim to fame in 1925 was as a book writer and budding political philosopher.

In fact, the first election of the reformed NDSAP in May 1928 was a complete humiliation and disaster.  It was during this period of recrimination and failure that Fr. Heinrich Himmler S.J. entered to be immediately appointed the deputy of Erhard Heiden, commanded of the Schutzstaffel (squadron).  Within a matter of a few months, Erhard Heiden resigned and Fr. Himmler S.J. was appointed as commander of the Schutzstaffel.

It is a remarkable and rarely considered event occurred—in 1929, a 29 year old rank outsider with dubious military experience, but impeccable Catholic and Jesuit connections is suddenly appointed Reichführer-SS—the 280 most elite security personnel and bodyguards of Hitler himself.

There can be absolutely no question that Himmler was a direct Vatican appointment via the support of Jesuits as there is no way Hitler would have accepted such an appointment of such a person into a critical role unless it came from the very highest authority.

Again, it is important of emphasize that the Schutzstaffel (only one S) wore brown shirts until the Reich Concordat was signed between Cardinal Pacelli and Franz von Papen (for Germany) in 1933 bestowing exclusive spiritual powers on the Schutzstaffel of Fr. Himmler S.J. by the Vatican.  The Jesuit Skull and Bones was incorporated by Fr. Himmler into the military insignia of the Schutzstaffel but not the infamous SS until after the 1933 Concordat.

The political fortunes of the NDSAP appeared to suddenly turn around thanks to the swelling ranks of disciplined recruits to the Schutzstaffel.  In September 1930, the NSDAP won 18.3% of the vote and 107 seats in the Reichstag (Parliament).  By the July 1932 national elections, this vote had swelled to 37.8% and 230 of the 608 seats of Parliament.  However, in the November 1932 elections, their lead had dropped to 33.1% and 196 seats in a 584 seat Parliament.

By 1933 National Elections, the Schutzstaffel under the control of Fr. Himmler S.J. numbered at least 52,000 highly trained and absolutely loyal members – a far cry from the early incompetence in Munich ten years earlier.

It was March 1933 that the world saw the word “Nazi” unleashed as a political religious force in the elections following the destruction of the Reichstag (Parliament) by Schutzstaffel agents and blamed on communists.

Red Herrings Abound

To distract as much as possible from the Jesuit connections, soft history was created in the form of allegations he married or was in a defacto relationship with an already pregnant Protestant woman seven years his senior called Margarete.  A convenient window dressing rarely challenged in spite of the fact Himmler was famously known for being a devout Catholic from a devout and powerful Catholic family.

In another brilliant misdirection, some rare claims exist stating that Himmler had an “uncle” who was a Jesuit priest and that any reference to Fr. Himmler S.J. is the uncle, not Heinrich.

The Birth of the Nazi SS

There is a parallel and quite extraordinary change within the power structure of the NSDAP as the Nazis- the rise of Fr. Himmler to Reichführer (also Reichführer Nazi SS) – or Superior General of the Knights of the Holy See—SS standing for Sedes Sacrorum or “Holy See” in Latin.

Many historians deliberately mask the first beginnings of the use of the title Reichführer by dropping off the word “Nazi”, or removing “SS” to somehow claim this position was the official title of the commander of the Schutzstaffel as early as 1925.  The reason for this forgery is twofold—one to mask the true date of 1933 as the historic shift in the introduction of the initials SS and secondly to mask the true arrival of Himmler in 1929 and the title Reichführer-Nazi SS in 1933.

But what is more incredible is the fabricated history that continues to hid the absolute fact that in 1933 after the Reich Concordat was signed with the Vatican, Fr. Himmler was elevated in power, name and status above Hitler.  Fr. Himmler S.J. as the Reichführer has superior title (as opposed to plain old führer for Hitler).  Fr. Himmler had complete independent control over all police, paramilitary, intelligence, scientific research and weapons development and the dreaded elite units of over 50,000 just in 1933—and Hitler had absolutely no authority over him.  In fact the proof of the distaste each man had for one another is demonstrated in countless war archive movies showing in clear detail the body language of both men.

Prior to its use by Himmler, the symbols SS were most frequently and officially used as the abbreviation of Sedes Sacrorum or the legal name of the Vatican being the “Holy See” (Latin Sedes = seat/see and Sacrorum = Holy/Sacred) since the 16th Century as a sign of imprimatur over official Vatican documents.

It is either an extraordinary coincidence that Himmler and his elite began wearing the SS symbol as Reichführer immediately after the signing of the Reich Concordat in 1933 with the SS- the Sedes Sacrorum, the Holy See.  Given the four hundred year precedent of SS being associated with the Holy See, it is not unreasonable to conclude that the wearing of the symbols is associated with some as yet unpublished spiritual/temporal powers bestowed on the SS Troops by the SS—Holy See.

When one considers that Nazi SS translates most perfectly into the meaning “Knights of the Holy See”, that the role of Himmler best translates into the new Grand Inquisitor and that over 18 million innocent people were burned alive in human sacrifice camps in Poland and Russia, then the SS were without doubt the new “Holy Army” of a great inquisition against “heretics” orchestrated by the Vatican, Rome.

The fact that Hitler could do nothing against Himmler at the end of the war when it is universally recognized that Himmler was seeking to broker some kind of personal peace deal is more than enough evidence to conclude Hitler was part-puppet to larger forces.

Finally, the fact that neither Hitler nor any of his henchmen ever attempted to assassinate Himmler, in spite of his open usurping of Hitler’s authority on many occasions, is indication the title of Reichführer-Nazi SS and the meaning of the SS is extremely significant.

In 1934, Himmler successfully convinced Hermann Göring, and General Werner von Blomberg that Ernst Röhm and others were plotting against the Nazi Party.  Röhm and several others were murdered in what became known as the Night of the Long Knives on 30 June 1934.  The next day, the SS became its own independent organization.

In the same year (1934), Himmler was named head of the Gestapo, the German secret police.  In 1936, Himmler was appointed Chief of the German Police.

The next phase of the Holy (Roman Cult) Inquisition of Pope Pius XII

On February 10, 1939, Archbishop Pacelli was elected as Pope Pius XII.  Himmler headed the delegation of Nazis who travelled to the Vatican to congratulate their patron.  It was in Rome in February 1939, that Himmler first received his instructions concerning the Grand-Counter-Reformation Strategy- the single largest crusade by the Catholic Church to end the hold of Protestant states once and for all, coupled with a plan to remake the Middle East.

But the most extraordinary nature of this event with Pope Pius XII and Fr. Himmler S.J. has never been properly realised—for in 1939, Pope Pius XII called into action Himmler as Grand Inquisitor of the Holy Inquisition — to eliminate heretics and usher in a new era of Catholic power throughout Europe.

At the meeting, Pope Pius XII with Jesuit General Ledóchowski outlined his strategy to the key Nazis.  Enemy no 1, were Protestants intellectuals.  The wedge strategy were the Jews.

Jesuit Himmler knew that since the days of Martin Luther who made a fortune selling anti-Jewish pamphlets, the Protestants of Europe had shown a fierce anti-semetism towards the Jews.  Now this anti-semitism would be used for their downfall.

Within weeks of securing Poland, Himmler rallied substantial resources to commence building the human sacrifice camps as instructed by Pope Pius XII and the Catholic Church in Rome.  The centrepiece were the ovens, in which millions were to be sacrificed to Moloch, the ancient demon god of the Sadducee High Priests.

The gas chambers were designed to render victims unconscious, allowing their securing on metal trays for the furnaces easier.  Contrary to falsified documents and testimony, the camps began operation by 1940, not ending until 1945.

Himmler personally toured the camps and the selection of staff, in which Jesuit priests, including Franciscans were embedded within the SS and were placed in rotation to pray satanic prayers in front of the ovens so that at all times, the burning and dying were being properly cursed.

Musicians were even employed from the prisoners to drown out the screams of the people being burnt alive in the ovens.

In 1944, Himmler became Commander in Chief of the newly formed Army Group Upper Rhine to fight against the U.S. 7th Army and French 1st Army.  However, he failed to show leadership in the field capabilities and by March 13th 1945 abandoned his command claiming illness.

Himmler Switching Sides and “Relocation”

In late March 1945 Himmler then started negotiations with Count Folke Bernadotte of Sweden at Lübeck to contact the Americans and British on how a peace settlement could be secured.  However, his negotiations failed.

Considering the extreme punishment given to failing generals in the last years of the Third Reich, the actions of Himmler testify to him being virtually untouchable, even by Hitler himself.

Undeterred, Himmler then allegedly contacted the headquarters of General Dwight D. Eisenhower the details of which remain shrouded in mystery and contradictions.

Yet more controversy in a life of controversy concerns the events surrounding the capture and alleged suicide of Himmler.  On May 22 1945, Himmler was “found” by a British unit.  But it is alleged he managed to commit suicide the following day by swallowing poison before being interrogated.

After being alerted that Himmler had been found, Allied Command ordered an official autopsy be conducted, including photographic and forensic evidence—an extremely rare event during wartime.

But for all the care allegedly carried out on orders of the Allied command concerning the “dead” Himmler, the next fact defies all logic and reason—his body was then supposed to have been quickly buried in an unmarked grave with deliberate attempts to hide the precise location.  To this day, the exact site is not known.  While historians claim this is not a big issue, it remains one of the greatest contradictions and absurdities of history.

Given the extraordinary and contradictory allegation that the body of Himmler had been disposed and hidden so quickly, the alleged autopsy records and a few choice photographs were all that remained as verification of his suicide—except the fact that the autopsy apparently failed to record a number of key and unique distinguishing features of Himmler—the most obvious of which was a scar on his face since childhood.

When put together with the events of Himmler openly seeking safe passage prior to his capture and the extraordinary events around his alleged death, it is almost certain Himmler was secretly relocated.

Again, contrary to revisionist historians who perversely on the one hand try to play up the power of Himmler and on the other down-play his intelligence value to the Allies— particularly being in charge of every single Nazi scientific and military project.  Himmler would almost certainly have been The Great Prize for the United States in terms of knowing the key scientists of weapons research, rockets and advanced aircraft.

The only problem would have been to have Fr. Himmler in a location close enough to mainland United States, but under a regime that would ensure his identity would not be exposed—Cuba.

Contrary to the deliberate falsity that Argentina was the largest population of Nazi war criminals outside U.S. military bases after World War II, Cuba remained a key haven for prestige former Nazi officials such as Fr. Himmler, in spite of the political turmoil.  In reality, the Jesuits continued to rule the island nation with an iron fist and the return of Fulgencio Batista in 1952 only strengthened their hand.

Upon the death of his life long mentor and friend Pope Pius XII on October 9, 1958, Fr. Himmler S.J. probably died soon after.  Soon after the death of Fr. Himmler, the forces of Jesuit trained Castro launched their offensive to “takeover” Cuba and get rid of those in power with knowledge.  By January 1, 1959, the most senior military and intelligence officials of the former regimes were arrested and executed.

Reposted from the site One-Evil.

Original link no-longer available.

Joseph Stalin

Background

hJosef Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili, Ioseb Besarionis Dze Jughashvili; Russian: Ио́сиф Виссарио́нович Джугашви́ли Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili) (18 December 1878 – 5 March 1953), better known by his adopted name, Joseph Stalin (Иосиф Сталин, Iosif Stalin; stalin meaning “made of steel”).

Josef was born to influential Catholic parents Vissarion “Beso” Dzhugashvili and Ekaterina “Keke” Geladze.  His father Beso was a successful and relatively wealthy local businessman.  However, in later biographies, he is variously described as poor, dirt poor and a violent alcoholic.

Whatever the real truth, Josef was accepted into the Catholic Cappuchin run school at Gori.  He graduated in 1892 first in his class and at the age of 14 he was accepted to enter the “Orthodox” Seminary of Tiflis (Tbilisi, Georgia), a Jesuit institution to be trained as a Jesuit priest.

In spite of contrary history written about the Jesuit run Seminary, the Jesuits remained in Russian territory after the order was banned by Alexander I in 1820, maintaining control of several institutions, including the Seminary of Tiflis.

Stalin himself openly admitted the Jesuit control of the institution in his famous interview with Jewish Journalist Emil Ludwig (Cohen):

Ludwig: What impelled you to become an oppositionist?  Was it, perhaps, bad treatment by your parents?

Stalin: No.  My parents were uneducated, but they did not treat me badly by any means.  But it was a different matter at the Orthodox theological seminary which I was then attending.  In protest against the outrageous regime and the Jesuitical methods prevalent at the seminary, I was ready to become, and actually did become, a revolutionary, a believer in Marxism as a really revolutionary teaching.

Ludwig: But do you not admit that the Jesuits have good points?

Stalin: Yes, they are systematic and persevering in working to achieve sordid ends.  Hut their principal method is spying, prying, worming their way into people’s souls and outraging their feelings.  What good can there be in that?  For instance, the spying in the hostel.  At nine o’clock the bell rings for morning tea, we go to the dining-room, and when we return to our rooms we find that meantime a search has been made and all our chests have been ransacked…  What good point can there be in that?

While accounts of his time at Tiflis have been changed many times, it is universally accepted that Stalin was the star pupils of the Seminary.  As a result, the events of 1899 remain shrouded in mystery.

In the final week of his studies, having completed seven (7) years as the star pupil of the Jesuits, Stalin is variously claimed to have quit or been expelled.  Neither account, adequately explains how a seminary student of seven years, suddenly appeared influential and active in coordinating the Georgian Social-Democratic movement less than 12 months later — an achievement that could not possibly have happened without substantial support.

The more credible and controversial conclusion is that Stalin did graduate from the Jesuit Seminary as a proper Jesuit priest, with his first assignment being to infiltrate and manage the Georgian underground against the Russian Tsarist Government.

Again, the fact that Stalin was awarded an academic position at the Tiflis Observatory gives credence to his Jesuit credentials and completed study.  His double life as a secret leader of the May day uprising of 1901 less than 2 years from graduating from the Jesuit seminary attests to his skill as a key Jesuit agent.

After avoiding capture by the Tsarist Secret Police (Okhrana), Stalin fled to Batumi where he was hidden in safety by the Rothschild’s via one of their oil refineries located there.  In 1902, when authorities learnt of his hiding place, the local Cossacks were ordered to capture him.  However, the oil workers rallied behind Stalin with a number killed and arrested along with Stalin.  Later this whole event was turned into Stalin rather than remaining in hiding, organizing a strike and arson against the oil refinery- all of which defies common sense of his circumstances.

In 1903, Stalin was exiled to Siberia for three years.  However, a few months later the Jesuits managed to get false papers to the prison camp and free Stalin, who returned to Tiflis on January 4, 1904.

His new orders from the Jesuits was to start an underground paper called Credo, denouncing international Marxist ideology of Lenin in favour of the Facist Social-Democratic model of Roman Catholicism.  Once the Russo-Japanese War started in February 1904, Stalin was active across Georgia in organizing resistance and focused attacks against the Mensheivik breakaway faction of the communists.

In January 9 1905, Stalin succeeded in starting the spark his masters had requested by successfully arranging a mass demonstration of workers with communist and anti-Tsarist banners in Baku.  He then secretly alerted the Cossacks that the demonstration was an armed rebellion.  The Cossacks reacted as expected and killed several hundred demonstrators thus sparking the Russian Revolution of 1905.

During the following months, Stalin excelled as guerilla leader in maintaining the rebellion across Georgia.  Yet the movement never gained critical mass and Stalin was ordered to redirect his efforts to infiltrating the top echelon of the Bolsheviks.  In December 1905, Stalin secured a meeting with Lenin, but failed to gain his trust and endorsement and returned to Tiflis, effectively a free agent.

In February 1906, to prove his credentials to the Bolsheviks, Stalin arranged for the assassination of General Fyodo Griiazanov.  He also continued to stage bank robberies and extortions, sending the money through to the Bolsheviks as proof of his trustworthiness.

These event were enough to force Lenin to permit Stalin to attend the Socialist Democratic Party meeting in London in 1907.  After returning to Georgia, Stalin was again arrested in March 25, 1908.  He was sentenced to two years in exile in Siberia, but after seven months, the Jesuit influence within the Tsarist Government enabled his escape by February 1909.

Around the exact same time, the Bolsheiviks were on the verge of extinction in account of their leaders in prison or exile and a lack of new recuits and funds.  Stalin called for a reconciliation with the Menshevik faction, which Lenin opposed.  Stalin then called for a major witchunt to weed out alleged double-agents.  A number of key Lenin supporters and intelligensia were hounded out and some murdered – later records revealing none were traitors.  Stalin was again arrest in 1910 and again in 1913 for four years.

In the wake of the February Revolution in 1917, Stalin was released from prison and moved to Saint Petersburg and promptly founded the Pravda, the official Bolshevik newspaper with substantial finances and equipment that arrived virtually overnight, while Lenin and the rest of the leadership were still in exile.

The Pravda became a major tool of the revolution and Lenin was forced to include Stalin in senior committees on account of the power and influence of Pravda.

Lenin like most of the Bolsheviks regarded Stalin as a double agent of the Jesuits.  Their most visible proof was the fact that Stalin had escaped death in prison and the extraordinary and unprecedented leniency given to him by the Tsarist Government – when agitators found guilty of a fraction of the actions of Stalin had been brutally tortured and killed.  While the escapes and “near misses” are recorded about the life of Stalin, the fact that he was apparently the “luckiest revolutionary” of the 20th Century is not discussed.

By 1922, the Bolsheviks had won the Civil War, but left the whole country broke.  The Rothschilds and the American Jesuit Bankers on Wall Street made a simple offer – they would help fund and bail out new new Soviet Union, providing Stalin was given a key role.  Thus on 3 April 1922, Stalin was made General Secretary of the Central Commitee, a post he subsequently grew to become the most powerful.

In spite of his position, Lenin still sought to thwart the influence of Stalin and in December 1923 it came to a head with Lenin planning to have Stalin finally eliminated.  In January 1924, Jesuit Superior General Wlodimir Ledochowski gave the order to Stalin allowing him to kill Lenin and on 21 January 1924, Lenin was poisoned to death at the age of 53.

To quell any rumours of foul play, Stalin published retractions in Pravda against “allegations” that never existed such as Lenin had been mentally unwell and that he even died from Syphilis.

From this point on, Stalin was the most powerful and undisputed ruler of the Soviet Union.

One of the earliest acts of Stalin was to begin the outlawing of the Russian Orthodox Church, allowing seized thousands of churches and schools to be handed over to the Catholic Church — a highly controversial program that has largely been unreported even to this day.  By 1939, the Russian Orthodox Church was all but extinct.

Of the other persecutions, the Ukraine and deportation of Jews is also infamous under his reign in which tens of millions perished.  But what is rarely, if ever, published is that the Head of the Death Camps of Siberia was none other than Catholic Cardinal Gregory Agagianian, his former classmate at the Jesuit Seminary of Tiflis.

There is a further and most disturbing note to this Catholic connection concerning the nature of the atrocities of Siberia.  While it has been admitted by some historians that a number of concentration camps in Siberia had ovens to burn dead bodies, the lack of sufficient mass graves, even with the use of quick lime to destroy evidence has been found.

This implies that the use of ovens for body disposal must have been in frequent use across the thousands of camps.  Furthermore, that people were not dead when fed into the furnaces.  Unlike the Nazis who at least used a nerve agent to render people unconscious but living before being fed into the furnaces of the death camps, it appears Stalin and Catholic Cardinal Agagianian had no need for such sensitivity.

Tens of millions of people burnt alive under Satanic Vatican rituals in Siberia — at least three times those of Catholic Dictator Hitler, and not a single book accounting for these major anomalies has made the light of day.

Towards the end of his life, there appears a major falling out between Stalin and the Catholic Church, with Stalin ordering extraordinary suppression orders against the Catholic Church in his final year, including the execution of Lubyanka General Alexander Poskrebyshev — who oversaw the hanging of Vlasov in the Lubyanka — and NKVD General Nicolai Vlasik.

Shortly thereafter, Stalin was poisoned and died on 5 March 1953.

Most Evil Crimes:

Crime of publishing a false statement for the purpose of concealment of status: (1900 to present day) —

That the Catholic Church, more specifically the Jesuit Order has maintained countless false statements and documents pertaining to the status of Joseph Stalin.

That Fr. Joseph Stalin S.J. was a trained, dedicated and fully ordained Catholic priest of the Jesuit order, who was recruited for a historic mission in his final year at the seminary in 1899.

That in addition to failing to recognize Fr. Joseph Stalin S.J.

Furthermore, that the Jesuit Order did permit Fr. Stalin to marry not once but twice, while remaining a fully ordained priest.

That for his entire life until his death, there is no indication that Fr. Joseph Stalin S.J. was ever defrocked as a priest.

Of Murder (political assassination) (1924):

That Jesuit Superior General Wlodimir Ledochowski did order Fr. Joseph Stalin S.J. to murder the leader of Communist Russia on 21 January 1924, aged 53.

That Fr. Stalin did act to protect his position and mission as General Secretary of the Communist Party upon the insistence of Lenin that he be removed.

That not only did Stalin have Lenin poisoned, but that he did spread rumours upon his ascendancy to absolute power that Lenin has been mentally unwell for the last few years of his reign and had even died from Syphilis.

Of one of the greatest crimes against humanity (1939-1945):

That the Catholic Church through its deliberate placement of key figures including loyal Catholics Mussolini, Hitler, Franco and Fr Stalin S.J. and through its financing of a second European arms race including the deliberate extension of the war is directly and ultimately responsible for the deaths of in excess of 63,000,000 people between 1939 and 1945.

What is of supreme depravity and inhumanity is that this was done by an organization that maintains the façade of being a “good” religion headed by a position known as “his holiness”.

Furthermore, that the Catholic Church did profit on this terrible act of evil.

Of open contempt for church law for the purpose of promoting crimes against humanity (1953 to present):

That the Catholic Church has well established laws and cases of excommunicating individuals after their death from actions considered heretical.

That these laws enabling a dead person to be excommunicated have been available for use for over three hundred years.

That at the death of Fr. Joseph Stalin S.J. the leader of the Soviet Union in 1953, there was sufficient evidence both that Fr. Stalin was Catholic and had ordered some of the greatest atrocities of human history including reputedly the death of over 60,000,000 innocent people.

That at no time since the end of Word War II until the present day has any Pope ever sought to excommunicate Fr. Stalin S.J.

That such inaction, and deliberate concealment of his status even until his death of being a fully empowered Catholic priest and of even being Catholic by itself implies the tacit support of Stalin’s actions, regardless of any public statement by the Vatican to the contrary.

Furthermore, such inaction voids any legality, or credibility of the excommunication and heresy investigation process of the Catholic Church as such inaction by the Vatican is in open contempt for church law.

That all excommunications since 1953 are to be considered suspect and potentially invalid due to the nullification of the credibility of such law.

The “notable alumni” list is more than enough reason to take this accusation seriously.

After spending time with Eric Phelps in 2015, I came to the conclusion that he is controlled opposition—quite possibly an incognito Jesuit, per the Fourth Vow of Extreme Unction (the “Blood Oath”).

Immediately after I made a public statement regarding my concerns over Eric Phelps, his Jesuit eschatology and his extreme “white separatist” racism, “Veritas__Aequitas” reached out to me to defend Phelps.

This made me immediately uneasy and I distanced myself from him.  He responded by not only blocking my access but anyone else he doesn’t explicitly approve of.

Being wary of someone who puts so much effort into hiding behind a Latin nom de plume seems appropriate as does making available this forbidden blog entry.

The entry is written with the same needlessly bombastic (if not offensive) style as Eric Phelps but I cite it none-the-less because, if true, the University of Pennsylvania affords the Jesuits powerful plausible deniability while controlling and indoctrinating the powerful.

https://www.reddit.com/r/RomeRules/comments/3g7zgf/donald_trump_secret_jesuit_agent_for/

Donald Trump: secret Jesuit agent for Commander-in-Chief?

Original Research (self.RomeRules)

submitted [2016] * by Veritas__Aequitas

Donald Trump has been the subject of media frenzy as of late.  It seems that a considerable amount of those who subscribe to alternative sources of information are Trump supporters.  They see him as some kind of rebel, going against both the Republican and Democratic parties (as exemplified by his recent non-commitment to support the Republican nominee for President).

Could it be though, that Donald Trump is a “false flag candidate” being used to secure the vote of the ever-increasing independent constituency in order to inevitably lull the US into a false sense of positive political novelty and thus to subsequently impose Jesuitical right-wing fascism leading to a nation-wide race war as devised by the masters of class adversarialism, the Sons of Loyola?

It very well could be.  Here is why:

Trump claims to be Presbyterian, yet he attended Jesuit Fordham University for two years and then transferred to the covertly Jesuit-controlled University of Pennsylvania.¹

The University of Pennsylvania is funded by various Papal Court Jews, notably by The Annenberg Foundation,² started by Papal Knight and hofjude Walter Hubert Annenberg.  Annenberg briefly attended the University of Pennsylvania in his youth and later established the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania.  Mr. Annenberg is a Knight Commander of the Order of St. Gregory the Great. ^{3 , 4}

Court Jew David L. Cohen is the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania as well as an alumnus of University of Pennsylvania.  He is also the executive vice president of Comcast. ⁵  He was recently named co-chairman of the leadership planning committee of the Roman Catholic World Meeting of Families in Philadelphia (which is the coming of the Pope to Philadelphia!) ⁶

University of Pennsylvania could be renamed “Hofjude University” because of its enormous amount of Papist Jewish funding and leadership and really the entire Pennsylvania area is controlled by the Roman Catholic hierarchy via the Jesuit provincial holding jurisdiction over Pennsylvania, the Archbishop of Philadelphia and the Bishop of Pittsburgh in conjunction with the temporal coadjutor government officials produced from UPenn and the following Roman Catholic or Catholic-funded Universities: La Salle University, Duquesne University, Pennsylvania State University, Villanova University, Temple University and Saint Joseph’s University.

Protestants do not attend Roman Catholic institutions, especially counter-reformation Jesuit institutions like Fordham University, so Trump is at the very least an apostate for having done that. However, the story does not end with Trump.

Out of the five children he has, the three listed on Wikipedia have attended the following schools: ^{7 , 8 , 9}
Donald John Trump, Jr. – Alma mater: University of Pennsylvania
Ivanka Marie Trump – Alma mater: University of Pennsylvania
Eric Frederic Trump – Alma mater: Georgetown University

There you have it; Trump, in addition to being affiliated with both Jesuit Fordham and covertly Jesuit UPenn, has at least three children who are all alumni of UPenn and notorious Jesuit Georgetown University!

Whether it be Trump, Jeb Bush, Hilary Clinton or even Bernie Sanders that ends up winning the 2016 election, all of these candidates are connected to Rome and all will only serve to implement the tyrannical, neo-Romanist policies of the Papacy and its professed soldiers of the Society of Jesus.

Sources:
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump
2. http://peoplesupportingpenn.upenn.edu/pspSection/?section=BFS
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Annenberg
4. http://www.papalhonorees.org/gregmmbcom.htm (note: the middle initial is incorrect; it is erroneously written as “Walter J. Annenberg”)
5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_L._Cohen
6. http://ncronline.org/news/people/archbishop-says-2015-meeting-can-help-transform-families-communities
7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump,_Jr.
8. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanka_Trump
9. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Trump

There’s a solitary man at the financial center of the Ferguson protest movement. No, it’s not victim Michael Brown or Officer Darren Wilson. It’s not even the Rev. Al Sharpton, despite his ubiquitous campaign on TV and the streets.

Rather, it’s liberal billionaire George Soros, who has built a business empire that dominates across the ocean in Europe while forging a political machine powered by nonprofit foundations that impacts American politics and policy, not unlike what he did with MoveOn.org.

Mr. Soros spurred the Ferguson protest movement through years of funding and mobilizing groups across the U.S., according to interviews with key players and financial records reviewed by The Washington Times.

In all, Mr. Soros gave at least $33 million in one year to support already-established groups that emboldened the grass-roots, on-the-ground activists in Ferguson, according to the most recent tax filings of his nonprofit Open Society Foundations.

The financial tether from Mr. Soros to the activist groups gave rise to a combustible protest movement that transformed a one-day criminal event in Missouri into a 24-hour-a-day national cause celebre.

George Soros, chairman, Soros Fund Management, speaks during a forum “Charting A New Growth Path for the Euro Zone” at the IMF/World Bank annual meetings in Washington, Saturday, Sept. 24, 2011.
(AP Photo Manuel Balce Ceneta)

“Our DNA includes a belief that having people participate in government is indispensable to living in a more just, inclusive, democratic society,” said Kenneth Zimmerman, director of Mr. Soros‘ Open Society Foundations’ U.S. programs, in an interview with The Washington Times. “Helping groups combine policy, research [and] data collection with community organizing feels very much the way our society becomes more accountable.”

No Strings Attached

Mr. Zimmerman said OSF has been giving to these types of groups since its inception in the early ‘90s, and that, although groups involved in the protests have been recipients of Mr. Soros‘ grants, they were in no way directed to protest at the behest of Open Society.

“The incidents, whether in Staten Island, Cleveland or Ferguson, were spontaneous protests — we don’t have the ability to control or dictate what others say or choose to say,” Mr. Zimmerman said. “But these circumstances focused people’s attention — and it became increasingly evident to the social justice groups involved that what a particular incident like Ferguson represents is a lack of accountability and a lack of democratic participation.”

Soros-sponsored organizations helped mobilize protests in Ferguson, building grass-roots coalitions on the ground backed by a nationwide online and social media campaign.

Other Soros-funded groups made it their job to remotely monitor and exploit anything related to the incident that they could portray as a conservative misstep, and to develop academic research and editorials to disseminate to the news media to keep the story alive.

The plethora of organizations involved not only shared Mr. Soros‘ funding, but they also fed off each other, using content and buzzwords developed by one organization on another’s website, referencing each other’s news columns and by creating a social media echo chamber of Facebook “likes” and Twitter hashtags that dominated the mainstream media and personal online newsfeeds.

Buses of activists from the Samuel Dewitt Proctor Conference in Chicago; from the Drug Policy Alliance, Make the Road New York and Equal Justice USA from New York; from Sojourners, the Advancement Project and Center for Community Change in Washington; and networks from the Gamaliel Foundation — all funded in part by Mr. Soros — descended on Ferguson starting in August and later organized protests and gatherings in the city until late last month.

Broaden Issue Focus

All were aimed at keeping the media’s attention on the city and to widen the scope of the incident to focus on interrelated causes — not just the overpolicing and racial discrimination narratives that were highlighted by the news media in August.

The Nation

Mitch McConnell’s Freighted Ties to a Shadowy Shipping Company

After drugs were found aboard the Ping May, a vessel owned by his wife’s family’s company, Colombian authorities are investigating.

By Lee Fang
Twitter

30 October 2014

Mitch McConnell’s father-in-law, James Chao (second from right), at the christening of the Ping May in Shanghai (Image: Shanghai Mulan Education Foundation)

Before the Ping May, a rusty cargo vessel, could disembark from the port of Santa Marta en route to the Netherlands in late August, Colombian inspectors boarded the boat and made a discovery.  Hidden in the ship’s chain locker, amidst its load of coal bound for Europe, were approximately 40 kilograms, or about ninety pounds, of cocaine.  A Colombian Coast Guard official told The Nation that there is an ongoing investigation.

The seizure of the narcotics shipment in the Caribbean port occurred far away from Kentucky, the state in which Senator Mitch McConnell is now facing a career-defining election.  But the Republican Senate minority leader has the closest of ties to the owner of the Ping May, the vessel containing the illicit materials: the Foremost Maritime Corporation, a firm founded and owned by McConnell’s in-laws, the Chao family.

Though Foremost has played a pivotal role in McConnell’s life, bestowing the senator with most of his personal wealth and generating thousands in donations to his campaign committees, the drug bust went unnoticed in Kentucky, where every bit of McConnell-related news has generated fodder for the campaign trail.  That’s because, like many international shipping companies, Chao’s firm is shrouded from public view, concealing its identity and limiting its legal liability through an array of tax shelters and foreign registrations.  Registered through a limited liability company in the Marshall Islands, the Ping May flies the Liberian flag.

Mitch McConnell and his wife Elaine Chao with James Chao (image:ElaineLChao.com)

McConnell’s ties to the Chaos go back to the late 1980s, when James Chao began donating to the senator.  In 1993, McConnell married James’s daughter, Elaine Chao, a Republican activist and former Reagan administration official who would later serve as secretary of labor in the George W. Bush cabinet.  James Chao emigrated to the United States from Taiwan, and founded the Foremost Maritime Corporation upon settling in New York.  The company has grown significantly over the years, from acting as maritime agent during the Vietnam War to controlling a fleet of approximately sixteen dry-bulk cargo ships in operation today.

Foremost acts as a shipping agent, purchasing vessels made primarily in China and coordinating shipment of commodities.  Records reviewed by The Nation reveal that Foremost transports corn, chemicals and other goods to cities throughout the world.  The company has offices in New York and Hong Kong.

Some of the goods shipped by Foremost echo themes of the McConnell campaign.  At a Young Professionals Association of Louisville event this month, McConnell stressed his opposition to carbon dioxide limits imposed by the federal government that would impact the domestic coal market.  He argued that such efforts would be fruitless given the role of coal in developing countries and the rising coal trade.  Foremost ships routinely transport coal from ports in Australia and Colombia, countries with cheap coal, for export to Asia and Europe.

The firm, however, leaves a faint online trace.  Foremost’s website FMCNY.com is blank.  Records and court documents obtained by The Nationshow that the ownership of the company’s vessels—with names such as Ping May, Soya May, Fu May and Grain May—is obscured through a byzantine structure of tax entities.  Most of Foremost’s vessels are flagged in Liberia, which ensures that crew members of Foremost’s ships work under Liberia’s maritime labor laws, which critics note allow for intimidation in the workplace and few protections for labor unions.  In addition, a Liberian “flag of convenience” allows ship owners to pay lower tonnage taxes than ships that fly the U.S. flag.  Maritime companies have increasingly used the Marshall Islands to register their vessels.  The jurisdiction boasts of “no taxation, lax regulation, and no requirements for disclosure of many corporate details—even to the United States government,” according to a report in World Policy Journal.

The recent seizure of cocaine on a Foremost coal ship came as authorities in Colombia have stepped up anti-drug trafficking enforcement in the region.  The Nation spoke to Luis Gonzales, an official with the Colombian Coast Guard in Santa Marta, who told us that the Ping May’s crew were questioned as part of an ongoing investigation, but that no charges have yet been filed.  His team found the cocaine in forty separate packages.

Picture provided by the Colombian Navy after the cocaine seizure (image: armada.mil.co)

Contacted by telephone, a representative of Foremost said he is “obviously going to have no comment on this one.”

McConnell has benefitted in many ways from his relationship with his in-laws.

The Republican Senate minority leader’s personal wealth grew seven-fold over the last ten years thanks in large part to a gift given to him and his wife in 2008 from James Chao worth between $5 million and $25 million (Senate ethics forms require personal finance disclosures in ranges of amounts, rather than specific figures).  The gift helped the McConnells after their stock portfolio dipped in the wake of the financial crisis that year, and ensured they could pay off more than $100,000 in mortgage debt on their Washington home.

The generous gift made McConnell one of the wealthiest members of the Senate, with a net worth averaging around $22.8 million, according to The Washington Post’s review of his financial disclosures.

Following the gift, McConnell sent a letter of congratulations to an auditorium of Chinese officials in Shanghai who were gathered for an event honoring James Chao’s wife (McConnell’s mother-in-law, Ruth Mulan Chu Chao, who passed away in 2007).  The Shanghai Mulan Education Foundation, created in her honor, regularly hosts students from the University of Louisville, where McConnell has a leadership academy bearing his name that sends students on trips to China.

The ties between McConnell and his in-laws have come under scrutiny before.  In 2001, they were probed in depth by The New Republic in an article that charged that McConnell led an effort to soften his party’s criticism of China.  Through James Chao, who was a classmate of Jiang Zemin, the president of China in the ’90s, McConnell and his wife met with Jiang several times, both in Beijing and in Washington.  McConnell subsequently tempered his criticism of Chinese human rights abuses, and broke with hawks like Senator Jesse Helms to support Most Favored Nation trading status with China.  As Foremost established closer ties with mainland China, McConnell endorsed the position that the United States should remain “ambiguous” about coming to the defense of Taiwan.  In 1999, McConnell and his wife appeared at the University of Louisville with Chinese Ambassador Li Zhaoxing.  Li used the opportunity to bash congressional leaders for rebuking China over its repression of the Falun Gong religious sect.  “Any responsible government will not foster evil propensities of cults by being over-lenient,” Li reportedly said at the event with McConnell and Chao.  Rather than distance himself from the remarks, McConnell reportedly spoke about his “good working relationship” with Li.

Last Friday, McConnell dipped into his personal fortune to lend his own campaign $1.8 million for the final week before the election.  Members of the Chao family and employees of Foremost have also given over $90,000 in contributions to McConnell over the years.

Requests for comment to the McConnell team about the Ping May cocaine incident have gone unanswered.

McConnell has positioned himself over the years as a tough on drugs politician.  In 1996, McConnell was the sole sponsor of the Enhanced Marijuana Penalties Act, a bill to increase the mandatory minimum sentencing for those caught with certain amounts of marijuana.  A press release noted that his bill would make “penalties for selling marijuana comparable to those for selling heroin and cocaine.”

In recent weeks, McConnell has touted his role in calling for more federal money to be used for drug enforcement.

25 November 2013

The sign in the window warned burglars that the homeowner owned a handgun and would use it in self-defense. The state agents knocking on the door were there to confiscate the weapon.

The agents are part of the California Department of Justice’s Armed Prohibited Persons System (APPS), a program that takes firearms from people barred from owning them.  The law says that group can include ex-felons and people deemed to be mentally unstable.

Often arriving in SUVs and dressed in black tactical uniforms, the teams regularly sweep through California cities with a list of names and addresses.

It was Fresno’s turn last week.

Thursday night, the agents went to the home near Roeding Park to collect a Smith & Wesson semi-automatic pistol from a woman who had been evaluated under California Welfare and Institutions Code 5150 as a danger to herself and others.  As such, she had been ordered to surrender any firearms in her possession and had not.

As is often the case, the agents were told that the weapon was not there and the woman’s father-in-law had it in Bakersfield.

But that won’t be the end of the search, according to Kisu Yo, a special agent who was part of the team making the sweep.

“There’s no such thing as safe-keeping (by another family member),” Yo said.

Team members say they are dogged: They will press a prohibited person to allow them to search a home to look for the gun and ask to see the paperwork if they are told a weapon has been sold.

If agents are denied the search but have reason to believe they are being lied to, they will seek a warrant and lock down the house until they get results.

“That can make for a long night,” said Michelle Gregory, a spokeswoman for the Department of Justice.

Long nights are part of the job for the 33 agents who make up the APPS teams. They work evenings and nights because they are more likely to find people at home during those hours. They work in teams because they often have to approach darkened homes where there is likely to be an armed person inside.

“It really is a dangerous job,” said Yo, a Marine Corps veteran of the first Gulf War. “Every time we make a contact, it’s a very dangerous situation.”

Agents also say they are understaffed, but they are likely to get some help soon.

Gov. Jerry Brown recently signed legislation to use a $24 million surplus from funds paid during firearms purchases to hire as many as 36 more agents. (Fresno gun dealer Barry Bauer and several Second Amendment groups are suing because they say the diversion of funds is unconstitutional.)

California is the only state to use a program like APPS, which cross references five databases to find people who legally purchased handguns and registered assault weapons since 1996 with people banned from owning or possessing firearms.

The Attorney General’s Office said that more than 2,000 firearms were seized last year under the program. The Department of Justice says there are about 21,000 prohibited persons who possess about 43,000 firearms in the state.

Gun rights groups such as the National Rifle Association argue that making surprise visits to homes of prohibited persons is a step too far, but agents argue that people who have lost the firearms rights are clearly notified in court paperwork and other documents that they are to turn in their weapons. When they don’t, the agents can make an arrest as well as take the gun.

That was the case for a Clovis man who is prohibited from firearms possession after being convicted of felony DUI and evading officers. When agents went to his home near Swift and Fowler avenues Thursday, they found a Taurus .45 caliber pistol and he was booked as a felon in possession of a firearm.

Arrests don’t always follow the discovery of a gun. Agents visited a nearby home in Clovis in search of a firearm owned by a man who had been evaluated as mentally unstable. They found that he had access to a gun safe with several long guns as well as a long-barreled .50-caliber Smith & Wesson revolver valued at several thousand dollars.

The man told agents that he and his entire family were hunters and that the revolver was used as a weapon of last-resort when facing an attack by a charging wild pig. He said he was devastated to lose his firearm rights. The agents left with the weapons but did not arrest him.

Left behind was a hunting bow.

“You’re not taking my bow and arrows, are you?” the man asked.

“No,” said Yo. “We’re not the bow and arrow police.”

I consider this a sincere and outstanding exposé by Leonard and his late partner Sherri.  Issues that I find fault with are, in my estimation, honest mistakes such as missing how Jesuit-controlled Rome is obviously behind all of this as well as the fraud that “HIV/AIDS” is a “real virus” manufactured by the CIA.

Citation data such as original posting date is missing.  It is obviously post Kane / Horowitz interview of Barbara Hartwell on 24 May 2011 mentioned in the “references” so I’ll use that date for now.

http://www.waronwethepeople.com/child-sex-trafficking-scandal-exposes-ciafbi-justice-department-cover-crime-network/

War On We The People.com

Child Sex Trafficking Scandal Exposes CIA/FBI Justice Department Cover-Up Of Crime Network

Sherri Kane and Leonard G. Horowitz’s comprehensive report on the child sex trafficking network responsible for disappearing an estimated 500,000 American children annually.

Los Angeles–Shocking proof has surfaced to indict a former FBI Division 5 director for lying about his marriage to Church of Satan heiress, Diana Rively, Anton LaVey’s ex-wife, to keep a secret child-trafficking sex-slavery network hidden.

The revealing document threatens to shake-up the Justice Department with many questions as to why the FBI, working with the CIA, has been unable to stop a network of child traffickers from kidnapping, raping, and sexually enslaving hundreds, possibly thousands, of American children annually.

In the handwritten letter, recovered from 1998, Ted Gunderson, a retired FBI/CIA official and informant on matters of a satanic network of pedophiles and child traffickers wrote, “The marriage [to Diana Rively] … didn’t work out. It only lasted 2 and one half weeks and I left.  It would have been a catastrophe to stay there. Nothing against Diana.”

The letter, signed with kisses and hugs, was sent to Gunderson’s professional associate, Barbara Hartwell, who was programmed to serve in the CIA’s psychological operations unit.  She trained in psychological profiling and in debriefing military and intelligence personnel, and later toured with Gunderson to “disseminate intelligence on government corruption,” according to Hartwell.  Their assignments included a child-trafficking operation linked to officials of the CIA, U.S. military, Church of Satan, and Justice Department.

The stunning admission and letter raises several scandalous questions, including why mind-control inductees are assigned to operate as enemies of State, even embracing satanism, to disseminate indicting intelligence on U.S. government corruption on behalf of the CIA?

One reason involves undermining “dissident activism” by generating “controlled opposition.”  Fake dissidents provide cover for criminal operations, and deter real grassroots activism from sparking revolutions.

Another explanation involves globalization, and propaganda intended to undermine nationalism to embrace governance through the United Nations.

Hartwell and Gunderson toured with alleged CIA mind control victim sex slave, Brice Taylor, who’s celebrity is widely known among American patriot and Christian fundamentalist groups.  One researcher among them, Robert Sterling, discerned “a deeper conspiracy” operating here.

Photo shows murdered child, Jon Benet Ramsey, resembling MKULTRA sex slave, Brice Taylor.  Experts say pedophile satanists prefer their victims to appear innocent and doll-like due to their “dominant/submissive perversion complex” generated, likewise, from early sexual abuse.

Sterling concluded, “The most effective form of disinformation is that which blurs the truth with fiction so effectively that they become impossible to differentiate.”  He noted that at the time Taylor, and other alleged victims of the CIA’s Project Monarch MKULTRA sex slavery operation, such as Cathy O’Brien, hit the lecture circuit, “some powerful research was starting to circulate in alternative circles involving Satanic pedophilia operations.”*

Letter Links Gunderson To The Church Of Satan

Gunderson’s letter, citing his marriage to Rively, helps clarify a criminal conspiracy responsible for censoring the actual number of abductions that experts put annually in the tens of thousands.

The letter compels investigations of two satanic churches and the FBI and CIA, the agencies supposedly gathering intelligence on kidnappings to arrest villains.  In addition, officials in Congress, the White House, and even the Vatican, concerned about criminal exposures and embarrassing publicity over matters of pedophilia, are susceptible to additional investigations compelled by the letter.

The letter proves Gunderson lied about his marriage to “Diana,” and confirms what many independent investigators determined–Gunderson secreted his relationships with satanic church officials, evidencing a double agent assignment.

More CIA/FBI Officials Linked By Letter

Over the years, Gunderson, a high profile CIA/FBI official, had been harshly criticized for lamely addressing pedophilia, sex slavery, and “The Franklin Cover-up” involving Nebraska Senator John DeCamp, politicians, and Catholic priests.  As FBI, Division 5, Director, Gunderson gathered intelligence on the satanic network that involved members of the Church of Satan, Temple of Set, the CIA, FBI, judges, prosecutors, politicians, and other clients acquiring sex slaves he failed to disclose publicly, or pursue through internal affairs.

Many conscientious objectors, including Hartwell, charged Gunderson with protecting his superiors and the network.

Gunderson, however, had repeatedly denied allegations of his marriage to the Church of Satan heiress, sorceress, and high priestess, Diana Rively (a.k.a., Diana Hegarty).  The revelation would have devastated his career, generated domestic outrage, and possibly risked national security. Imagine the public learning their presidents acquired kidnapped satanically-trained sex slaves through the FBI and CIA.

Two years after the letter was written, Gunderson, and a half dozen agents, began to harass, libel, and threaten Hartwell for speaking out about Gunderson’s “anonymous sources,” including relationships with officials linked to satanic churches and international pedophilia and child trafficking networks.

A Marriage Too Hot To Handle

Gunderson’s marriage to Rively was taboo, since she edited The Satanic Bible, Satanic Rituals, The Complete Witch and The Devil’s Notebook while married to Anton LeVay.

Since the Rively-Gunderson annulment, Gunderson has had a team of agents working to discredit anyone who dared mention his relationship with Rively, or Temple of Set founder, Michael Aquino–a most incriminating fact evidenced widely over the Internet.

The CIA agents involved with Gunderson, covering-up his marriage, filtering government corruption stories, and harassing, threatening, and discrediting journalists investigating his links to the satanic network, include: convicted felon Timothy Patrick White, “Dr. True Ott,” Greg Szymanski, Eric John Phelps / Craig Oxley, Doug Millar, Don Nicoloff, Ken Adachi, Todd Fahey, and Anthony Hilder.

Hilder allegedly retired from the CIA to produce low-budget poor-quality films that have discredited several conspiracy stories and their analysts, as per the agency’s intent.

Doug Millar, claimed by Gunderson to be “the nation’s expert on Aquino,” and his Temple of Set, likewise discredits himself, and Gunderson too, by writing aimlessly about Gunderson’s targets.  A good example is his “review of Michael Aquino’s letter to Ted Gunderson,” that Ott posted on his “LabVirus.com” website, including White’s limp rebuke of Hartwell.  The confusing dribble captivates suckers only, as intended.

Millar defamed Dr. Leonard Horowitz, the co-author of this report, at a Conspiracy Conference in 2010, falsely accusing him of being knighted by the Pope, even though Millar knew that his collaborators, Szymanski and Ott, had sourced the false claim, and a fraudulent Knights of Malta list upon which the allegation was based.

If, according to Gunderson and his agents, Aquino and his satanic church is public enemy number one, then Aquino’s history, actions, and connections are keys to determining what is happening to America’s abducted children, and even the dysfunction within the Department of Justice (DoJ).  But Aquino’s indictment has remained grossly neglected by Gunderson, several prosecutors and courts, and Gunderson’s band of secret agents.

This is why double-agency propaganda is the only way to reconcile the weak, conflicting, and confusing exposures Aquino has received from Gunderson’s group, DoJ officials, and the mainstream media.

Geraldo Rivera Interviews Gunderson and Aquino

Michael Aquino appeared with Gunderson on NBC’s Geraldo in 1989, when Gunderson contradicted himself, lamely excused police and FBI officials for doing nothing about the satanic child trafficking network, and made extremely nervous eye movements that experts say evidences lying.

Viewed in retrospect as a propaganda piece, Gunderson and Aquino play “good cop/bad cop” to muddle the horrifying facts, and cover-up the organized crime network.

Rivera asked Gunderson, “Is there a network of satanic murderers in this country?”

Gunderson replied, “I cannot say that there is a network of satanic murderers.”

Then he contradicted himself:

“I can say that based on information furnished to me by confidential sources and informants, based on interviews with dozens of survivors from the satanic operations through the years, satanic beliefs, etc.  I can say that there is a network of these people across the country who are very active.  They have their own rest and relaxation farm, they are in contact with each other.  It ties in loosely with the drug operation, it ties into motorcycle gangs, and it goes on and on.  They have their own people who specialize in surveillances, photography, and assassinations.”

Later in the show, Geraldo questioned Gunderson, “Do you believe sir, that these dreadful allegations of babies being sacrificed are true?”

Gunderson returned, “I absolutely believe it, without any doubt, based on the information that’s been given to me across the country by numerous survivors and by confidential sources and informants.”

The “Good Cop/Bad Cop” Scam

Aquino then discredited Gunderson by playing the “bad cop.”  In the CIA, the Temple of Set founder is actually Gunderson’s MKULTRA boss.

Aquino berated Gunderson, “Then why don’t you name these people and arrest them.  Never a name.  Never an arrest.  These women come out of a group, and they insist that they know the people in the group, and yet they do not identify these large mysterious cults.  Name them, and arrest them, and get them off the street.”

Aquino was costumed to look like a cartoon character in devil’s attire.  He was immediately and subliminally discredited, even though he asked crucial common sense questions.

The staged broadcast was a mind-trip for public deception.  Geraldo, allegedly neutral, turned to Gunderson and asked, “Does he [Aquino] not make a valid point?”

Gunderson responded with a bunch of silly excuses.  “He makes a valid point.  The problem with that is number one, police officers don’t believe it, I may believe it.  You may believe it, and some people in your audience may believe it.  They don’t believe it.”

Gunderson’s statement was ridiculous, given his FBI director’s job required oversight of nearly 700 personnel, each of whom required professional training to follow his orders.

Gunderson continued, “If you decide to investigate these people, you have to number one, handle it from an undercover operation.  If you put an undercover operation into effect, then you have in a sense your own police officers becoming involved in these heinous crimes, and they of course become murderers.  And in addition to that, if you decide to investigate these people, that’s a lot of work, and many law enforcement officers are apathetic and don’t want to get involved.”

This, too, violates common sense, television, film, and law enforcement, wherein federal agents and spooks go undercover routinely to safely and effectively investigate, indict, and jail criminals.

New Evidence The “Franklin Cover-Up” Was A CIA Black-Op

Gunderson’s letter sparks new interest in his reported links to Church of Satan/Temple of Set official Aquino, who is widely feared as America’s Joseph Goebbels–the leading propagandist for the U.S. Army, and a psychological warfare expert working for the CIA.

Aquino broke from Church of Satan founder Anton LaVey in 1975 to establish the Temple of Set, linked by solid evidence to The Church of Scientology and the U.S. Army.  At the time, Aquino was a Lt. Colonel in the Army, stationed at San Francisco’s Presidio.  He was identified by several children among more than sixty victims of pedophilia, vaginal sex, sodomy, and oral copulation, but was inexplicably acquitted.

In advancing the Temple of Set, Aquino attracted nearly thirty Church of Satan members and officials including Diana Rively’s daughter, briefly Gunderson’s daughter-in-law, Zeena LaVey.

On 30 April 1990, Zeena formally denounced her ties to father Anton, after the Church of Satan leader set her up to be sexually molested by a recognized stalker.  Zeena then pledged her allegiance to Aquino and his Temple of Set.

Freelance writer Jeffrey Steinberg covered the story about satanism and pedophilia in the U.S. military during the infamous “Franklin Cover-up” case heard by the U.S. District Court in Lincoln, Nebraska.  During its 5 February 1999, hearing, “Paul Bonacci claimed that he had been ritualistically abused by Lawrence E. King, as part of a nationwide pedophile ring linked to powerful political figures in Washington, and to elements of the U.S. military and intelligence establishment.”

“On 27 February, Judge Warren K. Urbom ordered King to pay $1 million in damages to Bonacci, in what Bonacci’s attorney, John DeCamp, said was a clear signal that ‘the evidence presented was credible,’” Steinberg reported.

John DeCamp’s CIA Service in the Army

John DeCamp, author of the Franklin Cover-up, is a Gunderson ally, former Henry Kissinger/William Colby subordinate, and a retired Nebraska Senator.  Like Aquino and Gunderson, DeCamp worked for the CIA.  The U.S. Army assigned DeCamp to serve Colby, the Director of Central Intelligence, during the Nixon era.  Colby, with DeCamp, ran the Phoenix Program that involved assassinations and torture.

As the Vietnam War was winding down, with dissidents on the rise, and the media devastating public confidence in government and the military, Aquino and Colby, assisted by DeCamp, refined psychological warfare black ops for “The Company,” especially leveraging the media for controlling opposition.

Their new form of media manipulation for mass mind control advanced the top secret MKULTRA program.  The Vietnam War brought horrific bloodshed into people’s living rooms for the first time. Aquino and Company realized that to sedate public opinion and win propaganda wars, the media had to be leveraged to “spin” stories, minimizing horrors and discrediting opposition.

Given this new information, it is obvious the 1999 case in the “Boys Town” State was a “Franklin Double Cover-up”–a black-op, or side show, directed by The Company to camouflage or minimize more widespread crimes against children, but leave the impression that the Justice Department operates effectively.

The proceedings and story was controlled nearly as well as Aquino’s conduct and bad press throughout his long criminal career as the CIA/MKULTRA/Church of Satan/Temple of Set director.

“This is a lesson in how the CIA/FBI’s counter-intelligence program (i.e., COINTELPRO) operates to control opposition, and is the only way to reconcile Gunderson’s and his group’s behavior–lamely protesting government corruption, while limply indicting the Illuminati, the CIA, and Aquino’s satanic child-trafficking network,” said Dr. Horowitz, a Harvard trained behavioral science expert, libeled by Gunderson’s agents across the Internet.  (CLICK HERE to read Side Bar #1 explaining how and why Horowitz and Kane chose to investigate Gunderson following the assassination of Edward Harle (a.k.a., Chistopher Story), a Bush family nemesis and world leading financial industries whistleblower.)

“This illustrates how modern propagandists serve to confuse people, discrediting all sources of intelligence, to generate general apathy.  This is precisely how Gunderson–a professional mind-controlled disinformation agent, hypnotized to feign activism and spread government hate–infiltrated the grassroots with his team of agents to generate fear, controversy, and apathy, thus securing the CIA’s entire rogue operation that is kidnapping and killing children,” Dr. Horowitz  concluded

Controlled Opposition: The Primary Propaganda Ploy

It can now be seen that the utility of the Franklin Double Cover-up was to create and control opposition to pedophilia, sex slavery, and child-trafficking.  The case served to localize and minimize the widespread child trafficking operation. It was a decoy that purposely fell short of exposing the widespread network of pedophiles, its criminal administrators, and the CIA/FBI’s black-op scheme providing propaganda cover for the entire operation.

A more recent example came from a West Hawaii Today (21 April 2011) feature story. It read, “Two W. Hawaii farms named in human trafficking suit.”  The article concerned two farms that were named in a lawsuit by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for abusing 200 Thai men.

“What about the thousands of abducted children disappearing every year?” co-author Kane asked.  “The CIA-controlled mainstream media generates its own controlled opposition.  200 men get attention in Hawaii.  DeCamp’s cover-up in Nebraska gets attention. But not Aquino’s involvements in the national child-trafficking network that is abducting thousands of children annually.”

The Gang Behind Johnny Gosch’s Kidnapping

Noreen Gosch, mother of famous abductee Johnny Gosch, gave sworn testimony linking the CIA’s Aquino to the national network of pedophiles neglected by the FBI.

The Justice Department touts its collection of data on missing children, and the FBI’s forensic lab reports administered by, believe it or not, Target stores.

Incredibly, besides serving FBI forensics, Target co-owns the “LifeTouch” Company that publishes all public school yearbooks, providing a virtual menu of children for pedophiles, CIA/FBI agents included, and the sex slavery ring targeting youngsters.

This FBI/Target/LifeTouch operation additionally evidences the Justice Department’s gross neglect of conflicting interests, abductee data analysis, and reasonable intervention by internal affairs, all of which strongly suggests higher level CIA involvement in extremely well organized crimes against America’s families and children.

The Court learned that Johnny Gosch disappeared in 1982 while delivering newspapers.  Kept from the Court, however, was a photograph of Johnny, allegedly standing near George H.W. Bush.

The photo’s source was Gunderson’s crony, Timothy Patrick White. Gunderson’s team circulated the photo claiming Bush was the network’s sex slave client.  The trouble is, White is a convicted felon, and the web’s leading rogue CIA agent provocateur. So no one believes him, or by association, the legitimacy of the photo. The story is generally dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Mission accomplished.

Noreen Gosch testified in DeCamp’s case that the satanic pedophile network, “was an offshoot of … [t]he MKULTRA program … developed in the 1950s by the CIA. … There was a man by the name of Michael Aquino.  He was in the military. He had top Pentagon clearances.  He was a pedophile. … He was a close friend of Anton LaVey.  The two of them were very active in ritualistic sexual abuse.  And they deferred funding from this government program to use [in] this experimentation on children.”

Where is the American “free press” when you need it?  Censored by the CIA and payoffs from organized crime.

Johnny Gosch Or Jeffrey Gannon: The CIA’S Plame Scandal

Evidence issued by the mainstream media, including the New York Times and MSNBC, indicates Jeff Gannon (a.k.a., Jeff Guckert, James Guckert, and “Bull Dog”)–identifying a gay porn “military stud” in the White House–served George H.W. Bush and Republican officials by administering a fake story and news agency that leaked the identity of CIA-agent Valerie Plame.  The CIA scandal that compromised her career began when Plame’s husband, U.S. Diplomat Joseph C. Wilson, embarrassed Bush by discrediting his claims Iraq had developed nuclear weapons.  The leak appears to have been a payback.

A glaring hypocrisy in this story grossly neglected by the media is that Republicans opposing gay marriage, and homosexuals serving in the military, delegated their dirty tricks to the gay porn site entrepreneur supposedly named Gannon, that could be Johnny Gosch.

“The unqualified [Gannon] was so much a part of the White House Press Corps,” wrote Wayne Besen, author of the book,

Anything But Straight: Unmasking the Scandals and Lies Behind the Ex-Gay Myth, “he reportedly was given a classified CIA memo that outed Plame.”

“You’ve got to hand it to this [Bush] White House,” Besen concluded.  “When they couldn’t get the media to buy their spin, they bought the media. Now, when they couldn’t get the media hook they desired, they simply got a hooker.”

Hooker Gannon, however, as reported by MSNBC, may be Johnny Gosch, although a DNA test, unlikely forthcoming, is required to prove it.

Sherman Skolnick, who exposed bribery within the Illinois court system in the late 1960s, in a corruption scandal that led to the indictment of former Gov. Otto Kerner, posted intelligence provided by his reputable group of investigators who had been tracking “the operation of the male prostitution ring in Omaha (Boys Town), Chicago, and the District of Colombia.”  (See: Rense.com, 28 Feb. 2005.)  He wrote that Gannon/Gosch was an “expert penetration agent” compiling scandalous sex data on U.S. and foreign governmental officials.

For example, Skolnick reported, fourteen members of the House and Senate used the Gannon/Gosch “whorehouse service” with at least two members of the Federal Reserve Board, Congressional members, mostly Republicans, and George Bush, Sr., administered these affairs to secure loyalties, according to Skolnick’s sources.

Evidence Linking Johnny Gosch to Jeffrey Gannon is muddled by the CIA for Bush and Satanic Network Protection

Despite confusion over the identities and activities of Gosch and Gannon, both stories feature CIA sex trafficking scandals with stories that were certifiably “planted” by Gunderson’s group of MKULTRA propagandists, implicating Aquino, DeCamp, and the Bush family and others.

Despite being the world’s leading experts on Gosch and the child trafficking network that disappeared him, Gunderson neglected using the mainstream media attention the Valerie Plame Affair brought, as an opportunity to expose these horrific satanic pedophilia crimes.  Gunderson and his agents instead avoided Plame’s compromise by Gannon like a plague. Their rantings exclusively focused on confirming and heralding, as though celebrating, the supposed Gosch/Gannon single identity without DNA testing or definite confirmation.  More muddling of the scandal resulted.

Gunderson in a rare mention of Plame, nearly slipped, but caught himself, in stating that the leaked document came from Bush.  Gunderson said, “… her husband made an uncomplimentary remark about George Bush and that Bush gave, –exposed these people through Jeff Gannon, …”  The broken statement was made to talk show host, Alex Merklinger (8 March 2005).

Rense.com Provides Platform For Propagandists

Two other Gunderson aides, Symanski and White, contributed to the speculation, falsely claiming confirmation, of the single Gosch/Gannon identity.  Szymanski, the CIA/FBI forger cited earlier, issued through Rense.com a lengthy ridiculous tale of David Johnson-Holm’s abuse by his kidnappers.  David, Gosch’s fellow abductee, is shown below in the photo next to Johnny.

Jeff Rense published Szymanski’s embarrassingly poor writing, presented to discredit its author and content, while Rense has consistently rejected Kane and Horowitz’s reports exposing these operatives and their COINTELPRO operations.  (All other previous reports by Horowitz and Kane were posted immediately by Rense, whose limited censorship he attributed to his fear of retaliation by Gunderson’s group of agents.)

Rense also published a coherent and well-edited statement by White (allegedly), authorized by Gunderson, claiming “100% Confirmation” that Gannon is Gosch.  The trouble is, White has never written well, or coherently, anywhere on the Internet in dozens of postings.  Add to this uncertainty of authorship, White’s felony conviction, his participation in trafficking drugs and arms, his sourcing the Bush/Gosch photograph, his harassment and libel of these authors and others, plus Gunderson’s “100% Confirmation” of the single Gosch/Gannon identity that was sourced anonymously, and the only certainty is this crime network’s intention to sell fear, confusion, and discrediting information, to the public.

It appears certain that these FBI/CIA agents leaked these photos of their abductees as an intended form of terrorism

Filmmaker Thompson Kills Himself After Bonacci Claim

Besen also reported that the famous American journalist and rumored snuff filmaker, Hunter S. Thompson, shot himself hours after Bonacci revealed that Gannon was Johnny Gosch.  Thompson is credited for creating “Gonzo Journalism”–a style of reporting where reporters involve themselves in the action to such a degree that they become central figures of their stories.

Bonacci was forced by the satanic child traffickers to rape Gosch, and participate in murder, homosexual pedophilia, and a necrophilic orgy.  He testified in the Nebraska court that these actions were videotaped by “Hunter Thompson,” at a location later identified as the Bohemian Grove.  Hours after the Gosch/Gannon single identity announcement, Thompson typed the single word “COUNSELOR” on his typewriter, then shot himself in the head, according to police.  The message conceivably references Counselor DeCamp, or even Massachusetts Senator, John Kerry, who attended Thompson’s funeral.

John Kerry participated in Thompson’s “Fear and Loathing, Campaign 2004,” Thompson’s account of the road trip he took with Kerry during his presidential campaign.  This was Thompson’s final magazine feature.

The fraudulent doctored photo of Kerry with Church of Satan founder, Anton LaVey, shown above, is another example of how COINTELPRO creates and disseminates falsehoods to confuse everyone about everything.  The fact that this forged photograph is a fraud does not encourage faith in Kerry.  Quite the opposite.  The action smacks of an intelligence operation to muddle matters implicating Kerry’s probable knowledge of, and/or involvement in, the satanic child trafficking network.

Child Abuse, the CIA, and the Origin Of AIDS

Neglected intelligence on the use of mentally retarded children as guinea pigs in vaccine trials triggering HIV/AIDS in New York involves the CIA, Litton Bionetics, and the National Cancer Institute.  CLICK HERE to read SIDE BAR #2 on this matter that also implicates Aquino, Colby, DeCamp and, by extension, Gunderson, whose aides targeted HIV/AIDS origin expert, Dr. Horowitz, for libel, defamation, and assassination.

More Aquino Criminality Neglected

Reporter Steinberg also noted that, “The U.S. Attorney in San Francisco handling the [Presidio’s pedophilia] case was Joseph Russoniello. Russoniello would later be identified by reporter Gary Webb (of the San Jose Mercury News) as a player in the Contra cocaine smuggling operation led by Lt. Col. Oliver North and company.”

According to Hartwell and others, Aquino, Gunderson, and White were, likewise, involved in the Iran Contra affair under Ronald Reagan, trading arms for drugs.

“In May 1989, Aquino was again questioned in connection with child abuse investigations,” Steinberg continued.  “[T]his time, at least five children in three cities were making the accusations.  The children had seen Aquino in newspaper and television coverage of the Presidio case, and immediately recognized him as one of their abusers…”

“Aquino was also identified by children in Santa Rosa and Fort Bragg, California.  In the Fort Bragg case, ‘allegations of ritual abuse erupted… in 1985 when several children at the Jubilation Day Care Center said they were sexually abused by a number of people at the day care center and at several locations away from the center, including at least two churches.’  Aquino was identified as having been present at one of those churches…”

“The Mercury News reported, ‘by November, 1987 the Army had received allegations of child abuse at 15 of its day care centers and several elementary schools.  There were also at least two cases in Air Force day care centers,’ and another in a center run by the U.S. Navy.”

“In addition, ‘a special team of experts was sent to Panama [in June 1988] to help determine if as many as 10 children at a Department of Defense elementary school had been molested and possibly infected with AIDS.’”

“Yet another case emerged in a U.S.-run facility in West Germany.”

“These cases erupted at some of the country’s most esteemed military bases, including Fort Dix, Fort Leavenworth, Fort Jackson, and West Point.  Many of those making the accusations were career military officers who had devoted their lives to unquestioned allegiance to the U.S. armed forces. Many would resign their posts in outraged protest…”

“The Mercury News [continued], ‘by the end of the year, 50 children had been interviewed by investigators.  Children at West Point told stories that would become horrifyingly familiar.  They said they had been ritually abused.  They said they had had excrement smeared on their bodies and been forced to eat feces and drink urine.  They said they were taken away from the day care center and photographed.’”

“Despite abundant medical and psychological evidence and literally dozens of child witnesses, and despite ‘950 interviews by 60 FBI agents assigned to the investigation,’ the investigation, ‘led by former U.S. Attorney [and future mayor] Rudolph Giuliani’ (of 9/11 infamy) produced ‘no federal grand jury indictments,’ according to the Herald Record…”  (See Steinberg’s full report HERE.)

Celebrities Abused As Activists Against Child Sex Slavery

As journalists have been turning up the heat on the international child trafficking network, Hollywood celebrities are providing more cover and controlled opposition for the CIA.  Deceived fans believe that their stars are doing something substantive to deter sex slavery and pedophila.

Actors Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher have started their own organization, called the Demi & Ashton Foundation (DNA.) Their international campaign message is, “Take A Stand Against Child Sex Slavery.”

Instead of addressing the widespread problem–the international satanic network and its officials pulling the strings–the celebrities lamely address local pedophiles.  DNA is asking, “Are You A Real Man?”  “Do You Prefer A Real Man?”

The psychology and target of this message is idiotic, reconcilable only as controlled opposition.  Someone should inform Moore and Kutcher that satanists don’t give a damn about “real manhood.”  The Illuminati, superficially depicted in Eyes Wide Shut, relish their Bohemian Grove diet of human sacrifices, served on plates of Royal Copenhagen porcelain.

Moore and Kutcher’s United Nation’s sponsor, David Rockefeller and company, means they are part of the problem of controlled opposition, needed by the CIA and Aquino to control opposition.

David Rockefeller is shown here with Benjamin Fulford who altered the last report of assassinated journalist Edward Harle (a.k.a., Christopher Story), attaching Szymanski’s Knights of Malta forgery to extend the COINTELPRO assault on Horowitz, and implicate the doctor in Harle’s murder.

Read more of this story by CLICKING HERE.

Alex Jones Also Involved in the Franklin Double Coverup

In a personal letter to Kane, Hartwell explained how Gunderson’s reach extended to Alex Jones and Genesis Communications Network (GCN) officials.  She learned this the hard way during an interview with Jeremy Floyd.  While Floyd and Hartwell were broadcasting revelations about Gunderson and DeCamp, Jones called repeatedly to stop them.

The Floyd Report host complained, “This Ted Gunderson issue is so hot that Alex Jones called me 3 times in a 40 min period to get me to stop [interviewing Hartwell].”

Besides indicting Jones, Floyd wrote that Michael Trudeau, the Vice President of GCN, supported the censorship.

The day after the show, Hartwell wrote, “I exposed for the first time on radio … that John DeCamp was in fact involved in the pedophilia, child sex abuse, and blackmailing of politicians in the Franklin case.  I confronted Ted Gunderson with what I knew in November, 1999 … and at that time Gunderson admitted to me that he knew of DeCamp’s involvement.  That was the beginning of the end of my association with Ted Gunderson, as I could not in good conscience continue to endorse him, or work with him.”

In protesting her censors, Hartwell wrote that “Alex Jones has proven himself to be a liar, a bully, a false patriot, a scamster and a shill; not just to me, but to many others who have been targeted for Jones’s censorship and intimidation tactics.”

After Hartwell told listeners on the GCN broadcast with Floyd about Gunderson’s marriage to Rively, Floyd claimed that Jones forbid him from ever communicating with Hartwell again.  The next day Floyd quit working for Genesis.

Critics complain that Alex Jones continues to endorse Gunderson and DeCamp, despite knowing the larger truth about them pertaining to child trafficking, sex crimes, and ritual murders.

Other broadcasters have openly protested Gunderson’s and Jones’s power to suspend them on networks besides Genesis.  These include Jeff Rense, broadcasting now on American Freedom Radio Network (AFRN), and Art Bell, previously with Premier Radio Network.

More Gunderson and Jones Dirty Dealings

Gunderson is widely known for having libeled Coast to Coast [AM] celebrity host, Art Bell, forcing his early retirement from broadcasting.  Bell disclosed that on 16 May 1997, his son was kidnapped and raped.  The assailant was HIV positive.  The pedophile was tried, convicted, and is now serving a life sentence.

But Gunderson, along with David Hinkson, the developer of WaterOz, who threatened to ruin Bell over an advertising fracas, then aired a broadcast that twisted Bell’s kidnapping, falsely claiming Art Bell had committed the molestation.  Gunderson’s hit squad further libeled Bell, claiming he had paid to cover up a criminal indictment, and urged listeners to call Bell “on air” to ask if he had been indicted.  Bell retired shortly thereafter.

Hickson was later sentenced to 43 years in prison for numerous crimes, including a “murder-for-hire plot,” and false labeling and advertising of WaterOz, his mineral product containing colloidal silver.

A related fraud occurred in 2009 with Gunderson’s agents increasing their attacks on Dr. Horowitz and his 528 resonating silver hydrosol–OxySilver.  The doctor had been advertising OxySilver with Alex Jones, with Jones promising a program explaining 528Hz frequency and its revolutionary use in the hydrosol as an alternative to toxic antibiotics and deadly vaccines.  Suddenly, at the height of the Swine Flu fright, the show was nixed, and 528 advertising for OxySilver was suspiciously delayed for 5 weeks, during which time Jones’s staff provided a series of unreasonable excuses.

Then Horowitz learned that Jones, famous for bashing government officials for genocide, had contracted to advertise Silver Sol, a competitor to OxySilver, produced by American Biotech Labs and Clifton Mining Company, on whose Board of Directors sat top medical officials in the Dept. of Homeland Security and FEMA.

Additional inquiries proved Jones’s sponsors had committed consumer fraud, and even scientific fraud, by altering an electron micrograph for advertising to simulate Dr. Horowitz’s research on 528Hz healing technology.

Gunderson’s Infamy in the McMartin Crime Investigation

Gunderson showed up at a crime scene where pre-schoolers had been sexually abused by teachers at the McMartin Pre-School in Manhattan Beach, CA.  He then befriended one of the mothers, Jackie McGauley, whose child had been molested.

McGauley claimed that Gunderson poisoned her.  She got sick shortly after his arrival, and remained ill the entire time he was living with her.

In an open letter to Barbara Hartwell, McGauley wrote, “I was ill the entire time Gunderson was in my house.  The first week I contracted a rare form of influenza called Psytocosis, then severe fatigue and pain. I once found a substance (like motor oil) in my wall heater and caught Ted putting eyedroppers full of an unknown substance in my coffee.”

Jackie McGauley is not the only one who reported life-threatening experiences with Gunderson.  Others, mostly woman, came forward over the years to charge Gunderson with various offenses, including an attempted murder, reported by investigative journalist, Janet Phelan.

According to Phelan, “Gunderson deployed chemical assassination weapons against [her].”  CLICK HERE to read more about Janet Phelan’s ordeal with Gunderson.

“This pattern is seen over and over again,” Sherri Kane concluded after reviewing hundreds of pages of complaints against Gunderson by dozens of authors online.  She noted a pattern: “Women journalists report black-ops involving the CIA, and then Gunderson, White, and their allied agents, each using several aliases, attack them on the Internet for damage control.  They demonize, harass, and attempt to discredit the messengers, rather than refuting the messages.”

Gunderson lied, according to McGauley, when he claimed he helped McMartin investigators.  He did that, according to McGauley and other published sources, in an effort to feign heroism and recover credibility lost during his lame and embarrassing defense of Jeffrey R. MacDonald, convicted for murdering his family.

Below is Gunderson’s handwritten note to McGauley that implicates him in the reported murder of private investigator, Rick Post who worked to expose the criminals at the McMartin school. Gunderson expresses contempt for Post in his writting to McGauley before Post’s disappearance.

To cover for Gunderson, an inaccurate and confusing note, from an anonymous source, was attached to the widely circulated Gunderson memo to hash all the information, including that provided by the Associated Press (AP) in the news clipping detailing Post’s alleged murder.

Meanwhile, AP is widely known as a primary source of CIA propaganda, that in this case exonerates Gunderson.

The obviously false and confusing side note says, “Ted Gunderson murder of P.I. Rick Post.  Post worked out McMartin Preschool case.  Ted Gunderson’s handwritten note to Rick trying to persuade Rick to flip to Bad Guys side.  Rick’s body tortured & cut apart at Gunderson & Munotts Sierra Clinic.”

Gunderson wrote the note to Jackie McCauley, complaining about Rick Post.  Thus, the side-note should have cited “Jackie,” not “Rick.”

Gunderson wrote: “You aren’t going to do research and put my name on it, but you will do this with Rick Post or Chris Clark & put their name on it.  Did Post or Clark support you and your children for the past year and a half?  Come on, how about working with me instead of against me?  This was the idea when you quit your job – we were going to work together & both take credit – as a Team”.

Gunderson’s Extended Network of the Rich and Infamous

Mounting evidence indicates Gunderson is an extremely dangerous man.  In several thorough reports, including an article by James Orlin Grabbe (deceased), Gunderson worked with a CIA “high-tech genius” named Michael Riconosciuto.  This “friend” of Richard Nixon was alleged to be the “developer of the main bomb that blew up the Oklahoma City Murrah Federal Building,” and was a “key CIA figure in the INSLAW scandal that mainly caused the Ruby Ridge Siege,” according to exhibits in a federal suit filed in Dallas, Texas at the breakout of the Waco Siege.  These court records claimed to elucidate “important truths regarding Ruby Ridge and Waco, as well as the ties between them even to the point of showing the ties between the Ruby Ridge, Waco, and Oklahoma City scandals.”

Gunderson and Riconosciuto also worked with Robert Booth Nichols (allegedly deceased), the son of John Lear, founder of the Lear Jet Corporation. Nichols, according to Grabbe, and other credible authors, worked for the FBI and collaborated with Gunderson in criminal affairs, including money laundering and narcotics trafficking involving the Yakuza and Gambino crime family.

Gunderson, according to Hartwell and others, was nefariously involved in exposing Riconosciuto’s connection the “Prosecutor’s Management Information System (PROMIS)” software, designed to help organize the large amounts of paperwork generated by law enforcement and the courts.  It was developed by Bill Hamilton, the founder of INSLAW.  Hamilton alleged that the Justice Dept. had stolen PROMIS and illegally distributed it, robbing his company of millions of dollars.

Riconosciuto claimed to have modified the software at the Justice Department’s request, so that it could be sold to dozens of foreign governments, with a secret backdoor feature that allowed outsiders to access computer systems using PROMIS.  The scam involved Riconosciuto and Gunderson in theft and banking fraud, and was claimed by Hamilton to increase the risk of terrorism and illegal money transfers, including possibly enriching Osama Bin Laden.

Riconosciuto was then set up with 900 pounds of methamphetamine, framed, he claimed, to keep him from exposing the Justice Department’s theft. Gunderson testified in his defense, with Riconosciuto ending up in jail.

Gunderson was also aware that Riconosciuto introduced murdered journalist, Danny Casolara, to Nichols. According the book written by Cheri Seymour, The Last Circle, Casolara was in his final stages of investigating an “association of mobsters, government officials, and rogue intelligence figures grown out of a dirty CIA “Old Boy” network that he had dubbed “The Octopus.”  Casolara told friends that he had in hand significant hard evidence pointing to the connections between INSLAW, Iran-Contra, and the BCCI scandal.

Gunderson was reportedly scheduled to have met with Casolara the day he died.

Risconosciuto, reportedly in prison, is also connected to, Bio-Rad.  Bio-Rad is a molecular biology industry supplier and perceived competitor of American Bionetics–American Cyanamid’s acquisition of Litton Bionetics, that Dr. Horowitz explains originated the first AIDS-like viruses spread via tainted vaccines. CLICK HERE to read SIDE BAR #2 on this matter that also implicates Gunderson, Aquino, and the CIA.

Robert Booth Nichol’s corporation Meridian Arms, a subsidiary of Meridian International Logistics, was reported to be working with Japanese and Russian firms to advance same research as Bio-Rad.

Grabbe also wrote about Gunderson and Risconosciuto meeting “Tim Osman” (alleged to be an alias for Osama Bin Laden), in 1986. The men discussed MANPADs—Man Portable Air Defense Systems.  Two representatives of the mujahadeen were also there to discuss their armament needs.  One of the two men, Ralph Olberg, was an American businessman securing weapons for Afghan rebels.  (Read more here.)

Gunderson Defended Convicted Murderer MacDonald

Gunderson lost a lot of credibility when, as the head of the FBI’s Los Angeles division, he served as defense investigator for the green beret, Jeffrey R. MacDonald, indicted for murdering his wife and two young daughters in 1970.  MacDonald blamed the murders on a Manson type group.  But Gunderson enlisted a drug addicted woman, Helena Stoeckley, most likely a mind-control slave, to confess to the murders.  Later she retracted her confessions, leading to Gunderson’s ridicule.

(Read more here.)

Gunderson and Hilder Jeopardize “Chemtrail” Awareness

Most recently, Gunderson has “partnered” with Anthony Hilder to create an elaborate website, and publicity campaign, discrediting “chemtrails” by their endorsements.

The costly operation raises the question who is funding this site and why, as both Gunderson and Hilder claim poverty, and they do not sell anything on their site?  The involvement of Hilder, besides Gunderson, discredits an otherwise very serious matter as public concern, while media coverage of the repeated assaults is mounting.

The CIA’s involvement in this black op, that includes discrediting intelligence, (i.e., the COINTELPRO’s counter-intelligence) best explains this new Gunderson/Hilder partnership, and their sudden engagement in this matter beyond their scientific or technical expertise.

Conclusion

Gunderson’s letter to Hartwell raises several scandalous questions, including why are CIA/FBI agents operating as enemies of State, embracing satanism, terrorizing people, muddying the media, and perplexing the public by disseminating intelligence on U.S. government corruption along with scandalous information about child sex trafficking serving pedophiles and perverted officials?

Gunderson’s group demonstrates “controlled opposition”–fake dissidents providing cover for deadly criminal operations.  This is also how the CIA/FBI COINTELPRO operatives deter grassroots activism, preventing peaceful revolutions triggered by righteous indignation about government corruption.  So long as confusion persists in the public’s mind, and proof of official criminal malfeasance is limited, murderous covert operations, including child trafficking and sex slavery networks operating today, will continue to please and profit the criminal elite.

Geraldo Rivera concluded his satanic child-trafficking-sex-slavery interview with Gunderson and Aquino by saying, “[I]t has never been proven in a court of law.  Obviously it needs more investigation.  But if these things are happening, then there should be a national task force of federal and state and local cops working together to prove or disprove [this], because this is just unacceptable… .”

The evidence and common sense presented herein debunks Rivera’s claim that Gunderson is “a sincere man.”  Gunderson’s letter to Hartwell proves he lied to the American people, and demands an inquiry, honesty, and greater accountability, along with transparancy in the Justice Department and the CIA.

There is a curious website that asks, “Who is this man, and what is he up to?”  That website claims that Ted Gunderson is an impostor.

The author of that publication claims that the original Ted Gunderson “was paid $500,000 to retire from the FBI, assume a false identity, ‘start a new life’ with no traceable connections to the life he had led before, and keep his mouth shut.  This enabled an impostor to assume the identity of “FBI Agent Ted Gunderson, retired.”

Given the gravity of these revelations, and their implications for family, as well as national security, the authors urge readers to demand answers to the following questions from the Justice Department:

“Who is Ted Gunderson and Michael Aquino, really, and what is their status and function(s) in America’s intelligence community?”

“Is there anyone at the CIA or FBI who can stop the satanic network’s child trafficking operations?”  If not, “What shall We The People do about losing our nation, and children, to pedophile perverts neglected by, and assisted by, the CIA and FBI?

Please register your personal complaints by sending letters and copies of this article to the Acting Inspector General of the Justice Department, Cynthia A. Schnedar.

Don’t bother writing the former internal affairs director of the FBI, John H. Conditt, Jr.  He was sentenced to 12 years in prison after assaulting a 6-year-old girl, the daughter of two FBI agents, and at least two other girls before beginning his two-decade career in law enforcement.

This simply proves FBI agents are not immune to the pedophilia plauge infecting the Justice Department and CIA.

Ask Schnedar to do the right thing, demanding investigations and indictments. During her last two years with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Ms. Schnedar served as the Deputy Chief of the Sex Offense and Domestic Violence Section.

The FBI encourages you to report fraud, abuse, or misconduct concerning Department of Justice employees, contractors, and grantees, to the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) by mail:

Office of the Inspector General
U.S. Department of Justice
Investigations Division
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Room 4706
Washington, DC 20530

E-mail: oig.hotline@usdoj.gov

Online: Reporting Form

Hotline: (800) 869-4499 (contact information in English and Spanish) or Hotline Fax: (202) 616-9881

Additional information concerning the jurisdiction, the confidentiality of complaints, and how to report allegations of retaliation is available at: http://www.justice.gov/oig/FOIA/hotline_plus.htm

End

* FOOTNOTE: According to Sterling, “The end result of O’Brien and Taylor’s public ravings has been to trivialize this research by association. The CIA itself could be behind the plot: Both Cathy and Brice had the ‘help’ of self-described ‘renegade CIA operatives’ in the recovery of their memories. It’s quite possible those operatives weren’t renegades. Their help might have involved implanting bogus tales.

“Such a plot is straight out of Machiavelli. Whether the CIA is behind it or not, their mind-control fraternity is the major beneficiary of these lurid tales, and no doubt their members are chuckling over them right now.”

** REFERENCE: Barbara Hartwell was interviewed by Sherri Kane and Leonard Horowitz on Tues. 24 May 2011, on The Insight Hour regarding the named COINTELPRO agent provocateurs .
Listen To The Interview Here.

ABOUT THE AUTHORS:

Dr. Leonard Horowitz is the author of seventeen books including three American best-sellers, Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola–Nature, Accident or Intentional?, Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse, and Healing Celebrations: Miraculous Recoveries Through Ancient Scripture, Natural Medicine and Modern Science. Dr. Horowitz is currently advancing as an alternative to the duplicitous World Health Organization (WHO), called, Healthy World Organization (HWO).

Sherri Kane is an investigative journalist who defected from FOX News, Los Angeles, for ethical reasons. She has written extensively on Barack Obama’s history, and has most recently exposed the “PharmaMedia,” detailing links between the wealthiest Wall Street investors in mass media and the pharmaceutical cartel. She has defined her life mission “to save the children” from the spoils of pedophilia, child trafficking, and sex slavery.

4 July 2008

JONESBORO – Police say a man turned in by his father was arrested and charged with shooting a restaurant manager in the head during a robbery and then shooting a Clayton County police officer in the wrist.

It began around 2 a.m. Thursday with a robbery at a fast-food restaurant in Stockbridge. Police say 23-year-old Marquet Donald was arrested about nine hours later.

The manager was listed in critical condition at an Atlanta hospital. The officer, Matthew Whitton, a 6-year veteran of the police department, was treated at the scene.

Senator Barack Obama at a public forum on Wednesday at Harry S. Truman High School in Levittown, Pa., near Philadelphia.
Credit: Ruth Fremson/The New York Times

To counter opponents’ accusations that he lacks experience in foreign policy, Senator Barack Obama of Illinois often cites his ties to relatives in poor villages in Kenya and the years he spent growing up in Indonesia. Now he has added a new personal detail to that résumé: a trip to Pakistan while a college student.

Mr. Obama, the front-runner in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, made the disclosure Sunday night while speaking to supporters at a fund-raiser in San Francisco. His remarks, in which he poked fun at the utility of traditional foreign policy qualifications like government officials traveling abroad on fact-finding missions, were recorded and were quickly placed on the Web.

With the war in Iraq and Islamic terrorism among the top issues in the campaign, all three of the presidential contenders have sought to emphasize the value of their very different foreign policy credentials. Senator John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee, has often pointed to his military and combat experience, while Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton has emphasized her involvement in international and national security issues as both first lady and a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

But Mr. Obama has argued that his rivals’ longer official record is no substitute for his real-life grass-roots experience. “Foreign policy is the area where I am probably most confident that I know more and understand the world better than Senator Clinton and Senator McCain,” he said in his remarks in San Francisco.

“Experience in Washington is not knowledge of the world,” he continued, provoking laughter among those present. “This I know. When Senator Clinton brags, ‘I’ve met leaders from 80 countries,’ I know what those trips are like. I’ve been on them. You go from the airport to the embassy. There’s a group of children who do a native dance. You meet with the C.I.A. station chief and the embassy and they give you a briefing. You go take a tour of plant that” with “the assistance of Usaid has started something. And then, you go.”

During the speech, Mr. Obama also spoke about having traveled to Pakistan in the early 1980s. Because of that trip, which he did not mention in either of his autobiographical books, “I knew what Sunni and Shia was before I joined the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,” he said.

Over all, Mr. Obama’s remarks seemed directed primarily at his Democratic rival, Mrs. Clinton. But some of his digs, including the one about distinguishing Shias from Sunnis, also apply to Mr. McCain, whose campaign offered a sharp, mocking response to Mr. Obama’s claim to expertise.

“When John McCain travels on official business, he meets with presidents, prime ministers, foreign and defense ministers, members of parliament, human rights leaders, N.G.O.’s, business leaders and journalists so that he acquires a full understanding of the country he visits and the issues at stake in our relations,” said Mark Salter, a senior adviser to Mr. McCain. “Oh, and as Senator Obama may know, he has actually spent some time living abroad as well.”

Even more than a gap on specific policies, Mr. Obama and Mr. McCain’s respective positions represent a fundamental philosophical difference. Mr. Obama’s advisers argue that “there are multiple aspects to experience, each of which can be relevant.” Mr. Obama’s experience “provides a different kind of insight” than the traditional résumé, said Susan E. Rice, a former assistant secretary of state for African affairs and a National Security Council official who is one of Mr. Obama’s foreign policy advisers.

“At a time when our foreign policy and national security have so obviously suffered from a simplistic, black-and-white interpretation,” Ms. Rice added, having “an American president who spent part of his formative years and young adulthood living in a poor country under a dictatorship brings an understanding of the complexity of things that others may not have. I’m not saying that official travels and Congressional delegations are without value, but there are limits to what you can glean from that.”

Mr. Obama’s advisers acknowledge that there are gaps in his experience — he has never traveled to Latin America, for instance — but they maintain that the sound judgment they say he has demonstrated on foreign policy issues, like Iraq and Pakistan, where he wants the United States to distance itself from Gen. Pervez Musharraf, more than compensates for any such shortcomings.

According to his campaign staff, Mr. Obama visited Pakistan in 1981, on the way back from Indonesia, where his mother and half-sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng, were living. He spent “about three weeks” there, Mr. Obama’s press secretary, Bill Burton, said, staying in Karachi with the family of a college friend, Mohammed Hasan Chandoo, but also traveling to Hyderabad, in India.

Mr. Obama appears not to have previously cited his travel in Pakistan in speeches during the campaign. In “Dreams from My Father,” he talks of having a Pakistani roommate when he moved to New York, a man he calls Sadik who “had overstayed his tourist visa and now made a living in New York’s high-turnover, illegal immigrant work force, waiting on tables.”

Mr. Obama, the campaign and his publisher have not provided any details about the identity of Sadik.

During his years at Occidental College, Mr. Obama also befriended Wahid Hamid, a fellow student who was an immigrant from Pakistan and traveled with Mr. Obama there, the Obama campaign said. Mr. Hamid is now a vice president at Pepsico in New York, and according to public records, has donated the maximum $2,300 to the Obama campaign and is listed as a fund-raiser for it.

Mr. Chandoo is now a self-employed financial consultant, living in Armonk, N.Y. He has also donated the maximum, $2,300, to Mr. Obama’s primary campaign and an additional $309 for the general election, campaign finance records show.

A version of this article appears in print on , on page A18 of the New York edition with the headline: Obama Says Real-Life Experience Trumps Rivals’ Foreign Policy Credits. Order Reprints| Today’s Paper|Subscribe

[Johnny: I archived this because the New York Times took it down.  It shows conclusively that Barack Obama was/is a CIA asset.  American citizens were not allowed to travel to Pakistan during the turbulent 1980’s.]

In all the tales of wartime courage peppering John McCain’s presidential campaign trail, perhaps the most outstanding example of selfless heroism involves not the candidate but a humble Vietnamese peasant.

On October 26, 1967, Mai Van On ran from the safety of a bomb shelter at the height of an air raid and swam out into the lake where Lieutenant Commander McCain was drowning, tangled in his parachute cord after ejecting when his Skyhawk bomber was hit by a missile.

In an extraordinary act of compassion at a time when Vietnamese citizens were being killed by US aerial bombardments, he pulled a barely conscious McCain to the lake surface and, with the help of a neighbour, dragged him towards the shore.

And when a furious mob at the water’s edge began to beat and stab the captured pilot, Mr. On drove them back.

Nearly three decades later, a Vietnamese government commission confirmed he was indeed the rescuer and, in a 1996 meeting in Hanoi, McCain embraced and thanked Mr. On and presented him with a Senate memento.

From that brief encounter to his death at the age of 88 two years ago, Mr. On never heard from the senator again, and three years after their meeting, McCain published an autobiography that makes no mention of his apparent debt to Mr. On.

It is a snub Mr. On took to his death.

His widow, Bui Thi Lien, 71, said: “In his last years, my husband was very sad sometimes.

He would say, ‘Mr. McCain has forgotten me.’

“Mr. McCain would be dead if it weren’t for my husband. He would never have returned to his family and he wouldn’t be in the presidential race today.”

Last week on a visit to Britain to meet Gordon Brown, McCain paid tribute to the role played by British troops in Iraq and Afghanistan – comments that carried extra weight in the light of McCain’s own wartime exploits.

In his 1999 autobiography, Faith Of My Fathers, which laid the ground for his first, unsuccessful run for president in 2000, McCain wrote a Boy’s Own-style narrative of his rescue: “When I came to, I was being hauled ashore on two bamboo poles.

To the rescue: John McCain, lying on his back across a bamboo log, is saved by villagers – including Mai Van On – after his jet was shot down in 1967.

“A crowd of several hundred Vietnamese gathered around me as I lay dazed before them, shouting wildly at me, stripping my clothes off, spitting on me, kicking and striking me repeatedly.”

What followed, according to McCain, was five-and-a-half years of torture and brutal beatings as a prisoner of war – an account that has given a steely edge to his candidacy by establishing him as a true American war hero.

But the story is at odds with the version uncovered by Vietnam veteran Chuck Searcy, who lives in Hanoi and is in charge of the Vietnam Veteran Memorial Fund.

“In 1995, Mr. On gave me a letter he wanted me to deliver to McCain,” said Searcy.

“‘It said, ‘I am the guy who pulled you out of the lake and I have followed your progress over the years. I wish the best for you and your family and I hope some day you will be president of the United States.’

“I thought it was endearing. I sent the letter to McCain’s office and I got back a sniffy response from some assistant saying, ‘Mr. McCain isn’t interested in these fanciful stories.’“

Republican candidate John McCain met French President Nicholas Sarkozy this week.

Indeed, claiming to have saved McCain had by then become something of a cottage industry in Hanoi.

Searcy, 63, recalled: “There had been a lot of preposterous claims, but I asked the neighbours around the lake if it was true and they said that was exactly how it happened.”

The story was also confirmed by the Vietnamese government.

Later in 1995, Searcy met McCain at a veterans’ reunion in Washington.

He said: “I mentioned the story of Mr. On to him, and told him it was true. He said, ‘Hell, I would like to meet this guy – I’ll set it up.’“

McCain, then a senator closely involved in rebuilding US-Vietnam relations, visited Hanoi in 1996, and a meeting was arranged with Searcy and Mr. On.

Searcy said: “Mr. On was a wiry little guy. He looked as if he had only ever shaved once or twice and he had his old uniform on.

“He raced up to McCain and kept repeating his name as he embraced him.”

Then, through an interpreter, Mr. On recounted the events of that day as McCain listened.

“He launched into a very emotional description,” said Searcy.

“Suddenly they saw this parachute coming down into their small lake.

“Everybody was afraid because they knew it was an American pilot and they didn’t know what to do.

“He said he just instinctively grabbed this big bamboo log and threw it into the water and jumped in after it.

“One of his neighbours joined him and the two of them swam out to the parachute.

“Apparently McCain had broken both arms and one leg, and had sunk to the bottom, but they pulled him out of the lake.

“When they got to the bank, a couple of men attacked McCain, breaking his shoulder with a rifle butt and stabbing his leg, before Mr. On stopped them.

“That day, he saved McCain from drowning and then from maybe being killed by the mob.

“McCain listened but there was no dramatic response. He just nodded, said, ‘Thank you very much,’ and gave Mr. On a little Senate seal.

“It was the kind of thing you buy in the souvenir shop in the Senate basement.

“But Mr. On, to the day he died, treated it as if it were a Congressional Medal of Honour.”

But although McCain appeared to believe the story, it was one he would later seem to ignore in his autobiography and there was no more contact between the two men.

When Mr. On died in 2006, an email was apparently sent to McCain’s office requesting a message of condolence for the family. There was no response.

Whether or not McCain believed Mr. On is unclear.

But his refusal to acknowledge his heroism is likely to fuel other, more damaging allegations that McCain exaggerated elements of his PoW ordeal in Hoa Lo prison.

Phung Van Chung, 70, who was a Communist Party official at the time, claims McCain was quickly singled out for softer treatment, adding: “I found out he was the son of an American admiral, so the top people wanted to keep him as a live witness so they could use him for negotiations.”

Mr. On’s son-in-law, Nguyen Ngoc Toan, said: “Before he died, he told us not to sell the medal McCain gave him.

He said, ‘If any of the grandchildren ever go to America, having it might help them.’“

In 2000, McCain, by then a presidential candidate, visited the lake that almost claimed his life.

“His entourage was outside our house but Mr. McCain just passed by,” said Mr. On’s widow, who insists she bears no grudge.

Behind her calm words, however, lies an anxiety to right the injustice she feels her husband suffered.

As we prepared to leave she clutched my hand and said: “Please help us to remind Mr. McCain what my husband did.

“Just a few words will be enough to let the family know that he is grateful.”

Additional reporting: William Lowther, in Washington

Is Bill Gates a Closet Liberal?
Andrew Leonard
30 January 1998
Salon.com

In 1997, Bill Gates contributed $35,000 in support of a Washington state ballot initiative supporting gun control.  In 1993, he ponied up $80,000 to fight a conservative initiative seeking to roll back state taxes.  And ever since 1994, the William H. Gates III Foundation, Bill’s private philanthropic funnel, has been busy channeling millions to groups that specialize in “reproductive health and family planning.”

…Bill Gates has always enjoyed a singularly apolitical reputation…

…his struggle with the federal government has been adopted as a cause célèbre by many Net-based libertarians.

…Look at the personal checkbook record: pro taxes, pro birth control, against guns.  The evidence is clear …

…His own father, Bill Gates Sr., who administers the approximately $300 million William H. Gates III Foundation, summed up the situation most succinctly: “If you think you’re going to get me to characterize what he does as liberal or conservative, you’re crazy.”  Bill Jr.’s politics are not for public consumption…

…Gates’ more grandiose gestures — $20 million for a computer center here, $12 million for a biotechnology building there and a whopping $200 million for wiring up rural libraries to the Internet — get the headlines.  But his smaller philanthropic statements give us the few clues we have to what Gates, the man…

…Sure, Bill Gates has given away close to $600 million.  But more than 90 percent of that sum has been disbursed since 1994, and more than half the total was given away in 1997 alone.

1994, incidentally, was the year Bill Gates’ mother, Mary Gates, died of breast cancer…

…Hardly a soul in the wired world can have escaped hearing the much-ballyhooed pledge from Bill and Melinda Gates to spend $200 million over the next five years on library Internet access.  Less well publicized has been Bill’s 1997 gift of $115 million worth of Microsoft stock to the Gates Foundation, which has brought the total endowment of the foundation up to around $300 million.  After a slow start, the foundation gave away some $40 million in 1997, a big jump from 1996’s $6.5 million…

$1 million to Ursuline Academy¹ in Dallas (where his wife, Melinda French Gates, was high school valedictorian)…²

The big-ticket donations do not come without associated waves of skepticism from Gates’ stable of critics.  That $12 million grant for the new biotech building at the University of Washington?  Just the price tag necessary to lure a star biotech professor to the Seattle area, where he can serve as Gates’ informal advisor on biotech investments.  Last year’s $20 million pledge (through the Gates Foundation) to Cambridge University for a new computing center?  A fine way to keep a close eye on one of the world’s most illustrious centers for cryptography research — and an investment sure to pay huge dividends as digital security becomes ever more paramount.  And that oh-so-noble deal to wire up the libraries?  An insidious scheme: Hook the poor kids on the Net, and then make sure that they’re all using Internet Explorer as the browser of choice.  Future generations of Microsoft market domination will be assured.

No businessman as famous for being as ultra-competitive as Bill Gates can ever escape cynical accusations that his every move is motivated by greed.  Nor should he.  But the smaller details of Gates’ giving lead us to a different truth…  The groups that the Gates Foundation is giving money to have close ideological and organizational ties with [“]pro-choice[”] bastions like Planned Parenthood.  Religious right zealots are already beginning to pay attention…³

The first overtly political statement on the Bill Gates balance sheet is his $80,000 contribution to a coalition working against the passage of Washington state ballot initiative 602…

The anti-602 campaign was victorious.  Gates’ next foray into initiative politics met with less success.  Initiative 676, a handgun safety bill in 1997 that would have increased licensing and training requirements for new handgun purchasers, went down to overwhelming defeat…

…Joe Waldron, chairman of WeCARE, a coalition of anti-gun control activists that led the local opposition to 676, refused to speculate.

“I don’t want to put it in those terms,” said Waldron.  “It’s like kicking Superman in the kneecap: You can do it, but you may not like the consequences.”…

…And there is absolutely no evidence of Gatesian financial support for measures that could be considered “conservative” in a political sense…

…After all, his own father contributed $150,000 to support Initiative 676 — more than four times as much he did…

Ultimately, separating out what is attributable to the parents and what to the son may be pointless.  It’s a joint venture.  Nothing better illustrates that fact than the William H. Gates III Foundation.

Gates Jr. created the foundation in 1994, the same year his mother died of breast cancer…

Bill Gates Sr., with the part-time help of one private secretary, administers the foundation from the comfort of his home.  It is, he said, “the thing that occupies the largest percentage of my time.”

The foundation does not accept unsolicited requests for funding nor does it give out grant-giving guidelines.  But a review of its tax returns, which are public record, reveal some clear points of social concern…

…$10,000 for [“]refugee relief[”]…  But the third and smallest group, medium-sized donations, stands out: They’re the only ones with political import.

The Gates Foundation has given $750,000 over three years to the Seattle-based PATH (Program for Appropriate Technology in Health) — funding that has in part been used for such work as “a quality assurance survey of contraceptives in 22 countries.”  The Alan Guttmacher Institute received $1 million over three years for “an international examination of issues facing young women around the world.”  And finally, most recently, the Department of Population Dynamics at Johns Hopkins University received $2.3 million for an array of programs aimed at training international specialists in “reproductive health and family planning.”

“Reproductive health and family planning” is a buzz phrase that emerged out of the 1994 United Nations Cairo conference on population issues, said Dr. Gordon Perkin, president of PATH.  In the past, the research topic used to be referred to as “population control” — though, said Dr. Perkin, “the words ‘population control’ are not used any more, except by people who don’t know the field.”

Billionaires have always had a fond spot in their hearts for population control: Ted Turner is a big supporter, as is Warren Buffett, a Gates family friend…

But whatever you call it — “population control” or “family planning” — this isn’t just a billionaire fad for the Gates family.

“Bill Gates Sr. has been deeply involved in this issue for decades,” says Laurie S. Zabin, a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health.  Zabin, who served with Gates Sr. on the national board of Planned Parenthood, was instrumental in getting the Gates Foundation grant for Johns Hopkins.

But that doesn’t mean Gates Sr. is the only one who cares about overpopulation, said Zabin: Gates Jr. “has supported issues of real social concern and certainly this is one of them.”…

A “proclivity fit” is one way to put it.  Or one could surmise that Bill Gates is growing up to be the man his parents raised him to be…

…So far, he has loosened the reins on a mere fraction of his massive bank account…

FULL ARTICLE HERE