Who Is The Antichrist? – Catholic Answers, Inc

Perhaps that’s because “Google” was “born” on the same day (September 27^th) that the Company of Loyola¹ were consecrated by Alessandro “Pope Paul III” Farnese² to become the inversely-named “Society of Jesus”: the Jesuits.³

Above it is an ad from “Lion & Lamb Ministries” but when you click on the ad it brings you to a general home page that doesn’t answer your question.  Instead you are encouraged to indulge in several false doctrines such as the “Pre-Tribulation Rapture”^{4, 5, 6}, “Dispensationalism”⁷ / “Zionism”^{8, 9}, Futurism^{10, 11}, etc.  These are heresies fabricated by the Catholic Church and her masters of deception, the Jesuits, to specifically obscure Rome as the answer to this question.

Third from the top might surprise you if you don’t know all the “facts”.  It’s from “Amazing Facts” and does disclose Rome as the Fourth and Final Beast, however, “Amazing Facts” is the Seventh Day Adventist ministry of Doug Batchelor.

Today, Adventists are the last Protestants in existence.  Sadly, only a handful of their preachers take even their own religion seriously, such as Professor Walter Veith.

As reward for his dedication, Veith has been marginalized by his religion’s hierarchy and banned from most Adventist forums.¹²

If Rome controls all media (and it does), you may wonder if Doug Batchelor has had some help and perhaps you might get the answer you seek if you’ve seen Batchelor’s teaching on “Heaven” and “Hell”.

In it, without explanation, he dresses in a suit split down the middle half black and half white.

The answer can be found in the alternating black and white floor tiles of any Masonic Hall.

In fact, Adventism was founded by Freemason William Miller who humiliated “Protestant” Christians by predicting the return of Jesus Christ in 1843.  When Christ didn’t appear, Miller re-predicted His Return the year following!

Miller was a member of “Morning Star No. 27” Lodge, the same Lodge was implicated in the disappearance of Freemason whistleblower Captain William Morgan in 1826.

There are no specific descriptions of the devil in the Christian Bible but most scholars consider Isaiah 14 to contain metaphors about the Great Adversary and verse 12 calls him the “shining son of the dawn”.¹³

Morning Star No. 27 Lodge has been erased from existence but there was such a Lodge founded in Poultney, Vermont, in the year 1807.¹⁴

It was both telling and appropriate for Batchelor to wear his super-villain costume when preaching on the “temporary” nature of Heaven and Hell as it is a Luciferian doctrine designed to encourage the Fallen that their punishment won’t last forever¹⁵ and to likewise dishearten the Saved as to their fleeting rewards.

A New Testament word search¹⁶ of “Eternal Life” or “Eternal Salvation” proves this categorically wrong and, given the damage it does, perhaps even heretical.

But when the Kindness and the Love of God our Savior toward man appeared, not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His Mercy He saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit, whom He poured out on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Savior, that having been justified by His Grace we should become heirs according to the hope of Eternal Life. ~ Titus 3:4-7

So who is the Antichrist?

Today, answers range from an artificial intelligence super-computer¹⁷ to a Muslim madman.

Christians live in a cloud of confusion but was there a time when the identity of the Antichrist was clear?

Any serious study should bring up this passage:

Now, brethren, concerning the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering together to Him, we ask you, not to be soon shaken in mind or troubled, either by spirit or by word or by letter, as if from us, as though the Day of Christ had come.

Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the Man of Sin is revealed, the Son of Perdition, who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the Temple of God, showing himself that he is God. ~ II Thessalonians 2:1-4¹⁸

Has there been a “falling away”?

Do we exist in a civilization where deception is the rule, not the exception?

Who is the “Man of Sin”?

He is also the “Son of Perdition” and that title is only mentioned in one other place.

When Jesus prays for His disciples, He calls the one disciple, Judas, who betrays Him by that same name.

The Antichrist, therefore, is someone intimately acquainted with Jesus Christ and the Gospel Message yet betrays and mocks Him.

And while He was still speaking, behold, a multitude; and he who was called Judas, one of the twelve, went before them and drew near to Jesus to kiss Him.

But Jesus said to him, “Judas, are you betraying the Son of Man with a kiss?” ~ Luke 22:47-48

The office of the Papacy clearly fulfills this prophecy and it is filled with men of the most debased and debauched natures.

In Rome, a de Medici was sitting in the Papal Seat; Giovanni di Lorenzo de´Medici (“Pope Leo X”). …

In 1488, Giovanni de Medici’s father, Lorenzo il Magnifico (“Lorenzo the Magnificent”), ruler of the Province of Florentine, prevailed upon his relative, Giovanni Battista Cybo (Pope Innocent VIII) to make his son a cardinal, which Cybo did.

Having bought Giovanni the cardinalcy at such a young age (13) he was forbidden to wear the insignia or deliberate as Cardinal for another 3 years.

In 1513, de Medici was “elected” Pope.  Clearly a political decision, after it was made, the College of Cardinals realized de Medici had never been ordained a priest.  This minor oversight was rectified on a date that proved the Papacy was far more “Roman” than “Christian” — the Ides of March (the 15^th) of that same year — the date memorialized as the assassination of Julius Caesar.

Medici maintained and even increased his lavish lifestyle which included the sexual perversions of the upper class.  Pope Leo was well-known as a “lover of boys”.

Leo X was said to have invited guests to lavish banquets with up to 65 courses at which little boys jumped naked out of puddings.

It was no secret Leo was “a lover of boys” who possessed also “an insatiable love of pleasure”.

Like Pope Paul II, Leo loved parades and his passion was to travel around Rome at the head of a long procession featuring panthers, jesters, and a white elephant called Hanno a gift from the King of Portugal.

Scholar Joseph McCabe said Leo was “a coarse, frivolous, cynical voluptuary, probably addicted to homosexual vice in the Vatican”.

Leo spent much of his childhood in numerous abbeys which, like many monasteries since the time of Leo III (795-816), had become homosexual haunts.

Even before he became pope, Leo X allegedly had been a practicing sodomite.

On the day of his election, Leo suffered from chronic ulcers [venereal skin ulcers, not of the stomach] and had to be carried into the conclave on a stretcher.

Not a few remarked that the ulcers had been caused by his “boyish predilections” … ~ D. Christie Sinton¹¹³

Medici was far from unique as a corrupt, immoral and depraved Pope.

Most Catholics go through life and never hear a word of reproach for any pope or member of the clergy.  Yet the recorded history of the lives of the clerical hierarchy bears no resemblance to its modern-day portrayal, and the true stories of the popes in particular are among the most misrepresented in religious history.

The Catholic historian and Archbishop of New York, John Cardinal Farley (d. c. 1916), subtly admitted that the “old legends of their dissolute lives may be partly true…that they didn’t sternly insist upon sexual virtue and injustice was a general license of the papal court, but it is probable that moral improvement was at the vanguard of their thinking” (Catholic Encyclopedia, Pecci ed., 1897, iii, p. 207).  The real character of the popes as a rule has been so falsely represented that many people don’t know that so many popes were not only decadent but were also the most savage and perfidious of military strategists ever known.  Cardinal Farley added this comment:

“The popes were temporal rulers of the civil territory and they naturally had recourse to force the re-establishment or extend the States of the Church until the conclusion of peace was confirmed … their attempts to purify particularly the Duchy of Rome caused them considerable distress and the need to resort to violence, but always on the side of mercy … lives were lost in the service of truth but the legal basis for the Christian Church to hold and transmit properties for the benefit of revenues was given to them [the popes] by Emperor Constantine in 312.” (Catholic Encyclopedia, Pecci ed., ii, pp. 157–169)

The comments of the cardinal warrant our attention, for within them rests a little-known story of the leaders of the Christian religion [not] and reveals that today’s presentation of popes as incorruptible moral oracles is untrue.  The hidden history of doctrinal foundations that permitted a papal alliance with conflict and licentiousness, and to what degree decadence among the clergy is “partly true”, provides for an extraordinary story — one that has no precedent or parallel in the history of world religions. ~ Bushby¹¹⁴

___________________

Sergius III (? – 911) was accused of ordering the murders of his predecessor Pope Leo V and Antipope Christopher in prison. It is said that his mistress was the young Marozia (later to become a powerful Roman noblewoman), and it was their son who became Pope John XI in 931.¹¹⁵ ~ Shell Harris

Octavianus, the son of Alberic II, became Pope John XII in 955 AD.  “Former”, “former” Jesuit Malachi Martin said this about Octavianus —

John XII, perjured himself, breaking his oath to the … Emperor … he stole the Treasury of the Popes and fled to Rome’s enemies … was deposed by a Holy Synod and replaced by Pope Leo VIII … then the apostate returned to Rome, evicted Pope Leo VIII, cut off the nose and tongue and two fingers of the Cardinal-Deacon, flayed the skin off Bishop Otger, cut off the hands of Notary Azzo, and beheaded sixty-three of Rome’s clergy and nobility. … During the night of May 14, 964, while having illicit and filthy relations with a Roman matron, he was surprised in the act of sin by the matron’s angry husband who, in just wrath, smashed his skull with a hammer and thus liberated his evil soul into the grasp of Satan. …” ~ The Decline and Fall of the Roman Church, Malachi Martin, p. 126¹¹⁶

Australian “entrepreneur” Tony Bushby is a vicious critic of Christianity and, as such, he (like his innumerable brethren) defames Christendom with the sins of Rome.^xxxv  This is a purposeful propaganda conflation and the culprits usually behind it reside in Rome!  Knowing that her sins are many, she seeks to use them to her advantage.^xxxvi

Bushby adds this on Octavianus —

…he opened his inglorious career by invoking pagan gods and goddesses as he flung the dice in gambling sessions. He toasted Satan during a drinking spree and put his notorious mistress/prostitute Marcia in charge of his brothel in the Lateran Palace (Antapodosis, ibid.).

He “liked to have around him a collection of Scarlet Women”, said the monk-chronicler Benedict of Soracte, and at his trial for the murder of an opponent his clergy swore on oath that he’d had incestuous relations with his sisters and had raped his nuns (Annals of Beneventum in the Monumenta Germaniae, v).¹¹⁷

Rome has done an excellent job covering the tracks of the true power players. Whilst truth-seekers focus on names like Soros, Rockefeller and Rothschild (urged on by well-placed propagandists), the names they should be looking in to escape them^xxxvii — names like de Medici, Orsini, Colonna, Aldobrandini, Breakspear (alternately Breakspeare), Farnese…and Borgia. ~ Secret History, Cirucci¹⁹

One of Ireland’s greatest Protestant preachers, Henry Grattan Guinness, confirms this and elucidates two more parallels.

The face of the man of sin is the face of a false apostle, the dark face of a Judas.

Written upon the wall of the temple, in letters of light, just above the proud, false, central figure, is the name “son of perdition.”

The man of sin is a Judas, a secret enemy while a seeming friend a “familiar friend,” yet a fatal foe who betrays with a kiss and a “hail, master!”

There are several features in this portrait which I must ask you specially to notice.

Observe the place occupied by the man of sin the “temple” or house of God.

This is not, and cannot be, any Jewish temple.

Paul, who uses this expression in his prophetic portrait of Romanism, employs it both in Corinthians and Ephesians with reference to the Christian Church.

In the second Epistle to the Corinthians, writing to Gentile Christians, he says, “Ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them.”

In Ephesians he calls the Church “a holy temple,” a “habitation of God through the Spirit”; and he would never have applied it to the Jewish temple, which, with all other Jewish things, he regarded as mere shadows of Christian realities.  To Paul emphatically the temple of God was the Church of Christ.

This is the temple in which his prophetic eye saw the man of sin seated.  It is no question of his bodily location in any structure of wood and stone, but of something far higher.

The temple of God is that “spiritual house” in which He dwells.  It is built of “living stones,” of true believers.

It is here that the man of sin was to usurp the place of God.

This is the “mystery,” the dread danger, the deadly evil, predicted by the Apostle.

It is no person in a temple of stone, but a power in the Christian Church.

Observe next the character of the man of sin.

He is at once an imitation of Christ, and a contrast to Him.  He occupies His position, but is totally unlike Him, and opposed to Him.  He has usurped His place and His prerogatives; but, so far from truly representing Him, he represents His great enemy.

As Christ acts for God, so the man of sin acts for Satan, who indeed produces him for this very purpose.  His coming is “after the working of Satan.”

Christ and he are antagonistic powers: the power of light, and the power of darkness; the majesty of heaven, and the might of hell.

And as the Son of God humbled Himself, so the “man of sin” exalts himself.

There is infinite self-abasement in the one, the Divine nature stooping to humanity; and infinite self-exaltation in the other, the human and satanic assuming to be Divine.

Observe here that it is not asserted that the man of sin will say that he is God, but that he will show himself as such.  The words are, “He as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God” or is Divine, or a Divine being (ἀποδεικνύντα ἑαυτὸν ὅτι ἔστιν Θεός).

There is no article here before the name God.  The expression indicates that the man of sin would show himself by acts and professions to be possessed of superhuman and Divine dignity, authority, and power.

Observe the position of the man of sin.

Notice the word καθίσαι, “sitteth,” and connect with it κάθισμα, a seat, a word which occurs three times in the New Testament.  It is used twice with reference to the seats in the temple of those who sold doves, who turned the house of God into a house of merchandise and den of thieves; and once in the sentence, “the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat.”

From κάθισμα comes “cathedral,” the “bishop’s seat,” and also the expression ex cathedra; as when we say the pope speaks ex cathedra, or from his seat, officially.

There, in that exalted cathedral position, and claiming to represent God, the man of sin was to act and abide as the pretended vicar, but real antagonist, of Christ, undermining His authority, abolishing His laws, and oppressing His people.

Observe the words, “who opposeth.”

It is possible effectually to oppose another without being his avowed antagonist; so the professions of the predicted power might be friendly, while his actions would be those of an opponent of the gospel of Christ.²⁰

In March of 2000, Karol Józef “Pope John Paul II” Wojtyła, now a Saint of the Catholic Church, gave a special Mass in Israel to “honor children”.

As we now are aware of the millions of children who have been violated, raped and even murdered by Catholic clergy, the hypocrisy is palpable.

Perhaps, most appropriately so, Wojtyła sat in a chair with an inverted cross and clutched a hideous crozier (crucifix²¹ staff).

Although mainstream media refused to report on the event, it was not lost upon the Catholic faithful.

The location for the children’s Mass in Israel was the village of Korazim.  This, too, was perfectly appropriate.²²

“Woe to you, Chorazin!  Woe to you, Bethsaida!  For if the miracles had occurred in Tyre and Sidon which occurred in you, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes.” ~ Matthew 11:21

UPDATE: 20 November 2019

II Thessalonians 2:1-4 discusses the Papal Antichrist and verses 5 through 12 are just as obscured as they discuss his system.

Do you not remember that when I was still with you I told you these things?

And now you know what is restraining, that he may be revealed in his own time.  For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only he²³ who now restrains will do so until he is taken out of the way.

And then the Lawless One²⁴ will be revealed, whom the Lord will consume with the breath of His Mouth and destroy with the brightness of His Appearance.

The coming of the Lawless One is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, that they all may be condemned who did not believe the Truth²⁵ but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

It is natural, but wrong, to assume that, because the Antichrist is being “restrained”, that which restrains him is good.

Today, most “Evangelicals” preach that the Restrainer is the Holy Spirit, but if that’s so, why didn’t Paul write that?  He was being obtuse to spare himself and the early Christians from even more harm than they were already suffering.

The military Roman Empire needed to fall away so that the religious Roman Empire could take its place.

Although Emperors from Julius Caesar on demanded to be worshipped as gods, they never claimed they were the God of the Hebrew (and later) Christian Scriptures (Bible) but their replacements all did: the Popes.

Most of the church fathers held to this view.^[1]  Under this view, Paul didn’t want to say this outright, because this would have led to persecution for the Church in the first century.  On this view, the masculine singular (“he”) would refer to the Roman emperor, while the neuter pronoun (“what”) would refer to the Roman government.

For instance, Preterist Gary DeMar holds that this passage likely refers to the Roman Empire, while the restrainer might refer to King Agrippa, who stopped further killing of Christians after the death of James and tried to stop the Jewish War in AD 66.^[2]

However, we do not hold to this view.  For one, the Roman Empire did not “restrain” the Antichrist.  Specifically, under the Preterist view, Emperor Nero was the Antichrist, and he governed over the Roman Empire!  Moreover, King Agrippa did not restrain Nero in any way.

Second, Daniel and Revelation see human government as pushing for the rise of the Antichrist—not restraining him.

Third, the Roman Empire fell in the fifth century AD, so this “restrainer” would have no meaning for today.  As Thomas writes²⁶, “Elimination of this solution is sealed when we remember that the Roman Empire has long since ceased to exist, and the appearance of Christ or the lawless one has yet to take place.”^[3] ~ Evidence Unseen

The “we” above is actually an “I”: author James M. Rochford of Peoria, Illinois.

He discredits this interpretation, not with facts, but with association.

Preterism is the idea that the Antichrist has come and gone and that all of Bible Prophecy has been fulfilled, which calls into question the judgment of the un-Godly and the existence of the Millennial Kingdom.

You’ll never guess where it came from.

With Rome so clearly depicted as the 4^th and final Beast of both Daniel and Revelation, Jesuits needed to disconnect Christians from that interpretation and they used Preterism and Futurism to do it.

Preterism is the idea that most of prophecy has already taken place.  It was concocted by a Jesuit.

Preterism was first advanced in 1604 by Jesuit Luis de Alcasar to destroy the Reformed Protestant teaching that the papacy was Mystery Babylon, the Great Whore and the historical Antichrist.

What Scholars Had To Say About Preterism

Henry Alford (an Anglican Greek scholar)

“The praeterist view found no favour and was hardly so much as thought of in the time of primitive Christianity.  Those who lived near the date of the book of Revelation itself had no idea that its groups of imagery were intended merely to describe things then passing, and to be in a few years completed.  This view is said to have been first promulgated in anything like completeness by the Jesuit Alcasar, in his “Vestigatio Arcani Sensus in Apocalypsi” (1604).  Very nearly, the same plan was adopted by Grotius.  The next great name among this school of interpreters is that of Bossuet the great antagonist of Protestantism.”

Charles Hodge

Also dismissing the Jesuit-Romanist Preterist approach, Charles Hodge noted that the preterists of his time for the most part were German Rationalists.

“[they] were German interpreters who, denying any real prediction of the future, confine the views of Daniel and John to their contemporary history”.

He lists some of the liberal scholars such as Ewald, DeWette and Lucke, who not only denied the predictive element in Scripture but also denied the inspiration and authority of the Word of God. ~ Bulletin for Biblical Christianity Today, Dr. Ronald Cooke⁵⁵⁶

Preterism wasn’t accepted by large groups of Protestants and an alternative interpretation of the End Times was put forth.

Futurism is more appealing in that it acknowledges that much of prophecy is yet future.  However it distracts from the 4th Beast and paints the anti-Christ as a man who suddenly appears just before the Tribulation and who stands alone, apart from any organization or system.

It, too, was fabricated by a Jesuit. ~ Illuminati Unmasked, Cirucci²⁷

The military Roman Empire did restrain the religious empire that spawned the Antichrist.

This takes care of the second critique, as well.

The idea that the Roman Empire fell “in the 5^th century” is, therefore, the most important; either as a flaw or ultimate fulfillment as Daniel and Revelation repeatedly mention four empires:

1. Babylon
2. Medo/Persia
3. Greece
4. Rome

If Rome disappeared then the Bible is obsolete and of no use to us, but if Rome lives on then the Bible is far more accurate than “Evangelicals” give it credit for.

Mr. Rochford has been a Board of Trustees President of the “children’s charity” Kiwanis International, an organization that promotes pilgrimages to Fatima and Vatican City.

The capitalization of pronouns is not evident in the original languages of Scripture and modern English language Bibles erroneously capitalize the “he” of II Thessalonians 2:6-7, making the choice for you who the “restrainer” is.

However, even trusted older translations like the King James, although getting II Thessalonians right, fail to capitalize the pronouns of Daniel 9.

Now while I was speaking, praying, and confessing my sin and the sin of my people Israel, and presenting my supplication before the Lord my God for the Holy Mountain²⁸ of my God, yes, while I was speaking in prayer, the man Gabriel, whom I had seen in the vision at the beginning, being caused to fly swiftly, reached me about the time of the evening offering.  And he informed me, and talked with me, and said, “O Daniel, I have now come forth to give you skill to understand.  At the beginning of your supplications the command went out, and I have come to tell you, for you are greatly beloved; therefore consider the matter, and understand the vision:”

“Seventy weeks are determined
For your people and for your holy city,
To finish the transgression,
To make an end of sins,
To make reconciliation for iniquity,
To bring in everlasting righteousness,
To seal up vision and prophecy,
And to anoint the Most Holy.”

“Know therefore and understand,
That from the going forth of the command
To restore and build Jerusalem
Until Messiah the Prince,
There shall be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks;
The street shall be built again, and the wall,
Even in troublesome times.”

“And after the sixty-two weeks
Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself;
And the people of the prince who is to come
Shall destroy the city and the sanctuary.”

“The end of it shall be with a flood,
And till the end of the war desolations are determined.”

“Then he [He] shall confirm a covenant with many for one week;
But in the middle of the week
He²⁹ shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering.”

“And on the wing of abominations shall be one who makes desolate,
Even until the consummation, which is determined,
Is poured out on the desolate.”

“Then he [He] shall confirm a covenant with many for one week;
But in the middle of the week he [He] shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering.” ~ The Seventy-Weeks Prophecy of Daniel 9:20-27

Daniel 9 maintains a “Chiastic” structure or pattern of “A, B, B, A”.

Who is it that confirms the Covenant with Israel then “breaks” (fulfills) it?  —The Christ, not the Antichrist!

The Temple is forever cursed.

“O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the one who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her!  How often I wanted to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing!”

“See!  Your house is left to you desolate; for I say to you, you shall see Me no more till you say, ‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord!’”

Then Jesus went out and departed from the Temple³⁰, and His disciples³¹ came up to show Him the buildings of the Temple.  And Jesus said to them, “Do you not see all these things?  Assuredly, I say to you, not one stone shall be left here upon another, that shall not be thrown down.” ~ Matthew 23:37-24:2

It will never be rebuilt.

Now when Peter had come to Antioch, I withstood him to his face, because he was to be blamed; for before certain men came from James, he would eat with the Gentiles; but when they came, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing those who were of the circumcision.

And the rest of the Jews also played the hypocrite with him, so that even Barnabas was carried away with their hypocrisy.

But when I saw that they were not straightforward about the truth of the Gospel, I said to Peter before them all, “If you, being a Jew, live in the manner of Gentiles and not as the Jews, why do you compel Gentiles to live as Jews?”

“We who are Jews by nature, and not sinners of the Gentiles, knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the Law³² but by faith in Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, that we might be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the Law; for by the works of the Law no flesh shall be justified.”

“But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is Christ therefore a minister of sin?  Certainly not!  For if I build again those things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor.  For I through the Law died to the Law that I might live to God.  I have been crucified with Christ; it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.  I do not set aside the Grace³³ of God; for if righteousness comes through the Law, then Christ died in vain.”

For if I build again those things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor. ~ Galatians 2:11-21

That the “restrainer” was the Roman Empire was not lost on Quintus Septimius Florens Tertullianus, more popularly known as “Tertullian” (approximately 155 – 240 AD).

Again, in the second epistle he addresses them with even greater earnestness: “Now I beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto Him, that ye be not soon shaken in mind, nor be troubled, either by spirit, or by word,” that is, the word of false prophets, “or by letter,” that is, the letter of false apostles, “as if from us, as that the day of the Lord is at hand.  Let no man deceive you by any means.

For that day shall not come, unless indeed there first come a falling away,” he means indeed of this present empire, “and that man of sin be revealed,” that is to say, Antichrist, “the son of perdition, who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God or religion; so that he sitteth in the temple of God, affirming that he is God.  Remember ye not, that when I was with you, I used to tell you these things?  And now ye know what detaineth, that he might be revealed in his time.  For the mystery of iniquity doth already work; only he who now hinders must hinder, until he be taken out of the way.”⁷⁴⁵³  What obstacle is there but the Roman state, the falling away of which, by being scattered into ten kingdoms, shall introduce Antichrist upon (its own ruins)?  “And then shall be revealed the wicked one, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of His mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of His coming: even him whose coming is after the working of Satan, with all power, and signs, and lying wonders, and with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish.”⁷⁴⁵⁴³⁴

Nor was it lost to John Chrysostom of Antioch.

One may naturally enquire, what is that which withholdeth, and after that would know, why Paul expresses it so obscurely.  What then is it that withholdeth, that is, hindereth him from being revealed?

Some indeed say, the grace of the Spirit, but others the Roman empire, to whom I most of all accede.

Wherefore?

Because if he meant to say the Spirit, he would not have spoken obscurely, but plainly, that even now the grace of the Spirit, that is the gifts, withhold him.  And otherwise he ought now to have come, if he was about to come when the gifts ceased; for they have long since ceased.  But because he said this of the Roman empire, he naturally glanced at it, and speaks covertly and darkly.  For he did not wish to bring upon himself superfluous enmities, and useless dangers.  For if he had said that after a little while 389 the Roman empire would be dissolved, they would immediately have even overwhelmed him, as a pestilent person, and all the faithful, as living and warring to this end.  And he did not say that it will be quickly, although he is always saying it—but what? “that he may be revealed in his own season,” he says,

“For the mystery of lawlessness doth already work.”  He speaks here of Nero, as if he were the type of Antichrist.  For he too wished to be thought a god.  And he has well said, “the mystery”; that is, it worketh not openly, as the other, nor without shame.  For if there was found a man before that time, he means, who was not much behind Antichrist in wickedness, what wonder, if there shall now be one?

But he did not also wish to point him out plainly: and this not from cowardice, but instructing us not to bring upon ourselves unnecessary enmities, when there is nothing to call for it.  So indeed he also says here.  “Only there is one that restraineth now, until he be taken out of the way,” that is, when the Roman empire is taken out of the way, then he shall come.  And naturally.  For as long as the fear of this empire lasts, no one will willingly exalt himself, but when that is dissolved, he will attack the anarchy, and endeavor to seize upon the government both of man and of God.  For as the kingdoms before this were destroyed, for example, that of the Medes by the Babylonians, that of the Babylonians by the Persians, that of the Persians by the Macedonians, that of the Macedonians by the Romans: so will this also be by the Antichrist, and he by Christ, and it will no longer withhold.  And these things Daniel delivered to us with great clearness.

“And then,” he says, “shall be revealed the lawless one.”  And what after this? The consolation is at hand.  “Whom the Lord Jesus shall slay with the breath of His mouth, and bring to nought by the manifestation of His coming, even he whose coming is according to the working of Satan.”

For as fire merely coming on even before its arrival makes torpid and consumes the little animals that are afar off; so also Christ, by His commandment only, and Coming.  It is enough for Him to be present, and all these things are destroyed.  He will put a stop to the deceit, by only appearing.  Then who is this, whose coming is after the working of Satan, “With all display all power,” but nothing true, but for deceit.  “And lying wonder,” he says, that is, false, or leading to falsehood.³⁵

Rome is full of “signs and lying wonders”.

Apparition Apprehensions

In 1916, three Portuguese children were herding sheep when an angel appeared to them on multiple occasions at Cova da Iria (“Irene’s Cove”) just outside of Fátima.  Lucia dos Santos was 9 and her cousin Francisco Marto was 8.  Francisco’s sister, Jacinta Marto, was 6.  The angel taught them how to pray¹⁷²² and “sacrifice” on behalf of sinners.¹⁷²³

On May 13, 1917, Lúcia described seeing a lady “brighter than the sun, shedding rays of light clearer and stronger than a crystal goblet filled with the most sparkling water and pierced by the burning rays of the sun”.  While they had never spoken to anyone about the angel, Jacinta divulged her sightings to her family despite Lucia’s admonition to keep this experience private.  Her disbelieving mother told neighbors as a joke, and within a day the whole village knew.^[6]  Further appearances were reported on June 13 and July 13.  In these, the lady asked the children to do penance and Acts of Reparation and make personal sacrifices to save sinners.  According to Lúcia’s account, the lady also confided to the children three secrets, now known as the Three Secrets of Fátima.

The children subsequently wore tight cords around their waists, performed self-flagellation using stinging nettles, abstained from drinking water on hot days, and performed other works of penance.^[6]~ Wikipedia¹⁷²⁴

Despite their claims, they were ridiculed by some and the apparition they saw promised to give them powerful prophecies on the 13th of the month, in October of 1917.

Between May and October of 1917, always on the 13^th of the month, the children received three secrets.  Lucia eventually disclosed them from the Convent where she became a nun.  Francisco and Jacinta died just a few short years later in the Spanish Flu Epidemic of 1918-20.

It is important to note that October 13th 1307 is established by the Luciferian Elite as the day Pope Clement V collaborated with France’s King Philip IV and suppressed the Vatican Treasury guardians—the Knights Templar.¹⁷²⁵

Sister Lucia wrote her account much later in life under orders from the Bishop of Leiria.  In 1940, she sent her recollection to Pope Pius XII.

Well, the secret is made up of three distinct parts, two of which I am now going to reveal⁴.

The first part is the vision of hell⁵.

Our Lady showed us a great sea of fire which seemed to be under the earth.  Plunged in this fire were demons and souls in human form, like transparent burning embers, all blackened or burnished bronze, floating about in the conflagration, now raised into the air by the flames that issued from within themselves together with great clouds of smoke, now falling back on every side like sparks in a huge fire, without weight or equilibrium, and amid shrieks and groans of pain and despair, which horrified us and made us tremble with fear.  The demons could be distinguished by their terrifying and repellent likeness to frightful and unknown animals, all black and transparent.  This vision lasted but an instant.

How can we ever be grateful enough to our kind heavenly Mother, who had already prepared us by promising, in the first Apparition, to take us to Heaven.  Otherwise, I think we would have died of fear and terror.

We then looked up at Our Lady, who said to us so kindly and so sadly: “You have seen hell where the souls of poor sinners go.  To save them, God wishes to establish in the world devotion to my Immaculate Heart⁶.” ~ Fátima In Lucia’s Own Words: Sister Lucia’s Memoirs¹⁷²⁶

The second secret stated that a very important country would stand in the balance between “good” and “evil”: Russia.

The war⁷[World War II] is going to end: but if people do not cease offending God, a worse one will break out during the pontificate of Pius Xl⁸.  When you see a night illumined by an unknown light, know that this is the great sign ⁹ given you by God that He is about to punish the world for its crimes, by means of war, famine, and persecutions of the Church and of the Holy Father.

“To prevent this, I shall come¹⁰ to ask for the consecration of Russia to my Immaculate Heart, and the Communion of reparation on the First Saturdays.  If my requests are heeded, Russia will be converted, and there will be peace; if not, she will spread her errors throughout the world, causing wars and persecutions of the Church.  The good will be martyred; the Holy Father will have much to suffer; various nations will be annihilated.  In the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph.  The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to me¹¹, and she will be converted, and a period of peace will be granted to the world¹².” ~ Sister Lucia’s Memoirs¹⁷²⁷

When Sister Lucia released her memoirs, Papal authority had passed from Pius XI to Pius XII.

May 13th is celebrated as the first apparition of Mary in 1917 and that was the day the Jesuits made an attempt on the life of John Paul II.  He survived after having been shot 4 times and accounted it as a miracle from Our Lady of Fátima.

After the assassination attempt of 13 May 1981, it appeared evident that it was “a mother’s hand that guided the bullet’s path”, enabling “the Pope in his throes” to halt “at the threshold of death” (Pope John Paul II, Meditation from the Policlinico Gemelli to the Italian Bishops, Insegnamenti, XVII, 1 [1994], 1061).  On the occasion of a visit to Rome by the then Bishop of Leiria-Fátima, the Pope decided to give him the bullet which had remained in the jeep after the assassination attempt, so that it might be kept in the shrine.  By the Bishop’s decision, the bullet was later set in the crown of the statue of Our Lady of Fátima.  ~ Cardinal Angelo Sodano, Vatican Secretary Of State¹⁷²⁸

Catholics everywhere awaited with great anticipation for the third secret.

After the nearly-successful attempt on John Paul II’s life (a Pole named Karol Józef Wojtyła), there were 3 more¹⁷²⁹.  It was then that the secret was finally released.

The third part of the secret revealed at the Cova da Iria-Fátima, on 13 July 1917.

I write in obedience to you, my God, who command me to do so through his Excellency the Bishop of Leiria and through your Most Holy Mother and mine.

After the two parts which I have already explained, at the left of Our Lady and a little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his left hand; flashing, it gave out flames that looked as though they would set the world on fire; but they died out in contact with the splendour that Our Lady radiated towards him from her right hand: pointing to the earth with his right hand, the Angel cried out in a loud voice: ‘Penance, Penance, Penance!’.  And we saw in an immense light that is God: ‘something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it’ a Bishop dressed in White ‘we had the impression that it was the Holy Father’.  Other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions.  Beneath the two arms of the Cross there were two Angels each with a crystal aspersorium in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood of the Martyrs and with it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to God.  ~ Sister Lucia’s Memoirs¹⁷³⁰

The future Benedict XVI (then Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger) was chosen to give the Doctrinal Response.  Even he seemed unenthused.

A careful reading of the text of the so-called third “secret” of Fátima, published here in its entirety long after the fact and by decision of the Holy Father, will probably prove disappointing or surprising after all the speculation it has stirred.  No great mystery is revealed; nor is the future unveiled.¹⁷³¹

But what was noteworthy is that witnesses claim something did show up on October 13th, 1917.  From some accounts, it didn’t look like Mary.

“Miracle of the Sun”

On the 610th anniversary^ddd of the Templar suppression, Mary appeared to three children as well as anywhere from 30,000 to 100,000 Portuguese, depending upon which report you believe.

It had been raining but, as the miracle goes, the rain suddenly stopped and there were two visions—one of Mary, Joseph and baby Jesus^eee, seen only by the 3 children of whom only 1 survived into adulthood.

The rest of the people there saw a UFO.

While the rain had stopped, dark clouds continued to obscure the sun, which suddenly bursts through them and is seen to be a soft spinning disk of silver. …

O Seculo (a pro-government, anti-clerical, Lisbon paper):

— the sun O Dia (another Lisbon daily, edition of 17 October 1917):

At one o’clock in the afternoon, midday by the sun, the rain stopped.  The sky, pearly grey in colour, illuminated the vast arid landscape with a strange light.  The sun had a transparent gauzy veil so that the eyes could easily be fixed upon it.  The grey mother-of-pearl tone turned into a sheet of silver which broke up as the clouds were torn apart and the silver sun, enveloped in the same gauzy grey light, was seen to whirl and turn in the circle of broken clouds. …

The light turned a beautiful blue, as if it had come through the stained-glass windows of a cathedral, and spread itself over the people who knelt with outstretched hands.  The blue faded slowly, and then the light seemed to pass through yellow glass.  Yellow stains fell against white handkerchiefs, against the dark skirts of the women.  They were repeated on the trees, on the stones and on the serra. …

Ti Marto (father of Jacinta and Francisco):

We looked easily at the sun, which for some reason did not blind us.  It seemed to flicker on and off, first one way, then another.  It cast its rays in many directions and painted everything in different colors—the trees, the people, the air and the ground.  But what was most extraordinary, I thought, was that the sun did not hurt our eyes.  Everything was still and quiet, and everyone was looking up.  Then at a certain moment, the sun appeared to stop spinning.  It then began to move and to dance in the sky until it seemed to detach itself from its place and fall upon us.  It was a terrible moment.

Dr. Almeida Garrett, PhD (Coimbra University):

…The sun’s disc did not remain immobile.  This was not the sparkling of a, heavenly body, for it spun round on itself in a mad whirl.  Then, suddenly, one heard a clamor, a cry of anguish breaking from all the people.  The sun, whirling wildly, seemed to loosen itself from the firmament and advance threateningly upon the earth as if to crush us with its huge and fiery weight.  The sensation during those moments was terrible.  ~ Apparition of 13 October 1917, EWTN¹⁷³²

Christian author and researcher L.A. Marzulli has suggested that this was an introduction to the “coming great deception”¹⁷³³ (an “alien disclosure”) and we will see shortly that, if the aliens have an official religion it is Roman Catholicism.

But there has been another purpose exposed for the Fátima apparition and that has been for the Pope to extend the olive branch of “peace” to the Religion of Pieces.

The Blue Army

Did you know that Our Lady of Fátima has an army? —A blue army.

The Blue Army of Our Lady of Fátima, now mostly known as the World Apostolate of Fátima, is a public international association of the Christian faithful that has as its general purpose “the promotion of the authentic teaching of the Roman Catholic Church and the strict adherence to the tenets of the Gospel; the personal sanctification of adherents through faithful adherence to the Message of Fátima and the promotion of the common good by the spreading of that Message of Fátima”.  ~ Wikipedia¹⁷³⁴

—And they’re recruiting muslims.

Islam is an Arabic word that can be defined as “to make peace.” …  over the centuries, Muslims have engaged in tremendous wars with Christians and Jews.  It would seem that there is little hope for peace.  However, Heaven’s Peace Plan, involving Our Lady, is evidenced at Fatima, Portugal as well as other places around the world.

The Moors once occupied Portugal.  The village of Fatima was given the Islamic name of the well-loved Princess of the nearby Castle of Ourem.  She died at an early age after marrying the Count of Ourem and converting to Catholicism.  Baptized with the Christian name of Oureana, she was named at birth “Fatima,” like many other Moslem girls, in honor of the daughter of Mohammed.  Of his daughter, Fatima, the founder of Islam, Mohammed, said: “She has the highest place in heaven after the Virgin Mary.”

It is a fact that Moslems from various nations, especially from the Middle East, make so many pilgrimages to Our Lady of Fatima’s Shrine in Portugal that Portuguese officials have expressed concern.  The combination of an Islamic name and Islamic devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary is a great attraction to Moslems.  God is writing straight with crooked lines, as we will see.  Fatima is a part of Heaven’s Peace Plan.  It is hope for the world.

In the Koran, the holy name of the Blessed Virgin Mary is mentioned no less than thirty times.  No other woman’s name is even mentioned, not even that of Mohammed’s daughter, Fatima.  Among men, only Abraham, Moses, and Noah are mentioned more times than Our Lady.  In the Koran, Our Blessed Mother is described as “Virgin, ever Virgin.”  The Islamic belief in the virginity of Mary puts to shame the heretical beliefs of those who call themselves Christian, while denying the perpetual virginity of Mary.  Make no mistake about it, there is a very special relationship between the Blessed Virgin Mary and the Moslems! ~ Fr Ladis J. Cizik, Blue Army National Executive Director¹⁷³⁵

There are many questions surrounding the apparition at Fátima.  Why would it choose a location so easily identified by muslims?

Is the apparition of Fátima a cunningly-divined hoax for the political power of uniting Catholicism with Islam?

* Only the children saw “Mary”, even during the October event in 1917.  Two of them died shortly thereafter and the third was controlled from a convent.  She even admits she was directed to reveal what she saw by Catholic authorities.

* There were supposedly 70,000 people in the Cova da Iria that day in 1917 yet evidence is extremely sparse with only a handful of eyewitness accounts existing. ~ Illuminati Unmasked, Cirucci³⁶

It is a terrible thing to be so close to Christ in the Catholic religion yet barred from accepting Him as Savior.

All the more can we therefore feel the emotion with which He reaches out to all Catholics—

And I heard another Voice from Heaven saying, “Come out of her, My People, lest you share in her sins, and lest you receive of her plagues.  For her sins have reached to Heaven, and God has remembered her wicked deeds³⁷.  Render to her just as she rendered to you, and repay her double according to her works; in the cup which she has mixed, mix double for her.” ~ Revelation 18:4-6

If you were paying attention, you could’ve rightfully questioned me, “OK Johnny, it’s not resurrected Soviets. Then who is controlling world affairs and secretly screwing us over so effectively?”

For that we need to delve into a couple of disciplines that aren’t as empirical as I prefer: philosophy and theology.

4^th AND INCHES

I’m not big on just winning.

When it’s the Big Game, I don’t want some cheap NFL loophole like “pass interference” giving me 1^st and goal at the one yard line and then having to use instant replay to see if the ball “broke the plane” on the next play.

I want some big diesel to run over a dude and punch it in from way down the field.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOJZ5o18_PA&

But I’m afraid that’s what we’re looking at if we have to answer the question “who runs the world”?

If the premise is, “A tiny über-wealthy Elite is secretly pulling the strings of governments everywhere,” then we also have to expect that they can effectively make themselves invisible by controlling information. The more wealth and power you ascribe to them, the greater their abilities become to disappear.

As a result, this premise has automatically marked us as “conspiracy theorists”.

This, by the way, is the exact same label you earn the second you think a commonly-accepted source like your government, textbooks or news media have lied to you.

Here’s the interesting part: if you take the Christian Bible seriously, both Old and New Testaments tell you man is more than evil enough.

Then the L-RD saw that the wickedness of man was great on the Earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. ~ Genesis 6:5 (New American Standard Bible, abbreviation added for respect)

The heart is more deceitful than all else
And is desperately sick;
Who can understand it? ~ Jeremiah 17:9 (NASB)

Peter said to Him, “Explain the parable to us.” Jesus said, “Are you still lacking in understanding also? Do you not understand that everything that goes into the mouth passes into the stomach, and is eliminated? But the things that proceed out of the mouth come from the heart, and those defile the man. For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, slanders. These are the things which defile the man; but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile the man.” ~ Matthew 15:15-20

Now imagine such an evil heart wielding so much power and money that they can make themselves completely immune from the consequences of their actions (in this life).

Great men are almost always bad men. …

There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it. …

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

~ John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton, 1st Baron Acton

But here’s the thing; manipulation leaves evidence. Like a big predator just under the surface of the water, we can see wakes and ripples pointing to the threat just out of sight.

ELEMENTARY

The challenge to drawing inferences only from circumstantial evidence is that, once in a while, the circumstances point in the wrong direction.

And if you’re tracking a ruthless and cunning criminal, you will have many false leads left behind like breadcrumbs.

Shall we begin…?

First let me tell you how much I hate the word “Illuminati”. It’s such a ridiculous, meaningless epithet I’d almost wager that our quarry made it up and disseminated it to make us sound like idiots. I will guarantee you that the enemy we are looking for do not call themselves this and laugh whenever it is mentioned.

Words mean things which is why the Machine has already put you at a disadvantage before you even open your mouth. If we don’t believe the government or the media about something, we’re “truthers”. If we question where Barack Obama, the Manchurian Messiah of Mystery, was actually born (a question critical to his eligibility to even be president), we’re lampooned as “birthers”—even by people pretending to be on our side like Ann Coulter and Glenn Beck. If you lean to the Right in the political spectrum you are “red”—the traditional color of Communism and the color the NATO military assigns to enemy forces. If you lean to the Left you are “blue”, the NATO color for coalition forces. If you are horrified by the Nazi-esque scenes that take place in a Planned Parenthood “clinic” you’re “anti-abortion” but the ghouls who promote it are “Pro Choice”.

So what do we call them?

I don’t like the term “globalist” because, although unifying the globe for enslavement is their goal it implies they are above national boundaries and, if there’s one thing they are doing it is exploiting the very nations they live in. There are Americans who were born and bred here that will be held to account for their high treason.

“Elite” gets closer because it connects them with what they believe in: they are above you, they look down upon you. It is their Divine Rite to rule over you.

But I really like the term “Luciferian” because that is whom they serve; most of them do so unknowingly but those at the very top willfully worship and obey their master, Lucifer. “Luciferian Elite” punches the exclamation point.

We’ve named our quarry, now let’s hunt them down.

ARISTOXICITY

As I noted in a previous column:

Anywhere there is an agenda to harm the common man, it invariably gets traced to a tiny super-wealthy Elite.

Some of the richest men and women in the world met secretly recently in New York to conspire on using their vast wealth to bring the world’s population growth under control.

The meeting included some of the biggest names in the “billionaires club,” according to the London Times – Bill Gates, David Rockefeller, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey, Warren Buffett, George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. ~ Secret Billionaire Club Seeks Population Control, WorldNetDaily

Wealthy family hegemonies are thoroughly entrenched in both the U.S. and the U.K. and they are every bit a malignant cancer. Where-ever they exert themselves, the average citizen suffers.

Two of the greatest coups the bankster Elite pulled on Americans were the 16^th Amendment to the Constitution (your government has a right to skim your money before you see a dime of it and call it an “Income Tax”) and the Federal Reserve Act. As former Texas Congressman Ron Paul has quipped, we should repeal 1913—the year both of these travesties were enacted.

At least one crusader continues to claim the Amendment wasn’t properly ratified and many others will tell you that nowhere are you required to file a tax return.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4jrbkCJwTM&

The problem is, quite a few judges and juries don’t care what the law says. In fact, you run a very high risk when you refuse to pay your bloodmoney of being made an example of.

Now in his eighth year in federal prison on tax-related charges, the popular Florida-based creation-science lecturer and theme-park creator known as “Dr. Dino” hopes a U.S. Senate bill will free him, perhaps even before Christmas.

Kent Hovind, incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution at Berlin, N.H., began serving a 10-year sentence in January 2007 after he was convicted of 12 tax offenses, one count of obstructing federal agents and 45 counts of structuring cash transactions.

The Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to vote Thursday on a bill that would reduce the amount of time served for first-offense, nonviolent federal offenders who exhibit good behavior, cutting sentences by 33 percent instead of the current 12 percent. ~ Creationist Hopes Bill Will Free Him From Prison, WorldNetDaily

The details of just how these insurgencies were accomplished could fill volumes on the so-called “Federal Reserve” alone—with the cockroaches climbing aboard a specially-chartered train using code names for each other as they headed for their Luciferian playground on Jekyll Island. Author G. Edward Griffin penned the defining work on this conspiracy titled The Creature From Jekyll Island. He was featured in Hollywood producer Aaron Russo’s breakaway film America: Freedom to Fascism.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhLOPUMpC_c&

Aaron was a popular, Left-of-center Hollywood figure who had “taken the Red Pill”. Not only was he trying to look behind the curtain, he was using his talent to show a great many other people what was back there. He died at the very young age of 64 from bladder cancer.

That sounds normally tragic unless you have read Edward Haslem’s book Dr. Mary’s Monkey which chronicles the CIA’s efforts to use a viral form of cancer for assassination. That was in the early 1960’s. I’m sure what they can do today would make killing someone by heart attack seem like child’s play.

Covering your tracks, however, might cause you to be a little more clumsy.

The unexpected death of conservative commentator Andrew Breitbart just got a whole lot more mysterious. Only two months after Breitbart’s passing, the coroner that investigated the cause of death may have succumbed to arsenic poisoning.

Michael Cormier, 61, passed away on April 20, the Los Angeles Times reports this week. Although Cormier’s death is only being publicized now, the timing of actual passing actually came within hours of the release of the preliminary autopsy report of Breitbart. ~ What A Coincidence! Breitbart’s Coroner Dead From Arsenic Poisoning? Russia Today

OF ROTHSCHILDS & ROCKEFELLERS

What is most frustrating about the story behind the Federal Reserve is how clearly those involved were all from the same Ruling Elite America had fought a war to cut off. Just 3 generations after Andy Jackson’s epic battle to kill the Central bank, the Land of Freedom was sound asleep and the foxes quietly crept back into the henhouse.

Nelson W. Aldrich was a U.S. senator who chaired the National Monetary Commission that spent years collecting material about monetary systems. He met with others at Jekyll Island to draft a plan that the commission approved and released in a report in January 1912. This was the Aldrich Plan. It called for a National Reserve Association, which was a banking cartel (called a trust in the cartoon).

Aldrich had a daughter, Abby Greene Aldrich, who had married John D. Rockefeller, Jr. in 1901, and Aldrich was known as a Rockefeller man in the Senate. Aldrich also had a son Winthrop who chaired the Chase National Bank (1930-1953) and his son was Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller, the governor of New York (1959-1973) and vice-president (1974-1977) under Gerald Ford.

Control of Congress changed, Aldrich went out of office, and this plan died. But in mid-1913, a new plan was floated that took some elements of the Aldrich plan. In August, the Glass bill was introduced and that became the Federal Reserve Act when signed in December, 1913 by Wilson. ~ What Was the Aldrich Plan? Michael S. Rozeff, LewRockwell.com

When it comes to the toxic American aristocracy, few families represent it more perfectly than the Rockefellers. They’re even quite open about it:

“Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.” ~ David Rockefeller, Memoirs, page 405

At least satan has a sense of humor and took old big daddy Nelson out with a heart attack while he was porking his secretary. What’s not as funny is how the Rockefellers have been doing the same to the American people for generations—and they amazingly keep asking for more.

Why, who better to represent the back-woods coal country state of West Virginia then John David “Jay” Rockefeller?! He’s been burrowed in like a tick on a hound dog starting with becoming Governor of that state way back in 1977, and then took over as a United States Senator in 1985 where he’s been ever since. They’ll probably carry him out in a pine box with drool on his chin the way they did the other United States Senator from that great state, Robert KKK Byrd.

To quote Jack Nicholson from the 1989 version of Batman, “This town needs an enema!”

Certainly, when looking at either who the “Illuminati” are or who serves them, wealthy families who have entrenched themselves in banking, business or political bureaucracy year after year, generation after generation should remain at the top of our list.

But as we look at another agent behind the Federal Reserve, we delve into another classification of who “they” are.

Paul Moritz Warburg was a wealthy banker. A German Jew, Warburg emigrated to the United States in 1902. He married Nina Loeb, daughter of Solomon Loeb of the law firm Kuhn, Loeb and Co. There are many who think Warburg didn’t act alone in his push for an unaccountable private Central Bank.

Preacher, 700 Club founder and presidential candidate Pat Robertson considered Warburg to have been acting on behalf of an even more nefarious Jewish cabal; the Rothschilds.

IT’S THE JEWS!

There is nothing that polarizes people today more than the Jewish people or the nation of Israel. Hatred for one is usually masked as hatred for the other. Even Martin Luther King, Jr. could recognize that when someone was spouting vicious hatred for so-called “Zionists” they were really just saying “kill the Jews!”

The level to which so many in the “Freedom Movement” go to vilify Israel and her proponents borders on psychosis. They imagine a secret Israeli agent in every position of influence!

The only thing worse than the Nazis, jihadis and Ku Klux Klansmen who see a wealthy, conniving Jew behind every seat of power are the wealthy, conniving Jews behind seats of power.

Although “anti-Zionism” is nothing less than a disease that destroys it’s host’s ability to think rationally, it is fed by large quantities of espionage and undue influence on behalf of “G-d’s* Chosen People”.

California Democrat Jane Harman was caught in just such a scandal though nothing was allowed to come of it:

Rep. Jane Harman , the California Democrat with a longtime involvement in intelligence issues, was overheard on an NSA wiretap telling a suspected Israeli agent that she would lobby the Justice Department to reduce espionage-related charges against two officials of the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee, the most powerful pro-Israel organization in Washington. ~ Major Scandal Erupts Involving Rep. Jane Harman, Alberto Gonzales and AIPAC, Glenn Greenwald, Salon

The Bush Administration had the radical Leftist dead to rights but there was something far more important that needed to be accomplished than playing political theater—your enslavement.

In 2009, it was revealed NSA wiretaps reportedly intercepted a 2005 phone call between Harman and an agent of the Israeli government, in which Harman allegedly agreed to lobby the Justice Department to reduce or drop criminal charges against two employees of AIPAC in exchange for increased support for Harman’s campaign to chair the House Intelligence Committee.^[13] The NSA transcripts reportedly recorded Harman ending the phone call after saying, “this conversation doesn’t exist.”^[14] It was reported that Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General at the time of the phone call, blocked Justice Department lawyers from continuing the investigation into Harman (in spite of the alleged crime) because the Bush administration “needed Jane” to support their warrantless wiretapping program, which was soon to be revealed to the public by the New York Times.^[15] ~ Jane Harman, 2009 Wiretap/AIPAC Allegations, Wikipedia

Subversive Leftist Jews have been humiliating the Children of Israel since their inception, from Karl Marx to some of the worst names in Congress like Chuck Schumer, Barbara Boxer and Diane Feinstein. Marx has made a good run at being one of the most notorious tools of the devil in all of human history but even his arm isn’t as long as the reach of the Rothschild Dynasty.

The story of Nathan Mayer Rothschild financing and manipulating the Napoleonic Wars has been legitimized enough to work its way into user-edited “Wikipedia”. Although Wikipedia is not a solidly reputable source there are many entries that are both well-written and heavily-footnoted by authors who are expert in the covered material and, if corroborated with another source can be rather persuasive (especially when few sources are allowed to exist):

The Rothschilds already possessed a significant fortune before the start of the Napoleonic Wars (1803–1815), and the family had gained preeminence in the bullion trade by this time.^[17] From London in 1813 to 1815, Nathan Mayer Rothschild was instrumental in almost single-handedly financing the British war effort, organizing the shipment of bullion to the Duke of Wellington’s armies across Europe, as well as arranging the payment of British financial subsidies to their continental allies. In 1815 alone, the Rothschilds provided £9.8 million (in 1815 currency, about £566 million or US$869 million today, when using the retail price index, and £6.58 billion or US$10.1 billion when using average earnings) in subsidy loans to Britain’s continental allies.^[18]

The brothers helped coordinate Rothschild activities across the continent, and the family developed a network of agents, shippers, and couriers to transport gold across war-torn Europe. The family network was also to provide Nathan Rothschild time and again with political and financial information ahead of his peers, giving him an advantage in the markets and rendering the house of Rothschild still more invaluable to the British government.

In one instance, the family network enabled Nathan to receive in London the news of Wellington’s victory at the Battle of Waterloo a full day ahead of the government’s official messengers.^[17] Rothschild’s first concern on this occasion was to the potential financial advantage on the market which the knowledge would have given him; he and his courier did not immediately take the news to the government.^[17] It was then repeated in later popular accounts, such as that of Morton.^[19][20] The basis for the Rothschild’s most famously profitable move was made after the news of British victory had been made public. Nathan Rothschild calculated that the future reduction in government borrowing brought about by the peace would create a bounce in British government bonds after a two-year stabilisation, which would finalise the post-war restructuring of the domestic economy.^[18][19][20] In what has been described as one of the most audacious moves in financial history, Nathan immediately bought up the government bond market, for what at the time seemed an excessively high price, before waiting two years, then selling the bonds on the crest of a short bounce in the market in 1817 for a 40% profit. Given the sheer power of leverage the Rothschild family had at their disposal, this profit was an enormous sum.^[18] ~ Rothschild Family, The Napoleonic Wars, Wikipedia

Both the Rockefellers and Rothschilds were generous benefactors when it came to building the infrastructure of Israel such as the Knesset and the Israeli Supreme Court, where a painting greets you as you come in with the likenesses of Yitzhak Rabin, Shimon Perez and several Rothschild family members.

After the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, Christianity grew until it began to threaten the Jewish Elite just as Jesus of Nazareth did. There arose a terrible persecution of Christians at the hands of the Jews. In a Revelation from Christ to John the Beloved, Jesus warned the church of Smyrna about this threat:

“And to the angel of the church in Smyrna write—‘The First and the Last, who was dead, and has come to life, says this: I know your tribulation and your poverty (but you are rich), and the blasphemy by those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a Synagogue of Satan. Do not fear what you are about to suffer. Behold, the devil is about to cast some of you into prison, so that you will be tested, and you will have tribulation for ten days. Be faithful until death, and I will give you the crown of life. He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. He who overcomes will not be hurt by the second death.’” ~ Revelation 2:8-11 (NASB with some capitalization added)

Who are those who “say they are Jews and are not”? Are they all Jews or just the Luciferians? A Bible scholar whom I respect greatly, Dr. Chuck Missler, says there may even be a 3^rd answer; they’re not true bloodline Jews.

Edomites are a close relative who trace their lineage to Issac’s son Esau (the one who despised his birthright) instead of the progenitor of the Israeli nation, Jacob (who was re-named “Israel” because he contended with both G-d* and man and survived!).

I didn’t think much of this until I found that some of the most notorious figures in the Bible were Edomites from Herod to the most infamous turncoat of all time.

Did you know that “Judas Iscariot” means in Hebrew, “Judah, the man from Kerioth”? Kerioth was also called Hazor and located between the territory of Judah and Edom.

Now an honest and studied Christian will tell you that, because no one may be in the Presence of G-d unless they clothe themselves with the Blood of Christ, you could technically call any unsaved Jew a member of the “Synagogue of Satan”. But, then again, that’s also true of anyone else who isn’t a Christian.

There’s another thing Jews are good for: because they are an instant lightning rod of controversy, they make an excellent distraction. I’ve already shown you how CIA operatives like John Lear have been caught fomenting anti-Semitism. It would be all-too-easy for a master manipulator to hold up Jews (who rightfully deserve your anger, but not your hatred) then hide behind them to do far worse things.

As far as persecution goes, there is an entity that has tortured and killed both faithful Christians and observant Jews in Biblical proportions.

A CITY ON SEVEN HILLS

One of the most renown accounts of Christian martyrdom is Fox’s Book of Martyrs and it is entirely focused on attempts by the Catholic Church to viciously and brutally maintain complete control of Christendom and the Bible.

A contemporary of Martin Luther, William Tyndale was a leading figure in the Protestant Reformation. He is quoted as having said (in the Old English, of course):

I defie the Pope and all his lawes. If God spare my life, ere many yeares I wyl cause a boy that driveth the plough to know more of the Scripture, than he doust.

Tyndale didn’t fare too well after that, however. He was eventually arrested by Papal authorities, tried for heresy and treason (ah, that’s “treason” against the political authority of the Vatican), and executed. First he was strangled, then burned at the stake. It was really quite nice of the Inquisitors to strangle Tyndale first.

Many others didn’t fare so well from Hugh Latimer to Joan of Arc. They were burned alive.

When Rome couldn’t get there in time, as was the case with great reformer John Wycliffe, they pulled his body out of the grave, then burned it.

Rather spiteful lot. But as we read on, we’ll find that Rome plays for keeps.

FROM THE EAGLE TO THE PHOENIX

In response to the Protestant Reformation, the Pope called out the Marines…his Marines.

Augustus’ breastplate shows Parthia returning the eagle standard.

Ignatius of Loyola (1491-1556) was the founder of the Jesuits or the Society of Jesus. …

Ignatius was “converted” by reading the legendary lives of Catholic saints (in The Life of Christ by Ludolph of Saxony and The Golden Legend by Jacopo of Varazze) and by allegedly seeing a vision of the baby Jesus in Mary’s arms. Ignatius vowed to “serve only God and the Roman pontiff, His vicar on earth.”

He also dedicated himself to Mary. At the pilgrimage site of Our Lady of Arantzazu in Spain he made a vow of chastity to her and entrusted himself to her protection and patronage. He spent an entire night venerating the Black Virgin at the Abbey of Montserrat near Barcelona and surrendered his sword and dagger to her.

Loyola’s asceticism was very extreme. He lived for a year in a cave, wearing rags, never bathing, and begging for his food. … He scourged and starved himself and slept very little. He taught that “penance” for sin requires “chastising the body by inflicting sensible pain on it” through “wearing hairshirts, cords, or iron chains on the body, or by scourging or wounding oneself, and by other kinds of austerities” (The Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius, First Week, Vintage Spiritual Classics, p. 31).

The Society of Jesus was approved in 1540 by Pope Paul III with the papal bull “Regimini Militantis Ecclesiae” (To the Government of the Church Militant) and was a major part of the brutal Counter-Reformation. The Jesuits were called the pope’s “shock troops.” By 1650 there were 15,000 of them operating throughout the world. Pope Paul was a staunch proponent of the Inquisition and the founder of the Council of Trent, which issued curses against those who refused to accept Catholic doctrine.

Ignatius’ Jesuits took a vow of complete submission to the pope, the superiors of their order, and the Catholic Church. They were determined “to go without questioning wherever the pope might direct,” and were instructed as follows: “Let every one persuade himself that he who lives under obedience should be moved and directed, under Divine Providence, by his superior, JUST AS IF HE WERE A CORPSE, which allows itself to be moved and led in any direction.”

In his Spiritual Exercises, Ignatius taught absolute obedience to Rome:

“WE MUST PUT ASIDE ALL JUDGMENT OF OUR OWN, and keep the mind ever ready and prompt to obey in all things the true Spouse of Christ our Lord, our holy Mother, the hierarchical Church. We should praise sacramental confession … the frequent hearing of Mass … vows of religion … relics of the saints by venerating them … the regulations of the Church … images and veneration of them. … Finally, we must praise all the commandments of the Church, and be on the alert to find reasons to defend them, and by no means in order to criticize them. … If we wish to proceed securely in all things, we must hold fast to the following principle: WHAT SEEMS TO ME WHITE, I WILL BELIEVE BLACK IF THE HIERARCHICAL CHURCH SO DEFINES” (The Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius, Vintage Books edition, Rules, 352-362, 365, pp. 124-124).

The members of Ignatius’ Society were willing to lie, steal, and kill for the pope and for their immediate superiors. The Jesuits plotted and often succeeded in the violent overthrow of governments and the assassination of non-Catholic leaders. ~ Ignatius Of Loyola And His Spiritual Disciplines, David Cloud, Fundamental Baptist Information Service,WayOfLife.org

With all due respect to Mr. Cloud and this excellent information, the Society of Jesus actually takes special care to assassinate what they consider to be wayward Catholics and one of them may very well have been John Fitzgerald Kennedy via the CIA.

Please don’t tell me you believe anything other.

Oswald? OK, here are two quick facts that you can look up about the young “Communist”.

1. Oswald was giving out pro-Communist tracts from the office of Intelligence insider Guy Banister:

After leaving the New Orleans Police Department, Banister established his own private detective agency, “Guy Banister Associates, Inc.” at “434 Balter Building”.^[9] In June 1960, Banister moved his office to “531 Lafayette Street” on the ground floor of the “Newman Building”.^[9] Around the corner but located in the same building, with a different entrance, was the address “544 Camp Street”. (The address “544 Camp Street” would later be found stamped on one of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee leaflets, distributed by Lee Harvey Oswald, the assassin of President John F. Kennedy.)^[10] The “Newman Building” housed militant anti-Castro groups, including the Cuban Revolutionary Council (October 1961 to February 1962), as well as Sergio Arcacha Smith‘s Crusade to Free Cuba Committee.^[11] Banister’s office was within walking distance of the New Orleans offices of the FBI, CIA, Office of Naval Intelligence and the Reily Coffee Company (Lee Harvey Oswald‘s employer and a supporter of anti-Castro Cubans).^[12][13]

Banister was implicated in a 1961 raid on a munitions depot in Houma, Louisiana, “…in which various weapons, grenades and ammunition were stolen … which were reportedly seen stacked in Banister’s back room by several witnesses.”^[7] ~ Guy Banister, Private Investigation, Cuba, Oswald, Marcello, Wikipedia

2. Oswald “defected” to the Soviet Union where he married the niece of a high-ranking MVD officer then returned to the United States without a hitch.

Previously, I have chronicled for you the shocking co-operation between the U.S. and Soviet Intelligence Agencies such as in the assassination of General George S. Patton.

Puppet-Master control of all Intelligence Agencies as well as assassination are the supposed fingerprint of the “Society of Jesus”.

That may seem far-fetched but we need look no-further than the first “Superior General”, Ignatius Loyola.

Let all with such artfulness gain the ascendant over princes, noblemen, and the magistrates of every place, that they may be ready at our beck, even to sacrifice their nearest relations and most intimate friends, when we say it is for our interest and advantage… ~ Ignatius Loyola (1540), Secret Instructions of the Jesuits W. C. Brownlee, (New York: American and Foreign Christian Union, 1857): p 47

Let proper methods be used to get knowledge of the animosities that arise among great men, that we may have a finger in reconciling their differences; for by this means we shall gradually become acquainted with their friends and secret affairs, and of necessity engage one of the parties in our interests. ~ Brownlee, op. cit., p. 45.

Princes and persons of distinction everywhere must, by all means be so managed that we may have their ear, and that will easily secure their hearts: by which way of proceeding, all persons will become our creatures, and no one will dare to give the Society the least disquiet or opposition … Finally, the Society must endeavor to effect this at least, that having gotten the favor and authority of princes, those who do not love them at least fear them. ~ Brownlee, op. cit., pp. 39 and 143.

Immediately upon the death of any person of post, let them take timely care to get some friend of our Society preferred in his room; but this must be cloaked with such cunning and management as to avoid giving the least suspicion of our intending to usurp the prince’s authority … ~ Ignatius Loyola, The Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius, tr. Anthony Mottola, (New York: Doubleday Publishers, 1989; originally written in 1523), pp. 139, 141.

How about another “Superior General”, Michelangelo Tamburini?

“See, sir, from this chamber I govern not only to Paris, but to China, not only to China, but to all the world, without any one to know how I do it.” ~ The Jesuit Conspiracy: The Secret Plan of the Order, Jacopo Leone, (London: Chapman and Hall, 1848), p. 134

These are not the words of mere Christian Evangelists but of a secretive military sect intent upon manipulating all power throughout the world.

In country after country Jesuits were found to have been subversive and expelled to include the fledgling United States! Spain and Portugal, in particular, exorcised the Jesuit influence in America until President Thomas Jefferson allowed their return in 1814. On May 5 of 1816, his Presidential predecessor John Adams wrote him this:

“My history of the Jesuits is not eloquently written, but it is supported by unquestionable authorities, is very particular and very horrible. Their restoration is indeed a step toward darkness, cruelty, perfidy, despotism, death … I do not like the appearance of the Jesuits. If ever there was a body of men who merited eternal damnation on earth and in hell, it is this Society of Loyola’s.” ~ The Babington Plot, J. E. C. Shepherd, (Toronto, Canada: Wittenburg Publications, 1987), p. 18; quoting a letter dated May 5, 1816.

“Shall we not have regular swarms of them here, in as many disguises as only a king of the gypsies can assume, dressed as painters, publishers, writers and schoolmasters? If ever there was a body of men who merited eternal damnation on earth and in hell it is this Society of Loyola’s … we are compelled by our system … to offer them asylum.” ~ The New Jesuits, George Riemer, (Boston, Massachusetts: Little, Brown & Co., 1971), p. xiv

It is not known if Jefferson did this out of treachery or idealistic altruism but it was a move of “tolerance” that stands in surprising opposition to one of the greatest Christian theologians of all time, Charles Haddon Spurgeon:

“Our ancient enemies have small belief in our common sense if they imagine that we shall ever be able to trust them, after having so often beheld the depths of Jesuitical cunning and duplicity. The sooner we let certain Archbishops and Cardinals know that we are aware of their designs, and will in nothing cooperate with them the better for us and our country. Of course, we shall be howled at as bigots, but we can afford to smile at that cry, when it comes from the church which invented the Inquisition, ‘No peace with Rome’ is the motto of reason as well as of religion.” ~ Geese In Their Hoods, Charles Haddon Spurgeon, referenced again, here

Quietly, Jesuits have been running education around the world to a chilling effect.

When using the term “Illuminati” there is one accurate application; in referencing the secret society created by Adam Weishaupt of Bavaria. Weishaupt founded the Masonic sect on May Day of 1776.

The Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie contains the biographical information of some 26,500 Bavarians of the 18^th, 19^th and 20^th centuries. It lists Adam Weishaupt as starting his education with the Jesuits at the tender age of 7.

I must admit to having been surprised by this connection, but not only do the Jesuits have a firm hold upon education, they appeared to be quite well-entrenched in Bavaria at the time:

“The degree of power to which the representatives of the Society of Jesus had been able to attain in Bavaria was all but absolute. Members of the order were the confessors and preceptors of the electors; hence they had a direct influence upon the policies of government. The censorship of religion had fallen into their eager hands, to the extent that some of the parishes even were compelled to recognize their authority and power. To exterminate all Protestant influence and to render the Catholic establishment complete, they had taken possession of the instruments of public education. It was by Jesuits that the majority of the Bavarian colleges were founded, and by them they were controlled. By them also the secondary schools of the country were conducted.” ~ New England and the Bavarian Illuminati, Dr. Vernon L. Stauffer, Chapter III: The European Illuminati

“Communist conspiracy”? It is entirely possible that the Jesuits invented Communism and have been wielding it ever since.

REVENGE IS A DISH BEST SERVED COLD

“The Jesuits … are simply the Roman army for the earthly sovereignty of the world in the future, with the Pontiff of Rome for Emperor … that’s their ideal … It’s simple lust of power, of filthy earthly gain, of domination – something like a universal serfdom with them as masters – that’s all they stand for. They don’t even believe in God perhaps.” ~ The Brothers Karamazov, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, (1880), p. 309

On March 13, 1820, Czar Alexander I reversed the warmth Catherine had given Rome and ejected the Jesuits from Russia. Their hatred festered against the House of Romanov, the Russian Orthodox Church and the children of Kievan Rus’ for 100 years. French scholar, ex-Catholic and expert on the Society of Jesus, Edmond Paris (1894-1970), saw World War I as precipitated by the Papists:

Pius X, in his hatred of the Orthodox Christians, was continually inciting Emperor Francis Joseph of Austria-Hungary to ‘chastise the Serbians.’ After Sarajevo, on July 26, 1914, Baron Ritter, Bavarian representative at the Holy See, wrote to his government: “The Pope approves of Austria’s harsh treatment of Serbia. He has no great opinion of the armies of Russia and France in the event of a war with Germany. The Cardinal Secretary of State does not see when Austria could make war if she does not decide to do so now.” … There, in true colours, is the Vicar of Christ, the gentle apostle of peace, the Holy Pontiff whom pious authors represent as having died of sorrow at seeing the outbreak of war.

One may say quite specifically that in 1914, the Roman Catholic Church started the series of hellish wars. It was then that the tribute of blood which she has always taken from the peoples began to swell into a veritable torrent. ~ The Vatican Against Europe, Edmund Paris, Wickliffe Press, pp. 14 & 48

Perhaps now, Bill Clinton’s crusade against the Christian Serbs on behalf of the Bosnian muslims makes more sense.

Now, in Ukraine, the United States via an installed military junta proxy government in Kiev is steam-rolling the remnant of Russian Orthodox in the East with Catholic Nazi stormtroopers and rewarding their agents like Mafia Joe Biden by giving his son a very lucrative position in the conquered country.

Don’t hold your breath waiting for the Republicans to bring you “justice”.

Alexander I died at only 47 of “mysterious circumstances” that some labeled typhus but others left in question:

Alexander died on December 1, 1825, of a fever in the southern port of Taganrog. There is considerably mystery surrounding Alexander’s demise. ~ Alexander I, Linda DeLaine, Russian Life

A Constitution is a document that delineates the scope of and restrictions upon government. Some have considered such philosophy as having sprung from the Reformation—the idea that the individual is responsible before God for their well-being and there are limitations upon Earthly authorities. The writings of Locke, Montesquieu and Blackstone gave the American Founding Fathers their decidedly Protestant Christian education that did not sit well with those who would control mankind. The ideas were quite contagious.

After freeing Russian serfs and instituting a Russian Constitution, Alexander II was assassinated in March of 1881 when “separatists” threw bombs at his carriage. They missed their target and wounded Cossacks that were guarding the Czar. He insisted upon attending them and when he emerged from his carriage more bombs were thrown and they eventually found their mark.

The Czars were typical of the Ruling Class, however, and made it easy for their enemies to foment hatred and subversion. Alexander II was as bold in his reforms for Russia and defense of Christendom as he was his own depravity, installing his mistress in the same mansion that housed his legal wife and family.

But it was the repeated attempts on his life that eventually lead to militarized repression:

He … reevaluated foreign policy: Russia reassessed its policy of continuous overseas expansion and concentrated on strengthening its own borders. In 1867, he sold Alaska and the Aleutian Islands to the United States, and used the proceeds to gild the domes of St. Isaac’s Cathedral in St. Petersburg in thanks for the peace that the Russian Empire had begun to enjoy due to his reforms.

The most important foreign policy achievement of his reign was the successful war of 1877-8 against the Ottoman Empire, resulting in the liberation of Bulgaria and annulment of the conditions of the Treaty of Paris of 1856, imposed after Russia’s defeat in the Crimean War. …

Alexander displayed a marked passion for helping orphans and children, and made personal wards of many of the children orphaned by the Crimean and Ottoman Wars. One of these, Catherine Dolgorukaya, captured his particular attention. Princess Dolgoruky, a beautiful descendant of one of Russia’s oldest families ultimately became the Emperor’s mistress, and the children of this morganatic union carried the title Prince and Princess Yurievsky (after Prince Yuri Dolgoruky, Catherine’s earliest ancestor).

Some dissidents preferred a policy of terrorism to obtain reform and on 14th April, 1879, Alexander Soloviev, a former schoolteacher, tried to kill Alexander. His attempt failed and he was executed the following month. The government responded to the assassination attempt by appointing six military governor-generals that imposed a rigorous system of censorship and repression in Russia. ~ Alexander II: The Tsar Liberator, Nick Nicolason, AlexanderPalace.org

In 1905, Father George Gapon lead a peaceful protest at the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg to protest the conditions for peasant workers from both wealthy industrialists and the government of Czar Nicholas II. It was reported that Nicholas told his Cossack Guards to “treat them like rebels” and 200 were killed with 800 wounded.

From there, it was easy to create a “Revolution” that would slaughter Nicholas and his entire family.

The instruments of this new alliance between the Soviets and the Vatican were to be the Jesuits, described as the hereditary enemies of the Orthodox Church. Reportedly, there were large numbers of representatives of the Jesuit Order in Moscow during the Revolution. ~ Descent Into Darkness, James Zatko, University of Notre Dame Press, p. 111

It was as early as 1586 that the Society of Jesus found power in destroying the individual. It was in their “Reduction” strategy used in Paraguay that the bastard child of Communism was birthed:

The Jesuits aimed to set up there a completely communistic system, in the sense that no individual rights were recognized there and was no private property. Everything belonged to the State, and was supposed to be shared in common. But in reality much the greater part of the proceeds of goods sold was always remitted to the Camaralla in Europe; and the Guaranis got only the bare necessities of life in return for their toil and sweat. ~ The Revolutionary Movement: A Diagnosis of World Disorders, (1933), J. Findlater, p. 77

“THE POISONED CUP, THE STRANGULATING CORD, THE STEEL OF THE PONIARD OR THE LEADEN BULLET”

Again and again we see war and assassination arise with the question “cui bono” (who benefits?) being answered by “the Jesuit Superior General”—also known as “The Black Pope”.

The Marquis de LaFayette warned his American brethren of this at the birth of our nation.

“It is my opinion that if the liberties of this country – the United States of America – are destroyed, it will be by the subtlety of the Roman Catholic Jesuit priests, for they are the most crafty, dangerous enemies to civil and religious liberty. They have instigated MOST of the wars of Europe.” ~ Americanism Versus Romanism, James L. Chapman, (1856), p. 127

The very instrument of their havoc—Napoleon Bonaparte, Emperor of France—said this of them:

“The Jesuits are a military organization, not a religious order. Their chief is a general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a monastery. And the aim of this organization is: POWER. Power in its most despotic exercise. Absolute power, universal power, power to control the world by the volition of a single man. Jesuitism is the most absolute of despotisms: and at the same time the greatest and most enormous of abuses … The general of the Jesuits insists on being master, sovereign, over the sovereign. Wherever the Jesuits are admitted they will be masters, cost what it may. Their society is by nature dictatorial, and therefore it is the irreconcilable enemy of all constituted authority. Every act, every crime, however atrocious, is a meritorious work, if committed for the interest of the Society of the Jesuits, or by the order of the general.” ~ Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, Charles Chiniquy, (1885) pp. 487, 488

Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès was the Jesuit agent that helped bring Bonaparte to power. It was the Corsican Ruler of France who imprisoned Pope Pius VII until the Society of Jesus was reinstated. From there, Pius started the dominoes falling in Russia:

Pius VII had resolved to restore the Society during his captivity in France; and after his return to Rome he did so with little delay; 7 August, 1814, by the Bull “Solicitudo omnium ecclesiarum,” and therewith, the general in Russia, Thaddeus Brzozowski, acquired universal jurisdiction. ~ The Jesuits After the Restoration, Catholic Encyclopedia

Few Americans know that President Abraham Lincoln actually laid the chaos of the Civil War at the feet of the Black Pope. In seeing and proclaiming the Unseen Hand, Lincoln knew he was ripe for the “poison cup” or “the leaden bullet”:

“This war would never have been possible without the sinister influence of the Jesuits. We owe it to Popery that we now see our land reddened with the blood of her noblest sons. Though there were great differences of opinion between the South and North, on the question of slavery, neither Jeff Davis nor any one of the leading men of the Confederacy would have dared to attack the North, had they not relied on the promise of the Jesuits, that, under the mask of Democracy, the money and the arms of the Roman Catholics, even the arms of France, were at their disposal if they would attack us. …”

“The Protestants of both the North and South would surely unite to exterminate the priests and the Jesuits, if they could learn how the priests, the nuns, and the monks, which daily land on our shores, under the pretext of preaching their religion … are nothing else but the emissaries of the Pope, of Napoleon III, and the other despots of Europe, to undermine our institutions, alienate the hearts of our people from our constitution, and our laws, destroy our schools, and prepare a reign of anarchy here as they have done in Ireland, in Mexico, in Spain, and wherever there are any people who want to be free. …”

“‘I am so glad to meet you again,’ he said: ‘you see that your friends, the Jesuits have not yet killed me. But they would have surely done it when I passed through their most devoted city, Baltimore, had I not defeated their plans, by passing incognito a few hours before they expected me … ’”

“‘New projects of assassination are detected almost every day, accompanied with such savage circumstances, that they bring to my memory the massacre of St. Bartholomew and the Gunpowder Plot. We feel, at their investigation, that they come from the same masters in the art of murder, the Jesuits …’”

“‘So many plots have already been made against my life, that it is a real miracle that they have all failed, when we consider that the great majority of them were in the hands of skilful Roman Catholic murderers, evidently trained by the Jesuits.’”

“I know that Jesuits never forget nor forsake. But man must not care how and where he dies, provided he dies at the post of honour and duty.” ~ Fifty Years in the Church of Rome, Charles Chiniquy, (1885) pp. 388, 472, 493, 499, 501 and 506

Civil War physician and Union General Thomas Maley Harris knew it was the Jesuits who murdered his President.

“The organization of the Roman Catholic Hierarchy is a complete military despotism, of which the Pope is the ostensible head … The Black Pope is the head of the order of the Jesuits, and is called a General. He not only has command of his own order, but directs and controls the general policy of the Roman Catholic Church. He is the power behind the throne, and is the real potential head of the Hierarchy … There is no independence of thought, or of action, in its subordinate parts. Implicit and unquestioning obedience to the orders of superiors in authority, is the sworn duty of the priesthood of every grade…”

“It would seem that the Jesuits had had it in mind, from the beginning of the war, to find an occasion for the taking off Mr. Lincoln. The favorite policy of the Jesuits [is] that of assassination.” ~ Rome’s Responsibility for the Assassination of Abraham Lincoln, (1897), a tract by General Thomas M. Harris

The Civil War, World War I…how about World War II?

More from Edmond Paris:

“I have learnt most of all from the Jesuit Order … So far, there has been nothing more imposing on earth than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic Church. A good part of that organization I have transported direct to my own party … The Catholic Church must be held up as an example … I will tell you a secret. I am founding an Order … In Himmler I see our Ignatius de Loyola!” ~ Adolf Hitler, The Vatican Against Europe, Edmond Paris, (1961), pp. 252, 256

“The SS had been organized by Himmler according to the principles of the Jesuit Order. The rules of service and spiritual exercises prescribed by Ignatius de Loyola constituted a model which Himmler strove carefully to copy. Absolute obedience was the supreme rule; every order had to be executed without comment.” ~ Walther Friedrich Schellenberg, 1910-1952, German SS-Brigadeführer, The Vatican Against Europe (1961), Edmond Paris, pp. 253

“The Fuhrer had come to power, thanks to the votes of the Catholic Zentrum [Center Party overseen by Jesuit Ludwig Kaas], only five years before [1933], but most of the objectives cynically revealed in Mein Kampf were already realized; this book … was written by the Jesuit [controlled] Father [Bernhardt] Stempfle and signed by Hitler. For … it was the Society of Jesus which perfected the famous Pan-German programme as laid out in this book, and the Fuhrer endorsed it.” ~ The Secret History of the Jesuits (1965), Edmond Paris, p. 138

Of course they didn’t just settle for one side; the Society of Jesus controlled both sides via the military/industrial complex:

“The Jesuits are one of the largest stockholders in the American steel company, Republic and National. They are also among the most important owners of the four greatest aircraft manufacturing companies in the U.S., Boeing, Lockheed, Douglas and Curtis-Wright.” ~ The Vatican Billions (1983), Avro Manhattan, p. 184

Centuries of war and intrigue have allowed Rome to secretly stockpile and amass more wealth via anything from property acquisition—

Few passing London tourists would ever guess that the premises of Bulgari, the upmarket jewellers in New Bond Street, had anything to do with the pope. Nor indeed the nearby headquarters of the wealthy investment bank Altium Capital, on the corner of St James’s Square and Pall Mall.

But these office blocks in one of London’s most expensive districts are part of a surprising secret commercial property empire owned by the Vatican.

Behind a disguised offshore company structure, the church’s international portfolio has been built up over the years, using cash originally handed over by Mussolini in return for papal recognition of the Italian fascist regime in 1929.

Since then the international value of Mussolini’s nest-egg has mounted until it now exceeds £500m. In 2006, at the height of the recent property bubble, the Vatican spent £15m of those funds to buy 30 St James’s Square. Other UK properties are at 168 New Bond Street and in the city of Coventry. It also owns blocks of flats in Paris and Switzerland. ~ How The Vatican Built A Secret Property Empire Using Mussolini’s Millions, David Leigh, Jean François Tanda and Jessica Benhamou, The Guardian

—to trafficking in adults and children.

This latter accusation seems extreme and far-fetched but I warned you when Rome brought the first Jesuit to power in her history that Jorge Bergoglio had a sordid past.

Jorge Bergoglio is well-loved and has become an instant success but there is a single “dirty” skeleton in his closet. He has been accused of passively enabling a brutal purge of “Leftists” in Argentina during her so-called “Dirty War”. …

The CIA has a long history of involvement in South American affairs. From Guatemala to Brazil, the Firm has been ousting governments that it deems not in the best interests of those making the decisions. …

Eclipsing cocaine, information (particularly private information garnered from citizens) now paves the way toward untold wealth. It is the kind of wealth that would make a lowly software developer like Steven Huff a billionaire who is now building his own private fortress—some say the “single family dwelling” will be a command center after an engineered American collapse.

This provides me with the ultimate of satanic segues: Father Marcial Maciel Degollado was known as the greatest fundraiser in the history of the Catholic Church, with powerful connections all over the world.

He was also known as a serial child predator who was so perverse he sexually abused his own illegitimate sons. It is fascinating to note that he told his son Raul Gonzales he “worked for the CIA”. None of the well-kept corporate media probe any further allowing readers to simply assume it was a “cover” Degollado gave to facilitate his crimes. Not surprising given the heavy-handed involvement the CIA has had in the media.

But as I detailed in one of my very first video reports, the CIA has been complicit in a massive child sex slave ring that caters to the rich and shameless particularly using young boys as either weapons of blackmail, currency for goods and services or curriers for intelligence. To draw any further connections might not be healthy.

There is this report of a child sex-trafficking suit filed at the “Common Law Court” in Brussels accusing both white and black popes of the heinous crimes although finding corroborating information of this legal action has proven extremely difficult.

I also reported for you how the first Jesuit Pope (who came to power via the unprecedented resignation of Benedict XVI—perhaps with a little persuasion?) seemed hard-Left in his politics, espousing the Communist doctrine of “Social Justice”.

It all fits together: the extreme power and perversion in the highest offices of politics and intelligence.

It wasn’t until I heard an interview with Dr. Steve Pieczenik that it clicked for me. Pieczenik has been roaming the halls of power for decades, from the CIA to the State Department through four administrations. In the interview, he continued to reference the dominance of “Irish Catholics” at the Central Intelligence Agency. He referenced it again in this rant I found on his blog.

The subject of Pieczenik’s ire is current Director John Brennan. Brennan certainly fits the bill as an “Irish Catholic” but recently there have been some serious questions regarding just which faith Brennan follows.

Former FBI agent and Middle East expert John Guandolo has made the astounding claim that Brennan converted to Islam in Saudi Arabia and has even made the Hajj to Mecca. The CIA has been wielding the Scimitar of Muhammad since the 1980’s. Is Brennan the ultimate Jesuit manipulator towards those ends? Certainly jihadis around the world have been slaughtering a great many Catholic enemies from Orthodox to Coptics to Jews and even other muslims.

But to answer that question we should go back in time…to the Sistine Chapel.

CATHOLIC INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

There are few who fail to be awed by the work of Michelangelo and the nuance he portrayed on the ceiling of St. Peter’s Cathedral in Rome. We all see how “God” reaches out, straining, to contact a listless Adam and we smile with understanding.

But are we drawing too many conclusions? Do we naturally assume that Michelangelo had the same ideology and values as we have—or that the Catholic Church did then or now?

As we examine the fresco more closely, we do see a few things that aren’t immediately obvious.

“God” and His cherubim are encompassed by an odd structure. Do you recognize it?

It’s the outline of the human brain.

What are we to deduce from this? Is “God” a figment of our imagination?

More than one source has accused both the Catholic Church and the Society of Jesus of being either Luciferian or God-less.

But more than that, there is an occult reference that is quite perverse.

The pineal gland is considered the gateway to an alternate conscience if not alternate dimensions.

Human reproduction has held a similar position and has been known as a gateway for evil spirits. The Bible speaks of a strange union between fallen angels and women creating a weird hybrid race of giants.

Now it came about, when men began to multiply on the face of the land, and daughters were born to them, that the sons of G-d saw that the daughters of men were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves, whomever they chose. Then the L-rd said, “My Spirit shall not strive with man forever, because he also is flesh; nevertheless his days shall be one hundred and twenty years.” The Nephilim were on the Earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of G-d came in to the daughters of men, and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown. ~ Genesis 6:1-4 (NASB, capitalization and abbreviation added for respect)

If we superimpose a schematic of the brain upon Michelangelo’s great work, notice where the pineal gland ends up on “God”.

But there’s more.

If you noticed the naked red-haired woman “God” has his arm around at all, you would just assume it was “Eve” and move on. But why does He hold her possessively?

More than one source has ascribed this mysterious figure to be the “bride” of God, “Wisdom” or “Sophia”. Reference here and here.

Deep within pagan/occult circles, “Sophia” is known by another name: “Isis”.

The connection between the Goddess Isis and the Goddess Wisdom (Sophia in Greek; Chokmah in Hebrew) is an interesting one. In fact, some scholars think that the figure of Sophia was patterned after Isis. And they may well be right.

In Michelangelo’s famous Sistine Chapel painting, Wisdom (Sophia) nestles in the crook of God’s left arm… ~ Isis & Sophia, by Isidora, Isiopolis: A votive Work in honor of the Goddess Isis

The “Islamic State of Iraq and Syria”, also known as “ISIS” is a CIA-created entity:

According a document recently released by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of ISIS, now the Islamic State, is an intelligence asset.

The NSA document reveals the United States, Israel, and Britain are responsible for the creation of ISIS.

Earlier this month Nabil Na’eem, the founder of the Islamic Democratic Jihad Party and former top al-Qaeda commander, told the Beirut-based pan-Arab TV station al-Maydeen all current al-Qaeda affiliates, including ISIS, work for the CIA. ~ ISIS Leader A Confirmed CIA Puppet, Hang The Bankers

And it is now slicing through Iraq slaughtering Christians with sickening brutality.

There is more than just a Michelanglo fresco to point towards manipulation of Islam by the Society of Jesus.

Former Jesuit priest Alberto Rivera has stated in multiple interviews such as this one with Henrick Palmgren of Red Ice Radio that the “children of Ishmael” were the perfect knife to cut where no others could.

What I’m going to tell you is what I learned in secret briefings in the Vatican when I was a Jesuit priest, under oath and induction. A Jesuit cardinal named Augustine Bea showed us how desperately the Roman Catholics wanted Jerusalem at the end of the third century. Because of its religious history and its strategic location, the Holy City was considered a priceless treasure. A scheme had to be developed to make Jerusalem a Roman Catholic city.

The great untapped source of manpower that could do this job was the children of Ishmael. The poor Arabs fell victim to one of the most clever plans ever devised by the powers of darkness.

Certainly the Catholic Church has found an army of invading illegal aliens to swarm the United States with. With breath-taking lawless high treason the Obama Administration is bussing, running and flying tens of thousands of future terrorists and Democrat voters into the country with no concern for retribution from Congress or the American people. While the TSA humiliates and molests good citizens it shoos the riff-raff onboard planes without even requiring proper identification.

Alberto Rivera helps tie all of the chords together, Communism, secret societies and satan:

“The higher I went in the Jesuit Order, the more corruption I saw within the institution. I was invited to attend a secret black mass by high-ranking Jesuits [including Superior General Pedro Arrupe] in a monastery in the northern part of Spain. When I knelt to kiss the ring of a high official, I saw a symbol on that ring that made my blood run cold. It was a Masonic symbol! A thing I hated and I had been told to fight against it … I found out the Jesuit General was also a Mason and a member of the Communist Party in Spain.” ~ Alberto (1979), Jack Chick, pp. 27, 28

REMEMBER, REMEMBER THE 5^th OF NOVEMBER

Perhaps the ultimate truth of who is in control can be found in our hope for the future.

I had avoided watching “V for Vendetta” long after its release in 2005. I really wasn’t interested but I continued to see references to it and Guy Fawkes masks everywhere.

They were always related to attempts to stand up against “the Machine”.

Even when I saw the movie, I still didn’t get it. It actually appeared to mock both Christianity and “Conservative” ideals claiming that muslims and homosexuals would show us the way.

Although the setting is a fictional one, the ancient hero is not; Guy Fawkes was a real, historical figure.

Do you know who he was and what those masks represent?

The Gunpowder Plot of 1605 was an effort by a Jesuit cabal of Catholics, lead by Guy Fawkes to assassinate James I of England.

_____________

* One thing we can learn from our Jewish Orthodox brethren is how to respect the Name of G-d. Have you ever texted “OMG!” to someone…?

Bergoglio is the first Jesuit to sit as Pontiff. Since the formation of the Society of Jesus in 1534, the militant order has never achieved such high honor. …

Not only does the Vatican have its own observatory, it has more than one and they are staffed with and run by Jesuits. In fact, the Director of the Observatory is Father Jose Funes, a Jesuit from Argentina.

Funes shocked both Catholics and non-Catholic Christians with an amazing assertion in 2008: not only is “extraterrestrial life” a possibility but we should consider such aliens “brothers” who may not even need the Redemption of Jesus Christ. …

Francis I could play a vital role in this [alien] “disclosure”.

Since then, Bergoglio has been raising eyebrows with a surprising attack on the free market culminating in a shocking defense of stateism—the same vicious hand of government that has killed more human beings than any other force on Earth ever.

In his Apostolic Exhortation: Evangelii Gaudium, the Holy Father put “social justice” on the same footing as rescuing the unborn;

Just as the commandment “Thou shalt not kill” sets a clear limit in order to safeguard the value of human life, today we also have to say “thou shalt not” to an economy of exclusion and inequality. Such an economy kills.

He directly and derisively attacked the economic policies espoused by President Ronald Reagan;

… some people continue to defend trickle-down theories which assume that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the world. This opinion, which has never been confirmed by the facts, expresses a crude and naïve trust in the goodness of those wielding economic power and in the sacralized [sic] workings of the prevailing economic system.

He references the very real issue of wealth inequality and dramatic disparity between the Super Class and the rest of the working world but in a stunning shortsighted oversimplification chalks it up to evil “ideals”;

While the earnings of a minority are growing exponentially, so too is the gap separating the majority from the prosperity enjoyed by those happy few. This imbalance is the result of ideologies which defend the absolute autonomy of the marketplace and financial speculation. Consequently, they reject the right of states, charged with vigilance for the common good, to exercise any form of control. A new tyranny is thus born…

Bergoglio, as one of the most powerful men in the world, is either frighteningly naive or he’s purposely empowering by deception the very “tyranny” he decries.

America is the most prosperous nation in the world yet, even here, the reality of the wealth disparity between the Elite and the rest of U.S. citizens staggers the mind.

http://youtu.be/8T0FsTJbfpM

The cause of this disparity isn’t “ideals”, it’s the corrupt complicity of mega-business and government defined as “corporatism”:

Buffett, Champion Of Bailout, Is Also A Leading Beneficiary
Charles Piller, Sacramento Bee | April 3, 2009

Billionaire investor Warren Buffett has been lauded for his plainspoken denunciation of the greed and foolishness behind the economic crisis. He’s pushed the massive federal bailout of imploding banks as the essential response to an “economic Pearl Harbor.”

When Buffett speaks, people in high places listen. He’s so highly regarded that in a fall debate, both presidential candidates said they’d consider him for Treasury secretary.

A Sacramento Bee examination of regulatory records has found that his extensive holdings in financial firms have made Buffett, the world’s second-wealthiest person behind Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates, one of the top beneficiaries of the banking bailout.

UNIVERSALLY ECUMENICAL

On Christmas Day, Pope Francis reached out to atheists in friendship under the auspices of cooperating towards “world peace”;

(Reuters) – Pope Francis, celebrating his first Christmas as Roman Catholic leader, on Wednesday called on atheists to unite with believers of all religions and work for “a homemade peace” that can spread across the world.

This was not the first time that Christ’s Vicar on Earth reached out to the Godless. Only a few months before, on the anniversary of 9/11, Bergoglio shockingly implied that those without God would be “forgiven” (in Christian parlance, that means “Saved” and enter into Heaven) as long as they were “good” people:

Pope Francis Reaches Out To Atheists And Agnostics
Nick Squires, UK Telegraph
5:03PM BST 11 Sep 2013

The Pope has struck a surprisingly conciliatory tone towards atheists and agnostics, saying that God will “forgive” them as long as they behave morally and live according to their consciences. …

“God forgives those who obey their conscience,” he wrote in the unprecedented letter, the latest example of the markedly different tone and style from his predecessors that he has set since being elected in March. …

He said that the “mercy of God has no limits” and encompassed even non-believers…

The Pope’s reaching out to atheists echoes a homily he delivered in May, when he said that even atheists could be welcomed into heaven. That declaration caused consternation among Vatican officials, with a spokesman later appearing to backtrack on the Pope’s remarks, saying that people who do not believe in God “cannot be saved”.

Consternation, indeed.

Although the necessity of Christ for Salvation is a favorite media trap—

http://youtu.be/JHaTamomFlc

—those who get snagged by it haven’t been reading their Bibles:

Then Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit, said to them, “Rulers and elders of the people, if we are on trial today for a benefit done to a sick man, as to how this man has been made well, let it be known to all of you and to all the people of Israel, that by the Name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene, whom you crucified, whom God raised from the dead—by this Name this man stands here before you in good health. He is the Stone which was rejected by you, the builders, but which became the Chief Corner Stone. And there is Salvation in no one else; for there is no other name under Heaven that has been given among men by which we must be Saved.” ~ Acts 4:8-12

For the wages of sin is death, but the Free Gift of God is Eternal Life in Christ Jesus our Lord! ~ Romans 6:23

For by Grace you have been Saved through Faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the Gift of God; not as a result of works, so that no one may boast. ~ Ephesians 2:8-9

Is there a tenet of the Christian Faith more important than this? It is truly disconcerting that the man who leads over 1 billion of the world’s population could actually be deceiving them on their very path to Heaven.

CAN’T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG?

For a Pope who’s been in office less than a year, Jorge Bergoglio has been busy stirring controversy.

In an exclusive interview for the Catholic magazine America, Bergoglio chided Catholics for being “obsessed” with issues like abortion and homosexual marriage, even suggesting that such focus is “disjointed”:

“We cannot insist only on issues related to abortion, gay marriage and the use of contraceptive methods. This is not possible. I have not spoken much about these things, and I was reprimanded for that. But when we speak about these issues, we have to talk about them in a context. The teaching of the church, for that matter, is clear and I am a son of the church, but it is not necessary to talk about these issues all the time.”

“The dogmatic and moral teachings of the church are not all equivalent. The church’s pastoral ministry cannot be obsessed with the transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines to be imposed insistently.”

He then went on to suggest that homosexuals need not repent of their lifestyles as part of their commitment to Christ:

“…if a homosexual person is of good will and is in search of God, I am no one to judge. By saying this, I said what the catechism says. Religion has the right to express its opinion in the service of the people, but God in creation has set us free: it is not possible to interfere spiritually in the life of a person.

“A person once asked me, in a provocative manner, if I approved of homosexuality. I replied with another question: ‘Tell me: when God looks at a gay person, does he endorse the existence of this person with love, or reject and condemn this person?’ We must always consider the person.”

Although the media lauded this as “open” and “inclusive” for homosexuals, more “Conservative” voices like those of Franklin Graham (son of world-renowned evangelist Billy Graham) were somewhat less enthused.

Homosexuality has been in the headlines a lot, lately but much of what has gone “viral” about the “Duck Dynasty” debacle can be chalked up to backlash from the incessant propagandizing and iron-fisted tyranny of the new “inclusiveness”.

Families who rang in 2014 with the Tournament of the Roses parade got to see two men marrying each other atop the “AIDS float”.

In New Mexico, a court has told a Christian photography business they will photograph homosexual weddings regardless of their religious conviction.

In Colorado, another judge told Christian Jack Phillips, owner of the Masterpiece Cakeshop, that he will produce cakes for homosexual weddings.

Today, homosexuality is no longer an issue of privacy but of a new culture forced upon American citizens by the iron fist of government.

Perhaps this is all the more reason why Christian leaders like the Pope of the Roman Catholic Church should be doubling down on Biblical absolutes rather than hand-waving them for the sake of “inclusive tolerance”.

By Scriptural doctrine, homosexuality is a sin:

You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination. ~Leviticus 18:22

…do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, will inherit the Kingdom of God. Such were some of you; but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God. ~ I Corinthians 6:9-11

As the above passage shows, it is sin just as adultery is, or lying, or addiction to pornography. As Christians, we understand that the key to receiving forgiveness in Christ is acknowledgement of that sin and repentance from it. There is no reason to demagogue homosexuality nor is there reason to give the practice preference nor consider it equal with the holy and ancient sacrament of heterosexual marriage. Even Greece at the height of her debauchery never did away with heterosexual marriage nor substituted homosexual relationships for it.

One of the most well-known passages in the world of Christ’s forgiveness is the adulterous woman paraded before Jesus in a test of His Compassion (found in John 8:1-11). Even non-Christians can quote the immortal Words “he who is without sin may cast the first stone” of execution. But very few know what He said next to the woman standing alone:

“Woman, where are they? Did no one condemn you?” She said, “No one, Lord.” And Jesus said, “I do not condemn you, either. Go. From now on sin no more.”

THE LAST POPE?

As I mentioned in March, author Thomas Horn has astounded many of his readers by referencing a prophecy that appeared to fulfill itself with Bergoglio as the final pope before the End of Days.

I leave that determination up to each individual reader but what I can show you is chilling proof that a powerful apparatus of disinformation appears to be shielding Bergoglio.

A few weeks ago, this article appeared from the web site “Diversity Chronicle” (below is an excerpt):

Pope Francis Condemns Racism And Declares That “All Religions Are True” At Historic Third Vatican Council

The Third Vatican Council concluded today with Pope Francis announcing that Catholicism is now a “modern and reasonable religion, which has undergone evolutionary changes. The time has come to abandon all intolerance. We must recognize that religious truth evolves and changes. Truth is not absolute or set in stone. Even atheists acknowledge the divine. Through acts of love and charity the atheist acknowledges God as well, and redeems his own soul, becoming an active participant in the redemption of humanity.”

“Through humility, soul searching, and prayerful contemplation we have gained a new understanding of certain dogmas. The church no longer believes in a literal hell where people suffer. This doctrine is incompatible with the infinite love of God. God is not a judge but a friend and a lover of humanity. God seeks not to condemn but only to embrace. Like the fable of Adam and Eve, we see hell as a literary device. Hell is merely a metaphor for the isolated soul, which like all souls ultimately will be united in love with God” Pope Francis declared.

In a speech that shocked many, the Pope claimed “All religions are true, because they are true in the hearts of all those who believe in them. What other kind of truth is there? In the past, the church has been harsh on those it deemed morally wrong or sinful. Today, we no longer judge. Like a loving father, we never condemn our children. Our church is big enough for heterosexuals and homosexuals, for the pro-life and the pro-choice! For conservatives and liberals, even communists are welcome and have joined us. We all love and worship the same God.”

As soon as one realizes there is no such thing as a “Third Vatican Council” you have a sense that you are being played but the writer has cleverly woven actual statements from the Pope into this deception.

Concerned Christians and Liberty-minded Patriots have already used this as a reference only to be laughed at and dismissed—all issues dismissed, including the very real questions about the new Vicar’s theology.

The “Diversity Chronicle” brags;

Diversity Chronicle is a News web site focusing on news events relating to diversity of all kinds. Our veteran hard hitting journalists are not afraid to tackle any subject from a rational, objective and balanced point of view.

Diversity Chronicle has been profiled or discussed on the following websites and radio programs:

American Thinker, Daily Kos, Examiner.com, Huffington Post, Media Matters For America, National Review Online, News Busters, Popehat, Red Alert Politics, The Blaze, The Gateway Pundit, Townhall.com, VDARE.com, Weasel Zippers, and The Rush Limbaugh Show.

The overwhelming number of Right-minded media referenced easily leads you to believe this site is targeting them for such disinformation.

—And protecting the questionable doctrines of Jorge Bergoglio appears to be their latest effort.

Is Jesus Christ behind His Vicar or perhaps a power somewhat more sinister?

http://youtu.be/EC_cgxtkTRE

Joseph Aloisius Ratzinger—Pope Benedict XVI—was the first pontiff to step down since 1415. It was an unexpected event with words like “shocking”, “surprise” and “sudden” being bandied by Catholics and news media, alike.

Sex abuse and pedophile rape allegations were devastating the Vatican and some had wondered if an unseen hand forced Benedict XVI to step down, perhaps to replace him with a chosen representative who would be a more open conduit for the will of the Elite.

Suspicions were fueled even further after the publishing of a book by Thomas Horn and Chris Putnam which claimed that an ancient Catholic prophecy accurately named 112 popes throughout history with the final pope in the prophecy said to be the last pope before “dreadful” judgment and the destruction of the city of Rome.

Enter Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

The child of two Italian émigrés to Argentina, Bergoglio was a shrewd choice for the papal conclave: a cardinal native to South America (far outweighing Europe in Catholic population) but who has such strong ties to Rome that he gave his acceptance speech in Italian.

But what is truly interesting is that Bergoglio is the first Jesuit to sit as Pontiff. Since the formation of the Society of Jesus in 1534, the militant order has never achieved such high honor. Maintaining founder Ignatius of Loyola’s staunch dedication, Jesuits are still well known for their loyalty to the Catholic hierarchy. Loyola’s charter, The Spiritual Exercises, contained a series of requirements by adherents titled Rules for Thinking with the Church. Rule #13 states:

That we may be altogether of the same mind and in conformity with the Church herself, if she shall have defined anything to be black which to our eyes appears to be white, we ought in like manner to pronounce it to be black.

Jorge Bergoglio’s selection perked the ears of Tom Horn who saw Bergoglio’s parents and holy order as fulfillment of how “Peter the Roman” will “pasture his sheep in many tribulations”.

But should we make too much of Malachy’s “Prophecy of the Popes”?

For a former Assemblies of God pastor, Horn has been reticent to weigh in on internecine issues but other non-Catholics may look with skepticism on the idea of Francis I being the “last Pope” before “the end”. To wit, there does not appear to be radical changes in store for Catholics as Bergoglio shares many of the values and priorities of his predecessor. The New York Times notes:

…Cardinal Bergoglio is … a conventional choice, a theological conservative of Italian ancestry who vigorously backs Vatican positions on abortion, gay marriage, the ordination of women and other major issues — leading to heated clashes with Argentina’s left-leaning president.

There are none of the sensational or tell-tale markers to make one think that these are pregnant times…unless you look to the stars.

PANSPERMIA

The Society of Jesus has a presence in schools, universities, hospitals and the mission fields but most surprising of all are the Jesuit astronomers.

With a Church past that includes coercively forcing Galileo Galilee to give up his Copernican helio-centric model of the solar system, one would not expect “God’s Marines” to be on the forefront of space exploration.

Not only does the Vatican have its own observatory, it has more than one and they are staffed with and run by Jesuits. In fact, the Director of the Observatory is Father Jose Funes, a Jesuit from Argentina.

Funes shocked both Catholics and non-Catholic Christians with an amazing assertion in 2008: not only is “extraterrestrial life” a possibility but we should consider such aliens “brothers” who may not even need the Redemption of Jesus Christ.

It was an announcement that sent shockwaves through the Evangelical community who view reports of “alien life” with extreme mistrust. It is common to hear authorities such as Chuck Missler, Gary Stearman and Lynn Marzulli speaking of an “alien deception” that pits demonic entities deceiving human beings through their puppets “the greys”.

Perhaps they are more accurately called golems than puppets. Just as in the most simple fashion, Frankenstinian “scientists” have created a jellyfish out of a rat’s heart—

“Morphologically, we’ve built a jellyfish. Functionally, we’ve built a jellyfish. Genetically, this thing is a rat,” says Kit Parker, a biophysicist at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, who led the work.

—some experts believe that, on an infinitely more complex level, the “greys” are manufactured organic portals designed to house disembodied unclean spirits.

Sound crazy? It’s in the Bible.

Now it came about, when men began to multiply on the face of the land, and daughters were born to them, that the sons of G-d [“God” is abbreviated out of respect and “sons of G-d” is a Hebrew euphemism for angels; see Job 1:6] saw that the daughters of men were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves, whomever they chose [“wives whomever they chose” implies a reproductive union that was not necessarily consensual]. Then the L-rd said, “My Spirit shall not strive with man forever, because he also is flesh; nevertheless his days shall be one hundred and twenty years.” The Nephilim [Hebrew for “Fallen Ones”] were on the Earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of G-d came in to the daughters of men, and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown [the natural result of genetic engineering was a great success: they became the world’s greatest warriors, killers and kings]. ~ Genesis 6:1-4

Secular researchers, as well, are questioning our understanding of who aliens are. No less an authority than Jacques Vallee—a legend in the UFO investigation community who was the model for the character of Lacombe in Steven Spielberg’s Close Encounters of the Third Kind—has noted a sinister aspect reported by those claiming to be alien abductees that transcends modern times and mimics ancient occult rites or demon-possession experiences. An amazingly open-minded thinker, Vallee’s latest book questions the entire phenomenon and looks with strong skepticism at both earthly and unearthly actors.

Accomplished author, researcher and lecturer Nick Redfern has an even more astounding supposition that perhaps powerful governmental agencies are working with these entities. Have they made a literal “deal with the devil” exchanging technological advances for some unknown and malignant design of the “aliens”?

What concerns Evangelicals the most is the possibility that we are not long for an official disclosure regarding such “alien life” and that they will be hailed as brothers, saviors and even creators.

Scientific advances in examining cell structure have cast long shadows over the Theory of Evolution as a viable explanation regarding human origins. “Intelligent Design” has taken off as the leading contender for its replacement. But just who is “the Designer”? The timeless appeal of “evolution” was the removal of a Moral Authority from our existence, One whose oversight was inconvenient to certain … “lifestyles”. An “alien” origin would fit that agenda nicely.

In an astounding betrayal of his “any explanation but the Divine” dogmatism, atheist and Darwinian “scientist” Richard Dawkins scrambled in an interview with media personality Ben Stein for the documentary Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed to answer the age-old question “how did life begin”. When pressed to come up with an example, Dawkins threw out the outrageous non sequitur of [paraphrased] “I can’t tell you how Evolution created life on Earth but perhaps Evolution created aliens who then created life on Earth.”

L.U.C.I.F.E.R.

Ever wonder why so many abductees admit an extremely unpleasant experience with such “advanced life”?

New Age alien advocates are “channeling” said entities and are paving the way for them, promising a “Cosmic Shift” where the “good alien” / “bad alien” paradigm will be given to us to explain away the trauma of previous encounters and abductions. Many of these (like clinical psychologist Dr. Kathryn May) are educated people, published authors who have bought into this deception completely. May has posted page upon page of “Spirit messages” that include depicting Jesus as one of them (note the capitalization of “Us” in the excerpt below):

You have the amusing saying, “Failure is not an option.” This is how our dear Jesus and his loyal followers feel about this Mission. Their hearts are on the line. Is there more you can do to ease their efforts? We see their tireless unrelenting work as the heroic Atlas carrying the world on his shoulders. Arise, children, and help the Atlas Team of Light to shoulder this burden. They adore you as they do Us, and will not give up until all good things have come to pass, but for their sakes and your own, please rouse yourselves from your 3D distractions and self-involved ambition to begin to pull your own weight.

Francis I could play a vital role in this “disclosure”. At their Mt. Graham observatory in Arizona, Jesuits are seeing further than ever with the help of a system used in conjunction with their powerful telescope. A 2010 article from PopSci.com tells us:

A new instrument with an evil-sounding name is helping scientists see how stars are born. Lucifer, which stands for (deep breath) “Large Binocular Telescope Near-infrared Utility with Camera and Integral Field Unit for Extragalactic Research,” is a chilled instrument attached to a telescope in Arizona. And yes, it’s named for the Devil, whose name itself means “morning star.” But it wasn’t meant to evoke him, according to a spokesman for the University of Arizona, where it is housed.

It is a fascinating twist on an ancient myth well known in Masonic circles: “Lucifer” is friend, not foe. He is Prometheus, the giver of light and knowledge to mankind who has been horribly tormented for his gifts to humanity. We are told that it is a mistake to link the “Morning Star” with who we know as “Satan”. Masons and Gnostics have, from the beginning, pushed the idea that only through secret knowledge can mankind be saved, yet the Apostle Paul spends much of the New Testament railing against it;

God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong. ~ I Corinthians 1:27

Knowledge makes arrogant, but love edifies. ~ I Corinthians 8:1

OPERATIVE OR ASSET, IT MATTERS NOT

Jorge Bergoglio is well-loved and has become an instant success but there is a single “dirty” skeleton in his closet. He has been accused of passively enabling a brutal purge of “Leftists” in Argentina during her so-called “Dirty War”.

Christopher Dickey of the Daily Beast asked:

When Jorge Mario Bergoglio, now Pope Francis, was the head of the Jesuit order in Argentina, did he do too little to protect his priests from a savage military dictatorship? Or, worse, did he denounce some of them as guerrilla sympathizers, virtually sentencing them to death?

“It was the time of the civil war between the extreme right-wing and left-wing groups in Argentine society,” wrote Franz Jalics, an Argentine priest…It was 1976, and after years of growing violence by various guerrilla groups, a military junta had seized power in Buenos Aires. The secretive campaign waged by the generals, known as the “dirty war,” was ferocious. Thousands of people were “disappeared” at the hands of a special Navy unit that took some prisoners to concentration camps and threw others into the sea from helicopters.

It must be noted that what the media calls “right” and “left” is neither consistent nor historically accurate. Around the world and especially in South America “Left” can sometimes be more populist than Marxist and “Right” can be more corrupt and autocratic than free market.

But what matters is who serves the Elite and behind the black curtain of the Elite lies the CIA.

The CIA has a long history of involvement in South American affairs. From Guatemala to Brazil, the Firm has been ousting governments that it deems not in the best interests of those making the decisions.

But the best interests of the Elite and powerful are often not the best interests of the American people.

During the so-called “Iran/Contra” debacle, weapons were sold to Iran to fuel the Iran/Iraq war and proceeds were given to a Nicaraguan insurgency calling themselves “Contras” in a move to overthrow the “Leftist” Sandinista regime. That much, most educated Americans know. Who can forget the incessant news coverage of Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North’s Congressional testimony?

What is less well-known is the role illegal narcotics played then and perhaps even to this day in funding CIA operations and even enriching high-level CIA officials.

Eclipsing cocaine, information (particularly private information garnered from citizens) now paves the way toward untold wealth. It is the kind of wealth that would make a lowly software developer like Steven Huff a billionaire who is now building his own private fortress—some say the “single family dwelling” will be a command center after an engineered American collapse.

This provides me with the ultimate of satanic segues: Father Marcial Maciel Degollado was known as the greatest fundraiser in the history of the Catholic Church, with powerful connections all over the world.

He was also known as a serial child predator who was so perverse he sexually abused his own illegitimate sons. It is fascinating to note that he told his son Raul Gonzales he “worked for the CIA”. None of the well-kept corporate media probe any further allowing readers to simply assume it was a “cover” Degollado gave to facilitate his crimes. Not surprising given the heavy-handed involvement the CIA has had in the media.

But as I detailed in one of my very first video reports, the CIA has been complicit in a massive child sex slave ring that caters to the rich and shameless particularly using young boys as either weapons of blackmail, currency for goods and services or curriers for intelligence. To draw any further connections might not be healthy.

THE DAWN OF A NEW AGE

Will Pope Francis be a “yes man” who covers the sins of the Elite and stands as the vanguard to the most frightening “disclosure” in human history?

We have been prepared, or perhaps warned, by Hollywood. The popular TV series “V” was spawned in the 80’s and reincarnated in 2009 with an alien reptilian race disguised as friends but with a much more malignant agenda behind them.

Will you be ready?