My personal relationship with “Eric” ended in my conviction that he is an undercover Jesuit, the details of which I shared on my show in October of 2015.

In February of that year, I published Illuminati Unmasked as the culmination of the shocking information “Eric” had shown me via his mission as an undercover agent.

In the best example of self-immolation, Phelps gives up a chilling amount of detail about the Jesuits before sowing it with disinformation and discord.  One such detail is what really happened in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Rome and her satanic Special Forces have completely woven a matrix of lies for us to live in, one of those lies was concocted over the “bombs” that were dropped to punish the “heretic Buddhists”.  They were more likely placed in secret as the technology to air-drop a nuclear munition was impossible in 1945.

In 1540, Alessandro Farnese—Pope Paul III—consecrated the “Knights of the Virgin Mary”, founded by a fanatical Basque nobleman named Ignacio Lopez, and turned them into “the Society of Jesus”.  Immediately the zeal of this new Company showed itself as they sent their missionaries all over the globe.  Within a matter of months they had landed in Japan where, contrary to popular belief they were well-received…unfortunately for the poor Japanese.

These missionaries found a powerful protector in [Daimyo Oda] Nobunaga, the military dictator of Japan (1573-82).  He was anxious to check the political power of a certain movement of Buddhist soldier-priests, but also held a genuine sympathy for the work of the “Christians” who were newcomers.  He encouraged them by granting them the right to propagate their religion throughout the Empire.  He donated them land in Kyoto itself and even promised them a yearly allowance.  Thanks to this, in no time the Catholic missions had spread throughout the country, converts were made by the thousands, establishing sizable Catholic centers in various parts of Japan.

Had the Catholic missionaries confined themselves exclusively to preaching religious principles, it is likely that Japan would have yielded them tremendous spiritual rewards.  But once a Catholic community was established the juridical-diplomatic-political domination of the Vatican came to the fore.  As is explicit in her doctrines, the Japanese converts could not remain the subjects only of the Japanese civil authorities.  The mere fact that they had entered the Catholic Church made them also the subjects of the Pope.  Once their loyalty was transferred outside Japan, automatically they became potentially disloyal to the Japanese civil rulers.¹

As a result of their espionage and subversions, Daimyo Toyotomi Hideyoshi put severe restrictions on the Jesuits.  Ultimately, they were completely successful in damning Japan because Shogun Tokugawa Ieyasu eventually banned all foreigners and Christian missionaries from the islands in 1641.  He made the same mistake many do today; mistaking Jesuits for “Christians”.

As is customary when a nation attempts to protect itself from the Company, the Jesuits soon set their sights on unspeakable evil in recompense, although it took just over 300 years to accomplish it.

Payback time had now come for Japan.  The American Army Air Force firebombed the island and totally destroyed Nagasaki and Hiroshima.  The future Jesuit General, Pedro Arrupe was near Hiroshima at the time of its destruction.  Could he and his Jesuits have been involved in a nuclear detonation on the ground, as no tested atomic device had ever been detonated in the air while in motion?

“At 8:15½ that August morning, every window in Arrupe’s residence at Nagatsuka was shattered by a roaring shockwave, and the sky was filled with a light he later described as [“a gigantic flare, like a magnesium flash” {52} being] ‘overwhelming and baleful’!  By the time he and his community of Jesuits ventured out some thirty minutes later, a firestorm driven by a scorching 40 mph wind had enveloped Hiroshima … That evening, one of the first survivors to reach his house in Nagatsuka was a theological student sent by a fellow priest, Father Wilhelm Kleinsorge, who had somehow survived the blast in the middle of Hiroshima [???].  From him, Arrupe got his first eyewitness accounts.” {53}²

(Whether the atomic bomb detonated in mid-air – a technical feat which was unknown to human history as of August 1945 – or secretly on the ground (the device having been carefully constructed inside a closed building), the future Jesuit General knew all about it.  For Pedro Arrupe greatly contributed in the laying of the “Nuclear War Hoax” – it being the foundation for that greatest of Jesuit Inquisitions called “the Cold War” – for which genocidal reason he became the Jesuit General in 1965!)³

Nearly 150,000 Japanese perished in the two incidents at Hiroshima and Nagasaki and many, many more died horrible deaths as a result of the war crimes ordered by their Freemasonic puppet General Curtis Emerson LeMay, “father” of the United States Strategic Air Command—a despicable butcher on par with Himmler or any other mass-murdering monster.

As a result of these horrors, the Japanese psyche was permanently scarred.  Survivors found solace in fictional musings over the terror the Jesuits had unleashed upon them.

In 1954, Toho Limited created Godzilla—the longest-running cinematic film series.  The second-longest running series was equally birthed by Jesuit machinations.

Dumble-dalf 007

If you’ve never heard of Dr. John Dee, you should have.  He was advisor to Elizabeth I and an advanced occult adept.  He was the impetus for the Harry Potter character of “Dumbledore” and the Tolkien magician “Gandalf” in Lord of the Rings.

Henry VIII was King of England from 1509-1547 and, although a licentious autocratic tyrant, his 6 marriages actually helped England break free of the power of Rome.  His son Edward VI was the first English king to be raised Protestant but he died at the young age of 15.

As England’s first true Protestant King, Edward was most certainly a Jesuit target for assassination.  Author Susan Higginbotham brings up the astounding accusation that, not only was Edward poisoned, his body was switched before burial to hide the evidence.¹⁴⁷⁵

Edward tried to have his cousin Jane Grey rule instead of Mary I but Lady Jane was quickly deposed and Bloody Mary took over the throne.  She and her husband Philip of Spain immediately repealed the protections Henry and Edward had extended to Protestants.  She reaffirmed England’s subservience to the Pope and then began a reign of terror that saw nearly 300 Protestants executed, most by being burned alive.

Even as “reformers”, both Henry VIII and Edward VI did little to help Protestants.

Protestants were martyred during persecutions against Protestant religious reformers for their faith during the reigns of Henry VIII (1509-1547) and Mary I of England (1553–1558).  Radical Protestants were also executed during the reigns of Edward VI (1547-1553), Elizabeth I (1558-1603) and James I (1603-1625).  The excesses of this period were recorded in Foxe’s Book of Martyrs.

Protestants in England and Wales were executed under legislation that punished anyone judged guilty of heresy against the Roman Catholic faith. ~ Wikipedia¹⁴⁷⁶

Mercifully, Mary died in 1558 after only a brief rule and her half-sister Elizabeth I, whom she had had imprisoned, ascended to the throne as a Protestant Queen.

While in prison, Elizabeth had made the acquaintance of a magician who had fallen out of favor with Bloody Mary; John Dee.

Once on the throne, the Jesuit threats to Elizabeth’s life were very real and a cordon of British Royalists formed around her lead by Francis Walsingham.  They created an intelligence network to ferret out Papists with designs against their Queen and Dr. John Dee was part of their network.  When he wrote to her, he knew she had an eye fetish so he signed his name in code to resemble eyes: “007”. ~ Illuminati Unmasked ⁴

Ian Lancaster Fleming was a journalist and Naval Intelligence officer during WWII (which means he worked indirectly for Rome, perhaps even directly).

The juxtaposition of those two occupations helped Fleming create the world’s most well-known fictional spy, James Bond, starting with the novel Casino Royale in 1953.  In less than a decade, a powerful Italian Catholic with connections from 20^th Century Fox to Howard Houghes—Albert Romolo Broccoli—would put Fleming’s Bond in cinema.  Of course the Romans never do something popular or public without first putting a Jewish face to their machinations and Broccoli brought in Harry Saltzman as his partner for the first three Bond films.

But Harry wasn’t just a name and a face, like Fleming he too was an Intelligence Officer—one who worked for the Papacy’s own Knight of Malta, William Donovan and his Office of Strategic Services during WWII.  This is the same OSS that murdered America’s greatest field commander, George Smith Patton in 1945 just after the war’s conclusion.

The Broccoli family have maintained an absolute lock on the Bond franchise and Albert Romolo’s daughter Barbara now oversees exactly what the world’s most famous spy does…whether or not she pets a fluffy white cat during her board meetings is still up to speculation.

Barbara Broccoli doesn’t M-handle Bond alone, she has another Broccoli to help; half-brother Michael Wilson.

Barbara Broccoli and Michael G Wilson – children of the franchise’s creator – keep all of Bond’s secrets.  They open up about wooing Daniel Craig, the next Bond, and life after SPECTRE

There’s a definite rhythm to the lives of James Bond producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G Wilson.  “Bond never quite goes away,” says Wilson, stepson of the legendary Albert “Cubby” Broccoli, sitting in the opulent Piccadilly offices of Eon productions, creators of the 007 franchise.

“But now we’re just about to peak,” chimes in Broccoli, his half-sister, with her trademark cheery laugh. ~ Julia Smith, The Telegraph

“Keep all of Bond’s secrets?”

This super-successful super-spy franchise has a tighter bloodline lock on its content than the Crown of England, herself…which, by the way, they work hand-in-hand with.

In 2012, Daniel Craig appeared as Bond, “parachuting” in with QE2 to open the London Olympics with the garish panache of a Bond sportscar.

Tragically, less than a year later, the stuntman who portrayed Craig in the jump would be killed in a wing-suit accident.

It’s all terribly patriotic…unless you understand that absolutely everything is as fake as a movie, from Elizabeth II dutifully watching over the best interests of Britons, to MI6 doing the same, to the Olympics being about ethical sportsmanship and not glorifying satan worship.⁵

Elizabeth I boldly established the Church of England to be a Protestant breakaway from all-powerful Rome.  Her current namesake is anything but.  Elizabeth 2 was born Elizabeth Alexandra Mary.  300 years post the great Protestant Virgin Queen, Rome yet again has complete control over England via her proxies like Elizabeth II, Dame of Malta.

The Knights of Malta

One Order of particular interest is the Knights of Malta.  According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, the Order of the Knights of Malta is, “The most important of all the military orders, both for the extent of its area and for its duration.  It is said to have existed before the Crusades and is not extinct at the present time.”ⁱⁱ

The Knights of Malta wore similar costumes to the Knights Templar before them.  The stylized cross we see on their uniforms is known today as a Maltese cross.

The Maltese cross is a common feature of the Pope’s garments, reminding us that he is the head of these Orders.

A Protestant branch of the Knights of Malta is the Order of St. John of Jerusalem.  Queen Elizabeth II is the Sovereign Head of the Order of St. John,ⁱⁱⁱ as we can see from her costume in the photograph.

The Queen’s participation in this Order, which brings with it required obedience to the Pope, is an example of how King John’s ancient concession of the crown to the Papacy is still in effect today. ~ The Pope’s Knights, Amazing Discoveries.org

With a franchise as “plugged in” as James Bond is, I fully expected to get hidden meaning imparted to me in “SPECTRE”, I just hadn’t expected it to be nearly as bold and open as it was.

Exodus

In my review of the 2014 Ridley Scott movie Exodus: Gods and Kings, I noted this, first remarking about confusion in whether the young boy in the movie was “God” or an angel—

We’re never really sure about the boy/God because after he proclaims to a buried-in-mud Moses “I AM” Moses later shouts in exasperation that he’s tired of dealing with a messenger.  Which is it?

There’s no confusion about what the boy wants, however.  He tells Moses he needs a general to fight.

…it’s the depiction of Moses as the insurrectionist general being rescued in his slow war of attrition by miracles, that doesn’t match well with the Biblical narrative.  This seems less an accurate account of the Exodus and more a cry for insurrection against the Luciferian world order…but the Luciferians make the movies so what’s going on here?! …

Another grievous departure from Scripture was what happened after the Hebrews were released.  Moses then attempted to lead them back through the desert wilderness trying to recall his trek from his family to Memphis.  He thinks he can remember but he’s deeply distraught.  He wants to bring them to a safe and tactically-secure location as soon as possible but not only does God ignore his pleas for help, Moses ineptly leads them to the Red Sea and a dead end as Pharaoh’s army comes crashing down on them—but not before losing many chariots through a dangerous mountain pass.

Not only is this not in Scripture, it actually contradicts the Word!

Moses never had to rack his brain for a route through the wilderness, wondering desperately how to stand in leadership for his people—the Lord made it powerfully clear with a massive plume of smoke by day and a terrifying column of fire by night guiding them the entire way.  When they reached the Red Sea, the column of fire switched positions and kept the Egyptians from bearing down on them before they were through crossing.

Again, what we are seeing is that it was much more important to the film-makers to encourage the rise of a future Moses than to honor the original story.

Those who rule the world over you are far from monochrome.  Only a very, very small number at the top are all in for satan and know full well that there’s no hope for them.  The vast majority of the rest of them have been seduced or co-opted into the system of Mystery Babylon out of their own lust for power, wealth, fame and/or just lust, period.  There are a large number that eventually feel remorse or concern over their involvement in rebellion.

Beyond them are the hapless pawns and system bureaucrats who fumble around.  They rub shoulders with the Luciferians in their dealings and gain insight as a result.  Sometimes they wish to send information out like messages in a bottle, hoping an alert hero will read it and have the courage to use it because they could not.

There are also the truly evil people who flaunt their control with open admission of who they are in mocking derision of humanity’s inability to either recognize them or bring them to justice.  They are wrong on both counts and their arrogance could very well be their undoing.

There’s a reason why Mystery Babylon is a system that relies entirely on secrecy—were humanity to be made aware of exactly who is in control, how they are in control and just how much they harm, hate and fear us, the end would be swift and terrible for the Whore of Babylon.

In fact, it’s predicted by the Bible to happen in just that way.

“The ten horns which you saw are ten kings who have received no kingdom [sounds like Popes to me!], but they receive authority for one hour as kings with the beast.  These are of one mind, and they will give their power and authority to the beast.  These will make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them, for He is Lord of lords and King of kings; and those who are with Him are called, chosen, and faithful.”

Then he said to me, “The waters which you saw, where the harlot sits, are peoples, multitudes, nations, and tongues.  And the ten horns which you saw on the beast, these will hate the harlot, make her desolate and naked, eat her flesh and burn her with fire.  For God has put it into their hearts to fulfill His Purpose, to be of one mind, and to give their kingdom to the beast, until the words of God are fulfilled.  And the woman whom you saw is that great city which reigns over the kings of the Earth.” ~ Revelation 17:12-18, NKJV (some capitalization added for respect and clarity)

One World Paganism

Catholic beliefs are a syncretistic mix of Christian doctrines terminally intertwined with the legends of the first rebellion against YHWH; Babylonian demonism and Chaldean sun worship.

In fact, Roman Catholicism has nothing to do with spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ and everything to do with abusing the worst of spiritual concerns over sin, guilt, salvation and damnation to exploit them for the purposes of subjugating mankind.

The Sacrifice of Jesus Christ was the most freeing event in human history.  It instantly rendered all religion—even the religion dictated by YHWH, Himself, to Moses—obsolete.

And Jesus cried out again with a loud voice, and yielded up His Spirit.

Then, behold, the Veil of the Temple was torn in two from top to bottom; and the Earth quaked, and the rocks were split, and the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised; and coming out of the graves after His resurrection, they went into the Holy City and appeared to many.

So when the centurion and those with him, who were guarding Jesus, saw the earthquake and the things that had happened, they feared greatly, saying, “Truly this was the Son of God!” ~ Matthew 27:50-54, NKJV (some capitalization added for respect and clarity)

Within 500 years, the very Beast that had executed Christ had used His Sacrifice to rebuild a new religion that mixed the Levitical priesthood with Rome’s Babylonian pagan beliefs and wrapped them in the trappings of Christianity—

It is known as “syncretism” and Rome’s Special Forces—the Jesuits—have been on the leading edge of this agenda since their founding.

Some of the best sources of information from the enemy’s camp are the enemy’s disaffected allies.  Helena Petrovna Blavatsky was a true Luciferian—a spiritist and medium who taught that the Devil didn’t exist and that demons could be friendly and helpful.  Once you isolate those ideas as spurious, her writing (particularly against Rome and the Jesuits) was nothing short of a revelation.

In Volume II of Isis Unveiled, Blavatsky makes a shocking statement that predated a Jesuit war by 120 years: the Papacy gave aid and comfort to muslim jihadists (who were, themselves, created by Rome) in order to see them commit unspeakable atrocities against Slavic Christians in Serbia.  They were able to do so because of the kindred doctrines shared by Catholics and muslims.

But is it merely Pagans and heathen that the Catholics persecute, and about whom, like Augustine, they cry to the Deity, “Oh, my God! so do I wish Thy enemies to be slain”?  Oh, no! their aspirations are more Mosaic and Cain‐like than that.

It is against their next of kin in faith, against their schismatic brothers that they are now intriguing within the walls which sheltered the murderous Borgias.  The larvæ of the infanticidal, parricidal, and fratricidal Popes have proved themselves fit counsellors for the Cains of Castelfidardo and Mentana.  It is now the turn of the Slavonian Christians, the Oriental Schismatics — the Philistines of the Greek Church!

His Holiness the Pope, after exhausting, in a metaphor of self-laudation, every point of assimilation between the great biblical prophets and himself, has finally and truly compared himself with the Patriarch Jacob “wrestling against his God.”

He now crowns the edifice of Catholic piety by openly sympathizing with the Turks!  The vicegerent of God inaugurates his infallibility by encouraging, in a true Christian spirit, the acts of that Moslem David, the modern Bashi‐Bazuk; and it seems as if nothing would more please his Holiness than to be presented by the latter with several thousands of the Bulgarian or Servian “foreskins.”  True to her policy to be all things to all men to promote her own interests, the Romish Church is, at this writing (1876), benevolently viewing the Bulgarian and Servian atrocities, and, probably, manoeuvring with Turkey against Russia.  Better Islam, and the hitherto‐hated Crescent over the sepulchre of the Christian god, than the Greek Church established at Constantinople and Jerusalem as the state religion.  Like a decrepit and toothless ex-tyrant in exile, the Vatican is eager for any alliance that promises, if not a restoration of its own power, at least the weakening of its rival.  The axe its inquisitors once swung, it now toys with in secret, feeling its edge, and waiting, and hoping against hope.  In her time, the Popish Church has lain with strange bedfellows, but never before now sunk to the degradation of giving her moral support to those who for over 1200 years spat in her face, called her adherents “infidel dogs,” repudiated her teachings, and denied godhood to her God!

SACRILEGIOUS TRICKS OF CATHOLIC CLERGY

The press of even Catholic France is fairly aroused at this indignity, and openly accuses the Ultramontane portion of the Catholic Church and the Vatican of siding, during the present Eastern struggle, with the Mahometan against the Christian.  “When the Minister of Foreign Affairs in the French Legislature spoke some mild words in favor of the Greek Christians, he was only applauded by the liberal Catholics, and received coldly by the Ultramontane party,” says the French correspondent of a New York paper.

“So pronounced was this, that M. Lemoinne, the wellknown editor of the great liberal Catholic journal, the Debats, was moved to say that the Roman Church felt more sympathy for the Moslem than the schismatic, just as they preferred an infidel to the Protestant.  ‘There is at bottom,’ says this writer, ‘a great affinity between the Syllabus and the Koran, and between the two heads of the faithful.  The two systems are of the same nature, and are united on the common ground of a one and unchangeable theory.’  In Italy, in like manner, the King and Liberal Catholics are in warm sympathy with the unfortunate Christians, while the Pope and Ultramontane faction are believed to be inclining to the Mahometans.”⁶

When Rome hates an enemy, it is a fire that lasts for centuries.  That was 1876.  120 years later, she would again use proxies—this time, her minions running the terrible military might of the United States—to again murder Slavic Christians wholesale.

In December of 1998, Congress began impeachment proceedings against William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.

In January of 1999, [Jesuit-educated at Georgetown] William Jefferson Blythe Clinton committed the American military to a 500 year old religious conflict between Bosnian muslims and Serbian Christians in the former Yugoslavia…aiding the Islamists against their Orthodox foes. …

The Bosnian War didn’t do much for Christian Serbs but it was a tremendous boon to the Religion of Peace—by the way, National Guardsmen that should be home digging citizens out of weather emergencies are still deploying on this mission today!

Mike Scruggs noted for the Tribune Papers (archived here) that this was a war that created a terrorist haven in the heart of Europe:

For 78 days in 1999, we bombed Christian Serbia and their forces in Kosovo, ostensibly as a humanitarian move to prevent Serbian ethnic cleansing of Kosovo’s Albanian population.  Our real motive was to cripple the troublesome anti-multiculturalist Serbs and to enhance our standing with the oil-rich Muslim world.  We bombed bridges, selected buildings, railroads, even passenger trains, and other targets in the Serbian capital of Belgrade.  Unfortunately, the Chinese Embassy was also hit.  According to John Pilger, writing in the Guardian, many of the bombs dropped from a relatively safe altitude (for us) of 15,000 feet, also hit schools, hospitals, and homes. Total Serbian dead amounted to about two thousand. Pope John Paul II described the bombing as an “act of diabolical retribution.” Many conservative and liberal American leaders agreed, but the Serbs eventually had to yield to our more advanced technology and vastly superior force. …

The results of our alliance with the KLA and establishing an Albanian base of Muslim power in Kosovo have been horrific.  The Albanians have driven 277 thousand Serbs from Kosovo.  Hundreds have been murdered.  Thousands have been robbed and brutalized as their homes and property were destroyed.  Muslim multiculturalists have destroyed 135 Orthodox churches, monasteries, and shrines.  All this was done under the noses of UN security forces.

Bill Clinton’s great military achievement was a humanitarian disaster, and it established a dangerous Muslim foothold in Europe that is exporting terror and crime.

~ Known By His Enemies, Johnny Cirucci, JohnnyCirucci.com

It’s not a “humanitarian disaster” if it was designed from the very beginning to be as vicious and horrific against the “heathen” enemies of Rome—and this time, Rome need not raise up an army for her brutal agenda, she can (did and still does) use yours, America.

The Mouth of Sauron

Because they have a reputation for being subversives and assassins, some of the best work for the Jesuits in ecumenical syncretism is done (again) by puppets and proxies—they take particular delight in using faux “Protestants” like John B. Cobb Jr.  Having been raised in Japan by Methodist missionaries, Cobb was selected at an early age by the same cabal of Jewish leadership and Roman muscle that has stood against Christ since His execution:

After his graduation from high school, Cobb attended Emory College in Oxford, Georgia before joining the U.S. Army in 1943.^[16]  He was chosen for the Japanese language program, which was filled mainly with Jewish and Catholic intellectuals who helped make him aware of the narrow, parochial nature of his Georgia Protestantism.^[17] ~ Wikipedia

In 1944, Cobb joined the US Army where he was exposed to the intellectuals such as academic-minded Jews and Irish Catholics who revealed a wonderful world of different perspectives expressed by them to Cobb. ~ The Boston Collaborative Encyclopedia of Modern Western Theology

The Jesuits and kabbalists would put Cobb on the forefront of ecumenical syncretism.  This is critical to the Luciferian agenda as when it comes to combining world religions those who dig in their heels the most are Protestant Christians—

As John Cobb (2002), a theologian in Buddhist–Christian dialogue, has observed, it is easier to have multiple religious belonging in some contexts than it is in others.  While it is possible for a Christian to adopt Buddhist meditation, it is harder for adherents of the monotheistic Abrahamic faiths to cross over.  He also thinks that even if a Christian adopts some Buddhist practices, it is difficult to live out both the Christian and Buddhist ways of being and commitments in the fullest sense.  Although he supports the experimentation of multiple belonging, which he says may have appeal to those individuals who find it difficult to identify fully with one tradition, he prefers to be rooted in a single tradition, while seeking its constant transformation by the inspiration of others.

Cobb’s position is different from that of advocates of the complementarity and convergence of Christianity and other religious traditions.  It was for advocating such radical views that Jesuit priest Jacques Dupuis (1997) was investigated by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith of the Vatican.  Citing the example of Henri Le Saux (with an Indian name Abhishiktananada) and the concept of Christ the Omega in Teilhard de Chardin, Dupuis (2002) is open to the possibility that double religious belonging can be a partial anticipation of the full recapitulation in Christ of all religions, which will only be disclosed at the end of time.  His fellow Jesuit, Aloysius Pieris of Sri Lanka, shares his view of the complementarity of religious traditions, but does not subscribe to the notion of teleological convergence.  A leading voice in Buddhist–Christian dialogue, Pieris says Buddhism and Christianity represent two different poles of experience – gnosis and agape, or wisdom and love – each of which is incomplete without the other…⁷

On my show, I repeatedly state the necessity of discernment—a Gift of the Holy Spirit (I call it “Anatoli’s nose” after a character from the SciFi movie The Chronicles of Riddick).  Discernment can help us glean important information from an organization like the “Cult Research Center”.  Despite claiming to be dedicated to the purity of the Christian Gospel, the CRC makes some very New Age declarations that show it to be far from theologically trustworthy.

The CRC, however, seems to have little love for the Catholic Church (although it wouldn’t be the first time a seeming enemy of Rome worked for her ultimate aims as a secret ally—it’s in the Jesuit 4^th Vow Blood Oath).

We are grateful to the CRC for showing the connection between Zoroastrianism and Catholicism as found in the mutual use of swastikas.

What does Catholicism have to do with Buddhism?  In Plaošnik (Sveti Kliment Pantelejmon), a Catholic Church in Macedonia, there is a mosaic floor with a Buddhist swastika next to a cross.  There are even swastikas on the Tombstone of Abbot Simon De Gillans (Paris, France 1345), and swastikas on the robes of the Catholic clergy of Rogier Van der Weyden’s “The Seven Sacraments” altarpiece.

Seeing this identical symbol, begs the question, “Why are Catholicism and Buddhism so alike?”  This is not a question that can come up just because of their identical swastikas; a symbol of their religion, it can be found in their temples and rituals, but no other religion has so much similarities like Catholicism and Buddhism. …

Then, why is this symbol of Aryanism found in Catholicism?  The Roman Catholic Church was mostly influenced by Zoroastrianism.  This influence that began from Persia continued to spread in Greece and Rome.  Especially the Romans were fanatic about this mithra god of Zoroastrianism, and many customs and rituals related to this religion started to settle in people’s lives.  The problem is, these religious Romans were accepted by the Roman Catholic Church of Christianity.  The Catholic Church absorbed a lot of paganistic customs to solidify their position.  This was how the Catholics started to carve the swastikas of Buddhism, Hinduism, and Zoroastrianism on the temples of God.₁₀

Because the Catholics’ and Buddhists’ roots are the same, they really resemble each other, such as the paintings and statues associated with the sun. …

Not only do they resemble each other in decorations, but Catholicism and Buddhism look incredibly alike.  Their faith of polytheism, the idea of venerating relics, repeating certain sentences while praying, the use of rosaries, and the ascetics’ celibacy all resemble each other.

Can we really say that Catholicism is a religion that believes in God, established by Jesus? ~ Catholicism and Buddhism – Aren’t we so alike?, Cult Research Center

The ecumenical syncretistic melding of world religions steamrolling over the complaints of the Reformation Pro Testari is so important to the Jesuits that they even seek to redefine the language of their machinations.

The Jesuit Mission Superior of Nigeria and Ghana, Peter Schineller, wrote a very revealing paper on the subject entitled Inculturation And The Issue Of Syncretism: What is the Real Issue?

What is the real issue?  Is syncretism always wrong?  Can there be good syncretism?  Is syncretism  inevitable?  Are syncretism and inculturation incompatible?  Is there any clear, agreed upon definition of syncretism?  Is syncretism a necessary step in the slow process of inculturation?  These are some of the questions that are raised when syncretism and inculturation come face to face.

My own judgment, conclusion, and thus strategy, as we will see, is that the employment of the word  “syncretism” is no longer helpful or constructive, because the word itself has so many contrasting connotations, meanings.  Many of these are pejorative. …

In light of this deep seated ambiguity, and in spite of attempts at redefining the word, my view is that the word cannot be redeemed, and it might be better not to enter into the controversy surrounding the word. …

Both in the history of its usage, and in contemporary usage, the word syncretism has had varied meanings.  Originally it was applied to political alliances in ancient Greece, to the cities of Crete which came together.  Then it described the way the Old Testament assimilated elements from surrounding cultures.  In the age of the Reformation it pointed to the links between Christianity and humanism, and to the need for Protestant and Catholic churches to come together…

In fact, syncretism has never been used in the need for Protestants and Catholics to come together.  This is known as “gaslighting”; flipping reality completely on its head simply by asserting a lie boldly as if it’s fact and using repetition, reputation and normalcy bias to bolster the lie.

Schineller also noted that his brother Jesuit Karl Rahner—the mind behind Vatican II—considered the Council of Jerusalem to have been the first step towards syncretizing Judaism and Greek culture.  This is a twisting of the Council’s determination so perverse as to be truly called “Jesuitical”.

The Jerusalem Council didn’t rid Believers of Mosaic Ceremonial Law in order to make it easier for Gentiles to combine their old with the Jewish new, they did so because the Ceremonial Law was an impediment to the simplicity of the Gospel.

If that isn’t clear enough, Scripture makes it so!

The Jerusalem Council

Now the apostles and elders came together to consider this matter.  And when there had been much dispute, Peter rose up and said to them: “Men and brethren, you know that a good while ago God chose among us, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the Gospel and believe.  So God, who knows the heart, acknowledged them by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He did to us, and made no distinction between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.  Now therefore, why do you test God by putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?” ~ Acts 15:6-10 (the NKJV adds headings)

Not to be outdone, Schineller then uses “Christ-mas” as an example of Catholic “Christian” victory of “inculturation” (syncretism) over paganism.

He ends by channeling the Jesuit founder of the New Age, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, by showing how the Gospel must transform and mutate like a living organism in order to absorb all other faiths—

In conclusion, we have discussed the question of inculturation and syncretism by commenting on the various, ambiguous meanings of the word syncretism, and then by suggesting that we avoid that word, and move rather to the real issue, namely the criteria and attitudes for discerning correct or adequate inculturation.  There is no simple answer, no simple criteria because we are dealing with complex realities, with a rich Christian tradition, and marvelously diverse and rich human cultures.  It is even more complex because we are dealing with changing cultures.  No longer is it simply a traditional culture in Nigeria that we must try to inculturate the gospel into.  Rather it is a traditional culture that is changing rapidly, influenced by the march of modernity, of modern science and technology.  This is all the more reason for theology to be creative and prophetic.  It cannot simply protect the past, maintain the old.  It must move, develop, grow, like a living organism.

But after the “organism” is done transforming…what will it finally look like?

Día de Muertos

There are two very important things to remember when dealing with the Roman Catholic “Church”:

1. It is not “Christian”.
2. It’s primary purpose is to exploit and abuse spiritual issues for the purpose of coalescing power over mankind.

That is why, when Rome moved into a new geographic location where the population has a strong pagan culture, it doesn’t compete with those pagan beliefs, it absorbs them.

One such example is the “Day of the Dead”.

Day of the Dead (Spanish: Día de Muertos) is a Mexican holiday celebrated throughout Mexico, in particular the Central and South regions, and by people of Mexican ancestry living in other places, especially the United States.  It is acknowledged internationally in many other cultures.  The multi-day holiday focuses on gatherings of family and friends to pray for and remember friends and family members who have died, and help support their spiritual journey.  In 2008 the tradition was inscribed in the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity by UNESCO.^[1]

The holiday is sometimes called Día de los Muertos^[2][3] in Anglophone countries, a back-translation of its original name, Día de Muertos.  It is particularly celebrated in Mexico where the day is a public holiday. Prior to Spanish colonization in the 16th century, the celebration took place at the beginning of summer.  Gradually it was associated with October 31, November 1 and November 2 to coincide with the Western Christian triduum of Allhallowtide: All Saints’ Eve, All Saints’ Day, and All Souls’ Day.^[4][5]  Traditions connected with the holiday include building private altars called ofrendas, honoring the deceased using sugar skulls, marigolds, and the favorite foods and beverages of the departed, and visiting graves with these as gifts.  Visitors also leave possessions of the deceased at the graves.

Scholars trace the origins of the modern Mexican holiday to indigenous observances dating back hundreds of years and to an Aztec festival dedicated to the goddess Mictecacihuatl.  The holiday has spread throughout the world, being absorbed within other deep traditions for honoring the dead.  It has become a national symbol and as such is taught (for educational purposes) in the nation’s schools. Many families celebrate a traditional “All Saints’ Day“ associated with the Catholic Church. ~ Wikipedia

Given that Rome rules the world from behind the scenes, she uses her whores, proxies and puppets in foreign governments to invade whole nations without a single shot being fired.

One such example is America’s wide-open borders.  Not a single American leader at the national, state or local level—not executive, legislative, judicial nor law enforcement—dares raise a hand to stem the tide.  Each and every one has been cowed into treason as millions upon millions of illegal immigrants stream into the United States; a very, very large percentage of them are Latino Catholics.

I have a very long list of examples in my book, Illuminati Unmasked, but here are a few more—

Catholic Charities Provides Aid to Families Entering U.S. Illegally

KSAT, ABC Channel 12, San Antonio, Texas

SAN ANTONIO—Catholic Charities operates various centers in Texas to help the influx of women and children from Central America entering the country illegally.

Sacred Heart Parish Hall in McAllen has been turned into a relief center for families that have crossed the border.

Members of the community have donated their time and resources, such as clothing and toys, to the cause.

“Everyone is a volunteer here. The solidarity you have seen in this humanitarian outreach has been so uplifting,” said Brenda Riojaso of Catholic Charities.

The city of McAllen has also provided hundreds of thousands of dollars in aid to keep the center open, with the expectation the government will pay them back.

The faith-based effort also extends to the Alamo City, where Archbishop Gustavo Garcia-Siller recently called on parishes to collect donations.

Parishioners have responded to the call and on Tuesday, Catholic Charities in San Antonio will be receiving the donations collected over the weekend.

Taxpayer-Funded Catholic Charities on Hiring Spree to Provide for Illegal Immigrants

Kristin Tate, Breitbart.com

HOUSTON, Texas–Catholic Charities in Texas is helping fulfill the needs of the thousands of illegal immigrants that continue to flood the U.S.-Mexico border.  Breitbart Texas has learned that Catholic Charities’ St. Jerome’s Home for Children, located in Fort Bend County, is providing many benefits including financial support, English classes, legal assistance, and release services to youths in the U.S. illegally.  The charity is looking to hire several staff members to help accommodate the influx of migrants.

St. Jerome’s webpage reads, “While the youth are living in this home, evaluations are provided to assess all their needs (medical, psychiatric/therapeutic, educational, vocational, social, familial, legal) with the development of an initial service plan.”

“After these assessments are completed, a decision about a long-term placement is made in the best interest of the youth,” it continues.  “If appropriate, the youth moves to live with an individual foster family.  Otherwise, the youth remains in the agency foster home. If a youth is not able to maintain the foster family placement, he or she returns to the agency home to live until discharge.”

The programs administers “financial assistance” for the foreigner’s housing, food, clothing, and other necessities.  It additionally provides case management by social workers, vocational training, English lessons, and legal assistance.

Romanizing America Through Illegal Immigration

Ian Paisley.org
Pastor Ralph Ovadal

In recent weeks, the advocates of the “rights” of illegal Mexican immigrants, accompanied by and even led by Roman Catholic priests, have staged rallies, protests, and parades all across the United States of America.

On 25th March, 500,000 people took to the streets of Los Angeles, flying Mexican flags and chanting slogans such as “Viva Mexico!”  Another 500,000 marched in Dallas on April 9, waving Mexican flags with “Our Lady of Guadalupe” emblazoned in the center.

On May 1, a favorite Communist holiday, illegals staged a nationwide work stoppage and boycott of businesses and schools.  The alien lobby also once more staged marches and rallies nationwide.  As reported by NBC News, some of those activities were launched from local Roman Catholic parish churches.  This outburst of protest is a response to several immigration and border reform measures working their way through the U.S. Congress.  According to current estimates, there are as many as twenty million illegal aliens in the United States of America. [today’s numbers are many times that]

Rome aiding and abetting

It is unfortunate that very few Americans have been concerned with the religious aspect of this issue.  The Roman Catholic Church is aiding and abetting the criminal invasion of America from Mexico, working both legally and criminally to bring as many illegal Mexican immigrants into my country as possible.  In this, Rome has one goal in mind—the pope and his henchmen are seeking to turn America, founded and still a Protestant country, into a Roman Catholic country.

This is criminal activity yet Catholic clergy and organizations such as “Catholic Charities” continue on as immune from prosecution as any of America’s mayors who also aid them by autocratically-declaring their fiefdoms to be “sanctuary cities”.  So total is the control of Rome in this effort that not even local law enforcement dares question the status of obvious non-English speaking illegal aliens.  I know, I’ve spoken to an officer directly about this.

Thanks to this invasion, now where America’s small towns used to celebrate Veteran’s Day and Memorial Day, instead they celebrate the Day of the Dead.

With its grinning skeletons dressed in feathered hats and gowns, jewel-eyed sugar skulls and colorful paper garlands, the Nov. 2 “Día de los Muertos,” or Day of the Dead, might appear to many Americans like a Mexican Halloween.  But this centuries-old tradition interwoven with Catholicism is much more than a night of ghouls, ghosts and goodies.

The day gets its name from an ancient Aztec belief that the dead could return home to visit their families one day a year.  In today’s Catholic Mexico, the Day of the Dead is a time for families to gather, remember their ancestors and pray for the souls of the deceased.

“It’s not a sad occasion,” said Prisciliano Maya, faith formation director at Sacred Heart in St. Paul.  “It’s a time to remember and celebrate their [ancestors’] lives.  It’s also about family coming together.”

Maya recalled how his family celebrated the Day of the Dead when he was growing up in central Mexico. Early Nov. 1, his father would lead him and his siblings in reciting the rosary.  Later that day the family would gather for a meal.  Then on Nov. 2 they would spend the day at the cemetery praying and sharing memories of their loved ones.

Memorial altars

Like all immigrant groups, Mexicans brought some of their traditions with them to the U.S.  Today, it is not uncommon to find Day of the Dead altars, or “ofrendas,” in Catholic churches around the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis on All Saints and All Souls days.

Every year at Sacred Heart and other majority Latino churches in the archdiocese, parishioners place pictures of their dead loved ones, flowers, candles and other symbolic items on multi-tiered Day of the Dead altars. ~ Julie Carroll, Catholic Spirit.com

Día de Muertos has even become popular in Hollywood.  It was used to convey all sorts of Luciferian hidden messages in the movie Batman vs. Superman.

It’s also how SPECTRE opens—

“The dead are alive.”

NOTE: There has been a copyright battle between Ian Fleming and screenwriter Kevin McClory over “Spectre/SPECTRE” causing what may have been a proper name to later become an acronym; Special Executive (for) Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge, and Extortion.  The battle, lasting several decades, was settled in 2013 just prior to the making of this movie but for the sake of simplicity I will maintain the spelling which implies an acronym.

This was no minor scene—it was something the film-makers expended great resources to extravagantly portray.

Mexico’s first Bond girl has spoken of her pride at filming SPECTRE in her country, and her anger at the insults heaped on her people by Donald Trump.

Stephanie Sigman, the 28-year-old model who became an international star after sitting next to Arctic Monkeys frontman Alex Turner on a plane, and then featuring in a music video, said shooting the film was a joy.

“The scenes in the streets of Mexico City were just incredible,” she told The Telegraph, speaking ahead of the world premier in London on Monday.  Sigman plays Estrella, and joins Bond on a spectacular Day of the Dead march through the city – the 11 minute opening sequence to the £200 million film.  Involving 1,500 extras, it brought the capital to a standstill, as helicopters swooped overhead and Daniel Craig’s stunt double hurtled above the Zocalo main square.

Michael Wilson, the co-producer, said the scene was the biggest opening shot they had ever done, while Sam Mendes, the Oscar-winning director, said Mexico provided the drama he sought. ~ Mexico’s First Bond Girl on Filming In Her Homeland, The Telegraph

As the movie progresses, we find that Bond’s mission in Mexico was an unsanctioned assignment!

He utilizes a sound-conducting laser weapon site to hear men in a room speaking Italian and planning a terrorist bombing.

It turns out that there is to be a big merger between England’s international intelligence agency, MI6 (the British counter-part to the CIA) and MI5 (Britain’s FBI).

Once merged, they will become the “Joint Security Service” under young rising star Max Denby, code-named “C”.  Bond gives “C” a frosty and formal reception when they meet.

Next we see a really poor facsimile of a picture depicting Bond’s “adopted” family when he was a boy, standing alongside his “father” and “brother”—whose head has been burned out of the picture due damage caused in the previous movie, Skyfall.

We then see a massive new building complex that will become the “Center for National Security” and we soon find out that it isn’t even built with taxpayer money but instead the funds have been donated by outside civilian sources!

There are terrorist incidents occurring all over the world and they are causing a heightened fear that is helping to centralize the world’s intelligence agencies into one monstrous enterprise named “Nine Eyes” and “C” is all for it.

During a meeting of the world’s security officials in Tokyo, “C” makes an impassioned speech for “Nine Eyes” whilst “M” quietly notes from the audience the resultant power will be “an unelected one”.

M’s Chief of Staff, Bill Tanner (Rory Kinnear), tells Bond with irony that it will usher in a “New World Order”.  Not quite sure how that phrase is even utterable in “mainstream” entertainment.

Because of Bond’s “unsanctioned assignment” in Mexico, he is injected with “smart blood”; “cutting edge nano-technology” to track his every move.  He willingly subjects to the procedure and the truth is that all of the West’s highly-trained operators have similar leashes on them…or in them.  They need to know it’s because they’re not trusted to fully obey masters who are traitors in sheep’s clothing.

Later, after “M” comes around to seeing the import of Bond’s rogue mission, he orders the Quartermaster—“Q”—to “erase all of the smart blood files”.

I’m afraid it’s not that simple.

Fiennes First

With Bond in the doghouse, friends are needed.  Lois Maxwell outlasted several different Bond actors in her role as Eve Moneypenny, M’s secretary, but the Daniel Craig genre apparently felt color was needed.  This is the same series that cast the Jewish Joseph Wiseman as the Oriental Dr. Julius No of SPECTRE in the film of the same name; Dr. No (1962).  Remember, whenever someone Jewish does something surly, there’s always a Roman standing behind him, egging him on.

So Bond calls in the new, minority Moneypenny (played by Naomie Harris) to read her in on his unsanctioned assignment.  The old “M” (played by Dame Judi Dench⁸) left a video recording for Bond stating, “If you’re watching this, I’m dead and you need to kill Marco Sciarra.”

UPDATE, 18 July 2016, 12:22 PM, EST: It’s amazing the things you learn when you uncover hidden history.

“Kill Sciarra!”

Giacomo “Sciarra” Colonna was a son of one of the most powerful families in Rome at the turn of the 14^th century (1300’s) or today.  “Colonna” is a name that should be coming up when one wants to find out who is ruling the world from behind the scenes (along with de Medici, Aldobrandini, Orsini, Farnese and Breakspeare).  Instead, we get names like “Soros”, “Rockefeller” and “Rothschild”.

Why do we need to “kill Sciarra”?  —Because Sciarra Colonna joined Philippe le Bel’s emissary Guillaume de Nogaret and confronted Benedetto Caetani, Pope Boniface VIII, in the ongoing feud between Philip IV and Boniface.  Caetani lost the confrontation and was slapped in the face by Colonna—a slap that resounded through history as schiaffo di Anagni (“the Anagni slap”—the confrontation took place at Caetani’s palace in Anagni.)

PC M

Speaking of political correctness, Dench was brought in to be the female “M” at the beginning of the Pierce Brosnan age of Bond.  Feminizing the character played so well by Bernard Lee in previous Bond movies was the second most annoying reason I haven’t seen any of the Brosnan Bond movies.  Picking Brosnan was the first.

It’s nothing against Brosnan’s ability as an actor, I despised his casting for the very reason he was cast: his previous work on a cheesy 80s TV show, Remington Steele.

Truth-be-told, it’s the same logic that brought Roger Moore but at least The Saint was somewhat more serious of a show.

Once allowed to age, Brosnan’s cheese has grated off—especially when he plays a bitter, grizzled ex-spy as he did in November Man (for more, read my review, here).

Dench was killed off in Skyfall (something she says she cried over) and replaced by Ralph Fiennes, whose full name is Ralph Nathaniel Twisleton-Wykeham-Fiennes to make sure we fully understand the depth of his blue-blood breeding.  Fiennes is known for work in Schindler’s List, The English Patient, The Avengers (1998) and was nominated for an MTV “best villain” award as Harry Potter’s “Lord Voldemort”.

Ralph’s brother Joseph Alberic Twisleton-Wykeham-Fiennes has an equally established acting career having worked or starred in such films as Shakespeare in Love, Enemy at the Gates, Luther (where he played the title role of the great Reformer), The Escapist and Hercules (2014).  His most recent accomplishment is to star as Clavius in the “Easter” movie blockbuster Risen, promised to pick up where Mel Gibson’s Passion of the Christ left off.  In fact, the two movies share a key expert—editor Steven Mirkovich.

Gibson played a special role, himself, as the man demonized by a decadent Hollywood because he dared make Passion but was he?  Passion was hugely successful (bringing back nearly $400 million with $30 million in cost) starring talent like devout Roman Catholic Jim Caviezel and Monica Bellucci who was raised Catholic but claims to be agnostic (we’ll see shortly what that really means to the Romans who run all).  Caviezel rode his stardom right into the presence of Rome’s Jesuit Pope Francis, Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

Mel is so ultra orthodox Catholic that he even built his own church in order to hear a pre-Vatican II Latin mass (not quite sure what he’s upset about, Vatican II was written by Jesuit mastermind Karl Rahner).

Do the Jews run Hollywood?  There sure was a lot of propaganda and publicity over Jewish outrage regarding Passion but the man standing behind Mel was a Jesuit named William J. Fulco.  He even did all the translating from English to Arabic to make sure the movie told you what the Jesuits wanted it to—much as another Jesuit (Edmund Walsh) did all the translating at Nuremburg to insure the world was left wonderfully ignorant over the Jesuit role behind the Third Reich.

Jesuit Georgetown’s School of Foreign service is named after Walsh and boasts having trained many of the world’s power players (or, rather, “puppets”).

The Jews are said to run Hollywood but I don’t see a Jew picking the island of Malta to film Risen on—and it was.  That should give a great boost to the fools who fight as today’s Crusaders for Rome like former Green Beret Tim Kennedy who recently went on the Alex Jones show to frighten everyone about the ISIS menace; making sure to prominently display his Crusader t-shirt.

So what has been the key to the success of the Twisleton-Wykeham-Fiennes clan?

Ralph isn’t a “religious” man, though Joseph is said to be drawn to “faith-based” movies.  Perhaps even blue-blooded Britons groveled at the feet of Jewish patrons to land important roles…or are there Jesuits in the woodpile here, too?

Ralph Fiennes was born in Ipswich, Suffolk, England.  He moved around quite a bit while growing up, living in several places in England and Ireland.

Fiennes grew up in a Catholic household, and says that his mother was quite devout,¹ but he says he “chucked it all in before I was confirmed.”² ~ Hollowverse.com

The boys got good Catholic educations, too.  Ralph went to St. Kieran’s College (a Catholic high school) and Joseph was educated by the Sisters of La Retraite at Leehurst.  For a “non-practicing” Catholic, Joseph certainly thought enough of his mother’s faith to be married in a Catholic ceremony.  I wonder what Martin Luther would’ve thought (“Couldn’t the Hollywood Jews have found a Lutheran to portray me?!”).

Fiennes, too, got to meet the superstar Jesuit Pope (oh, purely by “accident” during a “general audience” with His Holiness, of course).

I’ll bet when prominent people joke as Ralph did that he “chucked” his Catholicism “before [he] was confirmed” he didn’t “chuck” as much as he thought…and the real power in Hollywood (and everywhere else) knows it.

Besides the Pope, Fiennes was/is⁹ friends with billionaire Jew pedophile provider Jeffrey Epstein and a frequent visitor to his “rape island” via his “Lolita Express” flights.

I did notice one thing in my research—that a young Ralph looked a lot like the sketch Fleming drew of Bond years ago; far more than who Fleming thought he was drawing actor/composer Howard Hoagland “Hoagy” Carmichael.

Ralph Bond…?

All Roads…

After the catastrophic show-down in Mexico City, Bond must continue to go rogue and travel to the heart of the conspiracy: ROME.

He was successful in killing Sciarra but not the organization behind the man.  For that, he would need to meet and (of course) seduce his wife.

M’s recorded directions were “don’t miss the funeral” and Bond didn’t.  It was carried out in tasteful Roman fashion.  In fact, the cross wasn’t even a gory crucifix as is so wont the traditional depiction of the empire that executed Christ.

Bond does, indeed, connect with Lucia Sciarra…in more ways than one.  And who better to play a shapely, desirable 50 year old widow than Mel Gibson’s Mary Magdalen; Monica Bellucci?

During the encounter she warns Bond of the unspeakable power her dead husband’s organization wields.

Bond asks Lucia about a name he’s heard; the “Pale King”.  It’s a name that connects perfectly with Rome.

As it turns out, the organization is meeting that night and Bond has Sciarra’s ring for identification and entry.

Before he goes, Sciarra’s widow warns him that he is about to cross over to a place where there is no mercy.

Bond travels to Rome and infiltrates the SPECTRE meeting.  The head of SPECTRE sits in the dark and is treated with such reverence that underlings actually bow to him.

Does this remind you of anything?

Bond listens in as SPECTRE “Provincials” from all of their respective nations check in; reports are good—the shadowy organization has infiltrated everything from the military to banks to the oil industry (just like the Jesuits).

Did you know that the United States was divided into 10 Jesuit provinces governed by their own “Provincials”?

They are like kings ruling over their invisible kingdom, unknown to the subjects whose wealth, well-being, even their very sons feed into.

“After this I saw in the night visions, and behold, a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, exceedingly strong.  It had huge iron teeth [much as Nebuchadnezzar’s visionary statue with its legs of iron—Rome!]; it was devouring, breaking in pieces, and trampling the residue with its feet.  It was different from all the beasts that were before it [because it rules all nations in secret, as the system of Mystery Babylon], and it had ten horns.  I was considering the horns, and there was another horn, a little one, coming up among them, before whom three of the first horns were plucked out by the roots.  And there, in this horn, were eyes like the eyes of a man, and a mouth speaking pompous words.” ~ Daniel 7:7-8

There can be no confusing “horns” as nations.  Allow me to again quote Revelation 17—

“The ten horns which you saw are ten kings who have received no kingdom as yet, but they receive authority for one hour as kings with the beast.  These are of one mind, and they will give their power and authority to the beast…” ~ Revelation 17:12-13

If there ever was an organization that worked for evil “as one mind” it is the Company of Loyola.  Jesuit Provincials work tirelessly without an obvious “kingdom” and even the implication in Revelation 17:12 that they do not have a kingdom “yet” may not be an accurate Greek-to-English translation as that word οὔπω (oupó) can be translated “yet not” or “but are still without” as it is here—

Now the disciples had forgotten to take bread, neither had they in the ship with them more than one loaf.  And he charged them, saying, “Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod.”  And they reasoned among themselves, saying, “It is because we have no bread.”  And when Jesus knew it, he saith unto them, “Why reason ye, because ye have no bread?  Perceive ye not yet, neither understand?  Have ye your heart yet hardened?  Having eyes, see ye not?  And having ears, hear ye not? And do ye not remember?  When I brake the five loaves among five thousand, how many baskets full of fragments took ye up?”  They say unto him, “Twelve.”  “And when the seven among four thousand, how many baskets full of fragments took ye up?” And they said, “Seven.”  And he said unto them, “How is it that ye do not understand (οὔπω νοεῖτε οὐδὲ συνίετε)?” ~ Mark 8:14-21 (KJV)

Gnostic Cuckoos

During the meeting, we learn that Marco Sciarra departed with unfinished business—assassinate the “Pale King”.  The shadowy “Superior General” asks who will take Sciarra’s place?  “Guera” (Spanish actor Benito Sagredo), an assassin seated at the opposite end of the table volunteers until a massive man strides in, gouges out his eyes and breaks his neck.

The first two Daniel Craig James Bond movies (Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace) were masterful—gritty, tough and, above all, realistic.  They set the Craig movies apart from the comical, cheesy, tongue-in-cheek caricature he had become (particularly in the Roger Moore era).

Sadly, Barbara Broccoli would have Craig revert to that foolishness in his second two movies (Skyfall and SPECTRE) although not completely.

The assassin “Mr. Hinx” could be considered as part of this “return” but that is not the feeling I walked away with after watching the brutal bloodsport scene (given that the Jesuits are the world’s foremost assassins dedicated to lay down their very lives for the slightest trifle of their leadership I’m sure such things have been conducted in their circles).

Although Richard Kiel (“Jaws”) was a massive 7’2” his ridiculous steel teeth kept him out of the realm of reality and squarely in Bond-land.

However, Kiel never brutally blinded someone on screen and, despite Dave Bautista’s career in the aptly-renamed “World Wrestling Entertainment”, Bautista has trained with the Gracie clan in Brazilian jiu jitsu and even fought and won a single mixed martial arts match.  His 6’6”, 289lb stature spoke instantly to me of one thing: genetically-engineered killer.

Bond thought he had infiltrated SPECTRE in anonymity but there was a dramatic moment where the shadow-general reveals himself to be fully aware of Bond’s presence and he must make a hasty exit with “Mr. Hinx” fast on his heels.

The movie reverts to Bond-land as the two race through Rome in 6-figure sports cars (because that’s what spies and assassins drive, right Barbara?).

The Bondian ludicrous extravagance again takes a serious turn (preceded by a very dramatic soundtrack score) as the two race right through St. Peter’s square.

Bond eludes his would-be killer and makes it to the “Pale King” first who turns out to be “Mr. White” (Jesper Christensen) whom the audience has known from all four Daniel Craig movies; clearly a pivotal character.

A disheveled Pale King tells Bond that he became disenchanted with SPECTRE when the organization began sex trafficking women and children which was where Mr. White drew the line—slaughtering untold hundreds of innocents and repeatedly threatening to bring the world to extinction via a variety of weapons of mass destruction was all fair game.

The Jesuit Superior General is known as the “Black Pope” because of the terrible power he wields while still impersonating a humble black-cassock-wearing priest.  What is fascinating is how many “White Popes” the Jesuits have reputedly murdered because they, too, failed to get with the program.

Although “Mr. Hinx” is close behind Bond to kill them both, the Pale King has already been given cancer due to a thalium-impregnated cell phone.  Such a demise is a Jesuit specialty.

Mr. White then bargains with Bond for the only thing left that he cares about; his daughter, “Madeleine Swann” (Léa Seydoux).  If Bond will protect her, the Pale King will tell Bond how to get at SPECTRE.

Meanwhile, “Nine Eyes” is fast becoming a reality.  The lone holdout on the Security Council—South Africa—has been victimized by several deadly terrorist attacks and now all nations are onboard.

We later find out that Max Denby/C is actually a member of SPECTRE so what this means is that false flags were conducted in textbook Hegelian fashion: the organization claiming to protect citizens murdered them in order to frighten them into giving up rights for the enabling of that same organization.

Bond finds Swann who wants nothing to do with him until an attempt on her life convinces her otherwise.  The two then try to retrace the steps of the Pale King to strike at the heart of SPECTRE.

Bond and Swann must return to the hotel where the Pale King went regularly with his wife before they divorced along with a young Madeleine in Tangiers—L’Américain … “The American”.

So, too, have the Jesuits made America the lynchpin in all their machinations.  Their official publication is “America Magazine”.

In a drunken stupor, Madeleine whispers “to liars and killers everywhere” then drifts into sleep.

Never were the Jesuits more accurately described.

As the fetching Mr. White’s daughter and Secret Service spy get to know each other, young Madeleine asks Bond how a man ends up choosing to become a paid assassin?  Bond’s seemingly humorous response is, “Well it was either that or join the priesthood.”

Why compromise when you can have both?  Be a Jesuit!

It turns out that the leader of SPECTRE is actually Bond’s adopted brother, Franz Oberhauser.

The two travel to the hotel and discover White left evidence directing them to Oberhauser’s operations base in the desert.  After an encounter with Hinx that sees the assassin killed, Bond and Swann are escorted to Oberhauser’s base.  There, Oberhauser reveals that Spectre has been funding the Joint Intelligence Service while staging terrorist attacks around the world, creating a need for the Nine Eyes programme.  In return C will give Spectre unlimited access to intelligence gathered by Nine Eyes, allowing them to anticipate and counter-act investigations into their operations.  Bond is tortured as Oberhauser discusses their shared history: after the younger Bond was orphaned, Oberhauser’s father, Hannes, became his temporary guardian.  Believing that Bond supplanted his role as son, Oberhauser killed his father and staged his own death, subsequently adopting the name Ernst Stavro Blofeld and going on to form Spectre. ~ Wikipedia

So the ultimate villain turns out to be our hero’s brother—just as the gnostics teach that “Lucifer” is the wrongfully-wounded brother of Christ, cast out of Heaven like Prometheus for trying to give men the knowledge that would empower them.

This is why the floors of Freemasonic lodges always have black and white tiles—because darkness is light and light is darkness.

Messaging Us or Mocking Us?

SPECTRE is little different from any number of recent movies that seem to telegraph the truth of who is ruling the world in secret.  Why have they produced a movie like this?  Is it a private joke amongst the Elite at our expense or are they trying to wake the sleeping giant?

As I said at the beginning of this article—in any massive endeavor of malignant secrecy, those who rule tell those who carry out the orders very little.

From Cinema to the CIA, everything is carefully compartmentalized.

In his prologue to S. K. Bain’s The Most Dangerous Book in the World, Peter Levenda said this about the bureaucracy under the dark powers that commit false flags like 9/11—

There are other forces at work, forces that are unacknowledged by the state, the church, the media because to admit their existence is to admit failure.  Thus, when things go wrong terrorists are blamed, or communists, or witches.  This serves to rally the citizens around the government once again, instead of stopping to insist that explanations be given, that evidence is properly analyzed, that the guilty are apprehended and punished.  And we once more go to war, against …someone, somewhere.  Paranoia becomes institutionalized.  It is appropriated by the government as its own prerogative.  The state determines the nature and quality of the paranoia: it creates intelligence agencies whose sole purpose is to give a form to paranoia, to enshrine paranoia as one of the necessary qualities of an observant and caring state.  To prove that paranoia is an acceptable characteristic of the paternalistic regime.  The citizens are not allowed to become paranoid unless it is at government direction and sanction.  Individual cases of paranoia are frowned upon.  The state tells us that if we are not paranoid the way it is paranoid—and about the same things—it’s because we don’t have all the facts: about terrorism, fundamentalism, communism, foreign countries, weapons of mass destruction, sleeper cells.  The state has all the facts: classified documents, wire-tap transcripts, intelligence feeds, high-altitude reconnaissance images, none of which the citizen is permitted to see.  It does not realize that the logical conclusion of all this paranoia is suspicion of the state apparatus itself.  What the conspiracy theorist often fails to realize, however, is that those working for the state are often just as clueless as the average citizen when it comes to the origin and function of the forces at work to subvert it.  The strength of a conspiracy, after all, rests in the limited number of persons who are aware of its existence and parameters.  No one has the entire picture.  Each member of the state apparatus only has possession of a single piece of an enormous jigsaw puzzle.  Putting together all these disparate pieces—particularly when one does not have the original picture to work from—is a soul-destroying enterprise that consumes decades of work and years of one’s life.  This is especially true when the state has in its arsenal of lies the techniques of disinformation and misdirection, of false testimony and planted documents.

When movies like SPECTRE have films such as Exodus: Gods and Kings being released before it and Mad Max: Fury Road being released the same year (another deeply Luciferian movie that seemed to cry out for a hero), it sure seems like even the Machine is yearning for release from the chains of its cruel master.

NOTE: For related sound clips from the movie and a reading of this article, listen to my show—Resistance Rising, Episodes 087 & 088—on the embedded players below.

MORE PRO/CON JEWISH RACE-BAITING FROM THE PAPISTS AT CNSNews

THE BEST “PROTESTANTS” CAN DO: DR. DAVE REAGAN—HYPER ZIONIST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BQc8ofKdRI

AT LEAST THE ADVENTISTS ARE TALKING REAL TRUTH WITH THEIR SECTARIANISM

KNIGHT OF MALTA RUPTERT MURDOCH’S FAUXNEWS AT ITS BEST STIRRING NEEDLESS CONTROVERSY: “NASA BANS JESUS” (oh yeah, and they’re a bunch of Nazi frauds, too)

“‘CONSPIRACY’ THEORIES ‘SWIRL’ AROUND SCALIA’S DEATH”

EXACTLY WHO IS “CINDERELA GUEVERA”?

“IT’S THE JEWS!!!”

Second Jesuit-Sponsored Jewish Holocaust Coming Soon

STEVEN SPEILBERG REACHED OUT TO CARL GOTTLIEB FOR HUMOR IN JAWS SCRIPT

Gary Oldman Defends Mel Gibson’s Antisemitic Rant in Playboy Interview

MICHAEL RICHARDS’ RANT ABOUT “JEWS”

KING JAMES FREEMASONIC BIBLE

FREEMASONS BRAG ABOUT ONE OF THEIR OWN

WILLIE CLINTON’S TRIP TO MOSCOW OUTED BY JESUIT PUPPETS

ROBERT K. DORNAN, A BITCH OF THE WHORE

PAPAL PUPPET AND RABID RACIST PATRICK J. BUCHANAN

BUCHANAN AND DORNAN, PATRIOTIC DRAFT DODGERS

MEL GIBSON’S JESUIT HANDLER FOR PASSION OF THE CHRIST, WILLIAM FULCO

SANDRA SLUT; NO FLUKE SHE’S FROM GEORGETOWN LAW AND GETS AN AUDIENCE WITH JESUIT-TRAINED NAZI PELOSI

HUFFINGTON BLOWS: MESSIAH, NEIL DOOFUS TYSON AND BILL NYE THE MORON GUY

MORE FROM THE NY COMPOST

FILE – In this Feb. 7, 2012, file photo, President Barack Obama shakes hands with Bill Nye during an event in the East Room of the White House in Washington. Nye, a mechanical engineer and star of the popular 1990s Television show “Bill Nye The Science Guy,” recently waded into the evolution debate with an online video urging parents not to pass their religious-based doubts about evolution on to their children. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)

really???

Sarah Silverman says I would kill Christ again – YouTube

Sarah Silverman, “Jesus F-ing Christ” Mock Faith in Abortion PSA – Media Research Center

Sarah Silverman’s Abortion Stance Her Before & After Joke Pics

Pastor Mike Spaulding’s Soaring Eagle Radio

PRE TRIBULATION RUPTURE

JOHNNY SETS THE RECORD STRAIGHT IN THIS COLUMN

FRANCIS COPPOLA, UNCLE OF LITTLE NICKY “CAGE” AND KNIGHT OF MALTA

THE JESUIT BEHIND GIBSON’S PASSION OF THE CHRIST

COPS TRAINED TO BE THUGS

Court OKs Barring High IQs for Cops

Ohio Cop Shoots At Family’s Dog, Hits 4-Year-Old Girl Instead

CHARLESTON SHOOTING FALSE FLAG

AFRICAN METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH FOUNDED ON FREEMASONRY AND RACISM

MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX DONATES $100,000 TO FREEMASONIC CRISIS ACTORS

MFL DONATES $100,000 TO BLACK COMMUNIST CRISIS ACTORS

BLACK COMMUNISTS AT THE IN-JUSTICE DEPARTMENT DONATE $29 MILLION OF YOUR MONEY FOR THE PSYOP TO TAKE YOUR GUNS [and these Luciferian traitor puppet scum “FAST-TRACKED” it, too]

PSYOP FOR DISTRACTION: DYLANN ROOF IS SECRET MARINE PILOT…NOT! [don’t get caught by this crap!!!]

SANDY HOOK BODY COUNT

FIRST RESPONDER FOUND DEAD

SUPPOSEDLY SHOT HIMSELF [he fell on a knife 14 times]

CT STATE POLICE MAJOR LOSES BOUGHT WITH “BRIEF ILLNESS”

FRENCH FOREIGN MINISTER AND CATHOLIC SKULL & BONES JOHN FORBES KERRY PREDICT “CLIMATE CHAOS” FOR JESUIT POPE’S VISIT

BIRCHER-ERS

Robert Welch, Jr. > John Birch Society, Wikipedia [as of 12 April 2015]

In the 1960s, Welch began to believe that even the Communists were not the top level of his perceived conspiracy and began saying that communism was just a front for a Master Conspiracy, which had roots in the Illuminati; the essay “The Truth in Time” is an example.^[7]  He referred to the Conspirators as “The Insiders,” seeing them mainly in internationalist financial and business families such as the Rothschilds and Rockefellers, and organizations such as the Bilderbergers, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Trilateral Commission.  He did avoid the antisemitism, anti-Freemasonry, and anti-Catholicism of other conspiracy theorists, saying that such prejudices would “neutralize” anti-Communist, anti-conspiracy efforts.  According to one source, Welch converted to Roman Catholicism in the months prior to his death.^[8]  As a result of his conspiracy theories, the John Birch Society became synonymous with right-wing extremism, earning satirical blasts from critics ranging from the cartoonist Walt Kelly to the musicians Bob Dylan and Dizzy Gillespie.^[9]

MEL GIBSON

The Jesuit scholar who translated “The Passion”

CONTROLLED OPPOSITION: THE COUNCIL FOR NATIONAL POLICY

CNP ROLLS VIA THE COMMIES AT “SOURCEWATCH”

CNP VIA “SEEK GOD”

THE RON PAUL LIE

“Gesu” Ron Paul: Masonic Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor and Servant of “the Man of Sin” in Rome [Phelps]

But if we examine the details of the life of Ron Paul, his refusal to blame the “Sovereign State of Vatican City” for the crimes of the Fed make sense.  First, Paul is affiliated with Scottish-Rite Freemasonry, the “bulldog” of the Jesuits enforcing their economic monopoly over every American.  Indeed, the Jesuits created Scottish-Rite Freemasonry in the mid-1700s and its world headquarters is in Rome not far from the “Gesu”—the Jesuit Mother Church from which the Scottish-Rite gets its “G.”

But it gets better.  According to my source in Italy, Ron Paul lived in Rome, off and on, from 1956 to 1965.  His residence at 16 0018  Via dei Delfini was paid for by certain priests.

Later he moved to a home near the “Gesu” in the “Pizza del Gesu,” which plaza hosts the headquarters for Scottish-Rite Freemasonry as mentioned above.

Freemasonry in Italy > Re-establishment in the Risorgimento, Wikipedia as of 12 April 2015

On April 21, 1901 the Grand Orient opened its new headquarters in Palazzo Giustiniani in Rome.  A disagreement over secularism in elementary schools led in 1908 to the secession of the Supreme Council of Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite.  The stated reason for dissention was increasing politicisation of the Grand Orient.  On March 21, 1910 this body established the Grand Lodge of Italy, with Protestant pastor Saverio Fera, a former adherent of Garibaldi, as Grand Master.  From its headquarters it became known as the Grand Lodge of Piazza del Gesù.^[4][5]

THE JESUITS AND THE TITANIC

Jesuit seminarian took photographs of Titanic’s infamous voyage

PROMINENT PEOPLE ALL TRAINED BY SATAN’S SPECIAL FORCES

LIST FROM “POLITICAL CONNECTION”

On November 14, 1965 in the Ia Drang Valley of Vietnam, in a small clearing called Landing Zone X-Ray, 400 young fathers, husbands, brothers, and sons—all troopers from the U.S. 7th Cavalry (Air Mobile)—were surrounded by 2000 enemy soldiers. The ensuing battle was one of the most savage in U.S. history. Here is a tribute to the nobility of those men under fire, their common acts of uncommon valor, and their loyalty to and love for one another. ~ David Bruce, Hollywood Jesus

Movie-goers will be touched by this film but military families in particular will be especially moved by it (the wife cried through half of it).

Like the Band of Brothers series, Blackhawk Down and Saving Private Ryan, the war film has finally come of age. This movie is a must-have for all soldiers and enthusiasts…especially when Mel Gibson liberally includes his now signature reverence for God throughout the movie.

These movies have ushered in a new genre of “war movie”, one that emphasizes realism, accuracy and brotherhood as well as a subtle form of patriotism.

This is to be contrasted with movies like Platoon, Full Metal Jacket and Apocalypse Now—movies that lean strongly left with their agendas and often lack authenticity as well. Wonderfully absent from this film are the drugged-up, undisciplined, disrespectful soldiers so disproportionally accented in Platoon, or the psychotic, DI killing, suicidal recruit in Full Metal Jacket (never have forgiven R. Lee for participating in that).

Did soldiers do drugs? Did Marine recruits lose it? —Yes, but in such small numbers that it does all soldiers and all Marines a disservice to accent them in a 2 hour movie for the sake of Hollywood sensationalism (which is all part of the “do anything for $” priority). It is a welcome event to have a movie show the brutality of war yet still be inspired by it, verses wanting to go out after the movie and stick your head in an oven because you’re an American.

Of course, this movie was based on the autobiographical account of real events depicted in Lt Gen Hal Moore’s highly-acclaimed book, We Were Soldiers Once…And Young which spent 17 weeks on the NY Times best-seller list.

It was co-authored by the UPI reporter who was actually there, Joe Galloway, portrayed in the movie by Barry Pepper (PVT Daniel Jackson—sniper—in Saving Private Ryan). Pepper did a top-notch job, and Galloway was shown as a cut above the typical reporter, coming in by Huey as the battle started to get hot. At one point, the NVA attack was so fierce and overwhelming he joined in the defense by firing an M-16 left by a fallen soldier. It reminded me of the scene in John Wayne’s The Green Berets (1968) where skeptic reporter George Beckworth (played by David Janssen) turns to help the SF soldiers he was previously so cynical towards because their outpost is about to be over-run. It’s ironic in the light of the criticism Wayne took for his movie being “filled with propaganda”.

After the battle of Landing Zone X-ray is over, a C-47 Chinook helicopter deposits a gaggle of reporters who scurry around bothering LTC Moore and reporter Galloway who is sharply contrasted to them, dirty and bloody in his GI greens and unflinching at artillery bursts. It was a great slap at the leftist media, a la Duke Wayne.

In fact, there were no major players who were obnoxiously stereotyped. Mel Gibson did an outstanding job portraying LTC Hal Moore who was depicted as a sensitive, studied, God-fearing soldier. This movie joins the ranks of the handful of others that treats Christian faith with reverence and respect. Knowing what we now know about Mel, he surely had a lot to do with that. There is a cute clash of Catholicism and Protestantism between Mel and his very young “daughter”. Tastefully done.

Nearly every movie about Viet Nam is a tragedy of some kind, but the tragedy of blundering incompetence wasn’t over done as is usual for Hollywood. LTC Moore saw ahead of time the stacked deck he would face, perhaps most poignantly foreshadowed when Moore is told that his unit would be redesignated the 1^st BN, of the 7^th REG (1/7^th) for the deployment. He pauses and looks back cynically saying, “Custer’s regiment”.

This movie is also an excellent study in leadership. Much is made of how LTC Moore—the BN CDR responsible for 395 soldiers (“exactly”, his sergeant major tells us) was the first one to set foot on the battlefield, and the last one to step off. It was a great slow-motion sequence of Mel’s foot stepping off the Huey at the start and back on at the finish of the battle.

In a speech at Ft. Benning before 1/7^th deploys, he promised to bring every soldier back with him…alive or dead. At several points during the battle he checked for accountability. Before Somalia, before there was a Soldier’s Creed, there was Hal Moore.

During one of those accountability checks LTC Moore finds a young 2LT, “Jack Geoghegan” (played by Chris Klein), killed trying to rescue a wounded black soldier. Geoghegan’s character is also well done. We are shown during the movie that racism exists, but Geoghegan stops during a foot march to tenderly check the bare feet of that same black soldier. Geoghegan and his wife were Christian missionaries before he was commissioned—

Jesus…got up from supper, and laid aside His Garments; and taking a towel, He girded Himself. Then He poured water into the basin, and began to wash the disciples’ feet and to wipe them with the towel with which He was girded. ~ John 13:3-5, NASU

He died for that soldier—

“Greater love has no one than this, that one lay down his life for his friends.” ~ John 15:13, NASU

There is a tender scene between Gibson and Klein in a chapel before the deployment. It involved a great discourse that was punctuated with Gibson giving an inspiring prayer with wiry humor. Very unique in a big-budget movie.

The worst character in the group is a glory-hound platoon leader who also gets killed due to his exploits.

Another well-played character was that of LTC Moore’s BN sergeant major, CSM Basil Plumley (played by a mustache-less Sam Elliott). His one-liners were the only times my wife laughed during the movie. At one point, Gibson turns to Elliott lamenting about how they were outnumbered just like George Custer, to which Elliot responds gruffly, “Sir, Custer was a pussy.”

And he was, too.

Some of the aspects that set this movie apart were the points of view. Being that LTC Moore’s adversary was the uniformed North Vietnamese army, the audience saw what went on in the NVA command bunker, done in Vietnamese with subtitles (no other way if you want to go for realism).

There are a couple of reasons this seemed to be unique;

1. This movie is done exceptionally well, paying tribute to actual events.
2. The North Vietnamese army got it’s ass kicked any time it went toe-to-toe with any U.S. forces so such battles were rare anyway.

Another side of events not often shown is how the wives coped during the time their husbands were deployed. Madeleine Stowe plays LTC Moore’s wife, Julie. The movie DVD has a behind-the-scenes feature where Julie Moore complimented Stowe for her efforts at research. Lt. Gen. Moore and Joe Galloway said the same about their respective parts—the actors and movie-makers were sincerely interested in getting it right.

I don’t know about historical accuracy but the movie portrays wives getting a telegram from a taxi driver to let them know their husband was dead because “the Army wasn’t prepared for the casualties”. Stowe takes it upon herself to hand-deliver each notification rather than let the cab driver do it.

If that’s true, it is absolutely appalling (but not shocking for those of us who have ever been in the military). If you’ve read the book and that is corroborated, write me so that I can update this review.

As far as historical accuracy, the battle seems to unfold on screen just as it happened. Times and places are given before appropriate scenes. They match perfectly with information found on the official web site (a fantastic site that even includes flash animation depicting how the battle unfolded).

Uniforms, weapons and especially aircraft were expertly accurate. I was particularly thrilled to watch two A-1 “Sandys” give close air support. There were also sorties by F-100 Super Sabers, an F-4 Phantom and an A-4 Skyhawk. Computer graphics were done to affect that and I felt it was worth the effort. I have never seen an F-100 in a Viet Nam movie and that, too was a thrill.

The only negative thing I have to say about the movie is that Mel may have tried to give a southern accent at certain times. It was not consistent. If it were I would’ve been very impressed. You may not even pick up on it as you watch but it seemed to come across that way.

Over all, I give this movie an “8” out of “10”—well worth seeing. The replay value is only “5” due to the gory battle scenes and heart-wrenching death notifications…but the wife and I will probably buy it anyway because it was that good and we want to support another great, God-fearing Mel Gibson movie.

Oh, my mother wants credit for being the first one to tell me about this movie (happy?).

Lastly, there is an astounding tragedy linked to this movie. Many of the men who fought that battle in 1965 are around to see the battle immortalized on the silver screen. One of them is not.

Lt. Rick Rescorla, was a Platoon Leader, in B CO during that battle. A photo of him was taken just prior to the bayonet attack on the morning of November 16, 1965. It was the photo that was used on the cover of LTC Moore’s book.

He’d fought against Communist-backed insurgencies in Cyprus from 1957 to 1960, and in Rhodesia from 1960 to 1963. These experiences had made him a fierce anti-Communist. The reason he had come to America, he said, was to enlist in the Army, so that he could go to Vietnam. ~ The Real Heroes Are Dead, James B. Stewart, NewYorker.com

But Rick Rescorla wasn’t around to see this movie when it was released. He was killed on September 11, 2001.

Rick was vice-president for corporate security for Morgan Stanley Dean Witter. He was in Tower 2 that day and despite official requests to remain in the building he was last seen holding a megaphone ordering hundreds of his employees to evacuate the South Tower (almost certainly saving those lives).

Rick survived the Communists in 1965, only to be killed by Islamic terrorists in 2001.

And the fight continues…

The Soldier’s Creed

I am an American Soldier.
I am a Warrior and a member of a team.
I serve the people of the United States and live the Army Values.

I will always place the mission first.
I will never accept defeat.
I will never quit.
I will never leave a fallen comrade.

I am disciplined, physically and mentally tough, trained and proficient in my warrior tasks and drills.
I always maintain my arms, my equipment and myself.
I am an expert and I am a professional.
I stand ready to deploy, engage, and destroy the enemies of the United States of America in close combat.
I am a guardian of freedom and the American way of life.
I am an American Soldier.

Overall, the best word I can come up with to describe it is “powerful”. It was extremely moving (even though one of those “moving” feelings was nausea). I sit in amazement as I ponder how someone like Mel Gibson, who is (or rather was) such a big part of the Hollywood establishment, could do a film that openly approaches the Foundation of the Christian Faith.

Specifics:

WARNING: If you’re a perfectionist like me, go see the movie before reading my review because I don’t want to spoil it for ya.

• Is It Too Gory?

One common criticism I have heard is that it is excessively gory. How someone could go to a movie about crucifixion and then use that as a complaint is beyond me!

Even more, this was not your every-day crucifixion. There were spiritual forces at work—something Mel implied poignantly with a creepy-looking “satan” overseeing much of what Jesus (Yeshua) went through.

Before the movie even begins, we see a quote from the Prophet Isaiah taken from the astounding passage that predicts a Messiah that would suffer for His people and we are reminded that it was written 700 years before Yeshua was even born. Great touch, Mel! No wonder so many rabbis are gnashing their teeth over this movie. More on that shortly.

In that same passage, Isaiah tells us this:

Just as many were astonished at you, My people, So His Appearance was marred more than any man and His Form more than the sons of men. ~ Isaiah 52:14, New American Standard Update

This was not just any execution. It was punishment for the sins of the entire world:

He made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, so that we might become the Righteousness of G-d in Him. ~ II Corinthians 5:21, NASU

With more artistic license Gibson brings this home as his movie opens in the garden of Gethsemane where satan attempts to convince Jesus that one man can not atone for the sins of the world.

• Is it Inaccurate?

There is some controversy over just how Roman crucifixion took place, in particular, where the nails were put; in the hands or in the wrists? Traditional Christian artwork depicts the nails as being put through Yeshua’s Hands. This was doubtlessly caused by many passages which state the same:

But Thomas, one of the twelve, called “Didymus”, was not with them when Jesus came. So the other disciples were saying to him, “We have seen the L-rd!” But he said to them, “Unless I see in His Hands the imprint of the nails, and put my finger into the place of the nails, and put my hand into His Side, I will not believe.” ~ John 20:24-25, NASU

However, it has been proven that a body’s weight can not be born on the hands alone and it is thought that the nails were driven through the victim’s wrists. Does this contradict the Bible? No. Remember that the Gospels were written almost 2000 years ago by men who never went to Harvard. It’s entirely possible that “hand” was being used euphemistically to include that general area of the body.

Mel got around the issue by showing the Romans first tying Yeshua down, then putting the nails in his hands—a very graphic scene (I must admit to a little eye-shutting there).

Was the devil really that prominent during the events of Jesus’ last 12 hours? —Can you think of anything more important for him to do at the time? You can’t get to any higher priority for the enemy than the salvation of every living soul.

Now, of course the dialogue and physical presence of the devil are all Mel’s artistic license, but there is some precedent for much of what was depicted.

During the opening scene in the garden of Gethsemane I was about to say “Oh this is over the top” when the devil produced a scary-looking albino python to slither up to a prone, praying Jesus. This turned into an awesome scene as Jesus looked into the devil’s eyes with defiance and stomped the serpent’s head. As well-researched as the movie seemed to be, I wondered if Mel had a particular passage in mind for that scene:

The L-RD G-d said to the serpent, “Because you have done this, cursed are you more than all cattle, and more than every beast of the field; on your belly you will go, and dust you will eat all the days of your life; and I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed; He shall bruise you on the head, and you shall bruise him on the heel.” ~ Genesis 3:14-15, NASU

There is no “seed” of the woman, this is a prophecy of the Virgin Birth [Chuck Missler]. It was a great scene.

Mel took artistic license with another aspect of the crucifixion that I thought actually was over the top but in a precious-if-spiritually-inexperienced way. Jesus was crucified with 2 thieves. Just as the Gospels state, the movie depicts how one mocked Him while the other asked to be remembered when Jesus entered His Kingdom. The first thief continues to mock until a raven pecks out one of his eyes. If only justice were so swift for all who mock Jesus! Alas, the Wisdom of G-d is patient and many must wait until their deathbed to be judged but it is always rewarding to see it done instantly (if brutally).

Given the extent that some have gone to attack this movie, we could do with a few more eye patches out there. Internet topical website NewsMax reported that CBS 60 Minutes commentator Andy Rooney responded to being asked if he was going to go see The Passion with, “I don’t want to pay $9 just for a few laughs.”

Then there’s the issue of Judas’ suicide:

Then when Judas, who had betrayed Him, saw that He had been condemned, he felt remorse and returned the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, saying, “I have sinned by betraying innocent blood.” But they said, “What is that to us? See to that yourself!” And he threw the pieces of silver into the temple sanctuary and departed; and he went away and hanged himself. ~ Matthew 27:3-5, NASU

This was portrayed perfectly in the movie.

But Luke tells us:

…this man acquired a field with the price of his wickedness, and falling headlong, he burst open in the middle and all his intestines gushed out… ~ Acts 1:18, NASU

This was not depicted in the movie.

One of the best explanations I have seen explaining the different accounts is that Matthew gives us what happened first and Peter gives us what happened afterwards. Judas, in his haste to pay for what he had done, hung himself with either weak rope or weak foundation (thin tree branch, etc.) and perhaps fell over a cliff or onto sharp rocks. Given the fact that no one is born an expert at suicide and the Bible states that Judas was obviously extremely upset, the “contradiction” disappears rapidly.

• Mel’s Catholic Influence

It has been said that Mel Gibson is part of a “break-away” sect of “ultra-conservative” Catholics. This may explain the prominent role Mary plays in the movie and why the apostles call her “mother” with reverent familiarity (in fairness this does not necessarily imply that the apostles thought her the mother of mankind, only that they revered her).

And yet, none of the more controversial and unBiblical traditions amongst some Catholics (like considering Mary of equal importance to Jesus in the Saving of souls) were evident in the film. It accents what Mary must have gone through to see her Child so terribly treated. As some Catholics go to the unBiblical extreme of praying to Mary (Scripture states there is only One Intercessor for our souls, I John 2:1), many Protestants go to the opposite extreme and forget that Mary (Miriam) was indeed a special woman. Scripture says that Miriam watched Jesus grow up and treasured the moments where it was obvious that He was special (Luke 2:19, 51). The father of John the Baptist refused to believe Gabriel’s message that his barren wife will have a special son, filled with the Holy Spirit, so he spent the next 9 months unable to speak. Mary, however, accepted an even more unbelievable message without question in humble, precious faith.

One of the most powerful moments in the entire movie was a flashback in which Mary runs to Jesus as a child because he has fallen and skinned his knee, flashing forward to Jesus falling under the weight of his cross and the effects of his terrible wounds. Mary runs to him again and Jesus (played with award-winning sensitivity by actor James Caviezel) says (forgive me if I miss the exact quote), “See mother, I make all things new”. Then with renewed strength he rises up again under the burden of his cross. Masterfully done. Plus, it shows an expert knowledge of Scripture because that quote is not normally associated with the crucifixion:

And G-d will wipe away every tear from their eyes; there shall be no more death, nor sorrow, nor crying. There shall be no more pain, for the former things have passed away.” Then He who sat on the Throne said, “Behold, I make all things new.” ~ Revelation 21:4-5, New King James Version

Last but certainly not least, many have accused Mel and the influence of his Catholic faith of being “anti-semitic”. I can’t speak for what is in Mel Gibson’s heart but I can address what I saw on the screen.

• Is The Passion “Anti-Semitic”?

Then Pilate said to Him, “Do You not hear how many things they testify against You?” And He did not answer him with regard to even a single charge, so the governor was quite amazed.

Now at the feast the governor was accustomed to release for the people any one prisoner whom they wanted. At that time they were holding a notorious prisoner, called Barabbas.

So when the people gathered together, Pilate said to them, “Whom do you want me to release for you? Barabbas, or Jesus who is called Christ?” For he knew that because of envy they had handed Him over.

While he was sitting on the judgment seat, his wife sent him a message, saying, “Have nothing to do with that righteous Man; for last night I suffered greatly in a dream because of Him.” But the chief priests and the elders persuaded the crowds to ask for Barabbas and to put Jesus to death.

But the governor said to them, “Which of the two do you want me to release for you?” And they said, “Barabbas.” Pilate said to them, “Then what shall I do with Jesus who is called Christ?” They all said, “ Crucify Him!” And he said, “Why, what evil has He done?” But they kept shouting all the more, saying, “ Crucify Him!”

When Pilate saw that he was accomplishing nothing, but rather that a riot was starting, he took water and washed his hands in front of the crowd, saying, “I am innocent of this Man’s blood; see to that yourselves.” And all the people said, “His Blood shall be on us and on our children!” ~Matthew 27:13-25, NASU

Is Mel Gibson an anti-semite? Although he originally quoted Scripture stating the Jewish crowd before Pilate invoked a blood curse upon themselves, he edited that out of the movie in an attempt to soften that aspect. It has also been stated that the only time Mel went in front of the camera was to film his hand as the one driving the nails into Jesus, symbolizing that it is our sin that He died for.

In fact, some extremely important Scriptures were quoted in flashbacks. One, in particular, clearly addressed who was responsible for the Death of Jesus:

“I Am the Good Shepherd, and I know My own and My own know Me, even as the Father knows Me and I know the Father; and I lay down My Life for the sheep…For this reason the Father loves Me, because I lay down My Life so that I may take it again. No one has taken it away from Me, but I lay it down on My Own Initiative. I have Authority to lay it down, and I have Authority to take it up again. This Commandment I received from My Father.”~ John 10:14-15, 17-18, NASU

Mel did catch some flak from the other side of the debate. He was recently interviewed by Diane Sawyer for the ABC News program “Primetime”. Predictably, Sawyer hit Gibson with the age-old accusation, can you go to Heaven if you aren’t a Christian to which Gibson responded that you could.

It is foundational to the Christian Faith that Jesus Christ is the only Way to the Father and to Paradise. Why would G-d send His Son to undergo something as horrific as what The Passion portrays if there was another way?! How could you make such a movie then get corralled into making such a statement? Even more, one of the flashback scenes gave that very passage of Scripture:

Jesus said to him, “I Am the Way, and the Truth, and the Life; no one comes to the Father but through Me.” ~ John 14:6, NASU

It’s been suggested that Mel meant anyone can come to Jesus. Perhaps he was caught off guard. We’ll have to wait for further clarification.

Jesus—Yeshua—is a Jew. His family, friends, apostles and early disciples were all Jews. The movie portrays women who wept for him and Pharisees who objected to the unfair and high-handed trials. Yet, the outcry is overwhelming. Why?

I believe a big part of the reason is that the Truth hurts when you are in the wrong. The Children of Israel have been in the wrong for nearly 2000 years (Messianic Jews not withstanding) as is evidenced by their reaction to the first martyr, Stephen:

“You men who are stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears are always resisting the Holy Spirit; you are doing just as your fathers did. Which one of the prophets did your fathers not persecute? They killed those who had previously announced the coming of the Righteous One, whose betrayers and murderers you have now become; you who received the law as ordained by angels, and yet did not keep it.” Now when they heard this, they were cut to the quick, and they began gnashing their teeth at him. But being full of the Holy Spirit, he gazed intently into Heaven and saw the Glory of G-d, and Jesus standing at the Right Hand of G-d; and he said, “Behold, I see the Heavens opened up and the Son of Man standing at the Right Hand of G-d.” But they cried out with a loud voice, and covered their ears and rushed at him with one impulse. When they had driven him out of the city, they began stoning him… ~Acts 7:51-58, NASU

Jesus is on every page of the Old Testament, in every part of the Hebrew Faith, yet they refuse(d) to acknowledge Him. Jews are not responsible for Jesus’ Death, but they are accountable for the role they played in it—

When He approached Jerusalem, He saw the city and wept over it, saying, “If you had known in this day, even you, the things which make for peace! But now they have been hidden from your eyes. For the days will come upon you when your enemies will throw up a barricade against you, and surround you and hem you in on every side, and they will level you to the ground and your children within you, and they will not leave in you one stone upon another, because you did not recognize the Time of your Visitation.” ~Luke 19:41-44, NASU

It was the Father’s Plan for Jesus to be our Sacrifice, but that doesn’t let anyone off the hook for their own personal behavior, from Israel in general right down to Judas:

As they were reclining at the table and eating, Jesus said, “Truly I say to you that one of you will betray Me—one who is eating with Me.” They began to be grieved and to say to Him one by one, “Surely not I?” And He said to them, “It is one of the twelve, one who dips with Me in the bowl. For the Son of Man is to go just as it is written of Him; but woe to that man by whom the Son of Man is betrayed! It would have been good for that man if he had not been born.” ~Mark 14:18-21, NASU

And yet, we are all forgiven of everything we’ve ever done…if we only acknowledge Him and ask.

UPDATE: Saturday, 6 March 2004; 10:20 PM, EST

I love educational TV like the “History” Channel and the “Discovery” Channel…except when they dissect my Faith.

Tonight on the History Channel (“History vs. Hollywood: The Passion Of The Christ”) there was a panel of “experts” discussing Mel’s movie. Of the 3 experts and 1 moderator, there wasn’t a single well-known Christian scholar. Secular television does it every time: they attack faith-based subjects and load their panels completely against taking the tenets of Christianity seriously. Before the show even got started I was told that there are “contradictions” amongst the 4 Gospels.

Gotta love the secular media.

Something I forgot to address in my previous critique; more excellent scholarship by Gibson and his crew. As Christ undergoes interrogation, the Apostle John races back to alert his mother and Mary Magdalene. They are alone, in a dark room, reciting parts of the Passover Seder; “Why is this night not like any other?” —Masterfully done.

Did you know that Jesus was killed on Passover? What a coincidence.

Mel ended his movie in a great place: Christ emerging from His Tomb.

This begs a controversial question that no one can answer: How did Jesus look after He was raised from the dead? Mel had actor James Caviezel remove the make-up from scourging and accented the wounds in the hands (and feet).

However, this may be an over-simplification. There are several Scriptures that imply something different—

And behold, two of them were going that very day to a village named Emmaus, which was about seven miles from Jerusalem. And they were talking with each other about all these things which had taken place. While they were talking and discussing, Jesus Himself approached and began traveling with them. But their eyes were prevented from recognizing Him. ~ Luke 24:13-16, NASU

But when the day was now breaking, Jesus stood on the beach; yet the disciples did not know that it was Jesus. ~ John 21:4, NASU

Jesus Provides Jesus said to them, “Come and have breakfast.” None of the disciples ventured to question Him, “Who are You?” knowing that it was the L-rd. ~ John 21:12, NASU

Is it more likely that our Savior carries the scars of our Redemption upon His Body…forever?

And I saw between the Throne (with the four living creatures) and the elders a Lamb standing, as if slain… ~ Revelation 5:6, NASU