In slang, a Mickey Finn (or simply a Mickey) is a drink laced with an incapacitating agent, particularly chloral hydrate, given to someone without their knowledge with the intent to incapacitate them or “knock them out”; hence the colloquial name knockout drops.  Serving someone a “Mickey” is most commonly referred to as “slipping someone a mickey”.^[1] ~ Wikipedia

PAYWALL WARNING: The fraud that is “journalism” is played this way—that which is useless or near-useless (or even malignant) is openly available.  That which is of moderate utility in admitting some truths is both paywalled and comes in as top recommendations by aggregators such as CIA-hatched “Google”.  I have ameliorated some of this by archiving as many of them as I could but far-Left CIA propaganda outlets like the New York Times (which extorts me with a “subscription”) has tech that still abbreviates its articles even when archived.  If you need a source or citation, contact me and I’ll find a way to get it to you.

No time to read this massive article?  —Let Johnny do it for you!  (ADULT LANGUAGE WARNING)

It’s June of 2002.  Anita Busch had a blooming career writing about the banalities of Hollywood.  Her substanceless distractions were promoted by the biggest publications: the New York Times, the appropriately-named Vanity Fair, the Los Angeles Times and Henry Luce’s Time.¹

But then everything came to a screeching “STOP”.

Busch had found her car windshield shattered (possibly by gunshot), a dead fish with a rose in its mouth on the vehicle (dutifully placed in a pan) and a cardboard note with the single word “STOP”.

Busch had been following up on the story of Mafia connections to action-film actor Steven Seagal through his ex-producer Julius R. “Jules” Nasso.

A Hollywood reporter had a dead fish on her car?  This was clearly a “Federal case”!

In the reems of information that has subsequently been written about all of this, no-one puts much effort into the shining moment when it was obvious that “local law enforcement” in Los Angeles and Beveryly Hills needed to step aside for the Federal Bureau of Investigation.  Presumably it includes the words “wiretapping” and “racketeering”.

Trafficking of narcotics?  Corruption?  Human trafficking of women and children?  Mass murder?  These paled in comparison and the FBI dedicated top resources into solving the crime.

Enter serial con-man Daniel Patterson.

Patterson, a 64-year-old grandfather of 11, is the snitch who provided information that led investigators to raid Pellicano’s West Hollywood office at the outset of the FBI’s probe of the private investigator.  That search resulted in the seizure of two hand grenades and a military grade C-4 plastic explosive, and led to Pellicano’s subsequent plea to federal weapons charges (for which he was sentenced to 30 months in prison). ~ The Smoking Gun

“Pellicano”…that’s Italian Roman Catholic Private Investigator Anthony Joseph Pellicano, Senior², better known throughout Los Angeles at this time as “The Hollywood Fixer”.

If the rich and shameless had a problem, they went to The Fixer—and he fixed it for them…for a hefty fee, of course.

On this 106-degree summer day [Published 07 August 2011], Pellicano has agreed to his first sit-down interview since going to prison in 2008.  His case has long since disappeared from the front pages, replaced lately by the News of the World quagmire that has tarred Rupert Murdoch, David Cameron, and Scotland Yard.  The way Pellicano sees it, the British phone-hacking scandal is kid stuff.  “I was way ahead of my time,” he says.  What’s the big deal about some tabloid hijacking Hugh Grant’s voicemails?  “If Murdoch’s name wasn’t involved, would there be a story?  If someone wiretapped Britney Spears, no one would care.  The story is, did Murdoch know people were doing this?  Did he condone it?  I strongly believe he had no idea.”

Pellicano claims never to have lent his services to any of Murdoch’s newspapers, and says he met the mogul only once, “but it had to do with Judith Regan,” his former longtime friend, who was fired from News Corp.’s HarperCollins in 2006.  (Regan says she never introduced the two men.)  “If News of the World called,” he says hypothetically, “I would ask the editor, ‘Why would you want me to do that?  Are you stupid?!’  The guy at News of the World was just getting leads for stories.”  Pellicano boasts that “I was the top of the ladder.  Just to talk to me it cost $25,000.  These guys were stringers who worked with reporters to try to get information on a celebrity!” …

Before the convict was cooling his heels with more than 1,700 other inmates here in Big Spring, his milieu was the liposuctioned underbelly of Hollywood Babylon.  “If you saw the stuff I found in celebrity homes: cocaine, heroin, Ecstasy, vials of narcotics.  There was a doctor shooting up celebrities with morphine for $350.”  His job was to keep the lid on such indiscretions.  He liked to boast that he lived by omerta, the Mafia code of silence.  “When you are my client, you become my family,” he says, and his clan included Michael Jackson, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Farrah Fawcett, Kevin Costner, Courtney Love, Chris Rock, and über-agent Michael Ovitz, just to name a few.  “That was the attitude I kept.  I wasn’t really a P.I.  I was a problem solver.  People came to me because they had a problem.  The government wanted me to turn on them.” ~ Newsweek

In 2019, the New York Times would add this to the Pellicano resumé:

He wiretapped the actors Sylvester Stallone and Keith Carradine, and did work on behalf of Chris Rock and Courtney Love, among many others.  He conducted an illegal criminal background check on Garry Shandling, threatened a journalist and, according to testimony at his trial, even offered to have a producer murdered, his body buried in the desert.  He had been behind bars since 2003. ~ The New York Times

The “producer” not mentioned, here, by the New York Times, was none other than taxation dissident and staunch Libertarian (extremely rare qualities in Hollywood) Aaron Russo.

A hedge fund manager and art collector from New York testified under immunity Tuesday that Anthony Pellicano, the Hollywood private detective accused of wiretapping and racketeering, had once offered to have a movie producer killed for him.

Adam D. Sender, the owner of Exis Capital³, a hedge fund that at one point had more than $1 billion in assets, said in Federal District Court here that he had paid Mr. Pellicano about $500,000 to investigate Aaron Russo, a producer and onetime talent manager whose film credits included “Trading Places.”  Mr. Russo died of cancer last year.⁴

In 1999, Mr. Sender invested $1.1 million with Mr. Russo.  Later, Mr. Sender sued Mr. Russo, accusing him of pocketing the money.  Mr. Russo dodged process servers for more than a year, until Mr. Pellicano was brought into the case at the urging of Mr. Sender’s new lawyer, Bert Fields.⁵  (Mr. Sender said he paid Mr. Fields’s firm about $300,000, but recovered only $25,000 from Mr. Russo.)

Mr. Sender testified Tuesday that Mr. Pellicano had wiretapped Mr. Russo for a year and had played recordings of Mr. Russo’s intercepted phone calls for him 10 or 15 times.  But Mr. Pellicano grew sick of listening to Mr. Russo⁶, Mr. Sender said.  And, in a “frightening” moment in the garden of Mr. Sender’s mansion in Bel-Air, he said, Mr. Pellicano suggested killing Mr. Russo.

Mr. Pellicano said that “if I wanted to, I could basically authorize him” to have Mr. Russo “murdered on the way back from Las Vegas,” Mr. Sender testified.  “He would have someone follow him back, drive him off the road and bury his body somewhere in the desert.”  Mr. Sender said he had declined.

On cross-examination, Mr. Pellicano, acting as his own lawyer and speaking of himself in the third person, seemed more concerned with getting his own words right than with disputing Mr. Sender’s account.  He does not face any charges related to Mr. Sender’s statements. ~ The New York Times

Of course the FBI and Federal Prosecutors weren’t interested in a man who offered to have a high-profile tax dissident murdered—a dead fish was placed on a Hollywood reporter’s car.

In an interview with The Smoking Gun, Patterson explained how the FBI used him to connect dots to Pellicano but also stated he had little regard for government “law enforcement”.

Patterson told TSG, “I really don’t like government a whole hell of a lot.  I think that they misuse their influence.  And I believe that they’re probably the biggest crooks out there.”  His second federal conviction, Patterson explained, was “a typical government set up.”  And as for Daniel Saunders—lead prosecutor on the Pellicano case and the government lawyer who handled Patterson’s own most recent felony conviction—he had a similarly sharp opinion, recalling that he once said Saunders “had a propensity for lying.”

Patterson’s value to investigators lies solely in the fact that he literally got them in Pellicano’s door.  He did this by surreptitiously recording a series of meetings—four of which occurred in Patterson’s own home—with Pellicano pal Alexander Proctor, a career criminal who trafficked large quantities of heroin, cocaine, and Ecstasy, and was tied to Russian organized crime figures.  Those tapes, which Patterson made with an FBI digital recorder in his shirt pocket, formed the basis for the “probable cause” that allowed investigators to raid Pellicano’s office.  Though attacked by defense counsel, the validity of that crucial search warrant has been upheld in court.

In those sessions, Patterson, with the FBI’s guidance, deftly steered Proctor, 63, through lengthy conversations about his kilo-weight narcotics deals, which involved frequent drug runs to Mexico and a Southern California supplier named Javier.  In one conversation, Patterson told Proctor that he had someone who could “move some shit if Javier could come up with a couple [of kilos].”  Realizing that Patterson was new to cocaine trafficking, Proctor carefully explained the proper procedures for a successful transaction.  “I get the sense you’re not used to drug dealing,” Proctor said, adding helpfully that Patterson “could be easily fooled in a drug deal.”

Proctor, however, was the one being hoodwinked.

The veteran drug trafficker, who was introduced to Patterson by a Russian mob associate, apparently fell victim to his acquaintance’s unassuming, folksy way.  A former business associate who told TSG that Patterson fleeced him of more than $100,000 marveled at Patterson’s “gift of gab,” remarking that the convicted felon had an uncanny ability to separate people from their money.

Patterson cost Proctor his liberty.  Faced with damaging admissions on the FBI tapes—and evidence subsequently gathered via a search of his 1988 Acura Legend—Proctor pleaded to a felony charge of possession with intent to distribute heroin.  He was sentenced to ten years in prison, from which he is scheduled to be released in July 2011. ~ The Smoking Gun

Though Patterson had little regard for the “Justice System”, getting caught repeatedly conducting audacious swindles forced him into a corner.  The FBI was more-than-pleased to cut a deal.

As with many confidential witnesses and informants, self-preservation was a primary motive for Patterson’s cooperation with the FBI.  He is a thrice-convicted felon who most recently pleaded guilty to federal fraud charges stemming from his role in a scheme to swindle gold and platinum from several manufacturers.  Though he entered his plea 4-1/2 years ago, Patterson has yet to be sentenced in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles.  His sentencing, now scheduled for December 10, has been postponed nine times during that period.  While the fraud conviction could land him in prison for several years, Patterson is likely to escape with a greatly reduced sentence—perhaps even just probation—due to his extensive work with the government.

That cooperation was prompted by his arrest for a rather audacious scheme to swindle precious metals from several manufacturing firms.  Using an assortment of aliases, forged documents, counterfeit checks, and his very convincing telephone manner, Patterson and his fellow bandits succeeded in conning two companies out of $615,000 worth of gold and platinum products.  So where does a crook fence gold wire and sheet?  Patterson & Co. opted for a pawn shop in Pacoima in the San Fernando Valley. ~ The Smoking Gun

Movies With Three Names

Did Steven Seagal hire Anthony Pellicano to strong-arm Anita Busch?  Was Julius Nasso and the East Coast Mafia involved?

As far as the government was concerned, their only targets were Pellicano and the thugs he used to leave messages.

A man charged with threatening a Los Angeles Times reporter who was researching the relationship between Steven Seagal and an alleged Mafia associate told an informant for the FBI that Seagal was behind the threat, according to court documents.

Alexander Proctor, a 59-year-old ex-convict charged with threatening reporter Anita Busch, allegedly told the informant during secretly recorded conversations that he had been hired to carry out the threat by Anthony Pellicano, known as the private detective to the stars.

According to the FBI, Proctor told the informant that Seagal had hired Pellicano to threaten the reporter.

“He wanted to make it look like the Italians were putting the hit on her so it wouldn’t reflect on Seagal,” Proctor told the informant, according to a search warrant affidavit filed by an FBI agent assigned to the case.

On Thursday, more than a dozen FBI agents searched Pellicano’s West Hollywood office.  An FBI spokesman, Matt McLaughlin, said Pellicano had been arrested in connection with what appeared to be explosive materials discovered in his office during the search. …

According to court documents, Proctor told the informant that he owed Pellicano $14,000 and agreed to intimidate Busch for $10,000.  But after the job was done, Proctor said, “they” were so pleased with his work that Pellicano agreed to wipe out his remaining debt.

Proctor allegedly told the informant that he was supposed to “blow up” Busch’s car as a warning so she would stop reporting on the story about Seagal.  But he said it would have been too difficult to set her car ablaze, because she lived near an apartment complex.

He said Busch also had a neighbor who stayed up late at night, and he was apparently afraid he would be seen.

In the end, Proctor allegedly told the informant that he bought the fish and rose and placed them on Busch’s car, putting a bullet hole in the windshield and taping the cardboard sign to it.

After Busch’s car was vandalized, she told authorities she thought the incident was related to her investigative work on an article about Seagal and his former producing partner, Julius Nasso, who had a bitter business fallout with the film star.

According to federal authorities, Nasso is an associate of the Gambino crime family.  He was indicted earlier this year, along with other reputed mob figures, in connection with a plot to extort money from Seagal.  He has pleaded not guilty.  Seagal is scheduled to testify next year as a prosecution witness at the trials of several alleged mobsters and Nasso in Brooklyn.

Last month, Nasso’s attorney alleged in a court document that Seagal might have been involved in the threat against Busch, and that could reflect on the actor’s credibility as a witness.

Proctor’s taped statements to the informant are detailed in a 21-page application for a search warrant.  Investigators requested court permission to search Proctor’s residence, but a judge denied the request 17 Oct. [2002], a day after Proctor’s arrest.  There is no indication in the documents why the request was rejected.  One source said there was technical language that needed to be fixed before the judge would approve it. ~ The Los Angeles Times

The reticence of the government to search Alexander Proctor’s residence is interesting given that, once the FBI had a warrant to enter Anthony Pellicano’s office, they took everything that wasn’t nailed down and then came back with claw hammers to get that, too.

For the last two years, FBI computer specialists have been combing through the equivalent of nearly 2 billion double-spaced pages of text, enough to fill 245 rooms measuring 10-by-12-by-10 feet.

Those computer files were seized during a raid on the Sunset Strip offices of famed private detective Anthony Pellicano.  Also confiscated were two hand grenades and a quantity of C4 plastic explosives, resulting in a 30-month federal prison sentence for Pellicano.

Although the contents of the files have not been disclosed, they may be relevant to a pending federal wiretapping probe involving Pellicano, a number of rogue police officers and some big-name entertainment lawyers.

If so, that investigation could be significantly affected when a three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decides on a request by Pellicano’s lawyers to declare the search illegal, suppress the seized evidence and overturn his conviction.

A hearing is set for Thursday in Pasadena, but any ruling could be months away.

In legal briefs filed with the court, defense attorney Donald Re charged that the warrant authorizing the search and seizure was unconstitutionally overbroad, requiring FBI agents to examine every file, regardless of relevance.

“Effectively, there was no limitation on what was seized, reviewed, read and maintained by the government,” Re said.  “Every business file, personal file, irrelevant musing on the computers was taken and reviewed in detail.  This warrant gave the government carte blanche to seize and examine everything, and that is precisely what they did.” ~ The Los Angeles Times

Even more interesting, the government case against Alexander Proctor was dropped for “lack of evidence” (and lack of trying).  One might almost draw the conclusion that the purpose of the raid was for the FBI to help themselves to a veritable treasure-trove of dirt on Hollywood and beyond.

Proctor was charged with violating the Hobbs Act, the federal extortion statute, but prosecutors were forced to drop that case after concluding that the incident did not add up to a crime under the law.  The matter was referred to the district attorney’s office, where it remains.

Pellicano was never charged in that episode.  However, he was indicted and ultimately pleaded guilty to illegally possessing two military-style hand grenades and some plastic explosives that were discovered in a safe during the FBI search of his office.

In his court papers, defense lawyer Re said U.S. District Judge Dickran Tevrizian, who presided over the weapons case, should have suppressed the evidence used to convict Pellicano because the search was illegal.

FBI Agent Stanley Ornellas, who oversaw the court-authorized seizure, said at the time, “This represents the most data the Computer Analysis Response Team has ever seen in a single case since its formation in 1994.”

Assistant U.S. attorneys Daniel Saunders and Kevin Lally, who are heading the Pellicano investigation, contended in their legal briefs that the search was proper.

Although the FBI agents were authorized to seize all computers and data-storage devices in Pellicano’s office, the search warrant specifically directed them to look for documents that might link Pellicano to Proctor, Seagal, Busch or Ned Zeman, a Vanity Fair writer who also claimed to have been threatened, the prosecutors wrote.

What counts, they argued, is not the volume of material seized but whether search targets were spelled out in sufficient detail.

Even if, for argument’s sake, the warrant was flawed, it still was valid, according to the prosecutors, because the FBI agents relied in good faith on the decision of an independent judge who approved the search.

Re countered, however, that the good-faith rule didn’t apply in this case because the violation was so egregious. ~ The Los Angeles Times

The Seagal-Nasso co-operative is tabloid fare for sure, and such sensationalism is meat and potatoes for “Grunge”:

Steven Seagal has faced a great many challenges on his lifelong quest to become the biggest Steven Seagal to ever Steven Seagal, and quite a few of them have been of his own making.  He has been a historically awful Saturday Night Live host.  He has made horrible movies.  After making a flippant challenge, he was once (allegedly) choked out by martial arts master Gene LeBell so hard that he soiled himself.  Sylvester Stallone has recounted a story about Seagal talking smack about Jean-Claude Van Damme, and subsequently fleeing the scene when the furious Muscles from Brussels challenged him in a fight.  Oh, and multiple women have alleged that he has a habit of being … less than tactful with the ladies, which has caused more than one famous actress to outright flee their auditions with him.

However, Seagal once faced a force that was far more dangerous and criminal than he ever was: the Mafia. …

As CBS News and Ralph Blumenthal of the New York Times tell us, a legal case between Seagal and his producer, Julius R. Nasso, revealed that the bad blood between the two had led to the producer sending the Gambino family to shake down the actor, old school style.  As Staten Island Advance notes, Nasso and Seagal had been on perfectly fine terms for 15 successful years, but the relationship turned sour at the turn of the millennium, with the actor allegedly owing around $500,000 to Nasso.

Things came to a head when mafia types ordered Seagal to step into a car, and drove him to a Brooklyn restaurant, where an alleged Gambino captain called Anthony Ciccone had a little talk with him, ordering the movie star to resume his working relationship with Nasso — and to pay a cool $150,000 for every film he’d made with the producer.  The aikido star says that after Nasso and the mob paid him another visit in his L.A. home, he ended up paying $700,000. ~ Grunge

Seagal’s father was Russian Jew, a connection that Vladimir Putin is quite proud of (despite Russia’s less-than-stellar record on “Antisemitism”).  And yet, Seagal’s connection to Italian Catholic “Jules” Nasso was as a “distant cousin”.  The attachment to Putin should’ve been the more dangerous of the two but it was quite the reverse!

The Los Angeles Times gave the salacious story a much more professional and precise turn.  Why not?  These were world events anyone willing to pay needed to read!

The Mafia captain who rules the Staten Island waterfront threatened to kill an entertainment figure, identified previously as actor Steven Seagal, as part of a multimillion-dollar extortion scheme, federal prosecutors alleged Tuesday in court in Brooklyn.

Anthony “Sonny” Ciccone “demanded millions of dollars from this individual and threatened his life,” Assistant U.S. Atty. Andrew Genser said at a court hearing for the accused Gambino family docks boss, whose relatives and supporters wept and muttered from the courtroom benches as he was ordered held without bail pending trial on wide-ranging racketeering charges.

Ciccone, 67, was among 17 alleged Gambino higher-ups, soldiers and “associates” arrested last week under an indictment charging them mostly with plots to exert influence over the local waterfronts and the longshore workers union.

But prosecutors said electronic surveillance in the case also uncovered evidence that Ciccone and two others, including Seagal’s former producing partner, Julius R. “Jules” Nasso, were attempting to extort money from an “entertainment figure.”

Nasso, 49, of Staten Island, had a 15-year business relationship with Seagal until a bitter falling-out and filed a $60-million lawsuit against the actor in March, alleging that the star of films such as “Under Siege” had backed out of a contract to perform in four movies. …

The indictment alleged that the extortion scheme against the unnamed entertainment figure ran from September 2000 to last month and involved “wrongful use of actual and threatened force, violence and fear.”

Previously released documents alleged that Ciccone once was overheard instructing Nasso to demand $150,000 per film from the actor. …

Prosecutors have said that Ciccone became a “powerful captain” in the mob family during the rule of John Gotti, the “Dapper Don” who died Monday, then continued to serve under Gotti’s brother Peter, who also has been indicted in the current case. ~ The Los Angeles Times

It would appear that Grunge was a little grimy on the details: “Sonny” Ciccone was claiming that, since Seagal walked out on Nasso without fulfilling the promise of four more movies with three-name titles, Seagal would have to do the four and pay Nasso $150,000 for each.

Is Steven Seagal a tough-guy who would just as soon break your elbow, or rip your throat out, as look at you or is he a Mafia groupie who panders his sagging notoriety for access to real-life Dons?

The Gambinos will tell you he is the latter.

Seagal also has been granted limited immunity for his testimony, according to defense lawyers who were studying the government documents Friday [7 February 2003].

The actor’s own lawyer, Martin Pollner, would not confirm the deal, under which anything Seagal says cannot be used against him if he is subsequently charged with a crime other than perjury. …

Federal investigators have said they discovered the extortion plot against the actor by chance, through wiretaps and bugs used in their latest attempt to curtail mob influence along the docks.  The charges involving Seagal take up only two of the 67 counts in the indictment unsealed last June and stem from his longtime partnership with pharmacist-turned-producer Julius R. Nasso.

While the pair worked together on such films as “Out for Justice” (1991) and “Under Siege” (1992), Seagal sometimes lived in the guest house beside Nasso’s waterfront Staten Island mansion.  But their relationship soured in 2000, and Nasso allegedly complained to an old friend, Anthony “Sonny” Ciccone, that the actor was reneging on a deal to make four more films together and owed him a lot of money.

Prosecutor Whelan described Ciccone, 68, as the Gambino crime family’s captain who “has been dominating these piers for the last 20 years.”  Though Nasso and his brother are also charged in the attempted extortion of Seagal, their cases were severed from those of the core defendants currently on trial: Ciccone and three of his crew, along with three Gottis, including Peter Gotti, who prosecutors say took control of the crime family following the imprisonment of his brother, “Dapper Don” John Gotti, who died last year. …

During defense opening statements, Ciccone’s lawyer, George Santangelo, called the actor a “pathological liar” who cried “intimidation” whenever he owed somebody money.

Barry Levin, a Long Island lawyer representing Nasso’s brother … said the defense will hammer at the actor about “his ability to be truthful or not, ‘Did you tell people you were a CIA agent?’”  The defense lawyers said they also want to ask Seagal whether he was behind a threat against a Los Angeles Times reporter investigating his relationship with Nasso and the mob.  In the FBI reports, they said, Seagal denies having anything to do with a June incident in which the windshield of reporter Anita M. Busch’s car was vandalized and a dead fish left on it.

The defense lawyers have tried to brand Seagal a “mob nut” who initiated contacts with men like Ciccone. ~ The Los Angeles Times

Was Seagal innocently “Marked For Death” or was he playing an arrogant game with the government, knowing that he was insulated from prosecution?

Not long ago, Steven Seagal was one of the best-paid action stars in Hollywood.  The martial arts master played crime-busting anti-heroes in films that generated more than $1 billion in ticket and DVD sales during the 1990s.

Now he appears in low-budget productions that go straight to video.

Seagal says he knows why: Five years ago, he was implicated in a plot to frighten two journalists out of writing unflattering stories about him and his former business partner.

An FBI affidavit detailed allegations that Seagal hired private eye Anthony Pellicano to terrorize one of the reporters, a freelancer working for the Los Angeles Times.

The investigation soon changed course, focusing on allegations that Pellicano spied on celebrities and other members of the Hollywood elite.  The onetime detective-to-the-stars is in federal prison, awaiting trial on wire-tapping and other charges.

Seagal and the alleged plot to intimidate journalists became a footnote.  The actor was never charged, and federal authorities have privately told reporters they have no persuasive evidence against him.  But the FBI has never publicly cleared him.

Seagal said the publicity has been devastating to his career.  He wants an apology.

“False FBI accusations fueled thousands of articles saying that I terrorize journalists and associate with the Mafia,” Seagal, 56, said recently in his first public comments on the case.  “These kinds of inflammatory allegations scare studio heads and independent producers — and kill careers.”

Laura Eimiller, an FBI spokeswoman, said she could not comment on Seagal’s demand for an apology or on questions about the case.  They “relate to an ongoing investigation which we are not at liberty to discuss,” she said. ~ The Los Angeles Times

The Anita Busch incident wasn’t the only one.  The FBI took two sworn affidavits regarding two separate intimidations but seemed only interested in using them to get a judge to allow the confiscation of Anthony Pellicano’s snooping treasure.

A second affidavit filed by Ornellas under seal in federal court in November 2002 repeated the allegations about Seagal’s involvement in the threat against Busch.  The new affidavit also implicated Seagal in a separate threat against a writer for Vanity Fair magazine who was also working on an article on the actor.  The writer, Ned Zeman, had reported that an unidentified man had pointed a gun at him and said: “Stop!”  The affidavit said a source had told Ornellas the man was John Rottger, a former Navy SEAL and longtime friend of Seagal.

The affidavit did not lay out corroborating evidence for these assertions.  Its purpose was to show that there was probable cause to justify a search of Pellicano’s Sunset Boulevard office.

Based on the affidavit, a judge granted a search warrant, and on 21 Nov. 2002, more than a dozen FBI agents searched Pellicano’s office. ~ The Los Angeles Times

To date, the Federal Bureau of Instigation has not apologized to Steven Seagal…unless it was for the under-performing of “Half Past Dead”.

Sittin’ On The Dock Of The Bay

What of Julius R.⁷ Nasso, Senior⁸?

It turns out that our buddy “Jules” (always surrounded by his friends, Joey Bananas and Two-Fingers Tony) put himself on the map selling drugs—legal drugs.

His “first love” is pharmakia—pharmakia that he can sell to cruise ships.  The fact that the Gambino family runs the docks where the cruise ships come in has no bearing on Mr. Nasso’s success…really!

He may not have had the artistic impact of the composer Charles Ives and the poet Wallace Stevens, both versatile executives who juggled careers in insurance and the arts, but Julius R. Nasso’s dual career has a similarly diverse flair.

Mr. Nasso runs Universal Marine Medical Supplies, which he has built into the world’s largest distributor of pharmaceuticals to ships, while helping produce action films like “Hard to Kill” and “Out for Justice.”

The 36-year-old Brooklyn-based entrepreneur is quick to describe himself as “still a novice” in the movie business.  But Hollywood has been impressed by Mr. Nasso’s drive to master the nitty-gritty details of film production. ~ The New York Times

The year of this spotlight from the “Sulzberger-managed” New York Times is 1991—a full decade before the fireworks were lit on the other coast.

—and the Jews producing Hollywood⁹ were “impressed” with “Mr. Nasso”…or else!

“Jules is not looking for thanks or just to make money,” said Arnold Kopelson, the Academy Award-winning producer of “Out for Justice,” who relied heavily on Mr. Nasso for production of the portion of the film made in Brooklyn.¹⁰  “I have no doubt he will go on to do very important things in the film industry.”

A short, down-to-earth¹¹ son of Italian immigrants who brought him to Brooklyn when he was 2, Mr. Nasso betrays more excitement when talking about movies but insists that pharmacy remains his first love.  “If you told me I absolutely had to walk away from one or the other, I’d give up films,” Mr. Nasso said.  Indeed, Mr. Nasso frets that publicity about his growing involvement with movies might compromise his customers’ confidence in him as a businessman and registered pharmacist. ~ The New York Times

And yet, “Mr. Nasso” and his friends were equally “fretting” if he wasn’t getting publicity.

“Jules” learned pharmacy from the Vincentian Fathers of Roman Catholic Saint John’s in New York City.

Always the opportunist, “Jules” has exploited fads as far and wide as vitamin supplements¹² to Cabbage Patch Kids.

In 1976, Julius graduated from St. John’s University with a Bachelor of Science degree in pharmacy.  He then earned an advanced Doctor of Pharmacy degree from the University of Connecticut.  While attending college in 1974, he founded Universal Marine Medical Supply. Co. (UMMSC), which is now the largest international medical supply company servicing cruise ships, oil rigs, super yachts, merchant vessels, tankers, and freighters.  Julius is currently CEO of UMMSC. which maintains offices in New York, Miami, Southampton England, Singapore, Athens Greece, Perth Australia and Shanghai China.  Julius was listed in Best Startup Magazine as one of the US’ Top 101 CEO’s in the pharmaceutical space (2023).

In 1977, Julius, founder and CEO, formed Tishcon Corporation with his college professor Dr. Satish Patel.  Today Tishcon stands as one of the nation’s largest private labeling vitamin and health supplement manufacturing plants, headquartered in Westbury, New York.

In 1978, along with Xavier Roberts¹³, he capitalized on the worldwide Cabbage Patch craze by opening the Cabbage Patch Babyland General Hospital Store, formerly located on 41^st Street and 5^th Avenue in Manhattan.  At Babyland General Hospital Julius met Steve Ross, then CEO of Time Warner, who became instrumental in Julius’ acquisition of an overall production deal at Warner Brothers Studios in Burbank, California.

In 1980 while continuing his career in pharmaceutical distribution, Julius accepted a position as a personal assistant to director Sergio Leone.  Under Leone, Julius worked on the New York portion of Once Upon a Time in America (1984) and participated in the development of two films: In God’s Name¹⁴ and Saint Peter’s Banker¹⁵.  Under Sergio Leone’s guidance, Julius began to attend courses and seminars in film production at Cinecitta Studios in Rome, Italy. ~ Julius R. Nasso Productions

As a quick aside, my friend Shannon Rowan is working on a devastating exposé detailing how “supplements” and “vitamins” are a vicious scam designed to trap anyone putting effort into pulling themselves out of the sickness and death that is our food and the medical-industrial complex.

Brilliantly, Shannon has discovered that the Godfather of “vitamins”, Frederick Gowland Hopkins (1861-1947), was a Royal Society Freemason with a Jesuit in his family tree.

But does it get any more ironic than a native Italian Catholic in New York City who used pharmaceuticals to launch a career in Hollywood?  Perhaps no more ironic than “Mr. Nasso” keeping a model of the Titanic in his office while he sets up his next “Buy my drugs or else…” phone call.

There is a hint of Mr. Nasso’s dual interests at the front door of Universal Marine’s modest headquarters in Bensonhurst, a short drive from his home on Staten Island and just two blocks from where he grew up.  Universal Marine’s discreet sign shares the wall with one for Seagal/Nasso Productions Inc.  That is the movie-making partnership Mr. Nasso formed last year with Steven Seagal, a distant cousin and martial arts expert who shot to stardom three years ago by busting up bad guys in “Above the Law.”

Inside, the counter behind his desk is filled with a large model of the Titanic and a computer terminal that connects Mr. Nasso to Universal Marine’s operations.  The wall above it is covered with pharmacy degrees and certificates.  A model anchor serves as a paperweight.  But off to the side are a series of movie posters, pictures of Nasso family members with stars like Sylvester Stallone and the cast of “Ghostbusters” and a director’s chair with Mr. Nasso’s name. ~ The New York Times

“Pathological liar” Steven Seagal did win his battle for “Urban Justice” with “Mr. Nasso” but ole’ Jules just laughed it off as “scrambled eggs”.  It really didn’t hurt that bad: many of his other friends have felt worse.  The government and his judge were actually quite nice to him!  He was back at his waterfront mansion having parties and planning movies in no time!

The “whole scrambled-egg episode,” as Julius R. Nasso colorfully calls it, began in 2002.

Mr. Nasso, a film producer, filed a $60 million suit against the action film star Steven Seagal, his producing partner for 15 years, for failing to appear in four films.

Three months later, Mr. Nasso was indicted on charges of conspiring with members of the Gambino crime family to intimidate Mr. Seagal into paying hundreds of thousands of dollars. …

In 2003, Mr. Nasso pleaded guilty to conspiracy.  He was sentenced to a year and a day in federal prison, and fined $75,000.

Mr. Nasso, 52, was released at the end of June, about two months early for good behavior, and now he is planning a party to celebrate his next business venture: about 500 guests have been invited to the groundbreaking on 8 Sept. of Cinema Nasso Film Studios in Staten Island.

According to the invitation, the festivities include cocktails, dancing and fireworks on the beach.  Kylie Minogue and Armand Assante are expected to attend, a publicist for the event said.  But the groundbreaking, which is how Mr. Nasso refers to the party, is a bit of a misnomer.

Construction of the studio began when Mr. Nasso was still in prison, and is now well under way.  And his arrest did not stop Julius R. Nasso Productions from doing business, he said.  A partner in his production company, Damian Lee, ran the operation in his absence.

“I was very fortunate,” Mr. Nasso said.  “Both the government and judge allowed me when I was on bail to make ‘Prince of Central Park’ and ‘One Eyed King’ and ‘Narc’.”

The new studio in Staten Island, which is scheduled to open in January, is intended for editing and postproduction work.  “It also has a living suite for high-end directors if they want to be away from the city and on the water,” Mr. Nasso said. ~ The New York Times

Rather than wait for a “Shadow Man” to simply show up and pronounce “Today You Die”, Steven Seagal “The Patriot” decided it’s better to be “A Good Man” than to be “Pistol Whipped”.

The actor Steven Seagal and his former business partner, Julius R. Nasso, have agreed to settle a long-running legal battle, a lawyer and a spokeswoman said on Wednesday [9 January 2008]. …

In 2002, Mr. Nasso sued Mr. Seagal for $60 million, accusing the actor of backing out of a four-movie deal.

A few months later, Mr. Nasso was indicted on charges of conspiring with gangsters to shake down Mr. Seagal, and he served one year in federal prison.

In the recent out-of-court settlement, Mr. Nasso agreed to drop the suit and Mr. Seagal agreed to pay Mr. Nasso an undisclosed amount of money and write a letter supporting his application for a pardon, Mr. Nasso’s lawyer Robert Hantman said. ~ The New York Times

How much did Seagal pay to keep a “Mercenary for Justice” from being a “Force of Execution” to him?

Neither Seagal nor Nasso commented on the size of the settlement sum, though [Chuck] Philips [of the Los Angeles Times] reports that Seagal had to pay roughly $500,000 to his former producer.  While this may seem peanuts compared to $60 million, Staten Island Live notes that Nasso was quite happy with the situation.  “I got a lot more than I expected,” he commented, “I am very pleased.”  Nasso has said that he also acquired something more precious than money: A letter from Seagal to the Office of the Pardon Attorney, which read: “I am writing this letter to indicate that I have no objection to and would support the application (when it is timely) of Julius R. Nasso for a Presidential pardon.”  In time, that letter could clear his criminal record. ~ Grunge

Now, to me, writing Barack Obama’s teleprompter and saying “I, Steven Seagal, have no objection to you pardoning my dear friend Mr. Nasso—whenever it is timely” is a bit back-handed and not an especially effective way to ask the President’s teleprompter for a favor but, hell, as long as it puts Steven “Out of Reach” and “Into the Sun” we’ll make the sign of the cross and call it “Absolution”!

The Pellican and the Hooker

Raiding a non-governmental rival and helping themselves to the goodies was easy enough for the FBI (an organization founded by the devout Roman Catholic grand-nephew of Napoleon Bonaparte).  They’ve been doing it since Donald Trump’s uncle helped decipher and disappear everything stolen from Nicola Tesla’s hotel room before his body was even cold.

But teaching the Pellican that only the government can use cops and phone companies to eavesdrop on innocent citizens would take a conviction and some prison time.  To do that, they needed to apply pressure to a twig that would easily and quickly snap.

That twig was Robert Pfeiffer.

In the latest chapter of a still-unfolding investigation, FBI agents have quietly arrested a former music industry executive in connection with the wiretap and conspiracy prosecution of former Hollywood private investigator Anthony Pellicano.

Robert Joseph Pfeifer, 50, once president of Disney-owned Hollywood Records, was taken into custody Friday afternoon and held at the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles, sources close to the investigation said Saturday. …

Although the charges against Pfeifer could not be learned, his estranged wife in court documents said he was a longtime friend of Pellicano and had known for two years that he was a subject of the investigation into the detectives’ activities.

As part of a custody battle, Maria Misejova Pfeifer filed a sworn declaration alleging that Pfeifer had fled to Canada last September because he believed that an indictment was imminent. …

She went on to refer to an e-mail in which Pfeifer allegedly stated: “Hypothetically, I am assuming I will not have the money to fight this if it escalates; I am not going to jail.  You see me.  I wouldn’t last a night.  I have two alternatives then to run or commit suicide.”  The date of the e-mail is not clear from the documents.

Also filed in the custody case was a partial e-mail from Pfeifer’s attorney referring to the possibility that Pfeifer would be indicted for conspiracy, illegal wiretapping, computer fraud and obstruction of justice. …

A former musician and producer, Pfeifer was a member of the early 1980s band Human Switchboard, which recorded an album for I.R.S. Records, according to published reports.  He was president of Hollywood Records from 1994 to 1997.  Before joining Disney, he worked as an artist and repertoire executive at Epic Records, a division of Sony.  In 2000, he founded the multimedia company Segnana Inc. …

In an interview last week, Maria Pfeifer claimed that her ex-husband and Pellicano had been friends for years and that Pfeifer referred to the flamboyant private eye as his godfather.  Before Pellicano’s arrest in 2003, Pfeifer had twice hired the private investigator in connection with civil lawsuits, she said. …

Three weeks ago [January 2006], former Beverly Hills Police Officer Craig Stevens and Pellicano’s onetime girlfriend, Sandra Will Carradine¹⁶, pleaded guilty¹⁷ to lying about Pellicano’s use of illegal tactics. ~ The Los Angeles Times

“Robert Joseph Pfeifer, [now 68], once president of Disney-owned Hollywood Records…” seemed to roll through these executive positions he landed rather quickly.  It was when he was sacked from the videogame company Z-Axis that he ran to his “godfather” Tony The Fixer for help.  Somehow, his girlfriend had been turning tricks on the side and he had no idea!  Worse, she was testifying against him in his “wrongful termination” lawsuit.  That bitch!

In March 2008, pundit for the tabloid LA Weekly Steven Mikulan (who clearly misunderstood in his journalism classes that “witty” is different from “sophomoric” and “annoying”) described how the defense attorney for an active-duty cop was pulling this story out of Pfeiffer and his ex-girlfriend.

“Please describe the dates when you started being a prostitute,” asked the man in the expensive suit.  “What was the last time you were paid for sex?” …

Only three weeks old, the Gang of Five trial has laid bare L.A.’s true mosaic of diversity — not City Hall’s postcard melting pot but a psychedelic circus of powerful talent agents, high-priced hookers and lonely rich men tweaked on speed.  Forget the $50 blowjob, that old staple of the L.A. economy — to step inside Room 890 of the Roybal Federal Building is to enter a brave new world where prostitutes are called “travel guides” and tricks are termed “encounters” that can run between $9,000 and $24,000.

For the record, the suit asking that cheeky question was Chad Hummel, the attorney for Mark Arneson, a former LAPD sergeant accused of illegally supplying Pellicano with reams of printouts detailing subjects’ arrest records and other private information.  The lady in question was Erin Finn, a slender woman in her 30s with blond hair curtaining an angular face.

Moments before, Finn had told her story to the more sympathetic ears of government prosecutor Kevin Lally.  A spunky Midwesterner, Finn had come to town with a dream and entrepreneurial savvy, and before long was running her own call-girl ring through a Web site called EducatedEscort.com (since renamed BrainyBlond.com), which serviced a specific clientele.

“It was during the dot-com era,” she explained on the witness stand this week, “[and we] appealed to the socially awkward geeks.”

Paging Robert Pfeifer!  The Z-Axis video-game executive began dating Finn in 1997, when he was 42 and she was 26.  Methamphetamine use would eventually annihilate Pfeifer’s career; when he sued Z-Axis for sacking him, Finn testified in a deposition about his drug usage.

That’s when Pfeifer sicced Pellicano on her.  The private eye’s job was to dig up dirt on Finn and use it to force her to recant her testimony that she’d seen Pfeifer on crystal meth during their stormy relationship.  Pfeifer, who preceded Finn on the witness stand, appeared as a deeply humiliated and apologetic individual who was now writhing before the world as his misdeeds were laid out.  He has pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting wiretapping, and hopes his testimony against Pellicano will earn him a light sentence.

As with many of the trial’s witnesses, much of Finn’s time on the stand was taken up with identifying personal information about herself that Arneson is accused of pilfering, as well as summaries of Pellicano’s alleged wire taps.  A projection screen was filled with tight columns of print that dryly annotated her life, ranging from her business opinions (“Russian girls will do anything for $10”) to small-world ironies (the man who carried out a break-in of Finn’s home was also connected to an escort service) to ages of lost innocence (Finn’s: 17, Pfeifer’s: 10).

Pfeifer paid to have Finn’s computer hacked into and then sent out her images, escort-service information and e-mails to everyone in her mail server’s address book — including unsuspecting parents, other family members and friends.

… The streetwise Finn claimed she had no idea what amyl nitrate was, replying, “Could it be the same as nitrous oxide?”¹⁸ …

Likewise, court spectators would have little idea what kind of business Finn ran when she described it.  “I was dealing with socially awkward geeks,” she repeated, pronouncing “geeks” as though she were a diplomat referring to “the Swiss” or “the Palestinians.” …

[Arneson’s attorney Chad Hummel destroyed Pfeifer on the story that he had no idea what Finn did]: “In December, 1999, she told you she was a prostitute.  And before that you just thought she was your girlfriend?” ~ LA Weekly

Pellicano was, indeed, “The Fixer” for his “godson”.

He eventually pressured Finn into perjuring herself by recanting her testimony against Pfeifer — and even moving back in with him for a few months. ~ LA Weekly

“Finn had come to town with a dream and entrepreneurial savvy, and before long was running her own call-girl ring”…“Russian girls will do anything for $10”: Erin Finn was more than simply selling her own vagina to “geeks” for a weekend for “between $9,000 and $24,000”—she was managing other women doing the same.

By the indifference of the government and any “journalist” covering this story, you’d think either prostitution or pimping other women was completely legal in California.  In 2023, the far-Left Democrat-dominated State did make “loitering with intent to commit prostitution” legal (and, consequently, impossible for police to make an arrest on¹⁹) yet the act is still, in fact, not legal.

Did the Federal Bureau of Instigation give her a nod and a wink?

Finn testified before a secret Los Angeles federal grand jury about what Robert Pfeifer and Anthony Pellicano were doing to her phones and her psyche. …

As the case against Pellicano and others moved forward Finn developed an affinity for her FBI friend agent [Stanley] Ornellas.  She had become so entangled in the Pellicano case that the pressure caused her to leave Los Angeles.  She now lives out of state, far from Hollywood.

While Finn doesn’t relish her role as a key witness against Pellicano in his upcoming trial, she does know that that FBI knows that she is crucial to the government’s case.  So crucial is her testimony that although Finn did speak candidly to this reporter in extensive interviews about her involvement in the case, she is still is afraid to speak entirely openly without the approval of the FBI. …

According to Finn, Ornellas’ told her not to talk to this reporter or any other until after the case came to trial.  He said that case and her role in it had changed since her former boyfriend Robert Pfeifer had pleaded guilty to charges related to wiretapping her.  All this meant that her testimony would be even more crucial than ever against Pellicano.  Ornellas told her that talking to reporters would harm the case. ~ ERSNews, taken down but mirrored here

Pfieffer and Pellicano did more to Finn’s “escort service” than the government ever did, sending embarrassing information about her prostitution and “escort service” catering to “socially-awkward geeks” (but only the ones with deep pockets) to friends and family.

Now here’s the really astounding part.  Are you sitting down?

Erin Finn, the on-again, off-again girlfriend of twice-her-age rocker-geek-executive Robert Pfeiffer, who sold herself and other women to the Silicon Valley Help Desk for an expensive weekend of anal sex and video games, resurfaced over a decade later as “Erin Elizabeth” (all she did was drop her last name), the “partner” of “Holistic” “Antivaxxer” Joseph Mercola.

“User-edited” Wikipedia connects Anthony Pellicano to her, but her own entry is completely sanitized of her past as a “madam” and prostitute and, even more amazingly, lists nothing of her connection as the FBI star-witness who helped take down the Hollywood Fixer!

Even further, her re-branding as a Mercola “health nut” (all of her digital outreach is titled “Health Nut News”) has been resoundingly successful!

Her Facebook (sorry, “Meta”) account has almost 1,500 followers.²⁰

Although she whined in 2022 that her Twitter (sorry, another ridiculous re-branding: “X”) account had been taken down, it’s alive and well today with nearly 175,000 subscribers.²¹

Yesterday, controlled alternative media hung out in “reddit”.  Today, it’s “Substack”.  There, “Erin Elizabeth” boasts an astounding 108,000 subscribers.

How is this possible?  She and her partner are listed as two of the “DISINFORMATION DOZEN!!!”  Just 12 People Are Behind Most Vaccine Hoaxes On Social Media, Research Shows screams your tax-dollars on “National Public Radio”.

As an aside, I’ve seen this weird mis-use of the English language by agents of the Machine repeatedly and consistently.  A “vaccine hoax” would be a vaccine that turns out to not be what it’s claimed to be for purposes of deception.  By the proper definition, it is every vaccine maker who is the “vaccine hoaxer”!

The “anti-vaxx” movement outs this issue and the least-corrupt voices in the movement explain properly that all vaccines are not what they are stated to be and are, in fact, dangerous and malignant.  There is not a single vaccine that has a beneficial purpose.

Is it that “NPR” and its taxpayer-funded editors are idiots or is there some sort of coded projection going on?

This print-out states that Joseph Mercola is Number One on that list, yet all of his social media is completely intact in an era where my YouTube channel No. 12 (which I can only use to watch other “safe” channels) is threatened simply for making comments that violate YouTube’s strict “community guidelines” on too much Truth.

These “guidelines” are in place, you see, because YouTube and the CIA giant that gobbled it up, “Google” (which was founded on the birthday of the Jesuits—27 September—just by coincidence, of course) loves you so much, it’s executives lay awake at night, tossing and turning, unable to sleep as they contemplate the possibility that you would be exposed to the slightest bit of information that might in any way be “harmful” to you—now or any day through to infinity and beyond²²—that they must take an Orwellian iron fist and smash it all down.  —either that, or they are part of a massive, criminal and Luciferian cabal who need to do everything possible to keep the Sleeping Giant from awakening to just who and what they are.

Is it possible that Joseph Mercola and his “partner”—that’s the euphemism used by “user-edited Wikipedia” on his entry as well as hers—are actually serving a very valuable purpose to the same cabal that gave us the “coronavirus” and its subsequent mandatory vaccinations?

Could it be that these extremely powerful (and extremely malignant) forces are carefully doling out negative publicity because they know that it’s still publicity and, in fact, works perfectly to draw anyone who isn’t blindly accepting the Kool Aid to gravitate towards these selected agents of disinformation instead of towards someone much more dangerous to the Machine and it’s false reality paradigm?

On 16 August 2022, no less a source than the New York Times devoted, not just a headline, but a documentary video to “Dr. Joseph Mercola: The Misinformation ‘Superspreader’”!

Take, for instance, the basic concept of “what really makes you ill” (a concept I covered thoroughly in my most recent book The Disciples of Ra!: The shocking truth about “medicine”, viruses and vaccines)?  Consider what makes more sense—what sickens you is all around you: what you eat, what you drink, what irradiates or seeps into your body, even stress and distress—your “terrain”.  Nope.  The “experts” tell us none of that matters.  Ignore it all.  Instead, what really makes you ill are these teeny, tiny boogie things that you can’t see (and they can’t prove) that you have to trust them to even tell you they exist at all—“Germ Theory”.  Don’t change a thing!  Don’t examine what you eat.  Don’t fret over the hazardous materials the government puts in your water.  Just coat your hands in “germ-killing” chemicals every few minutes, obey your “Doctor” and go about your herd-immunity business.

Who exactly is Joseph Michael Mercola?  Why does “user-edited Wikipedia” list him as having a “partner” at 69 and no history of having been previously married?  (You can always tell the skew of a Wikipedia entry by the chosen profile image.  Mercola’s is decent—an earnest moment while speaking.  “Conspiracy theorist” “Erin Elizabeth” is a full-on glamor-shot, as if she picked it herself.)

CelebsAgeWiki lists most everything about Mercola, including his spouse, as “Not Available”, while stating that his net worth is between $1 – $5 million.

“Erin Elizabeth” isn’t much better.  She likes her tricks young and geeky and her “partners” old and geeky (her birth-date and age are top secret—former unknown, latter about 53—which puts her around 16 years younger than Mercola).  It would appear she, too, remains unmarried.

The obvious question coiled at my feet (if it was a snake it would’ve bit me) until I was briefing my friend Sam Coonrod over the phone about this story and as I was familiarizing him with who Joseph Mercola was he asked it: “Is Mercola gay?”

That was a possibility that connected a lot of dots!

When I interviewed my friend Justin Leslie, we discussed (both then and many times privately) the possibility that Project Veritas²³ founder (now running “O’Keefe Media Group” which shortens to the ironically blasphemous “OMG”) James O’Keefe was not only controlled opposition but also homosexual.

In February 2023, Presidential candidate Robert Francis Kennedy, Jr. tweeted out (are we supposed to say “X’ed out” now?) how he was loving life in the “Santa Monica wilderness” with his friend James O’Keefe (carefully holding his breath and sucking in his less-than-svelte midsection) while proudly clutching a big-bosomed blonde with a nude mid-section.  The Daily Mail would be proud!

What a man’s man James O’Keefe obviously is!  Over 4 million of the Jesuit-trained²⁴ Irish Catholic lawyer-politician’s fans agree.

In Santa Monica wilderness with @Project_Veritas @JamesOKeefeIII relaxing after his triumphant cage fight with Pfizer exec pic.twitter.com/tzwU5o0t4q

— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) February 15, 2023

My friend, collaborator and co-host Klint “Hawkeye” Burton tracked down O’Keefe’s desirous wilderness friend: Alexandra Rose, a real-estate agent with the Jewish Oppenheim Group.

It’s a subjective opinion but not a “conspiracy theory”: “Erin Elizabeth” is a much bigger media presence than even her “partner”, Joseph Mercola.

Again, I must ask, is Erin Finn just a slut with a geek fetish, or is she a ruthless manipulator who uses her vagina to get an edge on the digital battlefield?

She also has friends like former super-hacker Kevin Mitnik. ~ ERSNews, taken down but mirrored here

Damage Control

If you carefully examine the list of the “DISINFORMATION DOZEN” put out by the theatrically-named “Center for Countering DIGITAL HATE”²⁵, you’ll notice they all have one thing in common: they’re all firmly on the Germ Plantation.

1. Joseph Mercola
2. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
3. Ty and Charlene Bollinger
4. Sherri Tenpenny
5. Rizza Islam
6. Rashid Buttar
7. Erin Elizabeth
8. Sayer Ji
9. Kelly Brogan
10. Christiane Northrup
11. Ben Tapper
12. Kevin Jenkins

That means if you follow any of these pied pipers, you’ll never get off the Plantation.  You can have a problem with “coronavirus” pandemic tyranny but when the next “bird flu” or “swine flu” or “ebola” “pandemic” strikes, you’ll get sucked right in.

CORRECTION: I am pleased to state that Andrew Kaufman has updated me on this list.  Kelly Brogan is not a promoter of Germ Theory disinformation.²⁶

My dear friend Shannon Rowan informs me that Sayer Ji (born Douglas Sayer Ji) is also a proponent of “Terrain Theory”.²⁷

I also wish to note that Rashid Buttar died suddenly on 18 May 2023 at only 57 years of age.  All “mainstream” sources slam Buttar as a “conspiracy theorist” and mock those concerned over his death from “user-edited Wikipedia” through to the appropriately-named “Vice magazine”, co-founded by devout Roman Catholic convert Gavin McInnes.  Am I wrong to criticize Erin Elizabeth on this issue or does she take it to a fearful extreme that frightens purveyors of real healing?

2014: In the heat of the “Ebola pandemic”, “Ebola-infectee” Amber Vinson is whisked out of Dallas on a “specially-equipped” aircraft.  Non-PPE²⁸ clipboard guy is there to see her off.

“Mystery Solved!” says local Dallas-Fort Worth NBC affiliate Channel 5²⁹: “clipboard guy” was supposed to be there (although The Independent admits, “he probably shouldn’t have been running around touching everyone”).

Contrast anyone in this line-up with my friend, Andy Kaufman: natural healing consultant, inventor, public speaker, forensic psychiatrist, and expert witness.  Andy is one of the top names in foiling the fallacies of Germ Theory.

Podcaster Derek Broze had the unique opportunity to put the question of coronavirus legitimacy to both men and their subsequent answers were diametrically opposed.

In May of 2022, medical dissident Sam Bailey shined the spotlight on Robert Francis Kennedy, Junior’s Germ theorizing and he ran.

You would think with a commercialized brand of condescending proportions like “Health Nut News”, “Erin Elizabeth” would attempt to promote “health” but one of her primary focuses has been all of the “holistic doctor deaths”.  That’s right!  A mysterious, unknown group of assassins has targeted “holistic doctors” so be afraid!

All Roads Lead To Rome

One thing both Joseph Mercola and Erin Elizabeth Finn have in common: they’re both Catholic.

More precisely, Mercola was raised Catholic.  After trying “Christianity”, he’s now “just spiritual”.

Mercola was raised as a Catholic.  Later in life he switched to evangelical Christianity, but now calls himself spiritual rather than religious.  Dr. Mercola was formerly a member of the Christian Medical Society but stopped his membership in 2002.  He promotes religion and prayer as having health benefits, and focuses strongly on studies that advocate this position. ~ Bionity.com

Yet it was a Catholic hospital that helped Mercola become a success.  According to his own website, he was once “Chairman of Family Medicine” at St. Alexius Medical Center.³⁰

Mercola’s website is one that is loaded with products and marketing.  Unfortunately for Mercola, it hasn’t been all just register bells clanging with unhindered sales.  In 2016, the Federal Trade Commission forced him to refund his “Vitality Elite” indoor tanning bed customers and even take the entire line down for falsely marketing the irradiators as completely free of cancer risk.

But as set-backs go, that one barely put a dent in Mercola’s champagne allowance.

It is only a deduction that “Erin Elizabeth” was “raised Catholic” but at least one post she states how she went to an “all-girls Catholic school” that included “Mass seven days a week”.  One would imagine that if either the Irish-named Ms. Finn or her family were serious about being anything other than Catholic, that would’ve been a problem.

The nature of the tweet (“X”…whatever) is to point towards Anthony Fauci’s supposed lapsed Catholicism and to shame a Catholic cleric for being improper.  Seems pretty TradCat to me!

I went to an all girls, Catholic boarding school and had to go to church seven days a week. I know Fauci said he’s not going to mass anymore or church because he’s thinks he’s gone but when he sees this, he may go back. Yikes. pic.twitter.com/7jdiws3OLS

— Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News 🙌 (@unhealthytruth) December 10, 2023

The twice-Jesuit-trained Anthony Fauci, in his retirement, is doing quite well for himself—courtesy of the “Separation of Church and State” United States government and you’re tax dollars.

Fauci’s Retirement Pension Will Pay Him More Than Biden’s Annual Salary ~ Fox Business

Not one to simply sit on the laurels of experimenting on orphans³¹ and making you pay for torturing beagle puppies to death, he’s now “a Distinguished University Professor at Georgetown’s School of Medicine and the McCourt School of Public Policy”.

Dr. Fauci Reflects on How He Has Lived Out Jesuit Values in His Career ~ Georgetown University

Doesn’t sound very “lapsed Catholic” to me, Miss Elizabeth…er, Miss Finn.

Max Head-Job

Prostitution is technically illegal in California but it’s always been part of the far-Left, pornographic, illegal alien fabric of life (especially in Los Angeles).  The issue surfaces only when it serves the purposes of government and “journalism”.  I hate to break it to you but those purposes have nothing to do with “protecting you” and “informing you”.  The words that best describe their combined efforts are “disinformation” and “distraction”.  A very central part of that agenda (an agenda that proves both of those entities serve the Roman Catholic Church) is to shine the spotlight on the misdeeds of anyone Jewish.  This immediately polarizes the audience into two camps (neither of which is thinking critically or rationally): LOVE THE JEWS and HATE THE JEWS.

Take, for instance, “LA Madam” Heidi Fleiss.  Here “user-edited Wikipedia” can have some moderate utility in giving us Miss Fleiss’ “official summary” although it is embarrassingly unprofessional and biased (which is typical for “Wikipedia”):

At the age of 22, Fleiss began managing a prostitution ring under Madam Alex after meeting her in 1987³² via Fleiss’s film-director boyfriend Iván Nagy.³³  Fleiss stated in 2002 that [Elizabeth Adams] and she had “a very intense relationship” and that she “was kind of like the daughter she loved and hated, so she was abusive and loving at the same time”.  In the same interview, Fleiss said she worked as a prostitute for a short period to learn all aspects of the trade.  At the time she was learning to take over [Adams’] business there was a labor shortage³⁴, as most of [Adams’] prostitutes were approaching middle age and planning to retire from prostitution³⁵.  [Adams] had Fleiss revitalize the business³⁶ by recruiting a new batch of young, attractive women.^[6]

By 1990, Fleiss severed her links with [“]Madam Alex[”] and began her own prostitution ring.  Fleiss has stated that she made her first million dollars after only four months in the business as a madam and that on her slowest night, she made $10,000.^[7]  By 1991, Fleiss was so successful that she was able to reject women who wished to work for her.  In June 1993, she was arrested on charges including attempted pandering.

Federal charges were filed in 1994, and Fleiss posted $1 million bail; the state trial began the same year and Fleiss was convicted.  In May 1996, her state conviction was overturned and her appeal bond was set at $200,000.^[8]  She was convicted of federal charges of tax evasion in September 1996 and sentenced to seven years in prison.^[9]  Fleiss served 20 months at the Federal Correctional Institution, Dublin, California.  She was released to a halfway house on 19 November 1998 and ordered to perform 370 hours of community service.^[10] ~ Wikipedia

“Federal charges”: a catch-all that simply means “you’re ___ed”?  “User-edited Wikipedia” is a “digital encyclopedia” right?

In a single paragraph, the Tampa Bay Times nonchalantly noted:

Hollywood madam³⁷ Heidi Fleiss was convicted Thursday of hiding hundreds of thousands of dollars in earnings from her high-priced call-girl ring.  A federal jury convicted Fleiss of conspiracy, tax evasion and money laundering.  The panel was unable to reach verdicts on two counts relating to a loan application, and the government said it probably won’t retry her.  Under federal sentencing guidelines, the 29-year-old Fleiss faces a maximum of about five years in prison.  Sentencing was set for 13 Nov. [1995].  Prosecutors will also try to make her forfeit $550,000 in cash and property. Fleiss, convicted earlier in state court of pandering, sobbed as the verdicts were read.  The jury deliberated six days.

Basically, Miss Fleiss was guilty of making too much money and not giving the government it’s cut.  Whether it’s trafficking human beings or narcotics, this is always the case: just ask San Jose Mercury News reporter Gary Webb who, after breaking the story of how the Central Intelligence Agency was making millions of dollars dumping illegal narcotics onto United States city streets³⁸, got “depressed” (how could he not be when he scooped the story of his era and the rest of his Legacy Media peers could only slander him) and shot himself in the face…twice.

No-one around Heidi Fleiss was pulled in via the Federal dragnet.  If they were worried (they shouldn’t have been) and had money, they called in the Fixer.

Mr. Pellicano could also be heard bragging to [Hollywood Director] Mr. [John Campbell] McTiernan [Junior] about his influence with other people around [Hollywood Producer] Mr. [Charles] Roven³⁹, saying he had saved the career of Michael Nathanson⁴⁰, then president of MGM, when Mr. Nathanson was caught up in the Heidi Fleiss prostitution scandal.  (Mr. Nathanson declined to comment.) ~ The New York Times

McTiernan was the only high-profile customer of the Fixer to get stung—one year in prison and a $100,000 donation to Uncle Sam—but only because he lied to his female judge and the FBI: he promised to co-operate and didn’t co-operate so now he’s co-operatin’.

And, oh, did you know Heidi Fleiss was Jewish?  You didn’t if you read her Wikipedia entry but the Notable Names Database has it.⁴¹

Poor Choices

Fleiss has neither lived nor aged well, some of which can apparently be attributed to “substance abuse”.  Would she have fared differently having chosen a different path in life?

Fleiss has been engaged to an odd assortment of people such as Francis Wayne Sinatra, (known popularly as “Frank Junior” though the famous father was Francis Albert Sinatra).  In 2016, Sinatra died “unexpectedly” of “cardiac arrest” while on tour in Daytona Beach, Florida.  He was 72 years old.  “Frank Junior” was cremated and his religious affilations are extremely difficult to discern thanks to the dominating presence of his Roman Catholic father.

Another engagement for Fleiss was Roman Catholic Thomas Edward “Tom” Sizemore, Junior.  In 2003, Sizemore was convicted of 6 out of 16 counts of assault and abuse of Fleiss.  He had apparently avoided jail time until repeatedly failing probation drug-testing which included the use of a fake male member filled with drug-free urine⁴².  That same year, Sizemore was “sent home” from the set of the Lionsgate thriller (just kidding) released directly to DVD, “Piggy Banks” (re-branded “Born Killers”).  Sizemore had sexually assaulted the 11-year-old girl who was portraying his character’s daughter in the movie.  For unknown reasons, the girl’s parents did not press charges.  The story didn’t break until 14 years later when the actress was revealed as Kiersten Pyke who was then engaging Sizemore in a civil suit.  Salt Lake City’s local CBS affiliate KUTV Channel 2 relayed this statement from Pyke:

On Monday morning [7 May 2018] Pyke is expected to file a complaint with hopes of “obtaining some measure of justice for this horrible offense committed years ago.”

In other words, the only thing that will assuage her PTSD is getting paid.

Unfortunately for Miss Pyke, there will be no “justice”.  Sizemore checked in to a Roman Catholic hospital⁴³ and didn’t check out (well…actually he did after his family made an “end-of-life decision”).

On 18 February 2023, Sizemore suffered a brain aneurysm at his Los Angeles home and was hospitalized at Providence Saint Joseph Medical Center in critical condition.^[67][68][69]  On 27 February, Sizemore’s representative issued a statement indicating that doctors had determined there was “no further hope” for Sizemore to recover and had “recommended end-of-life decisions” to his family.^[70][71][72]  Sizemore died on 3 March 2023, at the age of 61.^[69] ~ Wikipedia

In 2009, Fleiss was again engaged (but did not follow through with marriage), this time to “entrepreneur” and “brothel owner” Dennis Leroy Hof.  Hof had taken advantage of Nevada’s legal sex trade to build a $20 million-plus empire that was honored by everyone from pornography “star” Ron Jeremy⁴⁴ to tax reform personality Grover Norquist⁴⁵ to self-proclaimed “devout Catholic” ex-Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph “Joe” Arpaio and even a “HAPPY BIRTHDAY, DENNIS!” phone-call from then-Fox News host Tucker Carlson.

Hof had been celebrating his 72^nd birthday along with Fleiss, Jeremy, Arpaio, Cucker and others at one of his several brothels when the porn star found him dead and “stiff as a board”.

Getting Fluffed

The United States government prosecution of Heidi Fleiss was little more than yet another salacious distraction.  As with the Pellicano prosecution, virtually no-one above or below the government’s target was put in the spotlight.

In 2008, LA Weekly put it all in perspective.

This week, the RICO trial for Anthony Pellicano and four co-defendants finally began. …

Pellicano … faces 625 years behind bars on 110 counts of racketeering and conspiracy.⁴⁶

He’s … accused of using law-enforcement contacts to intimidate witnesses and journalists on behalf of his A-list clients, who include Hollywood superlawyer⁴⁷ Bert Fields⁴⁸, comic Chris Rock, Die Hard director John McTiernan, über-agent⁴⁹/producer Michael Ovitz⁵⁰ and film-studio chiefs Ron Meyer⁵¹ and Brad Grey⁵².

… Pellicano’s targets … formed a kind of A-list beyond just journalists and producers, and included actors Sylvester Stallone and Keith Carradine and comedian Garry Shandling.

The Pellicano case is important to Los Angeles’ secret dream life because it is the latest installment of the Permanent Trial — that unique and never-ending proceeding involving the entertainment industrial complex.  As American media have increasingly become celebrity-centric, L.A.’s local news outlets have made sure that at any given moment there is a spotlight on some scandalous misconduct on the part of some glamour-industry figure.

… the important thing is that there be something to fit in between the newest shenanigans of [sex] Britney [Spears], [sex] Lindsay [Lohan] or [sex…and money] Paris [Hilton]⁵³. ~ LA Weekly

The Los Angeles Times added this:

The charges are conspicuously silent on what embarrassing information Pellicano might have obtained, how he used it or who paid for it. …

The Times scoured thousands of legal experts to light upon the much-adored Jewish female teaching “law” at Jesuit Loyola Marymount:

Authorities said Pellicano could face a sentence of hundreds of years in prison if convicted on all counts.

Loyola law professor Laurie Levenson said the shock waves from the case could be “enormous.”  Although the government might not be able to charge some people criminally, information produced in the investigation could provide ammunition for future civil litigation against lawyers and other individuals who utilized Pellicano’s services.

“It’s a celebrity case without celebrity defendants.  If this is the tip, it is a very big iceberg,” Levenson said. ~ The Los Angeles Times

Well, Miss Levenson, rest assured that this was an iceberg the government-journalism Titanic easily avoided.

Roll The Credits

Anita Busch’s great success in writing meaningless stories of Hollywood “controversy” and fluff was “derailed” by the Proctor-Pellicano-Seagal-Nasso episode.  Today she has a much more heroic focus of altruistic reporting—taking guns out of the hands of Americans in order to finally put an end to deadly mass-shootings.

* * * * *

At the height of his power and mystique, Anthony Pellicano dated Sandra Will, the ex-wife of actor Keith Carradine⁵⁴.  Will employed her boyfriend to spy on her ex-husband in order to get an advantage in bitter divorce proceedings.  She committed perjury when asked about it during Pellicano’s trial and plea-bargained community service and a $10,000 fine.⁵⁵

1984: crass sex-themed comedy “Revenge of the Nerds” stars Robert Carradine, brother of Keith, brother of David⁵⁶, son of John, who tricks (no pun intended) and seduces “Betty” [Julia Montgomery] — the blonde cheerleader girlfriend of star quarterback “Stan” — into having sex and eventually romance.  Highlights can be found on a YouTube channel named “Julia Montgomery”.

If you invert the motivations of the key characters, add many times more salacious sensationalism and then top it off with a ruthless Machiavellian twist, you’ve got the story of Erin Elizabeth Finn.

Felipe Robles and Giovanni Cirucci

Don Inigo Lopez de Recalde, after Romanizing his name, has become known as Ignatius of Loyola.

Loyola, is perhaps the second most infamous man to only Judas Iscariot, the man who should have never been born.

Such a statement may seem like wild hyperbole, especially considering that the great majority of people don’t have the slightest idea who Loyola was and what he created.  Nevertheless, each and every one of us is subject to the matrix of lies first idealized by him and perfected through centuries by his followers.  Only a few of us that are aware of it, dare to expose it “for there’s nothing hidden that will not be disclosed”.

Inigo Lopez was born in the castle of Loyola, in the province of Gipuzkoa, in 1491.  He would go on to become one of the most famous monks in the Catholic Church, as well as a “saint” and the founder of his own religious order.  He called the order “The Knights of the Virgin Mary” (the pagan “Queen of Heaven”) but a cagey, ruthless Pope, Alessandro “Paul III” Farnese, renamed them “The Society of Jesus”.

Despite this pious resumé, his disorderly life prior to becoming a monk is well-known.

A police report said he was “treacherous, brutal, vindictive”.  All his biographers admit that he yielded to none of his boon companions regarding the violence of the instincts, then a common thing.  “An unruly and conceited soldier”, said one of his confidants— “he led a disorderly life as far as women, gambling and duels were concerned”, added his secretary Polanco. ~ Paris ⁵⁷

Loyola was accustomed to royalty, being a courtier for many years first for the treasurer of the Castille and then for the Viceroy of Navarre.  He began his military career defending the Castille stronghold of Pamplona against the French when a cannon ball shattered his leg and caused him to be immobile for extended periods after surgery.  This event is said to have deeply transformed him from a courtier/soldier to a holy man.

His sole entertainment, while lying wounded and in pain, was the reading of the “Life of Christ” and the “Life of the Saints”, the only books found in the castle.

As he was practically uneducated and still affected by that terrible shock, the anguish of Christ’s passion and the martyrdom of the saints had an indelible impact on him; this obsession led the crippled warrior on to the road of apostolate. ~ Paris ⁵⁸

From the excerpt above, we can comprehend a bit about what a “Catholic conversion” is about, which gives preference to the writings of man rather than the Scriptures.

According to Frank OʹCollins (whom some biographies state is an “ex-Jesuit”), Lopez/Loyola was a ruthless dictator who created the concept of a “secret police” to help keep a hostile populace subdued.  OʹCollins, like Paris, also states Loyola’s post-injury piety is a myth.

It is claimed Íñigo de Loyola suddenly found religion sometime after 1522 during his recovery.  Given his previous history as a brutal tyrant and sadist, it is more likely during this period of recovery he refined his theories on the use of secret forces, agents and assassins to maintain order, apart from brute military force. ~ One Evil

After his recovery, Lopez/Loyola was determined to become a Catholic saint.  To achieve that, he resorted to flagellation, maceration, fasting, penance, and long confessions before the “Madona”, “Mary, the mother of God”.  As a result of this intensive effort, he started seeing “heavenly visions” that would reveal to him truths, knowledge and secrets.  [The below account is written in the present tense.]

“It is because of a vision”, says H. Boehmer, “that he started eating meat again; it is a whole series of visions that revealed to him the mysteries of the Catholic dogma and helped him to truly live it: in that way, he meditates upon the Trinity under the shape of a musical instrument with three cords; the mystery of the creation of the world through ‘something’ hazy and light coming out of a ray of sunshine; the miraculous descent of Christ into the Eucharist as flashes of light entering the consecrated water, when the priest held it up while praying; the human nature of Christ and the holy Virgin under the form of a dazzling white body; and finally Satan as a serpentine and shimmering shape similar to a multitude of sparkling and mysterious eyes⁽⁶⁾.”  Is not this the start of the well-known Jesuitic image-making? ~ Paris ⁵⁹

Edmund Paris makes a parallel between Loyola’s state and what happens to opium smokers since in both cases they have very similar experiences: the illusion of having been given information from other dimensions (from on-high), but later having very limited recollection of what really happened.  This behavioral pattern regarding communication between God and men is never encountered in the Bible.  For instance, even though both Daniel and John the Apostle are given eschatological visions, both men were able to write about them and explain what they saw in detail.  Loyola was never able to explain the mysteries that were revealed to him.  Nevertheless, it was this mystic element combined with his calculative mind that made Loyola a very dangerous individual capable of creating the Jesuit Order: an order of infiltration and subversion.

Loyola’s vision of the Catholic Christ still carrying his cross surrounded by pagan baby/child angels (left) and John, the Apostle vision of Christ as depicted in Revelation 1:12-16. Source: World History Encyclopedia (left) and ChurchGists (right)

Some time in 1527, after returning from a pilgrimage to the “Holy Land”, Loyola raised suspicions from the Inquisition because of zealotry and gnostic mysticism.  His first run-in was at the University of Alcala in Barcelona and then there was a second in Salamanque.  In both cases, he was released on the condition he desisted from his pursuits.  He faced trouble again later at the college of Montague in Paris, but he retreated with the companionship of a few colleagues, Salmeron and Lainez amongst them.

It was around that time that a small book in his possession started making its impact on others.  Little did people knew, but this book called the “Spiritual Exercises” was destined to be one of the most influential books in the world.  Yet, to this day, it is a well-kept secret.

The “Spiritual Exercises” is the textbook of the Jesuit Order, and it contains a series of meditations and “contemplations” carefully crafted by its founder.  A novice in the Order or any other individual undertaking these Exercises is invited to meditate in a period of a month upon the “mysteries” of the Catholic faith and to relive them.  Every detail about this experience is meticulously planned from breathing pace to correct wording or incantation; all previously studied by Loyola to be the most effective for imbuing into the proselyte’s subconscious whatever ideals that are most profitable to the “master”.

“Ignatius understood more clearly than any other leader of men who preceded him that the best way to raise a man to a certain ideal is to become master of his imagination. We “imbue into him spiritual forces which he would find very difficult to eliminate later”, forces more lasting than all the best principles and doctrines; these forces can come up again to the surface, sometimes after years of not even mentioning them, and become so imperative that the will finds itself unable to oppose any obstacle and has to follow their irresistible impulse”. ~ Paris ⁶⁰

In most, if not in all the religions, its followers must abandon their individual thinking in order to follow what the pastor, preacher, or priest says.  This is clearly seen in traditional Roman Catholicism where the traditional form of the most extravagant ceremony called “Mass” is celebrated in Latin, a language that the common person doesn’t comprehend.  If memorization of Mass rituals starting in early childhood already imbues forces that are very difficult to eliminate later in life, imagine boosting it with a “spiritual retreat” in which one allows a priest to be the master of their mind for at least 30 days.  Few are able to resist what is literally “mind control”.

Loyola’s main intent is to have his subordinate’s complete obedience in which his soldiers would move “Perinde ac Cadaver” without a will of their own.

The Superior General’ s small army would be trained by the Spiritual Exercises to practice a brand of obedience Loyola termed contemplativus in actione, active contemplation, instantaneous obedience with all critical thought suppressed.  As stated in Section 353.1 of the Exercises, “We must put aside all judgment of our own and keep the mind ever ready and prompt to obey in all things the hierarchical Church.”  But Jesuit obedience would be more than mere obedience of the will.  An obedient will suppresses what it would do in order to obey what a superior wants done.  Ignatius demanded obedience of the understanding.  An obedient understanding alters its perception of reality according to the superior’s dictates.  Section 365.13 declares, “We must hold fast to the following principle: What seems to me white, I will believe black if the hierarchical Church so defines.”  Francis Xavier would later describe this quality of submission in a vow that unintentionally summarized the Jesuit mission: “I would not even believe in the Gospels were the Holy Church to forbid it.” ~ Saussy ⁶¹

This is what makes Roman Catholicism a powerful, dangerous weapon having nothing to do with Jesus Christ or the one-on-one relationship with Him that He asks of His followers.

From “science” to entertainment, we are all immersed in Loyola’s Spiritual exercises.

There are plenty of reasons to keep a close eye on Herman van Rompuy, the President of the European Council.  Early September, Van Rompuy spoke to the “Interreligious Dialogue” in Florence.  The world press did not notice, but fortunately there was still the “Katholiek Nieuwsblad” from Den Bosch, Rome’s last resort in the Netherlands.  The newspaper proudly quoted Van Rompuy as announcing: “We are all Jesuits”.  He was referring to those prominent European leaders with whom he is developing the architecture for the future Europe.  “It creates unbreakable ties.  So there is a ‘Jesuits International’”. ~ Derk Jan Eppink⁶²

When “doctors” and politicians demand one to believe a “virus” is floating around to get them at every corner and that one must also believe in their “positive test” telling they are sick, the same “doctors” and politicians are demanding you obey “perinde ac cadaver” — without a will of your own.  Regardless of evidence shown by real science, one must believe that viruses exist as the society hierarchy demands it.  Then, in order to shore up one’s imagination on the subject, Hollywood creates countless of titles including The Andromeda Strain (1971), The Omega Man (1971), Outbreak (1995), I Am Legend (2007), Pandemic (2009), Contagion (2011), World War Z (2013), and Pandemic (2016) just to name a few. The same tactics are employed in many other venues including “Space exploration” and dinosaurs.

From Tesla floating in Space (left) to “coronavirus” floating in the air, “Jesuit theater” shores up a false reality in both micro and macro scales.  Source: Space.com (left) and National Foundation for Infectious Diseases (right).

As far as “entertainment”, movies and Hollywood go, no other endeavor could have best worked out for the Jesuits.  A quick search on Google (the most powerful internet search engine created on 27 September, the founding date of the Jesuits) for the words “subconscious” and “watching tv”, brings up a myriad of results about how they affect one’s subconscious, bringing it to a hypnotic state.

Your mind slips into the hypnotic trance state within seconds of watching TV.  This lowers your brainwaves to a lower “alpha state” commonly associated with meditation and deep relaxation.  This is believed to be caused by the screen flicker and explains why you feel sleepy while watching TV.

Under this state of trance, your subconscious mind becomes highly suggestible and whatever information you receive from the TV becomes part of your memory pool. ~ How TV Influences Your Mind Through Hypnosis, PsychMechanics

The website Jesuits in Ireland affirms that film and television are powerful influences on our imagination and compile an impressive list of 40 movies in which Ignatian Spiritual themes are found.  From Star Wars to the Matrix, Avatar to the Book of Eli, Jesuitical ideals and principles are there.

Ultimately, however, this is mind control made easy through mimicry.  Malignancy has no creativity, no depth, no soul; it must steal and appropriate true meaning from those who have it and the Jesuits are able to do this after centuries of studying the Bible in their ongoing efforts to destroy it.

In 2016, the movie Silence from Altar Boy and seminarian, Italian Roman Catholic Martin Scorsese portrayed terrible persecution the Jesuits had to endure to bring Catholicism to 17^th-century Japan.

Cunningly, Scorsese (alternatively portrayed by media as a “lapsed Catholic” while admitting “you can’t leave Catholicism”⁶³) starts his story after the Jesuits have been found by Japanese rulers to be a military insurgency.  Repeatedly, they were commanded to leave Japan and each time they disobeyed.  Daimyo Toyotomi Hideyoshi and his successor Shogun Tokugawa Ieyasu banned the Jesuits but they went underground and were discovered.  It was only then that the persecution began.

Here, too, weavers of make-believe like Scorsese paint the Jesuits as “spreading the Christian Gospel”.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  They were securing a power stronghold for their empire as they did in South America where they put their ideas of communism into practice.

But theater is powerful magic and it has sway even over those who create it, such as Jewish actor Andrew Garfield who undertook the tutelage of Jesuit James Martin in order to play his character of “Rodrigues”, a Jesuit Priest.

Scorsese enlisted the help of Father James Martin S.J., editor-at-large of America magazine, to help the actors immerse themselves into Jesuit spirituality.  In particular, Father Martin led Andrew Garfield through the Spiritual Exercises of Saint Ignatius of Loyola in a process called “Exercises in Daily Life” that spanned a period of six months.  Garfield took the preparation very seriously and sincerely wanted to learn more about these spiritual lessons that have changed the lives of so many throughout the centuries.

By the end of it Garfield admitted, “I got totally swept up in all things Jesuit and very taken with Jesuit spirituality.”  He was so immersed in Jesuit spirituality that Garfield would stop and make suggestions on the set of the film, saying, “A Jesuit wouldn’t say that.” ~ Aleteia.org

Unfortunately, for someone like a Hollywood actor, that has a knowledge of Christianity but is not grounded in the Truth of Jesus Christ, these Exercises can indeed be appealing and as Loyola itself would say, “hard to resist”.

Andrew Garfield playing Seventh-Day Adventist combat medic in Hacksaw Ridge, 2016 (left) and Jesuit Rodrigues in Silence, 2016 (right). Source: IMDB

Even though Loyola founded the Jesuit Order on 15 August 1534, his company did not receive it’s Papal approval until 27 September 1540 from the Bull of Alessandro “Paul III” Farnese entitled Regimini militantis Ecclesiae.)

It is interesting to note that even the connection to the internet search engine “Google” (so dominating in providing information that it is synonymous with the concept; “Google it…”) is one that has been appropriated.

Google celebrated September 7 (the day when the company was incorporated) as its birthday till 2005.

In 2005 Google changed the date to September 27 to make it coincide with the announcement of the record number of pages that the search engine was indexing. ~ CNN News18, India

Undoubtedly, the Farnese Pope’s approval was greatly motivated by the fact that the Catholic Church was reeling thanks to the return of Biblical Christianity led by rogue Augustinian Priest Martin Luther.  Luther’s movement, powered by other brave Christians such as Frenchman Jehan Cauvin (“John Calvin”), Swiss Huldrych Zwingli, Scot John Knox and others, had destroyed the hold Catholic clergy had on the souls of millions.

In 1545, the Catholic Church convened one of its most famous councils in history.  It took place north of Rome in a city called Trent.  The Council of Trent continued for three sessions ending in 1563.  One of its main purposes was to plan a counterattack against Martin Luther and the Protestants.  Thus, the Council of Trent became a center for Rome’s Counter Reformation.

Up to this point, Rome’s main method of attack had been largely frontal: openly burning Bibles and heretics.  Yet this warfare only confirmed in the minds of Protestants the conviction that papal Rome was indeed the Beast power that would “make war with the saints” (Revelation 13:7).  Therefore a new tactic was needed, something less obvious.  The sought after solution was found in the Jesuit Order. ~ The Jesuit Order and the Council of Trent, Amazing Discoveries.org

Loyola cunningly understood the impracticality of burning Bibles and Christians as the sole method of Counter Reformation.  On the one hand, it could not keep up with the technological advancements brought by the advent of the printing press, and on the other hand, the Christians seemed to thrive during times of persecution.

As humanity was freeing itself from the shackles of the “Mother Church”, Loyola and his Company drove it all back to even deeper darkness thanks to a well-crafted false reality that could only have been brought about with help from Satan himself.  To start their inglorious dominion, the Jesuits had two key objectives: be the Confessors of kings and the tutors of their children.

The Jesuits became the predominant group supplying confessors to (meaning, hearers of the confessions of) kings and princes and those in authority. As the New Catholic Encyclopedia says, “they acted as royal confessor to all French kings for 2 centuries, from Henry III to Louis XV; to all German emperors after the early 17th century; to all Dukes of Bavaria after 1579; to most rulers of Poland and Portugal; to the Spanish kings in the 18th century; to James II of England; and to many ruling or princely families throughout Europe.”

As advisors to kings, they influenced political policy. A royal confessor was not slow to tell a king that he had a duty to make the kind of political alliances that would promote the temporal interests of the Church. It was Le Tellier, Jesuit confessor to Louis XIV, who in the 1680’s persuaded that monarch to revoke the Edict of Nantes, which granted religious liberty to Protestants. ~ Jesuits As Royal Confessors. Anglican.org

Just a quick search online reveals how many recent powerful and influential people were indoctrinated in Jesuit Universities such as Joseph Stalin, trained by Jesuit monks at Tiflis Seminary, Bill Clinton who got his Foreign Service degree at Georgetown University, and Denzel Washington, famous Hollywood actor who attended Fordham University.

From Ignatius Loyola to today’s Superior General of the Society of Jesus, Arturo Sosa, the Black Popes (as they are known) have enjoyed total power through centuries while, at the same time, being well hidden from the rest of the world.

“The general’s power concerning absolution and dispensations is even wider. He can lift all punishment inflicted on the members of the Society before or after them entering the Order, absolve all their sins, even the sin of heresy and schism, the falsification of apostolic writings, etc… “The general absolves, in person or through a delegate, all those who are under his obedience, of the unhappy state arising from excommunication, suspension or interdict, provided these censures were not inflicted for excesses so enormous that others, beside the papal tribunal, knew about them. He also absolves the irregularity issuing, from bigamy, injuries done to others, murder, assassination, etc. as long as these wicked deeds were not publicly known and the cause of a scandal”. Finally, Gregory XIII bestowed on the Company the right to deal in commerce and banking, a right it made use of extensively later on. These dispensations and unprecedented powers were fully guaranteed to them. ~ Paris ⁶⁴

The “Society of Jesus” knows this and revels in it.

See, sir, from this chamber I govern not only to Paris, but to China, not only to China, but to all the world, without any one to know how I do it.”

Michaelangelo Tamburini

14^th Jesuit General, 1706-1739 ~ Sherman ⁶⁵

Perhaps, Napoleon Bonaparte, leader of the French Revolution at the turn of the 19^th Century, can best describe why a religious leader of the Catholic Church would have such an unusual title as “General”.

The Jesuits are a MILITARY organization, not a religious order.  Their chief is a general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a monastery.  And the aim of this organization is power — power in its most despotic exercise – absolute power, universal power, power to control the world by the volition of a single man. Jesuitism is the most absolute of despotisms – and at the same time the greatest and most enormous of abuses. ~ Napoleon Bonaparte

There are many abuses committed by the Order throughout the ages and many books were written exposing their machinations.  Unfortunately, through cunning deception, intrigue, and infiltration, their dominion over people’s lives is Satanically perfect to the point that most of those same people are totally unaware of their masters.

Loyola, it seems, has created the perfect prison.  One that does not require chains or cells…a prison for the mind.

It’s the purpose of this and subsequent articles to expose the truth about these Enemies of Mankind in hopes that it will set you free.

Every individual I’ve ever heard claim to be “Pro Choice” was a disingenuous liar.  They had something to gain from purposefully misrepresenting the argument.

Abortion easily boils down to “life at conception” verses “sex without consequences”.  Any other argument is subterfuge.

I wanted to get, for you, an up-to-date description of what abortion does to an unborn child; the tearing limb-from-limb, the burning with chemicals, the shredding with blades like an abattoir.

To my extreme disgust, no combination of words in any query from even “trusted” engines like “Duck Duck Go” would give me anything less than page after page of pro-slaughter propaganda.

After four pages, a few impotent “heroes” were offered: all Catholic.

From my files I pulled a report from retired life activist Jill Stanek on the George Tiller⁶⁴ of Albuquerque, Curtis Boyd.  It was published by the Roman Catholic cheerleader “LifeSite” and appears to have been taken down (not surprisingly).

Abortionist: The Baby is Still Alive When I Pull on the Arm and Remove It
Jill Stanek
LifeNews.com
17 November 2013

Why don’t those who support abortion believe what abortionists say about it?

For example, abortionist Curtis Boyd, who runs late-term clinics in Dallas and Albuquerque, made a “jarring admission” during an interview with WFAA in 2009:

“Am I killing?” Boyd said.  “Yes, I am.  I know that.”

During questioning in court in 1997 regarding his opposition to the Nebraska Partial Birth Abortion Ban, late-term abortionist LeRoy Carhart testified:

Attorney for the Defense: In that situation… are you… when you pull on the arm and remove it, is the fetus still alive?

Carhart: Yes.

Late-term abortionist Warren Hern’s website, on third trimester abortions:

At this point, termination of pregnancy is considered a far more dangerous procedure and carries with it serious risks of complication.

UPDATE: Thank to Wendy for digging this up.

I have made a career out of showing that the gas-lit lie—that the Roman Catholic Church is “Pro Life”—to be an abomination, and that Rome lives and thrives upon the blood and tears of children.  I guess if I were to give one specific citation out of thousands of articles and videos it would be my third book, Eaters of Children.

In regards to what is “safe Christianity”—“Christian leaders” and “evangelists” who are in no way what-so-ever a risk to the Whore drunk on the blood of the Saints—the McDowell family does an excellent job of promoting a Biblical Gospel completely devoid of the warnings you need to grow and protect yourself.  Because of that, they remain popular and successful in the cage that Satan and his Jesuits have provided for their pets.

I don’t mean to disrespect their evangelism or be unduly harsh: only the McDowells can say whether they have broken the Watchman on the Wall compact for their own personal gain.

Ezekiel 33:1-9
1 The Word of the Lord came to me:
2 “Son of man, speak to your people and say to them, ‘If I bring the sword upon a land, and the people of the land take a man from among them, and make him their watchman,’”
3 “‘and if he sees the sword coming upon the land and blows the trumpet and warns the people,’”
4 “‘then if anyone who hears the sound of the trumpet does not take warning, and the sword comes and takes him away, his blood shall be upon his own head.’”
5 “‘He heard the sound of the trumpet and did not take warning; his blood shall be upon himself.  But if he had taken warning, he would have saved his life.’”
6 “‘But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, so that the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes any one of them, that person is taken away in his sin, but his blood I will require at the watchman’s hand.’”
7 “‘So you, son of man, I have made a watchman for the house of Israel.  Whenever you hear a Word from My Mouth, you shall give them warning from Me.’”
8 “‘If I say to the wicked, “O wicked one, you shall surely die”, and you do not speak to warn the wicked to turn from his way, that wicked person shall die in his sin, but his blood I will require at your hand.’”
9 “‘But if you warn the wicked to turn from his way, and he does not turn from his way, that person shall die in his sin, but you will have delivered your soul.’”
English Standard Version⁶⁶

But when YouTube recommended to me Sean McDowell interviewing “Pro Life” advocate Scott Klusendorf under the title “Responding to the Toughest Pro-choice Arguments” I was intrigued.

I do respect both Sean McDowell and Scott Klusendorf for their efforts.

Arguing With Christians

At one point, the discussion turned towards the need to convince “Christians” that abortion is “wrong”.

To me, arguing “abortion” with “Christians” is the least of my concerns because I would think that is a small target audience but Klusendorf claimed that most “Christians” are for abortion.

That is actually a misunderstanding.

Most religionists who think they are “Christians” are for abortion.

If you claim to be a Christian, then you value the Bible.  If you value the Bible, this argument is over before it started.

And yet, Scott Klusendorf began this segment throwing away the central tenet of the Biblical “Pro Life” argument!

Klusendorf: “If you simply trot out Psalm 139 a skeptical critic will simply say ‘That’s a poetic passage we can’t take THAT literally’.  Okay, I’ll give him that…”

I do not overtly dismiss Psalm 139:15 as “poetic”:

Psalm 139:1-16
Search Me, O God, and Know My Heart
To the choirmaster.  A Psalm of David.
1 O Lord, you have searched me and known me!
2 You know when I sit down and when I rise up;
you discern my thoughts from afar.
3 You search out my path and my lying down
and are acquainted with all my ways.
4 Even before a word is on my tongue,
behold, O Lord, you know it altogether.
5 You hem me in, behind and before,
and lay your hand upon me.
6 Such knowledge is too wonderful for me;
it is high; I cannot attain it.

7 Where shall I go from your Spirit?
Or where shall I flee from Your Presence?
8 If I ascend to Heaven, You are there!
If I make my bed in Sheol, You are there!
9 If I take the wings of the morning
and dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea,
10 even there Your Hand shall lead me,
and Your Right Hand shall hold me.
11 If I say, “Surely the darkness shall cover me,
and the light about me be night,”
12 even the darkness is not dark to You;
the night is bright as the day,
for darkness is as light with You.

13 For You formed my inward parts;
You knitted me together in my mother’s womb.
14 I praise You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made.
Wonderful are Your Works;
my soul knows it very well.
15 My frame was not hidden from You,
when I was being made in secret,
intricately woven in the depths of the earth.
16 Your Eyes saw my unformed substance;
in Your Book were written, every one of them,
the days that were formed for me,
when as yet there was none of them.
English Standard Version⁶⁷

If this is only “poetic” why does YHWH appear to quote this to affirm Jeremiah’s ministry to him?

Jeremiah 1:1-5
1 The words of Jeremiah, the son of Hilkiah, one of the priests who were in Anathoth in the land of Benjamin,
2 to whom the Word of the Lord came in the days of Josiah the son of Amon, king of Judah, in the thirteenth year of his reign.
3 It came also in the days of Jehoiakim the son of Josiah, king of Judah, and until the end of the eleventh year of Zedekiah, the son of Josiah, king of Judah, until the captivity of Jerusalem in the fifth month.
4 Now the Word of the Lord came to me, saying,
5 “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you,”
“and before you were born I consecrated you;”
“I appointed you a prophet to the nations.”
English Standard Version⁶⁸

Isaiah said the same about his ministry which was an interesting one: he was commissioned to warn the southern kingdom of Judah that she would follow the northern kingdom of Israel into captivity (falling to Assyria in 722 BC) because of her apostasy.  Judah’s fall to Babylon is predicted as is the restitution of the remnant, which YHWH calls “Israel” (yet another reason to understand there are no “ten lost tribes”).

Isaiah 49:1-6
The Servant of the Lord
1 Listen to me, O coastlands,
and give attention, you peoples from afar.
The Lord called me from the womb,
from the body of my mother he named my name.
2 He made my mouth like a sharp sword;
in the shadow of His Hand He hid me;
He made me a polished arrow;
in His Quiver He hid me away.
3 And He said to me, “You are my servant,”
“Israel, in whom I will be glorified.”
4 But I said, “I have labored in vain;”
“I have spent my strength for nothing and vanity;”
“yet surely my right is with the Lord,”
“and my recompense with my God.”

5 And now the Lord says,
He who formed me from the womb to be His servant,
to bring Jacob back to Him;
and that Israel might be gathered to Him—
for I am honored in the eyes of the Lord,
and my God has become my strength—
6 He says:
“It is too light a thing that you should be My servant”
“to raise up the tribes of Jacob”
“and to bring back the preserved of Israel;”
“I will make you as a light for the nations,”
“that My Salvation may reach to the end of the Earth.”
English Standard Version⁶⁹

These examples are not singular to the Old Testament.  Paul says the same about his Apostleship.  By the way, the false gospel Paul is excoriating the Galatians over is Judaizing.  It is the Book of Galatians that absolutely destroys “Christian Zionism”.

Galatians 1:1-17
1 Paul, an Apostle, not from men nor through man, but through Jesus Christ and God the Father, the One raising Him from the dead,
2 and all the brothers with me, to the [ecclesia: gathering, fellowship] of Galatia.
3 Grace to you and peace from God the Father and our Lord Jesus Christ,
4 who gave Himself for our sins, so that He might deliver us out of the present evil age, according to the Will of our God and Father,
5 to whom be the glory forever and ever.  Amen!
6 I wonder that you are so quickly being transferred from Him having called you by the Grace of Christ to another gospel,
7 which is not another; only there are some troubling you and desiring to pervert the Gospel of Christ.
8 But even if we, or an angel out of Heaven, should announce a gospel to you beside what we preached to you, let him be accursed.
9 As we have said before, and now I say again, If anyone announces a gospel to you beside what you received, let him be accursed.
10 For do I now persuade men or God?  Or do I seek to please men?  For if I yet pleased men, I would not be a slave of Christ.
11 And, brothers, I make known to you the Gospel preached by me, that it is not according to man.
12 For I did not receive it from man, nor was I taught it , but by a revelation of Jesus Christ.
13 For you heard my way of life when I was in Judaism, that with surpassing zeal I persecuted the [ecclesia, “congregation”, not “church”] of God and ravaged it.
14 And I progressed in Judaism beyond many contemporaries in my race, being much more a zealot of the traditions of my ancestors.
15 But when God was pleased, “He having separated me from my mother’s womb” and having called through His Grace,
16 to reveal His Son in me, that I might preach Him among the nations, immediately I did not confer with flesh and blood,
17 nor did I go up to Jerusalem to the apostles before me, but I went away into Arabia and returned again to Damascus.
Jay P. Green’s Literal Translation 1993⁷⁰

Even more powerful is the Gospel account of John the Baptist leaping in his mother’s womb at the voice of her cousin Miriam.

Luke 1:39-45
39 And rising up in these days, Mariam went into the hill country with haste to a city of Judah.
40 And she entered into the house of Zacharias and greeted Elizabeth.
41 And it happened, as Elizabeth heard Mariam’s greeting, the babe in her womb leaped, and Elizabeth was filled of the Holy Spirit.
42 And she cried out with a loud voice and said, “Blessed are you among women and blessed is the fruit of your womb!”
43 “And why is this to me that the mother of my Lord comes to me?”
44 “For behold, as the sound of your greeting came to my ears, the babe in my womb leaped in exultation.”
45 “And blessed is she believing, because there will be a completion to the things spoken to her from the Lord.”
Jay P. Green’s Literal Translation 1993

Exodus 21

McDowell: “What about Exodus 21…?”

Two men are fighting near a pregnant woman.  Someone runs into the pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely.

Most translations infer that if either the mother or child is harmed, the Lex Talionis punishments apply; when there is no harm, a fine must still be paid.

One translation stands out, implicitly stating “miscarriage” and implying the death of the child and then following with “only a fine need be paid”.

That is the 1952 Revised Standard Version, the brainchild of Luther Allan Weigel, the (then) Dean of Yale Divinity.  Biola University lauds him as an “outstanding Christian educator” and “ecumenical pioneer”.

He was one of the principal founders of the National Council of Churches and the World Council of Churches.  For four decades he chaired the committee which brought into being the Revised Standard Version of the Bible.

The Revised Standard was a revision of the unpopular American Standard Bible.  The “American Standard Bible Committee” was formed in 1930 and Weigel was “elected” chair.  According to Biola, “Roman Catholic scholars” were added in 1966 but their secret influence was apparent long before then.

Once Weigle added the Apocrypha to his Revised Standard Version in 1957, it was openly accepted by Rome and Constantinople.

When Weigle spoke at the dedication of the RSV memorial room at the Interchurch Center in New York City in 1964, he proudly pointed out the authorized Catholic publication, with the imprimatur of Cardinal Cushing of the Boston Archdiocese.  Conversations with representatives of the Greek Orthodox Churches led to the acceptance of the RSV as the “Common Bible” of all three branches of Christianity: Protestant, Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches. ~ Biola

Weigel brought in “Hebrew scholar” Harry Orlinsky, a practicing Jew best known for translating a “gender-free Torah“.  With the help of Orlinsky, the Revised Standard presents miracle prophecies such as the virgin birth in Isaiah 7:14—

Isaiah 7:14
14 So, The Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold! The virgin will conceive and will bring forth a son; and she shall call His Name Immanuel.
Jay P. Green’s Literal Translation 1993⁷¹

—as no miracle at all—

Isaiah 7:14
14 Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign. Behold, a young woman shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Imman′u-el.
Revised Standard Version

Luther Weigel was born on September 11^th, 1880.

Interestingly, this is the same “Biola University” where McDowell is an “Associate Professor in the Christian Apologetics program at Talbot School of Theology”.

That is the same Talbot School of Theology, Biola University, where McDowell’s father, Joslin “Josh” McDowell, received his Masters of Divinity.

In 2021, the (then) 81 year old McDowell made some non-descript remarks about the Jesuit Machine fad that is “Critical Race Theory”.  After making the generic remarks that were basically solid, truthful statements, a firestorm erupted in which the elder McDowell said his remarks did not reflect his remarks, groveled profusely at the altar of Race and “stepped back” from preaching for a “season of listening”.

The pay-walled Billy Graham magazine “Christianity Today” had the full breakdown.

Known by the acronym CRT, critical race theory has become controversial among Christian conservatives and political conservatives alike.

McDowell told Christian counselors that CRT “negates all the biblical teaching” about racism—because it focuses on systems rather than the sins of the human heart and said today’s definition of “social justice” is not biblical.

“There’s no comparison to what is known today as social justice with what the Bible speaks of as justice,” he said.  “With CRT they speak structurally.  The Bible speaks individually.  Make sure you get that.  That’s a big difference.”

He went on to say not all Americans have equal opportunities to succeed.

“They don’t, folks,” he said in his speech.  “I do not believe Blacks, African Americans, and many other minorities have equal opportunity.  Why?  Most of them grew up in families where there is not a big emphasis on education, security—you can do anything you want.  You can change the world.  If you work hard, you will make it.  So many African Americans don’t have those privileges like I was brought up with.”

He added that the Bible only focuses on individual sin, not structural sin.

McDowell’s comments were first noted on social media by Christian college professor Aaron New.  After New drew attention to those comments, a recording of McDowell’s speech was removed from the AACC website, where all the speeches and presentations at the conference are offered for sale. …

After being contacted by Religion News Service, McDowell issued a statement on social media apologizing for his remarks, saying they do not reflect his own beliefs. He said his comment about minority families “does not reflect reality.”

“Racism has kept equality from being achieved in our nation,” he said. …

On Wednesday, McDowell, 82, announced that he was stepping back from ministry and speaking engagements in the aftermath of his comments at the conference to enter a “season of listening.”

“At a recent conference, I made comments about race, the Black family, and minorities that were wrong and hurt many people,” he said. “It breaks my heart to know what deep pain I have caused.”

“Dr. Aaron New” followed up his outrage with:

Apparently he also claims “social justice is our next epidemic.”

.@josh_mcdowell Can you confirm and/or explain?

Because this is…… absolutely horrible.

— Aaron New (@DrAaronNew) September 18, 2021

To his credit, “Josh” McDowell overcame a physically abusive father and a sexually abusive family caretaker to come to Christ.

In both instances, McDowell was encouraged to give blanket, unsolicited “forgiveness”.

I have dealt, at length, with this mostly malignant, unBiblical heresy that McDowell fully promotes.⁷²

There are now three, successful generations of McDowell evangelists and despite all of their Biola University training (or because of it), not a one condemns the Roman Catholic Church as the Fourth and Final Beast of Daniel, the Whore drunk on the blood of the Saints from Revelation.

The very thing that caused “Josh” McDowell to “step back” from ministry, “social justice” was created by an Italian Jesuit who specialized in South American political insurgency, Prospero “Luigi” Taparelli.

Sean McDowell recently published a video on his popular YouTube channel where he and his son, “Scottie” addressed the Atheist 10 “Non-Commandments”.

It is a master-stroke in Jesuit mockery: lies founded on deception.  As a bold monument to the success of their malignant matrix, the third “Atheist Commandment” states “The Scientific Method is the most reliable way of understanding the natural world.”

As my latest book, Disciples of Ra, shows conclusively, neither “science” nor “medicine” follow the Scientific Method.  The McDowells simply accept this false premise and carry on the age-old dodge that “religion” is “at odds” with “science” but “here is your unworkable work-around: faith!”

In the video, “Scottie” is proudly wearing his Biola University t-shirt whilst his father sports some kind of Euro-military-grunge jacket over top of a t-shirt promoting “THE BATMAN”.

I am conflicted by this.

I do appreciate a high-profile Christian unafraid to be somewhat “secular”; usually the more publicly pious a Christian is, the more skeletons and demons they are hiding.

But high-profile Christian leaders and teachers must be extremely circumspect in everything they do.

James 3:1
1 Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers, for you know that we who teach will be judged with greater strictness.
English Standard Version

“THE BATMAN” is the title of a 2022 Warner Brothers comicbook reboot which I have shown at-length is a movie as Catholic as it is blasphemous and malignant to the common person.

“…that her child depart from her…”

Exodus 21:22-25 is crystal clear when read from Textus Receptus-based translations.  Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus translations are NOT trustworthy.

Perhaps most clear is the 1599 Geneva Bible—

Exodus 21:22-25
22 Also if men strive and hurt a woman with child, so that her child depart from her and death follow not, he shall be surely punished, according as the woman’s husband shall appoint him, or he shall pay as the Judges determine.
23 But if death follow, then thou shalt pay life for life.
24 Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
25 Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.
1599 Geneva Bible

“The Church”

McDowell: “How has the church and the Jewish community been consistently pro life?”

Klusendorf: “Most of your mainline Protestant churches are pro-abortion, as they are favorable towards gay marriage and trans ideology.”

Few statements could be a more resounding proof of something I’ve been saying for many years now: that is that organized religion is one of the most powerful weapons Satan wields in his ongoing agenda to take as many of us with him as he can.

The Most Dangerous Anti-Establishment Movement in History! Johnny Cirucci, 11 February 2016

Jesus referred to Himself in the Gospels as “son of man“ (Son of Man) 82 times and once more proclaimed by Stephen as he was being illegally put to death by enraged Jews in Acts 7:56.

And he said, “Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of Man standing at the Right Hand of God.”

In Biblical numerological patterns, eight is often symbolic of new beginnings, two is a witness and three is strength, completeness and inner-circle.

The common understanding of “son of man” is Jesus was constantly self-deprecating.  One might even claim “he” (He) was making it clear “he” (He) was not God.

After his death, his followers decided that Jesus had been divine.  This did not happen immediately; as we shall see, the doctrine that Jesus had been God in human form was not finalised [sic] until the fourth century.  The development of Christian belief in the Incarnation was a gradual, complex process.  Jesus himself certainly never claimed to be God.  At his baptism he had been called the Son of God by a voice from heaven but this was probably simply a confirmation that he was the beloved Messiah.  There was nothing particularly unusual about such a proclamation from above: the Rabbis often experienced what they called a bat qol (literally, ‘Daughter of the Voice’), a form of inspiration that had replaced the more direct prophetic revelations.  Rabbi Yohannan ben Zakkai had heard such a bat qol confirming his own mission on the occasion when the Holy Spirit had descended upon him and his disciples in the form of fire.  Jesus himself used to call himself ‘the Son of Man’.  There has been much controversy about this title but it seems that the original Aramaic phrase (bar nasha) simply stressed the weakness and mortality of the human condition.  If this is so, Jesus seems to have gone out of his way to emphasise [sic] that he was a frail human being who would one day suffer and die.⁶⁷

That’s Karen Armstrong, “former Roman Catholic nun”, “Dame of the British Empire” and “Fellow” of the “Royal Society of Literature”.  Armstrong is 79 and never married.

Unfortunately for her, none of her accolades or convent experiences showed her how to read a non-Catholic Bible.

All you need to do is pick up on the interplay between Jesus and devout or pious Jews.

Matthew 9:1-8
1 And entering into the boat, He passed over and came to His own city.⁶⁸ 2 And, behold!  They were bringing a paralytic lying on a cot to Him.  And seeing their faith, Jesus said to the paralytic, “Be comforted, child.  Your sins have been forgiven you.”
3 And, behold, some of the scribes said within themselves, “This one blasphemes.”
4 And seeing their thoughts, Jesus said, “Why do you think evil in your hearts?”⁶⁹ 5 “For what is easier, to say, ‘Your sins have been forgiven you’; or to say, ‘Rise up and walk?’”
6 “But that you may know that the Son of man has authority on Earth⁷³ to forgive sins”, then He said to the paralytic, “Rising up, lift up your cot and go to your house.”
7 And rising up, he went away to his house.
8 And seeing, the crowds marveled, and they glorified God who gave such authority to men.
Jay P. Green’s Literal Translation 1993

There is much controversy in the field of apologetics regarding the existence of miracles.  A “miracle” can be defined as Divine suspension and/or intervention of/in the natural order.  Such intervention is extremely rare and what better reason for YHWH to directly intervene in His Own natural order than to validate the Identity of His Son?

If you miss this interplay, the very threats on His Life for “blasphemy” will accent the incident!

John 8:31-59
31 So Jesus said to the Jews who had believed him, “If you abide in My Word, you are truly My disciples,”
32 “and you will know the Truth, and the Truth will set you free.”
33 They answered him, “We are offspring of Abraham and have never been enslaved to anyone.  How is it that you say, ‘You will become free’?”
34 Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, everyone who practices sin is a slave to sin.”
35 “The slave does not remain in the house forever; the son remains forever.”
36 “So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.”
37 “I know that you are offspring of Abraham; yet you seek to kill Me because My Word finds no place in you.”
38 “I speak of what I have seen with My Father, and you do what you have heard from your father.”
39 They answered him, “Abraham is our father.”  Jesus said to them, “If you were Abraham’s children, you would be doing the works Abraham did,”
40 “but now you seek to kill Me, a man who has told you the Truth that I heard from God.  This is not what Abraham did.”
41 “You are doing the works your father did.”  They said to him, “We were not born of sexual immorality.  We have one Father—even God.”
42 Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love Me, for I came from God and I Am here.  I came not of My Own Accord, but He sent Me.”
43 “Why do you not understand what I say?  It is because you cannot bear to hear My Word.”
44 “You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires.  He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the Truth, because there is no Truth in him.  When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies.”
45 “But because I tell the Truth, you do not believe Me.”
46 “Which one of you convicts me of sin?  If I tell the Truth, why do you not believe me?”
47 “Whoever is of God hears the Words of God.  The reason why you do not hear them is that you are not of God.”
48 The Jews answered him, “Are we not right in saying that you are a Samaritan and have a demon?”
49 Jesus answered, “I do not have a demon, but I honor my Father, and you dishonor me.”
50 “Yet I do not seek My Own glory; there is One who seeks it, and He is the Judge.”
51 “Truly, truly, I say to you, if anyone keeps My Word, he will never see death.”
52 The Jews said to him, “Now we know that you have a demon!  Abraham died, as did the prophets, yet you say, ‘If anyone keeps My Word, he will never taste death.’”
53 “Are you greater than our father Abraham, who died?  And the prophets died!  Who do You make Yourself out to be?”
54 Jesus answered, “If I glorify Myself, My Glory is nothing.  It is My Father who glorifies Me, of whom you say, ‘He is our God.’”
55 “But you have not known Him.  I know Him.  If I were to say that I do not know Him, I would be a liar like you, but I do know Him and I keep His Word.”
56 “Your father Abraham rejoiced that he would see My Day.  He saw it and was glad.”
57 So the Jews said to him, “You are not yet fifty years old, and have you seen Abraham?”
58 Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I Am.”
59 So they picked up stones to throw at Him [to kill Him], but Jesus hid Himself and went out of the Temple.
English Standard Version⁷⁴

What’s more, “son of man” (Son of Man) is actually an allusion to the beloved Prophet Daniel and his powerful vision of the four great beasts that complemented Nebuchadnezzar’s dream which he interpreted in Daniel 2.  His vision in Chapter 7 culminated in beholding a Divine Messiah with a very special title.

Daniel 7:13-14
13 I was looking in the night visions.  And behold!  One like the Son of Man came with the clouds of the heavens.  And He came to the Ancient of Days.  And they brought Him near before Him.
14 And dominion was given to Him, and glory, and a kingdom, that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve Him.  His dominion is an everlasting dominion which shall not pass away, and His kingdom that which shall not be destroyed.
Jay P. Green’s Literal Translation 1993

Looks like Dame Karen the unmarried former nun (and all like her) are wrong on all counts.

But there is another incident that humiliates Dame Karen and the skeptics even more and Jesus again alluded to Daniel with it.

Jesus was run through multiple illegal trials and the Jewish authorities were desperate to convict Him and put Him to death but they had nothing.

That is, until He gave them exactly what they were looking for.

Mark 14:53-64
53 And they led Jesus away to the High Priest.  And all the chief priests and the elders and the scribes came together to him.
54 And Peter followed Him from a distance, to the inside of the court of the High Priest.  And he was sitting with the under-officers, also warming himself near the light.
55 And the chief priests and the whole Sanhedrin sought testimony against Jesus, to put Him to death.  And they found none.
56 For many falsely testified against Him, but the testimonies were not identical.
57 And standing up, some falsely testified against Him, saying,
58 We heard Him saying, “I will throw down this temple made with hands, and through three days I will build another not made with hands.”
59 And neither in this was their testimony identical.
60 And standing in the middle, the High Priest questioned Jesus, saying, “Do you not answer?  Nothing?  What do these testify against you?”
61 But He was silent and answered nothing. [Isaiah 53:7]  Again the High Priest questioned Him, and said to Him, “Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?”
62 And Jesus said, “I AM!  And you will see the Son of Man sitting off the Right Hand of Power, and coming with the clouds of the Heaven.” [Psa. 110:1; Dan. 7:13]
63 And tearing his garments, the High Priest said, “Why do we still have need of witnesses?”
64 “You heard the blasphemy.  What does it seem to you?”  And they all condemned Him to be liable, even of death.
Jay P. Green’s Literal Translation 1993⁷⁵

If Jesus of Nazareth never claimed to be God He would never have been put to death.

These were not the only times Jesus made coded allusions to Daniel (who was, in his day, pointing back towards Christ).

Matthew 18:21-22
21 Then Peter came up and said to him, “Lord, how often will my brother sin against me, and I forgive him?  As many as seven times?”
22 Jesus said to him, “I do not say to you seven times, but seventy-seven times!”
English Standard Version

Most would call this extravagance or exaggeration on behalf of Jesus, making the point that there is no end to forgiving a brother when the injure you and repent of it with you—which it is—but as with so many powerful passages it has a deeper, second meaning.

The allusion is to Daniel Chapter 9, more commonly known as “the Seventy Weeks of Daniel”—a prophecy so important it could be considered the most important of Messianic Promises.

Daniel 9:21-27
21 And while I was setting my prayer in order, then the man Gabriel, whom I had seen in the vision at the beginning, touched me in my severe exhaustion about the time of the evening sacrifice.
22 And he enlightened me and talked with me, and said, O Daniel, I have now come out to give you skill in understanding.
23 At the beginning of your prayers the word came forth, and I have come to explain it.  For you are greatly beloved.  Then understand the matter and pay attention to the vision:
24 Seventy weeks are decreed as to your people, and as to your Holy City, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make atonement for wickedness, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the Most Holy.
25 Know, then, and understand that from the going out of a word to restore and to rebuild Jerusalem, to Messiah the Prince, shall be seven weeks and sixty two weeks.  The street shall be built again, and the wall, even in times of affliction.
26 And after sixty two weeks, Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself.  And the people of a coming prince shall destroy the city and the sanctuary.  And its end shall be with the flood, and ruins are determined, and war shall be until the end.
27 And he [He] shall confirm a [the] covenant [Covenant] with the many for one week.  And in the middle of the week he [He] shall cause the sacrifice and the offering to cease.  And on a wing of the altar will be abominations that desolate, even until the end.  And that which was decreed shall pour out on the desolator.
Jay P. Green’s Literal Translation 1993

“Seventy times seven” is a specific reference to Daniel 9:24 in which Gabriel tells Daniel just when to expect Messiah to appear!

Daniel 9:24
24 Shivi’im heptads [“seventy sevens”] is decreed upon thy people and upon thy Ir Kodesh (Holy City), to restrain the peysha (transgression), and to make an end of chattat (sin), and to make kapporah for avon, and to bring in Tzedek Olamim (Everlasting Righteousness), and to seal up the chazon and navi, and to anoint the Kodesh HaKodashim.
Orthodox Jewish Bible

There have been several interpretations of Daniel’s “Seventy Weeks”.  Perhaps the best known comes from a problematic source: Robert Anderson and his 1894 book The Coming Prince.

Sir Robert Anderson KCB [Knight Commander of the Royal Order of the Bath] (29 May 1841 – 15 November 1918) was the second Assistant Commissioner (Crime) of the London Metropolitan Police [also known as “Scotland Yard”], from 1888 to 1901.⁷⁶

The Ripper

In his 1976 book Jack The Ripper: The Final Solution, journalist Stephen Knight implicated Robert Anderson as being involved in the Scotland Yard coverup of the Ripper murders.

But more directly associated were the Queen’s personal physician Sir William Gull and the then-Prime Minister of England, Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, 3^rd Marquess of Salisbury (simply known as “Lord Salisbury”).

Albert Victor, Duke of Clarence and Avondale, known “lovingly” as “Prince Eddy” was a typical “Royal”: he had nothing to do but indulge his every urge and “learn the arts”.  Even that requirement of his effort was forced upon him by his mother, “Alexandra of Denmark, Queen of the United Kingdom and Empress of India”.

“Prince Eddy’s” main past-time was “Turkish baths” and homosexual sex with young men but he found time to fall in love with a poor and illiterate Irish Catholic woman named Annie Elizabeth Crook.  Crook resembled Albert Victor’s mother and he clung to her for stability, quickly siring an illegitimate daughter by her, Alice Margaret, on 18 April 1885.  Albert Victor would go on to marry Crook in both Anglican and Catholic ceremonies.

Yet try as they might to keep it secret, they were unable to and the scandal threatened to destroy the “House of Windsor”.

The Bill of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701 restrict succession to the throne to the legitimate Protestant descendants of Sophia of Hanover who are in “communion with the Church of England“.^[1]  Spouses of Catholics were disqualified from 1689 until the law was amended in 2015.⁷⁷

Both the Roman Catholic Church and the British Royals turned to Freemasonry for a solution and it was a vicious one.  Both Annie and Eddy were kidnapped by police disguised as “ruffians”.  The Queen’s personal physician, our Freemason William Gull, lobotomized Annie and Albert Victor was kept in seclusion.

Unfortunately, Annie had a friend—Mary Jean (“Marie Jeanette”) Kelly—who had nursed little Alice Margaret.  She was poor and would moonlight as a prostitute to supplement her living and she saw this as an opportunity to blackmail the artist who had put the two together, Walter Sickert, and, ultimately the “Royal family”.

Kelly was aided by several other poor women, all prostitutes.  The Royal Freemasons, enabled by their “brothers” in Scotland Yard, to include Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Charles Warren, tracked down the women.  Each was drugged and then brutally murdered with each body grotesquely left with Freemasonic symbolism such as entrails tossed over the left shoulder.

Unfortunately for her, the fourth victim (Catherine Eddowes) wasn’t even a blackmailer.  She had occasionally used the surname of a lover, John Kelly, and had been mistaken for Mary Kelly.  Kelly was ultimately hunted down and her body was carved the most viciously of all.

In his 2013 book The Falsification of History: Our Distorted Reality, my friend John Hamer states that William Gull had an accomplice: Lord Randolph Henry Spencer-Churchill.

Prior to the 1888 murder-spree, Spencer-Churchill had been the Tory Leader of the House of Commons and then Chancellor of the Exchequer (Britain’s top financial official).

He was a Freemason and the father of future Prime Minister Winston Churchill; also a Freemason.

In another effort to the newest of never-ending slaughters, the “Global War on Terror”, Skull and Bones Bush President No. 43 (not to be confused with Skull and Bones Bush President No. 41, bracketing their CIA cocaine buddy William Jefferson [Rockefeller] Clinton), stated of Churchill:

He said, “History will be kind to me — for I intend to write it.”  (Laughter.) History has been kind to Winston Churchill…

[Shriner Freemason] Franklin Roosevelt … once wrote to [Churchill], “It is fun to be in the same decade with you.” [Wounded, maimed, raped, mentally and emotionally ruined not included, combined death tolls of the second Roman Catholic Thirty Years War, “World Wars 1 & 2” just short of ONE BILLION human beings.] …

He was a prisoner in the Boer War, a controversial strategist in the Great War.  He was the rallying voice of the Second World War, and a prophet of the Cold War.

With the Jesuitical spin of “controversial strategist”, what Skull and Bones Bush 43 was actually saying is that “First Lord of the Admiralty” Churchill was personally responsible for the slaughter of 2,000 men, woman and children on board the RMS Lusitania.  At the same time (1915), Churchill was also responsible for the deaths of a quarter of a million human beings for his “Gallipoli campaign”.  It was a resounding slaughter for the British, French and Russian “Allies” against the Ottoman Turks and yet Churchill rose [was elevated] to Prime Minister for the bigger slaughter of “World War II”.

Churchill had, in fact, used his family influence to give himself an adventurous “taste of danger” and he survived with some stories to tell.

The two take-aways from that are:

1. Even people with adventuresome stories in their resumes can still be compromised, cowardly killers.
2. It’s fun when you have to use your blue blood to experience danger, have tea served to you and come right back home. That’s not how it works for the common men who die or get maimed just so that those same Elite can get even more wealthy.

Plausible Deniability

Knight did state that, if Robert Anderson had participated in the brutal “Ripper” assassinations, it was in the cover-up and he took no active part in the grisly murders.  Given Anderson’s position as a deputy chief law enforcement officer, this is no mark of integrity.

As for poor Stephen Knight, John Hamer states:

In the late 1970s, a researcher and author, Stephen Knight, managed to obtain limited access to the ‘Ripper’ files but discovered that there were many gaps in the records.  Despite this, he still managed to unearth new leads and information based upon which he wrote a book ‘Jack the Ripper – the final solution’.  Unfortunately before publication, many of the more incriminating parts were ‘stolen’ and in those days, before personal computers were commonplace, he had no back-ups or copies as protection. After the book was eventually published, minus the more incriminating information, he published another book.  ‘The Brotherhood’ which exposed the gross corruption and illegality prevalent in the freemasonic movement and shortly afterwards he was dead – allegedly poisoned, but of course no arrests were ever made.⁷⁸

Knight was 33.

The Coming Prince

Do the allegations against Robert Anderson mean his deciphering the Seventy Weeks prophecy in Daniel 9 can not be trusted?  We must approach it with the proper skepticism because Anderson’s computations make a very strong case.

The critical point of the prophecy is “when to start the clock” but there is an even more important point missing by men like William Miller, Master Mason founder of Seventh Day Adventism: “What kind of clock do we use?”

When Miller repeatedly prophesied the return of Jesus Christ based upon Daniel 8:14—in direct contravention of Christ’s warning Matthew 24:36—he used the purposefully convoluted calendar of Jesuit Christopher Clavius.  As a quick aside, the phrase “nor the Son” placed at the end of “no man knows the day or the hour” is not found in reliable manuscripts and Desiderius Erasmus did not include it in his Textus Receptus (the foundation of the 1611 Authorized Version).

“Know therefore and discern that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah, the Prince, shall be seven weeks and threescore and two weeks: it shall be built again with street and moat, even in troublous times.”^[17]

Now it is an undisputed fact that Jerusalem was rebuilt by Nehemiah, under an edict issued by Arta-xerxes (Longimanus), in the twentieth year of his reign.  Therefore, notwithstanding the doubts which controversy throws upon everything, the conclusion is obvious and irresistible that this was the epoch of the prophetic period.  But the month date was Nisan, and the sacred year of the Jews began with the phases of the Paschal moon.  I appealed, therefore, to the Astronomer Royal, the late Sir George Airy, to calculate for me the moon’s place for March in the year in question, and I thus ascertained the date required — March 14^th, B.C. 445.

This being settled, one question only remained: Of what kind of year does the era consist?  And the answer to this is definite and clear. That it is the ancient year of 360 days is plainly proved in two ways.  First, because, according to Daniel and the Apocalypse, 3 ½ prophetic years are equal to 1, 260 days; and, secondly, because it can be proved that the 70 years of the “Desolations” were of this character; and the connection between the period of the “Desolations” and the era of the “weeks” is one of the few universally admitted facts in this controversy.  The “Desolations” began on the 10^th Tebeth, B.C. 589 (a day which for four-and-twenty centuries has been commemorated by the Jews as a fast), and ended on the 24^th Chisleu, B.C. 520.

Having thus settled the terminus a quo of the “weeks,” and the form of year of which they are composed, nothing remains but to calculate the duration of the era.  Its terminus ad quem can thus with certainty be ascertained.  Now 483 years (69 x 7) of 360 days contain 173, 880 days.  And a period of 173, 880 days, beginning March 14^th, B.C. 445, ended upon that Sunday in the week of the crucifixion [6 April 32 A.D.], when, for the first and only time in His ministry, the Lord Jesus Christ, in fulfillment of Zechariah’s prophecy, made a public entry into Jerusalem, and caused His Messiahship to be openly proclaimed by “the whole multitude of the disciples.” (Luke 19)⁷⁹

It should be noted that not even the best translations available, which are mostly Erasmus Textus Receptus derived such as the 1611 Authorized Version, do not handle the pronouns in verse 27 with proper understanding.

Daniel 9:25-27
25 Know, then, and understand that from the going out of a word to restore and to rebuild Jerusalem, to Messiah the Prince, shall be seven weeks and sixty two weeks.  The street shall be built again, and the wall, even in times of affliction.
26 And after sixty two weeks, Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself.  And the people of a coming prince shall destroy the city [“City”: there’s only one Jerusalem] and the sanctuary [“Sanctuary”: there were two Temples but each was unique in its day serving a single, unique purpose just as the Tabernacle of Moses and Aaron did].  And its end shall be with the flood, and ruins are determined, and war shall be until the end.
27 And he [He: the Messiah!] shall confirm a covenant [THE Covenant!] with the many for one week.  And in the middle of the week he [He] shall cause the sacrifice and the offering to cease. [Messiah will stop the sacrifice by fulfilling it with His Own!]  And on a wing of the altar will be abominations that desolate, even until the end. [Here’s the tricky part: Messiah fulfilled the Sacrifice and cursed the Temple but the Antichrist Romans ended the Sacrifice in 70 A.D.]  And that which was decreed shall pour out on the desolator. [Even though Rome carried out Messiah’s Curse, she did it of her own accord, not for Him.  She shall drink twice the cup from which she forced upon others—Revelation 18:6.] Jay P. Green’s Literal Translation 1993

When Christ Openly Referenced Daniel, It Was STILL Coded!

Matthew 24:1-25
1 And going out, Jesus left the Temple.  And His disciples came to show Him the buildings of the Temple.
2 But Jesus said to them, “Do you not see all these things?  Truly I say to you, ‘There will not at all be left one stone on a stone which in no way will not be thrown down.’”
3 And as He was sitting on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, “Tell us, when will these things be?”  And, “What is the Sign of Your return and of the end of the age?”
4 And answering, Jesus said to them, “See that not any leads you astray.”
5 “For many will come in My Name, saying, I am the Christ.  And they will cause many to be led astray.”
6 “But you are going to hear of wars and rumors of wars.  See, do not be terrified.  For all things must take place, but the end is not yet.”
7 “For nation will be raised against nation, and kingdom against kingdom; and there will be famines and plagues and earthquakes against many places.”
8 “But all these are a beginning of throes.”
9 “Then they will deliver you up to affliction, and will kill you, and you will be hated by all nations for My Name’s Sake.”
10 “And then many will be offended, and they will deliver up one another and will hate one another.”
11 “And many false prophets will be raised and will cause many to err.”
12 “And because lawlessness shall have been multiplied, the love of the many will grow cold.”
13 “But the one who endures to the end, that one will be kept safe.”
14 “And this Gospel of the Kingdom shall be preached in all the Earth for a testimony to all the nations, and then will come the end.”
15 “Then when you see the Abomination of Desolation, which was spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the Holy Place (the one reading, let him understand),” [Dan. 11:31; 12:11—references by Green which should include 9:27]
16 “then let those in Judea flee on the mountains;”
17 “the one on the housetop, let him not come down to take anything out of his house;”
18 “and the one in the field, let him not turn back to take his garment.”
19 “But woe to the woman having a child in womb, and to those suckling in those days!”
20 “And pray that your flight will not be in winter nor on a Sabbath.”
21 “For there will be great affliction, such as has not happened from the beginning of the world until now, no, nor ever will be.”
22 “And except those days were shortened, not any flesh would be saved.  But on account of the Elect, those days will be shortened.”
23 “Then if anyone says to you, ‘Behold, here is the Christ!’ Or, ‘Here!’  Do not believe.”
24 “For false christs and false prophets will rise up.  And they will give great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the Elect.”
25 “Behold, I tell you beforehand.”
Jay P. Green’s Literal Translation 1993⁸⁰

There have been many guesses as to what Jesus is referencing but those who believed in Jesus as the Christ were given a clear sign during the Zealot rebellion of 68 A.D.

In 66 A.D. the Roman Procurator Gessius Florus was annoyed at the paucity of tax returns.  He made up what he felt was the difference with wealth he forcibly stole from the Temple treasury.

This incited the Zealots to revolt and forced Gessius Florus to flee.

It is a fascinating twist that the Zealots were areligious and had nothing but disdain for the Temple and the Priesthood.

The nation was split amongst several factions so the Zealots recruited Idumeans (Edomites, the children of Esau) to bolster their numbers.

According to the Jewish historian Josephus (who defected to the Romans when they arrived two years later) there was a great slaughter, even within the Temple, defiling it, starting with leading citizen Zacharias ben Baruch.

It is at this point that a direct quote by Josephus is again in order:

“These men trampled upon all the laws of men and laughed at the laws of God.  And as for the oracles of the prophets, they ridiculed them as the tricks of a juggler.”

“There was a certain ancient oracle of those men, that the city should then be taken and the sanctuary burnt, by right of war, when a sedition should invade the Jews, and their own hand should pollute the temple of God.”

[My Personal Note]: I find this last quote interesting.  What prophecy was Josephus talking about?  I do know, though, as we read in the Olivet Discourse in Mark 13, Matthew 24, and Luke 21, that Jesus did prophesy that the temple would be destroyed in language rather similar to this.⁸¹

Next, Legate of Syria, Cestius Gallus, brought the XII Legion to besiege Jerusalem.  Surprisingly, he underestimated the defenders and lost as many as 6,000 soldiers in his failure.

This encouraged the Jews to fortify their positions as Emperor Nero dispatched Vespasian to Palestine.

Vespasian brutally and methodically crushed his way towards Jerusalem but he, too, was interrupted by the death of Nero on 9 June 68 A.D.  Rome was embroiled in a leadership struggle that saw four men ascend the throne: Galba (who was assassinated), Otho (committed suicide), Vitellius (murdered by Vespasian supporters) and then Vespasian, himself, who ruled from 69 to 79 A.D.

All of this turmoil, much of it focused on the Temple, provided followers of Christ multiple opportunities to heed His Warnings and flee the city before it’s fiery end in 70 A.D.

Beyond Chapter 9, verse 27, there are two more references in Daniel to Temple desolation.

Daniel 9:27 seems clearly to be concerning the Temple’s destruction in 70 A.D. by the “people of the prince to come”.  Just ask any Pope if his lineage includes the military Roman Empire and he’ll just smile.

The reference in Daniel Chapter 12 seems as if it could be related to the crimes of Seleucid ruler (Seleucus I, one of Alexander’s four succeeding generals) Antiochus IV Epiphanes, his suppression of Judaism, profaning the Temple and successful revolt by Levite Priest Mattathias and his son Judas Maccabeus.

11 And from the time the regular sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that desolates set up, a thousand, two hundred and ninety days shall occur.

The dates between Antiochus’ sacrifice to Zeus in the Temple and the cleansing of the Temple by Maccabeus is attested by outside sources to be close enough for a precise fulfillment (depending upon who sets what date and does which counting).

Daniel Chapter 11 involves the kings of the North and South.  It is the king of the North who also defiles the Temple.

Daniel 11:31-32
31 And forces will stand away from him, and they will profane the Sanctuary, the fortress.  And they shall remove the regular Sacrifice, and they will place the abomination that desolates.
32 And he will defile by flatteries those who do evil against the Covenant.  But the people who know their God will be strong and will work.
Jay P. Green’s Literal Translation 1993⁸²

The key to the identity of the King of the North can be found in phrases like “defile by flatteries” and how the King of the North contrives war with the King of the South by the two sitting at the same table. [Daniel 11:27]

The purpose of the Tabernacle and first two Temples was to provide a conduit from YHWH to the people through the Levitical Priesthood but it was not a direct conduit and one that required strict regulations of cleansing and hierarchy.

Paul repeatedly explained in several passages that the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ turns each Believer into their own Temple, capable of direct interaction with YHWH by His Blood! [I Corinthians 3:9, 3:16-17, 6:19, II Corinthians 6:16, Ephesians 2:21]

The King of the North is the Papal Antichrist, the same Antichrist predicted by Jesus who would speak in His Name, as all Popes blasphemously claim when they pronounce “Ex cathedra”, “from the Chair”.

II Thessalonians 2:1-4
1 And, brothers, we entreat you, by the return of our Lord Jesus Christ, and of our gathering together to Him,
2 for you not to be quickly shaken in the mind, nor to be disturbed, neither through a spirit, nor through speech, nor through letter, as through us, as if the Day of Christ has come.
3 Do not let anyone deceive you in any way, because that Day will not come unless first comes the falling away, and the man of sin is revealed, the son of perdition,
4 the one opposing and exalting himself over everything being called God, or object of worship, so as for him “to sit in the temple of God” as God, proclaiming that he himself is God. [Dan. 11:36; Eze. 28:2] Jay P. Green’s Literal Translation 1993

There was no “chair” in the Holy of Holies.  It was blasphemy for the High Priest to sit in the Sanctuary.

But all Popes are conveyed with great pomp in their “Throne of Saint Peter”.

Some of them, like Eugenio “Pius XII” Pacelli, reveled in it repeatedly.

There can never be a physical Abomination of Desolation because Messiah cursed the City and Sanctuary—

Matthew 23:37-24:2
37 “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to it!  How often would I have gathered your children together as a hen gathers her brood under her wings, and you were not willing!”
38 “See, your house is left to you desolate.”
39 “For I tell you, you will not see me again, until you say, ‘Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.’”

Chapter 24

1 Jesus left the Temple and was going away, when his disciples came to point out to him the buildings of the Temple.
2 But He answered them, “You see all these, do you not?  Truly, I say to you, there will not be left here one stone upon another that will not be thrown down.”
English Standard Version⁸³

—never to be rebuilt—

Galatians 2:18
18. If I rebuild what I have already torn down, I prove myself to be a lawbreaker.
Berean Standard Bible

The Abomination of Desolation is the destruction of Christ’s Sacrifice by deception.  The Papal Son of Perdition—a title of betrayal the Papacy shares with Judas Iscariot (John 17:12, Authorized Version)—claims it is the “Vicar of Christ on Earth”.⁸⁴

There are many soul-traps laid out by the Catholic Church, not the least of which is “Mary, Mother of God, Co-Mediatrix and Co-Redemptrix, the Queen of Heaven”.  Interestingly, the Apostle Paul had already defeated the majority of these traps that were also shared by the Jews of his day in the letter to the Hebrews⁸⁵: worship of angels, prayers to the dead, wrongfully equating Jesus as equal to a Priest when He is the High Priest, King of kings and Lord of lords. [Revelation 22:13]  That is why the Roman Catholic Church suppressed the Bible for a thousand years and tortured anyone “unauthorized” to have one, found with one.

Daniel Demoted

There are only two men in Scripture to be given the special title of “beloved” by God.  One is John the Apostle.  The other is the Prophet Daniel.  John and Daniel are the premier sources for both the identity of Jesus of Nazareth as Christ and Papal Rome as Antichrist.

As a result, modern “Judaism” refuses to acknowledge Daniel amongst the Prophets and it is he who will condemn them before the King of kings.

It has been leaked Ukraine is using dummy decoys of military equipment to fool Russia!

In the crazy world of “fake news” and “conspiracy theories”, truly cynical nutters would claim that such decoys were being utilized to lend validity to a war that never was.

But that is not the case!

It is a brilliant strategy that has done nothing less than enrage Vladimir Putin, himself!!

This story has been allowed to have extremely limited circulation because the CIA’s own Washington Post has allowed it.

It’s a story that’s been written like this:

The evil Vladimir Putin has initiated an unprovoked criminal invasion of innocent Ukraine.

But evil Russia only managed to take a few measly hundred kilometers before the brave people of Ukraine rallied behind their stalwart superhero leader: a cross-dressing Jewish comedian.

The West, NATO (“HATO” in Cyrillic), and the brave women and transgenders at the Central Intelligence Agency couldn’t let this outrage go on and immediately spent taxpayer millions that weren’t theirs to spend giving gifts of death and destruction to the brave people of Ukraine.

It is unfortunate that some … okay, maybe most of that equipment has gone missing.  Mr. Zelensky and the brilliant generals around him were all very organized and then some wind blew the paper receipts ⁷⁵ they were using to track the thousands of Javelin and Stinger missiles and they all got mixed up with receipts from the Chinese take-out the night before.  (Hey, it was really good Moo-Goo Gai Pan, straight from real China!)

HATO is not really worried about finding all the misplaced missiles.  The CIA has friends everywhere.  They’ll turn up.

In the mean time we’ll take care of this by not letting you see when we gift powerful military equipment anymore.

Technically, these gifts come from you, the taxpayer, but Lockheed, British Aerospace and the Jesuits at Raytheon are all very appreciative of your post-pandemic generosity!

In the mean time, we far-Left anti-war Catholics running the West are all redoubling our efforts to send even more missiles!

And it’s working!

Brave Ukrainians are slowly taking back the land that evil Russia stole from them!

By the time you’ve forgotten that you’ve been illegally forcibly vaccinated to keep your job, by the time you’ve forgotten that your family business was stolen from you so that Amazon, Walmart and China could grow exponentially, by the time you’ve forgotten that Big Pharma has skunked you again, by the time you’ve forgotten that grandma and grandpa were murdered by the medical-industrial-government complex, everything will be back to the way it was!

Of course, you’ll be a lot poorer because this terrible war has cost you $5 gallon gasoline but this is the cost of “war” and we’ll quickly adjust to our “new normal”.

As the great Jesuit—ah, “Chinese General”—Sun Tzu once wrote, “All war is deception.”  (Yes, it is true that this is in the Jesuit Fourth Vow of Extreme Unction, a.k.a. “Blood Oath”…that’s just a coincidence.)

Part of that deception has been those wily Ukrainians making phony mock-ups of some of the gifted Western equipment they’ve received.

This story has been covered by our friends (whom we trust implicitly) at the Washington Post so there’s no need for us to look into it ourselves.  We’ll just re-post the Post.

They were very specific!  The only deception that occurred has been by making pretend versions of one piece of gifted Western equipment.

KYIV, Ukraine — Ukraine may be outgunned, but in the latest sign it is not yet outfoxed, a fleet of decoys resembling advanced U.S. rocket systems has tricked Russian forces into wasting expensive long-range cruise missiles on dummy targets, according to interviews with senior U.S. and Ukrainian officials and photographs of the replicas reviewed by The Washington Post.

The Ukrainian decoys are made out of wood but can be indistinguishable from an artillery battery through the lens of Russian drones, which transmit their locations to naval cruise-missile carriers in the Black Sea.

“When the UAVs see the battery, it’s like a VIP target,” said a senior Ukrainian official, referring to unmanned aerial vehicles, or drones, encountering long-range artillery replicas. …

The use of rocket system decoys, which has not been reported previously, is one of many asymmetrical tactics Ukraine’s armed forces have adopted to fight back against a bigger and better-equipped invading enemy.  In recent weeks, Kyiv’s operatives have blown up rail and electricity lines in occupied Russian territory, detonated explosives inside Russian arms depots and assassinated suspected collaborators.

The destruction of Ukrainian replicas may partly account for Russia’s unusually boastful battle damage assessments on Western artillery, particularly the U.S.-made High Mobility Artillery Rocket System, or HIMARS.

“They’ve claimed to have hit more HIMARS than we have even sent,” one U.S. diplomat observed. ~ the CIA…sorry, I mean “The Washington Post” [some conspiracy theorist put that bold in there…sorry again]

You’re probably curious to know what these fake pieces of “HIMARS” look like but it’s not important!  We will show you what the real once look like every time we re-report what the Washington Post has allowed us to journalize!

When you see them enough, you’ll even think they’re real, too!!

There have been some nosy nobodys who looked into this further and found some obscure, questionable references to all kinds of other fake military equipment, but they are neither trained nor licensed to give you real news that isn’t fake news!

Ukrainian inflatable decoys pic.twitter.com/fUaLiucTW1

— Lost Weapons (@LostWeapons) February 10, 2018

This one bit of fake “HIMARS” (and nothing else) is working for the foxy, undergunned Ukrainians!  It has made evil Vladimir Putin very wealthy…ah, angry!

Do not believe these conspiracy theorists telling you that you’ve been faked out by the fake news of a fake war to make you forget the very real crimes that have been committed against you…because that’s just fake.

Unlicensed bloggers never professionally trained in propaganda (sorry, “journalism”), chronicling Ukrainian fake armies as early as 2018 and whacky conspiracy theorists claiming that Jewish cross-dressing comedian Volodymyr Zelenskyy was installed in 2019 all as part of a pre-planned, premeditated pandemic exit strategy is so ridiculous anyone saying it should be jailed.

In 1944, at the age of two, McConnell’s upper left leg was paralyzed by a polio attack.

As I have shown in my latest book, The Disciples of Ra!, paralysis occurs as a result of poisoning, and has nothing to do with the fraud of “viruses”.  At this time and through the 1950’s and 60’s, children (and later adults) were attacked with paralysis through the toxicity of insecticides like “Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane”, more commonly known as “DDT”.

* McConnell’s family moved from Alabama to Louisville, Kentucky, where he then enrolled in a high school founded by Du Pont war profiteering largess.

The normal profits of a business concern in the United States are six, eight, ten, and sometimes twelve percent.  But war-time profits — ah! that is another matter — twenty, sixty, one hundred, three hundred, and even eighteen hundred per cent — the sky is the limit.  All that traffic will bear.  Uncle Sam has the money.  Let’s get it.

Of course, it isn’t put that crudely in war time.  It is dressed into speeches about patriotism, love of country, and “we must all put our shoulders to the wheel,” but the profits jump and leap and skyrocket — and are safely pocketed. Let’s just take a few examples:

Take our friends the du Ponts, the powder people — didn’t one of them testify before a Senate committee recently that their powder won the war?  Or saved the world for democracy?  Or something?  How did they do in the war?  They were a patriotic corporation.

Well, the average earnings of the du Ponts for the period 1910 to 1914 were $6,000,000 a year [$175,217,575.76 adjusted for fiat “Federal Reserve” “inflation” today].  It wasn’t much, but the du Ponts managed to get along on it.  Now let’s look at their average yearly profit during the war years, 1914 to 1918.  Fifty-eight million dollars [$1,693,769,898.99] a year profit we find!  Nearly ten times that of normal times, and the profits of normal times were pretty good.  An increase in profits of more than 950 per cent. ~ War Is A Racket, Smedley Butler⁸⁰

* McConnell learned the early stages of secret-keeping and possibly/likely sexual deviancy via the University of Louisville Phi Kappa Tau fraternity.

* McConnell was barely into his 20’s when he was gifted into politics.

In 1964, at the age of 22, he … interned with Senator John Sherman Cooper.

Cooper was Yale Skull and Bones.  Father, John Sherman Cooper (Senior?) was “named after the Apostle John and ‘Civil War hero’ William Tecumseh Sherman”.

The Apostle John or John the Baptist?

Another reason why [Jesuit Boston College Dracula expert] Radu Florescu’s sister Yvonne would choose the name “John the Baptist” upon her consecration as a Benedictine nun is Johannism.

Johannism is a secret and powerful heresy within Catholic upper echelons that claims the Baptist was the true Messiah and Jesus of Nazareth was an imposter. It was Johannism that encouraged the Templars to spit upon their crucifixes, in their rites.^lxxxviii  All the same, the action was enough to fuel a suppression of the Templars by the King of France, Philippe le Bel, on “unlucky” Friday the 13th in October of 1307.^lxxxix ~ Romans of Mass Destruction, Cirucci⁸²

Such a name-game is likely being played by Jorge Mario Bergoglio who, upon ascending to the so-called “Chair of Saint Peter” took upon him the new and unique name of “Francis”, supposedly to honor the founder of the Franciscans, Francis of Assisi.  Does this have a double meaning for Jesuits and hyper-devout Catholics in secretly honoring the co-founder of the Company of Loyola, Francis Xavier?

The convention of Popes taking on new names is meant to mimic Kings who take new names upon their “throne ascension” which is done by “blood right”.  Their inbred lineage has given them a “Divine Right” to tyrannize you.

William Tecumseh Sherman’s “heroism” included a vicious scorched-earth campaign of brutal punishment, burning his way across the South.  Sherman was adopted, raised Catholic (“Tecumseh” was given at his “baptism”) and married a Catholic: his sister.  His first-born son Thomas became a Jesuit Priest and gave him “Last Rites” on his deathbed.

* In 1967, McConnell continued his career in politics by becoming a lawyer: an occupation that warps power, hides behind Latin (like “Doctors”) and finances massive wealth with thievery and abuse.  It spawns the majority of politicians.

* McConnell breezed through the Roman Catholic meatgrinder that was the Vietnam War.

In March 1967, shortly before the expiration of his educational draft deferment upon graduation from law school, McConnell enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve as a private at Louisville, Kentucky.^[20]  This was a coveted position because the Reserve units were mostly kept out of combat during the Vietnam War.^{[20][21]: 11–12}  His first day of training at Fort Knox, Kentucky, was July 9, 1967, two days after taking the bar exam, and his last day was 15 August 1967.^[14][20]  Shortly after his arrival, he was diagnosed with optic neuritis and was deemed medically unfit for military service.^[20][22]  After five weeks at Fort Knox, he was honorably discharged.^[20]  His brief time in service has repeatedly been put at issue by his political opponents during his electoral campaigns.^[20][22][23] ~ Wikipedia

* McConnell danced around the periphery of power until, in 1977, he was selected as the Judge/Executive of Jefferson County, Kentucky.  In 1984, he was selected “United States Senator” (as opposed to a Roman Senator) for Kentucky.  He continues to be re-selected and his cumulative time in politics is now approaching sixty years.

* McConnell is supposedly a “Southern Baptist” yet his personal facts do not speak of Baptist considerations.  His first marriage ended in divorce after only 12 years.  His ex-wife became a “feminist scholar”.  Thirteen years later, he remarried at 51 into a very noteworthy family.

McConnell is a Southern Baptist, baptized at age 8.^[202]  He was married to his first wife, Sherrill Redmon, from 1968 to 1980 and had three daughters, Porter, Eleanor (Elly), and Claire.^{[203][204][205]}  Following her divorce from McConnell, Sherrill became a feminist scholar at Smith College and director of the Sophia Smith Collection.^[206][207] His second wife, whom he married in 1993, is Elaine Chao, Secretary of Labor under President George W. Bush and Secretary of Transportation under President Donald Trump.^[208] ~ Wikipedia

It is also interesting to note that Chao was forty years old when she married McConnell and, apparently, had not found “love” prior to this.

Arguably, Elaine Chao’s resume of power is even more powerful than her husband’s.

Before entering public service, Chao was vice president for syndications at Bank of America Capital Markets Group in San Francisco, and she was an International Banker at Citicorp in New York for four years from 1979 to 1983.^[10]  She was granted a White House Fellowship in 1983 during the Reagan Administration^[11] and was then Vice President, Syndications at Bank of America from 1984 to 1986.

In 1986, Chao became Deputy Administrator of the Maritime Administration in the U.S. Department of Transportation.  From 1988 to 1989, she served as Chairwoman of the Federal Maritime Commission.^[12]  In 1989, President George H. W. Bush nominated Chao to be Deputy Secretary of Transportation; she served from 1989 to 1991.^[13]  From 1991 to 1992, she was the Director of the Peace Corps.^[12] …

Following her service in President George H.W. Bush’s administration, Chao worked for three years from 1993 to 1996 as president and CEO of United Way of America.^[16][17] …

U.S. Secretary of Labor (2001–2009)

Chao was the only cabinet member in the George W. Bush administration to serve for the entirety of his eight years.^[21] …

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump announced on November 29, 2016, that he would nominate Chao to be Secretary of Transportation.^[13]  The U.S. Senate confirmed Chao on 31 January 2017, by a vote of 93–6, with her husband, then-Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell, abstaining.^[55] ~ Wikipedia

As I have covered in two separate books, Eaters of Children and The Disciples of Ra!, “Secretary of Labor” is a valuable position in that it oversees United States government human trafficking regulation (yes, “regulation”).

Notice the extreme disparity in Chao’s positions!  She has been richly rewarded as an expert in banking, labor, transportation, philanthropy and “conservative strategy” and that’s just for starters!

In 2009 Chao resumed her previous role as a Distinguished Fellow at The Heritage Foundation,^[20] and she contributed to Fox News and other media outlets.^[39]

She also served as a director on a number of corporate and non-profit boards,^[10][40] including the Institute of Politics at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government, Wells Fargo,^[41] New York–Presbyterian Hospital, News Corp,^[42] Dole Food Company,^[43] and Protective Life Corporation.^[44][45][46]  According to financial disclosure forms, Chao was slated to receive $1–5 million as compensation for her service on the board of Wells Fargo.^[47]  In June 2011, she was awarded the Woodrow Wilson Award for Public Service.^[48] ~ Wikipedia

Is Elaine Chao truly that brilliant?  Is she so dominating a leader that everyone from hospitals to health insurers, Republicans to Rupert Murdoch desperately need her sage guidance and are willing to pay millions to get it?

The Chao legacy begins with matriarch Ruth Mulan Chu(-)Chao.

Legends say that the Chu family attempted to escape a brutal Japanese occupation but back-tracked in their haste, realizing they forgot the family gold (what poor Chinese family doesn’t have such a stash?).  They decided to send back their 8-year-old little girl (named after the legendary cross-dressing heroine) back through gangs of murderers, rapists and thieves to retrieve it; which she did by cunningly sewing it into her tattered clothing.

She would go on to marry “Number One Sea Captain” James Si-Cheng Chao.

Chao was born on 29 December 1927^[3] in a small, rural farming village called Malu in Jiading County (now Jiading District) outside Shanghai, Republic of China.  His parents were Yi-Ren Chao, an elementary school principal, and Yu-Chin Hsu Chao. They were farmers who “emphasized the value of education”.^[4]

Chao attended schools near Shanghai, including Shanghai Jiao Tong University (formerly National Chiao Tung University) and Wusong Merchant Marine College, where he majored in navigation.  He finished his coursework in 1949 and went to sea as a cadet on a merchant vessel.  At the climax of the Chinese Civil War, Chao’s ship went to Taiwan, where it remained.^[5] ~ Wikipedia

What the “user” who “edited” this Wikipedia entry means by “Chinese Civil War” is the West’s installment^{83, 86, 87} of one of the most brutal mass-murderers in human history, Mao Tse-tung / “Zedong” / “ze Dung”, etc. (lovingly referred to as simply “Mao”).

James Chao relocated to America and, as soon as he did, he sought out more education from a premier Roman Catholic college.

In the mid-1950s, Chao advanced through the ranks to become one of the youngest sea captains at the age of 29.^[6][7]  He moved to the United States in 1958, settling in New York City the same year.^[8][9]  He received a master’s degree in management from St. John’s University in 1964.^[5] ~ Wikipedia

When Chao landed at St. John’s, he made his home there.  The Captain came onboard the Board of Trustees at St. John’s.  When his wife, Ruth Mulan Chu(-)Chao decided at 51 to return to school to learn “Asian Literature”, she learned it from the Priests and Nuns at St. John’s.

Disappointed that they missed him, other Catholic institutions rushed to honor the Number One Captain.

Roman Catholic (but public-sounding) Niagara University gave Chao an “honorary Doctorate of Law”.

Roman Catholic (but non-descriptive) Nyack College gave him an “honorary Doctorate of Letters”.

Missing from his Foremost Group bio, was the honorary Doctorate given him in 2016 by “Jesuit affiliated” Fu Jen Catholic University of Beijing.  Daughter “Honorable Elaine L. Chao” accompanied her father to receive an “outstanding public service achievement award” (she was given an honorary Doctorate by the “affiliated Jesuits” in 2013).

Supposed “Evangelical Christian” guru and secret “Templar Freemason” Norman Vincent Peale (a man idolized by Billy Graham⁸⁸) created the “Horatio Alger” award to “honor Americans who succeed in spite of adversity”.

Alger was a “brilliant author of young adult stories” (an endeavor easy to make “classic” or laud as “brilliant” with little to criticize) but the young boys who were encouraged to adore Alger and his stories were also being encouraged to follow him in his Unitarian heresy of denying the Divinity of Jesus Christ—as most “Templar Freemasons” who believe that John the Baptist was the true Messiah already do.

In 2009, James Chao was given the Horatio Alger Award to commemorate the adversity his millions of dollars brought him.  To tacitly imply U.S. government approval, it was given on the steps of the Supreme Court.

Interestingly, the Horatio Alger Association chose 23 September 2015 as the date to upload the James Chao commemoration to its YouTube channel.

By “coincidence”, this was the same date that the first Jesuit Pope was making the Vatican’s very first victory tour of Rome’s secretly-controlled United States government and it’s teleprompter-reading figurehead, Barack Hussein Obama.

The United States Department of “Homeland Security” isn’t known for giving accolades but when it came to James Chao, he was thanked for being an “Outstanding American by Choice” in 2008.

Just what was it that made the Vatican and the United States government so excited about Number One Captain James Chao?

In 2014, The Nation published a story disclosing how Chao’s “Foremost Maritime” (also known as “Foremost Shipping”) Corporation was being investigated for having a vessel found with a secret hold filled with cocaine.  The article was taken down, but has been archived here.

Mitch McConnell’s father-in-law, James Chao (second from right), at the christening of the Ping May in Shanghai (Image: Shanghai Mulan Education Foundation)

How successful have the Chao’s been?  A dowry of as much as $25 million was gifted to Senator McConnell for taking the 40-year-old spinster Elaine into his heart and hearth making him one of the richest men in Congress.

After the 2007 death of Ruth Mulan Chu Chao, husband James named a 2012 gift to Harvard after her, totaling $40 million.

The Chao children all did very well for themselves.  Besides Elaine, there were 5 other girls and all married bankers and stockbrokers.  Angela Chao would go on to chair her father’s “Foremost Group” in New York City.

There was an exception: Jeanette Chao, a devoted Christian, died at 52 in 2008 of an “undisclosed cause”.  It is of interest to this author that she had made Lebanon, Pennsylvania her home.  I was living in Lebanon when I became aware of the Jesuit/Roman Catholic menace through the work of Eric Jon Phelps.  After meeting Phelps (who just so happened to live 12 minutes away!) and hearing him promote Jesuit futurism and discredit himself with “white separatism”, I became convinced that he was an agent on their behalf.

However, as powerful as the Chaos are, there is one cold, clammy clutch they could not escape.

In 2015, when Mitch McConnel was sworn in by then-Vice President Joe Biden, Elaine’s sister Xiaomei “May” Chao(-)Hwang and her husband James Hwang, founder of United Orient Bank, were there with their young daughter Jessica.

Human beings broadly desire communion with the intransient (to interact with spirits).  Many would consider this common, innate desire proof that inter-dimensional agencies (“angels”, “demons” and God) exist.  “Why do so many people in so many places all want to interact with spirits?  Our souls must drive us to it.”

Christians do have an answer to this question: that we have been created by God with a hole in our souls and hearts that only Jesus Christ can fill.

Acts 17: 22-34 (King James 3, Literal)

Addressing the Areopagus
[Both a rock formation outside Athens and governmental body.]

22 And standing in the midst of the Areopagus, Paul said, “Men, Athenians, I see how you in everything are gods-fearing ones;”

23 “for passing through and looking up at the objects of your worship, I also found an altar on which had been written,”

“TO AN UNKNOWN GOD.”

“Therefore, not knowing Him whom you worship, I proclaim this One to you.”

24 “God, the One who made the world and all things in it, this One being Lord of Heaven and of Earth, does not dwell in temples made by hand,”

25 “nor is served by hands of men, as having need of anything.  For He is giving life and breath and all things to all.”

26 “And He made every nation of men of one blood, to live on all the face of the Earth, having determined fore-appointed seasons and boundaries of their dwelling,”

27 “to seek the Lord, if perhaps they might feel after Him and might find Him, though indeed He not being far from each one of us.”

28 “For in Him we live and move and exist, as also some of the poets among you have said,”

“‘For we are also His offspring.’”

29 “Therefore being offspring of God, we ought not to suppose that the Deity is like gold or silver or stone, engraved by art and the imagination of man.”

30 “Indeed, therefore, God overlooking the times of ignorance, now strictly commands all men everywhere to repent,”

31 “because He set a day in which ‘He is going to judge the inhabited Earth in righteousness,’ by a Man whom He appointed; having offered faith to all, having raised Him up from the dead.” [Psa. 9:8]

32 “And hearing of a resurrection of the dead, the ones indeed ridiculed, but said, ‘We will hear you again concerning this.’”

33 “And so Paul went out from their midst.”

34 “But some men believed, joining themselves to him, among whom also were both Dionysius the Areopagite and a woman named Damaris, and others with them.”

The trap of “New Age” is the idea that there is no such thing as a negative spiritual experience.  It is like inviting a toddler to swim in a swamp filled with alligators.

There are many stories of bad experiences where victims were duped or tricked by something they thought they knew or they thought was friendly towards them; a dead loved one, perhaps — something that knew their personal details to gain their confidence.

This is why their god is the great voyeur with a single “all-seeing” eye.

Not surprisingly, Jesuits have been on the forefront of this deadly deception.

None other than Pierre Teilhard de Chardin is considered the “father of the New Age”.

What is particularly disturbing about all of this is that the Club of Rome is being spiritually driven-spiritually as in occultism.  On pages 151 and 152 of Mankind at the Turning Point, Aurelio Peccei reveals his pantheistic/New Age beliefs, talking about man’s communion with nature and the transcendent and using the term “noosphere” in referring to the collective field of intelligence of the human race.  This uncommon expression cannot be found in a dictionary.  By use of the term “noosphere” Peccei gives himself away as a student of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, a French Jesuit priest (now deceased) whose occult ideas and writings, I would later discover, have had a deep impact on the New Age movement.  In fact, Chardin is one of the most frequently quoted writers by leading New Age occultists. ~ Gary Kah⁸⁹

Promoted lovingly as “Teilhard”, de Chardin was exceptionally dangerous, encouraging non-Christians that all will “ascend to the Omega Point” regardless of their path and none need to fear making decisions that will lead them to eternal damnation.

Pierre de Chardin has a long history of malignant and Satanic deception in Jesuit warfare against Christ and the Bible.  When critics of Darwinian evolution began to question the “fossil evidence” for “mutating from ape into man”, de Chardin utilized Jesuit relic aging techniques [notice how this article from the appropriately-named “Vice” calls this practice “Christian”] to create a phony “Missing Link” known as “Piltdown Man”.

Malignant minions of Satan like Jesuit Pierre Teilhard de Chardin are the one inviting foolish experimenters to take LSD and ayahuasca to close their eyes and enter the “Age of Aquarius”.

But what they all eventually find is broken dreams at best, damnation and ruin at worst.

In the age of the “coronavirus”, (rebranded the more frightening “COVID19” and “SarsCov 2”) one of the topics most debated was the care of the elderly.

The endless tyranny of pandemic “mandates” have only the purposes of mind-control and enslavement because there is no virus.  Amongst the worst of these non-binding “mandates” are the mask and “social distancing” requirements.

These twisted tactics have been applied to do maximum harm to those most vulnerable: the young and the old.

The elderly, especially, were targeted with vicious agendas to literally kill them with loneliness.

Don’t Hug Grandparents at Easter Even If They’re Vaccinated, Chris Whitty Warns (Yahoo.com)

England’s chief medical officer Professor Chris Whitty has warned that people who have had both coronavirus vaccines should not hug their grandchildren.

Speaking at the Downing Street press conference on Monday, Whitty said people are still vulnerable to catching COVID-19 even if they have had two jabs.

It comes as more than 30 million Brits have had their first vaccine and the government eases more lockdown restrictions.

When asked by Jason Groves, political correspondent at the Express, why people who have had both vaccines are still unable to hug their grandchildren this Easter, Prof Whitty explained that more people need to be vaccinated to build up protection.

Whitty said vaccines “provide increasing levels of protection as we go through.

“The first vaccine provides a high degree of protection. The second vaccine for the same person provides greater protection but there is still some vulnerability.”

“Then actually having people around someone who themselves have been vaccinated who themselves have been vaccinated provides a further third of protection,” he added.

In the State of New York, the far-Left, pro-abortion, gun-confiscating, Roman Catholic Governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo, son of a far-Left, pro-abortion, gun-confiscating, Roman Catholic Governor of New York, Mario Cuomo, first ordered nearly 10,000 elderly who “tested positive” for “COVID” into “Nursing Homes” and then began to mass murder so many that they hid the true numbers.

Cuomo Administration Hid Nursing Home Covid Deaths Longer Than Previously Thought: NYT (msn.com)

An explosive report published Wednesday in The New York Times reveals that aides to Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D-NY) withheld information on nursing home patient deaths from Covid-19 longer than previously believed.

Mr. Cuomo’s most senior aides engaged in a sustained effort to prevent the state’s own health officials, including the commissioner, Howard Zucker, from releasing the true death toll to the public or sharing it with state lawmakers, these interviews and documents showed.

A scientific paper, which incorporated the data, was never published. An audit of the numbers by a top Cuomo aide was finished months before it became publicly known. Two letters, drafted by the Health Department and meant for state legislators, were never sent.

The actions coincided with the period in which Mr. Cuomo was pitching and then writing a book on the pandemic, with the assistance of his top aide, Melissa DeRosa, and others.

Cuomo has repeatedly faced criticism over a directive he issued early in the pandemic on March 25, 2020 that prohibited nursing homes from refusing admission to patients with Covid-19. Under this policy, more than 9,000 Covid-positive patients were admitted to hundreds of nursing homes across the state early in the pandemic. That number is 40% higher than what had initially been released by the New York State Department of Health, according to the Associated Press.

In the ensuing months, the Cuomo administration withheld data relating to the impact the directive may have had on the spread of the virus in nursing homes across New York state. Many have blamed the policy for the high number of deaths among nursing home patients, which officially numbered around 6,200 as of last July. By January, the official number was 8,505.

And yet, Andrew Cuomo isn’t ultimately responsible for this genocide: every son, daughter, grandchild and custodian who pushed their elderly loved-one into a “hospice” for convenience did.  Rather than be burdened with their every-day care and needs, the pushed their responsibility off on a system that devoured them.

Most devastating of all is the realization (thanks to breakthrough exposés like The Disciples of Ra!) that all “Medicine” is based upon a system designed to sicken, impoverish and murder it’s victims while we’ve all been trusting it to do the exact opposite.

The very concoctions you have trusted—”medicines” and “vaccines”—have been the vectors of poison murderers have used to kill with.  When they lack the courage for vicious and outright murder, they whittle away at the victim’s will to live with psychological attacks such as telling their “patients” they only have a short time left.

As we have shown repeatedly on this site, in our Team Briefs, and in Johnny’s books, all roads still lead to Rome and the Great Harlot wishes to control every aspect of our lives.

This agenda became much more attainable thanks to the Counter-Reformation led by the Jesuits.  It’s then not surprising that fields such as medicine, health care, and nursing have their roots in Roman Catholicism.

The Christian Origins of the Hospital | Catholic Answers

Did you know that the institution we know as the hospital is entirely an invention of the Catholic Church?

Well, it was. The ancient world had all the material ingredients needed for such an institution. It had medical professionals, and it had sick people. It had a centuries-old tradition of medical science and technology. And yet it could not bring all that together to make a hospital. There was no way to make such a venture profitable, so there was no compelling motive to keep such a venture running during an epidemic.

What they had instead were individual freelance practitioners, who moved from place to place like traveling salesmen — usually outrunning their most recent failure. They passed down their knowledge, as trade secrets, within their family and never risked public disclosure.

The pagans had medicine. What they lacked was charity, as it came to be expressed in hospital-ity, the virtue that gave the healthcare institution its name.

It was Christians who invented the hospital, and they did this in response to a real need, an urgent need—in a time of epidemic.

It was the middle of the third century, and the world found itself suddenly oppressed by plague. Scholars disagree on whether the disease was smallpox or influenza. Some say it was Ebola. But whatever the bug was, it quickly reached pandemic levels—and it stayed there for thirteen years. In that time, the population of the empire was reduced by thirty percent, and there was a corresponding decline in every sector of the economy, not to mention the military.

“Whatever the bug was”, it certainly gave the opportunity for the Catholic Church to establish itself as a charitable “Christian” organization, having control over people’s wellbeing, and a chance to build up layers of pseudo-science.  All these benefits seem to be overlooked by the author of the above article for Catholic Answers since he mentioned “There was no way to make such a venture profitable, so there was no compelling motive to keep such a venture running during an epidemic”.  Nevertheless, the Catholic Church did find a way:

History of Nursing – Wikipedia

According to Geoffrey Blainey, the Catholic Church in Europe provided many of the services of a welfare state: “It conducted hospitals for the old and orphanages for the young; hospices for the sick of all ages; places for the lepers; and hostels or inns where pilgrims could buy a cheap bed and meal”. It supplied food to the population during famine and distributed food to the poor. This welfare system the church funded through collecting taxes on a large scale and possessing large farmlands and estates.

When your body is spent enough and you’re just waiting for the “holy unction”, you might be placed in a hospice to spend your last days in the care of the professionals.  Looking for the word “hospice” in the dictionary, we read the following:

Hospice Definition & Meaning – Merriam-Webster

Definition of hospice

1: a lodging for travelers, young persons, or the underprivileged especially when maintained by a religious order

2: a program designed to provide palliative care and emotional support to the terminally ill in a home or homelike setting so that quality of life is maintained and family members may be active participants in care

A more careful search reveals that by “religious order” it should be read “Catholic”.

A Brief History of Hospice, Hospice Care (understandhospice.org)

The word ‘hospice’ derives from the Latin word hospes, which means both ‘guest’ and ‘host.’ Since the 11th century, the concept of hospice was adopted by the Roman Catholic tradition to refer to a place of hospitality for the sick and dying as well as for travelers and pilgrims. The first of such hospices are believed to have been established during the Crusades. Hospices were widespread in the Middle Ages but diminished as religious orders became dispersed.

The modern usage of hospice as a place for and philosophy of end-of-life care began with the work of a British physician named Dame Cicely Saunders. Dr. Saunders began work with terminally ill patients in the London area in 1948 as a nurse and earned her medical degree in 1957. In 1963, during a talk at Yale University in the US, Dr. Saunders introduced the idea of specialized care for the dying, which centered on palliative care rather than treatments to cure. In the audience were doctors, nurses, chaplains, and medical students.

According to MayoClinic.org, palliative care is specialized medical care that focuses on providing patients relief from pain and other symptoms of a serious illness, no matter the diagnosis or stage of disease.

The truth is that managing symptoms is all doctors do nowadays. Even the drugs they prescribe to end some symptoms end up creating new ones called “side effects”.

A symptom is just nothing more than a sign your body gives that warns you something is wrong. Our bodies are complex machines composed of organs that must function in total harmony. In order to correctly interpret that sign and address its root cause, a complete history of the individual health, physical and alimentary habits must be known. Nevertheless, healthcare nowadays is mainly directed in treating symptoms with the use of drugs or vaccines; never with the intention to totally heal you so that you can be dependent on this system and always come back as a good costumer.

A “serious illness” doesn’t happen at once. Most likely, it’s the culmination of a process in a person that has been continually poisoned through their entire life by pesticides and GMO’s, heavy metals on vaccines, electromagnetism from cell towers, fluoride in the water, plus a myriad of other chemicals present in process food. Sadly, because most doctors are not even looking for any of the culprits just mentioned, but rather looking at invisible bogeymen like “viruses”, it’s inevitable that those “serious illness” will occur, and the person will end up in the care of the “professionals” until they draw their last breath.

More on Dr. Saunders:

Cicely Saunders – Wikipedia

Dame Cicely Mary Strode Saunders OM DBE FRCS FRCP FRCN (22 June 1918 – 14 July 2005) was an English nurse, social worker, physician and writer. She is noted for her work in terminal care research and her role in the birth of the hospice movement, emphasizing the importance of palliative care in modern medicine, and opposing the legalisation of voluntary euthanasia.

While training for social work, she holidayed with some Christians and was converted to Christianity.[8] In the late 1940s, Saunders began working part-time at St Luke’s Home for the Dying Poor in Bayswater, and it was partly this which, in 1951, led her to begin studying to become a physician.

A year later, she began working at St Joseph’s Hospice, a Catholic establishment in Hackney, East London, where she would remain for seven years, researching pain control.

Saunders was an Anglican. In 1977, she was awarded an honorary Lambeth doctorate by the Archbishop of Canterbury. She later was made a Dame of the Order of St Gregory the Great (awarded by the Pope).

(Left) Dame Cicely meeting Pope John Paul II. (Right) The Archbishop of Canterbury gestures his approval at Lambeth Palace after conferring a Lambeth Doctorate of Medicine upon Dr Cicely Saunders, medical director of St. Christopher’s Hospice in South London.

Another personality regarded as the “founder of the modern hospice movement” is Rose Hawthorne, daughter of “classic poet” Nathaniel Hawthorne.  Rose spent many years of her childhood in Europe thanks to her father’s position as consul.  Despite visiting many countries, Rome must have left the biggest impression on her.

Rose Hawthorne: Founder of the Modern Hospice Movement | NewBostonPost

When Rose was two years old, the Hawthornes moved to England when Nathaniel became the American Consul in Liverpool. The seven years they spent in Europe had a profound impact on the passionate, introspective Rose. During their travels through Portugal, France, and Italy, Rose’s parents taught her the importance of having faith and leading a sincere, purposeful life caring for others.

The family spent an extended period of time in Rome while Nathaniel was working on the gothic classic, The Marble Faun. The Hawthornes immersed themselves in the rich cultural surroundings of the city. After seeing Pope Pius IX during Holy Week, Rose wrote: “I became eloquent about the Pope, and was rewarded by a gift from my mother of a little medallion of him and a gold scudo with an excellent likeness thereon, both always tenderly reverenced by me.”

It’s told that after suffering a personal tragedy, Rose Hawthorne found solace in the Sisters of Charity of Saint Vincent de Paul in Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts. It was then, according to her, that she found her purpose in life, which was caring for the terminally ill and poor. After spending time as a nurse in the New York Cancer Hospital, she went on to found her own religious order as “Mother” Mary Alphonsa.

Mother Mary Alphonsa – Wikipedia

In the summer of 1896, Hawthorne trained as a nurse at the then–New York Cancer Hospital, the first institution in the United States to provide training in treating cancer at a time when general hospitals in the city did not admit patients with cancer. Later that year, she founded a charitable organization named after Saint Rose of Lima, Sister Rose’s Free Home, to care for impoverished cancer patients. At first, she visited patients at their homes. In October 1896, she rented three rooms in a tenement on Scammel Street on the Lower East Side, a poor immigrant neighborhood, with the help of an assistant named Alice Huber. A Dominican priest, Father Clement Thuente, O.P., witnessed their work in February 1899 and encouraged them to join the Dominican order as tertiaries (Third Order Dominicans).

On December 8, 1900, Sister Rose founded a new religious order, with the approval of Archbishop Michael A. Corrigan of New York. The order was named the Servants of Relief for Incurable Cancer; she became its first Mother Superior, with the name Mother Mary Alphonsa. Alice became known as Mother Rose. The order—now known as the Dominican Sisters of Hawthorne—opened a facility called St. Rose’s Home on Water Street in Manhattan; it then moved to Cherry Street, before settling north of New York City in what is now Rosary Hill Home in Hawthorne.

(Left) Rose Hawthorne (Courtesy of Hawthorne Dominican Sisters). (Right) “Mother” Mary Alphonsa in her habit.

“Servants of Relief for Incurable Cancer” is an interesting name.  Cancer is the most “managed” disease there is and, as a result of our increasingly poisonous environment, is one that has seen exponential growth throughout the world.

In the 1830s, cancer was responsible for two per cent of the deaths around Paris; cancer caused four per cent of deaths in the United States in 1900.

With the rise of cancer came “modern” methods of coping with it. A leading critic of the medical establishment, Dr. Robert S. Mendelsohn, comments that “Modern cancer surgery someday will be regarded with the same kind of horror that we now regard the use of leeches in George Washington’s time.” “Murder By Injection”, Mullins, p. 41

Also, the techniques used by “Doctors” to combat cancer make sure that those “Servants” will have plenty of job mitigating “incurable cancer”.

The surgery of which he spoke is the widely accepted and imposed method of cancer treatment now in vogue throughout the United States. It is called the “cut, slash and burn” technique. This method of cancer treatment actually represents the highwater mark of the … [“]medicine[“] in the United States. It relies almost exclusively on surgery, bleeding and heavy use of drugs, with the exotic addition of radium treatment. “Murder By Injection”, Mullins, p. 41

“Doctors” are paid large sums of money to manage cancer with toxic sessions called “chemo-therapy” before they send the patient to the “Servants” for their “final care”.

Guardians who choose not to treat their loved one’s cancer with carcinogens are then bullied and sometimes forced by a combination of “Doctors” and government into doing it anyway.

Brian Bernhard told his “Oncologist” that he has tried every possible drug to cure his wife Patty’s ovarian cancer — Cisplatinum, Taxol, Taxotere, Gemzar — not only where they ineffective but they were causing Patty extreme pain. The response of their “Oncologist” was, “I’m showering her organs with poison. It’s going to hurt.”

They know exactly what they are doing.

The base salary for an Oncologist is $250,000 and they are paid by the number of “patients” they pump drugs, chemicals and toxins into.

When Jim and Donna Navarro were told their little boy had leukemia and the only treatment was chemo-therapy they responded, “We want a second opinion.” They were told, “All ‘second opinions’ will tell you the same thing.”

That’s because anyone who can actually reverse cancer has been fined, arrested, un-licensed and/or run out of country. ~ Cirucci ⁹⁰

These few paragraphs only offer but a glimpse of the control Rome has over our health. There are many more connections involving modern treatment, vaccines, “scientific findings”, etc. that are tackled in “The Disciples of Ra!”. If there’s any good that this fake pandemic brought, it was our attention to how thoroughly controlled and manipulated medicine is.

The bottom line is that if you’re responsible for the care of someone, then just do it.

Because if you don’t, they will…

Genesis 17:1-14
1 When Abram was ninety-nine years old, the Lord appeared to Abram and said to him, “I am Almighty God; walk before Me and be blameless.”
2 “And I will make My Covenant between Me and you, and will multiply you exceedingly.”
3 Then Abram fell on his face, and God talked with him, saying:
4 “As for Me, behold, My Covenant is with you, and you shall be a father of many nations.”
5 “No longer shall your name be called Abram, but your name shall be Abraham; for I have made you a father of many nations.”
6 “I will make you exceedingly fruitful; and I will make nations of you, and kings shall come from you.”
7 “And I will establish My Covenant between Me and you and your descendants after you in their generations, for an everlasting Covenant, to be God to you and your descendants after you.”
8 “Also I give to you and your descendants after you the land in which you are a stranger, all the land of Canaan, as an everlasting possession; and I will be their God.”
9 And God said to Abraham: “As for you, you shall keep My Covenant, you and your descendants after you throughout their generations.”
10 “This is My Covenant which you shall keep, between Me and you and your descendants after you: Every male child among you shall be circumcised;”
11 “and you shall be circumcised in the flesh of your foreskins, and it shall be a sign of the Covenant between Me and you.”
12 “He who is eight days old among you shall be circumcised, every male child in your generations, he who is born in your house or bought with money from any foreigner who is not your descendant.”
13 “He who is born in your house and he who is bought with your money must be circumcised, and My Covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting Covenant.”
14 “And the uncircumcised male child, who is not circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin, that person shall be cut off from his people; he has broken My Covenant.”
New King James Version [capitalization corrections added]

The Jews corporately denied Yeshua as their Messiah and He cursed the religion His Father gave them that was meant to prepare them for Him (and do nothing more).

Mark 13:1-2
1 Then as He went out of the Temple, one of His disciples said to Him, “Teacher, see what manner of stones and what buildings are here!”
2 And Jesus answered and said to him, “Do you see these great buildings? Not one stone shall be left upon another, that shall not be thrown down.”

This was fulfilled by the Roman invasion of Judea by Titus Vespasian in 70 A.D.

Apparently, there is a forgery in the Annals of Josephus that embellishes how “gold in the Temple, when it caught fire, melted into the cracks of the stones and Roman soldiers tore them apart to get at it.”  As usual, this wasn’t necessary.  An order came directly from Cesar to level the Temple and the city with a few exceptions.

Now as soon as the army had no more people to slay or to plunder, because there remained none to be the objects of their fury, (for they would not have spared any, had there remained any other work to be done,) Caesar gave orders that they should now demolish the entire city and temple, but should leave as many of the towers standing as were of the greatest eminency; that is, Phasaelus, and Hippicus, and Mariamne; and so much of the wall as enclosed the city on the west side.  This wall was spared, in order to afford a camp for such as were to lie in garrison, as were the towers also spared, in order to demonstrate to posterity what kind of city it was, and how well fortified, which the Roman valor had subdued; but for all the rest of the wall, it was so thoroughly laid even with the ground by those that dug it up to the foundation, that there was left nothing to make those that came thither believe it had ever been inhabited. This was the end which Jerusalem came to by the madness of those that were for innovations; a city otherwise of great magnificence, and of mighty fame among all mankind.

The “Wailing Wall”, worshipped by Jews as a remnant of the Temple has been “debunked” as a portion of the Roman Antonia Fortress.

The Jews, themselves, made this horrible promise to Pilate that the execution of this innocent Rabbi was on them and their children!

Matthew 27:15-26
15 Now at the Feast the Governor was accustomed to releasing to the multitude one prisoner whom they wished.
16 And at that time they had a notorious prisoner called Barabbas.
17 Therefore, when they had gathered together, Pilate said to them, “Whom do you want me to release to you?  Barabbas, or Jesus who is called Christ?”
18 For he knew that they had handed Him over because of envy.
19 While he was sitting on the judgment seat, his wife sent to him, saying, “Have nothing to do with that just Man, for I have suffered many things today in a dream because of Him.”
20 But the chief Priests and elders persuaded the multitudes that they should ask for Barabbas and destroy Jesus.
21 The Governor answered and said to them, “Which of the two do you want me to release to you?”

They said, “Barabbas!”

22 Pilate said to them, “What then shall I do with Jesus who is called Christ?”

They all said to him, “Let Him be crucified!”

23 Then the governor said, “Why, what evil has He done?”

But they cried out all the more, saying, “Let Him be crucified!”

24 When Pilate saw that he could not prevail at all, but rather that a tumult was rising, he took water and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, “I am innocent of the blood of this just Person.  You see to it.”
25 And all the people answered and said, “His blood be on us and on our children.”
26 Then he released Barabbas to them; and when he had scourged Jesus, he delivered Him to be crucified.

The foundation of Judaism was their Temple where all their sins were regularly (but incompletely) “atoned for” by the Levitical Priesthood.

Yet the Mosaic law of animal sacrifices was an imperfect model of the One Sacrifice of the Son of God.

Romans 8:1-8
1 There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus, who do not walk according to the flesh [sinning as our bodies or “flesh” tell us to], but according to the Spirit.
2 For the Law of the Spirit of Life in Christ Jesus has made me free from the Law of sin and death.
3 For what the Law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God did by sending His Own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh [a man], on account of sin: He condemned sin in the flesh,
4 that the righteous requirement of the Law might be fulfilled in us who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.
5 For those who live according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the flesh [thinking they can earn their way into Heaven by strictly obeying the Law of Moses, but that is impossible], but those who live according to the Spirit, the things of the Spirit.
6 For to be carnally minded [believing you can earn your way into Heaven by good works] is death, but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
7 Because the carnal mind is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can be.
8 So then, those who are in the flesh cannot please God.

There was a heresy amongst early Christians that said, “You can only be Saved if you have Jesus and you are Jewish” (keeping the Law, requiring circumcision to enter Heaven!) and Paul vehemently attacked these “Judaizers”.

Galatians 3:1-14
1 O foolish Galatians!  Who has bewitched you that you should not obey the Truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ was clearly portrayed among you as crucified? [By His crucifixion, His Perfect Nature was punished for our sins.] 2 This only I want to learn from you: Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the Law [perfectly obeying the Law of Moses which is impossible], or by the hearing of faith? [Salvation is a free Gift by faith in Christ, Ephesians 2:8-9] 3 Are you so foolish?  Having begun in the Spirit, are you now being made perfect by the flesh?
4 Have you suffered so many things in vain — if indeed it was in vain?
5 Therefore He [Jesus of Nazareth] who supplies the Spirit to you and works miracles among you, does He do it by the works of the Law, or by the hearing of faith? — [the Son, as a limited man, had faith in His Father to empower Him] 6 just as Abraham “believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.” [Abraham was not a “Jew” though he is accounted as the first Jew amongst Israel!] 7 Therefore know that only those who are of faith are sons of Abraham. [This is critical: anyone who makes a decision to accept Jesus Christ, regardless of their lineage, ethnicity or religion becomes a child of Abraham and those who don’t accept Jesus are not “Jews”.] 8 And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the Gospel to Abraham beforehand, saying, “In you all the nations shall be blessed.”
9 So then those who are of faith are blessed with believing Abraham. [There are no “promises” to “Jews” through Abraham. Jesus of Nazareth is his Promise!] 10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse; for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who does not continue in all things which are written in the book of the law, to do them.”
11 But that no one is justified by the law in the sight of God is evident, for “the just shall live by faith.”
12 Yet the law is not of faith, but “the man who does them shall live by them.”
13 Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us (for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree”),
14 that the blessing of Abraham might come upon the Gentiles in Christ Jesus, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.

In this same letter to the Christians in Galatia, Paul specifically attacks circumcision as “proof” of being Saved.

Galatians 5:1-6
1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty by which Christ has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage.
2 Indeed I, Paul, say to you that if you become circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing. [If you’re trying to earn your Salvation by being a perfect Jew, you won’t succeed and the easier, more perfect Path will be unavailable to you!] 3 And I testify again to every man who becomes circumcised that he is a debtor to keep the whole Law. [Once you start down this path of earning your Salvation, you are locked into a way that will only bring you death and damnation!] 4 You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by Law; you have fallen from Grace. [You are damned and condemned!] 5 For we through the Spirit eagerly wait for the hope of righteousness by faith.
6 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision avails anything, but faith working through love.

It is amazing how many Christians have fallen for the charade that is “modern Israel”.  Meanwhile, their own Bibles say that they are blaspheming their Savior when they promote the Jesuit heresy that “Jews” even exist and that they have special “promises” that transcend the fact that 1) they killed their Messiah 2) they still deny Him.

BLASPHEMY.

You may respond, “But the Bible says there will be a third Temple and the Levitical Priesthood will once again have animal sacrifices!”

But does it?

Recently, I came across the following news:

St. Bernadette’s relics to begin first tour to U.S. in Florida in April – Catholic News Service

MIAMI (CNS) — The relics of St. Bernadette, the Marian visionary of Lourdes, France, will tour the United States for the first time.

The visit will begin in South Florida at Our Lady of Lourdes Church in Miami, with a morning welcome Mass April 7.  The next day the relics will visit St. Bernadette Church in Hollywood, Florida, then return to Our Lady of Lourdes Church.

On April 11, Monday of Holy Week, Archbishop Thomas G. Wenski of Miami will celebrate an evening Mass at the church, which will be followed by a candlelight procession. The relics will stay at Our Lady of Lourdes until April 18, Easter Monday, when a multilingual farewell Mass will be celebrated.

The relics will go to two other Florida dioceses, Palm Beach and St. Petersburg, and then zigzag across the country to 23 other dioceses, visiting 34 churches, cathedrals and shrines. The last stop is St. Bernadette Church in Los Angeles July 31-Aug. 4. …

The Vatican has granted a plenary indulgence for those visiting the relics during the tour. During the Miami stay, Masses will be offered daily at Our Lady of Lourdes along with “le geste de l’eau,” the water of Lourdes.

Mainstream sources tell us these “relics” have been used in “Christian” worship for centuries.  In that, acknowledging that the use of relics are perverse, pagan and occultic splatters all of Christendom.

Christianity – Relics and saints | Britannica

The cult (system of religious beliefs and rituals) of the saints emerged in the 3^rd century and gained momentum from the 4^th to the 6^th century.  The bones of martyrs were believed to provide evidence of God’s power at work in the world, producing miracles and spectacles of the effectiveness of faith.  The martyrs had imitated Christ even unto death, and the remains of their holy bodies were thought to be points of contact between earth and heaven.  On the model of Christ’s Incarnation, the bones of martyred saints embodied God’s salvific power and thus became the centre of active cults.  Relics were installed in basilicas or in special churches called martyria.  The tombs of martyrs, on the margins of cities and towns, attracted pilgrims and processions.  Legends described the prodigious virtues of martyrs and saints, as well as the dreams or visions that revealed the resting places of still more powerful relics.  Each discovery (inventio) promised new and effective signs of divine redemption.  Returning from distant places, especially Rome, pilgrims brought relics to their home churches.  Thus, during the 8^th century, bones and other relics were moved from southern Europe to the north and west.

A “Christian” venerates the “relics” of “Saint” Maria Goretti.  Karen Callaway/Catholic New World

Obviously, it is Roman Catholicism that makes these “relics” a vital part of its rituals.

Even more offensive is the concept that there are Catholic “martyrs” when it is Rome that has slaughtered more Christians than any other empire (military and religious Rome).

The Business of Relics (itakehistory.com)

Religious relics were an important part of the spiritual life of Medieval Christians.  The word relic derives from the Latin word “reliquiae” meaning “remains”.  There were two types of relics: the actual physical remains of a saint or an object that came in contact with the saint during his or her lifetime.  The veneration of saints and their relics is as old as Christianity, and it developed alongside the new religion during those formative first centuries.

By spinning these practices as “Christian”, the crimes of Rome can also be spun regardless of how they fly in the face of reality.  Whilst Popes like Innocent III sent French, Italian and Spanish soldiers to slaughter European Waldensian and Albigensian Christians in Europe, today, Catholic Crusades are “Christian” and these “Christians” mercilessly victimize Muslims and Jews.

Another tactic to legitimize deception is to state “early Church Fathers all did it!”  Rarely will that follow a citation of specifically what “Father” and why they are even considered a “Father”.

Baptist scholar Dave Hunt noted that this is a tactic often used by the Vatican.

To enhance their power they [devious Catholic clergy] issued a host of false documents which purported to be the writings of early Church Fathers and decrees of early synods. One self-serving theme of these forgeries was the claim that the popes had inherited “innocence and sanctity from Peter” and could not be judged by any man.⁹¹

It is human nature to lose sight of the intransient, spiritual nature of our relationships with Christ and focus on the transient and the physical.

From there, heresies and misperceptions run rampant.

One of the first attacks upon the new Christians (shortly after Christ ascended) was that of Simon the sorcerer who sought to purchase the Power of the Gospel for manipulation and self-aggrandizement.

Acts 8:9-25
9 But there was a certain man called Simon, who previously practiced sorcery in the city and astonished the people of Samaria, claiming that he was someone great,
10 to whom they all gave heed, from the least to the greatest, saying, “This man is the great power of God.”
11 And they heeded him because he had astonished them with his sorceries for a long time.
12 But when they believed Philip as he preached the things concerning the kingdom of God and the Name of Jesus Christ, both men and women were baptized.
13 Then Simon himself also believed; and when he was baptized he continued with Philip, and was amazed, seeing the miracles and signs which were done.
14 Now when the apostles who were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the Word of God, they sent Peter and John to them,
15 who, when they had come down, prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit.
16 For as yet He had fallen upon none of them.  They had only been baptized in the Name of the Lord Jesus.
17 Then they laid hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit.
18 And when Simon saw that through the laying on of the apostles’ hands the Holy Spirit was given, he offered them money,
19 saying, “Give me this power also, that anyone on whom I lay hands may receive the Holy Spirit.”
20 But Peter said to him, “Your money perish with you, because you thought that the Gift of God could be purchased with money!”
21 “You have neither part nor portion in this matter, for your heart is not right in the Sight of God.”
22 “Repent therefore of this your wickedness, and pray God if perhaps the thought of your heart may be forgiven you.”
23 “For I see that you are poisoned by bitterness and bound by sin.”
24 Then Simon answered and said, “Pray to the Lord for me, that none of the things which you have spoken may come upon me.”
25 So when they had testified and preached the Word of the Lord, they returned to Jerusalem, preaching the Gospel in many villages of the Samaritans.

Many Christians are unaware that Simon was a Believer.  He saw the Holy Spirit as “magic” to be wielded for his own fame but the Spirit empowers us only when we empty ourselves and seek to be used by Him for His Purposes.

The Catholic Church has fabricated “relics” to hold the same power.

Relics have a dangerous appeal to the human mind.  Even though we are commanded to believe, have faith, and put our trust in Jesus, the flesh always want to have proof or a connection to God; to have something palpable that can be touched or felt and that have “magical powers”.  The trap is that your faith mutates into a fixation on the physical that you erroneously believe connects you to God when it should be a simple but intimate relationship very similar to a marriage (which is why the Apostle John frequently uses marriage metaphors in his writing).  Our Israelite forebears regularly fell into this trap and it was always encouraged by the paganism of Middle Eastern cultures from Canaan to Egypt.

As if the destruction of souls wasn’t enough for Rome, she capitalizes further on the practice by bilking foolish Catholics into spending hard-earned money on utter fraud.

Martin Luther, himself, complained that there were so many pieces of “Christ’s cross” being traded by clergy he could build a mausoleum out of them all.

Even today, a quick online search will find the hair of the “Virgin Mary” for $2,000 or pieces of clothing supposedly worn by Peter and Paul for a couple hundred more.  For the one that is in need of more “blessings”, there’s an opportunity to acquire 50 relics for only $12,850 (Important Antique Reliquary 50 Relics True Cross 12 Apostles 4 Evangelists Theca | eBay).

If your schooling hasn’t yet destroyed your capacity for critical thought, and you realize that the “heart of Saint Cecelia” was actually last-year’s prize-winning freeze-dried turnip, mainstream media will gladly jump in to finally do its job and mock those ridiculous “Christian” beliefs.

The Weird and Fraudulent World of Catholic Relics (vice.com)

For centuries, some Christians have venerated the bodies and possessions of saints, but more often than not, there’s no way to tell whether something is St. Peter’s skull or a really old potato.

In the Sicilian region of Italy, in the town of Palermo, on the mountain dubbed Pellegrino, nestled inside a cave, inside a church, inside a small shrine, lie the bones of Saint Rosalia.

Her story is rare in the annals of Catholic sainthood, as she wasn’t martyred in a particularly grisly way.  Instead, when she was a young teenager, Rosalia devoted herself to Christ and lived as a hermit in a cave until dying, of natural causes, in 1160.  There, her bones lay for centuries, until a plague struck Palermo in 1624.  Residents began having visions of “the Little Saint,” and a hunter, looking for any kind of cure, went to her cave, dug up her bones, and paraded them through the streets.  The plague miraculously ceased. That was good enough to get her sainthood, turn her former abode into a place of worship, and for Sicilians to get on their knees and pray to this particular set of bones.

Just one problem: The bones in Saint Rosalia’s shrine belong to a goat.

And yet, as proof that Rome secretly runs both sides of the game, the same entertainment super-powers that mock “Christian” paganism delivers it up with millions of dollars of polish for adoration.

In 2018, Marvel comics and Disney wowed us all with the $400 million movie Avengers: Infinity War (which went on to gross $2 billion at the box office alone).  The ultimate super-villain “Thanos” (played by Josh Brolin from behind millions in computer graphics imaging, “CGI”).  Thanos seeks to re-assemble the 6 “Infinity Stones” and wield them to murder half of all the universe so that we can finally have relief from over-population and get lots of free carbon credits.  The question remains, “Where to put them all once you’ve got ‘em??”

Oddly, Marvel and Disney just happened to rely upon a Roman Catholic relic for the solution!

Thanos’ Infinity Gauntlet looks eerily similar to a Catholic relic (aleteia.org)

The Infinity Gauntlet has been shown to be the most powerful object in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, if not the comics world as well. All of Marvel’s future films are bound to be touched by its influence and the events of the last two movies. What many of the fans who pack the theaters may not know, however, is that the real-life inspiration for the fictional glove of power appears to be a Catholic one.

When it comes to utilizing the power of the Infinity Gauntlet, intention matters. Now, thanks to a revelation by Curiosmos, we’re learning that this intention may be a commentary on religion, as a striking similarity has been noticed between the Infinity Gauntlet and the reliquary containing the incorrupt hand of the 16th-century Spanish mystic St. Teresa of Avila.

According to historical records, St. Teresa of Avila’s body was exhumed nine months after her death, when it was first observed that her body did not decay. Even though the passage of time had rotted her clothing, her remains were incorrupt, just as they had been when she died.

Relics from the Spanish saint were distributed for veneration, but her hand was stolen in 1936 by Francisco Franco, the Spanish military dictator. Franco reportedly took the relic with him everywhere he went and even slept with it on his nightstand.

The relic was recovered by nuns after Franco’s death in 1975. From there, the relic traveled to several convents until it found a permanent resting place in the Iglesia de la Merced, in the city of Ronda. It is now housed in a safe, locked room, set behind gilded silver and encrusted with jewels.

While it is still unconfirmed by Marvel that this relic was the influence of the most powerful object in the MCU, from a visual comparison, it seems likely that the Infinity Gauntlet, which harnesses the power of creation, has its roots in Catholicism.

It’s actually not so odd when you find out that powerful Jesuits like Leo OʹDonovan (chosen by rabidly-pro abortion Catholic “President” Joe Biden to give his “invocation”) ran the Disney Company from 1996 to 2007.

“The Human Stain” New York City Premiere After Party. Left-to-right:
Harvey Weinstein, Jesuit Priest Leo O’Donovan, Nicole Kidman, Guiseppe Cipriani.

The revelation that there is a “Saint Corona, the patron saint of pandemics” follows with less shock and (hopefully) far more cynicism.

Saint Corona

German cathedral prepares showcase for relics of Saint Corona, patron of epidemics | TheHill

A German cathedral is digging out its collection of relics related to “St. Corona,” the little-known patron saint of surviving epidemics, amid the global coronavirus outbreak.

Reuters reported that the Aachen Cathedral in Germany had already been planning to showcase relics and a shrine of St. Corona as part of an exhibition of gold craftsmanship, but has now accelerated those plans after the coincidentally-named outbreak began.

“We have brought the shrine out a bit earlier than planned and now we expect more interest due to the virus,” said a cathedral spokeswoman.

“Like many other saints, Saint Corona may be a source of hope in these difficult times,” added the head of the cathedral’s relics trove in a statement to Reuters.

A 14th-century painting of Saint Corona by the Master of Palazzo Venezia Madonna. Wikimedia/Statens Museum For Kunst

If you’ve read Johnny’s latest book, The Disciples of Ra!, the process of being “tested” and getting told that (even though you feel perfectly healthy) you have the “coronavirus” and must seclude yourself just as Jesuit founder Ignatius Loyola did.  As former Jesuit-trained Catholic President of the European Council Herman Van Rompuy said in 2012, “We’re all Jesuits now!”

Perhaps if you’re still feeling ill, you could always touch a relic or sleep with one to be healed!

Talking about those minions, you may find that most of them were trained by Jesuits.  One of the most important examples is one of the leading members of the White House Covid-19 Response team, “Dr.” Anthony Fauci.

Video: Dr. Anthony Fauci Addresses His Fellow Jesuit Educated Graduates – USA East Province (jesuitseast.org)

13 May 2020 – Regis High School alumnus Dr. Anthony Fauci, class of ‘58, recently record a video for the high school’s graduates of 2020.

Dr. Fauci has been a familiar face during the coronavirus pandemic because of his role as the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

In addition to being a Regis graduate, Dr. Fauci is also an alumnus of the College of the Holy Cross, class of ‘62.

“I became immersed in the intellectual rigor of a Jesuit education,” said Dr. Facui in the video. “Importantly, certain tenets of the Jesuit tradition have sustained me throughout my life and career.

I assume that back in 2018, if he were to be in Canada, he’d be in awe as one of his master’s arms toured the Maple Leave.  Cirucci Team host and investigative journalist Hawkeye keenly mentioned that just after Xavier’s arm crossed Canada, the Humboldt Broncos bus crashed after 5 p.m. on 6 April 2018 — 7 April, Francis Xavier’s birthday, in Rome. (Humboldt Broncos bus crash – Wikipedia).

Centuries-old arm of St. Francis Xavier touring Canada | CTV News

The severed arm of St. Francis Xavier, a Catholic missionary who died more than 400 years ago, is on a tour of Canada.

The arm and hand of the saint — which is said to have blessed and baptized thousands — has begun a one-month, tour of Canada, with the first of 15 stops held Wednesday at Notre-Dame Basilica in Quebec City.

This is first time the relic, which the Church considers sacred, has been put on display on Canadian soil. …

After St. Francis Xavier died in China in 1552, his corpse did not decompose.  The Catholic Church says the “incorruptibility” of Xavier’s body is a sign he was a saint.

Another of Xavier’s arm bones is kept at a church in Macau.  The rest of his remains are in a tomb in Goa, India, a former Portuguese colony where Xavier spent many years doing missionary work.

The right arm was severed from the rest of the saint’s remains in 1614 and encased in a silver reliquary before being sent to Rome.  The arm is normally kept on display at the Church of the Gesu in Rome, one of the first churches of the Jesuit Catholic order.

The Second Council of Nicaea in 787 decreed that every Catholic Church should contain a “relic” in their altar.  As 7^th Day Adventist Professor Walter Veith said in one of his lectures, dead bones are part of the foundation of every Catholic Church.  Supposedly, this is the organization whose leader is the “vicar of Christ” on Earth, and yet repeatedly, its teachings contradict with everything the Bible teaches.

Jesus said we should worship God in spirit and in truth (John 4:24) and the Lord is not the God of the dead, but of the living (Mark 12:27).  The Old Testament is filled of examples that proof that one of the attributes of God is jealousy (Exodus 34:14).  That means, He’s not willing to share your worship and veneration with anything or anyone, let alone a piece of bone.

Jesus also said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.”

There are no shortcuts.

As the above newspaper link explains, what you now call “Washington” was originally named “Rome on the Tiber”.

SIR George Calvert was a secret Irishman and a devout Catholic.  He was given the powerful position of Secretary of State by “Protestant” King James I of England, the “Royal Commissioner of the Authorized 1611 Bible”.

“Protestant James I” also knighted Tobie Matthew for attempting to arrange a marriage between his “Protestant” son Charles and devout Catholic Princess Maria Anna of Spain.  Matthew was an underground, ORDAINED JESUIT PRIEST.

Charles instead married a DIFFERENT devout Catholic, Henrietta Maria of France. His corruption and open alliances with the Vatican caused the English civil war and his execution for treason at the hands of Protestant Puritan Oliver Cromwell, Lord Protector of England.

Charles gave George Calvert a “Royal Charter” to create a colony by Catholics, for Catholics and call it “Mary-land”.

The move to bar Catholics from voting in their own colony was clearly an Art of War move to create sympathy for their insurgency as F. Tupper Saussy clearly states in his powerful exposé “Rulers of Evil”.

“Pope Francis” touched down in Romerica for the victory tour to survey all he owned on 22 Sept. 2015 on the 222nd anniversary (do you think the Jesuits keep METICULOUS track of these facts?!).

A missing chapter from Johnny’s upcoming book, The Disciples of Ra!⁹²

Francis Bacon … Viscount Saint Alban … A lawyer, statesman, philosopher, and master of the English tongue, he is remembered in literary terms for the sharp worldly wisdom of a few dozen essays; by students of constitutional history for his power as a speaker in Parliament and in famous trials … and intellectually as a man who claimed all knowledge as his province and, after a magisterial survey, urgently advocated new ways by which man might establish a legitimate command over nature for the relief of his estate. ~ Britannica

________________________

New Atlantis is an incomplete utopian novel by Sir Francis Bacon, published posthumously in 1626.  It appeared unheralded and tucked into the back of a longer work of natural history, Sylva sylvarum (forest of materials).  In New Atlantis, Bacon portrayed a vision of the future of human discovery and knowledge, expressing his aspirations and ideals for humankind.  The novel depicts the creation of a utopian land where “generosity and enlightenment, dignity and splendour, piety and public spirit” are the commonly held qualities of the inhabitants of the mythical Bensalem.  The plan and organisation of his ideal college, Salomon’s House (or Solomon’s House), envisioned the modern research university in both applied and pure sciences. ~ Wikipedia

When you seek out who created the Scientific Method, most sources tell you “Francis⁹³ Bacon”.

Bacon was as key a player in history as it gets.

To give perspective, let’s go through a timeline of key, related dates.

282 B.C.: The city-state of Rome wins the Battle of Populonia and becomes the dominate power in Italy.

146 B.C.: Lucius Mummius defeats the Achaean League and sacks Corinth as Rome eclipses Greece.

17 March 45 B.C.: Gaius Julius Caesar wins the Battle of Munda making him dictator of Rome.  A year later he declared himself a god that would rule for the remainder of life.  The god then died a few months afterward when the Roman Senate had him assassinated, 2 days short of the anniversary of his victory; March 15^th, 44 B.C.

27 B.C.: Octavian, the nephew of Julius Caesar (more popularly known as “Caesar Augustus”) rides his military power to become the first Emperor of Rome.

September 11^th, 3 B.C.: A young woman gives birth to her first son in the town of Bethlehem and calls him “Jesus” which, in the Hebrew (Yeshua) means “Salvation”.

This date for the birth of Jesus Christ has been popularized by Michael S. Heiser who cites Ernest Martin’s The Star That Astonished the World, first published in 1991.

April 6^th, 32 A.D.: Jesus of Nazareth rides into Jerusalem on the back of a donkey and is proclaimed “King of the Jews”.

Robert Anderson (1841 – 1918), like his lawyer brother Samuel, made a name for himself spying in Ireland on behalf of the British crown.

This put him on the fast-track to becoming Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police at an important moment in history.

Anderson was the Freemason placed in charge of “Criminal Investigation” at “Scotland Yard” to help cover-up the brutal murders of prostitutes from 1888 to 1891.

The murders have been attributed to the pharisaical myth of “Jack the Ripper” when they were actually messages of dire warning sent to anyone who would unveil the Vatican’s control of the British Crown.

I hope to get into author Stephen Knight’s brilliant exposé regarding “the Ripper” in a future installment of Romans of Mass Destruction.

Though Masonic apologists claim Anderson was not one of theirs (the corruption of London Metro would be an embarrassing thing to explain), Knight “outed” him.⁹⁴

Unfortunately, Stephen Knight is no-longer accessible for interview as he died in 1985 of cancer at only 33 years of age.

Robert Anderson’s penance for corrupting justice at Scotland Yard on behalf of the handmaids of the Vatican was to disclose the precision of Messianic prophecy found in Daniel Chapter 9 (sometimes called “Daniel’s 70 Weeks”) which he did in his 1894 book The Coming Prince.

If we accept Anderson and Heiser/Martin (and I do), that puts the age of Jesus Christ at exactly 33 years and 7 months when He was executed on the Hebrew Passover (“Pesach”).

Thus begins the Jesuit / Freemasonic / gnostic obsession with “33”, particularly as an age.

18 July 64 A.D.: A fire starts in a run-down section of Rome just outside the Circus Maximus chariot stadium.  The historian Tacitus records that it was aided by looters who doubled as arsonists.  By the time it died down, 6 days later, a section of the city that Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus (a.k.a. “Emperor Nero”) had lusted after for his new palace was conveniently cleared.

Just as convenient was who Nero scapegoated: a sect of burgeoning “religious fanatics” known as “Christians”.

This is one of the earliest examples of a “false flag”.

27 October 312 A.D.: Flavius Valerius Constantinus has a vision of the Christian God and is told by a “voice from Heaven”; “In hoc signo vinces” (in this sign shall you conquer).

What was the sign?  Some say a simple Christian cross, others say the “Christogram” of Greek letters chi and rho.⁹⁵

Constantine placed the symbol upon the shields of his soldiers and beat his rival Maxentius at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge the next day, becoming the sole Emperor of Rome and her first “overt Christian monarch”.⁹⁶

February 313 A.D.: Constantine issues the Edict of Milan, decreeing tolerance for all Christians.

27 February 380 A.D.: Emperor Theodosius I dictates the Edict of Thessalonica which mandated Christianity to be the sole religion of the Roman Empire.

4 September 476 A.D.: Roman Emperor Romulus Augustus abdicates his throne to the “barbarian invader” German Goth, Flavius Odoacer signifying the “fall” of military Rome.

March 533 A.D.: Emperor Justinian writes a letter to John, Bishop of Rome, giving him authority as “Bishop of bishops” and “Corrector of Heretics” but the power was left unasserted because Rome was under siege by the Ostrogoths.  The siege was lifted in 538 A.D. and the Bishopric had changed hands 3 times from Silverius to Agapetus to Vigilius.

It is Vigilius whom we should rightly call “the first Pope”.

Thus begins the true “Dark Ages” (especially for Christians) as military Rome transforms into the much more dangerous and powerful religious Rome.

Adventist scholars have an excellent explanation of this being the start point for the “times and times and the dividing of time” prophecy of Daniel 7:25 spanning 1,260 years and culminating in the February 10^th, 1798 entrance by Napoleon Bonaparte’s General Louis-Alexandre Berthier into Rome and subsequent imprisoning of Giovanni Braschi, “Pope Pius VI”.

November 1^st, 1517 A.D. [“All Saints Day”]: An upstart Augustinian monk posts a scathing rebuke of Medici Pope Leo X and his Dominican zealots like Johann Tetzel for bilking naive peasants out of what little wealth they had to secure spiritual favor via “indulgences”.⁹⁷  He is reprimanded but digs his heels in.  What starts as an effort to reform his religion soon becomes a devastating revolution, thanks to the advent of the movable-type printing press just a few miles nearby and a few years earlier!

For the first time in history, the Christian Scriptures (strictly forbidden to the masses by Rome on pain of torture and death) flowed out of Guttenberg presses and quickly turn Germany from “Catholic” to “Christian”!

Many other nations follow Germany’s lead such as Switzerland, Denmark and the Netherlands but none combined the doctrinal turn with dangerous power like Britain.

3 November 1534 A.D.: King of England Henry Tudor (Number 8) is married to devout Catholic Catherine of Aragon, Princess of the Spanish Crown.  As with all loveless, political marriages of the Elite, it shored up the power of both families but there was a problem: Catherine was only able to produce a single female child (Bloody Mary Tudor).  At all costs, Henry believed he could “live on” with a male heir.  He beseeched the Medici Pope⁹⁸ for a divorce (Kings need permission from Rome to do anything of import) but was denied.  Spain was far too important to risk ire over one king’s selfish obsession.

In response, Henry simply created a miniature Church of Rome and made himself Pope on this date.

Although the “Church of England” mirrors Rome in all its trappings it was, for a time, politically expedient to pretend to be Protestant.  This was the case for Elizabeth I and James I, neither of which were in any way dedicated to Christianity but both saw some advantages in not kissing the Papal ring.

Into this caldron of intrigue was inserted Francis Bacon.

Bacon was “Queen’s Counsel” for Elizabeth I and the first to bear that title.  This was/is the chief legal advisor “to the Crown”.

After Elizabeth, he was Attorney General and Lord High Chancellor for James I.  “Lord High Chancellor” is second only to the Prime Minister in power and that is a close “second”.

Bacon did so by “riding the coat-tails” of Robert Devereux, “2^nd Earl of Essex”.⁹⁹

Bacon soon became acquainted with Robert Devereux, 2nd Earl of Essex, Queen Elizabeth’s favorite.^[20]  By 1591 he acted as the earl’s confidential adviser.^[12][20]

In 1592 he was commissioned to write a tract in response to the Jesuit Robert Parson’s anti-government polemic, which he titled Certain observations made upon a libel, identifying England with the ideals of democratic Athens against the belligerence of Spain.^[21] ~ Wikipedia

What better way to prove Bacon’s “Protestant credentials” than to have him counter a Jesuit in writing where the stakes are as high as a papercut?

Robert Devereux was known as a “Favourite” of Elizabeth I: someone kept within the Queen’s inner-most circle yet there seems little reason for it.

One of the first nations to fall under Roman control after the city-state’s transformation into a “religious” power was Ireland.  She has been dominated by Catholicism ever since.  Every move to make Ireland independent from Britain has been irrevocably destroyed by the fallacy that the movement was “Catholic” and tragically doomed to failure in the face of “Protestant” Britain.

Although this was the case for the “Nine Years War” (also known as “the Tyrone Rebellion”) the very name betrays the power behind the chaos.  In no way should an Irish “revolt” against Britain have lasted nearly a decade but Robert Devereux’s role further implies Vatican enabling.

Britannica put’s it this way:

The Tyrone Rebellion

The origins of the third rebellion, the O’Neill (Tyrone) war, remain in doubt.  Both Hugh Roe O’Donnell and Hugh O’Neill (younger son of Feardorchadh), for whom the earldom of Tyrone had been revived in 1585 and who had been elected O’Neill on Turlough Luineach’s death in 1595, certainly resented the extension of the royal administration, but the religious issue was probably more important.  For a generation, exiled Roman Catholics had been trained as missionaries in the continental colleges of the Counter-Reformation, and the majority of those who returned to Ireland concluded that Catholicism could survive there only if Elizabeth were defeated.

At the height of the conflict, in 1599, Devereux talked Elizabeth into making him “Lord Lieutenant of Ireland”: the highest-ranking British official there.

Wikipedia states:

Essex led the largest expeditionary force ever sent to Ireland—16,000 troops—with orders to put an end to the rebellion.  He departed London to the cheers of the Queen’s subjects, and it was expected the rebellion would be crushed instantly…

Essex had declared to the Privy Council that he would confront O’Neill in Ulster.  Instead, he led his army into southern Ireland, where he fought a series of inconclusive engagements, wasted his funds, and dispersed his army into garrisons, while the Irish won two important battles in other parts of the country.  Rather than face O’Neill in battle, Essex entered a truce that some considered humiliating to the Crown and to the detriment of English authority.  The Queen herself told Essex that if she had wished to abandon Ireland it would scarcely have been necessary to send him there.

In all of his campaigns Essex secured the loyalty of his officers by conferring knighthoods, an honour the Queen herself dispensed sparingly, and by the end of his time in Ireland more than half the knights in England owed their rank to him.  The rebels were said to have joked that, “he never drew sword but to make knights.”

Devereux appeared to show utter contempt for Elizabeth’s power.  He could easily have been executed for treason but the Queen merely stripped him of his privileges.

In February of 1601, the “Earl of Essex” lead a group of armed men from his “estate, Essex House” towards Whitehall Palace.  The goal was, supposedly, to force the Queen to throw out several of her advisors such as Robert Cecil, an enemy of Devereux.

“Ill-advised” would be too kind an assessment: needless suicide would be more accurate.

All it took were cries of “Treason!” to echo through the streets and Devereux’s army melted away before he got remotely close to the Palace.  He retreated to “Essex House” where he sulked until he was arrested, tried for treason and beheaded.

Perhaps if Devereux had retained a barrister like his understudy, Francis Bacon could’ve argued that “Treason” is a crime against the citizenry, not to be confused with vexing a Royal.

Was Devereux truly that foolish or was something else afoot?

“Remember, Remember…”

Four years later, several conspirators involved in the “Essex Rebellion” would resurface in another suicide strategy of revolt: the Gunpowder Plot.

But this plot wasn’t against “Protestant” Elizabeth I, it was against “Protestant” James I.

It was so fantastic, it had to fail: fill the basement of the House of Lords with gunpowder and, at the right time, blow up James and all of Parliament.

At the last moment, the plot was “discovered” and thwarted.  The culprits were Jesuits.  Eight of the conspirators were tried and executed including the Provincial, Henry Garnet.

When authorities rushed to the basement entrance, they found Guy “Guido” Fawkes guarding the door.  Fawkes was a Vatican mercenary whose parents had raised to defy Henry’s new Protestant religion.  He had honed his skills killing Dutch Protestants on behalf of Catholic Spain in the “Eighty Years War”.

But was this a cunning chess move by the Company of Loyola?

Can “Shakespeare” shed some light?

… as Garry Wills in his book Witches & Jesuits points out, Macbeth is an elaborate condemnation of the Jesuits as satanists, murderers, witches.  Macbeth is one of many of its period’s “powder plays,” a genre in which certain buzz words, well understood by contemporaries, memorialize the guilt and execution of eight Jesuits for having schemed the Gunpowder Plot of November 5, 1605.  The Plot aimed to blow up the entire government of Great Britain, including the royal family, in a single catastrophic explosion under the Houses of Parliament.

How could a play defaming Jesuits be of service to the Jesuit agenda?  As we shall see, warfare in defense of the papacy requires extravagant measures.  In fact, both the Gunpowder Plot, which failed, and the celebration of its detection, which lives on in Macbeth, served Rome abundantly.  King James I, who declared himself the Plot’s divinely-illuminated discoverer, blamed the Plot on “Jesuits and papists.”  But at the same time, James exonerated “less fanatical Catholics.”⁶  According to Wills, “the Plot gave [James] his best opportunity to separate loyal and moderate Catholics from the mad extremists of the Plot.”  In short, the Plot secured England for “loyal and moderate” Roman Catholicism.  In the reasoning of a Superior General, particularly the General of the Gunpowder Plot and Shakespearian theatre, Claudio Acquaviva, the sacrifice of eight Jesuits was a small tactical price to pay for moving the King of England to express confidence in the Pope’s British subjects, estimated at half the population of the realm. ~ Saussy¹⁰⁰

It should be noted that, as “Protestants” both Elizabeth and James were quite happy to put their own to the stake to preserve their power.

Not So Anonymous

            In 2005, a $54 million movie was released titled “V for Vendetta”, based upon a limited DC comic series.

The inspiration for both was the 1605 Gunpowder Plot.

However, in the comicbook and movie, the Jesuit terrorists are the heroes, immortalized by a mask said to depict Guy Fawkes.

The movie was written by Andy and Larry Wachowski who are also credited with the 1999 Science Fiction thriller “The Matrix”.

Oddly, both Andy and Larry have surrendered their genders and are now known as “Lilly” and “Lana”, respectively.

As government tyranny (controlled by the Jesuits) ramps up to insufferable levels around the world, angry citizens are given empty, impotent “resistance movements” to misplace their trust with such as “Anonymous” and “Occupy Wall Street”.  Both movements have adopted the effigy of lay-Jesuit assassin Guy Fawkes as their symbol.

Robert Devereux wasn’t the only Vatican agent standing behind brilliant wordsmith Francis Bacon.

Although I covered this with detail in my book Romans of Mass Destruction, Volume I, a portion is worth citing for you.

_________________________

The character of “Dracula” has been so ingrained into the human experience that we don’t even realize that weapons of choice against this evil, frightening creature are “holy water” and a crucifix.  We may then deduce that blood-sucking vampires are a metaphor for any enemy of the Catholic Church.^lv

Elementary, John and Mary.

Or did Stoker, rather than shirking the political issue and despite claiming to be a Protestant while he lived a high-profile life in England’s theatre circles, in fact, subtly thematicize it?  Writing the biography of Stoker, David Glover notes: “Indeed, it is essential to see that the anxieties that animate these novels are inextricably bound up with the most deeply rooted dilemmas facing late Victorian culture”⁽¹⁵⁾.  Writing at the time of the Land Acts which stripped the landlords of their power, Stoker was only too aware of the decline of the Anglo-Irish gentry.  Did he cautiously write a novel promoting the proselytization of Protestants to Catholicism in an era when to do so might be dangerous to an Irishman’s health and / or freedom?  One reading of Dracula indeed suggests that its author was a closet Catholic cloaking his dangerous views in a relatively safe literary medium.⁸⁸

This identical tactic has been attributed to another “legendary classic” author; “William Shakespeare”.

“ — by any other name…”

If there is one writer who is mandatory reading in nearly any school, anywhere, it is “Shakespeare” yet controversy abounds regarding the questions “Did he really exist?”  “Is ‘Shakespeare’ a pen name for someone else?”

If you’ve never heard of this being a controversy, not only is it, it has its own special name: the “Shakespeare Authorship Question”.

Dr. Helen Gordon, Professor of English at Bakersfield, puts it this way:

Actual facts about [the “William Shakspere” of Stratford-on-Avonlvi] are scarce.  During his lifetime (1564-1614) no portraits of him were painted, no biography written about him, and no records kept of his education.  He left no manuscripts in his own hand, no letters, no diary, no memoranda, no notes.  We have only six shaky signatures on legal documents, property deeds, and a few public records unrelated to literature.  The signatures that we do have are variously spelled (Shakspere, Shagspere, Shaxper, Shakspear), but none are spelled as the author’s name was consistently spelled (Shakespeare or Shake-speare).  The pronunciation indicated by the Stratfordian spellings would be SHACK-spur, to differentiate it from the author’s name, pronounced SHAKE-spear.  Shakspere’s last will said nothing about a personal library, scripts, or royalties which his family might have inherited.

Diana Price in her unauthorized biography of Shakespeare^[lvii] lists several criteria with which we determine the authenticity of an author such as personal letters, acknowledgement of their literary talent by peers, drafts of manuscripts, records of publication, proof of payments, and so forth.  Of all the writers known to be living in the Elizabethan age, only William Shakespeare draws a complete blank.  This lack of evidence compared to other writers of the time seems to suggest that “William Shakespeare” was a pen name.⁸⁹

In light of such evidence, the constant reinforcing of a real “Shakespeare” by major media becomes as suspect as their many other propaganda efforts.  The fact that no major or “accepted” source even mentions these concerns in any attempt at balance is almost conclusive in itself.

A 1617 portrait of Francis Bacon by Paul van Somer. Wikimedia Commons)

Notice the supposed lifetime of “William Shakespeare”: (1564-1614).  By this time, the kindling that Martin Luther had lit on November 1^st, All Saints’ Day, in 1517 was a full-blown prairie fire.

One of the most “controversial” (and, likewise, plausible) contentions is that the Lord Chancellor of King James I of England (who was also “James VI of Scotland”), Sir Francis Bacon, was secretly “William Shakespeare”.

Sources like “user-edited Wikipedia” display extreme derision towards the idea, calling this theory an “alleged subterfuge^[lviii] … [d]espite the academic consensus^[lix] that Shakespeare wrote the works bearing his name…”⁹⁰ …

Perhaps the reason Bacon as Shakespeare is immediately dismissed is because one of the strongest sources on the issue was Bacon’s best friend, confidant and Confessor, English Jesuit Sir Tobie Matthew who wrote to him in 1623 —

The most prodigious wit, that ever I knew of my nation, and of this side of the sea, is of your Lordship’s name, though he be known by another.⁹¹

So close were they, in fact, that when relative Arnold Harris Mathew wrote his ancestor’s biography in 1907 he titled it The Life of Sir Tobie Matthew: Bacon’s Alter Ego.

If Francis Bacon was, indeed, William Shakespeare, then it’s not a stretch to say that, ultimately, so was Jesuit Tobie Matthew.

Official sources on Matthew carefully avoid identifying him as a Jesuit but his proud kinsman was happy to put that to rest and to confirm that Father Tobie Matthew’s hand was ultimately behind Francis “William Shakespeare” Bacon.

Students of seventeenth-century literature may find some new facts recorded in these pages, and admirers of Bacon, and all persons to whom the Bacon-Shakespeare question appeals, will not fail to be interested in the correspondence between the Philosopher and his Alter Ego.

Should this attempt to rescue from oblivion the name of a remarkable personality prove acceptable to the literary world, I shall have no reason to regret the hard work which the undertaking has involved.

That Sir Tobie Matthew was ever a Jesuit has been strenuously denied by some members of the Society.

Nevertheless, it may be considered certain that he was a member of it at an early date after his conversion.

By his will, dated 1614, the year of his ordination by the great Jesuit, Cardinal [Robert] Bellarmine,^[lx] he bequeathed the whole of his earthly possessions to the Society.  This fact by itself would not suffice to prove Sir Tobie to have been anything more than a friend and admirer of the Society.

Other facts, however, have come to light.

At the Benedictine Abbey of St. Mary, at Oulton, in Staffordshire, the ancient English Benedictine nuns, who were exiled during the reign of Henry VIII., are now represented.

The community descends from the convent established at Ghent as an offshoot of the community settled at Brussels.

In the library at Oulton Abbey is preserved the original MS. [manuscript] of an unpublished work of Sir Tobie’s, written by him for the nuns at Ghent, and dated “The first of January, 1652.”

The MS. consists of a biography of the Lady Abbess Lucy Knatchbull, O.S.B.[“Ordo Sancti Benedicti”, “Order of Saint Benedict”], of Ghent, and is written in a hand which is not Sir Tobie’s, probably a scrivener’s.

The preface, however, is signed by him, and the MS. is corrected.  The work is entitled: “A Relation of the Holy and Happy Life and Death of the Lady Lucie Knatchbull, Abbess, and of her foundinge the English Monastery of Benedictines at Ghent; together with some notice which is given of her Religious there, concerning both their persons, and particular devotions and Perfections; as also of divers Blessings wherewith they have been enriched from Heaven.  This Relation consists of two Parts.  By SIR TOBIE MATTHEW, KNIGHT, Soc. JES.”⁹²

The “Sir” / “Knight” comes from an English Knighthood bestowed upon Matthew by none other than the commissioner of the “Authorized 1611 Version of the Bible”, “Protestant” King James I. The reason for the Knighthood is even less “Protestant”: Jesuit Father Tobie was James I’s personal ambassador to Spain to arrange for his son Charles to marry “Infanta^lxi” Maria Anna, the daughter of King Philip III.

In fact, the deal fell through but Father Tobie was Knighted anyway!

“Protestant” King James found a match just as Catholic, Henrietta Maria of France, the daughter of King Henry IV, of the House of Bourbon.

Perhaps you’re now wondering just how “Protestant” the commissioner of the “Authorized Version” really was, especially given that he was raised by hyper-devout Catholic, Mary, Queen of Scots.

By the time Charles was gifted the throne (by right of his “Blood Succession”) many Britons were wondering, as well.  In fact, Charles’ Catholicity and aloof mismanagement of his nation’s affairs precipitated the English Civil war that ended with the offing of his head and the very brief reign of true Protestant Oliver Cromwell.^lxii

Father Tobie Matthew, S.J., from his position of power and influence in “Protestant England”, sowed seeds of subversion that bore fruit in America.

In March, 1630, Sir Tobie was in London, sending Court gossip to Sir Henry Vane in Paris.

Later in the same year he was in Staffordshire, acting as a zealous layman, in assisting the Catholic cause.

On August 12th he concluded a visit to Lord Baltimore, who, as Sir George Calvert, had been one of the principal Secretaries of State, from 1619 to 1624; in the latter year he resigned the seals, frankly acknowledging to the King that he had become a Catholic.

Sir Tobie is credited with his conversion.

The King, however, retained Sir George as a Privy Councillor, and in 1625 elevated him to the peerage, under the title of Baron of Baltimore, in Ireland.

The capital of Maryland was named after him.⁹³

The reason why the “capital”^lxiii of Mary-land was named after Lord Baltimore is because he was specifically granted a Royal Charter to send Catholics there by the same King who promoted him even after he sheepishly admitted he had converted^lxiv — the son of James I: Charles I.

~ Romans of Mass Destruction, Cirucci¹⁰¹

_________________________

“Authorized”

There are multiple sources which state that Francis Bacon was “William Shakespeare” and credit him with formulating Elizabethan English in specific and the English language in general.

The works of “Shakespeare” have been fed to generations of children for centuries as “immortal classics” because they were an intimate part of Rome’s insurgency against Protestant Britain.

If Bacon was a proxy for the Jesuits, crediting him as “Shakespeare” and creator of the English language becomes even more plausible.

From their inception, the Company of Loyola has toiled to break down the barrier of language to them while weaponizing it against humanity.

With the advent of Johannes Gutenberg’s movable-type printing press around 1450 in Mainz, Germany came a flood of illegal, common-tongue Bibles.  Rome could no-longer suppress the Christian Scriptures by finding and burning precious hand-written copies (along with anyone connected to them).

A new tactic was required and its breadth and complexity is nothing short of Diabolical: alter the understanding of reality while simultaneously altering Scripture so that there is enough of a divergence to cause readers to question and mock it.

The attack on the Christian Bible has been subtle yet insidious.

By the 19^th century, Protestant Bibles were losing their potency because of their reliance upon Francis Bacon’s Elizabethan English.  Although the language of “Shakespeare” sounds poetic and “holy” it is confusing, especially for spiritual and educational novices.

This provided a key opportunity for Rome to usher in a flood of modernized, yet inherently flawed translations.

On 11 February 2020, in correspondence to me, one of my research assistants put it this way:

_________________________

Freemason Manly P. Hall Admits He is an Agent Working for the Jesuits in His 1944 Letter

Setting the groundwork:

One must search long and hard for photographs of Manly Hall not staged with Vaudevillian drama.

In 1844, 33° Freemason & Knight of Malta, Constantin von Tischendorf, met with Jesuit Cardinal Angelo Mai and Pope Gregory XVI at the Vatican — they disclosed to Tischendorf that the Vatican had retrieved a known fake Bible manuscript penned by Constantine Simonides as a gift for Tsar Nicholas I, of Russia, and that they had stored it at the Roman Catholic St. Catherine’s Monastery in Egypt, for him to go gather, stain it to look older, and say he found a “4^th century Alexandria Bible MS,” making it the oldest and therefore “the purest.”

This Jesuit Forgery of the Textus Vaticanus and Textus Sinaiticus, is the base text for all modernized translations such as the ESV, NIV, NASB and NLT.

Yet, it is so corrupted and distorted that it denies Jesus ascending on the third day, and makes Him a sinner, just to name only 2 out of hundreds of errors compared to Textus Receptus translations.

Near the end of Jesuits’ Second Thirty Years’ War [“World Wars” I and II], a famous 33° Illuminized Freemason, Manly Palmer Hall, asserted that there was something wrong with the mankind and that things must change.

In the spring of 1944, exactly 100 years since the Jesuits’ created the Textus Vaticanus and Textus Sinaiticus forgeries, he made a following statement:

“To make things right we will have to undo much that is cherished error.  The problem of revising the Bible shows how difficult it is to do this.  For the last hundred years we have been trying to get out an edition of the Bible that is reasonably correct; but nobody wants it.  What’s wanted is the good old King James Version, every jot and tittle of it, because most people are convinced that God dictated the Bible to King James in English.” ~ Manly Hall

Who are “we”?  Let’s take that apart right now.  And while we’re at it, we’ll see what the Sinaiticus might have to do with it.

“To make things right we will have to undo much that is cherished error … For the last hundred years we have been trying to get out an edition of the Bible that is reasonably correct, but nobody wants it.”

By “we,” it seems that Hall is referring to some very high-up powerful individuals in the Occult and Political world.  That was the focus of his 1944 article, as he goes on furthermore to say:

“In the next ten years we will have to rebuild a world civilization.  I hope for some Psychologists and even Philosophers to be among those appointed to administer this problem … We are thinking now of a world Police Force.  We will first perhaps try to make a great world plan … We will sit at a council table and figure how to iron out the troubles on the earth … The way of that conditioning would be the one used in Central Europe to condition Nazi minds.  There the circulation of an ideology began in the public schools, began with the small child; which is where we will have to begin, and educate not only our own people but the peoples of the world … And we will have to have five generations of the consciousness concept of Democratic cooperation before we can create a world capable of mental and emotional tolerance.” ~ Manly Hall

Let’s count the generations after WWII:

1. 1946-64: Baby Boomers

2. 1965-early 80s were: Generation X

3. Mid-1980s-early 2000s: Generation Y/Millennials

4. Mid-2000s-present: Generation Z

            So how are we doing?  The Jesuits, through their control of “education”, have created a generation of revolutionary proxies to push their Luciferian agenda while simultaneously giving them plausible deniability for the resulting enslavement.

MTV asked 1,000 13-14 year-olds; “Which of the proposed names they wanted their generation to be called?”  The majority of them wanted to be called; “The Founder Generation.”  These teenagers, born after 9/11, supposedly; “have a stunningly intuitive sense of the changing times they’ve been born into, and the huge opportunity that lies ahead to make new History.”

Who are “founders”?

—They abandon the old and start something new.

Guided by whom?  Who are their teachers?

This is the Jesuit New One World Order by Manly P. Hall’s own standards.  And we’re only in Generation Four.

But to accomplish this enslavement, Hall and his masters needed to muddy the understanding of anyone reading a Bible in the common tongue.  Once again, they cloaked the Word of God in an ancient language and offered a counterfeit in the common tongue to the unwary masses.

“For the last hundred years we have been trying to get out an edition of the Bible that is reasonably correct …”

            Occultist Hall wrote these words in what year?  —1944.

What happened 100 years earlier, in 1844?

In 1844, according to text scholar 33° Freemason and Papal Knight of Malta, Constantin Tischendorf, he began to acquire Greek vellum pages that ultimately were named, “Codex Sinaiticus.”  This is the same “manuscript” behind all modern Bibles and their subversive footnotes, including the New King James.

However, are we sure Hall meant the Sinaiticus?

Manly Hall wrote strongly in favor of it.  Here are two powerful quotes.

“The Codex Sinaiticus is a manuscript of the 4^th Century of about the same date as the Codex Vaticanus … This manuscript is one of the great books of the world … it is sufficiently important to justify considerable revision of our popular conception of the Scriptural writings …” ~ Manly Hall

In other words, presenting modern Bibles with Jesuit-edited errors as an alternative to confusing, antiquated translations.

Furthermore, from Hall’s “Monthly Letter,” published on April Fools’ Day, he writes the following:

“Of importance to students of occultism is the fact that the Codex Sinaiticus contains many passages suppressed from the published Gospels.  These passages in many cases greatly alter the significance of the text.” ~ Manly Hall

Hall cunningly pitted himself on the side of “reason” by contrasting the need for modern translations against the minority of misguided Christians who consider the King James translation, itself, “inerrant”.

“But what does this mean to the average Bible student?  This enthusiastic jot and tittle worshiper will insist that the words of the King James version are the very words of God Himself.” ~ Manly Hall

Hall’s attacks upon the Textus Receptus, via the King James, were nothing short of Jesuitical: so much so that one wonders if he penned the words himself.

For 400 years the Company of Loyola sought to discredit the Christian Scriptures that had burst off of the Gutenberg presses and with utter frustration did Hall revile the rejection of von Tischendorf’s Jesuit-inspired fraud.

At his time, the “King James Version” was merely the most popular, 300-year-old accepted product of the Textus Receptus and one sealed by the hand of Knighted British Rosicrucian Sir Francis Bacon on behalf of Knighted British Jesuit Sir Tobie Matthew.

“… the King James Version of the Holy Bible.  This translation teems with error and is hopelessly unreliable from a Scholastic viewpoint, yet popular acceptance has caused this mis-version of holy writing, to come to be recognized as infallible so that the religious public would now reject a correct translation.  In fact it has already shown its attitude in the matter by refusing a revised edition.  For over 300 years erroneous theological notions have been circulated, deriving their authority from the King James translation of the Bible.” ~ Manly Hall

_________________________

Mirrored from Eric’s excellent reddit post.

The characteristics of the supervillain Bane from the Batman universe share many similarities to that of Jesuits and the Jesuit order:

…intelligent, idealistic, and insane.  A charismatic leader of a growing band of revolutionaries, Bane is unafraid to kill anyone who stands in his way. ~ Charactour.com

Bane, we shall see in the comic book fictional story rebels against the Jesuits after being educated by them, killing 2 priests using the principles they taught him! They are killed by Bane because he is seeking information on a secret society based in Rome that the Jesuits told him about.  This society, “The Order of Saint Dumas”, is supposedly at war with the Jesuits while having Jesuits being members of society!  Some classic Jesuit theatre indeed.  Good thing there is Catholic Batman to swoop in and save the day.

Bane was in fact a product of the Jesuits, just like real life supervillains such as Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Ante Pavelic, Francisco Franco, Fidel Castro, Bill Clinton, John Surrat, Samuel Mudd, Heinrich Himmler, Joseph Goebbels, Adrien Arcand, Leon Degrelle, J. Edgar Hoover, John Brennan, Karl Marx, Pol Pot, Joseph Kibweteere, Joseph Vacher, Robert Mugabe, Adam Weishaupt, Maximilien Robespierre, Phillip II, Ferdinand VII, Louis XIV, José Manuel Barroso, Herman Van Rompuy, Pope Francis, Klaus Schawb, Anthony Fauci, Stephan Bancel, Justin Trudeau ,Paul Biya, Jerome Powell, etc., etc.

Quoting from the batman.fandom.com entry on the character Bane we read:

The origin of Bane has similarities with another fictional character, Alexandre Dumas’ Edmond Dantes.  Born to serve the life sentence of his father, Bane’s childhood and early adult life are spent behind the walls of Peña Duro, an infamous prison located in Santa Prisca.  Though imprisoned, his natural abilities allow him to develop extraordinary skills within the prison’s walls.  He reads as many books as he can get his hands on, builds up his body in the prison’s gymnasium, and learns to fight in the merciless school of prison life.  Despite his circumstances, he appears to have found teachers of various sorts during his incarceration, ranging from hardened convicts to an elderly Jesuit priest, under whose tutelage he apparently receives a classical education.  Bane murders this priest upon his return to Santa Prisca years later.  However, he commits his first murder at the age of eight, stabbing a criminal who wanted to use him to gain information about the prison.

The comic book “Bane of the Demon” #1 (1998) goes into detail on Bane’s relationship with Jesuit Father Orestes. The two are chatting here on page 4.

Jesuit Father Orestes played a big role in educating and training Bane while he was at Pena Duro prison, in the fictional storyline:

Bane’s father, Edmund Dorrance / King Snake is a revolutionary who had supposedly escaped Santa Prisca’s court system.  The corrupt government decrees that his young son will serve out the man’s life sentence, and thus Bane spends his childhood, starting at 4 years old, and his early adult life in prison.  Having no name, he is given the name of the criminal who was supposed to inhabit the cell he is moved into, Antonio Diego, a serial killer who was killed on his way to Pena Duro.  During his early years in prison, Bane carries a teddy bear he calls Osito with him but his cellmate, an older and mysterious elderly Jesuit priest known as “The Father”, convinces Bane that the teddy bear will not protect him and that he’ll have to forge real friendships in life.  The Father gives him a classical education as well as teaching him martial arts, military battle strategies, and the languages of Spanish, English, Portuguese, and Latin.  The Father instills a code of honor and respect into young Bane, while also giving him the belief that he will not spend his entire life behind bars. ~ reddit

During Bane’s time in the hellish prison called Peña Dura, he had only one friend.  Well, two friends.  First of all there was the kindly, elderly Jesuit priest who gave him the classical education that enabled him to become a master strategist and one of Batman’s few intellectual rivals, a man that the great Ra’s al Ghul says “has a mind equal to the greatest he has known”.  So that makes him pretty smart.  He was a nice old dude, and played a big part in making Bane into the man he is today, but the villain ended up killing him regardless. — 10 Things DC Comics Wants You To Forget About Bane, WhatCulture.com

The source information for the villain Bane’s ties to the Jesuits is the 1998 comic book Batman: Bane of the Demon #1.  —More proof of the Jesuits’ influence and control of Hollywood and pop(e) culture!

Synopsis for “Bane of the Demon”

Bane returns to his home island of St. Prisca.  He talks to Father Orestes.  They discuss men who could possibly be Bane’s father.  Bane travels to Rome to try and find information about a secret order.  He discovers this group is “The Order of St.  Dumas”.  He travels to Singapore looking for more information.  Mean while, Talia Al Ghul steals the Parthian Text from the same building Bane is in.  ~ DC.Fandom.com

Bane having a conversation with Jesuit Father Orestes on page 7 of “Bane of the Demon” #1. “We are Gods Secret Police” says the Jesuit to Bane. Bane says “Trust the Jesuits to record everything” referencing the Jesuit archive of the history of Santa Prisca which Bane is reading in this photo

Bane seeking out information on the secret Roman Order. He finds out that a Jesuit, Father Bismala is a member of this secret society. He proceeds to confront Bismala. (page 13)

Bane is about to kill Jesuit Father Bisala in Rome after forcing Bisala to reveal the name of the secret Roman Order—“The Order of Saint Dumas”. Bisala says he is trusted by the Pope to keep the name of the order secret!

page 13

page 14

Earlier on in the story Batman: Bane of the Demon #1 some grandiose Jesuit theatre is on display.  The Order of Saint Dumas, the secret Roman society determined to enact world domination which Bane is seeking to find information on, is supposedly at war with the Jesuit order!  This is shown in Bane’s dialogue with Jesuit Father Orestes on page 9, when discussing the possible identity of Bane’s father—a man nicknamed “Swiss” whom helped the Jesuit and rebels cause a coup on the island St.  Prisca which looks incredibly similar to the coup of Jesuit shaped Marxist revolutionary Fidel Castro in Cuba—The Castro revolutionary look alike in this Bane comic is named El Jefe del Pais, also a possible suspect for being Bane’ s real father.  El Jefe appearance wise even looks much like Jesuit trained Fidel Castro in the comic.  The island of St.  Prisca is named after the Roman Empress Prisca (286-305) who converted to Christianity—this is shown on the first page of the comic book.

Jesuit Father Orestes speaking to Bane

Bane then kills Jesuit Father Orestes and flies to Rome after getting this secret information from him on the Roman Order of Saint Dumas.

Bane pushes Father Orestes out to his death.

Further reading — Why Batman Is Catholic, EpicPew.com

The ingenious {Jesuit} priest who discovered how bats “see” in the dark ~ NewScientist.com

* The NY Times claims Modell “fought in World War II” but he enlisted in the Army Air Corps and accounts of his “fighting” are noticeably absent.  Only a minority of Army Air Corps enlisted faced danger as aircraft crew.  “Combat veterans” are almost always listed with combat commendations or medals.  He used his “GI Bill” to buy his way into the brand new venue of television.

* 1961: Modell bought a controlling interest in the Cleveland Browns.

* 1963: Modell fired Browns’ Head Coach Paul Brown for making decisions without him.  Paul Brown had won 3 “All-American Football League” Championships and three NFL Championships.  He has been called “the most innovative coach in football history” and was foundational in “breaking the color barrier” with black players.  The “Browns” are named after Paul Eugene Brown.

* When Modell found out some Cleveland bars had discovered a way to play “blacked-out” games, free of charge, for their customers, Modell sued them and the judge “shockingly” sided with Modell.

* In 1969 he married devout Roman Catholic (twice-Catholic-educated) actress Patricia Breslin.

* When Modell repeatedly lost money from a team he micro-managed more than Jerry Jones and after promising never to move, he moved the team to Baltimore.

Three Cleveland Indians’ owners, Vernon Stouffer, Ted Bonda, and Steve OʹNeill had the chance to sell the Indians for more money, but they chose to sell to people that would keep the team in Cleveland.  That is called class.

If Mr. Modell had financial problems, he could have sold the team to a Clevelander and retired from football, thereby keeping his standing in the community.  He was over 70 years old.  He was on the board of The Cleveland Clinic and other charitable institutions.

But he was spiteful and moved the Browns to (I’m trying to find the proper verb to describe this, but all I can come up with is) stick it to the Cleveland fans. ~ The Baltimore Sun

* Modell conducted negotiations in secret with the Mary-land administration of Catholic Governor Parris Glendening.

* Baltimore is the capitol of Mary-land: a colony made by Catholics, for Catholics.

* A “city” is so-named because it was large enough to have a cathedral and be overseen by a Bishop.

* A “citizen” is an inhabitant of a “city” and the responsibility of a Bishop.

* All cathedrals are built upon dead bodies.  The “Christian” practice of a miniature pilgrimage every Sun-day is entirely pagan, as well.  For more, read my book Secret History: The erased clues that prove who rules the world from behind the curtain.  For an understanding of true worship, read this article (no “COVID” restrictions necessary).

* All States, all nations, have “capitols” named after Capitoline Hill, one of the infamous “seven hills of Rome”.

Revelation 17:1-9, New King James Version

¹Then one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls came and talked with me, saying to me, “Come, I will show you the judgment of the great harlot who sits on many waters, ² with whom the kings of the earth committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth were made drunk with the wine of her fornication.”

³ So he carried me away in the Spirit into the wilderness. And I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast which was full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. ⁴ The woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and precious stones and pearls, having in her hand a golden cup full of abominations and the filthiness of her fornication. ⁵ And on her forehead a name was written:

MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT,
THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS
AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS
OF THE EARTH.

⁶ I saw the woman, drunk with the blood of the saints and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus. And when I saw her, I marveled with great amazement.

The Meaning of the Woman and the Beast

⁷ But the angel said to me, “Why did you marvel? I will tell you the mystery of the woman and of the beast that carries her, which has the seven heads and the ten horns. ⁸ The beast that you saw was, and is not, and will ascend out of the bottomless pit and go to perdition. And those who dwell on the earth will marvel, whose names are not written in the Book of Life from the foundation of the world, when they see the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.

⁹ “Here is the mind which has wisdom: The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits.”

* In 2000, Modell sold the “Baltimore Ravens” to Italian “businessman” Steve Bisciotti, so devoted to Catholicism he’s on the Board of “Associated Catholic Charities” which manages the use and abuse of Baltimore orphans for the “Archdiocese of Baltimore”.

* By pre-arranged agreement within the NFL, the Browns were brought back to life in 1999 and given to Alfred “Al” Lerner, the minority owner who convinced Modell to move to Baltimore.

* Lerner was also a New York City Jew.

* The team has struggled to give its fans winning seasons.  In 2001, they endured the debacle of referees going back in time and losing a game they were poised to win by negating a play that had taken place two plays before.  The referees then called the game with 48 seconds left to play due fan displeasure and the NFL forced everyone back out onto the field for a further humiliation of the Jacksonville Jaguars “taking a knee”.

* The Cleveland Browns are currently coached by Kevin Stefanski who graduated from Jesuit St. Joseph’s Preparatory School in Philadelphia and the “private” University of Pennsylvania (controlled by the Jesuits in secret).

* Stefanski is the son of Edward “Ed” Stefanski.  Ed Stefanski also attended the University of Pennsylvania after St. Bernadette’s Catholic Grade school in Drexel Hill, PA and Monsignor Bonner Catholic High School in Upper Darby, PA.  Ed Stefanski was drafted by the Philadelphia 76ers in 1976 but didn’t play.  Instead, he used his Wharton School of Business degree to go into mortgage banking but made a “miraculous” return to professional basketball as an administrator and executive.

* The University of Pennsylvania has an astounding list of powerful alumni  including John William Heisman who was born in Cleveland and played (and later coached) at “Penn” while learning to become a lawyer.  Beginning in 1936, the most accomplished college football player is given a “Heisman Trophy”.

* Here is a different list of U of PA “notable alumni” including the “PayPal” (“Papal”) “founder” who calls himself “Elon Musk”.  Mark Zuckerberg is wrongly named after having “collaborated” with a U of PA student to help start “Facebook”.

* A DARPA initiative in “social networking” called LifeLog began on 30 May 2003 and then ended on 4 February 2004, one year later.

* 4 February 2004 is when “Facebook” began…but it was all Mark Zuckerberg’s idea, really.

* Even when they take classes but don’t graduate they still make headlines, like “religious Jew” Nicholas Evan “Nick” Berg.  In 2002 Berg founded “Prometheus Methods Tower Service” with family members.  Some of those family lived in Mosul, Iraq, where he intended to conduct contract work.  In April 2004, Berg was “detained” by the United States military.  In May, the Central Intelligence Agency claimed Berg was beheaded by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.  No-one had heard of Berg before then but, somehow, far-Left Roman Catholic seminarian (“almost Priest”) “documentary film-maker” Michael Moore knew to interview Berg for his expert opinion on Iraq before he was murdered there.  In fairness, Berg also attended Drexel and the University of Oklahoma without graduating either of those facilities as well.