If the world was controlled by a malignant, Luciferian cabal (and it is) intent on keeping track of and blackmailing as many human beings as possible—especially dangerous, awake ones—“social networking” would be an intelligence-gathering apparatus unparalleled in human history.

And it is.

If there’s one thing people want, it’s for other people to pay attention to them; “to be loved”.

Prior to social networking, intelligence-gathering was an extremely laborious and intensive undertaking requiring armies of skilled operatives and assets tailing and trialing their quarry—and there were never enough even to gather on “really important” people.

Today, all it takes are unskilled computer operators (or very skilled computer programs) to simply sit back and record all of the personal information people willingly give up themselves on “social networking”.

One Twitter user boldly proclaimed—

i will now be tweeting my every move

— Drew Dempsey (@WinnieTheDrew3) November 9, 2015

And he did (and then he disappeared…hope he’s alright).

At best, the company you work for can mine your personal networking account and posts and, if it finds something there it doesn’t like, you will pay the consequences.

There are even companies who go so far as demand the ability to log in to your personal networking account!

It gets more dangerous from there.

There are so many pictures of you guys floating around the internet, thanks to “Facebook selfies” that one expert boldly proclaimed to his audience, “I can find you anywhere”.

Professor Alessandro Acquisti of Carnegie Mellon, who researches how technology impacts privacy, stunned [Leslie] Stahl [of CBS] with an experiment.  He photographed random students on the campus and in short order, not only identified several of them, but in a number of cases found their personal information, including social security numbers, just using a facial recognition program he downloaded for free.  Acquisti says smart-phones will make “facial searches” as common as Google searches in the future.  And nearly everybody can be subject to such prying, even those who are careful about their Internet use.

“One of the participants, before doing the experiment, told us, ‘You’re not going to find me because I’m very careful about my photos online.’  And we found him,” says Acquisti, “Because someone else had uploaded a photo of him.” ~ “Big Brother” Is Big Business? CBS News

Oh, and let me remind you that Shriner Freemason Franklin Roosevelt promised Americans that their Social Security numbers would never be used to identify them.

For many years, Social Security cards carried an admonition that they were to be used “for Social Security and tax purposes—not for identification.”

That assurance rings hollow today.  Congress has authorized so many uses of the nine-digit number, and Americans use it for so many unauthorized purposes, that it has just about become a national identifier.

For the Clinton Administration, which is considering assigning all Americans a health-care identification number, the slow, steady march of the Social Security number from secrecy to all-purpose identifier may be a cautionary tale. ~ The Nation; Not for Identification Purposes (Just Kidding), Robert Pear, The New York Times, July 26, 1998

Now even grocery store bonus shopper programs ask you for your SSN…oh, and they’re used to track how you feed your family and whether or not you’re “prepping” against government orders.

Of course, the big sharks on social networking are government agencies.  But those agencies have graduated from simply digging for dirt on you, they now actively participate in networking dialogue to take hot news items that have been leaked to you outside of “mainstream” sources and discredit them.

Perhaps one of the most shocking and under-reported revelations came from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden via his Pulitzer Prize-winning lawyer/journalist outlet, Glenn Greenwald.

Apparently, the “signals intelligence” branch of the British government—Government Communications Headquarters, or “GCHQ”—has been using its “Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group” (JTRIG) to destroy truth-seekers.  Its methods include sexual seduction (which I’ve proven includes children, both boys and girls), denial of service attacks, impersonating and/or co-opting truth-seekers and planting government operatives (“trolls”) in key discussions throughout the internet.

One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of deception and reputation-destruction. It’s time to tell a chunk of that story, complete with the relevant documents. …

Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums. ~ Greenwald, The Intercept

As a result of all this, I don’t stay on “Facebook” very long.

I stay on it even less when I see how infuriatingly easy it is to manipulate Western and American “Conservatives”.

The injustices we all suffer today should have us in the streets with torches and pitch forks—from mass, warrantless surveillance, to a militarized police force aimed at us, to endless wars that eat our children up and spit them out minus arms, legs and marriages (yet leave us even less “secure”), to confiscatory taxes that don’t even come close to staving off a debt that is guaranteed to fiscally collapse the nation.  We won’t even bring in the “conspiracy” efforts to poison us by the very air that we breath and water we drink; from the cancer industry to the prison-industrial complex—we have less freedom today than ever.

But give a “Conservative” a good meme on Facebook and they think they’ve taken America back overnight!

Darrell Issa: FBI Director Wants ‘to Indict Both Huma and Hillary’ Over Email Scandal!

“Lindsey Graham Destroyed Eric Holder!”

Trey Gowdy Probe Claims ‘Big Wins’ In Getting Benghazi Info

Each one of them (and the rags that put them out for exactly this purpose) is hilarious.  They don’t have a hen’s tooth of substance to ‘a one of them.

A better headline would read, Eric Holder Blissfully Retires on $11,500,000.00 After Scandals That Would Make Benedict Arnold Look Like George Patton!

It reminds me of a similar ridiculous assertion; that then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was going to lose her position because she claimed she wasn’t read in on CIA torture when she was.  Sean Hannity from “Fox News” lead the way on this smokescreen.

That’s Irish Catholic Sean Hannity working for Knight of Malta, Order of St. Gregory, “I Like ‘Em Blonde” Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News, claiming that Jesuit-trained Italian Catholic Nancy Pelosi was going down over Catholic/Jesuit-dominated CIA Inquisition-style torture.  As shocking as this may sound…it never happened.

Another powerful trick is misdirection; build up the threat that doesn’t exist while masking the threat at the front door.

I just saw a great example of this on Facebook today—

Paul Ryan Tells Sean Hannity He Will Not Support Any Cuts To Muslim Immigration: ‘That’s Not Who We Are’—Breitbart.com

Wow.  Where to begin?!

It’s always good to start a psychological operation (“PSYOP”) with a false assumption or four.

For instance: muslims are the source of America’s greatest threats.

At the very least, there is information from a very respectable source (ex-Jesuit Alberto Rivera) which says Islam as a religion was created by Rome to win her back the Holy Land.

But the easily-verifiable path leads to a collaboration between Rome and Western Intelligence with such stand-out examples as Polish Catholic National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski working with CIA asset “Tim Osman” to create “al Qaeda”.  You probably know Tim better as “Osama bin Laden”.

When the fizz from al Qaeda began to go flat, creating “ISIS” was easy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORYL8jPtpQU

Not to be outdone by the CIA, British Intelligence continues to contribute their fair share to the jihadi scare (great work by my friend Jon Ryman).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bca7soVu4zE

When running out of actual terrorist events, the CIA began fabricating beheadings (and some of them weren’t even very good).  They got a lot of help from their friends in “Jesuit theater” like Jesuit-trained journalist James Foley, who volunteered to get beheaded.  It actually just stung a little.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AF6jDlPCEsU

The latest ridiculous rub is Fox News perennial clown favorite, “The Donald” (both he and his spawn are Jesuit-trained), exploiting the deluge of illegal immigrants to switch focus from the tens—perhaps hundreds—of millions of low-income, Hispanic Catholic illegal aliens and focus on the dreaded muslim hoards.

Proving how equally-ridiculous and depraved the United Kingdom is (where there are more CCTV cameras per capita than anywhere else in the world), the rainbow mayor of Londonistan—Sadiq Khan (no relation to Genghis…we think)—got into the clown act.

The reality is that Rome has filled every key position in America—from the Teleprompter-in-Chief to your local police chief—with her agents to insure that the waves of Catholic Hispanic illegals never cease.

When you get tired of being played, perhaps you’ll start looking around for some pitch forks.

I’ve already stocked up on torches.

At 1334 hours (1:34 PM) Nidal Hasan (a muslim of Palestinian origin) produced a Fabrique Nationale “Five-seveN” and began murdering soldiers and civilians. The “5-7” is not the weapon of a random act of passion. It is basically an assault weapon in the form of a pistol. With a magazine boasting a 20 round capacity and a 5.7mm projectile pushing a muzzle velocity of an astounding 2100 feet per second (the deadly .45 ACP clocks in at around 830 fps), the 5-7 would be a weapon more likely seen in the hands of a Special Forces operator…especially one that wanted to be sure he could punch through body armor. And, according to Wikipedia, Hasan’s 5-7 was outfitted with both red and green laser designators (the green is preferable for daylight scenarios).

In spite of the use of this hardware, “controversy” surrounds Hasan’s motives to this day (encapsulated by that same Wikipedia article):

Internal Army reports indicate officers within the Army had discussed what they characterized as Hasan’s tendencies toward radical Islam since 2005. Additionally, investigations before and after the shooting discovered e-mail communications between Hasan and Yemen-based cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, who quickly declared Hasan a hero, as “fighting against the U.S. army is an Islamic duty”. After communications between the two were forwarded to FBI terrorism task forces in 2008, they determined that Hasan was not a threat prior to the shooting and that his questions to al-Awlaki were consistent with medical research.

In November 2009, after examining the e-mails and previous terrorism investigations, the FBI had found no information to indicate Hasan had any co-conspirators or was part of a broader terrorist plot. The U.S. has since classified Anwar al-Awlaki as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist, and the UN considers Awlaki to be associated with al-Qaeda. A year after the Fort Hood shooting, however, questions still lingered as to whether the incident was caused by mental health issues, and government agencies still had not officially linked Hasan to any radical terrorist groups.

Certainly, the results of Hasan’s handiwork don’t appear to be that of a mentally-deranged or distraught man in a random act of violence, either: 29 wounded, 14 dead. That’s one man, firing one weapon with a tactical magazine change, dodging soldiers and the tables and chairs they threw at him, over the course of a few minutes.

All media accounts will give you the death toll at “13”, but that’s not accurate. The actual total is 14. One soldier, Private First Class Francheska Velez, was home from her deployment early due to her getting pregnant. Both she and her baby were killed; two-time victims of the lies of American Leftists—1) women are indistinguishable from men, especially as soldiers and 2) religiously active muslims are as equally valuable to America and her military as are religiously active Christians and Jews.

Eventually two law enforcement officers (one male and one female) managed to wound and subdue Hasan, but not kill him. And, as soon as civilian investigators and bloggers began looking in to the incident, Nidal Hasan appeared to be less of a mentally deranged lunatic and more of a highly trained muslim operative.

• Witnesses who survived the shooting stated that Hasan shouted “Allahu Akbar” before opening fire.
• Investigators discovered that Hasan had an acronym for the phrase “Soldier of Allah” on his business cards.
• And soldiers began coming forward saying that Hasan pushed Islam on them when he should’ve been counseling them about their deployment.

Certainly, the idea that Hasan was acting out of duress or depression became even more hard to believe when it was revealed that he, himself had never deployed.

The official reaction to the bloodiest insurgent attack on a domestic military facility in U.S. history defied comprehension.

The President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama (no relation), actually took the time to give a leisurely “shout out” during his speaking engagement at a meeting of the Department of the Interior before even mentioning that 43 people had just been murdered or wounded in the middle of an American military facility on home soil.

Even more bizarre is that the “shout out” was fraught with grammar school-level humiliating mistakes, going something like;

“Dr. Joe Medicine Crow – that Congressional Medal of Honor winner.”

But “Joe Medicine Crow” was never awarded the highest possible military citation for valor in combat, but was given the “Medal of Freedom”—a civilian award that can often be more political than meritorious—by Obama, only a few weeks before!

Even more astounding was the reaction of the Chief of Staff of the United States Army, General George Casey, whom Reuters noted:

Asked on NBC’s “Meet the Press” whether Muslim soldiers are conflicted in fighting wars in Muslim countries like Afghanistan and Iraq, Casey said: “Our diversity, not only in our Army, but in our country, is a strength. And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse,” Casey said.

It is unknown why the efforts and energy of the Army staff was placed in candlelight vigils instead of directly addressing the enemy that took 43 casualties.

Not sure what George Casey’s wife Sheila, nor the female soldier next to him found enjoyable on the occasion of commemorating 43 casualties at the hand of an Islamist operative in a military post on American soil.

What is known, is that the killing field at Fort Hood was plowed by William Jefferson Clinton:

Among President Clinton’s first acts upon taking office in 1993 was to disarm U.S. soldiers on military bases. In March 1993, the Army imposed regulations forbidding military personnel from carrying their personal firearms and making it almost impossible for commanders to issue firearms to soldiers in the U.S. for personal protection. For the most part, only military police regularly carry firearms on base, and their presence is stretched thin by high demand for MPs in war zones.

Outside of the common Leftist distaste for institutions like the military—

The military is a linchpin for all of society. It is a bastion of traditional values. Former communist David Horowitz recalls that during the ‘60s, radical leftists determined that if they could destroy the U.S. military, they could destabilize the rest of capitalist America. Two things could accomplish this, they said: Putting women into combat, and opening the armed forces to homosexuality.

—the disconnect here defies explanation.

But there are clues that lead to a very disturbing side of this outrage.

The NY Times—“U.S. Knew of Suspect’s Tie to Radical Cleric”:

Major Hasan’s 10 to 20 messages to Anwar al-Awlaki, once a spiritual leader at a mosque in suburban Virginia where Major Hasan worshiped, indicate that the troubled military psychiatrist came to the attention of the authorities long before last Thursday’s shooting rampage at Fort Hood, but that the authorities left him in his post.

Al Qaeda recruiter, trainer, motivator and planner Anwar al-Awlaki, we’ve been told, is now “the most dangerous man in the world”. But it is extremely interesting to note that he was born in New Mexico and “happened” to run a mosque in VA. Where in Virginia?

—Why, the Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center in Falls Church.

Just 18 minutes from the Pentagon and only 16 minutes from Langley.

And we all know who lives there.

Sorry if that was misleading. Former Director of the Central Intellignce Agency George Herbert Walker Bush is now retired and living comfortably in Houston, Texas.

Another reputable, mainstream source, FoxNews, tells us that “Anwar al-Awlaki” was a guest at the Pentagon shortly after 9/11.

QUESTION: DID NIDAL HASAN RECEIVE PERSONAL INSTRUCTIONS FROM ANWAR al AWLAKI—AN AGENT OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY—TO DO WHAT HE DID AT FORT HOOD?

Jeremiah 50:9
9 “For behold, I Am going to arouse and bring up against Babylon
A horde of great nations from the land of the north,
And they will draw up their battle lines against her;
From there she will be taken captive.
Their arrows will be like an expert warrior
Who does not return empty-handed.
New American Standard Update (capitalization added to correct disrespect)

Their arrows will be like an expert warrior
Who does not return empty-handed.

“expert”; sakal (saw-kal’), OT:7919; a primitive root; to be (causatively, make or act) circumspect and hence, intelligent… ~ New Exhaustive Strong’s Numbers and Concordance with Expanded Greek-Hebrew Dictionary. [Missler]

“sakal” is a participle that describes the arrow as having the intelligence.

Who is geographic Babylon today?

Walid Shoebat is a former Palestinian terrorist who is now a Born Again Christian. His unique international perspective has opened up new ways of understanding for prophetic passages that have historically been difficult to understand. Shoebat believes that Islam has been the key to so many misinterpreted verses in Scripture.

Traditionally, many western Biblical scholars have believed that the anti-Christ will be a homosexual based upon this passage;

Daniel 11:36-37
36 “Then the king will do as he pleases, and he will exalt and magnify himself above every god and will speak monstrous things against the G-d of gods; and he will prosper until the indignation is finished, for that which is decreed will be done.
37 He will show no regard for the gods of his fathers or for the desire of women, nor will he show regard for any other god; for he will magnify himself above them all.”
New American Standard Update (abbreviation added to correct disrespect)

But is that what this passage really means? Or should the first part of verse 37 be translated more clearly to read, “he shall show no regard for what women desire,” meaning that he will be a misogynist who degrades women?

Is there a system of thought that does that, today?

And note the 2 verses afterwards;

Daniel 11:38-39
38 “But instead he will honor a god of fortresses, a god whom his fathers did not know; he will honor him with gold, silver, costly stones and treasures.
39 He will take action against the strongest of fortresses with the help of a foreign god; he will give great honor to those who acknowledge him and will cause them to rule over the many, and will parcel out land for a price.”
NASU

Who is the “god of fortresses”, the “god of warfare”?

Has this anti-Christ, and his spirit, and his god made war on “the strongest of fortresses”?

Note in this passage, which kingdoms will be judged by Almighty G-d after He has restored Israel once again to her place of power—

Joel 3:1-4
3 “For behold, in those days and at that time,
When I restore the fortunes of Judah and Jerusalem,
2 I will gather all the nations
And bring them down to the valley of Jehoshaphat.
Then I will enter into judgment with them there
On behalf of My people and My Inheritance, Israel,
Whom they have scattered among the nations;
And they have divided up My Land.
3 They have also cast lots for My people,
Traded a boy for a harlot
And sold a girl for wine that they may drink.
4 Moreover, what are you to Me, O Tyre, Sidon and all the regions of Philistia?
Are you rendering Me a recompense?
But if you do recompense Me, swiftly and speedily I will return your recompense on your head.”
New American Standard Update (capitalization added to correct disrespect)

“…O Tyre, Sidon and all the regions of Philistia…”

“Lebanon and all of the [muslim] regions of Palestine…”

For years, Christians have looked towards technology as the answer to what this passage means;

Revelation 13:16-17
16 And he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead,
17 and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name.
NASU

What does the mark mean? It means you share allegiance with the beast and notice the “or” in verse 17. Do all marks have to be the same? Is this one such mark of allegiance to the beast?—

And what of the saints who are martyred in the Book of Revelation? How are they martyred?

Revelation 20:1-4
1 Then I saw an angel coming down from Heaven, holding the key of the abyss and a great chain in his hand.
2 And he laid hold of the dragon, the serpent of old, who is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years;
3 and he threw him into the abyss, and shut it and sealed it over him, so that he would not deceive the nations any longer, until the thousand years were completed; after these things he must be released for a short time.
4 Then I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was given to them. And I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded because of their testimony of Jesus and because of the Word of G-d, and those who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received the mark on their forehead and on their hand; and they came to life and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.
NASU (capitalization and abbreviation added to correct disrespect)

How anachronistic. The Bible is such a quaint, inaccurate book. Who beheads people in the 21^st century?

And notice this passage regarding the Two Witnesses from Revelation;

Revelation 11:8-10
8 And their dead bodies will lie in the street of the great city which mystically is called Sodom and Egypt, where also their L-rd was crucified.
9 Those from the peoples and tribes and tongues and nations will look at their dead bodies for three and a half days, and will not permit their dead bodies to be laid in a tomb.
10 And those who dwell on the Earth will rejoice over them and celebrate; and they will send gifts to one another, because these two prophets tormented those who dwell on the Earth.
NASU (capitalization and abbreviation added to correct disrespect)

Who is it that desecrates bodies and rejoices over them?

But the story does not end there.

The Witnesses return in a fearful way;

Revelation 11:11
11 But after the three and a half days, the breath of life from G-d came into them, and they stood on their feet; and great fear fell upon those who were watching them.
NASU (abbreviation added to correct disrespect)

Much as the King of kings will return;

Revelation 19:11-13
11 And I saw Heaven opened, and behold, a white horse, and He who sat on it is called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He judges and wages war.
12 His Eyes are a flame of fire, and on His Head are many diadems; and He has a Name written on Him which no one knows except Himself.
13 He is clothed with a Robe dipped in blood, and His Name is called The Word of G-d.
NASU (capitalization and abbreviation added to correct disrespect)

Are you ready to stand before Him when he does…?