II Thessalonians 2:5-12 (New King James Version)
⁵ Do you not remember that when I was still with you I told you these things?
⁶ And now you know what is restraining, that he may be revealed in his own time.
⁷ For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only He who now restrains will do so until He is taken out of the way.
⁸ And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord will consume with the breath of His mouth and destroy with the brightness of His coming.
⁹ The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders,
¹⁰ and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
¹¹ And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie,
¹² that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

If you read the NKJV, the translators capitalize the pronouns in verse seven clearly leading all to believe “the restrainer” is the Lord.

But is that accurate?

The King James version was based upon the highly-reliable Textus Receptus manuscripts.  The New King James, however, was not a modern English update of the KJV.  Critical changes to Scripture were made.  Although the 1982 preface to the New King James states the intent is only to take the Elizabethan language¹ and make it understandable in modern English, the translators failed to mention that changes would be made according to the Septuagint and even Jerome’s Latin Vulgate!

Other translations are noticeably different.

II Thessalonians 2:5-12 (New American Standard Bible)
⁵ Do you not remember that while I was still with you, I was telling you these things?
⁶ And you know what restrains him now, so that in his time he will be revealed.
⁷ For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only he who now restrains will do so until he is taken out of the way.
⁸ Then that lawless one will be revealed whom the Lord will slay with the breath of His mouth and bring to an end by the appearance of His coming;
⁹ that is, the one whose coming is in accord with the activity of Satan, with all power and signs and false wonders,
¹⁰ and with all the deception of wickedness for those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth so as to be saved.
¹¹ For this reason God will send upon them a deluding influence so that they will believe what is false,
¹² in order that they all may be judged who did not believe the truth, but took pleasure in wickedness.

So who is “the Restrainer”?  Does this help us understand who anti-Christ will be?  What is the “strong delusion”?

Often, it is assumptions that lead to biased and incorrect exegesis of Scripture.  Such is frequently an error of the Western mindset.  A Buddhist saw tells us—

If you wish to know the truth, hold no opinions.²

Daniel’s 70 Weeks

A similar confusion of pronouns can be found in an even more important passage; Daniel’s “70 Weeks”—the Prophecy of Daniel 9:24-27.

Sadly, there are no English translations that show this Prophecy in its clarity.

Daniel 9:24-27 (New International Version)
²⁴ “Seventy ‘sevens’ are decreed for your people and your holy city to finish transgression, to put an end to sin, to atone for wickedness, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy and to anoint the Most Holy Place.
²⁵ “Know and understand this: From the time the word goes out to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until the Anointed One, the ruler, comes, there will be seven ‘sevens,’ and sixty-two ‘sevens.’  It will be rebuilt with streets and a trench, but in times of trouble.
²⁶ After the sixty-two ‘sevens,’ the Anointed One will be put to death and will have nothing.  The people of the ruler who will come will destroy the city and the sanctuary.  The end will come like a flood: War will continue until the end, and desolations have been decreed.
²⁷ He will confirm a covenant with many for one ‘seven.’  In the middle of the ‘seven’ he will put an end to sacrifice and offering.  And at the temple he will set up an abomination that causes desolation, until the end that is decreed is poured out on him.”

In one of the most important passages of Scripture are mixed two seminal yet diametrically-opposed figures; the Anointed Messiah and the Destroyer—the anti-Messiah (although not equal in power).

The key to interpretation is found in the final verse.  The one who puts an end to the sacrifice and offering must be evil, mustn’t he?  The “covenant” must be a future, 7-year covenant, mustn’t it?

In Scripture, there are only two Covenants—the first is the Covenant between YHWH and His People given by Moses.  It was a Covenant His People could not keep [Acts 15:7-11], one that was only meant to hold them and point them toward a new Covenant [Galatians 3:19-24].  This New Covenant was radically different from the old—rather than written on tablets of stone and impossible to keep, this One would be written on the hearts of God’s People and they would keep it out of love for Him! [Jeremiah 31:31-34]

In this light a literal reading of the Prophecy produces a radically different interpretation.

Daniel 9:24-27 (Young’s Literal Translation)
²⁴ ‘Seventy weeks are determined for thy people, and for thy holy city, to shut up the transgression, and to seal up sins, and to cover iniquity, and to bring in righteousness age-during, and to seal up vision and prophet, and to anoint the holy of holies.
²⁵ And thou dost know, and dost consider wisely, from the going forth of the word to restore and to build Jerusalem till Messiah the Leader [is] seven weeks, and sixty and two weeks: the broad place hath been built again, and the rampart, even in the distress of the times.
²⁶ And after the sixty and two weeks, cut off is Messiah, and the city and the holy place are not his, the Leader who hath come doth destroy the people; and its end [is] with a flood, and till the end [is] war, determined [are] desolations.
²⁷ And he hath strengthened a covenant with many — one week, and [in] the midst of the week he causeth sacrifice and present to cease, and by the wing of abominations he is making desolate, even till the consummation, and that which is determined is poured on the desolate one.’

There are flip-flopping contrasts floating between verses 26 and 27; first Messiah arrives at the appointed time but is “cut off”.  Then, anti-Messiah comes (from the anti-Messiah people) and will destroy the Sanctuary and make desolate with a “flood” (flooding waters often are a Biblical metaphor for many people).  Contrasting again, Messiah will re-affirm the Old Covenant but only for a single “week” (7 years).  Halfway through, He will cause the sacrifice to become obsolete and impossible to continue both physically and spiritually.

John 2:13-22 (Modern English Version)
¹³ The Passover of the Jews was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem.
¹⁴ In the temple He found those who were selling oxen and sheep and doves, and the moneychangers sitting there.
¹⁵ When He had made a whip of cords, He drove them all out of the temple, with the sheep and oxen.  He poured out the changers’ money and overturned the tables.
¹⁶ He said to those who sold doves, “Take these things away!  Do not make My Father’s house a house of merchandise!”
¹⁷ His disciples remembered that it was written, “Zeal for Your house will consume Me.”
¹⁸ Then the Jews said to Him, “What sign do You show us, seeing that You do these things?”
¹⁹ Jesus answered them, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.”
²⁰ Then the Jews said, “It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and will You raise it up in three days?”
²¹ But He was speaking concerning the temple of His body.
²² Therefore, when He was raised from the dead, His disciples remembered that He had said this to them.  And they believed the Scripture and the word which Jesus had spoken.

______________

Matthew 23:37-24:2 (Modern English Version)
³⁷ “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those who are sent to you, how often I would have gathered your children together as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you would not!”
³⁸ “Look, your house is left to you desolate.”
³⁹ “For I tell you, you shall not see Me again until you say, ‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord.’”

Chapter 24

¹ Jesus departed from the temple and was leaving when His disciples came to show Him the temple buildings.
² Jesus answered them, “Do you not see all these things?  Truly I say to you, not one stone shall be left here upon another that shall not be thrown down.”

Most bizarre of all, both Messiah and anti-Messiah work together to fulfill the Prophetic Divine Will!

It was intended for Messiah to re-affirm the Old Covenant with His 7-year ministry (beginning at His Baptism by John).

Halfway through His Ministry, traitorous Jewish leaders intent on killing anyone who threatened their power, seditiously worked with real power in Judea to have the Anointed One murdered without just cause (“not for Himself”).

A short time later, the people of the coming anti-Christ devastated Jerusalem and leveled the Temple down to its last foundation stone—Romans.

Gessius Florus loved money and hated Jews.  As Roman procurator, he ruled Judea, caring little for their religious sensibilities.  When tax revenues were low, he seized silver from the temple.  As the uproar against him grew, in A.D. 66, he sent troops into Jerusalem who massacred 3,600 citizens.  Florus’s action touched off an explosive rebellion—the First Jewish Revolt—that had been sizzling for some time.

Launching the Revolt

The Jewish Revolt began—and met its bitter end—at Masada, a hunk of rock overlooking the Dead Sea.  The Romans had built a virtually impregnable fortress there.  Yet the atrocities of Florus inspired some crazy Zealots to attack Masada.  Amazingly, they won, slaughtering the Roman army there.

In Jerusalem, the temple captain signified solidarity with the revolt by stopping the daily sacrifices to Caesar.  Soon all Jerusalem was in an uproar, expelling or killing the Roman troops.  Then all Judea was in revolt; then Galilee.

Cestius Callus, the Roman governor of the region, marched from Syria with twenty thousand soldiers.  He besieged Jerusalem for six months, yet failed.  He left six thousand dead Roman soldiers, not to mention weaponry that the Jewish defenders picked up and used.

Emperor Nero then sent Vespasian, a decorated general, to quell the Judean rebellion.  Vespasian put down the opposition in Galilee, then in Transjordan, then in Idumea.  He circled in on Jerusalem.  But before the coup de grace, Nero died.  Vespasian became embroiled in a leadership struggle that concluded with the eastern armies calling for him to be emperor.  One of his first imperial acts was to appoint his son Titus to conduct the Jewish War.

Crushing the Revolt

By now, Jerusalem was isolated from the rest of the nation, and factions within the city fought over strategies of defense.  As the siege wore on, people began dying from starvation and plague.  The high priest’s wife, who once basked in luxury, scavenged for crumbs in the streets.

Meanwhile the Romans employed new war machines to hurl boulders against the city walls.  Battering rams assaulted the fortifications.  Jewish defenders fought all day and struggled to rebuild the walls at night.  Eventually the Romans broke through the outer wall, then the second wall, and finally the third wall.  Still the Jews fought, scurrying to the temple as their last line of defense.

That was the end for the valiant Jewish defenders and for the temple.  Historian Josephus claimed that Titus wanted to preserve the temple, but his soldiers were so angry at their resilient opponents that they burned it.  The remaining Jews were slaughtered or sold as slaves.

The Zealot band that took Masada held it for at least three more years.  When the Romans finally built their siege ramp and invaded the mountain fortress, they found the defenders dead—they had committed suicide to avoid being captured by foreigners.

Results of the Revolt

The Jewish Revolt marked the end of the Jewish state until modern times.  The destruction of the temple also signified a change in the Jews’ worship…³

Confirmed

Understanding the Romans as the people of the anti-Christ is the key to unlocking the proper understanding of these passages.  The Romans would later become “Holy Romans”, mutating just as Daniel predicted into a Beast very different from the three previous Beasts (empires) given to both Daniel and Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar.

Daniel 7:1-8 (Modern English Version)
¹ In the first year of Belshazzar king of Babylon, Daniel had a dream and visions of his mind while on his bed.  Then he wrote the dream and told the sum of the matters.
² Daniel spoke and said: I saw in my vision by night the four winds of the heaven striving upon the Mediterranean Sea.
³ Four great beasts came up from the sea, diverse from one another.
⁴ The first was like a lion and had eagle’s wings.  I watched until its wings were plucked and it was lifted up from the earth and made to stand on the feet as a man, and a man’s heart was given to it.
⁵ Another beast appeared, a second, like a bear, and it raised itself up on one side, and it had three ribs in its mouth between its teeth.  And they said to it, “Arise, devour much flesh.”
⁶ After this I looked and there was another, like a leopard, which had on its back four wings of a fowl.  The beast also had four heads.  And dominion was given to it.
⁷ After this I saw in the visions at night a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and exceedingly strong.  And it had great iron teeth.  It devoured and broke in pieces, and stamped the rest with its feet.  And it was different from all the beasts that were before it, and it had ten horns.
⁸ I considered the horns, when there came up among them another little horn before whom three of the first horns were plucked up by the roots.  And there, in this horn, were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things.

This Fourth and Final Beast was unlike the previous three because she would control in secret.  This way, she would spread tendrils across civilization.

Now, instead of enforcing her will by posting soldiers on every street corner, she would co-opt the soldiers and officials of each nation she conquered and they would do her will in secret!

Daniel’s vision was in perfect harmony with the dream he interpreted for King Nebuchadnezzar in Chapter 2 of a great statue which had a head of gold (Babylon), a torso of silver (Medo/Persia), loins of brass (Greece), legs and feet of iron (Rome).

Notice how the teeth of the Final Beast were the same material as the legs in Nebuchadnezzar’s dream: iron.

But this new “Holy Roman Empire” knew she had been predicted in Scripture and went about wiping off her bloody fingerprints, leaving only faded clues behind.

The 1517 Reformation initiated by Martin Luther gave new light which explained that the entire office of the Papacy was anti-Christ.

The theme became very popular in the late Middle Ages among the Fraticelli, Wycliffites, and Hussites, who identified the popes with the Antichrist soon to be overthrown.  Luther was unwittingly in line with these sectaries, with one significant difference, however.

Whereas they identified particular popes, because of their evil lives, with Antichrist, Luther held that every pope was Antichrist even though personally exemplary, because Antichrist is collective: an institution, the papacy, a system which corrupts the truth of Christ.

That was why Luther could repeatedly address Leo X in terms of personal respect only a week or so after blasting him as Antichrist.⁴

The Jesuit-run Counter-Reformation began immediately upon Luther’s break.  Unable to destroy the movement by the brute force of the Inquisition’s burning pyres and instruments of torture, they embarked upon a new strategy to compromise and discredit Scripture.

Again, the keepers of Truth became an underground minority.

Despite their creation by Freemason William Miller, Seventh Day Adventists remained as the sole keeper of the torch of Luther.

Adventist scholar Uriah Smith confirmed these interpretations for us in the 19^th century.

Commenting on the prophecy that the little horn should “wear out the saints of the Most High,” Barnes, in his Notes on Dan.7:25, says: “Can any one doubt that this is true of the papacy?  The Inquisition, the persecutions of the Waldenses, the ravages of the Duke of Alva, the fires of Smithfield, the tortures of Goa, — indeed, the whole history of the papacy, may be appealed to in proof that this is applicable to that power.  If anything could have worn out the saints of the Most High, — could have cut them off from the earth so that evangelical religion would have become extinct, — it would have been the persecutions of the papal power.  In year 1208 a crusade was proclaimed by Pope Innocent III against the Waldenses and Albigenses, in which a million men perished.  From the beginning of the order of Jesuits in the year 1540 to 1580, nine hundred thousand were destroyed.  One hundred and fifty thousand perished by the Inquisition in thirty years.  In the Low Countries fifty thousand persons were hanged, beheaded, burned, or buried alive, for the crime of heresy, within the space of thirty-eight years from the edict of Charles V against the Protestants to the peace of Chateau Cambresis in 1559.  Eighteen thousand suffered by the hand of the executioner in the space of five years and a half, during the administration of the Duke of Alva.  Indeed, the slightest acquaintance with the history of the papacy will convince any one that what is here said of ‘making war with the saints’ ([Daniel 7] verse 21), and ‘wearing out the saints of the Most High’ (verse 25), is strictly applicable to that power, and will accurately describe its history.”  (See Buck’s Theological Dictionary, art., Persecutions: Oswald’s Kingdom, etc., pp.107-133; Dowling’s History of Romanism; Fox’s Book of Martyrs: Charlotte Elizabeth’s Martyrology; The Wars of the Huguenots; The Great Red Dragon, by Anthony Gavin, formerly one of the Roman Catholic priests of Saragossa, Spain; Histories of the Reformation, etc.) …

“The prince of the covenant” unquestionably refers to Jesus Christ, “the Messiah the Prince,” who was to “confirm the covenant” one week with his people. Dan. 9:25-27.  The prophet, having taken us down to the death of Tiberius, now mentions incidentally an event to transpire in his reign, so important that it should not be passed over; namely, the cutting off of the Prince of the covenant, or in other words, the death of our Lord Jesus Christ.  According to the prophecy, this took place in the reign of Tiberius.  Luke informs us (3:1-3) that in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, John the Baptist commenced his ministry.  The reign of Tiberius is to be reckoned, according to Prideaux, Dr. Hales, Lardner, and others, from his elevation to the throne to reign jointly with Augustus, his step-father, in August, A.D. 12.  His fifteenth year would therefore be from August, A.D. 26, to August, A.D. 27.  Christ was six months younger than John, and is supposed to have commenced his ministry six months later, both, according to the law of the priesthood, entering upon their work when they were thirty years of age.  If John commenced in the spring, in the latter portion of Tiberius’s fifteenth year, it would bring the commencement of Christ’s ministry in the autumn of A.D. 27; and right here the best authorities place the baptism of Christ, it being the exact point where the 483 years from B.C. 457, which were to extend to the Messiah the Prince, terminated; and Christ went forth proclaiming that the time was fulfilled.  From this point we go forward three years and a half to find the date of the crucifixion; for Christ attended but four Passovers, and was crucified at the last one.  Three and a half years from the autumn of A.D. 27 bring us to the spring of A.D. 31.  The death of Tiberius is placed but six years later, in A.D. 37.⁵

Who Is The Restrainer?

Now with the proper understanding we can return to our original question.

It was well understood be even “Church Fathers” like Quintus Septimius Florens Tertullianus, (c. 155 – 240 AD)—better known to us as “Tertullian”.

Dealing with the eschatological section of Paul’s first Epistle to the Thessalonians, Tertullian asks: ‘What archangel’s voice, what trump of God, is now heard, except it be forsooth in the entertainments of the heretics?  ‘He also points out that in the second Epistle to the Thessalonians Paul bids them not be troubled by false prophets, who teach that the day of the Lord is at hand.  For that day shall not come, unless there first comes a falling away, and the appearance of Antichrist.  The Antichrist cannot, however, come until he who now hinders shall be taken out of the way.  The ‘one who now hinders’ is the Roman Empire.  ‘What obstacle is there but the Roman state, the falling away of which, by being scattered |^p210 into ten kingdoms, shall introduce Antichrist upon (its own ruins.)’⁶

The anti-Christ office of the Papacy could not materialize unless the military office of the Roman Empire first disappeared.

Learning Against Learning

So if the early Church knew Rome was the 4^th and Final Beast, and Protestants knew the Papacy was the anti-Christ, why isn’t it common knowledge today?

With Rome so clearly depicted as the 4th and final Beast of both Daniel and Revelation, Jesuits needed to disconnect Christians from that interpretation and they used Preterism and Futurism to do it.

Preterism is the idea that most of prophecy has already taken place.  It was concocted by a Jesuit.

Preterism was first advanced in 1604 by Jesuit Luis de Alcasar to destroy the Reformed Protestant teaching that the papacy was Mystery Babylon, the Great Whore and the historical Antichrist. …

Preterism wasn’t accepted by large groups of Protestants and an alternative interpretation of the End Times was put forth.

Futurism is more appealing in that it acknowledges that much of prophecy is yet future but it distracts from the 4th Beast and paints the anti-Christ as a man who suddenly appears just before the Tribulation and who stands alone, apart from any organization or system.

It, too, was fabricated by a Jesuit.

Francisco Ribera (1537-1591) of Salamanca, Spain, published a 500 page commentary on the grand points of Babylon and Antichrist, the object being to set aside the Protestant teaching that the Papacy is the Antichrist.  In his commentary, he assigned the first chapters of Revelation to the first century.  The rest he restricted to a literal three and a half years a the end of time.  He taught that the Jewish temple would be rebuilt by a single individual antichrist who would abolish the Christian religion, deny Christ, pretend to be God, and conquer the world.⁸ …

Ribera’s commentary laid the foundation for the greater structure of Futurism, which would be built upon and expanded by those who followed.  Ribera’s teaching was further popularized by Robert Bellarmine (1544-0621), an Italian cardinal and the most renowned of all Jesuit controversialists.¹⁰

After accepting the Jesuits’ Futurist System (and the Preterist System…) millenarian Protestants no longer saw Rome as a present but only a distant future threat.¹¹  We should also mention Irving’s system saw no hope of victory over the present forces of evil except “by the brightness of his coming” in the second advent. With no hope, why try to conquer all things for Christ? ~ Death of the Church Victorious, Ovid Need^{557 7}

Perhaps such a complete accomplishment seems impossible—no organization on Earth could so thoroughly control the understanding of almost all Christendom … could it?

“Unless those days were shortened, no one would be saved.  But for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened.  Then if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ,’ or ‘There He is,’ do not believe it.  For false christs and false prophets will arise and show great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect.  Listen, I have told you beforehand.” ~ Matthew 24:22-25 (Modern English Version)

UPDATE 29 March 2017, 01:31 PM, EST

The dichotomy and contrast between the old Mosaic Covenant and new Covenant in Messiah Jesus Christ can clearly be seen in this passage from Jeremiah where even physically circumcised Jews are called “uncircumsized”—

Jeremiah 9:25-26, (Modern English Version)
²⁵ The days are surely coming, says the Lord, that I will punish all who are circumcised and yet uncircumcised—
²⁶ Egypt, Judah, Edom, the children of Ammon, Moab, and all who dwell in the wilderness who clip the hair on their temples; for all these nations are uncircumcised, and all the house of Israel are uncircumcised of heart.

The meaning is clear: true Faith in YHWH (through His Son) is a radical change of the heart.  Righteousness is kept from within, not by memorization, legalism or rote.

1.  Perhaps “Shakespearian” would be better as King James I gave his Bible to Francis Bacon to edit and Francis Bacon was a Gnostic (the Freemason of his day) who was probably William Shakespeare.
2. Kindness: A Treasury of Buddhist Wisdom for Children and Parents, translated by Sarah Conover, Eastern Washington University Press (2001), p. 32
3.  A.D. 70 Titus Destroys Jerusalem, Christianity Today, Issue 28: 100 Most Important Events in Church History, 1990
4.  Here I Stand: The Life of Martin Luther, Roland H. Bainton, Abingdon-Cokesbury Press, New York (1950), p. 111
5.  Daniel and the Revelation, Uriah Smith, Review and Herald (1897), pp. 156-157, 269-270
6.  The Theology of Tertullian, R.E. Roberts, Epworth Press, London (1924), p. 161 [digital] 7.  Illuminati Unmasked, Johnny Cirucci, CreateSpace (2015), pp. 185-186, 187

One of today’s greatest deceptions is that the common citizen must drastically reduce their already heavily-burdened standard of living to compensate for “global warming”.

As with many other deceptions, it is wrought with fraud from “science”—a community that is supposedly above deception, dedicated to a strict code devoid of any bias.

The best example of this has already been expunged from the internet: “Climate-Gate”.

Columnist James Delingpole wrote a scathing series of articles for Britain’s Daily Telegraph (which have since been taken down but archived here).

The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth … has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka CRU) and released 61 megabytes of confidential files onto the internet. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)

When you read some of those files – including 1079 emails and 72 documents – you realise just why the boffins at CRU might have preferred to keep them confidential.  As Andrew Bolt puts it, this scandal could well be “the greatest in modern science”.  These alleged emails – supposedly exchanged by some of the most prominent scientists pushing AGW theory – suggest:

Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.

One of the alleged emails has a gentle gloat over the death in 2004 of John L Daly (one of the first climate change sceptics, founder of the Still Waiting For Greenhouse site), commenting:

“In an odd way this is cheering news.”

But perhaps the most damaging revelations – the scientific equivalent of the Telegraph’s MPs’ expenses scandal – are those concerning the way Warmist scientists may variously have manipulated or suppressed evidence in order to support their cause.

The very premise is thin as the “scientific community” has only been keeping very detailed methodical thermometer-based records since the 1880’s.

As a result, blaming the internal combustion engine for radical or dangerous changes in the Earth’s temperatures is the purest sophistry.

In the United States, as of August 1989, there has been little to no temperature change.

Even more disturbing then “scientists” doctoring data to shame common citizens out of their air conditioners and automobiles are government agencies joining the charade.

One wouldn’t expect the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to be involved in the “Global Warming” debate but, apparently, they have a lot of time and money on their hands.  Perhaps “space exploration” isn’t as difficult as it seems.

NASA lent it’s rocket muscle to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in also cooking the books—

Right after the year 2000, NASA and NOAA dramatically altered US climate history, making the past much colder and the present much warmer.  …NASA cooled 1934 and warmed 1998, to make 1998 the hottest year in US history instead of 1934.  This alteration turned a long term cooling trend since 1930 into a warming trend. ~ Steven Goddard

As the “alarming increase” in temperatures became more and more difficult to prove, the threat was re-branded to “Climate Change” which now includes any noticeable alteration in temperature, hot or cold (which we used to call “weather”).

In lock-step, politicians, “scientists”, “journalists” and the greatest experts of all—moviestars—continue to sound the Chicken Little alarm that is the tolling of the bell on your standard of living (but not theirs).

Being an A-list actor is an exhausting business — and Leonardo DiCaprio has a diary so full it would make a lesser playboy weep.

There are parties and premieres around the world and engagements with everyone from UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to the Pope.

As the Mail reported yesterday, only last week he took a day trip from France, where he was at the Cannes Film Festival, to New York, where he received a ‘green’ award.

And back again the following day.

The round trip of 7,942 miles was reportedly completed by private jet — a notoriously environmentally unfriendly way to travel.

It is rather embarrassing for DiCaprio, 41, as he used his Oscar acceptance speech in February to demand action on climate change.

His charitable foundation recently pledged £10 million for various green projects.  He sits on the boards of two eco pressure groups and has made his own environmental documentary — The 11th Hour, which sank like a stone at the box office.  However, DiCaprio doesn’t always practise the carbon footprint aware lifestyle that he preaches.  In the past five months alone, he has travelled at least 90,606 miles by plane in 18 separate trips.  Where private jets are used, the carbon dioxide emitted goes up hugely — between seven and 20 times, depending on the plane. ~ Daily Mail

DiCaprio then took his Climate Change road show to the seat of all world power—Rome—and kissed the ring of the Jesuit Vicar of Christ.

As Rome continues to seek the total enslavement of all mankind, the fraud of “Climate Change” is a top priority for Pope Francis.

In May of 2015, Francis released a special encyclical on the dangers of Climate Change.  In it he harkens to the Gaia worship of “Mother Earth”—

“LAUDATO SI’, mi’ Signore” – “Praise be to you, my Lord”.  In the words of this beautiful canticle, Saint Francis of Assisi reminds us that our common home is like a sister with whom we share our life and a beautiful mother who opens her arms to embrace us.  “Praise be to you, my Lord, through our Sister, Mother Earth, who sustains and governs us, and who produces various fruit with coloured flowers and herbs”.[1]

He referenced Pope Paul VI calling your cars and air conditioners “unchecked human activity” and Pope Benedict (who so kindly made way for Francis by stepping down—he got a Jesuit offer he couldn’t refuse) in stating that “the natural environment has been gravely damaged by our irresponsible behavior.”  This was all caused by too much freedom which the Vatican is very eager to rectify.

These statements of the Popes echo the reflections of numerous scientists, philosophers, theologians and civic groups…

—all of which are run by insiders who use altered date to bolster fraud.

Bergoglio then quoted the pantheism of Francis of Assisi whom he claims is his Papal namesake (not to be confused with Francis Xavier, one of the founders of the Jesuit Order) on how important it is to stop wanting things like the ability to drive a car or keep temperatures in our tiny Agenda 21 domicile livable—

If we approach nature and the environment without this openness to awe and wonder, if we no longer speak the language of fraternity and beauty in our relationship with the world, our attitude will be that of masters, consumers, ruthless exploiters, unable to set limits on their immediate needs.

Perhaps best of all was the Jesuit Pope’s connecting of our “climate emergency” with the need to “redistribute goods”—

Climate change is a global problem with grave implications: environmental, social, economic, political and for the distribution of goods.

Although this sounds extremely appealing when one looks at the wealth of Google, Microsoft, Blackwater/Xe/Academi, Haliburton, HSBC, Bank of America and many, many other Leviathans, this is not the Vicar’s intent as most of those venues are already owned or run by his trusted knights like Blackwater’s Erik Prince.

No, it’s we in the Middle and Lower classes who are the target of the Pontifex Maximus.

Leonardo DiCaprio’s visit must’ve worked.  Exactly one month later the actor received his very first Oscar.

“…all the nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, the kings of the Earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the Earth have become rich through the abundance of her luxury.” ~ Revelation 18:3

Although DiCaprio’s environmental cheek is bold, it’s nothing compared to the High Priest of high temperatures—Al Gore (also known as ManBearPig).

The Gores used about 191,000 kilowatt hours in 2006, according to bills reviewed by The Associated Press spanning the period from Feb. 3, 2006, to Jan. 5.  That is far more than the typical Nashville household, which uses about 15,600 kilowatt-hours per year. ~ CBS News

It’s hard to figure which came first, Pope Francis or Global Warming, but the ManBearPig is a big fan.  In fact, Al Gore is so impressed with Bergoglio’s dedication to deception that he’s ready to become Roman Catholic.

But there’s no such thing as “too much cheek” as was shown by Roman Catholic John Forbes Kerry (Yale Skull & Bones ’66) when he contrasted one Machine boogeyman to another, insisting in July of 2016 that your air conditioner was as frightening a threat as an ISIS terrorist.

But Pope Francis is far from done when it comes to joining hands with “science” to attack Christians and the Bible.  He recently made the bold proclamation that—

The theories of evolution and the Big Bang are real and God is not “a magician with a magic wand”…

This should be no surprise to those who know that the brilliance of the “Big Bang theory” (first there was nothing and then it exploded) came from a Jesuit-trained Roman Catholic priest, or that “evolution” was bolstered by the hoaxes of Jesuit Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.

When the basis for “science” is science fiction (stop and think about just how many movies there are depicting “aliens” and/or “space travel”) it’s easy to plant what Lenin called a “useful idiot” in the top post at NASA—someone who’s all-in for “aliens” and even mashes them into his distorted view of Christianity.

“You know, the universe is a big place.  I’m a practicing Christian, so in my faith, I learn about omnipotent, omnipresent God, which means he’s everywhere.  He’s all-knowing.  He does everything.  And I just cannot bring my little pea brain to believe that a God like that would pick one planet of one of millions of suns and say that’s the only place in the vast universe that I’m going to put any kind of life.  And so the problem is I haven’t been far enough away.” ~ A Conversation With Charles Bolden, Council on Foreign Relations.org

But perhaps NASA’s first black Administrator isn’t such a fool after all.  He at least knows that his masters cherish the strife caused by the manipulated “clash of cultures” and has needlessly added to it with the proclamation that “Muslim outreach” is a top NASA priority.  While Christians, Muslims and Jews fight contrived battles amongst themselves there’s little attention paid to the Papa behind the curtain.

As we become more skeptical of this farce, “the Church” may feel the need to exercise a little force powered by the same Jesuit Communism that has already overturned many nations.

Before the days of Avtomat Kalashnikov rifles and Schmeisser submachine guns, large groups of prisoners were hard to handle with just a few Jesuit priests.  The Company needed to use brains over brawn.  Later, they would be able to appropriate the “brawn” of whole nations.

The appeal of wealth redistribution is that recipients can live a somewhat easier life, though it is a utopia that has always disappointed.

In South America, “social justice” would become the cry for taking from “the rich” and giving to “the poor”.  What usually happens, however, is that the super-rich exploit the poor to bleed the few real producers in the Middle Class.

If this seems like the perfect weapon to be used in the Counter-Reformation, it’s not by coincidence.

The phrase “social justice” was coined by the Jesuit theologian and mentor to Pope Leo XIII, Father Luigi Taparelli D’Azeglio.

Pope Leo XIII’s social encyclical Rerum Novarum, published in 1891, drew on insights from his former teacher, Taparelli. ~ Real Social Justice, Ryan Messmore⁹³⁵

The utility of Communism was immediately seized upon by the Vatican.

Taparelli’s influence on Leo XIII is evident in the encyclical Aeterni Patris (1879) on restoring Thomistic philosophy and in the Magna Charta of Catholic social thought, Rerum Novarum (1891),⁴ the last draft of which was written by Taparelli protégé Matteo Liberatore.  The Jesuit Nell-Breuning employed Taparelli’s principles of sociality (or solidarism, as rephrased by Heinrich Pesch, SJ) and subsidiarity in the drafting of Pius XI’s Quadragesimo Anno. Indeed, Pius XI believed that Taparelli’s writings could “never be studied enough” (Divini illius magistri, 1939) and ranked him in importance for Catholic thought right after Saint Thomas. ~ Thomas C. Behr, University of Houston⁹³⁶

Professor Behr betrays his ideological blindness by comparing Rerum Novarum to the Magna Carta as they couldn’t be more diametrically opposed in their intent.

In the interests of full disclosure, Vincenzo Gioacchino Raffaele Luigi Pecci (Pope Leo XIII) published Rerum Novarum on May 15th, 1891 when the industrialist Robber Barons were strip-mining humanity in their unbridled lust. Nor did Leo XIII endorse the full confiscation of property nor the complete redistribution of wealth and goods.

However, he most certainly did channel his Communist Jesuit mentor, Taparelli with terms like “proletarian” and phrases like “…the spirit of revolutionary change…”. ~ Illuminati Unmasked, Johnny Cirucci, CreateSpace (2015), pp. 315-316

Now Francis can call upon his “Global Catholic Climate Movement” to seek “climate justice”.

Hopefully enough of the sheep wake up before they’re voted into the pot.

UPDATE 15 January 2017, 06:41 AM, EST

Marc Morano of Climate Depot found something of interest in the e-mails of Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff, Barack Obama’s lawyer and Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign Chairman, John Podesta.  No, not the veiled language of child rapists, murderers and sex slave traffickers—

Did you leave a handkerchief

From:ses@sandlerfoundation.org
To: john.podesta@gmail.com
CC: eryn.sepp@gmail.com
Date: 2014-09-02 17:54
Subject: Did you leave a handkerchief

Hi John,

The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems pizza-related. Is it yorus? They can send it if you want. I know you're busy, so feel free not to respond if it's not yours or you don't want it.

Susaner

From: Kathryn Tate [mailto:kathy@ktate.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 10:04 AM
To: Sandler, Susan
Cc: Sandler, Herbert
Subject: You left something at the Field house

Susan & Herb

I just came from checking the Field house and I have a square cloth handkerchief (white w/ black) that was left on the kitchen island.

Happy to send it via the mail if you let me know where I should send it.

I also meant to inquire yesterday about the pillows you purchased. I can send them as well, if you let me know where they are in the house.

Safe travels to all
Kate

Apparently, Podesta (who trained to become a Jesuit priest) has “Jesuit friends” who are pleased with the Jesuit Pope’s emphasis on using “climate change” to enslave mankind.

Despite leaked emails showing members of Hillary Clinton’s team expressing contempt for Catholics, Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta is apparently fond of Pope Francis because his “Jesuit friends” think the pope is “the real deal” on climate issues.

In an email exchange released by WikiLeaks, Podesta spoke to New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio after de Blasio’s trip to Rome. Podesta took the opportunity to applaud Pope Francis because Podesta claims “all my Jesuit friends say the Pope is the real deal”:

I’m kind of tight. Could you do 2:00 or 2:30? If not, I’ll get on your calendar for when I get back. John PS Great work on climate. Impressive event. As all my Jesuit friends say the Pope is the real deal. Are you going to go to LA for the US China cities climate meeting in the fall?

While de Blasio was Rome, he participated in a conference, sponsored by the Vatican, on how to fight climate change. Pope Francis has actively spoken out against climate change, even reportedly calling it a “sin.”

Although Podesta expressed he is fond of the pope because of the pope’s actions on climate change, other leaked emails show the Clinton chairman involved in email chains that call Catholicism “backwards” and urge a “Catholic spring” to move the religion away from a “Middle Ages dictatorship.” ~ Climate Depot

It’s perhaps the most trafficked web site right of center.

13 years ago, “the Drudge Report” was earning $3,500 a day.  One can just imagine what it does now.

Ans-wer.com states that Drudge—

—has a worth of over a million dollars per year thanks to his talk show and the advertising revenues generated from his website.  It is estimated that his net worth is $90 million.  According to recent statistics, Drudge has 87,000 twitter followers and 42,000 facebook fans.  He also published a book in 2000 called Drudge Manifesto adding to his career versatility.  Despite his life as a public image, Drudge’s sexuality is still a matter of controversy for the world media.  He is rumored to be gay.  However he has dismissed these claims every time in spite of the fact that Hilton has an exclusive video of Drudge holding the lip lock with an unidentified man in London.

Of his origins, Wikipedia states that he was raised in the Catholic colony of Maryland (granted to devout Roman Catholic George Calvert—Lord Baltimore—by “Protestant” King Charles I) by Leftist Democrat Jewish parents whose mother was a lawyer for Ted Kennedy.  The entire Irish Catholic Kennedy clan was carefully controlled by master Jesuit manipulators like Richard McSorely.

Matthew Drudge was raised in Takoma Park, Maryland, near Washington, D.C.  His parents are Reform Jewish Democrats who both worked for the federal government, and he is their only child.^[1]  His father, Robert Drudge, a former social worker who owns the reference site refdesk.com,^[1] and his mother, a former staff attorney for U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy,^[2] divorced when he was six.  Drudge went to live with his mother.^[1]  He had few friends and was an avid news reader and radio talk show fan.^[1][3]  In his book Drudge Manifesto, Drudge says that he “failed his Bar Mitzvah”, and graduated 341st out of a class of 355 from Northwood High School in 1984, giving himself, in his words, a “more than adequate curriculum vitae for a post at 7-Eleven”.^[1]

In the 1980s, Drudge worked as a telemarketer for Time-Life Books.

But what put little Jewish Matt Drudge on the map was insider scoops.

Drudge’s website gained in popularity in the late 1990s after a number of stories which he reported before the mainstream media.  Drudge first received national attention in 1996 when he broke the news that Jack Kemp would be Republican Bob Dole’s running mate in the 1996 presidential election.  In 1998, Drudge gained popularity when he was the first outlet to break the news that later became the Monica Lewinsky scandal.^[5] ~ Wikipedia

Catholic All-Star

In the 80’s and 90’s, All-Star NFL quarterback Jack Kemp was ubiquitous in all of the “Conservative” political circles.  What no one knew at the time was that, like Drudge, he has been implicated as a homosexual (which means blackmail).

One of the researchers who did the implicating was author Nick Bryant.

Bryant is best known for his work on the Nebraska CIA pedophile ring titled The Franklin Scandal.  He implicates Kemp and corroborates my claim (Illuminati Unmasked pp. 454-458) that the source for many of the boys kidnapped, tortured and turned into sex slaves by the United States government was the Catholic orphanage for boys known as “Boys Town”.

In a massive 1987 column for the NY Times, Leftist Maureen Dowd called Kemp “the Savonarola of supply side”.

Girolamo Savonarola (1452 to 1498) was a Dominican friar who decried the corruption of Rome and her exploitation of the poor and prophesied there would come a “Cyrus from the north” who would reform it all.  He was excommunicated, imprisoned, tortured and burned at the stake.  Less than 20 years later, an Augustinian monk in Wittenberg, (875 miles north of Rome) would protest Medici Pope Leo X’s exploitation of the poor through indulgences by posting 95 bullets, or “theses”, on the door of All Saints Cathedral on All Saints Day (November 1^st) in 1517.

At the end of Chapter VI in The Prince, Machiavelli laments that Savonarola did not have the weapons to insure his revolution as did “Moses, Cyrus, Theseus, and Romulus”—he therefore succumbed to those who did; the children of Romulus.

Only an Irish Catholic girl educated at Immaculata High School and Catholic University of America would get such a reference (or give it) but what was she trying to say about Kemp?

Other Catholic media outlets were also lifting Kemp up at the time.  Dowd noted that Kemp was raised in the cult of Mary Baker Eddy as a “Christian Scientist” in California but that he “converted” to being a Presbyterian with his wife, Joanne.

In 1996, Crisis Magazine (“A Voice For Faithful Catholic Laity”) stated that Kemp’s political doctrines spoke with “a Catholic voice”.

Dowd also made note of something extremely odd in Kemp’s office—an 18” statue of Don Quixote.  Secret society insiders and Roman Catholic knights know the fictional figure to be a caricature of the founder of the Jesuits, Ignatius Loyola.  Miguel de Cervantes, who penned Don Quixote, was a Catholic Spaniard who lived just as the Jesuits were becoming known (1547 to 1616).

Interestingly, Dowd even mentioned Kemp being implicated in a “homosexual ring” — not in Nebraska in the 1980’s — but in the administration of the Governor of California where Kemp worked as an aid in 1967 … for Ronald Wilson Reagan.

Jack Kemp mentored the current Speaker of the House, devout Roman Catholic Paul Ryan.

Dowd painted the Kemps as such strong “Born Again Christians” that wife Joanne was conducting “Bible study groups for Congressional wives every Friday.”  Yet, after Jack Kemp passed in 2009, the family asked close friend Chuck Colson to do his eulogy.  Colson was Richard Nixon’s legal “hatchet man” who was one of the fall guys for Watergate, spending a whole 7 months in a federal penitentiary (many soldiers have spent twice that on deployment).

Although he claimed at some times to be a “Baptist” and at others an “Episcopalian”, Colson’s top endeavors were the creation of Roman Catholic-dominated “Prison Fellowship” and an endless push for ecumenicalism—the uniting of all Christian denominations.  Once all the denominations are united, they would be forced to follow the authority of the one that was most powerful: Rome.

In the early 1990s, Colson joined with his close friend, Father Richard John Neuhaus, to begin the project known as Evangelicals and Catholics Together (ECT).  Catholics and evangelicals were, and remain, the two largest faith communities in North America.  Increasingly, they found themselves drawn together in what I described at the time as “an ecumenism of the trenches,” especially in defense of the sanctity of life from conception to natural death.

Evangelicals and Catholics shared much in common, but there was little understanding or cooperation, and all too often deep hostility between the two groups.  It is hard to imagine now the virulent reaction provoked by the ECT initiatives some two decades ago.

While Father Neuhaus received some critical comments from the Catholic side, reactionary evangelicals exploded with anger, bombast and recrimination.

Colson was excoriated by some of his fellow evangelicals for having betrayed the Gospel.  Prison Fellowship lost $1 million in donations from some disaffected supporters.  But Colson never wavered from what he believed was a summons from the Holy Spirit.

At the outset of ECT, Colson asked, “Dare we believe that God is calling us to make a bold statement that could influence the course of his church in the decades to come?”

The work of ECT still continues.  Our most recent statement, “In Defense of Religious Freedom,” was published in the March 2012 issue of First Things.  Bereft now of both of our founders, the ECT project moves forward, building on the initial statement drafted by Colson and Father Neuhaus (who died in 2009): “We thank God for the discovery of one another in contending for a common cause.  Much more we thank God for the discovery of one another as brothers and sisters in Christ.” ~ Charles Colson’s ‘Ecumenism of the Trenches’, National Catholic Register

When Colson wrote his epithet for Kemp, it was promoted by sites like “the Catholic Exchange”.

Templar Tactic

Today, Rome is in complete control of all major governments via her agents and insurgents, but it wasn’t always so.  In the age of kings, Royals frequently kicked against their masters as they were intent on being true sovereigns and not proxies for the “Vicar of Christ”.  This didn’t make those kings any less ruthless or evil, just equally filled with a lust for power.

One such king was Philippe le Bel of France (1268-1314)—also known as “Philip IV” or “Philippe the Fair”.

Philippe was the only king in history to control the Papacy and even forced it to move to France where it stayed for 75 years before returning to Rome.

Realizing that the actual power of Rome laid in her knights, Philippe sought a way to reign in the Papacy’s special forces—at that time, it was the Knights Templar.

The Templars were founded in 1119 to fight in the First Crusade but they very quickly exploited their experiences in the Holy Land and branched out into anything from diplomacy to mercantilism to finance.  They became protectors of pilgrim valuables and developed a system of seals and cyphers by which a traveler to the Holy Land could give their wealth to a Templar in one location, receive a cyphered receipt, and pick up their wealth in another location for a fee.

As a result, they developed modern usury banking and quickly surpassed most kingdoms in wealth and influence.  They even joined hands with battlefield foes like the Muslim Assassins, pooling their knowledge of how to murder without trace.

During the next hundred years the Templars became a power with international influence.  They were constantly engaged in high-level diplomacy between nobles and monarchs throughout the Western world and the Holy Land.  In England, for example, the Master of the Temple was regularly called to the king’s Parliament, and was regarded as head of all religious orders, taking precedence over all priors and abbots in the land.  Maintaining close links with both Henry II and Thomas a Becket, the Templars were instrumental in trying to reconcile the sovereign and his estranged archbishop.  Successive English kings, including King John, often resided in the Temple’s London preceptory, and the Master of the Order stood by the monarch’s side at the signing of the Magna Carta.”

Nor was the Order’s political involvement confined to Christendom alone.

Close links were forged with the Muslim world as well the world so often opposed on the battlefield and the Templars commanded a respect from Saracen leaders exceeding that accorded any other Europeans.  Secret connections were also maintained with the Hashishim or Assassins, the famous sect of militant and often fanatical adepts who were Islam’s equivalent of the Templars.  The Hashishim paid tribute to the Templars and were rumoured to be in their employ.

On almost every political level the Templars acted as official arbiters in disputes, and even kings submitted to their authority.  In 1252 Henry III of England dared to challenge them, threatening to confiscate certain of their domains.  “You Templars … have so many liberties and charters that your enormous possessions make you rave with pride and haughtiness.  What was imprudently given must therefore be prudently revoked; and what was inconsiderately bestowed must be considerately recalled.”  The Master of the Order replied, “What say est thou, O King?  Far be it that thy mouth should utter so disagreeable and silly a word.  So long as thou dost exercise justice, thou wilt reign.  But if thou infringe it, thou wilt cease to be King.”  It is difficult to convey to the modern mind the enormity and audacity of this statement.  Implicitly the Master is taking for his Order and himself a power that not even the papacy dared explicitly claim the power to make or depose monarchs.¹

Secrecy was the most powerful Templar weapon and they developed dual personalities—one face they put towards those outside their ranks, and another towards those inside.  They adopted the Roman eagle as their insignia but gave it two heads to exemplify this.

Freemasons trace their lineage through the Templars which is likely true but Freemasonic leadership then attempted to cover their subservience to Rome by claiming that both they and the Templars are the enemies of the Papacy (which is ridiculous).  Humorously, for their part, Rome does the same; claiming to be mortal enemies with their loyal Freemasonic footsoldiers.

Templars, Freemasons and Catholic high clergy are all gnostics who revel in ancient “secret knowledge”.  While in the Holy Land, Templars connected with what they considered to be the remnant of the Essenes who convinced them that Jesus of Nazareth was a fraud and the real messiah was John the Baptist; a belief system known as Johannism.

The Templars, or Poor Fellow-Soldiery of the Holy House of the Temple … took as their models, in the Bible, the Warrior-Masons of Zorobabel, who worked, holding the sword in one hand and the trowel in the other.

Therefore it was that the Sword and the Trowel were the insignia of the Templars,² who subsequently, as will be seen, concealed themselves under the name of Brethren Masons. …

The trowel of the Templars is quadruple, and the triangular plates of it are arranged in the form of a cross, making the Kabalistic pantacle known by the name of the Cross of the East.  The Knight of the East, and the Knight of the East and West, have in their titles secret allusions to the Templars of whom they were at first the successors.

The secret thought of Hugues de Payens [founder of the Templars], in founding his Order, was not exactly to serve the ambition of the Patriarchs of Constantinople.  There existed at that period in the East a Sect of Johannite Christians, who claimed to be the only true Initiates into the real mysteries of the religion of the Saviour.

They pretended to know the real history of Yesus the Anointed, and, adopting in part the Jewish traditions and the tales of the Talmud, they held that the facts recounted in the Evangels are but allegories, the key of which Saint John gives, in saying that the world might be filled with the books that could be written upon the words and deeds of Jesus Christ; words which, they thought, would be only a ridiculous exaggeration, if he were not speaking of an allegory and a legend, that might be varied and prolonged to infinity.

The Johannites ascribed to Saint John the foundation of their Secret Church, and the Grand Pontiffs of the Sect assumed the title of Christos, Anointed, or Consecrated, and claimed to have succeeded one another from Saint John by an uninterrupted succession of pontifical powers.  He who, at the period of the foundation of the Order of the Temple, claimed these imaginary prerogatives, was named Theoclet; he knew Hugues de Payens, he initiated him into the Mysteries and hopes of his pretended church, he seduced him by the notions of Sovereign Priesthood and Supreme royalty, and finally designated him as his successor.

Thus the Order of Knights of the Temple was at its very origin devoted to the cause of opposition to the tiara of Rome and the crowns of Kings, and the Apostolate of Kabalistic Gnosticism was vested in its chiefs.  For Saint John himself was the Father of the Gnostics, and the current translation of his polemic against the heretical of his Sect and the pagans who denied that Christ was the Word, is throughout a misrepresentation, or misunderstanding at least, of the whole Spirit of that Evangel.³

As a result of their Johannism, Templar degree rituals included spitting upon and defacing a crucifix (Roman Catholicism was the only “Christianity” they knew) which lead to rumors of satan worship.  This was later aided by a propaganda smokescreen fabricated by a French Roman Catholic priest named Alphonse Louis Constant.  Constant, masquerading as a Jew called “Éliphas Lévi” created the hermaphroditic goat gargoyle known as “Baphomet” and claimed that was what the Templars were worshipping.

These efforts were aided by another Catholic Frenchman—this time a Jesuit—named Marie Joseph Gabriel Antoine Jogand-Pagès.  Jogand-Pagès also wrote his propaganda via a pseudonym; “Léo Taxil”.  Jogand-Pagès then proceeded to thoroughly muddy the waters by claiming that Freemasons worshipped Baphomet in a series of pamphlets which he eventually stated were hoaxes encouraged by the Vatican’s mindless, vicious crusade against the poor hapless Freemasons (who derived themselves from Templars and are some of Rome’s most loyal footsoldiers).

The Templars being exceedingly wealthy and secretive also lead to sexual perversion.  Soon this gave enemies like Philippe le Bel their opportunity.  With the Papacy secured at Avignon, Philip moved to crush the Vatican’s special forces.  He forced Pope Clement V to rubber-stamp his actions and then he moved quickly to arrest the Templars and confiscate their wealth and holdings.

This was done on Friday, October 13^th, 1307—“black Friday” or “bad luck Friday”.

Many Templars were captured, tortured and burned at the stake (the form of execution created by the Inquisition), including their Grand Master, Jacques de Molay.  However, many more went underground and learned to masque their machinations.  No longer could they operate in the open, using their own names and faces.  They needed scapegoats to hide behind and they found the perfect victims: Jews.  As long as they elevated their target Jew to a position of wealth and prominence, they were always willing to be a target and make a spectacle of themselves.

An older sister of the Templars (only by about 20 years)—the Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta, also known as “the Knights of Malta”—adopted and adapted many of their brother Knights.  This included, as the name applies, the practice of Johannism.

Like the double-headed eagle, the Maltese Cross worn by these Knights (then and now), is a cunning ruse.  Yes, it is a type of cross but it isn’t the traditional Christian cross, it predates the crucifixion of Jesus Christ in its pagan significance.

All Popes and most Cardinals and Bishops wear the Maltese cross to show their Knights who they answer to.

The official emblems and insignia of almost every major public and private organization anywhere have either a double-headed eagle or Maltese cross somewhere in them; for instance the flag of the Russian Federation is adorned with a double-headed eagle and the insignia of Russia’s intelligence agency—the FSB—is over top a massive Maltese cross poorly disguised with red outside instead of inside the cross.  For more, read my column, here.

This process has been in place ever since and was responsible for the Communist anti-Semitic purges as well as the Nazi Holocaust.  Today, an ugly undercurrent of anti-Semitism is always ready when called upon by Roman operatives to cloud investigations with racial hatred as Jewish frontmen have been cunningly emplaced in all walks of power from Hollywood to banking, politics to news media—Jews like Matt Drudge.

Despite his $90 million net worth, Drudge continues to get help from Rome from her media operatives like Catholic Peggy Noonan who proclaims for all her duped Right-wing faithful that, in 2013, Drudge “discovered prayer” (although one never knows where prayer hides itself from Jews these days).

Drudge has been a frequent guest on the Alex Jones show.

Jones is a very important Roman operative whose job it is to bring in, expose and mislead truth-seekers who don’t trust the obviously-controlled mainstream media.

Like Drudge, he was emplaced by being given the insider scoop of a sanitized view inside Bohemian Grove—the satanic sexual deviant “retreat” for Rome’s Republican elite like Joseph Coors, both Bush 41 and 43, James Baker, John Bolton, Dwight Eisenhower, William Randolph Hearst, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, Henry Kissinger, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, David Rockefeller, Clinton “prosecutor” Ken Starr, Teddy Roosevelt, George Shultz, Caspar Weinberger, Patrick Wayne (son of John Wayne), and many, many others.⁴

In the Jones version, no sexual perversion is shown or even implied and the child sacrifice ritual, “Cremation of Care” is portrayed as a silly play.

The reality is much more perverse and satanic.

Reputed victim of CIA mind-control and sex slavery (years of involuntary rape, sodomy and torture for both her and her young daughter) Cathy O’Brien paints a satanic picture of what America’s top personalities do at the Grove.

WARNING: DISTURBING NARRATIVE

I was programmed and equipped to function in all rooms at Bohemian Grove in order to compromise specific government targets according to their personal perversions.  “Anything, anytime, anywhere with anyone” was my mode of operation at the Grove.  I do not purport to understand the full function of this political cesspool playground as my perception was limited to my own realm of experience.  My perception is that Bohemian Grove serves those ushering in the New World Order through mind control, and consists primarily of the highest Mafia and U.S. Government officials.  I do not use the term “highest” loosely, as copious quantities of drugs were consumed there. …

Bohemian Grove is reportedly intended to be used recreationally, providing a supposedly secure environment for politically affluent individuals to “party” without restraint.  The only business conducted there pertained to implementing the New World Order, through the proliferation of mind-control atrocities, giving the place an air of “Masonic Secrecy”.  The only room where business discussions were permitted was the small, dark lounge affectionately and appropriately referred to as the Underground.²

Sex slaves were not routinely permitted in the Underground for security reasons, leaving the lounge’s small stage as the only source of “entertainment”.

This entertainment ranged from would-be talents such as Lee Atwater, Bill Clinton, and George Bush to CIA Operative entertainers such as Boxcar Willie and Lee Greenwood, On one occasion I was instructed to meet with former President Gerald Ford in the Underground where Lee Atwater was picking and singing. …

My purpose at the Grove was sexual in nature, and therefore my perceptions were limited to a sex slave’s viewpoint.  As an effective means of control to ensure undetected proliferation of their perverse indulgences, slaves such as myself were subjected to ritualistic trauma.  I knew each breath I took could be my last, as the threat of death lurked in every shadow.  Slaves of advancing age or with failing programming were sacrificially murdered “at random” in the wooded grounds of Bohemian Grave, and I fell it was “simply a matter of time until it would be me”.  Rituals were held at a giant, concrete owl monument on the banks of, ironically enough, the Russian (rushin’) River.  These occultish sex rituals stemmed from the scientific belief that mind-controlled slaves required severe trauma to ensure compartmentalization of the memory, and not from any spiritual motivation.

My own threat of death was instilled when I witnessed the sacrificial death of a young, dark-haired victim at which time I was instructed to perform sexually “as though my life depended upon it”.  I was told, “…the next sacrifice victim could be you.  Anytime when you least expect it, the owl will consume you.  Prepare yourself, and stay prepared.” Being “prepared” equated to being totally suggestible, i.e., “on my toes” awaiting their command. …

The club offered a “Necrophilia” theme room to its members. …

Other perversion theme rooms at the Bohemian Club included what I heard Ford refer to as the “Dark Room”.  When he not so cleverly said, “Let’s go to the Dark Room and see what develops,” I understood from experience that he was interested in indulging in his perverse obsession for pornography.  In the Dark Room, members had sex with the same mind-controlled slave they were viewing in porn on a big screen television.

There was a triangular glass display centered in a main through way where I was locked in with various trained animals, including snakes.  Members walking by watched elicit [sic] sex acts of bestiality, women with women, mothers with daughters, kids with kids, or any other unlimited perverse visual display. …

There was a room of shackles and tortures, black lights and strobes, an opium den, ritualistic sex altars, a chapel, group orgy rooms including poster beds, water beds, and “kitten” houses.  I was used as a “rag doll” in the “toy store,” and as a urinal in the “golden arches” room.

From the owl’s roost to the necrophilia room, no memory of sexual abuse is as horrifying as the conversations overheard in the Underground pertaining to implementing the New World Order.  I learned that perpetrators believed that controlling the masses through propaganda mind manipulation did not guarantee there would be a world left to dominate due to environmental and overpopulation problems.  The solution being debated was not pollution/population control, but mass genocide of “selected undesirables.”⁵

What is also absent from Jones’ faux “exposé” is the high position held at the Grove by a dead Catholic priest.

A priest, of all unlikely people, holds the honor of being the only person to be the subject of two Grove plays.  He is the Patron Saint of Bohemia, Saint John of Nepomuck (pronounced NAY-po-muk), a man who lived in the thirteenth century in the real Bohemia that is now part of Czechoslovakia.  Saint John received his unique distinction among latter-day Bohemians in 1882, when his sad but courageous story was told in a jinks “sired” (the club argot for master of ceremonies) by the poet Charles Warren Stoddard.

Saint John was a cutup in his youth, but had forsaken ephemeral pleasures — or at least most of them — for the priesthood.  One of his first assignments was as a tutor to the heir apparent to the kingship of Bohemia.  John soon became fast friends with the fun-loving prince, often joining him in his spirited and amorous adventures.  When the prince became king, he made Saint John the court confessor.

All went well for Saint John until the king began to suspect that his beautiful queen was having a love affair with a local nobleman.  To allay his suspicions, the king naturally turned to his loyal friend and teacher, Saint John of Nepomuck, demanding that this former companion in many revelries reveal to him the most intimate confessions of the queen.  Saint John refused.  The king pleaded, but to no avail.  Then the king threatened him, which had no effect either.  Finally, in a fit of rage, he ordered Saint John hurled into the river to drown.  John chose to die rather than reveal a woman’s secrets.  Here, truly, was a remarkable fellow, and his story appealed mightily to the San Francisco Bohemians of the nineteenth century.

Several months after the poet Stoddard introduced Saint John to his fellow Bohemians, a small statue of Saint John arrived at the clubhouse in San Francisco from faraway Czechoslovakia.  It seems one of the people present for Stoddard’s talk had been Count Joseph Oswald Von Thun of Czechoslovakia, who had been much taken by the club and its appreciation of his fellow countryman.  Upon his return to Czechoslovakia be had commissioned a woodcarver to make a replica of the statue of Saint John which adorns the bridge in Prague near the place of his drowning.

This unexpected gift still guards the library room in the Bohemians’ large club building in San Francisco — except during the encampment at the Grove, that is.  For that event the statue is carefully transported to a hallowed tree near the center of the Grove, where Saint John, with his forefinger carefully sealing his lips, can be a saintly reminder of the need for discretion.

The legend surrounding Saint John of Nepomuck became part of the oral tradition of the Bohemian Club.  New members inevitably hear the story when they happen upon the statue while being shown around the city clubhouse or the Grove.  But oral tradition is not enough for a patron saint, and the good man’s legend was therefore enacted in a Grove play in 1921 under the title St. John of Nepomuck.  It was retold in 1969 by a different author under the title St. John of Bohemia.⁶

Sadly, there is nothing “unlikely” about “Saint John” being the patron of Bohemian Grove.

Once Jones was established as the place to go when one questions mainstream media, he then went to work discrediting himself and all who subscribe to him.

In 2010, Jones was alerted to a pro-Second Amendment rally by Texans for Accountable Government—a sincere, anti-tyranny organization—taking place in Austin.  He spoke about the rally on his program, then showed up to the engagement already in progress.  He used a bullhorn and constant loud histrionics to disrupt and humiliate the participants.

Like Drudge, Jones is not clearly connected to Rome which gives his masters plausible deniability.  His father-in-law (Edmund Lowe Nichols), however, was U.S. Agricultural Counselor to Italy and was so important to the Italian government they awarded him with their highest civilian honor; Cavaliere Commendatore (Knight Commander) of the Order of Merit.

As usual, Jones’ keepers have plenty of ridiculous smokescreens from claiming he’s a dead comic to accusing him of being a Jewish pawn through that very same father-in-law.

Matt Drudge serves a similar role, though not so obviously antagonistic to the cause of Patriotic Americans.

Like Knight of Malta Rupert Murdoch, a recipient of the Order of Saint Gregory, and his “Fox News”, Drudge is there to redirect Right-wing anger at all of the wrong sources; minorities, Muslims, Jews—whatever best causes division instead of allowing “Conservative” Americans to see that all of their woes come from Rome.

On any given day, one can see the best of Roman distraction, fear-mongering, misplaced focus and wholly-fabricated lies.

My friend Alan, host of Restoring America, sent me notice on September 21^st that Drudge was promoting something particularly disturbing: Roman Catholics flocking to venerate the supposed petrified heart of “Saint Padre Pio” in Lowell, Massachusetts.

Hundreds View Heart of Saint, ‘the Very Core of Our Faith’

Worship and veneration of “relics” like the body parts of “Saints” is an ancient pagan rite.

Nothing is more characteristic of Rome than the worship of relics.  Wherever a chapel is opened, or a temple consecrated, it cannot be thoroughly complete without some relic or other of he-saint or she-saint to give sanctity to it.  The relics of the saints and rotten bones of the martyrs form a great part of the wealth of the Church.  The grossest impostures have been practised in regard to such relics; and the most drivelling tales have been told of their wonder-working powers, and that too by Fathers of high name in the records of Christendom.  Even Augustine, with all his philosophical acuteness and zeal against some forms of false doctrine, was deeply infected with the grovelling spirit that led to relic worship.  Let any one read the stuff with which he concludes his famous “City of God,” and he will in no wise wonder that Rome has made a saint of him, and set him up for the worship of her devotees.  Take only a specimen or two of the stories with which he bolsters up the prevalent delusions of his day: “When the Bishop Projectius brought the relics of St.  Stephen to the town called Aquae Tibiltinae, the people came in great crowds to honour them.  Amongst these was a blind woman, who entreated the people to lead her to the bishop who had the HOLY RELICS.  They did so, and the bishop gave her some flowers which he had in his hand.  She took them, and put them to her eyes, and immediately her sight was restored, so that she passed speedily on before all the others, no longer requiring to be guided.”⁷

______________

The learned Pareus proceeds in a different way to prove that Peter was never at Rome.  He shows from different parts of the Acts of the Apostles and the Epistle to the Galatians, that Peter was in Judea at the time when tradition declares that he was at Rome.  Peter was in Judea when Paul was converted, Acts 9; and three years after this — that is, in the year 38, Galatians 1:8.  He was in Judea in the year 45, when he was imprisoned by Herod, Acts 12, and in 49, fourteen years after Paul’s conversion, Acts 15, Galatians 2:1-9.  Had he been to Rome during this time, some account of such a journey must surely have been given.  After this time we find that he was at Antioch, Galatians 2:11.  If it be asked, where did he afterwards exercise his ministry?  Where more likely than among the Jews, as he had hitherto most clearly done; for he was the Apostle of the Circumcision, and among those to whom he sent his Epistles.  The dating of the first at “Babylon,” has led some to conjecture that it was a figurative term for Rome; but why not for Jerusalem, or for Antioch?  for Christians were at that time treated everywhere like captives or aliens, and especially in the land of Judea.

What then are we to say as to this tradition?  The same, according to the just remark of Pareus, as what we must say of many other traditions of that age, that it is nothing but a fable, which, like many others, would have passed away, had it not been allied to a growing superstition.  With respect to what Eusebius says of the testimony of a presbyter, named Caius, that about the beginning of the third century he saw the graves of Peter and Paul at Rome, it may be easily accounted for: it was the age of pious fraud, when the relics of saints could be found almost everywhere; and, in the next century, the wood and the nails of the Cross were discovered!  Those who can believe these things, may have a credulity large enough to swallow up the testimony of Caius.^8 8

______________

The germinating superstition of the times,—owing principally to the prevalence of the Platonic philosophy, from the subtile disquisitions and specious reasonings of which Christianity suffered far more than she did from the persecuting edicts of emperors and pro-consuls,—likewise aided the advance of the Papacy.  This superstition, which was in truth, as we have already explained, nothing but the revived Paganism of a former age, continued to increase from an early part of the third century and onward.  The simplicity of the Christian faith began to be corrupted by novel and heathenish opinions, and the worship of the Church to be burdened by ridiculous and idolatrous ceremonies.  When the Church exchanged the catacombs for the magnificent edifices which the wealth, the policy, and sometimes the piety of princes erected, she exchanged also the simplicity of life and purity of faith, of which so many affecting memorials remain to our day, for the accommodating spirit of the schools, and the easy manners of the court.  Already, in the fourth century, we find images introduced into churches, the bones of martyrs hawked about as relics, the tombs of saints become the resort of pilgrims, and monks and hermits swarming in the various countries.  We find the pagan festivals, slightly disguised, adopted into the Christian worship; the homage offered anciently to the gods transferred to the martyrs; the Lord’s Supper dispensed sometimes at funerals; the not improbable origin of masses; and the churches filled with the blaze of lamps and tapers, the smoke of incense, the perfume of flowers, and the goodly show of gorgeous robes, crosiers, mitres, and gold and silver vases; reminding one of the not unsimilar spectacles which might be witnessed in the pagan temples.  “The religion of Constantine,” remarks Gibbon, “achieved in less than a century the final conquest of the Roman empire; but the victors themselves were insensibly subdued by the arts of their vanquished rivals.”^{[16] 9}

No less a source than the Catholic Encyclopedia admits that many of these “relics” were frauds—

…it remains true that many of the more ancient relics duly exhibited for veneration in the great sanctuaries of Christendom or even at Rome itself must now be pronounced to be either certainty spurious or open to grave suspicion.  To take one example of the latter class, the boards of the Crib (Praesaepe)— a name which for much more than a thousand years has been associated, as now, with the basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore—can only be considered to be of doubtful.  In his monograph “Le memorie Liberiane dell´ Infanzia di N. S. Gesù Cristo” (Rome, 1894), Mgr. Cozza Luzi frankly avows that all positive evidence for the authenticity of the relics of the Crib etc., is wanting before the eleventh century.  Strangely enough, an inscription in Greek uncials of the eighth century is found on one of the boards, the inscription having nothing to do with the Crib but being apparently concerned with some commercial transaction.  It is hard to explain its presence on the supposition that the relic is authentic.  Similar difficulties might he urged against the supposed “column of the flagellation” venerated at Rome in the Church of Santa Prassede and against many other famous relics.

These skills would come in quite handy for later operatives like Jesuit Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (1881 – 1955).

Chardin was a busy priest—known as the “Father of the New Age”—he was also into archeology.

Teilhard spent most of the next 20 years in China.  In early 1929 he joined the National Geological Survey of China and took part in the excavations, in December 1929, that uncovered a Homo erectus skull, known as Peking man. As the stratigrapher (a geologist who studies layers of the rock record), Teilhard played a major role in dating the discovery. ~ Kahn Academy

“Science” and “archeology”, however, have been the unexpected arenas for chicanery.  One such example was “Piltdown Man”.

The Piltdown Man was a paleoanthropological hoax in which bone fragments were presented as the fossilised remains of a previously unknown early human.

In 1912 amateur archaeologist Charles Dawson claimed he had discovered the “missing link” between ape and man. After finding a section of a human-like skull in Pleistocene gravel beds near Piltdown, East Sussex, Dawson contacted Arthur Smith Woodward, Keeper of Geology at the Natural History Museum.  Dawson and Smith Woodward made further discoveries at the site which they connected to the same individual, including a jawbone, more skull fragments, a set of teeth and primitive tools.

Smith Woodward reconstructed the skull fragments and hypothesised that they belonged to a human ancestor from 500,000 years ago.  The discovery was announced at a Geological Society meeting and was given the Latin name Eoanthropus dawsoni (“Dawson’s dawn-man”).  The questionable significance of the assemblage remained the subject of considerable controversy until it was conclusively exposed in 1953 as a forgery. It was found to have consisted of the altered mandible and some teeth of an orangutan deliberately combined with the cranium of a fully developed, though small-brained, modern human. ~ Wikipedia

At the center of this controversy was a Jesuit priest and “archeologist” named Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.

In reconstructing the recollections of de Chardin in his role with his friend Charles Dawson, paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould discovered that de Chardin had misrepresented exactly when he claimed to have been shown Piltdown specimens which conflicted with when he was conscripted into WWI to be a stretcher-bearer for the French Army.  The implication was that—

Teilhard and Dawson planned the Piltdown 2 discovery before Teilhard left England.  Forty years later, Teilhard misconstructed the exact chronology, forgot that he could not have seen the specimens when they were officially “found,” and slipped in writing to [English physical anthropologist, palaeontologist and geologist Kenneth Page] Oakley [(1911-1981) who proved that the Piltdown bones had been chemically stained to mimic great age, the teeth artificially filed to simulate human wear, the associated mammal remains all brought in from elsewhere, and the flint “implements” recently carved].

Since the founding of the Counter-Reformation shortly after 1517 and the founding of the Jesuits unofficially in 1534 and then officially in 1540, the Company of Loyola had been fast at work on a project of unbelievable scope and satanic success: to re-write all of human cosmology to include ancient pre-humans, the “Big Bang”, dinosaurs and Darwinian evolution.  The matrix-weavers needed a “missing link” to shore up their lies so Teilhard created one.

Unbelievably, he remains a respected archeologist, along with his other “discoveries” like “Peking Man”, even amongst paleontologists who are aware of his skuldugery.

Blind to reality or to the matrix that has been woven for them, neither “scientists” nor laymen stop to consider the staggering question of why anyone who subscribed to empiricism via the Scientific Method—record an observation, formulate an hypothesis, attempt to replicate the observation via experiment which isolates all perceived variables, thereby replicating the observation and proving the hypothesis, submit the results for peer review—would possibly have any impetus what-so-ever in corrupting this process.

That “impetus” is the agenda to completely fabricate an alternative reality that calls into question the assertions of the Bible and the Jesuits have been so successful it’s apparent they’ve had interdimensional aid.

Part of this matrix is the propaganda promoted by “Papal Court Jews” (persecuted but allowed status in a Royal or Roman Catholic Court because they served a purpose) like Matthew Nathan Drudge.

On September 21^st “Drudge” was a cornucopia of Catholic casuistry:

* Headline pushing Jesuit-educated Donald Trump.
* A story about Roman Catholic Leonard DiCaprio, a popular face to push the sophistry of “global warming” that Rome is using to lower the common standard of living and return humanity to feudalism.  In January of this year DiCaprio publicly met with Pope Francis on this issue.  A month later he was awarded his first Oscar.
* Multiple side-stories pushing Trump.
* Stories lionizing Hillary Clinton (neither she nor Trump are in any way controlling their destinies).
* A predominance of stories promoting fear over “ISIS” and Islamic jihad terror (all fabricated by Western Intelligence who answer to Rome).
* Frothing of anger over unimpeded waves of illegal immigrants; an agenda insured by the Papacy and then highlighted so that frustration leads to a Roman-selected fascist demagogue.
* Fear over manipulated threats in North Korea or Russia.
* Catholic faithful venerating what appears to be a petrified human organ.

Upon waking up from his transformation out of the Matrix and into reality, Morpheus welcomed Neo with, “Welcome to the real world.”

They fear your awakening and your righteous wrath.

As a result, they must work subversively to dumb you down, sicken, impoverish and kill you so that the small handful that are left are easily enslaved.

There are several chokepoints by which they conduct this agenda;

• Public Schools
• The Entertainment Industry
• Food
• Your Environment [“Chemtrails”, Fluoride, etc.]
• Re-Writing History
• Co-opting Military, Intelligence and Law Enforcement to act as Slavers, not Protectors

—and Vaccines.

Used by reputable doctors and scientists, vaccines can save and improve lives.

But that’s not who controls the vaccine industry.

Vaccines can be equated with technology. When they are wielded by ethical, compassionate people, they save lives.

But when malignant or malicious people are behind the needle (or, at least, what goes into the needle), there are few better vectors for getting poison or nanobots or whatever is desired into oblivious, trusting citizens.

When injecting agents directly into the body, there is little room for error.

In Syria, a measles vaccine administered by the United Nations caused at least 15 children to go into allergic shock and die¹²²⁶. With nearly 200,000 dead in Syria (many of them Christians) as the current running tally of victims of the Western-backed civil war, the world has but shrugged at the deaths.¹²²⁷ …

A common vaccine preservative is mercury-based Thimerosal whose cumulative effects are essentially the same as being poisoned with mercury. …

These toxins are insidious and work slowly over time. Victims are only aware of the symptoms, not the causes or who is behind them.

Many vaccines contain the chemical compound squalene, ostensibly to increase the immune-response from the host body. This defines squalene as an “adjuvant”.

Dr. Viera Scheibner noted this about oil-in-water adjuvants like squalene:

The adjuvant activity of non-ionic block copolymer surfactants was demonstrated when given with 2% squalene-in-water emulsion. However, this adjuvant contributed to the cascade of reactions called “Gulf War syndrome”, documented in the soldiers involved in the Gulf War. The symptoms they developed included arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, rashes, photosensitive rashes, malar rashes, chronic fatigue, chronic headaches, abnormal body hair loss, non-healing skin lesions, aphthous ulcers, dizziness, weakness, memory loss, seizures, mood changes, neuropsychiatric problems, anti-thyroid effects, anaemia, elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), Raynaud’s phenomenon, Sjorgren’s syndrome, chronic diarrhea, night sweats and low-grade fevers.

This long list of reactions shows just how much damage is done by vaccines, particularly when potentiated by powerful “immunoenhancers” such as squalene and other adjuvants.¹²³⁴

~ Illuminati Unmasked, pp. 418, 419, 420

Johnny is a 20 year military veteran and suffers from several of these ailments, including Reynaud’s.

Sometimes this Luciferian cabal of government, doctors, pharmacists and scientists cavort in ways that seem torn from the pages of a dystopic horror novel…like allowing vaccines to be used as vectors for cancer.

The lead doctor on the polio vaccine project was Alton Ochsner who was working with the ground-breaking data initiated by Dr. Jonas Salk.

Salk found that injecting dead forms of the virus allowed the human host to create antibodies that would fight future infections.

It was these polio vaccines grown on monkey organs that doomed many children to die of cancer. Insidiously, many more would die later as the dormant virus was activated by some quirk of biological circumstance.

Although [author Edward T.] Haslam, himself, attributes the contraction of cancer by kids injected with the polio vaccine as a true accident, the dangers and outcomes were completely covered up by the United States government.

The 1950’s in America was an era of polio hysteria—especially after the disease claimed the life of Franklin Roosevelt. Physicians and politicians wanted results now. Like war profiteers, pharmaceutical monopolies had much to gain from the panic.

Alton Ochsner rushed to bring results and would later pay for his efforts with the life of his grandson.

In order to assuage American fears that the vaccines were untested and liable to cause more harm than good, Ochsner injected his grandson—Eugene “Davey” Davis—with a vaccine provided by Cutter Laboratories in Berkeley, California.

Davey died a short time later.²⁷⁰ ~ Illuminati Unmasked, p. 74

Shockingly, when victims become aware that they or their children have been harmed, they find that the law has given this industry immunity to damage them and make billions.

Federal law protects pharmaceutical companies from lawsuits by parents who claim that vaccines harmed their children, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.

The court ruled 6 to 2 that going before a special tribunal set up by Congress is the only way parents can be compensated for the negative side effects that in rare instances accompany vaccinations.

The majority said that Congress found such a system necessary to ensure that vaccines remain readily available, and that federal regulators are in the best position to decide whether vaccines are safe and properly designed.

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 “reflects a sensible choice to leave complex epidemiological judgments about vaccine design to the FDA and the National Vaccine Program rather than juries,” Justice Antonin Scalia wrote, referring to the Food and Drug Administration. ~ Robert Barnes, the Washington Post

Outside of this hedge of protection, injured families are winning court battles over the link between vaccines and autism.

On September 23, 2014, an Italian court in Milan award compensation to a boy for vaccine-induced autism. (See the Italian document here.) A childhood vaccine against six childhood diseases caused the boy’s permanent autism and brain damage. While the Italian press has devoted considerable attention to this decision and its public health implications, the U.S. press has been silent. ~ Mary Holland J.D., Health Impact News

Giving birth to your baby in a hospital is another chokepoint. Those who try to circumvent what is being done are crushed.

…social service workers … called police when a new mother wanted tests before authorizing shots for her child, [the] hospital … ejected the new mom from its property over the issue,[resulting in] a social service “investigation” into the birth…

…the situation involv[ed a] couple named Scott and Jodi Ferris.

Jodi had gone into labor early and the midwife they had hoped would deliver their baby encouraged them to head to a hospital. They did.

“Their baby, whom I will call ‘Annie,’ was born in the ambulance in the parking lot of the Hershey Medical Center – a government hospital in Pennsylvania. Hospital personnel arrived very quickly and took charge of both baby and mom,” he reported.

But when Jodi asked nurses about her baby, “the hospital staff was utterly unresponsive. When they started to give Jodi an injection, she asked what it was and what is was for. They gave her vague answers like, ‘It’s just to help.’”

Farris said eventually a physician told Jodi her baby scored a 9 on a physical exam applied to newborns known as the APGAR test, where a score of 8 or higher is considered healthy.

But then another doctor said the baby was “very sick” and would need to stay in the hospital.

Continuing the back-and-forth, another hospital staffer then said the baby was doing good but that was followed several hours later by a worker who told the couple their baby must stay in the hospital for 48 to 72 hours.

“‘The law requires us to keep the baby for 48 hours,’” they were told, according to the HSLDA, which noted there is no such law in Pennsylvania. ~ Bob Unruh, WorldNetDaily

Yet, more and more families are waking up to the causal connection between vaccinations and dysfunctions such as autism.

30 Scientific Studies Showing the Link between Vaccines and Autism

Numbers, alone, point to the alarming reality that mentally-handicapping the common citizen is an important agenda for those in power.

In 2002 the Center for Disease Control estimated that autism affected about 1 in 150 children. By 2012 the CDC estimate had increased to 1 in 88. Now, according to the latest revision of the estimate recently released, autism affects 1 in 50 children. That’s a phenomenal 300 percent increase in 11 years. ~ Peter Murray, Singularity Hub

As citizens become awakened to the dangers, the Machine is doubling down.

A recent occurrence of an infant contracting measles at Disneyland is being run hard by the mainstream media. Clearly, it is the rising number of “anti-vaxxers” that have put the child at risk.

Without even touching the correlation between Disney and mind control, there are tell-tale signs that the incident has been fabricated.

On local news, the child is seen in a green “onesie” with splotches that overtly resemble bacteria.

Ridiculously, the child’s name is “Mobius”.

The Möbius strip or Möbius band (UK /ˈmɜrbiəs/ or US /ˈmoʊbiəs/; German: [ˈmøːbi̯ʊs]), also Mobius or Moebius, is a surface with only one side and only one boundary component. The Möbius strip has the mathematical property of being non-orientable. It can be realized as a ruled surface. It was discovered independently by the German mathematicians August Ferdinand Möbius and Johann Benedict Listing in 1858.^[1][2][3] ~ Möbius Strip, Wikipedia

Who are the parents? Ariel (like the Little Mermaid) and Christopher Loop.

“Mobius Loop”.

The story is being used as kindling for war against the vaccine resistance.

It’s an unseasonably warm day in Oakland, California, a perfect morning for Jennifer and Dave Simon to take their baby, Livia, out for a walk. But her stroller sits idle, and Livia is stuck inside the house—as she has been for nearly a month.

Livia isn’t sick, but doctors fear she might become the 53rd person to contract measles in a recent Disneyland outbreak. Now she’s in a 28-day quarantine, because of a family that refused to vaccinate their child. ~ Mom: Anti-Vaxxers Put My Baby in Quarantine, CNN

All Western nations are controlled by treasonous puppets who do the bidding of malignant masters. It, therefore, shouldn’t be a surprise to see Canada jump on the fear-mongering vaccination bandwagon.

Parents who don’t vaccinate their children are putting their health and the health of other children at risk, Canada’s health minister warned Tuesday.

The vaccination issue has returned to the forefront in recent weeks, with a spike in measles cases in Toronto and some parts of the United States. ~ Rona Ambrose Says Anti-Vaccine Movement Puts Children at Risk, CBC News

The reality is that most children who are given the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella vaccine aren’t even immunized.

While the vaccine industry is exploiting the Disneyland measles outbreak to call for widespread MMR vaccination, nobody in the mainstream media is telling you how the MMR vaccine clinical trial results were faked by Big Pharma in yet another example of runaway scientific fraud by the vaccine industry.

According to two Merck scientists who filed a False Claims Act complaint in 2010 — a complaint which was unsealed three years ago — vaccine manufacturer Merck knowingly falsified its mumps vaccine test data, spiked blood samples with animal antibodies, sold a vaccine that actually promoted mumps and measles outbreaks, and ripped off governments and consumers who bought the vaccine thinking it was “95% effective.” ~ Mike Adams, Natural News

In fact, more children have died from the vaccine in the past 10 years than the disease.

Over the last decade in the United States, the deaths of over 100 children — at the very least — have been linked to receiving a measles vaccine, compared with zero children dying from the disease itself, according to the U.S. government’s own compiled data. Put another way, an American child would have been infinitely more likely to die after receiving a measles shot, percentage-wise, than from getting the actual measles disease in the last ten years. Thousands more have suffered from adverse reactions to the measles shot and other vaccines. The explosive numbers have massive implications for public health efforts, analysts said. ~ Alex Newman, the New American

Sadly, this vaccination failure is not unique to measles.

In 2006 an epidemic of mumps broke out in my state of Iowa. Ultimately, 11 states reported 2,597 cases of mumps. The majority of mumps cases (1,487) were reported from Iowa. As reported in “Mumps Epidemic – Iowa, 2006,” “Despite control efforts and a highly vaccinated population, this epidemic has spread across Iowa and potentially to neighboring states.” According to the CDC, “During the prevaccine era, nearly everyone in the United States experienced mumps, and 90 percent of cases occurred among children, although 97 percent of children entering school in Iowa had received two doses of MMR vaccine.” Of note, this outbreak mostly occurred in young adults of college age who had received the vaccine. Only 6 percent of those affected were known to be unvaccinated, 12 percent received one dose of MMR vaccine, 51 percent had two doses of MMR vaccine, and 31 percent (mostly adults) were not sure of their immunization history.

In 2008-2009, Australia had epidemics of whooping cough and measles. Health authorities there must reveal the vaccination status of children in epidemics. Eighty-four percent of Australian children who got whooping cough were fully vaccinated, and 78 percent who got measles had record of measles vaccination.

In the 2010 outbreak of whooping cough in California, well over half the victims were fully vaccinated. ~ Lee Hieb, M.D., WorldNetDaily

But the facts don’t matter.

This is war by the Luciferian Elite on the American public.

There is a war raging against American Citizens, an attack, hidden and packaged in a religion of pretended Authority, presented and sold by an immoral and synthetic, media manufactured, culture of self-sacrifice, guilt, pacifism, denial and learned helplessness.

The phony, plastic, unnatural culture is supported by pseudo-science, monopoly capitalism, false intellectualism and a growing expression of violence against those beginning to see behind the mask of this specious malevolent deception.

Vaccination hysteria and a crescendoing push to validate, normalize and implement vaccinations for growing numbers of disease is one expression of this multi-headed serpent gathering strength via usurpation of an individual’s rights, responsibilities and sovereign authority over their property including their bodies. ~ Jack Mullen, the Government Rag

It is a war they intend to win.

The opening salvo is “convenience”. While mom fills the kids with poison from McDonalds, she can get them loaded up on shots, too.

The city of Amarillo in Texas are offering free vaccinations for children at a McDonald’s restaurant between 9am and 2pm.

The Department of Public Health and the Caring For Children Foundation of Texas say the vaccinations being offered include the meningococcal vaccine; the varicella vaccine; the Tdap vaccine booster; MMR vaccine; and hepatitis A.

Parents and guardians have been told to bring immunization records, and children under 17 must be accompanied by a parent or guardian. ~ Sean Adl-Tabatabai, YourNewsWire

It’s actually a cooperative that is several years old.

Fear now drives the fascism that is closing the Mobius Loop on all exemptions.

TIBURON, Calif. —A first grader with leukemia plead with school board members in Tiburon Tuesday night to get all children vaccinated against the measles.

CBS station KPIX reports that by the end of the night, the Reed Union School Board in Marin County voted to support state legislation that would scrap the personal belief exemption—a big win for a 7-year-old with a lot of fight still in him. ~ First Grader with Leukemia Makes Passionate Plea for Vaccinations, CBS News

The same leukemia-ridden child is scheduled for a tour of surrounding public schools but in future engagements he will be holding several kittens.

Kalifornia kleptocrats aren’t waiting to have individual schools take away parental choice one district at a time, they are pushing the issue state-wide, now.

A group of state lawmakers announced legislation Wednesday that would abolish an exemption from the mandate that children get vaccinated before they enter school if it conflicts with their parents’ personal beliefs.

Surrounded by mothers holding babies, five lawmakers said during a Capitol news conference that the legislation was needed to address a trend among many parents not getting their children immunized against common diseases and the spread of some preventable illnesses including measles and whooping cough. ~ Patrick McGreevy, LA Times

In future lobbying, the baby-holding mothers will also be given kittens.

Combining vaccines with public schools is a win/win for Luciferian Leftists. Kalifornia is racing to catch up to the People’s Republic of New York where radical Leftist governor Andrew Cuomo, son of radical Leftist governor Mario Cuomo, presides over complete fascistic control of kids receiving mandatory poison in public schools.

New York State’s requirement that children be vaccinated before attending public school does not violate their constitutional rights, a federal appeals court in Manhattan said on Wednesday. ~ Patrick McGeehan, NY Times*

USA Today pushed the issue even further with this convenient “opinion” piece.

The entirely preventable California measles outbreak has now sickened more than 70 people. With perhaps hundreds more exposed, the outbreak will likely continue.

As the disease spreads, experts will debate how we respond and what to do about the anti-vaccine movement that’s partly to blame for this mess. Likely, all we’ll agree on is better outreach to parents.

That’s not enough. Parents who do not vaccinate their children should go to jail.

EboLIE

The recent outbreak of Ebola in Africa and the United States has powerfully set the stage for vaccination hysteria.

Is it, indeed, a stage?

In July of 2014, it was declared that the lead doctor handling the outbreak in Sierra Leon became a victim of the virus despite the precautions he was taking.¹²⁴⁸

That same month, media stated that Christian aid worker Kent Brantly also contracted the disease. Sky News reported on the troubling knowledge that fully-protected doctors and scientists were still getting the virus. …

As if in answer to prayer, Mapp Biopharmaceutical arrived on the map with a secret serum to bring both Kent and fellow infected aid worker Nancy Writebol back from certain death.¹²⁵⁰

The media actually reported it as a “secret serum”.¹²⁵¹

Researchers were shocked to learn that the Ebola virus is patented, as are any related cures.

Investigative reporter Dave Hodges found three entities that hold the title: the Center for Disease Control, the National Institute of Health and Bill Gates.¹²⁵²

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) has one of those patented vaccines and is giving it to eager volunteers.¹²⁵³

As of 2014, the man running NIAID is Anthony Fauci. Fauci is an Italian Catholic who went to Jesuit-run Regis High School and Jesuit-run Holy Cross college before receiving his MD at Cornell.¹²⁵⁴

Barack Obama appointed Ronald Klain as “Ebola Czar”. He was doing this in response to what Republican legislators demanded. …

Klain has no medical or healthcare experience. He does, however, have ties to the housing bubble scandal.¹²⁵⁶

More importantly, he was Joe Biden’s Chief of Staff, and an alumnus of Georgetown.¹²⁵⁷

But Klain’s not just any Georgetown alum, he teaches there.¹²⁵⁸

Jesuit-trained Ron Klain believes that “Climate Change” and “over population” (particularly in Africa) are the world’s top problems.¹²⁵⁹

This doesn’t sound like the man best suited to defend us from, or help stop, an African pandemic.~ Illuminati Unmasked, pp. 424, 425, 426

To date, the Ebola pandemic has not materialized in the United States but, when it does, Barack Obama has already given himself the power to “quarantine” so-called “anti-vaxxers”.

In July 2014, President Barack Obama signed an expanded version of a previous Executive Order as the Ebola outbreak worsened in West Africa revising a list of quarantinable communicable diseases. Added to the previous orders of 2003 and 2005 is this passage:

(b) Severe acute respiratory syndromes, which are diseases that are associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, are capable of being transmitted from person to person, and that either are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic, or, upon infection, are highly likely to cause mortality or serious morbidity if not properly controlled. This subsection does not apply to influenza.

~ J. D. Heyes, Natural News

Maybe those FEMA camps don’t sound so crazy after all…

UPDATE: Friday, 20 February 2015; 06:36 PM, EST

The rural, cowboy state of Oregon has decided to climb onboard the Disney measles PsyOp express.

At issue is the fact that Oregon has the most religious exemptions in the country.

The measles outbreak is of particular concern in Oregon, home to the highest rate of unvaccinated children in the country. Parents have been warned to get their children vaccinated by Wednesday or face expulsion from school.

The state of Oregon is making Jolynn Reynolds watch an educational video before she can opt out of having her child vaccinated. Reynolds is claiming a philosophical exemption, allowing her kids to go to school without their required vaccinations.

As a result, a Leftist hyphenated career woman from Portland is stepping up to step on all of Oregon’s backward religious folk.

Elizabeth Steiner-Hayward** used her lucrative income as a doctor to buy her way into the Oregon State Senate representing Portland’s 17^th District as *sharp intake of breath* a Democrat!

Her soft Leftist mind can’t even conceive of why anyone would have a problem loading their babies up with the good stuff from Merck. In fact, those religious nuts—

“Scares the living daylights out of me,” said Elizabeth Steiner Hayward, a doctor who’s also an Oregon state senator.

Hayward is proposing legislation to eliminate all non-medical exemptions. She says she doesn’t buy the argument that there’s a personal belief.

“A belief has to be based on something,” said Hayward. “You don’t have to demonstrate that you really understand the issue, that you’ve really done valid research on this. You just have to say, ‘nah, I don’t think it’s the right idea for my kid.’” ~ Ben Tracy, CBS News

I’m Johnny Religious-Nut-Cirucci and it’s the brain-dead dupes who willingly give steam to this fascistic, malignant agenda that scare the daylights out of me.

UPDATE: Saturday, 21 February 2015; 08:10 AM, EST

Thanks to Tim and Andrew of Revelations Radio News for more disturbing reports.

It should be pointed out that “anti-vaxxer” (two x’s) is another propaganda ploy to discredit those who are awake. They are also called by the derogatory term “Truther” just as anyone who questions the miraculous birth of the Manchurian Messiah of Mystery is a “Birther”.

The Washington Post is promoting a nationally-syndicated column by the great Arthur Caplan demanding that doctors who dare give patients the full story on vaccinations should have their license to practice medicine taken from them.

Amateurs and hucksters are not the only people telling parents not to vaccinate their children. Unfortunately some doctors – men and women sworn to the Hippocratic Oath – are purveying junk science. They say that vaccines cause autism, as in the famous case of Andrew Wakefield, whose study drawing the link has been retracted. Or that measles isn’t that bad, so your child can skip the shots, as Jack Wolfson, a cardiologist in Arizona, says, adding that “the facts” show vaccines to be full of “harmful things” like “chemicals.” Or that, according to some parents, vaccines cause “profound mental disorders,” as Sen. Rand Paul, an ophthalmologist, warned before he walked the statement back. Or that vaccines cause “permanent disability or death,” in the words of Bob Sears, a pediatrician in California. …

Doctors who purvey views based on anecdote, myth, hearsay, rumor, ideology, fraud or some combination of all of these, particularly during an epidemic, should have their medical licenses revoked. Thankfully, states have the right tools to do so. It’s time to use them.

Caplan is laughably-considered an “expert” in “medical bioethics” which is a little like lauding Colonel Sanders an “expert” in the humane treatment of domesticated farm fowl.

Again to Oregon where I was so shocked to see a government apparatus vehemently antagonistic toward Mid-Western values. I’m not familiar with the state and it would seem that Oregonians are captive to an obnoxiously Leftist establishment. We have experienced this phenomenon, personally, in New York; the majority of the state is rural, Conservative and Christian but the state is ruled by the political power of the radical Left emanating from its major cities—NYC, Buffalo, Albany, etc.

Oregon’s Democrat Governor, John Kitzhaber, has been forced to resign over a corruption scandal regarding his “fiancé”. He is being replaced by his female Democrat Secretary of State, Kate Brown.

Oregon’s new “openly bisexual” rabidly pro-abortion Governor-ette, Kate Brown…LEFT.

Brown is an outspoken advocate of slaughtering the unborn and Planned Parenthood, Oregon, awarded her as such in 2012.

Aside from being an institutionalized bureaucrat, Brown has only one qualification: she’s “openly bisexual”.

This is being lauded as a “first” in America’s politics of perversion…is it by design?

As an independent research journalist, I can tell you that the more you look at puppet politicians the more you realize that they are all co-opted, corrupt and controlled. If they don’t have dirt on them when they come in, dirt is given to them. Those behind the scenes only need the right opportunity to pull the plug and further their agenda of destruction.

It only goes to prove something I’ve been writing for some time now: America is a Captured Operation.

* The similarity between these too Irish Catholic-sounding purveyors of poison propaganda and their puppet papers is extremely coincidental…or is it?
** I added the hyphen. Apparently, the new trend for career women who marry gelding men and feel the necessity to carry their surnames along with them is to not hyphenate themselves which usually has the confusing result of you wondering whether they’re a career woman or had morons for parents. In this case, probably both.

Fortunately for those terrified by the sleeping giant, dutiful Machine propaganda mills were there to assure us that there was nothing to it;

Did the Federal Government Just Purchase 30,000 Guillotines? No. ~ About.com

Did the United States Congress approve the purchase of 30,000 guillotines for “government purposes” to be used under coming martial law? FALSE: It’s a persistent rumor, but no proponent web site seems to provide evidence… ~ Microsoft Network

The U.S. government has purchased a stockpile of 30,000 guillotines. FALSE ~ Snopes

But thanks to the dawn of CIA-powered jihad, the sawing off of heads is now sickeningly modern.

Few Americans will forget when Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl had his head sawed off for all the world to see in 2002. Many have died the same way ever since.

All of that hard work “dispelling myths” was for naught.

But are government-purchased guillotines “myths”?

For as long as this page stays up, here is an interesting write-up from the Georgia House of Representatives—their official page at “www.legis.ga.gov”—regarding a bill proposed for the 1995/1996 legislative session, HB 1274:

Georgia House of Representatives - 1995/1996 Sessions

HB 1274 - Death penalty; guillotine provisions

Code Sections - 17-10-38/ 17-10-44

                       A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

                               AN ACT

1- 1 To amend Article 2 of Chapter 10 of Title 17 of the Official

1- 2 Code of Georgia Annotated, relating to the death penalty

1- 3 generally, so as to provide a statement of legislative

1- 4 policy; to provide for death by guillotine; to provide for

1- 5 applicability; to repeal conflicting laws; and for other

1- 6 purposes.

1- 7       BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF GEORGIA:

                         SECTION 1.

1- 8 The General Assembly finds that while prisoners condemned to

1- 9 death may wish to donate one or more of their organs for

1-10 transplant, any such desire is thwarted by the fact that

1-11 electrocution makes all such organs unsuitable for

1-12 transplant. The intent of the General Assembly in enacting

1-13 this legislation is to provide for a method of execution

1-14 which is compatible with the donation of organs by a

1-15 condemned prisoner.

...

1-22   (a) All persons who have been convicted of a capital

1-23   offense and have had imposed upon them a sentence of death

1-24   shall, at the election of the condemned, suffer such

1-25   punishment either by electrocution or by guillotine.

Ever seen a prisoner in the United States of America executed by guillotine…ever?!

That “organ donor” thing? Yeah, there’s a lot of money in it. Just ask my friend Kevin Curtis. He was trying to blow the whistle on an illicit organ donor racket he found in Mississippi…just before he was framed for sending ricin-laced letters to Barack Obama.

Creeped out yet?

It gets worse.

In 2011, upstart Israelis were being a nuisance, camping in the center of Tel Aviv and complaining that “Contractor companies are organized crime!” Where they came up with that idea, no one knows.

Then, suddenly, in the middle of their protest, a guillotine was placed, right there…on Rothschild Boulevard. “Get the message, pesky peasants?”

Folks, you can’t make this up.

Two weeks ago, this headline splashed across the mainstream website “Slate.com”:

Bring Back the Guillotine
Lethal injection is the wrong way to do capital punishment. Severing the head is the better way to go.
By John Kruzel

A nationwide shortage of a key ingredient used in lethal injections has led some states to experiment with new, untested drug cocktails for executing death row inmates. The practice has raised moral and constitutional questions, and unleashed a wave of litigation. At this point, as a society, we should be asking whether we can stand by and watch as this barbaric practice continues. Are these iffy drug combinations really any better than the guillotine?

Bringing back the guillotine may sound crazy, but it’s certainly better than the current alternative. It’s better for prisoners because quickly severing the head is believed to be one of the quickest, least painful ways to die. And it’s better for organ recipients because the bodies of guillotined prisoners could be more quickly harvested for viable parts, unlike organs that may become unusable after lethal injection due to hypoxemia.

In unguarded moments, Barack Obama says he has a “muslim faith”. Perhaps he does not. But he chose John Brennan to be Director of the CIA and it was recently revealed that Brennan converted to Islam in Saudi Arabia (where the body of the Prophet lays) and has even been on the Hajj pilgrimage.

The question remains…

—Is one of these in your future…?

A decorated combat veteran, recently honored for going to extreme lengths to take care of a brother soldier is stopped for a “random vehicle check”, found to have 30 round AR15 magazines (now illegal in the state of New York) and is arrested. He now faces an astounding seven years in prison.

It was the perfect time.

I had just made myself a gin and tonic that would’ve required a small loan had I got it at the pub.

All I wanted to do was listen to a scary episode of Coast to Coast, sip my drink and play some violent video games (completely inappropriate for teens but good escapism for an adult with anger issues).

The “ding” of an e-mail alert went off. It was a young friend I had made via social networking. We had a lot in common: we hated being deployed and we loved America. He was worth breaking out of my stupor to see what was going on.

“Is this legit?” he asked. It was a story from a blog I wasn’t familiar with claiming that the VA was sending out notifications to veterans telling them that if they were adjudicated “mentally incompetent” that a section of the “Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act” prohibited them from purchasing or even possessing a firearm.

I looked at the blog and realized there was way too much research to be done in order to give him a fair answer. My cynical nature wanted to say, “Of course,” or “I wouldn’t doubt it” but the journalist in me forced something more rational, “I’ll have to look it up and get back to you, kid.”

A short time later, another e-mail alert went off. This time from a friend currently deployed. He was taken from my unit and forced to fill a partial mission requirement that left me in garrison. When he writes, I always stop what I’m doing to respond…even when I have to shake some gin fog out of my eyes. He wanted to know if, when he got back, some do-gooder at the VA was going to label him with PTSD and take his guns away.

He referenced the same blog.

After blinking hard a few times, my cowardice got the best of me and I wrote, “I’ll look it up and get back to you, brother.”

I closed Microsoft Outlook on my computer and attempted to stretch out my arthritic back in a way that would give me a good view of the virtual carnage about to appear on my TV screen.

—When I realized that I had left my Facebook account logged in and the annoying e-mail noise went off. It was my researcher, co-worker and friend, the Sergeant Major. He wanted to know if I had seen the story about the VA helping take away soldier’s guns.

But this time, I had an ace up my sleeve: the Sergeant Major was on the team and I knew just how to get to him, “Looks shady. Get me another source so that I can verify it.” All he could come up with were pictures and pdf’s of the same letter from the blog.

“I’ll track it down tomorrow!” I snapped, logged off of Facebook, took a big pull from my drink and grabbed my game controller.

_______________________

The next morning brought some urgency and I pushed hard to get my work accomplished so that I could squeeze in time to address this upsetting allegation.

As I began to dig, it seemed that this was an issue that came to a head all last year. Since 2007, well-meaning legislators have been pushing the “Veterans Second Amendment Protection Act”—a bill that sought to safeguard veterans from losing their Constitutional right to keep and bear arms should the Veterans Administration deem them incapable of handling their own financial affairs. Perhaps not surprisingly, it has repeatedly failed in the Senate.

For a short period of time, Tom Coburn (R-OK) sought to add a similar protection to this year’s National Defense Authorization Act—the annual funding legislation whose previous incarnation included some disconcerting language about indefinite detention of “terrorists”. Tough-as-nails fighter that he is, Coburn eventually withdrew the amendment after the objections of his friend Charles Schumer (D-NY) who claimed to “love” veterans and “vote for them all the time” and then equated a veteran with PTSD as no different than any other “felon”.

So it was time for me to go to work.

Um…besides the real job that paid my bills.

As soon as I had the opportunity, I began making calls to the VA. The first thing I realized was that, unless you proclaim that you are ready to hurt yourself, the Veterans Administration was as responsive as Lily Tomlin with a switchboard in front of her. The main 800 number wouldn’t even allow you to leave a voicemail, you just got hung up on after the automated message finished telling you how important your call was.

Time to get inventive. The letter in question appeared to come from the Portland Oregon VA. After several different department personnel admitting they really had no idea what I was talking about, I was finally given the information of someone who would: Mental Health official and Suicide Prevention Manager Rob Tell.

And had to leave a message.

Fortunately, Rob wasn’t like the typical VA administrator, he returned my call.

The information he gave me was that mental incompetence adjudication was different for every state, and he assured me that the process in Oregon erred on the side of caution. The weight necessary to require the VA to submit a soldier to the FBI’s “National Instant Criminal Background Check System” was similar to what would be required in a legal commitment proceeding. In his experience, he had only seen it happen once.

But what he did admit was happening more often, was when local law enforcement was involved in responding to a troubled vet call and they found out the soldier had a concealed carry permit. These required almost no effort for law enforcement to revoke and they frequently did just that.

The Huffington Post and Associated Press dismiss the issue with the disgustingly deceptive statistic that:

Only 185 out of some 127,000 veterans added to the gun-check registry since 1998 have sought to have their names taken off, according to data that the VA shared with lawmakers during a hearing last June.

So of the 127,000 veterans stripped of their Constitutional Rights, only 185 had the desire or the means to fight it…this “honesty” from the very institution that conducted the travesty.

This outrageous number was confirmed by the office of Senator Richard Burr (R-NC).

Besides bureaucrats at the VA gunning for their guns, soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines face their very own chain of command who pushed last year to take their already draconian privately-owned firearms restrictions even further for the sake of their “safety”. These are the same restrictions that made the massacre at Fort Hood by the Islamist-non-terrorist Army Major Nidal Hassan easy to pull off.

The Department of Homeland Security recently labeled returning veterans as a terror risk because they “possess combat skills and experience that are attractive to right-wing extremists…”

The FBI—an organization whose premier occupation seems to be entrapping mentally-defective dupes into terror activities and then swooping in to stop them—joined in the push to demonize veterans based upon their “confidential sources”.

With “gratitude” like this for disrupting their lives, destroying their families, ruining their souls and mutilating their bodies, it’s hard to imagine why there’s so much trouble getting soldiers to re-up these days.

UPDATE: 25 February, 2013, 08:55 am EST

What constitutes “incompetency”? Johnny’s brother has the answer.