Skip to main content

In my previous column, I gave you key issues that would indicate to you who really cares about America and who is part of the subversive plot to tear her asunder. Those who mock or avoid issues like false flags, fluoride and toxic particulate falling from the sky are in on it and that includes a shocking list of so-called “Conservatives” and supposedly Right-wing organizations.

But the damage to our nation is so insidious, so complete that it begs the question; is this an organized, complex plot? Overwhelming circumstantial evidence would have us say, “Yes!”

The next question would be even more important—“Who is behind it?” There are quite a few people screaming, “It’s a Communist conspiracy!” and they have no small amount of proof to back them up. But are they right?


If you were to say “Communist Plot!” to a bunch of depressed American Patriots today, the first thing they’ll probably think of is the advent of Barack Hussein Obama.

However, as you research, you find something even more disturbing than Obama’s Marxist roots: you find that he’s as intertwined with the Central Intelligence Agency as he is the Communist Party.

This from one of my earlier columns:

Barack Obama’s CIA pedigree is a family affair. Investigative journalist and former NSA employee Wayne Madsen wrote:

… Obama’s own work in 1983 for Business International Corporation, a CIA front that conducted seminars with the world’s most powerful leaders and used journalists as agents abroad, dovetails with CIA espionage activities conducted by his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham in 1960s post-coup Indonesia on behalf of a number of CIA front operations, including the East-West Center at the University of Hawaii, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and the Ford Foundation. Dunham met and married Lolo Soetoro, Obama’s stepfather, at the East-West Center in 1965. Soetoro was recalled to Indonesia in 1965 to serve as a senior army officer and assist General Suharto and the CIA in the bloody overthrow of President Sukarno.

Barack Obama, Sr., who met Dunham in 1959 in a Russian language class at the University of Hawaii, had been part of what was described as an airlift of 280 East African students to the United States to attend various colleges — merely “aided” by a grant from the Joseph P. Kennedy Foundation, according to a September 12, 1960, Reuters report from London. The airlift was a CIA operation to train and indoctrinate future agents of influence in Africa, which was becoming a battleground between the United States and the Soviet Union and China for influence among newly-independent and soon-to-be independent countries on the continent.

“Stanley” Ann Dunham was a sexual conquest of Communist pedophile Frank Marshall Davis (who has a high probability of being Barack Obama’s real father), notes WND’s Joel Gilbert and reporter Jerome Corsi:

In 1968, Greenleaf Classics in San Diego published a pornographic novel titled “Sex Rebel Black: Memoirs of a Gash Gourmet,” authored by “Bob Greene,” a pen name Davis later admitted was his own.

In the sex novel that Davis claimed was autobiographical, he describes a swinging lifestyle in which he and his wife had sex numerous times with an underage girl named “Anne,” a figure very suggestive of Obama’s mother.

It was a liaison arranged by Stanley’s namesake father, Stanley Armour Dunham. Professor of Political Science and Cold War historian Dr. Paul Kengor was interviewed by

Kengor: Davis was a literal card-carrying communist. He joined the Communist Party in World War II. His Party work was so intense, and so pro-Soviet, that the old Cold War Democrats who ran the Senate committees called him to Washington to testify on his “Soviet activities.” The FBI had him under constant surveillance. He was considered such a potential threat that the federal government placed him on the Security Index, which meant he could be immediately arrested if a war broke out between the United States and the USSR. And when and how did he meet Obama?

Kengor: He was introduced to Obama by Obama’s grandfather, Stanley Dunham, in 1970. Dunham was looking for a black-male role model/father figure for his grandson. Davis was a curious pick.

“Curious”, indeed.

Trevor Loudon has connected the dots from Frank Marshall Davis to Chicago Sun Times columnist and radical black Communist Vernon Jarrett, father-in-law of key Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett.

Senior Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett’s late father-in-law and Chicago Sun-Times columnist Vernon Jarrett, was a key member of the South Chicago communist left of the late 1940s.

After graduating from Knoxville College in Tennessee, Jarrett moved to Chicago in 1946 to work as a journalist. On his first day on the job at the radical Chicago Defender, he was sent to cover a race riot.

The Defender was heavily influenced by the Communist Party USA and included on its roster well known Chicago Communist Party member Frank Marshall Davis.

Patton at BastogneWe’ve seen this kind of sick co-operative effort from the clandestine community before. Author Robert Wilcox wrote an historical exposé with a shocking premise—arguably America’s greatest wartime leader (George S. Patton) was going to spill the beans on how traitors in the American government had empowered a struggling Soviet Union thereby creating the Cold War that followed the end of WWII. As a result, he was critically wounded by an OSS (precursor to the CIA) hitman, and began to recover until the job was finished by the NKVD (precursor to the KGB).


Another great example of this twisted relationship between the CIA and the radical Left are Bill and Hillary Clinton. Like a metastasizing virus, it didn’t take long from the public slaughter of sitting President John F. Kennedy until the CIA had an absolute lock on the White House. Ronald Reagan was forced to take on former CIA Director George Herbert Walker Skull & Bones Bush and 61 days later he had a bullet in his side.

Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama…all appear to be completely controlled by or worked for the Cocaine Importation Agency.

Extreme Leftists were crushed when they found out that their hero was actually a CIA plant.

When Bill Clinton ran for the U.S. presidency four years ago, Republicans tried to prove that, as a student, he burnt the Stars and Stripes in protest at the Vietnam War.

Now Dr Roger Morris, author of an astonishing new book called Partners in Power, claims that, in the late 1960s, Mr. Clinton worked as a source for the Central Intelligence Agency. So, was the young Clinton a patriot or just an opportunist? He was certainly no dangerous radical. “No attack by his reactionary opponents would be more undeserved than the charge that young Bill Clinton was ‘radical’,” concludes Morris.

According to the book, the bearded, dishevelled Rhodes scholar was recruited by the CIA while at Oxford – along with several other young Americans with political aspirations – to keep tabs on fellow students involved in protest activities against the Vietnam War. Morris says that the young Clinton indulged in some low-level spying in Norway in 1969, visiting the Oslo Peace Institute and submitting a CIA informant’s report on American peace activists who had taken refuge in Scandinavia to avoid the draft. “An officer in the CIA station in Stockholm confirmed that,” said Morris.

The Washington Establishment would like to dismiss this troubling book as the work of a fevered conspiracy theorist. But Morris is no lightweight. He worked at the White House in both the Johnson and Nixon administrations, resigning from the National Security Council in 1970 in protest over the U.S. invasion of Cambodia. He went on to become an acclaimed biographer of Richard Nixon. …

The point is not that Bill and Hillary Clinton are Right-wingers in disguise. It is that they have no conviction, no ideology, no guiding purpose. ~ Student Bill Clinton “Spied” on Americans Abroad for CIA, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, The Sunday Telegraph

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard writing for The Sunday Telegraph is as good a source you can find but, interestingly, the piece has been expunged from the internet save this one location I found (hope the link still works).

Despite this or because of it, Bill Clinton’s Communist connections were undeniable:

During the 1992 campaign, Bill Clinton’s student protests and Moscow trip generated much controversy, but few answers. While Clinton’s government files from that era seemingly remain unavailable even today, there is at least more information available than in 1992. The public record reveals that Clinton’s social network and views on Vietnam were influenced by a pattern of contact between Communist agents and sympathizers and Clinton’s academic and political associates. This pattern is documented here through an analysis of Clinton’s antiwar activity up through the time he left Oxford in 1970. Included are quotations from a June 9, 1969 profile of Clinton by the Frederick, Maryland Post which does not seem to have been previously cited elsewhere.

As a Georgetown junior, Clinton inherited his antiwar orientation from his part-time employer, Senator J. William Fulbright. Fulbright’s views on Vietnam had in turn been influenced by scholar Bernard Fall. Fall had an academic background at institutions linked to Chinese Communist apologist Owen Lattimore. He had recently co-authored a book on Vietnam with Marcus Raskin, cofounder of the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), which disseminated Marxist propaganda aimed to sway Fulbright and other decision-makers. Fulbright’s office was also in regular contact with Igor Bubnov, a KGB operative on Capitol Hill. ~ Bill Clinton’s Road to Moscow, FrontPage

Few can deny that Clinton governed from the Left. With the exception of allowing the Republican Congress to temporarily balance the budget, all other polices were radically Marxist to include empowering reprobates like Jocelyn Elders to Surgeon General—a woman so radical in her perversion that public outrage forced Clinton to fire her—as well as the targeting of Constitutionalist and Patriot groups for false flag terror operations.

Destruction of the nuclear family is a central tenet of Communism:

Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.

On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.

The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.

Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.

But, you say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.

And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, &c.? The Communists have not invented the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.

The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all the family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labour. ~ The Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx

When Communists do not have the power to force destruction of the traditional family, they do it with subversion. Moral depravity and feminism are two of their most potent weapons.

The largest impediment to this agenda is a Godly citizenry and feminists like Gloria Steinem know this:

“By the year 2000 we will, I hope, raise our children to believe in human potential, not God…”

Does Steinem strike you as excellent CIA material? They thought so.

What of the patriotic volunteers? Gloria Steinem, the future feminist, has acknowledged that she worked for a CIA front, the amusingly named Independent Service for Information, whose purpose was to undermine a Soviet-bloc youth festival in Vienna. ~ What Gloria Steinem, Henry Kissinger Have in Common: CIA Pay, Charles Trueheart, Bloomberg


Vladimir Putin officialAny conversation about modern Russia will usually be punctuated somewhere with the name “Putin”.

Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin has either been the President or Prime Minister of the Russian Federation since 1999. Today’s Russia indelibly has his finger prints on her but are they around her hand or her throat?

Putin certainly fits the mold of a selected world leader. He attempted to join the KGB at 16 and was later accepted after graduating from his hometown’s university Leningrad State, eventually rising to the rank of Lieutenant Colonel.

Brian Warner of Celebrity Networth claims that Putin took advantage of Russian privatization of her precious natural resources to net him astounding wealth:

While many previously state-owned industries were privatized, Putin allegedly has used his power to build large secret ownership stakes several multi-billion dollar commodity firms. His most vocal critics assert that Putin has leveraged his power to acquire a 4.5% ownership stake in natural gas producer Gazprom, a 37% stake in oil company Surgutneftegas and 50% stake in Swiss oil-trader Gunvor. Gazprom alone does over $150 billion in revenue annually, Guvnor does $80 billion and Surgutneftegas over $20 billion. Using their most recent market capitalizations, Putin’s combined ownership stakes would give him a personal net worth of $70 billion!

Warner also fairly points out that Barack Obama has done quite well since rising from his humble beginnings as a “community organizer”.

By comparison, Obama’s reported net worth has increased from $200,000 when he first stepped into the Oval Office to nearly $12 million today. That’s a 5900% increase in net worth between 2000 and 2014 (the same time period Putin has essentially ruled Russia).

Surprise! Putin is a wealthy Intelligence insider. Let’s compare him to, say, the current Prime Minister of Britain, “Conservative” David Cameron:

David Cameron is the younger son of stockbroker Ian Donald Cameron …

Cameron’s great-great-grandfather, Alexander Geddes,[12] … made a fortune in the grain trade in Chicago and returned to Scotland in the 1880s.[13]

Through his paternal grandmother, Enid Agnes Maud Levita, Cameron is a lineal descendant of King William IV by his mistress Dorothea Jordan. This illegitimate line consists of five generations of women starting with Elizabeth Hay, Countess of Erroll, née FitzClarence, William and Jordan’s sixth child,[14] through to Cameron’s grandmother (thereby making Cameron a 5th cousin of Queen Elizabeth II).[15]

Cameron’s paternal forebears also have a long history in finance. His father Ian was senior partner of the stockbrokers Panmure Gordon, in which firm partnerships had long been held by Cameron’s ancestors, including David’s grandfather and great-grandfather,[3] and was a Director of estate agent John D. Wood. David Cameron’s great-great-grandfather Emile Levita, a German Jewish financier (and descendant of Renaissance scholar Elia Levita), who obtained British citizenship in 1871, was the director of the Chartered Bank of India, Australia and China which became Standard Chartered Bank in 1969.[15] His wife, Cameron’s great-great-grandmother, was a descendant of the wealthy Danish Jewish Rée family on her father’s side.[16][17]

One of Emile’s sons, Arthur Francis Levita (died 1910, brother of Sir Cecil Levita),[18] of Panmure Gordon stockbrokers, together with great-great-grandfather Sir Ewen Cameron,[19] London head of the Hongkong and Shanghai Bank, played key roles in arranging loans supplied by the Rothschilds to the Japanese Central Banker (later Prime Minister) Takahashi Korekiyo for the financing of the Japanese Government in the Russo-Japanese war.[20] ~ David Cameron, Wikipedia

Some really interesting connections there from the Communist capital of the United States, Chicago, to helping Lord Rothschild hem Russia in to working for one of the most corrupt, satanic, bloodsucking banks in the world: Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation.

Britain’s biggest bank HSBC has been dragged into yet another potential scandal over claims that it set up offshore accounts in Jersey for suspected drug-dealers and fraudsters.

HM Revenue & Customs launched an investigation after a whistleblower leaked details of £700million allegedly held in more than 4,000 accounts hidden in the island tax haven. …

Those whose account details were leaked to HMRC are said to include Daniel Bayes, a suspected drug-dealer now living in Venezuela. …

The list also includes a man convicted of owning 300 weapons at a property in Devon, three bankers facing fraud allegations, and a man known as London’s “number two computer crook”, according to the Daily Telegraph. ~ HSBC “Held Offshore Accounts For Criminals”, Rob Davies, Mail

So if you had to pick between David Cameron, Barack Obama or Vladimir Putin…who would you chose as your national leader?

Putin Bond Obama Urkle


But a rough Communist amongst a field of metrosexual Luciferian puppet boys is no real choice. Is Vladimir Putin a Soviet or is he Russian?

Many on the old-school Conservative Right (like the John Bircher’s at the New American) consider Putin a clandestine comrade of the worst order:

For nearly a decade, even before he became Russia’s “president,” The New American has been reporting on Putin’s KGB pedigree and his steady implementation of a long-range Soviet deception strategy, including the public rehabilitation and refortifying of the KGB-FSB.

We reported in 1999, for instance, on Putin’s ominously revealing speech for Security Organs Day, celebrating the accomplishments of Dzerzhinsky and the Cheka. We reported in 2002 on Putin’s restoration of important communist symbols:

• the Red Star, as Russia’s official military emblem;
• the Red Banner, as Russia’s military flag;
• the music of the old Soviet anthem, albeit with new words;
• and his attempt, along with Moscow Mayor Yuri Luzhkov, to restore the giant statue of Dzerzhinsky to its former place of honor in Moscow’s Lubyanka Square.

Public opposition to the glorification of “Iron Felix” have (temporarily) scotched Putin’s plans for Dzerzhinsky’s statue. Nevertheless, as we have reported, in 2005, Putin did restore a smaller bust of the mass-murdering Chekist to a pedestal at the infamous Lubyanka headquarters of the KGB-FSB. ~ Putin’s Russia, William F. Jasper, New American

It is well-known that Putin was inspired by spy movies as a youth and they were what encouraged him to enter the KGB.

However, resurrecting Felix Dzerzhinsky is indefensible. It is interesting to note that, when querying a popular search engine for “Felix Dzerzhinsky atrocities” the first usable, historical hit is from one of Russia’s “propaganda outlets”; “Russia Today”.*

ÄçåðæèíñêèéIn 1918 the Cheka orchestrated the campaign of mass arrests and executions that came to be known as Red Terror. A Red Army newspaper wrote: “Let there be floods of blood of the bourgeoisie – more blood, as much as possible”. The arrests didn’t stop at deserters and rioting workers. Anyone could fall under Cheka’s suspicion based on religious beliefs or social standing.

The Cheka also initiated the infamous system of labour camps and conducted a terrifying campaign against the peasantry. According to Lenin’s orders, peasants had to sell their excess grain to the state at fixed prices. Because of uncontrolled inflation these payments were virtually worthless so many refused to obey. The full fury of the Cheka was unleashed on them in what was later called the “Bread War”. Entire families were executed and villages wiped out.

The organization turned into a giant man-killing machine. At Cheka’s headquarters in Moscow lights glared every night as hundreds were brought in for interrogations. Here Dzerzhinsky spent days on end, keen to take part in questioning and studying files. He virtually lived in his office, where a bed’s been fitted for him.

Mass murders left Dzerzhinsky unfazed. During party meetings, Lenin would often send short notes to some of his colleagues. A story goes that at one gathering in 1918, a note went to Dzerzhinsky, asking how many enemies of the revolution were currently jailed. Dzerzhinsky replied with a number of about 1,500. After reading it, Lenin put a cross next to the number and returned the paper to Dzerzhinsky who immediately stood up and left.

Nobody paid any attention to this sudden departure and only the following day did the result of this correspondence become known: Dzerzhinsky had all of the 1,500 inmates shot that very night, having interpreted Lenin’s cross as an execution order. Lenin apparently didn’t mean it – a cross was his usual way of showing he’s read and considered the information. 1,500 people fell victim of Dzerzhinsky’s misinterpretation – something nobody dared criticize. ~ Prominent Russians: Felix Dzerzhinsky, Russiapedia, RT

I do have to say, however, that a harmonized, a capella rendition of the former-Soviet-now-Russian-Federation national anthem is pretty bad-ass.

The Russian national anthem is set to the melody of the Soviet anthem (used since 1944). As a result, there have been several controversies related to its use. For instance, some—including cellist Mstislav Rostropovich—have vowed not to stand during the anthem.[66][67] Russian cultural figures and government officials were also troubled by Putin’s restoration of the Soviet anthem. A former adviser to both Yeltsin and Mikhail Gorbachev, the last President of the Soviet Union, stated that, when “Stalin’s hymn” was used as the national anthem of the Soviet Union, millions were executed and other horrific crimes took place.[67]

In a 2009 poll conducted by the Russian Public Opinion Research Center and publicized just two days before Russia’s flag day (22 August), 56% of respondents stated that they felt proud when hearing the national anthem. ~ The National Anthem of Russia, Wikipedia

This begs the question; does Vladimir Putin hearken to days of Soviet past because he is a Communist or because he mistakenly connects the Soviet Union to power and preeminence of Russia?

Could it be, perhaps, that Vladimir Putin is as complex as Russia, herself?

One important tell that will alert you to an unrepentant Communist is if a person is unwilling to clearly examine the Soviet Union’s crimes against her own people. Few Russian Patriots did this better than the great author Alexander Isayevich Solzhenitsyn.

A man with a proud Imperial Russian military past (both he and his father served), it only took criticizing Joseph Stalin in a private letter to a friend to get him arrested and imprisoned.

Eventually released, he was exiled from the Soviet Union though his works were already popular and well-read. He took residence in the United States and was an outspoken critic of the Communist Police State.

But, after living in Vermont for 20 years, Solzhenitsyn felt compelled to return to his beloved homeland having been thoroughly disgusted by the decadence of the West. He proved to be a man of true Christian conviction who went were he felt he was called, not where he personally profited:

Alexander SolzhenitsynBesides being credited as one of the most prominent figures in bringing about the demise of Soviet communism, Solzhenitsyn is considered to be one of the most articulate critics of the materialistic decadence of the West and post-communist Russia, a position most famously elucidated in his devastating 1978 “Harvard Address.”

In that Address, delivered to some 10-15 thousand listeners, and which ultimately served to put him out of favor with many of the West’s intelligentsia, Solzhenitsyn denounced the West for its lack of courage and personality, its legalism, moral decadence, intellectual and social shallowness, enslavement to fashion, passivity, short-sightedness, and more. The writer traced these Western sicknesses to the embrace of the materialistic humanism of the Enlightenment, which he defined as “the proclaimed and practiced autonomy of man from any higher force above him.” ~ Alexander Solzhenitsyn – Modern Day Prophet, Moral Crusader, Critic of Both West and East, John Jalsevac, Catholic Culture

This is a man Vladimir Putin has embraced warmly.

It is an embrace that confused many and may tell us more about just who Vladimir Vladimirovich sees himself to be.

In these days of acrimonious political mud-slinging, there seems to be almost nothing upon which the radicals on the left and the reactionaries on the right can agree. There is, however, one thing on which both ends of the political spectrum are in absolute agreement, and that’s their univocal and unadulterated disdain for Russian President Vladimir Putin.

For those on the left, Putin is beyond the pale because of his failure to endorse the homosexual agenda. Over the past couple of years, Putin has supported the passing of laws in Russia banning “homosexual propaganda.” For those on the right, Putin represents the resurrection of the Soviet bogeyman, a sort of reincarnation of Joseph Stalin or Nikita Khrushchev.

Considering the universal condemnation and demonization of the Russian president, it might seem foolish and perhaps perilous to seek a more balanced perspective. …

Like Obama’s America, Putin’s Russia also has a state-”encouraged” common core curriculum. It is intriguing, however, that three of the major works of the anti-Communist dissident and Nobel Prize winner Alexander Solzhenitsyn are required reading at all Russian high schools. These three works are the novella “One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich,” a harrowing account of the cruelty and barbarism of the Soviet labor camps; “The Gulag Archipelago,” a monumental history of the Soviet prison system and its inherent and endemic injustices; and “Matryona’s House,” a short story about the heroine’s retention of traditional Christian virtue in the face of Communist tyranny.

It is worthy of note that Putin is a great admirer of Solzhenitsyn. He met him in September 2000 and was at pains to emphasize that he had Solzhenitsyn’s approval for his education policies. In August 2001, Putin stated that, prior to his education reforms, he had contacted eminent people “known and respected by the country, including Alexander Solzhenitsyn.” In October 2010, after it was announced that Solzhenitsyn’s works would become required reading for all Russian high school students, Putin described “The Gulag Archipelago” as “essential reading”: “Without the knowledge of that book, we would lack a full understanding of our country and it would be difficult for us to think about the future.” …

In June 2007, Putin signed a decree honoring Solzhenitsyn (who died in 2008) “for exemplary achievements in the area of humanitarian activities.” This apparent rapprochement between the apparatchik and the dissident, between Putin, the former KGB operative, and Solzhenitsyn, the former victim of a failed KGB assassination attempt, has understandably puzzled many observers. Endeavoring to explain the seemingly inexplicable, Daniel Mahoney, author of “Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn: The Ascent from Ideology” and co-editor of “The Solzhenitsyn Reader,” saw the solution to the conundrum in Solzhenitsyn’s frank appraisal of Putin’s political achievements:

Solzhenitsyn, Mahoney wrote, “surely credits Putin for taking on the most unsavory of the oligarchs, confronting the demographic crisis (it was Solzhenitsyn who first warned in his speech to the Duma in the fall of 1994 that Russians were in danger of dying out), and restoring Russian self-respect (although Solzhenitsyn adamantly opposes every identification of Russian patriotism with Soviet-style imperialism).” ~ Russian Revelations: Putting Putin In Perspective, Joseph Pearce, International Business Times

Even if such an embrace were simply a disingenuous appeal to currying favor with the Russian people, it tells us something about who those citizens are.

No one knows a man’s heart but a picture says a thousand words.

Putin meeting Solzhenitsyn

Appealing to Godly folk is something Barack Obama can not find within himself even for the sake of a few votes. He so seethes with disgust for Americans who cling to their Bibles and guns it comes out when he thinks no one is recording.

When speaking to a private cabal of donors in the same city that puts lesbians as their top law enforcement official and transvestite sex shop owners as their citizen/law enforcement liaisons, the man with multiple aliases let slip out how he feels about the folks in “fly-over country”.

Barack Obama was forced onto the defensive at the weekend over unguarded comments he made about small-town voters across the midwest.

Obama was caught in an uncharacteristic moment of loose language. Referring to working-class voters in old industrial towns decimated by job losses, the presidential hopeful said: “They get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” ~ Obama Angers Midwest Voters With Guns And Religion Remark, Ed Pilkington, The Guardian

It would appear that Vladimir Putin loves Russia almost as much as Barack Obama hates America.


Since the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, Russians have been cynical and disillusioned. Some, especially those who fell prey to it like Solzhenitsyn, saw Communism as a totalitarian beast of satan but most Russians saw the Soviet Union as just strong, centralized power. It left a terrible vaccum in that society that has been filled with an amalgam of Orthodox Christian virtue, a drive for renewed nationalistic pride and even Tsarist imperialism.

Few men embody this better than Aleksandr Gelyevich Dugin.

Aleksandr Gelyevich DuginDugin is a political scientist with some revolutionary ideas about putting “truth to power”. At this writing he may or may not be the Head of the Department of Sociology of International Relations at Moscow State University. According to Dugin he has been sacked but Moscow State is denying this.

I must pause and tell the reader how near-impossible it is to find reputable, objective sources on this man. Those on the American hard-Left are busy supporting their messiah Barack the Most Merciful (who’s foreign policies picked up from the Bush CIA Crime family without a nanoparticle of change) while those on the “Conservative” Right are either busy defending that very same CIA Machine or too obtuse to see objectively, blinded by ideas of an America that doesn’t exist.

As Rasputin was the mystic advisor to the Romanovs, Dugin is reported to have the attention of Vladimir Putin (hence the moniker “Putin’s brain”) but to what extent no one knows or even if he has any influence at all. Certainly the West is terrified of him and even alternatives to alternative information like “Metapedia” warn that extreme caution should be used when dabbling in Dugin:

Alexander (also spelled Aleksandr) Gel’yevich Dugin (Russian: Александр Гельевич Дугин) (born January 7, 1962) is a Russian political activist and ideologue of the contemporary Russian school of geopolitics often known as “neo-Eurasianism”. Dugin’s so-called “Fourth Political Theory” should be read with caution. Dugin’s philosophy mixes a number of both positive and negative ideas, due to his interest in dubious occult and possibly masonic-derived ideas from banned books during the Soviet Era.

He has been embraced by the Kremlin to some extent, mainly because of his geopolitical theories of how to destroy the American Empire. Unlike traditional Russian nationalists of the Black Hundred cloth, he claims to be opposed to “anti-Semitism”. Some suspect that this is perhaps due to sharing a common ideological basis with the Jews in their Kabbalah (he openly glorifies Gershom Scholem as “the greatest traditionalist thinker”). …

Dugin comes from a military family. His father was a high-ranking officer of the Soviet military intelligence; his mother is a doctor. In 1979 he entered the Moscow Aviation Institute, but never graduated. His father helped him to get a job in KGB archives, where he found eventually what he was really interested in – forbidden for the general Soviet population works on fascism, eurasianism, world religions and mysticism.

Dugin worked as a journalist, before becoming involved in politics just before the fall of communism. In 1988 he and his friend Geidar Dzhemal joined the nationalist group Pamyat. He helped to write the political programme for the newly refounded Communist Party of the Russian Federation under the leadership of Gennady Zyuganov, producing a document that was more nationalist in tone than Marxist. ~ Alexander Dugin, Metapedia

Dugin’s The Fourth Political Theory appears to be some kind of transcendent roadmap to handling the post-fascist, post-communist, post-liberal world—fascism having been conquered in 1945 (Dugin claims), Communism having been vanquished in 1991 with few remaining Communist nations proving that their system is or will fail and liberalism morphing into a “global financial oligarchy” that has turned democracy on its head and gives world power to a satanic Elite that is riding the United States into a One World Order.


Hold on there.

Everything was academic until that last bit.

Did you catch how it suddenly became something right out of the Libertarian Freedom movement? Evangelical Christians have been saying that exact same thing for several years now.

OK, I have been saying that same thing.

But Dugin is not Evangelical, he is Russian Orthodox with a very strong smattering of occult. It is his appeal to the occult that allows detractors to be shrill in their denunciation of his ideas. You must be the judge if they are right to be so.

Dugin’s push for a greater “Eurasia” is gaining popularity amongst the most dangerous demographic possible: young people.

He gave a somewhat paranoid denunciation of the two sides of Vladimir Putin and whether or not the Russian President was behind the efforts to oust Dugin from Moscow State. In a statement on his personal blog, he mentioned the “Solar Putin” who bravely lead Russia against the Chechen insurgency verses the “Lunar Putin” who succumbs to liberalism and compromise.**

Dugin with his flag

He even has his own flag; 6 outward-pointing gold arrows on a black field.

And yet, when interviewed by the “Larry King of Russia”, Vladimir Posner, shortly after Easter, Dugin responds to Posner’s formal “hello” (more like “good evening”) with an immediate, “Good evening. He is risen!” Posner, son of a Soviet Jew who spied for the Communists while working for Metro-Goldwyn Mayer in Europe, immediately chided Dugin that he was not Christian.

When Posner criticized Dugin for the militancy of his views in countering the London/Washington anti-Christ hegemony he brought up the “peaceful” teachings of Jesus Christ and how incongruous they were with Dugin’s passion. Dugin’s response was “Christ was perfect man and perfect God” but even He chased out the money-changers and proclaimed, “‘I come not to bring peace, but the sword’…”

Can I get an “Amen!”?

He got one out of me.

Dugin also uses the metaphor of Russia being the “land” empire and America being the “water” or Atlantean empire. I hope no one shares the work of Christian author Christopher Pinto with him or that’s going to supercharge his message. While Dugin means to focus associating America with the Atlantic ocean, Pinto has shown that occultic secret society forces like the Free Masons intended America to be the “new Atlantis”.

In this fascinating interview Dugin also was quick to point his acrimony, not at the American people, but at the United States Elite, stating that if America were following the policies of Ron Paul or Pat Buchanan, she would at worst be neutral towards Russia and at best fast friends.

Listen, Patriots, I poop you not. Watch it for yourself:


But what happened to the vicious, ruthless Communists running the Soviet Union—the kind who imprison you after reading in a private letter you wrote that you criticized Dear Leader? These aren’t the type of people to just pack up their teapot and go home.

Many believe they never did. They just went underground, both in Russia and America.

You’ve probably never heard of Anatoly Golitsyn, but in light of the developments in the Ukraine, you might want to look him up.

Golitsyn is an ex-KGB officer who defected to the West back in 1961, in his own words to “warn the American Government about the adoption of the current grand strategy for Communism and the political role of the KGB and the use of disinformation and controlled political opposition which the strategy entailed, and…help the West neutralise KGB penetration of their governments.”

Golitsyn’s overarching thesis, the so-called “grand strategy,” is laid out in painstaking detail over two books: “New Lies for Old” (1984) and “The Perestroika Deception” (1985), which can be summarized as follows:

The Soviets developed a long-range strategy to defeat the West back in the late 1950s based on a Leninist strategy of strategic deception and subterfuge, replete with a planned collapse — including potentially tearing down the Berlin Wall (which Golitsyn first detailed in a 1978 memorandum embedded at the end of this post) in combination with perestroika and glasnost, words whose true definitions were far different than those the West ascribed to them.

These moves according to Golitsyn were designed to invite the West’s capital, technology and most of all gullibility/trust to Russia, which it could then use to build itself up, and, while the West moved leftward and intertwined itself inextricably with Russia and other socialist states, “converge” and dominate the West under a world government headed by none other than the Russians and Chinese. ~ What If An Ex-KGB Officer Predicted That The USSR Would Fake Its Own Collapse To Ultimately Defeat The West…And No One Listened? Benjamin Weingarten, The Blaze

This makes eminent sense except that there’s one thing the Conservitards working for Glenn Blech at “The Blaze” aren’t telling you (I’m being rough on Beck because he’s proven himself to be a Machine insider who frequently mocks those critical issues I told you about earlier, particularly the important ones like the Manchurian Messiah’s miraculous birth and the hidden hands that run the world); as I’ve shown you in meticulous detail, the upheaval in Ukraine was caused by the West, not the East.

After that vote against the EU in late 2013, the Three Fingers rose again…with a little help from their friends.

A video plea for help from a pretty Ukrainian protestor went viral on YouTube. Later, it was found to have all of the usual CIA suspects behind it.

The propaganda war went full bore and the Central Intelligence Agency showed its power by the shocking uniformity of message between the charlatans behind the Left/Right Menagerie. …

Perennial Arizona Reptilican Pretender John “I Can Take A Dive For The New World Order” McCain apparently stopped by the same bad acting school Fox sent plucked drunkard poofter Shepard Smith and Black Negligee, Can’t-Spell-My-Name-Right Megyn Kelly to.

When McCain tried to pop a blood vessel with his feigned outrage over Republican reticence to jump into war with Russia, Huffington’s Marc Lamont “You Big Dummy” Hill and Jen “I’m A Pudgy Even More Homely Version Of Rachel Maddow” Bendery chimed in, “He’s got a point!”

The “neocon” pundits joined the fun with National Review shaming its readers over how little Barack Obama has done in the face of such “blatant aggression”. The brainchild of former Yale Skull & Bones CIA operative William F. Buckley seemed to be reading from the same book of propaganda McCain was. In spite of the treasonous suicidal track America’s politicians have put us on, according to them, we’re flying high and Russia is filled with puss.

Not even supposed legitimate Tea Partiers can resisted the red cape of the USSR flashing in front of them as former Congressman Allen West trumpeted “Lets Wipe That Smile Off Of Putin’s Face” and former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin bragged how she saw the Russian “invasion” of Ukraine way back in 2008…from her house.**

Disappointing, but not surprising, as I’ve already laid out for you how the phony-Right has betrayed America. Palin and West play the game with the rest. …

But the efforts of Western meddlers didn’t just end with propaganda. There was a very real physical presence in Kiev’s Maidan Nezalezhnosti (Independence Square), both overt and covert.

Supposed “Conservative” Republican John McCain locked arms with hard-core Leftist Democrat Dick Durbin and several other United States Senators and lit out for Kiev where he told Nazi rabble-rousers there that they were “inspiring the world”.

After weeks of fighting, the elected Ukrainian leaders were ousted and the interim Prime Minister, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, was quickly given the royal carpet treatment by Barack Obama, himself. You may be shocked to read this but, Yatsenyuk is also a banker. …

Victoria Nuland is another Leftist-apparatchik-turned-Hawk for the CIA globalist Machine. After repeated trips to Kiev, handing out cookies to Nazis, she spoke for Chevron and admitted that your government has spent $5,000,000,000 helping to destabilize Ukraine…

I don’t doubt for a minute that Barack Obama and all of the Marxist slime that made him who he is—Frank Marshall Davis, Vernon and Valerie Jarrett, William Ayers and many others—were created and/or enabled by a brilliantly-effective KGB.

But I don’t have the sense that this is a micromanaged effort that includes sending coded messages each night from Moscow for the next day’s agenda. My guess is that these were general weapons of terror and chaos created years ago and they are working perfectly through to today.

However, this is the critical point; their effectiveness is a direct result of the knowing collusion and cooperation of the upper echelons within the Central Intelligence Agency.

So is Russia on the move or on the run? Are there Russian Special Forces hiding in America just waiting for the order from Barack Obama to spring to action and start killing and imprisoning American Patriots?

It certainly is in the vested interest of the Russian Elite to see America implode and I don’t doubt that, at all levels of government, they are keeping their options open.

But as the most popular philosopher in human history once said, “A tree is known by its fruit.”

For as much as the Communist chaos sown in the West has returned to bite Russia you can have some bit of rueful satisfaction but it appears that the real enemies of America are much higher and more powerful than a nation-state.

Understand that even KGB-defector Golitsyn’s “unheeded warnings” were approved by the seemingly oblivious CIA. And one very important prediction of his has gone in the absolute opposite direction: the dissolution of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

Page 262: “One of the objectives [of Euro-Communism] was to prepare the ground, in coordination with Bloc policy in general, for an eventual ‘liberalization’ in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe and a major drive to promote the dissolution of NATO and the Warsaw Pact and the withdrawal of the American military presence from a neutral, socialist Europe.”

On this one we can say, “EPIC FAIL!”

NATO Expansion, EU Expansion

If Washington and London are power centers for the hegemony of the anti-Christ, they clearly have Russia in a corner with Ukraine being the lynchpin holding back the floodgates.

But why? Why would the former Communist nation be on the Luciferian hit-list? Is it possible that Rasputin/Dugin has a point and Russia is really starting to piss off the New World Order?


The fruit coming from Russia has a sweet, righteous flavor to it and Christian virtue is not compatible with the Communist vision of a German Jew who clearly hated God.

As the new stanza in the Russian National Anthem puts it;

You are unique in the world, one of a kind –
This native land protected by God!

And it would appear that the Duma (the Russian legislature), her leaders and a resurgent Russian Orthodox Church intend to keep her protected.

russian orthodox processionSeveral pieces of recent Russian legislation have the decadent West seething with anger such as refusing to acknowledge pedophilia as a sexual orientation or laws that ban vicious attacks on churches and homosexual propaganda aimed at children.

Russia has banned homosexual couples from adopting Russian children.

Russia has outlawed abortion ads.

There are powerful movements to protect Russians from genetically-modified foods.

The greatest coup of “global warming” fraud was had when the e-mail account of the top man on the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change was hacked and correspondence was released proving that “scientists” had rigged data because they had no case. It was later determined that the breach was a top-notch, sophisticated effort by the Russian Secret Service.

Restrictions are being placed on the building of new mosques and the Orthodox Church is pushing for more.

The President of one of Russia’s two remaining Eastern European allies, Belarus, recently stated “If we lose our Christian values, we lose everything.”

In Belgium, sexual deviants performed grotesque public acts to protest this resurgence of Christian virtue and mock Vladimir Putin.

One of the driving forces behind the European Union, Carl Bildt, stated that Russia’s Christian values were a “threat to Western civilization”.

When Russian troops mobilize, a Christian priest blesses them.


Compare this to the fruit coming from the United States.

In the U.S. military warriors are required to allow open homosexuals to control their units and humiliate them in parades.

In every nation where the United States has deployed her military or exerted influence Christians suffer horribly.


Anywhere there is an agenda to harm the common man, it invariably gets traced to a tiny super-wealthy Elite.

Some of the richest men and women in the world met secretly recently in New York to conspire on using their vast wealth to bring the world’s population growth under control.

The meeting included some of the biggest names in the “billionaires club,” according to the London Times – Bill Gates, David Rockefeller, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey, Warren Buffett, George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. ~ Secret Billionaire Club Seeks Population Control, WorldNetDaily

It was these very people who empowered Boris Yeltsin and installed Vladimir Putin as his replacement.

Until he decided he would be his own man.

On July 28, 2000, Vladimir Putin gathered the 18 most powerful businessmen in Russia for an unprecedented discussion. This was the beginning of Putin’s campaign to undermine and reduce the power of a group of men who had made titanic fortunes from reforms designed to pave the way for a transformation of the Soviet planned economy into a free market economy. Russian President Vladimir Putin was rewriting the rules again. In no uncertain terms, Putin told Russia’s wealthiest that the jig was up, and he denounced them as creators of a corrupt state.

A very small number of people — known now as the oligarchs— were able to concentrate a very large portion of the Russian people’s wealth into their hands through backroom deals and insider connections. Some who read this essay might condemn me because I point out the Jewish identity of the majority of these oligarchs. My reason for doing so is not to be unfair to Jews or to increase hostile feelings towards them. The reason is the simple fact that their Jewishness is a factor and must be taken into consideration when dealing with Russian politics. In Russia, everyone is aware of the Jewish identity of these men, and the acts of the Jewish oligarchs themselves have done quite a bit to increase anti-Jewish feelings there. The oligarchs themselves recognize this, as do many Russian Jews, who blame the oligarchs for giving Jews a bad name. In my opinion, it is much better to be honest about it than try to pretend that this factor doesn’t exist. ~ The Silent Coup: Putin vs. the Oligarchs, Justin Cowgill, NationalVanguard

The ringleader of this wealthy cartel was Boris Berezovsky. He was intimately entwined with anything that happened in Russia from running state television channel ORT to Deputy Secretary of Russia’s National Security Council.

However, after Putin was made President courtesy of Berezovsky’s media empire, he quickly found out that Vladimir Vladimirovich was no man’s puppet. Berezovsky was forced to flee Russia and it is fascinating to note that it was in London where he was given asylum. He later died there under … “mysterious circumstances”.

When Putin was first approached with the idea of being nominated to the presidency by Boris Yeltsin, he asked for a reconsideration. Yetlsin’s daughter Tatyana (herself, a wealthy oligarch, friend of Boris Berezovsky and beneficiary to graft and corruption) claimed this was proof that the strong image of Putin is a lie. If true, I find it rather endearing, instead.

Certainly, the quiet and unsure leader does seem to have his moments:

So where does that leave us?

If the Lord confronted you right now and said, “Johnny, you’re not sitting this one out,” who would you side with?

Perhaps I can answer that by pointing something out.

Have you ever taken a look at the very unusual Imperial Russian crest? There’s a lot to see in the double-headed eagle, scepter and Christian crowns but what is most interesting is the shield across the eagle’s chest. On that shield is Saint George…the dragon-slayer.

Imperial Russian Crest


* Yeah, I know. The “mind of God” knew what I wanted to see.
** Personally, I think Putin’s foreign policy—particularly in relation to Ukraine—has been brilliant. His seeming hesitation is exactly what a master chess player would do. Obama, the CIA and NATO are pushing hard to provoke a military response and he isn’t giving it to them. He’s secured Russia’s access to the Black Sea, now he waits! His patience also reassures me, personally, that he is not a knee-jerk totalitarian. Again and again I have heard that Putin relies on an eclectic mix of political liberals and ex-KGB. He may very well be a modern “Peter the Great”, pulling Russia into world dominance.

Leave a Reply