The corruption of King Solomon’s rule, followed by the foolishness of his successor son, Rehoboam caused a civil war which split the nation of Israel into a Northern Kingdom (“Israel”) and a Southern Kingdom (“Judah”).  Judah maintained Jerusalem as its capital and Israel adopted Samaria as its capital.

Both fell under God’s Judgment for apostacy.  Both received Prophets who warned them.

Chart of Israel’s and Judah’s Kings and Prophets, Jonathan Petersen, Bible Gateway

In both cases, the Prophets sent by God were ridiculed, persecuted, punished, imprisoned and sometimes killed.

Between 732 and 740 B.C.¹, the Kingdom of Assyria began a 20-year conquest of the Northern Kingdom of Israel.

A century later, the Southern Kingdom fell.

In 605 BC, Nebuchadnezzar II, king of Babylon defeated Pharaoh Necho at the Battle of Carchemish, and subsequently invaded Judah.  To avoid the destruction of Jerusalem, King Jehoiakim of Judah, in his third year, changed allegiances from Egypt to Babylon. ~ Wikipedia

The populations of both were carried into captivity.  In violation of the Law of Moses (Deuteronomy 7:3), the Children of Israel were forced to inter-mingle and inter-marry with their pagan neighbors.  It was a cunning military tactic which diluted the national identity of conquered nations and inhibited them from rebelling against their captors.  It is the real reason Western nations have been inundated with immigrants by traitors in their own governments, both legal and illegal aliens.  While angry citizens aim their ire at the immigrants, the real culprit is Rome.

Babylon was a kingdom empowered by the Devil’s Simulation; a Luciferian system based upon sexual perversion and suffering of the innocent.  It was a system that maintained the strictest secrecy and power through to this very day until I exposed it with my latest book, Eaters of Children.

Kings honored the Satanic source of their authority in many ways.  One of them was to ritually castrate young boys.

The “mother goddess” has taken on many forms through the centuries, “Columbia” being one of the more recent versions.

What has been consistent, however, has been the connection to debauchery, fixation on reproduction and proof of dedication by causing the innocent to suffer.

These are all foundational to the Devil’s Simulation.

In Greece, the mother-goddess Cybele was honored in such fashion.  The most iconic example of blood-sacrifice to Cybele was the slaughter of a bull upon her altar, known as the Taurobolium.

The consort of Cybele was Attis, a youth who was so dedicated to her that he cut off his own genitals in her service.

The voluntary or involuntary castration of young men became a key part of pagan rites.

Such boys were presented to kings as cowed servants, guaranteed not to interfere with royal harems.

These abominable practices go back to the dawn of “civilization”.³

Across the centuries it was learned that court “eunuchs” could also be employed as minstrels known as “castrati” (singular, “castrato”). …

With good reason is the practice known by an Italian term. It wasn’t until 18615 that the practice was finally outlawed in Italy but it continued to be openly “tolerated” and secretly encouraged by the Vatican at least until 1959.

Thousands of boys were mutilated regularly, ostensibly to give them singing voices unattainable any other way but most never sang after they were victimized. ~ Eaters of Children, Cirucci, CreateSpace, Sept. 11, 2017, pp. 7, 8

Rather than inflict this crime upon their own populations, kings would often take the children of nations they captured.  This is likely what happened to the Prophet Daniel and his comrades Hananiah, Mishael and Azariah (who were given the Babylonian names Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego).  Out of respect for God’s servants, Scripture makes no mention of this but it is almost certain that Daniel would not have been placed in close proximity of the King and under the authority of the Chief Eunuch unless he was one himself.  It was a terrible price to pay but it also put Daniel in position to become one of the most powerful men in the world at his time.

The Book of Daniel explains that God sent King Nebuchadnezzar a powerful, disturbing dream.  He sought an explanation from his soothsayers but their usual procedures of taking what was known and putting an unverifiable spin upon it angered him.

… in the second year of the reign of Nebuchadnezzar, Nebuchadnezzar had dreams, and his spirit was troubled and his sleep left him.  Then the king gave the command to call the magicians and the astrologers and the sorcerers and the Chaldeans to tell the king his dreams.  So they came and stood before the king.  The king said to them, “I have had a dream, and my spirit is anxious to understand the dream.”

Then the Chaldeans spoke to the king in Aramaic, “O king, live forever.  Tell your servants the dream, and we will tell the interpretation.”

The king answered and said to the Chaldeans, “The command from me is firm: If you will not make known to me the dream with its interpretation, you shall be cut in pieces and your houses shall be made a dunghill.  But if you tell the dream and its interpretation, you shall receive from me gifts and rewards and great honor.  Therefore tell me the dream and its interpretation.”

They answered again and said, “Let the king tell his servants the dream, and we will tell the interpretation.”

The king answered and said, “I know of certainty that you are bargaining for time, because you see that the command from me is firm: If you will not make known to me the dream, there is but one decree for you.  For you have agreed to speak lying and corrupt words before me until the circumstance is changed.  Therefore tell me the dream so that I know that you can tell me its interpretation.”

The Chaldeans answered before the king and said, “There is not a man on the earth who can tell the king’s matter, inasmuch as no great king or ruler has ever asked such things of any magician or astrologer or Chaldean.  Also, it is a rare thing that the king requires, and there is no one else who can tell it before the king, except the gods whose dwelling is not with flesh.”

For this cause the king was angry and very furious, and commanded to destroy all the wise men of Babylon.  Therefore the decree went out that the wise men should be slain.  And they sought for Daniel and his companions to be slain.

Then Daniel answered with discretion and wisdom to Arioch the captain of the king’s guard, who had gone out to kill the wise men of Babylon.  He answered and said to Arioch the king’s captain, “Why is the decree from the king so urgent?”  Then Arioch made the thing known to Daniel.  Then Daniel went in and desired of the king that he would give him time in order that he could tell the king the interpretation.

Then Daniel went to his house and made the thing known to Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah, his companions, so that they might ask for compassion from the God of Heaven concerning this secret, so that Daniel and his companions might not perish with the rest of the wise men of Babylon. ~ Daniel 2:1-17, Modern English Version

Daniel beseeched God to give him understanding of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream and it was granted to him.  He bravely used it to proclaim YHWH as the one, true God before the most powerful man in the world.

Daniel answered in the presence of the King and said, “The secret which the King has demanded, the wise men, the astrologers, the magicians, and the soothsayers cannot tell the king.  But there is a God in Heaven who reveals secrets and makes known to King Nebuchadnezzar what shall be in the latter days.  Your dream and the visions of your head upon your bed are these:”

“As for you, O king, your thoughts came into your mind upon your bed about what would come to pass hereafter, and He who reveals secrets makes known to you what shall come to pass.  But as for me, this secret is not revealed to me for any wisdom that I have more than any living man, but for the purpose of making known the interpretation to the king, and that you might understand the thoughts of your heart.”

“You, O king, were watching, and there was a great image.  This great image, whose brightness was excellent, stood before you.  And its form was awesome.  This image’s head was of fine gold, its breast and its arms of silver, its belly and its thighs of bronze, its legs of iron, its feet partly of iron and partly of clay.  You watched until a Stone was cut out without hands which struck the image upon its feet, which were of iron and clay, and broke them to pieces.  Then the iron, the clay, the bronze, the silver, and the gold were broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshing floors.  And the wind carried them away so that not a trace of them was found.  But the Stone that struck the image became a great mountain and filled the whole Earth.”

“This was the dream.  Now we will tell its interpretation before the king.  You, O King, are the King of kings.  For the God of Heaven has given you a kingdom, power, and strength, and glory.  Wherever the sons of men dwell, or the animals of the field, or the fowl of the heavens, He has given them into your hand and has made you ruler over them all.  You are the head of gold.”

“After you, another kingdom inferior to you shall arise, and a third kingdom of bronze, which shall rule over all the Earth.  And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron, for iron breaks in pieces and shatters everything; and like iron that crushes, it shall crush and shatter all these.  As you saw the feet and toes, partly of potters’ clay and partly of iron, the kingdom shall be divided.  But there shall be in it some of the strength of the iron, inasmuch as you saw the iron mixed with miry clay.  As the toes of the feet were partly of iron and partly of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong and partly broken.  Whereas you saw iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men, but they shall not cleave to one another, even as iron does not mix with clay.”

“In the days of these kings the God of Heaven shall set up a Kingdom which shall never be destroyed.  And the Kingdom shall not be left to another people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand forever.  Inasmuch as you saw that the Stone was cut out of the Mountain without hands and that it broke in pieces the iron, the bronze, the clay, the silver, and the gold, the great God has made known to the King what shall come to pass hereafter.  And the dream is certain, and its interpretation sure.” ~ Daniel 2:27-45, Modern English Version (some capitalization added for clarity and to correct disrespect)

United Church of God

Christian and secular historians are nearly unanimous in their explaining the four major kingdoms:

* Head of Gold: Babylon
* Chest and Arms of Silver: Medo / Persia
* Belly and Thighs of Bronze: Greece
* Legs and Feet of Iron and Miry Clay: Rome (and no-human allies)

What they have been quiet about is how the military empire of Rome transformed into the religious empire which rides world power just as the Bible predicted.

“After this I was seeing in the visions of the night, and lo, a fourth beast, terrible and fearful, and exceedingly strong; and it hath iron teeth very great, it hath consumed, yea, it doth break small, and the remnant with its feet it hath trampled; and it [is] diverse from all the beasts that [are] before it; and it hath ten horns.” ~ Daniel 7:7, Young’s Literal Translation

The four beasts of Daniel’s vision in Chapter 7 are the same as those of Nebuchadnezzar in Chapter 2.  Note the “great iron teeth” of the fourth beast.

One of the seven angels who had the seven bowls came and talked with me, saying to me, “Come, I will show you the judgment of the Great Harlot who sits on many waters, with whom the kings of the Earth committed adultery, and the inhabitants of the Earth were made drunk with the wine of her sexual immorality.”

Then he carried me away in the Spirit into the wilderness. I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast which was full of blasphemous names, having seven heads and ten horns.  The woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and precious stones and pearls, having in her hand a golden cup full of abominations and the filth of her sexual immorality.  On her forehead a name was written:

MYSTERY,
BABYLON THE GREAT,
THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS
AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.

I saw the woman, drunk with the blood of the Saints and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus.

When I saw her, I marveled greatly.  Then the angel said to me, “Why do you marvel?  I will tell you the mystery of the woman and of the beast that carries her, which has the seven heads and the ten horns.  The beast, which you saw, was, and is not, and is to ascend out of the bottomless pit and go to destruction.  Those who dwell on the earth whose names are not written in the Book of Life from the foundation of the world will marvel when they see the beast that was, and is not, and is to come.”

“Here is the mind which has wisdom: The seven heads are seven hills on which the woman sits.  They are also seven kings.  Five have fallen, one is, the other has not yet come; and when he comes, he must remain a little while.  Concerning the Beast who was, and is not, he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and is going to destruction.”

“The ten horns which you saw are ten kings who have received no kingdom yet, but they will receive authority as kings for one hour with the Beast.  These are of one mind and will give their power and authority to the beast.  These will wage war with the Lamb, but the Lamb will overcome them, for He is Lord of lords and King of kings.  Those who are with Him are called and Chosen and Faithful.”

Then he said to me, “The waters which you saw, where the Harlot sits, are peoples and multitudes and nations and tongues.  These ten horns and the Beast which you saw will hate the Harlot; they will make her desolate and naked, and devour her flesh, and burn her with fire.  For God has put in their hearts to fulfill His Will, and to be of one mind, and to give their kingdom to the beast, until the Words of God are fulfilled.  The woman whom you saw is that great city, which reigns over the kings of the Earth.” ~ Revelation 17, Modern English Version (some capitalization added)

The seven hills of Rome are so legendary even “user-edited” Wikipedia acknowledges them with a special entry.

The split of the fourth kingdom is also easy to define in history.

Charlemagne’s crowning made the Byzantine Emperor redundant, and relations between the East and the West deteriorated until a formal split occurred in 1054.  The Eastern Church became the Greek Orthodox Church by severing all ties with Rome and the Roman Catholic Church — from the pope to the Holy Roman Emperor on down. ~ Dummies.com

The scandals in the “Eastern Rite” / Orthodox Church seem not as well-covered as those of the Catholic Church.

Orthodox clergy are allowed to marry before being ordained but not afterward.

This may have reduced the number of scandals but they still exist.

Thirty-two years old, struggling with severe mental illness, the man turned in desperation to his church, the Greek Orthodox Metropolis of San Francisco.

But soon after the man implored the Rev. Michael Rymer to be his “spiritual father” and guide him through his troubles, the priest allegedly seduced him without revealing that he had been exposed to HIV, court records show.

The priest allegedly entangled the mentally ill parishioner in a long-running, illicit relationship, offering religious salvation while inflicting sexual abuse.

“I was going to Father Michael when I was in my worst state,” the man later testified.  “When I would go to him to help me, he would help me, and afterward he would take advantage of me.  That was his method of continual operation over and over again.”

Over a 14-year-period, several church officials learned that the priest was HIV-positive, and they suspected he was having sex with his parishioner, according to court records.  But they did not report Rymer’s misconduct.

The priest’s alleged sexual abuse of his vulnerable parishioner seemed destined to remain a secret masked by a church hierarchy steeped in tradition rich with incense and icons.

But the man’s psychiatrists urged him to complain.  And with encouragement from a San Francisco-based watchdog organization that monitors sex abuse in the Eastern Orthodox Church, he filed a lawsuit accusing the priest of sexual battery and the church of negligence.

Rymer and the church have denied wrongdoing.  But after San Francisco Superior Court Judge Patrick Mahoney ruled that the church might face potentially high punitive damages, the defendants settled the case at a closed court hearing on Thursday from which members of the media and the public were excluded.

The man’s lawyers, Terry Gross and Monique Alonso, declined to comment but said in court papers that despite blatant evidence of clerical misconduct, “the Church deliberately turned a blind eye.” Carla Hartley and William Wilson, attorneys for the church, also declined comment but said in a brief that the church had acted appropriately.

Many Lawsuits Against Church

The Rymer case is the latest sex abuse settlement to roil the 1.5 million-member Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, part of the worldwide Eastern Orthodox Church, which split from the Roman Catholic Church in the 11th century.

In the past decade, the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese has paid more than $10 million to settle sex abuse cases, according to the church.  The archdiocese faces pending lawsuits alleging sex abuse by priests in Texas, Florida, Illinois and Arizona.

Meanwhile, more than two dozen Greek Orthodox priests around the country have been criminally convicted, sanctioned by the church or sued for sexually abusing parishioners, according to the San Francisco-based watchdog group.  The organization is called Pokrov, for an Orthodox church icon that represents the protection of Mary, mother of God. ~ San Francisco Chronicle

Naming the Orthodox victim advocate group after an “icon” of the “mother of God” is an ominous sign that they will not receive justice.

Miriam was vessel that bore Jesus in His human form, God has no mother.  The “Mary” of Rome is the reincarnated “Semiramis”, “Isis”, “Cybele” and “Columbia” of the Devil’s Simulation.

In Greece, Orthodoxy openly runs government as it does secretly in Russia.  2005 saw the outing of some of its skulduggery.

Greece’s Orthodox church, buffeted by sex and corruption scandals, met in emergency session yesterday amid lurid claims that have included one newspaper publishing photographs of a 91-year-old bishop naked in bed with a nubile young woman.

Scrambling to resolve the worst crisis in the church’s modern history, the embattled spiritual leader, Archbishop Christodoulos, convened the rare meeting as allegations of skulduggery, sexual improprieties, trial rigging, drug and antiquities smuggling engulfed the institution.

“I humbly ask for forgiveness from the people and the clerics who, for the most, honour… the cassock they wear,” he said addressing the 102-member Holy Synod, the church’s ruling council.

“There is a lot that must be done to put our house in order,” he conceded before proposing a series of reforms.

Greeks have watched dumbfounded as allegations of their priesthood’s dissolute lifestyle have unfolded on their television screens.

Snatched tape-recordings, aired nightly, have revealed rampant homosexuality among senior clerics who, unlike ordinary priests, are under oaths of chastity.

The alleged debauchery has not been limited to monastic cells. Last week, claims emerged that Metropolitan Theoklitos of Thessaly, a leading churchman, had been arrested on suspicion of drug dealing in a police raid on a notorious nightclub in Athens.

The priest was reportedly rounded up with Seraphim Koulousousas, the archbishop’s former private secretary, also implicated in another “unholy affair” involving gay sex with a bishop. ~ The Guardian

In the shadow of the Acropolis, Greeks are witnessing a scandal-plagued showdown — involving allegations of drug-dealing bishops, bribe-taking judges and a mysterious fugitive — that could permanently sever the ancient bonds of church and state.

A series of stunning revelations has uncovered what seems to be a powerful criminal element within the leadership of the Greek Orthodox church.  Run by bishops accused of serious crimes, the ring is reported to exert control over Greek politicians and judges, and to have used the church’s almost unlimited powers to build a mafia-like hierarchy of wealth and corruption.

This week, the scandal threatened to reach the very top of this secretive church.  Archbishop Christodoulos, the 66-year-old leader of the church, has been accused of working with a convicted drug smuggler named Apostolos Vavilis, who is wanted by Interpol and believed to be hiding in Italy.  The archbishop said this week that the relationship is innocent, but police want to question Mr.  Vavilis about his role in the church, where he allegedly acted as an envoy at the highest levels.

The church, which for decades has seemed immune to criticism, has begun to be shaken.  During the ceremonial inauguration of a new Greek president on Saturday, half a dozen members of parliament stormed out of the legislature, and dozens more refused to stand, when the archbishop entered the chamber in his ceremonial headdress and carrying his sceptre.

“These are issues which must be confronted,” MP Fotis Kouvelis, one of the six who walked out, said in an interview in his office earlier this week.

“We believe the church has delayed in confronting these corruptions — consequently, there is a responsibility in the hierarchy of the church to answer for these events … for us, the only answer is a severance of the powers and responsibilities of the church from those of the state.”

A majority of Greeks now believe that the archbishop should resign, according to a poll this week, but it will not be easy to transform a church that is older, and in many ways mightier and wealthier, than the modern Greek state.

The Orthodox Church is a state religion, its 10,500 priests and 10,000 theologians paid government salaries similar to those earned by high-school teachers.  Its 81 bishops are far more powerful, earning tax-free salaries similar to those of cabinet ministers and at least twice again that much from fees for weddings, baptisms and funerals, from the rental of burial plots and from the construction and renting of apartments on church property (which is legal). ~ The Globe and Mail

Actually, Greece is to be commended.  Where Rome controls all the rest of world governments unbeknownst to their citizenry, at least Greeks know who really runs things.

Clearly, the Prophet Daniel knew what he was talking about.

As we’ve told you repeatedly, Rome likes to commit crimes hiding behind Jews.

Searches via the Roman-controlled internet are quick to substitute Jewish Orthodox scandals that are much more robust in the staggering secret control of government.

The Harlot of Babylon even controls our information.  It’s no coincidence that the founding of the world’s most powerful search engine, “Google”, is on the anniversary of the founding of the Jesuits: September 27^th.

As a result, if one tries to search “Google” for “Orthodox scandals” the primary results are from those committed by Orthodox Jews.

It is truly ironic that Rome gets her “Papal Court Jews” to so eagerly betray their own.  The Great Harlot emplaces Jews like “Dave Seaman” to be the acceptable name and face of the 2016 “PizzaGate scandal” and then use him to promote how the Jews at the New York Times have “outed” the criminal deviancy of Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein.

But even when they are patsies, Rome’s Jews still get the same protections of any of her pedophiles.

Brooklyn district attorney Charles Hynes has refused a freedom of information request for details of child sex abuse prosecutions in the Orthodox Jewish community, amid questions over the veracity of his arrest figures.

The refusal coincides with the collapse of his most vaunted prosecution after appellate court judges ruled this week for a mistrial in the case of Baruch Lebovits, sentenced in 2010 to a maximum 32-year jail term.

Lebovits was convicted in March 2010 of abusing a 16-year-old boy.  The DA’s office said it is prepared to retry the case.  But victims’ advocates say his mistrial is a major setback in their efforts to encourage other child sex victims to risk community censure and come forward.  Advocate Joel Engelman said the decision was “extremely demoralising”.

Last month the Guardian reported that the DA was facing accusations that he has failed to tackle up the cover-up of abuse in Brooklyn’s Orthodox community – the largest Orthodox community in the world outside Israel.  Rabbinic leaders are accused of hampering efforts to uncover abuse, and many victims face intimidation and threats to prevent them pressing charges.

The Guardian and the Jewish Forward paper had submitted freedom of information (FOI) requests for details of cases.  But this week Hynes’s office informed the Forward that it was denying its request, because the close-knit nature of the Orthodox community meant disclosing the names of defendants would reveal the identities of the victims.  The DA’s spokesman, Jerry Schmetterer, confirmed that the Guardian’s request would also be refused on the same grounds.

The statement refusing the FOI request marks the first admission by Hynes that suspected child abusers from the Orthodox Jewish community receive exceptional treatment. ~ The Guardian

It’s quite courageous of The Guardian to post an ancillary story on the special treatment Jewish clergy receives from “secular” government.  What is missing, however, are the overwhelming number of stories showing who Catholic clergy get this treatment and more…about 20-to-1 more (both treatment and stories).  For that, you’ll need to get Eaters of Children.

Proving the Pedocracy has an absolute lock on all power positions even down to a big city District Attorney, the change of the guard in Brooklyn brought no change.

After initially facing up to 32 years in prison for eight counts of child sexual abuse, Baruch Lebovits walked out of Riker’s Island last week a free man.  He had served just under 16 months of total prison time.

That Lebovits, a cantor from the ultra-Orthodox Borough Park section of Brooklyn, was even convicted is seen as a victory considering the difficulty of prosecuting abuse in that community.  However, his release is disappointing, if not surprising, for those who hoped Brooklyn district attorney Kenneth Thompson would be the man to end decades of ultra-Orthodox sex abuse cover-ups.

Thompson beat out Charles Hynes for Brooklyn DA, ending a reign that last more than 23 years.  Towards the end of his time as DA, Hynes was scrutinized for his perceived unwillingness to prosecute crimes against the ultra-Orthodox, especially in regards to sexual abuse.  At best, his administration appeared exceptionally lax, and at worst, it willfully obstructed justice.  He was famously reluctant to release the names of convicted sex abusers in the Orthodox community.  His office let Rabbi Yehuda Kolko get away without jail time or registering as a sex offender.  Instead, Kolko received a plea deal that allowed him to plea guilty to child endangerment.  The DA claimed the alleged victims—first graders in Kolko’s class—were unwilling to testify, but chief of the Kings County sex crimes division, Rhonnie Jaus, publicly said that their parents had been willing to put the kids on the stand.  It was one of many cases that raised questions about Hynes’ willingness to prosecute ultra-Orthodox sex abuse.

Many critics of abuse and corruption in the ultra-Orthodox community hoped and believed Thompson would bring justice to Brooklyn.  For his part, Thompson openly criticized Hynes’ record on crimes committed by the ultra-Orthodox.  “Every community in Brooklyn has to be treated the same,” he said during a 2013 interview.  “When I become Brooklyn DA, I’ll make sure there’s equal justice for everyone, under the law.”

In fact, days after Thompson was elected last November, he requested that Hynes freeze any new ruling on the Lebovits case.  Thompson said he wanted to ensure a “full opportunity to review the Lebovits matter and participate in the decision to take the case to trial or dispose of it by way of a guilty plea.”  The Jewish Week reported that sources said Hynes was expected to dispose of the case with a lenient plea deal.  Ultimately, Thompson did the same, if not worse.

According to a transcript of the plea deal hearing from May 16, 2014 reviewed by The Daily Beast, Lebovits served even less time than was proposed during negotiations. ~ The Daily Beast

But when it comes to the rape and abuse of the innocent, Rome is still the reigning King.

—or, rather, “Queen”.

Sunday may be for the God-fearing, but Monday is for the fashion-faithful.  That’s when Dilara Findikoglu—along with all those drawn to the hypnotic, fantastical world she creates through her self-titled label—will head into a Catholic church in London for her spring show.  For the first time, after two smaller presentations, the Turkish designer is sending her clothes down the runway (in this case, a checkerboard stone floor), with a cast that includes the drag artist Violet Chachki and the rapper Brooke Candy.  Don’t expect any preaching to the choir.  Set to a soundtrack that blends boom metal, ‘80s dark wave, and traditional belly-dancing music, her collection might well be accompanied by face tattoos, extreme piercings, or Goth-meets-Victorian makeup.  “Each season I have distinct characters, so every look is different on its own,” Findikoglu says, explaining that her backstage collaborators—hairstylist Cyndia Harvey and makeup artist Isamaya Ffrench—are in sync with her bricolage of far-flung inspirations: Black Sabbath, Alejandro Jodorowksy, Victoriana.  “I have a lot of historical references,” says the designer, who cut her teeth interning for the ever-theatrical John Galliano.  “But you’ve got to use it in your own way.”

Findikoglu established herself at the outset as something of an iconoclast.  Two years ago at Central Saint Martins, she broke rank, staging a guerilla presentation for students whose thesis collections didn’t make it into the official press show.  Since then, rebel muses like Rihanna, Grimes, FKA twigs, and Adwoa Aboah have worn her designs—labors of obsession embellished with such details as tattoo imagery, Ottoman embroidery, or patches advertising favorite metal bands, which she discovered as a girl growing up in Istanbul.  “I was trying to explore new things constantly,” Findikoglu recalls of her deep Internet dives, which stoked interests beyond the comprehension of her Muslim parents.  “I’m into parapsychology and all the occult and magic stuff, so when I was reading those books, they thought I was going to be a Satanist,” she adds with a laugh.  She is not one for doctrine, pagan or otherwise — “I don’t like how religion divides people into groups,” she says — but the dark world suits her self-styling.  Jet-black blunt fringe offsets her milky complexion, which serves as the perfect canvas for a blood-red lip.  “Vampire finally melting under the sun,” she quipped in a recent sunglass-shaded selfie while on holiday in Turkey. ~ Vogue

In light of these images, we feel the need to question Dilara’s claim that she doesn’t like the “divisiveness” of “religion”.

But what is interesting is her chosen venue: Church of St. Andrew, Holborn in north-east London.

St. Andrew is, technically, an Anglican Church.  Yet, Wikipedia lists the composition of the congregation as “Modern Catholic”.

The terms Anglo-Catholicism, Anglican Catholicism, and Catholic Anglicanism refer to people, beliefs and practices within Anglicanism that emphasise the Catholic heritage and identity of the various Anglican churches.^[1][2] ~ Wikipedia

Although this may surprise some, it is simply the natural progression of Henry’s Church returning to her Mother.

Henry VIII was a loyal Catholic Tudor. In response to Martin Luther and the burgeoning Reformation in general, and Luther’s questioning of the Roman Sacredotal system in his book On the Babylonian Captivity of the Church, Henry wrote a scathing attack via his book On The Seven Sacraments.  Even Henry’s Lord Chancellor, Sir Thomas More, was uncomfortable with how much Henry pandered to Rome (and More was the chief Inquisitor behind stamping out William Tyndale and his English Bible).  More warned Henry that he gave “too much honor to the Pope” and Henry’s response was “There is no such thing as ‘Too much honor to the Pope’.”³¹³

As a result, Giovanni di Lorenzo de’ Medici (Pope Leo X) recognized Henry as Fidei defensor; Defender of the Faith.³¹⁴

But when it was found that Henry’s Catholic Castilian wife, Catherine of Aragon, could give him no male heirs, he beseeched Pope Clement VIIc for a “special dispensation” to divorce her and it was refused.  The Defender of the Faith then crowned himself the Pontifex Maximus of England’s Roman Catholicism which became the Anglican Episcopal Church of England.

After the break was made, anger at Rome seethed and a turn-around occurred as dramatic as Constantine’s ceasing of Christian persecution.

Henry left Catherine of Aragorn for Anne Boleyn but after three miscarriages she could only bear Henry a single girl.  She was brought up on controversial charges of treason, adultery, incest and even witchcraft and executed in 1536.  By the accounts of most scholars all accusations were specious and this was nothing more than politically-convenient murder conducted by Henry.

The girl that Anne bore her murderous husband was Elizabeth I.  Anne had been greatly influenced by England’s powerful Protestant, William Tyndale.  As a result, her legacy was far more potent than her husband’s as Elizabeth was England’s best Protestant monarch and her administration one of England’s most prosperous.

Anne was replaced by Jane Seymour who was able to finally give Henry a son, Edward VI.

Edward’s convictions on Scripture and Protestantism were so strong he would’ve made Elizabeth look like her sister, Bloody Mary.  Edward was tutored by Reformers like the Archbishop of  Canterbury, Thomas Cranmer and the fiery Scott evangelist John Knox. …

Like Alexander taught by Aristotle, Edward’s passion and pure ideology threatened to make him the most powerful Protestant of his time — perhaps ever.

That was something neither Rome, nor her assassins, could entertain in the slightest.

As England’s first true Protestant King, Edward was most certainly a target for assassination. Author Susan Higginbotham brings up the astounding accusation that, not only was Edward poisoned, his body was switched before burial to hide the evidence.¹⁴⁷⁵ ~ Illuminati Unmasked, Johnny Cirucci³¹⁷

~ Secret History: The erased clues that prove who rules the world from behind the curtain.
Cirucci, CreateSpace (2016) pp. 409-411, 413

In 2016, a fascinating incident occurred which showed just how much Henry’s “Protestant” Church of England is owned by the “Mother Church”.

A Church of England vicar kicked, bit and spat at a police officer and paramedic while claiming he had “diplomatic immunity” from the Vatican, a court heard on Friday.

Parish priest Gareth Jones, 36, had been drinking heavily when he passed out on a street in his clerical attire and swore at a paramedic when he tried to wake him up.

The married father-of-one, who was ordained in 2006 and serves at St. Mary and the Virgin in Great Ilford, north-east London, then lashed out and kicked the emergency worker twice in the leg.

When two police officers intervened, he kicked one in the cheek, prosecutor Edward Aydin said.

“He says: ‘I have diplomatic immunity’,” said Mr. Aydin.

“The officer says ‘which embassy?’” and he says: “The Vatican, you’re f*****.”

“He is growling, makes no attempt to respond to a caution and continues to shout that he has diplomatic immunity.”

He added: “I’m not sure if he has anything to do with the Vatican because he is with the Church of England.” ~ Telegraph

This was something I warned you about that same year—

Romans in vicar vestments run all the way to the top at Westminster.

The 104^th Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Douglas Williams, was recommended by “closet Catholic” Prime Minister Tony Blair and immediately underwent a pagan ceremony to have him promoted to the highest Druidic Degree just prior to his enthronement.³⁷⁵  Williams’ 10 years of “service” included pushing to have his homosexual friend³⁷⁶ Jeffrey John appointed Bishop of Reading³⁷⁷, claiming that sodomy reflected the “love of God”³⁷⁸, calling Sharia law “acceptable” and “unavoidable”³⁷⁹ and announcing that unity of all Christian sects under Rome was a “matter of urgency”.³⁸⁰

This can be explained by his audience in 2003 before the Catholic Pole chemist and salesman who helped get cyanide into the Nazi extermination chambers during WWII,³⁸¹ Karol Józef Wojtyła where, unlike Thomas Cranmer (who burned his hand off rather than serve Rome) he carefully kissed the ring of Pope John Paul II.

~ Secret History, pp. 487-488

Media such as “Dazed Digitial” was quick to blame only the Anglican Church.

In trying to learn about topics such as these, one of the first places truth-seekers go is the extremely-popular blog “Vigilant Christian”.  It doesn’t take long to see why “Vigilant Christian” is so popular when he calls St. Andrew a “Christian church”.

For that matter, so did Breitbart.com.

Although several “mainstream” sources were quick to label Andrew Breitbart’s heat attack death at 43 “natural causes”, grievous suspicions remained.

One of the sources quick to stress that there was nothing unusual about Breitbart’s death from stress, was his successor, Steven K. Bannon.

Some were surprised when Donald Trump chose Bannon (fresh off his visit to the Vatican) to run his 2016 Presidential campaign but they share a Jesuit education.

Trump has an affinity for Goldman Sachs bankers and Bannon is no exception.  In fact, for Bannon, his time at Goldman was akin to becoming a Jesuit.

Although some may question our assertions that Rome rules the world from behind her insurgent agents on behalf of the Devil but, for us, it’s just a walk down the aisle.

_________________________

Chapter 1

The Devil’s Simulation

~29 AD: The Temptation of Christ.

Again, the devil took Him up on a very high mountain and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and their grandeur, and said to Him, “All these things I will give You if You will fall down and worship me.”

Then Jesus said to him, “Be gone, Satan!  For it is written, ‘You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only shall you serve.’”

Then the devil left Him, and immediately angels came and ministered to Him. ~ Matthew 4:8-11 (Modern English)

Certainly, in our spinning-globe-Earth-modern-reality, such Bible passages seem quaint, perhaps even ridiculous.

But what if some version of the devil’s narrative (remembering that he is the very “father of lies”, [John 8:44]) were accurate?

Perhaps he has utilized whatever advantages he retained as an inter-dimensional entity, along with those loyal to him, and conducted a malignant version of the game “Sims” — slowly building empires from the ground up and giving his most trusted lieutenants control over principalities. (Daniel 10:13)

Perhaps God allowed this to take place for several reasons:

• He places restrictions upon His interventions to guarantee free will is granted His created beings.
• The malignancy of the empires created by the devil are used by God to test and refine His Children; to perfect them as companions for His Son. [Romans 8:29]
• He has pity for the angelic beings that do not receive the opportunity for redemption that human souls have. [Matthew 25:41; II Peter 2:4]
• He is giving those who choose to participate “enough rope to hang themselves” as a Testimony to His Justice.

Screenshot from the Microsoft video game Age of Empires.
(Wikimedia Commons/Fair Use)

If true, does this put the words of Jesus to Pontius Pilate in a different light, “My Kingdom is not of this world”? [John 18:36]

The Greek κόσμου (“kosmou”) translated as “world” has an interesting double meaning to include “adornment” or “trappings”.  Is there a hidden metaphor that implies a malignant system at work; the devil’s empire-building simulation?

How can Christ be “King of kings and Lord of lords” (Revelation 19:16) and yet not rule “in this world”?

Was Jesus giving Pilate a false sense of security by actually saying “That which empowers Me is not the system which has elevated you…”?

This further makes sense in light of the assertion that all of Creation was made through Christ and for Him. (Colossians 1:16)

If true, then the Devil’s Simulation would be a tenuous parasite, controlling God’s Creation.  As a fallen angel, he has the handicap of needing to co-opt human hands to do the work for him.  He would need a system that insured the loyalty of anyone he empowered.  It would be a system that guaranteed any human he used would someday share in his judgment.

Those who choose loyalty to God would be known by partaking of His Nature; compassion and selfless love. (I John 4:7-21)  The devil would force his followers to show their allegiance by going as far in the opposite direction as possible: lust of any kind, feeding self-interest, creating a callous, inhuman monster.

This is exactly what history shows.

*****

Chapter 16

Who Took Johnny?¹

5 September 1982: 12 year old John David “Johnny” Gosch disappears while on his paper route in Des Moines, Iowa.

In recounting the disappearance, John Gosch, Senior, stated that he always accompanied his son every Sunday morning for his paper route, but that morning he didn’t.  Supposedly, Johnny took his wagon filled with papers and the family dachshund to go it alone.

By 6 a.m., neighbors began calling the Gosch residence to complain that they hadn’t received their paper.  John Senior drove the route and found Johnny’s wagon and the family dog still tied to it, but no sign of the boy.

John Senior, along with his wife (Johnny’s mother) Noreen, called the Des Moines Police but they were disturbingly unresponsive.  They took 45 minutes to arrive (Headquarters was 10 minutes away) and distressed the Goschs by suggesting that Johnny had run away from home.  Johnny was well-adjusted and happy.  He had just bought himself a dirtbike with his paper route money.  The Goschs quickly dismissed the assertion that he had run away.

*****

The Left always has fun with exposing the sexually-perverted underbelly of the pseudo-Right but it quickly leads to the inner workings of the Devil’s Simulation so it never receives the coverage one would expect.

The same is true for a similar scandal in the 1980’s but it, too, was quickly buried as the Reagan / Bush “call boy” story which lead to the “Franklin” Cover-up (more in Chapter 21).

However, “alternative media” did follow up on the Gannon / Guckert / gay escort story.

In late January a conservative journalist in Washington D.C. was found to have gained access to the White House press pool despite using a fake name, and despite the fact that he once worked as a high-priced homosexual escort.

Jeff Gannon was a White House correspondent for Talon News who regularly attended White House press briefings and at least four press conferences with President George W. Bush.  On Jan. 26, 2005, Gannon asked a question of the president that was so friendly and factually inaccurate that some of his colleagues began looking into his background.

Talon News, it was learned, is a barely disguised tool of the Republican Party, and Gannon’s credentials as a journalist consist solely of a training course at the Leadership Broadcast School of Journalism.  After two days of training that cost $50, Gannon was officially a graduate of a journalism school and on his way to the White House press pool.

It was soon discovered that Gannon’s real name is Jeff Guckert and that he has also gone by the nickname “Bulldog” when listing himself on the Internet as a homosexual escort and personal trainer charging $200 per hour for his “discreet” services.

Gannon was removed from the White House and resigned from Talon News on Feb. 8 “Gannongate” quickly became the presidential scandal of the hour, though the story faded from public view as politicians and the media eagerly turned their attention to such pressing matters as steroids in baseball and the Terri Schiavo² situation.

 — “Christian Conservative” politicians hiring out the services of sodomites is nothing much of a story, anyway. —

But before long, Internet bloggers had picked up the story and began to think back to the administration of President Bush’s father, which was rocked by a scandal that allegedly involved a high-level official giving private, late-night tours of the White House to teenage, male prostitutes.  The New York Times and the Washington Post both wrote about the story and the eventual death of Washington lobbyist Craig Spence, who reportedly arranged the visits.  Spence, it has been suggested, was preparing to admit publicly that he was using the teenage boys to blackmail high-powered politicians in the beltway.  He committed suicide before he had the opportunity to do so. …

Private investigator Sherman H. Skolnick posted a story about the Gannon debacle on www.rense.com, a site known for its conspiracy theories, and publicly stated on Feb. 19 that Gannon is Johnny Gosch.

Andy Stephenson, a blogger from Seattle familiar with the details of the Johnny Gosch case and the child sex rings in Nebraska detailed in the Book, “The Franklin Cover-Up,” began, with a group of other writers and investigators, to ponder the claim.  They looked at markings on Gannon’s body and compared them to those reported on Johnny Gosch.  They considered the lack of personal information about Gannon’s early years.  They considered that Johnny was alleged to have been used as a gay prostitute for blackmail purposes.  They considered that the high-powered people alleged to have kidnapped and brainwashed children as part of the government’s Monarch Project and MK-Ultra program, including Johnny, did so to use them in a variety of ways to advance their own agendas.  And they contacted Noreen Gosch and discussed the idea with her — the first she’d heard of the theory — and they, too, came to the conclusion that Jeff Gannon is none other than Johnny Gosch.

The Internet has been abuzz with the theory ever since.  And, in a way, it makes perfect sense.  You’ve got a kid abducted and brainwashed into doing the bidding of government officials as part of top-secret mind-control programs, so now that he’s older why not put him into the White House to soften press briefings to make the president look better?  The suggestion from many is that Gannon is a Monarch Program child-turned-adult operative. ~ Pointblank Des Moines³

Alternative media then received “spokesmen” for the issue: gatekeepers who carefully steered the conversation clear of Roman implications.  These included men like Nebraska State Senator John DeCamp (a Roman Catholic seminarian and former aid to CIA Director William Colby, the “warrior monk” — also a devout Roman Catholic).  Also making the rounds was Theodore L. “Ted” Gunderson, former FBI Special Agent in charge of the high-profile Los Angeles office.  Gunderson helped destroy the creditability of child sex-slave trafficking with his appearance alongside “Satanist” Michael Aquino (who attained Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army, ludicrously waxed “horned” eyebrows and all) for the comic relief that was daytime television and the Geraldo Rivera show.  Geraldo is a Puerto Rican Roman Catholic.

Another is retired Jewish NYPD Detective James “Jim” Rothstein.

Each played their part in blaming nebulous and nefarious “Satanists” with clownish pawns like Colonel Aquino portraying one.

Rothstein “investigated” the disappearance of Johnny Gosch and provided a “confidential report” for Noreen which she posted on her web site “The Johnny Gosch Foundation”.⁴

As a dutiful “Papal Court Jew”, Rothstein covered for his masters by claiming that the CIA’s James Jesus Angleton “compromised” the Vatican and allowed pedophiles to “get a foothold” there.

If ever there was a man who embodied the fraud of needless war and proved its genesis was in Rome, it was James Jesus Angleton.

Angleton held the vital position of Chief of Counterintelligence for the critical Cold War decades of 1954 to 1974.  From there, he kept those in the CIA who were serious about their work cowering in fear from the seeming paranoia of his persecutions while devastating moles like MI6’s Harold Adrian Russell “Kim” Philby — a friend of Angleton’s — sent reams of sensitive information to the Soviets.

Angleton, in his relentless pursuit of Soviet agents, questioned the loyalty of many of the agency’s best analysts of Soviet affairs, and ruined the careers of more than a few.  The CIA only recently completed the painful business of restoring the reputation of those Angleton besmirched.

During Angleton’s tenure as chief of counterintelligence from 1954-74, the CIA’s ability to decipher the politics and military strategy of the Soviet Union was often crippled by his byzantine investigations.

Oddly, Angleton insisted that he never suspected Kim Philby, the British intelligence officer who provided Moscow with a stream of British and American secrets while a friend and close associate of Angleton. ~ New York Times⁵

In a similar “PsyOp” (Psychological Operation), the Leftist magazine Mother Jones also claimed the CIA manipulated the hapless Vatican but, in the process, admitted the shocking revelations that Angleton was a Knight of Malta, was in position to be screened for his treasonous future by working in Rome during World War II and had ran the supposedly “non-existent” Vatican and Israel Desks for “the Company”.⁶

The SMOM had given a different prestigious award in 1946 to another high-level CIA operative, James Jesus Angleton.  “It had to do with counterintelligence,” Angleton told Mother Jones, when asked why he was chosen for such a distinction.  During World War II, Angleton was head of the Rome station of the OSS.  Later, on his return to Washington, he ran what was tantamount to the “Vatican desk” for the CIA.  According to Angleton, the agency does not have a Vatican desk.  Nor does it have an Israel desk, for that matter, yet Angleton also covered that area.  The extreme sensitivity associated with Israel and the Vatican required that work relating to them be buried among Angleton’s counterintelligence staff, which was well-suited for such assignments.⁷

Angleton’s work on the unacknowledged “Israel Desk” shows the Zionist quagmire is cunningly woven by Rome through Western Intelligence.

“Jesus” Angleton is also reputed by at least one Vatican insider to have directly fed information to the KGB resulting in the death of agents working in Russia.⁸

In his “Confidential Report”, Detective Rothstein admitted that the CIA was involved in commercial-grade pedophilia.

A notorious homosexual pedophile and procurer … Ben Rose was arrested after an investigation by the New York Police Department at his residence on St. Mark’s Place in New York City during the summer of 1972.  At the time of the arrest, he had in his possession three young boy ages 14-15 years, who had been transported by him from Baltimore to New York City for the specific purpose of sexual exploitation.

— Baltimore is a city as openly-controlled by the Catholic Church as Boston.  It was founded in honor of Cecil Calvert, 2^nd Baron Baltimore whose Roman Catholic father, George Calvert secured the colony of Mary-land for the Vatican. —

Upon his arrest, he agreed to cooperate with the New York City Police Department and an investigation was begun under the code name GAFF.⁹  This investigation uncovered the commercial part of pedophilia and child abuse.

The commercial group includes child pornography, prostitution, pimping, extortion, and human intelligence.  Child pornography, prostitution, and pimping are well organized and promoted throughout the pedophile community.  Because of Ben Rose’s cooperation with investigators, many of the rumors and information under investigation were verified.  He informed the New York City Detectives that in November of 1971, three boys, ages 14-15 years, were sexually abused and then murdered in his apartment on East 64th Street in New York City by three men he identified as Dr. (name deleted) (a surgeon), (name deleted) (OPEC), and (name deleted) (CIA).  The bodies were then transported to Connecticut by car and then buried on a farm.  Under the GAFF investigation these murders were to be assigned to other investigators in the New York City Police Department, but then disappeared in the hierarchy of the Department.

A second investigation conducted in the mid 1970’s, by the Police Department during which thirteen homicides, plus the murder of these 14-15 year old boys at Ben Rose’s apartment, were investigated under the code name OPERATION TOGETHER.  This investigation was under the command of Deputy Inspector John Colin.  At a critical point in the investigation, it was stopped.  Inspector Colin was demoted and forced into retirement.

The third investigation was done by the New York State Select Committee on Crime.  This Committee served subpoenas on both (name deleted) and (name deleted).  When (name deleted) was served with the subpoena and questioned by the detectives, he informed them that because he worked for the CIA, the subpoena would be quashed, invoking National Security.  He was correct, because before the detectives returned to their offices, the subpoena was withdrawn.  One wonders what part of the National Security Act allows the murder of children.

How is it that America’s international intelligence agency should be her most heinous enemy, kidnapping her children off the street to torture, rape, abuse and sell them?  — Because the CIA doesn’t work for the American people, it works for Rome and serves the Devil’s Simulation.

Rothstein also admitted that Cardinal Francis Joseph Spellman (1889 – 1967) was an arch pedophile who remained free during his lifetime to rape children at will, thanks to protection from Roman Catholics in New York State government and law enforcement.

…from the days of Cardinal Spellman (nicknamed “NELLIE”, a known pedophile) in New York City to the present, no scandals have been made public.  There is no way that these hidden scandals will be made public as long as (name deleted) or someone like him is the District Attorney in New York City.  Any District Attorney or Prosecutor who routinely covers up these crimes against children by politically connected pedophiles, assures these crimes against children will remain hidden from the public.

This bears out our contention that Cardinals and Bishops who protect pedophile priests are, themselves, child predators who remain protected and anonymous in their crimes.  Neither “mainstream” media, “alternative” media, nor any government institution is allowed to bring them down or even out their status.

New York has always been owned by either Roman Catholics or “Papal Court Jews” and she has suffered for it.  On the heels of the Sandy Hook false flag in Connecticut, far-Left Catholic Governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo (son of Leftist Catholic Governor of New York Mario Cuomo), over-nighted a bill which destroyed what was left of New York gun rights.  In violation of the New York State Constitution, Cuomo forced his inversely-named SAFE Act through the legislature in a closed door session without any committee hearings.  In hours it was passed and Cuomo immediately signed it in a bold show of lawless Leftist Catholic tyranny.  Cuomo was required by the Constitution of New York to allow law-makers and citizens three days to examine proposed legislation and he simply ignored the requirement.  To date, no citizen, lawyer or advocacy group (such as the highly-publicized “National Rifle Association”) has attempted to bring this outrage into court where only the most corrupt and debased judge would dare to uphold it.

Detective Rothstein also acknowledged that the Pedocracy takes care of its own.

In most investigations into pedophilia and child abuse, the investigators, federal and local, will initially do an honest and in-depth investigation, but when a certain level of progress is attained, the investigations are stopped or compromised.  Again one asks the question, “Why is this?”  To this date there is no high profile case that has ever been investigated to the fullest extent and then prosecuted in the court of the United States.  Why?  Three examples of this can be found in the following cases: a) The Finders – Florida and Washington D.C.; b) Franklin Cover-up – Nebraska; c) St. Johns Abbey – Minnesota.

In segments of the family, homosexual, commercial, serial killer, and the occult, the pedophile and child abuser feel that they are above the law.  They believe that because of their contacts, position in society, or the secrecy of their actions, if caught, they can use these connections to cover-up their criminal activities.  In most cases this is true and known throughout the pedophile subculture.

High-profile pedophiles even use this protection as validation and vindication.

In 2017, four men accused Seattle Mayor Ed Murray of sexually abusing them when they were boys.  One of the men was in Murray’s care as a foster child.  Murray is an overt “married” homosexual and remains tightly tied to the Catholic Church.¹⁰  He arrogantly used lack of criminal prosecution as the reason why he refused to step down as Mayor in light of the accusations.¹¹  How an overt homosexual is able to care for foster children is, itself, a heinous crime of the Pedocracy.¹²

For a high-profile big-city Mayor, Ed Murray’s past is apparently “hands off” to the “secular” media.  However, if one digs deep enough, one finds that, like California’s once-and-future Governor Jerry “Moonbeam” Brown, Ed Murray was trained in a Jesuit seminary. ^{13 14 15}

Depressed

Independent investigative reporter Tim Schmitt of the now-defunct news outlet Pointblank Des Moines linked the apparent suicide of famed journalist Hunter Stockton Thompson to the “outing” of White House press reporter “Jeff Gannon”, a.k.a. “James Guckert” and supposedly a.k.a. John Gosch, Jr.

Shortly after the theory was presented, Gannon posted an article titled “Hiding in Plain Sight,” and has posted a column entitled “Fear and Loathing in the Press Room,” which some suggest is a reference to the recently deceased Hunter S. Thompson, who also was accused of involvement in pedophile, child slavery rings in the 1980s …

Others suggest that his name itself is a clue to his real identity.  Both Jeff Gannon and James Guckert share the same initials as Johnny Gosch.  Furthermore, shortly after Johnny’s disappearance, Noreen made a personal plea to the editor of The Des Moines Register, Johnny’s employer.  The editor printed her letter in the paper and mocked it by allowing the police department to dissect it.  The editor’s name was James Gannon. …

The Gannon/Gosch connection was first made public early in the morning on Feb. 20.  Later that same day, Hunter S. Thompson was found dead in his home, the victim of an apparent self-inflicted gunshot.

Few people would ever have thought to connect Thompson and Gosch, but those familiar with the tales of child abuse and pedophilia documented in “The Franklin Cover-Up,” a book first released in 1994 by former Neb. State Sen. John DeCamp, understand the association.

In his book, DeCamp relates many interviews and discussions with Paul Bonacci, the young man who claims to have been involved with the kidnapping of Johnny Gosch.  Bonacci told horrific tales of being forced into sex with adults and other children.  In one case he recalls being flown into Nevada with another young boy whom he did not know.  They took on another passenger there and headed to a secluded location where Bonacci says he was forced to have sex with the younger boy.  The young boy, Bonacci claims in this book, was also forced to have sex with adult males, who then killed the boy with a gunshot to the head.  Bonacci says he was then forced to have sex with the corpse.

The passenger they took on in Nevada filmed the entire thing, and Bonacci recalled that his name was Hunter Thompson.¹⁶

Thompson was an anti-American muck-raker who was an important part of Jesuit “counter-culture”.  He disguised his yellow journalism with a new name: “gonzo journalism”.  However, raw, emotion-filled diatribe is the same it has always been before or since: propaganda.

As a result of being an active agent for the Devil’s Simulation, Thompson was lionized by fellow deviants in Hollywood.

The work he remains best known for, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas: A Savage Journey to the Heart of the American Dream (1971), constitutes a rumination on the failure of the 1960s counterculture movement.  It was first serialized in Rolling Stone, a magazine with which Thompson would be long associated, and was released as a film starring Johnny Depp and Benicio del Toro and directed by Terry Gilliam in 1998. …

In accordance with his wishes, his ashes were fired out of a cannon in a ceremony funded by his friend Johnny Depp and attended by friends including then-Senator John Kerry¹⁷ and Jack Nicholson. ~ Wikipedia¹⁸

Schmitt also connected the CIA to Johnny Gosch.

George Paul Bishop (often known just as Paul Bishop) claimed he was a “CIA asset” and arrived in Des Moines in July of 1984 to offer his assistance to the Goschs.  Before he left, he provided, through his investigation, a detailed map of the kidnapping scene.  Bishop, according to Noreen’s book, often called the Gosch home from the Washington D.C. office of Sen. Charles Grassley, with whom Noreen had worked on Johnny’s case.

“Many times Paul Bishop would call me from Sen. Grassley’s office and, when finished speaking with me, he would hand the phone to one of Grassley’s aides who I was familiar with,” Noreen recalled in her book, published in 2000.  “That convinced me Paul was an accepted visitor on the Hill in Washington.”

Based on this, Noreen believed that Bishop was responsible for securing her invitation to testify before Sen. Arlan Specter’s Hearing on Organized Crime and its Relationship to Kidnapping at the U.S. Capitol.  Bishop, in fact, picked Noreen up from her D.C. hotel and accompanied her to the hearings.

Bishop became close to Noreen, even referring to her as “Mom,” but suddenly, in 1985, he disappeared from the scene.  The phone number he’d left was no longer valid and no one knew how to contact him.  No one had seen or heard from him in almost 20 years, until he was suddenly arrested on Feb. 4 of this year in Virginia, after police allegedly found an explicit video of a 16-year-old boy in his home.

Detectives searched Bishop’s home and found the tape after receiving a complaint that he was allowing teenage boys to drink and use drugs on the premises.

Noreen wonders now if Bishop was on the wrong side of Johnny’s case all along.  Was he involved in the kidnapping and merely running a smokescreen at the time to prevent discovery?  Was his recent arrest an effort to keep him quiet about the larger story?  A threat? …

Either way, Bishop seemed to know a lot about Johnny’s disappearance in 1982, and his sudden reappearance on the scene coinciding with the outing of Jeff Gannon [and] the death of Thompson … is too much of a coincidence for some to accept.¹⁹

From its founding through today, the CIA has been so overtly Catholic that the Catholic Herald sheepishly admitted to its nickname “the Catholic Intelligence Agency”, or alternatively “Catholics In Action”.²⁰

Many of its Directors have been devout Catholics (most of them, Jesuit trained or mentored) and Knights for the Vatican; OSS founder William Donovan, the CIA’s first Director Walter Bedell Smith, John McCone, William Colby, William Casey, Michael Hayden, Leon Panetta and John Brennan.  Many more can be found in key positions and those who aren’t overt Catholics are still tied to the Church.  They have engineered America’s most grievous treasons.  Examples include Allen Dulles and the murder of sitting Jesuit-trained Roman Catholic President John F. Kennedy or George Tenet and 9/11.  Dulles was the brother of John Foster Dulles, Kennedy’s Secretary of State who later committed suicide under odd circumstances.  John’s son, Allen’s nephew, Avery Dulles, subsequently became one of the most powerful Jesuit Cardinals in the United States.  This is in spite of the claim that the Dulles family was the same religion that married the Catholic homosexual pedophile Mayor of Seattle Ed Murray; Episcopalian.

“Orthodox” George Tenet was trained by the Jesuits at Georgetown.  Even if the ludicrous official story of 9/11 was true, Tenet should have been dragged from office in disgrace and prosecuted for criminal negligence that caused the death of over 3,000 Americans and billions of dollars of damage resulting in a modern Police State.²¹  Instead, President George W. Bush (Yale Skull and Bones ’68), son of President George H. W. Bush (Yale Skull and Bones ’48) gave him the highest civilian honor, the Medal of Freedom.

_________________________

As of 12 September, the far-Left, “married” homosexual, would-be Jesuit priest, Mayor of far-Left Seattle, Ed Murray, has finally vowed to resign.

The revealing that the “married” homosexual adopted a foster son in order to sodomize and abuse him wasn’t enough, nor was the 4 other open complaints against the Jesuit seminarian.  However, when Murray’s cousin came forward alleging that the Seattle Mayor assaulted him 4 decades ago, he finally decided to call it quits.

In California, another Jesuit seminarian, Jerry “Moonbeam” Brown, is finally making it official: rather than being satisfied that all of California’s big cities brazenly disobey un-enforced Federal immigration laws, Brown is making the entire Democrat-dominated state a haven for Roman Catholic illegal aliens.

In Lanark, Scotland a grisly discovery was made.  The little bodies of hundreds of children (400 and still counting) were found in a mass, unmarked grave outside the Smyllum Park Roman Catholic Orphanage.

In the heart of Protestant firebrand John Knox’s homeland, a malignant parasite was fast at work eating the children of Scotland.

The Orphanage was started in 1864 and run by the inversely-named Daughters of Charity.  The prominence of nuns in the great harm done to children via the Devil’s Simulation thoroughly buries the subterfuge that systemic abuse comes from male-dominated patriarchies.

Former First Minister of Scotland, Jack McConnell (a “Labour” Leftist) apologized to victims “care home” abuse.  As has been the case in Ireland, Australia and elsewhere, the Catholic Church dominates “secular” government responsibilities, abuses them like an enemy insurgency, then lets the junior partners in government take the blame.  It is a story chronicled repeatedly in Eaters of Children: The Pedocracy Exposed.

Young, single mothers, unwanted children, illicit sex between priests and nuns — the victims were given into the tender care of Catholic clergy.  Their little bodies dumped in a pile outside the doors.

Pol Pot, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, “Papa Doc” Duvalier: all pale in comparison to the systemic mass murder of the Devil’s Simulation (but they are all a part of it).

Scotland’s healthcare facilities were socialized in 1947 with the National Health Service Act and it made things much easier for Rome to pull the strings and help herself to Scotland’s vulnerable.

As word got out over how child sex abuse controls power behind the scenes, it collapsed the government of Iceland.

Iceland’s ruling three-party coalition has fallen in the wake of public outcry following the discovery of Prime Minister Bjarni Benediktsson’s links to a convicted pedophile.

On Thursday, it was revealed that the prime minister’s father signed a letter recommending “restored honor” —a provision within the Icelandic judicial system that allows convicted criminals to apply for some jobs in some professions and join a company board —for Hjalti Sigurjón Hauksson, a convicted pedophile.  Hauksson had served a five-and-a-half-year jail term for repeatedly raping his stepdaughter over a twelve-year period.

Hauksson’s victim told the Icelandic newspaper Stundin that he continued harassing her even after his release, pursuing her with phone calls and messages to this day. ~ Foreign Policy

What will happen as American wake up to the same reality?

The Billionaire Pedophile Who Could Bring Down Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton

II Thessalonians 2:5-12 (New King James Version)
⁵ Do you not remember that when I was still with you I told you these things?
⁶ And now you know what is restraining, that he may be revealed in his own time.
⁷ For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only He who now restrains will do so until He is taken out of the way.
⁸ And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord will consume with the breath of His mouth and destroy with the brightness of His coming.
⁹ The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders,
¹⁰ and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
¹¹ And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie,
¹² that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

If you read the NKJV, the translators capitalize the pronouns in verse seven clearly leading all to believe “the restrainer” is the Lord.

But is that accurate?

The King James version was based upon the highly-reliable Textus Receptus manuscripts.  The New King James, however, was not a modern English update of the KJV.  Critical changes to Scripture were made.  Although the 1982 preface to the New King James states the intent is only to take the Elizabethan language¹ and make it understandable in modern English, the translators failed to mention that changes would be made according to the Septuagint and even Jerome’s Latin Vulgate!

Other translations are noticeably different.

II Thessalonians 2:5-12 (New American Standard Bible)
⁵ Do you not remember that while I was still with you, I was telling you these things?
⁶ And you know what restrains him now, so that in his time he will be revealed.
⁷ For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only he who now restrains will do so until he is taken out of the way.
⁸ Then that lawless one will be revealed whom the Lord will slay with the breath of His mouth and bring to an end by the appearance of His coming;
⁹ that is, the one whose coming is in accord with the activity of Satan, with all power and signs and false wonders,
¹⁰ and with all the deception of wickedness for those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth so as to be saved.
¹¹ For this reason God will send upon them a deluding influence so that they will believe what is false,
¹² in order that they all may be judged who did not believe the truth, but took pleasure in wickedness.

So who is “the Restrainer”?  Does this help us understand who anti-Christ will be?  What is the “strong delusion”?

Often, it is assumptions that lead to biased and incorrect exegesis of Scripture.  Such is frequently an error of the Western mindset.  A Buddhist saw tells us—

If you wish to know the truth, hold no opinions.²

Daniel’s 70 Weeks

A similar confusion of pronouns can be found in an even more important passage; Daniel’s “70 Weeks”—the Prophecy of Daniel 9:24-27.

Sadly, there are no English translations that show this Prophecy in its clarity.

Daniel 9:24-27 (New International Version)
²⁴ “Seventy ‘sevens’ are decreed for your people and your holy city to finish transgression, to put an end to sin, to atone for wickedness, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy and to anoint the Most Holy Place.
²⁵ “Know and understand this: From the time the word goes out to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One, the ruler, comes, there will be seven ‘sevens,’ and sixty-two ‘sevens.’  It will be rebuilt with streets and a trench, but in times of trouble.
²⁶ After the sixty-two ‘sevens,’ the Anointed One will be put to death and will have nothing.  The people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary.  The end will come like a flood: War will continue until the end, and desolations have been decreed.
²⁷ He will confirm a covenant with many for one ‘seven.’  In the middle of the ‘seven’ he will put an end to sacrifice and offering.  And at the temple he will set up an abomination that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him.”

In one of the most important passages of Scripture are mixed two seminal yet diametrically-opposed figures; the Anointed Messiah and the Destroyer—the anti-Messiah (although not equal in power).

The key to interpretation is found in the final verse.  The one who puts an end to the sacrifice and offering must be evil, mustn’t he?  The “covenant” must be a future, 7-year covenant, mustn’t it?

In Scripture, there are only two Covenants—the first is the Covenant between YHWH and His People given by Moses.  It was a Covenant His People could not keep [Acts 15:7-11], one that was only meant to hold them and point them toward a new Covenant [Galatians 3:19-24].  This New Covenant was radically different from the old—rather than written on tablets of stone and impossible to keep, this One would be written on the hearts of God’s People and they would keep it out of love for Him! [Jeremiah 31:31-34]

In this light a literal reading of the Prophecy produces a radically different interpretation.

Daniel 9:24-27 (Young’s Literal Translation)
²⁴ ‘Seventy weeks are determined for thy people, and for thy holy city, to shut up the transgression, and to seal up sins, and to cover iniquity, and to bring in righteousness age-during, and to seal up vision and prophet, and to anoint the holy of holies.
²⁵ And thou dost know, and dost consider wisely, from the going forth of the word to restore and to build Jerusalem till Messiah the Leader [is] seven weeks, and sixty and two weeks: the broad place hath been built again, and the rampart, even in the distress of the times.
²⁶ And after the sixty and two weeks, cut off is Messiah, and the city and the holy place are not his, the Leader who hath come doth destroy the people; and its end [is] with a flood, and till the end [is] war, determined [are] desolations.
²⁷ And he hath strengthened a covenant with many — one week, and [in] the midst of the week he causeth sacrifice and present to cease, and by the wing of abominations he is making desolate, even till the consummation, and that which is determined is poured on the desolate one.’

There are flip-flopping contrasts floating between verses 26 and 27; first Messiah arrives at the appointed time but is “cut off”.  Then, anti-Messiah comes (from the anti-Messiah people) and will destroy the Sanctuary and make desolate with a “flood” (flooding waters often are a Biblical metaphor for many people).  Contrasting again, Messiah will re-affirm the Old Covenant but only for a single “week” (7 years).  Halfway through, He will cause the sacrifice to become obsolete and impossible to continue both physically and spiritually.

John 2:13-22 (Modern English Version)
¹³ The Passover of the Jews was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem.
¹⁴ In the temple He found those who were selling oxen and sheep and doves, and the moneychangers sitting there.
¹⁵ When He had made a whip of cords, He drove them all out of the temple, with the sheep and oxen.  He poured out the changers’ money and overturned the tables.
¹⁶ He said to those who sold doves, “Take these things away!  Do not make My Father’s house a house of merchandise!”
¹⁷ His disciples remembered that it was written, “Zeal for Your house will consume Me.”
¹⁸ Then the Jews said to Him, “What sign do You show us, seeing that You do these things?”
¹⁹ Jesus answered them, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.”
²⁰ Then the Jews said, “It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and will You raise it up in three days?”
²¹ But He was speaking concerning the temple of His body.
²² Therefore, when He was raised from the dead, His disciples remembered that He had said this to them.  And they believed the Scripture and the word which Jesus had spoken.

______________

Matthew 23:37-24:2 (Modern English Version)
³⁷ “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those who are sent to you, how often I would have gathered your children together as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you would not!”
³⁸ “Look, your house is left to you desolate.”
³⁹ “For I tell you, you shall not see Me again until you say, ‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord.’”

Chapter 24

¹ Jesus departed from the temple and was leaving when His disciples came to show Him the temple buildings.
² Jesus answered them, “Do you not see all these things?  Truly I say to you, not one stone shall be left here upon another that shall not be thrown down.”

Most bizarre of all, both Messiah and anti-Messiah work together to fulfill the Prophetic Divine Will!

It was intended for Messiah to re-affirm the Old Covenant with His 7-year ministry (beginning at His Baptism by John).

Halfway through His Ministry, traitorous Jewish leaders intent on killing anyone who threatened their power, seditiously worked with real power in Judea to have the Anointed One murdered without just cause (“not for Himself”).

A short time later, the people of the coming anti-Christ devastated Jerusalem and leveled the Temple down to its last foundation stone—Romans.

Gessius Florus loved money and hated Jews.  As Roman procurator, he ruled Judea, caring little for their religious sensibilities.  When tax revenues were low, he seized silver from the temple.  As the uproar against him grew, in A.D. 66, he sent troops into Jerusalem who massacred 3,600 citizens.  Florus’s action touched off an explosive rebellion—the First Jewish Revolt—that had been sizzling for some time.

Launching the Revolt

The Jewish Revolt began—and met its bitter end—at Masada, a hunk of rock overlooking the Dead Sea.  The Romans had built a virtually impregnable fortress there.  Yet the atrocities of Florus inspired some crazy Zealots to attack Masada.  Amazingly, they won, slaughtering the Roman army there.

In Jerusalem, the temple captain signified solidarity with the revolt by stopping the daily sacrifices to Caesar.  Soon all Jerusalem was in an uproar, expelling or killing the Roman troops.  Then all Judea was in revolt; then Galilee.

Cestius Callus, the Roman governor of the region, marched from Syria with twenty thousand soldiers.  He besieged Jerusalem for six months, yet failed.  He left six thousand dead Roman soldiers, not to mention weaponry that the Jewish defenders picked up and used.

Emperor Nero then sent Vespasian, a decorated general, to quell the Judean rebellion.  Vespasian put down the opposition in Galilee, then in Transjordan, then in Idumea.  He circled in on Jerusalem.  But before the coup de grace, Nero died.  Vespasian became embroiled in a leadership struggle that concluded with the eastern armies calling for him to be emperor.  One of his first imperial acts was to appoint his son Titus to conduct the Jewish War.

Crushing the Revolt

By now, Jerusalem was isolated from the rest of the nation, and factions within the city fought over strategies of defense.  As the siege wore on, people began dying from starvation and plague.  The high priest’s wife, who once basked in luxury, scavenged for crumbs in the streets.

Meanwhile the Romans employed new war machines to hurl boulders against the city walls.  Battering rams assaulted the fortifications.  Jewish defenders fought all day and struggled to rebuild the walls at night.  Eventually the Romans broke through the outer wall, then the second wall, and finally the third wall.  Still the Jews fought, scurrying to the temple as their last line of defense.

That was the end for the valiant Jewish defenders and for the temple.  Historian Josephus claimed that Titus wanted to preserve the temple, but his soldiers were so angry at their resilient opponents that they burned it.  The remaining Jews were slaughtered or sold as slaves.

The Zealot band that took Masada held it for at least three more years.  When the Romans finally built their siege ramp and invaded the mountain fortress, they found the defenders dead—they had committed suicide to avoid being captured by foreigners.

Results of the Revolt

The Jewish Revolt marked the end of the Jewish state until modern times.  The destruction of the temple also signified a change in the Jews’ worship…³

Confirmed

Understanding the Romans as the people of the anti-Christ is the key to unlocking the proper understanding of these passages.  The Romans would later become “Holy Romans”, mutating just as Daniel predicted into a Beast very different from the three previous Beasts (empires) given to both Daniel and Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar.

Daniel 7:1-8 (Modern English Version)
¹ In the first year of Belshazzar king of Babylon, Daniel had a dream and visions of his mind while on his bed.  Then he wrote the dream and told the sum of the matters.
² Daniel spoke and said: I saw in my vision by night the four winds of the heaven striving upon the Mediterranean Sea.
³ Four great beasts came up from the sea, diverse from one another.
⁴ The first was like a lion and had eagle’s wings.  I watched until its wings were plucked and it was lifted up from the earth and made to stand on the feet as a man, and a man’s heart was given to it.
⁵ Another beast appeared, a second, like a bear, and it raised itself up on one side, and it had three ribs in its mouth between its teeth.  And they said to it, “Arise, devour much flesh.”
⁶ After this I looked and there was another, like a leopard, which had on its back four wings of a fowl.  The beast also had four heads.  And dominion was given to it.
⁷ After this I saw in the visions at night a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and exceedingly strong.  And it had great iron teeth.  It devoured and broke in pieces, and stamped the rest with its feet.  And it was different from all the beasts that were before it, and it had ten horns.
⁸ I considered the horns, when there came up among them another little horn before whom three of the first horns were plucked up by the roots.  And there, in this horn, were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things.

This Fourth and Final Beast was unlike the previous three because she would control in secret.  This way, she would spread tendrils across civilization.

Now, instead of enforcing her will by posting soldiers on every street corner, she would co-opt the soldiers and officials of each nation she conquered and they would do her will in secret!

Daniel’s vision was in perfect harmony with the dream he interpreted for King Nebuchadnezzar in Chapter 2 of a great statue which had a head of gold (Babylon), a torso of silver (Medo/Persia), loins of brass (Greece), legs and feet of iron (Rome).

Notice how the teeth of the Final Beast were the same material as the legs in Nebuchadnezzar’s dream: iron.

But this new “Holy Roman Empire” knew she had been predicted in Scripture and went about wiping off her bloody fingerprints, leaving only faded clues behind.

The 1517 Reformation initiated by Martin Luther gave new light which explained that the entire office of the Papacy was anti-Christ.

The theme became very popular in the late Middle Ages among the Fraticelli, Wycliffites, and Hussites, who identified the popes with the Antichrist soon to be overthrown.  Luther was unwittingly in line with these sectaries, with one significant difference, however.

Whereas they identified particular popes, because of their evil lives, with Antichrist, Luther held that every pope was Antichrist even though personally exemplary, because Antichrist is collective: an institution, the papacy, a system which corrupts the truth of Christ.

That was why Luther could repeatedly address Leo X in terms of personal respect only a week or so after blasting him as Antichrist.⁴

The Jesuit-run Counter-Reformation began immediately upon Luther’s break.  Unable to destroy the movement by the brute force of the Inquisition’s burning pyres and instruments of torture, they embarked upon a new strategy to compromise and discredit Scripture.

Again, the keepers of Truth became an underground minority.

Despite their creation by Freemason William Miller, Seventh Day Adventists remained as the sole keeper of the torch of Luther.

Adventist scholar Uriah Smith confirmed these interpretations for us in the 19^th century.

Commenting on the prophecy that the little horn should “wear out the saints of the Most High,” Barnes, in his Notes on Dan.7:25, says: “Can any one doubt that this is true of the papacy?  The Inquisition, the persecutions of the Waldenses, the ravages of the Duke of Alva, the fires of Smithfield, the tortures of Goa, — indeed, the whole history of the papacy, may be appealed to in proof that this is applicable to that power.  If anything could have worn out the saints of the Most High, — could have cut them off from the earth so that evangelical religion would have become extinct, — it would have been the persecutions of the papal power.  In year 1208 a crusade was proclaimed by Pope Innocent III against the Waldenses and Albigenses, in which a million men perished.  From the beginning of the order of Jesuits in the year 1540 to 1580, nine hundred thousand were destroyed.  One hundred and fifty thousand perished by the Inquisition in thirty years.  In the Low Countries fifty thousand persons were hanged, beheaded, burned, or buried alive, for the crime of heresy, within the space of thirty-eight years from the edict of Charles V against the Protestants to the peace of Chateau Cambresis in 1559.  Eighteen thousand suffered by the hand of the executioner in the space of five years and a half, during the administration of the Duke of Alva.  Indeed, the slightest acquaintance with the history of the papacy will convince any one that what is here said of ‘making war with the saints’ ([Daniel 7] verse 21), and ‘wearing out the saints of the Most High’ (verse 25), is strictly applicable to that power, and will accurately describe its history.”  (See Buck’s Theological Dictionary, art., Persecutions: Oswald’s Kingdom, etc., pp.107-133; Dowling’s History of Romanism; Fox’s Book of Martyrs: Charlotte Elizabeth’s Martyrology; The Wars of the Huguenots; The Great Red Dragon, by Anthony Gavin, formerly one of the Roman Catholic priests of Saragossa, Spain; Histories of the Reformation, etc.) …

“The prince of the covenant” unquestionably refers to Jesus Christ, “the Messiah the Prince,” who was to “confirm the covenant” one week with his people. Dan. 9:25-27.  The prophet, having taken us down to the death of Tiberius, now mentions incidentally an event to transpire in his reign, so important that it should not be passed over; namely, the cutting off of the Prince of the covenant, or in other words, the death of our Lord Jesus Christ.  According to the prophecy, this took place in the reign of Tiberius.  Luke informs us (3:1-3) that in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, John the Baptist commenced his ministry.  The reign of Tiberius is to be reckoned, according to Prideaux, Dr. Hales, Lardner, and others, from his elevation to the throne to reign jointly with Augustus, his step-father, in August, A.D. 12.  His fifteenth year would therefore be from August, A.D. 26, to August, A.D. 27.  Christ was six months younger than John, and is supposed to have commenced his ministry six months later, both, according to the law of the priesthood, entering upon their work when they were thirty years of age.  If John commenced in the spring, in the latter portion of Tiberius’s fifteenth year, it would bring the commencement of Christ’s ministry in the autumn of A.D. 27; and right here the best authorities place the baptism of Christ, it being the exact point where the 483 years from B.C. 457, which were to extend to the Messiah the Prince, terminated; and Christ went forth proclaiming that the time was fulfilled.  From this point we go forward three years and a half to find the date of the crucifixion; for Christ attended but four Passovers, and was crucified at the last one.  Three and a half years from the autumn of A.D. 27 bring us to the spring of A.D. 31.  The death of Tiberius is placed but six years later, in A.D. 37.⁵

Who Is The Restrainer?

Now with the proper understanding we can return to our original question.

It was well understood be even “Church Fathers” like Quintus Septimius Florens Tertullianus, (c. 155 – 240 AD)—better known to us as “Tertullian”.

Dealing with the eschatological section of Paul’s first Epistle to the Thessalonians, Tertullian asks: ‘What archangel’s voice, what trump of God, is now heard, except it be forsooth in the entertainments of the heretics?  ‘He also points out that in the second Epistle to the Thessalonians Paul bids them not be troubled by false prophets, who teach that the day of the Lord is at hand.  For that day shall not come, unless there first comes a falling away, and the appearance of Antichrist.  The Antichrist cannot, however, come until he who now hinders shall be taken out of the way.  The ‘one who now hinders’ is the Roman Empire.  ‘What obstacle is there but the Roman state, the falling away of which, by being scattered |^p210 into ten kingdoms, shall introduce Antichrist upon (its own ruins.)’⁶

The anti-Christ office of the Papacy could not materialize unless the military office of the Roman Empire first disappeared.

Learning Against Learning

So if the early Church knew Rome was the 4^th and Final Beast, and Protestants knew the Papacy was the anti-Christ, why isn’t it common knowledge today?

With Rome so clearly depicted as the 4th and final Beast of both Daniel and Revelation, Jesuits needed to disconnect Christians from that interpretation and they used Preterism and Futurism to do it.

Preterism is the idea that most of prophecy has already taken place.  It was concocted by a Jesuit.

Preterism was first advanced in 1604 by Jesuit Luis de Alcasar to destroy the Reformed Protestant teaching that the papacy was Mystery Babylon, the Great Whore and the historical Antichrist. …

Preterism wasn’t accepted by large groups of Protestants and an alternative interpretation of the End Times was put forth.

Futurism is more appealing in that it acknowledges that much of prophecy is yet future but it distracts from the 4th Beast and paints the anti-Christ as a man who suddenly appears just before the Tribulation and who stands alone, apart from any organization or system.

It, too, was fabricated by a Jesuit.

Francisco Ribera (1537-1591) of Salamanca, Spain, published a 500 page commentary on the grand points of Babylon and Antichrist, the object being to set aside the Protestant teaching that the Papacy is the Antichrist.  In his commentary, he assigned the first chapters of Revelation to the first century.  The rest he restricted to a literal three and a half years a the end of time.  He taught that the Jewish temple would be rebuilt by a single individual antichrist who would abolish the Christian religion, deny Christ, pretend to be God, and conquer the world.⁸ …

Ribera’s commentary laid the foundation for the greater structure of Futurism, which would be built upon and expanded by those who followed.  Ribera’s teaching was further popularized by Robert Bellarmine (1544-0621), an Italian cardinal and the most renowned of all Jesuit controversialists.¹⁰

After accepting the Jesuits’ Futurist System (and the Preterist System…) millenarian Protestants no longer saw Rome as a present but only a distant future threat.¹¹  We should also mention Irving’s system saw no hope of victory over the present forces of evil except “by the brightness of his coming” in the second advent. With no hope, why try to conquer all things for Christ? ~ Death of the Church Victorious, Ovid Need^{557 7}

Perhaps such a complete accomplishment seems impossible—no organization on Earth could so thoroughly control the understanding of almost all Christendom … could it?

“Unless those days were shortened, no one would be saved.  But for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened.  Then if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ,’ or ‘There He is,’ do not believe it.  For false christs and false prophets will arise and show great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect.  Listen, I have told you beforehand.” ~ Matthew 24:22-25 (Modern English Version)

UPDATE 29 March 2017, 01:31 PM, EST

The dichotomy and contrast between the old Mosaic Covenant and new Covenant in Messiah Jesus Christ can clearly be seen in this passage from Jeremiah where even physically circumcised Jews are called “uncircumsized”—

Jeremiah 9:25-26, (Modern English Version)
²⁵ The days are surely coming, says the Lord, that I will punish all who are circumcised and yet uncircumcised—
²⁶ Egypt, Judah, Edom, the children of Ammon, Moab, and all who dwell in the wilderness who clip the hair on their temples; for all these nations are uncircumcised, and all the house of Israel are uncircumcised of heart.

The meaning is clear: true Faith in YHWH (through His Son) is a radical change of the heart.  Righteousness is kept from within, not by memorization, legalism or rote.

1.  Perhaps “Shakespearian” would be better as King James I gave his Bible to Francis Bacon to edit and Francis Bacon was a Gnostic (the Freemason of his day) who was probably William Shakespeare.
2. Kindness: A Treasury of Buddhist Wisdom for Children and Parents, translated by Sarah Conover, Eastern Washington University Press (2001), p. 32
3.  A.D. 70 Titus Destroys Jerusalem, Christianity Today, Issue 28: 100 Most Important Events in Church History, 1990
4.  Here I Stand: The Life of Martin Luther, Roland H. Bainton, Abingdon-Cokesbury Press, New York (1950), p. 111
5.  Daniel and the Revelation, Uriah Smith, Review and Herald (1897), pp. 156-157, 269-270
6.  The Theology of Tertullian, R.E. Roberts, Epworth Press, London (1924), p. 161 [digital] 7.  Illuminati Unmasked, Johnny Cirucci, CreateSpace (2015), pp. 185-186, 187

One of today’s greatest deceptions is that the common citizen must drastically reduce their already heavily-burdened standard of living to compensate for “global warming”.

As with many other deceptions, it is wrought with fraud from “science”—a community that is supposedly above deception, dedicated to a strict code devoid of any bias.

The best example of this has already been expunged from the internet: “Climate-Gate”.

Columnist James Delingpole wrote a scathing series of articles for Britain’s Daily Telegraph (which have since been taken down but archived here).

The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth … has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka CRU) and released 61 megabytes of confidential files onto the internet. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)

When you read some of those files – including 1079 emails and 72 documents – you realise just why the boffins at CRU might have preferred to keep them confidential.  As Andrew Bolt puts it, this scandal could well be “the greatest in modern science”.  These alleged emails – supposedly exchanged by some of the most prominent scientists pushing AGW theory – suggest:

Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.

One of the alleged emails has a gentle gloat over the death in 2004 of John L Daly (one of the first climate change sceptics, founder of the Still Waiting For Greenhouse site), commenting:

“In an odd way this is cheering news.”

But perhaps the most damaging revelations – the scientific equivalent of the Telegraph’s MPs’ expenses scandal – are those concerning the way Warmist scientists may variously have manipulated or suppressed evidence in order to support their cause.

The very premise is thin as the “scientific community” has only been keeping very detailed methodical thermometer-based records since the 1880’s.

As a result, blaming the internal combustion engine for radical or dangerous changes in the Earth’s temperatures is the purest sophistry.

In the United States, as of August 1989, there has been little to no temperature change.

Even more disturbing then “scientists” doctoring data to shame common citizens out of their air conditioners and automobiles are government agencies joining the charade.

One wouldn’t expect the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to be involved in the “Global Warming” debate but, apparently, they have a lot of time and money on their hands.  Perhaps “space exploration” isn’t as difficult as it seems.

NASA lent it’s rocket muscle to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in also cooking the books—

Right after the year 2000, NASA and NOAA dramatically altered US climate history, making the past much colder and the present much warmer.  …NASA cooled 1934 and warmed 1998, to make 1998 the hottest year in US history instead of 1934.  This alteration turned a long term cooling trend since 1930 into a warming trend. ~ Steven Goddard

As the “alarming increase” in temperatures became more and more difficult to prove, the threat was re-branded to “Climate Change” which now includes any noticeable alteration in temperature, hot or cold (which we used to call “weather”).

In lock-step, politicians, “scientists”, “journalists” and the greatest experts of all—moviestars—continue to sound the Chicken Little alarm that is the tolling of the bell on your standard of living (but not theirs).

Being an A-list actor is an exhausting business — and Leonardo DiCaprio has a diary so full it would make a lesser playboy weep.

There are parties and premieres around the world and engagements with everyone from UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to the Pope.

As the Mail reported yesterday, only last week he took a day trip from France, where he was at the Cannes Film Festival, to New York, where he received a ‘green’ award.

And back again the following day.

The round trip of 7,942 miles was reportedly completed by private jet — a notoriously environmentally unfriendly way to travel.

It is rather embarrassing for DiCaprio, 41, as he used his Oscar acceptance speech in February to demand action on climate change.

His charitable foundation recently pledged £10 million for various green projects.  He sits on the boards of two eco pressure groups and has made his own environmental documentary — The 11th Hour, which sank like a stone at the box office.  However, DiCaprio doesn’t always practise the carbon footprint aware lifestyle that he preaches.  In the past five months alone, he has travelled at least 90,606 miles by plane in 18 separate trips.  Where private jets are used, the carbon dioxide emitted goes up hugely — between seven and 20 times, depending on the plane. ~ Daily Mail

DiCaprio then took his Climate Change road show to the seat of all world power—Rome—and kissed the ring of the Jesuit Vicar of Christ.

As Rome continues to seek the total enslavement of all mankind, the fraud of “Climate Change” is a top priority for Pope Francis.

In May of 2015, Francis released a special encyclical on the dangers of Climate Change.  In it he harkens to the Gaia worship of “Mother Earth”—

“LAUDATO SI’, mi’ Signore” – “Praise be to you, my Lord”.  In the words of this beautiful canticle, Saint Francis of Assisi reminds us that our common home is like a sister with whom we share our life and a beautiful mother who opens her arms to embrace us.  “Praise be to you, my Lord, through our Sister, Mother Earth, who sustains and governs us, and who produces various fruit with coloured flowers and herbs”.[1]

He referenced Pope Paul VI calling your cars and air conditioners “unchecked human activity” and Pope Benedict (who so kindly made way for Francis by stepping down—he got a Jesuit offer he couldn’t refuse) in stating that “the natural environment has been gravely damaged by our irresponsible behavior.”  This was all caused by too much freedom which the Vatican is very eager to rectify.

These statements of the Popes echo the reflections of numerous scientists, philosophers, theologians and civic groups…

—all of which are run by insiders who use altered date to bolster fraud.

Bergoglio then quoted the pantheism of Francis of Assisi whom he claims is his Papal namesake (not to be confused with Francis Xavier, one of the founders of the Jesuit Order) on how important it is to stop wanting things like the ability to drive a car or keep temperatures in our tiny Agenda 21 domicile livable—

If we approach nature and the environment without this openness to awe and wonder, if we no longer speak the language of fraternity and beauty in our relationship with the world, our attitude will be that of masters, consumers, ruthless exploiters, unable to set limits on their immediate needs.

Perhaps best of all was the Jesuit Pope’s connecting of our “climate emergency” with the need to “redistribute goods”—

Climate change is a global problem with grave implications: environmental, social, economic, political and for the distribution of goods.

Although this sounds extremely appealing when one looks at the wealth of Google, Microsoft, Blackwater/Xe/Academi, Haliburton, HSBC, Bank of America and many, many other Leviathans, this is not the Vicar’s intent as most of those venues are already owned or run by his trusted knights like Blackwater’s Erik Prince.

No, it’s we in the Middle and Lower classes who are the target of the Pontifex Maximus.

Leonardo DiCaprio’s visit must’ve worked.  Exactly one month later the actor received his very first Oscar.

“…all the nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, the kings of the Earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the Earth have become rich through the abundance of her luxury.” ~ Revelation 18:3

Although DiCaprio’s environmental cheek is bold, it’s nothing compared to the High Priest of high temperatures—Al Gore (also known as ManBearPig).

The Gores used about 191,000 kilowatt hours in 2006, according to bills reviewed by The Associated Press spanning the period from Feb. 3, 2006, to Jan. 5.  That is far more than the typical Nashville household, which uses about 15,600 kilowatt-hours per year. ~ CBS News

It’s hard to figure which came first, Pope Francis or Global Warming, but the ManBearPig is a big fan.  In fact, Al Gore is so impressed with Bergoglio’s dedication to deception that he’s ready to become Roman Catholic.

But there’s no such thing as “too much cheek” as was shown by Roman Catholic John Forbes Kerry (Yale Skull & Bones ’66) when he contrasted one Machine boogeyman to another, insisting in July of 2016 that your air conditioner was as frightening a threat as an ISIS terrorist.

But Pope Francis is far from done when it comes to joining hands with “science” to attack Christians and the Bible.  He recently made the bold proclamation that—

The theories of evolution and the Big Bang are real and God is not “a magician with a magic wand”…

This should be no surprise to those who know that the brilliance of the “Big Bang theory” (first there was nothing and then it exploded) came from a Jesuit-trained Roman Catholic priest, or that “evolution” was bolstered by the hoaxes of Jesuit Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.

When the basis for “science” is science fiction (stop and think about just how many movies there are depicting “aliens” and/or “space travel”) it’s easy to plant what Lenin called a “useful idiot” in the top post at NASA—someone who’s all-in for “aliens” and even mashes them into his distorted view of Christianity.

“You know, the universe is a big place.  I’m a practicing Christian, so in my faith, I learn about omnipotent, omnipresent God, which means he’s everywhere.  He’s all-knowing.  He does everything.  And I just cannot bring my little pea brain to believe that a God like that would pick one planet of one of millions of suns and say that’s the only place in the vast universe that I’m going to put any kind of life.  And so the problem is I haven’t been far enough away.” ~ A Conversation With Charles Bolden, Council on Foreign Relations.org

But perhaps NASA’s first black Administrator isn’t such a fool after all.  He at least knows that his masters cherish the strife caused by the manipulated “clash of cultures” and has needlessly added to it with the proclamation that “Muslim outreach” is a top NASA priority.  While Christians, Muslims and Jews fight contrived battles amongst themselves there’s little attention paid to the Papa behind the curtain.

As we become more skeptical of this farce, “the Church” may feel the need to exercise a little force powered by the same Jesuit Communism that has already overturned many nations.

Before the days of Avtomat Kalashnikov rifles and Schmeisser submachine guns, large groups of prisoners were hard to handle with just a few Jesuit priests.  The Company needed to use brains over brawn.  Later, they would be able to appropriate the “brawn” of whole nations.

The appeal of wealth redistribution is that recipients can live a somewhat easier life, though it is a utopia that has always disappointed.

In South America, “social justice” would become the cry for taking from “the rich” and giving to “the poor”.  What usually happens, however, is that the super-rich exploit the poor to bleed the few real producers in the Middle Class.

If this seems like the perfect weapon to be used in the Counter-Reformation, it’s not by coincidence.

The phrase “social justice” was coined by the Jesuit theologian and mentor to Pope Leo XIII, Father Luigi Taparelli D’Azeglio.

Pope Leo XIII’s social encyclical Rerum Novarum, published in 1891, drew on insights from his former teacher, Taparelli. ~ Real Social Justice, Ryan Messmore⁹³⁵

The utility of Communism was immediately seized upon by the Vatican.

Taparelli’s influence on Leo XIII is evident in the encyclical Aeterni Patris (1879) on restoring Thomistic philosophy and in the Magna Charta of Catholic social thought, Rerum Novarum (1891),⁴ the last draft of which was written by Taparelli protégé Matteo Liberatore.  The Jesuit Nell-Breuning employed Taparelli’s principles of sociality (or solidarism, as rephrased by Heinrich Pesch, SJ) and subsidiarity in the drafting of Pius XI’s Quadragesimo Anno. Indeed, Pius XI believed that Taparelli’s writings could “never be studied enough” (Divini illius magistri, 1939) and ranked him in importance for Catholic thought right after Saint Thomas. ~ Thomas C. Behr, University of Houston⁹³⁶

Professor Behr betrays his ideological blindness by comparing Rerum Novarum to the Magna Carta as they couldn’t be more diametrically opposed in their intent.

In the interests of full disclosure, Vincenzo Gioacchino Raffaele Luigi Pecci (Pope Leo XIII) published Rerum Novarum on May 15th, 1891 when the industrialist Robber Barons were strip-mining humanity in their unbridled lust. Nor did Leo XIII endorse the full confiscation of property nor the complete redistribution of wealth and goods.

However, he most certainly did channel his Communist Jesuit mentor, Taparelli with terms like “proletarian” and phrases like “…the spirit of revolutionary change…”. ~ Illuminati Unmasked, Johnny Cirucci, CreateSpace (2015), pp. 315-316

Now Francis can call upon his “Global Catholic Climate Movement” to seek “climate justice”.

Hopefully enough of the sheep wake up before they’re voted into the pot.

UPDATE 15 January 2017, 06:41 AM, EST

Marc Morano of Climate Depot found something of interest in the e-mails of Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff, Barack Obama’s lawyer and Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign Chairman, John Podesta.  No, not the veiled language of child rapists, murderers and sex slave traffickers—

Did you leave a handkerchief

From:ses@sandlerfoundation.org
To: john.podesta@gmail.com
CC: eryn.sepp@gmail.com
Date: 2014-09-02 17:54
Subject: Did you leave a handkerchief

Hi John,

The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems pizza-related. Is it yorus? They can send it if you want. I know you're busy, so feel free not to respond if it's not yours or you don't want it.

Susaner

From: Kathryn Tate [mailto:kathy@ktate.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 10:04 AM
To: Sandler, Susan
Cc: Sandler, Herbert
Subject: You left something at the Field house

Susan & Herb

I just came from checking the Field house and I have a square cloth handkerchief (white w/ black) that was left on the kitchen island.

Happy to send it via the mail if you let me know where I should send it.

I also meant to inquire yesterday about the pillows you purchased. I can send them as well, if you let me know where they are in the house.

Safe travels to all
Kate

Apparently, Podesta (who trained to become a Jesuit priest) has “Jesuit friends” who are pleased with the Jesuit Pope’s emphasis on using “climate change” to enslave mankind.

Despite leaked emails showing members of Hillary Clinton’s team expressing contempt for Catholics, Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta is apparently fond of Pope Francis because his “Jesuit friends” think the pope is “the real deal” on climate issues.

In an email exchange released by WikiLeaks, Podesta spoke to New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio after de Blasio’s trip to Rome. Podesta took the opportunity to applaud Pope Francis because Podesta claims “all my Jesuit friends say the Pope is the real deal”:

I’m kind of tight. Could you do 2:00 or 2:30? If not, I’ll get on your calendar for when I get back. John PS Great work on climate. Impressive event. As all my Jesuit friends say the Pope is the real deal. Are you going to go to LA for the US China cities climate meeting in the fall?

While de Blasio was Rome, he participated in a conference, sponsored by the Vatican, on how to fight climate change. Pope Francis has actively spoken out against climate change, even reportedly calling it a “sin.”

Although Podesta expressed he is fond of the pope because of the pope’s actions on climate change, other leaked emails show the Clinton chairman involved in email chains that call Catholicism “backwards” and urge a “Catholic spring” to move the religion away from a “Middle Ages dictatorship.” ~ Climate Depot

C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien are both very well-known English writers that have been influencing generations with their works.

The two young professors, once members of a literary group in Oxford, have introduced to the public the fantastic worlds of Narnia and Middle-earth.

In fact, they had a renowned friendship that’s allegedly the source of Lewis’s conversion to Christianity.

The work of Tolkein and Lewis is now both classic and mainstream; having been brought to life many times over in animated and feature film versions.

Why are these relatively old stories so popular?

Why do they continue to be the impetus for efforts in the entertainment industry?

Is there a powerful, perhaps even sinister force at work?  How can that be when both men were such “devout Christians”?

Perhaps the answer lies in exactly what kind of “Christians” they were.

J.R.R. Tolkien: The Lord of the Jesuit Tales

John Ronald Reuel Tolkien (aka J.R.R. Tolkien) was an English writer born in South Africa in 1892.

He’s most known by his classic fantasy works such as The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings trilogy.

Although his family was composed mostly of Protestants, Tolkien’s mother Mabel converted to Catholicism following a trip to Birmingham, England, after the death of Tolkien’s father.

This decision caused Mabel’s Protestant and Baptist family to withdraw her financial support.

Such struggles contributed to her death four years later, but not before she had enrolled John and his brother Hilary Arthur Reuel Tolkien into St. Philip’s Grammar School, associated with the Birmingham Oratory.  There, they were acquitted to Father Francis Xavier Morgan, a Roman Catholic priest, who eventually took custody of Ronald and Hilary.  Morgan was named after Francis Xavier, one of the founders of the Jesuits along with Ignatius Loyola and Peter Faber.  The brothers considered the Oratory as their home, serving as Morgan’s altar boys every morning.

These events set Tolkien to be a devout Roman Catholic.

His mother’s martyr-like perseverance in remaining true to her new faith, despite dire poverty, made a deep impression on Tolkien.  As historian Owen Dudley Edwards eloquently observed: “This meant that Tolkien’s Catholicism was fused with his identity at the most basic points of self-awareness. Clichés about the influence of devout mothers do not begin to describe the force of an inheritance like this.”  He and his brother were left in the care of a Roman Catholic priest at the Birmingham Oratory.  Tolkien persuaded his wife to convert before their marriage.  He attended Mass regularly, often daily, all of his life, although he was displeased with the changes to the Mass following Vatican II. ~ The Ring and the Cross: Christianity and the Lord of the Rings by Paul E. Kerry, p.241, 2011.

The main theme of The Lord of the Rings (LOTR) is the quest to destroy Sauron and his evil ring by a fellowship composed of hobbits, humans, dwarfs and elves.  The Hobbit acts as a prequel and, analogously to the LOTR, it’s also centered in the Middle-earth.

Tolkien’s religious views permeated many of his works, as he discusses the Catholic nature of the LOTR in a letter addressed to his friend, Jesuit priest Robert Murray.

“I know exactly what you mean by the order of grace; and of course by your references to Our Lady, upon which all my own small perception of beauty both in majesty and simplicity is founded.  The Lord of the Rings is of course a fundamentally religious and Catholic work; unconsciously so at first, but consciously in the revision.  I have not put in, or have cut out, practically all references to anything like ‘religion’, to cults and practices in the imaginary world.  For the religious element is absorbed into the story and symbolism.” ~ The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien by J.R.R. Tolkien, p.172, 2000.

Such imagery and metaphor is also seen in the stories of C.S. Lewis.  Tolkien incorporated several occult elements to compose his mythical Middle-earth tales.  Even freemasonic symbolism can be found throughout the stories as is the case with The Doors of Durin portrayed in The Fellowship of the Ring.

However, it is the doctrines of Roman Catholicism that thoroughly permeate this well-known (and well-promoted) fantasy series.

Such religious influences are exemplified in the similarities between the Catholic Mary, “Our Lady”, and character Galadriel, also known as “Lady of the Galadhrim” or “Lady of Light”.

The “conversion” of Gimli a is used to show how “heretics” can be drawn to reconcile with Rome by the power of the ever-virgin “Queen of Heaven.

Gimli is a dwarf that initially viewed the Elves with prejudice.  But upon marveling over Galadriel’s light and grace, he is won over by her.

In the same instance, Galadriel bestowed cloaks of invisibility to hero Hobbits Frodo and Sam as a gift in order to protect them against the sight of unfriendly eyes.  Similarly, there is a Catholic belief that professes one may be “preserved from eternal fire” by using the brown scapular of the Virgin Mary.

There are also some researchers who claim Tolkien believed in distributism (redistribution of wealth and property by force), which is a an economic ideology based on the Catholic social teaching.  The Society of Jesus is the most vocal Catholic order when it comes to “social justice”.

The website Jesuits in Malta features an interview with Dr. Alison Milbank of the University of Nottingham.  According to her, The Hobbit is a story that opposes the dwarves’ selfish desires to accumulate more gold and riches with the altruistic Bilbo, the Hobbit, who decided to share the Arkenstone, the great dwarf ancestral stone, with the men and the elves in order to make peace among them.  She goes on to assert the following:

“…for Tolkien this would have had a political resonance as well, influenced by Catholic social teaching from the early part of the century which was seeking a third way between the extremes of capitalism individualism and socialist denial of the individual.  They sought something called Distributism, where money and goods were to be distributed as widely as possible in society.  And you can see that really underpinning the novel, in a children’s book version.” ~ The Hobbit, an unexpected theological journey by Dr. Alison Milbank.

Robert Lazu, a Romanian Roman Catholic philosopher and theologian, asserted in his paper The Fantastic Secret of Tolkien’s Fairy Tales: Literature and Jesuit Spiritual Exercises that Tolkien might have used Jesuit spiritual exercises while composing his fairy stories.

Although there is no evidence to prove that Tolkien practiced Jesuit spiritual exercises, a few fragments referring to the way in which his fairy stories were conceived entitle us to uphold that their “secret” consisted in the fact that they had been created in a way similar to the practice of “composing the place” from St. Ignatius’s spiritual exercises. …

Tolkien practiced a similar method that involved the visualization of the most minute details of his fantasy world.  Although it is only natural that a writer should picture, as faithfully as possible, the characters and settings of his stories with the help of his own imagination, what Tolkien did clearly separated him from earlier authors: he drew detailed maps and prepared a rigorous chronology of his secondary universe.  In other words, he requested, as no other modern fiction writer had previously done, an increased degree of exactness on the part of the reader with regard to the “structuring” of his fantastic world.  He acted much like a regular Jesuit master in offering spiritual exercises to his disciples. He proposed an imaginary framework meant to help us experience powerful and profound emotions resulting in a commitment of our entire being to pondering the dominant values of Middle-earth.  Yet, there is more to it than meets the eye. …

In my opinion, Tolkien presented the world with singular writings, literary creations that contain truths that cannot and should not be presented as “scientific truths” to the present-day reader.  Once again, we encounter a good use of creative imagination perfectly harmonizing with a sound mind.  Tolkien was not just a “secular” counterpart to St. Ignatius.  On the contrary, he reminds us of the lesson that Aquinas, the “Angelic Doctor,” left to posterity—the harmony between faith and reason.  Tolkien urges us to learn, alongside his characters, how to distinguish between Good and Evil and how to fight unrelentingly to protect what is morally right. ~ Light Beyond All Shadow: Religious Experience in Tolkien’s Work by Paul E. Kerry and Sandra Miesel, p.124, 2011, [emphasis mine].

The Jesuit spiritual exercises integrate the core of what is called Ignatian spirituality named after its founder Ignatius of Loyola.  The Exercises deeply rely on the use of imagination during religious meditation and they are allegedly designed to free one of his own desires and even individual identity in order to solely obey what the adherent understands as “God’s will”.

Martin Scorsese’s new movie Silence will tell the story of violence and persecution two young Jesuits suffered in Japan in the seventeenth century.  It’s most probable that the motive of persecution, which is the Jesuit involvement and subversion of that nation’s political affairs, will not be discussed.  Neither their resultant expulsion from every country in which they held a mission, for similar reasons.

Scorsese was raised in such a devoted Catholic environment that it led him to spend a year in seminary.  The renowned film director used Jesuit James J. Martin as a trusted adviser on the film.  Father Martin was also in charge of helping the actors immerse themselves in Jesuit spirituality.  The star of the film, Andre Garfield (of The Amazing Spider-Man fame), recounted his experiences with the spiritual exercises:

By the end of it Garfield admitted, “I got totally swept up in all things Jesuit and very taken with Jesuit spirituality.”  He was so immersed in Jesuit spirituality that Garfield would stop and make suggestions on the set of the film, saying, “A Jesuit wouldn’t say that.” ~Philip Kosloski, Aleteia, December 8, 2016.

It is interesting to note that Garfield is Jewish.  As Scorsese will not be dealing with the reasons behind the Jesuit expulsion from Japan, it seems to be a forgone conclusion that Andrew Garfield is completely ignorant of Jewish persecution at the hands of the “Society of Jesus”.

Tolkien could have acquired his Jesuit writing style during his stay at Stonyhurst College, a Jesuit boarding school.  He spent time in one of the guesthouses and one of the classrooms in order to compile the LOTR trilogy.

“Tolkien was renowned for his love of nature and wooded landscapes and the countryside around Stonyhurst College and St Mary’s Hall is richly beautiful. The area is dotted with names that are familiar from The Lord of the Rings – Shire Lane in Hurst Green, for instance, or the River Shirebourn. Perhaps named after the Shireburn Family who had built Stonyhurst and owned the estate in the 16th and 17th centuries. The green countryside is dominated by the dark shape of Pendle Hill, famous for its association with witches, sorcery and black magic in the 16th century – surely inspiration for Middle Earth’s Misty Mountains or The Lonely Mountain?” ~BBC Lancashire, October 28, 2014.

Moreover, three of his sons attended Stonyhurst.  His eldest son John studied to become a priest after being evacuated from Rome during the Second World War, while his other son Michael was a professor there.  The place ended up being a source of inspiration for his Middle-earth.  Tolkien’s original manuscripts are kept at Jesuit Marquette University.

Another important personality who attended Stonyhurst was George Herbert Walker, the maternal grandfather and uncle of his namesake, George Herbert Walker Bush, Jr. (Skull and Bones ‘48) —the 41^st President of the United States and the 11^th Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.  As President of the investment bank Brown Brothers, Harriman, Walker was a key figure in bankrolling and enabling the rise of the Third Reich.  This was done to insure the Jesuit-managed Hegelian dialectic of Nazism verses Communism which was the source of unbelievable suffering in the Second World War and subsequent “Cold War”.

Admired by Pope Francis, J.R.R. Tolkien was, and still is, an important asset to the Jesuits and the Vatican; which justifies the amount of exposure his works have received through to the present day.  Tolkein was most assuredly not a great writer who happened to also be Roman Catholic.  He was and is a Jesuit-controlled agent of using fantasy to instill warmth and openness to Roman Catholicism.

C.S. Lewis: Chronicles of an Ecumenical Writer in the Service of Rome

Close friend to devout Roman Catholic J.R.R. Tolkien, Clive Staples Lewis (aka C.S. Lewis) was born in Belfast, N. Ireland in 1898.  He’s commonly portrayed as coming from a bigoted Protestant family due to his maternal grandfather, Anglican priest Rev. Thomas Hamilton and Hamilton’s anti-Catholic views.  Nevertheless, Hamilton served as a priest in Rome prior to returning to Ireland.

On the other hand Lewis’ mother, Florence (Flora) Hamilton, was known for her tolerance towards Catholics, even hiring several to work in her home and to look after Lewis and his brother Warren.  Both Clive and Warren were frequent guests at the local monastery in Blackfriars, Oxford of Fr. Gervase Mathew.  In addition, a “miracle” witnessed by Flora while still living in Rome may have inspired one of the characters of Narnia.

While Thomas Hamilton was living in Rome, incidentally, something occurred which entered into family legend and eventually formed a seed for C. S. Lewis’s most famous story.  Hamilton’s daughter Flora – C. S. Lewis’s mother – was then a little girl.  One afternoon she and some grown-ups escaped the scorching heat of the pavement by walking into a church.  Under one of the altars there was the body of a saint lying in a glass case.  While no grown-up was looking, Flora distinctly saw this figure open her eyelids.  Just as when Lucy comes back from the other side of the wardrobe and discovers that everyone thinks Narnia is a product of her imagination, so the Hamiltons failed to believe in Flora’s “miracle”.  The difference between Flora and Lucy was Flora did not herself believed that she had witnessed anything miraculous.  “I thought it was done by cords pulled by a priest behind the alter [sic].”  Nevertheless, the pattern of the story – a little girl who has seen a wonder in which the rest of her family refuse to believe – is structurally the same as that of the Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. ~ C.S. Lewis: A Biography by A.N. Wilson, p.2, 1990.

Another possible source of inspiration for Lewis in the character of Lucy in his Chronicles of Narnia may actually have been a Dominican tertiary, the Blessed Lucy of Narni.

…today is the actual feast day of the actual Blessed Lucy of Narnia. …

The life of the real Lucy is even more magical and wondrous even than the one CS Lewis imagined for “Queen Lucy the Valiant”.

Born in the late fifteenth century, Blessed Lucia (“Lucy” in English) Brocadelli was from the ancient Umbrian town of Narni (“Narnia” in Latin).  A pious child, she is said to have received visions from an early age.  Following her father’s death in her early teens, she was married off by her uncle to Pietro, Count of Milan, though they lived as brother and sister.

As Countess, she was famed for her life of prayer and care for the poor, baking bread for them herself (ably assisted, it is said, by a number of Saints from Heaven).  The lure of religious life proved irresistible. And the couple separated, she to become a Dominican tertiary, and he ultimately to join the Franciscans.

Among much else, Lucy of Narnia received the stigmata and became prioress of a convent, before ultimately spending her final four decades locked up by her successor. She died in 1544. In 1710, her body incorrupt, she was beatified by Pope Clement XI. ~ The real Blessed Lucy of Narnia was even more amazing than CS Lewis’s imagination, the Catholic Herald

Lewis went on to hold academic positions at Oxford University and according to Jesuit Peter Milward, he was an occasional guest of Jesuit Thomas Corbishley, the then Master of Campion Hall.  The Society of Jesus runs Campion Hall as one of the Permanent Private Halls of Oxford University.  Undoubtedly, Lewis acquitted himself to many Jesuits during his tenure there, as evidenced by his frequent letters to or about them.  In a letter to Milward from June 27, 1963; Lewis addresses his “lacking in the spiritual tact which is so conspicuous among my Jesuit friends in Oxford”.  Moreover, in a letter to Sister Madeleva CSC from April 12, 1954; Lewis asks to be remembered by Jesuit Martin Cyril D’Arcy who, according to him, had a “fine mind, both rich and sharp”.  D’Arcy was Campion Hall’s Master prior to Corbishley.

Interestingly, there were rumors at the time that perhaps Lewis was secretly a Jesuit himself.  These speculations were also corroborated by Christopher Derrick, one of Lewis’s friends.  Regardless of that, his works such as Mere Christianity and Screwtape Letters account for the conversion of innumerous people to Catholicism.

Lewis has been credited (or blamed) in recent years with setting numerous people on the road to Rome.  Such Catholic converts have included many of the serious scholars and disciples of Lewis, some of whom knew him before he died… ~ R.A. Benthall, Ave Maria College, Michigan quoted in C.S. Lewis and the Catholic Church by Joseph Pearce, Ignatius Press, 2003, p.xv.

Perhaps, the appeal to coming to the Roman Catholic Church was mainly due to the ecumenical aspects of his work, reflected especially in Mere Christianity.  The book was Lewis’s attempt to gloss over any theological controversies between Catholics and Protestants in order to establish a generic Christianity suitable to anyone that vaguely related to “God” in any way.  Lewis contributed, and proudly so, to bridge Protestants and Roman Catholics.

If I have not directly helped the cause of reunion, I have perhaps made it clear why we ought to be reunited. ~Mere Christianity, Issue 7 by C.S. Lewis, p.XI, 2001.

The time is always ripe for reunion.  Divisions between Christians are a sin and a scandal and Christians ought at all times to be making contributions toward reunion…the result is that letters of agreement reach me from what are ordinarily regarded as the most different kinds of Christians; for instance, I get letters from Jesuits, monks, nuns, also from Quakers and Welsh Dissenters, and so on. ~ C.S. Lewis, The Grand Miracle, and Other Selected Essays on Theology and Ethics from God in the Dock, (Random House, 1970), p. 35.

In order to accomplish such an ecumenical task, Lewis compromised on many Christian doctrines.  One important example was the parallel between the Mass (transubstantiation) and the Lord’s Supper.  He also believed in Purgatory, although not quite the one professed by the Catholic Church; and praying for the dead, albeit not saints.

Mark Brumley, president of RC Ignatius Press summarizes Lewis’s legacy quite well.

Moreover, Lewis’s distinction between the Christian faith as such and any particular denominational formulation of it, whether Protestant or Catholic or Orthodox, has helped foster a more sympathetic assessment of Catholicism among some Protestants and, ironically, has aided in bringing more than a few searching sheep into the Catholic fold. Protestants who tend to equate Christianity with their Protestant version of it will find in Lewis no ally. (emphasis mine) ~ The Relevance and Challenge of C. S. Lewis by Mark Brumley on November 29, 2005.

Despite his engagement in spiritual matters, his best-known work is the children’s series The Chronicles of Narnia, which tells the story of four ordinary children discovering and exploring the imaginary land of Narnia.  Published in the 1950’s, Lewis was previously assured that his ideas on writing children’s novels were “Jesuitical”, which perhaps may explain the broad coverage the series has enjoyed to this date.

In a letter of 1945 to Dorothy L. Sayers, he declares that he is “all for little books on other subjects with their Christianity latent.  I propounded this in the S.C.R [Senior Common Room at Campion Hall [the Jesuit House of Studies in Oxford] and was told that it was “Jesuitical” ~ The Lion’s World: A Journey into the Heart of Narnia by Rowan Williams, p.15, 2012.

Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams would know.

Romans in vicar vestments run all the way to the top at Westminster.

The 104^th Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Douglas Williams, was recommended by “closet Catholic” Prime Minister Tony Blair and immediately underwent a pagan ceremony to have him promoted to the highest Druidic Degree just prior to his enthronement.³⁷⁵  Williams’ 10 years of “service” included pushing to have his homosexual friend³⁷⁶ Jeffrey John appointed Bishop of Reading³⁷⁷, claiming that sodomy reflected the “love of God”³⁷⁸, calling Sharia law “acceptable” and “unavoidable”³⁷⁹ and announcing that unity of all Christian sects under Rome was a “matter of urgency”.³⁸⁰

This can be explained by his audience in 2003 before the Catholic Pole chemist and salesman who helped get cyanide into the Nazi extermination chambers during WWII,³⁸¹ Karol Józef Wojtyła where, unlike Thomas Cranmer (who burned his hand off rather than serve Rome) he carefully kissed the ring of Pope John Paul II. ~ Secret History: The erased clues that prove who rules the world from behind the curtain. Johnny Cirucci, CreateSpace (2016), pp. 487-488

The most important character in this realm is Aslan, a talking lion that is described as the King of Beasts and son of the Emperor-Over-the-Sea.  Depicted as a protector of the children, Aslan was conceived as an alternative version of Christ.

Although Aslan can be read as an original character, parallels exist with Christ.  In particular, Aslan’s sacrifice and subsequent resurrection parallel Christ’s crucifixion and resurrection.  Aslan also has God-like powers; he created Narnia with a song (The Magician’s Nephew).  The Emperor-Over-the-Sea then refers to God the Father, and Aslan’s country (The Voyage of the Dawn Treader) to heaven.  In The Last Battle a new Narnia is made and also a new Earth, as in the Book of Revelation.  Furthermore, there are biblical references of Christ being called a lion, as in Revelation 5:5 “Then one of the elders said to me, ‘Do not weep.  See, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, has conquered, so that he can open the scroll and its seven seals.’” (NRSV).  When he first appeared at the end of The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, he looked like a lamb, which is also a symbol of Christ, who is frequently described throughout the New Testament as being “The Lamb of God”. ~ Wikipedia

As a result, the Narnia’s tales have been deliberately propagated among Christian circles.  James Dobson’s Focus on the Family promotes the series on radio.  Even the then-governor of Florida, Jeb Bush (a converted Roman Catholic and Knight of Columbus), wants every child in the state to read The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe.  Despite the fact that the stories have been implicated with witchcraft and medieval astrology, Lewis himself was proud to utilize pagan elements in order to introduce Christianity.

Lewis himself believed that pagan mythology could act as a preparation for Christianity, both in history and in the imaginative life of an individual, and even suggested that modern man was in such a lamentable state that perhaps it was necessary “first to make people good pagans, and after that to make them Christians.” ~ Wikipedia

Catholic beliefs are a syncretistic mix of Christianity and pagan elements, namely Babylonian demonism and Chaldean sun worship.  In fact, the association of the lion with the words “beast” and “emperor-over-the sea” may have a meaning complete opposite to Christ, which is found in the last book of the Bible.

The Beast out of the Sea

The dragon stood on the shore of the sea.  And I saw a beast coming out of the sea.  It had ten horns and seven heads, with ten crowns on its horns, and on each head a blasphemous name.  The beast I saw resembled a leopard, but had feet like those of a bear and a mouth like that of a lion.  The dragon gave the beast his power and his throne and great authority.  One of the heads of the beast seemed to have had a fatal wound, but the fatal wound had been healed.  The whole world was filled with wonder and followed the beast.  People worshiped the dragon because he had given authority to the beast, and they also worshiped the beast and asked, “Who is like the beast?  Who can wage war against it?” ~ Revelation 13:1-4 – NIV

Prior to erasing such understanding from the minds of all Christians save Seventh Day Adventists, this passage was clearly understood to be speaking of Rome.

“This calls for a mind with wisdom.  The seven heads are seven hills on which the woman sits.” ~ Revelation 17:9

The seven hills of Rome are legendary to any aware enough of either history or geography.

Although it’s assumed that C.S. Lewis never converted to Catholicism, a Jesuit priest named Guy Brinkworth wrote a letter suggesting that Lewis came very close to a conversion.

In the letters I received from him, he time and time again asked specifically for prayers that God might give him “the light and grace to make the final gesture”. He even went so far as to ask in a postscript to one of his letters for “prayers that the prejudices instilled in me by an Ulster nurse might be overcome”. ~ C.S. Lewis and the Catholic Church by Joseph Pearce, Ignatius Press, 2003.

If in fact he was a secret Catholic or even a disguised Jesuit priest as all the evidence may suggest, it’s more likely that the decision to not disclose his true identity came from his superiors.  Perhaps, even the story about Lewis being a secret MI6 agent might have been disclosed to cover up his real masters.

Lewis died on November 22, 1963.  Curiously, two other preeminent people died within minutes of each other; namely the 35^th President of the United States, John F. Kennedy and the English writer, Aldous Huxley.  It certainly brings to memory another case involving the death of founding fathers John Adams and Thomas Jefferson on the same day: the 4^th of July.  And as one might think, the odds are against mere coincidence.  Even more so when President James Monroe also died on the 4^th of July.

Having a prominent person die on a significant date is the calling card of assassins so good at their work they leave no other trace.  Such is the reputation of the Jesuits.

It’s pointless to discuss if C.S. Lewis indeed became a Roman Catholic.  His works speak for themselves.  The ecumenical seeds he planted in the minds of Protestants and Catholics alike are germinating in the present time.  Bringing multitudes to the “Holy Mother Church” and being admired by Popes were some of Lewis’s achievements.

At a papal audience, Walter Hooper found himself discussing C.S. Lewis with Pope John Paul II.  At the end of the meeting, the Pope gave his own summary of Lewis’s achievement.  Lewis, he said, knew what his “apostolate”, his divine calling, was.  There was a long pause when Hooper thought the Pope had finished.  Then the Pope added “and he did it”. ~ C.S. Lewis in a Time of War: The World War II Broadcasts That Riveted a Nation and Became the Classic Mere Christianity by Justin Phillips, p.296, 2002.

Christ spoke in Mathew 7:16: You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles?

Lewis’s and Tolkien’s fruits are rotten.

UPDATE 16 November 2017

Farnese, Borgia and “Aragorn”

The Jesuits were founded originally as The Society of Jesus on August 15, 1534, the day of  “Assumption”, during a secret ceremony held in the crypt of the Chapel of St. Denis by Ignatius of Loyola (full name Iñigo López de Loyola), Francisco Xavier, Alfonso Salmeron, Diego Lainez, Nicolás Bobadilla from Spain, Peter Faber from Savoy, France, and Simão Rodrigues from Portugal.

Francis Borgia founded the Jesuits

Its constitution was approved by Francis Borgia, a member of the infamous Borgia family , also known as Borja / Borgia, Duke of Grandia, nephew of Pope Alexander VI and patron of Ignatius of Loyola.  Francis Borgia was the main financier and architect of the gradual transformation of the Jesuits in the first order of monks as a military organization within the Catholic Church.  He was also a promoter of adoption of the Papal Bull Regimini militantis ( 27 September 1540 ), by the very close companion of the Borgia family, Alessandro Farnese, Pope Paul III, who first granted the official status of Jesuit order.

Ignatius of Loyola was noticed for the first time by the young Duke of Grandia already in 1529, when he was re-arrested by the Inquisition in relation to extreme practices of religious devotion.  Borgia saw the potential in the devotion of a military charter founded on the extremism preached by Ignatius of Loyola, and his will to establish a military order of monks.  It was the young Borgia, who saved the life of Ignatius from the Inquisition.

On the death of Ignatius in 1557, Francis Borgia should have secured the appointment of a second Superior General.  However, his ambitions were thwarted in by his arch – enemy Giovanni Pietro Carafa, Pope Paul IV (1555-1559).  Carafa had always been one of the biggest opponents of Borgia Pope Alexander VI and promptly named Diego Laynez (Jaime Lainez) as Superior General.

Pope Paul IV died in August of 1559 and he was succeeded by Giovanni Angelo de `Medici (Pope Pius IV).  In both cases, the Superior General of the Jesuits Diego Laynez aligned himself closely to the conduct of the pontiff, proving to be virtually untouchable.

However, when Medici Pope Pius IV tortured and murdered Benedetto Accolti the Younger and other members of the papal families in what was called a conspiracy against him, Cardinal Borgia acted and Pius IV was poisoned and killed December 9, 1565.  A few days later, the Superior General Diego Laynez suffered the same fate and immediately after Cardinal Francis Borgia was unanimously elected as the third Superior General. ~ SouthEast Asian Water And Power Alliance

Francis Borgia, 4th Duke of Gandía was born in Duchy of Gandía, Valencia, on 28 October 1510.  His father was Juan Borgia, 3rd Duke of Gandía, the son of Giovanni Borgia, the son of Pope Alexander VI (Rodrigo Borgia).  His mother was Juana, daughter of Alonso de Aragón, Archbishop of Zaragoza, who, in turn, was the illegitimate son of King Ferdinand II of Aragon.^[1]  His brother, Tomás de Borja y Castro, also became a clergyman, becoming the Bishop of Málaga, and later the Archbishop of Zaragoza. ~ Wikipedia

The daughter of Ferdinand II was Catherine of Aragon, the wife of Henry VIII.  Her inability to give Henry a male heir instead caused him to give birth to the “Church of England” when his request for the marriage to be annulled was denied by Pope Clement VII.  She was pushed aside in favor of Anne Boleyn but not before giving birth to daughter Mary.

The greatest thing Henry ever created was Edward VI.  Along with Oliver Cromwell, they were perhaps the only true Protestants ever to hold power anywhere in the world.  Consequently, Edward was murdered before reaching maturity.  He chose his cousin Lady Jane Grey over his half-sister Mary but Mary was able to steal power in a coup.  She had Lady Jane murdered and then went on a bloody rampage, burning almost 300 English Protestants at the stake earning her the moniker “Bloody Mary”.

Was this why Tolkien’s returning king hero was named “Aragorn”? ~ MIG MAG

• Commit a heinous, unspeakable crime using agents of treason within your own institutions.
• Use those institutions to cover up the crime with a ludicrous official story for mass consumption.
• Allow a carefully-selected “hero” to disclose a partial admonition of the truth which outs key players but never the figure behind the curtain (Rome).
• Give the hero minimal coverage, victimize him but later lionize him along with the victims in the crime.

The “Great Depression” of the 1930s was just such an example, on the heels of a previous example, “World War I”: both of which were completely unnecessary, mass crimes against humanity by the Luciferian Elite.

…the American Branch of the Knights of Malta was established in 1927.  This was one year before the Company created Opus Dei (another international Brotherhood dedicated to the restoration of the Pope’s Temporal Power and the Dark Ages) in Spain and two years before the Knights caused the Great Depression, which in effect made the Jesuits’ Federal Reserve Bank the financial monopoly of the American Empire created in 1868.  This was five years before they attempted to make FDR a fascist dictator who, as President, formally recognized Jesuit-trained Joseph Stalin’s bloody government.  This enabled the American Knights, in control of the Empire’s Military Industrial Complex, to aid the Russian nights in building the Military Industrial Complex of the Jesuits’ Soviet Empire. …

By 1914 the Jesuits were now ready to begin their vengeance – the Second Thirty Years’ War – on a Europe, Russia, China and Japan having banished the Company “forever” from their shores.  The Order would use the Federal Reserve Bank, their financial “Frankenstein,” to pay for it.  The “Fed” was given the exclusive privilege to create credit with no collateral, that is, “out of thin air.”  Like the Bolshevik Revolution – also financed by the Fed – the Jesuits would use their Masonic Jewish Zionists such as Paul Warburg (yearning to rebuild Solomon’s Temple) as the visible leaders of the Fed.  This would enable the Order to justify American anti-Jewish fury at the later date in the person of the ex-Basilian (secret Jesuit) radio-priest, Charles E. Coughlin, “the father of hate radio.”  Being the personal friend of J. Edgar Hoover and FDR, he would blame the Jews for the Order’s Great Depression and the New Deal, calling it “the Jew Deal.” …

The Jesuits waited from 1913 to 1929 to make a virtual monopoly out of their “Frankenstein Fed.”  The Great Depression put all the smaller banks out of business and made the Federal Reserve Bank “lord of all.”  And who caused the Great Depression?  According to FDR’s son-in-law, Curtis Dall, it was the Knight of Malta, Joseph P. Kennedy.  We read:

“The feeling around the Street, in succeeding months, was that there were, in particular, three large short-sellers of stock, allegedly, Tom Bragg, Ben Smith, and Joe Kennedy … Of the three mentioned well-known short-sellers, Joe Kennedy was allegedly the most important, the most powerful and the most successful.  This service … made him invaluable … Was Joe Kennedy carefully selected by world money leaders to sell short?”^{12}

~ Vatican Assassins¹

If you’re a listener to Resistance Rising then you know that “Eric Phelps” sows his excellent information with race-baiting and Jesuit doctrines because he is an incognito Jesuit priest.

“Eric” just happens to be the ultimate example of the Jesuit disinformation game; because he gives a very high percentage of sound, secret knowledge before adding disinformation or distraction, he is not allowed mainstream coverage and he knows his place—which is why he did his best to muddy up his book Vatican Assassins with poor technique.

It’s a good habit to check anyone’s citations or references but especially if you believe them to be an agent of disinformation.

Fortunately for truth-seekers (unfortunately for America), citing Franklin Roosevelt’s son-in-law as source for Joe Kennedy being chosen to take down the Stock Market is accurate—

After confidence was duly shaken, on October 24, 1929, the destruction had to be made deeper, so that the insiders could ultimately reap a substantial harvest before the signal was given for the beginning of operation “reacquisition”.

Of course, it would be most important for us to learn who called the “play” of October 24, 1929.  Probably the actual date was accidental, though the month was evidently selected for the sudden withdrawal of the normal supply of credit.  My guess is that “the signal” came from abroad.  Obviously, much informed selling and short-selling of stocks came before the actual Crash itself, as well as after it, on rallies.  The feeling around the Street, in succeeding months, was that there were, in particular, three large short-sellers of stock, allegedly, Tom Bragg, Ben Smith, and Joe Kennedy.

…Tom Bragg and Joe Kennedy allegedly operated through various large wire houses, chosen as to their location, thus making the sell orders appear as though coming from all over the country.  I saw Ben Smith, however, operate at the close range of five feet.  Of the three mentioned well-known short sellers, Joe Kennedy was allegedly the most important, the most powerful and the most successful.  This service, or operation, if such were the case, made him invaluable, but obviously controllable politically, to important -very important-world money people.  Was Joe Kennedy carefully selected by world money leaders to sell short?

Later on, when Ambassador Kennedy was stationed in London and made his famous “over my dead body” remark about this country not getting sucked into World War II, he was reportedly promptly recalled from his post in London, relegated to Florida for a while to cool off so as to reacquire the “correct” point of view.  He went to Florida.  By whom and why was his point of view re-oriented?  His judgment in London, as strongly expressed about our remaining aloof from the war, was sound. ~ FDR: My Exploited Father-in-Law, Curtis Bean Dall, Dubois Publishing (1967), pp. 119, 120

As a result of this mass-crime of financial enslavement, millions of Americans were devastated; not the least of which were veterans of the first “World War”.

When the traitors in the United States government began playing games with their wartime bonuses, they marched on Washington in 1932.  Not having a future, they built tents with the expectation of a prolonged fight.

The Elite were greatly annoyed by the protest but the soldiers had one, very special ally who showed up to encourage them: United States Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler.

Free Reign

In 1933, Prescott Bush co-ordinated with several large Wall Street firms and attempted a military coup against the Leftist Freemason Franklin Roosevelt.^340,341  It was lose/lose for America; Fascists if they win, Communists if they lose.  Unfortunately for the conspirators, they chose the wrong man for the job.

Major General Smedley D. Butler was the only Marine Corps officer to be awarded not one, but two Congressional Medals of Honor.  He had seen more than his fair share of bloodshed in the Banana Wars where Wall Street fruit interests used Marines to strong-arm themselves massive profits in

Central and South America. Butler wrote a blistering indictment of the profiteering which he delivered as a speech and later a 51-page pamphlet published by Round Table Press titled appropriately War Is A Racket in 1935.  His sentiments then easily read as if spoken by veterans today, broken and disenfranchised by the never-ending “War on Terror”—but only if you multiply Butler’s figures by several times.

The normal profits of a business concern in the United States are six, eight, ten, and sometimes twelve percent.  But war-time profits — ah! that is another matter — twenty, sixty, one hundred, three hundred, and even eighteen hundred per cent — the sky is the limit. …

Take our friends the du Ponts, the powder people…  They were a patriotic corporation.

…let’s look at their average yearly profit during the war years, 1914 to 1918. Fifty-eight million dollars a year profit we find! …  An increase in profits of more than 950 per cent. …

How many of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle?  How many of them dug a trench?  How many of them knew what it meant to go hungry in a rat-infested dug-out? …

But Major General Butler refused to be the front man for the coup against Roosevelt and in 1933 he turned informant on Prescott Bush and co-conspirators like Ambassador to the Soviet Union Averell Harriman (Skull and Bones class of 1913) who’s Guarantee Trust made profits off of both the Nazis and the Communists.

No action was taken. ~ Illuminati Unmasked ²

Unfortunately for the soldiers, the traitors in government owned the power of coercive force and they weren’t afraid to use it—especially given that the Praetorian Guard entrusted with that power had no scruples in breaking their oaths to protect and defend Constitutional freedom for the citizenry.

The marchers remained at their campsite waiting for Hoover to act.  On July 28, 1932, Attorney General William D. Mitchell ordered the police to remove the Bonus Army veterans from their camp.  When the veterans moved back into it, police drew their revolvers and shot at the veterans, two of whom, William Hushka and Eric Carlson, died later.^[11][12]

Hushka (1895– July 28, 1932) was an immigrant to the United States from Lithuania.  When the US entered World War I in 1917, he sold his butcher shop in St. Louis, Missouri and joined the United States Army.  After the war, he lived in Chicago.^[12]  Hushka is buried in Arlington National Cemetery.^{[citation needed]}

Carlson (1894 – August 2, 1932) was a US veteran from Oakland, California.  He fought in the trenches of France in World War I.^[12][13][14]  He was interred in Arlington National Cemetery.^[15] ~ Wikipedia

One would’ve expected that the horror of shedding innocent blood would’ve put an end to the government effort to uproot the veterans.

Not only were the murdering police not prosecuted, U.S. government traitors took their abuse to the next level.  They ordered Ararat Shriner Freemason General Douglas MacArthur to unleash Fort Howard’s 3^rd Calvary on the protestors.  MacArthur had an aggressive Regimental Commander who prized his personal advancement above his Oath

At 4:45 p.m., commanded by General Douglas MacArthur, the 12th Infantry Regiment, Fort Howard, Maryland, and the 3rd Cavalry Regiment, supported by six battle tanks commanded by Maj. George S. Patton, formed in Pennsylvania Avenue while thousands of civil service employees left work to line the street and watch.  The Bonus Marchers, believing the troops were marching in their honor, cheered the troops until Patton ordered^{[citation needed]} the cavalry to charge them, which prompted the spectators to yell, “Shame!  Shame!”^{[citation needed]}

After the cavalry charged, the infantry, with fixed bayonets and tear gas (adamsite, an arsenical vomiting agent) entered the camps, evicting veterans, families, and camp followers.  The veterans fled across the Anacostia River to their largest camp, and Hoover ordered the assault stopped.  MacArthur chose to ignore the president and ordered a new attack, claiming that the Bonus March was an attempt to overthrow the US government; 55 veterans were injured and 135 arrested.^[12]  A veteran’s wife miscarried.  When 12-week-old Bernard Myers died in the hospital after being caught in the tear gas attack, a government investigation reported he died of enteritis, and a hospital spokesman said the tear gas “didn’t do [him] any good.”^[16]

During the military operation, Major Dwight D. Eisenhower, later the 34th president of the United States, served as one of MacArthur’s junior aides.^[17]  Believing it wrong for the Army’s highest-ranking officer to lead an action against fellow American war veterans, he strongly advised MacArthur against taking any public role: “I told that dumb son-of-a-bitch not to go down there,” he said later.  “I told him it was no place for the Chief of Staff.”^[18]  Despite his misgivings, Eisenhower later wrote the Army’s official incident report that endorsed MacArthur’s conduct.^[19] ~ Wikipedia

It is no coincidence that all three “yes men” played a significant role in the next World War.  Unfortunately for George Patton, he played his role a little too well and repeatedly denied orders to stop winning.  Because of his hesitation in obeying treason, he was ordered killed by the Papal Knight of Malta who founded the “Office of Strategic Services”, William Donovan.

Bread & Circuses

An alteration of the game has just been played upon us recently and claimed to have been the “democratic” election of United State President.

A Jesuit-educated clown named Donald John Trump has been elevated to take the baton from the Teleprompter-in-Chief.

He is yet another sick Roman joke on the American people.

Trump has done everything from body-block Vince McMahon and shave his head at a WWE event to shoving his face into the fake breasts of the Roman Catholic cross-dressing Mayor of New York City, Rudolph Giuliani (the Roman gate-keeper on guard in NYC during the treason that was 9/11).

With America’s other “choice” being a vicious Communist serial criminal, Hillary Rodham Clinton (also carefully controlled by Rome), millions were goaded into making Trump their savior.

It was a sad, sick, spectacle and continues to be.

As part of her military conquest by Rome, America has been inundated by tens of millions of illegal alien Hispanic Roman Catholic immigrants for generations.  Both captured, controlled political parties continue to enable the self-destruction of wide-open borders proving that all in leadership are seditious agents of a foreign enemy.

Although Trump has been sure to grand-stand the issue (careful to needlessly fan the flames of racial hatred in the process), he will no-sooner “close the borders” than Barack Obama closed the terrorist-indoctrinating torture facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (our supposed enemy).  It was a key promise made by the 2008 Obama campaign.

Guantanamo Bay is still going strong, taking innocent Muslims and torturing them until they willingly choose to help continue the Papacy’s fraudulent “War on Terror” as enemy terrorists.

These crimes are made possible by keeping the facility off U.S. soil in the Jesuit-controlled stronghold of Cuba.  Fidel Castro has been a loyal Catholic Communist, carefully trained by the Jesuits which is why the CIA has been “unable” (unwilling) to overthrow him and his criminal cartel family for over 50 years.

Trump recently breathed a sigh of relief at not being called on his bluff to “send them all home”.

The Republican Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan, was quick to make a statement after Trump’s “election” that there would not be any action taken on the Rome’s army of illegal Catholic “voters”.

Ryan is a Roman Catholic and former altar boy who, according to the Wall Street Journal, has Roman roots that “reach deep”.  He took over from Jesuit-educated (Xavier ‘77) Republican John Boehner who rubber-stamped each and every self-destructive Democrat agenda from socialized medicine to the national debt—now at a treasonous, nation-killing $19,000,000,000,000.

Boehner took over from his “political opponent”, Nancy Pelosi, carefully kissing her while taking the gavel.  Pro-homosexual, pro-abortion, “anti-war” (but not really) Pelosi was also trained by a Jesuit; Stephen J. Privett, President of the University of San Francisco.

Being unable to oust Fidel is in stark contrast to how the CIA treated its Commander in Chief in 1963, John F. Kennedy.

Only the most gullible believe that Lee Oswald shot the 35^th President of the United States.

Mountains of evidence can be summarized by the brutality of the 8mm film taken by Abraham Zapruder which shows the fatal shot coming from Kennedy’s front, knocking his head “back and to the left” and taking off a large portion of Kennedy’s skull and brain with the exit of the round.  Jackie is then seen attempting to recover her husband’s flesh from the trunk of the Presidential limousine.

Oswald said it, himself, “I’m just a patsy.”

The freezing of communications during the assassination, changing the route to include the stop and slow turn down Elm Street through Dealey Plaza, waiving off security assistance from the Army’s 112^th Military Intelligence out of nearby Fort Sam Houston or ordering select Secret Service agents to stand down—

What Americans need to understand is that their own institutions are their greatest enemy and those of “Intelligence” and “Law Enforcement” or “Justice” are the most ironically corrupt.

The FBI’s role in colluding with the CIA to murder Jack Kennedy is an excellent example.

Federal Bureau of Obfuscation

With good reason was the FBI a willing partner in the public slaughter of President John F. Kennedy.  Like the CIA, they don’t work for the American people and never did.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation was created by Charles Joseph Bonaparte, a distant relation to French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte.²⁵³

Bonaparte was from Lord Baltimore’s Catholic colony of Mary-land, from the very namesake city of her benefactor.  The Jesuits were in the business of gathering intelligence on their enemies and the FBI would do that in spades.  They readily admit the origins of their creator from their own “about us”, though with only a short phrase amongst his “accomplishments”.

As a Catholic [Bonaparte] was never absent from his pew in Baltimore Cathedral on Sunday mornings…²⁵⁴

But soon, the FBI would metastasize into far worse than just an intelligence-gathering operation and graduate into actually facilitating disasters and helping to cover them up once they occurred.

In his review of the book Pretty Boy Floyd²⁵⁵, NY Times critic Sidney Zion reminds us of how the FBI quietly chose to ignore the big criminal interests that were destroying America and focus on the sensationalized banditos robbing a single bank here and there—even to the extreme of telling the American public, “There’s no such thing as ‘organized crime’.”

…after his G-men cut down John Dillinger outside the Biograph movie house in Chicago, J. Edgar Hoover elevated Charles Arthur (Pretty Boy) Floyd to Dillinger’s exalted position as Public Enemy No. 1, catapulting him over such bank-robbing peers as Baby Face Nelson, Machine Gun Kelly and Ma Barker and her sons.

In the summer of 1934, the following candidates failed to make Mr. Hoover’s F.B.I. hit parade: Meyer Lansky, Lucky Luciano, Bugsy Siegel, Frank Costello, Owney Madden, Lepke Buchalter, Gurrah Shapiro, Dutch Schultz, Albert Anastasia, Tommy Lucchese, Joe Profaci, Moe Dalitz—to name just a few of the lads who ran organized crime in the United States.

It was Hoover’s genius to play up the hick bandits who roamed the sticks, living off pathetically unsecured banks, while ignoring the men who ran America’s rackets.  Intent on setting himself up as the Godfather of law enforcement, Hoover understood that to tangle with the mob was a prescription for failure, for it inevitably meant taking on the big-city political bosses and the labor unions, those bedrocks of the New Deal.  During the Depression, nobody but the mobsters seemed to have the cash so badly needed by the pols.²⁵⁶

Zion explains this away as a practical necessity for the FBI—the United States government was afraid to do its job and go after the Mafia.

The reality is that the FBI was doing the bidding of a higher authority.

Italian blogger Piazza del Popolo points us towards a helpful source.

According to Maria Antoinetta Calabro’ in her book “Le Mani Della Mafia” (The Hands of the Mafia), for decades the Sicilian Mafia and its American counterparts used the Vatican bank, known as IOR (Institute for Religious Works) to launder its money.²⁵⁷

Missing Evidence

Whenever there has been a tragedy of political significance, the FBI immediately shows up, not to investigate, but to cover up any wrongdoing that traces back to traitors in the United States government. ~ Illuminati Unmasked, Johnny Cirucci, CreateSpace (2015), pp. 70-71

As far as Hoover was concerned, local dice games were far more dangerous to the American people!

The story that was later concocted as to why J. Edgar would spend decades denying that the Vatican’s criminal friends in organized crime even existed was because he was a sexual deviant and the Mafia had the goods on him.

Of course Hoover being a homosexual cross-dresser is true.  He promoted his “friend” Clyde Tolson to Associate Director where he stayed for forty-two years.

Wikipedia states that Tolson was “primarily responsible for personnel and discipline.”

Right.

It has been stated that J. Edgar Hoover described Tolson as his alter ego: “They rode to and from work together, ate lunch together, traveled together on official business, and even vacationed together.”^[10] ~ [ibid]

Sexual perversion is a prerequisite in the halls of power.

The FBI would play a key role in covering up the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and the men used by the CIA were all sexual deviants, as was found out by New Orleans Parish District Attorney Earling Caruthers “Jim” Garrison.

It is not well known, but at that point Garrison was firmly believing that the whole plot was a gay-based plot, with the motive being what he called “thrill killing.”  This is astounding, but it is based on multiple credible sources. James Phelan was a journalist who in the early days of Garrison’s case had written a positive article for the Saturday Evening Post. As a result Garrison invited him in to give him an “exclusive” story about the investigation.  The following jaw-dropping excerpt from Phelan’s book, Scandals, Scamps and Scoundrels, lays out Garrison’s primary theory at the time:

In an effort to get Garrison’s story into focus, I asked him the motive of the Kennedy conspirators.  He told me that the murder at Dallas had been a homosexual plot.

“They had the same motive as Loeb and Leopold, when they murdered Bobbie Franks in Chicago back in the twenties,” Garrison said.  “It was a homosexual thrill-killing, plus the excitement of getting away with a perfect crime. John Kennedy was everything that Dave Ferrie was not — a successful, handsome, popular, wealthy, virile man.  You can just picture the charge Ferrie got out of plotting his death.”

I asked how he had learned that the murder was a homosexual plot.

“Look at the people involved,” Garrison said. “Dave Ferrie, homosexual.  Clay Shaw, homosexual.  Jack Ruby, homosexual.”

“Ruby was a homosexual?”

“Sure, we dug that out,” Garrison said.  “His homosexual nickname was Pinkie.  That’s three.  Then there was Lee Harvey Oswald.”

But Oswald was married and had two children, I pointed out.

“A switch-hitter who couldn’t satisfy his wife,” Garrison said.  “That’s all in the Warren Report.”  He named two more “key figures” whom he labeled homosexual.  “That’s six homosexuals in the plot,” Garrison said.  “One or maybe two, okay.  But all six homosexual?  How far can you stretch the arm of coincidence?”

So Lee Harvey Oswald was gay.  Jack Ruby was gay.  The conspirators in the killing were all gay.  The biggest crime of the century was entirely gay based.  Phelan’s take is corroborated by many others, including Life Magazine reporter Richard Billings, who was in Garrison’s inner circle at the time, and kept detailed notes of their conversations.

At some point along the way the “thrill-killing” theory was replaced by a theory based around right-wing zealots and CIA operatives.  It appears that occurred as left wing conspiracy theorists descended on New Orleans after the case became public and convinced Garrison to change his focus. ~ The Gay Angle In the JFK Assassination, Dennis Stone, 26 November 2013, The New Millennial Gay Experience

Clay Shaw was a key figure who tied it all together; a flawed sexual deviant who compensated with fanatical devotion to the Catholic ruse of “fighting Commies”.  As Army Intelligence stationed in Italy during World War II, Shaw was just the man the Jesuits could use to commit high treason.

Jim Garrison found³ Shaw had been on the board of Centro Mondiale Commerciale, a subdivision Permindex—a stock-holding front company for clandestine operations for Western Intelligence like the CIA.  CMC was based in Rome while Permindex was based in Switzerland.  Switzerland also happens to be where the Templars went underground after being suppressed in 1307.

French Canadian author Maurice Philipps has asserted that Rome, not New Orleans, was the location from which the murder of America’s 35^th President was planned and carried out.

Since April 2010, I have posted on this forum documents that I have unearthed from the Louis M. Bloomfield Archives held by Library and Archives Canada (LAC).  Those documents dealing with Permindex were posted under a “Louis Mortimer Bloomfield” thread (Louis M. Bloomfield thread) that was started in 2006 at a time where I shared with members of The Education Forum the news relating to the legal battle I engaged with LAC and the Canadian government in order to make the Louis M. Bloomfield [case] opened.

Today, I’m starting this new Bloomfield, Permindex and the CIA thread because I believe that the JFK assassination researchers should take a new look at the Permindex issue under the enlightening information contained in the E. Howard Hunt death bed confession.  At a first level, Hunt’s confession pointed a finger at President Johnson and Cord Meyer, but what may be the more interesting piece of information from Hunt is his description of the operational aspect of the JFK conspiracy, in which he implicated William Harvey, who in 1963 was Chief of CIA station in Rome, the city where Permindex and Centro Mondiale Commerciale (CMC) were located.

E. Howard Hunt, who also specified that Bill Harvey organized the assassination from Rome and hired Corsican sharpshooters, was thus giving us an important missing link necessary to understand how an Italian corporation as Permindex could be related to the JFK conspiracy. As of now, only Clay Shaw could be related to this Italian company since he was a member of CMC directorship.

Documents found in the Bloomfield Archives gave us more details on the structure and leadership of Permindex.  For instance, they show that Ferenc Nagy was the active leader of Permindex and, in 1960, was making contact with David Rockefeller in order to develop the New York City’s World Trade Center on the model of the CMC.

When we combine the E. H. Hunt’s revelation, the information form the Bloomfield archives and some little known documents released by NARA under the JFK documents program, we start to sketch a coherent picture in which the JFK assassination seems to be carried by (rogue?) members of the CIA [no, and Philipps did well to be equivocal there] using Permindex as part of the Italian Gladio network put in place to combat Soviet Communism. ~ The Educational Forum

But New Orleans was an important location for a different reason.

Jim Garrison was the only law enforcement official to question the Warren Report.  He was humiliated and had his reputation besmirched but his career didn’t suffer, although his marriage did.

Garrison is reputed to have abused his wife, whose maiden name was Leah Elizabeth Ziegler, and they divorced in 1980 only to remarry just five months before Garrison’s death in 1992 at 71 of an unnamed cancer.  Garrison lived long enough to play Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren in Oliver Stone’s movie JFK.

The Garrison of Stone’s movie was a lone seeker of justice standing courageously in the face of the full weight of a treasonous American government…but was he?

As I’ve shown you conclusively in Illuminati Unmasked, at the top of the pyramid of evil is the Vatican run and empowered by her satanic special forces, the Jesuits.  Below her are many powerful organizations from the Mafia to Freemasonry to the Central Intelligence Agency and many others.  It seems unusual that a District Attorney could track Clay Shaw  to Rome but only see a CIA connection.

It seems even more so that Garrison would be the District Attorney of Orleans Parish and not have connections in the Catholic Church.

New Orleans was founded by Canadian Jean-Baptiste Le Moyne, also known as “Sieur de Bienville”.

Le Moyne was 4 times governor of Louisiana although one must dig very deep to see that he was also an “enthusiastic supporter” of the Company of Loyola.⁹⁸ ~ Secret History, Johnny Cirucci, CreateSpace (2016), p. 129

What was Jim Garrison before he was DA?  —He was a Special Agent for the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Seattle.

Coincidence?

Of course the FBI is a massive organization that needs the majority of its employees to believe the lie that it truly serves the American people.  Only special, well-placed insiders organize and commit murder to cover up treason—

Rachel Maddow Admits the FBI Made a ”Mess” Executing Ibragim Todashev from Johnny Cirucci on Vimeo.

But Jim Garrison wasn’t an FBI administrator, he was a Special Agent who became District Attorney in a city extremely important to the Papacy—one tied to both the Vatican’s murder of Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy.⁴

What’s even more damning is that Garrison continued to be a good Company man in regards to the FBI’s ludicrous stance on organized crime—that it doesn’t exist.

More than one source has stated that was because Garrison was in bed with that same non-existent organized crime.

Garrison’s New Orleans was a hotbed of illegal, covert paramilitary operations where corruption, disguise and deception had produced an intelligence cottage industry.  In the 1960’s, it was the city where the Mafia, anti-Castro exiles and self-styled intelligence spooks joined hands to celebrate what they called their patriotic bonds and to condemn their common enemies—Castro, Communists, Liberals…

Entrenched interests dominated the order of the day.  In particular, New Orleans was a mature organized crime haven, where political campaign contributions and outright bribery insulated Mafia bosses like Carlos Marcello.  In the final analysis, the power source of the city that made its own rules and regulations as it went along, was the cozy relationship between Mob Lords like Carlos Marcello and high ranking law enforcement officials like Jim Garrison.

Unaccountable corruption is probably the most common feature of the politics of the 1960’s in New Orleans.  Mobsters like Carlos Marcello relied upon “the Fix” or the working relationship between public officials and the Mafia and they were accustomed to sharing power.  The sheer audacity of “the Fix” is absolutely astounding.  When the Kennedy Justice Department targeted Jimmy Hoffa, the Mafia responded through the Governor of Louisiana, who set up a meeting where the mob offered the key prosecution witness one million dollars to change his testimony.  It was a desperate, foolish bribe which was prompted and ultimately exposed, only because a series of dynamite explosions failed to murder targeted witness.  In the face of such violent, blatant corruption, the fact that powerful Mafia Bosses like Carlos Marcello survived criminal prosecution in the 1960’s, is astounding and illuminating.  In 1967, Life Magazine printed the following account of the Mob Lord: “He [Marcello] operates through a complex of political Fixes which enable him to control the makers and enforcers of law at every level of state government.”  Friends in high places were clearly responsible for the lapse in American justice, which saw the power of Marcello grow despite press scrutiny and astute Louisiana newcomers like Aaron Kohn identified the peculiar flavour of New Orleans “politicking” when he said: “After about a year, I began to realize something about the system here.  In Chicago, people were generally on one side of the fence or the other—honest or crooked.  But in Louisiana there just isn’t any fence”.  Jim Garrison, who was elected District Attorney in 1962, embodied the fact that “the fence” had been dismantled when he falsely claimed that the Mafia did not exist despite his association with Marcello’s henchman, Mario Marino, who operated the Sands Hotel in Las Vegas.  Garrison routinely accepted the hospitality of the Mafia and instead of cutting off his indebtedness, he said: “I may be naive—this is my first public office—but I don’t see what’s wrong with it”.  Frequent meetings between Garrison investigator Pershing Gervais and Carlos Marcello, further cemented the fact that in New Orleans, business was transacted in cooperation with the Marcello Mafia.  Like J. Edgar Hoover, Jim Garrison responded to Life Magazine disclosures by using the power of his office to manufacture the impression that organized crime did not exist. …

In the final analysis, Jim Garrison was essentially J. Edgar Hoover’s clone in New Orleans. ~ Jim Garrison & Carlos Marcello: Hoover’s Enforcers, Mat Wilson⁵

Wilson is not the only one claiming Garrison had Mafia ties.

In September, 1967, Richard Billings told Garrison that Life Magazine was no longer willing to work with him in the investigation.  Billings claimed that this was because he had come to the conclusion that he had links to organized crime.  Soon afterwards, Life began a smear campaign against Garrison.  It was reported that Garrison had been given money by an unnamed “New Orleans mobster”. ~ Jim Garrison, John Simkin, Spartacus Educational.com, September 1997

It created the perfect quagmire of questions and an easy avenue from which to attack the most important part of Jim Garrison’s investigation and, later, Oliver Stone’s movie JFK.

“Jim Garrison attacked the FBI to cover for his Mafia benefactors.”

The truth is that the Mafia played almost no role in the murder of John F. Kennedy.  Garrison and Stone get it impeccably right but stop well short of the most important question: who is at the top of this conspiracy?

Oliver Stone’s JFK used material from Jim Garrison, “investigative journalist” Jim Marrs and apparent whistleblower Leroy Fletcher Prouty.  The movie completely skipped over any Vatican connections and even attempted to give the Papacy an implied clean bill of health by pushing the idea that David Ferrie was defrocked immediately upon clergy perceiving that he was homosexual.

The epidemic of pedophile priests in America, and the sickening criminal behavior of their superiors carefully shielding them and even moving them to new dioceses where they could continue to prey upon innocent children clearly disproves that angle.

It is more likely that Ferrie was seen to be of greater use in intelligence than the priesthood and his path was carefully manipulated to turn out that way.

Temple Professor of English Joan Mellen is an ardent supporter of Jim Garrison and his legacy.

Like all professors, she apparently has plenty of time to write over 20 books, many of them about the turbulent 60s.

Professor Joan seems as oblivious of the role the Vatican and the Jesuits have played in politics then and now as Oliver Stone, Jim Marrs and L. Fletcher Prouty.

Like all of those other names, she presents well-researched work that ends up being disinformation by omission.

One would think it impossible to write about Jim Garrison, Haiti or the Columbian writer Gabriel Garcı́a Márquez without writing the word “Jesuit” but Professor Mellen manages it well.

The cesspool of Haiti was made possible only by the Jesuits.  Haitian President from 1991 to 2004 Jean-Bertrand Aristide was an ardent supporter of “liberation theology”.  He learned the Jesuit doctrine while he was a Jesuit priest (although this is being re-written to make him a “Salesian” priest).  Thanks to their hard work, Haitian children are sold for slave labor or sex slaves (and for little money).

Like Oliver Stone and Jim Marrs, Joan Mellen acknowledged the human disaster in Haiti at the hands of the CIA but that was all.

“Liberation theology” and “social justice” are Jesuit doctrines that exploit the greed of the very Elite the Vatican installed.  In constant turmoil and civil war, Rome and her minions prosper.

Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler, the only Marine officer twice-awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor, figured out how he and the American military were used in just this way—

I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time.  Now I am sure of it.  Like all the members of the military profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service.  My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups.  This is typical with everyone in the military service.

I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914.  I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in.  I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street.  The record of racketeering is long.  I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912 (where have I heard that name before?).  I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916.  In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested. ~ War is a Racket

Each and every one of those areas was first seeded by the inversely-named “Society of Jesus”.

Perhaps the most glaring omission of the Vatican’s handiwork for Joan Mellen is her biography on Gabriel Garcı́a Márquez.  Márquez was a Jesuit-trained enabler of Catholic Communism and a personal friend of Fidel Castro.

Like Garrison’s On the Trail of the Assassins or Stone’s JFK, Mellen’s book A Farewell to Justice: Jim Garrison, JFK’s Assassination, and the Case That Should Have Changed History is at least an excellent source for destroying the ridiculous Warren Commission Report.

There is no doubt that former Catholic priest David Ferrie was the bridge between the Mafia and the CIA.

Dave had flown Carlos Marcello back to New Orleans after Robert Kennedy had him deported.  Prior to that, Ferrie had traveled to Guatemala to arrange a false passport for Marcello; returning to New Orleans, Ferrie had taped this passport to his chest.  When Eastern Airlines fired Ferrie because of his police record, redolent of crimes against nature, his attorney had been a Carlos Marcello lawyer, G. Wray Gill.  Dave was paying Gill back by working on the Marcello case, which was heard on November 22, 1963.

It was Ferrie’s political affiliations that interested Jim Garrison.  Ferrie had flown for the CIA as a contract pilot, taking off from Tampa, the Keys and Venice, Florida, in sabotage missions: he burned sugarcane fields, dropped propaganda leaflets, and infiltrated and exfiltrated anti-Castro activists.  His handler was Eladio del Valle, a mob-connected Cuban exile, who was also involved in setting up training camps to wage war against Castro.  Del Valle paid Ferrie between $1,000 and $1,500 a mission, missions tracked by Cuban intelligence.  Ferrie also flew for South Central Air Lines, a CIA proprietary.  Ferrie’s CIA employment has been confirmed by ex-CIA employee Victor Marchetti.  By 1959, U.S. Customs had put David Ferrie under twenty-four-hour surveillance.

On occasion, Ferrie flew with another CIA contract pilot named E. Carl McNabb, who would later join Jim Garrison’s investigation in an attempt to redeem a murderous past.  One day they arrived at the School of the Americas in the Panama Canal Zone, a joint project of Robert Kennedy and the CIA for training of the Latin American military.  McNabb met with some resistance.  Dave walked in as if he owned the place.

“I didn’t know your security clearance was so high,” McNabb laughed, a light glittering in his ice-blue eyes. … ~ A Farewell to Justice⁶

However, neither Garrison, Stone nor Mellen seemed able to make the connection of why it all came together in “Orleans Parish”—the heart of Louisiana French Roman Catholicism.

It wasn’t from lack of evidence.

Somewhat more honest, at least, Mellen’s account acknowledges much more about Jack Martin than other sources.

Martin was much more than just hired help for private dick Guy Bannister.  Like all the other players in the drama, Martin was a sexual deviant, a criminal, a “religious fanatic”, and an operative for the Central Intelligence Agency.

Jack Martin had a scar on his chin, chain-smoked and subsisted on bad coffee.  He seemed a broken-down, harmless individual, a hanger-on.  A would-be journalist, he had worked for the Westbank Herald, a right-wing paper owned by a Major Stewart, who bore intelligence ties to Latin America.  In 1958 Guy Banister had been publisher.  Jack also worked for Banister as a sometime private eye, describing himself as “a con man who has stayed just within the law.”  He had mysterious access to police records, information he peddled.  Like David Ferrie, he was a religious zealot, belonging to the same “church.”  Martin was, Robert Buras says, “a type of Ferrie,” both men “highly intelligent.”

Jack Martin also bore a checkered criminal history.  He had been caught in a crime against nature with a homosexual named “Mona Lisa,” and had a police record ranging from disturbing the peace, vagrancy and drunkenness to a 1952 murder charge in Houston, Texas, which had miraculously vanished.  Despite all this, Martin was on a first-name basis with Senator Russell Long and enjoyed access to the office of Attorney General Jack P. F. Gremillion.  Jack could get you a letter certifying you were an honorary attorney general of the state of Louisiana.  Yet on the instructions of Plaquemines Parish czar Leander Perez, Martin had filed a petition to disqualify Gremillion as a candidate for reelection.

In November of 1963, Jack Martin’s business card read, “Martin, Newbrough & Dalzell, Private Investigations.”  The telephone number rang through at Guy Banister’s detective agency, even as Banister’s own intelligence connections ranged from the expected FBI to the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) and CIA.  William Dalzell was a CIA operative, as was Joseph Newbrough, a steady asset of the Domestic Contact Service, which in New Orleans also supervised the clandestine services.  Newbrough was close to another CIA figure shortly to enter this story, Fred Lee Crisman.  Dalzell’s criminal charges had disappeared in a manner similar to Martin’s.  He had joined the Agency in the early fifties, a cryptologist with a “top secret” clearance, and was acquainted with David Ferrie.  In New Orleans, CIA and FBI shared information about Dalzell.

Almost from the start Jim Garrison had come to believe that Lee Harvey Oswald was not observed with anyone who was not connected with the Central Intelligence Agency.  Garrison’s own witnesses were equally Agency-involved.  His instincts were correct, although he never learned that Jack Martin, his first

real witness, not only sewed with military intelligence, but was himself a former CIA employee.  Jack’s real name was Suggs.  His close intelligence ties he kept hidden.  At one point Martin became hysterical at the thought that a television reporter had his photograph.  “There are no photographs of me!” Jack insisted.*

John J. Martin was a low-ranking intelligence assistant.  He joined the Agency in November of 1950 and left supposedly in June of 1958 on a “disability retirement.”  He had been a GS-7 in the Transportation Branch, Services Division.  Like David Ferrie, his rival and nemesis in matters ecclesiastical, Martin had been born in Cleveland, in 1913.  Ferrie was born in 1918.

What emerges from the record is that Jack Martin never left the Agency.  In New Orleans, Martin was assigned to a young man named Thomas Edward Beckham, in a manner similar to Ferrie’s relationship with Lee Oswald.  Beckham was to notice that Martin had in his possession a variety of police credentials, and often posed as a police officer.

In Louisville, Martin had worked for “Echo Blue,” a publication of the Fraternal Order of Police, where he also came to know Archbishop Carl Stanley.  In New Orleans, Martin still carried “numerous police commissions,” making it his business to spy on other policemen.  The “S” in the New Orleans name of Jack S. Martin stood for “Suggs,” Stanley told the FBI.  But it was the same man he knew as John J. Martin.

Stanley created churches.  He raised funds and mixed in politics, and John J. Martin had requested that Stanley consecrate him as a bishop to go to Cuba.  He admitted to Stanley that he worked for the CIA and saw to it that Stanley did not promote David Ferrie in his quest to become a bishop. … ⁷

Whenever anyone is found to be a “religious zealot” serious investigators or law-men immediately ask the extremely important question of “which religion?”

If mentioned at all, we are told that Martin and Ferrie were members of the “American Orthodox Catholic Church”—an offshoot of Orthodoxy, not Roman Catholicism.

How or why David Ferrie—Jesuit-educated in both high school and college,⁸ and a former Roman Catholic seminarian⁹—made the switch to an unknown sect of Orthodoxy to become a priest and perhaps even a bishop seemed of no importance to any involved.

Orthodoxy, like Anglicanism, is, itself, an offshoot of Roman Catholicism and adherents move seamlessly between the two just as agents of the Papacy like the Jesuits easily infiltrate them.  Like Freemasonry or supposed “non-Catholic” secret societies like Skull and Bones, Orthodox operatives and assets give Rome plausible deniability.

Mellen’s cryptic statement that Jack Martin was David Ferrie’s “rival and nemesis in matters ecclesiastical” also goes unexplained.

But a man with a CIA pedigree who has murder charges “disappeared” on his behalf was certainly someone a District Attorney needed to look into—especially if he claimed he had information regarding the assassination of a sitting President.

Jim Garrison knew enough to listen to Jack Martin, then verify his facts.  Almost always, unless he intended it otherwise, what Jack Martin told you checked out.  One day Martin had invited Joe Newbrough to meet him at nine A.M. at a coffee shop.  While Newbrough, “the fat man,” ate his hearty breakfast, and Jack sipped his bad coffee, a limousine pulled up.  Suddenly Newbrough saw Carlos Marcello being hustled off.  It was the day Marcello was deported, and Jack had foreknowledge of the kidnapping of the Mafia don engineered by Robert Kennedy.

In 1971, when Jim Garrison was arrested for allegedly accepting bribes from pinball gambling interests and was driven to the Wild Life and Fisheries building for booking, at the front of a crowd of spectators stood that man who always knew what was happening in New Orleans.

“They had to frame a case on the DA!” Jack Martin called out loudly.  “How about that!”  Then Martin led the crowd in applause.  “Let’s hear it for the DA!” Martin shouted.

States-Item reporter Hoke May, himself a CIA asset, and for whom Jack Martin was an entirely reliable source, concluded that Jack Martin had been badly discredited by the FBI on purpose, made to seem an alcoholic, a mental case and a person not to be taken seriously, when in fact he was entirely credible.¹⁰

Joe Newbrough was also a New Orleans dick with ties to the Central Intelligence Agency.

Lee Oswald was a mal-adjusted loner from a broken family.  Unable to relate to other people, women especially, it was easy for predators to prey upon him and that’s exactly what David Ferrie did (sadly, what many other Catholic priests have done, as well).

Ferrie would target boys and young men by impressing them with his CIA connections or self-inflated mystery regarding “missions” he was involved in, flying regularly to Communist Cuba.  This worked particularly well with the boys in his Civil Air Patrol unit.

He wound his tendrils around Oswald but after Lee had been targeted as the assassination patsy this caused problems for Ferrie.

Although Jim Garrison never learned about that loan granted to David Ferrie and cosigned by Clay Shaw, there was further evidence that persuaded him that Ferrie was connected to the assassination.  Jack Martin, during the weekend of the assassination, had said that when Oswald was arrested, he had Ferrie’s library card with him, information he could not have gleaned from New Orleans television.  When the FBI questioned Ferrie, he denied emphatically that he had loaned the card to Oswald.  “The card has never been out of my possession,” Ferrie said.  Then he wandered around town inquiring whether anyone knew about Oswald’s possessing his library card.  He asked Oswald’s neighbor, Mrs. Doris Eames, if she knew “whose library card Oswald had.”  He questioned Oswald’s landlady, Mrs. Lena Gamer: “They found my library card on Oswald,” Ferrie said.

Jim Garrison concluded that if there were no evidence linking a library card found on Oswald to Ferrie, the FBI would never have put the issue in its report.  If “Oswald had a library card on him bearing the name ‘George Washington,’ it would not be reasonable to state in an investigative report that David Ferrie denied lending his library card to Oswald.”  Later Garrison learned from a source that Ferrie’s library card had indeed been found on Oswald, “but has since been destroyed.”

Despite Ferrie’s denials, his CAP cadets reported that Oswald had been among them.  Ferrie, expecting protection from higher authority, was so bold as to name Jerry Paradis as willing to confirm that Oswald had not served under his command.  But in 1978, an attorney now, Paradis clearly remembered for the House Select Committee that Oswald and Ferrie were “in the unit together” at ten or fifteen meetings.  “I’m not saying that they may have been there together.  I’m saying it was a certainty.”¹¹

Pulling loner or orphaned young men out of military service for use as tools in Intelligence wasn’t David Ferrie’s idea, it was a system used repeatedly by Roman traitors and continues to be.

The mirror tragedy was played out for another “Lee Harvey Oswald”—Timothy McVeigh—in a Roman treason even more heinous than the broad-daylight slaughter of a sitting President.  McVeigh was the patsy used for the despicable treason that was the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, that blamed the deaths of 168 victims, 19 of which were small children (15 having perished in the prophetically-named America’s Kids Day Care Center) on the politically-convenient enemies of Rome and Bill Clinton—supposedly “Constitutional Christians”.  For the details, see the author’s column, here.

Lee had time to kill during that steamy New Orleans September.  But you could relax at the Old Pontchartrain Beach amusement park, ride the ferris wheel, have a mechanical gypsy tell your fortune, or knock lead milk bottles off their stool with a ball.

Van Bums, a recent high school graduate, was in charge of the parakeet stand while he awaited Marine Corps boot camp.  You threw a nickel onto a plate and earned a free parakeet.  On the night in question, Van’s friend Bob Boylston wandered by in the company of two men.  Six months earlier, Bob had been inducted into the Army.  Now, surprisingly, he was out.  He mumbled something about the Civil Air Patrol.  Van would wonder later whether the man accompanying Bob Boylston that night had liberated him from the Army for some purpose.  The Civil Air Patrol interested Van Bums.  The fad among the cadets, he had learned, had switched from learning German to studying Russian.

Bob introduced Van to his companions.  One was an older man with odd hair.  His name was David Ferrie.  The other was named “Lee.”

“Lee, Lee Oswald,” he said.  He threw a few nickels at the plates, but missed.  He did not win a parakeet, a creature he had once bought for his mother out of the first money he ever earned.  He was in the Marine Corps, Lee told Van.  “In recon.”

“What do you do in recon?” Van said, genuinely interested.  Lee scowled.

“We take pictures,” Lee said finally, moving away toward the greyhound booth where Bob Boylston stood.  So among Oswald’s possessions after his death would be a Minox camera used for microdot work, an artifact of espionage.  “Possession of same in Eastern Europe is in itself sufficient to deny egress across borders,” one of Garrison’s anonymous leads states.

Boylston returned.  “He’s a great pilot,” he said, referring to Ferrie, who had wandered off.  “I know what you’re thinking,” Boylston said quickly to Bums.  “Maybe he is and maybe he isn’t.  But he’s never approached me.”  Ferrie in fact reserved his sexual advances for a select few of his acolytes.

Boylston confided that Lee traveled with him and Ferrie on flights to Cuba where Lee took pictures.  The three appeared to be so intimate as to seem to form a special clique, Van Bums thought.  When he learned of Jim Garrison’s investigation, he did not come forward with the information that he had seen Oswald and Ferrie together.

Bob Boylston did provide some information to Jim Garrison’s investigators.  He was close enough to Ferrie for Ferrie to have paid his Loyola University tuition, he said.  Ferrie had talked in 1961 of “secret orders” having to do with Cuba, of having been wounded and shot down on one of his flights.  Bob was in charge of CAP records, which were sent to Washington, but when Jim Garrison attempted to subpoena these records, he was told they did not exist.

Boylston also had told Van Bums of having gone to Dallas several times with Dave, and how Dave spoke of a “super-special army always ready to fight.”  Once he had driven Dave to the airport as Dave was headed for one of his trips to Cuba.  He must never talk about the training going on over the Lake, no matter what happens, Dave told Boylston.  “Even if ‘it’ didn’t go.”  They were “taking care of something,” something very serious.

From the mid-fifties, Ferrie kept in touch with Oswald.  In Russia as a false defector, Oswald wrote on a form that, should his first child be a boy, he was to be named “David Lee Oswald.”  The only “David” in his life was Ferrie.¹²

For a disaffected “Orthodox” priest, it was odd that Ferrie would shell out big money seemingly without strings to send another boy to a Jesuit University.

Another author corroborates this odd fact.

Robert Boylston told the HSCA that Ferrie gave him over a thousand dollars to attend Loyola University in New Orleans and never once asked for it back.¹³

Did Ferrie have money to burn, or was this more of the Roman/Intelligence apparatus lusting continuously for vulnerable young men to be used and abused?

On July 27^th of 1963, Lee Oswald had an interesting engagement; 3 hours and 150 miles away from New Orleans, Oswald gave an “anti-Communist” speech at Jesuit Spring Hill seminary in Mobile Alabama.  It was quite an interesting thing to put so much effort into for the supposed Communist defector.  Just as unusual as the ease with which Oswald moved to the Soviet Union, attempted to give up his U.S. citizenship, lived extremely comfortably in Minsk, married the daughter of a well-placed Soviet Army Intelligence Colonel, and just as easily returned to the United States with his new wife Marina.

Such collusion between United States and Soviet Intelligence in the heat of the Cold War bespeaks of a higher power ordering them both.

How The Game Works

Although Garrison, Stone and Mellen have all carefully avoided the 800 lb. Jesuit in the room, they do so by delivering an extremely important part of the truth; how all of America’s major institutions—CIA, FBI, Executive Branch, politicians, judges and even local law enforcement—were all corrupt.  If they didn’t answer to the American people, who do they answer to and what explains why they are so poisonous to the best interests of the citizens they supposedly work for?

The answer is one word: Rome.

But because Garrison, Stone, Mellen and a few others like them prove that America’s major institutions are corrupt, even without answering “Why?” or “Who?” they needed to be discredited and attacked to mitigate their message.

One author who wasn’t as keen on Earling Caruthers “Jim” Garrison was Patricia Lambert.  She managed to hit Garrison hard with a particularly ugly accusation (and do it believably).

When he was at the pinnacle of his popularity and notoriety.  Garrison remarked on the forces out to sabotage his investigation.   The next charge he expected from them, he said, was that he engaged in “child molesting”¹⁵ Garrison probably was launching a preemptive strike with that remark.  He undoubtedly had reason to fear that such a charge might occur.  The wall of secrecy that shielded the dark side of Garrison’s personal life cracked in 1969 in the aftermath of just such an act involving a thirteen-year-old boy.  The boy’s family wanted to file charges but were warned that Garrison was unpredictable and would be an extremely dangerous adversary.  Aaron Kohn urged the family to prosecute.  But concern about the boy’s welfare and even his safety outweighed all else, and they took no action.  Kohn then gave the information to the grand jury and someone leaked the story to columnist Jack Anderson.  The grand jury foreman, William J. Krummel, Sr., confirmed off the record to Anderson that they were looking into it.  But, Krummel said, “I’m afraid that if I say so [in public], they’ll want to throw me in jail.”¹⁶  Krummel declined to be interviewed for this book: so what occurred in the grand jury’s investigation is unknown.  The family wisely decided to protect the boy and the grand jury could have done little without their assistance.

Jack Anderson personally spoke to the boy’s father, described in the column Anderson wrote as “a prominent member of the New Orleans ‘establishment:” Anderson also spoke to two other family members, one of whom Anderson said “is one of the most respected men in the South.” Anderson’s column, long the most infamous unexplored landmark in Garrison’s background, gave only a bare-bones account of what occurred.  The grand jury was investigating a charge, Anderson reported, that “on a Sunday in June, 1969,” Garrison had “fondled” a thirteen-year-old boy in the New Orleans Athletic Club.”  But Anderson wrote nothing more about it, and Garrison supporters have long claimed that the story was merely an effort to smear him.  Yet some in New Orleans who know the family involved have insisted over the years that the episode occurred.  An author of a recent book on the case verified the story with a family member.  Until now however, no one has heard from the victim.¹⁴

Beyond this, Lambert then proceeded to give the seedy details.

There are some things to take note of:

* Lambert puts a little too much effort into this although she makes a very credible case.
* A grand jury supposedly looked into this yet there is no official record of the outcome?
* It is rare for a child predator to strike only once yet this is the only accusation Lambert gives.
* Lambert seems to be on a mission here to get both Jim Garrison and Oliver Stone; that smacks more of propaganda than journalism.

It’s probably true that Jim Garrison was not as heroic as Oliver Stone portrayed him to be.

It’s probably true that Jim Garrison wasn’t even completely free of corruption and was as soiled a “law man” as his previous employer, the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

It’s a good guess that Jim Garrison was playing a role for that same corrupt Machine.  Three years after the assassination, the shock was wearing off and a few smart, perhaps dangerous people were asking tough questions.  Time for someone to step forward and provide cover to those at the very top by outing the mid-range players.

But was Garrison a child molester?  As strong a case as Lambert makes, it’s clear she’s also just playing a role.

The end result of Garrison’s official investigation was a single arrest and trial.  At that trial, the accused, Clay Shaw, was aquitted despite overwhelming evidence that he was a key player in the assassination.

In fact, close examination shows a lot of talking by Garrison with little to back it up.  He took 42 minutes to give his opening statement but his own key witnesses and methods helped destroy his credibility.  Was it on purpose?

Insurance salesman Perry Russo was critical to the case, claiming to have been in the company of Shaw, Ferrie and Oswald and overhearing them conspire to kill Kennedy.  He supposedly came forward to keep from being caught by Garrison’s dragnet but it was revealed during the trial that Garrison used hypnosis and “truth drug” sodium pentathol on his willing witness.

This was most certainly not standard procedure for a District Attorney in a high-profile case.

The man behind Garrison’s work up for the case was lead Prosecutor Andrew “Moo-Moo” Sciambra—a name and face virtually invisible from all accounts.

Perhaps that’s because Moo-Moo was a Jesuit-trained Roman Catholic.

Any similarity between Moo-Moo and a Mafia enforcer is purely circumstantial.  Moo-Moo went on to become Magistrate Commissioner of the Orleans Parish Criminal Court System and passed on in 2010 at the age of 75.

Garrison was also assisted by James Alcock.

Alcock delivered a key witness from out of town, Charles Spiesel, an accountant from New York City.

Spiesel claimed to have recognized David Ferrie as someone he flew with in the Air Force during WWII and was later invited to a party where Ferrie and Clay Shaw discussed killing the President.  The only problem was that Ferrie never served in WWII, nor was there an “Air Force” (it was the Army Air Corps).

It got worse from there.

Spiesel began to self-destruct on the stand stating that he had been forcibly hypnotized.  The crescendo was arrived at when Spiesel stated that, before sending his daughter to Louisiana State University he had taken her finger prints to insure that when she returned to him it was not an imposter.

Little else is known about Spiesel and almost as little about Assistant District Attorney James Alcock.

Toilet Reading

Did Garrison self-destruct on purpose?

It is true that he was savaged by mainstream media as were others who attempted to bolster the understanding that the Warren Report was a rank fraud and cover-up.

Colonel Leroy Fletcher Prouty, U.S. Air Force (DoD/CIA liaison) was just such a whistle-blower and he is loosely portrayed in Oliver Stone’s JFK by actor Donald Sutherland.

Prouty was a consultant for JFK and someone who communicated frequently with Jim Garrison.  Prouty continued to be a wealth of information on everything from war profiteering to the true nature of oil.

Is it a coincidence that not just Garrison but Prouty as well damaged their credibility seemingly on purpose by doing interviews with pornographic publications.

Prouty’s insider information was only published in “Genesis” and “Gallery” porn magazines in 1974 and 75 and Garrison got an in-depth write-up in Playboy in 1967.

Endgame

Using handlers to protect the Papacy is an old game but one that is often played.  After victimizing, torturing, violating and ruining a life, if the victim is allowed to live they are given “resucers” or handlers that control them just as when they were enslaved in order to cover for the great Whore of Babylon.

CIA mind-controlled sex slave Cathy O’Brien is one sad example; “rescued” by her husband Mark Phillips, whom she is never seen in public without.

Another is Franklin Coverup scandal “whistleblower” John DeCamp.

Mark Phillips “rescued” and subsequently married Cathy O’Brien.

What O’Brien doesn’t know is that she exchanged one handler [small-time Nashville star Alex Houston] for another.

Although Phillips isn’t the abusive monster Houston was, his job for Rome is almost as important as wrangling innocent victims to be used as sex slaves: screening Cathy’s modest media outreach to insure the Vatican isn’t understood as the foundation of this unspeakable mass crime.

Mark Phillips admitted in an interview in 2016 that he was made aware of child sex slavery after being inducted into the Knights of Malta²⁶⁷; the footsoldiers of Rome and her total control over government Intelligence Agencies.

O’Brien is, herself, a former Roman Catholic (sadly, she states that her experiences have made her an atheist^xcii) and knows that the Vatican plays a key role in this sadistic, satanic scheme but doesn’t understand that Rome orchestrates it.

Having been abused shortly after the Franklin Cover-up broke, O’Brien had knowledge of many aspects of that operation, but because she’s been shielded, she only makes passing mention of how her parasitic pedophile handler Alex Houston took time away for “business at Boys Town in Omaha, Nebraska”.²⁶⁸

If anyone has heard of “Boys Town” — the Roman Catholic orphanage for homeless boys — it was as a result of the 1938 propaganda movie Boys Town starring Spencer Tracey as the Catholic priest with endless rivers of compassion for young boys and Mickey Rooney as the diamond-in-the-rough ruffian who just needed a chance.

The reality is much more perverse as boys were screened at Boys Town for use as sex slaves — many of them were pimped by Lawrence King and some even worked at the Franklin Community Federal Credit Union.

On the rare occasions that the Franklin Cover-up is a topic for “fringe” media, Roman Catholic²⁶⁹ Nebraska State Senator John DeCamp has been the go-to “whistleblower”.

DeCamp’s job is the same as Mark Phillips: control the conversation to insure it is steered away from Rome.

Although DeCamp is not a household name (for that matter, neither is the Franklin Cover-up), he had friends in high places.  DeCamp served in Vietnam in the United States Army and was an aid to the Deputy Ambassador to Vietnam; William Egan Colby.

Colby — also a devout Roman Catholic — would go on to be named Director of the Central Intelligence Agency shortly thereafter in 1973.  He was succeeded by George Herbert Walker Bush.  Bush was nominated by Warren Commission participant Gerald Ford in 1976.

Colby was a lawyer with a Leftist bent who originally worked for the same firm as the founder of the OSS: Roman Catholic Knight of Malta William Donovan.²⁷⁰

Wikipedia says of Colby’s Catholicism:

Colby was for most of his life a staunch Roman Catholic.^[3]  He was often referred to as “the warrior–priest”.  He married Barbara Heinzen (1920-2015) in 1945 and they had five children. The Catholic Church played a “central role” in the family’s life, with Colby’s two daughters receiving their First Communion at St. Peter’s Basilica.^{[4] 271}

~ Secret History, ¹⁵

American Patriots are cheering and gloating that their man, Donald John Trump, vanquished the evil Hillary Rodham Clinton who will now almost certainly be going to prison for her many (very real) crimes and treasons.

It’s a game as old as the Trojan Horse.

UPDATE 18 December 2016, 03:53 PM, EST

Just how much was J. Edgar Hoover in the tank for Rome?

In 1964, Loyola University, Chicago, instituted a special honor; the Sword of Loyola.

A replica of the blade carried by Ignatius, himself, was given as an award to prominent leaders who have dedicated their lives to serving the Papacy just as Ignatius did when he placed his sword at the feet of the Black Madonna of Monserrat in 1522.

The very first recipient was J. Edgar Hoover on September 22^nd, 1964.

It was exactly 10 months since the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, an event Rome played quite prominently in.  Were the Jesuits of Loyola quietly celebrating?

Two years later (with enough distance from the terrible treason to be more bold), the Sword of Loyola was given on the exact date: November 22^nd, 1966.  The recipient was Vietnam hero POW Lieutenant Dieter Dengler, USN.

Dengler’s exploits escaping from a brutal Vietnamese prison (he was first held in Laos but was transferred) in 1966 is the stuff of legend.  His ordeal sapped so much of his vitality that he died in February 2001 at only 62 years old.

In 2006, Dengler was memorialized in the movie Rescue Dawn staring Christian Bale.

Loyola University President, the Very Reverend James E. McGuire, SJ, can be seen to the immediate left of either recipient.  By 1970, the Very Reverend Jesuit President would be accused of child molestation but “lacking conclusive evidence”, no charges were filed.

At the same time, another Jesuit in the Chicago area named “McGuire” was also raping children; Donald J. McGuire, SJ, was carefully shielded by his leadership after complaints began to surface in 1960 insuring that he would have a reign of terror over unsuspecting children for the next 35 years.

Protecting child predators was not a singular incident in Chicago but a full agenda for both the Jesuits and Rome.

2006 was a year that also marked the promotion of Father Thomas Smolich, SJ, to become the President of the Jesuit Conference of the United States.  His qualifications seem to be the repeated screening and enabling of predatory priests.  One priest, Angel Crisostomo Mariano, SJ, would do whatever it took to abuse the vulnerable from preying upon the mentally handicapped to dressing up as a woman.  Even after Mariano’s arrest and conviction, his immediate supervisor at the time (Smolich) felt it was not necessary to alert those in Mariano’s congregation.

There can be no other deduction in light of the careful coddling of such monsters but that it is a purposeful agenda to victimize as many vulnerable innocents as possible just as surely as the Inquisition’s tortures had nothing to do with maintaining religious doctrine.

9/11 airline pilot whistleblower Field McConnell has a prominent sibling: Deputy Associate Attorney General Kristine Marcy with 30 years working as a Federal official.

Not only has McConnell accused her of being a gatekeeper for systemic governmental child sex slave trafficking but he claims that her handler is Father Thomas Smolich, SJ.

They began with the surest institutions of control; secret societies, royalty, intelligence-gatherers and agencies, armies, banks and businesses.

Despite all this, they can never and will never have enough control to securely enslave all of humanity; there’s just too many of us.

As a result, they need to coax us to willingly place our heads in the stocks; or at least convince enough of our neighbors to force us there.

That’s where the Hegelian Dialectic comes into play—thesis / antithesis = synthesis.  By fabricating a boogeyman, most sheep will allow themselves to be frightened into following the Judas Goat (an operative of the Elite pretending to be one of us) towards the slaughter pens.

But this process takes time.  You can’t turn up the heat too fast, otherwise too many frogs jump out of the pot to save themselves.

So while this plot is cooking, the masses need to be kept calm.  They need to be assured that everything is fine; that their government really does want to take care of them, that their police really will protect them, that their judges really will meet out justice to the criminals and acquit the innocent, that their banks and businesses really want to honestly compete for a fair price for products and services rendered, and that the wars their sons (and now daughters) are being chewed up in are absolutely necessary for their “freedom”.

An important part of this masquerade is elections; particularly national ones.

On the pretend-Right we have one choice: Donald Trump.  For the minority of Americans who love their country and want to put an end to the unspeakable treason of hundreds of millions of illegal immigrants streaming across wide open borders for decades, or a guaranteed fiscal collapse of an unbelievable 19 trillion dollars in national debt, he’s all you get.

Trump was screened by the Jesuits at Fordham for two years then sent off to the University of Pennsylvania where they control incognito for a “secular” degree and plausible deniability regarding Rome’s control of his actions.  It’s a cute trick that other American “Protestant” puppets like Donald Rumsfeld have pulled (or his masters pulled for him); attending Jesuit Georgetown Law in 1956 but not staying long enough to get a Jesuit degree.

Donald Jr. and Ivanka have also attended incognito Jesuit U. of PA.

Trump’s son Eric, however, did receive his degree from Georgetown (the epicenter of Jesuit control over Washington, DC) and is even a board member of the Georgetown “Business Society and Public Policy Initiative Board of Advisors”.  Being lower profile from daddy means more direct control can be used.

The local papers pretend that Donald Trump is running his campaign, but if you search deep enough through to section D you’ll see stories such as Trump’s private meeting with one of his controllers, the Archbishop of New York, Timothy Cardinal Dolan.

If Americans are tired of endless war and unending “free trade” that has sent American jobs to be done by slaves for pittance overseas, they have one choice: Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Hillary is the business partner of William Jefferson Blythe Clinton—also educated and screened by the Jesuits at Georgetown.

Hillary and Bill were installed into power, first in the governor’s mansion in Arkansas (behind Bill’s real father, Winthrop Rockefeller) and they later followed on the heels of their good friend, former Director of the CIA, George Herbert Walker Bush into the White House (named for the Jesuit who previously owned the location; Andrew White).  The Bush and Clinton crime dynasties were installed by the Central Intelligence Agency on a mountain of cocaine trafficked through Mena, Arkansas.

Just before the election, Rome’s two jesters pretending to vie for popular support will fulfill their real destinies by making Timothy Cardinal Dolan laugh at the annual Alfred E. Smith dinner.

In 1928, the two men on the ballot for president were the Democrat Governor of New York, Alfred E. Smith and the Republican Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover. The issue of Smith’s Catholic religion came up in an exchange between himself and lawyer Charles Marshall via editorials printed in Atlantic Monthly magazine.

Marshall warned that when torn between the best interests of America and the best interests of the Church, devout Catholics were always at risk of choosing Rome over the Land of the Free. …

Smith lost the election but was soon immortalized in an annual dinner hosted by the Church that requires the two American finalists for the presidency to appear before one of the most powerful Papal emissaries in the world—the Cardinal of the Archdiocese of New York—and make him laugh.

Today’s dinners are presided over by the aristocratic descendent of the NY Governor, Alfred E. Smith IV.

The dinners continue even in off election years where luminaries from all walks show homage to Rome, from the director of the FBI, to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to the Secretary of State. ~ Illuminati Unmasked ¹

Dwight Eisenhower and Francis Cardinal Spellman at the 1954 Alfred E. Smith Dinner.

John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Francis Cardinal Spellman (not his middle name) and Richard Milhous Nixon at the 1960 Alfred E. Smith Dinner.

Roman Catholic William F. Buckley, Yale Skull & Bones ’50, founder of the “Right-wing” magazine National Review with Francis Cardinal Spellman at the 1965 Alfred E. Smith Dinner.

Terrance Cardinal Cooke (not his middle name) and Lyndon Baines Johnson at the 1968 Alfred E. Smith Dinner.  After the CIA murdered Jack Kennedy in November of 1963, Johnson was sworn in by U.S. District Judge Sarah Hughes—not on a Bible, but on a Roman Catholic missalette (a booklet containing the rites of the mass which is of pagan Babylonian origin).

Jimmy Carter, John Cardinal O’Hara and Ronald Wilson Reagan at the 1980 Alfred E. Smith Dinner.

Knight of Malta Lee Iaccoca (who personally insured that all criminal evidence was wiped clean from the Kennedy Presidential limo), Roman Catholic Communist Cuomo Governor of New York (No. 52) Mario Cuomo and Papal Court Jewish jester and Mayor of New York City Ed Koch at the 1983 Alfred E. Smith Dinner.

John McCain, Edward Cardinal Egan and Barack Hussein Obama at the 2008 Alfred E. Smith Dinner.

Barack Hussein Obama, Timothy Cardinal Dolan (throwing his head back for the camera yet again) and Willard Mitt Romney (yes, that’s his first name) at the 2012 Alfred E. Smith Dinner.  Behind them you can make out Jesuit-trained Chris Matthews…on the far Left.

Communist Roman Catholic Mayor of New York City Bill DeBlasio shares a limp-wristed thumb-in-flesh Freemasonic handshake and stupid grin with Roman Catholic Communist Cuomo Governor of New York (No. 56) Andrew Cuomo at the 2015 Alfred E. Smith Dinner.

Hillary Rodham Clinton, Timothy Cardinal “Good Times” Dolan and Donald John Trump showing who’s really in charge at the 2016 Alfred E. Smith Dinner.

Jesuit-trained Roman Catholics run absolutely every institution in the United States government from Congress to the military to the Judiciary to the Executive.  The few who aren’t are controlled by other means from blackmail to bribery and are usually in a secret society as well which holds its members to maintaining the Luciferian agenda on pain of death.

Just ask the family of NASA astronaut Virgil “Gus” Grissom what happens when you’re a Freemason who strays from the approved agenda.

Grissom attempted to tell outsiders that there was something wrong with the NASA moon landing program (it was a complete and utter fraud) by hanging a lemon on his moon lander on January 22^nd, 1967.  Five days later he was dead, along with fellow astronauts Ed White and Roger Chaffee (collateral damage).  They were killed as Rome has killed so many of her enemies; by being burned alive.  Future astronauts do not question the agenda any more than “Presidents” post John F. Kennedy do.  Despite being a Jesuit-trained Irish Roman Catholic, Kennedy felt he could be his own man and the Roman-controlled Central Intelligence Agency blew his brains out while he sat next to his wife as a lesson to anyone else who wished to leave the plantation.

The 2016 United States Presidential election has already been planned out to the very end and, even if it weren’t, Americans would still get the same agenda from either of the two very-controlled puppets who are “running”.

The only real course of action is to take information like this about the Jesuit World Order and wake up as many as you can with it.  Eventually, the house of cards will collapse from within and the terrible beast that the Great Harlot has ridden to her high position will turn on her and tear her to shreds.

Then [the angel] said to me, “The waters which you saw, where the harlot sits, are peoples, multitudes, nations, and tongues.  And the ten horns which you saw on the beast, these will hate the harlot, make her desolate and naked, eat her flesh and burn her with fire.  For God has put it into their hearts to fulfill His Purpose…” ~ Revelation 17:15-17

UPDATE 20 October 2016, 07:40 PM, EST

Debbie: Ok, I can wrap my mind around this no problem but what to do with information.

Johnny: spread it as best you can.

* start with conversations with friends and family
* repost on social networking
* start a blog if you’ve a mind, or a podcast, or encourage others whom you’ve woken up
* spread the information in any way you know how

You think that one or two people you awaken mean nothing but you’ve no idea what they are now doing so have courage and put one foot in front of the other.

How Did We Get Here?

Curious to see just how much Rome, the Vatican and their special forces the Jesuits have run the world in secret—killing, overturning governments, fabricating endless wars, enslaving billions?  Read Johnny’s book Illuminati Unmasked.

• Barack Obama’s shocking ties to this Mystery Religion—and it’s not Islam.
• How American politics have been rigged and who has the power to control every level of your government.
• All of America’s external threats—illegal immigration, pandemics, terrorism—orchestrated by the same people.
• Who was really behind 9/11 and how they have far worse planned.
• America’s top leaders from both Parties bow to this secret power.
• The worst days in America can all be traced back to them.
• American Patriots have been framed and murdered by them and assassination is their specialty.
• Hidden history uncovered! The Communists and Nazis owe them their origins.
• “Another lone gunman” lie with a twist you’ve never heard: the real story behind Abraham Lincoln’s death.
• The chilling reality of “mind control”: LSD, satanism and the CIA…and who is behind it all.
• The death of the dollar and destruction of the Middle Class: all carefully planned.
• The “Alien Agenda”: a coming world deception completely controlled by them… —with help from another realm.
• Signs that a nation you never would suspect is secretly fighting the New World Order and proof that Resistance is Rising!

The Bible records that, from the beginning of mankind’s existence, he has rebelled against God.  In fact, many stories recount people’s attempts to distance themselves from the true Creator in act of defiance.  The Tower of Babel was on of the first examples of such behavior as written in Genesis 11:1-4.

Now the whole world had one language and a common speech.  As people moved eastward, they found a plain in Shinar and settled there.

They said to each other, “Come, let’s make bricks and bake them thoroughly.”  They used brick instead of stone, and tar for mortar.  Then they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city, with a tower that reaches to the heavens, so that we may make a name for ourselves; otherwise we will be scattered over the face of the whole earth.” ~ Genesis 11:1-4 – NIV

Before God intervened by confusing their languages and scattering the people across the Earth as depicted in Genesis 11:5-9, people were worshiping Bel (Baal), the god of Babylon under the control and influence of Nimrod.  It was clear to the Lord that whenever people get together in apparent harmony in the name of world peace without the King of kings, Jesus Christ, immediate plans to overthrown Him would follow.

The superstate known as the European Union (EU) seems to have plans to accomplish what its ancestors could not do with the Tower of Babel.  This time backed up by the fourth beast, the Vatican, and its soldiers, the Jesuit Order.  The idea the European States should unite in order to avoid conflict between themselves is a product of Hegelian dialect as the major wars are known to be manipulated in accordance with the will of the elites.

The New Tower of Babel

The EU is currently composed by 28 member states that agreed to form a political-economic that aims the free circulation of people, goods, services, and capital.  Nevertheless, its Parliament building in the city of Strasbourg, France stroke the attention of many who saw eerie similarity with the Tower of Babel depicted by artist Pieter Bruegel.  The unfinished portion at the top of the Parliament building is explained in metaphoric terms related to the ongoing transformation of the European culture. However, the resemblance is so evident that even Jesuit trained and Roman-Catholic raised Glenn Beck had to point it out.

This fact can’t be denied as one examines the official EU poster once put out to promote the EU Parliament.  Apparently, its Luciferian references were so blatant that it was withdrawn thanks to Christian’s protests.

The tower in the center is a clear depiction of Bruegel’s Tower of Babel, which makes nearly impossible to deny where their inspiration for this enterprise came from.  At the top of the tower, it’s possible to see 11 upside down stars, or pentagrams.  This symbolism is oftentimes used by dark occultist in order to conjure up the powers of evil.  Moreover, the motto read at the bottom right corner which reads “Europe: many tongues, one voice” is a clear allusion to the confusion of tongues promoted by God.  However, the statement makes clear that despite the apparent differences in language and costumes, the members of the European Union think and act as one voice. The elite ambition to exalt themselves above the Lord and finally finish Nimrod’s work was never extinguished and it’s as strong as ever before.

Catholic Roots of the EU

The founding fathers of the European Union project, which started out in 1952 as the European Coal and Steel Community, were known to be devout Catholics and as a consequence were greatly influenced by the Encyclicals put out by Popes Leo XIII and Pius XI. Catholic historian Alan Fimister affirms that on his interview to Zenit.

The first European Community was the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) from which the other communities developed. These were eventually merged into the European Community and then placed within the larger framework of the European Union, which now includes intergovernmental cooperation on security and foreign affairs as well as the “communitarian” supranational tasks of the original community.

The political leaders who founded the ECSC were overwhelmingly Catholic: Robert Schuman was intensely loyal to the faith and affirmed publicly that papal encyclicals “define Catholic doctrine and bind in conscience” Konrad Adenauer and Alcide de Gaspari were also particularly important. The coal and steel plan was drawn up by an official, Jean Monnet, who became the first man to hold the office which is now called President of the Commission. He was not a committed Catholic but the essential architecture for the institutions was already being advocated by Schuman before Monnet came to him with his own project.

Adenauer and de Gaspari were both strongly influenced by Leo XIII’s teaching and its intellectual legacy. Schuman was directly influenced by Maritain’s conception of supranational democracy as the foundation for a New Christendom. “Europe,” said Schuman, is “the establishment of a generalized democracy in the Christian sense of the word.” ~ Interview of Catholic historian Alan Fimister to Zenit

Konrad Adenauer would be one of the six European leaders that agreed to the Treaty of Rome of 1957 that eventually helped solidify the creation of the EU.  Five of the six signatories went from the Capitoline Hill to the Vatican for a Papal blessing.  Interestingly, the document signed that day was blank.

Thomas Aquinas, a famous Catholic philosopher and theologian, greatly influenced the work of Pope Leo XIII and his many Encyclicals on social justice.  Thomism as a philosophical school that teaches among other things that the possession of things in common is the natural law which enforces the socialist idea of communal possessions.  In his Summa Theologica, Aquinas lays down the Vatican’s communist agenda of wealth redistribution and social justice.

Community of goods is ascribed to the natural law, not that the natural law dictates that all things should be possessed in common and that nothing should be possessed as one’s own: but because the division of possessions is not according to the natural law, but rather arose from human agreement which belongs to positive law, as stated above (II-II:57:3). Hence the ownership of possessions is not contrary to the natural law, but an addition thereto devised by human reason. ~ Summa Theologica¹

Pope Leo XIII went on to write the Encyclical Rerum Novarum, which to this date is seen as one of the most influential Vatican document on social justice.  The document and himself were heavily influenced by Jesuit scholar Luigi Taparelli.  In fact, Taparelli is claimed to have coined the term “social justice” and Rerum Novarum clearly channels his socialist ideas with terms such as “proletarian” and phrases like “…the spirit of revolutionary change…”.

Exactly 40 years later, Pope Pius XI issued the encyclical Quadragesimo anno that covered the ethical implications of the social and economic order.  Similar to Rerum Novarum, Jesuit theologians such as German social philosophers Gustav Gundlach and Königswinterer Kreis contributed with the document formulation . Roman Catholic theologian and sociologist Oswald von Nell-Breuning was also critical in the encyclical drafting.

For the most part, Quadragesimo anno reiterates and salutes Pope’s Leo XIII encyclical as an instrumental tool that legitimated an effective influence of the Church over government affairs. The following quote from Quadragesimo anno reaffirmed that Roman Catholic principles had in fact permeated secular venues without being noticed.

Under the guidance and in light of Leo’s encyclical was thus evolved a truly Christian social science, which continues to be fostered and enriched daily by the tireless labours of those picked men whom we have named the auxiliaries of the Church…The doctrine of Rerum Novarum began little by little to penetrate among those who, being outside Catholic unity, do not recognize the authority of the Church; and these Catholic principles of sociology gradually became part of the intellectual heritage of the whole human race…Thus too, we rejoice that the Catholic truths proclaimed so vigorously by our illustrious Predecessor [Leo XIII in 1891’s Rerum Novarum], are advanced and advocated not merely in non-Catholic books and journals, but frequently also in legislative assemblies and in courts of justice. ~ Pius XI²

Oswald von Nell-Breuning, who also was a Jesuit, developed the principle of subsidiarity which plays a key role in the political interplay between the EU governing body and its members.  In short, it guarantees every member state is able to take actions to achieve its objectives. However, whenever it’s not possible the EU may interfere for the good of all.

Ultimately, these teachings would form the basis for the Jesuit created doctrine of Communism and it first application in their reduction settlements in South America. From there, it would be used again in countries like Russia and China via revolutionary Jesuit educated Karl Marx and Jesuit priest Joseph Stalin. Professor Walter J. Veith has a great teaching on Roman Catholic social justice.

“Founding Fathers”

In the same way as the American experiment, the EU has its own founding fathers.  However, while the former nation was constructed based on protestant ideology the later was a Vatican bastion since its inception. Most of the founders were Roman Catholic themselves and/or Jesuit trained.

• German statesman Konrad Adenauer was a devout Roman Catholic that certainly pleased the Vatican as being granted membership in the Order of Holy Sepulcher, Teutonic Order, Order of the Golden Spur, and the highest order of chivalry awarded by the Pope: Supreme Order of Christ. He’s also listed as one of the notable alumni of the University of Freiburg, which traces its origins to the Jesuits;
• Luxembourgian politician Joseph Bech was a Roman Catholic. He’s also a notable alumni of the University of Freiburg;
• Dutch banker and politician Johan Beyen was a Dutch banker with no apparent ties to Rome. However, Wikipedia in German states that despite his parents being protestants he later converted to Catholicism;
• British statesman and Prime Minister of the UK Winston Churchill was a high level freemason;
• Italian statesman and politician Alcide de Gasperi was a conservative Roman Catholic whose alma maters are the University of Innsbruck and the University of Vienna. Both institutions had its origins traced back to the Jesuits.  In the book Soldier of Christ: The Life of Pope Pius XII – page 238, an account involving Gasperi may depict the Jesuit influence in government affairs;
• German academic and politician Walter Hallstein is listed as a protestant. However, he attended a Jesuit school in Mainz.  He also had ties to Nazi professional organizations;
• Dutch politician Sicco Mansholt declared in this interview he’s not protestant, he’s Catholic;
• French political economist Jean Monnet was a Roman Catholic;
• Luxembourg-born French statesman Robert Schuman was a devout Catholic. He attended secondary school at the Athénée de Luxembourg, which is a Jesuit institution;
• Belgian politician and statesman Paul Henri-Spaak apparently was not Catholic. However, he was a socialist and lawyer that excelled defending Communists;
• Italian politician Altiero Spinelli was yet another communist that greatly sympathized with the Catholic Parties ideas of an European unification.

The Roman Catholic faith of founding fathers like Konrad Adenauer, Alcide de Gasperi, and Robert Schuman was credited as the inspiration for creating the EU.  Pope John Paul II not only exalted the aforementioned founder, but also provided interesting information on what happened before the Treaty of Paris was signed.

Dear friends, in these days in which you are reflecting on Europe, it is natural to recall that among the principal promotors of the reunification of this continent were men inspired by profound Christian faith, like Adenauer, De Gasperi and Schuman.  How can we underestimate, for example, the fact that, in 1951, before beginning the delicate negotiations which would lead to the adoption of the Treaty of Paris, they wished to meet in a Benedictine monastery on the Rhine for meditation and prayer?³

The Roman Catholic Church started the process of canonization of both Robert Schuman and Alcide de Gasperi.  Schuman is backed by Polish Catholics that seem more careful of his candidacy than the Vatican itself.  If any of the processes goes through, it will be the first time a secular political leader is elevated to sainthood.  This only reflects the priceless contributions these men gave to the Vatican-Jesuit plans in Europe.

Marian Flag

The European flag, designed and adopted in the 1950s, is composed of 12 golden stars forming a circle on a blue background.  One of its designers is a German artist called Arsène Heitz.  He’s is a devout Roman Catholic and member of the Order of the Miraculous Medal, whose followers believe they can obtain special grace by wearing the medal of the Virgin Mary.  Paul Lévy, the other flag designer, was a Belgian of Jewish descendant that vowed to convert to Christianity if he survived the War.  Rather, he became a Roman Catholic.

The speculations involving Marian influence in the flag design were confirmed in an interview Heitz gave to Lourdes magazine and  in a testimony of a Catholic priest called Pierre Caillon at the time when meeting Heitz.

Secondly, it is worth noting the testimony of Father Pierre Caillon, who refers to a meeting with Arsène Heitz.  Caillon tells of having met the former Council of Europe employee by chance in August 1987 at Lisieux in front of the Carmelite monastery.  It was Heitz who stopped him and declared ‘I was the one who designed the European flag.  I suddenly had the idea of putting the 12 stars of the Miraculous Medal of the Rue du Bac on a blue field.  My proposal was adopted unanimously on 8 December 1955, the Feast of the Immaculate Conception.  I am telling you this, Father, because you are wearing the little blue cross of the Blue Army of Our Lady of Fatima’(272) .⁴

The official explanation for the flag given by the Council of Europe in 1955 explains that the stars represent the European people united together.  The twelve stars are a symbol of completeness and perfection.  In fact, the number 12 is referenced in the Bible many times with strong connotations.

The Meaning of Numbers: The Number 12

Twelve can be found in 187 places in God’s word. Revelation alone has 22 occurrences of the number. The meaning of 12, which is considered a perfect number, is that it symbolizes God’s power and authority, as well as serving as a perfect governmental foundation. It can also symbolize completeness or the nation of Israel as a whole. For example, Jacob (Israel) had twelve sons, each of which represented a tribe begun by a prince, for 12 princes total. Ishmael, who was born to Abraham through Hagar, also had twelve princes.

God specified that twelve unleavened cakes of bread be placed every week in the temple with frankincense next to each of the two piles that were to be made. The priests were commanded to change the bread every Sabbath day (Leviticus 24).

Christ called and choose twelve men to bear witness to what he did and to spread the good news of the gospel to the entire world. After he was raised from the dead, Jesus told the eleven disciples (Judas had killed himself) that God had given him ALL power and authority in both earth and heaven (God’s divine authority – Matthew 28:18).

Twelve thousand from each tribe of Israel (144,000 total) will receive salvation during the end time’s Great Tribulation (Revelation 7). Another set of 144,000 (12 x 12,000) will be taken from earth in order to serve and follow the Lamb of God (Revelation 14:1 – 5). Christ’s bride in Revelation 12, the church, wears a crown containing twelve stars.

New Jerusalem, which is made in heaven and brought to the earth by God himself, contains 12 gates made of pearl which are each manned by an angel. Over each gate will be one of the names of Israel’s twelve tribes. The walls are 144 cubits high (12 multiplied by itself – Revelation 21:16 – 17), with the city itself being 12,000 furlongs square.⁵

Indeed, numerology is a key component in the Jesuit World Order machinations.  Boldly proclaiming their union as complete and perfect is a direct affront to the Lord and His Law.  Professor Javier Paredes from the University of Alcala Spain talks about another “coincidence” regarding numbers and dates.

“However, in Heitz’s soul the words of the Apocalypse were very present: ‘A great sign appeared in the Heavens: a Woman clothed with the sun and with the moon at her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars.’ And, perhaps without realizing it, the delegates of the European Ministers officially adopted the design proposed by Heitz on the feast of Our Lady: December 8, 1955,” explained Prof.  Paredes.  “That’s a lot of coincidences, so henceforth it should not be difficult for us to discover in the folds of the Europeans’ flag the smile and affection of Our Mother, the Queen of Europe, ready to lend a hand in that great challenge that St.  Peter’s successor has proposed to us: to re-Christianize the Old Continent with the example of our lives and the testimony of our words.”⁶

Perhaps the term re-Christianize should be rewritten as counter-reform which better reflects the real  plans of the Jesuit Order.  It’s interesting to note that the city of Alcala in Spain was one of the favorite places of Ignatius Loyola, the founder of the Society of Jesus.

We are all Jesuits

It was with this bold statement that the former president of the European Council, Herman van Rompuy, was quoted by the Dutch Catholic newspaper: the ‘Katholiek Nieuwsblad’.  Dutch political analyst Derk Jan Eppink noticed well the similarities between the EU and Jesuit methodologies.

Listening to Van Rompuy, you will instantly notice the similarities of the Jesuits with Europe.  Jesuits formed the vanguard of the Catholic Church, like the European elite is the vanguard of the European integration.  Both portray themselves as ‘the elite’, elevated above the ordinary people.  Their methods are very similar.  A sophisticated lie or purposeful deception is allowed when framed in the interest of the greater goal.  A barely contained cynicism typifies the attitude toward the normal citizen, the ignorant fool, who within a democracy needs to be protected from himself.  The Catholic and European elites work through inner circles.  The rest is prose.  Van Rompuy, Barroso, Monti and Rajoy are frequent visitors at papal audiences.⁷

Once one starts to investigate some of the people who occupy the highest offices in the EU, it’s clear that Rompuy is being truthful and accurate.

• French politician and Roman Catholic Jacques Delors was president of the European Commission from 1985 to 1995. Wikipedia in French states he went to the Lycée Blaise-Pascal, listed as a former Jesuit school.  He also taught at the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA) founded by Michel Debré. Debré himself studied at the Lycée Louis-le-Grand, “The Jesuit College of Paris”.  It would be plausible that Delors came in contact with the Jesuits either during his secondary education or during the time he was at ENA;
• Luxembourg politician Jacques Santer, also Roman Catholic, was the European Commission President from 1995 to 1999. He graduated from the Athénée de Luxembourg, a Jesuit high school;
• Italian Roman Catholic, economist and politician Romano Prodi was the European Commission President from 1999 to 2004. He was thoroughly involved with Goldman Sachs, which was quoted by Pope Benedict XVI as doing the “work of God”.  Prodi became a teaching assistant for Beniamino Andreatta, an Italian economist and politician.  Andreatta studied at the Liceo Classico Giovanni Prati in Trento, which is run by the Jesuits.  It’s conceivable that Andreatta would pass his Jesuit training on to one of his collaborators, Prodi;
• Roman Catholic Portuguese Jose Manuel Barroso was the European Commission President from 2004 to 2014. Currently, Barroso works for Goldman Sachs International.  He did PhD research at Jesuit Georgetown University.  He also has a degree for the same institution on Leadership Seminar;
• Roman Catholic, Belgian politician Herman Van Rompuy was the first president of the European Council from 2010 to 2014. Rompuy attended St John Berchmans College in Brussels, which is Jesuit secondary school.  Later on, he worked as a lecturer at the Lessius Hogeschool, a Catholic college named after Jesuit Leonard Lessius;
• Donald Tusk is Roman Catholic, Polish politician that has been the president of the European Council since 2014. Tusk was an active organizer and supporter of the Solidarity Trade Union in Poland, a movement that was greatly influenced by the Catholic social teaching.  He wrote his M.A.  thesis under professor Roman Wapiński advisory at the University of Gdańsk.  Wapiński received his Doctor honoris cause from the University of Wrocław, which was early converted into a Jesuit school and an important instrument of the Counter-Reformation;
• Jean-Claude Juncker is a Roman Catholic, Luxembourgish politician that has been the president of the European Commission since 2014. Juncker has been a strong proponent of open border policies even to the extreme of menacing to fine countries that are not welcoming to refugees.  Juncker was also implicated in tax avoidance scams in his home country.  He attended the Lycée Michel-Rodange in Luxembourg to finish his secondary education.  The first director of Juncker’s high-school came, Pierre Goedert, was a professor in the Lycée de Garçons in Luxembourg, which was an annex of the Athénée de Luxembourg.  The Athénée is known for being a Jesuit institution.  Moreover, Juncker’s Lycée Michel-Rodange and the Jesuit Athénée de Luxembourg belong to the same campus, the so called Campus Geesseknäppchen. Both schools are very close to each other which makes it not difficult for Juncker obtain his Jesuit education during that period.

Brexit: The Latest Deception

Many believed the result of June 2016 Referendum that voted for the withdraw of the UK from the EU was a great blow to the globalists and their New World Order.  Brexit was also taken as a protestant response to the Roman/Vatican tradition of centralization of power.  It’s interesting to note that some Catholics believe that the reason the EU is falling apart is because it became godless and, for that reason, needs to come back to its Catholic roots.  Similarly to the researchers who claim that only recently the Vatican is being taken by malignant forces, people hold to the idea that only now the EU has turned away from God.  In reality, it has always been this way and it was planned to be like this.

Nevertheless, there are always those skeptical enough that prefer to analyze the situation without being influenced by the media.  One of them is Professor Veith who again has a great take on Brexit in light of Bible prophecy.

It’s very important not to forget that the British crown belongs to Rome and the Pope since king John (1167-1216) gave Concession of England and Ireland to Pope Innocent III.  This was done as the king wanted to have a lift on his excommunication and the interdict placed on the churches of England following a quarrel with the Pope over choosing a new archbishop of Canterbury.  King John ended up capitulating to the Pope as he was facing pressure from invasions and revolts of his own people.  As a result of king John’s surrender to the Vatican, Pope Innocent III declared the Magna Carta just signed by the king as invalid.

King John broke the terms of this charter by signing the Magna Carta on June 15, 1215.  Remember; the penalty for breaking the 1213 agreement was the loss of the Crown (right to the kingdom) to the Pope and his Roman Church.  It says so quite plainly.  To formally and lawfully take the Crown from the royal monarchs of England by an act of declaration, on August 24, 1215, Pope Innocent III annulled the Magna Carta; later in the year, he placed an Interdict (prohibition) on the entire British empire.  From that time until today, the English monarchy and the entire British Crown belonged to the Pope. ~ Khondakar Golam Mowla, The Judgment Against Imperialism, Fascism and Racism Against Caliphate and Islam volume 2 (AuthorHouse, 2008)

From that time on, the British Crown belonged legally to the Pope.  Bearing that in mind, it’s reasonable to think that any major decision taken by the British government or the Queen has to have the approval of the Vatican.  Including, of course, Brexit.  It’s also critical to point out that, as Vatican City and Washington DC, the city of London is a sovereign state.  It has its own territory, flag, police and role, which in the case of the City of London is to be the financial center of the world.  The former mayor of the City of London, Boris Johnson, was in favor of Brexit while the Prime Minister David Cameron was not.  Despite that, Cameron was the one who called for a referendum, which result only brought him trouble.

Following Cameron’s resignation, Theresa May assumed as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom.  If Hillary Clinton is elected the 45^th president of the United States, three of the most powerful nations of the world will be controlled by women: Angela Merkel in Germany, Theresa May in UK, and Hillary Clinton in the US.  This corroborates what the prophet Isaiah foresaw for our future when men are not strong and ethical enough to take the lead.

Youths oppress my people, women rule over them.  My people, your guides lead you astray; they turn you from the path. ~ Isaiah 3:12

Theresa May’s first statement as Prime Minister echoes the Catholic social justice doctrine.

That means fighting against the burning injustice that, if you’re born poor, you will die on average 9 years earlier than others.  If you’re black, you’re treated more harshly by the criminal justice system than if you’re white.  If you’re a white, working-class boy, you’re less likely than anybody else in Britain to go to university.  If you’re at a state school, you’re less likely to reach the top professions than if you’re educated privately.  If you’re a woman, you will earn less than a man.  If you suffer from mental health problems, there’s not enough help to hand.  If you’re young, you’ll find it harder than ever before to own your own home. ~ Theresa May’s First Statement as Prime Minister, July 13, 2016

Could it be only a theater between Johnson and Cameron? The mainstream media has depicted them as rivals, although is more probable both politicians were working together to achieve the same goal.  It’s unarguably that both are insiders when it comes to the Jesuit World Order.  David Cameron has even attended secret meetings of the Billdeberg Group, a secretive gathering of the most powerful men in the world founded by the Jesuit Józef Hieronim Retinger.  Perhaps the Great Britain had to leave the EU in order for the City of London to separate from Europe and occupy its position alongside the Vatican and the Washington DC as a sovereign state subjected only to the Crown, which means subjected to the Pope.  This would better fit the Scriptures with the Vatican as the beast in Revelation 17:12-13.

The ten horns you saw are ten kings who have not yet received a kingdom, but who for one hour will receive authority as kings along with the beast.  13 They have one purpose and will give their power and authority to the beast. ~ Revelation 17:12-13

The European Union is just one more of the Vatican’s monstrous enterprises that mainly seeks to dominate and subjugate the European citizen back to Rome.  The cunning Jesuit tactic of problem-reaction-solution has convinced many that in order to avoid conflict, it’s necessary to come together.  What the common person does not realize is that these conflicts were all engineered at the first place.  Ultimately, any gathering of states or institutions that do not have Christ in its core is at best, useless and at worst, dangerous.  Once detected, it’s pernicious plans must be exposed and combated.  The rulers of this world know their time is short as they are moving relentlessly to accomplish their goals.  Advancements in science and technology combined with centuries of Jesuit indoctrination provide the today’s elite with an unprecedented power to enslave humanity.  However, the Lord is sovereign and He’s allowing everything that is taking place.  Let’s see how high they build their tower this time before it succumbs to ruins.

Why do the nations conspire and the peoples plot in vain?
The kings of the earth rise up and the rulers band together against the Lord and against his anointed, saying,
“Let us break their chains and throw off their shackles.”
The One enthroned in heaven laughs; the Lord scoffs at them.
He rebukes them in his anger and terrifies them in his wrath, saying,
“I have installed my king on Zion, my holy mountain.”
I will proclaim the Lord’s decree: He said to me, “You are my son; today I have become your father.
Ask me, and I will make the nations your inheritance, the ends of the earth your possession.
You will break them with a rod of iron; you will dash them to pieces like pottery.”
Therefore, you kings, be wise; be warned, you rulers of the earth.
Serve the Lord with fear and celebrate his rule with trembling.
Kiss his son, or he will be angry and your way will lead to your destruction, for his wrath can flare up in a moment.  Blessed are all who take refuge in him. ~ Psalm 2

UPDATE: Friday, 7 October 2016; 3:50 PM, EST

Tony Blair: Rome’s Agent In London

Tony Blair, former Prime Minister of the UK from 1997 to 2007, was educated at St. John’s College, a Counter-Reformation Institution.  Blair only converted to Catholicism in 2007, soon after leaving office, giving the impression he took the decision once out of the spotlight.  His wife, practising Roman Catholic Cherie Blaire, had much to do with his choice.  She is known for her feminist ideologies, even giving a lecture at the Pontifical University of St. Thomas in Rome entitled The Church and Women’s Rights: time for a fresh perspective?  In 2006, Blaire signed the EU’s new Constitutional Treaty in Rome under a massive statue of Pope Innocent X only to underscore once more who really is in control.

It’s perhaps the most trafficked web site right of center.

13 years ago, “the Drudge Report” was earning $3,500 a day.  One can just imagine what it does now.

Ans-wer.com states that Drudge—

—has a worth of over a million dollars per year thanks to his talk show and the advertising revenues generated from his website.  It is estimated that his net worth is $90 million.  According to recent statistics, Drudge has 87,000 twitter followers and 42,000 facebook fans.  He also published a book in 2000 called Drudge Manifesto adding to his career versatility.  Despite his life as a public image, Drudge’s sexuality is still a matter of controversy for the world media.  He is rumored to be gay.  However he has dismissed these claims every time in spite of the fact that Hilton has an exclusive video of Drudge holding the lip lock with an unidentified man in London.

Of his origins, Wikipedia states that he was raised in the Catholic colony of Maryland (granted to devout Roman Catholic George Calvert—Lord Baltimore—by “Protestant” King Charles I) by Leftist Democrat Jewish parents whose mother was a lawyer for Ted Kennedy.  The entire Irish Catholic Kennedy clan was carefully controlled by master Jesuit manipulators like Richard McSorely.

Matthew Drudge was raised in Takoma Park, Maryland, near Washington, D.C.  His parents are Reform Jewish Democrats who both worked for the federal government, and he is their only child.^[1]  His father, Robert Drudge, a former social worker who owns the reference site refdesk.com,^[1] and his mother, a former staff attorney for U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy,^[2] divorced when he was six.  Drudge went to live with his mother.^[1]  He had few friends and was an avid news reader and radio talk show fan.^[1][3]  In his book Drudge Manifesto, Drudge says that he “failed his Bar Mitzvah”, and graduated 341st out of a class of 355 from Northwood High School in 1984, giving himself, in his words, a “more than adequate curriculum vitae for a post at 7-Eleven”.^[1]

In the 1980s, Drudge worked as a telemarketer for Time-Life Books.

But what put little Jewish Matt Drudge on the map was insider scoops.

Drudge’s website gained in popularity in the late 1990s after a number of stories which he reported before the mainstream media.  Drudge first received national attention in 1996 when he broke the news that Jack Kemp would be Republican Bob Dole’s running mate in the 1996 presidential election.  In 1998, Drudge gained popularity when he was the first outlet to break the news that later became the Monica Lewinsky scandal.^[5] ~ Wikipedia

Catholic All-Star

In the 80’s and 90’s, All-Star NFL quarterback Jack Kemp was ubiquitous in all of the “Conservative” political circles.  What no one knew at the time was that, like Drudge, he has been implicated as a homosexual (which means blackmail).

One of the researchers who did the implicating was author Nick Bryant.

Bryant is best known for his work on the Nebraska CIA pedophile ring titled The Franklin Scandal.  He implicates Kemp and corroborates my claim (Illuminati Unmasked pp. 454-458) that the source for many of the boys kidnapped, tortured and turned into sex slaves by the United States government was the Catholic orphanage for boys known as “Boys Town”.

In a massive 1987 column for the NY Times, Leftist Maureen Dowd called Kemp “the Savonarola of supply side”.

Girolamo Savonarola (1452 to 1498) was a Dominican friar who decried the corruption of Rome and her exploitation of the poor and prophesied there would come a “Cyrus from the north” who would reform it all.  He was excommunicated, imprisoned, tortured and burned at the stake.  Less than 20 years later, an Augustinian monk in Wittenberg, (875 miles north of Rome) would protest Medici Pope Leo X’s exploitation of the poor through indulgences by posting 95 bullets, or “theses”, on the door of All Saints Cathedral on All Saints Day (November 1^st) in 1517.

At the end of Chapter VI in The Prince, Machiavelli laments that Savonarola did not have the weapons to insure his revolution as did “Moses, Cyrus, Theseus, and Romulus”—he therefore succumbed to those who did; the children of Romulus.

Only an Irish Catholic girl educated at Immaculata High School and Catholic University of America would get such a reference (or give it) but what was she trying to say about Kemp?

Other Catholic media outlets were also lifting Kemp up at the time.  Dowd noted that Kemp was raised in the cult of Mary Baker Eddy as a “Christian Scientist” in California but that he “converted” to being a Presbyterian with his wife, Joanne.

In 1996, Crisis Magazine (“A Voice For Faithful Catholic Laity”) stated that Kemp’s political doctrines spoke with “a Catholic voice”.

Dowd also made note of something extremely odd in Kemp’s office—an 18” statue of Don Quixote.  Secret society insiders and Roman Catholic knights know the fictional figure to be a caricature of the founder of the Jesuits, Ignatius Loyola.  Miguel de Cervantes, who penned Don Quixote, was a Catholic Spaniard who lived just as the Jesuits were becoming known (1547 to 1616).

Interestingly, Dowd even mentioned Kemp being implicated in a “homosexual ring” — not in Nebraska in the 1980’s — but in the administration of the Governor of California where Kemp worked as an aid in 1967 … for Ronald Wilson Reagan.

Jack Kemp mentored the current Speaker of the House, devout Roman Catholic Paul Ryan.

Dowd painted the Kemps as such strong “Born Again Christians” that wife Joanne was conducting “Bible study groups for Congressional wives every Friday.”  Yet, after Jack Kemp passed in 2009, the family asked close friend Chuck Colson to do his eulogy.  Colson was Richard Nixon’s legal “hatchet man” who was one of the fall guys for Watergate, spending a whole 7 months in a federal penitentiary (many soldiers have spent twice that on deployment).

Although he claimed at some times to be a “Baptist” and at others an “Episcopalian”, Colson’s top endeavors were the creation of Roman Catholic-dominated “Prison Fellowship” and an endless push for ecumenicalism—the uniting of all Christian denominations.  Once all the denominations are united, they would be forced to follow the authority of the one that was most powerful: Rome.

In the early 1990s, Colson joined with his close friend, Father Richard John Neuhaus, to begin the project known as Evangelicals and Catholics Together (ECT).  Catholics and evangelicals were, and remain, the two largest faith communities in North America.  Increasingly, they found themselves drawn together in what I described at the time as “an ecumenism of the trenches,” especially in defense of the sanctity of life from conception to natural death.

Evangelicals and Catholics shared much in common, but there was little understanding or cooperation, and all too often deep hostility between the two groups.  It is hard to imagine now the virulent reaction provoked by the ECT initiatives some two decades ago.

While Father Neuhaus received some critical comments from the Catholic side, reactionary evangelicals exploded with anger, bombast and recrimination.

Colson was excoriated by some of his fellow evangelicals for having betrayed the Gospel.  Prison Fellowship lost $1 million in donations from some disaffected supporters.  But Colson never wavered from what he believed was a summons from the Holy Spirit.

At the outset of ECT, Colson asked, “Dare we believe that God is calling us to make a bold statement that could influence the course of his church in the decades to come?”

The work of ECT still continues.  Our most recent statement, “In Defense of Religious Freedom,” was published in the March 2012 issue of First Things.  Bereft now of both of our founders, the ECT project moves forward, building on the initial statement drafted by Colson and Father Neuhaus (who died in 2009): “We thank God for the discovery of one another in contending for a common cause.  Much more we thank God for the discovery of one another as brothers and sisters in Christ.” ~ Charles Colson’s ‘Ecumenism of the Trenches’, National Catholic Register

When Colson wrote his epithet for Kemp, it was promoted by sites like “the Catholic Exchange”.

Templar Tactic

Today, Rome is in complete control of all major governments via her agents and insurgents, but it wasn’t always so.  In the age of kings, Royals frequently kicked against their masters as they were intent on being true sovereigns and not proxies for the “Vicar of Christ”.  This didn’t make those kings any less ruthless or evil, just equally filled with a lust for power.

One such king was Philippe le Bel of France (1268-1314)—also known as “Philip IV” or “Philippe the Fair”.

Philippe was the only king in history to control the Papacy and even forced it to move to France where it stayed for 75 years before returning to Rome.

Realizing that the actual power of Rome laid in her knights, Philippe sought a way to reign in the Papacy’s special forces—at that time, it was the Knights Templar.

The Templars were founded in 1119 to fight in the First Crusade but they very quickly exploited their experiences in the Holy Land and branched out into anything from diplomacy to mercantilism to finance.  They became protectors of pilgrim valuables and developed a system of seals and cyphers by which a traveler to the Holy Land could give their wealth to a Templar in one location, receive a cyphered receipt, and pick up their wealth in another location for a fee.

As a result, they developed modern usury banking and quickly surpassed most kingdoms in wealth and influence.  They even joined hands with battlefield foes like the Muslim Assassins, pooling their knowledge of how to murder without trace.

During the next hundred years the Templars became a power with international influence.  They were constantly engaged in high-level diplomacy between nobles and monarchs throughout the Western world and the Holy Land.  In England, for example, the Master of the Temple was regularly called to the king’s Parliament, and was regarded as head of all religious orders, taking precedence over all priors and abbots in the land.  Maintaining close links with both Henry II and Thomas a Becket, the Templars were instrumental in trying to reconcile the sovereign and his estranged archbishop.  Successive English kings, including King John, often resided in the Temple’s London preceptory, and the Master of the Order stood by the monarch’s side at the signing of the Magna Carta.”

Nor was the Order’s political involvement confined to Christendom alone.

Close links were forged with the Muslim world as well the world so often opposed on the battlefield and the Templars commanded a respect from Saracen leaders exceeding that accorded any other Europeans.  Secret connections were also maintained with the Hashishim or Assassins, the famous sect of militant and often fanatical adepts who were Islam’s equivalent of the Templars.  The Hashishim paid tribute to the Templars and were rumoured to be in their employ.

On almost every political level the Templars acted as official arbiters in disputes, and even kings submitted to their authority.  In 1252 Henry III of England dared to challenge them, threatening to confiscate certain of their domains.  “You Templars … have so many liberties and charters that your enormous possessions make you rave with pride and haughtiness.  What was imprudently given must therefore be prudently revoked; and what was inconsiderately bestowed must be considerately recalled.”  The Master of the Order replied, “What say est thou, O King?  Far be it that thy mouth should utter so disagreeable and silly a word.  So long as thou dost exercise justice, thou wilt reign.  But if thou infringe it, thou wilt cease to be King.”  It is difficult to convey to the modern mind the enormity and audacity of this statement.  Implicitly the Master is taking for his Order and himself a power that not even the papacy dared explicitly claim the power to make or depose monarchs.¹

Secrecy was the most powerful Templar weapon and they developed dual personalities—one face they put towards those outside their ranks, and another towards those inside.  They adopted the Roman eagle as their insignia but gave it two heads to exemplify this.

Freemasons trace their lineage through the Templars which is likely true but Freemasonic leadership then attempted to cover their subservience to Rome by claiming that both they and the Templars are the enemies of the Papacy (which is ridiculous).  Humorously, for their part, Rome does the same; claiming to be mortal enemies with their loyal Freemasonic footsoldiers.

Templars, Freemasons and Catholic high clergy are all gnostics who revel in ancient “secret knowledge”.  While in the Holy Land, Templars connected with what they considered to be the remnant of the Essenes who convinced them that Jesus of Nazareth was a fraud and the real messiah was John the Baptist; a belief system known as Johannism.

The Templars, or Poor Fellow-Soldiery of the Holy House of the Temple … took as their models, in the Bible, the Warrior-Masons of Zorobabel, who worked, holding the sword in one hand and the trowel in the other.

Therefore it was that the Sword and the Trowel were the insignia of the Templars,² who subsequently, as will be seen, concealed themselves under the name of Brethren Masons. …

The trowel of the Templars is quadruple, and the triangular plates of it are arranged in the form of a cross, making the Kabalistic pantacle known by the name of the Cross of the East.  The Knight of the East, and the Knight of the East and West, have in their titles secret allusions to the Templars of whom they were at first the successors.

The secret thought of Hugues de Payens [founder of the Templars], in founding his Order, was not exactly to serve the ambition of the Patriarchs of Constantinople.  There existed at that period in the East a Sect of Johannite Christians, who claimed to be the only true Initiates into the real mysteries of the religion of the Saviour.

They pretended to know the real history of Yesus the Anointed, and, adopting in part the Jewish traditions and the tales of the Talmud, they held that the facts recounted in the Evangels are but allegories, the key of which Saint John gives, in saying that the world might be filled with the books that could be written upon the words and deeds of Jesus Christ; words which, they thought, would be only a ridiculous exaggeration, if he were not speaking of an allegory and a legend, that might be varied and prolonged to infinity.

The Johannites ascribed to Saint John the foundation of their Secret Church, and the Grand Pontiffs of the Sect assumed the title of Christos, Anointed, or Consecrated, and claimed to have succeeded one another from Saint John by an uninterrupted succession of pontifical powers.  He who, at the period of the foundation of the Order of the Temple, claimed these imaginary prerogatives, was named Theoclet; he knew Hugues de Payens, he initiated him into the Mysteries and hopes of his pretended church, he seduced him by the notions of Sovereign Priesthood and Supreme royalty, and finally designated him as his successor.

Thus the Order of Knights of the Temple was at its very origin devoted to the cause of opposition to the tiara of Rome and the crowns of Kings, and the Apostolate of Kabalistic Gnosticism was vested in its chiefs.  For Saint John himself was the Father of the Gnostics, and the current translation of his polemic against the heretical of his Sect and the pagans who denied that Christ was the Word, is throughout a misrepresentation, or misunderstanding at least, of the whole Spirit of that Evangel.³

As a result of their Johannism, Templar degree rituals included spitting upon and defacing a crucifix (Roman Catholicism was the only “Christianity” they knew) which lead to rumors of satan worship.  This was later aided by a propaganda smokescreen fabricated by a French Roman Catholic priest named Alphonse Louis Constant.  Constant, masquerading as a Jew called “Éliphas Lévi” created the hermaphroditic goat gargoyle known as “Baphomet” and claimed that was what the Templars were worshipping.

These efforts were aided by another Catholic Frenchman—this time a Jesuit—named Marie Joseph Gabriel Antoine Jogand-Pagès.  Jogand-Pagès also wrote his propaganda via a pseudonym; “Léo Taxil”.  Jogand-Pagès then proceeded to thoroughly muddy the waters by claiming that Freemasons worshipped Baphomet in a series of pamphlets which he eventually stated were hoaxes encouraged by the Vatican’s mindless, vicious crusade against the poor hapless Freemasons (who derived themselves from Templars and are some of Rome’s most loyal footsoldiers).

The Templars being exceedingly wealthy and secretive also lead to sexual perversion.  Soon this gave enemies like Philippe le Bel their opportunity.  With the Papacy secured at Avignon, Philip moved to crush the Vatican’s special forces.  He forced Pope Clement V to rubber-stamp his actions and then he moved quickly to arrest the Templars and confiscate their wealth and holdings.

This was done on Friday, October 13^th, 1307—“black Friday” or “bad luck Friday”.

Many Templars were captured, tortured and burned at the stake (the form of execution created by the Inquisition), including their Grand Master, Jacques de Molay.  However, many more went underground and learned to masque their machinations.  No longer could they operate in the open, using their own names and faces.  They needed scapegoats to hide behind and they found the perfect victims: Jews.  As long as they elevated their target Jew to a position of wealth and prominence, they were always willing to be a target and make a spectacle of themselves.

An older sister of the Templars (only by about 20 years)—the Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta, also known as “the Knights of Malta”—adopted and adapted many of their brother Knights.  This included, as the name applies, the practice of Johannism.

Like the double-headed eagle, the Maltese Cross worn by these Knights (then and now), is a cunning ruse.  Yes, it is a type of cross but it isn’t the traditional Christian cross, it predates the crucifixion of Jesus Christ in its pagan significance.

All Popes and most Cardinals and Bishops wear the Maltese cross to show their Knights who they answer to.

The official emblems and insignia of almost every major public and private organization anywhere have either a double-headed eagle or Maltese cross somewhere in them; for instance the flag of the Russian Federation is adorned with a double-headed eagle and the insignia of Russia’s intelligence agency—the FSB—is over top a massive Maltese cross poorly disguised with red outside instead of inside the cross.  For more, read my column, here.

This process has been in place ever since and was responsible for the Communist anti-Semitic purges as well as the Nazi Holocaust.  Today, an ugly undercurrent of anti-Semitism is always ready when called upon by Roman operatives to cloud investigations with racial hatred as Jewish frontmen have been cunningly emplaced in all walks of power from Hollywood to banking, politics to news media—Jews like Matt Drudge.

Despite his $90 million net worth, Drudge continues to get help from Rome from her media operatives like Catholic Peggy Noonan who proclaims for all her duped Right-wing faithful that, in 2013, Drudge “discovered prayer” (although one never knows where prayer hides itself from Jews these days).

Drudge has been a frequent guest on the Alex Jones show.

Jones is a very important Roman operative whose job it is to bring in, expose and mislead truth-seekers who don’t trust the obviously-controlled mainstream media.

Like Drudge, he was emplaced by being given the insider scoop of a sanitized view inside Bohemian Grove—the satanic sexual deviant “retreat” for Rome’s Republican elite like Joseph Coors, both Bush 41 and 43, James Baker, John Bolton, Dwight Eisenhower, William Randolph Hearst, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, Henry Kissinger, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, David Rockefeller, Clinton “prosecutor” Ken Starr, Teddy Roosevelt, George Shultz, Caspar Weinberger, Patrick Wayne (son of John Wayne), and many, many others.⁴

In the Jones version, no sexual perversion is shown or even implied and the child sacrifice ritual, “Cremation of Care” is portrayed as a silly play.

The reality is much more perverse and satanic.

Reputed victim of CIA mind-control and sex slavery (years of involuntary rape, sodomy and torture for both her and her young daughter) Cathy O’Brien paints a satanic picture of what America’s top personalities do at the Grove.

WARNING: DISTURBING NARRATIVE

I was programmed and equipped to function in all rooms at Bohemian Grove in order to compromise specific government targets according to their personal perversions.  “Anything, anytime, anywhere with anyone” was my mode of operation at the Grove.  I do not purport to understand the full function of this political cesspool playground as my perception was limited to my own realm of experience.  My perception is that Bohemian Grove serves those ushering in the New World Order through mind control, and consists primarily of the highest Mafia and U.S. Government officials.  I do not use the term “highest” loosely, as copious quantities of drugs were consumed there. …

Bohemian Grove is reportedly intended to be used recreationally, providing a supposedly secure environment for politically affluent individuals to “party” without restraint.  The only business conducted there pertained to implementing the New World Order, through the proliferation of mind-control atrocities, giving the place an air of “Masonic Secrecy”.  The only room where business discussions were permitted was the small, dark lounge affectionately and appropriately referred to as the Underground.²

Sex slaves were not routinely permitted in the Underground for security reasons, leaving the lounge’s small stage as the only source of “entertainment”.

This entertainment ranged from would-be talents such as Lee Atwater, Bill Clinton, and George Bush to CIA Operative entertainers such as Boxcar Willie and Lee Greenwood, On one occasion I was instructed to meet with former President Gerald Ford in the Underground where Lee Atwater was picking and singing. …

My purpose at the Grove was sexual in nature, and therefore my perceptions were limited to a sex slave’s viewpoint.  As an effective means of control to ensure undetected proliferation of their perverse indulgences, slaves such as myself were subjected to ritualistic trauma.  I knew each breath I took could be my last, as the threat of death lurked in every shadow.  Slaves of advancing age or with failing programming were sacrificially murdered “at random” in the wooded grounds of Bohemian Grave, and I fell it was “simply a matter of time until it would be me”.  Rituals were held at a giant, concrete owl monument on the banks of, ironically enough, the Russian (rushin’) River.  These occultish sex rituals stemmed from the scientific belief that mind-controlled slaves required severe trauma to ensure compartmentalization of the memory, and not from any spiritual motivation.

My own threat of death was instilled when I witnessed the sacrificial death of a young, dark-haired victim at which time I was instructed to perform sexually “as though my life depended upon it”.  I was told, “…the next sacrifice victim could be you.  Anytime when you least expect it, the owl will consume you.  Prepare yourself, and stay prepared.” Being “prepared” equated to being totally suggestible, i.e., “on my toes” awaiting their command. …

The club offered a “Necrophilia” theme room to its members. …

Other perversion theme rooms at the Bohemian Club included what I heard Ford refer to as the “Dark Room”.  When he not so cleverly said, “Let’s go to the Dark Room and see what develops,” I understood from experience that he was interested in indulging in his perverse obsession for pornography.  In the Dark Room, members had sex with the same mind-controlled slave they were viewing in porn on a big screen television.

There was a triangular glass display centered in a main through way where I was locked in with various trained animals, including snakes.  Members walking by watched elicit [sic] sex acts of bestiality, women with women, mothers with daughters, kids with kids, or any other unlimited perverse visual display. …

There was a room of shackles and tortures, black lights and strobes, an opium den, ritualistic sex altars, a chapel, group orgy rooms including poster beds, water beds, and “kitten” houses.  I was used as a “rag doll” in the “toy store,” and as a urinal in the “golden arches” room.

From the owl’s roost to the necrophilia room, no memory of sexual abuse is as horrifying as the conversations overheard in the Underground pertaining to implementing the New World Order.  I learned that perpetrators believed that controlling the masses through propaganda mind manipulation did not guarantee there would be a world left to dominate due to environmental and overpopulation problems.  The solution being debated was not pollution/population control, but mass genocide of “selected undesirables.”⁵

What is also absent from Jones’ faux “exposé” is the high position held at the Grove by a dead Catholic priest.

A priest, of all unlikely people, holds the honor of being the only person to be the subject of two Grove plays.  He is the Patron Saint of Bohemia, Saint John of Nepomuck (pronounced NAY-po-muk), a man who lived in the thirteenth century in the real Bohemia that is now part of Czechoslovakia.  Saint John received his unique distinction among latter-day Bohemians in 1882, when his sad but courageous story was told in a jinks “sired” (the club argot for master of ceremonies) by the poet Charles Warren Stoddard.

Saint John was a cutup in his youth, but had forsaken ephemeral pleasures — or at least most of them — for the priesthood.  One of his first assignments was as a tutor to the heir apparent to the kingship of Bohemia.  John soon became fast friends with the fun-loving prince, often joining him in his spirited and amorous adventures.  When the prince became king, he made Saint John the court confessor.

All went well for Saint John until the king began to suspect that his beautiful queen was having a love affair with a local nobleman.  To allay his suspicions, the king naturally turned to his loyal friend and teacher, Saint John of Nepomuck, demanding that this former companion in many revelries reveal to him the most intimate confessions of the queen.  Saint John refused.  The king pleaded, but to no avail.  Then the king threatened him, which had no effect either.  Finally, in a fit of rage, he ordered Saint John hurled into the river to drown.  John chose to die rather than reveal a woman’s secrets.  Here, truly, was a remarkable fellow, and his story appealed mightily to the San Francisco Bohemians of the nineteenth century.

Several months after the poet Stoddard introduced Saint John to his fellow Bohemians, a small statue of Saint John arrived at the clubhouse in San Francisco from faraway Czechoslovakia.  It seems one of the people present for Stoddard’s talk had been Count Joseph Oswald Von Thun of Czechoslovakia, who had been much taken by the club and its appreciation of his fellow countryman.  Upon his return to Czechoslovakia be had commissioned a woodcarver to make a replica of the statue of Saint John which adorns the bridge in Prague near the place of his drowning.

This unexpected gift still guards the library room in the Bohemians’ large club building in San Francisco — except during the encampment at the Grove, that is.  For that event the statue is carefully transported to a hallowed tree near the center of the Grove, where Saint John, with his forefinger carefully sealing his lips, can be a saintly reminder of the need for discretion.

The legend surrounding Saint John of Nepomuck became part of the oral tradition of the Bohemian Club.  New members inevitably hear the story when they happen upon the statue while being shown around the city clubhouse or the Grove.  But oral tradition is not enough for a patron saint, and the good man’s legend was therefore enacted in a Grove play in 1921 under the title St. John of Nepomuck.  It was retold in 1969 by a different author under the title St. John of Bohemia.⁶

Sadly, there is nothing “unlikely” about “Saint John” being the patron of Bohemian Grove.

Once Jones was established as the place to go when one questions mainstream media, he then went to work discrediting himself and all who subscribe to him.

In 2010, Jones was alerted to a pro-Second Amendment rally by Texans for Accountable Government—a sincere, anti-tyranny organization—taking place in Austin.  He spoke about the rally on his program, then showed up to the engagement already in progress.  He used a bullhorn and constant loud histrionics to disrupt and humiliate the participants.

Like Drudge, Jones is not clearly connected to Rome which gives his masters plausible deniability.  His father-in-law (Edmund Lowe Nichols), however, was U.S. Agricultural Counselor to Italy and was so important to the Italian government they awarded him with their highest civilian honor; Cavaliere Commendatore (Knight Commander) of the Order of Merit.

As usual, Jones’ keepers have plenty of ridiculous smokescreens from claiming he’s a dead comic to accusing him of being a Jewish pawn through that very same father-in-law.

Matt Drudge serves a similar role, though not so obviously antagonistic to the cause of Patriotic Americans.

Like Knight of Malta Rupert Murdoch, a recipient of the Order of Saint Gregory, and his “Fox News”, Drudge is there to redirect Right-wing anger at all of the wrong sources; minorities, Muslims, Jews—whatever best causes division instead of allowing “Conservative” Americans to see that all of their woes come from Rome.

On any given day, one can see the best of Roman distraction, fear-mongering, misplaced focus and wholly-fabricated lies.

My friend Alan, host of Restoring America, sent me notice on September 21^st that Drudge was promoting something particularly disturbing: Roman Catholics flocking to venerate the supposed petrified heart of “Saint Padre Pio” in Lowell, Massachusetts.

Hundreds View Heart of Saint, ‘the Very Core of Our Faith’

Worship and veneration of “relics” like the body parts of “Saints” is an ancient pagan rite.

Nothing is more characteristic of Rome than the worship of relics.  Wherever a chapel is opened, or a temple consecrated, it cannot be thoroughly complete without some relic or other of he-saint or she-saint to give sanctity to it.  The relics of the saints and rotten bones of the martyrs form a great part of the wealth of the Church.  The grossest impostures have been practised in regard to such relics; and the most drivelling tales have been told of their wonder-working powers, and that too by Fathers of high name in the records of Christendom.  Even Augustine, with all his philosophical acuteness and zeal against some forms of false doctrine, was deeply infected with the grovelling spirit that led to relic worship.  Let any one read the stuff with which he concludes his famous “City of God,” and he will in no wise wonder that Rome has made a saint of him, and set him up for the worship of her devotees.  Take only a specimen or two of the stories with which he bolsters up the prevalent delusions of his day: “When the Bishop Projectius brought the relics of St.  Stephen to the town called Aquae Tibiltinae, the people came in great crowds to honour them.  Amongst these was a blind woman, who entreated the people to lead her to the bishop who had the HOLY RELICS.  They did so, and the bishop gave her some flowers which he had in his hand.  She took them, and put them to her eyes, and immediately her sight was restored, so that she passed speedily on before all the others, no longer requiring to be guided.”⁷

______________

The learned Pareus proceeds in a different way to prove that Peter was never at Rome.  He shows from different parts of the Acts of the Apostles and the Epistle to the Galatians, that Peter was in Judea at the time when tradition declares that he was at Rome.  Peter was in Judea when Paul was converted, Acts 9; and three years after this — that is, in the year 38, Galatians 1:8.  He was in Judea in the year 45, when he was imprisoned by Herod, Acts 12, and in 49, fourteen years after Paul’s conversion, Acts 15, Galatians 2:1-9.  Had he been to Rome during this time, some account of such a journey must surely have been given.  After this time we find that he was at Antioch, Galatians 2:11.  If it be asked, where did he afterwards exercise his ministry?  Where more likely than among the Jews, as he had hitherto most clearly done; for he was the Apostle of the Circumcision, and among those to whom he sent his Epistles.  The dating of the first at “Babylon,” has led some to conjecture that it was a figurative term for Rome; but why not for Jerusalem, or for Antioch?  for Christians were at that time treated everywhere like captives or aliens, and especially in the land of Judea.

What then are we to say as to this tradition?  The same, according to the just remark of Pareus, as what we must say of many other traditions of that age, that it is nothing but a fable, which, like many others, would have passed away, had it not been allied to a growing superstition.  With respect to what Eusebius says of the testimony of a presbyter, named Caius, that about the beginning of the third century he saw the graves of Peter and Paul at Rome, it may be easily accounted for: it was the age of pious fraud, when the relics of saints could be found almost everywhere; and, in the next century, the wood and the nails of the Cross were discovered!  Those who can believe these things, may have a credulity large enough to swallow up the testimony of Caius.^8 8

______________

The germinating superstition of the times,—owing principally to the prevalence of the Platonic philosophy, from the subtile disquisitions and specious reasonings of which Christianity suffered far more than she did from the persecuting edicts of emperors and pro-consuls,—likewise aided the advance of the Papacy.  This superstition, which was in truth, as we have already explained, nothing but the revived Paganism of a former age, continued to increase from an early part of the third century and onward.  The simplicity of the Christian faith began to be corrupted by novel and heathenish opinions, and the worship of the Church to be burdened by ridiculous and idolatrous ceremonies.  When the Church exchanged the catacombs for the magnificent edifices which the wealth, the policy, and sometimes the piety of princes erected, she exchanged also the simplicity of life and purity of faith, of which so many affecting memorials remain to our day, for the accommodating spirit of the schools, and the easy manners of the court.  Already, in the fourth century, we find images introduced into churches, the bones of martyrs hawked about as relics, the tombs of saints become the resort of pilgrims, and monks and hermits swarming in the various countries.  We find the pagan festivals, slightly disguised, adopted into the Christian worship; the homage offered anciently to the gods transferred to the martyrs; the Lord’s Supper dispensed sometimes at funerals; the not improbable origin of masses; and the churches filled with the blaze of lamps and tapers, the smoke of incense, the perfume of flowers, and the goodly show of gorgeous robes, crosiers, mitres, and gold and silver vases; reminding one of the not unsimilar spectacles which might be witnessed in the pagan temples.  “The religion of Constantine,” remarks Gibbon, “achieved in less than a century the final conquest of the Roman empire; but the victors themselves were insensibly subdued by the arts of their vanquished rivals.”^{[16] 9}

No less a source than the Catholic Encyclopedia admits that many of these “relics” were frauds—

…it remains true that many of the more ancient relics duly exhibited for veneration in the great sanctuaries of Christendom or even at Rome itself must now be pronounced to be either certainty spurious or open to grave suspicion.  To take one example of the latter class, the boards of the Crib (Praesaepe)— a name which for much more than a thousand years has been associated, as now, with the basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore—can only be considered to be of doubtful.  In his monograph “Le memorie Liberiane dell´ Infanzia di N. S. Gesù Cristo” (Rome, 1894), Mgr. Cozza Luzi frankly avows that all positive evidence for the authenticity of the relics of the Crib etc., is wanting before the eleventh century.  Strangely enough, an inscription in Greek uncials of the eighth century is found on one of the boards, the inscription having nothing to do with the Crib but being apparently concerned with some commercial transaction.  It is hard to explain its presence on the supposition that the relic is authentic.  Similar difficulties might he urged against the supposed “column of the flagellation” venerated at Rome in the Church of Santa Prassede and against many other famous relics.

These skills would come in quite handy for later operatives like Jesuit Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (1881 – 1955).

Chardin was a busy priest—known as the “Father of the New Age”—he was also into archeology.

Teilhard spent most of the next 20 years in China.  In early 1929 he joined the National Geological Survey of China and took part in the excavations, in December 1929, that uncovered a Homo erectus skull, known as Peking man. As the stratigrapher (a geologist who studies layers of the rock record), Teilhard played a major role in dating the discovery. ~ Kahn Academy

“Science” and “archeology”, however, have been the unexpected arenas for chicanery.  One such example was “Piltdown Man”.

The Piltdown Man was a paleoanthropological hoax in which bone fragments were presented as the fossilised remains of a previously unknown early human.

In 1912 amateur archaeologist Charles Dawson claimed he had discovered the “missing link” between ape and man. After finding a section of a human-like skull in Pleistocene gravel beds near Piltdown, East Sussex, Dawson contacted Arthur Smith Woodward, Keeper of Geology at the Natural History Museum.  Dawson and Smith Woodward made further discoveries at the site which they connected to the same individual, including a jawbone, more skull fragments, a set of teeth and primitive tools.

Smith Woodward reconstructed the skull fragments and hypothesised that they belonged to a human ancestor from 500,000 years ago.  The discovery was announced at a Geological Society meeting and was given the Latin name Eoanthropus dawsoni (“Dawson’s dawn-man”).  The questionable significance of the assemblage remained the subject of considerable controversy until it was conclusively exposed in 1953 as a forgery. It was found to have consisted of the altered mandible and some teeth of an orangutan deliberately combined with the cranium of a fully developed, though small-brained, modern human. ~ Wikipedia

At the center of this controversy was a Jesuit priest and “archeologist” named Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.

In reconstructing the recollections of de Chardin in his role with his friend Charles Dawson, paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould discovered that de Chardin had misrepresented exactly when he claimed to have been shown Piltdown specimens which conflicted with when he was conscripted into WWI to be a stretcher-bearer for the French Army.  The implication was that—

Teilhard and Dawson planned the Piltdown 2 discovery before Teilhard left England.  Forty years later, Teilhard misconstructed the exact chronology, forgot that he could not have seen the specimens when they were officially “found,” and slipped in writing to [English physical anthropologist, palaeontologist and geologist Kenneth Page] Oakley [(1911-1981) who proved that the Piltdown bones had been chemically stained to mimic great age, the teeth artificially filed to simulate human wear, the associated mammal remains all brought in from elsewhere, and the flint “implements” recently carved].

Since the founding of the Counter-Reformation shortly after 1517 and the founding of the Jesuits unofficially in 1534 and then officially in 1540, the Company of Loyola had been fast at work on a project of unbelievable scope and satanic success: to re-write all of human cosmology to include ancient pre-humans, the “Big Bang”, dinosaurs and Darwinian evolution.  The matrix-weavers needed a “missing link” to shore up their lies so Teilhard created one.

Unbelievably, he remains a respected archeologist, along with his other “discoveries” like “Peking Man”, even amongst paleontologists who are aware of his skuldugery.

Blind to reality or to the matrix that has been woven for them, neither “scientists” nor laymen stop to consider the staggering question of why anyone who subscribed to empiricism via the Scientific Method—record an observation, formulate an hypothesis, attempt to replicate the observation via experiment which isolates all perceived variables, thereby replicating the observation and proving the hypothesis, submit the results for peer review—would possibly have any impetus what-so-ever in corrupting this process.

That “impetus” is the agenda to completely fabricate an alternative reality that calls into question the assertions of the Bible and the Jesuits have been so successful it’s apparent they’ve had interdimensional aid.

Part of this matrix is the propaganda promoted by “Papal Court Jews” (persecuted but allowed status in a Royal or Roman Catholic Court because they served a purpose) like Matthew Nathan Drudge.

On September 21^st “Drudge” was a cornucopia of Catholic casuistry:

* Headline pushing Jesuit-educated Donald Trump.
* A story about Roman Catholic Leonard DiCaprio, a popular face to push the sophistry of “global warming” that Rome is using to lower the common standard of living and return humanity to feudalism.  In January of this year DiCaprio publicly met with Pope Francis on this issue.  A month later he was awarded his first Oscar.
* Multiple side-stories pushing Trump.
* Stories lionizing Hillary Clinton (neither she nor Trump are in any way controlling their destinies).
* A predominance of stories promoting fear over “ISIS” and Islamic jihad terror (all fabricated by Western Intelligence who answer to Rome).
* Frothing of anger over unimpeded waves of illegal immigrants; an agenda insured by the Papacy and then highlighted so that frustration leads to a Roman-selected fascist demagogue.
* Fear over manipulated threats in North Korea or Russia.
* Catholic faithful venerating what appears to be a petrified human organ.

Upon waking up from his transformation out of the Matrix and into reality, Morpheus welcomed Neo with, “Welcome to the real world.”

In December of 1998, Congress began impeachment proceedings against William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.

In January of 1999, William Jefferson Blythe Clinton committed the American military to a 500 year old religious conflict between Bosnian muslims and Serbian Christians in the former Yugoslavia…aiding the Islamists against their Orthodox foes.

The action was sold to the American people as necessary due to inhuman atrocities created by Serbian “ethnic cleansing”, but a decade later it emerged that Albanian muslims self-inflicted “cleansing” on innocent locals:

Eve-Ann Prentice, a British journalist who covered the Kosovo war for the Guardian and the London Times, testified during Slobodan Milosevic’s trial in the Hague. He said that rather than being driven out by the Serbs, “The KLA [Kosovo Liberation Army] told ethnic Albanian civilians that it was their patriotic duty to leave because the world was watching. This was their one big opportunity to make Kosovo part of Albania eventually, that NATO was there, ready to come in, and that anybody who failed to join the exodus was not supporting the Albanian cause.” ~ Rewarding Terrorism, Deception in Kosovo, Andy Wilcoxson, World Net Daily

Even the “atrocities” were hotly contested at the time as nothing more than contrived provocations for war:

…in Belgrade, Gen. Wesley K. Clark, the NATO commander, and Gen. Klaus Naumann, chairman of the NATO military council, were sitting with President Slobodan Milosevic of Yugoslavia. They came brandishing a plastic portfolio of color photographs documenting a massacre of Albanians three days earlier by Serbian security forces in the Kosovo town of Racak.

They also came with threats of NATO air strikes.

This was far from their first encounter with the Serbian leader, but this time, they recalled, they found a newly hardened man with a bunker mentality.

“This was not a massacre,” Milosevic shouted. “This was staged. These people are terrorists.”

When General Clark warned him that NATO would “start telling me to move aircraft,” Milosevic appeared infuriated by the prospect of bombings. He called the general a war criminal. ~ How a President, Distracted by Scandal, Entered Balkan War, Elaine Sciolino and Ethan Bronner, New York Times

This is the same Wesley Clark that later spilled the beans on similar plans for the Middle East—plans that ran as far back as 1991 to destabilize governments and overturn them with the help of radical Islam…

Note that Syria and Iran are on the doorstep of this policy.

The Bosnian War didn’t do much for Christian Serbs but it was a tremendous boon to the Religion of Peace—by the way, National Guardsmen that should be home digging citizens out of weather emergencies are still deploying on this mission today!

Mike Scruggs noted for the Tribune Papers (archived here) that this was a war that created a terrorist haven in the heart of Europe:

For 78 days in 1999, we bombed Christian Serbia and their forces in Kosovo, ostensibly as a humanitarian move to prevent Serbian ethnic cleansing of Kosovo’s Albanian population. Our real motive was to cripple the troublesome anti-multiculturalist Serbs and to enhance our standing with the oil-rich Muslim world. We bombed bridges, selected buildings, railroads, even passenger trains, and other targets in the Serbian capital of Belgrade. Unfortunately, the Chinese Embassy was also hit. According to John Pilger, writing in the Guardian, many of the bombs dropped from a relatively safe altitude (for us) of 15,000 feet, also hit schools, hospitals, and homes. Total Serbian dead amounted to about two thousand. Pope John Paul II described the bombing as an “act of diabolical retribution.” Many conservative and liberal American leaders agreed, but the Serbs eventually had to yield to our more advanced technology and vastly superior force. …

The results of our alliance with the KLA and establishing an Albanian base of Muslim power in Kosovo have been horrific. The Albanians have driven 277 thousand Serbs from Kosovo. Hundreds have been murdered. Thousands have been robbed and brutalized as their homes and property were destroyed. Muslim multiculturalists have destroyed 135 Orthodox churches, monasteries, and shrines. All this was done under the noses of UN security forces.

Bill Clinton’s great military achievement was a humanitarian disaster, and it established a dangerous Muslim foothold in Europe that is exporting terror and crime.

Unfortunately for Milosevic and the Christians of Serbia, their most important ally, Russia (lead at the time by Boris Yeltsin) was weak and unable to do much more than pick up the pieces for the embattled nation.

At that time, I was completely sold on Russia and Vladimir Putin standing as “good Christians” against the “New World Order”.  I foolishly yet prophetically called Putin “Constantine rising”.  At the time, I didn’t understand who really ran the “New World Order” nor that the same power—Rome—equally controlled Russia.

As the blinders came off, I would write in April of this year—

I was recently sent an interesting video professing to show the Rector of Saint-Petersburg State Agrarian University, Victor Alekseyevich Efimov, giving a class purportedly to members of Russia’s Federal Security Service (Федеральная Служба Безопасности “FSB”).  I thought that, although I had to trust the poor English subtitles and couldn’t verify where Efimov was, it was well worth trying to get through.

I’m glad I did.

Within 20 minutes it was clear to me that the Jesuits and Rome have far more control in Russia than what I had thought beginning with their favorite domain; Intelligence.

One need look no further than the flag of the FSB to know that the Dragon of Rome and her soldiers are secure there.  On a field of a Maltese Cross (the symbol of the Knights of Saint John of Jerusalem, a.k.a. the Hospitallers, a.k.a. the Knights of Malta) sits the Imperial Russian crest which has the two-headed eagle of Freemasonry.

More specifically, the two-headed eagle is a Templar insignia which was adopted by the Freemasons.

It shows the two faces of the Imperial Roman Eagle and bespeaks of how Rome and her secret societies have conquered mankind by stealth and deception; putting a kindly, gentle face of lies towards us but a ravenous parasitic face of satanic feudal domination towards those “in the know”.

Having seen a post-Soviet Russia reborn in Christian culture, I had hoped that it signaled the one nation left that stood against the Great Whore of Babylon but such is not the case.

Russia’s Christian virtues and everything else of significance—from her industry to her military, from her banks to her intelligence agencies—are dominated by the second leg of iron in Nebuchadnezzar’s dream; Orthodoxy.

This was proven quite succinctly just in the past few weeks as a completely needless “anti-terrorism” law was concocted by the Duma and dutifully signed by the KGB Colonel, himself.  It strikes—not at the phantasm of “radical Islam” created by Intelligence Agencies—but directly at who Rome hates the most: Protestant Evangelicals.

I wrote in July—

In 2012, the Christian Post reported that the Orthodox Church had guaranteed President Putin would step up to protect Christians around the world.

The representative of the Russian Orthodox Church has told Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin this week of the urgent situation Christians are facing around the world in persecution hot spots, and has asked him to use his power to aid their situations.

RT online reported that Metropolitan Hilarion, foreign relation chief of the Russian Orthodox Church presented evidence and statistics that stated, “Every five minutes one Christian was dying for his or her faith in some part of the word.”

Christians face persecution in many nations; from church demolition in Afghanistan and bombings of churches in Iraq, to the violence against Christians taking place in rebellious towns in Syria.

After delivering the facts, Metropolitan Hilarion asked Putin to make protection and defense of Christianity around the globe a major part of his foreign policy.

And, as reported by Interfax, Putin replied, “You needn’t have any doubt that that’s the way it will be,” assuring Hilarion that Russian foreign policy would defend Christians from persecution abroad.

But the bloodletting of Christians continues unabated.

In fact, as a result of the so-called “War on Terror”, Protestant Evangelical Christians are being persecuted in Russia, as well.

This week, Russian president Vladimir Putin approved a package of anti-terrorism laws that usher in tighter restrictions on missionary activity and evangelism.

Despite prayers and protests from religious leaders and human rights advocates, the Kremlin announced Putin’s approval yesterday.  The amendments, including laws against sharing faith in homes, online, or anywhere but recognized church buildings, go into effect July 20.

Though opponents to the new measures hope to eventually appeal in court or elect legislators to amend them, they have begun to prepare their communities for life under the new rules, reported Forum 18 News Service, a Christian outlet reporting on the region.

Protestants and religious minorities small enough to gather in homes fear they will be most affected.  Last month, “the local police officer came to a home where a group of Pentecostals meet each Sunday,” Konstantin Bendas, deputy bishop of the Pentecostal Union, told Forum 18.  “With a contented expression he told them: ‘Now they’re adopting the law I’ll drive you all out of here.’ I reckon we should now fear such zealous enforcement.” ~ Christianity Today

As I’ve already reported to you, at length, organized religion is the most deadly weapon used against a healthy Christian Faith.  Slowly, Evangelical Protestants are awakening to this danger and returning to their roots by joining in their homes as the first Christians once did.

In Russia, this is now illegal.

The bloom is most certainly off the Russian rose—for me and it should be for you.

Since then, I have come across some fascinating information that shows who the real target was of the Jesuits running the Clinton Administration.

Yes, at a basic level, Rome still despises Orthodox Christians and revels in slaughtering them.

At the very top, however, Orthodoxy as well as any other Roman run-off like the Anglican Church is all completely co-opted and controlled by Rome.

The Romans secretly running the United States did, indeed, wish to punish the Orthodox “heretic” Christians of Yugoslavia.  They also sought to create a bastion for “radical Islam” in Europe.

From 1992 to 1995, the Pentagon assisted with the movement of thousands of mujahedin and other Islamic elements from Central Asia into Europe, to fight alongside Bosnian Muslims against the Serbs.

The Bosnia venture appears to have been very important to the rise of mujahedin forces, to the emergence of today’s cross-border Islamic terrorists who think nothing of moving from state to state in the search of outlets for their jihadist mission. …

As part of the Dutch government’s inquiry into the Srebrenica massacre of July 1995, Professor Cees Wiebes of Amsterdam University compiled a report entitled “Intelligence and the War in Bosnia”, published in April 2002.  In it he details the secret alliance between the Pentagon and radical Islamic groups from the Middle East, and their efforts to assist Bosnia’s Muslims.  By 1993, there was a vast amount of weapons-smuggling through Croatia to the Muslims, organised by “clandestine agencies” of the USA, Turkey and Iran, in association with a range of Islamic groups that included Afghan mujahedin and the pro-Iranian Hezbollah.  Arms bought by Iran and Turkey with the financial backing of Saudi Arabia were airlifted from the Middle East to Bosnia—airlifts with which, Wiebes points out, the USA was “very closely involved”.

… for all the Clinton officials’ concern about Islamic extremists in the Balkans, they continued to allow the growth and movement of mujahedin forces in Europe through the 1990s.  In the late 1990s, in the run-up to Clinton’s and Blair’s Kosovo war of 1999, the USA backed the Kosovo Liberation Army against Serbia.  According to a report in the Jerusalem Post in 1998, KLA members, like the Bosnian Muslims before them, had been “provided with financial and military support from Islamic countries”, and had been “bolstered by hundreds of Iranian fighters or mujahedin…[some of whom] were trained in Osama bin Laden’s terrorist camps in Afghanistan”. ~ How We Trained al-Qa’eda, Brendan O’Neill, The Spectator

More importantly, there is a reason why Bosnia is in Ignatius Loyola’s “little black book”: in the not-too-distant past it was a haven for Bible-believing Christians as they tried to preserve pure doctrine through the Roman Dark Ages.

As I research the sequel for my book Illuminati Unmasked, I have found an excellent resourse: Edmund Broadbent’s 1931 epic The Pilgrim Church.

In it, Broadbent carefully chronicles the true underground Church prior to the Reformation.

Some of those Christians emigrated to Bosnia where they were persecuted by both of Nebuchadnezzar’s legs of iron.

Byzantine persecution drove many of the believers westward into Serbia, and the strength of the Orthodox Church in Serbia pushed them further, into Bosnia.  They continued active on the eastern side of the Peninsula and in Asia Minor.  In 1140 supposed Bogomil error was found in the writings of Constantine Chrysomalus and condemned at a synod held in Constantinople.  The teaching objected to was, that Church baptism is not efficacious, that nothing done by unconverted persons, though baptised, is of any value, that God’s grace is received by the laying on of hands, but only in accordance with the measure of faith.  In 1143 a synod at Constantinople deposed two Cappadocian bishops on the charge of being Bogomils, and in the following century the Patriarch Gemadius complained of their spread in Constantinople itself, where, it was said, they got into private houses and made converts.  Their churches continued in Bulgaria.

As late as the 17th century congregations known as “Pavlicani” (Paulicians)^[31] remained in Philippopolis and other parts of Bulgaria reaching even North of the Danube, who were described by the Orthodox Church as “convinced heretics” and who condemned the Orthodox Church as idolatrous.  Then came Franciscan missionaries from Bosnia and laboured with much zeal among them, in spite of many dangers from the wrath of the Orthodox clergy.  Taking advantage of the persecution suffered by the Paulicians at the hands of the Orthodox Church, the missionaries gradually persuaded them to put themselves under the protection of the Roman Catholic Church and so won them for Rome.  Long after this, however, they continued some of their former practices, especially their custom of meeting together for a meal in common, but they were little by little assimilated to the Roman practice, received images into their churches, and are now known as Bulgarian Catholics in contradistinction to the Bulgarians generally, who are either Orthodox, or Pomaks, that is, descended from ancestors forcibly converted to Mohammedanism.

It was, however, in Bosnia that their greatest development took place.

In the twelfth century they were already very numerous there, and spread to Spalato and Dalmatia.  Here they came into conflict with the Roman Catholic Church.  The title of the rulers of Bosnia was Ban, the most eminent of these being Kulin Ban.  In 1180 this ruler was addressed by the Pope as a faithful adherent of the Church, but by 1199 it was acknowledged that he and his wife and family and ten thousand Bosnians had joined the Bogomil or Patarene heresy, otherwise churches of believers, in Bosnia.  Minoslav, Prince of the Herzegovina, took the same stand, as did also the Roman Catholic Bishop of Bosnia.  The country ceased to be Catholic and experienced a time of prosperity that has remained proverbial ever since.

There were no priests, or rather the priesthood of all believers was acknowledged.  The churches were guided by elders who were chosen by lot, several in each church, an overseer (called grandfather), and ministering brethren called leaders and elders.  Meetings could be held in any house and the regular meeting-places were quite plain, no bells, no altar, only a table, on which might be a white cloth and a copy of the Gospels.

A part of the earnings of the brethren was set aside for the relief of sick believers and of the poor and for the support of those who travelled to preach the Gospel among the unconverted.

Pope Innocent III, with the help of the King of Hungary, brought such pressure to bear on Kulin Ban that, at a meeting (1203) between the Pope’s envoys and the Ban, accompanied by the magnates of Bosnia, at Bjelopolje, “the White Plain”, where Kulin held his court, the Bosnian leaders agreed to submit to the Roman Church, promised never again to relapse into heresy, but to erect an altar and a cross in each of their places of worship, and to have priests who should read the Mass and listen to Confession, and administer the Sacrament twice a year.  They agreed to observe fasts and holy days, that the laity should cease to undertake spiritual functions, and that those who ministered in spiritual matters should be the clergy only, who would be distinguished from the laity by wearing cowls and being called brothers, and that when these elected a Prior, they would apply to the Pope for confirmation.  Heretics were never again to be tolerated in Bosnia.  Though, under pressure of the threat of war, the Ban and rulers of the country made such an agreement, the people entirely refused to accept it or to be bound by it in any way.

Brethren in Bosnia had intercourse with their fellow-believers in Italy, in the South of France, in Bohemia, on the Rhine, and in other parts, reaching even to Flanders and England.  When the Pope declared a crusade against the Albigenses, and Provence was being wasted, fugitives found refuge in Bosnia.  Bosnian and Provencal elders consulted together on matters of doctrine.  Rumours were current that the spiritual movements in Italy, France, and Bohemia, were all connected with a “heretical Pope” in Bosnia.  This was only imaginary, as no such person existed, but it showed that a strong influence went out from Bosnia.  An Italian Inquisitor, Reniero Sacconi, living in the reign of Kulin, who, having been himself a “heretic”, knew more about them than most, calls them the Church of the Cathari, or pure-living, a name used from before the time of the Emperor Constantine, and says they extended from the Black Sea to the Atlantic.

The peace which Kulin Ban purchased by yielding to Rome was not of long duration, for he could not compel his people to observe its terms.

On his death (1216) the Pope appointed a Roman Catholic Ban, and sent a mission to convert the Bosnians.  The churches of the country, however, increased the more, and spread into Croatia, Dalmatia, Istria, Carniola and Slavonia.  Some six years later the Pope, despairing of converting the Bosnians by other than forcible methods, and encouraged by the success of his crusade in Provence, ordered the King of Hungary to invade Bosnia.  The Bosnians deposed their Roman Catholic Ban and elected a Bogomil, Ninoslav.  For years the war went on, with varying fortune.  Ninoslav yielded to circumstances and became a Roman Catholic, but no change in their rulers affected the faith and confession of the great bulk of the people.  The country was devastated, but whenever the invading armies withdrew, the churches were found still existing, and the industry of the people quickly restored prosperity.  Fortresses were erected throughout the country “for the protection of the Roman Catholic Church and religion”; the Pope gave the land to Hungary, which long ruled it, but its people still holding to their faith, he at length called a crusade of “all the Christian world” against it; the Inquisition was established (1291), and Dominican and Franciscan brothers competed in applying its terrors to the devoted churches.¹

Another excellent source has been the writings of Luciferian Helena Blavatsky.

Very often real truth is the treasure that erupts from one evil entity fighting with another.

In this case, it is Blavatsky outing the atrocities of Rome as the great Harlot enabled Islam against the Christians of Serbia and Bosnia—116 years before Bill Clinton’s treasonous war.

But is it merely Pagans and heathen that the Catholics persecute, and about whom, like Augustine, they cry to the Deity, “Oh, my God! so do I wish Thy enemies to be slain”?  Oh, no! their aspirations are more Mosaic and Cain‐like than that.

It is against their next of kin in faith, against their schismatic brothers that they are now intriguing within the walls which sheltered the murderous Borgias.  The larvæ of the infanticidal, parricidal, and fratricidal Popes have proved themselves fit counsellors for the Cains of Castelfidardo and Mentana.  It is now the turn of the Slavonian Christians, the Oriental Schismatics — the Philistines of the Greek Church!

His Holiness the Pope, after exhausting, in a metaphor of self‐laudation, every point of assimilation between the great biblical prophets and himself, has finally and truly compared himself with the Patriarch Jacob “wrestling against his God.”

He now crowns the edifice of Catholic piety by openly sympathizing with the Turks!  The vicegerent of God inaugurates his infallibility by encouraging, in a true Christian spirit, the acts of that Moslem David, the modern Bashi‐Bazuk; and it seems as if nothing would more please his Holiness than to be presented by the latter with several thousands of the Bulgarian or Servian “foreskins.”  True to her policy to be all things to all men to promote her own interests, the Romish Church is, at this writing (1876), benevolently viewing the Bulgarian and Servian atrocities, and, probably, manoeuvring with Turkey against Russia.  Better Islam, and the hitherto‐hated Crescent over the sepulchre of the Christian god, than the Greek Church established at Constantinople and Jerusalem as the state religion.  Like a decrepit and toothless ex‐tyrant in exile, the Vatican is eager for any alliance that promises, if not a restoration of its own power, at least the weakening of its rival.  The axe its inquisitors once swung, it now toys with in secret, feeling its edge, and waiting, and hoping against hope.  In her time, the Popish Church has lain with strange bedfellows, but never before now sunk to the degradation of giving her moral support to those who for over 1200 years spat in her face, called her adherents “infidel dogs,” repudiated her teachings, and denied godhood to her God!²

As I continue to dig, I have found one thing remains consistent: the Great Harlot may bite off an ear or cut off the arm of one of her wayward children but she never waivers from attacking with full ferocity those who fully serve God.

Depopulation is a top agenda of the secret Elite who control the world from behind the scenes.  Researchers have found evidence of several diseases that have been engineered in order to accomplish this agenda.  In the process, common people’s lives are played with and/or experimented on as a way to also develop vaccines and medicines that are designed to have certain side effects that, in the end, excel its alleged benefits.  What many do not know (or pretend not to know) is the critical of the Vatican and the Jesuits play in this task as articulators.  It’s understandable since one is accustomed to see many Catholic organizations involved in helping the poor and the sick.  However, these seem to be front institutions only to maintain a charitable face to the public.  The tactic seems to work , but yet the evidence is there to be exposed.

What a “Zica”?

“Zica” is a supposed virus epidemic being exploited to stir panic in the population and prop up the Jesuit World Order sponsorship of new vaccines.  Scientists have claimed that the Zika virus carried by Aedes Aegypti mosquitoes is responsible for the spike in cases of microcephaly in newborn babies, mainly in Brazil.  The media, as usual, has helped spread panic over an epidemic supported by the World Health Organization and its director-general, Dr. Margaret Chan.  Chan is the same director-general who had stated the following at a Georgetown University lecture (Georgetown is a Jesuit University)—

President Jack DeGioia, faculty at the campuses of Georgetown University, students and post-graduate students, ladies and gentlemen;

It is a great honour to address an event organized by Georgetown University, America’s oldest Catholic and Jesuit university.  I am well aware of the ethical values that guide the work of this university and its several institutes and centres.

I fully agree with the principles that underpin the Global Futures Initiative.  Issues of governance, especially in health, will profoundly affect the future of humanity.

The Pope’s visit to this country has done much to underscore the human dimensions of climate change and the refugee crisis.  He asks us all to remember the people. ~ Dr. Margaret Chan, Director-General of the WHO, Washington, DC, USA, 30 September 2015

As a result of hysteria (or perhaps as a calculated reaction), Latin-American governments started to advocate contraceptive methods to avoid the prospective of having a child with birth defects.  Some went beyond, and recommended women not to get pregnant for a while.  Even the Pope condoned the use of contraceptives in face of such a menace.  However, the most shocking reaction came from the place admired by Dr. Chan for its “ethical values”: Georgetown now promotes abortion as a way to combat Zika.

Despite of the initial figures that claim more than 4000 cases of microcephaly linked to the Zika virus, only about 400 cases were confirmed.  This by no means characterizes an epidemic as alarmed by the press.  Interestingly, it went unnoticed the fact that newborn microcephaly seems to be endemic in certain areas of Brazil at least since 2012 (prior to Zika’s discussion), which might indicate another cause for the illness.  It turns out pre-Zika microcephaly cases were far more prevalent than originally reported.  Also, the virus was discovered circa 1947 and has been around all this time without causing severe problems other than mild transient illness.  Nevertheless, there has been a big push towards spending on vaccine development with Hillary Clinton in the frontlines.

Is it possible that Jesuit trained, recently Catholic converted (as uncovered by Johnny Cirucci.com investigative reporter Graham) Bill Gates has something to do with that story?  He has stated as much, himself:

First, we’ve got population.  The world today has 6.8 billion people.  That’s headed up to about nine billion.  Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent, but there we see an increase of about 1.3.  ~ Bill Gates, TED2010, Innovation to zero!, February 2010

In mid-2015 it was reported that a British biotech company called Oxitec had created GMO¹ mosquitos to eradicate dengue (another sickness caused by the Aedes Aegypti mosquitoes) in certain risk areas.  Brazil was one of the countries that released these mosquitoes in the environment.  Curiously, the northern Brazilian city of Juazeiro, where these mosquitoes were released reported most of the birth defects.  Oxitec was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Another possibility to consider is the Tdap vaccines for pregnant women.  Starting in late 2014, Brazilian pregnant women are required to take Tdap shots to combat pertussis infections despite overwhelming evidence that points towards its unsafety during pregnancy.  The Tdap vaccine initiative was also conducted by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Last but not least, Brazil is the largest consumer of pesticide in the world using chemicals that are banned in most other nations.  Fetal growth impairment was observed with pesticides such as Antrazine and Metolachlor, largely used in Brazil.  The GMO crops introduced there are feared to be responsible for the rampant use of pesticides.  Once again, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was deeply involved in introducing GMO crops in Brazil.

Indeed, there are many evidences pointing toward Bill Gates and his foundation as the leading cause of suffering in these instances.  Depopulation has always been one of the top priorities of the Jesuit-run Elite and only a few puppets like Bill Gates carry on this agenda with such will.  By controlling population with genetically-engineered diseases and their “preventative vaccines”, this same Jesuit-controlled Elite have used Brazil as their evil test bed.

It is ironic to note that, in the Brazilian language, “What a zica” is a slang expression for “What bad luck!”

The HIV/AIDS Deception

Since its alleged discovery in 1983 by Catholic-educated Dr. Robert Gallo, the HIV virus is now wholly accepted by both science and medicine as the leading cause of AIDS.  However, some dissenting voices in both fields have been questioning the validity of this assertion.  One of them is Dr. Eleni Papadopulos, a biophysicist that has led a group of HIV/ADIS research scientists in Australia in the past years.  According to this interview, Dr. Papadopulos affirms that in order to prove the existence of a virus, three things are required: find the particle one might think is the virus, isolate it and break down its constituents, then prove the particle can make faithful copies of itself.  However, it seems these key procedures were not followed regarding HIV.  Dr. Papadopulos (EP) explains this further in her interview with independent reporter Christine Johnson (CJ).

CJ: Does HIV cause AIDS?

EPE: There is no proof that HIV causes AIDS.

CJ: Why not?

EPE: For many reasons, but most importantly, because there is no proof that HIV exists. …

CJ: Didn’t Luc Montagnier and Robert Gallo [purportedly the co-discoverers of HIV] isolate HIV back in the early eighties?

EPE: No.  In the papers published in Science by those two research groups, there is no proof of the isolation of a retrovirus from AIDS patients.  [HIV is said to be a retrovirus.]

Despite recent advances in micro and nano technology as well as the advent of electron microscopy, one is yet to see an electron micrograph of the HIV virus.

CJ: But Montagnier and Gallo did publish photographs of virus particles.

EPE: No.  Montagnier and Gallo published electron micrographs of culture fluids that had not been centrifuged, or even separated from the culture cells, for that matter.  These EMs contained, in addition to many other things, including the culture cells and other things that clearly are not retroviruses, a few particles which Montagnier and Gallo claimed are retroviruses, and which all belonged to the same retroviral species, now called HIV.  But photographs of unpurified particles don’t prove that those particles are viruses.  The existence of HIV was not established by Montagnier and Gallo — or anyone since — using the method presented at the 1973 meeting.

CJ: But what about their pictures?

EPE: Montagnier’s and Gallo’s electron micrographs…are of entire cell cultures, or of unpurified fluids from cultures…” ~ An interview with Eleni Papadopulos-Eleopulos by Christine Johnson

Once Dr. Gallo announced the probable cause of AIDS, the race was on to find a pharmaceutical weapon to combat it.  AZT, a drug developed by Dr. Jerome Horowitz that failed to treat cancer, was recycled and given to HIV patients as the only hope available.  The high toxicity level of AZT was not addressed properly and eventually, many patients have begun to complain about its efficacy and safety.  Dr. Horowitz obtained his Master’s degree at the Roman-Catholic, Jesuit-run University of Detroit Mercy.

The company GlaxoSmithKline (previously known as “Glaxo Wellcome”) is the largest manufacturer of drugs for HIV/AIDS treatment, and has been at the center of this controversy.  Perhaps the most notorious case concerns Glaxo’s sponsorship of drug trials (including AZT) on babies as young as three months.  In 2004, a BBC documentary revealed that tests were being conducted in New York at Incarnation Children’s Center, which is run by Catholic charities.  Drugs were administered to HIV-positive children and/or orphans of drug users by mixing them with food or, in more severe cases, mixing it with food or, in more severe cases, directly into the child’s stomach via syringe via syringe.  Other scandals include Glaxo’s involvement in Catholic sexual abuse cover-ups and, more recently, the pouring of 45 liters of polio vaccine into a river in Belgium.  Interestingly, James Murdoch and his Knight of Malta father Rupert Murdoch are linked to Glaxo through their board of committees.

Whistleblowers have tried to alert the public regarding the true origins of viruses such as HIV and Ebola.  Among them, Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz is perhaps the most prominent.  Horowitz is renowned for accusing the U.S. military, CIA, and DoD of developing HIV and other viruses and releasing them into public circulation, mostly in African countries.  Unfortunately, Horowitz has not implicated the Vatican in any of his dissertations.  Research into the background of Leonard Horowitz shows that he is a Knight of Malta.  As long as big pharmaceutical companies, driven mainly by profit and by Elite agendas that seek to harm the common citizen, people will continue to suffer and minorities will continue to be treated as guinea pigs.

Proud Caped Crusaders for Rome, Knights of Malta Nelson Mandela and Prince Richard Alexander Walter George, the Duke of Gloucester in 2009

Ebola: Another Weapon of Depopulation?

The most recent Ebola outbreak started in West Africa in 2013 and spread throughout other countries over a period of two years.  This caused the world to fear a disease allegedly without cure.  Researchers and doctors from all over the world rushed to Africa in order to study the disease and treat the patients.   However, one of the most controversial contributions might be from Tulane University.

Tulane is recognized as a private, secular institution.  However, it has a consortium with two Jesuit Catholic Universities; Loyola and Xavier.  In fact, Tulane highly prizes its Catholic Center.  Bioweapon expert, Prof. Francis Boyle blames Tulane and the U.S. Department of Defense, working together with giant pharmaceutical and biotech companies with releasing a bioengineered Ebola strain in Serra Leone.  As a result, Sierra Leone has halted Tulane from conducting further Ebola testing and to close the U.S. bioweapons lab.

Diseases like Ebola usually bring some sort of stigma to the patients as they are seen as contagious people even after treated.  The Society of Jesus knows very well how to explore this social component of Ebola.  A Jesuit High School canceled the visit of some African students based on Ebola scare, even though they were not from the affected areas in Africa.  This only serves to inflate social justice warrior’s speech regarding how Africans are mistreated by whites as to prompt white guilty.  Racism, which of course is one the Jesuits calling cards had to play a role in this incident as well, igniting a social strife that is planned to culminate with a Jesuit World Order synthesis  In fact, the Jesuits largely contributed with African slavery in America and other parts of the world such as in Africa under the pretext of slaying the unbelievers.  By the way, the Company of Loyola is still very active in Africa through organizations such as AJAN (African Jesuit Aids Network) as they join the “fight” against Ebola.  It’s also interesting to note that AJAN is responsible for 25 percent of all HIV treatment in Africa and nearly 100 percent in remote areas.  Of course, that included the poisonous AZT administered to pregnant mother infected with HIV.

In any way possible, the goal of the Jesuit World Order is ultimate control.  One important aspect of that is the control of our well-being.  By wielding the sword of engineered viruses and diseases and the shield of poisonous and purposely-ineffective cures and vaccines in the best Hegelian dialect style, the Vatican intends to obtain its goal.  The clock is ticking and the Jesuits know they must use every resource available, from giant pharmaceutical companies to mind-controlled billionaires, to disseminate their poisonous cup over the entire humanity.

Perhaps, as with all other overwhelming threats, the best weapon we have in response…is faith.

“They will pick up snakes with their hands; and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all; they will place their hands on sick people, and they will get well.” ~ Mark 16:18

John McLaughlin died on August 16^th, 2016, at 89 years of age after almost two decades as a television media pundit—most notably for the show he hosted titled “The McLaughlin Group”.

But more than that, McLaughlin was a key player in politics, as well, having unsuccessfully run for United States Senate as a Jesuit priest.  Why not?  His Jesuit brother, pro-abortion priest Robert Drinan became an anti-Vietnam Leftist Democrat Congressman for Massachusetts from 1971 to 1981—and never took his collar off.

America has come a sad, long way from her founding where Roman Catholic citizens (not to mention clergy) were barred from the vote because American Protestants remembered all too well the Papal tyranny and persecution they had run from in Europe.

McLaughlin would’ve been the perfect pro-Vietnam foil for his brother, just as the blood oath they both took swore them to be:

You have been taught to plant insidiously the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces, states that were at peace, and to incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the arts and the sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace; to take sides with the combatants and to act secretly with your brother Jesuit, who might be engaged on the other side, but openly opposed to that with which you might be connected, only that the Church might be the gainer in the end, in the conditions fixed in the treaties for peace and that the end justifies the means.

Instead, McLaughlin became the Jesuit who put words in the mouth of their minion, Richard Milhous Nixon.

The Jesuits have always been telling their American puppets what to say.

The Teleprompter In Chief

Although Americans have no idea who Barack Obama is, it is clear that he is heavily controlled by powers beyond him.

Obama is so controlled, he is required to speak from a teleprompter even when he is before a classroom of 6^th grade children, as was the case in Falls Church, VA in January of 2010.

Even Left-wing comic Jonathan Leibowitz (more popularly known as “Jon Stewart”) couldn’t pass up the opportunity to lampoon this event⁵⁷⁴, but the idea that Obama is handled from a higher power just as, if not more malignant towards America than he is, is no laughing matter.

Who is telling Obama what to say?

—Jesuits are…through their agents like Jon Favreau.

Favreau started his political career via an internship with Skull and Bones alum John Kerry while attending Jesuit Holy Cross.

From there, his Leftist ideology passed the test for the Society of Jesus and he was given to Barack Obama…

…

[Chris] Matthews is one of the most well-known vitriolic Leftists in mainstream media.

What isn’t as well known is that he had a special Catholic education starting with Jesuit La Salle College High School and then on to Jesuit Holy Cross.  He has an honorary degree from Jesuit Fordham, as well.⁸⁹²

He was cultivated by the premier Catholic Leftist of his day, Thomas P. “Tip” O’Neill. Matthews was his top aide.  O’Neill held his protected seat in Congress for thirty four years—ten of those as Speaker of the House of Representatives.

O’Neill was a graduate of Jesuit-run Boston College.⁸⁹³

As Jesuit-trained Jon Favreau would tell Barack Obama what to say in his speeches, Chris Matthews would do the same for President Jimmy Carter.⁸⁹⁴ ~ Illuminati Unmasked ¹

Good ole radical Catholic Leftist “Tip” O’Neill was a late-night drinking buddy with “Conservative Patriot” Ronald Wilson Reagan.  Matthews enjoyed manipulating it so much, he wrote a book to brag about it; Tip and the Gipper.

“Conservative Patriot” Ronald Reagan is one of the best propaganda efforts America has ever seen; gun control, higher taxes, legalized illegal aliens, bigger government—Reagan did it all.

Understanding that the Jesuits created both Nazi fascism and Communism, if we take away “taking down the wall”, the Presidency of Ronald Reagan was little different than his Leftist predecessor Jimmy Carter.

What did Reagan do to deserve the re-write of history?

He reunited America with her puppeteer.

In investigating the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, so many ties were found to the Vatican that the United States severed relations with the “sovereign entity” in 1867.  The man to change that in late 1983 was Ronald Reagan.  …it was his administration that signaled the complete control of America by “the Unseen Hand”.

THE PHALLUS OF OSIRIS

It is, indeed, an historical fact that on January 20^th , 1981, Ronald Wilson Reagan was the first President of the United States to conduct his inauguration on the west front of the Capitol instead of the east front.  As [ex-Jesuit priest] Alberto Rivera predicted, he was facing the Washington Monument. ~ Illuminati DEFEATED, Johnny Cirucci.com

Few know that Reagan was raised by a Catholic father and he openly practiced Catholicism as a late teen.

Reagan’s father, Jack, was a lapsed Catholic.  Ronald’s brother Neil was baptized into the Roman Catholic Church but Ronald was baptized into the Disciples of Christ.  His mother, Nell, was baptized into the Disciples on 27 March 1910, less than one year before Ronald’s birth.  At age 19, Ronald left the Disciples, claiming the Catholicism of his father. ~ Ronald Reagan, Notable Names Database

Even those that buy into the lie of the “Cold War” admit that Ronald Reagan was absolutely surrounded (and controlled) by Roman Catholics—most of them either Jesuit-trained or Jesuits, themselves!

Reagan counted many Catholics among his intimates, especially his chief foreign policy players: National Security Adviser Richard Allen, CIA Director William Casey, Ambassador to the United Nations Vernon Walters, Secretary of State Alexander Haig (whose brother was a Jesuit priest), to name a few.

Most vital was William Clark, who replaced Allen.  Clark supervised and implemented the formal National Security Decision Directives crucial to confronting the Soviet empire.  A student of Aquinas, Fulton Sheen and Thomas Merton, who as a young man attended an Augustinian novitiate in upstate New York, Clark was dubbed Reagan’s “most impressive” and “most important and influential” adviser by official biographer Edmund Morris.  Morris rightly discerned that no other person was as close to the president spiritually.  Clark and Reagan prayed together, particularly the Prayer of St. Francis.

Also notable, given Reagan’s moniker “the Great Communicator,” was the contribution of Catholic speechwriters, such as Peter Robinson, who wrote the Brandenburg Gate speech, Peggy Noonan, author of the Challenger remarks, and chief speechwriter Tony Dolan, who penned Reagan’s most memorable foreign policy addresses.

Then there were Reagan’s poignant relationships with high-profile Catholics such as Terence Cardinal Cooke, Mother Teresa and, of course, Pope John Paul II.  To all three, Reagan confided that he believed God had spared his life during the March 1981 assassination attempt for the purpose of taking down Soviet communism.  He and John Paul II were jointly committed to that historic endeavor. ~ USA Today

Reagan was part of the same game Rome plays on us today: pseudo-Right and rabid Left.

Writing the script on the one side was Chris Matthews for “Tip” O’Neill.  On the Reagan side of the Hegelian dialectic was Patrick Joseph Buchanan.  Buchanan was Reagan’s Communications Director, having first been trained at Blessed Sacrament Grammar School, Jesuit-run Gonzaga College High School, and then Jesuit-run Georgetown University.

Each one of these personalities would leave politics for propaganda at NBC/MSNBC as well as CNN and FoxNews.  It’s all the same.

Eleanor Clift, Morton Kondracke, Fred Barnes, and Roman Catholic Robert Novak would all join the supporting cast behind McLaughlin.

Of course, like so many others who have appeared to leave the Company of Loyola or the priesthood altogether, McLaughlin only took off his cassock for appearance’ sake.  He went to his grave doing the bidding of the Superior General.

Who runs the media, the Jews or the Jesuits?

The answer is clear.

For the past 18 to 24 months I’ve been Russia’s biggest fan in America.

If one makes the stretch that says the Orthodox religion is “Christian”, Russia is a Christian nation.

As the West devolves further and further into an anti-Christian, amoral dystopia, Russia has bucked the trend.

In 2013, a law was signed by President Vladimir Putin banning homosexual propaganda (particularly that which targets children).

A year later, more restrictions went into place that targeted outside nations which have enacted homosexual “marriage” then sending homosexual couples to Russia to adopt children.

No other First World nation protects children from the terrible effects of being subjected to homosexual “parents”.

Western Intelligence, particularly the Central Intelligence Agency (thoroughly controlled by the Jesuits) has been using sexual depravity and extreme feminism to attack Russia.

Of particular note was the interruption and degradation of a service at Moscow’s Cathedral of Christ the Savior by the supposed punk rock band “Pussy Riot”.

The band is said to have been founded in 2011 but has neither recorded music nor presented concerts.

Offending Russians does seem to be high on their play list as the spectacle at Christ the Savior Cathedral occurred just a few months after their founding.

A year later, angry Orthodox Christians stormed into a Pussy Riot support event and scolded the attendees with “Repent!”, “Why do you hate Russia?”

Under pressure to appear like a real band, the United States State Department helped the hapless harpies hump out a single.  I’m sure you’ve heard it on the radio.

In response to the punk assault, the Russian Legislature (Duma) has enacted a law which levies a $15,000 penalty and “correctional work” for those who disrupt sacred institutions.

As onlookers begin to realize that the Pussy Riot and Femen (a similar subversive group with nebulous beginnings and funding) saboteurs were focusing on Russia, Ukraine and the Vatican, suspicions began to arise.  On cue, Papal insurgents threw down the “IT’S THE JEWS!” card.

When it comes to fighting the “New World Order”, Russia repeatedly steps away from the decadent, enslaved West in defiance.

As the dangers of GMO food (“genetically-modified organisms”) continue to be of concern, the Russian government has banned their production.

As Leftist and globalist demagogues proclaimed the “end of the world” due to “global warming” unless common citizens returned to the stone age, Russian hackers released e-mails from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, in Britain, showing how climate “scientists” doctored and fabricated data to emphasize the doom and gloom.

When it comes to the use and abuse of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV’s or “drones”) for mass surveillance and use in war, Vladimir Putin has stated that “drones aren’t toys” and has vowed to be circumspect in their use.

The most shocking move of all has been the relaxation of private firearm ownership restrictions to allow for the use of “self-defense”.  It is a trend unprecedented in any nation.  Where governments hostile to their citizenry actually create false flag events as excuses to confiscate firearms, Russia appears to be firmly moving in the opposite direction.

“Conservative” wonks stuck in the Cold War (or who knowingly manipulate you to be stuck there) were having fits.

It’s beginning to border on the surreal.  We’ve talked to great lengths about the inversion of international influence between the U.S. and Russia.  Under President Obama we have seen America’s command of world events sink to an unrecognizable (and quite embarrassing) level, while the Bond villain in the Kremlin [“Bond villain in the Kremlin”?  What “journalist” writes pap like that?¹] has taken control of international conversations. …

Yep.  The land of Vladimir Putin, run by an oligarchical collection of cronies and criminals, is about to relax their gun laws… And not by just a little.  After the reforms, they’ll make some U.S. jurisdictions look positively Soviet.  While places like New York and Washington DC continue to make it (almost) impossible to get a permit for carrying a handgun, Putin’s Russia is about to make it easier.

Previously, Russians were only permitted to own firearms (subject to approval) for hunting or sporting.  But under the new law they will soon be allowed to carry guns, open or concealed, for the purposes of self-defense.  (Yeah… A background check and training will be a prerequisite.)

And let’s face it, having a gun for self-defense is probably not the worst idea in Russia.  While America saw its share of homicides in 2011 (roughly 13,600), Putin’s homeland saw far more… Despite having a population that is almost half of the U.S., Russia recorded over 21,000 homicides in the same year.  (Wow…  So much for believing that gun control works, right Chicago?)  The new laws aim to curb that trend, and add to Russia’s homeland defense against outside threats. ~ Michael Schaus, Townhall.com

But, perhaps above all of these issues, is that of Russia proclaiming herself a bastion of Christian virtue against Western decadence.

MOSCOW — At the height of the Cold War, it was common for American conservatives to label the officially atheist Soviet Union a “godless nation.”

More than two decades on, history has come full circle, as the Kremlin and its allies in the Russian Orthodox Church hurl the same allegation at the West.

“Many Euro-Atlantic countries have moved away from their roots, including Christian values,” Russian President Vladimir Putin said in a recent keynote speech.  “Policies are being pursued that place on the same level a multi-child family and a same-sex partnership, a faith in God and a belief in Satan.  This is the path to degradation.”

In his state of the nation address in mid-December, Mr. Putin also portrayed Russia as a staunch defender of “traditional values” against what he depicted as the morally bankrupt West.  Social and religious conservatism, the former KGB officer insisted, is the only way to prevent the world from slipping into “chaotic darkness.” ~ The Washington Times

In 2013, Vladimir Putin (who has been either Prime Minister or President of Russia since the turn of the century) gave a statement which skewered both Western decadence and “political correctness” when used as a weapon to silence Christian morality.

Russia Will Defend National Identity, Based on Religious Values — Putin
Interfax, 20 September 2013

Valdai — People will lose their human dignity without [the] values enshrined in Christianity and other world religions, without [the] moral standards that have taken millennia to take shape, [said] President Vladimir Putin.

“We believe that it is natural and appropriate to defend those values.  Any minority deserves respect for its distinctive identity, but the rights of the majority must not be questioned,” Putin said during a meeting of the Valdai discussion club.

He believes, that Russia can’t move forward without cultural and national self-determination.  Otherwise the country won’t be able to respond to external or internal challenges, can’t be successful in global competition.

“Events that take place in the world represent [a] serious challenge to the Russian identity.  There are foreign policy and moral aspects to this.  We have been able to see many Euro-Atlantic countries effectively embark on a path of renouncing their roots, including Christian values, which underlie Western civilization,” Putin said.

“That involves the negation of moral principles and any traditional identity — national, cultural, religious, or even sexual,” he said.

“Policies are pursued that put large families and same-sex partnerships in the same category, belief in God and belief in Satan.  Excesses of political correctness reach the point where there are serious discussions on the registration of parties that have propaganda of pedophilia as their objective.  People in many European countries are ashamed and afraid of speaking about their religion, holidays are abolished or given other names, names that shyly conceal the nature of those holidays, and aggressive attempts are made to force this model on the rest of the world,” Putin said.

“This is a direct path to degradation and primitiveness, to deep demographic and moral crises,” he said.

“What can be a better indication of a moral crisis in human society than its loss of the ability for self-reproduction?” Putin said.

Paper Tranquilized Tiger?

Does Vladimir Putin’s 16-year (and counting) reign at the top of the Russian food chain make him a miracle of the Resistance or a carefully-cultivated puppet for the Machine?

Putin is most definitely a Soviet-made man; having rising to the rank of Lieutenant Colonel in the KGB, then after the KGB became the “FSB”, Boris Yeltsin appointed Putin as Director in July of 1998 where he remained until August of 1999.

One month later, a series of terrorist bombings in Buynaksk, Volgodonsk and Moscow killed nearly 300 innocent Russian citizens.

By this time, Yeltsin had moved Putin from Director of the FSB (where he was instrumental in planning the attacks?) to acting Prime Minister where he was instrumental in cashing in the political clout to initiate a war against Chechen muslims.

Behind both Yeltsin and Putin was a cabal of mostly Jewish billionaires known as “the Family”.  Although one source claims that it was the Family that planned the attacks and war to shore up support for their political proxies, a top member of the Family, Boris Berezovsky, stated from London in 2002 that it was the FSB, which meant that Putin had to at least been aware of the plot.

The Russian former media mogul Boris Berezovsky launched his strongest attack yesterday on his one-time friend and now president, Vladimir Putin, accusing him of being linked to the terrorist bombings of apartment buildings that killed about 300 Russians in September 1999.

Mr. Berezovsky, now living in London, called a press conference to produce a British explosives expert, a French documentary-maker, a former Russian agent of the FSB (successor to the KGB), and a woman who lost her mother in the blasts, to accuse the security service and demand an official inquiry.

“I am sure the bombings were organised by the FSB.  It’s not just speculation.  It’s a clear conclusion”, Mr. Berezovsky said yesterday.  “I’m not saying Mr. Putin gave an order to blow up those buildings.  I’m saying that at the least he knew the FSB was involved.” ~ The Guardian

Berezovsky died in London a decade later.  The investigating coroner said “conflicting evidence” prohibited him from determining the cause of death.  Perhaps the conflicting evidence was his own zest for life.

In August of 2000, another treasonous event rocked Russia from the Barents Sea.

An Oscar-class cruise missile submarine, the K-141 Kursk, suffered multiple explosions and sank in 300 feet of water.

Emergency systems were sabotaged and the Russian response guaranteed that all on board would perish.

The Kursk submarine disaster that caused the sinking of the Oscar-class submarine (Russian: Project 949A Антей) Kursk took place during the first major Russian naval exercise in more than 10 years, in the Barents Sea on Saturday, 12 August 2000, killing all 118 personnel on board.  Nearby ships registered the initial explosion and a second, much larger, explosion two minutes and 15 seconds later, which was powerful enough to register on seismographs as far away as Alaska.  The Russian Navy did not recognize that the sub had sunk and did not halt the exercise or initiate a search for the sub for more than six hours.  Because the emergency rescue buoy had been intentionally disabled, it took more than 16 hours for them to locate the sunken ship.

Over four days the Russian Navy used four different diving bells and submersibles to try to attach to the escape hatch without success.  The navy’s response was criticised as slow and inept.  The government initially misled and manipulated the public and media about the timing of the accident, stating that communication had been established and that a rescue effort was under way, and refused help from other governments.  The Russian Navy offered a variety of reasons for the sub’s sinking, including publicly blaming the accident on a collision with a NATO submarine.  On the fifth day, President Putin authorized the navy to accept British and Norwegian offers of assistance.  Seven days after the submarine went down, Norwegian divers finally opened a hatch to the escape trunk in the ship’s ninth compartment, hoping to locate survivors, but found it flooded. ~ Wikipedia

Putin should’ve been immediately ousted the moment he sanctioned two NATO nations recovering the finally dead Russian sailors and all the pertinent military technology aboard.  But the entire operation was being masterminded by the same satanic Elite who engineered 9/11 a year afterward.

Having sunk the Kursk in shallow water, it was then possible for the British and Norwegians to collect their prize; her 22 P-700 Granit (П-700 Гранит) cruise missiles, one of which would be used against the accounting section of the Pentagon to cover up the $2 trillion in stolen funds.

Was it a coincidence that the groundbreaking ceremony for the Pentagon was held on September 11^th, 1941, or simply proof that war is a deadly, brutal illusion of the Elite?  Both Americans and Russians should think of such thoughts on May Day or Memorial Day.

Dimitri Khalezov was a commissioned officer in the Russian Special Control Service of the 12^th Chief Directorate of the Defense Ministry (also known as “Unit 46179”).  He is an expert in nuclear ordinance:

The 12th Chief (or “Main”) Directorate of the Ministry of Defense (12 GU MO) of the former USSR and of the modern Russian Federation (Russian: 12 Главное Управление Министерства Обороны СССР/РФ (Ядерно-техническое обеспечение и Безопасность)) is a department within the Russian (ex-Soviet) Ministry of Defense responsible for safe-keeping, technical maintenance, transportation, delivery, issuance, disposal, etc. of the nuclear arsenal of the state.  The agency is also responsible for testing of nuclear charges, for ecological safety of such testing, and for maintenance of Soviet/Russian testing grounds, known in Russian as “polygons” – in Semipalatinsk (Semipalatinsk Test Site, now Kazakhstan) and on Novaya Zemlya Archipelago. ~ Wikipedia

In the below interview, Khalezov claims that he is living in Bangkok, Thailand to avoid an extradition demand by American Intelligence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I

In Khalezov’s 1,000-plus page work, 9/11thology: The “Third” Truth About 9/11, he states that 9/11 came to his attention as a nuclear munitions expert because World Trade Centers 1, 2 and 7 were brought down by nuclear devices.

He further states that a Granit missile from the Kursk hit the Pentagon and that Vladimir Putin was unaware of its application there; having been kept in the dark by his advisers.

The use of a Russian Granit gave plausible deniability to the Papist traitors in Washington as well as acted as a blackmail chip to keep Putin from disclosing anything he knew.

… – the perpetrators wanted to make sure that Russian President Vladimir Putin would not voice any objections concerning the nuclear demolition of the World Trade Center by its inbuilt emergency nuclear demolition scheme [Khalezov claims that such devices were originally integral to the complex], despite learning of this fact very well from his own intelligence services.

The weak point was that President Putin had already declared to the world in August 2000 that in the sunken “Kursk” submarine there weren’t any nuclear weapons.  Of course, he could not then take back his noble presidential words and admit that he was only “joking” and that in reality all the 22 highly sophisticated supersonic “Granit” missiles – each equipped with a 500 kiloton thermonuclear warhead (and also with a pre-loaded list in their guidance systems of the most important NATO targets) – were simply missing.

When confronted with the remains of the “Granit” missile which hit the Pentagon, President Putin was simply forced to shut up in regard to the WTC nuclear demolition, despite the fact that he knew about it very well from reports of his own intelligence.  Therefore, instead of voicing his objections, he obediently took the side of the U.S. Government in its so-called “War against Terror”.

These were the real reasons behind the seemingly “unexplainable” 9/11 attack against the Pentagon.

Indeed, this attack was very well calculated and it was quite explainable.

Now the odd behavior of the Russian President immediately after the 9/11 attacks becomes also “explainable”.  Actually, everybody was sincerely expecting Putin to pull the Americans up in their bizarre and totally outrageous anti-Muslim claims, and everybody was surprised when that did not happen.

The true problem, however, was that President Putin was simply blackmailed into this pitiable condition by the 9/11 perpetrators – almost as easy as they managed to blackmail the U.S. Government into the most incredible cover-up of 9/11 and into a declaration of the “War against Terror”.

In fact, a position of the poor Russian President after 9/11 was reduced to such a lowly extent, that Putin was forced to supply the biggest ever quantities of various Russian weapons – including tanks, carriers, artillery, light weaponry and a huge number of munitions (enough to fully arm a couple of standard infantry or tank divisions) to the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan.  He did it totally free of charge.

Moreover, Putin did not even dare to voice any objections when the Americans unilaterally decided to quit the 1972 ABM Treaty (undoubtedly, the most impudent and the most aggressive step of the “Main Adversary of Russia”) when the decision of pulling out of the Treaty was announced by G.W. Bush on December 14, 2001.

President Putin was humiliated even further, when he failed to come up with any appropriate public response to the most impudent statement of G.W. Bush, who claimed exactly as follows:

“Today I am giving formal notice to Russia that the United States of America is withdrawing from this almost 30-year-old treaty,” Bush said in the White House Rose Garden.  “I have concluded the ABM treaty hinders our government’s ability to develop ways to protect our people from future terrorist or rogue state missile attacks.…Bush said he and Russian President Vladimir Putin “have also agreed that my decision to withdraw from the treaty will not in any way undermine our new relationship or Russian security…”³²¹

Was Russian President Putin personally guilty in that stolen “Granit” missiles affair?

Most probably, he was not.  He was, probably, a victim – misinformed by his subordinates in regard to exact details of the “Kursk” affair. …

When the Americans confronted him with one of the “Granit” missiles found in the Pentagon – the Russian President most probably answered that he was not guilty.  It is obvious that he became the President of Russia relatively recently, while those Soviet-made missiles could have been sold out of Soviet Union or Russia (or Ukraine) well before his term.

It is not known what was said exactly, of course, because that conversation was apparently confidential.

But it seems that both sides agreed that some evil guys from either Russian, or Ukrainian, or from the former Soviet Government had sold those “Granit” missiles to evil Saddam Hussein.  It looks exactly like that.²

In February of 2015, Pravda stated that Putin was poised to release “satellite images” which prove that 9/11 was an inside job.

A year and a half later, the images have not materialized (perhaps it’s because there is no such thing as “satellites”).

It’s not the first time truth-seekers have been played by the great white Russian hope that didn’t materialize.

The “Global War on Terror” has done nothing to increase the security of any average citizen.  Quite the contrary, citizens now live in fear, get sexually assaulted for the “privilege” of flying on a plane and watch as their local law enforcement dawn camouflage, body armor and drive around in GWOT MRAPs.

But it has been resoundingly successful in punishing good Christians everywhere the Jesuit-controlled United States military has deployed.

Not a Single Christian Church Left in Afghanistan ~ CNS News

“Syria and Iraq are among those countries with the worst persecution.” ~ Relevant Magazine

In 2012, the Christian Post reported that the Orthodox Church had guaranteed President Putin would step up to protect Christians around the world.

The representative of the Russian Orthodox Church has told Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin this week of the urgent situation Christians are facing around the world in persecution hot spots, and has asked him to use his power to aid their situations.

RT online reported that Metropolitan Hilarion, foreign relation chief of the Russian Orthodox Church presented evidence and statistics that stated, “Every five minutes one Christian was dying for his or her faith in some part of the word.”

Christians face persecution in many nations; from church demolition in Afghanistan and bombings of churches in Iraq, to the violence against Christians taking place in rebellious towns in Syria.

After delivering the facts, Metropolitan Hilarion asked Putin to make protection and defense of Christianity around the globe a major part of his foreign policy.

And, as reported by Interfax, Putin replied, “You needn’t have any doubt that that’s the way it will be,” assuring Hilarion that Russian foreign policy would defend Christians from persecution abroad.

But the bloodletting of Christians continues unabated.

In fact, as a result of the so-called “War on Terror”, Protestant Evangelical Christians are being persecuted in Russia, as well.

This week, Russian president Vladimir Putin approved a package of anti-terrorism laws that usher in tighter restrictions on missionary activity and evangelism.

Despite prayers and protests from religious leaders and human rights advocates, the Kremlin announced Putin’s approval yesterday.  The amendments, including laws against sharing faith in homes, online, or anywhere but recognized church buildings, go into effect July 20.

Though opponents to the new measures hope to eventually appeal in court or elect legislators to amend them, they have begun to prepare their communities for life under the new rules, reported Forum 18 News Service, a Christian outlet reporting on the region.

Protestants and religious minorities small enough to gather in homes fear they will be most affected.  Last month, “the local police officer came to a home where a group of Pentecostals meet each Sunday,” Konstantin Bendas, deputy bishop of the Pentecostal Union, told Forum 18.  “With a contented expression he told them: ‘Now they’re adopting the law I’ll drive you all out of here.’ I reckon we should now fear such zealous enforcement.” ~ Christianity Today

As I’ve already reported to you, at length, organized religion is the most deadly weapon used against a healthy Christian Faith.  Slowly, Evangelical Protestants are awakening to this danger and returning to their roots by joining in their homes as the first Christians once did.

In Russia, this is now illegal.

One reason that Russia has been so appealing is that staged terror events, like those occurring in Roman Catholic-controlled France and America (about one every two weeks now) are quite rare.

All the more reason that such an extreme measure is nothing short of Stalinist.

Perhaps there is the key to understanding its origins.

As I reported for you in Illuminati Unmasked, the worst dictator of Russia’s Soviet era was Ioseb Besarionis dze Jughashvili, who later changed his name to “Joseph Stalin”.  As Adolph Hitler can be blamed for some 9 million deaths, Stalin was responsible for 40 to 60 million.

Joseph Stalin, who died 60 years ago in Moscow, was a small man — no more than 5-foot-4.  The abused son of a poor, alcoholic Georgian cobbler, Josef Vissarionovich Djughashvili (the future Stalin) also had a withered arm, a clubbed foot and a face scarred by small pox, but he stood very tall as one of history’s most prolific killers.

Stalin’s extremely brutal 30-year rule as absolute ruler of the Soviet Union featured so many atrocities, including purges, expulsions, forced displacements, imprisonment in labor camps, manufactured famines, torture and good old-fashioned acts of mass murder and massacres (not to mention World War II) that the complete toll of bloodshed will likely never be known.

An amoral psychopath and paranoid with a gangster’s mentality, Stalin eliminated anyone and everyone who was a threat to his power – including (and especially) former allies. He had absolutely no regard for the sanctity of human life.

But how many people is he responsible for killing?

In February 1989, two years before the fall of the Soviet Union, a research paper by Georgian historian Roy Aleksandrovich Medvedev published in the weekly tabloid Argumenti i Fakti estimated that the death toll directly attributable to Stalin’s rule amounted to some 20 million lives (on top of the estimated 20 million Soviet troops and civilians who perished in the Second World War), for a total tally of 40 million.

“It’s important that they published it, although the numbers themselves are horrible,” Medvedev told the New York Times at the time.

“Those numbers include my father.”

Medevedev’s grim bookkeeping included the following tragic episodes: 1 million imprisoned or exiled between 1927 to 1929; 9 to 11 million peasants forced off their lands and another 2 to 3 million peasants arrested or exiled in the mass collectivization program; 6 to 7 million killed by an artificial famine in 1932-1934; 1 million exiled from Moscow and Leningrad in 1935; 1 million executed during the “Great Terror” of 1937-1938; 4 to 6 million dispatched to forced labor camps; 10 to 12 million people forcibly relocated during World War II; and at least 1 million arrested for various “political crimes” from 1946 to 1953.

Although not everyone who was swept up in the aforementioned events died from unnatural causes, Medvedev’s 20 million non-combatant deaths estimate is likely a conservative guess.

Indeed, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, the literary giant who wrote harrowingly about the Soviet gulag system, claimed the true number of Stalin’s victims might have been as high as 60 million. ~ International Business Times

What could create such a paranoid monster?

Jesuits.

Stalin was trained at the Orthodox seminary in Tiflis to become a priest.  As he later told biographer Emil Cohen (“Emil Ludwig”), the Jesuits secretly ran the seminary which made his training that of a Jesuit priest.

There are too many in Russia, including Putin, himself, who see that dark time as “the good ole days”.

Putin resurrected Stalin’s national anthem and reinstituted the Red Star as the official military emblem for the Russian military.

The Jesuits particularly enjoy setting up Jews to be their instruments of death and that is Stalin’s heritage (“dze Jughashvili” means “of the Jewish people”).

Another Jesuit-created Jewish monster was Felix Dzerzhinsky.

Putin is a fan as are many Russians.

President Vladimir Putin signed a decree restoring the title “Dzerzhinsky Division” to an elite police unit that was previously named after the founder of the Bolshevik secret police, the Interior Ministry’s internal troops press service said Monday.

Felix Dzerzhinsky founded the Cheka, a security apparatus notorious for orchestrating mass summary executions during the Russian Civil War and the Red Terror.  Established in 1924, the unit bore his name from 1926 until 1994, when its name was changed to the Independent Operational Purpose Division, the press service said.  The Dzerzhinsky Division ensured security at the Potsdam Conference of 1945 and the 1980 Moscow Summer Olympics.  It was also dispatched to the restive regions of Nagorno-Karabakh, North Ossetia and Chechnya upon the demise of the Soviet Union.

Today the unit is tasked with maintaining public order in Moscow and the surrounding region, as well as in the North Caucasus.

Dzerzhinsky’s name and image have become a highly contentious issue in modern Russia.

Earlier this month, members of the Communist Party erected a plaster monument to Dzerzhinsky in front of the FSB’s headquarters — the infamous Lubyanka — in downtown Moscow to mark the 137th anniversary of his birth.

A 15-ton sculpture of Dzerzhinsky stood in front of Lubyanka from 1958 until 1991, when it was toppled by protesters.  There are periodically calls for the statue of the controversial figure to be returned, though so far they have not been successful. ~ The Moscow Times

Putin is also said to have kept a bust of Dzerzhinsky on his desk while at the KGB.

Two Legs of Iron

The great statue of human rebellion against YHWH, chronicled in Daniel 2, had two legs of iron.

As we understand the legs and feet of Iron to generally be Rome, it should more specifically be understood as “Rome” and “Constantinople”.

Although the business end of persecuting the Saints comes through Rome, the Orthodox Church is one with her Babylonian cousin.

Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia met with Rome’s Jesuit White Pope “Francis I” in Havana, Cuba—the Communist paradise created and protected by the Jesuits.

There the two signed a “Joint Declaration” of their mutual love for each other.

It’s probably no contest for the Great Harlot to woo back her lost sheep whether Orthodox or Anglican.  The disturbing part is how the wooed continue on in Orthodox or Anglican cloth as agents of Rome.

Only a month ago, an Anglican Vicar in London was approached by police and paramedics due to his public intoxication when he lashed out at them to back off, “You don’t know who you’re ___ing with.  I’m with the Vatican!”

Not only was Vicar Gareth Lambert arrogant in his revelry, but he knew that his Roman hierarchy trumped any in the British government.

Although Soviet Communism was known as a brutal beast of atheism, the Orthodox Church never suffered as much as Jews and Protestants did.

At the fall of the USSR, Orthodoxy rose to assume dominance in Russia; including of her intelligence agencies.  It should be no surprise that Putin and the Patriarch work hand in iron fist.

But do they know that a Dragon pulls the strings above them?

Post Script

Like the CIA and the FBI, the FSB is run by the Jesuits.  They own Intelligence everywhere.

As further proof of the Roman control of Russia (our false hope against the Jesuit New World Order), Vladimir Putin has endorsed the false hope of the blind “Conservative” Right; Jesuit-trained Donald Trump.

Now, when the CIA uses sexual perversion to create inverse support, it includes them both.

They should be.

Hillary Rodham was born in the Jesuit capital of radical Leftist “community organizing”: Chicago.  The Jesuits have a long history of radicalizing minorities there.  It’s where the man who is likely Obama’s biological father, black Communist, pornographer and pedophile Frank Marshall Davis worked on the same Communist newspaper (the Chicago Defender) as Vernon Jarrett, the father-in-law of Obama’s top advisor, Valerie Jarrett—a woman so powerful she has her own secret service detail, courtesy of the American taxpayer.  A “former” Jesuit named Greg Galluzzo would show young Barry the ropes of organizing the minority community in Chicago and Roman Catholics would later fund both Obama and the “secular” Jesuit vehicle for that radicalization; “ACORN”.

Hillary Rodham would walk a similar path.  In 1974, Rodham was on the staff of John Andrew Droar, the lawyer hired by Congress to investigate the Watergate Hotel Democrat National Convention break-in which had CIA hit-man Everett Howard Hunt at the heart of it.  Hunt had done it all for the CIA, from overthrowing the administration of Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala in 1954 to the Bay of Pigs invasion to the murder of John F. Kennedy.  Rumor has it that fellow conspirator Frank Angelo Fiorini (who later changed his name to “Frank Anthony Sturgis”) made a death-bed confession claiming Jesuit-trained FBI Special Agent George Gordon Battle Liddy was the one who murdered Dallas Police officer JD¹ Tippit, not Lee Oswald, with the rationale being that Tippit was “dirty”.  One might call that a “Jesuitical” rationale in light of Tippit’s murder being used to further frame a Patriot who tried to warn the FBI through Special Agent James Hosty that there was a plot to murder the President.

The irony of Hillary asking Richard Nixon “What did you know and when did you know it?” has not been lost on the politically astute.

A year later, in 1975, Hillary Rodham would become Hillary Rodham-Clinton.

The media very strongly proclaims that Bill Clinton is a “Southern Baptist”, which is interesting because at each turn of his life, there has been either a Roman Catholic or a Jesuit holding his hand.

Clinton was born “William Jefferson Blythe, III” although his biological father is said to be a travelling salesman who died in a car accident just after his birth.

It was a rather sophisticated name coming from mother Virginia Dell who dumped William Jefferson off on her parents while she went to nursing school.  She apparently didn’t do well as she was subsequently named in the wrongful deaths of at least two of her patients as an anesthesiologist.

Officially, Virginia was married to four different men and may have “known” a few more.

One of them might have been the son of John Davison Rockefeller, Jr., Winthrop Aldrich Rockefeller, the 37^th Governor of the State of Arkansas.

A transplant from New York who had no roots in Arkansas (the striking reverse of Hillary Rodham’s political career), Rockefeller was a reputed homosexual who lived with a black friend and had “the world’s largest porn collection”.²

Perhaps “sexual deviant” would be a more appropriate descriptor rather than “gay” if one believes Winthrop Aldrich to be Bill Clinton’s father and, given the lifestyles of the rich and shameless, not a far stretch.

Nor does the connection end there.  Winthrop is said to have been the one who engineered the famous meeting between Bill and Jack Kennedy just a few months before Kennedy was brutally murdered.³

It was Winthrop Rockefeller who stepped up and made sure that Bill got a Vietnam draft deferment and an internship with J. William Fulbright that lead to an all-expenses-paid tour of Communist Europe and Asia.

Another oddity regarding the “blue collar” upbringing of William Jefferson Blythe-Clinton is that he was a member of the Jacques de Molay Society, named after the final (overt) Grand Master of the Knights Templar.

If the Rockefellers gave Bill Clinton life, it was the Jesuits who trained him.

After getting his ticket from Winthrop out of Vietnam (known as “Spelly’s War” because it was co-ordinated by NY Cardinal Francis Joseph Spellman⁴), Hippie-Communist Jesuit Richard McSorely helped train Bill as he protested the war he didn’t have to go die in while in England then received special training in then-Communist Prague and Moscow.

Later, Bill would complete his training under the tutelage of men like Professor Carroll Quigley while at Jesuit Georgetown.

Bill’s hidden silver spoon would soon get him to sit where his benefactor (and father?) once sat; in the Arkansas Governor’s mansion.

There, Bill and Hillary joined hands with the Bush family and they all built dynasties on a mountain of cocaine flown in to Arkansas courtesy of the Central Intelligence Agency.

That Jesuit guidance continued through a full 8 years of punishing the American people hard and it included shooting up a separatist family in Idaho in which a Japanese Roman Catholic FBI sniper named Lon Horiuchi⁵ slaughtered a mother with an infant in her arms⁶; a trial run false flag on the World Trade Center in 1993 killing 6 and injuring 1,000; burning alive 80 men, women and children in the Seventh Day Adventist compound at Waco (what the Inquisition does to “heretics”—you may not believe that this was part of the tactical decision-making process but it was) and slaughtering 168 people, including 19 small children and then blaming it on a “right-wing Constitutional Christian fanatic”, Timothy McVeigh.

While this was going on, both Bill and Hillary were living large as debauched sexual predators, both raping and defiling as they pleased and when victims came forward, Hillary Rodham lowered the boom.

An alleged rape victim said in an interview Friday that Mrs. Clinton “took me through hell,” during her early days as a lawyer. The woman was referring to Mrs. Clinton’s major criminal case at age 27, in which she defended Thomas Alfred Taylor. The man, then age 41, was accused of raping a 12-year-old girl in 1975, and ultimately plead guilty to lesser charges.

Audio tape of Mrs. Clinton talking about the case was provided by the Washington Free Beacon on June 15. During the tape, the former Secretary of State seems to suggest that her client was guilty.

“I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs,” she says in an interview archived at the University of Arkansas in Fayetteville. Mrs. Clinton laughs at the remark and does so again after discussing DNA evidence that was accidentally destroyed by a crime lab.The interview was conducted by Arkansas reporter Roy Reed.

In her interview with the Daily Beast, the victim addressed Mrs. Clinton directly: “I would say [to Clinton], ‘You took a case of mine in ‘75, you lied on me… I realize the truth now, the heart of what you’ve done to me. And you are supposed to be for women? You call that [being] for women, what you done to me? And I hear you on tape laughing.” ~ The Washington Times

Hillary Rodham continued to play the role of strong-man by illegally going through the FBI dossiers of their political enemies for blackmail.  Neither the existence of the dossiers nor the activity were addressed with prosecution.

In fact, the corruptions that occurred during the Clinton Administration that were being ignored were so vast a side-show was fabricated over a sexual tryst Bill had in the Oral Office.  Meanwhile, in best Hegelian fashion, Bill’s Jesuit keepers were ordering him to keep backwards Communist China in full threat status by sending them nuclear secrets and supercomputers; all acts of high treason that were shoved under Monica Lewinsky’s stained dress.

After Clinton dodged his impeachment the way he dodged the draft (with help from his handlers), “bulldog” Republican investigator Kenneth Starr opinioned how he would’ve liked to have had dinner with the Clintons.  This was in 2005 so he very well may have by now.

But after Bill stepped down into retirement (with a Jesuit “job well done!”) Hillary stepped up.

With no political experience what-so-ever, she ran for United States Senate in a state she’s never lived in; New York—the exact opposite of Bill’s father, Winthrop Rockefeller.

New York is a state owned by Rome; the “Pope of America”—the Archbishop of New York—sees to it that Leftist Catholic Democrats always reign supreme even when they claim to be “Methodists” like Hillary.

Timothy Cardinal Dolan with the far-Left Roman Catholic Mayor of New York City, Bill de Blasio.

Timothy Cardinal Dolan with the far-Left Roman Catholic Governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo (son of former far-Left Roman Catholic Governor of New York, Mario Cuomo). “Free elections”, indeed.

The Pope of America and the Pope of Rome.

In 2008, Hillary put her political career on hold…to seek higher political office.

Unfortunately for her, she was informed that the Jesuits had a better candidate in Barack Hussein Obama.

As much as the “press” is corrupted and controlled, they aren’t on board enough (at least at the lower levels) to be privy to a Bilderberg meeting so they were tricked and basically kidnapped.

The Bilderberg Group is a regular meeting of the Power Elite where they get instructions on how to push the enslaved masses towards unification under the Holy Father.  The founder of the Bilderberg movement (and of European unification) was a former Jesuit seminarian, some say full ordained Jesuit priest, Józef Retinger.

If you know how to pick through the smokescreens of blaming Jews, claiming the Vatican was alright until it was “infiltrated” and promoting Freemasons as “enemies of Rome”, sources like Jan Van Helsing’s⁷ Secret Societies and Their Power in the 20th Century can be illustrative.

The Vatican’s secret service has always been the Society of Jesus, whose members are called Jesuits.  I would like to open the eyes a bit of those who believe that Jesuits were just another harmless religious organization.  The initiation oath for the 2nd degree demands the death of all Protestants…  They were the leading force behind the massacre of the Huguenots and were also responsible for the beheading of countless Protestants … in England during the 16th and 17th centuries.  The Society of Jesus was founded in 1534 by Ignatius Loyola…

The power of the general of the Jesuits is such that he is called the Black Pope.

… The P2 is the strongest of the Italian Masonic Lodges.

Within the P2 is the Great Vatican Lodge, which was at the root of the P2 scandal in 1976, when a list surfaced in the Vatican with the names and entry dates of 121 high Church dignitaries, among them cardinals of the Curia, archbishops, bishops, prelates and laymen. …

Among the names on the list were also those of the secretary of state cardinal Jean Villot, the Vatican’s Foreign Minister Agostino Casaroli, cardinal Sebastiano Baggio, cardinal Ugo Poletti and the head of the Vatican Bank, Bishop Marcinkus. …

By the end of World War II … Allen Dulles, head of the CIA … had a secret meeting with the SS leader Gehlen.

They made arrangements to smuggle SS officers under the cover of the Catholic Church into Switzerland.  Some SS officers took their vows and were posted in other countries, predominantly Argentina, Paraguay, and the U.S.  After the war it was Gehlen’s task to organize the station Radio Free Europe.  After the war a large section of the SS was directly taken over by the CIA.

Another interesting member of the Committee of 300 was Joseph Retinger.  After the war the CIA supported him in making contracts with the Vatican.  For instance, he won over Dr. Luigi Gedda, the medical advisor of Pope Pius VII and leader of Catholic activities.  With Gedda’s help he succeeded in strengthening for the future the connection with Pope Paul VI who had already collaborated with the OSS (Office of Strategic Services).

Retinger also met with Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, the Italian prime minister, Sir Colin Grubbin, director of the SOE (Special Operations Executive, British Secret Service), and CIA director General Walter Bedell.

Before the war Prince Bernhard was with the SS and then held a position at I.G. Farben.  He married Juliana, who in 1948 became queen of the Netherlands, and he took up a post with Shell Oil.  This group was the core that met at the hotel De Bilderberg in Oosterbeek, Holland for the first time in May 1954 and later became known as The Bilderbergers.  Committee of 300 member Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands became the first director of the Bilderbergers. …

One of the CIA members with a strong influence in the Vatican was Cardinal Spellman.  He helped the CIA with the overthrow of democracy in Guatemala in 1954.  It was also Spellman who introduced Father Paul Marcinkus from Chicago to the Pope.  In 1971, Marcinkus became archbishop and head of the Vatican Bank.  Marcinkus developed close links with Masonic P2 lodge members Michele Sindona and Roberto Calvi.  The grand master of the P2 was Licio Gelli.  Calvi who headed the Banco Ambrosiano helped the Vatican to transfer more than 100 million U.S. $ to the Polish Solidarnose movement.  Later he was involved in the huge Banco Ambrosiano scandal.  In 1982 his body was found hanging from the London Blackfriars bridge.  He had bricks in his left and right pockets and his legs were tied at a right angle.  This a Masonic ritual murder.  This peculiarity was never written about in the newspapers.  Sindona became advisor to the Vatican Bank.  The P2 lodge had many links with the Vatican, Opus Dei and the CIA.  Many of its members held high offices in the Italian government.⁸

Here is another source that claims Retinger was an ordained Jesuit and not just a seminarian who didn’t graduate.

The Committee of 300, although in existence for over 150 years, did not take on its present form until around 1897.  It was always given to issuing orders through other fronts, such as the Royal Institute for International Affairs.  When it was decided that a super-body would control European affairs, the RIIA founded the Tavistock Institute, which in turn created NATO.  For five years NATO was financed by the German Marshall Fund.

Perhaps the most important member of the Bilderbergers, a foreign policy body of the Committee, was Joseph Rettinger⁹, said to have been its founder and organiser, whose annual meetings have delighted conspiracy-hunters for several decades.

Rettinger was a well-trained Jesuit priest and a 33rd Degree Freemason.

Mrs. Katherine Meyer Graham who is suspected of having murdered her husband in order to get control of the Washington Post, was another ranking member of the Club of Rome, as was Paul G. Hoffman of the New York Life Insurance Company, one of the largest insurance companies in the United States and a leading Rank company, with ties directly to Queen Elizabeth of England’s immediate-family.  John J. McCloy,^{10 11} the man who attempted to wipe post-World War II Germany off the map and last but not least, James A. Perkins of the Carnegie Corporation, were also founding-members of the Bilderbergers and the Club of Rome.¹²

If you had any doubt, just look at the Papal Knight symbolism on this Bilderberg Hotel in Apeldoorn, Netherlands.

As apparently vehement as the campaign was, Hillary Rodham would later accept the position as President Obama’s Secretary of State where she oversaw matters of high treason such as an illegal 8-month war to oust the sovereign of Libya—and oust him they did.

Oddly, in an interview with CBS, Rodham quoted Julius Caesar in his letter to the Senate after his victory against Pharnaces II of Pontus, Veni, vidi, vici, adding her own perverse sociopath twist.

It was an unusually Roman thing to say for a gloating Methodist.

Clinton would help to insure the treasonous humiliation of purposefully allowing a CIA arms hub and interrogation center to be over-run, sacrificing her own ambassador along with several security experts who courageously attempted to intervene.

The end-state for such unbelievable treason was to arm the CIA-trained “rebels” in Syria with Russian-made man-portable surface-to-air missiles and it has been a sickening success.

Rumors that Hillary Rodham prefers women over men continue to fly as the result of the role played by her close aide, Huma Abedin.

In the crass, tabloid sensationalism of the Village Voice, Michael Musto wrote—

As I recently said on MONICA CROWLEY’s radio show, whisper campaigns are claiming that HILLARY CLINTON is GAYLE KING–ing her aide de camp, the glamorous HUMA ABEDIN, an Indian/Pakistani goddess from Kalamazoo, Michigan.  In other words, Hillary may be putting Huma out there in the press and purposely making her more visible as a pre-emptive strike that amounts to her hiding in plain sight.  This way, no Republican can later say, “Who is this gorgeous babe who spends so much intimate time with Hillary that the Observer called her Hill’s ‘body person’?  Was GENNIFER FLOWERS’s book right about Hillary’s sexual taste?”  And does either of this couple have the balls to bottom?

Of course that whole scenario can’t possibly be true, since Bill and Hill have been so lovey-dovey lately for the cameras, and besides, whenever he’s been serviced by an intern—or by anyone—he’s clearly been thinking of his wife.  (They’re that close.)  But suddenly, Huma—a sort of Muslim SALMA HAYEK—has that spread in Vogue and the accompanying write-up notes that she “oversees every minute of Senator Clinton’s day.”  Every single minute?  Even Gayle King takes a break now and then!

The Observer noted that Abedin has an opulent lifestyle (one that doesn’t comport with a staffer’s salary):

According to a friend, her favorite designers are Mr. de la Renta, Catherine Malandrino, Charles Nolan and Prada.  “And she has a weakness for Marc Jacobs bags,” said the friend.  “She is known for her bags.”

Robert Barnett, the Clintons’ longtime attorney, said that in 11 years of knowing her, he has never seen her wear the same outfit twice.

Although there are “Christian” web sites like that of the Shoebat family who draw attention to connections Abedin supposedly has with the Saudi Royals, the Shoebats are clearly incognito Papal insurgents, masquerading as “Christians” who frequently attack Protestants and draw focus away from Rome with calls for a new Crusade against Islam.  There are a great many just like them (because Rome owns all of the media resources) and it takes a despicable individual to wage such a psychological operation of misrepresentation specifically designed to fleece Christians.

Abedin has been with Hillary Rodham since 1996 but was married to former Congressman and former NYC mayoral candidate Anthony Weiner in 2010.

It is not, apparently, a fulfilling marriage as Weiner was forced to leave Congress and step away from the mayoral campaign as a result of repeatedly getting caught sending lewd pictures of himself (“sexting”) to women other than his wife.

Perhaps the marriage is as convenient to the Weiners as Hillary’s is to Bill.  Another Washington blog confirmed the special relationship between Hillary Rodham and Mrs. Weiner.

In 2015 it was discovered that, as Secretary of State, Clinton had made extensive use of private e-mail servers for official communication; a grievous breach in national security.  Hundreds, perhaps thousands of State Department e-mails could either have been intercepted or sent to hostile entities on purpose without an official record or Federal Government security mechanisms (which would be the reason why Clinton sent them from an outside server, if treason was, once again, her intent).

The Director of the FBI, however, said that after a “thorough examination”, no wrong-doing was conducted.

But in 2010, the FBI was able to keep Russian spy Cynthia Murphy from getting “too close” to Clinton, although what exactly that meant was left to the imagination.

The current Director, James Comey, is a Roman Catholic raised in a very devout Catholic family; much as the founder of the FBI was, Charles Joseph Bonaparte, great grand-nephew of Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte.

In 2009, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visited the shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe at the basilica of the same name in Mexico City, to see first-hand the mural of the Virgin Mary.  The scant media accounts of the visit all mock Clinton’s non-Catholic couth at not knowing the image was miraculously imprinted on the cloak of St. Juan Diego in 1531 as the Virgin had been communicating to him her desire for a church to be built in that location in her name.  But is Hillary Clinton really that oblivious to the ways of the hands that feed her?

Now in 2016, Hillary Rodham is again on the campaign trail for President of the United States.

She’ll be running against Donald Trump, who spent two years at Jesuit Fordham before transferring to the incognito Jesuit facility—the University of Pennsylvania.  Trump’s son, Eric, received a full degree at Jesuit Georgetown and is now on the board of the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown.

Is Hillary Rodham Roman Catholic?

One doesn’t need to be Roman Catholic to be powerfully used by Rome (just ask Knight of Malta, recipient of the Order of St. Gregory, Rupert Murdoch) to the detriment of the American people—it just helps to have that added bit of loyalty.

Yet there’s no question that Hillary gets her marching orders from Rome and that the relationship is kept hush-hush.  Recently Clinton had a “private” meeting with American Pope¹³ Timothy Cardinal Dolan, which the media played off as just a “candidate” reaching out to the “Catholic community for votes”.  Why this would happen “in private” and without any pictures of Clinton and Dolan together does leave one to question.

The deciphering of who handles Hillary can perhaps finally be ascerted beyond doubt with the selection of her vice presidential running mate; Tim Kaine.

Kaine is, you guessed it, a devout Roman Catholic.  He is a United States Senator for the Commonwealth of Virginia—a state which also boasts a Jesuit-trained Roman Catholic Governor; Terence Richard “Terry” McAuliffe.

Kaine went to Rockhurst; an all-boys Jesuit prep school in Kansas City, Missouri.

But more than a Jesuit prep school, Kaine spent a year with the Company while on mission in Honduras.

How did that shape the United States Senator and possible future Vice President?

Professor of Political Science at the University of Virginia, (and devout Roman Catholic) Larry Sabato, says of Kaine—

People are cynical about politicians, but in Tim Kaine’s case, faith and service really have driven his life. There’s a lot of Jesuit in him

— Larry Sabato (@LarrySabato) July 23, 2016

At this point, we can throw out any vestiges of Hillary’s “Methodist” background.

Perhaps we should simply rename her “Hillary Roman-Clinton”.

UPDATE 26 July 2016, 01:37 PM, EST:  Tim Kaine, the Democrat with “a lot of Jesuit in him” has promised at the Democrat National Convention in Philadelphia to legalize America’s invading army of Hispanic Roman Catholic illegal immigrants within the first 100 days of a Hillary Roman Clinton administration.

Given that flooding Western nations with Catholic and muslim immigrants (either legally or illegally) is a top priority for the Jesuits, we can say more than just “Kaine has a lot of Jesuit in him”.

Most Papal operatives work very distantly from their masters, receiving positive and negative reinforcement for their behavior.

It’s clear, however, that Kaine is trusted enough to be receiving direct communication from America’s Inquisitors.

Alone in a sea of minority faces at Mass. This couldn’t have been a photo op, could it?

As time is running short for what the Book of Revelation calls “the Whore of Babylon” (Revelation 17-18) expect the Jesuit puppets on the far Left to pick up the torch from Barack Obama rather than the Jesuit puppets on the pseudo-Right come this November.