“Scientism” is a word almost as nebulous as “Illuminati” or “globalists” or “deep state” and is equally designed to say nothing yet invoke emotional reactions.

Christian flat Earth personality Robbie Davidson is a newcomer to the new field of cosmology re-discovery, yet he very quickly produced a high-quality docu-drama (which takes tremendous resources of time and money) titled “SCIENTISM EXPOSED”.

Although there is differentiation between the scientific method and “scientism” Davidson still bolsters the idea that “science” is the problem.

“Scientism” is the “epistemology” [the theory of knowledge, especially with regard to its methods, validity, and scope] which states that “the methods of science are superior to any and all other methods of determining truth.”

By implication, “Christians” can use other methods such as “faith” to discovery their reality.

This subterfuge is no less dangerous than the propaganda and psychological operations that helped weave our present false reality.

It harkens to the smoke & mirrors circus of the “Scopes Monkey Trial” (State of Tennessee v. John Scopes): a massive propaganda effort to solidify Darwinian evolution.  When it failed (high school teacher John Scopes and his powerful Darwinian backers lost the case) the supreme power of false-reality-weaving stepped in: Hollywood.

The false and inflammatory caricature of “Christians” stopping their ears and shutting their eyes to “science” (because “science” disproves their Faith) continues on in the “critique” of “scientism”.

It negates the most powerful part of the understanding that our reality (given to us by frauds with truly evil ulterior motives) isn’t real: the fact that the Bible is a science textbook.

The Scientific Method—

* Make an observation.
* Develop an hypothesis.
* Conduct experiments in a sterile environment (isolating known variables) to replicate the observation, thereby proving the hypothesis.
* Present to peers of equal or greater reliability in this method who can prove or disprove using the same reliable steps (peer review).

—makes scientists of all who wish to be.  Each person is only limited by what they can test.

If a “theory” isn’t observable, testable or repeatable (such as Darwinian “evolution” or anything “scientists” tell us about “space” or “gravity”, etc.) then it isn’t a theory and those who promote it as such are either unbelievably ignorant of their own disciplines or have a sinister ulterior motive.

Alfred Kinsey is one of the worst examples available.  He began his “sex research” with the outcome already in mind: destroy commonly accepted sexual mores.  He then warped “data” he received towards that end by either encouraging criminal behavior (such as torture and rape of children, toddlers and even infants) or conducted such crimes himself or with his “staff” of deviants.

The premier and accepted critic of Kinsey is Dr. Judith Reisman—a Jewish Doctor of Communications and legal counselor to the Vatican who has the glowing support in the form of references and citations of some of the most vicious Catholic anti-Semites like E. Michael Jones and Patrick J. Buchanan, (support she shockingly returns in kind).

In her 1998 book, Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences, Reisman, invests considerable and effective effort proving that Kinsey’s outrages were anything but “science” yet she then blurs the lines by implying misuse of Kinsey by other organizations (with questionable motives) was another example of our nebulous term—

Despite the four books and the many voices trumpeting Kinsey’s research, there were a few voices of concern over Kinsey’s acceptance in academia and the promotion of Kinsey’s science, more accurately termed “scientism”… ~ Kinsey: Crimes & Consequences, Judith Reisman, The Institute for Media Education (1998), p. 190

Why aren’t experts in science fraud like Davidson and Reisman being clear?  —Wherever “science” has done us harm via fraud it isn’t science.  Therefore, those who question fraudulent “science” need not retreat to less intellectual venues such as “faith” and give detractors that age-old propaganda win.

In fact, rediscovering our reality by daring to question fraudulent “experts” with movements such as “flat Earth” is turning the Bible back into a true science textbook.  One wonders how an expert in that arena would be so willing to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Recently, the country has undergone a face-lift, but the atrocities and abuses remain (although they are now more covert).

For most of its independent years, the country has been engrossed in rampant ethnic strife and Burma’s myriad ethnic groups have been involved in one of the world’s longest-running ongoing civil wars.  During this time, the United Nations and several other organisations have reported consistent and systematic human rights violations in the country.^[14][15][16]  In 2011, the military junta was officially dissolved following a 2010 general election, and a nominally civilian government was installed.  While former military leaders still wield enormous power in the country, the Burmese military have taken steps toward relinquishing control of the government.  This, along with the release of Aung San Suu Kyi and political prisoners, has improved the country’s human rights record and foreign relations, and has led to the easing of trade and other economic sanctions.^[17][18]  There is, however, continuing criticism of the government’s treatment of the Muslim Rohingya minority and its poor response to the religious clashes.^[19][20][21]  In the landmark 2015 election, Aung San Suu Kyi’s party won a majority in both houses.

Myanmar is a country rich in jade and gems, oil, natural gas and other mineral resources.  In 2013, its GDP (nominal) stood at US$56.7 billion and its GDP (PPP) at US$221.5 billion.^[3]  The income gap in Myanmar is among the widest in the world, as a large proportion of the economy is controlled by supporters of the former military government.^[22][23]  As of 2016, according to the Human Development Index (HDI), Myanmar had a medium level of human development, ranking 145 out of 188 countries.^[4] ~ Wikipedia

It is easy for the Elite to “play” there as Burma rarely gets media coverage.

Myanmar’s head of state, “First State Counsellor” Aung San Suu Kyi, is the kindler, gentler face on Burma’s tyranny.

First State Counsellor of Myanmar, Aung San Suu Kyi, speaking in Sydney on “World AIDS Day” in 2013.  Sinisterly appropriate is the Roman Catholic fleur de lis background.  The fleur de lis is an ancient gnostic / Luciferian symbol implying male-female intercourse.

Although, as “political prisoners” go, the majority have suffered far worse than 15 years of “house arrest”.

In fact, if Suu Kyi were a puppet of the Elite, it would be the perfect way to portray her as a persecuted outsider.

This has been bolstered by her receiving the Nobel Peace Prize in 1991.  The merits behind the award rest on her ineffective resistance to the ruling military junta and her “house arrest”.

The year before she received the Sakharov Prize from European Parliament for the same criteria.  The way the European Union celebrated its 60^th anniversary of tyranny shows clearly who those officials all work for.

Perhaps most telling has been her support from the agents of corruption in the United States, having received a “Congressional Gold Medal” in 2012.

A damning rogue’s gallery of support: (left to right) Joseph Crowley (D-NY), John Boehner, Laura Bush, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Mitch McConnell, Harry Reid, John McCain, Barbara Boxer.

It is appropriate that McConnell and Clinton stand directly behind the award-winner, as they are most responsible for her empowerment.

Clinton is the extreme sexual deviant installed into hegemony by the Central Intelligence Agency and their controllers, the Jesuits (who directly trained her husband).

McConnell married into power; specifically, the Roman Catholic Asian drug trade.

Not to be left out are the contributions of Barack Obama and his Roman Catholic handler, Joe Biden.

Perhaps this was why: despite the new happy face on Myanmar’s military autocracy, ethnic cleansing continues.

Particularly disturbing are reports that Burmese soldiers are pillaging the remote villages of Myanmar’s Rohingya Muslims where they commit atrocities like raping women and children.

This is done under the rubric of fighting “ISIS” for the never-ending “Global War on Terror”.

But modern “jihad” is a completely fabricated enemy founded in the bowels of Roman Western Intelligence operatives like Zbigniew Brzezinski, “close and warm” friend of Pope John Paul II, below pictured with an Afghani soldier believed to be Osama bin Laden (known by the CIA as “Tim Osman”).

Perhaps some will consider criticism of Myanmar’s First State Counsellor as unfair, especially in light of an accusation that she is an operative or at least a pawn of the Papacy.

Interestingly, however, Aung San Suu Kyi (listed as a practicing Buddhist) spent her first 15 years under Roman Catholic tutelage (by “coincidence” the same amount of time she later spent under “house arrest”).  She completed her secondary education at the Convent of Jesus and Mary School in New Delhi, (“Hindu/Buddhist” India) with the “Sisters of Jesus”.²

Her late husband, Michael Aris, had even more interesting connections.

Aris was born in Catholic Cuba to a Foreign Service Catholic British father and French-Canadian Catholic, (and Catholic-educated) mother.  Not surprisingly, he was raised Catholic.³

When the Aris family returned to “Protestant/Anglican” England, Michael and his twin brother Anthony attended Worth Abbey Roman Catholic boarding school.⁴

His well-traveled father gave him a Buddhist “prayer wheel” as a gift.  Again, coincidentally, one of his instructors at Worth just happened to be future Knight of Malta Grand Master Andrew Bertie who also just happened to speak Ü-Tsang Tibetan.  Bertie translated the prayer wheel for Aris helping imbue him with a passion for the Orient.⁵

Aris would go on to teach Asian History at St. John’s, Oxford.  “St. John’s” is the most well-endowed college at Oxford, founded by Roman Catholic Sir Thomas White to lead the Counter-Reformation against Protestantism.

It’s full name is Saint John Baptist College which is important given that the secret belief of the Templars was to profane Jesus Christ as an imposter and worship the Baptist as the true Messiah (known as “Johanism”).⁶

St. John’s boasts many powerful alumni such as Barack Obama’s Secretary of Defense, Ashton Carter.

Michael Aris died of prostate cancer on his 53^rd birthday in 1999.  Although believed by many to share his wife’s apparent Buddhism (they were married in a Buddhist ceremony); the Benedictine monks of Worth and Ampleforth Abbies gave blessings at his funeral.⁷

In 2013, Myanmar’s First State Counsellor was received in a personal audience with Jesuit White Pope⁸ Francis, Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

If any had doubts about her fealty, they were dissolved with a kiss.

C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien are both very well-known English writers that have been influencing generations with their works.

The two young professors, once members of a literary group in Oxford, have introduced to the public the fantastic worlds of Narnia and Middle-earth.

In fact, they had a renowned friendship that’s allegedly the source of Lewis’s conversion to Christianity.

The work of Tolkein and Lewis is now both classic and mainstream; having been brought to life many times over in animated and feature film versions.

Why are these relatively old stories so popular?

Why do they continue to be the impetus for efforts in the entertainment industry?

Is there a powerful, perhaps even sinister force at work?  How can that be when both men were such “devout Christians”?

Perhaps the answer lies in exactly what kind of “Christians” they were.

J.R.R. Tolkien: The Lord of the Jesuit Tales

John Ronald Reuel Tolkien (aka J.R.R. Tolkien) was an English writer born in South Africa in 1892.

He’s most known by his classic fantasy works such as The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings trilogy.

Although his family was composed mostly of Protestants, Tolkien’s mother Mabel converted to Catholicism following a trip to Birmingham, England, after the death of Tolkien’s father.

This decision caused Mabel’s Protestant and Baptist family to withdraw her financial support.

Such struggles contributed to her death four years later, but not before she had enrolled John and his brother Hilary Arthur Reuel Tolkien into St. Philip’s Grammar School, associated with the Birmingham Oratory.  There, they were acquitted to Father Francis Xavier Morgan, a Roman Catholic priest, who eventually took custody of Ronald and Hilary.  Morgan was named after Francis Xavier, one of the founders of the Jesuits along with Ignatius Loyola and Peter Faber.  The brothers considered the Oratory as their home, serving as Morgan’s altar boys every morning.

These events set Tolkien to be a devout Roman Catholic.

His mother’s martyr-like perseverance in remaining true to her new faith, despite dire poverty, made a deep impression on Tolkien.  As historian Owen Dudley Edwards eloquently observed: “This meant that Tolkien’s Catholicism was fused with his identity at the most basic points of self-awareness. Clichés about the influence of devout mothers do not begin to describe the force of an inheritance like this.”  He and his brother were left in the care of a Roman Catholic priest at the Birmingham Oratory.  Tolkien persuaded his wife to convert before their marriage.  He attended Mass regularly, often daily, all of his life, although he was displeased with the changes to the Mass following Vatican II. ~ The Ring and the Cross: Christianity and the Lord of the Rings by Paul E. Kerry, p.241, 2011.

The main theme of The Lord of the Rings (LOTR) is the quest to destroy Sauron and his evil ring by a fellowship composed of hobbits, humans, dwarfs and elves.  The Hobbit acts as a prequel and, analogously to the LOTR, it’s also centered in the Middle-earth.

Tolkien’s religious views permeated many of his works, as he discusses the Catholic nature of the LOTR in a letter addressed to his friend, Jesuit priest Robert Murray.

“I know exactly what you mean by the order of grace; and of course by your references to Our Lady, upon which all my own small perception of beauty both in majesty and simplicity is founded.  The Lord of the Rings is of course a fundamentally religious and Catholic work; unconsciously so at first, but consciously in the revision.  I have not put in, or have cut out, practically all references to anything like ‘religion’, to cults and practices in the imaginary world.  For the religious element is absorbed into the story and symbolism.” ~ The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien by J.R.R. Tolkien, p.172, 2000.

Such imagery and metaphor is also seen in the stories of C.S. Lewis.  Tolkien incorporated several occult elements to compose his mythical Middle-earth tales.  Even freemasonic symbolism can be found throughout the stories as is the case with The Doors of Durin portrayed in The Fellowship of the Ring.

However, it is the doctrines of Roman Catholicism that thoroughly permeate this well-known (and well-promoted) fantasy series.

Such religious influences are exemplified in the similarities between the Catholic Mary, “Our Lady”, and character Galadriel, also known as “Lady of the Galadhrim” or “Lady of Light”.

The “conversion” of Gimli a is used to show how “heretics” can be drawn to reconcile with Rome by the power of the ever-virgin “Queen of Heaven.

Gimli is a dwarf that initially viewed the Elves with prejudice.  But upon marveling over Galadriel’s light and grace, he is won over by her.

In the same instance, Galadriel bestowed cloaks of invisibility to hero Hobbits Frodo and Sam as a gift in order to protect them against the sight of unfriendly eyes.  Similarly, there is a Catholic belief that professes one may be “preserved from eternal fire” by using the brown scapular of the Virgin Mary.

There are also some researchers who claim Tolkien believed in distributism (redistribution of wealth and property by force), which is a an economic ideology based on the Catholic social teaching.  The Society of Jesus is the most vocal Catholic order when it comes to “social justice”.

The website Jesuits in Malta features an interview with Dr. Alison Milbank of the University of Nottingham.  According to her, The Hobbit is a story that opposes the dwarves’ selfish desires to accumulate more gold and riches with the altruistic Bilbo, the Hobbit, who decided to share the Arkenstone, the great dwarf ancestral stone, with the men and the elves in order to make peace among them.  She goes on to assert the following:

“…for Tolkien this would have had a political resonance as well, influenced by Catholic social teaching from the early part of the century which was seeking a third way between the extremes of capitalism individualism and socialist denial of the individual.  They sought something called Distributism, where money and goods were to be distributed as widely as possible in society.  And you can see that really underpinning the novel, in a children’s book version.” ~ The Hobbit, an unexpected theological journey by Dr. Alison Milbank.

Robert Lazu, a Romanian Roman Catholic philosopher and theologian, asserted in his paper The Fantastic Secret of Tolkien’s Fairy Tales: Literature and Jesuit Spiritual Exercises that Tolkien might have used Jesuit spiritual exercises while composing his fairy stories.

Although there is no evidence to prove that Tolkien practiced Jesuit spiritual exercises, a few fragments referring to the way in which his fairy stories were conceived entitle us to uphold that their “secret” consisted in the fact that they had been created in a way similar to the practice of “composing the place” from St. Ignatius’s spiritual exercises. …

Tolkien practiced a similar method that involved the visualization of the most minute details of his fantasy world.  Although it is only natural that a writer should picture, as faithfully as possible, the characters and settings of his stories with the help of his own imagination, what Tolkien did clearly separated him from earlier authors: he drew detailed maps and prepared a rigorous chronology of his secondary universe.  In other words, he requested, as no other modern fiction writer had previously done, an increased degree of exactness on the part of the reader with regard to the “structuring” of his fantastic world.  He acted much like a regular Jesuit master in offering spiritual exercises to his disciples. He proposed an imaginary framework meant to help us experience powerful and profound emotions resulting in a commitment of our entire being to pondering the dominant values of Middle-earth.  Yet, there is more to it than meets the eye. …

In my opinion, Tolkien presented the world with singular writings, literary creations that contain truths that cannot and should not be presented as “scientific truths” to the present-day reader.  Once again, we encounter a good use of creative imagination perfectly harmonizing with a sound mind.  Tolkien was not just a “secular” counterpart to St. Ignatius.  On the contrary, he reminds us of the lesson that Aquinas, the “Angelic Doctor,” left to posterity—the harmony between faith and reason.  Tolkien urges us to learn, alongside his characters, how to distinguish between Good and Evil and how to fight unrelentingly to protect what is morally right. ~ Light Beyond All Shadow: Religious Experience in Tolkien’s Work by Paul E. Kerry and Sandra Miesel, p.124, 2011, [emphasis mine].

The Jesuit spiritual exercises integrate the core of what is called Ignatian spirituality named after its founder Ignatius of Loyola.  The Exercises deeply rely on the use of imagination during religious meditation and they are allegedly designed to free one of his own desires and even individual identity in order to solely obey what the adherent understands as “God’s will”.

Martin Scorsese’s new movie Silence will tell the story of violence and persecution two young Jesuits suffered in Japan in the seventeenth century.  It’s most probable that the motive of persecution, which is the Jesuit involvement and subversion of that nation’s political affairs, will not be discussed.  Neither their resultant expulsion from every country in which they held a mission, for similar reasons.

Scorsese was raised in such a devoted Catholic environment that it led him to spend a year in seminary.  The renowned film director used Jesuit James J. Martin as a trusted adviser on the film.  Father Martin was also in charge of helping the actors immerse themselves in Jesuit spirituality.  The star of the film, Andre Garfield (of The Amazing Spider-Man fame), recounted his experiences with the spiritual exercises:

By the end of it Garfield admitted, “I got totally swept up in all things Jesuit and very taken with Jesuit spirituality.”  He was so immersed in Jesuit spirituality that Garfield would stop and make suggestions on the set of the film, saying, “A Jesuit wouldn’t say that.” ~Philip Kosloski, Aleteia, December 8, 2016.

It is interesting to note that Garfield is Jewish.  As Scorsese will not be dealing with the reasons behind the Jesuit expulsion from Japan, it seems to be a forgone conclusion that Andrew Garfield is completely ignorant of Jewish persecution at the hands of the “Society of Jesus”.

Tolkien could have acquired his Jesuit writing style during his stay at Stonyhurst College, a Jesuit boarding school.  He spent time in one of the guesthouses and one of the classrooms in order to compile the LOTR trilogy.

“Tolkien was renowned for his love of nature and wooded landscapes and the countryside around Stonyhurst College and St Mary’s Hall is richly beautiful. The area is dotted with names that are familiar from The Lord of the Rings – Shire Lane in Hurst Green, for instance, or the River Shirebourn. Perhaps named after the Shireburn Family who had built Stonyhurst and owned the estate in the 16th and 17th centuries. The green countryside is dominated by the dark shape of Pendle Hill, famous for its association with witches, sorcery and black magic in the 16th century – surely inspiration for Middle Earth’s Misty Mountains or The Lonely Mountain?” ~BBC Lancashire, October 28, 2014.

Moreover, three of his sons attended Stonyhurst.  His eldest son John studied to become a priest after being evacuated from Rome during the Second World War, while his other son Michael was a professor there.  The place ended up being a source of inspiration for his Middle-earth.  Tolkien’s original manuscripts are kept at Jesuit Marquette University.

Another important personality who attended Stonyhurst was George Herbert Walker, the maternal grandfather and uncle of his namesake, George Herbert Walker Bush, Jr. (Skull and Bones ‘48) —the 41^st President of the United States and the 11^th Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.  As President of the investment bank Brown Brothers, Harriman, Walker was a key figure in bankrolling and enabling the rise of the Third Reich.  This was done to insure the Jesuit-managed Hegelian dialectic of Nazism verses Communism which was the source of unbelievable suffering in the Second World War and subsequent “Cold War”.

Admired by Pope Francis, J.R.R. Tolkien was, and still is, an important asset to the Jesuits and the Vatican; which justifies the amount of exposure his works have received through to the present day.  Tolkein was most assuredly not a great writer who happened to also be Roman Catholic.  He was and is a Jesuit-controlled agent of using fantasy to instill warmth and openness to Roman Catholicism.

C.S. Lewis: Chronicles of an Ecumenical Writer in the Service of Rome

Close friend to devout Roman Catholic J.R.R. Tolkien, Clive Staples Lewis (aka C.S. Lewis) was born in Belfast, N. Ireland in 1898.  He’s commonly portrayed as coming from a bigoted Protestant family due to his maternal grandfather, Anglican priest Rev. Thomas Hamilton and Hamilton’s anti-Catholic views.  Nevertheless, Hamilton served as a priest in Rome prior to returning to Ireland.

On the other hand Lewis’ mother, Florence (Flora) Hamilton, was known for her tolerance towards Catholics, even hiring several to work in her home and to look after Lewis and his brother Warren.  Both Clive and Warren were frequent guests at the local monastery in Blackfriars, Oxford of Fr. Gervase Mathew.  In addition, a “miracle” witnessed by Flora while still living in Rome may have inspired one of the characters of Narnia.

While Thomas Hamilton was living in Rome, incidentally, something occurred which entered into family legend and eventually formed a seed for C. S. Lewis’s most famous story.  Hamilton’s daughter Flora – C. S. Lewis’s mother – was then a little girl.  One afternoon she and some grown-ups escaped the scorching heat of the pavement by walking into a church.  Under one of the altars there was the body of a saint lying in a glass case.  While no grown-up was looking, Flora distinctly saw this figure open her eyelids.  Just as when Lucy comes back from the other side of the wardrobe and discovers that everyone thinks Narnia is a product of her imagination, so the Hamiltons failed to believe in Flora’s “miracle”.  The difference between Flora and Lucy was Flora did not herself believed that she had witnessed anything miraculous.  “I thought it was done by cords pulled by a priest behind the alter [sic].”  Nevertheless, the pattern of the story – a little girl who has seen a wonder in which the rest of her family refuse to believe – is structurally the same as that of the Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. ~ C.S. Lewis: A Biography by A.N. Wilson, p.2, 1990.

Another possible source of inspiration for Lewis in the character of Lucy in his Chronicles of Narnia may actually have been a Dominican tertiary, the Blessed Lucy of Narni.

…today is the actual feast day of the actual Blessed Lucy of Narnia. …

The life of the real Lucy is even more magical and wondrous even than the one CS Lewis imagined for “Queen Lucy the Valiant”.

Born in the late fifteenth century, Blessed Lucia (“Lucy” in English) Brocadelli was from the ancient Umbrian town of Narni (“Narnia” in Latin).  A pious child, she is said to have received visions from an early age.  Following her father’s death in her early teens, she was married off by her uncle to Pietro, Count of Milan, though they lived as brother and sister.

As Countess, she was famed for her life of prayer and care for the poor, baking bread for them herself (ably assisted, it is said, by a number of Saints from Heaven).  The lure of religious life proved irresistible. And the couple separated, she to become a Dominican tertiary, and he ultimately to join the Franciscans.

Among much else, Lucy of Narnia received the stigmata and became prioress of a convent, before ultimately spending her final four decades locked up by her successor. She died in 1544. In 1710, her body incorrupt, she was beatified by Pope Clement XI. ~ The real Blessed Lucy of Narnia was even more amazing than CS Lewis’s imagination, the Catholic Herald

Lewis went on to hold academic positions at Oxford University and according to Jesuit Peter Milward, he was an occasional guest of Jesuit Thomas Corbishley, the then Master of Campion Hall.  The Society of Jesus runs Campion Hall as one of the Permanent Private Halls of Oxford University.  Undoubtedly, Lewis acquitted himself to many Jesuits during his tenure there, as evidenced by his frequent letters to or about them.  In a letter to Milward from June 27, 1963; Lewis addresses his “lacking in the spiritual tact which is so conspicuous among my Jesuit friends in Oxford”.  Moreover, in a letter to Sister Madeleva CSC from April 12, 1954; Lewis asks to be remembered by Jesuit Martin Cyril D’Arcy who, according to him, had a “fine mind, both rich and sharp”.  D’Arcy was Campion Hall’s Master prior to Corbishley.

Interestingly, there were rumors at the time that perhaps Lewis was secretly a Jesuit himself.  These speculations were also corroborated by Christopher Derrick, one of Lewis’s friends.  Regardless of that, his works such as Mere Christianity and Screwtape Letters account for the conversion of innumerous people to Catholicism.

Lewis has been credited (or blamed) in recent years with setting numerous people on the road to Rome.  Such Catholic converts have included many of the serious scholars and disciples of Lewis, some of whom knew him before he died… ~ R.A. Benthall, Ave Maria College, Michigan quoted in C.S. Lewis and the Catholic Church by Joseph Pearce, Ignatius Press, 2003, p.xv.

Perhaps, the appeal to coming to the Roman Catholic Church was mainly due to the ecumenical aspects of his work, reflected especially in Mere Christianity.  The book was Lewis’s attempt to gloss over any theological controversies between Catholics and Protestants in order to establish a generic Christianity suitable to anyone that vaguely related to “God” in any way.  Lewis contributed, and proudly so, to bridge Protestants and Roman Catholics.

If I have not directly helped the cause of reunion, I have perhaps made it clear why we ought to be reunited. ~Mere Christianity, Issue 7 by C.S. Lewis, p.XI, 2001.

The time is always ripe for reunion.  Divisions between Christians are a sin and a scandal and Christians ought at all times to be making contributions toward reunion…the result is that letters of agreement reach me from what are ordinarily regarded as the most different kinds of Christians; for instance, I get letters from Jesuits, monks, nuns, also from Quakers and Welsh Dissenters, and so on. ~ C.S. Lewis, The Grand Miracle, and Other Selected Essays on Theology and Ethics from God in the Dock, (Random House, 1970), p. 35.

In order to accomplish such an ecumenical task, Lewis compromised on many Christian doctrines.  One important example was the parallel between the Mass (transubstantiation) and the Lord’s Supper.  He also believed in Purgatory, although not quite the one professed by the Catholic Church; and praying for the dead, albeit not saints.

Mark Brumley, president of RC Ignatius Press summarizes Lewis’s legacy quite well.

Moreover, Lewis’s distinction between the Christian faith as such and any particular denominational formulation of it, whether Protestant or Catholic or Orthodox, has helped foster a more sympathetic assessment of Catholicism among some Protestants and, ironically, has aided in bringing more than a few searching sheep into the Catholic fold. Protestants who tend to equate Christianity with their Protestant version of it will find in Lewis no ally. (emphasis mine) ~ The Relevance and Challenge of C. S. Lewis by Mark Brumley on November 29, 2005.

Despite his engagement in spiritual matters, his best-known work is the children’s series The Chronicles of Narnia, which tells the story of four ordinary children discovering and exploring the imaginary land of Narnia.  Published in the 1950’s, Lewis was previously assured that his ideas on writing children’s novels were “Jesuitical”, which perhaps may explain the broad coverage the series has enjoyed to this date.

In a letter of 1945 to Dorothy L. Sayers, he declares that he is “all for little books on other subjects with their Christianity latent.  I propounded this in the S.C.R [Senior Common Room at Campion Hall [the Jesuit House of Studies in Oxford] and was told that it was “Jesuitical” ~ The Lion’s World: A Journey into the Heart of Narnia by Rowan Williams, p.15, 2012.

Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams would know.

Romans in vicar vestments run all the way to the top at Westminster.

The 104^th Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Douglas Williams, was recommended by “closet Catholic” Prime Minister Tony Blair and immediately underwent a pagan ceremony to have him promoted to the highest Druidic Degree just prior to his enthronement.³⁷⁵  Williams’ 10 years of “service” included pushing to have his homosexual friend³⁷⁶ Jeffrey John appointed Bishop of Reading³⁷⁷, claiming that sodomy reflected the “love of God”³⁷⁸, calling Sharia law “acceptable” and “unavoidable”³⁷⁹ and announcing that unity of all Christian sects under Rome was a “matter of urgency”.³⁸⁰

This can be explained by his audience in 2003 before the Catholic Pole chemist and salesman who helped get cyanide into the Nazi extermination chambers during WWII,³⁸¹ Karol Józef Wojtyła where, unlike Thomas Cranmer (who burned his hand off rather than serve Rome) he carefully kissed the ring of Pope John Paul II. ~ Secret History: The erased clues that prove who rules the world from behind the curtain. Johnny Cirucci, CreateSpace (2016), pp. 487-488

The most important character in this realm is Aslan, a talking lion that is described as the King of Beasts and son of the Emperor-Over-the-Sea.  Depicted as a protector of the children, Aslan was conceived as an alternative version of Christ.

Although Aslan can be read as an original character, parallels exist with Christ.  In particular, Aslan’s sacrifice and subsequent resurrection parallel Christ’s crucifixion and resurrection.  Aslan also has God-like powers; he created Narnia with a song (The Magician’s Nephew).  The Emperor-Over-the-Sea then refers to God the Father, and Aslan’s country (The Voyage of the Dawn Treader) to heaven.  In The Last Battle a new Narnia is made and also a new Earth, as in the Book of Revelation.  Furthermore, there are biblical references of Christ being called a lion, as in Revelation 5:5 “Then one of the elders said to me, ‘Do not weep.  See, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, has conquered, so that he can open the scroll and its seven seals.’” (NRSV).  When he first appeared at the end of The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, he looked like a lamb, which is also a symbol of Christ, who is frequently described throughout the New Testament as being “The Lamb of God”. ~ Wikipedia

As a result, the Narnia’s tales have been deliberately propagated among Christian circles.  James Dobson’s Focus on the Family promotes the series on radio.  Even the then-governor of Florida, Jeb Bush (a converted Roman Catholic and Knight of Columbus), wants every child in the state to read The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe.  Despite the fact that the stories have been implicated with witchcraft and medieval astrology, Lewis himself was proud to utilize pagan elements in order to introduce Christianity.

Lewis himself believed that pagan mythology could act as a preparation for Christianity, both in history and in the imaginative life of an individual, and even suggested that modern man was in such a lamentable state that perhaps it was necessary “first to make people good pagans, and after that to make them Christians.” ~ Wikipedia

Catholic beliefs are a syncretistic mix of Christianity and pagan elements, namely Babylonian demonism and Chaldean sun worship.  In fact, the association of the lion with the words “beast” and “emperor-over-the sea” may have a meaning complete opposite to Christ, which is found in the last book of the Bible.

The Beast out of the Sea

The dragon stood on the shore of the sea.  And I saw a beast coming out of the sea.  It had ten horns and seven heads, with ten crowns on its horns, and on each head a blasphemous name.  The beast I saw resembled a leopard, but had feet like those of a bear and a mouth like that of a lion.  The dragon gave the beast his power and his throne and great authority.  One of the heads of the beast seemed to have had a fatal wound, but the fatal wound had been healed.  The whole world was filled with wonder and followed the beast.  People worshiped the dragon because he had given authority to the beast, and they also worshiped the beast and asked, “Who is like the beast?  Who can wage war against it?” ~ Revelation 13:1-4 – NIV

Prior to erasing such understanding from the minds of all Christians save Seventh Day Adventists, this passage was clearly understood to be speaking of Rome.

“This calls for a mind with wisdom.  The seven heads are seven hills on which the woman sits.” ~ Revelation 17:9

The seven hills of Rome are legendary to any aware enough of either history or geography.

Although it’s assumed that C.S. Lewis never converted to Catholicism, a Jesuit priest named Guy Brinkworth wrote a letter suggesting that Lewis came very close to a conversion.

In the letters I received from him, he time and time again asked specifically for prayers that God might give him “the light and grace to make the final gesture”. He even went so far as to ask in a postscript to one of his letters for “prayers that the prejudices instilled in me by an Ulster nurse might be overcome”. ~ C.S. Lewis and the Catholic Church by Joseph Pearce, Ignatius Press, 2003.

If in fact he was a secret Catholic or even a disguised Jesuit priest as all the evidence may suggest, it’s more likely that the decision to not disclose his true identity came from his superiors.  Perhaps, even the story about Lewis being a secret MI6 agent might have been disclosed to cover up his real masters.

Lewis died on November 22, 1963.  Curiously, two other preeminent people died within minutes of each other; namely the 35^th President of the United States, John F. Kennedy and the English writer, Aldous Huxley.  It certainly brings to memory another case involving the death of founding fathers John Adams and Thomas Jefferson on the same day: the 4^th of July.  And as one might think, the odds are against mere coincidence.  Even more so when President James Monroe also died on the 4^th of July.

Having a prominent person die on a significant date is the calling card of assassins so good at their work they leave no other trace.  Such is the reputation of the Jesuits.

It’s pointless to discuss if C.S. Lewis indeed became a Roman Catholic.  His works speak for themselves.  The ecumenical seeds he planted in the minds of Protestants and Catholics alike are germinating in the present time.  Bringing multitudes to the “Holy Mother Church” and being admired by Popes were some of Lewis’s achievements.

At a papal audience, Walter Hooper found himself discussing C.S. Lewis with Pope John Paul II.  At the end of the meeting, the Pope gave his own summary of Lewis’s achievement.  Lewis, he said, knew what his “apostolate”, his divine calling, was.  There was a long pause when Hooper thought the Pope had finished.  Then the Pope added “and he did it”. ~ C.S. Lewis in a Time of War: The World War II Broadcasts That Riveted a Nation and Became the Classic Mere Christianity by Justin Phillips, p.296, 2002.

Christ spoke in Mathew 7:16: You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles?

Lewis’s and Tolkien’s fruits are rotten.

UPDATE 16 November 2017

Farnese, Borgia and “Aragorn”

The Jesuits were founded originally as The Society of Jesus on August 15, 1534, the day of  “Assumption”, during a secret ceremony held in the crypt of the Chapel of St. Denis by Ignatius of Loyola (full name Iñigo López de Loyola), Francisco Xavier, Alfonso Salmeron, Diego Lainez, Nicolás Bobadilla from Spain, Peter Faber from Savoy, France, and Simão Rodrigues from Portugal.

Francis Borgia founded the Jesuits

Its constitution was approved by Francis Borgia, a member of the infamous Borgia family , also known as Borja / Borgia, Duke of Grandia, nephew of Pope Alexander VI and patron of Ignatius of Loyola.  Francis Borgia was the main financier and architect of the gradual transformation of the Jesuits in the first order of monks as a military organization within the Catholic Church.  He was also a promoter of adoption of the Papal Bull Regimini militantis ( 27 September 1540 ), by the very close companion of the Borgia family, Alessandro Farnese, Pope Paul III, who first granted the official status of Jesuit order.

Ignatius of Loyola was noticed for the first time by the young Duke of Grandia already in 1529, when he was re-arrested by the Inquisition in relation to extreme practices of religious devotion.  Borgia saw the potential in the devotion of a military charter founded on the extremism preached by Ignatius of Loyola, and his will to establish a military order of monks.  It was the young Borgia, who saved the life of Ignatius from the Inquisition.

On the death of Ignatius in 1557, Francis Borgia should have secured the appointment of a second Superior General.  However, his ambitions were thwarted in by his arch – enemy Giovanni Pietro Carafa, Pope Paul IV (1555-1559).  Carafa had always been one of the biggest opponents of Borgia Pope Alexander VI and promptly named Diego Laynez (Jaime Lainez) as Superior General.

Pope Paul IV died in August of 1559 and he was succeeded by Giovanni Angelo de `Medici (Pope Pius IV).  In both cases, the Superior General of the Jesuits Diego Laynez aligned himself closely to the conduct of the pontiff, proving to be virtually untouchable.

However, when Medici Pope Pius IV tortured and murdered Benedetto Accolti the Younger and other members of the papal families in what was called a conspiracy against him, Cardinal Borgia acted and Pius IV was poisoned and killed December 9, 1565.  A few days later, the Superior General Diego Laynez suffered the same fate and immediately after Cardinal Francis Borgia was unanimously elected as the third Superior General. ~ SouthEast Asian Water And Power Alliance

Francis Borgia, 4th Duke of Gandía was born in Duchy of Gandía, Valencia, on 28 October 1510.  His father was Juan Borgia, 3rd Duke of Gandía, the son of Giovanni Borgia, the son of Pope Alexander VI (Rodrigo Borgia).  His mother was Juana, daughter of Alonso de Aragón, Archbishop of Zaragoza, who, in turn, was the illegitimate son of King Ferdinand II of Aragon.^[1]  His brother, Tomás de Borja y Castro, also became a clergyman, becoming the Bishop of Málaga, and later the Archbishop of Zaragoza. ~ Wikipedia

The daughter of Ferdinand II was Catherine of Aragon, the wife of Henry VIII.  Her inability to give Henry a male heir instead caused him to give birth to the “Church of England” when his request for the marriage to be annulled was denied by Pope Clement VII.  She was pushed aside in favor of Anne Boleyn but not before giving birth to daughter Mary.

The greatest thing Henry ever created was Edward VI.  Along with Oliver Cromwell, they were perhaps the only true Protestants ever to hold power anywhere in the world.  Consequently, Edward was murdered before reaching maturity.  He chose his cousin Lady Jane Grey over his half-sister Mary but Mary was able to steal power in a coup.  She had Lady Jane murdered and then went on a bloody rampage, burning almost 300 English Protestants at the stake earning her the moniker “Bloody Mary”.

Was this why Tolkien’s returning king hero was named “Aragorn”? ~ MIG MAG

• Commit a heinous, unspeakable crime using agents of treason within your own institutions.
• Use those institutions to cover up the crime with a ludicrous official story for mass consumption.
• Allow a carefully-selected “hero” to disclose a partial admonition of the truth which outs key players but never the figure behind the curtain (Rome).
• Give the hero minimal coverage, victimize him but later lionize him along with the victims in the crime.

The “Great Depression” of the 1930s was just such an example, on the heels of a previous example, “World War I”: both of which were completely unnecessary, mass crimes against humanity by the Luciferian Elite.

…the American Branch of the Knights of Malta was established in 1927.  This was one year before the Company created Opus Dei (another international Brotherhood dedicated to the restoration of the Pope’s Temporal Power and the Dark Ages) in Spain and two years before the Knights caused the Great Depression, which in effect made the Jesuits’ Federal Reserve Bank the financial monopoly of the American Empire created in 1868.  This was five years before they attempted to make FDR a fascist dictator who, as President, formally recognized Jesuit-trained Joseph Stalin’s bloody government.  This enabled the American Knights, in control of the Empire’s Military Industrial Complex, to aid the Russian nights in building the Military Industrial Complex of the Jesuits’ Soviet Empire. …

By 1914 the Jesuits were now ready to begin their vengeance – the Second Thirty Years’ War – on a Europe, Russia, China and Japan having banished the Company “forever” from their shores.  The Order would use the Federal Reserve Bank, their financial “Frankenstein,” to pay for it.  The “Fed” was given the exclusive privilege to create credit with no collateral, that is, “out of thin air.”  Like the Bolshevik Revolution – also financed by the Fed – the Jesuits would use their Masonic Jewish Zionists such as Paul Warburg (yearning to rebuild Solomon’s Temple) as the visible leaders of the Fed.  This would enable the Order to justify American anti-Jewish fury at the later date in the person of the ex-Basilian (secret Jesuit) radio-priest, Charles E. Coughlin, “the father of hate radio.”  Being the personal friend of J. Edgar Hoover and FDR, he would blame the Jews for the Order’s Great Depression and the New Deal, calling it “the Jew Deal.” …

The Jesuits waited from 1913 to 1929 to make a virtual monopoly out of their “Frankenstein Fed.”  The Great Depression put all the smaller banks out of business and made the Federal Reserve Bank “lord of all.”  And who caused the Great Depression?  According to FDR’s son-in-law, Curtis Dall, it was the Knight of Malta, Joseph P. Kennedy.  We read:

“The feeling around the Street, in succeeding months, was that there were, in particular, three large short-sellers of stock, allegedly, Tom Bragg, Ben Smith, and Joe Kennedy … Of the three mentioned well-known short-sellers, Joe Kennedy was allegedly the most important, the most powerful and the most successful.  This service … made him invaluable … Was Joe Kennedy carefully selected by world money leaders to sell short?”^{12}

~ Vatican Assassins⁵

If you’re a listener to Resistance Rising then you know that “Eric Phelps” sows his excellent information with race-baiting and Jesuit doctrines because he is an incognito Jesuit priest.

“Eric” just happens to be the ultimate example of the Jesuit disinformation game; because he gives a very high percentage of sound, secret knowledge before adding disinformation or distraction, he is not allowed mainstream coverage and he knows his place—which is why he did his best to muddy up his book Vatican Assassins with poor technique.

It’s a good habit to check anyone’s citations or references but especially if you believe them to be an agent of disinformation.

Fortunately for truth-seekers (unfortunately for America), citing Franklin Roosevelt’s son-in-law as source for Joe Kennedy being chosen to take down the Stock Market is accurate—

After confidence was duly shaken, on October 24, 1929, the destruction had to be made deeper, so that the insiders could ultimately reap a substantial harvest before the signal was given for the beginning of operation “reacquisition”.

Of course, it would be most important for us to learn who called the “play” of October 24, 1929.  Probably the actual date was accidental, though the month was evidently selected for the sudden withdrawal of the normal supply of credit.  My guess is that “the signal” came from abroad.  Obviously, much informed selling and short-selling of stocks came before the actual Crash itself, as well as after it, on rallies.  The feeling around the Street, in succeeding months, was that there were, in particular, three large short-sellers of stock, allegedly, Tom Bragg, Ben Smith, and Joe Kennedy.

…Tom Bragg and Joe Kennedy allegedly operated through various large wire houses, chosen as to their location, thus making the sell orders appear as though coming from all over the country.  I saw Ben Smith, however, operate at the close range of five feet.  Of the three mentioned well-known short sellers, Joe Kennedy was allegedly the most important, the most powerful and the most successful.  This service, or operation, if such were the case, made him invaluable, but obviously controllable politically, to important -very important-world money people.  Was Joe Kennedy carefully selected by world money leaders to sell short?

Later on, when Ambassador Kennedy was stationed in London and made his famous “over my dead body” remark about this country not getting sucked into World War II, he was reportedly promptly recalled from his post in London, relegated to Florida for a while to cool off so as to reacquire the “correct” point of view.  He went to Florida.  By whom and why was his point of view re-oriented?  His judgment in London, as strongly expressed about our remaining aloof from the war, was sound. ~ FDR: My Exploited Father-in-Law, Curtis Bean Dall, Dubois Publishing (1967), pp. 119, 120

As a result of this mass-crime of financial enslavement, millions of Americans were devastated; not the least of which were veterans of the first “World War”.

When the traitors in the United States government began playing games with their wartime bonuses, they marched on Washington in 1932.  Not having a future, they built tents with the expectation of a prolonged fight.

The Elite were greatly annoyed by the protest but the soldiers had one, very special ally who showed up to encourage them: United States Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler.

Free Reign

In 1933, Prescott Bush co-ordinated with several large Wall Street firms and attempted a military coup against the Leftist Freemason Franklin Roosevelt.^340,341  It was lose/lose for America; Fascists if they win, Communists if they lose.  Unfortunately for the conspirators, they chose the wrong man for the job.

Major General Smedley D. Butler was the only Marine Corps officer to be awarded not one, but two Congressional Medals of Honor.  He had seen more than his fair share of bloodshed in the Banana Wars where Wall Street fruit interests used Marines to strong-arm themselves massive profits in

Central and South America. Butler wrote a blistering indictment of the profiteering which he delivered as a speech and later a 51-page pamphlet published by Round Table Press titled appropriately War Is A Racket in 1935.  His sentiments then easily read as if spoken by veterans today, broken and disenfranchised by the never-ending “War on Terror”—but only if you multiply Butler’s figures by several times.

The normal profits of a business concern in the United States are six, eight, ten, and sometimes twelve percent.  But war-time profits — ah! that is another matter — twenty, sixty, one hundred, three hundred, and even eighteen hundred per cent — the sky is the limit. …

Take our friends the du Ponts, the powder people…  They were a patriotic corporation.

…let’s look at their average yearly profit during the war years, 1914 to 1918. Fifty-eight million dollars a year profit we find! …  An increase in profits of more than 950 per cent. …

How many of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle?  How many of them dug a trench?  How many of them knew what it meant to go hungry in a rat-infested dug-out? …

But Major General Butler refused to be the front man for the coup against Roosevelt and in 1933 he turned informant on Prescott Bush and co-conspirators like Ambassador to the Soviet Union Averell Harriman (Skull and Bones class of 1913) who’s Guarantee Trust made profits off of both the Nazis and the Communists.

No action was taken. ~ Illuminati Unmasked ⁹

Unfortunately for the soldiers, the traitors in government owned the power of coercive force and they weren’t afraid to use it—especially given that the Praetorian Guard entrusted with that power had no scruples in breaking their oaths to protect and defend Constitutional freedom for the citizenry.

The marchers remained at their campsite waiting for Hoover to act.  On July 28, 1932, Attorney General William D. Mitchell ordered the police to remove the Bonus Army veterans from their camp.  When the veterans moved back into it, police drew their revolvers and shot at the veterans, two of whom, William Hushka and Eric Carlson, died later.^[11][12]

Hushka (1895– July 28, 1932) was an immigrant to the United States from Lithuania.  When the US entered World War I in 1917, he sold his butcher shop in St. Louis, Missouri and joined the United States Army.  After the war, he lived in Chicago.^[12]  Hushka is buried in Arlington National Cemetery.^{[citation needed]}

Carlson (1894 – August 2, 1932) was a US veteran from Oakland, California.  He fought in the trenches of France in World War I.^[12][13][14]  He was interred in Arlington National Cemetery.^[15] ~ Wikipedia

One would’ve expected that the horror of shedding innocent blood would’ve put an end to the government effort to uproot the veterans.

Not only were the murdering police not prosecuted, U.S. government traitors took their abuse to the next level.  They ordered Ararat Shriner Freemason General Douglas MacArthur to unleash Fort Howard’s 3^rd Calvary on the protestors.  MacArthur had an aggressive Regimental Commander who prized his personal advancement above his Oath

At 4:45 p.m., commanded by General Douglas MacArthur, the 12th Infantry Regiment, Fort Howard, Maryland, and the 3rd Cavalry Regiment, supported by six battle tanks commanded by Maj. George S. Patton, formed in Pennsylvania Avenue while thousands of civil service employees left work to line the street and watch.  The Bonus Marchers, believing the troops were marching in their honor, cheered the troops until Patton ordered^{[citation needed]} the cavalry to charge them, which prompted the spectators to yell, “Shame!  Shame!”^{[citation needed]}

After the cavalry charged, the infantry, with fixed bayonets and tear gas (adamsite, an arsenical vomiting agent) entered the camps, evicting veterans, families, and camp followers.  The veterans fled across the Anacostia River to their largest camp, and Hoover ordered the assault stopped.  MacArthur chose to ignore the president and ordered a new attack, claiming that the Bonus March was an attempt to overthrow the US government; 55 veterans were injured and 135 arrested.^[12]  A veteran’s wife miscarried.  When 12-week-old Bernard Myers died in the hospital after being caught in the tear gas attack, a government investigation reported he died of enteritis, and a hospital spokesman said the tear gas “didn’t do [him] any good.”^[16]

During the military operation, Major Dwight D. Eisenhower, later the 34th president of the United States, served as one of MacArthur’s junior aides.^[17]  Believing it wrong for the Army’s highest-ranking officer to lead an action against fellow American war veterans, he strongly advised MacArthur against taking any public role: “I told that dumb son-of-a-bitch not to go down there,” he said later.  “I told him it was no place for the Chief of Staff.”^[18]  Despite his misgivings, Eisenhower later wrote the Army’s official incident report that endorsed MacArthur’s conduct.^[19] ~ Wikipedia

It is no coincidence that all three “yes men” played a significant role in the next World War.  Unfortunately for George Patton, he played his role a little too well and repeatedly denied orders to stop winning.  Because of his hesitation in obeying treason, he was ordered killed by the Papal Knight of Malta who founded the “Office of Strategic Services”, William Donovan.

Bread & Circuses

An alteration of the game has just been played upon us recently and claimed to have been the “democratic” election of United State President.

A Jesuit-educated clown named Donald John Trump has been elevated to take the baton from the Teleprompter-in-Chief.

He is yet another sick Roman joke on the American people.

Trump has done everything from body-block Vince McMahon and shave his head at a WWE event to shoving his face into the fake breasts of the Roman Catholic cross-dressing Mayor of New York City, Rudolph Giuliani (the Roman gate-keeper on guard in NYC during the treason that was 9/11).

With America’s other “choice” being a vicious Communist serial criminal, Hillary Rodham Clinton (also carefully controlled by Rome), millions were goaded into making Trump their savior.

It was a sad, sick, spectacle and continues to be.

As part of her military conquest by Rome, America has been inundated by tens of millions of illegal alien Hispanic Roman Catholic immigrants for generations.  Both captured, controlled political parties continue to enable the self-destruction of wide-open borders proving that all in leadership are seditious agents of a foreign enemy.

Although Trump has been sure to grand-stand the issue (careful to needlessly fan the flames of racial hatred in the process), he will no-sooner “close the borders” than Barack Obama closed the terrorist-indoctrinating torture facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba (our supposed enemy).  It was a key promise made by the 2008 Obama campaign.

Guantanamo Bay is still going strong, taking innocent Muslims and torturing them until they willingly choose to help continue the Papacy’s fraudulent “War on Terror” as enemy terrorists.

These crimes are made possible by keeping the facility off U.S. soil in the Jesuit-controlled stronghold of Cuba.  Fidel Castro has been a loyal Catholic Communist, carefully trained by the Jesuits which is why the CIA has been “unable” (unwilling) to overthrow him and his criminal cartel family for over 50 years.

Trump recently breathed a sigh of relief at not being called on his bluff to “send them all home”.

The Republican Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan, was quick to make a statement after Trump’s “election” that there would not be any action taken on the Rome’s army of illegal Catholic “voters”.

Ryan is a Roman Catholic and former altar boy who, according to the Wall Street Journal, has Roman roots that “reach deep”.  He took over from Jesuit-educated (Xavier ‘77) Republican John Boehner who rubber-stamped each and every self-destructive Democrat agenda from socialized medicine to the national debt—now at a treasonous, nation-killing $19,000,000,000,000.

Boehner took over from his “political opponent”, Nancy Pelosi, carefully kissing her while taking the gavel.  Pro-homosexual, pro-abortion, “anti-war” (but not really) Pelosi was also trained by a Jesuit; Stephen J. Privett, President of the University of San Francisco.

Being unable to oust Fidel is in stark contrast to how the CIA treated its Commander in Chief in 1963, John F. Kennedy.

Only the most gullible believe that Lee Oswald shot the 35^th President of the United States.

Mountains of evidence can be summarized by the brutality of the 8mm film taken by Abraham Zapruder which shows the fatal shot coming from Kennedy’s front, knocking his head “back and to the left” and taking off a large portion of Kennedy’s skull and brain with the exit of the round.  Jackie is then seen attempting to recover her husband’s flesh from the trunk of the Presidential limousine.

Oswald said it, himself, “I’m just a patsy.”

The freezing of communications during the assassination, changing the route to include the stop and slow turn down Elm Street through Dealey Plaza, waiving off security assistance from the Army’s 112^th Military Intelligence out of nearby Fort Sam Houston or ordering select Secret Service agents to stand down—

What Americans need to understand is that their own institutions are their greatest enemy and those of “Intelligence” and “Law Enforcement” or “Justice” are the most ironically corrupt.

The FBI’s role in colluding with the CIA to murder Jack Kennedy is an excellent example.

Federal Bureau of Obfuscation

With good reason was the FBI a willing partner in the public slaughter of President John F. Kennedy.  Like the CIA, they don’t work for the American people and never did.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation was created by Charles Joseph Bonaparte, a distant relation to French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte.²⁵³

Bonaparte was from Lord Baltimore’s Catholic colony of Mary-land, from the very namesake city of her benefactor.  The Jesuits were in the business of gathering intelligence on their enemies and the FBI would do that in spades.  They readily admit the origins of their creator from their own “about us”, though with only a short phrase amongst his “accomplishments”.

As a Catholic [Bonaparte] was never absent from his pew in Baltimore Cathedral on Sunday mornings…²⁵⁴

But soon, the FBI would metastasize into far worse than just an intelligence-gathering operation and graduate into actually facilitating disasters and helping to cover them up once they occurred.

In his review of the book Pretty Boy Floyd²⁵⁵, NY Times critic Sidney Zion reminds us of how the FBI quietly chose to ignore the big criminal interests that were destroying America and focus on the sensationalized banditos robbing a single bank here and there—even to the extreme of telling the American public, “There’s no such thing as ‘organized crime’.”

…after his G-men cut down John Dillinger outside the Biograph movie house in Chicago, J. Edgar Hoover elevated Charles Arthur (Pretty Boy) Floyd to Dillinger’s exalted position as Public Enemy No. 1, catapulting him over such bank-robbing peers as Baby Face Nelson, Machine Gun Kelly and Ma Barker and her sons.

In the summer of 1934, the following candidates failed to make Mr. Hoover’s F.B.I. hit parade: Meyer Lansky, Lucky Luciano, Bugsy Siegel, Frank Costello, Owney Madden, Lepke Buchalter, Gurrah Shapiro, Dutch Schultz, Albert Anastasia, Tommy Lucchese, Joe Profaci, Moe Dalitz—to name just a few of the lads who ran organized crime in the United States.

It was Hoover’s genius to play up the hick bandits who roamed the sticks, living off pathetically unsecured banks, while ignoring the men who ran America’s rackets.  Intent on setting himself up as the Godfather of law enforcement, Hoover understood that to tangle with the mob was a prescription for failure, for it inevitably meant taking on the big-city political bosses and the labor unions, those bedrocks of the New Deal.  During the Depression, nobody but the mobsters seemed to have the cash so badly needed by the pols.²⁵⁶

Zion explains this away as a practical necessity for the FBI—the United States government was afraid to do its job and go after the Mafia.

The reality is that the FBI was doing the bidding of a higher authority.

Italian blogger Piazza del Popolo points us towards a helpful source.

According to Maria Antoinetta Calabro’ in her book “Le Mani Della Mafia” (The Hands of the Mafia), for decades the Sicilian Mafia and its American counterparts used the Vatican bank, known as IOR (Institute for Religious Works) to launder its money.²⁵⁷

Missing Evidence

Whenever there has been a tragedy of political significance, the FBI immediately shows up, not to investigate, but to cover up any wrongdoing that traces back to traitors in the United States government. ~ Illuminati Unmasked, Johnny Cirucci, CreateSpace (2015), pp. 70-71

As far as Hoover was concerned, local dice games were far more dangerous to the American people!

The story that was later concocted as to why J. Edgar would spend decades denying that the Vatican’s criminal friends in organized crime even existed was because he was a sexual deviant and the Mafia had the goods on him.

Of course Hoover being a homosexual cross-dresser is true.  He promoted his “friend” Clyde Tolson to Associate Director where he stayed for forty-two years.

Wikipedia states that Tolson was “primarily responsible for personnel and discipline.”

Right.

It has been stated that J. Edgar Hoover described Tolson as his alter ego: “They rode to and from work together, ate lunch together, traveled together on official business, and even vacationed together.”^[10] ~ [ibid]

Sexual perversion is a prerequisite in the halls of power.

The FBI would play a key role in covering up the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and the men used by the CIA were all sexual deviants, as was found out by New Orleans Parish District Attorney Earling Caruthers “Jim” Garrison.

It is not well known, but at that point Garrison was firmly believing that the whole plot was a gay-based plot, with the motive being what he called “thrill killing.”  This is astounding, but it is based on multiple credible sources. James Phelan was a journalist who in the early days of Garrison’s case had written a positive article for the Saturday Evening Post. As a result Garrison invited him in to give him an “exclusive” story about the investigation.  The following jaw-dropping excerpt from Phelan’s book, Scandals, Scamps and Scoundrels, lays out Garrison’s primary theory at the time:

In an effort to get Garrison’s story into focus, I asked him the motive of the Kennedy conspirators.  He told me that the murder at Dallas had been a homosexual plot.

“They had the same motive as Loeb and Leopold, when they murdered Bobbie Franks in Chicago back in the twenties,” Garrison said.  “It was a homosexual thrill-killing, plus the excitement of getting away with a perfect crime. John Kennedy was everything that Dave Ferrie was not — a successful, handsome, popular, wealthy, virile man.  You can just picture the charge Ferrie got out of plotting his death.”

I asked how he had learned that the murder was a homosexual plot.

“Look at the people involved,” Garrison said. “Dave Ferrie, homosexual.  Clay Shaw, homosexual.  Jack Ruby, homosexual.”

“Ruby was a homosexual?”

“Sure, we dug that out,” Garrison said.  “His homosexual nickname was Pinkie.  That’s three.  Then there was Lee Harvey Oswald.”

But Oswald was married and had two children, I pointed out.

“A switch-hitter who couldn’t satisfy his wife,” Garrison said.  “That’s all in the Warren Report.”  He named two more “key figures” whom he labeled homosexual.  “That’s six homosexuals in the plot,” Garrison said.  “One or maybe two, okay.  But all six homosexual?  How far can you stretch the arm of coincidence?”

So Lee Harvey Oswald was gay.  Jack Ruby was gay.  The conspirators in the killing were all gay.  The biggest crime of the century was entirely gay based.  Phelan’s take is corroborated by many others, including Life Magazine reporter Richard Billings, who was in Garrison’s inner circle at the time, and kept detailed notes of their conversations.

At some point along the way the “thrill-killing” theory was replaced by a theory based around right-wing zealots and CIA operatives.  It appears that occurred as left wing conspiracy theorists descended on New Orleans after the case became public and convinced Garrison to change his focus. ~ The Gay Angle In the JFK Assassination, Dennis Stone, 26 November 2013, The New Millennial Gay Experience

Clay Shaw was a key figure who tied it all together; a flawed sexual deviant who compensated with fanatical devotion to the Catholic ruse of “fighting Commies”.  As Army Intelligence stationed in Italy during World War II, Shaw was just the man the Jesuits could use to commit high treason.

Jim Garrison found¹⁰ Shaw had been on the board of Centro Mondiale Commerciale, a subdivision Permindex—a stock-holding front company for clandestine operations for Western Intelligence like the CIA.  CMC was based in Rome while Permindex was based in Switzerland.  Switzerland also happens to be where the Templars went underground after being suppressed in 1307.

French Canadian author Maurice Philipps has asserted that Rome, not New Orleans, was the location from which the murder of America’s 35^th President was planned and carried out.

Since April 2010, I have posted on this forum documents that I have unearthed from the Louis M. Bloomfield Archives held by Library and Archives Canada (LAC).  Those documents dealing with Permindex were posted under a “Louis Mortimer Bloomfield” thread (Louis M. Bloomfield thread) that was started in 2006 at a time where I shared with members of The Education Forum the news relating to the legal battle I engaged with LAC and the Canadian government in order to make the Louis M. Bloomfield [case] opened.

Today, I’m starting this new Bloomfield, Permindex and the CIA thread because I believe that the JFK assassination researchers should take a new look at the Permindex issue under the enlightening information contained in the E. Howard Hunt death bed confession.  At a first level, Hunt’s confession pointed a finger at President Johnson and Cord Meyer, but what may be the more interesting piece of information from Hunt is his description of the operational aspect of the JFK conspiracy, in which he implicated William Harvey, who in 1963 was Chief of CIA station in Rome, the city where Permindex and Centro Mondiale Commerciale (CMC) were located.

E. Howard Hunt, who also specified that Bill Harvey organized the assassination from Rome and hired Corsican sharpshooters, was thus giving us an important missing link necessary to understand how an Italian corporation as Permindex could be related to the JFK conspiracy. As of now, only Clay Shaw could be related to this Italian company since he was a member of CMC directorship.

Documents found in the Bloomfield Archives gave us more details on the structure and leadership of Permindex.  For instance, they show that Ferenc Nagy was the active leader of Permindex and, in 1960, was making contact with David Rockefeller in order to develop the New York City’s World Trade Center on the model of the CMC.

When we combine the E. H. Hunt’s revelation, the information form the Bloomfield archives and some little known documents released by NARA under the JFK documents program, we start to sketch a coherent picture in which the JFK assassination seems to be carried by (rogue?) members of the CIA [no, and Philipps did well to be equivocal there] using Permindex as part of the Italian Gladio network put in place to combat Soviet Communism. ~ The Educational Forum

But New Orleans was an important location for a different reason.

Jim Garrison was the only law enforcement official to question the Warren Report.  He was humiliated and had his reputation besmirched but his career didn’t suffer, although his marriage did.

Garrison is reputed to have abused his wife, whose maiden name was Leah Elizabeth Ziegler, and they divorced in 1980 only to remarry just five months before Garrison’s death in 1992 at 71 of an unnamed cancer.  Garrison lived long enough to play Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren in Oliver Stone’s movie JFK.

The Garrison of Stone’s movie was a lone seeker of justice standing courageously in the face of the full weight of a treasonous American government…but was he?

As I’ve shown you conclusively in Illuminati Unmasked, at the top of the pyramid of evil is the Vatican run and empowered by her satanic special forces, the Jesuits.  Below her are many powerful organizations from the Mafia to Freemasonry to the Central Intelligence Agency and many others.  It seems unusual that a District Attorney could track Clay Shaw  to Rome but only see a CIA connection.

It seems even more so that Garrison would be the District Attorney of Orleans Parish and not have connections in the Catholic Church.

New Orleans was founded by Canadian Jean-Baptiste Le Moyne, also known as “Sieur de Bienville”.

Le Moyne was 4 times governor of Louisiana although one must dig very deep to see that he was also an “enthusiastic supporter” of the Company of Loyola.⁹⁸ ~ Secret History, Johnny Cirucci, CreateSpace (2016), p. 129

What was Jim Garrison before he was DA?  —He was a Special Agent for the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Seattle.

Coincidence?

Of course the FBI is a massive organization that needs the majority of its employees to believe the lie that it truly serves the American people.  Only special, well-placed insiders organize and commit murder to cover up treason—

Rachel Maddow Admits the FBI Made a ”Mess” Executing Ibragim Todashev from Johnny Cirucci on Vimeo.

But Jim Garrison wasn’t an FBI administrator, he was a Special Agent who became District Attorney in a city extremely important to the Papacy—one tied to both the Vatican’s murder of Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy.¹¹

What’s even more damning is that Garrison continued to be a good Company man in regards to the FBI’s ludicrous stance on organized crime—that it doesn’t exist.

More than one source has stated that was because Garrison was in bed with that same non-existent organized crime.

Garrison’s New Orleans was a hotbed of illegal, covert paramilitary operations where corruption, disguise and deception had produced an intelligence cottage industry.  In the 1960’s, it was the city where the Mafia, anti-Castro exiles and self-styled intelligence spooks joined hands to celebrate what they called their patriotic bonds and to condemn their common enemies—Castro, Communists, Liberals…

Entrenched interests dominated the order of the day.  In particular, New Orleans was a mature organized crime haven, where political campaign contributions and outright bribery insulated Mafia bosses like Carlos Marcello.  In the final analysis, the power source of the city that made its own rules and regulations as it went along, was the cozy relationship between Mob Lords like Carlos Marcello and high ranking law enforcement officials like Jim Garrison.

Unaccountable corruption is probably the most common feature of the politics of the 1960’s in New Orleans.  Mobsters like Carlos Marcello relied upon “the Fix” or the working relationship between public officials and the Mafia and they were accustomed to sharing power.  The sheer audacity of “the Fix” is absolutely astounding.  When the Kennedy Justice Department targeted Jimmy Hoffa, the Mafia responded through the Governor of Louisiana, who set up a meeting where the mob offered the key prosecution witness one million dollars to change his testimony.  It was a desperate, foolish bribe which was prompted and ultimately exposed, only because a series of dynamite explosions failed to murder targeted witness.  In the face of such violent, blatant corruption, the fact that powerful Mafia Bosses like Carlos Marcello survived criminal prosecution in the 1960’s, is astounding and illuminating.  In 1967, Life Magazine printed the following account of the Mob Lord: “He [Marcello] operates through a complex of political Fixes which enable him to control the makers and enforcers of law at every level of state government.”  Friends in high places were clearly responsible for the lapse in American justice, which saw the power of Marcello grow despite press scrutiny and astute Louisiana newcomers like Aaron Kohn identified the peculiar flavour of New Orleans “politicking” when he said: “After about a year, I began to realize something about the system here.  In Chicago, people were generally on one side of the fence or the other—honest or crooked.  But in Louisiana there just isn’t any fence”.  Jim Garrison, who was elected District Attorney in 1962, embodied the fact that “the fence” had been dismantled when he falsely claimed that the Mafia did not exist despite his association with Marcello’s henchman, Mario Marino, who operated the Sands Hotel in Las Vegas.  Garrison routinely accepted the hospitality of the Mafia and instead of cutting off his indebtedness, he said: “I may be naive—this is my first public office—but I don’t see what’s wrong with it”.  Frequent meetings between Garrison investigator Pershing Gervais and Carlos Marcello, further cemented the fact that in New Orleans, business was transacted in cooperation with the Marcello Mafia.  Like J. Edgar Hoover, Jim Garrison responded to Life Magazine disclosures by using the power of his office to manufacture the impression that organized crime did not exist. …

In the final analysis, Jim Garrison was essentially J. Edgar Hoover’s clone in New Orleans. ~ Jim Garrison & Carlos Marcello: Hoover’s Enforcers, Mat Wilson¹²

Wilson is not the only one claiming Garrison had Mafia ties.

In September, 1967, Richard Billings told Garrison that Life Magazine was no longer willing to work with him in the investigation.  Billings claimed that this was because he had come to the conclusion that he had links to organized crime.  Soon afterwards, Life began a smear campaign against Garrison.  It was reported that Garrison had been given money by an unnamed “New Orleans mobster”. ~ Jim Garrison, John Simkin, Spartacus Educational.com, September 1997

It created the perfect quagmire of questions and an easy avenue from which to attack the most important part of Jim Garrison’s investigation and, later, Oliver Stone’s movie JFK.

“Jim Garrison attacked the FBI to cover for his Mafia benefactors.”

The truth is that the Mafia played almost no role in the murder of John F. Kennedy.  Garrison and Stone get it impeccably right but stop well short of the most important question: who is at the top of this conspiracy?

Oliver Stone’s JFK used material from Jim Garrison, “investigative journalist” Jim Marrs and apparent whistleblower Leroy Fletcher Prouty.  The movie completely skipped over any Vatican connections and even attempted to give the Papacy an implied clean bill of health by pushing the idea that David Ferrie was defrocked immediately upon clergy perceiving that he was homosexual.

The epidemic of pedophile priests in America, and the sickening criminal behavior of their superiors carefully shielding them and even moving them to new dioceses where they could continue to prey upon innocent children clearly disproves that angle.

It is more likely that Ferrie was seen to be of greater use in intelligence than the priesthood and his path was carefully manipulated to turn out that way.

Temple Professor of English Joan Mellen is an ardent supporter of Jim Garrison and his legacy.

Like all professors, she apparently has plenty of time to write over 20 books, many of them about the turbulent 60s.

Professor Joan seems as oblivious of the role the Vatican and the Jesuits have played in politics then and now as Oliver Stone, Jim Marrs and L. Fletcher Prouty.

Like all of those other names, she presents well-researched work that ends up being disinformation by omission.

One would think it impossible to write about Jim Garrison, Haiti or the Columbian writer Gabriel Garcı́a Márquez without writing the word “Jesuit” but Professor Mellen manages it well.

The cesspool of Haiti was made possible only by the Jesuits.  Haitian President from 1991 to 2004 Jean-Bertrand Aristide was an ardent supporter of “liberation theology”.  He learned the Jesuit doctrine while he was a Jesuit priest (although this is being re-written to make him a “Salesian” priest).  Thanks to their hard work, Haitian children are sold for slave labor or sex slaves (and for little money).

Like Oliver Stone and Jim Marrs, Joan Mellen acknowledged the human disaster in Haiti at the hands of the CIA but that was all.

“Liberation theology” and “social justice” are Jesuit doctrines that exploit the greed of the very Elite the Vatican installed.  In constant turmoil and civil war, Rome and her minions prosper.

Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler, the only Marine officer twice-awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor, figured out how he and the American military were used in just this way—

I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time.  Now I am sure of it.  Like all the members of the military profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service.  My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups.  This is typical with everyone in the military service.

I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914.  I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in.  I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street.  The record of racketeering is long.  I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912 (where have I heard that name before?).  I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916.  In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested. ~ War is a Racket

Each and every one of those areas was first seeded by the inversely-named “Society of Jesus”.

Perhaps the most glaring omission of the Vatican’s handiwork for Joan Mellen is her biography on Gabriel Garcı́a Márquez.  Márquez was a Jesuit-trained enabler of Catholic Communism and a personal friend of Fidel Castro.

Like Garrison’s On the Trail of the Assassins or Stone’s JFK, Mellen’s book A Farewell to Justice: Jim Garrison, JFK’s Assassination, and the Case That Should Have Changed History is at least an excellent source for destroying the ridiculous Warren Commission Report.

There is no doubt that former Catholic priest David Ferrie was the bridge between the Mafia and the CIA.

Dave had flown Carlos Marcello back to New Orleans after Robert Kennedy had him deported.  Prior to that, Ferrie had traveled to Guatemala to arrange a false passport for Marcello; returning to New Orleans, Ferrie had taped this passport to his chest.  When Eastern Airlines fired Ferrie because of his police record, redolent of crimes against nature, his attorney had been a Carlos Marcello lawyer, G. Wray Gill.  Dave was paying Gill back by working on the Marcello case, which was heard on November 22, 1963.

It was Ferrie’s political affiliations that interested Jim Garrison.  Ferrie had flown for the CIA as a contract pilot, taking off from Tampa, the Keys and Venice, Florida, in sabotage missions: he burned sugarcane fields, dropped propaganda leaflets, and infiltrated and exfiltrated anti-Castro activists.  His handler was Eladio del Valle, a mob-connected Cuban exile, who was also involved in setting up training camps to wage war against Castro.  Del Valle paid Ferrie between $1,000 and $1,500 a mission, missions tracked by Cuban intelligence.  Ferrie also flew for South Central Air Lines, a CIA proprietary.  Ferrie’s CIA employment has been confirmed by ex-CIA employee Victor Marchetti.  By 1959, U.S. Customs had put David Ferrie under twenty-four-hour surveillance.

On occasion, Ferrie flew with another CIA contract pilot named E. Carl McNabb, who would later join Jim Garrison’s investigation in an attempt to redeem a murderous past.  One day they arrived at the School of the Americas in the Panama Canal Zone, a joint project of Robert Kennedy and the CIA for training of the Latin American military.  McNabb met with some resistance.  Dave walked in as if he owned the place.

“I didn’t know your security clearance was so high,” McNabb laughed, a light glittering in his ice-blue eyes. … ~ A Farewell to Justice¹³

However, neither Garrison, Stone nor Mellen seemed able to make the connection of why it all came together in “Orleans Parish”—the heart of Louisiana French Roman Catholicism.

It wasn’t from lack of evidence.

Somewhat more honest, at least, Mellen’s account acknowledges much more about Jack Martin than other sources.

Martin was much more than just hired help for private dick Guy Bannister.  Like all the other players in the drama, Martin was a sexual deviant, a criminal, a “religious fanatic”, and an operative for the Central Intelligence Agency.

Jack Martin had a scar on his chin, chain-smoked and subsisted on bad coffee.  He seemed a broken-down, harmless individual, a hanger-on.  A would-be journalist, he had worked for the Westbank Herald, a right-wing paper owned by a Major Stewart, who bore intelligence ties to Latin America.  In 1958 Guy Banister had been publisher.  Jack also worked for Banister as a sometime private eye, describing himself as “a con man who has stayed just within the law.”  He had mysterious access to police records, information he peddled.  Like David Ferrie, he was a religious zealot, belonging to the same “church.”  Martin was, Robert Buras says, “a type of Ferrie,” both men “highly intelligent.”

Jack Martin also bore a checkered criminal history.  He had been caught in a crime against nature with a homosexual named “Mona Lisa,” and had a police record ranging from disturbing the peace, vagrancy and drunkenness to a 1952 murder charge in Houston, Texas, which had miraculously vanished.  Despite all this, Martin was on a first-name basis with Senator Russell Long and enjoyed access to the office of Attorney General Jack P. F. Gremillion.  Jack could get you a letter certifying you were an honorary attorney general of the state of Louisiana.  Yet on the instructions of Plaquemines Parish czar Leander Perez, Martin had filed a petition to disqualify Gremillion as a candidate for reelection.

In November of 1963, Jack Martin’s business card read, “Martin, Newbrough & Dalzell, Private Investigations.”  The telephone number rang through at Guy Banister’s detective agency, even as Banister’s own intelligence connections ranged from the expected FBI to the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) and CIA.  William Dalzell was a CIA operative, as was Joseph Newbrough, a steady asset of the Domestic Contact Service, which in New Orleans also supervised the clandestine services.  Newbrough was close to another CIA figure shortly to enter this story, Fred Lee Crisman.  Dalzell’s criminal charges had disappeared in a manner similar to Martin’s.  He had joined the Agency in the early fifties, a cryptologist with a “top secret” clearance, and was acquainted with David Ferrie.  In New Orleans, CIA and FBI shared information about Dalzell.

Almost from the start Jim Garrison had come to believe that Lee Harvey Oswald was not observed with anyone who was not connected with the Central Intelligence Agency.  Garrison’s own witnesses were equally Agency-involved.  His instincts were correct, although he never learned that Jack Martin, his first

real witness, not only sewed with military intelligence, but was himself a former CIA employee.  Jack’s real name was Suggs.  His close intelligence ties he kept hidden.  At one point Martin became hysterical at the thought that a television reporter had his photograph.  “There are no photographs of me!” Jack insisted.*

John J. Martin was a low-ranking intelligence assistant.  He joined the Agency in November of 1950 and left supposedly in June of 1958 on a “disability retirement.”  He had been a GS-7 in the Transportation Branch, Services Division.  Like David Ferrie, his rival and nemesis in matters ecclesiastical, Martin had been born in Cleveland, in 1913.  Ferrie was born in 1918.

What emerges from the record is that Jack Martin never left the Agency.  In New Orleans, Martin was assigned to a young man named Thomas Edward Beckham, in a manner similar to Ferrie’s relationship with Lee Oswald.  Beckham was to notice that Martin had in his possession a variety of police credentials, and often posed as a police officer.

In Louisville, Martin had worked for “Echo Blue,” a publication of the Fraternal Order of Police, where he also came to know Archbishop Carl Stanley.  In New Orleans, Martin still carried “numerous police commissions,” making it his business to spy on other policemen.  The “S” in the New Orleans name of Jack S. Martin stood for “Suggs,” Stanley told the FBI.  But it was the same man he knew as John J. Martin.

Stanley created churches.  He raised funds and mixed in politics, and John J. Martin had requested that Stanley consecrate him as a bishop to go to Cuba.  He admitted to Stanley that he worked for the CIA and saw to it that Stanley did not promote David Ferrie in his quest to become a bishop. … ¹⁴

Whenever anyone is found to be a “religious zealot” serious investigators or law-men immediately ask the extremely important question of “which religion?”

If mentioned at all, we are told that Martin and Ferrie were members of the “American Orthodox Catholic Church”—an offshoot of Orthodoxy, not Roman Catholicism.

How or why David Ferrie—Jesuit-educated in both high school and college,¹⁵ and a former Roman Catholic seminarian¹⁶—made the switch to an unknown sect of Orthodoxy to become a priest and perhaps even a bishop seemed of no importance to any involved.

Orthodoxy, like Anglicanism, is, itself, an offshoot of Roman Catholicism and adherents move seamlessly between the two just as agents of the Papacy like the Jesuits easily infiltrate them.  Like Freemasonry or supposed “non-Catholic” secret societies like Skull and Bones, Orthodox operatives and assets give Rome plausible deniability.

Mellen’s cryptic statement that Jack Martin was David Ferrie’s “rival and nemesis in matters ecclesiastical” also goes unexplained.

But a man with a CIA pedigree who has murder charges “disappeared” on his behalf was certainly someone a District Attorney needed to look into—especially if he claimed he had information regarding the assassination of a sitting President.

Jim Garrison knew enough to listen to Jack Martin, then verify his facts.  Almost always, unless he intended it otherwise, what Jack Martin told you checked out.  One day Martin had invited Joe Newbrough to meet him at nine A.M. at a coffee shop.  While Newbrough, “the fat man,” ate his hearty breakfast, and Jack sipped his bad coffee, a limousine pulled up.  Suddenly Newbrough saw Carlos Marcello being hustled off.  It was the day Marcello was deported, and Jack had foreknowledge of the kidnapping of the Mafia don engineered by Robert Kennedy.

In 1971, when Jim Garrison was arrested for allegedly accepting bribes from pinball gambling interests and was driven to the Wild Life and Fisheries building for booking, at the front of a crowd of spectators stood that man who always knew what was happening in New Orleans.

“They had to frame a case on the DA!” Jack Martin called out loudly.  “How about that!”  Then Martin led the crowd in applause.  “Let’s hear it for the DA!” Martin shouted.

States-Item reporter Hoke May, himself a CIA asset, and for whom Jack Martin was an entirely reliable source, concluded that Jack Martin had been badly discredited by the FBI on purpose, made to seem an alcoholic, a mental case and a person not to be taken seriously, when in fact he was entirely credible.¹⁷

Joe Newbrough was also a New Orleans dick with ties to the Central Intelligence Agency.

Lee Oswald was a mal-adjusted loner from a broken family.  Unable to relate to other people, women especially, it was easy for predators to prey upon him and that’s exactly what David Ferrie did (sadly, what many other Catholic priests have done, as well).

Ferrie would target boys and young men by impressing them with his CIA connections or self-inflated mystery regarding “missions” he was involved in, flying regularly to Communist Cuba.  This worked particularly well with the boys in his Civil Air Patrol unit.

He wound his tendrils around Oswald but after Lee had been targeted as the assassination patsy this caused problems for Ferrie.

Although Jim Garrison never learned about that loan granted to David Ferrie and cosigned by Clay Shaw, there was further evidence that persuaded him that Ferrie was connected to the assassination.  Jack Martin, during the weekend of the assassination, had said that when Oswald was arrested, he had Ferrie’s library card with him, information he could not have gleaned from New Orleans television.  When the FBI questioned Ferrie, he denied emphatically that he had loaned the card to Oswald.  “The card has never been out of my possession,” Ferrie said.  Then he wandered around town inquiring whether anyone knew about Oswald’s possessing his library card.  He asked Oswald’s neighbor, Mrs. Doris Eames, if she knew “whose library card Oswald had.”  He questioned Oswald’s landlady, Mrs. Lena Gamer: “They found my library card on Oswald,” Ferrie said.

Jim Garrison concluded that if there were no evidence linking a library card found on Oswald to Ferrie, the FBI would never have put the issue in its report.  If “Oswald had a library card on him bearing the name ‘George Washington,’ it would not be reasonable to state in an investigative report that David Ferrie denied lending his library card to Oswald.”  Later Garrison learned from a source that Ferrie’s library card had indeed been found on Oswald, “but has since been destroyed.”

Despite Ferrie’s denials, his CAP cadets reported that Oswald had been among them.  Ferrie, expecting protection from higher authority, was so bold as to name Jerry Paradis as willing to confirm that Oswald had not served under his command.  But in 1978, an attorney now, Paradis clearly remembered for the House Select Committee that Oswald and Ferrie were “in the unit together” at ten or fifteen meetings.  “I’m not saying that they may have been there together.  I’m saying it was a certainty.”¹⁸

Pulling loner or orphaned young men out of military service for use as tools in Intelligence wasn’t David Ferrie’s idea, it was a system used repeatedly by Roman traitors and continues to be.

The mirror tragedy was played out for another “Lee Harvey Oswald”—Timothy McVeigh—in a Roman treason even more heinous than the broad-daylight slaughter of a sitting President.  McVeigh was the patsy used for the despicable treason that was the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, that blamed the deaths of 168 victims, 19 of which were small children (15 having perished in the prophetically-named America’s Kids Day Care Center) on the politically-convenient enemies of Rome and Bill Clinton—supposedly “Constitutional Christians”.  For the details, see the author’s column, here.

Lee had time to kill during that steamy New Orleans September.  But you could relax at the Old Pontchartrain Beach amusement park, ride the ferris wheel, have a mechanical gypsy tell your fortune, or knock lead milk bottles off their stool with a ball.

Van Bums, a recent high school graduate, was in charge of the parakeet stand while he awaited Marine Corps boot camp.  You threw a nickel onto a plate and earned a free parakeet.  On the night in question, Van’s friend Bob Boylston wandered by in the company of two men.  Six months earlier, Bob had been inducted into the Army.  Now, surprisingly, he was out.  He mumbled something about the Civil Air Patrol.  Van would wonder later whether the man accompanying Bob Boylston that night had liberated him from the Army for some purpose.  The Civil Air Patrol interested Van Bums.  The fad among the cadets, he had learned, had switched from learning German to studying Russian.

Bob introduced Van to his companions.  One was an older man with odd hair.  His name was David Ferrie.  The other was named “Lee.”

“Lee, Lee Oswald,” he said.  He threw a few nickels at the plates, but missed.  He did not win a parakeet, a creature he had once bought for his mother out of the first money he ever earned.  He was in the Marine Corps, Lee told Van.  “In recon.”

“What do you do in recon?” Van said, genuinely interested.  Lee scowled.

“We take pictures,” Lee said finally, moving away toward the greyhound booth where Bob Boylston stood.  So among Oswald’s possessions after his death would be a Minox camera used for microdot work, an artifact of espionage.  “Possession of same in Eastern Europe is in itself sufficient to deny egress across borders,” one of Garrison’s anonymous leads states.

Boylston returned.  “He’s a great pilot,” he said, referring to Ferrie, who had wandered off.  “I know what you’re thinking,” Boylston said quickly to Bums.  “Maybe he is and maybe he isn’t.  But he’s never approached me.”  Ferrie in fact reserved his sexual advances for a select few of his acolytes.

Boylston confided that Lee traveled with him and Ferrie on flights to Cuba where Lee took pictures.  The three appeared to be so intimate as to seem to form a special clique, Van Bums thought.  When he learned of Jim Garrison’s investigation, he did not come forward with the information that he had seen Oswald and Ferrie together.

Bob Boylston did provide some information to Jim Garrison’s investigators.  He was close enough to Ferrie for Ferrie to have paid his Loyola University tuition, he said.  Ferrie had talked in 1961 of “secret orders” having to do with Cuba, of having been wounded and shot down on one of his flights.  Bob was in charge of CAP records, which were sent to Washington, but when Jim Garrison attempted to subpoena these records, he was told they did not exist.

Boylston also had told Van Bums of having gone to Dallas several times with Dave, and how Dave spoke of a “super-special army always ready to fight.”  Once he had driven Dave to the airport as Dave was headed for one of his trips to Cuba.  He must never talk about the training going on over the Lake, no matter what happens, Dave told Boylston.  “Even if ‘it’ didn’t go.”  They were “taking care of something,” something very serious.

From the mid-fifties, Ferrie kept in touch with Oswald.  In Russia as a false defector, Oswald wrote on a form that, should his first child be a boy, he was to be named “David Lee Oswald.”  The only “David” in his life was Ferrie.¹⁹

For a disaffected “Orthodox” priest, it was odd that Ferrie would shell out big money seemingly without strings to send another boy to a Jesuit University.

Another author corroborates this odd fact.

Robert Boylston told the HSCA that Ferrie gave him over a thousand dollars to attend Loyola University in New Orleans and never once asked for it back.²⁰

Did Ferrie have money to burn, or was this more of the Roman/Intelligence apparatus lusting continuously for vulnerable young men to be used and abused?

On July 27^th of 1963, Lee Oswald had an interesting engagement; 3 hours and 150 miles away from New Orleans, Oswald gave an “anti-Communist” speech at Jesuit Spring Hill seminary in Mobile Alabama.  It was quite an interesting thing to put so much effort into for the supposed Communist defector.  Just as unusual as the ease with which Oswald moved to the Soviet Union, attempted to give up his U.S. citizenship, lived extremely comfortably in Minsk, married the daughter of a well-placed Soviet Army Intelligence Colonel, and just as easily returned to the United States with his new wife Marina.

Such collusion between United States and Soviet Intelligence in the heat of the Cold War bespeaks of a higher power ordering them both.

How The Game Works

Although Garrison, Stone and Mellen have all carefully avoided the 800 lb. Jesuit in the room, they do so by delivering an extremely important part of the truth; how all of America’s major institutions—CIA, FBI, Executive Branch, politicians, judges and even local law enforcement—were all corrupt.  If they didn’t answer to the American people, who do they answer to and what explains why they are so poisonous to the best interests of the citizens they supposedly work for?

The answer is one word: Rome.

But because Garrison, Stone, Mellen and a few others like them prove that America’s major institutions are corrupt, even without answering “Why?” or “Who?” they needed to be discredited and attacked to mitigate their message.

One author who wasn’t as keen on Earling Caruthers “Jim” Garrison was Patricia Lambert.  She managed to hit Garrison hard with a particularly ugly accusation (and do it believably).

When he was at the pinnacle of his popularity and notoriety.  Garrison remarked on the forces out to sabotage his investigation.   The next charge he expected from them, he said, was that he engaged in “child molesting”¹⁵ Garrison probably was launching a preemptive strike with that remark.  He undoubtedly had reason to fear that such a charge might occur.  The wall of secrecy that shielded the dark side of Garrison’s personal life cracked in 1969 in the aftermath of just such an act involving a thirteen-year-old boy.  The boy’s family wanted to file charges but were warned that Garrison was unpredictable and would be an extremely dangerous adversary.  Aaron Kohn urged the family to prosecute.  But concern about the boy’s welfare and even his safety outweighed all else, and they took no action.  Kohn then gave the information to the grand jury and someone leaked the story to columnist Jack Anderson.  The grand jury foreman, William J. Krummel, Sr., confirmed off the record to Anderson that they were looking into it.  But, Krummel said, “I’m afraid that if I say so [in public], they’ll want to throw me in jail.”¹⁶  Krummel declined to be interviewed for this book: so what occurred in the grand jury’s investigation is unknown.  The family wisely decided to protect the boy and the grand jury could have done little without their assistance.

Jack Anderson personally spoke to the boy’s father, described in the column Anderson wrote as “a prominent member of the New Orleans ‘establishment:” Anderson also spoke to two other family members, one of whom Anderson said “is one of the most respected men in the South.” Anderson’s column, long the most infamous unexplored landmark in Garrison’s background, gave only a bare-bones account of what occurred.  The grand jury was investigating a charge, Anderson reported, that “on a Sunday in June, 1969,” Garrison had “fondled” a thirteen-year-old boy in the New Orleans Athletic Club.”  But Anderson wrote nothing more about it, and Garrison supporters have long claimed that the story was merely an effort to smear him.  Yet some in New Orleans who know the family involved have insisted over the years that the episode occurred.  An author of a recent book on the case verified the story with a family member.  Until now however, no one has heard from the victim.²¹

Beyond this, Lambert then proceeded to give the seedy details.

There are some things to take note of:

* Lambert puts a little too much effort into this although she makes a very credible case.
* A grand jury supposedly looked into this yet there is no official record of the outcome?
* It is rare for a child predator to strike only once yet this is the only accusation Lambert gives.
* Lambert seems to be on a mission here to get both Jim Garrison and Oliver Stone; that smacks more of propaganda than journalism.

It’s probably true that Jim Garrison was not as heroic as Oliver Stone portrayed him to be.

It’s probably true that Jim Garrison wasn’t even completely free of corruption and was as soiled a “law man” as his previous employer, the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

It’s a good guess that Jim Garrison was playing a role for that same corrupt Machine.  Three years after the assassination, the shock was wearing off and a few smart, perhaps dangerous people were asking tough questions.  Time for someone to step forward and provide cover to those at the very top by outing the mid-range players.

But was Garrison a child molester?  As strong a case as Lambert makes, it’s clear she’s also just playing a role.

The end result of Garrison’s official investigation was a single arrest and trial.  At that trial, the accused, Clay Shaw, was aquitted despite overwhelming evidence that he was a key player in the assassination.

In fact, close examination shows a lot of talking by Garrison with little to back it up.  He took 42 minutes to give his opening statement but his own key witnesses and methods helped destroy his credibility.  Was it on purpose?

Insurance salesman Perry Russo was critical to the case, claiming to have been in the company of Shaw, Ferrie and Oswald and overhearing them conspire to kill Kennedy.  He supposedly came forward to keep from being caught by Garrison’s dragnet but it was revealed during the trial that Garrison used hypnosis and “truth drug” sodium pentathol on his willing witness.

This was most certainly not standard procedure for a District Attorney in a high-profile case.

The man behind Garrison’s work up for the case was lead Prosecutor Andrew “Moo-Moo” Sciambra—a name and face virtually invisible from all accounts.

Perhaps that’s because Moo-Moo was a Jesuit-trained Roman Catholic.

Any similarity between Moo-Moo and a Mafia enforcer is purely circumstantial.  Moo-Moo went on to become Magistrate Commissioner of the Orleans Parish Criminal Court System and passed on in 2010 at the age of 75.

Garrison was also assisted by James Alcock.

Alcock delivered a key witness from out of town, Charles Spiesel, an accountant from New York City.

Spiesel claimed to have recognized David Ferrie as someone he flew with in the Air Force during WWII and was later invited to a party where Ferrie and Clay Shaw discussed killing the President.  The only problem was that Ferrie never served in WWII, nor was there an “Air Force” (it was the Army Air Corps).

It got worse from there.

Spiesel began to self-destruct on the stand stating that he had been forcibly hypnotized.  The crescendo was arrived at when Spiesel stated that, before sending his daughter to Louisiana State University he had taken her finger prints to insure that when she returned to him it was not an imposter.

Little else is known about Spiesel and almost as little about Assistant District Attorney James Alcock.

Toilet Reading

Did Garrison self-destruct on purpose?

It is true that he was savaged by mainstream media as were others who attempted to bolster the understanding that the Warren Report was a rank fraud and cover-up.

Colonel Leroy Fletcher Prouty, U.S. Air Force (DoD/CIA liaison) was just such a whistle-blower and he is loosely portrayed in Oliver Stone’s JFK by actor Donald Sutherland.

Prouty was a consultant for JFK and someone who communicated frequently with Jim Garrison.  Prouty continued to be a wealth of information on everything from war profiteering to the true nature of oil.

Is it a coincidence that not just Garrison but Prouty as well damaged their credibility seemingly on purpose by doing interviews with pornographic publications.

Prouty’s insider information was only published in “Genesis” and “Gallery” porn magazines in 1974 and 75 and Garrison got an in-depth write-up in Playboy in 1967.

Endgame

Using handlers to protect the Papacy is an old game but one that is often played.  After victimizing, torturing, violating and ruining a life, if the victim is allowed to live they are given “resucers” or handlers that control them just as when they were enslaved in order to cover for the great Whore of Babylon.

CIA mind-controlled sex slave Cathy O’Brien is one sad example; “rescued” by her husband Mark Phillips, whom she is never seen in public without.

Another is Franklin Coverup scandal “whistleblower” John DeCamp.

Mark Phillips “rescued” and subsequently married Cathy O’Brien.

What O’Brien doesn’t know is that she exchanged one handler [small-time Nashville star Alex Houston] for another.

Although Phillips isn’t the abusive monster Houston was, his job for Rome is almost as important as wrangling innocent victims to be used as sex slaves: screening Cathy’s modest media outreach to insure the Vatican isn’t understood as the foundation of this unspeakable mass crime.

Mark Phillips admitted in an interview in 2016 that he was made aware of child sex slavery after being inducted into the Knights of Malta²⁶⁷; the footsoldiers of Rome and her total control over government Intelligence Agencies.

O’Brien is, herself, a former Roman Catholic (sadly, she states that her experiences have made her an atheist^xcii) and knows that the Vatican plays a key role in this sadistic, satanic scheme but doesn’t understand that Rome orchestrates it.

Having been abused shortly after the Franklin Cover-up broke, O’Brien had knowledge of many aspects of that operation, but because she’s been shielded, she only makes passing mention of how her parasitic pedophile handler Alex Houston took time away for “business at Boys Town in Omaha, Nebraska”.²⁶⁸

If anyone has heard of “Boys Town” — the Roman Catholic orphanage for homeless boys — it was as a result of the 1938 propaganda movie Boys Town starring Spencer Tracey as the Catholic priest with endless rivers of compassion for young boys and Mickey Rooney as the diamond-in-the-rough ruffian who just needed a chance.

The reality is much more perverse as boys were screened at Boys Town for use as sex slaves — many of them were pimped by Lawrence King and some even worked at the Franklin Community Federal Credit Union.

On the rare occasions that the Franklin Cover-up is a topic for “fringe” media, Roman Catholic²⁶⁹ Nebraska State Senator John DeCamp has been the go-to “whistleblower”.

DeCamp’s job is the same as Mark Phillips: control the conversation to insure it is steered away from Rome.

Although DeCamp is not a household name (for that matter, neither is the Franklin Cover-up), he had friends in high places.  DeCamp served in Vietnam in the United States Army and was an aid to the Deputy Ambassador to Vietnam; William Egan Colby.

Colby — also a devout Roman Catholic — would go on to be named Director of the Central Intelligence Agency shortly thereafter in 1973.  He was succeeded by George Herbert Walker Bush.  Bush was nominated by Warren Commission participant Gerald Ford in 1976.

Colby was a lawyer with a Leftist bent who originally worked for the same firm as the founder of the OSS: Roman Catholic Knight of Malta William Donovan.²⁷⁰

Wikipedia says of Colby’s Catholicism:

Colby was for most of his life a staunch Roman Catholic.^[3]  He was often referred to as “the warrior–priest”.  He married Barbara Heinzen (1920-2015) in 1945 and they had five children. The Catholic Church played a “central role” in the family’s life, with Colby’s two daughters receiving their First Communion at St. Peter’s Basilica.^{[4] 271}

~ Secret History, ²²

American Patriots are cheering and gloating that their man, Donald John Trump, vanquished the evil Hillary Rodham Clinton who will now almost certainly be going to prison for her many (very real) crimes and treasons.

It’s a game as old as the Trojan Horse.

UPDATE 18 December 2016, 03:53 PM, EST

Just how much was J. Edgar Hoover in the tank for Rome?

In 1964, Loyola University, Chicago, instituted a special honor; the Sword of Loyola.

A replica of the blade carried by Ignatius, himself, was given as an award to prominent leaders who have dedicated their lives to serving the Papacy just as Ignatius did when he placed his sword at the feet of the Black Madonna of Monserrat in 1522.

The very first recipient was J. Edgar Hoover on September 22^nd, 1964.

It was exactly 10 months since the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, an event Rome played quite prominently in.  Were the Jesuits of Loyola quietly celebrating?

Two years later (with enough distance from the terrible treason to be more bold), the Sword of Loyola was given on the exact date: November 22^nd, 1966.  The recipient was Vietnam hero POW Lieutenant Dieter Dengler, USN.

Dengler’s exploits escaping from a brutal Vietnamese prison (he was first held in Laos but was transferred) in 1966 is the stuff of legend.  His ordeal sapped so much of his vitality that he died in February 2001 at only 62 years old.

In 2006, Dengler was memorialized in the movie Rescue Dawn staring Christian Bale.

Loyola University President, the Very Reverend James E. McGuire, SJ, can be seen to the immediate left of either recipient.  By 1970, the Very Reverend Jesuit President would be accused of child molestation but “lacking conclusive evidence”, no charges were filed.

At the same time, another Jesuit in the Chicago area named “McGuire” was also raping children; Donald J. McGuire, SJ, was carefully shielded by his leadership after complaints began to surface in 1960 insuring that he would have a reign of terror over unsuspecting children for the next 35 years.

Protecting child predators was not a singular incident in Chicago but a full agenda for both the Jesuits and Rome.

2006 was a year that also marked the promotion of Father Thomas Smolich, SJ, to become the President of the Jesuit Conference of the United States.  His qualifications seem to be the repeated screening and enabling of predatory priests.  One priest, Angel Crisostomo Mariano, SJ, would do whatever it took to abuse the vulnerable from preying upon the mentally handicapped to dressing up as a woman.  Even after Mariano’s arrest and conviction, his immediate supervisor at the time (Smolich) felt it was not necessary to alert those in Mariano’s congregation.

There can be no other deduction in light of the careful coddling of such monsters but that it is a purposeful agenda to victimize as many vulnerable innocents as possible just as surely as the Inquisition’s tortures had nothing to do with maintaining religious doctrine.

9/11 airline pilot whistleblower Field McConnell has a prominent sibling: Deputy Associate Attorney General Kristine Marcy with 30 years working as a Federal official.

Not only has McConnell accused her of being a gatekeeper for systemic governmental child sex slave trafficking but he claims that her handler is Father Thomas Smolich, SJ.

It’s perhaps the most trafficked web site right of center.

13 years ago, “the Drudge Report” was earning $3,500 a day.  One can just imagine what it does now.

Ans-wer.com states that Drudge—

—has a worth of over a million dollars per year thanks to his talk show and the advertising revenues generated from his website.  It is estimated that his net worth is $90 million.  According to recent statistics, Drudge has 87,000 twitter followers and 42,000 facebook fans.  He also published a book in 2000 called Drudge Manifesto adding to his career versatility.  Despite his life as a public image, Drudge’s sexuality is still a matter of controversy for the world media.  He is rumored to be gay.  However he has dismissed these claims every time in spite of the fact that Hilton has an exclusive video of Drudge holding the lip lock with an unidentified man in London.

Of his origins, Wikipedia states that he was raised in the Catholic colony of Maryland (granted to devout Roman Catholic George Calvert—Lord Baltimore—by “Protestant” King Charles I) by Leftist Democrat Jewish parents whose mother was a lawyer for Ted Kennedy.  The entire Irish Catholic Kennedy clan was carefully controlled by master Jesuit manipulators like Richard McSorely.

Matthew Drudge was raised in Takoma Park, Maryland, near Washington, D.C.  His parents are Reform Jewish Democrats who both worked for the federal government, and he is their only child.^[1]  His father, Robert Drudge, a former social worker who owns the reference site refdesk.com,^[1] and his mother, a former staff attorney for U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy,^[2] divorced when he was six.  Drudge went to live with his mother.^[1]  He had few friends and was an avid news reader and radio talk show fan.^[1][3]  In his book Drudge Manifesto, Drudge says that he “failed his Bar Mitzvah”, and graduated 341st out of a class of 355 from Northwood High School in 1984, giving himself, in his words, a “more than adequate curriculum vitae for a post at 7-Eleven”.^[1]

In the 1980s, Drudge worked as a telemarketer for Time-Life Books.

But what put little Jewish Matt Drudge on the map was insider scoops.

Drudge’s website gained in popularity in the late 1990s after a number of stories which he reported before the mainstream media.  Drudge first received national attention in 1996 when he broke the news that Jack Kemp would be Republican Bob Dole’s running mate in the 1996 presidential election.  In 1998, Drudge gained popularity when he was the first outlet to break the news that later became the Monica Lewinsky scandal.^[5] ~ Wikipedia

Catholic All-Star

In the 80’s and 90’s, All-Star NFL quarterback Jack Kemp was ubiquitous in all of the “Conservative” political circles.  What no one knew at the time was that, like Drudge, he has been implicated as a homosexual (which means blackmail).

One of the researchers who did the implicating was author Nick Bryant.

Bryant is best known for his work on the Nebraska CIA pedophile ring titled The Franklin Scandal.  He implicates Kemp and corroborates my claim (Illuminati Unmasked pp. 454-458) that the source for many of the boys kidnapped, tortured and turned into sex slaves by the United States government was the Catholic orphanage for boys known as “Boys Town”.

In a massive 1987 column for the NY Times, Leftist Maureen Dowd called Kemp “the Savonarola of supply side”.

Girolamo Savonarola (1452 to 1498) was a Dominican friar who decried the corruption of Rome and her exploitation of the poor and prophesied there would come a “Cyrus from the north” who would reform it all.  He was excommunicated, imprisoned, tortured and burned at the stake.  Less than 20 years later, an Augustinian monk in Wittenberg, (875 miles north of Rome) would protest Medici Pope Leo X’s exploitation of the poor through indulgences by posting 95 bullets, or “theses”, on the door of All Saints Cathedral on All Saints Day (November 1^st) in 1517.

At the end of Chapter VI in The Prince, Machiavelli laments that Savonarola did not have the weapons to insure his revolution as did “Moses, Cyrus, Theseus, and Romulus”—he therefore succumbed to those who did; the children of Romulus.

Only an Irish Catholic girl educated at Immaculata High School and Catholic University of America would get such a reference (or give it) but what was she trying to say about Kemp?

Other Catholic media outlets were also lifting Kemp up at the time.  Dowd noted that Kemp was raised in the cult of Mary Baker Eddy as a “Christian Scientist” in California but that he “converted” to being a Presbyterian with his wife, Joanne.

In 1996, Crisis Magazine (“A Voice For Faithful Catholic Laity”) stated that Kemp’s political doctrines spoke with “a Catholic voice”.

Dowd also made note of something extremely odd in Kemp’s office—an 18” statue of Don Quixote.  Secret society insiders and Roman Catholic knights know the fictional figure to be a caricature of the founder of the Jesuits, Ignatius Loyola.  Miguel de Cervantes, who penned Don Quixote, was a Catholic Spaniard who lived just as the Jesuits were becoming known (1547 to 1616).

Interestingly, Dowd even mentioned Kemp being implicated in a “homosexual ring” — not in Nebraska in the 1980’s — but in the administration of the Governor of California where Kemp worked as an aid in 1967 … for Ronald Wilson Reagan.

Jack Kemp mentored the current Speaker of the House, devout Roman Catholic Paul Ryan.

Dowd painted the Kemps as such strong “Born Again Christians” that wife Joanne was conducting “Bible study groups for Congressional wives every Friday.”  Yet, after Jack Kemp passed in 2009, the family asked close friend Chuck Colson to do his eulogy.  Colson was Richard Nixon’s legal “hatchet man” who was one of the fall guys for Watergate, spending a whole 7 months in a federal penitentiary (many soldiers have spent twice that on deployment).

Although he claimed at some times to be a “Baptist” and at others an “Episcopalian”, Colson’s top endeavors were the creation of Roman Catholic-dominated “Prison Fellowship” and an endless push for ecumenicalism—the uniting of all Christian denominations.  Once all the denominations are united, they would be forced to follow the authority of the one that was most powerful: Rome.

In the early 1990s, Colson joined with his close friend, Father Richard John Neuhaus, to begin the project known as Evangelicals and Catholics Together (ECT).  Catholics and evangelicals were, and remain, the two largest faith communities in North America.  Increasingly, they found themselves drawn together in what I described at the time as “an ecumenism of the trenches,” especially in defense of the sanctity of life from conception to natural death.

Evangelicals and Catholics shared much in common, but there was little understanding or cooperation, and all too often deep hostility between the two groups.  It is hard to imagine now the virulent reaction provoked by the ECT initiatives some two decades ago.

While Father Neuhaus received some critical comments from the Catholic side, reactionary evangelicals exploded with anger, bombast and recrimination.

Colson was excoriated by some of his fellow evangelicals for having betrayed the Gospel.  Prison Fellowship lost $1 million in donations from some disaffected supporters.  But Colson never wavered from what he believed was a summons from the Holy Spirit.

At the outset of ECT, Colson asked, “Dare we believe that God is calling us to make a bold statement that could influence the course of his church in the decades to come?”

The work of ECT still continues.  Our most recent statement, “In Defense of Religious Freedom,” was published in the March 2012 issue of First Things.  Bereft now of both of our founders, the ECT project moves forward, building on the initial statement drafted by Colson and Father Neuhaus (who died in 2009): “We thank God for the discovery of one another in contending for a common cause.  Much more we thank God for the discovery of one another as brothers and sisters in Christ.” ~ Charles Colson’s ‘Ecumenism of the Trenches’, National Catholic Register

When Colson wrote his epithet for Kemp, it was promoted by sites like “the Catholic Exchange”.

Templar Tactic

Today, Rome is in complete control of all major governments via her agents and insurgents, but it wasn’t always so.  In the age of kings, Royals frequently kicked against their masters as they were intent on being true sovereigns and not proxies for the “Vicar of Christ”.  This didn’t make those kings any less ruthless or evil, just equally filled with a lust for power.

One such king was Philippe le Bel of France (1268-1314)—also known as “Philip IV” or “Philippe the Fair”.

Philippe was the only king in history to control the Papacy and even forced it to move to France where it stayed for 75 years before returning to Rome.

Realizing that the actual power of Rome laid in her knights, Philippe sought a way to reign in the Papacy’s special forces—at that time, it was the Knights Templar.

The Templars were founded in 1119 to fight in the First Crusade but they very quickly exploited their experiences in the Holy Land and branched out into anything from diplomacy to mercantilism to finance.  They became protectors of pilgrim valuables and developed a system of seals and cyphers by which a traveler to the Holy Land could give their wealth to a Templar in one location, receive a cyphered receipt, and pick up their wealth in another location for a fee.

As a result, they developed modern usury banking and quickly surpassed most kingdoms in wealth and influence.  They even joined hands with battlefield foes like the Muslim Assassins, pooling their knowledge of how to murder without trace.

During the next hundred years the Templars became a power with international influence.  They were constantly engaged in high-level diplomacy between nobles and monarchs throughout the Western world and the Holy Land.  In England, for example, the Master of the Temple was regularly called to the king’s Parliament, and was regarded as head of all religious orders, taking precedence over all priors and abbots in the land.  Maintaining close links with both Henry II and Thomas a Becket, the Templars were instrumental in trying to reconcile the sovereign and his estranged archbishop.  Successive English kings, including King John, often resided in the Temple’s London preceptory, and the Master of the Order stood by the monarch’s side at the signing of the Magna Carta.”

Nor was the Order’s political involvement confined to Christendom alone.

Close links were forged with the Muslim world as well the world so often opposed on the battlefield and the Templars commanded a respect from Saracen leaders exceeding that accorded any other Europeans.  Secret connections were also maintained with the Hashishim or Assassins, the famous sect of militant and often fanatical adepts who were Islam’s equivalent of the Templars.  The Hashishim paid tribute to the Templars and were rumoured to be in their employ.

On almost every political level the Templars acted as official arbiters in disputes, and even kings submitted to their authority.  In 1252 Henry III of England dared to challenge them, threatening to confiscate certain of their domains.  “You Templars … have so many liberties and charters that your enormous possessions make you rave with pride and haughtiness.  What was imprudently given must therefore be prudently revoked; and what was inconsiderately bestowed must be considerately recalled.”  The Master of the Order replied, “What say est thou, O King?  Far be it that thy mouth should utter so disagreeable and silly a word.  So long as thou dost exercise justice, thou wilt reign.  But if thou infringe it, thou wilt cease to be King.”  It is difficult to convey to the modern mind the enormity and audacity of this statement.  Implicitly the Master is taking for his Order and himself a power that not even the papacy dared explicitly claim the power to make or depose monarchs.²³

Secrecy was the most powerful Templar weapon and they developed dual personalities—one face they put towards those outside their ranks, and another towards those inside.  They adopted the Roman eagle as their insignia but gave it two heads to exemplify this.

Freemasons trace their lineage through the Templars which is likely true but Freemasonic leadership then attempted to cover their subservience to Rome by claiming that both they and the Templars are the enemies of the Papacy (which is ridiculous).  Humorously, for their part, Rome does the same; claiming to be mortal enemies with their loyal Freemasonic footsoldiers.

Templars, Freemasons and Catholic high clergy are all gnostics who revel in ancient “secret knowledge”.  While in the Holy Land, Templars connected with what they considered to be the remnant of the Essenes who convinced them that Jesus of Nazareth was a fraud and the real messiah was John the Baptist; a belief system known as Johannism.

The Templars, or Poor Fellow-Soldiery of the Holy House of the Temple … took as their models, in the Bible, the Warrior-Masons of Zorobabel, who worked, holding the sword in one hand and the trowel in the other.

Therefore it was that the Sword and the Trowel were the insignia of the Templars,²⁴ who subsequently, as will be seen, concealed themselves under the name of Brethren Masons. …

The trowel of the Templars is quadruple, and the triangular plates of it are arranged in the form of a cross, making the Kabalistic pantacle known by the name of the Cross of the East.  The Knight of the East, and the Knight of the East and West, have in their titles secret allusions to the Templars of whom they were at first the successors.

The secret thought of Hugues de Payens [founder of the Templars], in founding his Order, was not exactly to serve the ambition of the Patriarchs of Constantinople.  There existed at that period in the East a Sect of Johannite Christians, who claimed to be the only true Initiates into the real mysteries of the religion of the Saviour.

They pretended to know the real history of Yesus the Anointed, and, adopting in part the Jewish traditions and the tales of the Talmud, they held that the facts recounted in the Evangels are but allegories, the key of which Saint John gives, in saying that the world might be filled with the books that could be written upon the words and deeds of Jesus Christ; words which, they thought, would be only a ridiculous exaggeration, if he were not speaking of an allegory and a legend, that might be varied and prolonged to infinity.

The Johannites ascribed to Saint John the foundation of their Secret Church, and the Grand Pontiffs of the Sect assumed the title of Christos, Anointed, or Consecrated, and claimed to have succeeded one another from Saint John by an uninterrupted succession of pontifical powers.  He who, at the period of the foundation of the Order of the Temple, claimed these imaginary prerogatives, was named Theoclet; he knew Hugues de Payens, he initiated him into the Mysteries and hopes of his pretended church, he seduced him by the notions of Sovereign Priesthood and Supreme royalty, and finally designated him as his successor.

Thus the Order of Knights of the Temple was at its very origin devoted to the cause of opposition to the tiara of Rome and the crowns of Kings, and the Apostolate of Kabalistic Gnosticism was vested in its chiefs.  For Saint John himself was the Father of the Gnostics, and the current translation of his polemic against the heretical of his Sect and the pagans who denied that Christ was the Word, is throughout a misrepresentation, or misunderstanding at least, of the whole Spirit of that Evangel.²⁵

As a result of their Johannism, Templar degree rituals included spitting upon and defacing a crucifix (Roman Catholicism was the only “Christianity” they knew) which lead to rumors of satan worship.  This was later aided by a propaganda smokescreen fabricated by a French Roman Catholic priest named Alphonse Louis Constant.  Constant, masquerading as a Jew called “Éliphas Lévi” created the hermaphroditic goat gargoyle known as “Baphomet” and claimed that was what the Templars were worshipping.

These efforts were aided by another Catholic Frenchman—this time a Jesuit—named Marie Joseph Gabriel Antoine Jogand-Pagès.  Jogand-Pagès also wrote his propaganda via a pseudonym; “Léo Taxil”.  Jogand-Pagès then proceeded to thoroughly muddy the waters by claiming that Freemasons worshipped Baphomet in a series of pamphlets which he eventually stated were hoaxes encouraged by the Vatican’s mindless, vicious crusade against the poor hapless Freemasons (who derived themselves from Templars and are some of Rome’s most loyal footsoldiers).

The Templars being exceedingly wealthy and secretive also lead to sexual perversion.  Soon this gave enemies like Philippe le Bel their opportunity.  With the Papacy secured at Avignon, Philip moved to crush the Vatican’s special forces.  He forced Pope Clement V to rubber-stamp his actions and then he moved quickly to arrest the Templars and confiscate their wealth and holdings.

This was done on Friday, October 13^th, 1307—“black Friday” or “bad luck Friday”.

Many Templars were captured, tortured and burned at the stake (the form of execution created by the Inquisition), including their Grand Master, Jacques de Molay.  However, many more went underground and learned to masque their machinations.  No longer could they operate in the open, using their own names and faces.  They needed scapegoats to hide behind and they found the perfect victims: Jews.  As long as they elevated their target Jew to a position of wealth and prominence, they were always willing to be a target and make a spectacle of themselves.

An older sister of the Templars (only by about 20 years)—the Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta, also known as “the Knights of Malta”—adopted and adapted many of their brother Knights.  This included, as the name applies, the practice of Johannism.

Like the double-headed eagle, the Maltese Cross worn by these Knights (then and now), is a cunning ruse.  Yes, it is a type of cross but it isn’t the traditional Christian cross, it predates the crucifixion of Jesus Christ in its pagan significance.

All Popes and most Cardinals and Bishops wear the Maltese cross to show their Knights who they answer to.

The official emblems and insignia of almost every major public and private organization anywhere have either a double-headed eagle or Maltese cross somewhere in them; for instance the flag of the Russian Federation is adorned with a double-headed eagle and the insignia of Russia’s intelligence agency—the FSB—is over top a massive Maltese cross poorly disguised with red outside instead of inside the cross.  For more, read my column, here.

This process has been in place ever since and was responsible for the Communist anti-Semitic purges as well as the Nazi Holocaust.  Today, an ugly undercurrent of anti-Semitism is always ready when called upon by Roman operatives to cloud investigations with racial hatred as Jewish frontmen have been cunningly emplaced in all walks of power from Hollywood to banking, politics to news media—Jews like Matt Drudge.

Despite his $90 million net worth, Drudge continues to get help from Rome from her media operatives like Catholic Peggy Noonan who proclaims for all her duped Right-wing faithful that, in 2013, Drudge “discovered prayer” (although one never knows where prayer hides itself from Jews these days).

Drudge has been a frequent guest on the Alex Jones show.

Jones is a very important Roman operative whose job it is to bring in, expose and mislead truth-seekers who don’t trust the obviously-controlled mainstream media.

Like Drudge, he was emplaced by being given the insider scoop of a sanitized view inside Bohemian Grove—the satanic sexual deviant “retreat” for Rome’s Republican elite like Joseph Coors, both Bush 41 and 43, James Baker, John Bolton, Dwight Eisenhower, William Randolph Hearst, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, Henry Kissinger, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, David Rockefeller, Clinton “prosecutor” Ken Starr, Teddy Roosevelt, George Shultz, Caspar Weinberger, Patrick Wayne (son of John Wayne), and many, many others.²⁶

In the Jones version, no sexual perversion is shown or even implied and the child sacrifice ritual, “Cremation of Care” is portrayed as a silly play.

The reality is much more perverse and satanic.

Reputed victim of CIA mind-control and sex slavery (years of involuntary rape, sodomy and torture for both her and her young daughter) Cathy O’Brien paints a satanic picture of what America’s top personalities do at the Grove.

WARNING: DISTURBING NARRATIVE

I was programmed and equipped to function in all rooms at Bohemian Grove in order to compromise specific government targets according to their personal perversions.  “Anything, anytime, anywhere with anyone” was my mode of operation at the Grove.  I do not purport to understand the full function of this political cesspool playground as my perception was limited to my own realm of experience.  My perception is that Bohemian Grove serves those ushering in the New World Order through mind control, and consists primarily of the highest Mafia and U.S. Government officials.  I do not use the term “highest” loosely, as copious quantities of drugs were consumed there. …

Bohemian Grove is reportedly intended to be used recreationally, providing a supposedly secure environment for politically affluent individuals to “party” without restraint.  The only business conducted there pertained to implementing the New World Order, through the proliferation of mind-control atrocities, giving the place an air of “Masonic Secrecy”.  The only room where business discussions were permitted was the small, dark lounge affectionately and appropriately referred to as the Underground.²

Sex slaves were not routinely permitted in the Underground for security reasons, leaving the lounge’s small stage as the only source of “entertainment”.

This entertainment ranged from would-be talents such as Lee Atwater, Bill Clinton, and George Bush to CIA Operative entertainers such as Boxcar Willie and Lee Greenwood, On one occasion I was instructed to meet with former President Gerald Ford in the Underground where Lee Atwater was picking and singing. …

My purpose at the Grove was sexual in nature, and therefore my perceptions were limited to a sex slave’s viewpoint.  As an effective means of control to ensure undetected proliferation of their perverse indulgences, slaves such as myself were subjected to ritualistic trauma.  I knew each breath I took could be my last, as the threat of death lurked in every shadow.  Slaves of advancing age or with failing programming were sacrificially murdered “at random” in the wooded grounds of Bohemian Grave, and I fell it was “simply a matter of time until it would be me”.  Rituals were held at a giant, concrete owl monument on the banks of, ironically enough, the Russian (rushin’) River.  These occultish sex rituals stemmed from the scientific belief that mind-controlled slaves required severe trauma to ensure compartmentalization of the memory, and not from any spiritual motivation.

My own threat of death was instilled when I witnessed the sacrificial death of a young, dark-haired victim at which time I was instructed to perform sexually “as though my life depended upon it”.  I was told, “…the next sacrifice victim could be you.  Anytime when you least expect it, the owl will consume you.  Prepare yourself, and stay prepared.” Being “prepared” equated to being totally suggestible, i.e., “on my toes” awaiting their command. …

The club offered a “Necrophilia” theme room to its members. …

Other perversion theme rooms at the Bohemian Club included what I heard Ford refer to as the “Dark Room”.  When he not so cleverly said, “Let’s go to the Dark Room and see what develops,” I understood from experience that he was interested in indulging in his perverse obsession for pornography.  In the Dark Room, members had sex with the same mind-controlled slave they were viewing in porn on a big screen television.

There was a triangular glass display centered in a main through way where I was locked in with various trained animals, including snakes.  Members walking by watched elicit [sic] sex acts of bestiality, women with women, mothers with daughters, kids with kids, or any other unlimited perverse visual display. …

There was a room of shackles and tortures, black lights and strobes, an opium den, ritualistic sex altars, a chapel, group orgy rooms including poster beds, water beds, and “kitten” houses.  I was used as a “rag doll” in the “toy store,” and as a urinal in the “golden arches” room.

From the owl’s roost to the necrophilia room, no memory of sexual abuse is as horrifying as the conversations overheard in the Underground pertaining to implementing the New World Order.  I learned that perpetrators believed that controlling the masses through propaganda mind manipulation did not guarantee there would be a world left to dominate due to environmental and overpopulation problems.  The solution being debated was not pollution/population control, but mass genocide of “selected undesirables.”²⁷

What is also absent from Jones’ faux “exposé” is the high position held at the Grove by a dead Catholic priest.

A priest, of all unlikely people, holds the honor of being the only person to be the subject of two Grove plays.  He is the Patron Saint of Bohemia, Saint John of Nepomuck (pronounced NAY-po-muk), a man who lived in the thirteenth century in the real Bohemia that is now part of Czechoslovakia.  Saint John received his unique distinction among latter-day Bohemians in 1882, when his sad but courageous story was told in a jinks “sired” (the club argot for master of ceremonies) by the poet Charles Warren Stoddard.

Saint John was a cutup in his youth, but had forsaken ephemeral pleasures — or at least most of them — for the priesthood.  One of his first assignments was as a tutor to the heir apparent to the kingship of Bohemia.  John soon became fast friends with the fun-loving prince, often joining him in his spirited and amorous adventures.  When the prince became king, he made Saint John the court confessor.

All went well for Saint John until the king began to suspect that his beautiful queen was having a love affair with a local nobleman.  To allay his suspicions, the king naturally turned to his loyal friend and teacher, Saint John of Nepomuck, demanding that this former companion in many revelries reveal to him the most intimate confessions of the queen.  Saint John refused.  The king pleaded, but to no avail.  Then the king threatened him, which had no effect either.  Finally, in a fit of rage, he ordered Saint John hurled into the river to drown.  John chose to die rather than reveal a woman’s secrets.  Here, truly, was a remarkable fellow, and his story appealed mightily to the San Francisco Bohemians of the nineteenth century.

Several months after the poet Stoddard introduced Saint John to his fellow Bohemians, a small statue of Saint John arrived at the clubhouse in San Francisco from faraway Czechoslovakia.  It seems one of the people present for Stoddard’s talk had been Count Joseph Oswald Von Thun of Czechoslovakia, who had been much taken by the club and its appreciation of his fellow countryman.  Upon his return to Czechoslovakia be had commissioned a woodcarver to make a replica of the statue of Saint John which adorns the bridge in Prague near the place of his drowning.

This unexpected gift still guards the library room in the Bohemians’ large club building in San Francisco — except during the encampment at the Grove, that is.  For that event the statue is carefully transported to a hallowed tree near the center of the Grove, where Saint John, with his forefinger carefully sealing his lips, can be a saintly reminder of the need for discretion.

The legend surrounding Saint John of Nepomuck became part of the oral tradition of the Bohemian Club.  New members inevitably hear the story when they happen upon the statue while being shown around the city clubhouse or the Grove.  But oral tradition is not enough for a patron saint, and the good man’s legend was therefore enacted in a Grove play in 1921 under the title St. John of Nepomuck.  It was retold in 1969 by a different author under the title St. John of Bohemia.²⁸

Sadly, there is nothing “unlikely” about “Saint John” being the patron of Bohemian Grove.

Once Jones was established as the place to go when one questions mainstream media, he then went to work discrediting himself and all who subscribe to him.

In 2010, Jones was alerted to a pro-Second Amendment rally by Texans for Accountable Government—a sincere, anti-tyranny organization—taking place in Austin.  He spoke about the rally on his program, then showed up to the engagement already in progress.  He used a bullhorn and constant loud histrionics to disrupt and humiliate the participants.

Like Drudge, Jones is not clearly connected to Rome which gives his masters plausible deniability.  His father-in-law (Edmund Lowe Nichols), however, was U.S. Agricultural Counselor to Italy and was so important to the Italian government they awarded him with their highest civilian honor; Cavaliere Commendatore (Knight Commander) of the Order of Merit.

As usual, Jones’ keepers have plenty of ridiculous smokescreens from claiming he’s a dead comic to accusing him of being a Jewish pawn through that very same father-in-law.

Matt Drudge serves a similar role, though not so obviously antagonistic to the cause of Patriotic Americans.

Like Knight of Malta Rupert Murdoch, a recipient of the Order of Saint Gregory, and his “Fox News”, Drudge is there to redirect Right-wing anger at all of the wrong sources; minorities, Muslims, Jews—whatever best causes division instead of allowing “Conservative” Americans to see that all of their woes come from Rome.

On any given day, one can see the best of Roman distraction, fear-mongering, misplaced focus and wholly-fabricated lies.

My friend Alan, host of Restoring America, sent me notice on September 21^st that Drudge was promoting something particularly disturbing: Roman Catholics flocking to venerate the supposed petrified heart of “Saint Padre Pio” in Lowell, Massachusetts.

Hundreds View Heart of Saint, ‘the Very Core of Our Faith’

Worship and veneration of “relics” like the body parts of “Saints” is an ancient pagan rite.

Nothing is more characteristic of Rome than the worship of relics.  Wherever a chapel is opened, or a temple consecrated, it cannot be thoroughly complete without some relic or other of he-saint or she-saint to give sanctity to it.  The relics of the saints and rotten bones of the martyrs form a great part of the wealth of the Church.  The grossest impostures have been practised in regard to such relics; and the most drivelling tales have been told of their wonder-working powers, and that too by Fathers of high name in the records of Christendom.  Even Augustine, with all his philosophical acuteness and zeal against some forms of false doctrine, was deeply infected with the grovelling spirit that led to relic worship.  Let any one read the stuff with which he concludes his famous “City of God,” and he will in no wise wonder that Rome has made a saint of him, and set him up for the worship of her devotees.  Take only a specimen or two of the stories with which he bolsters up the prevalent delusions of his day: “When the Bishop Projectius brought the relics of St.  Stephen to the town called Aquae Tibiltinae, the people came in great crowds to honour them.  Amongst these was a blind woman, who entreated the people to lead her to the bishop who had the HOLY RELICS.  They did so, and the bishop gave her some flowers which he had in his hand.  She took them, and put them to her eyes, and immediately her sight was restored, so that she passed speedily on before all the others, no longer requiring to be guided.”²⁹

______________

The learned Pareus proceeds in a different way to prove that Peter was never at Rome.  He shows from different parts of the Acts of the Apostles and the Epistle to the Galatians, that Peter was in Judea at the time when tradition declares that he was at Rome.  Peter was in Judea when Paul was converted, Acts 9; and three years after this — that is, in the year 38, Galatians 1:8.  He was in Judea in the year 45, when he was imprisoned by Herod, Acts 12, and in 49, fourteen years after Paul’s conversion, Acts 15, Galatians 2:1-9.  Had he been to Rome during this time, some account of such a journey must surely have been given.  After this time we find that he was at Antioch, Galatians 2:11.  If it be asked, where did he afterwards exercise his ministry?  Where more likely than among the Jews, as he had hitherto most clearly done; for he was the Apostle of the Circumcision, and among those to whom he sent his Epistles.  The dating of the first at “Babylon,” has led some to conjecture that it was a figurative term for Rome; but why not for Jerusalem, or for Antioch?  for Christians were at that time treated everywhere like captives or aliens, and especially in the land of Judea.

What then are we to say as to this tradition?  The same, according to the just remark of Pareus, as what we must say of many other traditions of that age, that it is nothing but a fable, which, like many others, would have passed away, had it not been allied to a growing superstition.  With respect to what Eusebius says of the testimony of a presbyter, named Caius, that about the beginning of the third century he saw the graves of Peter and Paul at Rome, it may be easily accounted for: it was the age of pious fraud, when the relics of saints could be found almost everywhere; and, in the next century, the wood and the nails of the Cross were discovered!  Those who can believe these things, may have a credulity large enough to swallow up the testimony of Caius.^8 30

______________

The germinating superstition of the times,—owing principally to the prevalence of the Platonic philosophy, from the subtile disquisitions and specious reasonings of which Christianity suffered far more than she did from the persecuting edicts of emperors and pro-consuls,—likewise aided the advance of the Papacy.  This superstition, which was in truth, as we have already explained, nothing but the revived Paganism of a former age, continued to increase from an early part of the third century and onward.  The simplicity of the Christian faith began to be corrupted by novel and heathenish opinions, and the worship of the Church to be burdened by ridiculous and idolatrous ceremonies.  When the Church exchanged the catacombs for the magnificent edifices which the wealth, the policy, and sometimes the piety of princes erected, she exchanged also the simplicity of life and purity of faith, of which so many affecting memorials remain to our day, for the accommodating spirit of the schools, and the easy manners of the court.  Already, in the fourth century, we find images introduced into churches, the bones of martyrs hawked about as relics, the tombs of saints become the resort of pilgrims, and monks and hermits swarming in the various countries.  We find the pagan festivals, slightly disguised, adopted into the Christian worship; the homage offered anciently to the gods transferred to the martyrs; the Lord’s Supper dispensed sometimes at funerals; the not improbable origin of masses; and the churches filled with the blaze of lamps and tapers, the smoke of incense, the perfume of flowers, and the goodly show of gorgeous robes, crosiers, mitres, and gold and silver vases; reminding one of the not unsimilar spectacles which might be witnessed in the pagan temples.  “The religion of Constantine,” remarks Gibbon, “achieved in less than a century the final conquest of the Roman empire; but the victors themselves were insensibly subdued by the arts of their vanquished rivals.”^{[16] 31}

No less a source than the Catholic Encyclopedia admits that many of these “relics” were frauds—

…it remains true that many of the more ancient relics duly exhibited for veneration in the great sanctuaries of Christendom or even at Rome itself must now be pronounced to be either certainty spurious or open to grave suspicion.  To take one example of the latter class, the boards of the Crib (Praesaepe)— a name which for much more than a thousand years has been associated, as now, with the basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore—can only be considered to be of doubtful.  In his monograph “Le memorie Liberiane dell´ Infanzia di N. S. Gesù Cristo” (Rome, 1894), Mgr. Cozza Luzi frankly avows that all positive evidence for the authenticity of the relics of the Crib etc., is wanting before the eleventh century.  Strangely enough, an inscription in Greek uncials of the eighth century is found on one of the boards, the inscription having nothing to do with the Crib but being apparently concerned with some commercial transaction.  It is hard to explain its presence on the supposition that the relic is authentic.  Similar difficulties might he urged against the supposed “column of the flagellation” venerated at Rome in the Church of Santa Prassede and against many other famous relics.

These skills would come in quite handy for later operatives like Jesuit Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (1881 – 1955).

Chardin was a busy priest—known as the “Father of the New Age”—he was also into archeology.

Teilhard spent most of the next 20 years in China.  In early 1929 he joined the National Geological Survey of China and took part in the excavations, in December 1929, that uncovered a Homo erectus skull, known as Peking man. As the stratigrapher (a geologist who studies layers of the rock record), Teilhard played a major role in dating the discovery. ~ Kahn Academy

“Science” and “archeology”, however, have been the unexpected arenas for chicanery.  One such example was “Piltdown Man”.

The Piltdown Man was a paleoanthropological hoax in which bone fragments were presented as the fossilised remains of a previously unknown early human.

In 1912 amateur archaeologist Charles Dawson claimed he had discovered the “missing link” between ape and man. After finding a section of a human-like skull in Pleistocene gravel beds near Piltdown, East Sussex, Dawson contacted Arthur Smith Woodward, Keeper of Geology at the Natural History Museum.  Dawson and Smith Woodward made further discoveries at the site which they connected to the same individual, including a jawbone, more skull fragments, a set of teeth and primitive tools.

Smith Woodward reconstructed the skull fragments and hypothesised that they belonged to a human ancestor from 500,000 years ago.  The discovery was announced at a Geological Society meeting and was given the Latin name Eoanthropus dawsoni (“Dawson’s dawn-man”).  The questionable significance of the assemblage remained the subject of considerable controversy until it was conclusively exposed in 1953 as a forgery. It was found to have consisted of the altered mandible and some teeth of an orangutan deliberately combined with the cranium of a fully developed, though small-brained, modern human. ~ Wikipedia

At the center of this controversy was a Jesuit priest and “archeologist” named Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.

In reconstructing the recollections of de Chardin in his role with his friend Charles Dawson, paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould discovered that de Chardin had misrepresented exactly when he claimed to have been shown Piltdown specimens which conflicted with when he was conscripted into WWI to be a stretcher-bearer for the French Army.  The implication was that—

Teilhard and Dawson planned the Piltdown 2 discovery before Teilhard left England.  Forty years later, Teilhard misconstructed the exact chronology, forgot that he could not have seen the specimens when they were officially “found,” and slipped in writing to [English physical anthropologist, palaeontologist and geologist Kenneth Page] Oakley [(1911-1981) who proved that the Piltdown bones had been chemically stained to mimic great age, the teeth artificially filed to simulate human wear, the associated mammal remains all brought in from elsewhere, and the flint “implements” recently carved].

Since the founding of the Counter-Reformation shortly after 1517 and the founding of the Jesuits unofficially in 1534 and then officially in 1540, the Company of Loyola had been fast at work on a project of unbelievable scope and satanic success: to re-write all of human cosmology to include ancient pre-humans, the “Big Bang”, dinosaurs and Darwinian evolution.  The matrix-weavers needed a “missing link” to shore up their lies so Teilhard created one.

Unbelievably, he remains a respected archeologist, along with his other “discoveries” like “Peking Man”, even amongst paleontologists who are aware of his skuldugery.

Blind to reality or to the matrix that has been woven for them, neither “scientists” nor laymen stop to consider the staggering question of why anyone who subscribed to empiricism via the Scientific Method—record an observation, formulate an hypothesis, attempt to replicate the observation via experiment which isolates all perceived variables, thereby replicating the observation and proving the hypothesis, submit the results for peer review—would possibly have any impetus what-so-ever in corrupting this process.

That “impetus” is the agenda to completely fabricate an alternative reality that calls into question the assertions of the Bible and the Jesuits have been so successful it’s apparent they’ve had interdimensional aid.

Part of this matrix is the propaganda promoted by “Papal Court Jews” (persecuted but allowed status in a Royal or Roman Catholic Court because they served a purpose) like Matthew Nathan Drudge.

On September 21^st “Drudge” was a cornucopia of Catholic casuistry:

* Headline pushing Jesuit-educated Donald Trump.
* A story about Roman Catholic Leonard DiCaprio, a popular face to push the sophistry of “global warming” that Rome is using to lower the common standard of living and return humanity to feudalism.  In January of this year DiCaprio publicly met with Pope Francis on this issue.  A month later he was awarded his first Oscar.
* Multiple side-stories pushing Trump.
* Stories lionizing Hillary Clinton (neither she nor Trump are in any way controlling their destinies).
* A predominance of stories promoting fear over “ISIS” and Islamic jihad terror (all fabricated by Western Intelligence who answer to Rome).
* Frothing of anger over unimpeded waves of illegal immigrants; an agenda insured by the Papacy and then highlighted so that frustration leads to a Roman-selected fascist demagogue.
* Fear over manipulated threats in North Korea or Russia.
* Catholic faithful venerating what appears to be a petrified human organ.

Upon waking up from his transformation out of the Matrix and into reality, Morpheus welcomed Neo with, “Welcome to the real world.”

John McLaughlin died on August 16^th, 2016, at 89 years of age after almost two decades as a television media pundit—most notably for the show he hosted titled “The McLaughlin Group”.

But more than that, McLaughlin was a key player in politics, as well, having unsuccessfully run for United States Senate as a Jesuit priest.  Why not?  His Jesuit brother, pro-abortion priest Robert Drinan became an anti-Vietnam Leftist Democrat Congressman for Massachusetts from 1971 to 1981—and never took his collar off.

America has come a sad, long way from her founding where Roman Catholic citizens (not to mention clergy) were barred from the vote because American Protestants remembered all too well the Papal tyranny and persecution they had run from in Europe.

McLaughlin would’ve been the perfect pro-Vietnam foil for his brother, just as the blood oath they both took swore them to be:

You have been taught to plant insidiously the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces, states that were at peace, and to incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the arts and the sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace; to take sides with the combatants and to act secretly with your brother Jesuit, who might be engaged on the other side, but openly opposed to that with which you might be connected, only that the Church might be the gainer in the end, in the conditions fixed in the treaties for peace and that the end justifies the means.

Instead, McLaughlin became the Jesuit who put words in the mouth of their minion, Richard Milhous Nixon.

The Jesuits have always been telling their American puppets what to say.

The Teleprompter In Chief

Although Americans have no idea who Barack Obama is, it is clear that he is heavily controlled by powers beyond him.

Obama is so controlled, he is required to speak from a teleprompter even when he is before a classroom of 6^th grade children, as was the case in Falls Church, VA in January of 2010.

Even Left-wing comic Jonathan Leibowitz (more popularly known as “Jon Stewart”) couldn’t pass up the opportunity to lampoon this event⁵⁷⁴, but the idea that Obama is handled from a higher power just as, if not more malignant towards America than he is, is no laughing matter.

Who is telling Obama what to say?

—Jesuits are…through their agents like Jon Favreau.

Favreau started his political career via an internship with Skull and Bones alum John Kerry while attending Jesuit Holy Cross.

From there, his Leftist ideology passed the test for the Society of Jesus and he was given to Barack Obama…

…

[Chris] Matthews is one of the most well-known vitriolic Leftists in mainstream media.

What isn’t as well known is that he had a special Catholic education starting with Jesuit La Salle College High School and then on to Jesuit Holy Cross.  He has an honorary degree from Jesuit Fordham, as well.⁸⁹²

He was cultivated by the premier Catholic Leftist of his day, Thomas P. “Tip” O’Neill. Matthews was his top aide.  O’Neill held his protected seat in Congress for thirty four years—ten of those as Speaker of the House of Representatives.

O’Neill was a graduate of Jesuit-run Boston College.⁸⁹³

As Jesuit-trained Jon Favreau would tell Barack Obama what to say in his speeches, Chris Matthews would do the same for President Jimmy Carter.⁸⁹⁴ ~ Illuminati Unmasked ³²

Good ole radical Catholic Leftist “Tip” O’Neill was a late-night drinking buddy with “Conservative Patriot” Ronald Wilson Reagan.  Matthews enjoyed manipulating it so much, he wrote a book to brag about it; Tip and the Gipper.

“Conservative Patriot” Ronald Reagan is one of the best propaganda efforts America has ever seen; gun control, higher taxes, legalized illegal aliens, bigger government—Reagan did it all.

Understanding that the Jesuits created both Nazi fascism and Communism, if we take away “taking down the wall”, the Presidency of Ronald Reagan was little different than his Leftist predecessor Jimmy Carter.

What did Reagan do to deserve the re-write of history?

He reunited America with her puppeteer.

In investigating the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, so many ties were found to the Vatican that the United States severed relations with the “sovereign entity” in 1867.  The man to change that in late 1983 was Ronald Reagan.  …it was his administration that signaled the complete control of America by “the Unseen Hand”.

THE PHALLUS OF OSIRIS

It is, indeed, an historical fact that on January 20^th , 1981, Ronald Wilson Reagan was the first President of the United States to conduct his inauguration on the west front of the Capitol instead of the east front.  As [ex-Jesuit priest] Alberto Rivera predicted, he was facing the Washington Monument. ~ Illuminati DEFEATED, Johnny Cirucci.com

Few know that Reagan was raised by a Catholic father and he openly practiced Catholicism as a late teen.

Reagan’s father, Jack, was a lapsed Catholic.  Ronald’s brother Neil was baptized into the Roman Catholic Church but Ronald was baptized into the Disciples of Christ.  His mother, Nell, was baptized into the Disciples on 27 March 1910, less than one year before Ronald’s birth.  At age 19, Ronald left the Disciples, claiming the Catholicism of his father. ~ Ronald Reagan, Notable Names Database

Even those that buy into the lie of the “Cold War” admit that Ronald Reagan was absolutely surrounded (and controlled) by Roman Catholics—most of them either Jesuit-trained or Jesuits, themselves!

Reagan counted many Catholics among his intimates, especially his chief foreign policy players: National Security Adviser Richard Allen, CIA Director William Casey, Ambassador to the United Nations Vernon Walters, Secretary of State Alexander Haig (whose brother was a Jesuit priest), to name a few.

Most vital was William Clark, who replaced Allen.  Clark supervised and implemented the formal National Security Decision Directives crucial to confronting the Soviet empire.  A student of Aquinas, Fulton Sheen and Thomas Merton, who as a young man attended an Augustinian novitiate in upstate New York, Clark was dubbed Reagan’s “most impressive” and “most important and influential” adviser by official biographer Edmund Morris.  Morris rightly discerned that no other person was as close to the president spiritually.  Clark and Reagan prayed together, particularly the Prayer of St. Francis.

Also notable, given Reagan’s moniker “the Great Communicator,” was the contribution of Catholic speechwriters, such as Peter Robinson, who wrote the Brandenburg Gate speech, Peggy Noonan, author of the Challenger remarks, and chief speechwriter Tony Dolan, who penned Reagan’s most memorable foreign policy addresses.

Then there were Reagan’s poignant relationships with high-profile Catholics such as Terence Cardinal Cooke, Mother Teresa and, of course, Pope John Paul II.  To all three, Reagan confided that he believed God had spared his life during the March 1981 assassination attempt for the purpose of taking down Soviet communism.  He and John Paul II were jointly committed to that historic endeavor. ~ USA Today

Reagan was part of the same game Rome plays on us today: pseudo-Right and rabid Left.

Writing the script on the one side was Chris Matthews for “Tip” O’Neill.  On the Reagan side of the Hegelian dialectic was Patrick Joseph Buchanan.  Buchanan was Reagan’s Communications Director, having first been trained at Blessed Sacrament Grammar School, Jesuit-run Gonzaga College High School, and then Jesuit-run Georgetown University.

Each one of these personalities would leave politics for propaganda at NBC/MSNBC as well as CNN and FoxNews.  It’s all the same.

Eleanor Clift, Morton Kondracke, Fred Barnes, and Roman Catholic Robert Novak would all join the supporting cast behind McLaughlin.

Of course, like so many others who have appeared to leave the Company of Loyola or the priesthood altogether, McLaughlin only took off his cassock for appearance’ sake.  He went to his grave doing the bidding of the Superior General.

Who runs the media, the Jews or the Jesuits?

The answer is clear.

Finding out the truth on what is really happening in the world can be tough and sometimes frustrating.  It usually starts out when you are fed up with the rabid leftists that infest practically all media channels today.  Suddenly, you are eager to hear from somebody the dissemination of some basic values, such as the importance of the traditional family, good moral and values, or owning a gun for protection.  For that reason, the first guys you usually look up to are the so called conservatives.  These are the ones who will get you fixated on some issues like gay marriage, illegal immigration, or drug abuse.  Sadly, the cause of these problems are hardly addressed and you are always prompted to hate the puppet and not the puppet master as a real conservitard.  Strange enough, most of the time they fall short when facing the other side in the most critical issues.  If you decide to go beyond to find out what power is behind all evil, there are plenty of alternative media outlets that might help with that.  However, most of the time you will end up chasing Zionists, Illuminatis, Communists or Free-Masons.  The trail always gets cold prior to the real culprits: Rome and most prominently her special forces, the Jesuits.

I myself was a proud conservitard that would blindly follow Olavo de Carvalho, a Brazilian rightwing pundit.  Olavo does a great job on fighting the Socialists in South America as being one of the first to expose the Sao Paulo Forum, a supranational Organization that joins South American leftist parties and criminal organizations, such as FARC.  His most recent debate with Alexandr Dugin (Putin’s brain) is another evidence of his stand against Communism.  However, what I did not take in account at the time was his blind allegiance to Rome as a fanatic Catholic and acquaintance with members of Opus Dei and Free-Masonry evidenced by one of his latest Hangouts (maçons = free-masons).  Olavo writes on his personal website (translated):

Nothing I said about omission and cowardice could apply to, let’s say, the American Opus Dei which is one of the most active fronts of the culture war in defense of Christianity, much less to the originary Spanish branch of the same entity, whose intense and fruitful political activity is accounted by eminent historian Ricardo de la Cierva in the indispensable book Las Puertas del Infierno.  La Historia de la Iglesia Jamás Contada (Barcelona, Fénix, 1995, pp. 567-587). ~ olavodecarvalho.org

That explains why the words “Jesuit” or “Vatican” never comes up (and never will) when he exposes the NWO; instead Rockefellers, Rothschilds, CFR, Bilderberg, among others are given out as the top of the pyramid.

In Brazil, being an outspoken Catholic conservative person is the norm, not the exception.  Roman Catholicism is wide spread in South America as I come to believe that’s nothing more than a Jesuit playground. Communism was perfected there during their Missions and, of course, since I was a little kid at school I learn how great the Jesuits were in instructing the native people.  During the time I was there I never heard or seen anything that remotely pointed the finger to the Vatican.  In fact, to this date I was only able to find a single Brazilian YouTube channel exposing the Whore of Babylon.  Unfortunately, a collaboration could not be established so far.

Sometimes it’s hard to find a direct link between some US conservative “truther” groups or individuals to the Vatican.  That’s not the case of American conservative political activist Alan Lee Keyes as he’s already clearly stated his Roman Catholicism devotion.  Despite of that, he has taken a strong position against false affirmative actions towards minorities, the gay agenda and abortion. He has even advocated the abolishing of the income tax, calling for the dissolution of the Internal Revenue Service.  Nevertheless, we may not forget that being a Roman Catholic means that your ultimate allegiance lies with Rome, no matter at what cost.  It’s is interesting to note that Keyes is not only a traditional Catholic, but also a third-degree Knight of Columbus, which is never a good sign as the objective of these secret societies is nothing more than covertly aid the Vatican to attain world domination.  Keyes was also awarded by the Prime Minister Ariel Sharon for his strong advocacy of Israel on his MSNBC show “Alan Keyes is making sense”.  As we know, such position is a powerful Jesuit weapon to stir emotions regarding the “promised land”.  The show also featured scandals on sex abuse by Catholic church priests, which in my opinion, may better explain why it was ultimately canceled.  Keyes is a good friend of Olavo de Carvalho, having even met with him and Alejandro Peña Esclusa, a right-wing Venezuelan politician, in Washington DC for a friendly talk.  Curiously, Peña Esclusa was accused by the Venezuelan government to be the head of a plot that intended to assassinate Pope John Paul II during his visit to Venezuela in 1984.

We now turn our attention to another renown conservative: Ted Nugent.  It’s easy to get pretty excited when watching Nugent arguments in defense of the 2^nd Amendment.  However, his support for Donald Trump and even Jeb Bush is becoming harder to assimilate, especially for us who are past the left/right paradigm.  Trump’s family ties to the Jesuits and Bush’s Skull&Bones Nazi crime legacy speak for themselves.  Based on that, you are most inclined to take Nugent as just one more conservitard who simply does not know any better.  A closer look on his religion and education backgrounds may indicate that it’s not the case as Wikipedia says:

Nugent was born in Redford, Michigan.  He moved to Palatine, Illinois as a teenager, and has two brothers: John and Jeffrey, and a sister, Kathy.  Raised Catholic, Nugent has mentioned his ties with Catholicism many times during interviews, and has stated that he regularly attends church.  He attended William Fremd High School in Palatine, Illinois, then transferred after his freshman year to St. Viator High School in Arlington Heights, Illinois. ~ Wikipedia

Now all of a sudden his buffoonish mannerisms as a right-wing political activist and singer makes a lot more sense: It’s designed to mock his own followers by identifying them with his traits and causing embarrassment due to his “controversial” comments.

Perhaps you may think that attending the church nowadays means you’re somewhat more enlighten than the average gentile.  It’s better you think again.  Many of the so called conservative evangelical Christian pastors are at best totally alienated, or at worst preaching toxic Jesuit doctrines to further endanger their flock souls.  Dr.  David Jeremiah, the senior pastor of Shadow Community Church in San Diego, California might just be doing that.  Jeremiah, as many others of his likeness, consistently promotes the sin of worshipping the Land of Israel instead of the God of Israel.  His use of Genesis 12:3 to justify any US political and/or economic aid to that land only inspires the worship of Jerusalem, supposedly the chosen nation, and excessive emotional display over the always intricate Jew/Muslim issues of that region.  Nevertheless, he continues to push this agenda by organizing a yearly tour to the “holy land”.  And guess what? You also have the option to take a pre-tour to Rome because, of course, there is where all true protestant Christian would like to visit.

Furthermore, Jeremiah associations may definitely confirm the fraud he is.  Several of his books were actually written by Carole C.  Carlson, a lesbian feminist pastor.  He was also asked by Roma Downey and Mark Burnett, the married couple behind The Son of God movie, to write a companion book on Acts that would follow their NBC tv show A.D. The Revolution Continues.  Roma Downey is a devout Roman Catholic with a Master’s Degree in spiritual psychology from the University of Santa Monica, a New Age college.  More recently, you can spot Jeremiah’s name composing Donald Trump’s evangelical executive advisory board together with other equally fraudulent people, not to mention Kenneth Copeland and his prosperity ministry.

Perhaps it’s safe to assume that virtually every conservative right-wing politician, religious leader, or activist in the spotlight is used to some extent by the Vatican and his agents.  By applying learning against learning and mixing truth with lies, tactics that I was just acquitted to recently, the Jesuits control both sides of the spectrum of ideas.  The leftists always go on full power when it comes to implement their agenda, while the conservitards try to retard their advance, never really stopping it.  It’s my conviction that the latter will have a harsher judgement than the former coming their way.  Eventually, it’s up to you to decide whether someone is worthy of your trust, but even if he’s not, it’s wise to know how to attain good information and get rid of the crap.  After all, it’s the job of papal frauds to give you at least 51% of truth.

In that time, the number of connections I’ve made that have proved to be worthwhile are so small as to be negligible.  Allies have turned out to be enemies and enemies have turned out to have some damn smart things to say.

In their desire to disseminate disinformation and to pit “learning against learning” (the Counter-Reformation tactic of sowing truth with lies) it was actually an incognito Jesuit priest who alerted me to the Jesuit World Order.  It took me a while to sniff him out but his pushing of Jesuit doctrines like Zionism, Dispensationalism, Futurism and the Pre-Tribulation Rapture helped me to know that his inexplicable racism wasn’t just a personal dysfunction but confirmation of his true agenda.

While Papal insurgents like Joseph Farah of WorldNetDaily and Walid Shoebat, the reformed “terrorist”, pushed Barack Obama’s birth certificate and supposed muslim background, the reality of his past is that he is a CIA fabrication ³³ who learned to be a black Communist from the best; the Jesuits in Chicago like Greg Galluzzo.

The “Jewish-run” New York Times very carefully screens Galluzzo as a “former” Jesuit (no such thing) who learned activism from Jewish Communist Saul Alinsky.

The Romans have slithered a long way down from putting out their own legions and now never make a stand unless there’s a patsy Jew standing in front of them—and if there isn’t enough anti-Semitism slamming their target they make sure to have their trolls, operatives and coadjutors stir it up.

Galluzzo ran the so-called “Gamaliel Foundation” that taught disenfranchised blacks in Chicago how to be malcontent Communist “community organizers”.  When it comes to “who?” founded Gamaliel, no one seems to know, (not Wikipedia nor anyone else) they simply state “when” (1968) and move on, pretending that they’ve answered your question.

We can answer that question at the same time that we answer “Who really runs Chicago?” — with the location of the Gamaliel offices on La Salle Street.

La Salle Street is named after Jean-Baptiste de La Salle, the Roman Catholic patron saint of rabble-rousers — I’m sorry … “teachers” (same thing). [quote: “The Church played a central if not exclusive role in the establishment and encouragement of the university.”]

Not to go down a rabbithole but while in Chicago Obama met the man that would eventually pen his “autobiography” for him; Weather Underground terrorist William Ayers.  This was uncovered by an outstanding investigative journalist named Jack Cashill.  One wonders how Jack is able to get his work published regularly by sites like Joseph Farah’s WorldNetDaily until one learns that Jack is a good Franciscan-trained Catholic.

One also wonders how William Ayers can go from an unpunished true “domestic terrorist” to teaching your college student how to be like him until one learns how Rome and her Jesuits own “higher education” and always have.

But the Good Lord has a sense of humor and the good news is that, by “coincidence”, I just happened to live right down the street from that very same incognito Jesuit — “Eric Jon Phelps”.  I would not have been able to sniff him out had I not broken bread with him, and his family, on several occasions.

—That’s right; his family.  The man is an incognito Jesuit with a wife and children.

I know what the Lord did for me with this “coincidence” of location, I wonder what He was doing for Eric and the Jesuits.

Someone’s Knockin’ At The Door, Somebody’s Ringin’ The Bell…³⁴

I have something akin to a love/hate relationship with the Seventh Day Adventist Church (more like “love/intense annoyance”).

After the Jesuits woke me up to the Jesuit World Order (I really enjoy writing that), I latched on to the teachings of Seventh Day Adventists like Bill Hughes, Steve Wohlberg, Doug Batchelor and Professor Walter Julius Veith.

Professor Walt, by far, has the most to offer as a dedicated instructor on the topic of “Who rules the world from behind the scenes?”  The other men are good teachers but also pastors so they aren’t dedicated to their craft (sorry!³⁵) the way Professor Walt is.

You know you’ve arrived when you get your own Wikipedia entry!

What I’ve found deeply frustrating, however, is that Walter Veith will zero right in on the Luciferian agenda in religion and reality and completely miss the fire in his own house due his blind sectarian zeal.

This is actually true of all the men I’ve mentioned; particularly Pastor Bill Hughes—again, solid men of Christ but fiercely sectarian and just as fiercely blind in that regard.

As a result of how they cling to the doctrines of men along with an honest examination of Scripture (who can really say they have the one true interpretation of all doctrines?!), they get ensnared in traps laid by the very Luciferians they are aware of and preach against.

Perhaps this is why I’ve not gotten a particularly warm reception from those ministries, this despite having taken the money and trouble to send copies of my book out to them.

I proceed with the desire to take the solid teachings of this sect and showing Adventists how to make them much, much better through freeing them from the chains of organized religion via an open examination of their own Luciferian origin.

Reformed

Counter-reformation: noun; coun·ter·ref·or·ma·tion \ˌkau̇n-tə(r)-ˌre-fər-ˈmā-shən\

1:  usually Counter–Reformation :  the reform movement in the Roman Catholic Church following the Reformation

2:  a reformation designed to counter the effects of a previous reformation

~ Merriam-Webster

All of the top major sources of information have a completely inadequate and even deceptive definition of the Counter-Reformation.  The above is the closest and it’s still deceptive.

Britannica puts so much effort into re-writing reality it’s embarrassing; “the Counter-Reformation was a ‘Catholic Revival’ attempt to ‘reform’ Catholic ‘criticisms’ even before the Reformation.”

This should come as no surprise given that all forms of popular media, both mainstream and “alternative” are completely controlled by Rome.

Nearly 140 years ago, James Aitken Wylie wrote—

When it is a Church or a nation that is to be overthrown, the battle is ordered in the same manner.  The first blow is levelled at that one great principle—for there is such in every society—which is its mainstay, and this cannot be better done than by sowing the seeds of diverse and strange doctrines.  The Sons of Loyola, now flocking to our shores, will not spare to sow such seeds.  We may not see that seed as it falls; its sowers will pass through the land at the dead hour of night; but such seed does not usually lie long under the clod, and the work of these sowers will speedily notify itself by the din—music how sweet to them—of our dissentions and wranglings, which will break out on all sides.

There are two institutions in especial to which the Jesuits will lay siege.  These are the Press and the Pulpit.  They will strain every nerve to possess themselves of both, and work them for their own ends.  The press of Great Britain is already manipulated by them to an extent of which the public but little dream.  Not a few newspapers have a Jesuit on their staff as editor, or “contributor,” or “reporter.”  The reporting force of the kingdom is, to a considerable extent, made up of Romanists; and the esprit de corps is such that a newspaper may, unaware to itself often, be influenced against a cause, or an individual obnoxious to Rome, although it may have no Romanist in its service.  There are names the Times dare not mention; there are causes, true and noble, it dare not advocate.  There are British authors as well as Irish farmers who are “Boycotted.”  The author speaks from documentary evidence when he. says, that the identical Jesuit has been traced through successive disguises in the journalism of the metropolis: now assailing violently in his own proper character of Papist; and now in the guise of a pious Methodist, whispering into the editorial ear, in oily phrase, how much he was pained by such and such an article in his columns, it was so lacking in the sweet grace of charity.  The whole English press of the world is supervised, and the word is passed round how writers, speakers, and causes are to be handled, so that everywhere its verdict may be the same, and applause or condemnation dealt out just as it may accord with the interests and wishes of Rome.³⁶

So allow me to give you an unbiased definition of the Roman Catholic “Counter-Reformation”: a military agenda of subversion, deception, lies, insurgency, assassination and coups designed to destroy the Protestant Reformation by discrediting the Holy Bible and bring all humanity back under the autocratic and tyrannical authority of Rome.  It is spearheaded by the Vatican’s most diabolical and fanatical order; the Jesuits.

How successful has it been?

—In September of last year, a Jesuit Pope addressed the American people via a joint session of Congress for the first time in United States history.  He did so in a rotunda that mimics St. Peter’s basilica, which stands opposite a massive phallic obelisk just as the one outside St. Peter’s does.

The first part of this agenda took place immediately; a Spanish Basque noble named Ignacio López volunteered to be the Special Forces of this effort and “Ignatius of Loyola” founded the Knights of the Virgin Mary in 1534.  Six years later, Loyola would have his order sanctioned by a Farnese Pope—Paul III—but under the more deceptive name of “the Society of Jesus”.

As Jesuits rose in the ranks and proved their trustworthiness in the service of the Whore of Babylon, they would eventually take the Oath of Induction, also known as the 4^th Oath, the Blood Oath or the Oath of Extreme Unction and his Superior would preface the oath by acknowledging his mission thus far—

My son, heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler: among Roman Catholics to be a Roman Catholic, and to be a spy even among your own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man.  Among the Reformers, to be a reformer; among the Huguenots, to be a Huguenot; among the Calvinists, to be a Calvinist; among other Protestants, generally to be a Protestant, and obtaining their confidence, to seek even to preach from their pulpits, and to denounce with all the vehemence in your nature our Holy Religion and the Pope; and even to descend so low as to become a Jew among Jews, that you might be enabled to gather together all information for the benefit of your Order as a faithful soldier of the Pope.

You have been taught to insidiously plant the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces, states that were at peace, and incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the arts and the sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace.  To take sides with the combatants and to act secretly with your brother Jesuit, who might be engaged on the other side, but openly opposed to that with which you might be connected, only that the Church might be the gainer in the end, in the conditions fixed in the treaties for peace and that the end justifies the means.

You have been taught your duty as a spy, to gather all statistics, facts and information in your power from every source; to ingratiate yourself into the confidence of the family circle of Protestants and heretics of every class and character, as well as that of the merchant, the banker, the lawyer, among the schools and universities, in parliaments and legislatures, and the judiciaries and councils of state, and to be all things to all men, for the Pope’s sake, whose servants we are unto death.

The neophyte would confirm this and, with a dagger to his heart, held by the blade and a black crucifix in his off hand the crescendo of his oath promises—

…that I will, when opportunity present, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex or condition; and that I will hang, waste, boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants’ heads against the walls, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race.  That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup, the strangulating cord, the steel of the poniard or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity, or authority of the person or persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Faith, of the Society of Jesus.

Jesuits were then sent to the 4 corners of our flat Earth to enact this agenda of deception and subversion.

The Reformers had been doing all they could to put the Word of God into the hands of common men.  A full 150 years before Martin Luther nailed his 95 Theses to the doors of All Saints Cathedral in Wittenberg, John Wycliffe—the Morning Star of the Reformation—had translated the Scriptures into English.  His Lollard followers did all they could to transcribe the Wycliffe Bible and pass them out and many Lollards paid for it by having the Wycliffe Bible tied around their necks to be burned together at the stake.

These efforts were slow and easily thwarted by the viciousness of Rome.

All of that would change in 1439 when Johannes Guttenberg invented a printing press that used “movable type” metal inserts which dramatically sped up the printing process.  Less than 100 years later and less than 500 kilometers from Guttenberg’s home of Mainz, a young Augustinian monk named Martin Luther would fire the shot heard ‘round the world.

Luther’s Protest was taken by Rome the same way she took the protests of the Waldenses, John Wycliffe’s Lollards, Jan Huss, Jerome of Prague and many others; she sought to kill Luther and obliterate his following.

In 1521, Luther was called to stand before the Roman authorities lead by Johann Eck at the Diet of Worms.  It was demanded of the monk that he recant his charges of corruption against Rome, or else!  Knowing what lay before him, Luther stood firm; “Here I stand.  I can do no other.”

The Elector of Saxony, Frederick III, was aghast at Luther’s disobedience … publicly.

Privately, he adored the upstart priest and, on the pretense of dispensing “justice” kidnapped Luther and interred him in Wartburg castle for safe keeping.

They didn’t call him “Frederick the Wise” for nothing.

“Junker Jörg”

While at Wartburg, Luther (as “Junker Jörg” — a Knight named George) had a lot of time on his hands.  He put it to good use by having the new Greek and Latin translations of the Bible done by Desiderius Erasmus brought to him so that he could translate the New Testament into German, which he soon did.

When it was safe for him to return home, Luther then translated the Old Testament as well.

His followers quickly put these documents to the Guttenberg movable-type press and soon flooded the German countryside with the Word of God.

For the first time in her founding, Rome was hit with a threat she couldn’t stamp out or crush.  She was forced to take up a different tactic—one that was nothing less than satanic; to discredit the Bible even if it meant altering the very fabric of reality.

Sound incredible?  I’ll be writing more on this in the near future (Lord willing).

Forgotten Failures of Freemasonic Frauds

Another tactic of the Dragon and her satanic Special Forces—the Jesuits—was to seed Protestantism with apostate and heretical sects whose doctrines and leaders would be used to humiliate and discredit the movement.

This effort was particularly effective in the 19^th century when several movements were started by Jesuits’ faux-Protestant footsoldiers; the Freemasons.

The connection of Freemasonry to Mormonism is so profound, Wikipedia has an entry on it.  Joseph Smith, his brother Hyrum and perhaps even their father were all Freemasons.  Mormonism differs so strongly from Protestant Christianity it’s considered by many to be a non-Christian cult; the “Jesus” of Mormonism not being the Jesus of Protestantism.

I contend these doctrinal differences are a purposeful agenda.

As I noted to you previously—

All of the early Mormon leaders were Freemasons and they were guided behind the scenes by Jesuits like Pierre-Jean de Smet ³⁷

The Jesuit/Mason connection is always good for murder and mayhem and it’s not a stretch to imagine Brigham Young’s friend Pierre-Jean whispering in his ear before he urged fellow Mormons to massacre an innocent wagon train full of men, women and children at Mountain Meadows, Utah.

When you realize that the Jesuits were behind the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, it’s not so surprising to find that the Mountain Meadows massacre occurred on September 11^th, 1857.

In his teaching titled “The New Age Agenda” Professor Walter Veith notes that all of the early astronauts were either Mormons or Masons (given the connection between Mormonism and Freemasonry it’s basically the same thing).

This is one of Professor Veith’s best teachings.

What Professor Walt fails to follow with is why the early astronauts were either Mormons or Masons: because space travel is impossible.  It is part of the elaborate Roman re-write of our reality designed to discredit Scripture.

Professor Walt is blind to some other connections even more devastating to Adventism but we’ll get to that in a moment.

Another offshoot of “Protestant Christianity” are the Jehovah’s Witnesses—they’re actually an offshoot of the founder of the Adventists!

There is much controversy over whether founder Charles Taze Russell was a Freemason (they buried the connections deep under a pyramid).  But with the help of author Fritz Springmeier we see connections to Russell’s beliefs, family and even repeated close geographic proximity to Freemasonry and Freemasonic “Temples”.

Too bad we also see that Fritz Springmeier is actually Victor Earl Schoof, government-trained domestic terrorist for Rome and one that used the nefarious origins of the Jehovah’s Witnesses to slander all of Protestantism—just like the Counter-Reformation wanted him to.

It is fascinating to note that, just before his death, Russell exhibited some extremely unusual behavior as was noted by his future replacement, Joseph Franklin Rutherford—

A few weeks ago he started on a trip to the Pacific Coast, preaching every evening, and traveling throughout the remainder of the night and of the day.  His last sermon he preached to the Congregation at Los Angeles; and being too weak to stand, he sat throughout the discourse.  He left Los Angeles Sunday evening on his return to Brooklyn, and rapidly grew weaker.  Seven hours before his death, addressing his traveling companion, Brother Menta Sturgeon, he said, “Make me a Roman toga.”

Using the bed sheets, Brother Sturgeon made a toga, which Brother Russell put on himself.  He stood erect for a moment, and then lying down on the couch in his Pullman drawing room, closed his eyes, thus in symbolic language speaking of death.  A great deal of the Bible is written in symbolic language, and it was quite appropriate that he should speak his last message in symbols.  It is interesting here to know what a Roman toga symbolizes: Augustus’ Poet Laureate, said, “It is by the toga that the royal nation is recognized.”

It is absolutely “appropriate” for the founder of the Jehovah’s Witnesses to die “in symbols”—particularly the symbols of Rome.

Let me agree again; it is “by the toga” that the power who rules behind the scenes “is recognized.”

Buh-Bahá’í

The Bahá’í religion was founded by Báb Ali Muhammad Shirāzi via a declaration he made in 1844—an important date and smack in the middle of this era of creating off-shoot cults.

Bahá’í is an Iranian monotheistic religion that prizes “unity” above all and seeks to unify all religions and peoples.  Does that sound like the agenda of another religion?

‘Pope Francis’ Calls for Collaboration With World’s Religions, Those Who ‘Meet God in Different Ways’ ~ Christian News.net

Shaykhism is an apocalyptic/messianic offshoot of Shi’a Islam that is considered to be the forerunner to Bahá’í.  There is an interesting note regarding the successor of “Mahdi” Sayyid Kazim:

Successorship

On the death of Sayyid Kazim on 31 December 1843, some Shaykhis went on to become Babis, some of whom later became Bahais, and the rest split into three factions. It is reported that before dying, instead of appointing a successor, he sent his disciples out to find the Promised One. One of his most noted followers, Mullá Husayn said:

“Our departed teacher insistently exhorted us to forsake our homes, to scatter far and wide, in quest of the promised Beloved…  Regarding the features of the Promised One, he told us that He is of a pure lineage, is of illustrious descent, and of the seed of Fatimah.  As to His age, He is more than twenty and less than thirty.  He is endowed with innate knowledge.  He is of medium height, abstains from smoking, and is free from bodily deficiency.”³⁸

In 1844 Mullá Husayn, after meeting the Siyyid `Alí-Muhammad (the Báb) in Shiraz accepted him as the Mahdi. ~ Wikipedia

Fatimah plays a key role in Shi’a Islam:

According to Shi’a and non-Muslim scholars, Fatima Zahra was Muhammad’s only daughter.^[1]  The Sunni belief that he had other daughters by Khadijah denies Ali ibn Abu Talib the distinction of being Muhammad’s only son-in-law.  She is held in highest of esteem, as being the single most ideal example for all women; in terms of her purity and the eventual martyrdom of her son, she is considered to be the Muslim counterpart to the Christian Mary, mother of Jesus; indeed, one of her names is Maryam al-Kubrá, or “the greater Mary”.^[2] ~ Wikipedia

If you’ve seen the name before in Catholic circles, here’s why:

Apparition Apprehensions

In 1916, three Portuguese children were herding sheep when an angel appeared to them on multiple occasions at Cova da Iria (“Irene’s Cove”) just outside of Fátima.  Lucia dos Santos was 9 and her cousin Francisco Marto was 8.  Francisco’s sister, Jacinta Marto, was 6.  The angel taught them how to pray1722 and “sacrifice” on behalf of sinners.1723 …

Despite their claims, they were ridiculed by some and the apparition they saw promised to give them powerful prophecies on the 13th of the month, in October of 1917.

Between May and October of 1917, always on the 13th of the month, the children received three secrets.  Lucia eventually disclosed them from the Convent where she became a nun.  Francisco and Jacinta died just a few short years later in the Spanish Flu Epidemic of 1918-20.

It is important to note that October 13th 1307 is established by the Luciferian Elite as the day Pope Clement V collaborated with France’s King Philip IV and suppressed the Vatican Treasury guardians—the Knights Templar.1725

There are many questions surrounding the apparition at Fátima.  Why would it choose a location so easily identified by muslims?

Is the apparition of Fátima a cunningly-divined hoax for the political power of uniting Catholicism with Islam?

Only the children saw “Mary”, even during the October event in 1917.  Two of them died shortly thereafter and the third was controlled from a convent.  She even admits she was directed to reveal what she saw by Catholic authorities. ~ Illuminati Unmasked ³⁹

Ex-Jesuit priest Alberto Rivera contended that both Islam and Fátima/Fatimah were heavily manipulated from the very beginning for Rome to wield the Scimtar of Islam, which makes it even more disturbing to see how she does this while hiding behind the “Shield of David”.

There are other indicators of a Freemasonic founding of Bahá’í such as the Luciferian/gnostic symbolism like Bahai’s 9-pointed star. [Trying to make “Bahá’í” possessive was just a bridge too far.]

Nine-Pointed Star

According to the Abjad system of Isopsephy, the word Bahá’ has a numerical equivalence of 9, and thus there is frequent use of the number 9 in Bahá’í symbols.^[8]  The most commonly used symbol connected to the number 9 is the nine-pointed star…  While the star is not a part of the teachings of the Bahá’í Faith, it is commonly used as an emblem representing “9”, because of the association of number 9 with perfection, unity and Bahá’.

The number 9 also comes up several times in Bahá’í history and teachings. On the significance of the number 9, Shoghi Effendi wrote:

“Concerning the number nine: the Bahá’ís reverence this for two reasons, first because it is considered by those interested in numbers as the sign of perfection. The second consideration, which is the more important one, is that it is the numerical value of the word “Bahá’”…
“Besides these two significances the number nine has no other meaning. It is, however, enough to make the Bahá’ís use it when an arbitrary number is to be chosen.”^[12]

Its use on gravestone markers was approved by Shoghi Effendi, then head of the religion, in 1944.^[13] ~ Wikipedia

Nine is, indeed, a number of “completion” … to Freemasons [WARNING: clicking on that link then clicking on “Home” put me in a pop-up spam loop.]—

NINE: Nine is a number representing wholeness and completion as expressed in the Royal Arch, one of whose meanings is the Vault of Heaven, and therefore is especially significant.

Possible references include: Three times three; three plus three plus three.

Sayings: Q. How shall I know you to be a Royal Arch Mason?
A:  By three times three.

Three Times Three, Under a Living Arch.
(note the three T’s in this expression, as also expressed visually in the Triple Tau sign)

In Royal Arch Masonry:

nine officers
nine raps
nine arches in the secret vault of Solomon under Temple Mount.
the nine-branched menorah
An association with the secret name of God

In the Thirty-Second Degree ( =  Sublime Prince of the Royal Secret)

the nonagon (nine-sided figure).  This is a primary figure of ritual in this degree. It contains within it, successively, a pentagon, a triangle and a circle.

Other connotations include: the High Priest (First of Nine); Joshua.

If the above 9-pointed star looks a lot like the so-called “Star of David” just with an extra triangle jammed in, that’s because it is.

The 6-pointed star is a gnostic, pagan/demonic symbol used to invoke sex magick (joining two pubic areas) as well as to symbolize the Luciferian mocking desire for “as above, so below”.

In Freemasonry, the intersecting of the compass and square are meant to call to mind the Luciferian desire to create a “paradise on Earth” and to “be like unto God” [Isaiah 14:14] with their mantra “as above, so below”. ~ Illuminati Unmasked ⁴⁰

It was raised to prominence as part of the psychological operation that was the “refounding” of the modern state of Israel.

The Star (Shield) of David, also called Magen David, is a relatively new Jewish symbol.  Supposedly, it represents the shape of King David’s shield (but there is no rabbinic support for that claim).  The symbol is very rare in early Jewish literature. ~ Shamash: The Jewish Network

Prior to 1948, the national symbol for Judaism was the menorah.

The 8-pointed square-within-a-square has similar gnostic significance and, as a result, has been adopted in Islam.

The Freemason-founded Mormons call it “the seal of Melchizedek”.

Perhaps the best rendition of the Bahá’í star is this one which includes a flat Earth map.

Wikipedia used to contain a sanitized section on Bahá’í ties to Freemasonry under the entry Political objections to the Baha’i Faith.

It has since been expunged (I’m not sure how a Freemasonic founding of Bahá’í is a “political objection”).  Not even a sanitized account that mentions the ties but then “debunks” them is allowed.  Fortunately I found it archived here.

Bahá’í Ties To Freemasonry

Iranian critics of this faith have also accused the Bahá’í Faith of having ties to Freemasonry.  As Freemasonry was a secretive society originating from the West, many in Iran connected the movement with the introduction of foreign ideas into the country in order to undermine Iranian values. Claims were made that many of the earliest Freemason lodges, such as Malkom Khan’s faramush-khanih, which were founded in 1858, were linked to European lodges.  However, Freemasonry was brought to Iran by Iranians who had seen the movement in other parts of the world.

Specific accusations connecting the Bahá’í Faith to Freemasonry often include an assertion that Dr. Dhabih Qurban, who was a well-known Bahá’í, was also a freemason.  This assertion is based on an Iranian book publishing documents related to Freemasonry in the country; that book states that in specific pages of Fazel Mazandarani’s book on the Bahá’í Faith there are statements that Dr. Dhabih Qurban is a Freemason, but in fact Freemasony is not mentioned in the pages of the referenced Bahá’í book.  Furthermore, the Iranian book that is the source of the accusation includes a discussion between the Grand Master of the Great Lodge in Iran, and the Grand Master notes that “no Bahá’ís have become masons and this is repeated by others present with no-one disagreeing.”

The teachings of the Baha’i Faith expressly forbid membership in secret societies.  Shoghi Effendi, the guardian of the Bahá’í Faith, asked all Bahá’ís to remove their memberships from all secret societies, including the Freemasons, so that they can serve the teachings of the Bahá’í Faith without compromising their independence.

The Bahá’í prohibition against joining Freemasonry sounds suspiciously like the supposed war against the Masons waged by Rome—something I prove to the contrary in my book.

The Bahai Insider blog seems to have a little bit more to go on than the erased section from Wikipedia’s Political objections to the Baha’i Faith.

Dr. Dhabih Qurban, was a well-known Iranian Bahá’í and also a Freemason.  Moojan Momen tried to refute that no Baha’is were linked to the Freemasonry but his refutation with poor references has no value as the prominent Iranian Historian Abdollah Shahbazi has given numerous references that not only Dhabih Qurban but many other Baha’is were also active Freemasons. ~ Abdul Baha asks Manchester Baha’is to conceal their beliefs and act like Freemasons! Bahai Insider

If your browser has a translation capability I highly recommend you peruse Professor Shahbazi’s work on Freemasonry in Iran.

A Warning To My Adventist Brethren

I’ve saved the best for last.

On “the first Sabbath in August, 1833”, a Baptist preacher named William Miller began to speak out on how he had calculated the near-return of Jesus Christ based upon a shockingly flawed and deceptive interpretation of Daniel 8:14.

Daniel Chapter 8 is a vision that the Prophet Daniel was given regarding the kingdoms of Medo/Persia and Greece—we don’t have to wonder about this because the latter half of the chapter is the Archangel Gabriel explaining this to Daniel!

It is a difficult passage that states the span of time between the ceasing of sacrifices and the cleansing of the Temple would be two thousand, three hundred “days”—but, more accurately, “evenings and mornings” which is the Hebrew reckoning for a “day” that may not mean exact days.

One possible interpretation is that, due to the Mosaic practice of conducting a morning and evening sacrifice, the actual days should be half the prediction.  If that were the case, the span between Antiochus Epiphanes’ desecration of the Temple and its restoration under the Maccabees of 167 to 164 B.C. does work.

Even here there are problems because other passages connect the “little horn” with the office of the Papacy while Daniel 8:10-11 states that the little horn trampled under a number of the stars of Heaven (angels?) and magnified himself to the level of the Prince of Heaven (the Son of God?).  In verse 13 he tramples truth, itself!  That verse speaks to us today in ways that will rock your world.

There is no easy way to understand this passage, even with Gabriel’s help but that’s another rub; Gabriel is the herald of Jesus Christ yet there doesn’t seem to be an obvious connection to Christ in this prophecy—perhaps there actually is and it remains to be brought out.

One thing is sure; William Miller’s interpretation was way off:

Basing his calculations principally on Daniel 8:14: “Unto two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed”, Miller assumed that the cleansing of the sanctuary represented the Earth’s purification by fire at Christ’s Second Coming.  Then, using the interpretive principle of the “day-year principle”, Miller (and others) interpreted a day in prophecy to read not as a 24-hour period, but rather as a calendar year.  Further, Miller became convinced that the 2,300 day period started in 457 BC with the decree to rebuild Jerusalem by Artaxerxes I of Persia.  Simple calculation then revealed that this period would end in 1843.  Miller records, “I was thus brought… to the solemn conclusion, that in about twenty-five years from that time 1818 all the affairs of our present state would be wound up.”^[8] ~ Wikipedia

Although use of the day/year principle of prophecy interpretation is sound (and is actually critical in understanding Daniel 7:25 to speak of the Papacy rolling into her control of the United States—the Beast of the Land in Revelation 13) it simply doesn’t work under these parameters.

As the expected time of Christ’s Return came about, Millerites (early Adventists) went to all extremes in preparation for seeing their Savior; many sold all they had.  They were devastated when Jesus failed to appear.

This dashed hope came to be known as “The Great Disappointment.”  In his book When Time Shall Be No More, historian Paul Boyer offers an example of the deep despondency suffered by the Millerites.  In the words of one tragically disappointed believer: “Our fondest hopes and expectations were blasted, and such a spirit of weeping came over us as I never experienced before….  We wept, and wept, till the day dawned” (page 81).

When Jesus did not return as expected, many who had hopefully waited for the return of their Savior threw off their faith completely.  Some refused to give up their hope and eventually replaced one delusion with another.  They would claim that Christ must have come invisibly in 1844, moving into the Holy of Holies in heaven to begin his “investigative judgment” of Christian lives.

Many simply returned to the churches out of which they had come, no doubt confused, distraught and embarrassed to have accepted something that was revealed to have been an empty fantasy.  Miller, having renounced his prophecy studies after the Great Disappointment, died in 1849.  Any remaining followers split up over differences of belief and doctrine.  Ultimately, a variety of groups arose from the ashes of the Millerite camp, including the Jehovah’s Witnesses and Seventh-day Adventists.

Actually, the October 1844 debacle was the second great disappointment for followers of Miller’s chronology and prophecy blueprint.  He had previously announced that the coming of Jesus Christ would occur in about the year 1843.  The year came and went without Christ’s return.  Miller’s prophetic claim had failed and disappointed many people.

Then someone pointed out that he had neglected to take into account the transition from B.C. to A.D., so that his calculations were one year off.  Miller then moved the expected return of Jesus forward by one year, this time to Oct.  22, 1844.  But the great disappointment happened once again to the thousands of followers who had given away their possessions and waited in expectant belief — for nothing.  ~ The Great Disappointment, Grace Communion International

The disappointment of 1843 wasn’t devastating enough, it was contrived that computing the carry over from B.C. to A.D. required one add a year to humiliate Christians again?!  A true reckoning of the cross over from B.C. to A.D. subtracts a year because there is no “year 0”.

Not only are Jehovah’s Witnesses connected to this debacle, but Baháis is as well!

When it was clear that Miller was wrong, key Baháis ran to claim that the Báb was Christ returned in 1844.

Members of the Bahá’í Faith believe that Miller’s interpretation of signs and dates of the coming of Jesus were, for the most part, correct.^[15]  They believe that the fulfillment of biblical prophecies of the coming of Christ came through a forerunner of their own religion, the Báb, who declared that he was the “Promised One” on May 23, 1844, and began openly teaching in Persia in October 1844.^[16][17]  Several Bahá’í books and pamphlets make mention of the Millerites, the prophecies used by Miller and the Great Disappointment, most notably William Sears’ Thief in the Night.^[18][19][20] ~ Wikipedia

There are entire books written on validating this embarrassment from muslim and Bahá’í authors trying to cover for William Miller…why?

—Because William Miller was a Freemason.

Miller “resigned” in 1831 but this was long after he, himself, admits he received the interpretive “vision” of Daniel 8:14.

Looking for hints of Freemasonry (such as using the term “Brother” as a title) in William Miller’s biography, I came across the attempt to excuse his humiliating failure as something he was just tortured to do—

Mr. Miller succeeded in the accomplishment of his wishes, assisting according to his ability and known liberality.

He continued to make the Bible his daily study, and became more and more convinced that he had a personal duty to perform respecting what he conceived the Bible to teach of the nearness of the Advent [the Return of Jesus Christ].  These impressions he thus describes:

“When I was about my business, it was continually ringing in my ears, ‘Go and tell the world of their danger.’” …

“I prayed that some minister might see the truth, and devote himself to its promulgation; but still it was impressed upon me, ‘Go and tell it to the world: their blood will I require at thy hand.’”

[I find it odd that the Lord would communicate in Old English.]

“‘The more I presented it in conversation, the more dissatisfied I felt with myself for withholding it from the public.  I tried to excuse myself to the Lord for not going out and proclaiming it to the world.  I told the Lord that I was not used to public speaking; that I had not the necessary qualifications to gain the attention of an audience; that I was very diffident, and feared to go before the world; that they would ‘not believe me nor hearken to my voice;’ that I was ‘slow of speech, and of a slow tongue.’  But I could get no relief.”

In this way he struggled on for nine years longer, pursuing the study of the Bible, doing all he could to present the nearness of Christ’s coming to those whom circumstances threw in his way; but resisting the impressions of duty to go out as a public teacher.  He was then fifty years old, and it seemed impossible for him to surmount the obstacle which lay in his path, to successfully present it in a public manner.

Interestingly, this inability to speak powerfully in public (likened, not for lack of cheek, to Moses, himself) didn’t slow him from gaining power and prestige…exactly what one would expect from a Luciferian Freemason favorite.

His freedom to convene on the subject, and the ability with which he was able to defend his own views, and oppose those differing from him, had given him no little celebrity in his denomination in all that region; and some were rather shy in approaching him.  Elder T. [Truman⁴¹] Hendryx, a Baptist clergyman now in the State of Pennsylvania, who has kindly furnished the biographer with many original letters from Mr. Miller, thus speaks of his first acquaintance with him:

“My first acquaintance with Brother Miller was in the summer of 1881.  I had been requested to visit the Baptist church in Hampton, and concluded to go.” ~ Memoirs of William Miller by Sylvester Bliss, published by Joshua V. Himes, 1853, Boston, pp. 92-93

—And then there’s “Brother Miller”, titled as such like the good Freemason he was.  Of course we’re to take, “Brother” Hendryx in 19^th century Adventist speak but, sadly, it’s actually the same.

Here are important things to take into consideration regarding what could have been going on behind the scenes:

* the Jesuits are experts in Bible prophecy and even more adept at warping it to cover their tracks
* the day/year principle outs Rome as the Whore of Babylon the very Chapter before; the misapplication casts doubt on all applications
* Miller claimed to be a Baptist; a sect very high on the Jesuit hit-list

One would’ve thought that this humiliation would’ve been the death nell for the Millerites but with strange contortions of 1844 being “Investigative Judgment”, they carried on.  Again we must ask, “Why?”  Was there so much of value in what was left of the Millerite movement or was it a vehicle that the Puppet Masters wanted to continue to ride out?

One man who stayed after “The Great Disappointment” was James Springer White.

White met and married a young woman a year later, in 1845, and built the rest of the Seventh Day Adventist movement on her writings and visions—Ellen Gould Harmon, who then became Ellen G. White.

Ellen G. White is so highly venerated by Adventists it approaches the same Semiramis / Isis / “Mary” cult of Babylon / Egypt / Rome that they so effectively preach against.  The Banner at the top of the official web site of the Ellen White Estate is shocking.

It could easily have come from any Roman Catholic domain.

Un-real

The Jesuits and their Freemasonic henchmen have been busy from the beginning discrediting the Word of God with a literal re-write of our reality; just as Gabriel predicted to Daniel, “truth has been trampled upon”!

Darwin, dinosaurs, space travel, spinning globe Earth—all have been shockingly woven from the Reformation to this day and, sadly, the writings and “visions” of Ellen White contribute to it—despite her excellent warnings about Rome (perhaps because of them).

Do Adventists have such clear vision regarding the Fourth and Final Beast because the Beast gave that information to them to sweeten their Luciferian founding and resulting disinformation like the ability to visit other planets?

In the same way that NASA “astronaut” Mark Kelly handles his wife, Gabrielle Giffords, after the brain injury she received during the false flag of the Tucson mass shooting, it appears James Springer White “handled” Ellen to insure the best and worst information was circulated starting with a coverup of “the Great Disappointment” and rolling into space travel.

It is well known that many were expecting the Lord to come at the 7^th month, 1845.  That Christ would then come we firmly believed.  A few days before the time passed, I was at Fairhaven, and Dartmouth Mass., with a message on this point of time.  At this time, Ellen was with the band at Carver, Mass., where she saw in vision, that we should be disappointed, and that the saints must pass through the “time of Jacob’s trouble,” which was future.  Her view of Jacob’s trouble was entirely new to us, as well as herself.  At our conference in Topsham, Maine, last Nov., Ellen had a vision of the handy works of God.  She was guided to the planets Jupiter, Saturn, and I think one more.  After she came out of vision, she could give a clear description of their Moons, etc.  It is well known, that she knew nothing of astronomy, and could not answer one question in relation to the planets, before she had this vision. {1847 JW, WLF 22.6} ~ A Word to the Little Flock, James White⁴²

A more controversial example (but one catalogued by the Ellen White Estate) was that of Miss Marion Concordia Stowell Truesdail (whose married name was Crawford).  After being a present during a vision Ellen states she had, Miss Truesdail later recounted it—

“Sister White was in very feeble health, and while prayers were offered in her behalf, the Spirit of God rested upon us.  We soon noticed that she was insensible to earthly things.  This was her first view of the planetary world.  After counting aloud the moons of Jupiter, and soon after those of Saturn, she gave a beautiful description of the rings of the latter.  She then said, ‘The inhabitants are a tall, majestic people, so unlike the inhabitants of earth.  Sin has never entered here.’  It was evident from Brother Bates’s smiling face that his past doubts in regard to the source of her visions were fast leaving him.  We all knew that Captain Bates was a great lover of astronomy, as he would often locate many of the heavenly bodies for our instruction.  When Sister White replied to his questions, after the vision, saying that she had never studied or otherwise received knowledge in this direction, he was filled with joy and happiness.  He praised God, and expressed his belief that this vision concerning the planets was given that he might never again doubt.” {EGWC 93.4} ~ Ellen G. White And Her Critics, p. 93

Jehovah’s Whitenesses: The Eye And The Obelisk

Jehovah’s Witnesses, after having been birthed by the Millerite movement, managed to put out their own failed prophecies to humiliate Christians with (their reputation for being a cult, notwithstanding).

Another odd, disturbing, parallel between Adventists and Witnesses is the idea that the Archangel Michael is a theophany ⁴³ of Jesus Christ.  This doctrine is ridiculous in light of Michael’s mention in the New Testament [Jude 9, Revelation 12:7], after the Incarnation of Christ yet both sects still cling to this belief.  Knowing what I know of the Luciferians, I trace this heresy to the idea that Lucifer is too powerful to be handled by anything less than the Son of God, Himself.  This is most assuredly not the case and not Scriptural.

In her writings, Ellen White made mention of the “all-seeing eye” of God which has no place in the Word of God but is quite prominent in Luciferian, gnostic and Freemasonic writing as Lucifer is the great voyeur who secretly watches.

There is need of each one in every school and in every institution to be as was Daniel—in such close connection with the Source of all wisdom that his powers will enable him to reach the highest standard of his duties in every line, that he may be able to fulfill his scholastic requirements, not only under able teachers, but also under the supervision of heavenly intelligences, knowing that the all-seeing, the ever sleepless Eye is upon him. {SpM 75.2} ~ Spalding and Magan Collection, p. 75

“Ever seek to exert a good influence, that God may approve of your works.  Remember you are forming a character for heaven or for destruction.  Oh, that you may form a good Christian character!  You are daily stamping a record of your life by your course of action here.  Let all your acts be such that you would not be ashamed to meet them in the judgment.  God’s eye never slumbers or sleeps.  This all-seeing eye is ever upon you.” {3MR 52.1} ~ Manuscript Releases, Vol. 3 [Nos. 162-209], p. 52

I saw that before the work of God can make any decided progress, the ministers must be converted. … A faithful record of all their works is daily made by the recording angels.  All their acts, and even the intents and purposes of the heart, stand faithfully revealed.  Nothing is hid from the all-seeing eye of Him with whom we have to do. {1T 468.1} ~ Testimonies For The Church, Vol. 1, p. 468

The grave of Charles Taze Russell is marked by a massive pyramid decorated with the Templar cross-in-crown surrounded by Roman laurels on each side.

Similarly, it has been noted that James Springer White had an obelisk mark his grave and that another marks Ellen’s.

As I note in my book, these obelisks are the phallus of Osiris—not very appropriate on the grave of a Christian prophetess and her husband.

The Creator Gets A Vote

As I told you before, military tacticians are taught “the enemy gets a vote” before plans are acted upon.

Despite these troubling aspects regarding the Seventh Day Adventist sect, I do not consider them a cult.  In fact, I consider Adventists—their Luciferian founding and bad doctrines included—to have been chosen by YHWH to carry the vessel of His Truth through this very Counter-Reformation PSYOP to today!

The Adventists are the last true Protestants and their teaching on Rome, Futurism, Preterism, the Pre-Tribulation Rapture, Dispensationalism and Zionism are peerlessly accurate.  That’s why Jesuit-trained and managed Bill Clinton targeted the Branch Davidians for slaughter.

In the way that the gallows Haman built for Mordechai eventually executed him and his entire family, the Roman Luciferians were too smart by half when they created the Milleriate movement to humiliate Christians with.

I had been unfamiliar with the teaching or ministry of Dr. Walter Martin so, when a friend of my work (Daniel) sent this to me, I was shocked to learn of his frankness and effectiveness in dealing with heretical teaching.

Perhaps more than anything else, the contrast between Martin and Hanegraaff proves that Hanegraaff is part of a Papist coup.  While Martin was careful to first send certified letters to anyone he questioned in an attempt to dialogue before addressing them publicly (as is commanded in Matthew 18 by Christ, Himself), Hanegraaff shoots first, viciously, then ducks for cover—just what we’d expect from a man whose mission it is, is to divide and conquer for an Invisible Hand.

As I stated in my original column, it’s no coincidence that many of Hanegraaff’s victims are premier proponents of the Pro Testari.

Daniel’s comment to me in sharing this amazing interview (apparently, Walter’s last on Paul Crouch’s gold-plated TBN) was that Dr. Martin had all but called Robert Crystal Cathedral Schuller a Jesuit.  He didn’t quite go that far but he did mention how Schuller was one of the only personalities Dr. Martin had sent correspondence to that not only responded but also invited Dr. Martin to conduct an open discussion.  Once in Schuller’s office, Martin and Schuller walked through what they apparently agreed and disagreed on.  Dr. Martin then reproached Schuller for his “unification” seminars which push one-world ecumenism and destroyed the Gospel Message.  Schuller apologized, agreed that they were harmful to the Gospel and vowed to put an end to them.

6 months later, there was no change and the seminars continued.

This shouldn’t have surprised Walter, as Schuller has always been a puppet of Rome and maybe Daniel is right; all but a Jesuit.

Schuller’s “Rethink” seminar was an ecumenical outrage that exposed “Christians” to—

* George H.W. Skull and Bones Bush #41 (former Director of the CIA)
* Knight of Malta Rupert Murdoch
* Larry King.  Schuller and Larry are old friends, when on King’s show in December of 1998, Schuller told him “We all have to find God in our own way.”
* Ben Stein—a nice guy but not even Conservative Jews are people I want spiritual advice from
* Rick Warren’s wife Kay.  Rick would’ve gone himself but he needs some separation from his mentor, whom he vehemently claims he had little to do with but, humorously, Kay admits to freely!

Clearly, what Schuller wanted his parishioners to “rethink” was holding to the Word of God.

Let Us Reason.org states that Schuller’s own newsletter outed how Schuller was a frequent visitor to Rome to include getting input from John Paul II on the “Crystal Cathedral”.

Schuller’s monthly newsletter Powerlines (May 1998), wrote of his meeting with Pope John Paul II in Rome., “it was the fourth time Dr. Schuller and the Pope had met, hand-to-hand, heart-to-heart at the Vatican.”  The article also added a brief note concerning the discussion between the Pope and Schuller: “When the Schullers met Pope John Paul II in March, the Pope expressed interest in how our churches could work together to take part in the Vatican’s preparations for the Jubilee celebrations of Christianity’s third millennium in the year 2000.”  Pope John Paul II also blessed Mrs. Schuller, an act which Robert Schuller said may have caused his wife to be healed five days later when Mrs. Schuller suffered a mild heart attack.  “How could Arvella help but be healed when the Crystal Cathedral Congregation is praying for her, and after she had received private blessings from the Pope and a special visit from the pastor of the largest Protestant church in the world, David Yonggi Cho,” Schuller said.  Both the Pope and David Yonggi Cho are leading millions of people astray by the false doctrines they propagate, and Schuller is perfectly comfortable commending these men as servants of God! (Source: May-June 1998, Foundation magazine.)

The Roman Catholic site These Last Days Ministries of Lowell, Michigan reported how Bishop Fulton Sheen was a frequent and important guest of the Crystal Cathedral and her Keeper—

TV pastor Robert Schuller tells about the time Bishop Fulton Sheen spoke at the Crystal Cathedral.  Fulton Sheen was one of the most effective religious communicators of his time.  In the early 1950s his weekly television broadcast was the most popular program in the country.

Because he was so popular, thousands of people came to hear Sheen at the Crystal Cathedral.  After the message, he and Robert Schuller were able to get to their car only because a passageway was roped off.  Otherwise, they would have been mobbed.  Along both sides of the ropes, people were reaching out in an attempt to touch the bishop.  It was as if the pope himself had come to town.

As Sheen was passing through this section on his way to his car, someone handed him a note, which he folded and put into his pocket.  Then, as he and Schuller were on their way to the restaurant where they were going to eat lunch, Bishop Sheen pulled out that note, read it, and asked Schuller, “Do you know where this trailer park is?”  Schuller looked at the note and said, “Yes, it’s just a couple of miles from here.”  The bishop said, “Do you think we could go there before we go to lunch?”  “Sure,” Schuller answered.  “We have plenty of time.”  So they drove to this little trailer park, and Bishop Sheen went up to one of the trailers and knocked on the door.

An elderly woman opened the door, and seemed surprised–flabbergasted, really–when she saw who had come to visit her.  She opened the door and the bishop went in.   After a few moments, he came out, got back in the car and said, “Now she’s ready for living–in this life and the next.” ~ Our Lady of the Roses, March 25, 1978

WELL-KEPT SECRET: The life-sized bronze statue of Bishop Fulton J. Sheen that greeted “Protestants” as they entered Robert Schuller’s Crystal Cathedral. Now that the Cathedral has been re-taken by its land-lords, there’s no-longer a need for pretense.

On the page where TLDM.org extols the great virtues of the great orator, Sheen (after whom actor Ramón Antonio Gerardo Estévez took his stage name, “Martin Sheen”), is a picture of the April 14^th, 1952 issue of Knight of Malta Henry Luce’s Time magazine which shows the “Red Cross” of Malta Crusaders, a very complimentary illustration of Sheen and the U.N.’s flat Earth logo.

Schuller didn’t just invite Sheen to speak at his Crystal Cathedral, he memorialized him with a life-sized bronze statue of the man in his foyer where no one would miss Sheen’s “presence” coming in or going out of the Cathedral.

The Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen Spiritual Center says Schuller praised Sheen by stating, “I consider Fulton Sheen to be the brightest, the most brilliant, and the most beautiful Christian in mind and heart that I have known in the 20th Century.  No one inspired me more than Fulton Sheen to use television to reach the unbelieving word for Christ.”

When the Catholic masters of the Cathedral decided she had run her course, they confiscated her back.

The below article from the LA Times is so amazing I reposted it in its entirety;

* “for decades” the gaudy structure was considered a “Protestant landmark”, now it was getting engulfed by Rome
* seen as a “shot in the arm” for “ecumenism”
* Schuller states, “I could’ve done it 20 years ago” because “I trust” the Catholic Church…I don’t think Christian victims of the Inquisition did, however

* admits the Schuller/Sheen origins
* note that Schuller uses Freemasonic terminology and calls Rome the “mother Church” [for more, see my column on Freemasonry and the Charleston AME false flag] * the T. Marie Chilton Professor of Catholic Theology at Jesuit Loyola Marymount, Rev. Thomas P. Rausch, S.J. openly called it “a tactical decision”—why not, the Jesuits were running the show (and the press) from the beginning
* daughter Sheila Schuller Coleman is still teaching Jesuit-inspired New Age heresies and blather
* thanks to the treasonous flooding of America with illegal Roman Catholic alien immigrants from Papal puppets in DC, the diocese will easily fill the Crystal Catholic Cathedral
* there was nothing spontaneous about this at all—the only deception in this LA Times piece—it was a calculated victory dance over Martin Luther from its Luciferian inception

Crystal Cathedral Sale to Diocese a Milestone; Some See a Miracle

The deal was a triumph for ecumenism and for Orange County’s growing Catholic diocese.  Cathedral founder Robert H. Schuller is pleased.

December 18, 2011
Nicole Santa Cruz
Los Angeles Times

Whenever clergy from Asia, South America or Europe visit Roman Catholic Bishop Tod Brown in Orange County, they all want to see one church, but not one of Brown’s.  They want to see the Crystal Cathedral.

For decades, the architectural landmark — famous for its 10,000 panes of glass and 236-foot bell tower — has been synonymous with the Rev. Robert H. Schuller and his “Hour of Power” broadcasts.  That is about to change.

Last month, the Crystal Cathedral property became the future home of the diocese after a bankruptcy judge approved the sale for $57.5 million.  The Vatican has signed off and diocese officials expect escrow to open soon.

In Orange County, where a third of the population is Catholic, the deal represents both vast demographic change and the rising influence of the church.

“I think the Crystal Cathedral will be, for us, the heart and center for our Catholic community,” said Brown, who reached the mandatory retirement age of 75 on Nov. 15, two days before the court victory.  He will help oversee the transition because a successor has not yet been named.

Such cooperation between Catholic and Protestant faiths was once unimaginable in American Christianity.

In a rare interview, Schuller told The Times that he never saw it that way.

“I think it could have happened 20 years ago because I haven’t changed,” he said.  “It’s who I have always been.”

The 85-year-old minister, who became the pivotal unifying force in the bankruptcy sale, said he has always respected the Roman Catholic faith and considers it the “mother church.”  Schuller also said he drew inspiration for his “Hour of Power” from Catholic Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen, whose own popular TV show in the 1950s paved the way.

“The Roman Catholic Church isn’t going to change its theologies,” Schuller said.  “I trust them.”

Still, Brown’s tenacious pursuit of one of the most recognizable Protestant symbols surprised many, even Brown himself, who said the idea “never crossed my mind” until several lay advisors approached him.  After all, he had long planned to build a cathedral in Santa Ana for an estimated $200 million in response to the booming Catholic population.  He even hired an architect last year.

But he quickly saw the bankruptcy as a chance to fulfill his dream in a different way and began a bidding war for the church property with Chapman University.

In the final 24 hours, Brown said that even he thought “it was all over.”  Then Schuller, who had won over millions of believers through his credo of “possibility thinking,” told the court he could not abide the thought that Chapman might someday use the cathedral for nonreligious purposes.  The deal was struck.

Diocesan officials were elated, with one attorney calling it a miracle.  As Brown put it, “ecumenism has got a shot in the arm.”

The acquisition unquestionably raises the profile of the nation’s 10th-largest Roman Catholic diocese and could help it emerge from the shadow of the Los Angeles Archdiocese.

“It was a tactical decision,” said Father Thomas Rausch, a professor of Catholic theology at Loyola Marymount University.  “Here’s this beautiful church with a rich history in Orange County and an identity that’s already established.  It’s a bargain for the local church.”

It was a bittersweet victory, though, because Brown knew it marked the end of an era for Schuller’s world-famous Crystal Cathedral Ministries, which has three years to vacate under terms of the deal, whereupon the Catholic diocese will use the campus.

Sheila Schuller Coleman, the founder’s daughter, is senior pastor and continues to preach “possibility thinking,” though the philosophy has not brought the $50 million in donations that could have staved off a sale.

“There’s plenty of time for God to perform a miracle,” she told congregants on a recent Sunday.  At the front of the church, a table was set up with sign-up sheets for a “miracle” prayer drive.

Congregant Jillian Carter of Torrance said she still holds out hope.

“I feel like it’s not over until it’s over.  Anything can happen,” she said.  “This place has its trademark.  Nobody can take that.”

That trademark is exactly what appealed to the diocese.

When Brown succeeded Bishop Norman McFarland in 1998, there were 600,000 Catholics in Orange County.  There are now 1.2 million.  That growth can be seen on almost any Sunday.  For many parishes, the norm is standing-room-only turnout for Mass; at others, the Sunday crowds spill out the doors.  Mass is said in 10 languages, including Vietnamese, Polish, Mandarin, Korean, Indonesian and Spanish.

During Brown’s tenure, he dedicated nine churches, bringing the diocese total to 57.  He also appointed Latinos and women to key positions and gave a new parish a Vietnamese name, Our Lady of La Vang, a first for a Catholic church in Southern California.

But he never lost sight of building a cathedral, first announcing plans in 2001.

A lot of plans were hatched in 2001, not least of which was a Jesuit false flag of such evil one dare might call it “Biblical” in its malignancy and scope.

Many have wondered how Rome could have committed such a coup in using a man like Hanegraaff to take over and destroy Dr. Martin’s legacy but I think I see the answer in his last TBN interview; Walter Martin had no idea he was dealing with a vicious, military threat that would not and will not stop until it buries or enslaves us all.

NOTE: I am deeply saddened to see that the man who called me to Christ—Calvary Chapel Pastor Skip Heitzig—has been a guest on TBN.  I continue to love and respect Skip for all he’s done on behalf of the Gospel but I must now question at least his judgment…especially given the ties of the Calvary movement to Rome.  Interestingly, this anti-Vatican blog connects the dots from Chuck Smith to Paul Crouch to Rome.

UPDATE 30 May 2018:

As the Catholic Church pays out hundreds of millions of dollars to compensate tens of thousands of raped and assaulted children, “journalists” all over pull at our heartstrings for the many “bankruptcies” suffered by Rome (untold trillions in the Vatican basement notwithstanding).

St. Paul-Minneapolis Archdiocese Files For Bankruptcy To Pay Out Sex Abuse Lawsuits — New York Daily News

The Catholic Church in their Jesuit-created far-Left illegal Hispanic Roman Catholic paradise of California set records a few years back with a jaw-dropping $660 million joint settlement.

Yet, they still have the money to buy back their monstrosity from their puppet Robert Schuller, and then sink another $72 million into it for “remodeling”.

For more about just how lawless Rome has been and intent upon the rape, abuse and murder of your children, read my book Eaters of Children.

In the year 533, Justinian issued a decree in which he united all the priests “in the Orient” to the Apostolic See of Rome.

The emperor’s letter must have been sent before the 25^th of March, 533.  For in his letter of that date to Epiphanius he speaks of its having been already dispatched, and repeats his decision, that all affairs touching the church shall be referred to the Pope, “Head of all bishops, and the true and effective corrector of heretics.” [“Vel eo maxime, quod quoties in his locis haeretici pullularunt, et sententia et recto judicio illius venerabilis sedis correct! sunt.”]¹ …

The Vandals in Africa were defeated 534-­535 by Belisarius, Justinian’s general.  The Ostrogoths were defeated, and surrendered their supremacy over the Catholic Church, 538 A.D.; and this is the only logical and authentic date for the beginning of the supremacy of the “little horn” of Daniel 7, for that year marked the union of the Western Catholic Church, with the pope at its head, to the imperial Eastern Catholic Church, thus making the “little horn” organically complete, never again to be separated for 1260 years.

For generations, those who protested Rome’s iron teeth and claws understood Daniel 2 and 7 and Revelation 13, 17 and 18 to be speaking of Rome and the terrible system she built to rule and control the entire plane of our existence.

It was common knowledge that the great statue in Nebuchadnezzar’s dream and the Four Beasts translated thusly—

1. head was of fine gold/lion with eagle’s wings: Babylon, who conquered with the power of a lion but the swiftness of an eagle
2. chest and arms of silver/bear raised up on one side: Medo/Persia whose partnership first favored the Medes but later the Persians took control
3. belly and thighs of bronze/leopard with four wings and four heads: Greece who conquered even faster than Babylon and whose territory was carved by four generals after Alexander’s assassination (Lysimachus, Cassander, Ptolemy and Seleucus)
4. legs of iron, feet of iron and clay⁴⁴/dreadful beast with teeth of iron, different from those before it: Rome first as a military power like the others but then transforming into an invisible parasitic system of control which is able to appropriate the money and power of other nations without their knowledge

Rome has always been the Fourth and Final Beast and, as a result, she has used her satanic Special Forces—the Jesuits—to erase her from Protestant eschatology and they have been demonically successful!

I intend to go into more detail regarding the two beasts of Revelation 13 in subsequent writing, but for a thousand years after the Roman Empire transforming into the Holy Roman Empire⁴⁵, this Whore/Beast system ruled supreme, having buried the Word of God along with untold multitudes of true Christians—but not before horribly torturing most of them first (Daniel 7:21, Revelation 13:7).

The “shot heard ‘round the world” was fired on October 31^st, 1517 as a former Augustinian monk and university professor posted a notice of meeting to his peers regarding the outrages of the Mother Church in wrenching what little wealth the poor had for spiritual “indulgences” that would allow the Medici Pope (Leo X) to finish St. Peter’s Cathedral.  Luther never intended his 95 Theses to be dispersed amongst the parishners but he was the victim of his own popularity.  His students adored him and they quickly snatched the notice from the door of Wittenburg All Saints Cathedral (not that any of Martin Luther’s peers had the courage to respond—they didn’t), translated it into German and utilized the new Guttenberg printing press to disseminate it amongst the townspeople.

It was an instant success.

The revolt against Rome spread like a wild fire and put the young monk in danger of going the way of previous Pro Testari—being burned at the stake.  His benefactor, Frederick III, Elector of Saxony, kidnapped Luther and locked him in Wartburg castle.  This gave the Reformer a lot of time on his hands and he put it to good use; translating the New Testament into vernacular German.  He would later go on to translate the Old Testament as well.

Again, the Guttenberg press was put to powerful use and soon the Word of God was being spread and read faster than Rome could burn it.

It was too late.  The Truth was out.  There would be no way of containing it again as Canon law had dictated for centuries.

A new tactic was needed; one that would not only infiltrate and subvert the Reformation but re-weave the very fabric of human reality.

Footsoldiers of Fabricated Falsehood

Although they probably aren’t the founders of all secret societies, the Knights Templar sure showed how to get it done.

Servants of the Pope, they vowed to win him Jerusalem in the Crusades (which they didn’t).

What they did do, was get filthy rich as a result of their conquests which lead them into discovering the usefulness of usury in hording and utilizing wealth.  As a result, the Templars invented modern banking.

Freemasonic lore traces the “first mason” to “Hiram Abiff”, the supposed architect of the Temple of Solomon—

Hiram Abiff (also Hiram Abif or the Widow’s son) is the central character of an allegory presented to all candidates during the third degree in Freemasonry.  Hiram is presented as the chief architect of King Solomon’s Temple, who is murdered in the Temple he designed by three ruffians during an unsuccessful attempt to force him to divulge the Master Masons’ secret passwords.  The themes of the allegory are the importance of fidelity, and the certainty of death. ~ Wikipedia

It is no coincidence that the proper name for the Templars is “The Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon”.

Although there is great debate about whether or not the Freemasons were created by Rome or simply taken over, there can be little doubt whom they serve now.  Even the official historian of the Freemasons, Albert Mackey, admits in his Encyclopedia of Freemasonry that Catholic James II, while in exile from England (it’s always better to just go “off with the head”) conspired with the Jesuits of Clermont college in France to create the first 25 degrees of Freemasonry.

When it comes to weaving webs of lies and fabricating a false reality, the footsoldiers of Rome are her Freemasons.

From astronauts to cops, you can always count on a Freemason to break all other oaths and loyalties to serve the higher evil—and when they have second thoughts and try to send messages to non-Masons (like Gus Grissom’s hanging a lemon on his moon lander) they get made an example of (like Gus being burned alive along with Ed White and Roger Chafee who appeared to have been “collateral damage” to the satan worshippers).

The top play in the book of Rome is racial hatred and strife.  Nothing gets people disconnected from facts quicker than some racial hatred.  If you need a false flag phony shooting of a black man by a white cop, who better to betray everything they stand for than a Freemason?

Later, when “debriefing” his superior, officer Michael Slager made sure to roll up his left pant leg—

—just like he did in his initiation—

Rome was never able to murder Martin Luther.  This, apparently, made her all the more determined to destroy his legacy and she continues to undermine and destroy Protestant churches all over our open flat plains.

The Whore of Babylon immediately sent her best insurgents—the Jesuits—to infiltrate all other sects and religions.  They’d already done as much to their sister orders!

Making sure not to put all her eggs in one basket, she then proceeded to fabricate new sects that had serious flaws or were designed to embarrass and humiliate true Believers in Jesus Christ.

The biggest push for this effort occurred in the 19^th century with Mormonism.  All of the early Mormon leaders were Freemasons and they were guided behind the scenes by Jesuits like Pierre-Jean de Smet.

The Jesuit/Mason connection is always good for murder and mayhem and it’s not a stretch to imagine Brigham Young’s friend Pierre-Jean whispering in his ear before he urged fellow Mormons to massacre an innocent wagon train full of men, women and children at Mountain Meadows, Utah.

When you realize that the Jesuits were behind the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, it’s not so surprising to find that the Mountain Meadows massacre occurred on September 11^th, 1857.

Another example is that of William Miller, the founder of the Seventh Day Adventist Church.  Miller was an active Freemason until he needed credibility as a Christian and then he “resigned” (which, if you know Freemasonry, is often just as much a ruse as it is for “former” Jesuits like Malachi Martin).

Miller humiliated Adventists at home and Protestants everywhere with his prediction that Christ would return in 1844.

It was all by design.

But what the Luciferian Jesuit/Freemason cabal didn’t take into account is something we learned at the very beginning of the “MDMP” (the “Military Decision-Making Process”): “the enemy gets a vote”.

In this case, the “enemy” is YHWH, and He voted with His usual sense of sweet irony and payback; He chose the Adventists to be the guardians of the Reformation and, today, they remain the last true Protestant sect.  While every other sect of “non-Catholic” religions now teach Jesuit-fabricated heresies like the Pre-Tribulation Rapture, Preterism or Futurism, a prophetic role for modern Israel as well as many other eschatological fallacies, the SDA Church has stayed on course and on target.  They’re far from perfect, mind, and have their own misguided ideas about who the Archangel Michael is, how the Saturday Sabbath is the Seal of YHWH and how the soul isn’t immortal, but all told, they get far more right than they get wrong and they prove the Lord has a “wicked” sense of humor toward the wicked.

Can I Get A Witness For Jehovah?

If you ask Google whether or not the founder of the Jehovah’s Witnesses—one “Charles Taze Russell”—was a Freemason, the first hit you get is a JW apologetics site and the second site you get is Wikipedia which compassionately says this—

Use of Masonic symbolism

Some have claimed that various symbols Russell employed in his published literature are Masonic in nature, and that such associations implied he engaged in occult activity.  In later editions of the Studies in the Scriptures series a winged solar disk was stamped on the front cover, a symbol that is also associated with Freemasonry.^{[citation needed]}  However, Russell’s use of the winged solar-disk originated from his understanding of Malachi 4:2, which denotes a sun with wings, as a symbol that Christ’s millennial Kingdom had begun to emerge.^[103]  Some critics also claim that the pyramid near Russell’s gravesite is Masonic,^{[63][104][105][106]} because of its shape and its use of the Cross and Crown symbol, although this remains disputed.^[107][108]  The Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon has officially said that Russell was not a Freemason,^[109][110] and notes that these symbols under discussion used are not exclusive to Masonry but pre-date the fraternity.^[111]

In June 1913, during a transcontinental speaking tour, Russell lectured in a Masonic hall in San Francisco, saying:

“Although I have never been a Mason … Something I do seems to be the same as Masons do, I don’t know what it is; but they often give me all kinds of grips and I give them back, then I tell them I don’t know anything about it except just a few grips that have come to me naturally.”^[112]

Throughout his ministry he said that he believed Christian identity is incompatible with Freemasonry.^[113]  He described Freemasonry, Knights of Pythias, Theosophy, and other such groups as “grievous evils” and “unclean”.^[114][115]

Well I couldn’t have said it better if I was a JW myself!

Although Wikipedia may have been especially kind (along with Google) as to the origins of the JW’s, when it comes to calling them out on what embarrasses them (and, by association, all Protestant Christians), they get their own special entry; “Criticism of Jehovah’s Witnesses”—along with a special section on the number of prophecies that didn’t come true (so many, they make William Miller look like Nostradamus).

They even have their own pedophile sex scandal problems.

But before we leave the question of Russell’s Freemasonry, there’s been a whole book written on the subject!

The answer to where JWs receive their strange beliefs, strange doctrines, and attitudes comes primarily from two men.  Because primarily only two men, Charles Taze Russell and Joseph F. Rutherford made all the decisions of the Watchtower Society for the beginning 60 years.²  It is important to understand their overwhelming contribution. …

Charles T. Russell’s father was Joseph L. Russell.  Joseph L. was a Prebyterian and married one.  Joseph L. left Ireland, and immigrated directly to Allegheny, PA in 1846.³  He left during the Potato Famine.  It was a time when every village in Scotland and Britain had a Masonic Lodge.⁴  Also during the years just prior to Joseph L. immigrating to the U.S., Joseph L. experienced along with his Presbyterian churches the atonement heresies that broke out in 1841 and lasted for several years.  The heresies concerned the extent of Christ’s atonement, along with some leaders adopting the Arian view of Christ.  Several synods were cut off and some offenders disfellowshipped.⁵  The author hasn’t confirmed which side of the disputes Joseph was on, but there are indications.

The author (who we’ll divulge shortly) got this mostly right except for one very interesting change: a “Wikia Fandom” page notes that the Russell family may very well have been on the receiving end of Presbyterian “religious cleansing” and also notes that Roman Catholics were very high on that list.

What about the route Russell took?  First, he rejected his Presbyterian Church for the more liberal Congregational Church.  There was just one in town, a Welsh Congregational Church.  Then he rejected the Congregational Church when he tried to convert an “infidel” friend (one source says “pool hall friend”).  He was unable to defend his religion to his friend, especially why a just God would torment people in hell.  This caused him to question his minister and a Professor from the Allegheny Theological Seminary about the Bible’s reliability.  They did not answer him to his satisfaction, so he rejected Christianity and requested a letter of dismissal from the church.¹⁵ …

During C.T. Russell’s early years, there was a group which his upbringing exposed him to which had just the type of religious knowledge that Russell had a penchant for—that was the Masonic Hall located near his father’s Dry Good’s store on Federal St. Another eight blocks south across the St. Clair Street Bridge was another Masonic Hall.¹⁶  In 1851, in the Pittsburgh-Allegheny area there were 52 lodges of various kinds of Freemasons and Oddfellows, including a Scottish Rite lodge.¹⁷  By 1856, the Allegheny Lodge had moved their Hall a short distance from Federal St. to Water St. near Federal.  Two lodges met there, Allegheny Lodge No. 223 and Jefferson Lodge No. 288.¹⁸  By 1858, Pittsburgh had its own Masonic Knights Templar Commandery (more on this later).¹⁹

Clearly the author has done his homework!  He even isn’t afraid to connect the Masons to the Templars (but will he note that both serve Rome?).

Seventeen Presidents have been Masons: and all of these seventeen had English or Scot-Irish ancestry.  These seventeen are Washington, Madison, Monroe, Jackson, Polk, Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, Garfield, McKinley, both Roosevelts, Taft, Harding, Truman, Lyndon Johnson, Gerald Ford, and Ronald Reagon [sic].  Seventeen Vice-presidents have also been Masons.  Note that the first three presidents were affiliated with the Episcopal church and the next three Masons to become U.S. Presidents were Presbyterians.²⁷  Presidents are not the only Scot-Irish Freemason leaders.  Joseph Smith’s Masonic membership is proven,²⁸ and Mary Baker Eddy’s close ties with the Freemasons are documented.  Her first and beloved husband died and left her a widow.  He was a Freemason.  The Freemasons took care of her as a widow, and after that kindness she very close to them her entire life.  She had material published in the Freemason’s Monthly Magazine.²⁹

More good information…yet Rome remains free and clear.

It is clear Russell rejected the Presbyterian and the Congregational Churches that he belonged to, because they believed in hell, and not because they allowed Freeemasons within their congregations.  A study of Russell’s life, shows no interest on his part of joining the anti-Masonic campaign.   The worst enemy of the Masonic Lodge was the Catholic Church.  In modern times, the Masons have successfully obtained supporters and a few members from their long time opponent, the Catholic Church.³⁷  When Russell was a 33, Pope Leo XIII made it anathema for Catholics to join the Masons.  This act drew no acclaim from Russell.  Russell refers to the Catholic Church as the Jezebel of 2 Kgs. 9 in his second volume, p. 256.  And Russell does seem to echo the Masons Albert Pike, Mazzini, and others in his strong anti-Catholic attacks, who also, like Russell, branded the Pope and his hierarchy as agents of the Antichrist.  Both Russell and these men call the Catholic church “Babylon the Great.”  Considering Russell rejected the Protestant doctrines, it seems rather Masonic-like that he dislikes the Catholics to such an extreme.³⁶

Well, it seems the author has finally outed himself as a militant Roman Catholic who has either bought or gone all in for selling the idea that Rome and Freemasonry are mortal enemies.  As I prove in my book, this is the simplest diametric subterfuge.  I’ll give you one of many examples; Pierre Charles L’Enfant, the devout Roman Catholic colonial who answered directly to George Washington, designed the layout of Washington, DC which is acknowledged to be one of the most Masonically-esoteric architectures of any major city.  L’Enfant was also a member Holland Lodge No. 8 in New York City.  Mortal enemies?

I’ll give one more (and then you should just buy my book).

Wikipedia has an interesting entry regarding the location of the Grand Lodge of Italy—

On April 21, 1901 the Grand Orient opened its new headquarters in Palazzo Giustiniani in Rome.  A disagreement over secularism in elementary schools led in 1908 to the secession of the Supreme Council of Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite. The stated reason for dissention was increasing politicisation of the Grand Orient. On March 21, 1910 this body established the Grand Lodge of Italy, with Protestant pastor Saverio Fera, a former adherent of Garibaldi, as Grand Master.  From its headquarters it became known as the Grand Lodge of Piazza del Gesù.^[4][5]

A “Protestant pastor”?  That’s an interesting remark.  What’s missing here is who the Grand Lodge’s neighbors are; also in the Piazza del Gesù is who the Piazza is named after—della Compagnia di Gesù (the “Company of Jesus”, a.k.a. the Jesuits).  Oh, and that’s not some outpost, that’s the headquarters for the entire order.

This is too much fun, I have to do one more (especially as how this propaganda regarding Rome’s “vehement hatred” of the Freemasons is so insidious).

The “Southern Jurisdiction” of the Scottish Rite in America claims full supremacy over all other Freemasonic bodies—

The Supreme Council, Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, Southern Jurisdiction, USA (commonly known as the Mother Supreme Council of the World) was the first Supreme Council of Scottish RiteFreemasonry.  It claims that all other Supreme Councils and Subordinate Bodies of the Scottish Rite are derived from it.^[1] Its official full name is “The Supreme Council (Mother Council of the World) of the Inspectors General Knights Commander of the House of the Temple of Solomon of the Thirty-third Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry of the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States of America.”^[2] It is also commonly known as The Supreme Council, 33°, Southern Jurisdiction, or by some other varying degree of complete titulage.  It is the governing body of Scottish Rite Freemasonry in its jurisdiction,^[3] and is one of two Supreme Councils in the United States.  It oversees the Scottish Rite in 35 states^[4] (the other states fall within the Northern Jurisdiction, which is an independent body).

The Scottish Rite is one of the appendant bodies of Freemasonry that a Master Mason may join for further exposure to the principles of Freemasonry.  To join the Supreme Council, one must attain the 32° of the Scottish Rite, and then be conferred the honorary 33°.

In the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States, the Supreme Council consists of no more than 33 members, and is presided over by a Grand Commander.  Other members of the Supreme Council are called “Sovereign Grand Inspectors General” (S.G.I.G.), and each is the head of the Rite in his respective Orient (or state).  Other heads of the various Orients who are not members of the Supreme Council are called “Deputies of the Supreme Council.” ~ Wikipedia

“Inspectors General”?  That sounds an awful lot like the highest office in the Jesuits—the “Superior General”.  It’s probably just a coincidence, though…just like the Southern Jurisdiction will often simply abbreviate, “SJ”.

Mystery Guest

So who is our devout Catholic fighter of Freemasons?

—None other than author of Bloodlines of the Illuminati and frequent guest of alternative media, Fritz Artz Springmeier (we’ve been quoting from Fritz’ book The Watchtower and the Masons).

Fritz is a popular man, he’s been on the Hagmann and Hagmann Report, Sean Stone’s Buzzsaw on The LipTV, and has spoken at the “Free Your Mind Conference” (a supposed source of forbidden knowledge)—

Springmeier is also a very frequent guest of Alex Jones.

In fact, Jones has called Springmeier a framed political prisoner—

Did Fritz spend time in jail because he was giving away “Illuminati bloodline secrets”?!

No.

But Victor Earl Schoof has been arrested for drug manufacture and distribution, bank robbery, and ties to a radical Catholic white separatist terror group called the “Army of God”.

Federal agents and Clackamas County sheriff’s deputies arrested a Corbett couple Thursday as part of an ongoing investigation into the activities of a white separatist group.

Fritz A. Springmeier, 45, also known as Victor E. Schoff [either this journalist didn’t get the name “Schoof” correct or it’s cover to throw other investigators off track], and his wife, Patricia Springmeier, 46, are accused of first-degree manufacture and distribution of a controlled substance, and conspiracy to manufacture and distribute controlled substances.  They are being held in the Clackamas County Jail.

Agents from the FBI and the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms as well as sheriff’s deputies searched the couple’s home on Groce Road for several hours Thursday, said Deputy Angela Blanchard, spokeswoman for the Clackamas County Sheriff’s Department.

Blanchard said police seized equipment used to grow marijuana, several weapons and white separatist literature. …

Fritz Springmeier was known for writing books and tracts on the beliefs of the Christian Patriot Association, an ultra-right-wing group based in Boring.  “He does a lot of public speaking and proclaims himself to be a self-employed author,” Blanchard said.

Last month, police arrested three people in a Sandy-area home and seized military-style weapons and 50 marijuana plants.  Two of the people were released, but a third suspect, Forrest E. Bateman Jr., 29, is being held at the Justice Center Jail in Portland on outstanding warrants for previous charges of assault and illegal possession of an AK-47 assault rifle.

In the Feb. 9 raid, agents also seized a small amount of ammonium nitrate and fuel oil, and literature affiliated with the Army of God, a white supremacist group connected to the 1997 bombings of an abortion clinic and a gay nightclub in Atlanta.

Blanchard said Fritz Springmeier and Bateman met at a Christian Patriot Association meeting several years ago.

“We think that part of their supplemental income came from selling marijuana,” she said.  “We believe they were very close and worked in concert together to operate a marijuana grown operation.”

In November, federal agents arrested six members of the Christian Patriot Association on accusations of operating a $186 million “warehouse bank” scheme in Clackamas County that allowed 900 people across the nation to hide their money from the Internal Revenue Service.  The case has not yet come to trial. ~ Deputies, Feds Arrest Corbett Couple, Stuart Tomlinson, The Oregonian, 2 March 2001 [archived by Johnny here]

Please take special note of the date—March, 2001.

This was clearly part of an ongoing agenda of false flag preparation that really got into swing during the Jesuit-trained at Georgetown Clinton Administration—

FALSE FLAGS FOR FASCISM

From his position as leader of the South Florida Drug Task Force, former CIA Director and (at that time) vice president Bush was able to more thoroughly effect the unhindered importation of hard narcotics to poison America and fuel CIA operations. A key location for this activity was a little town called Mena in Arkansas, then governed by Bush’s successor (chosen before-hand by the Cocaine Importation Agency).

It was during the reign of William Jefferson Blythe Clinton that the cabal of billionaires, banksters, Bilderbergers and Intelligence Bureaus fast-tracked the destruction of America through a series of bold, in-your-face staged events where Americans were entrapped, encircled, shot in the face, burned alive and blown up. ~ The Clinton Years: When Traitors In Government Perfected The False Flag On Americans, Johnny Cirucci

—and climaxed on September 11^th—

Behind the All-Seeing Eye

The attacks of September 11th ushered in the Orwellian Police State for America, and the foundation of that Police State was the treasonously misnamed “Patriot Act”.  If a citizen ever has a question about what a piece of legislation does, simply invert its name in best Gaslighting fashion.

The “Patriot Act” was written by Vietnamese Catholic Professor Viet D. Dinh.⁶³⁸

Professor Dinh teaches at Georgetown. ~ Illuminati Unmasked ⁴⁶

Fritz/Victor isn’t just a run-of-the-mill protestor, Fritz/Victor was plugged in to some serious circles; circles that got him C4 and AK-47s (real automatic AK’s that Ronald Reagan outlawed, not the fake semi-automatic ones you can buy at Cabela’s or Walmart).

PORTLAND — A list of possible terror targets compiled by an ultra-right wing group, including government buildings and other facilities were made public Thursday as a federal judge sentenced a Portland area man for his part in a 1997 bank robbery.

After the sentencing of Fritz Springmeier, a self-described religious author, Clackamas County Sheriff deputies revealed a loose-leaf binder seized in 2001 as a part of the case.

Springmeier, a white separatist known for his anti-government writings will serve 9 years in federal prison.  Federal Judge James Redden characterized the robbery that included the detonation of a pipe bomb as a diversion as “vicious.”

Among the locations handwritten in the binder entitled “Army of God, Yahweh’s Warriors, were the federal building, FBI offices, and KATU studios in Portland.

Floor plans to the FBI offices were also a part of the evidence seized in a raid on property near Corbett on February 9, 2001.

In the raid, federal agents also seized a cache of military-style assault weapons, including an AK-47, hand grenades, C-4 explosives, and bomb-making ingredients that included ammonium nitrate and fuel oil.

“We take it (the target lists) very seriously,” says Steve Thoroughman, a detective with Clackamas County, and the lead investigator of the U.S. government’s case against Springmeier and his accomplice Forrest Bateman, who was convicted and sentenced earlier this year in connection with the bank robbery.

Thoroughman says agents of the FBI and ATF have reviewed the hand-written notes and have followed up on those leads.

“They had the means to do almost anything they wanted to,” said Thoroughman.  They had fully automatic AK-47’s, they had night vision, they had ceramic body armor, anything they needed to carry out an assault.”⁴⁷

When it comes to Vatican (Jesuit)-controlled government false flag terror operations, there are the players they protect and sneak off before the fireworks start (“operatives”) and then there are the patsies who get blown up with the fireworks or are left behind to take the blame (“assets”).

An example of an “operative” that gave the Federal Bureau of (terror) Instigation plausible deniability is Andreas “Andy the German” Strassmeir.  Strassmeir was the German Intelligence operative who “infiltrated” the Timothy McVeigh “terror cell” then disappeared just before the death and destruction on April 19^th, 1995, leaving Special Forces “sheep-dipped” McVeigh holding the bag.

Was Fritz/Victor a McVeigh or a Strassmeir?

Well, given the fact that he’s still alive and making all the rounds in “alternative media”, ‘sure looks like he’s a Strassmeir…German cover name included!

Not even a shooting in 1996 seemed to slow him down.  In fact, he seemed to draw on it to make a nefarious name for himself.

In 1996, Portland, Oregon resident Patricia Sweany called for help claiming she had been poisoned.  The fire department, paramedics and police arrived.  Sweany told them that she worked for the CIA and FBI and that she had inside information on corruption but had been poisoned.  The firemen, seeing that their services weren’t needed, left.  When Sweany recognized paramedic Kurt Ream, she blurted out, “I know you.  You were at that place last night!  I’m not going anywhere with you!”

According to the official release, Sweany then shot Ream, forcing officer Scott Westerman to shoot and kill her.  Sweany was obviously mentally unstable and distraught.  A special Portland PD Crisis Intervention Team negotiator was dispatched but Officer Westerman had dispatched Patricia Sweany before he could get there.

Interestingly, Ream was later reported “not seriously injured”, which doesn’t usually happen when someone gets shot.

Officer Westerman, however, is well known to Portland community watchdogs for his “shoot first” tactics and Patricia Sweany was not his first victim.

Here’s where it gets even more interesting: five years later, in 2001, just before 9/11, Victor Schoof (a.k.a. “Fritz Sringmeier”) made sure to get on law enforcement radar by asking journalist John Stevens for Scott Westerman’s home address, claiming that he had murdered Sweany to keep her quiet.  Boy, if you’re going to make a “terroristic threat” to a police officer, a journalist is the best person to do it to, huh?!

Interestingly, Scott Westerman was later given a “Meritorious Medal for Valor” by the Portland Police Department.  Was the firefight with little Patricia Sweany that hairy, or was this the Machine saying “Thank you for a risky assassination!” [see below for source material]

FBI Probes Alleged Threat to Officer, Jim Redden, The Portland Tribune, 6 April 2001 [archived by Johnny, here]

Shots Fired: Portland, Oregon 12/14/1996, Police Magazine [there might be a teeny-weeny bias here against Patricia Sweany and for Scott Westerman]

Four Civilians Shot by Portland Police; Fifth Dies in Fire, Portland CopWatch.org

Rapping Back #14, Portland CopWatch.org

Framing Protestant “Evangelicals”

Speaking of journalists, we know that Fritz/Victor is a militant Roman Catholic, but journalists that reported on his terroristic proclivities only wanted to describe—

Springmeier [as] a fundamentalist Christian who has written several books charging that satanic forces are conspiring with corrupt government officials to take over the world.  During a radio interview, he described his job as “exposing the New World Order agenda.”

That’s right—these aren’t connections to real people with names, places and dates that lead to the bloody hand of Jesuit-controlled Rome, it’s just the nebulous forces of “satan”.  Nothing to be done about that but pray and wait for the “Pre-Tribulation Rapture”!

The press has also conveniently disconnected the Catholic ties to the “Army of God”—

The Army of God “are anti-abortion religious zealots who believe in using explosives to get their point across,” said Gary Perlstein, a nationally recognized terrorism expert who teaches criminal justice classes at Portland State University.

In 1993, Army of God soldier Rachelle “Shelley” Shannon shot 3^rd Trimester abortion “Doctor” George Tiller in both arms.  Was this a carefully-designed trial run for his later execution in 2009 by Scott Roeder?  Roeder was a “Lutheran” who was also a member of the “Freemen” militia group.

In 1998, Army of God soldier James Charles Kopp murdered abortion “Doctor” Barnett Slepian.  Kopp was another Lutheran terrorist…until he converted to Roman Catholicism.

When it comes to finding Lutheran, Protestant or Evangelical “terrorists” where they don’t exist, the Southern Poverty Law Center is on the job!

The SPLC very gleefully lumps Timothy McVeigh and Fritz Springmeier together under the banner of “Terror From The Right”.

They are very proud partners with the Federal Bureau of (terror) Instigation, although a false report claimed the FBI was distancing itself from them as a result of their blatant, radical-Leftist, muck-racking.

They didn’t.

That’s the kind of sophistry Knight of Malta, Order of St. Gregory, Rupert “I Like ‘Em Blonde” Murdoch’s Fox News plays up all the time.  Sadly, tricking the American Right with empty promises is an old Roman game.

Oh, and let’s not forget the “white separatist” angle.  Pitting the races at each other’s throats is an important distraction tactic Rome has learned well, which is why Black Communist malcontent Barack Hussein Obama was trained to be a “community organizer” by Greg Galluzzo, aJesuit priest, before being enthroned as Rome’s hand-selected President (it’s also one of the many proofs that back up my contention that white supremacist, Jesuit expert Eric Jon Phelps is an incognito Jesuit).

Connecting The Dots

Recently, Fritz/Victor did an interview [hat/tip to a dear friend of Resistance Rising; DJ Kyte Kutter in Australia] with “TradCatKnight” who is self-described as “the most followed traditional catholic page on the Internet. (over 300,000 worldwide)” and “HOME of the New Crusade” where TradCatKnight holds “the message of Fatima near to my heart as I help individuals to understand the Vatican II apostasy and prepare those for the great chastisements coming foretold in the 3rd secret.  I am devoted to the Immaculate & Sacred Hearts.”

I’m not really sure why so many Conservative Catholics are upset over Vatican II, it was written by a Jesuit (Karl Rahner) and a Pope (Joseph Ratzinger).

Actually, I am.

The “Vatican II apostasy” is also a Jesuit ruse that keeps Conservative Catholics loyal to Rome when it’s clear her machinations are just so bloody evil.

Sadly, it works as good as Rupert Murdoch’s puppet act.

I hope that most of what I do exposes the leadership of Rome but there are some beliefs that I wish to address as well: being “devoted to the Immaculate & Sacred Hearts” is actually an ancient custom that traces to Babylonian paganism and Chaldean sun worship where the adherent is alleviated from having an intimate relationship with a living Redeemer and, instead “worships” the Redeemer’s Body Parts, or mother or attending angels.  It’s the difference between Salvation and damnation.

During the interview, Fritz admitted that he isn’t a Protestant, that he attacks all the Christian religions (except Rome, of course), and that Protestantism was taken over early on by some nasty Freemasons.

If you don’t want to endure the entire interview, I’ve got the pertinent clips here—

I would never accuse Fritz/Victor of this but if one were suspicious enough, one would see this as a brilliant scheme to discredit Protestants that was literally centuries in the making, with this final chapter also taking over a century to come to fruition: use Freemasonry to fabricate flawed Protestant sects, then out how you fabricated them with Freemasons (conveniently leaving out the nasty Roman bit), claim that it stands for all of Protestantism and use an “Evangelical terrorist” Papal insurgent to do it!

Clearly, this isn’t something Fritz/Victor is capable of coming up with all on his own, but if I were him, I’d really worry about the kind of power that could…or would.

UPDATE 25 May 2016:  I sure can’t match the power of Rome, she has appropriated everything; all the wealth, all of the intelligences agencies, all the technology, all of the militaries, banks, multinational corporations, organized crime…everything!  I can’t compete, so I don’t.  Instead, I just reach out to my audience.  Unlike all of the other Nephilim hucksters and paranormal variety show snake oil salesmen, I’m a real person and I put a lot of effort into responding to anyone who reaches out to me (except for the stalkers who want to know what I’m wearing right now…an old BDU t-shirt and a really comfy pair of terry-cloth shorts…happy?!).

Scotland Yard has its Flying Squad.  As a result of my show, Resistance Rising, I have my own investigators, detectives and constables, whom I call Johnny Cirucci’s Flying Monkey Squad.  I’ve trained them to look for what I look for, and then to report it to me in a concise, referenced way similar to what you see above you.

This requires a candidate training period, especially given that Rome has so many insurgents and coadjutors, quite a few of them, she has sent my way.  The training period is also a screening period.

One of my most recent candidates seems very promising.  Flying Monkey Constable JayRan has already given me some good intelligence.  Sometimes I need my Monkeys simply to jar my memory (there’s a lot of stuff up there and sometimes it likes to hide and play tricks on me).  FMC JayRan kicked out just such an important piece of information for me after reading this column.

In 2011, Americans were fed a story that quickly surpassed 9/11 in its disconnect from reality; the supposed killing of Osama bin Laden.  Neither official narrative seemed anything short of ludicrous—

In 2007 former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto told David Frost on his program Frost Around the World, that bin Laden was already dead158.  Russia’s state news agency Pravda was incredulous that Frost obliviously rolled over the announcement without follow-up.¹⁵⁹

Bhutto, herself, quickly fell victim to assassination after attending an event for the Pakistani Peoples Party in late December of that same year.

Another Russian source—Russia Today—interviewed former NSA Analyst-turned-independent-journalist Wayne Madsen who asserted that Bhutto’s death was a hit initiated by the CIA.¹⁶⁰

The SEAL Team that conducted the raid to get bin Laden executed him on sight, although he was surrounded only by his wife—depending upon which official story you read.¹⁶¹

Americans were first told that the SEALs fought their way through withering fire from al Qaeda to get to where bin Laden was hiding. This was later retracted. It turned out that there was no firefight.¹⁶²

The body of whomever it was that the SEALs shot on sight was brought back to the USS Carl Vinson where it was dumped into the ocean without a single sailor witnessing the event.¹⁶³

In 2012, Navy SEAL Matt Bissonnette claimed in his book No Easy Day that he shot bin Laden.  Two years later, Navy SEAL Rob O’Neill would claim he shot bin Laden¹⁶⁴.  O’Neill now says his life is in danger.¹⁶⁵

Is America being betrayed and misinformed by even her Special Forces operators?

The supposed mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, was waterboarded no fewer than 183 times to “break” him¹⁶⁶.  He was Osama bin Laden’s lieutenant.

Bin Laden, himself, can rightly be called the greatest intelligence asset of the entire “War on Terror” yet he was shot on sight and dumped in the ocean.

Photos released which purportedly showed the dead terrorist had to be retracted when it was proven that they were faked¹⁶⁷.  A Freedom of Information request demanding to see the real photos was denied by a Federal Judge.¹⁶⁸

The sensational White House Situation Room photo featuring National Security Advisor, now Director of the CIA John Brennan, Barack Obama, then Secretary of Defense Robert Gates (a Bush appointee), Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullins and Vice President Joe Biden along with an aghast Hillary Clinton was also admitted to be staged¹⁶⁹.  The media proclaimed this suspenseful photo depicted America’s leaders watching every step the SEALs made but it was later disclosed there was no “live feed” of the raid.¹⁷⁰ ~ Illuminati Unmasked ⁴⁸

The Roman-controlled presstitute media dutifully accepted every bit of this ridiculous story and even went further, later putting out fluff pieces to bolster the fabrication like, “Oh, here are some interesting books that bin Laden was reading.  We found them in his apartment after he was shot on sight.”

WASHINGTON — Osama Bin Laden kept close tabs on 9/11 conspiracy theories and warned followers not to forget about attacking America, according to documents, letters and books found at his compound in Pakistan.

The material, released Wednesday by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, included a list of more than three dozen English-language works at the compound, many of them focused on America’s efforts abroad. ~ Tops on Osama bin Laden’s Reading List: Illuminati, U.S. Foreign Policy, Noam Chomsky, NY Daily News

You will never guess what one of the books CIA asset Tim Osman, a.k.a. Osama bin Laden, was reading; Fritz Artz Springmeier’s Bloodlines of the Illuminati.

I guess the “Office of the Director of National Intelligence” thought Fritz needed some cred as he blamed “the Illuminati” for the War on Terror.

UPDATE 26 May 2016:  It pays to be your own critic.  I will frequently listen to my shows (usually as background noise while answering comments on YouTube) and was listening to the show embedded above, Resistance Rising 101, when I realized that our friend DJ Kyte Kutter had sent me something I forgot to include in this article—that Victor Earl Schoof was given an appointment to West Point by Kansas Republican Senator Robert Dole.

   Sen. Bob Dole Appoints Victor E. Schoof to West Point by Johnny_Cirucci

Remember the Army of God has a big footprint in Kansas.

I’d love to tell you that Fritz/Victor went into Army Intelligence or even the Special Forces but I have no evidence of that.  Anatoli’s nose tells me that Fritz/Victor never made it but it is an intriguing connection to the military/industrial complex.

Anatoli

I’d also like to address the so-called “Illuminati Bloodlines” Fritz/Victor writes of in Bloodlines of the Illuminati.  According to Fritz/Victor they are—

1. Astor
2. Bundy
3. Collins
4. DuPont
5. Freeman
6. Kennedy
7. Li
8. Onassis
9. Reynolds
10. Rockefeller
11. Rothschild
12. Russell
13. Van Duyn

I’m thinking that half of these he used because the uneducated expect to see them and the other half he just made up.

The real names that rule the world behind the scenes are—

• Orsini
• Breakspear (or “Breakspeare”)
• Aldobrandini
• Farnese
• de Medici
• Borgia

—as well as—

• Somaglia
• Conti
• Colonna

Researchers and historians will notice many of these names were also Popes—and that’s no coincidence.

What this proves is that Fritz/Victor is a willing instrument of disinformation for Rome, and not just some investigator that doesn’t know his ass from an Illuminist.

He, like all other agents of disinformation, will reap what they have sown.

—For those who continue to sin willfully after having received knowledge of the Truth, there no-longer remains sacrificial forgiveness of their sin, but the sure and terrifying expectation of judgment and fiery wrath which will devour them and all adversaries. ~ Hebrews 10:26-27

If the world was controlled by a malignant, Luciferian cabal (and it is) intent on keeping track of and blackmailing as many human beings as possible—especially dangerous, awake ones—“social networking” would be an intelligence-gathering apparatus unparalleled in human history.

And it is.

If there’s one thing people want, it’s for other people to pay attention to them; “to be loved”.

Prior to social networking, intelligence-gathering was an extremely laborious and intensive undertaking requiring armies of skilled operatives and assets tailing and trialing their quarry—and there were never enough even to gather on “really important” people.

Today, all it takes are unskilled computer operators (or very skilled computer programs) to simply sit back and record all of the personal information people willingly give up themselves on “social networking”.

One Twitter user boldly proclaimed—

i will now be tweeting my every move

— Drew Dempsey (@WinnieTheDrew3) November 9, 2015

And he did (and then he disappeared…hope he’s alright).

At best, the company you work for can mine your personal networking account and posts and, if it finds something there it doesn’t like, you will pay the consequences.

There are even companies who go so far as demand the ability to log in to your personal networking account!

It gets more dangerous from there.

There are so many pictures of you guys floating around the internet, thanks to “Facebook selfies” that one expert boldly proclaimed to his audience, “I can find you anywhere”.

Professor Alessandro Acquisti of Carnegie Mellon, who researches how technology impacts privacy, stunned [Leslie] Stahl [of CBS] with an experiment.  He photographed random students on the campus and in short order, not only identified several of them, but in a number of cases found their personal information, including social security numbers, just using a facial recognition program he downloaded for free.  Acquisti says smart-phones will make “facial searches” as common as Google searches in the future.  And nearly everybody can be subject to such prying, even those who are careful about their Internet use.

“One of the participants, before doing the experiment, told us, ‘You’re not going to find me because I’m very careful about my photos online.’  And we found him,” says Acquisti, “Because someone else had uploaded a photo of him.” ~ “Big Brother” Is Big Business? CBS News

Oh, and let me remind you that Shriner Freemason Franklin Roosevelt promised Americans that their Social Security numbers would never be used to identify them.

For many years, Social Security cards carried an admonition that they were to be used “for Social Security and tax purposes—not for identification.”

That assurance rings hollow today.  Congress has authorized so many uses of the nine-digit number, and Americans use it for so many unauthorized purposes, that it has just about become a national identifier.

For the Clinton Administration, which is considering assigning all Americans a health-care identification number, the slow, steady march of the Social Security number from secrecy to all-purpose identifier may be a cautionary tale. ~ The Nation; Not for Identification Purposes (Just Kidding), Robert Pear, The New York Times, July 26, 1998

Now even grocery store bonus shopper programs ask you for your SSN…oh, and they’re used to track how you feed your family and whether or not you’re “prepping” against government orders.

Of course, the big sharks on social networking are government agencies.  But those agencies have graduated from simply digging for dirt on you, they now actively participate in networking dialogue to take hot news items that have been leaked to you outside of “mainstream” sources and discredit them.

Perhaps one of the most shocking and under-reported revelations came from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden via his Pulitzer Prize-winning lawyer/journalist outlet, Glenn Greenwald.

Apparently, the “signals intelligence” branch of the British government—Government Communications Headquarters, or “GCHQ”—has been using its “Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group” (JTRIG) to destroy truth-seekers.  Its methods include sexual seduction (which I’ve proven includes children, both boys and girls), denial of service attacks, impersonating and/or co-opting truth-seekers and planting government operatives (“trolls”) in key discussions throughout the internet.

One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of deception and reputation-destruction. It’s time to tell a chunk of that story, complete with the relevant documents. …

Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums. ~ Greenwald, The Intercept

As a result of all this, I don’t stay on “Facebook” very long.

I stay on it even less when I see how infuriatingly easy it is to manipulate Western and American “Conservatives”.

The injustices we all suffer today should have us in the streets with torches and pitch forks—from mass, warrantless surveillance, to a militarized police force aimed at us, to endless wars that eat our children up and spit them out minus arms, legs and marriages (yet leave us even less “secure”), to confiscatory taxes that don’t even come close to staving off a debt that is guaranteed to fiscally collapse the nation.  We won’t even bring in the “conspiracy” efforts to poison us by the very air that we breath and water we drink; from the cancer industry to the prison-industrial complex—we have less freedom today than ever.

But give a “Conservative” a good meme on Facebook and they think they’ve taken America back overnight!

Darrell Issa: FBI Director Wants ‘to Indict Both Huma and Hillary’ Over Email Scandal!

“Lindsey Graham Destroyed Eric Holder!”

Trey Gowdy Probe Claims ‘Big Wins’ In Getting Benghazi Info

Each one of them (and the rags that put them out for exactly this purpose) is hilarious.  They don’t have a hen’s tooth of substance to ‘a one of them.

A better headline would read, Eric Holder Blissfully Retires on $11,500,000.00 After Scandals That Would Make Benedict Arnold Look Like George Patton!

It reminds me of a similar ridiculous assertion; that then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was going to lose her position because she claimed she wasn’t read in on CIA torture when she was.  Sean Hannity from “Fox News” lead the way on this smokescreen.

That’s Irish Catholic Sean Hannity working for Knight of Malta, Order of St. Gregory, “I Like ‘Em Blonde” Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News, claiming that Jesuit-trained Italian Catholic Nancy Pelosi was going down over Catholic/Jesuit-dominated CIA Inquisition-style torture.  As shocking as this may sound…it never happened.

Another powerful trick is misdirection; build up the threat that doesn’t exist while masking the threat at the front door.

I just saw a great example of this on Facebook today—

Paul Ryan Tells Sean Hannity He Will Not Support Any Cuts To Muslim Immigration: ‘That’s Not Who We Are’—Breitbart.com

Wow.  Where to begin?!

It’s always good to start a psychological operation (“PSYOP”) with a false assumption or four.

For instance: muslims are the source of America’s greatest threats.

At the very least, there is information from a very respectable source (ex-Jesuit Alberto Rivera) which says Islam as a religion was created by Rome to win her back the Holy Land.

But the easily-verifiable path leads to a collaboration between Rome and Western Intelligence with such stand-out examples as Polish Catholic National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski working with CIA asset “Tim Osman” to create “al Qaeda”.  You probably know Tim better as “Osama bin Laden”.

When the fizz from al Qaeda began to go flat, creating “ISIS” was easy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORYL8jPtpQU

Not to be outdone by the CIA, British Intelligence continues to contribute their fair share to the jihadi scare (great work by my friend Jon Ryman).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bca7soVu4zE

When running out of actual terrorist events, the CIA began fabricating beheadings (and some of them weren’t even very good).  They got a lot of help from their friends in “Jesuit theater” like Jesuit-trained journalist James Foley, who volunteered to get beheaded.  It actually just stung a little.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AF6jDlPCEsU

The latest ridiculous rub is Fox News perennial clown favorite, “The Donald” (both he and his spawn are Jesuit-trained), exploiting the deluge of illegal immigrants to switch focus from the tens—perhaps hundreds—of millions of low-income, Hispanic Catholic illegal aliens and focus on the dreaded muslim hoards.

Proving how equally-ridiculous and depraved the United Kingdom is (where there are more CCTV cameras per capita than anywhere else in the world), the rainbow mayor of Londonistan—Sadiq Khan (no relation to Genghis…we think)—got into the clown act.

The reality is that Rome has filled every key position in America—from the Teleprompter-in-Chief to your local police chief—with her agents to insure that the waves of Catholic Hispanic illegals never cease.

When you get tired of being played, perhaps you’ll start looking around for some pitch forks.

I’ve already stocked up on torches.

If so, the two legs have been at war since their splitting within the Holy Roman Empire.

For generations, the Papacy has sought to co-opt Orthodoxy with both the carrot and the stick.  She will frequently hold up various meetings with Orthodox Patriarchs as proof that she has won—

But this only proves that, despite Orthodoxy being heavily infiltrated with Jesuit operatives like “Brother Nathaneal” she does NOT have a lock on controlling her sister.

Rightly do our Russian brothers and sisters distrust anything from America.  Milton Kapner, a.k.a. “Brother Nathaneal”, is no different.  How a Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Jew ends up as an Orthodox priest preaching constant hatred of Jews via an extremely popular YouTube channel from Moscow can only be explained with three letters: CIA (which stands for “Catholic Intelligence Agency”).

Kapner is no different than another fabricated Papal/Intelligence asset, Anwar al Awlaki, the CIA lackey.

Al Awlaki wasn’t born in Pakistan or Iraq, he was born in good ole New Mexico, USA.  Where else do all vicious jihadis come from?  He even had a mosque in Virginia and dined at the Pentagon 2 weeks after 9/11.  He’s been the central figure in everything from the underwear bomber to the Fort Hood shooting…the first one.

As imam at a mosque in Falls Church, Virginia (2001–02), al-Awlaki spoke with and preached to three of the 9/11 hijackers, who were al-Qaeda members.^[21]  In 2001, he presided at the funeral of the mother of Nidal Malik Hasan, an Army psychiatrist who later e-mailed him extensively in 2008–09 before the Fort Hood shootings.^[22][23]  During al-Awlaki’s later radical period after 2006–07, when he went into hiding, he was associated with Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, who attempted the 2009 Christmas Day bombing of an American airliner.^[24][25][26]  Al-Awlaki was allegedly involved in planning Abdulmutallab’s attack. ~ Wikipedia

Certainly, someone like that could be a wealth of information, either of supposed terror plots or of collusion between “terrorists” and our own intelligence agencies.

Sadly, he’s beyond our reach as he was (apparently) killed by a drone strike conducted in Yemen without Yemeni permission and without due process for the execution of an American citizen.

It was the culmination of years of [“]painstaking[”] intelligence work, intense deliberation by lawyers working for [“]President[”] Obama and turf fights between the Pentagon and the C.I.A., whose parallel drone wars converged on the killing grounds of Yemen.  For what was apparently the first time since the Civil War, the United States government had carried out the deliberate killing of an American citizen as a wartime enemy and without a trial.

Eighteen months later, despite the Obama administration’s effort to keep it cloaked in secrecy, the decision to hunt and kill Mr. Awlaki has become the subject of new public scrutiny and debate, touched off by the nomination of John O. Brennan, Mr. Obama’s counterterrorism adviser, to be head of the C.I.A.

The leak last month of an unclassified Justice Department “white paper” summarizing the administration’s abstract legal arguments — prepared months after the Awlaki and Khan killings amid an internal debate over how much to disclose — has ignited demands for even greater transparency, culminating last week in a 13-hour Senate filibuster that temporarily delayed Mr. Brennan’s confirmation.  Some wondered aloud: If the president can order the assassination of Americans overseas, based on secret intelligence, what are the limits to his power? ~ Mark Mazzetti, Charlie Savage and Scott Shane, NY Times

Don’t worry!  John O. “Drone Executioner” Brennan, educated by the Jesuits at Fordham, was indeed confirmed.  In fact he was sworn in, not by “President” Obama, but by “President” Obama’s mafioso handler (another good Catholic); Joseph “Plugs” Biden…on a Constitution minus the Bill of Rights.

Either this man really is a clown and a fool or his white and black gloves are telling you that he’s been indoctrinated in the Jesuitical, Freemasonic Gnosticism of “good is evil and evil is good”.

It’s no stretch to imagine that Milton “Brother Nathaneal” Kapner has a similar, sinister, secret lineage.

Sadly, the “IT’S THE JEWS!” ploy has worked extremely well in Russia, thanks to the elevating of puppet Jews again and again to positions of prominence by the Roman Knight of Malta bankers and masters.  “The Family” of oligarchs that ruled Russia and still rule in Ukraine are mostly Jews installed by the Papists for an extremely effective smokescreen.  Very few Russians know of the extreme hatred the Vatican has for Russia and Russian Orthodoxy but it encompasses everything from the repeated assassinations of the Romanovs to the “October Revolution” that ushered in a Georgian Jesuit priest named Ioseb Besarionis dze Jughashvili.  He was used by the Papacy to slaughter forty million good Russians and Ukrainians (many of them were starved to death) and many more were enslaved and imprisoned.  You knew him as “Joseph Stalin”.

Read my book.

The renewing of the Cold War has been part of the Papal “strategy of containment” dreamed up by another Catholic Intelligence insurgent, Zbigniew Brzezinski, a dear friend of another devout Polish Catholic, Karol Wojtyla.

Wojtyla was a key figure behind putting cyanide and Zykon B into the hands of the Nazis to help efficiently slaughter as many Jews as the West would give them time for (and they certainly did what they could), but you knew him better as “Pope John Paul II”.

From Ioseb dze Jughashvili (“of the Jewish people”) to Moses Mordecai Marx Levy (“Karl Marx”), the Papacy and her satanic Special Forces, the Jesuits, have picked Jews to hide behind to conduct their despicable agendas again and again.

Don’t worry, though, when it comes to outing a Jesuit/CIA agent like “Brother Nathaneal”, we have the hard work of “Pastor Steven Anderson”, a clown himself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lz8g3fArSNY

Anderson is a Jesuit priest whose mission it is to lampoon proud, independent American Protestants and to “blow cover as cover” for himself and Kapner by muddying the waters with his antics.

It’s all part of the web of lies woven by the Jesuits that is so ruthless it included a “Superior General” who sacrificed hundreds of loyal priests to imprisonment and death just to attain more power.

I got into this somewhat in a previous column on another “Protestant” imposter, Hank Hanegraaff, the Papal Answer Man.

In spite of all of this, there is hope for Russia and for the East.

Although Orthodoxy is no less a veil than Catholicism in achieving the personal relationship with Jesus Christ which saves souls, its resurgence since the fall of Communism has sparked a renewed adherence to Christian virtues in Russia.

As the Founder of the Christian Faith has already told us, “He who is not against us, is for us.” (Mark 9:40, Luke 9:50)

I’ve told you this before—we Christians have been intimidated and lied to about why we don’t need to fight for Truth.  We’re told “satan owns the globe” and, therefore, there’s no sense trying to stand up to him.  We should just sit in a corner and wait for the Pre-Tribulation Rapture to beam us out.

There will be no “Pre-Tribulation Rapture.”

We own the Earth.  It was given to Adam to steward as a son of God.  Adam’s sin surrendered that authority for his children (who are all sons of Adam, sons of a man) but the Son of God, Jesus Christ won it back for us—for all who surrender to Him.

If our adversary “owns” anything it is the parasitic system that he built which he uses to usurp and control our Earth.

…the devil took Him up on an exceedingly high mountain, and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory.  And he said to Him, “All these things I will give You if You will fall down and worship me.”

Then Jesus said to him, “Away with you, Satan!  For it is written, ‘You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only you shall serve.’” ~ Matthew 4:8-10 (NKJV)

Although he masquerades as an angel of light [II Corinthians 11:14], our adversary is the very father of lies [John 8:44].  His entire empire is built upon them.  Without lies, falsehoods and propaganda, the chains fall off.

It’s that simple.

As a result, he has invested a sizable portion of all the wealth he has stolen and hoarded into buying pawns and traitors to Christianity to shore up the matrix we live in.

Enter Hendrick “Hank” Hanegraaff and the “Christian Research Institute”.

I grew up (spiritually), immersed in the Matrix of the Final Beast.  I came to Christ at a Calvary Chapel—a movement that has strong ties with Rome.  I spent the next ten years of my Christian Walk learning from Dr. Chuck Missler—a man born of the military/industrial complex who has put a great amount of effort into fooling Believers with Rome’s doctrines.  These doctrines include everything from the ball-Earth, heliocentric, cosmic accident of our supposed cosmology to a future Dispensationalist role of the fabricated nation of “Israel”; from the “Pre-Tribulation Rapture” to first Russia and now Islam replacing Rome as our greatest threat (all fabricated distractions from the Whore of Babylon, the Fourth and Final Beast).

One of my first experiences with Hank Hanegraaf and the “Christian Research Institute” was in concern over their attacking my virtual Jesuit mentor, Chuck Missler.  Of course, they weren’t attacking Missler on the critical issues taught by Rome like Dispensationalism or distracting Believers from understanding the “Holy Roman Empire” to be the Final Beast, they were simply attacking “Koinonia House” on teaching the importance of prophecy.

This is an old trick.

In the field of subversion and counter-intelligence, you can plant your agents deep into the enemy’s camp by having them seem to out other agents.  In reality, CRI’s “critique” of Missler also helps Rome!  Prophecy is critical to understanding our environment and also an important factor in discerning who runs the system of Mystery Babylon—the hidden control of all banks, militaries, intelligence agencies, media and governments.

SUPPRESSED

The Company of Loyola—the Jesuits—is a military organization (their commander is the “Superior General”) that specializes in assassination, subversion and gathering intelligence.  An excellent example of this is the suppression of the Jesuits in 1773.  After 200 years of Jesuit plots in their countries, even Catholic nations were demanding the Pope disband his special forces.  Although Clement XIII attempted to in 1767, he was murdered before he could sign the concordat.  His successor was able to publish a Papal Bull—Dominus ac Redemptor on 21 July 1773—and he languished in extreme pain and even premature decomposition before finally dying of aquetta poisoning.

Were they actually suppressed?  One late author says “No!” and he has built a shockingly brilliant case.  Frederick Tupper Saussy, in his Rulers of Evil, noted that Sun Tzu’s Art of War was published in 1772.  It was “translated” by a Jesuit named Jean Joseph Marie Amiot although neither East nor West had any recollection of the nebulous “Sun Tzu”.  It is far more likely that this book (required reading in America’s war colleges) was a publicizing of a Jesuit strategy so brilliant they would emerge in total control of all world affairs.

As the fourteenth Superior General, Michael Angelo Tamburini, is reputed to have told the French Duc de Brancas, Philippe II, in 1720, “See, my lord, from this room—from this room I govern not only Paris, but China: not only China, but the whole world, without any one knowing how ‘tis managed.”

It is no coincidence that Father Amiot was Qianlong Emperor Aisin Gioro Hongli’s personal astronomer: “Don’t worry about looking up, my king.  I will tell how the Earth is round.”

In Chapter XIII of The Art of War, we learn—

The Use of Spies

…what enables the wise sovereign and the good general to strike and conquer, and achieve things beyond the reach of ordinary men, is foreknowledge. …

6. Knowledge of the enemy’s dispositions can only be obtained from other men.

7. Hence the use of spies, of whom there are five classes:

(1) Local spies;
(2) inward spies;
(3) converted spies;
(4) doomed spies;
(5) surviving spies.

8. When these five kinds of spy are all at work, none can discover the secret system. This is called “divine manipulation of the threads.” It is the sovereign’s most precious faculty.

9. Having local spies means employing the services of the inhabitants of a district.

10. Having inward spies, making use of officials of the enemy.

11. Having converted spies, getting hold of the enemy’s spies and using them for our own purposes.

12. Having doomed spies, doing certain things openly for purposes of deception, and allowing our spies to know of them and report them to the enemy.

13. Surviving spies, finally, are those who bring back news from the enemy’s camp.

MEDICI LEARNING

CRI continues to pretend-attack fellow Papal agents like Missler and his Jesuit insurgent friend Hal Lindsey.

For a public Christian, Lindsey’s personal information has been expunged from the internet.  But when you are able to pull anything up it is at direct odds with his stellar moral and ethical reputation.

Hal appears to be on his fourth wife.  The book that put him on the “planet”—The Late, Great Planet Earth—was actually written by a Lesbian, radial Left activist and United Church of Christ “minister” Carole Carkeet Carlson (she also wrote several of David Jeremiah’s books for him, too, but don’t ask Wikipedia who she is).  If you want to know where Hal’s heart is, just follow his daughters…to Jesuit Gonzaga University.

Hanegraaff’s own personal life is also invisible across the vast internet, outside of his being born in the Netherlands and having twelve children with his wife Kathy.

A “Google” search of “hank hanegraaff netherlands catholic” lists the entire first page (or subsequent pages for that matter) completely devoid of anything negative.

It sure helps to have friends in extremely powerful places.

His Wikipedia entry says volumes because it says nothing—

Personal life

Hanegraaff was born in the Netherlands and raised in the United States since childhood. He and his wife Kathy have twelve children.  They lived in Southern California^[12] but are now living in Charlotte, North Carolina.^[1]

Having twelve children is an astounding number of offspring and, certainly, a family plan that fits very much in line with Catholic doctrine.

If you follow the Wikipedia footnote, it takes you right to the Christian Research Institute!  —Certainly an objective, critical source, there.

A blog connected to alternative media investigative journalist Anthony J. Hilder claims that Kathy is Hanegraaff’s second wife and he has a daughter by his first!  Indeed, Hendrick has been a busy man.

Although Wikipedia doesn’t have much to say about Hanegraaff, it does have an interesting article on Dutch Catholicism.

The Roman Catholic Church in the Netherlands (Dutch: rooms-katholiek kerkgenootschap in Nederland (RKK)), is part of the worldwide Catholic Church, under the spiritual leadership of the Pope, Dutch Conference of Bishops, and curia in Rome.  The Metropolitan Archbishop of Utrecht, currently Willem Jacobus Eijk, is Primate (bishop) of the Netherlands.

Although the number of Catholics in the Netherlands has decreased significantly in recent decades, the Dutch Catholic Church is today the largest religious group in the Netherlands.  Once known as a Protestant country, in 2007 the Netherlands was only 16.8 percent Dutch Protestant (down from 60 percent in the early 20th century; defections primarily due to rising unaffiliation).  There are an estimated 3.992 million Catholics (31 December 2013) in the Netherlands, 23.7 percent of the population^[6] down from more than 40 percent in 1970’s.

That would put Hanegraaff’s family in midst of a burgeoning boom for Rome; perhaps eager to be sent on a mission to America or at least providing a very appealing background for Hendrick to be chosen for use after he got here.

Hanegraaff employs a powerful Jesuit tactic when arguing; having memorized vast portions of Scripture, he can throw out copious amounts in debate whether they’re related to the topic or not and the immediate reaction of any Christian is to be humbled by the reference of God’s Word.

For a “Bible Answer Man” Hanegraaff’s secret past is a dark one.  He has been accused of plagiarizing D. James Kennedy’s 1970 book Evangelism Explosion for his 1987 book Personal Witness Training, and Kennedy was a close friend.

CRI is based in Rancho Santa Margarita, California and there are some interesting articles about Hanegraaff in the Los Angeles Times.

For instance, Hanegraaff took over the Bible Answer Man from Dr. Walter Martin but after Walter’s death, the Martin family began to show public displeasure with Hanegraaff’s decisions—

Relatives of the late Walter Martin, founder of the Christian Research Institute, based in Rancho Santa Margarita, contend that Hank Hanegraaff has departed from the organization’s mission of debunking unusual religious claims.  And they are demanding his resignation.

Hanegraaff, 50, was the handpicked successor to Martin, who retired in 1979.  But in recent years, the Martin family has been troubled by Hanegraaff’s leadership.

After a public rift with Hanegraaff in 1996, Darlene Martin, the widow of Walter Martin, resigned from the institute’s board. Last October, the family sent Hanegraaff a letter detailing objections to his leadership. ~ Elaine Gale, LA Times, 15 April 2000

Do you get the feeling that Hank is a bit of an interloper?  Perhaps “insurgent” is a better word.

Doctor Martin’s wife, Darlene confirmed this in a chilling letter to the editor.

After reading your article “Casting Stones” (April 15), I am writing to clarify several issues.

First, my husband, Walter Martin, never “handpicked” anyone to succeed him at Christian Research Institute and “The Bible Answer Man” radio program.

This claim was handed to me by someone I thought I could trust as I approached the lectern at my husband’s memorial service.

I read it for the first time—aloud—while standing in front of 1,500 people.  It took me completely by surprise and put me in a very awkward position.  I wish to take this opportunity now to apologize for allowing this statement to stand for so many years.

At the time of my husband’s death, I believed Hank Hanegraaff was a man God could mold into a strong Christian leader, one who could play a positive role in leading CRI.  I supported him loyally for six years before I came to see he was not the man I believed him to be.

Secondly, one of our family’s main objections to Hanegraaff’s continued leadership is his mistreatment of fellow Christians.  He has left a trail of wounded people behind him since the takeover of CRI in 1989.  The testimonies against him include those who are his “right-hand” people, people who worked closely with him.

Hanegraaff has called repeatedly for accountability in other Christian leaders and should be held accountable himself.

DARLENE MARTIN, San Juan Capistrano

Hanegraaff Wasn’t “Handpicked”, LA Times, 30 April 2000

Hendrick Hanegraaff wasn’t acting like a very good Christian but he sure does act like an excellent Jesuit.

BANKSTERS’ RULE

Since the suppression of the Templars (the first usury bankers, founders of modern banking) in 1307, the Papists have learned to never allow their own faces/names to be placed upon their machinations—especially their criminal financial exercises.  Instead they hide behind scapegoats and their number one favorite targets are the Jews.

Sadly, they’ve always found Jews interested only in self-aggrandizement, willing to be enriched and targeted in the process, or even malignant Jews who knowingly give their own race a bad name because they are true Luciferians.

The Bank of Italy was launched by Amadeo Peter Giannini in California.  After it’s shocking success, Americans began to get angry with both Rome and Italian immigrants.

The name was changed to “Bank of America” (just like the Jesuit magazine is “America magazine”).  Giannini used his money to found 20th Century Fox but put two Jews up front: Darryl Zanuck and Joseph Schenck.  Zanuck and Schenck immediately produced a movie about the Rothschild banking dynasty called The House of Rothschild which was so effective in stirring hatred against Jews it was used in Nazi propaganda.  Were Zanuck and Schenck really that self-loathing or were they merely Jewish faces behind a Papal plot?

SWARMS OF LOCUSTS

In his 2002 book Swarms of Locusts (pp. 116-119), Michael Bunker has a lengthy section on Hank.

Hundreds of thousands of “Christians” listen to Hank Hanegraaff, specifically because he claims to have the answers when it comes to Christian doctrine. …

In CRI’s statement entitled “What Think Ye of Rome? (part 2)” on Catholicism, CRI states that Roman Catholicism only “compromises” the biblical doctrines of justification, the sufficiency of Christ’s atonement, the authority of the Bible, and total depravity!  CRI accuses the other cults of DENYING these doctrines, but allow that the Catholics only “compromise” them. How can that be?  How can TOTAL DEPRAVITY be “compromised” but not denied?  Does CRI have a problem understanding the word TOTAL or the word DEPRAVITY?  How can the doctrines of justification and the sufficiency of Christ’s atonement on the Cross by “compromised” without denying them?

CRI states that:

“…no matter how theologically deviant Catholicism might be ‑ even if in some respects apostate ‑ it certainly does possess a structural or foundational orthodoxy, reflected in its adherence to the ancient ecumenical creeds …” (ibid, CRI)

In a fundraising letter dated 6/7/95, Hanegraaff stated that any obstacles between Protestants and Catholics should not stand in the way of cooperation in areas where we share mutual interests and concerns.  Sounds like Chuck Colson’s, “Evangelicals and Catholics Together” to me.

Hanegraaff is also a self-proclaimed Charismatic.  He was ordained by Chuck Smith’s Calvary Chapel:

“Despite Hanegraaff’s 1993 anti-charismatic book, Christianity in Crisis, CRI is not to be trusted when dealing with the charismatics either.  In an interview printed in the 5/93 Charisma magazine, Hanegraaff admitted that he himself is a charismatic and that more than half of the CRI staff are charismatics as well!  He said, ‘Spiritual gifts are not an issue at CRI.  We have never made a single anti-charismatic statement on our show.’” (Biblical Discernment Ministries, article on Hank Hanegraaff, revised 3/98) …

It is easy enough to trace the Jesuitical fingerprint back from Hank Hanegraaff to Ignatius of Loyola himself.  Hanegraaff is the product of Calvary Chapel, which is the product of the Neo-Pentacostal/Charismatic movement, which is the product of the Pentacostal movement, which is the product of the Ignatian/Arminians John Wesley and Charles Finney, who are the product of Jacobus Arminius, who is the product of Luis de Molina, who is the product of Ignatius of Loyola.

Do you wonder why Hanegraaff vociferously denies that the Catholic Church is HARLOT of Romans 17, and that Rome is the city that sits on “seven mountains”?

“Rome has not changed its heretical character…  If Hank Hanegraaff wants to look upon Rome with some favor and refuse to look upon it as the great anti-christian religious harlot that it is, that is his prerogative, but he is deceiving his listeners when he claims that old-fashioned Protestant and Baptist views on this matter are ‘extremist’ or unscholarly.” (David W. Cloud, 2000, Identifying the Whore)

Can you see why the last days Great Deception is considered GREAT?  When the armies of Jesuitical evangelism swarm the globe, they have a veritable buffet of “Catholic-Light” theology to offer.  Whether a new “convert” chooses a more austere, formalistic institution to attend, or a more emotional Charismatic church to frequent ‑ he will be thoroughly indoctrinated in Arminian theology in short order.

When it comes to the official CRI position on the Catholic Church, Michael Bunker isn’t exaggerating; it’s downright cozy—

IS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH A CULT?- A Mixed Bag

While Protestants continue to disagree over the issue, CRI firmly maintains that Roman Catholicism is a religious system which includes both orthodox biblical Christianity and elements of unbiblical or “cultic” doctrine and practice.  In other words, we recognize that Roman Catholicism historically has affirmed the essential teachings of the Bible, while also teaching doctrines which are inconsistent with that affirmation and which seriously compromise the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ.  We acknowledge in Roman Catholicism the presence of many genuine brothers and sisters in the Lord, while also recognizing that many of those within Roman Catholicism worldwide appear to be lost.

“Is Roman Catholicism a Cult” is not the most important or the easiest issue to prove (which is why it’s the one CRI addressed).  But even when cornered by callers to his radio show on Catholic doctrine that is questionable, he attacks their sources and dodges the issue.  I used a short clip on my show Resistance Rising and it’s quite clear who Hank works for.

CRI is fully aware of powerful accusations that they serve Rome; the issue is avoided with the usual Christian-speak that’s as soothing as the stare of Kaa the snake from Jungle Book.

IS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH A CULT?- To Speak the Truth

We take this stand fully aware that many are going to criticize us for it. In fact, Catholics will take issue with us because we are critical of many of their teachings.  Protestants label us because we don’t strongly criticize Roman Catholicism.  In fact, there have been some Protestants that have even accused CRI of being Jesuit-controlled!  Well, our concern, is not to please men, but to speak the truth in love.  Obviously we are not in any way controlled by the Roman Catholic church…

Obviously.

LETIGIOUS LECHERY

For the “Bible Answer Man”, Hanegraaff isn’t too keen on obeying Biblical restrictions on lawsuits—

Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unrighteous, and not before the saints?  Do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world will be judged by you, are you unworthy to judge the smallest matters?  Do you not know that we shall judge angels?  How much more, things that pertain to this life?

If then you have judgments concerning things pertaining to this life, do you appoint those who are least esteemed by the church to judge?  I say this to your shame.

Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you, not even one, who will be able to judge between his brethren?  But brother goes to law against brother, and that before unbelievers!

Now therefore, it is already an utter failure for you that you go to law against one another.  Why do you not rather accept wrong?  Why do you not rather let yourselves be cheated?  No, you yourselves do wrong and cheat, and you do these things to your brethren!

~ I Corinthians 6:1-8, New King James Version

A best-selling Christian author and radio evangelist known as the “Bible Answer Man” has filed a defamation lawsuit against a longtime critic who had accused him of being under investigation for mail fraud.

Controversy surrounding Hank Hanegraaff’s Rancho Santa Margarita-based Christian Research Institute arose earlier this year after he sent out an urgent fundraising letter, saying that a “bizarre error” by postal workers caused donations to be thrown away.

Critic and former Christian Research Institute employee Bill Alnor, a journalism professor at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, posted a story on his online magazine, the Christian Sentinel, saying that Hanegraaff was the focus of a federal mail-fraud investigation.

According to Hanegraaff, that was never true. Citing Alnor’s “escalating personal attacks,” he filed suit this week in Orange County Superior Court because, he said, Alnor’s allegations have “crossed the line.”  He is seeking unspecified damages. ~ Evangelist Sues Critic Over Charge, Kimi Yoshino, LA Times, 2 April 2005

It’s not the first time someone has accused Hank Hanegraaff of illicit or illegal behavior.  In fact, previous accusations rather shockingly include criminal behavior worthy of a full law enforcement investigation—

Christian Research Institute’s Hank Hanegraaff had been accused of financial fraud and other criminal activities.  A lawsuit was filed (“wrongful termination suit”) on March 7, 1994, in Orange County Superior Court, California.  The suit alleged that Hendrik (Hank) Hanegraaff, president of CRI, was guilty of numerous ethical lapses, financial theft, tax fraud, and a shocking list of other criminal activities and deceptive practices.  The plaintiffs also charged CRI and its president and officers with violation of the federal racketeering act, defined as a criminal conspiracy or a “combination.” ~ Brad Sparks, Biblical Discernment Ministries, 22 April 1996

Amazingly, Hanegraaff was only investigated by a religious insider group and not the FBI.

After complaints from former employees, a Southern California evangelist who calls himself a theological watchdog for Christians worldwide has been chastised for his ministry’s financial practices.

Officials with the national Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability conducted an audit that has resulted in what they called a “significant reimbursement” in June to the Christian Research Institute, a ministry run by Christian author and radio personality Hank Hanegraaff.

Neither the council nor Hanegraaff, known on the radio as the “Bible Answer Man,” would say how much money was paid back to the institute or by whom. Council officials said the ministry cooperated fully with the audit.

But a group of former employees called the audit a whitewash and made its complaints public by taking the story to the magazine Christianity Today. ~ Audit’s Lesson Was “Painful” for Evangelist, William Lobdell, LA Times, 17 August 2003

After this clean bill of health, perhaps we can call Hanegraaff the Teflon Don of Christian media!

Some accusations against Hanegraaff never make it to the forefront thanks to Christians who do try to live by what Scripture says about such things but that never stopped Hank from attacking them anyway…even when they mentored him like the late Dr. D. James Kennedy—

Hank Hanegraaff is president of the Christian Research Institute, an organization located in southern California that specializes in reviewing the major doctrines of various “cults” that profess an identity with “Christianity.”  Hanegraaff is the host of a radio program, called The Bible Answer Man.  The program is broadcast daily throughout the United States and Canada.

Currently, however, the “Answer Man” is under pressure for some “answers” relative to his own ethics.  And this is not the first time the gentleman has been in legal trouble.  See: “CRI – Hank Hanegraaff Lawsuit”.

Dr. James Kennedy is “Pastor” for the Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Kennedy is widely known for his own radio and television ministry, during which he enunciates strong positions relative to certain moral and social issues.  For example, he vigorously opposes abortion, and he courageously exposes the fallacies of the theory of evolution.

For some years Kennedy and Hanegraaff were associates and close friends.  It seems that Kennedy was significantly responsible for training the “Answer Man” for the position the latter now holds with the Research Institute.  Currently, though, the two are at serious odds.

Recently, Hanegraaff, via his radio broadcast, rebuked Kennedy for some statements the minister had made relative to “astrology.”  On the other hand, Dr. Kennedy is charging that Hanegraaff has flagrantly plagiarized his writings.  Supposedly, the offense is so serious that a lawsuit would be a viable recourse were it not for Kennedy’s scruples against such a drastic action. ~ Hank Hanegraaff and the “Christian Research Institute”, Wayne Jackson, the Christian Courier

And, despite being a lightning-rod for controversy (or perhaps because of it) Hanegraaff sure seems to have some high-powered friends.

JESUIT CHLOROFORM

Since the beginning of Christianity, Believers have understood Rome to be the 4^th and Final Beast of Daniel, the Dragon of Revelation.  As I noted in my book, this was something the Pope’s Special Forces—the Jesuits—worked overtime to fix:

With Rome so clearly depicted as the 4th and final Beast of both Daniel and Revelation, Jesuits needed to disconnect Christians from that interpretation and they used Preterism and Futurism to do it.

Preterism is the idea that most of prophecy has already taken place.  It was concocted by a Jesuit. …

Preterism wasn’t accepted by large groups of Protestants and an alternative interpretation of the End Times was put forth.

Futurism is more appealing in that it acknowledges that much of prophecy is yet future but it distracts from the 4th Beast and paints the anti-Christ as a man who suddenly appears just before the Tribulation and who stands alone, apart from any organization or system.

It, too, was fabricated by a Jesuit. ~ Illuminati Unmasked, pp. 185, 186

If that weren’t enough, the Jesuits contrived a Pre-Tribulation Rapture to insure any Christian who had second thoughts would rest assured that they would be beamed out before any trouble started.

Sadly, Scripture proves that is not the case.

Every single mainstream sect of “Protestant” Christianity teaches these Jesuit doctrines as if they’ve always existed with the exception of some stalwart Seventh Day Adventists.  A little digging shows that Jesuit-influenced Protestant preachers re-wrote 1800 years of eschatology, erasing Rome from our understanding.

One of the reasons they walk in lockstep is the culture created by wealthy fiction writers like Tim LaHaye.  His Futurist/Dispensationalist Rapture series “Left Behind” is so big it now has talent like Nicolas Cage starring in the latest batch of movies.

Can you remember the last time you saw a movie depicting the Vatican as secretly ruling the entire world through the banks, militaries and intelligence agencies?  How about a movie that showed any controversy regarding Rome?

Well we already know why; just ask Daryl Zanuck.

But the Jesuits never leave good people without a false outlet.  In fact, channeling anger and frustration is what they count on; part of the Hegelian Dialectic of thesis, antithesis, synthesis.

And they take great pleasure in using the good names and resources of their enemies to do it.  Let’s return to Jean Joseph Amiot again—I’m sorry…I mean “Sun Tzu”:

II Waging War

… a wise general makes a point of foraging on the enemy.  One cartload of the enemy’s provisions is equivalent to twenty of one’s own, and likewise a single picul of his provender is equivalent to twenty from one’s own store.

One of the great Protestant martyrs was an Englishman named William Tyndale.  Tyndale bravely spoke out against Papal injustices and the crowning glory of his efforts were the breaking of the restrictions of the Council of Trent (which forbade the printing of Scripture unless expressly approved by a Vatican official) and the printing of Bibles in English.  For that, Tyndale was condemned to be burned at the stake.  In an unusual show of “mercy”, he was strangled first.  Foxe’s Book of Martyrs has volumes on Protestants who didn’t receive the same “mercy”.

Who is it that publishes Tim LaHaye’s Jesuit Chloroform?  “Tyndale House”.

Sensing a glaring monotony in their Futurist fare, “Tyndale” brought in a “true Protestant” to offer Christians a different point of view.  Opposite LaHaye’s Pre-Tribulation Jesuit Futurism, Tyndale published Jesuit Preterist fiction written by our very own Hank Hanegraaff.

Although LaHaye is making hay about his “betrayal”, he still receives the lion’s share of attention…and money.

Tim LaHaye, coauthor (with Jerry Jenkins) of the Left Behind series, is publicly airing his displeasure with his publisher.  Tyndale House is selling The Last Disciple, a novel with a distinctly different take on the Book of Revelation than that of the Left Behind series.  LaHaye says he feels betrayed and told The Dallas Morning News, “They are going to take the money we made for them and promote this nonsense.”

The Last Disciple was coauthored by Hank Hanegraaff and Sigmund Brouwer, and teaches that most prophecies in Revelation have already been fulfilled.  The Left Behind series, however, is grounded in a premillennial, dispensationalist view of the end times, which includes a pre-Tribulation Rapture.  “I guess you would say I am disappointed, perplexed, and confused,” LaHaye told Christianity Today.

Ron Beers, Tyndale’s senior vice president and publisher, said his company wants to promote healthy dialogue on eschatology.  Beers said, “We haven’t come up with a consensus on end-times issues.”

LaHaye is continuing the Left Behind series with Tyndale, having agreed with Jenkins to produce three more books. LaHaye also signed a lucrative deal with Bantam Dell, a division of Random House, to write a four-book biblical adventure series, with Babylon Rising being the first installment.  LaHaye said press reports that the deal was worth $45 million were exaggerated.  “It is less than 60 percent of that amount,” LaHaye told CT. ~ LaHaye’s Tribulation, Jim Jones, Christianity Today, 20 January 2005

Don’t worry, LaHaye’s Babylon Rising series steers well clear of connecting the dots between Rome and the first rebellion empire of Babylon…but that’s why you have me.

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED

Perhaps the most disturbing of all are the rotten fruits of Hanegraaff’s work: Protestants doing the exact opposite of what Christ told them.

And I heard another voice from Heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. ~ Revelation 18:4

I have been a Catholic now for 4 years.  I was raised in the Nazarene Church.  I wouldn’t say our family was overtly anti-Catholic but I always heard comparisons between our Church and the Catholic Church and how Catholics were wrong…

My long discovery started when I met my future wife in college.  Before I married her I went to church with her and quickly realized that Catholics did not worship Mary.  While their service (the mass) was alien, I didn’t feel that uncomfortable going to church with her.  In college, I had already moved away from the fundamentalist Nazarene faith and adopted more of a generic “mere” Christianity approach to faith (i.e. CS Lewis).  Regardless, when I got married, I told her I would never become Catholic and my wife told me she would never become Protestant.  We just agreed to disagree. (My wife proved to me that practicing Catholics were indeed Christians. Prior to meeting her most Catholics I knew didn’t really live their faith.)  We considered each other to be Christians and that was good enough.  I agreed to get married in the Catholic Church. After we were married we went to the Catholic Church most of the time.  In fact, I went with my wife for 22 years and never had any motivation to become Catholic. …

When my daughter received her first communion in 1999, I started to think about investigating the church.  Protestants cannot receive communion and thought it would be good to receive communion as a family.  Unfortunately my schedule made it impossible to research the church at that time.  Later I heard Protestant Hank Hanegraaff (The Bible Answer Man) on the radio say that the Catholic Church was a true church but a church with “issues”.  I decided that I would investigate what the Church taught and if the Church was a “true church” I would consider joining… ~ 12 Reasons I Joined the Catholic Church, Tim Cooper, Triumph of Truth, 29 July 2007

For a “Protestant” “Bible Answer Man”, Hank Hanegraaff sure is doing great work for the Beast that crucified Christ and burned alive tens of thousands of His devoted Believers.

UPDATE 31 May 2016, 10:11 AM, EST:

Catholic Crystal Cathedral: the Papal Insurgency of Robert Schuller

UPDATE 12 April 2017, 10:13 AM, EST:

Hanegraaff has made it official.

Three days ago (9 April, 2017) on “Palm Sunday”, Hanegraaff publicly submitted himself to the pagan rite of “Chrismation” at Saint Nektarios Greek Orthodox Church in Charlotte, North Carolina.

“What astounding news,” said Rod Dreher, an Orthodox Christian and author of the New York Times best-selling book The Benedict Option, in an interview with The Christian Post Monday.

“Many evangelicals seek the early church; well here it is, in Orthodoxy,” he continued.

“I am sure some will be scandalized by Hannegraaf’s [sic] conversion but I hope at least some will wonder how someone as knowledgeable about the Bible as Hank could convert to Orthodoxy, and go to a Divine Liturgy to taste and see what it’s like.” ~ The Christian Post

Actually, it’s just the opposite: Hanegraaff was chosen from the beginning as an agent of disinformation who could twist and abuse Scripture to serve the Great Whore drunk on the blood of the Saints—but Dreher (and the “Christian Post”) would certain know about such agendas.  Dreher’s just-published book is a siren’s call for right-minded Christians to believe they are served by joining themselves to the very entity who tortured them horrendously not 500 years ago.

Johnny’s soon-to-be-released book will show you how these outrages never ended, they just went underground.

CONTROLLED OPPOSITION BLOWS UP WHAT A GREAT GUY PAPAL AGENT GREG ABBOTT IS

MITCH McCONNELL’S DRUG FAMILY

GOOD TEACHING FROM OUR LOVABLE LITTLE ADVENTIST PROFESSOR

HEADLINES FROM GUNS AMERICA

DEMON-RAT TED STRICKLAND BOWS TO ROME, GOES ANTI-GUN

NBA HELPING BLOOM-TERD’S ANTI-GUN AGENDA

SURPRISE! HITLERY CLINTON IS ANTI-GUN

THE OUTRAGE OF AMERICAN IN-JUSTICE

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF NY PUSH EVEN HARDER

NY “CHURCH” HELPS ADD TO GUN CONTROL

RUGER’S NEW PISTOL

PAPIST “JOURNALIST” JACK CASHILL GIVES YOU CONTROLLED OPPOSITION TO THE MANCHURIAN MESSIAH

At Rockhurst College in Kansas City, I have taught advertising copywriting and feature writing on a part-time basis. I also redesigned the school newspaper, The Hawk, and moderated it for two years.

Rockhurst is Jesuit.

FAUX NEWS IRISH CATHOLIC SEAN HANNITY PROMISES JESUIT-TRAINED PELOSI IS DONE! (not)

DINO HOAX