Who Is The Antichrist? – Catholic Answers, Inc

Perhaps that’s because “Google” was “born” on the same day (September 27^th) that the Company of Loyola¹ were consecrated by Alessandro “Pope Paul III” Farnese² to become the inversely-named “Society of Jesus”: the Jesuits.³

Above it is an ad from “Lion & Lamb Ministries” but when you click on the ad it brings you to a general home page that doesn’t answer your question.  Instead you are encouraged to indulge in several false doctrines such as the “Pre-Tribulation Rapture”^{4, 5, 6}, “Dispensationalism”⁷ / “Zionism”^{8, 9}, Futurism^{10, 11}, etc.  These are heresies fabricated by the Catholic Church and her masters of deception, the Jesuits, to specifically obscure Rome as the answer to this question.

Third from the top might surprise you if you don’t know all the “facts”.  It’s from “Amazing Facts” and does disclose Rome as the Fourth and Final Beast, however, “Amazing Facts” is the Seventh Day Adventist ministry of Doug Batchelor.

Today, Adventists are the last Protestants in existence.  Sadly, only a handful of their preachers take even their own religion seriously, such as Professor Walter Veith.

As reward for his dedication, Veith has been marginalized by his religion’s hierarchy and banned from most Adventist forums.¹²

If Rome controls all media (and it does), you may wonder if Doug Batchelor has had some help and perhaps you might get the answer you seek if you’ve seen Batchelor’s teaching on “Heaven” and “Hell”.

In it, without explanation, he dresses in a suit split down the middle half black and half white.

The answer can be found in the alternating black and white floor tiles of any Masonic Hall.

In fact, Adventism was founded by Freemason William Miller who humiliated “Protestant” Christians by predicting the return of Jesus Christ in 1843.  When Christ didn’t appear, Miller re-predicted His Return the year following!

Miller was a member of “Morning Star No. 27” Lodge, the same Lodge was implicated in the disappearance of Freemason whistleblower Captain William Morgan in 1826.

There are no specific descriptions of the devil in the Christian Bible but most scholars consider Isaiah 14 to contain metaphors about the Great Adversary and verse 12 calls him the “shining son of the dawn”.¹³

Morning Star No. 27 Lodge has been erased from existence but there was such a Lodge founded in Poultney, Vermont, in the year 1807.¹⁴

It was both telling and appropriate for Batchelor to wear his super-villain costume when preaching on the “temporary” nature of Heaven and Hell as it is a Luciferian doctrine designed to encourage the Fallen that their punishment won’t last forever¹⁵ and to likewise dishearten the Saved as to their fleeting rewards.

A New Testament word search¹⁶ of “Eternal Life” or “Eternal Salvation” proves this categorically wrong and, given the damage it does, perhaps even heretical.

But when the Kindness and the Love of God our Savior toward man appeared, not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His Mercy He saved us, through the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit, whom He poured out on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Savior, that having been justified by His Grace we should become heirs according to the hope of Eternal Life. ~ Titus 3:4-7

So who is the Antichrist?

Today, answers range from an artificial intelligence super-computer¹⁷ to a Muslim madman.

Christians live in a cloud of confusion but was there a time when the identity of the Antichrist was clear?

Any serious study should bring up this passage:

Now, brethren, concerning the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering together to Him, we ask you, not to be soon shaken in mind or troubled, either by spirit or by word or by letter, as if from us, as though the Day of Christ had come.

Let no one deceive you by any means; for that Day will not come unless the falling away comes first, and the Man of Sin is revealed, the Son of Perdition, who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the Temple of God, showing himself that he is God. ~ II Thessalonians 2:1-4¹⁸

Has there been a “falling away”?

Do we exist in a civilization where deception is the rule, not the exception?

Who is the “Man of Sin”?

He is also the “Son of Perdition” and that title is only mentioned in one other place.

When Jesus prays for His disciples, He calls the one disciple, Judas, who betrays Him by that same name.

The Antichrist, therefore, is someone intimately acquainted with Jesus Christ and the Gospel Message yet betrays and mocks Him.

And while He was still speaking, behold, a multitude; and he who was called Judas, one of the twelve, went before them and drew near to Jesus to kiss Him.

But Jesus said to him, “Judas, are you betraying the Son of Man with a kiss?” ~ Luke 22:47-48

The office of the Papacy clearly fulfills this prophecy and it is filled with men of the most debased and debauched natures.

In Rome, a de Medici was sitting in the Papal Seat; Giovanni di Lorenzo de´Medici (“Pope Leo X”). …

In 1488, Giovanni de Medici’s father, Lorenzo il Magnifico (“Lorenzo the Magnificent”), ruler of the Province of Florentine, prevailed upon his relative, Giovanni Battista Cybo (Pope Innocent VIII) to make his son a cardinal, which Cybo did.

Having bought Giovanni the cardinalcy at such a young age (13) he was forbidden to wear the insignia or deliberate as Cardinal for another 3 years.

In 1513, de Medici was “elected” Pope.  Clearly a political decision, after it was made, the College of Cardinals realized de Medici had never been ordained a priest.  This minor oversight was rectified on a date that proved the Papacy was far more “Roman” than “Christian” — the Ides of March (the 15^th) of that same year — the date memorialized as the assassination of Julius Caesar.

Medici maintained and even increased his lavish lifestyle which included the sexual perversions of the upper class.  Pope Leo was well-known as a “lover of boys”.

Leo X was said to have invited guests to lavish banquets with up to 65 courses at which little boys jumped naked out of puddings.

It was no secret Leo was “a lover of boys” who possessed also “an insatiable love of pleasure”.

Like Pope Paul II, Leo loved parades and his passion was to travel around Rome at the head of a long procession featuring panthers, jesters, and a white elephant called Hanno a gift from the King of Portugal.

Scholar Joseph McCabe said Leo was “a coarse, frivolous, cynical voluptuary, probably addicted to homosexual vice in the Vatican”.

Leo spent much of his childhood in numerous abbeys which, like many monasteries since the time of Leo III (795-816), had become homosexual haunts.

Even before he became pope, Leo X allegedly had been a practicing sodomite.

On the day of his election, Leo suffered from chronic ulcers [venereal skin ulcers, not of the stomach] and had to be carried into the conclave on a stretcher.

Not a few remarked that the ulcers had been caused by his “boyish predilections” … ~ D. Christie Sinton¹¹³

Medici was far from unique as a corrupt, immoral and depraved Pope.

Most Catholics go through life and never hear a word of reproach for any pope or member of the clergy.  Yet the recorded history of the lives of the clerical hierarchy bears no resemblance to its modern-day portrayal, and the true stories of the popes in particular are among the most misrepresented in religious history.

The Catholic historian and Archbishop of New York, John Cardinal Farley (d. c. 1916), subtly admitted that the “old legends of their dissolute lives may be partly true…that they didn’t sternly insist upon sexual virtue and injustice was a general license of the papal court, but it is probable that moral improvement was at the vanguard of their thinking” (Catholic Encyclopedia, Pecci ed., 1897, iii, p. 207).  The real character of the popes as a rule has been so falsely represented that many people don’t know that so many popes were not only decadent but were also the most savage and perfidious of military strategists ever known.  Cardinal Farley added this comment:

“The popes were temporal rulers of the civil territory and they naturally had recourse to force the re-establishment or extend the States of the Church until the conclusion of peace was confirmed … their attempts to purify particularly the Duchy of Rome caused them considerable distress and the need to resort to violence, but always on the side of mercy … lives were lost in the service of truth but the legal basis for the Christian Church to hold and transmit properties for the benefit of revenues was given to them [the popes] by Emperor Constantine in 312.” (Catholic Encyclopedia, Pecci ed., ii, pp. 157–169)

The comments of the cardinal warrant our attention, for within them rests a little-known story of the leaders of the Christian religion [not] and reveals that today’s presentation of popes as incorruptible moral oracles is untrue.  The hidden history of doctrinal foundations that permitted a papal alliance with conflict and licentiousness, and to what degree decadence among the clergy is “partly true”, provides for an extraordinary story — one that has no precedent or parallel in the history of world religions. ~ Bushby¹¹⁴

___________________

Sergius III (? – 911) was accused of ordering the murders of his predecessor Pope Leo V and Antipope Christopher in prison. It is said that his mistress was the young Marozia (later to become a powerful Roman noblewoman), and it was their son who became Pope John XI in 931.¹¹⁵ ~ Shell Harris

Octavianus, the son of Alberic II, became Pope John XII in 955 AD.  “Former”, “former” Jesuit Malachi Martin said this about Octavianus —

John XII, perjured himself, breaking his oath to the … Emperor … he stole the Treasury of the Popes and fled to Rome’s enemies … was deposed by a Holy Synod and replaced by Pope Leo VIII … then the apostate returned to Rome, evicted Pope Leo VIII, cut off the nose and tongue and two fingers of the Cardinal-Deacon, flayed the skin off Bishop Otger, cut off the hands of Notary Azzo, and beheaded sixty-three of Rome’s clergy and nobility. … During the night of May 14, 964, while having illicit and filthy relations with a Roman matron, he was surprised in the act of sin by the matron’s angry husband who, in just wrath, smashed his skull with a hammer and thus liberated his evil soul into the grasp of Satan. …” ~ The Decline and Fall of the Roman Church, Malachi Martin, p. 126¹¹⁶

Australian “entrepreneur” Tony Bushby is a vicious critic of Christianity and, as such, he (like his innumerable brethren) defames Christendom with the sins of Rome.^xxxv  This is a purposeful propaganda conflation and the culprits usually behind it reside in Rome!  Knowing that her sins are many, she seeks to use them to her advantage.^xxxvi

Bushby adds this on Octavianus —

…he opened his inglorious career by invoking pagan gods and goddesses as he flung the dice in gambling sessions. He toasted Satan during a drinking spree and put his notorious mistress/prostitute Marcia in charge of his brothel in the Lateran Palace (Antapodosis, ibid.).

He “liked to have around him a collection of Scarlet Women”, said the monk-chronicler Benedict of Soracte, and at his trial for the murder of an opponent his clergy swore on oath that he’d had incestuous relations with his sisters and had raped his nuns (Annals of Beneventum in the Monumenta Germaniae, v).¹¹⁷

Rome has done an excellent job covering the tracks of the true power players. Whilst truth-seekers focus on names like Soros, Rockefeller and Rothschild (urged on by well-placed propagandists), the names they should be looking in to escape them^xxxvii — names like de Medici, Orsini, Colonna, Aldobrandini, Breakspear (alternately Breakspeare), Farnese…and Borgia. ~ Secret History, Cirucci¹⁹

One of Ireland’s greatest Protestant preachers, Henry Grattan Guinness, confirms this and elucidates two more parallels.

The face of the man of sin is the face of a false apostle, the dark face of a Judas.

Written upon the wall of the temple, in letters of light, just above the proud, false, central figure, is the name “son of perdition.”

The man of sin is a Judas, a secret enemy while a seeming friend a “familiar friend,” yet a fatal foe who betrays with a kiss and a “hail, master!”

There are several features in this portrait which I must ask you specially to notice.

Observe the place occupied by the man of sin the “temple” or house of God.

This is not, and cannot be, any Jewish temple.

Paul, who uses this expression in his prophetic portrait of Romanism, employs it both in Corinthians and Ephesians with reference to the Christian Church.

In the second Epistle to the Corinthians, writing to Gentile Christians, he says, “Ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them.”

In Ephesians he calls the Church “a holy temple,” a “habitation of God through the Spirit”; and he would never have applied it to the Jewish temple, which, with all other Jewish things, he regarded as mere shadows of Christian realities.  To Paul emphatically the temple of God was the Church of Christ.

This is the temple in which his prophetic eye saw the man of sin seated.  It is no question of his bodily location in any structure of wood and stone, but of something far higher.

The temple of God is that “spiritual house” in which He dwells.  It is built of “living stones,” of true believers.

It is here that the man of sin was to usurp the place of God.

This is the “mystery,” the dread danger, the deadly evil, predicted by the Apostle.

It is no person in a temple of stone, but a power in the Christian Church.

Observe next the character of the man of sin.

He is at once an imitation of Christ, and a contrast to Him.  He occupies His position, but is totally unlike Him, and opposed to Him.  He has usurped His place and His prerogatives; but, so far from truly representing Him, he represents His great enemy.

As Christ acts for God, so the man of sin acts for Satan, who indeed produces him for this very purpose.  His coming is “after the working of Satan.”

Christ and he are antagonistic powers: the power of light, and the power of darkness; the majesty of heaven, and the might of hell.

And as the Son of God humbled Himself, so the “man of sin” exalts himself.

There is infinite self-abasement in the one, the Divine nature stooping to humanity; and infinite self-exaltation in the other, the human and satanic assuming to be Divine.

Observe here that it is not asserted that the man of sin will say that he is God, but that he will show himself as such.  The words are, “He as God sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God” or is Divine, or a Divine being (ἀποδεικνύντα ἑαυτὸν ὅτι ἔστιν Θεός).

There is no article here before the name God.  The expression indicates that the man of sin would show himself by acts and professions to be possessed of superhuman and Divine dignity, authority, and power.

Observe the position of the man of sin.

Notice the word καθίσαι, “sitteth,” and connect with it κάθισμα, a seat, a word which occurs three times in the New Testament.  It is used twice with reference to the seats in the temple of those who sold doves, who turned the house of God into a house of merchandise and den of thieves; and once in the sentence, “the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat.”

From κάθισμα comes “cathedral,” the “bishop’s seat,” and also the expression ex cathedra; as when we say the pope speaks ex cathedra, or from his seat, officially.

There, in that exalted cathedral position, and claiming to represent God, the man of sin was to act and abide as the pretended vicar, but real antagonist, of Christ, undermining His authority, abolishing His laws, and oppressing His people.

Observe the words, “who opposeth.”

It is possible effectually to oppose another without being his avowed antagonist; so the professions of the predicted power might be friendly, while his actions would be those of an opponent of the gospel of Christ.²⁰

In March of 2000, Karol Józef “Pope John Paul II” Wojtyła, now a Saint of the Catholic Church, gave a special Mass in Israel to “honor children”.

As we now are aware of the millions of children who have been violated, raped and even murdered by Catholic clergy, the hypocrisy is palpable.

Perhaps, most appropriately so, Wojtyła sat in a chair with an inverted cross and clutched a hideous crozier (crucifix²¹ staff).

Although mainstream media refused to report on the event, it was not lost upon the Catholic faithful.

The location for the children’s Mass in Israel was the village of Korazim.  This, too, was perfectly appropriate.²²

“Woe to you, Chorazin!  Woe to you, Bethsaida!  For if the miracles had occurred in Tyre and Sidon which occurred in you, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes.” ~ Matthew 11:21

UPDATE: 20 November 2019

II Thessalonians 2:1-4 discusses the Papal Antichrist and verses 5 through 12 are just as obscured as they discuss his system.

Do you not remember that when I was still with you I told you these things?

And now you know what is restraining, that he may be revealed in his own time.  For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only he²³ who now restrains will do so until he is taken out of the way.

And then the Lawless One²⁴ will be revealed, whom the Lord will consume with the breath of His Mouth and destroy with the brightness of His Appearance.

The coming of the Lawless One is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved.

And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, that they all may be condemned who did not believe the Truth²⁵ but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

It is natural, but wrong, to assume that, because the Antichrist is being “restrained”, that which restrains him is good.

Today, most “Evangelicals” preach that the Restrainer is the Holy Spirit, but if that’s so, why didn’t Paul write that?  He was being obtuse to spare himself and the early Christians from even more harm than they were already suffering.

The military Roman Empire needed to fall away so that the religious Roman Empire could take its place.

Although Emperors from Julius Caesar on demanded to be worshipped as gods, they never claimed they were the God of the Hebrew (and later) Christian Scriptures (Bible) but their replacements all did: the Popes.

Most of the church fathers held to this view.^[1]  Under this view, Paul didn’t want to say this outright, because this would have led to persecution for the Church in the first century.  On this view, the masculine singular (“he”) would refer to the Roman emperor, while the neuter pronoun (“what”) would refer to the Roman government.

For instance, Preterist Gary DeMar holds that this passage likely refers to the Roman Empire, while the restrainer might refer to King Agrippa, who stopped further killing of Christians after the death of James and tried to stop the Jewish War in AD 66.^[2]

However, we do not hold to this view.  For one, the Roman Empire did not “restrain” the Antichrist.  Specifically, under the Preterist view, Emperor Nero was the Antichrist, and he governed over the Roman Empire!  Moreover, King Agrippa did not restrain Nero in any way.

Second, Daniel and Revelation see human government as pushing for the rise of the Antichrist—not restraining him.

Third, the Roman Empire fell in the fifth century AD, so this “restrainer” would have no meaning for today.  As Thomas writes²⁶, “Elimination of this solution is sealed when we remember that the Roman Empire has long since ceased to exist, and the appearance of Christ or the lawless one has yet to take place.”^[3] ~ Evidence Unseen

The “we” above is actually an “I”: author James M. Rochford of Peoria, Illinois.

He discredits this interpretation, not with facts, but with association.

Preterism is the idea that the Antichrist has come and gone and that all of Bible Prophecy has been fulfilled, which calls into question the judgment of the un-Godly and the existence of the Millennial Kingdom.

You’ll never guess where it came from.

With Rome so clearly depicted as the 4^th and final Beast of both Daniel and Revelation, Jesuits needed to disconnect Christians from that interpretation and they used Preterism and Futurism to do it.

Preterism is the idea that most of prophecy has already taken place.  It was concocted by a Jesuit.

Preterism was first advanced in 1604 by Jesuit Luis de Alcasar to destroy the Reformed Protestant teaching that the papacy was Mystery Babylon, the Great Whore and the historical Antichrist.

What Scholars Had To Say About Preterism

Henry Alford (an Anglican Greek scholar)

“The praeterist view found no favour and was hardly so much as thought of in the time of primitive Christianity.  Those who lived near the date of the book of Revelation itself had no idea that its groups of imagery were intended merely to describe things then passing, and to be in a few years completed.  This view is said to have been first promulgated in anything like completeness by the Jesuit Alcasar, in his “Vestigatio Arcani Sensus in Apocalypsi” (1604).  Very nearly, the same plan was adopted by Grotius.  The next great name among this school of interpreters is that of Bossuet the great antagonist of Protestantism.”

Charles Hodge

Also dismissing the Jesuit-Romanist Preterist approach, Charles Hodge noted that the preterists of his time for the most part were German Rationalists.

“[they] were German interpreters who, denying any real prediction of the future, confine the views of Daniel and John to their contemporary history”.

He lists some of the liberal scholars such as Ewald, DeWette and Lucke, who not only denied the predictive element in Scripture but also denied the inspiration and authority of the Word of God. ~ Bulletin for Biblical Christianity Today, Dr. Ronald Cooke⁵⁵⁶

Preterism wasn’t accepted by large groups of Protestants and an alternative interpretation of the End Times was put forth.

Futurism is more appealing in that it acknowledges that much of prophecy is yet future.  However it distracts from the 4th Beast and paints the anti-Christ as a man who suddenly appears just before the Tribulation and who stands alone, apart from any organization or system.

It, too, was fabricated by a Jesuit. ~ Illuminati Unmasked, Cirucci²⁷

The military Roman Empire did restrain the religious empire that spawned the Antichrist.

This takes care of the second critique, as well.

The idea that the Roman Empire fell “in the 5^th century” is, therefore, the most important; either as a flaw or ultimate fulfillment as Daniel and Revelation repeatedly mention four empires:

1. Babylon
2. Medo/Persia
3. Greece
4. Rome

If Rome disappeared then the Bible is obsolete and of no use to us, but if Rome lives on then the Bible is far more accurate than “Evangelicals” give it credit for.

Mr. Rochford has been a Board of Trustees President of the “children’s charity” Kiwanis International, an organization that promotes pilgrimages to Fatima and Vatican City.

The capitalization of pronouns is not evident in the original languages of Scripture and modern English language Bibles erroneously capitalize the “he” of II Thessalonians 2:6-7, making the choice for you who the “restrainer” is.

However, even trusted older translations like the King James, although getting II Thessalonians right, fail to capitalize the pronouns of Daniel 9.

Now while I was speaking, praying, and confessing my sin and the sin of my people Israel, and presenting my supplication before the Lord my God for the Holy Mountain²⁸ of my God, yes, while I was speaking in prayer, the man Gabriel, whom I had seen in the vision at the beginning, being caused to fly swiftly, reached me about the time of the evening offering.  And he informed me, and talked with me, and said, “O Daniel, I have now come forth to give you skill to understand.  At the beginning of your supplications the command went out, and I have come to tell you, for you are greatly beloved; therefore consider the matter, and understand the vision:”

“Seventy weeks are determined
For your people and for your holy city,
To finish the transgression,
To make an end of sins,
To make reconciliation for iniquity,
To bring in everlasting righteousness,
To seal up vision and prophecy,
And to anoint the Most Holy.”

“Know therefore and understand,
That from the going forth of the command
To restore and build Jerusalem
Until Messiah the Prince,
There shall be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks;
The street shall be built again, and the wall,
Even in troublesome times.”

“And after the sixty-two weeks
Messiah shall be cut off, but not for Himself;
And the people of the prince who is to come
Shall destroy the city and the sanctuary.”

“The end of it shall be with a flood,
And till the end of the war desolations are determined.”

“Then he [He] shall confirm a covenant with many for one week;
But in the middle of the week
He²⁹ shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering.”

“And on the wing of abominations shall be one who makes desolate,
Even until the consummation, which is determined,
Is poured out on the desolate.”

“Then he [He] shall confirm a covenant with many for one week;
But in the middle of the week he [He] shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering.” ~ The Seventy-Weeks Prophecy of Daniel 9:20-27

Daniel 9 maintains a “Chiastic” structure or pattern of “A, B, B, A”.

Who is it that confirms the Covenant with Israel then “breaks” (fulfills) it?  —The Christ, not the Antichrist!

The Temple is forever cursed.

“O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the one who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her!  How often I wanted to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing!”

“See!  Your house is left to you desolate; for I say to you, you shall see Me no more till you say, ‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord!’”

Then Jesus went out and departed from the Temple³⁰, and His disciples³¹ came up to show Him the buildings of the Temple.  And Jesus said to them, “Do you not see all these things?  Assuredly, I say to you, not one stone shall be left here upon another, that shall not be thrown down.” ~ Matthew 23:37-24:2

It will never be rebuilt.

Now when Peter had come to Antioch, I withstood him to his face, because he was to be blamed; for before certain men came from James, he would eat with the Gentiles; but when they came, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing those who were of the circumcision.

And the rest of the Jews also played the hypocrite with him, so that even Barnabas was carried away with their hypocrisy.

But when I saw that they were not straightforward about the truth of the Gospel, I said to Peter before them all, “If you, being a Jew, live in the manner of Gentiles and not as the Jews, why do you compel Gentiles to live as Jews?”

“We who are Jews by nature, and not sinners of the Gentiles, knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the Law³² but by faith in Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, that we might be justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the Law; for by the works of the Law no flesh shall be justified.”

“But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is Christ therefore a minister of sin?  Certainly not!  For if I build again those things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor.  For I through the Law died to the Law that I might live to God.  I have been crucified with Christ; it is no longer I who live, but Christ lives in me; and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.  I do not set aside the Grace³³ of God; for if righteousness comes through the Law, then Christ died in vain.”

For if I build again those things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor. ~ Galatians 2:11-21

That the “restrainer” was the Roman Empire was not lost on Quintus Septimius Florens Tertullianus, more popularly known as “Tertullian” (approximately 155 – 240 AD).

Again, in the second epistle he addresses them with even greater earnestness: “Now I beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering together unto Him, that ye be not soon shaken in mind, nor be troubled, either by spirit, or by word,” that is, the word of false prophets, “or by letter,” that is, the letter of false apostles, “as if from us, as that the day of the Lord is at hand.  Let no man deceive you by any means.

For that day shall not come, unless indeed there first come a falling away,” he means indeed of this present empire, “and that man of sin be revealed,” that is to say, Antichrist, “the son of perdition, who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God or religion; so that he sitteth in the temple of God, affirming that he is God.  Remember ye not, that when I was with you, I used to tell you these things?  And now ye know what detaineth, that he might be revealed in his time.  For the mystery of iniquity doth already work; only he who now hinders must hinder, until he be taken out of the way.”⁷⁴⁵³  What obstacle is there but the Roman state, the falling away of which, by being scattered into ten kingdoms, shall introduce Antichrist upon (its own ruins)?  “And then shall be revealed the wicked one, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of His mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of His coming: even him whose coming is after the working of Satan, with all power, and signs, and lying wonders, and with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish.”⁷⁴⁵⁴³⁴

Nor was it lost to John Chrysostom of Antioch.

One may naturally enquire, what is that which withholdeth, and after that would know, why Paul expresses it so obscurely.  What then is it that withholdeth, that is, hindereth him from being revealed?

Some indeed say, the grace of the Spirit, but others the Roman empire, to whom I most of all accede.

Wherefore?

Because if he meant to say the Spirit, he would not have spoken obscurely, but plainly, that even now the grace of the Spirit, that is the gifts, withhold him.  And otherwise he ought now to have come, if he was about to come when the gifts ceased; for they have long since ceased.  But because he said this of the Roman empire, he naturally glanced at it, and speaks covertly and darkly.  For he did not wish to bring upon himself superfluous enmities, and useless dangers.  For if he had said that after a little while 389 the Roman empire would be dissolved, they would immediately have even overwhelmed him, as a pestilent person, and all the faithful, as living and warring to this end.  And he did not say that it will be quickly, although he is always saying it—but what? “that he may be revealed in his own season,” he says,

“For the mystery of lawlessness doth already work.”  He speaks here of Nero, as if he were the type of Antichrist.  For he too wished to be thought a god.  And he has well said, “the mystery”; that is, it worketh not openly, as the other, nor without shame.  For if there was found a man before that time, he means, who was not much behind Antichrist in wickedness, what wonder, if there shall now be one?

But he did not also wish to point him out plainly: and this not from cowardice, but instructing us not to bring upon ourselves unnecessary enmities, when there is nothing to call for it.  So indeed he also says here.  “Only there is one that restraineth now, until he be taken out of the way,” that is, when the Roman empire is taken out of the way, then he shall come.  And naturally.  For as long as the fear of this empire lasts, no one will willingly exalt himself, but when that is dissolved, he will attack the anarchy, and endeavor to seize upon the government both of man and of God.  For as the kingdoms before this were destroyed, for example, that of the Medes by the Babylonians, that of the Babylonians by the Persians, that of the Persians by the Macedonians, that of the Macedonians by the Romans: so will this also be by the Antichrist, and he by Christ, and it will no longer withhold.  And these things Daniel delivered to us with great clearness.

“And then,” he says, “shall be revealed the lawless one.”  And what after this? The consolation is at hand.  “Whom the Lord Jesus shall slay with the breath of His mouth, and bring to nought by the manifestation of His coming, even he whose coming is according to the working of Satan.”

For as fire merely coming on even before its arrival makes torpid and consumes the little animals that are afar off; so also Christ, by His commandment only, and Coming.  It is enough for Him to be present, and all these things are destroyed.  He will put a stop to the deceit, by only appearing.  Then who is this, whose coming is after the working of Satan, “With all display all power,” but nothing true, but for deceit.  “And lying wonder,” he says, that is, false, or leading to falsehood.³⁵

Rome is full of “signs and lying wonders”.

Apparition Apprehensions

In 1916, three Portuguese children were herding sheep when an angel appeared to them on multiple occasions at Cova da Iria (“Irene’s Cove”) just outside of Fátima.  Lucia dos Santos was 9 and her cousin Francisco Marto was 8.  Francisco’s sister, Jacinta Marto, was 6.  The angel taught them how to pray¹⁷²² and “sacrifice” on behalf of sinners.¹⁷²³

On May 13, 1917, Lúcia described seeing a lady “brighter than the sun, shedding rays of light clearer and stronger than a crystal goblet filled with the most sparkling water and pierced by the burning rays of the sun”.  While they had never spoken to anyone about the angel, Jacinta divulged her sightings to her family despite Lucia’s admonition to keep this experience private.  Her disbelieving mother told neighbors as a joke, and within a day the whole village knew.^[6]  Further appearances were reported on June 13 and July 13.  In these, the lady asked the children to do penance and Acts of Reparation and make personal sacrifices to save sinners.  According to Lúcia’s account, the lady also confided to the children three secrets, now known as the Three Secrets of Fátima.

The children subsequently wore tight cords around their waists, performed self-flagellation using stinging nettles, abstained from drinking water on hot days, and performed other works of penance.^[6]~ Wikipedia¹⁷²⁴

Despite their claims, they were ridiculed by some and the apparition they saw promised to give them powerful prophecies on the 13th of the month, in October of 1917.

Between May and October of 1917, always on the 13^th of the month, the children received three secrets.  Lucia eventually disclosed them from the Convent where she became a nun.  Francisco and Jacinta died just a few short years later in the Spanish Flu Epidemic of 1918-20.

It is important to note that October 13th 1307 is established by the Luciferian Elite as the day Pope Clement V collaborated with France’s King Philip IV and suppressed the Vatican Treasury guardians—the Knights Templar.¹⁷²⁵

Sister Lucia wrote her account much later in life under orders from the Bishop of Leiria.  In 1940, she sent her recollection to Pope Pius XII.

Well, the secret is made up of three distinct parts, two of which I am now going to reveal⁴.

The first part is the vision of hell⁵.

Our Lady showed us a great sea of fire which seemed to be under the earth.  Plunged in this fire were demons and souls in human form, like transparent burning embers, all blackened or burnished bronze, floating about in the conflagration, now raised into the air by the flames that issued from within themselves together with great clouds of smoke, now falling back on every side like sparks in a huge fire, without weight or equilibrium, and amid shrieks and groans of pain and despair, which horrified us and made us tremble with fear.  The demons could be distinguished by their terrifying and repellent likeness to frightful and unknown animals, all black and transparent.  This vision lasted but an instant.

How can we ever be grateful enough to our kind heavenly Mother, who had already prepared us by promising, in the first Apparition, to take us to Heaven.  Otherwise, I think we would have died of fear and terror.

We then looked up at Our Lady, who said to us so kindly and so sadly: “You have seen hell where the souls of poor sinners go.  To save them, God wishes to establish in the world devotion to my Immaculate Heart⁶.” ~ Fátima In Lucia’s Own Words: Sister Lucia’s Memoirs¹⁷²⁶

The second secret stated that a very important country would stand in the balance between “good” and “evil”: Russia.

The war⁷[World War II] is going to end: but if people do not cease offending God, a worse one will break out during the pontificate of Pius Xl⁸.  When you see a night illumined by an unknown light, know that this is the great sign ⁹ given you by God that He is about to punish the world for its crimes, by means of war, famine, and persecutions of the Church and of the Holy Father.

“To prevent this, I shall come¹⁰ to ask for the consecration of Russia to my Immaculate Heart, and the Communion of reparation on the First Saturdays.  If my requests are heeded, Russia will be converted, and there will be peace; if not, she will spread her errors throughout the world, causing wars and persecutions of the Church.  The good will be martyred; the Holy Father will have much to suffer; various nations will be annihilated.  In the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph.  The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to me¹¹, and she will be converted, and a period of peace will be granted to the world¹².” ~ Sister Lucia’s Memoirs¹⁷²⁷

When Sister Lucia released her memoirs, Papal authority had passed from Pius XI to Pius XII.

May 13th is celebrated as the first apparition of Mary in 1917 and that was the day the Jesuits made an attempt on the life of John Paul II.  He survived after having been shot 4 times and accounted it as a miracle from Our Lady of Fátima.

After the assassination attempt of 13 May 1981, it appeared evident that it was “a mother’s hand that guided the bullet’s path”, enabling “the Pope in his throes” to halt “at the threshold of death” (Pope John Paul II, Meditation from the Policlinico Gemelli to the Italian Bishops, Insegnamenti, XVII, 1 [1994], 1061).  On the occasion of a visit to Rome by the then Bishop of Leiria-Fátima, the Pope decided to give him the bullet which had remained in the jeep after the assassination attempt, so that it might be kept in the shrine.  By the Bishop’s decision, the bullet was later set in the crown of the statue of Our Lady of Fátima.  ~ Cardinal Angelo Sodano, Vatican Secretary Of State¹⁷²⁸

Catholics everywhere awaited with great anticipation for the third secret.

After the nearly-successful attempt on John Paul II’s life (a Pole named Karol Józef Wojtyła), there were 3 more¹⁷²⁹.  It was then that the secret was finally released.

The third part of the secret revealed at the Cova da Iria-Fátima, on 13 July 1917.

I write in obedience to you, my God, who command me to do so through his Excellency the Bishop of Leiria and through your Most Holy Mother and mine.

After the two parts which I have already explained, at the left of Our Lady and a little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his left hand; flashing, it gave out flames that looked as though they would set the world on fire; but they died out in contact with the splendour that Our Lady radiated towards him from her right hand: pointing to the earth with his right hand, the Angel cried out in a loud voice: ‘Penance, Penance, Penance!’.  And we saw in an immense light that is God: ‘something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it’ a Bishop dressed in White ‘we had the impression that it was the Holy Father’.  Other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions.  Beneath the two arms of the Cross there were two Angels each with a crystal aspersorium in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood of the Martyrs and with it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to God.  ~ Sister Lucia’s Memoirs¹⁷³⁰

The future Benedict XVI (then Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger) was chosen to give the Doctrinal Response.  Even he seemed unenthused.

A careful reading of the text of the so-called third “secret” of Fátima, published here in its entirety long after the fact and by decision of the Holy Father, will probably prove disappointing or surprising after all the speculation it has stirred.  No great mystery is revealed; nor is the future unveiled.¹⁷³¹

But what was noteworthy is that witnesses claim something did show up on October 13th, 1917.  From some accounts, it didn’t look like Mary.

“Miracle of the Sun”

On the 610th anniversary^ddd of the Templar suppression, Mary appeared to three children as well as anywhere from 30,000 to 100,000 Portuguese, depending upon which report you believe.

It had been raining but, as the miracle goes, the rain suddenly stopped and there were two visions—one of Mary, Joseph and baby Jesus^eee, seen only by the 3 children of whom only 1 survived into adulthood.

The rest of the people there saw a UFO.

While the rain had stopped, dark clouds continued to obscure the sun, which suddenly bursts through them and is seen to be a soft spinning disk of silver. …

O Seculo (a pro-government, anti-clerical, Lisbon paper):

— the sun O Dia (another Lisbon daily, edition of 17 October 1917):

At one o’clock in the afternoon, midday by the sun, the rain stopped.  The sky, pearly grey in colour, illuminated the vast arid landscape with a strange light.  The sun had a transparent gauzy veil so that the eyes could easily be fixed upon it.  The grey mother-of-pearl tone turned into a sheet of silver which broke up as the clouds were torn apart and the silver sun, enveloped in the same gauzy grey light, was seen to whirl and turn in the circle of broken clouds. …

The light turned a beautiful blue, as if it had come through the stained-glass windows of a cathedral, and spread itself over the people who knelt with outstretched hands.  The blue faded slowly, and then the light seemed to pass through yellow glass.  Yellow stains fell against white handkerchiefs, against the dark skirts of the women.  They were repeated on the trees, on the stones and on the serra. …

Ti Marto (father of Jacinta and Francisco):

We looked easily at the sun, which for some reason did not blind us.  It seemed to flicker on and off, first one way, then another.  It cast its rays in many directions and painted everything in different colors—the trees, the people, the air and the ground.  But what was most extraordinary, I thought, was that the sun did not hurt our eyes.  Everything was still and quiet, and everyone was looking up.  Then at a certain moment, the sun appeared to stop spinning.  It then began to move and to dance in the sky until it seemed to detach itself from its place and fall upon us.  It was a terrible moment.

Dr. Almeida Garrett, PhD (Coimbra University):

…The sun’s disc did not remain immobile.  This was not the sparkling of a, heavenly body, for it spun round on itself in a mad whirl.  Then, suddenly, one heard a clamor, a cry of anguish breaking from all the people.  The sun, whirling wildly, seemed to loosen itself from the firmament and advance threateningly upon the earth as if to crush us with its huge and fiery weight.  The sensation during those moments was terrible.  ~ Apparition of 13 October 1917, EWTN¹⁷³²

Christian author and researcher L.A. Marzulli has suggested that this was an introduction to the “coming great deception”¹⁷³³ (an “alien disclosure”) and we will see shortly that, if the aliens have an official religion it is Roman Catholicism.

But there has been another purpose exposed for the Fátima apparition and that has been for the Pope to extend the olive branch of “peace” to the Religion of Pieces.

The Blue Army

Did you know that Our Lady of Fátima has an army? —A blue army.

The Blue Army of Our Lady of Fátima, now mostly known as the World Apostolate of Fátima, is a public international association of the Christian faithful that has as its general purpose “the promotion of the authentic teaching of the Roman Catholic Church and the strict adherence to the tenets of the Gospel; the personal sanctification of adherents through faithful adherence to the Message of Fátima and the promotion of the common good by the spreading of that Message of Fátima”.  ~ Wikipedia¹⁷³⁴

—And they’re recruiting muslims.

Islam is an Arabic word that can be defined as “to make peace.” …  over the centuries, Muslims have engaged in tremendous wars with Christians and Jews.  It would seem that there is little hope for peace.  However, Heaven’s Peace Plan, involving Our Lady, is evidenced at Fatima, Portugal as well as other places around the world.

The Moors once occupied Portugal.  The village of Fatima was given the Islamic name of the well-loved Princess of the nearby Castle of Ourem.  She died at an early age after marrying the Count of Ourem and converting to Catholicism.  Baptized with the Christian name of Oureana, she was named at birth “Fatima,” like many other Moslem girls, in honor of the daughter of Mohammed.  Of his daughter, Fatima, the founder of Islam, Mohammed, said: “She has the highest place in heaven after the Virgin Mary.”

It is a fact that Moslems from various nations, especially from the Middle East, make so many pilgrimages to Our Lady of Fatima’s Shrine in Portugal that Portuguese officials have expressed concern.  The combination of an Islamic name and Islamic devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary is a great attraction to Moslems.  God is writing straight with crooked lines, as we will see.  Fatima is a part of Heaven’s Peace Plan.  It is hope for the world.

In the Koran, the holy name of the Blessed Virgin Mary is mentioned no less than thirty times.  No other woman’s name is even mentioned, not even that of Mohammed’s daughter, Fatima.  Among men, only Abraham, Moses, and Noah are mentioned more times than Our Lady.  In the Koran, Our Blessed Mother is described as “Virgin, ever Virgin.”  The Islamic belief in the virginity of Mary puts to shame the heretical beliefs of those who call themselves Christian, while denying the perpetual virginity of Mary.  Make no mistake about it, there is a very special relationship between the Blessed Virgin Mary and the Moslems! ~ Fr Ladis J. Cizik, Blue Army National Executive Director¹⁷³⁵

There are many questions surrounding the apparition at Fátima.  Why would it choose a location so easily identified by muslims?

Is the apparition of Fátima a cunningly-divined hoax for the political power of uniting Catholicism with Islam?

* Only the children saw “Mary”, even during the October event in 1917.  Two of them died shortly thereafter and the third was controlled from a convent.  She even admits she was directed to reveal what she saw by Catholic authorities.

* There were supposedly 70,000 people in the Cova da Iria that day in 1917 yet evidence is extremely sparse with only a handful of eyewitness accounts existing. ~ Illuminati Unmasked, Cirucci³⁶

It is a terrible thing to be so close to Christ in the Catholic religion yet barred from accepting Him as Savior.

All the more can we therefore feel the emotion with which He reaches out to all Catholics—

And I heard another Voice from Heaven saying, “Come out of her, My People, lest you share in her sins, and lest you receive of her plagues.  For her sins have reached to Heaven, and God has remembered her wicked deeds³⁷.  Render to her just as she rendered to you, and repay her double according to her works; in the cup which she has mixed, mix double for her.” ~ Revelation 18:4-6

The brilliant talent who has done all of my graphics and dramatically upgraded my web site is now applying his gifts to resurrecting important literary works.

Unlike all other sources who scoop up public domain works, Resurrect Books is fastidiously editing them, perfecting them, adding fantastic graphics and selling only hard copies.  The digital versions remain free!

He has employed the talent of another gifted friend whom you know from many of our Cirucci Team Briefs to resurrect Avro Manhattan’s The Dollar and the Vatican.

You can get an excellent, clean hard copy here, but you can still get a free digital copy here!

Preface: The Dollar and the Vatican

The Dollar and the Vatican, authored by Avro Manhattan in 1957, a world renowned authority on Vatican geo-politics, is surely in need of a reprint. It gives the reader a true history of the United States, rather than the watered down history students receive in the public and Catholic school system alike. The alliance between the massive American corporations and the Vatican is one of most fundamental alliances to understand in the current geopolitical landscape. Avro Manhattan’s 1957 book, The Dollar and the Vatican, is a great in depth look at this relationship, and how it spells out disaster for true genuine freedom and liberty in the United States, and all over the world for that matter. The merging of these forces in the United States actually date back all the way to the founding of America. Avro Manhattan clearly shows in this great book, that the Vatican and the forces of Big Business play both sides of the political spectrum and are working together to subjugate the human race to their dominion. The financial house of DuPont saw to invest $250,000 in hard cash to both the republican candidate Herbert Hoover “The Oracle of Wall Street” and Alfred E. Smith the democrat. For the Vatican, one would assume that there could no Catholic power in America considering the devout Catholic Smith lost the election. Think again.

On September 29, 1932 “The Oracle” Hoover received a medal from the Catholic Boys Brigade. The Oracle wrote to the Rev. Kilian J. Hennrich, O. M. Cap., Director General, Catholic Boys’ Brigade:

“My dear Father Hennrich:

Will you please express to the Catholic Boys’ Brigade of the United States my warm appreciation of their sincere and helpful cooperation with the purposes of the White House Conference on Child Health and Protection, as expressed by their conferring upon me the Star Pro Juventute. It is indeed heartening to know that the Brigade, as an organization for all boys without distinction of class, color, or creed, enlists its energies in furtherance of the Children’s Charter which the Conference formulated as a goal toward which all people of good will might work to bring health and happiness to all children. I am touched by this recognition of my part in this great undertaking and I ask you to take back to the Catholic Boys’ Brigade U.S., my heartfelt appreciation.

Yours faithfully,

HERBERT HOOVER”

This care for the children was curiously absent when Hoover allowed thousands to starve in Hungary while heading the U.S. Food Administration.

“There, the workers’ government of Bela Kun was overthrown by conservative forces financed and armed by the European and American governments. Key in weakening that government was the manipulation of International Red Cross and the U.S. relief commission’s food shipments by Herbert Hoover, then head of the U.S. Food Administration, and later Secretary of Commerce and President of the United States. Hoover’s maneuvers caused thousands of people in Hungary to starve to death.” (DuPont Dynasty: Behind the Nylon Curtain, Gerard Colby, 1984, pg. 201)

The government of Nikolas Horthy that was afterwards installed in Hungary was very close to the Vatican. It was very sacrilegious then when Herbert Hoover went to Rome to see Pope Pius XII “to discuss food problems”. (February 15th, 1947) The information on Hoover’s role in sabotaging the Geneva convention in The Dollar and the Vatican (chapters 5,6) is excellent. Herbert Hoover, the non-Catholic, cozied up to the Knights of Columbus—as do almost all American presidents—and wrote to Martin H. Carmody, the Supreme Knight of the Knights of Columbus March 29th 1932:

“My dear Mr. Carmody:

I cordially congratulate you, and through you the entire membership of the Knights of Columbus, upon the celebration of the Golden Anniversary of the foundation of an organization which has to its credit so many helpful contributions to education, fraternal benevolence, and the relief of human distress.

Yours faithfully,

HERBERT HOOVER”

General Smedley Butler, who is covered in great detail (chapter 7) in The Dollar and the Vatican, exposed the grand plot to fascitize the U.S.A, was puzzled as to why the devout Roman Catholic, Papal Chamberlain and Knight of Columbus Alfred E. Smith was completely shielded and protected by the McCormack-Dickstein committee investigating the plot, and why even his own testimony was censored.

The devout Catholic Smith was then chairman of the American Liberty League, and his name repeatedly came up among those who were responsible for the plot.

“In his broadcast over WCAU on February 17, 1935 Smedley Butler revealed that some of the “most important” portions of his testimony had been suppressed in the McCormack-Dickstein report to Congress. The committee, he growled, had “stopped dead in its tracks when it got near the top.” He added angrily: “Like most committees, it has slaughtered the little and allowed the big to escape. The big shots weren’t even called to testify. Why wasn’t Colonel Grayson M.-P. Murphy, New York broker called?  … Why wasn’t Louis Howe, Secretary to the President of the United States, called?  … Why wasn’t AI Smith called?  And why wasn’t Gen. Douglas MacArthur, Chief of Staff of the United States Army, called?  And why wasn’t Hanford MacNider, former American Legion commander, called?  They were unmentioned in the testimony. And why were all mention of these names suppressed from the committee report?  This was no piker setup.

MacGuire, who was the agent of the Wall Street bankers and brokers who proposed this organization, told me that $3,000,000 was “on the line” and that $300,000,000-and that’s a lot of money even today was in view to put over this plot to bluff the government.”

Butler then lashed out at the American Legion:

“Do you think it could be hard to buy the American Legion for un-American activities?  You know, the average veteran thinks the Legion is a patriotic organization to perpetuate the memories of the last war, an organization to promote green peace, to take care of the wounded and to keep the graves of those who gave their lives. But is the American Legion that?  No sir, not while it is controlled by the bankers. For years the bankers, by buying big club houses for various posts, by financing its beginning, and otherwise, have tried to make a strikebreaking organization of the Legion. The groups-the so-called Royal Family of the Legion-which have picked its officers for years, aren’t interested in patriotism, in peace, in wounded veterans, in those who gave their lives… No, they are interested only in using the veterans, through their officers. Why, even now, the commander of the American Legion is a banker (Frank N. Belgrano Jr., a close friend of A.P Giannini, E.B.) — a banker who must have known what MacGuire’s money was going to be used for. His name was mentioned in the testimony.

Why didn’t they call Belgrano and ask him why he contributed?” (The Plot to Seize the White House, Jules Archer, 1973, pg. 209, 210)

As Avro Manhattan clearly shows in The Dollar and the Vatican (chapter 2)—during the American civil war the Vatican openly got behind the cause of the south and wished to keep the slave economy going.  The Catholic love for the Confederacy is still present in America today (2019) and it is expressed by the highest officials in the American government.  Witness devout Catholic Robert Wilkie, who is currently the U.S. Secretary of Veteran Affairs and was educated by the Jesuits at Loyola University and Georgetown. Wilkie praised Confederate president Jefferson Davis as a “martyr to ‘The Lost Cause’“ and an “exceptional man in an exceptional age” in a 1995 speech at the U.S. Capitol. (VA secretary praised Confederate president as a “martyr to ‘The Lost Cause’“ in 1995 speech, CNN Politics).  Wilkie was acting very Jesuitical, when he lied about his affiliations to Confederate groups while being sworn in as Secretary of Veteran Affairs. (VA secretary gave inaccurate answers on pro-Confederate ties during confirmation process, CNN Politics) It should be noted that the Jesuit view on slavery was that there was nothing wrong with it. (Reckoning with Slavery at Georgetown, Association of American Colleges & Universities, Adam Rothman)

“Faculty and students at Georgetown accepted the slave economy and even endorsed it…  Father James Ryder, S.J., a two-time president of the school, condemned abolitionism, declaring “God is a God of order.” (Georgetown Slavery Archive, 1835).  A strong majority of students and alumni who fought in the Civil War did so on the Confederate side.”

• • • •

Now to trace the origins of the relationship between the Vatican and big business on the American continent, one needs to go all the way back to the inception of the United States of America. While openly condemning the principles and ideas of the American revolution as “that immense Babylon”, as Avro Manhattan shows (chapter 2), she was secretly flirting with its cause in a very similar way she did to the Bolshevik revolution that would engulf Russia over 100 years later. The Vatican’s financial aid to the American revolutionary cause, came from the Gardoqui banking house of Spain and one of the leading American diplomats the banking house made contact with was Arthur Lee, who was appointed by the Continental Congress as its envoy to Spain and Prussia. Diego De Gardoqui, sometimes written as James Gardoqui, was the Spanish ambassador to the United States and the Spanish finance minister at the time of the American revolution. Interestingly, in a letter to George Washington dated November 9th 1787 from Gardoqui, it is shown that Diego Gardoqui gave Washington a copy of the Catholic Spanish classic novel Don Quixote.

“…but having wished for the opportunity to renew my respects by my good friend Col. H. Lee, I gladly embrace it requesting you would accept and give a place in your Library to the last Spanish Edition of Don Quixote which I recollect to have heard you say at Dr. Franklin’s that you had never seen it.”

Now here is the financial information;

“The ministers in Spain refused an immediate alliance as proposed by Franklin, but proposed to aid the Americans secretly.  Arthur Lee left Paris for Spain in February 1777, returning after being told he would get help directly from Spain or from New Orleans, principally by the Gardoqui banking house, whose principal, Diego de Gardoqui, was a Spanish merchant who was to play a critical diplomatic role.”

“Gardoqui received from the Spanish Treasury first 70,000 pesos, and then another 50,000 pesos, to be sent to the Americans.  Drafts in the amount of 50,000 pesos were also sent to Lee, and Gardoqui himself sent merchandise worth 946,906 reales, including 215 bronze cannon, 30,000 muskets, 30,000 bayonets, 512,314 musket balls, 300,000 pounds of powder, 12,868 grenades, 30,000 uniforms, and 4,000 field tents.”  (Carlos III and System, William F. Wertz, Jr.  and Cruz del Carmen Moreno de Cota, 2004, The Schiller Institute).

Gardoqui wrote to Arthur Lee from Madrid, February 17th, 1777 and said:

“My person and house, in a commercial way, are well known in the American Colonies, not only on account of our long standing correspondence of thirty to forty years, but also on that of the true affection with which we have endeavored to serve them.”  (The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, United States. Dept. of State, 1830, pg. 400)

Diego Gardoqui had a brother who was a Catholic priest, Cardinal Francisco Gardoqui, who was very active in Vatican diplomacy, and was a very influential figure in his time, both in the religious sphere and in politics.  The Cardinal was an advisor to Spanish kings Carlos III and Carlos IV, being sent by the latter to take part in the negotiations of the Peace of Amiens in 1802.

Diego de Gardoqui, the Spanish ambassador’s influence on the founding of America surely must have been significant, as there was a World War II-era ship in the United States Navy named the USS Gardoqui (IX-218), and there was the USS Gardoqui (1898), that had seen action in the Spanish-American War, named after him and his Catholic banking family.  (Avro Manhattan in The Dollar and the Vatican goes into detail on how the big financial trusts got America into the Spanish-American war).  Lastly on Diego De Gardoqui, it is significant that he in 1785 laid the cornerstone of the first Catholic Church in New York City (St.  Peter’s Church on Barclay Street).

“In 1785, an act of incorporation of St. Peter’s Church was obtained from the Legislature of the State of New-York, and early in 1786 five lots were purchased from the trustees of Trinity Church, at the corner of Barclay and Church streets, upon which old St. Peter’s Church—the first Catholic Church in the city of New-York—was built.  The Spanish Ambassador to the United States, Don Diego de Gardoqui, laid the first stone.”  (A brief sketch of the history of the Catholic church on the island of New-York., 1853, pg. 54, James Roosevelt Bayley)

There is a statue of Diego De Gardoqui in Philadelphia standing to this very day.

Since 1957 when the Dollar and the Vatican was published, the alliance between the Vatican and the high powered dollar forces has strengthened ten-fold.  Across the board in all industries the massive corporations have immense consolidation of market share due primarily to the process of the merger.  The Open Market Institute in 2018 did a study titled America’s Concentration Crisis on monopoly power in the United States and the results were staggering.  For instance in the meat processing industry ($217 billion revenue) 53% of the market share is controlled by 4 firms.  The domestic airline industry ($142 billion revenue) has 76% of the market share controlled by 4 firms.  A few more examples will suffice.  The beer industry has 3 firms controlling 75% of the market share.  In the category of home improvement stores ($182 billion revenue) there are 3 firms controlling 87% of the market share.  In the cigarette and tobacco manufacturing industry ($46 billion in revenue) 91% of the market share is controlled by 3 firms, etc.

Military spending since 1957 continues to rise.  U.S. President Donald Trump has agreed to a request from the Catholic Secretary of Defense James Mattis to propose a defense budget of $750 billion for the year 2019!  The war in Iraq alone (2003-2011) cost the U.S. taxpayer $1.06 trillion, and what benefits did the average American receive from all that spending?  He received economic chains in the form of debt.

“Researcher Ryan Edwards estimated that the United States incurred an extra $453 billion in interest on the debt to pay for the wars in the Middle East.  Over the next 40 years, these costs will add $7.9 trillion to the debt.”  (Cost of Iraq War Its Timeline, and the Economic Impact, The Balance)

War has always been profitable for the armaments makers, the Iraq war being no exception.

Just glancing at the Korean war one discovers magnificent profits.

“In 1950 DuPont scored one of its highest annual profits, 13.3 percent.  G.M. reaped an even higher return.  During the war years of 1950-1952 G.M. averaged an annual profit rate, before taxes, six times that of the 1929 boom year.  From July 1950 to June 1952 G.M. grossed $5.5 billion in war contracts.”  (DuPont Dynasty: Behind the Nylon Curtain, Gerard Colby, 1984, pg. 398)

Now quickly glancing at war profits in Iraq—The United States has, spent at least $138 billion on private security alone.  This security includes:

“…logistics and reconstruction contractors, who have supplied everything from diplomatic security to power plants and toilet paper.”

“An analysis by the Financial Times reveals the extent to which both American and foreign companies have profited from the conflict – with the top 10 contractors securing business worth at least $72bn between them.  None has benefited more than KBR, once known as Kellogg Brown and Root.  The controversial former subsidiary of Halliburton, which was once run by Dick Cheney (Catholic, E.B.), vice-president to George W. Bush, was awarded at least $39.5bn in federal contracts related to the Iraq war over the past decade.”  (Contractors reap $138B from Iraq war, CNN Business)

The armaments maker Lockheed Martin for instance, would charge the U.S. military $600 for a toilet seat and $7,662 for a coffee maker, all financed by taxpayer dollars.  (Prophets Of War: Lockheed Martin And The Making Of The Military Industrial Complex, William D. Hartung, 2011, pg. 123) Americans should be concerned that since the signing of the program 1033 in 1997, $5 billion dollars in surplus military equipment has been funneled into various police departments across the country.  The program was briefly shut down by the Obama administration, but in 2017 president Trump signed an executive order bringing the program back into existence.  The U.S. attorney general Jeff Sessions referred to the grenade launchers, humvee’s, light machine guns, shotguns, assault rifles, tanks and bayonets, etc. that the police now have access to use on American citizens as “lifesaving equipment.”  (Trump Reverses Restrictions On Military Hardware For Police, Adam Goldman, Aug. 28, 2017, The New York Times)

• • • •

The police state is being buffed up by the powers that be (that being the Vatican and the massive corporations) to maintain to current status quo in society.  The power of both the mega financial forces and religion spearheaded by the Vatican is spelling out full spectrum dominance economic control on the Earth.  Never before in human history has so much economic power been concentrated into the hands of so few.

The British newspaper The Guardian reported in 2018 that the world’s richest 1% are on course to control as much as two-thirds of the world’s wealth by 2030.  Never before in history have we been in an epoch where corporate power rules virtually unchallenged.  As Avro Manhattan writes in The Dollar and the Vatican the financial aristocratic class have the masses acting as their “financial vessels”.  The Guardian in a 2015 article commenting on the appalling wealth gap noted that “About 3.4 bn (billion! E.B.) people – just over 70% of the global adult population – have wealth of less than $10,000.”  This wealth distribution is just the way that the Vatican geo political machine wants it.

While at least 80% of humanity lives on less than $10 a day, in 2008 for example, as a result of the global financial crisis known as “the great recession”, which came about due to reckless and criminal behavior of the financial “dinosaurs”, as Avro refers to the money fraternity, the banks were rewarded with taxpayer bailouts to their top executives to the tune of $1.6 billion.  Never in history have the masses been at the mercy of the corporate giants as we are now.  For instance, a 2013 report by consumer rights group Food and Water Watch found that no matter how many brands appear on the shelves, consumer dollars are going to the same massive companies (Kraft, PepsiCo, ConAgra Foods, Nestle, General Mills, Campbell Soup Co., etc.) when going shopping at the grocery store.  The Business Insider reported:

“Among 100 grocery categories, Food and Water Watch found that a handful of the largest companies control an average of 63.3% of the sales.  In 32 of those categories, 75% of the sales were controlled by four or fewer companies.  The report concludes that the average consumer is powerless against the companies controlling the grocery market, and that since the beginning of the Great Recession, grocery prices have risen up to twice as fast as inflation.”

The Catholic Church has been a natural ally for the massive corporations, for it should be remembered that the Catholic Church is the most ancient corporation on the planet.  She has by no means been feeling the economic hardships that the common man faces in this current paradigm where the corporations own everything.  As The National Post brought up in a 2013 article titled Wealth of Roman Catholic Church impossible to calculate, the wealth of the Catholic Church is so incredibly vast that it is really, truly, impossible to calculate.

As the article points out as of 2013, the Vatican owns 716,290,000 square kilometers of land all across the earth which is an area slightly bigger than the Canadian province of Alberta.  “These properties include Vatican embassies, churches, cathedrals, monasteries, some schools and convents.”  These are assets in hard cash and are tax exempt!

A given Catholic school has an accrued real estate value alone at over $25 million (that being the average construction cost for a school as of 2015).  Just in the United States then (not including the rest of the world) the 7,498 Catholic schools as of 2006-07 serve the Vatican as immense financial assets that run into the billions of dollars; let alone the real estate value of the thousands of Catholic hospitals!!

“The number of Catholic-owned or affiliated hospitals in the United States has grown by 22 percent since 2001, and now 1 in 6 acute care beds is in a hospital connected to the church, according to a report released by MergerWatch.  The watchdog group found that due to mergers and acquisitions over the past 15 years, 14.5 percent of all acute care hospitals in the nation are now either owned by or affiliated with the Catholic church, according to the study.  In 10 U.S. states, the number of Catholic hospitals is more than 30 percent.”  (Number of Catholic hospitals in US has grown 22% since 2001, FierceHealthcare.com)

Now to quote an excerpt from the 2013 MergerWatch report titled Miscarriage of Medicine: The Growth of Catholic Hospitals and the Threat to Reproductive Health Care, we see the Catholic health system rapidly expanding:

“In 2011, Catholic Health Initiatives (CHI) was the country’s fifth largest health system and second largest non-profit health system.”

“Between 2001 and 2011, the number of CHI hospitals grew from 50 to 64 and its Medicare gross patient revenues ballooned from $2.7 billion to $12.2 billion.  This giant Catholic-sponsored health system continues to grow.  In May 2013, for example, CHI completed a $2 billion acquisition of St. Luke’s Episcopal Health System in Texas, which included six acute-care hospitals in the Houston-metro area, as well as three emergency care centers, two medical clinics, and two diagnostic and treatment centers.  Catholic health care restrictions now apply in all of these historically non-Catholic facilities.  CHI is also now the majority sponsor of Kentucky One Health, Kentucky’s largest health system, formed in 2012 by the merger of two local health systems, Jewish Hospital & St. Mary’s Healthcare and St. Joseph Health System.”

“The University of Louisville Hospital joined the system in early 2013 in an arrangement that ‘carved out’ governance of its Center for Women and Infants, thus protecting it as a secular health care provider, but subjected the rest of the hospital and its 2,600 employees to Catholic restrictions on delivery of medical care.  Today, because of the addition of new hospitals since 2011, CHI has 87 acute-care hospitals in 17 states, approximately 88,000 employees, and annual operating revenues of more than $10 billion.  Like Ascension (the biggest Catholic health system in the world), CHI has a powerful position in the marketplace as well as the ability to influence health policy.”

“Modern Healthcare has included CHI’s President and CEO Kevin Lofton 10 times on its list of the 100 most influential people in health care.  CHI established an online Advocacy Action Center in 2007, ‘designed to make the collective voice of Catholic Health Initiatives heard in the nation’s capital … [and] to participate in key advocacy efforts by communicating with legislators.’”

The report noted that in 2011 Catholic hospitals billed the U.S. government $115 billion, the funds being coughed up primarily by non-Catholic taxpayers.

• • • •

The Catholic Church is a unique religious institution compared to other faiths in the sense that she teaches she alone holds the keys to truth and salvation, and therefore all other cultures, faiths, philosophies etc. are errors and false.  It was the super reactionary Pope Pius IX who drafted his famous Syllabus of Errors in 1864, in which the Pope declares himself nothing less than the king of the world and the Catholic Church the only true religion.  The United States is the primary country of study in Avro Manhattan’s 1957 book The Dollar and the Vatican.  In the United States constitution, the first amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”

The reader will see that this completely clashes with the fundamental basis of the Catholic doctrine, that being that the Pope is a non-earthly ruler; he actually rules from his divine-celestial-ethereal kingdom and therefore has absolute sovereignty and dominion over all earthly kingdoms and governments, for it was Christ himself who said “my kingdom is not of this world”, and the Pope claims to be the Vicar of Christ.

In the infamous syllabus we find such ideas condemned as heresy “Besides the power inherent in the episcopate (office of a bishop), other temporal power has been attributed to it by the civil authority granted either explicitly or tacitly, which on that account is revocable by the civil authority whenever it thinks fit.”  This is the absolute polar opposite from the principle that the Church and State ought to be separated; other condemned ideas in the syllabus include “The sacred ministers of the Church and the Roman pontiff are to be absolutely excluded from every charge and dominion over temporal affairs”.  It would be a very dangerous mistake to think that the Catholic hierarchy does not believe in this today.

Pope Leo XIII declared in his 1885 papal encyclical Immortale Dei, that democracy is the rule of the mob:

“Divine rule (Catholic rule, [E.B.]) is passed over in silence…as if there could be any government whose whole cause, power and authority was not vested in God (The Pope, [E.B.]) himself.  In this manner, as we see, the State is nothing else than a MOB as its own master and governor.”

The Pope is none other than God himself in Catholic doctrine:

“The Pope, then, is as a sun in the world, illuminating, with his rays, the politics of other princes.  For, when he declares a ‘reform’ to be un-Christian, every other ruler may see that it is bad.  When he proclaims that a principle is false, every other prince must shun it as deceptive… We must conclude then that priests must enter into politics.”  (Lord Robert Montagu, On some popular errors concerning politics and Religion, 1876, pg. 215, 232)

“The supreme Pontiff, by divine right, has the fullest power over the whole world both in ecclesiastical and in political matters.” (Cardinal Bellarmine Opera, Tom. I. De Romano Pontifice, L.v. C.i. Col. 887. A. Colonise, 1620, cited in Stamp’s edition of Elliotts Delineations of Romanism, pg. 707.)

Continuing…

“The Pope is bound by no forms of law; his pleasure is law”;

“The Pope makes right of that which is wrong, and can change the nature of things”;

“The Pope is all and over all; he can change square things into round.”  (The Christian World: The magazine of the American and Foreign Christian Union, Volume 21,1870, pg. 265)

If the Pope can “change the nature of things” and “can change square things into round” then surely he has the power of a god.  To summarize the anti-freedom, anti-reason, anti-logic and anti-democratic Papal doctrine I quote from the book Jesuit Political Thought, authored by Harro Hopfl, published by Cambridge University Press, pages 350/351.

It is important to remember that the Jesuit order a.k.a The Society of Jesus (S.J.) themselves are a strictly international military order who report to their general in Rome (The Black Pope) who is an absolute autocratic ruler whom the Jesuits view as Jesus Christ himself in the flesh. (R.W Thompson, The Footprints of the Jesuits, pg. 58)

The Jesuits like the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency), are referred to as “the company” and they were initially created in 1534 by “Saint” Ignatius of Loyola to combat the reformation which involved re-subjugating all the thrones of the world back to the Vatican.  Anyone can search “Jesuitism” in Webster 1828 dictionary and will find:

“1. Cunning, deceit; hypocrisy; prevarication; deceptive practices to effect a purpose…”

Loyola, in his Spiritual Exercises wrote:

“We should always be disposed to believe that that which appears white is really black, if the hierarchy of the Church so decides.”

A former CIA officer E. Howard Hunt, who is most famous for his role in the Watergate burglaries alongside Jesuit educated devout Catholic, G. Gordon Liddy, and his role on the ground in the 1954 coup d’etat in Guatemala said in an interview in the documentary A Coup Made in America which aired on Canadian television series Turning Points of History in 1998, speaking on his role in the coup d’etat in Guatemala in 1954, now widely publicized on the internet that:

“We had gotten the okay from Cardinal Spellman to go ahead with this… and I wouldn’t presume to trace the lines of authority within the Catholic Church… how they get their information they deal with… We’ve always said in an admiring way that the Jesuits form the Greatest Intelligence service in the world and always have.”

Now to summarize the doctrine of the pope’s infallibility in spiritual and temporal matters:

“As Molina (Luis de Molina S.J.) stated the doctrine: the spiritual potestas of the Supreme Pontiff … has joined to it, as it were by entailment (quasi ex consequenti), the supreme and most extensive (amplissimam) power of temporal jurisdiction (potestatem iurisdictionis temporalis) over all princes and others who belong to the Church, precisely to the degree demanded by the supernatural end for which the spiritual potestas is ordained.  If this supernatural end demands it, the Supreme Pontiff can depose kings, and deprive them of their kingdoms (or kingships: regnis).  He can also judge between them in temporal matters, invalidate their laws and do among Christians whatever else is judged necessary to the supernatural end and the common spiritual welfare (salutem), not in any way whatsoever, but according to the judgement of the prudent; and to that end he may use compulsion consisting not only of ecclesiastical censures, but also external punishments, and force of arms, in a manner no different to any other prince, although for the most part it is expedient that the Supreme Pontiff should not do such things himself, but have them done by secular princes.  And for this reason it is rightly said that the Pope has both swords.  According to Bellarmine’s (“Saint” Robert Bellarmine, S.J.) formulation: ‘The pontiff as pontiff does not have any temporal authority directly and immediately, but only a spiritual authority; however in virtue of this spiritual authority he does have a certain indirect authority, and that a supreme one, in temporal matters (indirectam potestatem quamdam, eamque summam, in temporalibus).’”

“The potestas was ‘in ordine ad bonum spirituale’.  Suarez’s (Francisco Suarez S.J.) version was: ´The Supreme Pontiff, by virtue of his spiritual authority or jurisdiction (ex vi potestatis seu iurisdictionis), is superior to kings and temporal rulers, so that he may direct them in the exercise of their temporal authority in order to the spiritual end; by reason of this he can command or forbid any such use of this [temporal] authority, demand it or prevent it, to the extent that it is expedient for the spiritual good of the Church.”  (Jesuit Political Thought)

This doctrine of the Pope being God is still followed today.  Witness U.S. President George W. Bush, who said in an interview with Raymond Arroyo April 11th, 2008:

Arroyo: Mr. President, final question.

President Bush: Yes, sir.

Arroyo: You said, famously, when you looked into Vladimir Putin’s

eyes you saw his soul.

President Bush: Yes.

Arroyo: When you look into Benedict XVI’s eyes what do you see?

President Bush: God.

Arroyo: Good way to end the interview.

President Bush: Thank you.

George Bush had an interesting choice of words for the global war on terrorism (which like the red witch hunts back in the 20th century serves as a bogeyman for the advancement of military spending and police state measures) when giving a speech at the White House lawn on September 17th, 2001; just 6 days after the September 11^th attacks.  “This crusade…This war on terror…is gunna take awhile”—and of course the crusades are of the identity of the Roman Catholic Church in her historical quest to Catholicize the whole world.  Cardinal Timothy Dolan, the current archbishop of New York, hinted at the doctrine of papal supremacy when he said at the 2016 inauguration ceremony of U.S. president Donald Trump “God of our ancestors and lord of mercy you have made all things and in your providence you have charged us to rule the creatures produced by you”.  Dolan like most American archbishops lives in a multi-million dollar mansion—15,000-square-feet to be exact on Madison Avenue appraised at over $30 million.  An illustrated 2014 CNN article titled The lavish homes of American archbishops shows “Records reveal that 10 of the country’s top church leaders defy the Pope’s example and live in residences worth more than $1 million.”

The influence of the Pope is in worldly affairs as a supreme sovereign is still practiced today as much as it was in the days of Pope Boniface VIII, whom in his Papal Bull Unam Sanctum (November 18, 1302) pontificated from his celestial kingdom:

“Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff.”

This influence was seen when a statue of Pope Innocent X overlooked the signing of the new E.U.  (European Union) constitution at Capitoline Hill, Rome (October 29, 2004).

A very ominous choice for the statue, as Pope Innocent X, who was Pope during the height of the Thirty Years War—used all his divine powers to ensure that the harmony which existed between Catholic and Protestant layman alike would cease at once as the war was winding down.

“The condition of Germany was, indeed, pitiable, but so much the more profound was the universal joy when this lust of murder was at length sated, and the hearts of the princes turned to peace consummation, finally achieved by the treaties of Osnabruck and Munster, under conditions honourable alike for both the parties to it.  Perhaps in all Europe there was but one man who did not rejoice at this; that one was Pope Innocent X., who, after causing his legate to enter formal protest against the preliminaries of the peace then under discussion at Osnabruck, next issued a Bull (November 26th, 1648), denouncing the good understanding just secured between Catholics and Protestants as contrary to religion, an infringement of the papal prerogatives, therefore invalid, vain, and damnable, declaring the treaty was null and void alike, with regard to the past, present and future, and that it behooved no one, though he had taken the most solemn oath upon it, to hold thereto, either in the whole, or in any particular…”

“He cursed what all men blessed.”  (The Mysteries of the Vatican, Theodor Griesinger, 1864, pg. 98)

Now to briefly analyze some of the financial intrigue of some of the priestly orders of the Catholic Church—for this preface I will just look at the Jesuit order.  To analyze all of the various religious order’s financial intrigues would surely require a full book.  It becomes very hypocritical, that the various orders priests and especially Jesuit priests take an oath and a vow of poverty when Jesuits can see be seen on the boards of the world’s biggest financial conglomerates.

To quickly summarize some of the historical significance of the order, The Jesuits have had a very peculiar relationship with the United States, and are known as “The Shock Troops of the Catholic Church” (G. Gordon Liddy) and “The Pope’s Marines” (Pat Buchanan).

Jesuit priests can be found among the relatives of the Presidents of the United States.  Witness Father Andrew Monroe S.J., a brother of President James Monroe, and Robert Francis Taft S.J., who was a younger cousin of President William Howard Taft.  The reactionary secretary of state (1981-1982), and supreme commander of NATO (1974-1979) Alexander Haig, who went back and forth from the mega corporate sphere making millions at United Aircraft, to crusading for the pope via formulating U.S. foreign policy—was a Knight of Malta, educated by the Jesuits at Georgetown University, and had a Jesuit priest as a brother, Frank Haig S.J.  The controversial Allen Dulles (director of the CIA) and his brother John Foster(Secretary of State) whom of both, much has been written about, had a Jesuit in the family, Avery Dulles S.J., (son of John Foster, nephew of Allan) George Washington himself is said to have called a Jesuit priest to his deathbed, that being Leonard Neale S.J.  The story may have veracity to it, as the first mayor of Washington D.C., Robert Brent, was the nephew of the Jesuit priest John Carroll S.J., and a devout Catholic.  Mayor Brent’s uncle John Carroll S.J. has been almost deified in Jesuit circles, and was the founder of the orders Georgetown University.  Brent was quite a “dinosaur” himself as he became the first president of the Patriotic Bank and of the Columbia Manufacturing Co.

James Roosevelt Bayley, a former Archbishop Of Newark, who was an older cousin of American Presidents Theodore and Franklin Roosevelt, wasn’t a Jesuit himself, but he was educated at St John’s College which would become Jesuit Fordham University.  Archbishop John Hughes of New-York (mentioned in chapter 2 of The Dollar and the Vatican) was the founder of St. John’s College which would become Fordham.  Going all the way back to the year 1832 there was a Jesuit priest Charles Constantine Pise S.J. (who was close friends with U.S. President John Tyler) who was serving as the chaplain to the United States senate (The only Catholic priest to do so to this very day).  Many Americans would probably be surprised to find out that a Jesuit Priest, Daniel A. Lord S.J., drafted the Hollywood motion picture code in 1930.(Avro Manhattan covers the Vatican concocted terror via Hollywood censorship at length in Chapter 12).

The Jesuit Daniel A. Lord S.J. in his autobiography Played By Ear: The Autobiography of Daniel A. Lord, S.J. writes:

“My own connection with the code was kept almost unexplainably secret.  It surprised me a little that none of the gossip columnists of the day made it a point.  I was much relieved that bigotry got no chance to scorn the code because it was the product of a Jesuit.  I agreed completely with the policy of silence, and for years never mentioned my authorship except in Hollywood, the Hays office in New York, or among close friends…It belonged to the industry and it was better that way” …

“It was an impressive group of leaders who gathered round the luncheon table for my presentation of the code.  Mr. Hays himself presided.”

“Mr. Martin Quigley (Knight of Malta, Knight of Saint Gregory the Great, E.B.) could feel that the moment was largely of his management.”

“I came with the code in my hand, and instructions to take half an hour to present it as only the actual author of the written document could do.”

There are even 35 moon craters named after Jesuit Priests!  (The 35 Lunar Craters Named to Honor Jesuit Scientists, Faculty.Fairfield.edu)

• • • •

Now to highlight the Jesuits intrigue in current massive corporations we start with Jesuit Priest, Chris Lowney, S.J., who entered a Jesuit seminary and was educated at Fordham University (The Jesuit University in New York City) who became a top executive at one of the world’s largest banks while being a Jesuit Priest—supposedly bound to a oath of poverty.  Lowney currently chairs the board of the health giant Catholic Health Initiatives.  He left the Jesuit seminary in 1983 to work at the Investment Bank J.P. Morgan Chase (1983-2001).  While at J.P. Morgan, the Jesuit was an investment banker to Fortune 1000 companies, and a managing director in Tokyo and Singapore, where he served on Morgan’s Asia-Pacific management committee.  (Heroic Leadership: Best Practices from a 450-Year-Old Company That Changed the World, Chris Lowney S.J)

Later, as a managing director in London, the Jesuit Lowney served on J.P. Morgan’s Europe, Mideast, and Africa management committee.

Perhaps J.P. Morgan is hiring Catholic priests because John Pierpont Morgan Sr., the financial titan, (1837-1913) was friendly to the Catholic cause.  Morgan was knighted into the Order of Saints Maurice and Lazarus, which is a “Roman Catholic dynastic order of knighthood bestowed by the House of Savoy, founded in 1572 by Emmanuel Philibert, Duke of Savoy, through amalgamation approved by Pope Gregory XIII”.

Mary Callahan Erdoes, the current CEO of J.P. Morgan Asset & Wealth Management ($2.8 Trillion in client assets), who is also a member of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.’s Operating Committee, is a devout Catholic and was educated at Jesuit Georgetown University.  Erdoes is on the board of the Catholic Alfred E.  Smith Memorial Foundation, and she attends the “Al Smith Dinner” for the Catholic elite regularly.

• • • •

Leo O’Donovan S.J., another Jesuit priest, who was the president of Georgetown University, joined the board of directors at Disney in 1996.  The Jesuit had close relations with the company before joining the board, Quoting from a 1996 article in the Washington Post titled Leo O’Donovan, Disney’s Provocative Choice we read:

“O’Donovan’s connection to the Walt Disney Co. dates to 1989, when he was inducted as Georgetown’s president and Disney Chairman Michael Eisner, whose son was a Georgetown student at the time, served on the college’s board.  The two became friends, and O’Donovan has served as an unofficial adviser to Eisner for several years.  Eisner holds O’Donovan in high esteem.  ‘He is just a wise, renaissance, all-purpose, creative, educated man.  And besides that, he has a perspective on things that bring diversity to the board,’ Eisner said in a telephone interview last week.  Eisner said he wanted to ask O’Donovan to join Disney’s board earlier, but there were no openings.”

“When Disney’s acquisition of Capital Cities/ABC Inc.  was completed in February, two new board positions were added, one of which Eisner asked O’Donovan to fill.”

O’Donovan while being appointed to the board of Disney was on the board of the Riggs National Bank.

“Riggs would be embroiled in the most extensive money-laundering scandal in modern banking, fined $25 million and damaged so severely that it would be forced into a merger.”  (The Washington Post)

The Scandal was due to Riggs Bank courting business from former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet, whom happened to be a devout Catholic, and was placed into power by a coup d’etat by the CIA and Henry Kissinger in 1973.

Kissinger became a professor at Jesuit Georgetown University in 1977.

Riggs Bank, while the Jesuit Leo O’Donovan S.J. was on the board, helped Pinochet hide millions of dollars in assets from international prosecutors while he was under house arrest in Britain.  Riggs merged with PNC financial as a result of the scandal.  It was by no means though the only scandal the bank had to endure however while the Jesuit Leo O’Donovan, S.J. was on the board:

“President Obiang of Equatorial Guinea ‘siphoned millions from his country’s treasury with the help of Riggs Bank in Washington, D.C.’  For this a Riggs account executive, Simon Kareri, was indicted.”

“But Obiang enjoyed State Department approval for a contract with the private U.S. military firm M.P.R.I., with an eye to defending offshore oil platforms owned by ExxonMobil, Marathon, and Hess.”  (The American Deep State, Deep Events, and Off-the-Books Financing, Peter Dale Scott, The Asia-Pacific Journal, Volume 12, Issue 14, Number 3, Apr 06, 2014)

These two Jesuits seen above (Lowney & O’Donovan) were earning their million dollar plus salaries tax free.

“If a bishop is a Jesuit or a Franciscan, he is sacerdotal religious and any income received by him is transferred to the Order, which then takes care of his personal needs.  If diocesan or secular, he is permitted to own property and could conceivably be required to pay taxes.  A Jesuit could, therefore, serve as president of a bank and receive a salary of $500,000 without being required to pay income or Social Security taxes; nor would he be under the necessity of filing any income-tax return at all.” (The Religious Empire : The Growth and Danger of Tax-Exempt Property in the United States, Martin A. Larson, C. Stanley Lowell, 1976, pg. 24)

• • • •

To briefly cover more Jesuit intrigue in the financial world in an interview for a French news documentary, Goldman Sachs: The Bank That Runs The World, Steve Bannon, who served as Donald Trump’s chief white house strategist for the first 7 months of his term, was educated at Georgetown, and is a big financial “dinosaur” himself, compared joining the Goldman Sachs bank to joining the Jesuits!

“Interviewer: What did Goldman Sachs represent for you?”

“Steve Bannon: Goldman Sachs represented excellence and meritocracy.”

“It didn’t matter where you came from, it didn’t matter what school you went to, what your religion was or what was your ethnicity.”

“It just mattered how hard you worked, how smart you were, and how good a banker you were for your clients.  It was really like joining the Jesuits.  This seems antiquated today, it was before the financialization, it was before all these quants and mathematicians really came to Wall Street.”  (STEVE BANNON SAYS JOINING GOLDMAN SACHS IS LIKE ‘JOINING THE JESUITS’ Shadowproof.com)

A couple of Jesuit alumni appear on the board of directors at Goldman Sachs as of 2019.  Board members include: Peter Oppenheimer (Santa Clara University), former executive vice president and CFO at Apple, and Lakshi Mittal (St. Xavier’s College, Calcutta), who is the founder of Mittal Steel Company and Chairman and CEO of ArcelorMittal S.A., the world’s leading integrated steel and mining company.  Timothy O’Neill, who is Global Co-Head of the Investment Management Division at Goldman Sachs and serves on the Management Committee is a member of the board of directors at Jesuit Georgetown University.  Der Spiegel, the German magazine, wrote an article on August 8th, 1958 on the Vatican’s financial shareholding activities titled The Major Shareholder and have some very revealing information on the Jesuits financial activities, we read:

“The influence of the Society of Jesus in the American financial world first became apparent fifty years ago, when Italian financier AP Giannini (Knight of Malta, E.B.) founded the Bank of California, which today is one of the largest banks in the world under the new name Bank of America.  Giannini was an extremely skillful financier who owed his starting capital to the Jesuits and figured as their trust or straw man.”

“Today, Bank of America is 51 percent owned by the Order.  In San Francisco, the Society of Jesus financed another Italian financier, the Sicilian Antonio Di Giorgio, who founded the politically influential fruit company ‘Di Giorgio Fruit Company’.  The group owns extensive fruit and banana plantations in Central America and a transport fleet of more than 100 ships.  The Jesuits are also involved in the major U.S. steel companies Republic Steel and National Steel, as well as in the four major U.S. aircraft plants: Boeing, Lockheed, Douglas and Curtiss-Wright.”

“They also control the independent petroleum company ‘Phillips Oil Co.’ in Galveston, Texas, and the Creole Petroleum Co., which has extensive concessions in South American Venezuela.  Until American companies launched competitor companies in South America a few years ago, the Society of Jesus also had a monopoly on mercury.  In fact, in 1923, the Order’s financial experts managed to seize all the shares of Almaden’s famous Spanish mercury mines held by the Madrid bank Banco Hispano-Americano.  From the point of view of stock market history, it was a masterly coup, for the Jesuits beat America’s largest chemical concern DuPont de Nemours out of the field; who also wanted to acquire the Almaden shares.  The founder of this trust, Alfred II DuPont de Nemours; said then: ‘I have had a great experience, one should never argue with priests, especially with Jesuits.’”

(The lawyer for the DuPonts during the 1934 munitions hearings was none other than “Wild Bill” Donovan, the devout staunch Catholic, who was head of the Office of Strategic Services.  Donovan was made a Knight of Saint Sylvester in 1944, and was a Knight of Malta.  Avro Manhattan has great information on the treasonous behavior of the DuPonts scattered throughout The Dollar and the Vatican, E.B.)

“In 1932, the Jesuits acquired the Tuscan mercury mines in Italy, which, together with Almaden, supplied the world market almost exclusively until a few years ago.  During the Second World War, the Order earned on both sides with this armor-important resource.  While the Spanish company supplied mainly to the Allies and Russia, the Italian mines supplied the German armaments.  In France, the interests of the Society of Jesus extend to the car companies Peugeot and Citroen and the ‘Banque de Paris et des Pays-Bas’, the numerous companies in France, Belgium and Holland, such as Schneider-Creusot, but also the casino controlled by Ostend.  The Jesuits also have a decisive influence on the Paris Bancque Francaise et Italienne for l’Amerique du Sud, in whose supervisory board again the Vatican financial expert Nogara appears; this financial institution virtually dominates the South American coffee market and the New York coffee exchange.  The assets of the Order are, however, largely in the hands of the American Jesuits, who are economically independent of Rome and do not wish the Holy See to have direct control over their possessions.”

The Jesuits as far as the current writer is aware have never denied these allegations made by Der Spiegel.  The Boston College CEO’S Club is additional evidence of the close relationship between the Vatican and big business.  Boston College is one of the 28 Jesuit Universities/Colleges in the United States.  Quoting from the website of the Club:

“The keynote speakers at these events are CEOs drawn from the top echelons of their fields – thought leaders who welcome the opportunity to address an audience of their peers.  Among the recent speakers are Disney’s Bob Iger, Nike’s Mark Parker, and IBM’s Virginia Rometty.”

Some other recent speakers at the Jesuit university include:

• Brian T. Moynihan,Chairman & CEO of Bank of America (November 8, 2018).
• Alfred F. Kelly, Jr., CEO Visa Inc. (September 27, 2018).
• Lloyd Blankfein, Chairman & CEO, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (March 22, 2018).
• Randall Stephenson, Chairman, President & CEO, AT&T (February 15, 2018).
• Klaus Schwab, Founder & Executive Chairman, World Economic Forum (September 22, 2017). Etc.

Staying in the microcosm of Boston, it is evident when looking at the list of the members of the financial council at the Boston Archdiocese (some listed below) of how close the relationship between the Catholic Church and the corporate machine is.  Now multiply this influence by the thousands, as there are thousands of archdioceses with a vast investment platform (New York, Chicago, San Francisco, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Los Angeles etc.) with equally far reaching financial councils.  Then one can begin to see the covert influence the Vatican can excerpt.  Let alone the Catholic schools (in particular Jesuit schools) that have an incredible amount of connections to thousands of massive corporations through the members of the board of directors/trustees, and through donations that they receive from large corporations.

For example, from looking at the 2017 Annual report of the General Electric Foundation, it is seen that General Electric gave out over $3 million to various Catholic charities, schools, organizations and Jesuit schools in 2017.  John L. Flannery, current CEO/Chairman of General Electric, was educated by Jesuits at Fairfield University and is a devout Catholic.  Catholic hospitals, Catholic lawyer guilds, Catholic foundations, etc. also need to be included in the overall influence that the Vatican exerts to the corporate sphere though the boards of trustees.  Here are just a few of the names, off of the financial council at the Boston Archdiocese (2017):

• His Eminence Sean P. Cardinal O’Malley, OFM, Cap., Chair
• John H. McCarthy, CPA, Vice Chair Senior Advisor to the President, Northeastern University
• Paul Hanley, CP Partner, Pricewaterhouse Coopers, L.L.C.
• Kimberly Y. Jones, Esq., Athena Legal Strategies Group
• Robert M. Mahoney, President and CEO, Belmont Savings Bank
• George E. Massaro, Vice-Chairman, Huron Consulting Group, L.L.C.
• Sean P. McGrath, Stonegate Group, L.L.C.
• Robert J. Morrissey, Partner, Morrissey, Hawkins & Lynch
• Kevin C. Phelan, Co-Chairman, Colliers International
• Mary L. Ryan, CEO, Thompson Steel Company
• Paul W. Sandman, Esquire, Board of Directors, PDL BioPharma
• John E. Straub, Chancellor, RCAB
• Most Reverend Peter J. Uglietto, V.G. Vicar General, Moderator of the Curia, etc.

Catholic Priests also act as lobbyists and can attract billions of dollars to covert intelligence projects.  Witness Father Felix Morlion, a Belgian Dominican priest who founded the Catholic intelligence organization Pro Deo.  The devout Catholic William “Wild Bill” Donovan made a pact with Father Felix Morlion to merge their intelligence apparatus’s together.  When the Nazis took control of western Europe, Donovan helped Morlion move his propaganda operations from Lisbon to New York.  Avro Manhattan in his 1985 book Murder and the Vatican briefly mentions this relationship.

“During World War II, in July 1944, for instance, Pope Pius XII decorated General William Donovan with the Grand Cross of the Order of St. Sylvester, a reward given only to 100 other men, ‘who by outstanding deed…championed the Church.’  The significance of the reward was in the fact that Donovan had served as a chief of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the wartime predecessor of the Central Intelligence Agency, or CIA.  Early in the war, in 1941, Donovan had already forged an alliance with the founder of a Catholic intelligence agency, called Pro Deo.  The two agencies collaborated during and after the war, to such an extent that eventually they amalgamated.”

“This resulted in the de facto integration of the CIA and of the Vatican intelligence, into a global USA-Vatican apparatus, whose operations now encompassed the globe.  The amalgamation operated in favour of the advancement of the Catholic Church in the political fields, at home and abroad.  And indeed, in joint USA-Vatican promotion of their respective objectives.  It helped in the promotion of Presidential candidates in the USA, and in the promotion of potential papal candidates in the Vatican.  The Vatican-CIA spying operations have assessed both Presidents and Popes, during the past three decades, and acted accordingly.”

• • • •

Father Morlion’s financial intrigues are shown in a declassified letter of the Inter-American Development Bank (The bank of the Organization of American States (OAS)), dated April 11th 1966.  The letter is from Grayton Upton, an executive vice President of the Bank, to Walter Rostow, special assistant to the Jesuit educated U.S. President Lyndon Johnson.  The subject heading on the letter is revealing in itself: “Father Morlion and Program, of Catholic Church for Indoctrination of Latin American Priests in Divulgation of Principles of U.S. Free Enterprise System.”  Parts of Grayton Upton’s letter to Walter Rostow include:

“You will recollect the lunch here at the Bank a few weeks ago with Father Morlion.  I now enclose a description of what he is doing.  I personally consider this matter of the utmost importance to U.S. Policy makers for Latin America, and ask you to give it the most serious study.”

“I first met Father Morlion at the Caracas meeting of CICYP last year.”

“There he gave a short talk in which he said, in effect, that after a year or so of letting the priesthood in Latin America follow their own ideas with respect to economics (and politics) the Pope had decided to make a major effort to indoctrinate them in the concepts of the free enterprise system and to insist that they take an active role in teaching these concepts.”

“The chief mechanism for this is the International University for Social Studies Pro Deo in Rome, which I understand must in the future be attended by any Latin American Priest before he rises to a higher level in the Catholic hierarchy.  In addition the various economic and social directives which will be issued to the Church in Latin America.”

Continuing “In effect what Father Morlion now wishes to obtain is the following:

1.) A serious review of, and orientation in, this whole effort by the U.S. Government (I understand that Ambassador Reinhardt is well informed on the matter.)

2.) The strong moral backing of the U.S. Government, in a discreet fashion, of this effort.  In this respect, as a first step, he wants to arrange a lunch in which you both, and hopefully Lincoln Gordon, would be present, with as many of the U.S. Directors as possible, where you would indicate the moral support of the U.S. Government for this effort — a support which would hopefully contribute towards substantial private contributions from U.S. business.

3.) An investigation of the possibility of financial support for this effort by the U.S. Government through an appropriate agency”.

The banker Grayton Upton notes:

“For obvious reasons, efforts have been made to date to give no publicity to the program” and says in conclusion “PS: I understand that commitments have already been received for contributions from business of $250M (250 Million)and that Father Morlion expects this to be increased to $1MM (1 Billion) in the next few weeks.”

Father Felix Morlion sent Grayton Upton a correspondence (April 6th, 1966) five days previous the letter quoted above from Upton to Walter Rostow:

“Mr. Grayton Upton Executive Vice President Inter-American Development Bank 808 17th Street Washington, D.C.”

“Dear Friend,”

“Here with the second draft improved on the basis of your suggestions.”

“If you think the matter is sufficiently clear, you might send to Mr. Mann, Mr. Gordon, Mr. Rostov photostats of this so that they can tell you which day — they could eventually meet with a few businessmen to conclude the first phase.  Mr. Huerdemat or another assistant can eventually make some further improvements after phoning me.”

“Before the middle of next week, I hope to tell you what first payments are made by some of the business leaders approached.  As you can imagine, the Rome authorities are waiting for my return at the end of the month to start preparations in practice.  I want to thank you again in the name of my high Roman friends for the inspiration you gave me in Caracas and the help so generously these days.  We will need very much that you should repeat your speech of Caracas in one of our Rome symposia, possibly in the Autumn.”

“Totus tuus Pro Deo”

“Felix A. Morlion”

“Pres., Intern. Pro Deo University”

These funds would go fund repressive dictatorial regimes all over South America to maintain the socio-economic-religious status quo.

For instance in Paraguay:

“Gran Chaco Ayoreo (Moro) and Tomarxa Indians were forced to choose between surrender and peonage or fighting the advance of the frontier of General Alfredo Stroessner’s dictatorship, which boasted census figures showing that 52 percent of the country’s arable land belonged to 145 owners.  There were Indian raids on settlements along the Trans-Chaco Highway financed with U.S. money under sponsorship of the Inter-American Development Bank.”  (Thy Will Be Done: The Conquest Of The Amazon, Nelson Rockefeller And Evangelism In The Age Of Oil, Gerard Colby, Charlotte Dennett, 1995, pg 680).

Cardinal Francis Spellman, who himself was known as “cardinal moneybag”, was very close to the dictatorship of Alfredo Stroessner.

“Spellman landed in Paraguay, where he warmly greeted the dictator Alfredo Stroessner, who had recently affected A military coup.”

“Unlike military dictatorships in Brazil and Chile that at least paid up service to helping the people, Stroessner made no pretenses.  His military and police were rewarded with graft, contraband and the spoils of lucrative narcotics and prostitution trades.  Upon his arrival Spellman went to the general’s residence, where he publicly proclaimed what a pleasure it was to be in ‘the ancient Catholic country of Paraguay.’”

“Stroessner, who desired just such a blessing for his regime, thanked the Cardinal profusely…”

“The C.I.A., like the F.B.I., turned to Spellman because of his connections and his prestige throughout Latin nations, where he helped churchmen with money and political advice and rebuked them on occasion…Spellman was an avowed supporter of the controversial dictatorships that the American government backed.  The Cardinal was wined and dined by Batista in Cuba, Trujillo in the Dominican Republic, Stroessner in Paraguay and Somoza in Nicaragua, and he accepted their many honors and blessed their regimes.”  (The American Pope, John Cooney, pg. 232, 233)

Spellman was very influential in the world of the big financial dinosaurs:

“The Catholic Church never had a greater executive than Cardinal Spellman”, said Jonah J. Goldstein, a Republican politician in New York.  “If there was a merger of AT&T, U.S. Steel, Westinghouse.”

“General Electric, and General Motors—and if you were asked to pick a president of that merged corporation, and he was not a priest—I’d suggest Francis Spellman.”  (Ibid, pg. 98)

What the Cardinal was referring to above by when saying “the ancient Catholic country of Paraguay” were the reduction camps that were set up in Paraguay by the Jesuits in the early 1600’s.  Spellman himself was educated by the Jesuits at Fordham University.  These reductions were essentially communist work camps where the local Indians were placed into a state of profound ignorance by the Jesuit fathers, whom they began to look upon as their spiritual masters.  The ideals and tenets of communism ruled the reductions whereby the Jesuit fathers replaced the secular state in the communist model, and thereby owned all of the property in the reductions as the state owns everything in a communist dictatorship.  It is rather intriguing then that Karl Marx was himself a pupil of the Jesuits for five years at the Jesuit high school in Trier, at that time known as the Friedrich-Wilhelm Gymnasium (Biography.com, Karl Marx).  The amount of money that the Jesuits made as a result of these reduction camps in Paraguay was enormous.

“There could not, however, be the slightest doubt that the profit was something enormous, as their dominion of Paraguay alone gave them annually over four millions of ducats, as is shown by an official report of the Portuguese Governor-General of the town of Potosi, Don Mathia de Anglose Gortari, written in the year 1731.  The said Governor, who had received from his Government orders to make the most minute investigation on all sides, found the country to be divided into thirty-six parishes, or reductions, and each of these comprehended in itself 10,000 families; in all of them, however, there existed so great a surplus of stores and produce that a single reduction was alone in a condition to supply six others for the whole year.  Even the smallest of their reductions possessed their 40,000 or 50,000 head of oxen and cows, and the larger and richer ones of them not less than double that quantity.  In consequence of this the Jesuits were enabled to export yearly to Spain about 300,000 hides of cattle, each of which was sold for six piastres or more, and the trade in leather brought in even as much.  The fields proved to be very productive, and all kinds of grain were grown upon them, as well, especially, as tobacco, sugar, and cotton, which latter the Indian women were required to spin and weave; all these articles were likewise transported to Europe, and cotton stuffs alone yielded an annual profit of 100,000 heavy piastres.  Everywhere were to be observed well-appointed workshops, and the Indians manufactured therein most beautiful gold and silver wares.”

“Moreover, there were numbers of locksmiths’ shops, and forges and foundries even were not wanting, in which cannon, mortars, and the like might be cast.  However, the latter manufactories were designed not so much for trade as for internal use; and the same remark also holds good as to manufactories of Arms.  A particularly extensive commerce took place, on the other hand, in the so-called Paraguay herb, and, as there was sale for it almost all over the world, it indeed brought a profit which was certainly as great as the gold and silver mines in other American countries…It was also to be remarked that in every parish considerable store-houses existed, in which the wares and land produce were stored until they could be conveyed to the great market-places of Santa Fe, Buenos Ayres, and Tacuman, either for sale or exportation, and from this it will be seen how exceedingly well the Jesuits understood the draining of their dominion of Paraguay.  Thus did Don Mathia de Anglose Gortari report concerning the Jesuits in Paraguay, and he calculated, as already remarked, the amount of their commercial trade at even more than ten millions of hard dollars annually.”  (The Jesuits: A Complete History of Their Open and Secret Proceedings from the Foundation of the Order to the Present Time, Theodor Griesinger, 1885, pg. 423, 424)

• • • •

Quoting from the 1967 annual report of the Inter-American Development Bank, we see the program of “Father Morlion and Program, of Catholic Church for Indoctrination of Latin American Priests in Divulgation of Principles of U.S. Free Enterprise System” being put to good use in Venezuela:

“Up to $55,000 of a $1.5 million loan extended Dec. 19 from the Fund for Special Operations to the Fundacion Andres Bello for a program of improvements at the Andres Bello Catholic University may be used to hire specialists to advise the School of Engineering on improvements in its curricula and studies programs.”

In Ecuador, from the 1970 annual report:

“With resources from the Populorum Progressio Fund, which the Bank administers for the Vatican, the Bank financed technical advice for studies to carry out agrarian reform programs in Ecuador on lands provided by the Catholic Church”.

The ancient military orders of the Vatican such as the Knights of Malta (SMOM), and the Knighthoods that have been erected since the Inquisitions and the crusades are influential as they have ever been in controlling the economic destiny of nations.  Many prominent financial “dinosaurs” as Avro Manhattan describes them, are indeed Knighted into papal orders of the Vatican, for example Rupert Murdoch, a non-Catholic (CEO/chairman of News Corporation).  In 2000, News Corporation owned over 800 companies in more than 50 countries.  Murdoch has a net worth of over $19 billion.  Quoting from the LA Times in an 1998 article we read:

“Pope John Paul II has awarded papal knighthood to comedian Bob Hope, news magnate Rupert Murdoch and entertainment executive Roy Disney—all non-Catholics—along with 64 prominent Los Angeles-area Catholics.  Among the Catholics named were actor Ricardo Montalban, longtime Los Angeles City Councilman John Ferraro and hotel executive Barron Hilton.”

Four more examples will suffice, these include:

1. Robert Shafer, who is the former senior public relations officer of Pfizer, ($52.5 billion revenue in 2017). Shafer is the Knights of Malta representative to the United Nations (where they have a permanent observer status). Shafer has a degree from Jesuit Georgetown University, and has also been the Chairman of the Catholic Convent of the Sacred Heart in Greenwich Connecticut.  Shafer is a director on the board of a number of mutual fund corporations; and is member of the Board of Regents at Catholic St. John’s University.
2. John Joseph Danilovich, who is currently Secretary General of the International Chamber of Commerce, which “is the largest, most representative business organization in the world”.

Danilovich is a Knight of Malta.  Prior to his current position Danilovich was United States Ambassador to Costa Rica (2001-2004), United States Ambassador to Brazil (2004-2005), and CEO of Millennium Challenge Corporation (2005-2009).

Danilovich also serves as a Director of the Stanford Trust, a Trustee of the American Museum in Britain , a Director of the U.S.-U.K. Fulbright Commission, a member of the Council of the Harvard School of Public Health, a member of The Council on Foreign Relations, and is a member of the American Academy of Diplomacy.

3. John Studzinski, who is Vice Chairman of Investor Relations and Business Development at the Blackstone Group (The World’s largest private equity firm), as well as Senior Managing Director of the Blackstone Group, where he holds “special responsibility for sovereign and institutional investor relationships.”

Studzinski is a Papal Knight of the Order of St. Gregory and a Knight Commander of Saint Sylvester.  Also at Blackstone there is Joseph Baratta, who is Global Head of Private Equity and a member of the firm’s Management Committee.  He also serves on many of the firm’s investment committees.  Baretta is on the board of directors at Jesuit Georgetown University, and was educated there.  Prior to joining Blackstone Group, Studzinski was at Morgan Stanley (1980-2003), and at HSBC (2003-2006), building mergers-and-acquisitions divisions in both of those institutions.

4. Thomas Stephen Monaghan, who is a Knight of Malta (SMOM) and is said to have strong connections to Opus Dei, founded Domino’s Pizza in 1960, and sold 93% of the stock it to Bain Capital for $1 billion. He also owned the Detroit Tigers (1983-1992). Monaghan also owns the Domino’s Farms Office Park.

In 1983 Monaghan established the Mater Christi Foundation, today known as the Ave Maria Foundation, to focus on “Catholic education, media, community projects and other charities.”

The foundation funds the Catholic Ave Maria School of Law.

In 1987 he helped form Legatus, an organization for Catholic CEOs of companies earning more than $4 million per year to promote and support “moral ethics in business in conformity with the teachings of the Roman Catholic church so that the lives of all can be enhanced”.  Legatus was to serve as a spiritual resource and social community for “top-ranking Catholic business leaders”.  Monaghan also helped to establish the Ave Maria Mutual Funds, “which is a U.S. mutual fund family that targets clients interested in financially sound investments in companies that do not violate certain religious principles of the Catholic Church.”  Reminds me of the old Spanish proverb: “Money is very Catholic.”  (“El dinero es muy Catolico”)

• • • •

This short look at the relationship with the forces behind high powered capitalism and the Vatican, would be incomplete without briefly going into sports, and how thoroughly controlled the “bread and circus games” are by the Vatican.  American sports alone are a multi-billion dollar industry, and are brilliant in distracting the masses from relevant geo political events.  An entire book could be written on how the Vatican and the big financial dinosaurs control all of the prosports leagues.  Limited space in this preface will suffice looking at just one of these leagues close relationship with Catholicism—that being the NFL.  To start, the super bowl trophy is named the Vince Lombardi trophy, after Vince Lombardi, who was as devout a Catholic as one can be, and educated by the Jesuits at Fordham University.  Lombardi in addition to being educated by the Jesuits, was going to become a Catholic Priest!  He attended Cathedral Preparatory Seminary in Queens, a part of Cathedral College of the Immaculate Conception in Brooklyn, with the intention of becoming a Catholic priest.  Lombardi was also a 4^th degree Knight of Columbus, and there is a KOC lodge named after Lombardi in New Jersey!  (The Vincent T. Lombardi Council, No. 6552, Knights of Columbus, in Middletown, New Jersey).  Then there is George “Papa Bear” Halas.  Halas, was the founder, owner, and head coach of the NFL’s Chicago Bears, and was one of the co-founders of the NFL in 1920.  Halas was also as devout Catholic as one can get.  Pat McCaskey, the current owner of the Chicago Bears, who happens to be Catholic, said this about his grandfather George Halas.

“My grandfather played football, basketball and baseball for the University of Illinois.  He played briefly for the New York Yankees and then transitioned back to football.  He was a player, coach and executive for the Chicago Bears, and then in 1932 he became sole owner.”

“He was a six-time NFL champion as head coach—not to mention two more just as an owner—and still has the second-most head-coaching wins in NFL history.  More importantly, he was a deeply Catholic man.”

“He went to Mass on Sundays, even when games were played that day, and he also went to confession on Saturdays.”  (Carrying on Catholic and Football Traditions in Chicago, National Catholic Register)

George Halas Sr. was even given the Sword of Ignatius of Loyola (a replica of the sword Ignatius used to murder heretics, there is a statue of Ignatius Loyola stomping on a heretic in Rome) in 1979 by Chicago’s Jesuit Loyola University.  George Halas Jr., who became a president and treasurer of the Chicago Bears, and served on the NFL’s management council, was also very close to the Jesuits.  He was educated at Loyola University in Chicago.  The Halas Sports Center and Halas Field at Loyola was named in honor of him after he passed away.

“On Sept. 2, 1982, Loyola held a ceremony under a large tent on the field to dedicate the new sports center to Halas Jr.  ‘Papa Bear wanted to do something for his son,’ Senior Associate Athletic Director Tom Hitcho, who attended the ceremony, said.  ‘With representatives from different NFL teams, the Halas family, students, faculty and trustees, it was a pretty big event from our history.”  The NFL commissioner at the time, Pete Rozelle, and Halas Sr. both attended and gave speeches.’” (Bears president was a Loyola alumnus, Loyola Phoenix News)

Pete Rozelle, who was commissioner of the NFL (1960-1989) was educated by the Jesuits at the University of San Francisco.

When the New Orleans Saints were created as an expansion team (clearly with the team name referring to the process of Canonization in the Church, i.e becoming a Saint) while Rozelle was commissioner, Catholicism as one can imagine played a large role.

“NFL Commissioner Pete Rozelle traveled to New Orleans to announce that they would be the home of the newest expansion team.”

“Although the decision was made more than a week prior to the announcement, Dixon convinced Rozelle to wait for the upcoming Catholic holiday to go public.  Thus, the proclamation took place on November 1, which made the team birthday All Saints Day.  Out of respect for the large Catholic community in New Orleans, the team’s management consulted then-Archbishop Philip Hannan of the Archdiocese of New Orleans to make sure the name would not seem offensive or sacrilegious.  The archbishop saw no problem with it; in fact, he liked the idea so much that he offered to write the team a prayer.”  (Song of faith and jazz: How the New Orleans Saints got their name, Aleteia)

Thomas Benson, the auto magnate, and longtime owner of the New Orleans Saints who passed away in 2018 was very close with the Vatican.

“In recognition of their generosity to the Catholic Church, New Orleans Saints owner Tom Benson and his wife, Gayle, have been awarded the highest papal honor that Catholic lay-people can receive.”

“They were nominated for the Pro Ecclesia et Pontifice (for the church and the pope) Award by San Angelo, Texas, Bishop Michael Pfeifer, a longtime friend, who cited their generosity to his religious order, the Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate in San Antonio, where Benson has several auto dealerships, he (Benson) gave $15 million to the capital campaign of the Oblate School of Theology, which the order operates.  The Bensons were married in San Antonio in October 2004.”

“The order operates Our Lady of Guadalupe Church in New Orleans, where Benson’s church-related gifts include $2 million for a senior citizens center.  The Bensons also gave Loyola University $8 million in 2010 for construction of a Jesuit Center, to include a major new campus chapel and headquarters for faith and service programs that express the university’s Jesuit worldview.”  (Tom and Gayle Benson receive highest papal honor for their generosity to Catholic Church, Nola.com)

It couldn’t get more obvious with the underlining Catholicity in the NFL, than the “Hail Mary” passes, which are passing attempts of long distances—The Hail Mary is one of the most familiar of all Roman Catholic prayers.  Many professional sports teams have the name “Cardinals” as there team name.  Catholic archbishops are referred to as Cardinals and have worn the long red robes for centuries-long before the little red bird now known as a Cardinal was given its name.

The devout Catholic Robert Hannegan (who is mentioned in chapter 14 of The Dollar and the Vatican) who was chairman of Democratic National Committee (1944-1947) and United States Postmaster General (1945-1947) purchased the St. Louis Cardinals baseball team in 1947, and was educated by the Jesuits at Saint Louis University.

Sports stadiums like Churches are tax exempt.  “Laws allowing teams to fund stadiums with tax-exempt bonds have cost the United States $3.7 billion in lost tax revenue from 2000 through 2014, according to a Brookings Institution paper released last year.” (Reuters)

This money for instance could have went to improve libraries all across the United States.  Rome requires the masses to be entertained rather than educated.

On average, American adults are watching over five hours of television every day, with a good portion of this being sports related programs.

The size of the TV deals of the four American sports leagues is impressive.  The NBA’s current contract with ABC, ESPN, and TNT is $24 billion; the NFL’s with Fox, CBS, ESPN, and NBC is $27 billion; the MLB’s with ESPN, TBS, and Fox is $12.4 billion, and lastly the NHL’s TV deal with ESPN, Fox, and TSN is $7.2 billion.

• • • •

Continuing on this brief look at the alliance of the forces of The Dollar and the Vatican, John J. McCloy (1895-1989), who is known as “The Chairman of the American Establishment”, whom had chairmanships on the Council on Foreign Relations, Chase Manhattan Bank, the Ford Foundation, the World Bank, etc. was on the board of over 15 large corporations, and was directly involved in the 1964 coup d’etat in Brazil, is a prime example of how the Vatican is working with the “secular” corporate apparatus.

McCloy was quoted by The New York Times in an 1975 article titled Head of Study on Gulf Oil Funds, saying “I have a sort of Catholic attitude…a lower case ‘c’,” he added with a laugh, “or else my Scotch Presbyterian forebears will stir in the graves.”  McCloy added that “I had the powers of a dictator as High Commissioner of Allied Forces in West Germany”.  “But I think I was a benevolent dictator”.  McCloy was pivotal while working as the American High Commissioner in West Germany, for the Vatican’s plans to free high level Nazi war criminals (Reinhard Gehlen, Klaus Barbie, Ernst Von Weizsacker, Martin Bormann (whose son was a Jesuit), Otto Ambros, Joseph Mengele, Walter Emil Schreiber, etc.) so that they could come work for the Catholic, in particular Jesuit controlled western intelligence agencies, and corporations.  Reinhard Gehlen, who was “chief of the Wehrmacht Foreign Armies East (FHO) military-intelligence unit for the Nazi’s”, was made a Knight of Malta in 1948, and Gehlen became the chief of the Western German Intelligence service (BND), which was funded and overseen by the CIA.  (known as “Catholics in Action”)

• • • •

Witness Otto Ambros, who became the head of head of IG Farben’s Schkopau plant in 1935.  Ambros’ division of IG Farben developed chemical weapons, including the nerve agents sarin (1938) and soman (1944) that were used in the concentration camps all over Europe to enact “The Jewish solution”.  Ambros , the most guilty of a war criminal that one could ever be, became an advisor to the W.R. Grace Co. in the United States (after serving a very lenient three years in prison for war crimes), which had a Knight of Malta J. Peter Grace as Chairman/CEO.  Ambros, the Nazi IG Farben chemist, also did work for Dow Chemical Co. and the U.S. Army Chemical Corps.  This was all part of Operation Paperclip, overseen by McCloy and his “Catholic attitude”.  Indeed Otto Ambros even became an advisor to the Knight of Malta, devout Catholic, Konrad Adenauer, who was the chancellor of West Germany (1949-1963).

Adenauer, who would attend Catholic Mass every-day while chancellor of West Germany—was very fond the Nazi Fascist cause:

“On August 10, 1934, Konrad Adenauer wrote to the Nazi interior minister in Berlin: ‘I have always treated the Nazi Party very correctly and thereby repeatedly placed myself in opposition to ministerial instructions of the time and those opinions represented by the Centre faction of the Cologne City Council.  For instance, I put the city’s sporting facilities at the disposal of the Nazi Party for years, in contradiction to the regulation of the Prussian Interior Minister at the time and allowed it to fly the swastika flags on the city’s masts at these places during its events.  I refer to the relevant files of the City of Cologne and the testimony of the retired Assistant Billstein.’”  (God And The Fascists: The Vatican Alliance With Mussolini, Franco, Hitler, and Pavelic, Karlheinz Deschner, 1965, pg. 82)

From the ABC Documentary Escape From Justice: Nazi War Criminals in America that aired Sunday, January 13th, 1980, this was said of the relationship between Knight of Malta, devout Catholic J. Peter Grace and Nazi chemist Otto Ambros:

“His (Ambros) prison sentence was commuted after only three years by American officials and he was helped in a bid to enter the United States by J. Peter Grace, President of W.R. Grace, a major American chemical company.  An internal State Department document describes how J. Peter Grace helped Otto Ambros in his efforts to enter the U.S.  In a memorandum to the U.S. Ambassador to Germany, Grace acknowledges that Ambros was a war criminal.  But he adds that in the years he’s known Ambros, ‘we have developed a very deep admiration, not only for his ability, but more important, for his character in terms of truthfulness and integrity.’”

“Today Otto Ambros does consulting work for W. R. Grace and Company and lives here in Mannheim, Germany.  In a recent telephone interview Ambros said ‘I’m happy to still be working as a chemist…but it’s funny.  Now I’m helping the Americans.’”

The documentary gave additional insight into Ambros’s background:

“Ambros was a chemist and a director of the notorious I.G. Farben Chemical Company which supplied gasoline and rubber for Hitler’s war effort…he played a supervisory role in the construction of Farben’s buna plant in the Polish village of Auschwitz…For his role there, Otto Ambros was convicted of slavery and mass murder and sentenced to eight years in prison.”

• • • •

J. Peter Grace was the introductory speaker at the annual convention of the Knights of Malta (SMOM) in 1989, when U.S. President Ronald Reagan as a sitting U.S. president was knighted into the order at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel. (January 13, 1989) Grace at this time was the President of the American wing of the Knights of Malta.

“Grace had also served as the Chairman of the Radio Free Europe Radio Liberty Fund, a CIA front infested with Nazi collaborators, and on the American Institute for Free Labor Development (AIFLD), another CIA funded organization.  The Chairman of the W. R. Grace Executive Committee, Felix Larkin, is also a SMOM (Knight of Malta).”

“The Chancellor of the Order, John D. J. Moore (U.S. Ambassador to Ireland, 1969-1975, E.B.), was a Director of the Grace company until at least 1982 having been with the company since 1946 managing its Peruvian operations from 1947-1950” (The Sovereign Military Order of Malta, Francois Hervet, 1986, CAIB 25).

Joseph J. Larkin, a vice president at Chase Manhattan, a bank which John J. McCloy would later chair, was another Knight of Malta in the financial dinosaur world who was very sympathetic to the Nazi and fascist cause.

“Joseph J. Larkin [vice-president of Chase Manhattan Bank in charge of European affairs] kept the Chase Bank open not only in the neutral countries of Europe and South America but in Nazi-occupied Paris throughout World War 2.  …A distinguished member of the Roman Catholic family, he had received the Order of the Grand Cross of the Knights of Malta from Pope Pius XI in 1928.  He was an ardent supporter of General Franco and, by extension Hitler.”

“Morgenthau first suspected him as a fascist sympathizer in October 1936, when Ferando de los Rios, the ambassador of Loyalist Spain, dedicated to Franco’s defeat went to see Larkin to open an account of $4 million.  The account was to be used to raise local assistance for the Spanish government, including the Lincoln Brigade.  Larkin said firmly that the 4 $ million account would not be allowed.  Larkin went a step further in the service of fascism.  When the Loyalist government deposited a similar account in the Chase bank in Paris, Larkin was furious with the subordinate who accepted the account.  He immediately contacted the Loyalist emissary and had him withdraw the deposit.  Simultaneously with the encouragement of Schacht, Larkin took on the Franco account and the Reichsbank account, though the Reichsbank was under the personal control of Hitler.” (Trading with the Enemy, Charles Higham, 1983, pg. 20,21)

• • • •

It was very fitting then for the CIA to move there head office in West Germany to the IG Farben building.  The American air force somehow missed the IG Farben headquarters while they were leveling the city of Frankfurt with 12,000 tons of explosives.  John J. McCloy, very fittingly, had his office at the former Nazi military machine headquarters as well.

Indeed the building was referred to by U.S. authorities as the Headquarters Building.  The United States Army Europe (USAREUR) with the U.S. Army renamed the building the General Creighton W. Abrams Building in 1975 after U.S army general Creighton Abrams, who converted to Catholicism while serving in the Vietnam war.  The IG Farben building was then informally referred to as “The Pentagon of Europe” while the CIA and U.S. Military occupied the building.

Many directors of the CIA have in fact been members of the order of the Knights of Malta (SMOM), as was Hitler’s Vice Chancellor Franz Von Papen, and fought in Knight of Saint Sylvester, SMOM William Donovan’s OSS (Office of Strategic Services) in World War 2.  Just to cover a couple of them, there is John A. McCone, Knight of Malta, CIA director (1961-1965), who was affiliated with over 10 massive corporations including: ITT, Standard Oil, Bechtel Corp, Consolidated Steel Corporation, and the California Shipbuilding Corporation etc. McCone was also Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission (1958-1961).  William Casey, a Knight of Malta, who was trained by the Jesuits at Fordham University, was CIA director (1981-1987), chairman of the Securities Exchange Commission (1971-1973), and Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment (1973-1974).  Casey got involved in the “financial dinosaur” realm before becoming a crusader for the Pope in his various positions in the U.S. government, such as his role in hiding the U.S. Military’s role in the 1985 arms shipments to Iran.  From 1957 to 1971, Casey was a partner at Hall, Casey, Dickler & Howley, a New York corporate law firm.  Ronald Reagan while President (1981-1989) used prominent Catholics in his administration to brief Pope John Paul II of developments in the Cold War.  Casey—according to Knight of Malta, devout Catholic Richard V. Allen, who was the United States National Security Advisor (1981-1982)—would regularly fly secretly to Rome in a windowless C-141 black jet and be “taken undercover to the Vatican”.  (Officials say pope, Reagan shared Cold War data, but lacked alliance, Catholic News Service)

Quoting from a 2016 article in the Catholic Herald titled Why Catholics Thrive in the CIA we read:

“…three out of the last five CIA directors have been Catholic: Michael Hayden, Leon Panetta, and the current director, John Brennan…”

“Some of the most influential directors in CIA history have been Catholic—men such as Walter Bedell Smith, John McCone, William Colby and William Casey.  They were not just casual Catholics.  They were devout Mass-goers—in many cases, members of groups like the Knights of Malta.”

There was perhaps was no greater evidence showing the relationship between the massive financial dinosaurs, the Vatican, and the CIA than the 1954 coup d’etat to take out the government of Jacobo Arbenz in the banana colony Guatemala.  Arbenz was elected as president in 1951 and immediately upon election began speaking on land reform to fix the miserable state of poverty the masses of Guatemala found themselves in.  The American United Fruit Company-known all across the region as “The Octopus” was the largest landowner in Guatemala.  United Fruit owned the railway lines, the powerlines, and controlled Guatemala’s biggest ocean port.  The economic tyranny of United Fruit was shown when:

“In 1928, 1,500 men, women, and children, employees of United Fruit, were murdered by troops in Santa Marta, Colombia, for striking in protest of receiving only 60 percent of their promised wages.”

“The survivors were imprisoned on the banana plantation and flogged, while two U.S. warships were anchored nearby in readiness to intervene if necessary.”  (DuPont Dynasty: Behind the Nylon Curtain, Gerard Colby, 1984, pg. 262)

The Vatican like the United Fruit company had reason for concern.  The Catholic clergy were excluded from the national affairs of Guatemala due to the policies of Justo Rufino Barrios, who became president in 1873, running on the principle of separation between church and state-the clergy were expelled and their properties confiscated.  John McCormack, who was Speaker of the House (1962-1971), and at the time of the coup, was the House Minority Wip, annually gave speeches on United Fruit and Guatemala, and even read into the Congressional Record articles by executives of the United Fruit Company, praising the companies contribution to Latin America.  McCormack was a Knight of Columbus and a devout Catholic.

Arbenz upon election began to nationalize many of United Fruit’s assets and signed decree 900, which gave 400,000 acres of land owned by United Fruit to Guatemalan nationals.  Arbenz was instantaneously labelled an agent of the Soviet Union and a Communist.  The great financial dinosaurs went to work through their tightly financed press syndicate (chapter 11 in The Dollar and the Vatican) to alarm Americans that the threat to the profits of the United Fruit company’s multi-million dollar banana plantations was a threat to national security.

United Fruit and the CIA then began working together to distribute hundreds of thousands of pamphlets warning of the existential Soviet threat that Arbenz posed, even going as far to hire propaganda expert Edward Bernays to convince the world Arbenz was a commie.

The Soviet Union had no diplomatic relations with Guatemala at this time.  Incredibly, Cardinal Francis Spellman of New York contacted the Archbishop in Guatemala, Mariano Arellano to issue a pastoral letter (April 9th, 1954) to the flock of Guatemalans telling them to rise up against Arbenz’s communist regime and overthrow it—the CIA then took the pastoral letter and airlifted it all over Guatemala.  (A Coup Made in America) Arbenz had no chance—he desperately took to the air waves to warn the people of the coup taking place, but all to no avail.  Arbenz then in desperation blacked out all of Guatemala City to in an attempt to stop the CIA’s radio broadcasts.  The CIA and the dinosaurs man in Guatemala was Castillo Armas.  Armas promised to crush Communism and restore the wealth of the United Fruit company.  With the gaining support Armas was receiving, bombs and machine gun fire all over Guatemala City, and one by one losing the loyalty of his top generals, Arbenz resigned from the presidency and the government was overthrown.  The big financial dinosaurs were once again all powerful in Guatemala.

The Catholic Church was also a big winner with Armas taking power.

“Spellman had reason to rejoice.  The new government re-established long-broken ties with Catholicism.  Castillo Armas restored the right of the Church to own property, to give religious instruction in public schools, and to increase the number of foreigners among the clergy.”

“To further enhance the Church’s position in Guatemala as well as that of the United States, Spellman saw to it that Catholic Relief Services, the metamorphosis of the War Relief Services, began operating in Guatemala shortly after Arbenz fell…Instead of putting Guatemala on the path to prosperity, Spellman and the U.S. officials involved in the Arbenz coup merely set the stage for decades of bloodshed.  Guatemala became a financial sinkhole for the United States, which poured some $80 million into the nation in the first three years of the new regime.”

“Little of it filtered down to the poor.  By the 1980s, Guatemalan history was marked by a succession of dictatorships and brutally crushed revolts.  According to a 1978 report on Guatemala by the World Bank, more than eighty percent of the land was owned by ten percent of the population; the illiteracy rate of seventy percent was the highest in the hemisphere but for Haiti’s; the infant mortality rate was also tragically high.”  (The American Pope, John Cooney, 1984, pg. 236)

The connections from the CIA to the United Fruit company were spectacular.  When President of Guatemala, Jacobo Arbenz threatened to nationalize land belonging to the United Fruit Company, Walter Bedell Smith, a devout mass-going Roman Catholic, who was director of the CIA (1950-1953) ordered the American ambassador in Guatemala John Peurifoy to put a CIA plan for a Guatemalan coup into action.  Smith then after leaving the CIA in late 1953 took up a position with the United Fruit Company!  Indeed, Arbenz even requested for international observers to be in Guatemala to ensure the borders were secure, the U.N. Security Council authorized the sending of an emergency peace-keeping unit, but it was blocked by the United States ambassador to the U.N. Henry Cabot Lodge Jr. (1953-1960) who had a substantial amount of stock invested in United Fruit!

Cabot Lodge Jr. would then become Richard Nixon’s personal ambassador to the Vatican (1970-1977) while Nixon was president of the United States.

Nixon, at this time U.S. vice president, gave a speech shortly after the coup praising the new regime of Castillo Armas and his victory in ousting the Communist menace with Armas present with him side by side.  Nixon’s anti-communist advisor oddly enough was a Roman Catholic priest!

That being father John Francis Cronin, who was in the Catholic secret society The Society of Saint Sulpice.  Nixon at this time would ask Cronin for help in writing speeches.  Cronin became an unpaid assistant to Nixon and even wrote the first draft of Nixon’s 1956 acceptance speech at the Republican Convention in San Francisco just two years after the coup. (Crusader in the Cold War: A Biography of Fr. John F. Cronin, S.S. (1908-1994), John T. Donovan, pg. 1)

The Dulles brothers John Foster (U.S. Secretary of State 1953-1959), and Alan (CIA Director 1953-1961) were very close to the United Fruit company.

“John Foster Dulles, who represented United Fruit while he was a law partner at Sullivan & Cromwell—he negotiated that crucial United Fruit deal with Guatemalan officials in the 1930s—was Secretary of State under Eisenhower; his brother Allen, who did legal work for the company and sat on its board of directors, was head of the CIA under Eisenhower; Henry Cabot Lodge, who was America’s ambassador to the UN, was a large owner of United Fruit stock; Ed Whitman, the United Fruit PR man, was married to Ann Whitman, Dwight Eisenhower’s personal secretary.  You could not see these connections until you could—and then you could not stop seeing them…” (The Fish that Ate the Whale, Rich Cohen, 2012, pg. 186.)

United Fruit was also the official bottler of Coca-Cola in Guatemala.

Coca-Cola was very sympathetic to the cause of dictatorships—in 1939 for instance a whole fleet of Coca-Cola trucks gathered en masse in a show of force in Essen’s Adolf-Hitler-Platz.  At the time of the coup of Arbenz, the Chairman of Coca-Cola export international was none other than the devout Catholic, Knight of Malta, James A. Farley, former chair of the Democratic national committee (1932-1940) and U.S. Postmaster General (1933-1940).

“The Coca-Cola Company was perfectly happy to conduct business with dictators, as long as they were professed anti-Communists.”

“Several ministers serving Franco (Catholic, E.B.), Spain’s fascist ruler, doubled as Coca-Cola bottlers.  James Farley met and befriended Getulio Vargas(Catholic, E.B.), the Brazilian dictator; while in Nicaragua, he solicited Anastasio Somoza’s (Catholic, E.B.) autograph for his daughter.  Big Jim was always lavishly entertained in Taiwan by Chiang Kai-shek and his wife.  He even unsuccessfully wooed Portugal’s autocratic ruler, Antonio de Oliveira Salazar (Catholic, E.B.), undeterred by the fact that Salazar ran a police state.  In 1954, the United Fruit Company, Coke’s Guatemalan bottler, helped overthrow the democratic leftist government, replacing President Jacobo Arbenz with a series of strong-arm dictators.  In a Coca-Cola Overseas feature three years later, the Company blandly ignored the overthrow, praising United Fruit for supplying workers on its banana plantations with Coca-Cola, their favorite soft drink.”  (For God, Country & Coca-Cola: The Definitive History of the Great American Soft Drink and the Company That Makes It, Mark Pendergrast, 2014, pg. 297)

This Vatican influence is by no means limited to just the CIA.  For example, Archbishop of Boston Cardinal Richard Cushing said of the FBI director J. Edgar Hoover in 1953 “You know in these parts if I quote J. Edgar Hoover, it’s just like quoting the Pope.” (The Director and His Eminence: The Working Relationship and Questions of Church and State as Reflected in Cardinal Cushing’s FBI Files, James F. Garneau).

Indeed J. Edgar Hoover even received a Sword of Ignatius of Loyola in 1964.  The New York Times reported thus:

“SEPT. 23, 1964: CHICAGO, Sept. 22 (AP)—J. Edgar Hoover, director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, was named today the first recipient of the Sword of Loyola Award of Loyola University of Chicago… The award, a reproduction of the sidearm of St. Ignatius of Loyola, is to be given annually to a person of a national or international prominence who exhibits to a high degree the qualities of courage, dedication and service.”

“Mr. Hoover has headed the F.B.I. for 40 years and, the university said, ‘has acted with authority and dispatch to effectively implement’ the goal of life that Mr. Hoover says is defined for him in the sixth chapter, eighth verse of Micah:

‘And what doth the Lord require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy and to walk humbly with thy God?’

“CHICAGO: Nov. 24 1964—J. Edgar Hoover, director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, pledged tonight that pressure groups would not be permitted to use the F.B.I. to ‘attain their selfish aims.’”

“The occasion for Mr. Hoover’s address was a $250-a-plate dinner in the Conrad Hilton Hotel to benefit the school of medicine.  He became the first recipient of the Sword of Loyola, a copy of the sword carried into battle by St. Ignatius Loyola, founder of the Jesuit order.”

“In presenting the full-sized sword, which was made in Toledo, Spain, as was Loyola’s original, the Rev. James F. Maguire, S. J., president of Loyola University, termed the honor the university’s highest non-academic distinction.  He said it was awarded to Mr. Hoover for his courage, dedication and service in giving the past 40 years of his life to ‘fashioning the most thorough and efficient crime-fighting agency in the history of law enforcement.’  The dinner was attended by 1,100 persons.”

Cardinal Cushing also celebrating big for Hoover’s 40th year anniversary in the FBI.

“The most outstanding expression of the level of sharing on the part of Cushing, however was expressed when Hoover celebrated his fortieth anniversary as director of the FBI in 1964.  For this occasion, Cushing arranged that forty masses would be celebrated by the priests of the St. James Society in Latin America, during a special period of forty days of prayer, set aside for the purpose of the Cardinal.” (The Director and His Eminence: The Working Relationship and Questions of Church and State as Reflected in Cardinal Cushing’s FBI Files, James F. Garneau)

This grand praise from the Vatican to J. Edgar Hoover is very natural, as Hoover was quite the tyrant himself.  But then again even Hoovers Machiavellian acts are child’s play compared to the those of the Roman Catholic Inquisition.  A newly declassified letter from J. Edgar Hoover to Sidney Sours, July 7th 1950 (a former director of Central Intelligence, who was a financial dinosaur) shows that J. Edgar Hoover, the longtime director of the F.B.I., had a plan to suspend habeas corpus and imprison at least 12,000 Americans, who were of course threats to national security and communists.  Parts of the letter include:

“For a long period of time the FBI has been accumulating the names, identities and activities of individuals found to be potentially dangerous to the internal security through investigation.  These names have been compiled in an index which index has been kept up to date.  The names in this index are the ones that have been furnished to the Department of Justice and will be attached to the master warrant referred to above.”

“This master warrant will, therefore, serve as legal authority for the FBI to cause the apprehension and detention of the individuals maintained in this index.  The index now contains approximately twelve thousand individuals, of which approximately ninety-seven per cent are citizens of the United States.  Immediately upon receipt of instructions and the master warrant from the Attorney General the various FBI Field Divisions will be instructed by expeditious means to cause the apprehension of the individuals within their various territories…In order to make effective these apprehensions, the proclamation suspends the Writ of Habeas Corpus for apprehensions made pursuant to it.  The plan also contains a prepared joint resolution to be passed by Congress and an Executive Order for the President which too will validate the previous Presidential proclamation…The permanent detention of these individuals will take place in regularly established Federal detention facilities.”

“These facilities have been confidentially surveyed and the facilities have been found to be adequate in all areas except in the territory covered by the FBI’s New-York, Los Angeles and San Francisco Offices.  In these three areas arrangements have been perfected with the National Military Establishment for the temporary and permanent detention in Military facilities of the individuals apprehended.”

We get a glimmer of the Inquisitions of old when Hoover speaking on the details of the hearing procedure to be set up by this fascist round up says “The hearing procedure will not be bound by the rules of evidence.” (E.B.)

Book II (2) of the official government report of the 1975 U.S. Senate Church Committee Hearings showed to what grave extent freedom in America has sunk:

• “Nearly a quarter of a million first class letters were opened and photographed in the United States by the CIA between 1953-1973, producing a CIA computerized index of nearly one and one-half million names.
• At least 130,000 first class letters were opened and photographed by the FBI between 1940-1966 in eight U.S. cities.
• Some 300,000 individuals were indexed in a CIA computer system and separate files were created on approximately 7,200 Americans and over 100 domestic groups during the course of CIA’s Operation CHAOS (1967-1973).
• Millions of private telegrams sent from, to, or through the United States were obtained by the National Security Agency from 1947 to 1975 under a secret ‘arrangement with three United States telegraph companies.
• An estimated 100,000 Americans were the subjects of United States Army intelligence files created between the mid-1960’s and 1971. Intelligence files on more than 11,000 individuals and groups were created by the Internal Revenue Service between 1969 and 1973 and tax investigations were started on the basis of political rather than tax criteria.
• At least 26,000 individuals were at one point catalogued on an FBI list of persons to be rounded up in the event of a ‘national emergency’.” (Final report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, United States Senate: together with additional, supplemental, and separate views, Book II, 1976, pg. 6, 7)

• • • •

To conclude, The Vatican has made great strides in taking full control of the world since The Dollar and the Vatican was published (1957) and continues to exert her geopolitical influence on Catholic politicians, judges, lawyers, generals etc. worldwide.  Interestingly, the word world is defined as “The Roman Empire” in Webster’s 1828 dictionary, and the Vatican has full legal diplomatic relations with 180 countries.

Is it a mere coincidence that the patenter for the ATM machine (which is now inescapable in our digital age as we progress towards a cashless society controlled by mega-monopolies), Donald Wetzel, was educated by Jesuits at Jesuit High-School in New Orleans, and at Loyola University New Orleans?

Or does it show the Vatican’s interest in hoarding as much earthly treasure as possible following the trend of economic globalization with more wealth, power, and decision making falling into fewer hands.  Wetzel even credits his instructor at Jesuit Loyola for getting him his job at IBM, and IBM it should be noted was working hand in hand with the Nazi regime.  Edwin Black, in his book IBM and the Holocaust, reports that every Nazi concentration camp maintained its own Hollerith-Abteilung (Hollerith Department), assigned with keeping tabs on inmates through use of IBM’s punchcard technology.  In 1937 the Chairman and CEO of IBM, Thomas J. Watson, was awarded the Order of the German Eagle by Adolf Hitler.

Wetzel said in a interview with Dr. David K. Allison of the National Museum of American History (NMAH) September 21, 1995:

“Well, the dean of our business school at Loyola, whom I got to know fairly well, recruited, in a sense, for IBM, and he knew a lot of people at IBM and he helped me get the interview at IBM, and from there I was able to get the job, with his recommendation, I’m sure.  So that made it easier for me.  And that’s really the reason I went to work for IBM.  It turned out, I think, it was a good decision on my part and I hope it was for them also.”

A Cashless society whereby all financial information for a given person will placed into a RFID chip inserting in one’s body is looking very inevitable at this point.  The chip of course will be easily be able to be monitored with GPS and turned off by a third party source creating an 1984 Orwellian nightmare scenario where if one is disobedient to the ruling status quo their ability to engage in commerce will be completely cut off once everything is digitized.  Therefore the masses will be forced to submit, or the run the risk of going hungry.  Already in Sweden half the nation’s retailers are predicting they will stop accepting paper money before 2025.

“More than 4,000 Swedes have implanted microchips in their hands, allowing them to pay for rail travel and food, or enter keyless offices, with a wave.  Restaurants, buses, parking lots and even pay toilets depend on clicks rather than cash.”  (In Sweden, cash is almost extinct and people implant microchips in their hands to pay for things, The Financial Post).

• • • •

In the United States, the prominent Catholic publication Commonwealth (December 19th, 2012) wrote an article titled The Catholic takeover of the U.S. is almost complete.  Here are some excerpts.

“Upon the passing of Senator Daniel Inouye of Hawaii (a war hero from WWII, leaving Senator Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey the sole remaining WWII veteran in Congress), Senator Pat Leahy of Vermont becomes the President pro tempore of the Senate and, I believe, the first Catholic to hold the position.  Indeed, if Senator John Kerry is nominated and confirmed to be Secretary of State, the four offices in line of succession to the presidency will all be held by Catholics: Vice President Joe Biden, House Speaker John Boehner, Senator Leahy, and Secretary Kerry.”

This echoes what the Archbishop of Chicago, James Edward Quigley, said in 1903 at the Children of Mary sodality at the Holy Name parish school, Chicago avenue and Cass street, covered by The Chicago Tribune, May 5th 1903:

“Since I have seen the western parochial schools I have come to the conclusion that in fifty years, if things go on as I see they are going on at present, the Catholic Church will actually own the west…”

Quigley continued.

“Within twenty years this country is going to rule the world.  Kings and emperors will soon pass away, and the democracy of the United States will take their place.  The west will dominate the country, and what I have seen of the western parochial schools has proved that the generation which follows us will be exclusively Catholic….In fifty years Chicago will be exclusively Catholic.  The same may be said of greater New York and the chain of big cities stretching across the continent to San Francisco.  It has never forced itself on me—this conviction—as it has since I have been in Chicago.  I am simply overcome by it.  I am not telling you this to flatter you.  I mean what I say.  When I see what is going on I am more than pleased.”

The pious Archbishop then threatens all politicians in Chicago who won’t submit to the Church.

“Nothing can stand against the Church.  I’d like to see the politician who would try to rule against the Church in Chicago.  His reign would be short Indeed.”

• • • •

This is the power apparatus that current U.S. President Donald Trump, whose older sister Maryanne Trump Barry gave $4 million to Jesuit Fairfield University in 2016 (Palm Beach Daily News), who was educated himself for two years at Jesuit Fordham University, and who went to the Vatican to see the Pope only 6 months into his first term, was defending when he said during his speech at the 2016 Catholic Alfred E. Smith Dinner “We can also agree on the need to stand up to anti-Catholic bias”.  (October 20th, 2016) Author Peter J. Doeswyck, in his book Catholic Victory in 1960? accurately states:

“No one has ever doubted that the average Roman Catholic farm boy is as loyal as a non-Catholic.  The disloyalty and subversion is found in the professional groups of teachers, priests, judges, journalists, police, sheriffs, mayors, senators, etc., who by papal Bulls are bound to written and secret obligations which are contrary to the interest of the United States and contrary to its Constitution.”

I have no issues with everyday Catholics, but I certainly take issue with the Catholic hierarchy and corporate imperialism.  This brief preface is just the tip of the iceberg.  A full up to date (2019) in-depth analysis of the current alliance between the powerful forces of the dollar and the Vatican would require many volumes.  The Dollar and the Vatican, by Avro Manhattan is an excellent study in the forces that truly wish to conquer the earth, that being the Vatican and Big Business, and this book gives the reader much insight into what is happening in the world around him.

~ ERIC BOWMAN

February 17th, 2019

THOMAS’ PREVIOUS APPEARANCE ON RESISTANCE RISING

CONNECT WITH THOMAS ON FACEBOOK!

Simon Bolivar by José Gil de Castro in Lima, Peru (1825)

2008: Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio while on the subway to Buenos Aires, Argentina (AP-Pablo Leguizamon)

HISPANIC GENDER-INDETERMINATE PARKLAND “SURVIVOR” VS CATHOLIC CONTROLLED NRA TWITTER PROPAGANDA

THE SWORD OF THE HARLOT: AFTER U.S. OCCUPATION, NOT A SINGLE CHRISTIAN CHURCH LEFT IN AFGHANISTAN

THE PEDOPHILE JESUIT-TRAINED PRESIDENT DOESN’T RULE OUT A “MILITARY OPTION” FOR VENEZUELA

HERE’S WHO IT WILL OR WON’T COME THROUGH

ARTURO SOSA’S PRACTICE FOR BECOMING SUPERIOR GENERAL

CONFIRMED VIA UNIVISION

SHOCKER! Jesuit Superior General ‘signed letter praising Fidel Castro in 1989’

SOSA DEFENDS THE INTERMINGLING OF “MARXISM” WITH CHRISTIANITY

The history of “religion”, more specifically, Christianity, is powerful, surprising and even shocking.

“Shocking” because so much of it has been erased by a hidden hand.

Biblical Christianity teaches that Judaism was given by God to prove the fallen state of mankind and its need for a Savior.  As a religion, it is impossible to follow perfectly and, therefore, showed that no one can be right before God, or earn their way into Heaven.

Romans 3:10-12
¹⁰ as it is written:

“None is righteous, no, not one;
¹¹  no one understands;
no one seeks for God.
¹² All have turned aside; together they have become worthless;
no one does good,
not even one.”

English Standard Version (ESV)

The Bible teaches that the perfect Son of God became imperfection so that, through Him, those that loved Him could attain the perfection necessary to stand in the Presence of God.

II Corinthians 5:21
He made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, so that we might become the Righteousness¹ of God in Him.

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

Jewish leadership betrayed their nation and colluded with their Roman tyrants to put one of their own to death.

Astoundingly, it is a relationship that remains to this day: traitor Jews in positions of prominence who turn their backs on the people in order to be empowered by their Roman masters.  Rome is only too eager to have her Jewish minions grovel to receive both the limelight and the blame for her tyranny and corruption.

As the military empire of Rome declined, a religious empire took its place.

In 313 A.D., Emperor Constantine (along with his temporary rival, Licinius) signed the Edict of Milan ending the persecution of Christians.

In 380 A.D., Emperor Theodosius I made Christianity the state religion of the Roman Empire with his Edict of Thessalonica.  This caused a great many pagans to intermingle their practices with Christianity such as prayer to the dead, holy pilgrimages, and reliance upon “religious experts” (clergy).

Justinian I reigned as Byzantine Emperor from 527 to 565 A.D.  In 534 A.D., he instituted what has become known as “Justinian’s Decree” or “Justinian’s Code” which firmly cemented the Bishop of Rome as, “Pope”, “Bishop of Bishops” and “Corrector of Heresies”.

In 538 A.D., Justinian broke the siege of the Goths around Rome, deposed their Pope—Silverius—and emplaced his own—Vigilius—via military escort, as Pontifex Maximus.

As the power of the Roman religion grew under the guise of “Christianity”, Christians who still had access to the Scriptures decried it as heretical with the reinstitution of a priesthood (now required to be celibate), prayer to angels, the supplanting of Messiah Jesus with His mother and “indulgences” (release from certain sins by payment).

The Sword Arm of the Whore of Babylon: U.S. Military Burns Bibles In Afghanistan

Christians like the Albigensians, the Waldensians and the Vaudois were, in turn, horribly persecuted by Rome.  The target of Rome’s original Crusades, they were chased into the Alps and, when caught, brutally tortured and murdered; men, women and children.  Any Bibles found were immediately burned.

The Papacy outlawed the Word of God, only allowing it to be kept by clergy in Latin.  Christianity remained in darkened ignorance of its own Scriptures for a thousand years until the Protest of Augustinian monk, Martin Luther in 1517 A.D.

Prior to this, when Christians were found with Bibles, they were eradicated in flames.  Such was the end of men like Jan Hus, Jerome of Prague and many of John Wycliffe’s dedicated Lollards.

However, what made Luther’s protest infinitely more powerful than those of Wycliffe or Hus was an invention that occurred just a few years before and a few days ride southwest of him: that of Johannes Gutenberg’s movable type printing press.

It was caused by Pope Leo X (Giovanni de Medici) exploiting the ignorance of the people and bilking them out of wealth they didn’t have, under the guise of saving their souls!  He sent his most dedicated servants (at that time), the Dominicans, to frighten the masses with hellfire, then tell them they could pay their way out of it for themselves and even their dead loved ones via an “indulgence” that went to fund the Medici Pope’s lascivious and licentious parties.  While peasant parents, devastated by sickness and disease that claimed the life of their little boy gave Dominicans their last ducats thinking Leo would accept them as Vicar of Christ and release their boy from Purgatory, he was actually releasing naked little boys from the deserts of his parties to be enjoyed by his guests.

In response to this, an outraged Father Martin Luther posted a referendum on such “indulgences” with 95 pointed paragraphs.

When he submitted his 95 Theses, which he had nailed to the doors of All Saints Cathedral in Wittenberg on All Saints Day (November 1^st, 1517), to his leadership in Rome, copies had arrived well before his original!

Luther’s benefactor, Frederick the Wise, Elector of Saxony, knew his favorite monk was in danger of mercenaries paid by the Vatican to murder him.  Frederick shut Luther up in Wartburg Castle for his own protection, and Luther was forced to pass the time using the manuscripts of his friend Desiderius Erasmus to translate the Bible into colloquial German in order to give the Word of God back to the people.

But much to the consternation of the Inquisition (at the time led by the Dominicans, but turned over to the Jesuits a few years hence), these Bibles could not be burned faster than the Gutenberg press was able to print them.

To make matters worse, Luther’s example was being followed by other upstart priests such as William Tyndale, who wrote his translation in his native English.  Although Tyndale was betrayed and executed by Henry VIII for his “crimes” against a Church Henry eventually broke from, Tyndale’s dying exclamation, “Lord, open the King of England’s eyes!” would be shown by how Henry later ordered the Tyndale Bible to be chained to the altars of every church in England.

Now, to the Papacy, the Bible was more dangerous than ever.

A new tactic was arrived at and coined by Henry’s Lord Chancellor, Archbishop of York and Primate of England, Thomas Wolsey, as “learning against learning”.  This new approach sought to discredit the Bible and all who revered it.

It was an agenda to re-write our very reality and it has had nothing less than fiendish success.

“Science” mocks Christianity and the Bible by indoctrinating students everywhere with that which doesn’t even qualify as “science”.

An entire spectrum from Darwinian evolution to astronomy overtly defies the Scientific Method—

* make an observation
* compose an hypothesis about the observation
* isolate the variables and conduct an experiment in a sterile environment to replicate the observation
* have a trusted peer replicate the experiment to prove or disprove

Humanity has turned over both its past and its cosmology—its very reality—to “experts” who refuse to adhere to their own disciplines.  As a result we are all oblivious slaves with the key to our freedom sitting right in front of us, yet no one reaches for it.  It is an invisible key which only reappears through the power of skepticism: refusal to trust anyone in “authority”.

Within 15 years of Martin Luther’s revolution to reform Christianity, a “Counter-Reformation” was born to undo and discredit the effort.

It was spear-headed by a Spanish Basque nobleman and Templar² mystic called Íñigo López de Loyola who would later become known as Ignatius Loyola.

Loyola’s fanaticism shocked even the most dedicated Catholics and he was twice imprisoned by the Inquisition but Alessandro Farnese (Pope Paul III) shrewdly saw Loyola’s usefulness.  By 1540, Loyola (along with fellow Spaniard Francisco de Jasso y Azpilicueta—later “Francis Xavier”—and Frenchman Pierre Lefevre—“Peter Faber”) had organized the Knights of the Virgin Mary which Farnese cunningly ordained as the “Society of Jesus”.

They were and are unrivaled in their dedication to the Papacy and, in fact, have put many a Pope to death for failing to maintain their ruthless standards.  Manipulation, murder, extortion, sexual deviancy, toppling governments, instigating or betraying revolutions, exploitation of the confessional—the ends justify the means for Pope Paul’s shock troops.  They were soon given the sarcastic nickname “Jesuits” for jesuita or “Are you Jesus-like?”

Disguise and infiltration are their specialty, as is shown by the re-branding of Guy “Guido” Fawkes as the embodiment of rebellion against tyranny, illustrates.  A Jesuit plot to blow up the House of Lords on the 5^th of November, 1605, in order to murder Protestant King James I, his queen and his son, was betrayed (some suggest by the Jesuits, themselves, in a Machiavellian move for sympathy).  Under the instruction of Jesuit Provincial Henry Garnett, Fawkes was found guarding the entrance to the basement where the gunpowder had been stockpiled.

The use of Fawkes’ visage as the representation of resistance also shows just how much the Jesuits manipulate the very fabric of our existence.

But the examples of Jesuit control don’t end there.

Jesuit-trained Roman Catholics hold the key positions of power all over the world from the U.K. to the E.U. to the U.S.  The list is so expansive and extensive it staggers the mind and makes examples hard to sift through.  Here are just a very few—

* Donald John Trump, current U.S. President, trained by the Jesuits at Fordham before he transferred to the clandestine “public” Jesuit college, the University of Pennsylvania.
* Trump’s predecessor, President Barack Obama, was trained in Chicago to be a “community organizer” by Jesuit Father Greg Galluzzo.
* Emmanuel Macron, President of France, is Catholic; he ran against “far Right xenophobe” Marine le Pen who was taught by her father Jean-Marie le Pen to blame all of Roman Catholic France’s woes on the Jews.  Jean-Marie learned this while at Saint Francis Xavier boarding school in Vannes.
* Macron was sexualized by his 6^th grade teacher while attending La Providence Jesuit high school in Amiens.  He would go on to marry her.
* Speaking of deviant sex and corrupt control, the current Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau, is the far-Left Catholic son of a previous far-Left Jesuit-trained Catholic Prime Minister, Pierre Trudeau.  There’s an excellent chance that he’s actually the biological son of thrice-Jesuit-trained Communist Catholic, Fidel Castro.
* José Manuel Barroso; 11^th President of the European Commission, was trained by the Jesuits at Georgetown as was former President Bill Clinton.
* Former President of the European Council (plans European policy), staunch Dutch Leftist Roman Catholic Herman Van Rompuy, was raised from his youth at Jesuit Sint-Jan Berchmanscollege (Grammar School) in Brussels.
* In fact, the entire European Unification movement is an overt attempt to reinstitute the medieval “Holy Roman Empire” and was founded by Jesuit Seminarian (as was the secret Bilderberg power meetings) Jozef Retinger.
* America wields her terrible military might through Jesuit-trained Roman agents from Secretaries of State like Alexander Haig through Leftist Roman Catholics like Leon Panetta who held both Secretary of Defense and Director of the CIA.
* The Pentagon is a mirror image of the Farnese family castle in Caprarola, Italy and its foundation was laid on September 11^th, 1941—just a few months prior to the “surprise attack” of Pearl Harbor.

* When truth-seekers ask Google “Which families secretly control the world?” Google answers, “DuPont, Astor, Kennedy³, Rockefeller and Rothschild”.  Carefully omitted from any search are the names Farnese, Orsini, Borgia, Aldobrandini, Breakspeare, Colonna and Medici.  Each have held positions in Rome as Bishops, Cardinals and Popes.  This becomes less of a surprise when you find out that Google was “ordained” the same day Alessandro Farnese ordained the Jesuits: September 27^th.
* Donald Trump was put into office by Jesuit-trained Goldman Sachs strategist Stephen K. Bannon who got his marching orders directly via a Vatican visit in 2014.
* Trump has installed even more Jesuit-trained Roman Catholics than his Jesuit-trained predecessor (no mean feat); from his Chief of Staff and former Secretary of “Homeland Security”, Marine Corps General John Francis Kelly (Georgetown) to the current Secretary of “Defense”, Roman Catholic Marine Corps General James Mattis.  Mattis is known as the “warrior monk” because he’s gone his entire life without getting married.  Normally, this is just a personal oddity but, given the role of sexual deviancy in the halls of power, quite disconcerting.
* The Central Intelligence Agency was founded by a Roman Catholic Knight of Malta, William Donovan, and often run overtly by Catholics from Walter Bedell Smith to William Casey to William Colby to the “Drone Executioner”, John O. Brennan.
* The same is true of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; founded by devout Roman Catholic Charles Joseph Bonaparte (great grand-nephew of Napoleon Bonaparte) and its many Catholic Directors from Opus Dei member Louis Freeh to James Comey, infamous for giving both Hillary Clinton and suspected pedophile John Podesta a clean bill of health.
* The Pentagon is dominated by Roman Catholics (many of them Jesuit-trained) from former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Army General Martin Dempsey to the current Chairman, chosen by “Democrat” Barack Obama and maintained by “Republican” Donald Trump, Marine Corps General Joseph Dunford (Georgetown).
* Even the Texas (Connecticut) Bush ruling dynasty has its Jesuits in the woodpile, despite claiming to be Protestants—from Knight of Columbus and former Governor of Florida, John Ellis “JEB” Bush to maternal patriarch George Herbert Walker (namesake for both Bush Presidents), who lived with the Jesuits at Stonyhurst in England.
* Whether Democrat or Republican, the Jesuits rule behind the scenes and few choke-holds evidence this better than Speaker of the House of Representatives.  Far-Left Jesuit-mentored Catholic Nancy Pelosi resided over the ram-rodding of socialized medicine and her successor, Jesuit-trained (Xavier) “Conservative” John Boehner did nothing to jeopardize it.  His Roman Catholic successor, former altar boy Paul Ryan has also stayed the course.
* When plausible deniability is needed by Rome, her agents wait until they step down from office to “convert” to Catholicism; from former British Prime Minister Tony Blair to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
* Although Newt’s “conversion” may be presented as a “surprise” the Catholicism of his third wife, Callista, isn’t.  She’s such a stalwart Catholic she was made Ambassador to the sovereign city-state of the Vatican.

In 2012, “converted” Catholic Newt Gingrich was filmed receiving the very rare honor of a Papal Mass.

The man sitting right next to him (conveniently edited so that only his back was shown in the above video) was none other than “Evangelical” Televangelist Benny Hinn.

Few have done more harm to “Protestant” Christianity than Hinn.  Consequently, both the news media and Congress are proud to out him.

Only after they have done great harm to Christians do these Roman insurgents make headlines, such as frequent guest of conspiracy host Alex Jones, “Baptist” preacher Steven Anderson.

Given Anderson’s pull to put Christians to shame, it’s not a huge leap to call him an incognito Jesuit priest (and likely homosexual).

Equally, Benny Hinn and Rome go way back, as well.

Hinn has turned in his signature white suit for a high-collar black jacket, with a window for his white shirt underneath at the center.  He is also a very vociferous supporter of Jesuit-trained President Donald Trump.

Trump’s “Spiritual Advisor” is another Prosperity Gospel Preacher and Televangelist, Paula White (who lists her name as “Paula White-Cain”).

White was chosen to give Trump’s inaugural prayer, over which the Washington Post lamented—

White is known for embracing the prosperity gospel — the theology that God will bless true believers not just with eternal salvation but with material wealth here on Earth.  To many believers, the prosperity gospel offers hope and promise.  But to other Christians, it’s heretical; and to some, prosperity gospel preachers’ motives are suspect, especially when they seem to be enriching themselves by asking for money from their followers.

Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) launched an investigation in 2007 into spending by White and several other televangelists, but ended it three years later without reaching any conclusions.

Given how both Congress and these Televangelist charlatans answer to the same authority, we shouldn’t be surprised that Senator Grassley’s “investigation” ended “without reaching any conclusions”.

As I’ve chronicled for you in my latest book, the surest sign of corruption is when police, prosecutors and judges all refuse to do their jobs and politicians then provide smokescreens with “Commissions” and “Committees”.  If even Sherlock Holmes, himself, (the creation of Roman Catholic Freemason Sir Arthur Ignatius Conan Doyle) were to conduct a “Congressional Investigation” the end result would still be the same: nothing.  Legislatures write legislation.  They are bodies that have nothing to do with law enforcement.

From the very beginning, the seat of American power was owned by Catholics and named after Catholics.  The “Capitol” (named after Capitoline, one of the infamous seven hills of Rome) isn’t called “White House” for its color but in honor of Father Andrew White of the Society of Jesus.  Before it was “Washington, D.C.” it was known as “Little Rome on the Potomac” given that it’s gnostic architecture came from Catholic Freemason Pierre Charles L´Enfante.

Tying it all together in depravity, Hinn and Paula White were spotted in Rome holding hands, despite their respective marriages to other people.

Unfortunately, neither Charles Grassley nor the Washington Post were available so the reporting fell to the National Enquirer where it was sure to get it’s due respect.

No major news outlet thought the story was worth carrying but California’s Orange County Weekly did.

Perhaps, the reason media founded and run by Papal Knights like Henry Luce, William Randolph Hearst, John Paul Getty and Rupert Murdoch wasn’t interested in the explosive story was because of the even bigger story beneath it—

They found themselves in Italy because both were meeting independently with Vatican officials, according to White, who reportedly added, “We were never alone and were in the constant company of staff and other associates.” ~ OC Weekly

In an effort to cover up the very “un-Christian” adultery, two of Christianity’s most embarrassing and harmful “Protestants” admitted they go to Rome to receive instruction from the Jesuit Pope!

When invited to sit with another embarrassment to Christianity, Jim Bakker⁴ Paula White said that opposition to Donald Trump was opposition to God.

This is quite a statement from a Christian woman preacher given that Donald Trump is a pedophile who enables other pedophiles and has likely gone as far as to have sexually abused his daughter Ivanka (who is now a foundational part of American government).

Does Paula White believe in what she does?  Is she oblivious to the great harm she is being used to commit?

It’s certainly possible.  She, herself, is a victim of child sex abuse, apparently by her father, who committed suicide.

This report was initiated by the outstanding research of “Doc” Felipe Robles.

UPDATE FROM DOC, 31 December 2019:

Pentecostal Benny Hinn Says Catholics Have More Miracles, Credits Eucharist

I had been unfamiliar with the teaching or ministry of Dr. Walter Martin so, when a friend of my work (Daniel) sent this to me, I was shocked to learn of his frankness and effectiveness in dealing with heretical teaching.

Perhaps more than anything else, the contrast between Martin and Hanegraaff proves that Hanegraaff is part of a Papist coup.  While Martin was careful to first send certified letters to anyone he questioned in an attempt to dialogue before addressing them publicly (as is commanded in Matthew 18 by Christ, Himself), Hanegraaff shoots first, viciously, then ducks for cover—just what we’d expect from a man whose mission it is, is to divide and conquer for an Invisible Hand.

As I stated in my original column, it’s no coincidence that many of Hanegraaff’s victims are premier proponents of the Pro Testari.

Daniel’s comment to me in sharing this amazing interview (apparently, Walter’s last on Paul Crouch’s gold-plated TBN) was that Dr. Martin had all but called Robert Crystal Cathedral Schuller a Jesuit.  He didn’t quite go that far but he did mention how Schuller was one of the only personalities Dr. Martin had sent correspondence to that not only responded but also invited Dr. Martin to conduct an open discussion.  Once in Schuller’s office, Martin and Schuller walked through what they apparently agreed and disagreed on.  Dr. Martin then reproached Schuller for his “unification” seminars which push one-world ecumenism and destroyed the Gospel Message.  Schuller apologized, agreed that they were harmful to the Gospel and vowed to put an end to them.

6 months later, there was no change and the seminars continued.

This shouldn’t have surprised Walter, as Schuller has always been a puppet of Rome and maybe Daniel is right; all but a Jesuit.

Schuller’s “Rethink” seminar was an ecumenical outrage that exposed “Christians” to—

* George H.W. Skull and Bones Bush #41 (former Director of the CIA)
* Knight of Malta Rupert Murdoch
* Larry King.  Schuller and Larry are old friends, when on King’s show in December of 1998, Schuller told him “We all have to find God in our own way.”
* Ben Stein—a nice guy but not even Conservative Jews are people I want spiritual advice from
* Rick Warren’s wife Kay.  Rick would’ve gone himself but he needs some separation from his mentor, whom he vehemently claims he had little to do with but, humorously, Kay admits to freely!

Clearly, what Schuller wanted his parishioners to “rethink” was holding to the Word of God.

Let Us Reason.org states that Schuller’s own newsletter outed how Schuller was a frequent visitor to Rome to include getting input from John Paul II on the “Crystal Cathedral”.

Schuller’s monthly newsletter Powerlines (May 1998), wrote of his meeting with Pope John Paul II in Rome., “it was the fourth time Dr. Schuller and the Pope had met, hand-to-hand, heart-to-heart at the Vatican.”  The article also added a brief note concerning the discussion between the Pope and Schuller: “When the Schullers met Pope John Paul II in March, the Pope expressed interest in how our churches could work together to take part in the Vatican’s preparations for the Jubilee celebrations of Christianity’s third millennium in the year 2000.”  Pope John Paul II also blessed Mrs. Schuller, an act which Robert Schuller said may have caused his wife to be healed five days later when Mrs. Schuller suffered a mild heart attack.  “How could Arvella help but be healed when the Crystal Cathedral Congregation is praying for her, and after she had received private blessings from the Pope and a special visit from the pastor of the largest Protestant church in the world, David Yonggi Cho,” Schuller said.  Both the Pope and David Yonggi Cho are leading millions of people astray by the false doctrines they propagate, and Schuller is perfectly comfortable commending these men as servants of God! (Source: May-June 1998, Foundation magazine.)

The Roman Catholic site These Last Days Ministries of Lowell, Michigan reported how Bishop Fulton Sheen was a frequent and important guest of the Crystal Cathedral and her Keeper—

TV pastor Robert Schuller tells about the time Bishop Fulton Sheen spoke at the Crystal Cathedral.  Fulton Sheen was one of the most effective religious communicators of his time.  In the early 1950s his weekly television broadcast was the most popular program in the country.

Because he was so popular, thousands of people came to hear Sheen at the Crystal Cathedral.  After the message, he and Robert Schuller were able to get to their car only because a passageway was roped off.  Otherwise, they would have been mobbed.  Along both sides of the ropes, people were reaching out in an attempt to touch the bishop.  It was as if the pope himself had come to town.

As Sheen was passing through this section on his way to his car, someone handed him a note, which he folded and put into his pocket.  Then, as he and Schuller were on their way to the restaurant where they were going to eat lunch, Bishop Sheen pulled out that note, read it, and asked Schuller, “Do you know where this trailer park is?”  Schuller looked at the note and said, “Yes, it’s just a couple of miles from here.”  The bishop said, “Do you think we could go there before we go to lunch?”  “Sure,” Schuller answered.  “We have plenty of time.”  So they drove to this little trailer park, and Bishop Sheen went up to one of the trailers and knocked on the door.

An elderly woman opened the door, and seemed surprised–flabbergasted, really–when she saw who had come to visit her.  She opened the door and the bishop went in.   After a few moments, he came out, got back in the car and said, “Now she’s ready for living–in this life and the next.” ~ Our Lady of the Roses, March 25, 1978

WELL-KEPT SECRET: The life-sized bronze statue of Bishop Fulton J. Sheen that greeted “Protestants” as they entered Robert Schuller’s Crystal Cathedral. Now that the Cathedral has been re-taken by its land-lords, there’s no-longer a need for pretense.

On the page where TLDM.org extols the great virtues of the great orator, Sheen (after whom actor Ramón Antonio Gerardo Estévez took his stage name, “Martin Sheen”), is a picture of the April 14^th, 1952 issue of Knight of Malta Henry Luce’s Time magazine which shows the “Red Cross” of Malta Crusaders, a very complimentary illustration of Sheen and the U.N.’s flat Earth logo.

Schuller didn’t just invite Sheen to speak at his Crystal Cathedral, he memorialized him with a life-sized bronze statue of the man in his foyer where no one would miss Sheen’s “presence” coming in or going out of the Cathedral.

The Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen Spiritual Center says Schuller praised Sheen by stating, “I consider Fulton Sheen to be the brightest, the most brilliant, and the most beautiful Christian in mind and heart that I have known in the 20th Century.  No one inspired me more than Fulton Sheen to use television to reach the unbelieving word for Christ.”

When the Catholic masters of the Cathedral decided she had run her course, they confiscated her back.

The below article from the LA Times is so amazing I reposted it in its entirety;

* “for decades” the gaudy structure was considered a “Protestant landmark”, now it was getting engulfed by Rome
* seen as a “shot in the arm” for “ecumenism”
* Schuller states, “I could’ve done it 20 years ago” because “I trust” the Catholic Church…I don’t think Christian victims of the Inquisition did, however

* admits the Schuller/Sheen origins
* note that Schuller uses Freemasonic terminology and calls Rome the “mother Church” [for more, see my column on Freemasonry and the Charleston AME false flag] * the T. Marie Chilton Professor of Catholic Theology at Jesuit Loyola Marymount, Rev. Thomas P. Rausch, S.J. openly called it “a tactical decision”—why not, the Jesuits were running the show (and the press) from the beginning
* daughter Sheila Schuller Coleman is still teaching Jesuit-inspired New Age heresies and blather
* thanks to the treasonous flooding of America with illegal Roman Catholic alien immigrants from Papal puppets in DC, the diocese will easily fill the Crystal Catholic Cathedral
* there was nothing spontaneous about this at all—the only deception in this LA Times piece—it was a calculated victory dance over Martin Luther from its Luciferian inception

Crystal Cathedral Sale to Diocese a Milestone; Some See a Miracle

The deal was a triumph for ecumenism and for Orange County’s growing Catholic diocese.  Cathedral founder Robert H. Schuller is pleased.

December 18, 2011
Nicole Santa Cruz
Los Angeles Times

Whenever clergy from Asia, South America or Europe visit Roman Catholic Bishop Tod Brown in Orange County, they all want to see one church, but not one of Brown’s.  They want to see the Crystal Cathedral.

For decades, the architectural landmark — famous for its 10,000 panes of glass and 236-foot bell tower — has been synonymous with the Rev. Robert H. Schuller and his “Hour of Power” broadcasts.  That is about to change.

Last month, the Crystal Cathedral property became the future home of the diocese after a bankruptcy judge approved the sale for $57.5 million.  The Vatican has signed off and diocese officials expect escrow to open soon.

In Orange County, where a third of the population is Catholic, the deal represents both vast demographic change and the rising influence of the church.

“I think the Crystal Cathedral will be, for us, the heart and center for our Catholic community,” said Brown, who reached the mandatory retirement age of 75 on Nov. 15, two days before the court victory.  He will help oversee the transition because a successor has not yet been named.

Such cooperation between Catholic and Protestant faiths was once unimaginable in American Christianity.

In a rare interview, Schuller told The Times that he never saw it that way.

“I think it could have happened 20 years ago because I haven’t changed,” he said.  “It’s who I have always been.”

The 85-year-old minister, who became the pivotal unifying force in the bankruptcy sale, said he has always respected the Roman Catholic faith and considers it the “mother church.”  Schuller also said he drew inspiration for his “Hour of Power” from Catholic Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen, whose own popular TV show in the 1950s paved the way.

“The Roman Catholic Church isn’t going to change its theologies,” Schuller said.  “I trust them.”

Still, Brown’s tenacious pursuit of one of the most recognizable Protestant symbols surprised many, even Brown himself, who said the idea “never crossed my mind” until several lay advisors approached him.  After all, he had long planned to build a cathedral in Santa Ana for an estimated $200 million in response to the booming Catholic population.  He even hired an architect last year.

But he quickly saw the bankruptcy as a chance to fulfill his dream in a different way and began a bidding war for the church property with Chapman University.

In the final 24 hours, Brown said that even he thought “it was all over.”  Then Schuller, who had won over millions of believers through his credo of “possibility thinking,” told the court he could not abide the thought that Chapman might someday use the cathedral for nonreligious purposes.  The deal was struck.

Diocesan officials were elated, with one attorney calling it a miracle.  As Brown put it, “ecumenism has got a shot in the arm.”

The acquisition unquestionably raises the profile of the nation’s 10th-largest Roman Catholic diocese and could help it emerge from the shadow of the Los Angeles Archdiocese.

“It was a tactical decision,” said Father Thomas Rausch, a professor of Catholic theology at Loyola Marymount University.  “Here’s this beautiful church with a rich history in Orange County and an identity that’s already established.  It’s a bargain for the local church.”

It was a bittersweet victory, though, because Brown knew it marked the end of an era for Schuller’s world-famous Crystal Cathedral Ministries, which has three years to vacate under terms of the deal, whereupon the Catholic diocese will use the campus.

Sheila Schuller Coleman, the founder’s daughter, is senior pastor and continues to preach “possibility thinking,” though the philosophy has not brought the $50 million in donations that could have staved off a sale.

“There’s plenty of time for God to perform a miracle,” she told congregants on a recent Sunday.  At the front of the church, a table was set up with sign-up sheets for a “miracle” prayer drive.

Congregant Jillian Carter of Torrance said she still holds out hope.

“I feel like it’s not over until it’s over.  Anything can happen,” she said.  “This place has its trademark.  Nobody can take that.”

That trademark is exactly what appealed to the diocese.

When Brown succeeded Bishop Norman McFarland in 1998, there were 600,000 Catholics in Orange County.  There are now 1.2 million.  That growth can be seen on almost any Sunday.  For many parishes, the norm is standing-room-only turnout for Mass; at others, the Sunday crowds spill out the doors.  Mass is said in 10 languages, including Vietnamese, Polish, Mandarin, Korean, Indonesian and Spanish.

During Brown’s tenure, he dedicated nine churches, bringing the diocese total to 57.  He also appointed Latinos and women to key positions and gave a new parish a Vietnamese name, Our Lady of La Vang, a first for a Catholic church in Southern California.

But he never lost sight of building a cathedral, first announcing plans in 2001.

A lot of plans were hatched in 2001, not least of which was a Jesuit false flag of such evil one dare might call it “Biblical” in its malignancy and scope.

Many have wondered how Rome could have committed such a coup in using a man like Hanegraaff to take over and destroy Dr. Martin’s legacy but I think I see the answer in his last TBN interview; Walter Martin had no idea he was dealing with a vicious, military threat that would not and will not stop until it buries or enslaves us all.

NOTE: I am deeply saddened to see that the man who called me to Christ—Calvary Chapel Pastor Skip Heitzig—has been a guest on TBN.  I continue to love and respect Skip for all he’s done on behalf of the Gospel but I must now question at least his judgment…especially given the ties of the Calvary movement to Rome.  Interestingly, this anti-Vatican blog connects the dots from Chuck Smith to Paul Crouch to Rome.

UPDATE 30 May 2018:

As the Catholic Church pays out hundreds of millions of dollars to compensate tens of thousands of raped and assaulted children, “journalists” all over pull at our heartstrings for the many “bankruptcies” suffered by Rome (untold trillions in the Vatican basement notwithstanding).

St. Paul-Minneapolis Archdiocese Files For Bankruptcy To Pay Out Sex Abuse Lawsuits — New York Daily News

The Catholic Church in their Jesuit-created far-Left illegal Hispanic Roman Catholic paradise of California set records a few years back with a jaw-dropping $660 million joint settlement.

Yet, they still have the money to buy back their monstrosity from their puppet Robert Schuller, and then sink another $72 million into it for “remodeling”.

For more about just how lawless Rome has been and intent upon the rape, abuse and murder of your children, read my book Eaters of Children.

My personal relationship with “Eric” ended in my conviction that he is an undercover Jesuit, the details of which I shared on my show in October of 2015.

In February of that year, I published Illuminati Unmasked as the culmination of the shocking information “Eric” had shown me via his mission as an undercover agent.

In the best example of self-immolation, Phelps gives up a chilling amount of detail about the Jesuits before sowing it with disinformation and discord.  One such detail is what really happened in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Rome and her satanic Special Forces have completely woven a matrix of lies for us to live in, one of those lies was concocted over the “bombs” that were dropped to punish the “heretic Buddhists”.  They were more likely placed in secret as the technology to air-drop a nuclear munition was impossible in 1945.

In 1540, Alessandro Farnese—Pope Paul III—consecrated the “Knights of the Virgin Mary”, founded by a fanatical Basque nobleman named Ignacio Lopez, and turned them into “the Society of Jesus”.  Immediately the zeal of this new Company showed itself as they sent their missionaries all over the globe.  Within a matter of months they had landed in Japan where, contrary to popular belief they were well-received…unfortunately for the poor Japanese.

These missionaries found a powerful protector in [Daimyo Oda] Nobunaga, the military dictator of Japan (1573-82).  He was anxious to check the political power of a certain movement of Buddhist soldier-priests, but also held a genuine sympathy for the work of the “Christians” who were newcomers.  He encouraged them by granting them the right to propagate their religion throughout the Empire.  He donated them land in Kyoto itself and even promised them a yearly allowance.  Thanks to this, in no time the Catholic missions had spread throughout the country, converts were made by the thousands, establishing sizable Catholic centers in various parts of Japan.

Had the Catholic missionaries confined themselves exclusively to preaching religious principles, it is likely that Japan would have yielded them tremendous spiritual rewards.  But once a Catholic community was established the juridical-diplomatic-political domination of the Vatican came to the fore.  As is explicit in her doctrines, the Japanese converts could not remain the subjects only of the Japanese civil authorities.  The mere fact that they had entered the Catholic Church made them also the subjects of the Pope.  Once their loyalty was transferred outside Japan, automatically they became potentially disloyal to the Japanese civil rulers.¹

As a result of their espionage and subversions, Daimyo Toyotomi Hideyoshi put severe restrictions on the Jesuits.  Ultimately, they were completely successful in damning Japan because Shogun Tokugawa Ieyasu eventually banned all foreigners and Christian missionaries from the islands in 1641.  He made the same mistake many do today; mistaking Jesuits for “Christians”.

As is customary when a nation attempts to protect itself from the Company, the Jesuits soon set their sights on unspeakable evil in recompense, although it took just over 300 years to accomplish it.

Payback time had now come for Japan.  The American Army Air Force firebombed the island and totally destroyed Nagasaki and Hiroshima.  The future Jesuit General, Pedro Arrupe was near Hiroshima at the time of its destruction.  Could he and his Jesuits have been involved in a nuclear detonation on the ground, as no tested atomic device had ever been detonated in the air while in motion?

“At 8:15½ that August morning, every window in Arrupe’s residence at Nagatsuka was shattered by a roaring shockwave, and the sky was filled with a light he later described as [“a gigantic flare, like a magnesium flash” {52} being] ‘overwhelming and baleful’!  By the time he and his community of Jesuits ventured out some thirty minutes later, a firestorm driven by a scorching 40 mph wind had enveloped Hiroshima … That evening, one of the first survivors to reach his house in Nagatsuka was a theological student sent by a fellow priest, Father Wilhelm Kleinsorge, who had somehow survived the blast in the middle of Hiroshima [???].  From him, Arrupe got his first eyewitness accounts.” {53}²

(Whether the atomic bomb detonated in mid-air – a technical feat which was unknown to human history as of August 1945 – or secretly on the ground (the device having been carefully constructed inside a closed building), the future Jesuit General knew all about it.  For Pedro Arrupe greatly contributed in the laying of the “Nuclear War Hoax” – it being the foundation for that greatest of Jesuit Inquisitions called “the Cold War” – for which genocidal reason he became the Jesuit General in 1965!)³

Nearly 150,000 Japanese perished in the two incidents at Hiroshima and Nagasaki and many, many more died horrible deaths as a result of the war crimes ordered by their Freemasonic puppet General Curtis Emerson LeMay, “father” of the United States Strategic Air Command—a despicable butcher on par with Himmler or any other mass-murdering monster.

As a result of these horrors, the Japanese psyche was permanently scarred.  Survivors found solace in fictional musings over the terror the Jesuits had unleashed upon them.

In 1954, Toho Limited created Godzilla—the longest-running cinematic film series.  The second-longest running series was equally birthed by Jesuit machinations.

Dumble-dalf 007

If you’ve never heard of Dr. John Dee, you should have.  He was advisor to Elizabeth I and an advanced occult adept.  He was the impetus for the Harry Potter character of “Dumbledore” and the Tolkien magician “Gandalf” in Lord of the Rings.

Henry VIII was King of England from 1509-1547 and, although a licentious autocratic tyrant, his 6 marriages actually helped England break free of the power of Rome.  His son Edward VI was the first English king to be raised Protestant but he died at the young age of 15.

As England’s first true Protestant King, Edward was most certainly a Jesuit target for assassination.  Author Susan Higginbotham brings up the astounding accusation that, not only was Edward poisoned, his body was switched before burial to hide the evidence.¹⁴⁷⁵

Edward tried to have his cousin Jane Grey rule instead of Mary I but Lady Jane was quickly deposed and Bloody Mary took over the throne.  She and her husband Philip of Spain immediately repealed the protections Henry and Edward had extended to Protestants.  She reaffirmed England’s subservience to the Pope and then began a reign of terror that saw nearly 300 Protestants executed, most by being burned alive.

Even as “reformers”, both Henry VIII and Edward VI did little to help Protestants.

Protestants were martyred during persecutions against Protestant religious reformers for their faith during the reigns of Henry VIII (1509-1547) and Mary I of England (1553–1558).  Radical Protestants were also executed during the reigns of Edward VI (1547-1553), Elizabeth I (1558-1603) and James I (1603-1625).  The excesses of this period were recorded in Foxe’s Book of Martyrs.

Protestants in England and Wales were executed under legislation that punished anyone judged guilty of heresy against the Roman Catholic faith. ~ Wikipedia¹⁴⁷⁶

Mercifully, Mary died in 1558 after only a brief rule and her half-sister Elizabeth I, whom she had had imprisoned, ascended to the throne as a Protestant Queen.

While in prison, Elizabeth had made the acquaintance of a magician who had fallen out of favor with Bloody Mary; John Dee.

Once on the throne, the Jesuit threats to Elizabeth’s life were very real and a cordon of British Royalists formed around her lead by Francis Walsingham.  They created an intelligence network to ferret out Papists with designs against their Queen and Dr. John Dee was part of their network.  When he wrote to her, he knew she had an eye fetish so he signed his name in code to resemble eyes: “007”. ~ Illuminati Unmasked ⁴

Ian Lancaster Fleming was a journalist and Naval Intelligence officer during WWII (which means he worked indirectly for Rome, perhaps even directly).

The juxtaposition of those two occupations helped Fleming create the world’s most well-known fictional spy, James Bond, starting with the novel Casino Royale in 1953.  In less than a decade, a powerful Italian Catholic with connections from 20^th Century Fox to Howard Houghes—Albert Romolo Broccoli—would put Fleming’s Bond in cinema.  Of course the Romans never do something popular or public without first putting a Jewish face to their machinations and Broccoli brought in Harry Saltzman as his partner for the first three Bond films.

But Harry wasn’t just a name and a face, like Fleming he too was an Intelligence Officer—one who worked for the Papacy’s own Knight of Malta, William Donovan and his Office of Strategic Services during WWII.  This is the same OSS that murdered America’s greatest field commander, George Smith Patton in 1945 just after the war’s conclusion.

The Broccoli family have maintained an absolute lock on the Bond franchise and Albert Romolo’s daughter Barbara now oversees exactly what the world’s most famous spy does…whether or not she pets a fluffy white cat during her board meetings is still up to speculation.

Barbara Broccoli doesn’t M-handle Bond alone, she has another Broccoli to help; half-brother Michael Wilson.

Barbara Broccoli and Michael G Wilson – children of the franchise’s creator – keep all of Bond’s secrets.  They open up about wooing Daniel Craig, the next Bond, and life after SPECTRE

There’s a definite rhythm to the lives of James Bond producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G Wilson.  “Bond never quite goes away,” says Wilson, stepson of the legendary Albert “Cubby” Broccoli, sitting in the opulent Piccadilly offices of Eon productions, creators of the 007 franchise.

“But now we’re just about to peak,” chimes in Broccoli, his half-sister, with her trademark cheery laugh. ~ Julia Smith, The Telegraph

“Keep all of Bond’s secrets?”

This super-successful super-spy franchise has a tighter bloodline lock on its content than the Crown of England, herself…which, by the way, they work hand-in-hand with.

In 2012, Daniel Craig appeared as Bond, “parachuting” in with QE2 to open the London Olympics with the garish panache of a Bond sportscar.

Tragically, less than a year later, the stuntman who portrayed Craig in the jump would be killed in a wing-suit accident.

It’s all terribly patriotic…unless you understand that absolutely everything is as fake as a movie, from Elizabeth II dutifully watching over the best interests of Britons, to MI6 doing the same, to the Olympics being about ethical sportsmanship and not glorifying satan worship.⁵

Elizabeth I boldly established the Church of England to be a Protestant breakaway from all-powerful Rome.  Her current namesake is anything but.  Elizabeth 2 was born Elizabeth Alexandra Mary.  300 years post the great Protestant Virgin Queen, Rome yet again has complete control over England via her proxies like Elizabeth II, Dame of Malta.

The Knights of Malta

One Order of particular interest is the Knights of Malta.  According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, the Order of the Knights of Malta is, “The most important of all the military orders, both for the extent of its area and for its duration.  It is said to have existed before the Crusades and is not extinct at the present time.”ⁱⁱ

The Knights of Malta wore similar costumes to the Knights Templar before them.  The stylized cross we see on their uniforms is known today as a Maltese cross.

The Maltese cross is a common feature of the Pope’s garments, reminding us that he is the head of these Orders.

A Protestant branch of the Knights of Malta is the Order of St. John of Jerusalem.  Queen Elizabeth II is the Sovereign Head of the Order of St. John,ⁱⁱⁱ as we can see from her costume in the photograph.

The Queen’s participation in this Order, which brings with it required obedience to the Pope, is an example of how King John’s ancient concession of the crown to the Papacy is still in effect today. ~ The Pope’s Knights, Amazing Discoveries.org

With a franchise as “plugged in” as James Bond is, I fully expected to get hidden meaning imparted to me in “SPECTRE”, I just hadn’t expected it to be nearly as bold and open as it was.

Exodus

In my review of the 2014 Ridley Scott movie Exodus: Gods and Kings, I noted this, first remarking about confusion in whether the young boy in the movie was “God” or an angel—

We’re never really sure about the boy/God because after he proclaims to a buried-in-mud Moses “I AM” Moses later shouts in exasperation that he’s tired of dealing with a messenger.  Which is it?

There’s no confusion about what the boy wants, however.  He tells Moses he needs a general to fight.

…it’s the depiction of Moses as the insurrectionist general being rescued in his slow war of attrition by miracles, that doesn’t match well with the Biblical narrative.  This seems less an accurate account of the Exodus and more a cry for insurrection against the Luciferian world order…but the Luciferians make the movies so what’s going on here?! …

Another grievous departure from Scripture was what happened after the Hebrews were released.  Moses then attempted to lead them back through the desert wilderness trying to recall his trek from his family to Memphis.  He thinks he can remember but he’s deeply distraught.  He wants to bring them to a safe and tactically-secure location as soon as possible but not only does God ignore his pleas for help, Moses ineptly leads them to the Red Sea and a dead end as Pharaoh’s army comes crashing down on them—but not before losing many chariots through a dangerous mountain pass.

Not only is this not in Scripture, it actually contradicts the Word!

Moses never had to rack his brain for a route through the wilderness, wondering desperately how to stand in leadership for his people—the Lord made it powerfully clear with a massive plume of smoke by day and a terrifying column of fire by night guiding them the entire way.  When they reached the Red Sea, the column of fire switched positions and kept the Egyptians from bearing down on them before they were through crossing.

Again, what we are seeing is that it was much more important to the film-makers to encourage the rise of a future Moses than to honor the original story.

Those who rule the world over you are far from monochrome.  Only a very, very small number at the top are all in for satan and know full well that there’s no hope for them.  The vast majority of the rest of them have been seduced or co-opted into the system of Mystery Babylon out of their own lust for power, wealth, fame and/or just lust, period.  There are a large number that eventually feel remorse or concern over their involvement in rebellion.

Beyond them are the hapless pawns and system bureaucrats who fumble around.  They rub shoulders with the Luciferians in their dealings and gain insight as a result.  Sometimes they wish to send information out like messages in a bottle, hoping an alert hero will read it and have the courage to use it because they could not.

There are also the truly evil people who flaunt their control with open admission of who they are in mocking derision of humanity’s inability to either recognize them or bring them to justice.  They are wrong on both counts and their arrogance could very well be their undoing.

There’s a reason why Mystery Babylon is a system that relies entirely on secrecy—were humanity to be made aware of exactly who is in control, how they are in control and just how much they harm, hate and fear us, the end would be swift and terrible for the Whore of Babylon.

In fact, it’s predicted by the Bible to happen in just that way.

“The ten horns which you saw are ten kings who have received no kingdom [sounds like Popes to me!], but they receive authority for one hour as kings with the beast.  These are of one mind, and they will give their power and authority to the beast.  These will make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them, for He is Lord of lords and King of kings; and those who are with Him are called, chosen, and faithful.”

Then he said to me, “The waters which you saw, where the harlot sits, are peoples, multitudes, nations, and tongues.  And the ten horns which you saw on the beast, these will hate the harlot, make her desolate and naked, eat her flesh and burn her with fire.  For God has put it into their hearts to fulfill His Purpose, to be of one mind, and to give their kingdom to the beast, until the words of God are fulfilled.  And the woman whom you saw is that great city which reigns over the kings of the Earth.” ~ Revelation 17:12-18, NKJV (some capitalization added for respect and clarity)

One World Paganism

Catholic beliefs are a syncretistic mix of Christian doctrines terminally intertwined with the legends of the first rebellion against YHWH; Babylonian demonism and Chaldean sun worship.

In fact, Roman Catholicism has nothing to do with spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ and everything to do with abusing the worst of spiritual concerns over sin, guilt, salvation and damnation to exploit them for the purposes of subjugating mankind.

The Sacrifice of Jesus Christ was the most freeing event in human history.  It instantly rendered all religion—even the religion dictated by YHWH, Himself, to Moses—obsolete.

And Jesus cried out again with a loud voice, and yielded up His Spirit.

Then, behold, the Veil of the Temple was torn in two from top to bottom; and the Earth quaked, and the rocks were split, and the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised; and coming out of the graves after His resurrection, they went into the Holy City and appeared to many.

So when the centurion and those with him, who were guarding Jesus, saw the earthquake and the things that had happened, they feared greatly, saying, “Truly this was the Son of God!” ~ Matthew 27:50-54, NKJV (some capitalization added for respect and clarity)

Within 500 years, the very Beast that had executed Christ had used His Sacrifice to rebuild a new religion that mixed the Levitical priesthood with Rome’s Babylonian pagan beliefs and wrapped them in the trappings of Christianity—

It is known as “syncretism” and Rome’s Special Forces—the Jesuits—have been on the leading edge of this agenda since their founding.

Some of the best sources of information from the enemy’s camp are the enemy’s disaffected allies.  Helena Petrovna Blavatsky was a true Luciferian—a spiritist and medium who taught that the Devil didn’t exist and that demons could be friendly and helpful.  Once you isolate those ideas as spurious, her writing (particularly against Rome and the Jesuits) was nothing short of a revelation.

In Volume II of Isis Unveiled, Blavatsky makes a shocking statement that predated a Jesuit war by 120 years: the Papacy gave aid and comfort to muslim jihadists (who were, themselves, created by Rome) in order to see them commit unspeakable atrocities against Slavic Christians in Serbia.  They were able to do so because of the kindred doctrines shared by Catholics and muslims.

But is it merely Pagans and heathen that the Catholics persecute, and about whom, like Augustine, they cry to the Deity, “Oh, my God! so do I wish Thy enemies to be slain”?  Oh, no! their aspirations are more Mosaic and Cain‐like than that.

It is against their next of kin in faith, against their schismatic brothers that they are now intriguing within the walls which sheltered the murderous Borgias.  The larvæ of the infanticidal, parricidal, and fratricidal Popes have proved themselves fit counsellors for the Cains of Castelfidardo and Mentana.  It is now the turn of the Slavonian Christians, the Oriental Schismatics — the Philistines of the Greek Church!

His Holiness the Pope, after exhausting, in a metaphor of self-laudation, every point of assimilation between the great biblical prophets and himself, has finally and truly compared himself with the Patriarch Jacob “wrestling against his God.”

He now crowns the edifice of Catholic piety by openly sympathizing with the Turks!  The vicegerent of God inaugurates his infallibility by encouraging, in a true Christian spirit, the acts of that Moslem David, the modern Bashi‐Bazuk; and it seems as if nothing would more please his Holiness than to be presented by the latter with several thousands of the Bulgarian or Servian “foreskins.”  True to her policy to be all things to all men to promote her own interests, the Romish Church is, at this writing (1876), benevolently viewing the Bulgarian and Servian atrocities, and, probably, manoeuvring with Turkey against Russia.  Better Islam, and the hitherto‐hated Crescent over the sepulchre of the Christian god, than the Greek Church established at Constantinople and Jerusalem as the state religion.  Like a decrepit and toothless ex-tyrant in exile, the Vatican is eager for any alliance that promises, if not a restoration of its own power, at least the weakening of its rival.  The axe its inquisitors once swung, it now toys with in secret, feeling its edge, and waiting, and hoping against hope.  In her time, the Popish Church has lain with strange bedfellows, but never before now sunk to the degradation of giving her moral support to those who for over 1200 years spat in her face, called her adherents “infidel dogs,” repudiated her teachings, and denied godhood to her God!

SACRILEGIOUS TRICKS OF CATHOLIC CLERGY

The press of even Catholic France is fairly aroused at this indignity, and openly accuses the Ultramontane portion of the Catholic Church and the Vatican of siding, during the present Eastern struggle, with the Mahometan against the Christian.  “When the Minister of Foreign Affairs in the French Legislature spoke some mild words in favor of the Greek Christians, he was only applauded by the liberal Catholics, and received coldly by the Ultramontane party,” says the French correspondent of a New York paper.

“So pronounced was this, that M. Lemoinne, the wellknown editor of the great liberal Catholic journal, the Debats, was moved to say that the Roman Church felt more sympathy for the Moslem than the schismatic, just as they preferred an infidel to the Protestant.  ‘There is at bottom,’ says this writer, ‘a great affinity between the Syllabus and the Koran, and between the two heads of the faithful.  The two systems are of the same nature, and are united on the common ground of a one and unchangeable theory.’  In Italy, in like manner, the King and Liberal Catholics are in warm sympathy with the unfortunate Christians, while the Pope and Ultramontane faction are believed to be inclining to the Mahometans.”⁶

When Rome hates an enemy, it is a fire that lasts for centuries.  That was 1876.  120 years later, she would again use proxies—this time, her minions running the terrible military might of the United States—to again murder Slavic Christians wholesale.

In December of 1998, Congress began impeachment proceedings against William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.

In January of 1999, [Jesuit-educated at Georgetown] William Jefferson Blythe Clinton committed the American military to a 500 year old religious conflict between Bosnian muslims and Serbian Christians in the former Yugoslavia…aiding the Islamists against their Orthodox foes. …

The Bosnian War didn’t do much for Christian Serbs but it was a tremendous boon to the Religion of Peace—by the way, National Guardsmen that should be home digging citizens out of weather emergencies are still deploying on this mission today!

Mike Scruggs noted for the Tribune Papers (archived here) that this was a war that created a terrorist haven in the heart of Europe:

For 78 days in 1999, we bombed Christian Serbia and their forces in Kosovo, ostensibly as a humanitarian move to prevent Serbian ethnic cleansing of Kosovo’s Albanian population.  Our real motive was to cripple the troublesome anti-multiculturalist Serbs and to enhance our standing with the oil-rich Muslim world.  We bombed bridges, selected buildings, railroads, even passenger trains, and other targets in the Serbian capital of Belgrade.  Unfortunately, the Chinese Embassy was also hit.  According to John Pilger, writing in the Guardian, many of the bombs dropped from a relatively safe altitude (for us) of 15,000 feet, also hit schools, hospitals, and homes. Total Serbian dead amounted to about two thousand. Pope John Paul II described the bombing as an “act of diabolical retribution.” Many conservative and liberal American leaders agreed, but the Serbs eventually had to yield to our more advanced technology and vastly superior force. …

The results of our alliance with the KLA and establishing an Albanian base of Muslim power in Kosovo have been horrific.  The Albanians have driven 277 thousand Serbs from Kosovo.  Hundreds have been murdered.  Thousands have been robbed and brutalized as their homes and property were destroyed.  Muslim multiculturalists have destroyed 135 Orthodox churches, monasteries, and shrines.  All this was done under the noses of UN security forces.

Bill Clinton’s great military achievement was a humanitarian disaster, and it established a dangerous Muslim foothold in Europe that is exporting terror and crime.

~ Known By His Enemies, Johnny Cirucci, JohnnyCirucci.com

It’s not a “humanitarian disaster” if it was designed from the very beginning to be as vicious and horrific against the “heathen” enemies of Rome—and this time, Rome need not raise up an army for her brutal agenda, she can (did and still does) use yours, America.

The Mouth of Sauron

Because they have a reputation for being subversives and assassins, some of the best work for the Jesuits in ecumenical syncretism is done (again) by puppets and proxies—they take particular delight in using faux “Protestants” like John B. Cobb Jr.  Having been raised in Japan by Methodist missionaries, Cobb was selected at an early age by the same cabal of Jewish leadership and Roman muscle that has stood against Christ since His execution:

After his graduation from high school, Cobb attended Emory College in Oxford, Georgia before joining the U.S. Army in 1943.^[16]  He was chosen for the Japanese language program, which was filled mainly with Jewish and Catholic intellectuals who helped make him aware of the narrow, parochial nature of his Georgia Protestantism.^[17] ~ Wikipedia

In 1944, Cobb joined the US Army where he was exposed to the intellectuals such as academic-minded Jews and Irish Catholics who revealed a wonderful world of different perspectives expressed by them to Cobb. ~ The Boston Collaborative Encyclopedia of Modern Western Theology

The Jesuits and kabbalists would put Cobb on the forefront of ecumenical syncretism.  This is critical to the Luciferian agenda as when it comes to combining world religions those who dig in their heels the most are Protestant Christians—

As John Cobb (2002), a theologian in Buddhist–Christian dialogue, has observed, it is easier to have multiple religious belonging in some contexts than it is in others.  While it is possible for a Christian to adopt Buddhist meditation, it is harder for adherents of the monotheistic Abrahamic faiths to cross over.  He also thinks that even if a Christian adopts some Buddhist practices, it is difficult to live out both the Christian and Buddhist ways of being and commitments in the fullest sense.  Although he supports the experimentation of multiple belonging, which he says may have appeal to those individuals who find it difficult to identify fully with one tradition, he prefers to be rooted in a single tradition, while seeking its constant transformation by the inspiration of others.

Cobb’s position is different from that of advocates of the complementarity and convergence of Christianity and other religious traditions.  It was for advocating such radical views that Jesuit priest Jacques Dupuis (1997) was investigated by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith of the Vatican.  Citing the example of Henri Le Saux (with an Indian name Abhishiktananada) and the concept of Christ the Omega in Teilhard de Chardin, Dupuis (2002) is open to the possibility that double religious belonging can be a partial anticipation of the full recapitulation in Christ of all religions, which will only be disclosed at the end of time.  His fellow Jesuit, Aloysius Pieris of Sri Lanka, shares his view of the complementarity of religious traditions, but does not subscribe to the notion of teleological convergence.  A leading voice in Buddhist–Christian dialogue, Pieris says Buddhism and Christianity represent two different poles of experience – gnosis and agape, or wisdom and love – each of which is incomplete without the other…⁷

On my show, I repeatedly state the necessity of discernment—a Gift of the Holy Spirit (I call it “Anatoli’s nose” after a character from the SciFi movie The Chronicles of Riddick).  Discernment can help us glean important information from an organization like the “Cult Research Center”.  Despite claiming to be dedicated to the purity of the Christian Gospel, the CRC makes some very New Age declarations that show it to be far from theologically trustworthy.

The CRC, however, seems to have little love for the Catholic Church (although it wouldn’t be the first time a seeming enemy of Rome worked for her ultimate aims as a secret ally—it’s in the Jesuit 4^th Vow Blood Oath).

We are grateful to the CRC for showing the connection between Zoroastrianism and Catholicism as found in the mutual use of swastikas.

What does Catholicism have to do with Buddhism?  In Plaošnik (Sveti Kliment Pantelejmon), a Catholic Church in Macedonia, there is a mosaic floor with a Buddhist swastika next to a cross.  There are even swastikas on the Tombstone of Abbot Simon De Gillans (Paris, France 1345), and swastikas on the robes of the Catholic clergy of Rogier Van der Weyden’s “The Seven Sacraments” altarpiece.

Seeing this identical symbol, begs the question, “Why are Catholicism and Buddhism so alike?”  This is not a question that can come up just because of their identical swastikas; a symbol of their religion, it can be found in their temples and rituals, but no other religion has so much similarities like Catholicism and Buddhism. …

Then, why is this symbol of Aryanism found in Catholicism?  The Roman Catholic Church was mostly influenced by Zoroastrianism.  This influence that began from Persia continued to spread in Greece and Rome.  Especially the Romans were fanatic about this mithra god of Zoroastrianism, and many customs and rituals related to this religion started to settle in people’s lives.  The problem is, these religious Romans were accepted by the Roman Catholic Church of Christianity.  The Catholic Church absorbed a lot of paganistic customs to solidify their position.  This was how the Catholics started to carve the swastikas of Buddhism, Hinduism, and Zoroastrianism on the temples of God.₁₀

Because the Catholics’ and Buddhists’ roots are the same, they really resemble each other, such as the paintings and statues associated with the sun. …

Not only do they resemble each other in decorations, but Catholicism and Buddhism look incredibly alike.  Their faith of polytheism, the idea of venerating relics, repeating certain sentences while praying, the use of rosaries, and the ascetics’ celibacy all resemble each other.

Can we really say that Catholicism is a religion that believes in God, established by Jesus? ~ Catholicism and Buddhism – Aren’t we so alike?, Cult Research Center

The ecumenical syncretistic melding of world religions steamrolling over the complaints of the Reformation Pro Testari is so important to the Jesuits that they even seek to redefine the language of their machinations.

The Jesuit Mission Superior of Nigeria and Ghana, Peter Schineller, wrote a very revealing paper on the subject entitled Inculturation And The Issue Of Syncretism: What is the Real Issue?

What is the real issue?  Is syncretism always wrong?  Can there be good syncretism?  Is syncretism  inevitable?  Are syncretism and inculturation incompatible?  Is there any clear, agreed upon definition of syncretism?  Is syncretism a necessary step in the slow process of inculturation?  These are some of the questions that are raised when syncretism and inculturation come face to face.

My own judgment, conclusion, and thus strategy, as we will see, is that the employment of the word  “syncretism” is no longer helpful or constructive, because the word itself has so many contrasting connotations, meanings.  Many of these are pejorative. …

In light of this deep seated ambiguity, and in spite of attempts at redefining the word, my view is that the word cannot be redeemed, and it might be better not to enter into the controversy surrounding the word. …

Both in the history of its usage, and in contemporary usage, the word syncretism has had varied meanings.  Originally it was applied to political alliances in ancient Greece, to the cities of Crete which came together.  Then it described the way the Old Testament assimilated elements from surrounding cultures.  In the age of the Reformation it pointed to the links between Christianity and humanism, and to the need for Protestant and Catholic churches to come together…

In fact, syncretism has never been used in the need for Protestants and Catholics to come together.  This is known as “gaslighting”; flipping reality completely on its head simply by asserting a lie boldly as if it’s fact and using repetition, reputation and normalcy bias to bolster the lie.

Schineller also noted that his brother Jesuit Karl Rahner—the mind behind Vatican II—considered the Council of Jerusalem to have been the first step towards syncretizing Judaism and Greek culture.  This is a twisting of the Council’s determination so perverse as to be truly called “Jesuitical”.

The Jerusalem Council didn’t rid Believers of Mosaic Ceremonial Law in order to make it easier for Gentiles to combine their old with the Jewish new, they did so because the Ceremonial Law was an impediment to the simplicity of the Gospel.

If that isn’t clear enough, Scripture makes it so!

The Jerusalem Council

Now the apostles and elders came together to consider this matter.  And when there had been much dispute, Peter rose up and said to them: “Men and brethren, you know that a good while ago God chose among us, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the Gospel and believe.  So God, who knows the heart, acknowledged them by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He did to us, and made no distinction between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.  Now therefore, why do you test God by putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?” ~ Acts 15:6-10 (the NKJV adds headings)

Not to be outdone, Schineller then uses “Christ-mas” as an example of Catholic “Christian” victory of “inculturation” (syncretism) over paganism.

He ends by channeling the Jesuit founder of the New Age, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, by showing how the Gospel must transform and mutate like a living organism in order to absorb all other faiths—

In conclusion, we have discussed the question of inculturation and syncretism by commenting on the various, ambiguous meanings of the word syncretism, and then by suggesting that we avoid that word, and move rather to the real issue, namely the criteria and attitudes for discerning correct or adequate inculturation.  There is no simple answer, no simple criteria because we are dealing with complex realities, with a rich Christian tradition, and marvelously diverse and rich human cultures.  It is even more complex because we are dealing with changing cultures.  No longer is it simply a traditional culture in Nigeria that we must try to inculturate the gospel into.  Rather it is a traditional culture that is changing rapidly, influenced by the march of modernity, of modern science and technology.  This is all the more reason for theology to be creative and prophetic.  It cannot simply protect the past, maintain the old.  It must move, develop, grow, like a living organism.

But after the “organism” is done transforming…what will it finally look like?

Día de Muertos

There are two very important things to remember when dealing with the Roman Catholic “Church”:

1. It is not “Christian”.
2. It’s primary purpose is to exploit and abuse spiritual issues for the purpose of coalescing power over mankind.

That is why, when Rome moved into a new geographic location where the population has a strong pagan culture, it doesn’t compete with those pagan beliefs, it absorbs them.

One such example is the “Day of the Dead”.

Day of the Dead (Spanish: Día de Muertos) is a Mexican holiday celebrated throughout Mexico, in particular the Central and South regions, and by people of Mexican ancestry living in other places, especially the United States.  It is acknowledged internationally in many other cultures.  The multi-day holiday focuses on gatherings of family and friends to pray for and remember friends and family members who have died, and help support their spiritual journey.  In 2008 the tradition was inscribed in the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity by UNESCO.^[1]

The holiday is sometimes called Día de los Muertos^[2][3] in Anglophone countries, a back-translation of its original name, Día de Muertos.  It is particularly celebrated in Mexico where the day is a public holiday. Prior to Spanish colonization in the 16th century, the celebration took place at the beginning of summer.  Gradually it was associated with October 31, November 1 and November 2 to coincide with the Western Christian triduum of Allhallowtide: All Saints’ Eve, All Saints’ Day, and All Souls’ Day.^[4][5]  Traditions connected with the holiday include building private altars called ofrendas, honoring the deceased using sugar skulls, marigolds, and the favorite foods and beverages of the departed, and visiting graves with these as gifts.  Visitors also leave possessions of the deceased at the graves.

Scholars trace the origins of the modern Mexican holiday to indigenous observances dating back hundreds of years and to an Aztec festival dedicated to the goddess Mictecacihuatl.  The holiday has spread throughout the world, being absorbed within other deep traditions for honoring the dead.  It has become a national symbol and as such is taught (for educational purposes) in the nation’s schools. Many families celebrate a traditional “All Saints’ Day“ associated with the Catholic Church. ~ Wikipedia

Given that Rome rules the world from behind the scenes, she uses her whores, proxies and puppets in foreign governments to invade whole nations without a single shot being fired.

One such example is America’s wide-open borders.  Not a single American leader at the national, state or local level—not executive, legislative, judicial nor law enforcement—dares raise a hand to stem the tide.  Each and every one has been cowed into treason as millions upon millions of illegal immigrants stream into the United States; a very, very large percentage of them are Latino Catholics.

I have a very long list of examples in my book, Illuminati Unmasked, but here are a few more—

Catholic Charities Provides Aid to Families Entering U.S. Illegally

KSAT, ABC Channel 12, San Antonio, Texas

SAN ANTONIO—Catholic Charities operates various centers in Texas to help the influx of women and children from Central America entering the country illegally.

Sacred Heart Parish Hall in McAllen has been turned into a relief center for families that have crossed the border.

Members of the community have donated their time and resources, such as clothing and toys, to the cause.

“Everyone is a volunteer here. The solidarity you have seen in this humanitarian outreach has been so uplifting,” said Brenda Riojaso of Catholic Charities.

The city of McAllen has also provided hundreds of thousands of dollars in aid to keep the center open, with the expectation the government will pay them back.

The faith-based effort also extends to the Alamo City, where Archbishop Gustavo Garcia-Siller recently called on parishes to collect donations.

Parishioners have responded to the call and on Tuesday, Catholic Charities in San Antonio will be receiving the donations collected over the weekend.

Taxpayer-Funded Catholic Charities on Hiring Spree to Provide for Illegal Immigrants

Kristin Tate, Breitbart.com

HOUSTON, Texas–Catholic Charities in Texas is helping fulfill the needs of the thousands of illegal immigrants that continue to flood the U.S.-Mexico border.  Breitbart Texas has learned that Catholic Charities’ St. Jerome’s Home for Children, located in Fort Bend County, is providing many benefits including financial support, English classes, legal assistance, and release services to youths in the U.S. illegally.  The charity is looking to hire several staff members to help accommodate the influx of migrants.

St. Jerome’s webpage reads, “While the youth are living in this home, evaluations are provided to assess all their needs (medical, psychiatric/therapeutic, educational, vocational, social, familial, legal) with the development of an initial service plan.”

“After these assessments are completed, a decision about a long-term placement is made in the best interest of the youth,” it continues.  “If appropriate, the youth moves to live with an individual foster family.  Otherwise, the youth remains in the agency foster home. If a youth is not able to maintain the foster family placement, he or she returns to the agency home to live until discharge.”

The programs administers “financial assistance” for the foreigner’s housing, food, clothing, and other necessities.  It additionally provides case management by social workers, vocational training, English lessons, and legal assistance.

Romanizing America Through Illegal Immigration

Ian Paisley.org
Pastor Ralph Ovadal

In recent weeks, the advocates of the “rights” of illegal Mexican immigrants, accompanied by and even led by Roman Catholic priests, have staged rallies, protests, and parades all across the United States of America.

On 25th March, 500,000 people took to the streets of Los Angeles, flying Mexican flags and chanting slogans such as “Viva Mexico!”  Another 500,000 marched in Dallas on April 9, waving Mexican flags with “Our Lady of Guadalupe” emblazoned in the center.

On May 1, a favorite Communist holiday, illegals staged a nationwide work stoppage and boycott of businesses and schools.  The alien lobby also once more staged marches and rallies nationwide.  As reported by NBC News, some of those activities were launched from local Roman Catholic parish churches.  This outburst of protest is a response to several immigration and border reform measures working their way through the U.S. Congress.  According to current estimates, there are as many as twenty million illegal aliens in the United States of America. [today’s numbers are many times that]

Rome aiding and abetting

It is unfortunate that very few Americans have been concerned with the religious aspect of this issue.  The Roman Catholic Church is aiding and abetting the criminal invasion of America from Mexico, working both legally and criminally to bring as many illegal Mexican immigrants into my country as possible.  In this, Rome has one goal in mind—the pope and his henchmen are seeking to turn America, founded and still a Protestant country, into a Roman Catholic country.

This is criminal activity yet Catholic clergy and organizations such as “Catholic Charities” continue on as immune from prosecution as any of America’s mayors who also aid them by autocratically-declaring their fiefdoms to be “sanctuary cities”.  So total is the control of Rome in this effort that not even local law enforcement dares question the status of obvious non-English speaking illegal aliens.  I know, I’ve spoken to an officer directly about this.

Thanks to this invasion, now where America’s small towns used to celebrate Veteran’s Day and Memorial Day, instead they celebrate the Day of the Dead.

With its grinning skeletons dressed in feathered hats and gowns, jewel-eyed sugar skulls and colorful paper garlands, the Nov. 2 “Día de los Muertos,” or Day of the Dead, might appear to many Americans like a Mexican Halloween.  But this centuries-old tradition interwoven with Catholicism is much more than a night of ghouls, ghosts and goodies.

The day gets its name from an ancient Aztec belief that the dead could return home to visit their families one day a year.  In today’s Catholic Mexico, the Day of the Dead is a time for families to gather, remember their ancestors and pray for the souls of the deceased.

“It’s not a sad occasion,” said Prisciliano Maya, faith formation director at Sacred Heart in St. Paul.  “It’s a time to remember and celebrate their [ancestors’] lives.  It’s also about family coming together.”

Maya recalled how his family celebrated the Day of the Dead when he was growing up in central Mexico. Early Nov. 1, his father would lead him and his siblings in reciting the rosary.  Later that day the family would gather for a meal.  Then on Nov. 2 they would spend the day at the cemetery praying and sharing memories of their loved ones.

Memorial altars

Like all immigrant groups, Mexicans brought some of their traditions with them to the U.S.  Today, it is not uncommon to find Day of the Dead altars, or “ofrendas,” in Catholic churches around the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis on All Saints and All Souls days.

Every year at Sacred Heart and other majority Latino churches in the archdiocese, parishioners place pictures of their dead loved ones, flowers, candles and other symbolic items on multi-tiered Day of the Dead altars. ~ Julie Carroll, Catholic Spirit.com

Día de Muertos has even become popular in Hollywood.  It was used to convey all sorts of Luciferian hidden messages in the movie Batman vs. Superman.

It’s also how SPECTRE opens—

“The dead are alive.”

NOTE: There has been a copyright battle between Ian Fleming and screenwriter Kevin McClory over “Spectre/SPECTRE” causing what may have been a proper name to later become an acronym; Special Executive (for) Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge, and Extortion.  The battle, lasting several decades, was settled in 2013 just prior to the making of this movie but for the sake of simplicity I will maintain the spelling which implies an acronym.

This was no minor scene—it was something the film-makers expended great resources to extravagantly portray.

Mexico’s first Bond girl has spoken of her pride at filming SPECTRE in her country, and her anger at the insults heaped on her people by Donald Trump.

Stephanie Sigman, the 28-year-old model who became an international star after sitting next to Arctic Monkeys frontman Alex Turner on a plane, and then featuring in a music video, said shooting the film was a joy.

“The scenes in the streets of Mexico City were just incredible,” she told The Telegraph, speaking ahead of the world premier in London on Monday.  Sigman plays Estrella, and joins Bond on a spectacular Day of the Dead march through the city – the 11 minute opening sequence to the £200 million film.  Involving 1,500 extras, it brought the capital to a standstill, as helicopters swooped overhead and Daniel Craig’s stunt double hurtled above the Zocalo main square.

Michael Wilson, the co-producer, said the scene was the biggest opening shot they had ever done, while Sam Mendes, the Oscar-winning director, said Mexico provided the drama he sought. ~ Mexico’s First Bond Girl on Filming In Her Homeland, The Telegraph

As the movie progresses, we find that Bond’s mission in Mexico was an unsanctioned assignment!

He utilizes a sound-conducting laser weapon site to hear men in a room speaking Italian and planning a terrorist bombing.

It turns out that there is to be a big merger between England’s international intelligence agency, MI6 (the British counter-part to the CIA) and MI5 (Britain’s FBI).

Once merged, they will become the “Joint Security Service” under young rising star Max Denby, code-named “C”.  Bond gives “C” a frosty and formal reception when they meet.

Next we see a really poor facsimile of a picture depicting Bond’s “adopted” family when he was a boy, standing alongside his “father” and “brother”—whose head has been burned out of the picture due damage caused in the previous movie, Skyfall.

We then see a massive new building complex that will become the “Center for National Security” and we soon find out that it isn’t even built with taxpayer money but instead the funds have been donated by outside civilian sources!

There are terrorist incidents occurring all over the world and they are causing a heightened fear that is helping to centralize the world’s intelligence agencies into one monstrous enterprise named “Nine Eyes” and “C” is all for it.

During a meeting of the world’s security officials in Tokyo, “C” makes an impassioned speech for “Nine Eyes” whilst “M” quietly notes from the audience the resultant power will be “an unelected one”.

M’s Chief of Staff, Bill Tanner (Rory Kinnear), tells Bond with irony that it will usher in a “New World Order”.  Not quite sure how that phrase is even utterable in “mainstream” entertainment.

Because of Bond’s “unsanctioned assignment” in Mexico, he is injected with “smart blood”; “cutting edge nano-technology” to track his every move.  He willingly subjects to the procedure and the truth is that all of the West’s highly-trained operators have similar leashes on them…or in them.  They need to know it’s because they’re not trusted to fully obey masters who are traitors in sheep’s clothing.

Later, after “M” comes around to seeing the import of Bond’s rogue mission, he orders the Quartermaster—“Q”—to “erase all of the smart blood files”.

I’m afraid it’s not that simple.

Fiennes First

With Bond in the doghouse, friends are needed.  Lois Maxwell outlasted several different Bond actors in her role as Eve Moneypenny, M’s secretary, but the Daniel Craig genre apparently felt color was needed.  This is the same series that cast the Jewish Joseph Wiseman as the Oriental Dr. Julius No of SPECTRE in the film of the same name; Dr. No (1962).  Remember, whenever someone Jewish does something surly, there’s always a Roman standing behind him, egging him on.

So Bond calls in the new, minority Moneypenny (played by Naomie Harris) to read her in on his unsanctioned assignment.  The old “M” (played by Dame Judi Dench⁸) left a video recording for Bond stating, “If you’re watching this, I’m dead and you need to kill Marco Sciarra.”

UPDATE, 18 July 2016, 12:22 PM, EST: It’s amazing the things you learn when you uncover hidden history.

“Kill Sciarra!”

Giacomo “Sciarra” Colonna was a son of one of the most powerful families in Rome at the turn of the 14^th century (1300’s) or today.  “Colonna” is a name that should be coming up when one wants to find out who is ruling the world from behind the scenes (along with de Medici, Aldobrandini, Orsini, Farnese and Breakspeare).  Instead, we get names like “Soros”, “Rockefeller” and “Rothschild”.

Why do we need to “kill Sciarra”?  —Because Sciarra Colonna joined Philippe le Bel’s emissary Guillaume de Nogaret and confronted Benedetto Caetani, Pope Boniface VIII, in the ongoing feud between Philip IV and Boniface.  Caetani lost the confrontation and was slapped in the face by Colonna—a slap that resounded through history as schiaffo di Anagni (“the Anagni slap”—the confrontation took place at Caetani’s palace in Anagni.)

PC M

Speaking of political correctness, Dench was brought in to be the female “M” at the beginning of the Pierce Brosnan age of Bond.  Feminizing the character played so well by Bernard Lee in previous Bond movies was the second most annoying reason I haven’t seen any of the Brosnan Bond movies.  Picking Brosnan was the first.

It’s nothing against Brosnan’s ability as an actor, I despised his casting for the very reason he was cast: his previous work on a cheesy 80s TV show, Remington Steele.

Truth-be-told, it’s the same logic that brought Roger Moore but at least The Saint was somewhat more serious of a show.

Once allowed to age, Brosnan’s cheese has grated off—especially when he plays a bitter, grizzled ex-spy as he did in November Man (for more, read my review, here).

Dench was killed off in Skyfall (something she says she cried over) and replaced by Ralph Fiennes, whose full name is Ralph Nathaniel Twisleton-Wykeham-Fiennes to make sure we fully understand the depth of his blue-blood breeding.  Fiennes is known for work in Schindler’s List, The English Patient, The Avengers (1998) and was nominated for an MTV “best villain” award as Harry Potter’s “Lord Voldemort”.

Ralph’s brother Joseph Alberic Twisleton-Wykeham-Fiennes has an equally established acting career having worked or starred in such films as Shakespeare in Love, Enemy at the Gates, Luther (where he played the title role of the great Reformer), The Escapist and Hercules (2014).  His most recent accomplishment is to star as Clavius in the “Easter” movie blockbuster Risen, promised to pick up where Mel Gibson’s Passion of the Christ left off.  In fact, the two movies share a key expert—editor Steven Mirkovich.

Gibson played a special role, himself, as the man demonized by a decadent Hollywood because he dared make Passion but was he?  Passion was hugely successful (bringing back nearly $400 million with $30 million in cost) starring talent like devout Roman Catholic Jim Caviezel and Monica Bellucci who was raised Catholic but claims to be agnostic (we’ll see shortly what that really means to the Romans who run all).  Caviezel rode his stardom right into the presence of Rome’s Jesuit Pope Francis, Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

Mel is so ultra orthodox Catholic that he even built his own church in order to hear a pre-Vatican II Latin mass (not quite sure what he’s upset about, Vatican II was written by Jesuit mastermind Karl Rahner).

Do the Jews run Hollywood?  There sure was a lot of propaganda and publicity over Jewish outrage regarding Passion but the man standing behind Mel was a Jesuit named William J. Fulco.  He even did all the translating from English to Arabic to make sure the movie told you what the Jesuits wanted it to—much as another Jesuit (Edmund Walsh) did all the translating at Nuremburg to insure the world was left wonderfully ignorant over the Jesuit role behind the Third Reich.

Jesuit Georgetown’s School of Foreign service is named after Walsh and boasts having trained many of the world’s power players (or, rather, “puppets”).

The Jews are said to run Hollywood but I don’t see a Jew picking the island of Malta to film Risen on—and it was.  That should give a great boost to the fools who fight as today’s Crusaders for Rome like former Green Beret Tim Kennedy who recently went on the Alex Jones show to frighten everyone about the ISIS menace; making sure to prominently display his Crusader t-shirt.

So what has been the key to the success of the Twisleton-Wykeham-Fiennes clan?

Ralph isn’t a “religious” man, though Joseph is said to be drawn to “faith-based” movies.  Perhaps even blue-blooded Britons groveled at the feet of Jewish patrons to land important roles…or are there Jesuits in the woodpile here, too?

Ralph Fiennes was born in Ipswich, Suffolk, England.  He moved around quite a bit while growing up, living in several places in England and Ireland.

Fiennes grew up in a Catholic household, and says that his mother was quite devout,¹ but he says he “chucked it all in before I was confirmed.”² ~ Hollowverse.com

The boys got good Catholic educations, too.  Ralph went to St. Kieran’s College (a Catholic high school) and Joseph was educated by the Sisters of La Retraite at Leehurst.  For a “non-practicing” Catholic, Joseph certainly thought enough of his mother’s faith to be married in a Catholic ceremony.  I wonder what Martin Luther would’ve thought (“Couldn’t the Hollywood Jews have found a Lutheran to portray me?!”).

Fiennes, too, got to meet the superstar Jesuit Pope (oh, purely by “accident” during a “general audience” with His Holiness, of course).

I’ll bet when prominent people joke as Ralph did that he “chucked” his Catholicism “before [he] was confirmed” he didn’t “chuck” as much as he thought…and the real power in Hollywood (and everywhere else) knows it.

Besides the Pope, Fiennes was/is⁹ friends with billionaire Jew pedophile provider Jeffrey Epstein and a frequent visitor to his “rape island” via his “Lolita Express” flights.

I did notice one thing in my research—that a young Ralph looked a lot like the sketch Fleming drew of Bond years ago; far more than who Fleming thought he was drawing actor/composer Howard Hoagland “Hoagy” Carmichael.

Ralph Bond…?

All Roads…

After the catastrophic show-down in Mexico City, Bond must continue to go rogue and travel to the heart of the conspiracy: ROME.

He was successful in killing Sciarra but not the organization behind the man.  For that, he would need to meet and (of course) seduce his wife.

M’s recorded directions were “don’t miss the funeral” and Bond didn’t.  It was carried out in tasteful Roman fashion.  In fact, the cross wasn’t even a gory crucifix as is so wont the traditional depiction of the empire that executed Christ.

Bond does, indeed, connect with Lucia Sciarra…in more ways than one.  And who better to play a shapely, desirable 50 year old widow than Mel Gibson’s Mary Magdalen; Monica Bellucci?

During the encounter she warns Bond of the unspeakable power her dead husband’s organization wields.

Bond asks Lucia about a name he’s heard; the “Pale King”.  It’s a name that connects perfectly with Rome.

As it turns out, the organization is meeting that night and Bond has Sciarra’s ring for identification and entry.

Before he goes, Sciarra’s widow warns him that he is about to cross over to a place where there is no mercy.

Bond travels to Rome and infiltrates the SPECTRE meeting.  The head of SPECTRE sits in the dark and is treated with such reverence that underlings actually bow to him.

Does this remind you of anything?

Bond listens in as SPECTRE “Provincials” from all of their respective nations check in; reports are good—the shadowy organization has infiltrated everything from the military to banks to the oil industry (just like the Jesuits).

Did you know that the United States was divided into 10 Jesuit provinces governed by their own “Provincials”?

They are like kings ruling over their invisible kingdom, unknown to the subjects whose wealth, well-being, even their very sons feed into.

“After this I saw in the night visions, and behold, a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, exceedingly strong.  It had huge iron teeth [much as Nebuchadnezzar’s visionary statue with its legs of iron—Rome!]; it was devouring, breaking in pieces, and trampling the residue with its feet.  It was different from all the beasts that were before it [because it rules all nations in secret, as the system of Mystery Babylon], and it had ten horns.  I was considering the horns, and there was another horn, a little one, coming up among them, before whom three of the first horns were plucked out by the roots.  And there, in this horn, were eyes like the eyes of a man, and a mouth speaking pompous words.” ~ Daniel 7:7-8

There can be no confusing “horns” as nations.  Allow me to again quote Revelation 17—

“The ten horns which you saw are ten kings who have received no kingdom as yet, but they receive authority for one hour as kings with the beast.  These are of one mind, and they will give their power and authority to the beast…” ~ Revelation 17:12-13

If there ever was an organization that worked for evil “as one mind” it is the Company of Loyola.  Jesuit Provincials work tirelessly without an obvious “kingdom” and even the implication in Revelation 17:12 that they do not have a kingdom “yet” may not be an accurate Greek-to-English translation as that word οὔπω (oupó) can be translated “yet not” or “but are still without” as it is here—

Now the disciples had forgotten to take bread, neither had they in the ship with them more than one loaf.  And he charged them, saying, “Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod.”  And they reasoned among themselves, saying, “It is because we have no bread.”  And when Jesus knew it, he saith unto them, “Why reason ye, because ye have no bread?  Perceive ye not yet, neither understand?  Have ye your heart yet hardened?  Having eyes, see ye not?  And having ears, hear ye not? And do ye not remember?  When I brake the five loaves among five thousand, how many baskets full of fragments took ye up?”  They say unto him, “Twelve.”  “And when the seven among four thousand, how many baskets full of fragments took ye up?” And they said, “Seven.”  And he said unto them, “How is it that ye do not understand (οὔπω νοεῖτε οὐδὲ συνίετε)?” ~ Mark 8:14-21 (KJV)

Gnostic Cuckoos

During the meeting, we learn that Marco Sciarra departed with unfinished business—assassinate the “Pale King”.  The shadowy “Superior General” asks who will take Sciarra’s place?  “Guera” (Spanish actor Benito Sagredo), an assassin seated at the opposite end of the table volunteers until a massive man strides in, gouges out his eyes and breaks his neck.

The first two Daniel Craig James Bond movies (Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace) were masterful—gritty, tough and, above all, realistic.  They set the Craig movies apart from the comical, cheesy, tongue-in-cheek caricature he had become (particularly in the Roger Moore era).

Sadly, Barbara Broccoli would have Craig revert to that foolishness in his second two movies (Skyfall and SPECTRE) although not completely.

The assassin “Mr. Hinx” could be considered as part of this “return” but that is not the feeling I walked away with after watching the brutal bloodsport scene (given that the Jesuits are the world’s foremost assassins dedicated to lay down their very lives for the slightest trifle of their leadership I’m sure such things have been conducted in their circles).

Although Richard Kiel (“Jaws”) was a massive 7’2” his ridiculous steel teeth kept him out of the realm of reality and squarely in Bond-land.

However, Kiel never brutally blinded someone on screen and, despite Dave Bautista’s career in the aptly-renamed “World Wrestling Entertainment”, Bautista has trained with the Gracie clan in Brazilian jiu jitsu and even fought and won a single mixed martial arts match.  His 6’6”, 289lb stature spoke instantly to me of one thing: genetically-engineered killer.

Bond thought he had infiltrated SPECTRE in anonymity but there was a dramatic moment where the shadow-general reveals himself to be fully aware of Bond’s presence and he must make a hasty exit with “Mr. Hinx” fast on his heels.

The movie reverts to Bond-land as the two race through Rome in 6-figure sports cars (because that’s what spies and assassins drive, right Barbara?).

The Bondian ludicrous extravagance again takes a serious turn (preceded by a very dramatic soundtrack score) as the two race right through St. Peter’s square.

Bond eludes his would-be killer and makes it to the “Pale King” first who turns out to be “Mr. White” (Jesper Christensen) whom the audience has known from all four Daniel Craig movies; clearly a pivotal character.

A disheveled Pale King tells Bond that he became disenchanted with SPECTRE when the organization began sex trafficking women and children which was where Mr. White drew the line—slaughtering untold hundreds of innocents and repeatedly threatening to bring the world to extinction via a variety of weapons of mass destruction was all fair game.

The Jesuit Superior General is known as the “Black Pope” because of the terrible power he wields while still impersonating a humble black-cassock-wearing priest.  What is fascinating is how many “White Popes” the Jesuits have reputedly murdered because they, too, failed to get with the program.

Although “Mr. Hinx” is close behind Bond to kill them both, the Pale King has already been given cancer due to a thalium-impregnated cell phone.  Such a demise is a Jesuit specialty.

Mr. White then bargains with Bond for the only thing left that he cares about; his daughter, “Madeleine Swann” (Léa Seydoux).  If Bond will protect her, the Pale King will tell Bond how to get at SPECTRE.

Meanwhile, “Nine Eyes” is fast becoming a reality.  The lone holdout on the Security Council—South Africa—has been victimized by several deadly terrorist attacks and now all nations are onboard.

We later find out that Max Denby/C is actually a member of SPECTRE so what this means is that false flags were conducted in textbook Hegelian fashion: the organization claiming to protect citizens murdered them in order to frighten them into giving up rights for the enabling of that same organization.

Bond finds Swann who wants nothing to do with him until an attempt on her life convinces her otherwise.  The two then try to retrace the steps of the Pale King to strike at the heart of SPECTRE.

Bond and Swann must return to the hotel where the Pale King went regularly with his wife before they divorced along with a young Madeleine in Tangiers—L’Américain … “The American”.

So, too, have the Jesuits made America the lynchpin in all their machinations.  Their official publication is “America Magazine”.

In a drunken stupor, Madeleine whispers “to liars and killers everywhere” then drifts into sleep.

Never were the Jesuits more accurately described.

As the fetching Mr. White’s daughter and Secret Service spy get to know each other, young Madeleine asks Bond how a man ends up choosing to become a paid assassin?  Bond’s seemingly humorous response is, “Well it was either that or join the priesthood.”

Why compromise when you can have both?  Be a Jesuit!

It turns out that the leader of SPECTRE is actually Bond’s adopted brother, Franz Oberhauser.

The two travel to the hotel and discover White left evidence directing them to Oberhauser’s operations base in the desert.  After an encounter with Hinx that sees the assassin killed, Bond and Swann are escorted to Oberhauser’s base.  There, Oberhauser reveals that Spectre has been funding the Joint Intelligence Service while staging terrorist attacks around the world, creating a need for the Nine Eyes programme.  In return C will give Spectre unlimited access to intelligence gathered by Nine Eyes, allowing them to anticipate and counter-act investigations into their operations.  Bond is tortured as Oberhauser discusses their shared history: after the younger Bond was orphaned, Oberhauser’s father, Hannes, became his temporary guardian.  Believing that Bond supplanted his role as son, Oberhauser killed his father and staged his own death, subsequently adopting the name Ernst Stavro Blofeld and going on to form Spectre. ~ Wikipedia

So the ultimate villain turns out to be our hero’s brother—just as the gnostics teach that “Lucifer” is the wrongfully-wounded brother of Christ, cast out of Heaven like Prometheus for trying to give men the knowledge that would empower them.

This is why the floors of Freemasonic lodges always have black and white tiles—because darkness is light and light is darkness.

Messaging Us or Mocking Us?

SPECTRE is little different from any number of recent movies that seem to telegraph the truth of who is ruling the world in secret.  Why have they produced a movie like this?  Is it a private joke amongst the Elite at our expense or are they trying to wake the sleeping giant?

As I said at the beginning of this article—in any massive endeavor of malignant secrecy, those who rule tell those who carry out the orders very little.

From Cinema to the CIA, everything is carefully compartmentalized.

In his prologue to S. K. Bain’s The Most Dangerous Book in the World, Peter Levenda said this about the bureaucracy under the dark powers that commit false flags like 9/11—

There are other forces at work, forces that are unacknowledged by the state, the church, the media because to admit their existence is to admit failure.  Thus, when things go wrong terrorists are blamed, or communists, or witches.  This serves to rally the citizens around the government once again, instead of stopping to insist that explanations be given, that evidence is properly analyzed, that the guilty are apprehended and punished.  And we once more go to war, against …someone, somewhere.  Paranoia becomes institutionalized.  It is appropriated by the government as its own prerogative.  The state determines the nature and quality of the paranoia: it creates intelligence agencies whose sole purpose is to give a form to paranoia, to enshrine paranoia as one of the necessary qualities of an observant and caring state.  To prove that paranoia is an acceptable characteristic of the paternalistic regime.  The citizens are not allowed to become paranoid unless it is at government direction and sanction.  Individual cases of paranoia are frowned upon.  The state tells us that if we are not paranoid the way it is paranoid—and about the same things—it’s because we don’t have all the facts: about terrorism, fundamentalism, communism, foreign countries, weapons of mass destruction, sleeper cells.  The state has all the facts: classified documents, wire-tap transcripts, intelligence feeds, high-altitude reconnaissance images, none of which the citizen is permitted to see.  It does not realize that the logical conclusion of all this paranoia is suspicion of the state apparatus itself.  What the conspiracy theorist often fails to realize, however, is that those working for the state are often just as clueless as the average citizen when it comes to the origin and function of the forces at work to subvert it.  The strength of a conspiracy, after all, rests in the limited number of persons who are aware of its existence and parameters.  No one has the entire picture.  Each member of the state apparatus only has possession of a single piece of an enormous jigsaw puzzle.  Putting together all these disparate pieces—particularly when one does not have the original picture to work from—is a soul-destroying enterprise that consumes decades of work and years of one’s life.  This is especially true when the state has in its arsenal of lies the techniques of disinformation and misdirection, of false testimony and planted documents.

When movies like SPECTRE have films such as Exodus: Gods and Kings being released before it and Mad Max: Fury Road being released the same year (another deeply Luciferian movie that seemed to cry out for a hero), it sure seems like even the Machine is yearning for release from the chains of its cruel master.

NOTE: For related sound clips from the movie and a reading of this article, listen to my show—Resistance Rising, Episodes 087 & 088—on the embedded players below.