Recently, the country has undergone a face-lift, but the atrocities and abuses remain (although they are now more covert).

For most of its independent years, the country has been engrossed in rampant ethnic strife and Burma’s myriad ethnic groups have been involved in one of the world’s longest-running ongoing civil wars.  During this time, the United Nations and several other organisations have reported consistent and systematic human rights violations in the country.^[14][15][16]  In 2011, the military junta was officially dissolved following a 2010 general election, and a nominally civilian government was installed.  While former military leaders still wield enormous power in the country, the Burmese military have taken steps toward relinquishing control of the government.  This, along with the release of Aung San Suu Kyi and political prisoners, has improved the country’s human rights record and foreign relations, and has led to the easing of trade and other economic sanctions.^[17][18]  There is, however, continuing criticism of the government’s treatment of the Muslim Rohingya minority and its poor response to the religious clashes.^[19][20][21]  In the landmark 2015 election, Aung San Suu Kyi’s party won a majority in both houses.

Myanmar is a country rich in jade and gems, oil, natural gas and other mineral resources.  In 2013, its GDP (nominal) stood at US$56.7 billion and its GDP (PPP) at US$221.5 billion.^[3]  The income gap in Myanmar is among the widest in the world, as a large proportion of the economy is controlled by supporters of the former military government.^[22][23]  As of 2016, according to the Human Development Index (HDI), Myanmar had a medium level of human development, ranking 145 out of 188 countries.^[4] ~ Wikipedia

It is easy for the Elite to “play” there as Burma rarely gets media coverage.

Myanmar’s head of state, “First State Counsellor” Aung San Suu Kyi, is the kindler, gentler face on Burma’s tyranny.

First State Counsellor of Myanmar, Aung San Suu Kyi, speaking in Sydney on “World AIDS Day” in 2013.  Sinisterly appropriate is the Roman Catholic fleur de lis background.  The fleur de lis is an ancient gnostic / Luciferian symbol implying male-female intercourse.

Although, as “political prisoners” go, the majority have suffered far worse than 15 years of “house arrest”.

In fact, if Suu Kyi were a puppet of the Elite, it would be the perfect way to portray her as a persecuted outsider.

This has been bolstered by her receiving the Nobel Peace Prize in 1991.  The merits behind the award rest on her ineffective resistance to the ruling military junta and her “house arrest”.

The year before she received the Sakharov Prize from European Parliament for the same criteria.  The way the European Union celebrated its 60^th anniversary of tyranny shows clearly who those officials all work for.

Perhaps most telling has been her support from the agents of corruption in the United States, having received a “Congressional Gold Medal” in 2012.

A damning rogue’s gallery of support: (left to right) Joseph Crowley (D-NY), John Boehner, Laura Bush, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Mitch McConnell, Harry Reid, John McCain, Barbara Boxer.

It is appropriate that McConnell and Clinton stand directly behind the award-winner, as they are most responsible for her empowerment.

Clinton is the extreme sexual deviant installed into hegemony by the Central Intelligence Agency and their controllers, the Jesuits (who directly trained her husband).

McConnell married into power; specifically, the Roman Catholic Asian drug trade.

Not to be left out are the contributions of Barack Obama and his Roman Catholic handler, Joe Biden.

Perhaps this was why: despite the new happy face on Myanmar’s military autocracy, ethnic cleansing continues.

Particularly disturbing are reports that Burmese soldiers are pillaging the remote villages of Myanmar’s Rohingya Muslims where they commit atrocities like raping women and children.

This is done under the rubric of fighting “ISIS” for the never-ending “Global War on Terror”.

But modern “jihad” is a completely fabricated enemy founded in the bowels of Roman Western Intelligence operatives like Zbigniew Brzezinski, “close and warm” friend of Pope John Paul II, below pictured with an Afghani soldier believed to be Osama bin Laden (known by the CIA as “Tim Osman”).

Perhaps some will consider criticism of Myanmar’s First State Counsellor as unfair, especially in light of an accusation that she is an operative or at least a pawn of the Papacy.

Interestingly, however, Aung San Suu Kyi (listed as a practicing Buddhist) spent her first 15 years under Roman Catholic tutelage (by “coincidence” the same amount of time she later spent under “house arrest”).  She completed her secondary education at the Convent of Jesus and Mary School in New Delhi, (“Hindu/Buddhist” India) with the “Sisters of Jesus”.²

Her late husband, Michael Aris, had even more interesting connections.

Aris was born in Catholic Cuba to a Foreign Service Catholic British father and French-Canadian Catholic, (and Catholic-educated) mother.  Not surprisingly, he was raised Catholic.³

When the Aris family returned to “Protestant/Anglican” England, Michael and his twin brother Anthony attended Worth Abbey Roman Catholic boarding school.⁴

His well-traveled father gave him a Buddhist “prayer wheel” as a gift.  Again, coincidentally, one of his instructors at Worth just happened to be future Knight of Malta Grand Master Andrew Bertie who also just happened to speak Ü-Tsang Tibetan.  Bertie translated the prayer wheel for Aris helping imbue him with a passion for the Orient.⁵

Aris would go on to teach Asian History at St. John’s, Oxford.  “St. John’s” is the most well-endowed college at Oxford, founded by Roman Catholic Sir Thomas White to lead the Counter-Reformation against Protestantism.

It’s full name is Saint John Baptist College which is important given that the secret belief of the Templars was to profane Jesus Christ as an imposter and worship the Baptist as the true Messiah (known as “Johanism”).⁶

St. John’s boasts many powerful alumni such as Barack Obama’s Secretary of Defense, Ashton Carter.

Michael Aris died of prostate cancer on his 53^rd birthday in 1999.  Although believed by many to share his wife’s apparent Buddhism (they were married in a Buddhist ceremony); the Benedictine monks of Worth and Ampleforth Abbies gave blessings at his funeral.⁷

In 2013, Myanmar’s First State Counsellor was received in a personal audience with Jesuit White Pope⁸ Francis, Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

If any had doubts about her fealty, they were dissolved with a kiss.

In December of 1998, Congress began impeachment proceedings against William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.

In January of 1999, William Jefferson Blythe Clinton committed the American military to a 500 year old religious conflict between Bosnian muslims and Serbian Christians in the former Yugoslavia…aiding the Islamists against their Orthodox foes.

The action was sold to the American people as necessary due to inhuman atrocities created by Serbian “ethnic cleansing”, but a decade later it emerged that Albanian muslims self-inflicted “cleansing” on innocent locals:

Eve-Ann Prentice, a British journalist who covered the Kosovo war for the Guardian and the London Times, testified during Slobodan Milosevic’s trial in the Hague. He said that rather than being driven out by the Serbs, “The KLA [Kosovo Liberation Army] told ethnic Albanian civilians that it was their patriotic duty to leave because the world was watching. This was their one big opportunity to make Kosovo part of Albania eventually, that NATO was there, ready to come in, and that anybody who failed to join the exodus was not supporting the Albanian cause.” ~ Rewarding Terrorism, Deception in Kosovo, Andy Wilcoxson, World Net Daily

Even the “atrocities” were hotly contested at the time as nothing more than contrived provocations for war:

…in Belgrade, Gen. Wesley K. Clark, the NATO commander, and Gen. Klaus Naumann, chairman of the NATO military council, were sitting with President Slobodan Milosevic of Yugoslavia. They came brandishing a plastic portfolio of color photographs documenting a massacre of Albanians three days earlier by Serbian security forces in the Kosovo town of Racak.

They also came with threats of NATO air strikes.

This was far from their first encounter with the Serbian leader, but this time, they recalled, they found a newly hardened man with a bunker mentality.

“This was not a massacre,” Milosevic shouted. “This was staged. These people are terrorists.”

When General Clark warned him that NATO would “start telling me to move aircraft,” Milosevic appeared infuriated by the prospect of bombings. He called the general a war criminal. ~ How a President, Distracted by Scandal, Entered Balkan War, Elaine Sciolino and Ethan Bronner, New York Times

This is the same Wesley Clark that later spilled the beans on similar plans for the Middle East—plans that ran as far back as 1991 to destabilize governments and overturn them with the help of radical Islam…

Note that Syria and Iran are on the doorstep of this policy.

The Bosnian War didn’t do much for Christian Serbs but it was a tremendous boon to the Religion of Peace—by the way, National Guardsmen that should be home digging citizens out of weather emergencies are still deploying on this mission today!

Mike Scruggs noted for the Tribune Papers (archived here) that this was a war that created a terrorist haven in the heart of Europe:

For 78 days in 1999, we bombed Christian Serbia and their forces in Kosovo, ostensibly as a humanitarian move to prevent Serbian ethnic cleansing of Kosovo’s Albanian population. Our real motive was to cripple the troublesome anti-multiculturalist Serbs and to enhance our standing with the oil-rich Muslim world. We bombed bridges, selected buildings, railroads, even passenger trains, and other targets in the Serbian capital of Belgrade. Unfortunately, the Chinese Embassy was also hit. According to John Pilger, writing in the Guardian, many of the bombs dropped from a relatively safe altitude (for us) of 15,000 feet, also hit schools, hospitals, and homes. Total Serbian dead amounted to about two thousand. Pope John Paul II described the bombing as an “act of diabolical retribution.” Many conservative and liberal American leaders agreed, but the Serbs eventually had to yield to our more advanced technology and vastly superior force. …

The results of our alliance with the KLA and establishing an Albanian base of Muslim power in Kosovo have been horrific. The Albanians have driven 277 thousand Serbs from Kosovo. Hundreds have been murdered. Thousands have been robbed and brutalized as their homes and property were destroyed. Muslim multiculturalists have destroyed 135 Orthodox churches, monasteries, and shrines. All this was done under the noses of UN security forces.

Bill Clinton’s great military achievement was a humanitarian disaster, and it established a dangerous Muslim foothold in Europe that is exporting terror and crime.

Unfortunately for Milosevic and the Christians of Serbia, their most important ally, Russia (lead at the time by Boris Yeltsin) was weak and unable to do much more than pick up the pieces for the embattled nation.

At that time, I was completely sold on Russia and Vladimir Putin standing as “good Christians” against the “New World Order”.  I foolishly yet prophetically called Putin “Constantine rising”.  At the time, I didn’t understand who really ran the “New World Order” nor that the same power—Rome—equally controlled Russia.

As the blinders came off, I would write in April of this year—

I was recently sent an interesting video professing to show the Rector of Saint-Petersburg State Agrarian University, Victor Alekseyevich Efimov, giving a class purportedly to members of Russia’s Federal Security Service (Федеральная Служба Безопасности “FSB”).  I thought that, although I had to trust the poor English subtitles and couldn’t verify where Efimov was, it was well worth trying to get through.

I’m glad I did.

Within 20 minutes it was clear to me that the Jesuits and Rome have far more control in Russia than what I had thought beginning with their favorite domain; Intelligence.

One need look no further than the flag of the FSB to know that the Dragon of Rome and her soldiers are secure there.  On a field of a Maltese Cross (the symbol of the Knights of Saint John of Jerusalem, a.k.a. the Hospitallers, a.k.a. the Knights of Malta) sits the Imperial Russian crest which has the two-headed eagle of Freemasonry.

More specifically, the two-headed eagle is a Templar insignia which was adopted by the Freemasons.

It shows the two faces of the Imperial Roman Eagle and bespeaks of how Rome and her secret societies have conquered mankind by stealth and deception; putting a kindly, gentle face of lies towards us but a ravenous parasitic face of satanic feudal domination towards those “in the know”.

Having seen a post-Soviet Russia reborn in Christian culture, I had hoped that it signaled the one nation left that stood against the Great Whore of Babylon but such is not the case.

Russia’s Christian virtues and everything else of significance—from her industry to her military, from her banks to her intelligence agencies—are dominated by the second leg of iron in Nebuchadnezzar’s dream; Orthodoxy.

This was proven quite succinctly just in the past few weeks as a completely needless “anti-terrorism” law was concocted by the Duma and dutifully signed by the KGB Colonel, himself.  It strikes—not at the phantasm of “radical Islam” created by Intelligence Agencies—but directly at who Rome hates the most: Protestant Evangelicals.

I wrote in July—

In 2012, the Christian Post reported that the Orthodox Church had guaranteed President Putin would step up to protect Christians around the world.

The representative of the Russian Orthodox Church has told Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin this week of the urgent situation Christians are facing around the world in persecution hot spots, and has asked him to use his power to aid their situations.

RT online reported that Metropolitan Hilarion, foreign relation chief of the Russian Orthodox Church presented evidence and statistics that stated, “Every five minutes one Christian was dying for his or her faith in some part of the word.”

Christians face persecution in many nations; from church demolition in Afghanistan and bombings of churches in Iraq, to the violence against Christians taking place in rebellious towns in Syria.

After delivering the facts, Metropolitan Hilarion asked Putin to make protection and defense of Christianity around the globe a major part of his foreign policy.

And, as reported by Interfax, Putin replied, “You needn’t have any doubt that that’s the way it will be,” assuring Hilarion that Russian foreign policy would defend Christians from persecution abroad.

But the bloodletting of Christians continues unabated.

In fact, as a result of the so-called “War on Terror”, Protestant Evangelical Christians are being persecuted in Russia, as well.

This week, Russian president Vladimir Putin approved a package of anti-terrorism laws that usher in tighter restrictions on missionary activity and evangelism.

Despite prayers and protests from religious leaders and human rights advocates, the Kremlin announced Putin’s approval yesterday.  The amendments, including laws against sharing faith in homes, online, or anywhere but recognized church buildings, go into effect July 20.

Though opponents to the new measures hope to eventually appeal in court or elect legislators to amend them, they have begun to prepare their communities for life under the new rules, reported Forum 18 News Service, a Christian outlet reporting on the region.

Protestants and religious minorities small enough to gather in homes fear they will be most affected.  Last month, “the local police officer came to a home where a group of Pentecostals meet each Sunday,” Konstantin Bendas, deputy bishop of the Pentecostal Union, told Forum 18.  “With a contented expression he told them: ‘Now they’re adopting the law I’ll drive you all out of here.’ I reckon we should now fear such zealous enforcement.” ~ Christianity Today

As I’ve already reported to you, at length, organized religion is the most deadly weapon used against a healthy Christian Faith.  Slowly, Evangelical Protestants are awakening to this danger and returning to their roots by joining in their homes as the first Christians once did.

In Russia, this is now illegal.

The bloom is most certainly off the Russian rose—for me and it should be for you.

Since then, I have come across some fascinating information that shows who the real target was of the Jesuits running the Clinton Administration.

Yes, at a basic level, Rome still despises Orthodox Christians and revels in slaughtering them.

At the very top, however, Orthodoxy as well as any other Roman run-off like the Anglican Church is all completely co-opted and controlled by Rome.

The Romans secretly running the United States did, indeed, wish to punish the Orthodox “heretic” Christians of Yugoslavia.  They also sought to create a bastion for “radical Islam” in Europe.

From 1992 to 1995, the Pentagon assisted with the movement of thousands of mujahedin and other Islamic elements from Central Asia into Europe, to fight alongside Bosnian Muslims against the Serbs.

The Bosnia venture appears to have been very important to the rise of mujahedin forces, to the emergence of today’s cross-border Islamic terrorists who think nothing of moving from state to state in the search of outlets for their jihadist mission. …

As part of the Dutch government’s inquiry into the Srebrenica massacre of July 1995, Professor Cees Wiebes of Amsterdam University compiled a report entitled “Intelligence and the War in Bosnia”, published in April 2002.  In it he details the secret alliance between the Pentagon and radical Islamic groups from the Middle East, and their efforts to assist Bosnia’s Muslims.  By 1993, there was a vast amount of weapons-smuggling through Croatia to the Muslims, organised by “clandestine agencies” of the USA, Turkey and Iran, in association with a range of Islamic groups that included Afghan mujahedin and the pro-Iranian Hezbollah.  Arms bought by Iran and Turkey with the financial backing of Saudi Arabia were airlifted from the Middle East to Bosnia—airlifts with which, Wiebes points out, the USA was “very closely involved”.

… for all the Clinton officials’ concern about Islamic extremists in the Balkans, they continued to allow the growth and movement of mujahedin forces in Europe through the 1990s.  In the late 1990s, in the run-up to Clinton’s and Blair’s Kosovo war of 1999, the USA backed the Kosovo Liberation Army against Serbia.  According to a report in the Jerusalem Post in 1998, KLA members, like the Bosnian Muslims before them, had been “provided with financial and military support from Islamic countries”, and had been “bolstered by hundreds of Iranian fighters or mujahedin…[some of whom] were trained in Osama bin Laden’s terrorist camps in Afghanistan”. ~ How We Trained al-Qa’eda, Brendan O’Neill, The Spectator

More importantly, there is a reason why Bosnia is in Ignatius Loyola’s “little black book”: in the not-too-distant past it was a haven for Bible-believing Christians as they tried to preserve pure doctrine through the Roman Dark Ages.

As I research the sequel for my book Illuminati Unmasked, I have found an excellent resourse: Edmund Broadbent’s 1931 epic The Pilgrim Church.

In it, Broadbent carefully chronicles the true underground Church prior to the Reformation.

Some of those Christians emigrated to Bosnia where they were persecuted by both of Nebuchadnezzar’s legs of iron.

Byzantine persecution drove many of the believers westward into Serbia, and the strength of the Orthodox Church in Serbia pushed them further, into Bosnia.  They continued active on the eastern side of the Peninsula and in Asia Minor.  In 1140 supposed Bogomil error was found in the writings of Constantine Chrysomalus and condemned at a synod held in Constantinople.  The teaching objected to was, that Church baptism is not efficacious, that nothing done by unconverted persons, though baptised, is of any value, that God’s grace is received by the laying on of hands, but only in accordance with the measure of faith.  In 1143 a synod at Constantinople deposed two Cappadocian bishops on the charge of being Bogomils, and in the following century the Patriarch Gemadius complained of their spread in Constantinople itself, where, it was said, they got into private houses and made converts.  Their churches continued in Bulgaria.

As late as the 17th century congregations known as “Pavlicani” (Paulicians)^[31] remained in Philippopolis and other parts of Bulgaria reaching even North of the Danube, who were described by the Orthodox Church as “convinced heretics” and who condemned the Orthodox Church as idolatrous.  Then came Franciscan missionaries from Bosnia and laboured with much zeal among them, in spite of many dangers from the wrath of the Orthodox clergy.  Taking advantage of the persecution suffered by the Paulicians at the hands of the Orthodox Church, the missionaries gradually persuaded them to put themselves under the protection of the Roman Catholic Church and so won them for Rome.  Long after this, however, they continued some of their former practices, especially their custom of meeting together for a meal in common, but they were little by little assimilated to the Roman practice, received images into their churches, and are now known as Bulgarian Catholics in contradistinction to the Bulgarians generally, who are either Orthodox, or Pomaks, that is, descended from ancestors forcibly converted to Mohammedanism.

It was, however, in Bosnia that their greatest development took place.

In the twelfth century they were already very numerous there, and spread to Spalato and Dalmatia.  Here they came into conflict with the Roman Catholic Church.  The title of the rulers of Bosnia was Ban, the most eminent of these being Kulin Ban.  In 1180 this ruler was addressed by the Pope as a faithful adherent of the Church, but by 1199 it was acknowledged that he and his wife and family and ten thousand Bosnians had joined the Bogomil or Patarene heresy, otherwise churches of believers, in Bosnia.  Minoslav, Prince of the Herzegovina, took the same stand, as did also the Roman Catholic Bishop of Bosnia.  The country ceased to be Catholic and experienced a time of prosperity that has remained proverbial ever since.

There were no priests, or rather the priesthood of all believers was acknowledged.  The churches were guided by elders who were chosen by lot, several in each church, an overseer (called grandfather), and ministering brethren called leaders and elders.  Meetings could be held in any house and the regular meeting-places were quite plain, no bells, no altar, only a table, on which might be a white cloth and a copy of the Gospels.

A part of the earnings of the brethren was set aside for the relief of sick believers and of the poor and for the support of those who travelled to preach the Gospel among the unconverted.

Pope Innocent III, with the help of the King of Hungary, brought such pressure to bear on Kulin Ban that, at a meeting (1203) between the Pope’s envoys and the Ban, accompanied by the magnates of Bosnia, at Bjelopolje, “the White Plain”, where Kulin held his court, the Bosnian leaders agreed to submit to the Roman Church, promised never again to relapse into heresy, but to erect an altar and a cross in each of their places of worship, and to have priests who should read the Mass and listen to Confession, and administer the Sacrament twice a year.  They agreed to observe fasts and holy days, that the laity should cease to undertake spiritual functions, and that those who ministered in spiritual matters should be the clergy only, who would be distinguished from the laity by wearing cowls and being called brothers, and that when these elected a Prior, they would apply to the Pope for confirmation.  Heretics were never again to be tolerated in Bosnia.  Though, under pressure of the threat of war, the Ban and rulers of the country made such an agreement, the people entirely refused to accept it or to be bound by it in any way.

Brethren in Bosnia had intercourse with their fellow-believers in Italy, in the South of France, in Bohemia, on the Rhine, and in other parts, reaching even to Flanders and England.  When the Pope declared a crusade against the Albigenses, and Provence was being wasted, fugitives found refuge in Bosnia.  Bosnian and Provencal elders consulted together on matters of doctrine.  Rumours were current that the spiritual movements in Italy, France, and Bohemia, were all connected with a “heretical Pope” in Bosnia.  This was only imaginary, as no such person existed, but it showed that a strong influence went out from Bosnia.  An Italian Inquisitor, Reniero Sacconi, living in the reign of Kulin, who, having been himself a “heretic”, knew more about them than most, calls them the Church of the Cathari, or pure-living, a name used from before the time of the Emperor Constantine, and says they extended from the Black Sea to the Atlantic.

The peace which Kulin Ban purchased by yielding to Rome was not of long duration, for he could not compel his people to observe its terms.

On his death (1216) the Pope appointed a Roman Catholic Ban, and sent a mission to convert the Bosnians.  The churches of the country, however, increased the more, and spread into Croatia, Dalmatia, Istria, Carniola and Slavonia.  Some six years later the Pope, despairing of converting the Bosnians by other than forcible methods, and encouraged by the success of his crusade in Provence, ordered the King of Hungary to invade Bosnia.  The Bosnians deposed their Roman Catholic Ban and elected a Bogomil, Ninoslav.  For years the war went on, with varying fortune.  Ninoslav yielded to circumstances and became a Roman Catholic, but no change in their rulers affected the faith and confession of the great bulk of the people.  The country was devastated, but whenever the invading armies withdrew, the churches were found still existing, and the industry of the people quickly restored prosperity.  Fortresses were erected throughout the country “for the protection of the Roman Catholic Church and religion”; the Pope gave the land to Hungary, which long ruled it, but its people still holding to their faith, he at length called a crusade of “all the Christian world” against it; the Inquisition was established (1291), and Dominican and Franciscan brothers competed in applying its terrors to the devoted churches.⁵

Another excellent source has been the writings of Luciferian Helena Blavatsky.

Very often real truth is the treasure that erupts from one evil entity fighting with another.

In this case, it is Blavatsky outing the atrocities of Rome as the great Harlot enabled Islam against the Christians of Serbia and Bosnia—116 years before Bill Clinton’s treasonous war.

But is it merely Pagans and heathen that the Catholics persecute, and about whom, like Augustine, they cry to the Deity, “Oh, my God! so do I wish Thy enemies to be slain”?  Oh, no! their aspirations are more Mosaic and Cain‐like than that.

It is against their next of kin in faith, against their schismatic brothers that they are now intriguing within the walls which sheltered the murderous Borgias.  The larvæ of the infanticidal, parricidal, and fratricidal Popes have proved themselves fit counsellors for the Cains of Castelfidardo and Mentana.  It is now the turn of the Slavonian Christians, the Oriental Schismatics — the Philistines of the Greek Church!

His Holiness the Pope, after exhausting, in a metaphor of self‐laudation, every point of assimilation between the great biblical prophets and himself, has finally and truly compared himself with the Patriarch Jacob “wrestling against his God.”

He now crowns the edifice of Catholic piety by openly sympathizing with the Turks!  The vicegerent of God inaugurates his infallibility by encouraging, in a true Christian spirit, the acts of that Moslem David, the modern Bashi‐Bazuk; and it seems as if nothing would more please his Holiness than to be presented by the latter with several thousands of the Bulgarian or Servian “foreskins.”  True to her policy to be all things to all men to promote her own interests, the Romish Church is, at this writing (1876), benevolently viewing the Bulgarian and Servian atrocities, and, probably, manoeuvring with Turkey against Russia.  Better Islam, and the hitherto‐hated Crescent over the sepulchre of the Christian god, than the Greek Church established at Constantinople and Jerusalem as the state religion.  Like a decrepit and toothless ex‐tyrant in exile, the Vatican is eager for any alliance that promises, if not a restoration of its own power, at least the weakening of its rival.  The axe its inquisitors once swung, it now toys with in secret, feeling its edge, and waiting, and hoping against hope.  In her time, the Popish Church has lain with strange bedfellows, but never before now sunk to the degradation of giving her moral support to those who for over 1200 years spat in her face, called her adherents “infidel dogs,” repudiated her teachings, and denied godhood to her God!⁹

As I continue to dig, I have found one thing remains consistent: the Great Harlot may bite off an ear or cut off the arm of one of her wayward children but she never waivers from attacking with full ferocity those who fully serve God.

I’m glad I did.

Within 20 minutes it was clear to me that the Jesuits and Rome have far more control in Russia than what I had thought beginning with their favorite domain; Intelligence.

One need look no further than the flag of the FSB to know that the Dragon of Rome and her soldiers are secure there.  On a field of a Maltese Cross (the symbol of the Knights of Saint John of Jerusalem, a.k.a. the Hospitallers, a.k.a. the Knights of Malta) sits the Imperial Russian crest which has the two-headed eagle of Freemasonry.

Above is the Royal Crest of Czar Paul I

The problem Rome has is that she rules from the shadows and that requires the organs and bureaucracies of the nations she has stolen to believe a lie about why they are so incompetent.  This was clearly the mission given to Viktor Efimov—fill the heads of FSB officers with lies and subterfuge about why Russia is suffering and who her real enemies are.

We first notice that Efimov is a Communist who worked for Mikhail Gorbachev yet he mentions nothing of Gorbachev’s having presided over the destruction of the Soviet Union and isn’t embarrassed to have been a high official in Gorbachev’s administration.

Where is Gorbachev working now?  He’s working to promote “climate change” in the new office CIA Director George H.W. Bush gave him in California.

Where in California?  At a favorite Catholic location, “The Presidio” (a compound that was first used by Catholic monks, then the U.S. Army and is now “private” thanks to CIA Director Bush).  Supposed “former Jesuit Malachi Martin says, “Gorbachev was told to collapse the Soviet Union.”

From my book Illuminati Unmasked—

Mikhail Gorbachev oversaw the destruction of the USSR which critically weakened Russia. Gorbachev ran to a surprising source for safe haven: George H.W. Bush. Bush turned over the military base at the Presidio in California to the former Communist and it became a base of operations for Gorbachev’s continued subversive efforts under the guise of “environmentalism”.

It is a place of special significance to Rome.

San Francisco history remained devoid of Europeans until 1775, when the Spanish, long having a stronghold in Southern California, ventured north on a “Sacred Expedition” led by Gaspar de Portola. In 1776, the Spanish founded the Presidio Army Base and the Catholic Church commenced capturing and enslaving the San Francisco Ohlone population. Later, ranchers grazed San Francisco’s green hills with cattle and continued until an upstart nation to the east, the United Stated of America, set her sights westward to the Pacific’s shining seas. ~ San Francisco.com⁹⁷¹

The Presidio has been the reward of other Congressional Catholic Communist faithful like Pennsylvania Democrat Congressman John Murtha (ensconced in power until carried out in a pine box⁹⁷²) and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

“Among the unpublicized facts about Nancy Pelosi was that she was an investor in a real estate investment entity called PRESIDIO PARTNERS, which set up shortly after the Nixon Administration’s first closure of federal military bases around the US,”.

“Among the choicest real estate properties were (a) San Francisco’s Presidio Fort then the headquarters for the Sixth US Army (b) Treasure Island and Yreba Buena Island, the US Navy’s parcels in San Francisco Bay (c) The Hunter’s Point Naval Base, then biggest US Navy base between Seattle Washington Long Beach and San Diego California.”

Pelosi’s involvement in the disposal of federal military surplus land is matched only by Gorbachev, who as founder of Green Cross International (GCI) devised a mechanism for converting American military bases to civilian uses converting the bases over to “global centers for sustainability”. Gorbachev’s mission of converting American military bases to global centers for sustainability came just two years after he resigned as president of the Soviet Union on December 25, 1991. ~ Judi McLeod, Canada Free Press⁹⁷³

 ~ Illuminati Unmasked ¹⁰

Efimov says that he needs to give his students a completely new world view, just like Copernicus did.  This is a fascinating assertion that clearly shows he works for the Luciferian Elite that sit in the city on seven hills.

Nicolaus Copernicus was the Vatican mathematician who denied all of the observations and traditions of humanity prior to him and was the first to paint our modern picture of a heliocentric “solar system”¹¹.  In fact, Efimov claims that creating new vocabulary is a necessary step in getting people to think in new ways.

In Efimov’s case, his “new vocabulary” is liberally mixed with bovine fecal matter in order to confuse his audience.

Part of Efimov’s smokescreen vocabulary is the phrase “conceptual power” which he then creates a needless acronym for in order to simultaneously confuse and sound erudite.

Efimov asks the extremely important question, “How can a country rich in natural resources like oil and grain or demographic resources like physicists still be so poor?”  He then changes the subject without answering the question!

Another source of confusing “truth” is Aleksandr Dugin’s Fourth Political Theory.  Dugin rightly diagnoses “secularism” and the depravity of “Liberalism” and parts ways with Russian’s past by not claiming Communism is the cure.  But neither does he fully reveal the root cause (blaming such general ills as “materialism”) and he devolves into his amalgam of Liberalism and Communism.

Dugin is the former head of the Department of Sociology of International Relations of Moscow State University but controversial statements regarding Russia’s position on the conflict in Ukraine caused an outcry that eventually lead to his dismissal.

Surprisingly, Dugin has endorsed Rome’s own comic relief, Donald Trump for president.  Trump spent 2 years under the Jesuits at Fordham and then left to receive non-Catholic cred for his education.  It’s a trick also played by Donald Rumsfeld who spent time at Georgetown Law without taking a degree.

Little Eric Trump not only got his degree at Georgetown, he’s on the Georgetown School of Business Board of Directors.

It’s All About Centralization

The key to co-opting, corrupting and/or controlling power for the Whore of Babylon is centralization; where-ever there is a narrowing of power into a handful of people or organizations, she is quick to step in.  Russians have soured on so-called “Capitalist” oligarchies that have a stranglehold on their national resources but they suffered similarly under Communist mismanagement of those same resources.

Efimov then mentions 1948 U.S. National Security Council Directive 20/1 without even explaining it.  This is yet another example of his tactic of confusing his audience with both truth and lies/subterfuge at the same time.  NSC Directive 20/1 was asked for by then Secretary of Defense James Vincent Forrestal to organize U.S. policy against the Soviet Union.

Forrestal was a Roman Catholic who, like John F. Kennedy, the Catholic machine eventually decided “knew too much” (it seems they almost take special pleasure in murdering their own when they don’t do what they’re told).  He was interned for psychiatric treatment and later “committed suicide” by jumping out (being thrown out) of a 16^th story window.

NSC 20 has been linked to CIA Director Allen Dulles.  It created a “policy of containment” against Russia that is still in effect today despite the fact that Russia is no-longer a Communist empire or threat to the U.S.

Seamlessly U.S. government security perennial Zbigniew Brzezinski picked up and pushed this “strategy of containment” through his time as Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor through his role decades later in the Obama Administration.  It’s easy to pass the baton from father to son when you have connections that go right to the Papacy; Brzezinski was good friends with John Paul II and maintains those lines of communication to this day.

Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter’s former adviser, embodies the continuity of U.S. foreign policy whether it is democratic or republican.  A great admirer of Henry Kissinger, Brzezinski has always defended, praised and shown an absolute respect for the master’s two diplomacy concepts: the balance of the powers theorized by Metternich and George Kennan’s containment doctrine.  Zbigniew Brzezinski recommends how Russia should be militarily weakened and intimidated.  He is convinced that the best way to achieve it is by destabilizing its border regions, a political strategy that aroused the interest of former presidential candidate John Kerry’s team who recruited his son Mark Brzezinski as its foreign policy adviser. ~ The Outrageous Strategy to Destroy Russia, Arthur Lepic

A more controversial aspect of NSC 20 is the “conspiracy theory” of “control through corruption” known as “the Dulles Plan”.  This from Wikipedia—

The Dulles’ plan or the Dulles Doctrine (Russian: План Даллеса or Доктрина Даллеса) is the central document of a conspiracy theory, according to which the CIA chief Allen Dulles had developed a plan for United States to destroy the Soviet Union during the Cold War by secretly corrupting the cultural heritage and moral values of the Soviet nation.^[1]  The plan was first published in Russia shortly after the dissolution of the USSR and was often quoted by prominent Russian politicians, journalists and writers.

Whether this can truly be traced to Dulles or not is academic as this policy of disruption through corruption is being pushed by the CIA today against Russia.  Extreme feminism and sexual perversion are the agendas of “Femen” and “Pussy Riot” (the female punk rock band that has as much to do with “music” as Milli Vanilli…actually, less)—organizations linked to the CIA.

“Pussy Riot” interrupting a solemn church service at Moscow’s Cathedral of Christ the Savior on 12 February 2012.

“Femen” desecrating crosses in Kiev, Ukraine.

But this is key and an upsetting requiem on just who runs Russia; tactics such as these that are aimed at Russia’s conservative, Christian society (Russia’s common-sense policies that honor traditional families and traditional marriage) put good religious people around the world—especially Christians—in Russia’s camp against the CIA (who I call “the Catholic Intelligence Agency”).  Russian public relations and media have failed miserably to capitalize off of this and it would certainly seem to be resulting from those same agencies being controlled in key positions.

Even the supposedly “Presbyterian” Dulles family had a Jesuit in their woodpile.

The Dulles brothers (Allen at the CIA and John as Secretary of State) weren’t supposed to be Catholic yet John’s son, Avery became a powerful Jesuit Cardinal.

Jack Kennedy fired Director Allen Dulles because Dulles was responsible for betraying Cuban Patriots in the Bay of Pigs invasion.

The CIA was the best friend Soviet Communism ever had.  They set up Hungarian patriots in 1956 and Czechoslovakian patriots in 1968 in similar fashion.  They encouraged them to revolt with promises of support than stepped back and watch them get crushed by Soviet tanks.

Kennedy was a Catholic but he was a threat to the control the Jesuits had over America and the CIA so he was brutally murdered in broad daylight.  Lee Harvey Oswald was a key player in New Orleans during the CIA’s experimentation to weaponize viral cancer.

Unless Oswald had the power to order an unbelievably treasonous Secret Service stand-down, it’s pretty clear he was just a patsy.

Banksters

Rector Efimov mentions the Central Bank and how banks are many times more prosperous than Russia’s farmers and then, again, fails to explain why.

Centralizing finance is a key point of control for the Elite which is why the United States Federal Reserve was created in secrecy and against the stipulations of the U.S. Constitution.  More from my book—

The most powerful way to enslave and steer a nation is to control her finances and, on that definition alone, America has been enslaved since 1913.

The battle for a central bank has been waged from America’s inception and few in the Founding generation were for it, having witnessed the excesses and criminal activities of powerful bankers elsewhere in the world as well as throughout history.

Alexander Hamilton was a driving force behind both strong centralized government and a central bank. …

The great “Panic of 1907” is said to have been the impetus for convincing Americans they needed the “stability” of a central bank. What they didn’t know was just how easy it was to start a panic when banks never have enough capital to cover all the people’s investments (because they spend it like it’s their own commodity). …

Like foxes running the hen-house, the banker Elite planned on showing up to Congress pretending to be the saviors of the American people but, in reality, they were only finishing off the last battle in a meticulously choreographed war against the Middle Class. …

The Republican “Aldrich Plan” was repackaged by Paul Warburg as the Democrat “Federal Reserve Act” and voted on a week before Christmas when many legislators had already gone home for the holidays. This tactic has been used often to screen the worst of Elite-sponsored poisonous legislation.

Congressman Charles Lindbergh, Sr. stood on the near-empty floor of Congress and railed at the devil fruitlessly. …

Woodrow Wilson put his signature to the bill on December 23rd, 1913.

Merry Christmas, America. ~ Illuminati Unmasked ¹²

Who invented usury banking?  —The Templars; a Catholic “secret society” (at least “secret” in the frightening extent of their reach) of Crusader knights who grew so powerful they were hunted down, tortured and killed.  Rome learned from this and ever since that time in 1307 AD have placed puppets who have been almost always Jews in positions of power but behind every Jew there is a Roman pulling his strings.

I found Emanuel Josephson’s book The Federal Reserve Conspiracy & Rockefellers: Their Gold Corner, an excellent resource on this—

Rome’s successor, the Holy Roman Empire, dissimulated its interest in money and its power. This was in accord with its professed tenets of Nazarene, theistic Communism. Under ecclesiastic, Canon Law, even profits in business transactions were decreed to be the cardinal sin and capital offence of “usury”. As late as the sixteenth century, one hundred Christian business men who held no Papal dispensation, were burned at the stake in Geneva, as a penalty under Church law, for making profits in their business transactions. Title to all wealth as well as to the persons and lives of all the earth are claimed by the Church, on the ground that their ownership is divinely vested in the Pope as the vicar of Jesus Christ on earth. Thus theistic, Nazarene Communism, and the “modern” religion that goes by the name of Communism and is supposedly atheist, both are basically super-capitalist and both mask their avid grab for money and wealth.

Title to all wealth was vested in the Church and in its champion “knights,” who at the same time assumed the role of so-called “protectors,” much like the present-day “labor leaders” of their vassals whom they mercilessly enslaved and looted.

Both Churchmen and lay knights used the despised Jews for the conduct of their usurious financial operations, in order to avoid “sinning” and the death penalty that it involved. The Jews proved very useful and handy for that purpose.¹³

Efimov continues to blow smoke and confusion (those poor FSB cadets) with his blackboard drawings and then makes this amazing statement; “All political parties work together in one solid mechanism…”

It is an assertion so ludicrous as to be a clear example of gaslighting—to tell a lie that is diametrically opposed to the truth and then rely on how bold it is to expect it to be believed.

Can parties against abortion and for abortion “work together”?  Can a party against homosexual marriage and adoption of children and a party for homosexual marriage and adoption of children “work together”?  Can a party for security and independence and a party that weakens security and independence “work together”?  —Only if key positions in both parties are corrupted and controlled by a single power that dictates the same agenda for both.

This is exactly the case in the United States and was predicted by a famous professor at a Jesuit university (he taught Bill Clinton while Clinton was getting his Jesuit education at this Georgetown University)—

“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers.  Instead, the two parties should be almost identical…”

“The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole.  This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences.”¹⁴

Rector Efimov is effective because he admits “there is truth known only by those who govern” and that they keep the citizens unaware of this truth by telling “two opposing lies”.  These lies are known as “the Hegelian dialectic”, a process named after German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Fredrich Hegel on how to manipulate people to go where they don’t want to (from freedom into feudalistic slavery) by fabricating a danger that is a fraud then giving them their own solution when they were the reason for the problem in the first place.  This is absolutely true yet Efimov immediately tells another lie; “The agenda to create a world government is a conspiracy that doesn’t exist.”

Again, nothing short of gaslighting; telling a lie so outrageous it simply must be believed.

Every threat to Russia has come from someone or some group intent upon ruling the world from Napoleon—(controlled for Rome by their Jesuit-trained Catholic priest Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès) to Adolph Hitler.

Entire books have been written on how the Catholic Church created the Nazis from German aristocrat Franz von Papen who bankrolled the Party in the 30s to vicious Jesuit Heinrich Himmler to the rabid Jew-hating Jesuit who wrote Mein Kampf for Hitler Bernhard Stempfle to “Hitler’s Pope” Eugenio Pacelli (a.k.a. “Pius XXII”).  Pacelli was the Vatican’s ambassador—“Apostolic Nuncio”—to Germany in the critical years before the war making sure the Nazis rose to power.

Hitler even named his secret plan to invade Russia after Frederick I, Emperor of Rome: “BARBAROSSA”.

pah-LEASE. Even megalomaniacs aren’t above playing the victim…

Probably because he’s seen how well it works in this country.