A listener and contributor to my program, Tony, sent me an e-mail recommending a teaching by Rob Skiba that gave away nothing on what Tony and I know as the “Jesuit World Order” but none-the-less Tony considered the teaching “critical” and “outstanding”.

I assume Tony felt that way because of a vein that runs through all good Christians; we respect and revere the “Hebrew roots” of our Jewish Savior and we wish to please Him by disciplined living.  That is the appeal of Judaising and it is a dangerous trap that our Roman foes exploit to the fullest.

Heirs of the Promise

Whether it’s reverence for the Bible or respect for our “Hebrew roots”, the Dragon of Rome has zeroed in on our emotions of warmth and exploited them to the fullest in order to cover her tracks.

I remember like it was yesterday one of my final meetings with supposed Jesuit foe Eric Jon Phelps and my desperate attempts to rationalize the negative aspects of his mission such as needless enflaming of racial hatred¹ or his insistence that modern Israel still has a future prophetic role to play.  I now know the reason is what Cardinal Thomas Wolsey called “Learning Against Learning”; the Counter-Reformation tactic of mixing truth with lies.  Eric Jon Phelps is an undercover Jesuit—he even has a family under false pretenses (a crime for which he will answer to when he stands before Christ).

Questioning “Eric” on his Dispensationalism, I asked him about the 144,000 or Revelation 7.  “Eric” insisted that he took the Bible literally.  This is a cunning tactic that is meant to instantly gain the high ground amongst Fundamentalist Christians who revere the Word of God.

After these things I saw four angels standing at the four corners of the Earth, holding the four winds of the Earth, that the wind should not blow on the Earth, on the sea, or on any tree.  Then I saw another angel ascending from the east, having the Seal of the Living God.  And he cried with a loud voice to the four angels to whom it was granted to harm the Earth and the sea, saying, “Do not harm the Earth, the sea, or the trees till we have sealed the servants of our God on their foreheads.”  And I heard the number of those who were sealed.  One hundred and forty-four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel were sealed:

of the tribe of Judah twelve thousand were sealed;
of the tribe of Reuben twelve thousand were sealed;
of the tribe of Gad twelve thousand were sealed;
of the tribe of Asher twelve thousand were sealed;
of the tribe of Naphtali twelve thousand were sealed;
of the tribe of Manasseh twelve thousand were sealed;
of the tribe of Simeon twelve thousand were sealed;
of the tribe of Levi twelve thousand were sealed;
of the tribe of Issachar twelve thousand were sealed;
of the tribe of Zebulun twelve thousand were sealed;
of the tribe of Joseph twelve thousand were sealed;
of the tribe of Benjamin twelve thousand were sealed.

After these things I looked, and behold, a great multitude which no one could number, of all nations, tribes, peoples, and tongues, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, with palm branches in their hands, and crying out with a loud voice, saying, “Salvation belongs to our God who sits on the Throne, and to the Lamb!” ~ Revelation 7:1-10 (NKJV, some capitalization added to denote uniqueness)

Have these sealed servants received their special commission based upon their bloodlines?

If so, why are the tribes of Dan and Ephraim not mentioned?  Do they have a special curse upon them, transferred by blood?

It is impossible to trace ancestors of the tribes today, will God perform a miracle for this purpose?  Is it necessary?

Seventh Day Adventist Pastor Doug Batchelor has an excellent and compelling teaching ² on this that explains each of these concerns; he calls the number a literal “Special Forces” for Christ while the listing of tribes is symbolic.

For the details of this teaching, go here.

NOTE: I love the Adventists’ for their insights (they are the only Protestant sect today) but it is quite obvious and clear to us non-Adventists that the Seal of God is not their legalistic definition of a Saturday Sabbath.  Such are the pitfalls of organized religion; both truth and tradition are institutionalized.

* the 12 apostles did not come one from each Tribe, setting the precedent for a spiritual definition of “Children of Israel”
* historically, the 12 Tribes were very different in population but those listed in Revelation 7 and 14 are exactly 12,000 of each
* depending on how you count Joseph’s sons, Jacob’s two adopted grandsons, the Tribes can equal 12, 13 or 14
* the Miracle of Christ’s Sacrifice extends Grace to any person who believes; “Jews” are now defined by the spirit in their heart and not the flesh of their lineage (Romans 2:28-29)
* “12” is the number for building.  Pastor Doug states “Twelve is a perfect number for building, because it is one of the most versatile numbers.  It can be evenly divided by 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and of course 12.”
* this seal does not mean only 144,000 are Saved as verse 9 follows with the multitude worshipping the Lamb at His Throne
* the names appear to be aligned, not by birth, but by the significance of what they mean in order to reaffirm the Gospel!

1.         Judah means                “I will praise the Lord”
2.         Ruben means               “He has looked on me”
3.         Gad means                  “Given good fortune”
4.         Asher means                “Happy am I”
5.         Naphtali means           “My wrestling”
6.         Manasseh means         “Making me to forget”
7.         Simeon means             “God hears me”
8.         Levi means                  “Joined to me”
9.         Issachar means            “Purchased Me”
10.       Zebulun means            “Dwelling”
11.       Joseph means              “Will add to me”
12.       Benjamin means          “Son of His right hand”

“I will praise the Lord for he has looked on me and granted good fortune.  I am happy because my wrestling, God is making me to forget.  God hears me and is joined to me.  He has purchased me a dwelling and will add to me, the Son of His Right Hand.”

What Is Sin?

Here we have a bit of a translational problem; a definition of “sin” can be found in I John 3:4 but that all depends upon which translation you read.

Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness. ~ NKJV

Everyone who practices sin also practices lawlessness; and sin is lawlessness. ~ NASB

Despite it’s bad reputation for inaccuracy, the NIV comes a little closer.

Everyone who sins breaks the law; in fact, sin is lawlessness. ~ NIV

The King James appears to render this passage quite differently.

Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. ~ KJV

I neither like nor recommend the King James as its Shakespearian English is needlessly confusing.  It’s also a favorite translation of those desiring to sound righteous.  What I do recommend is serious scholarship; do exactly as I have done above.  Check multiple translations whenever possible and do original language word studies frequently.

What Is “the Law”?

If “sin” is “transgression of the Law”, then the next logical question is, “What is the Law?”  Does this mean that by eating shrimp, not covering my head or cutting the lawn on Saturday I’m sinning?

Perhaps a better question is, “Are the 613 Mitzvot of Moshe (the do’s and don’ts within the Law of Moses) what we mean by ‘the Law’?”

A careful examination of Scripture reveals something astounding: there appears to be more than one “Law”—the 10 Commandments or “Moral Law” verses the “Ceremonial Law”.

The “Moral Law” was written by the Finger of God on tablets of stone (even the second copy; Deuteronomy 10:1-5). (Exodus 31:18, 32:16)

The “Ceremonial Law” was written by Moses and placed in a Book as a testimony of Israel’s fleshly tendencies. (Deuteronomy 31:9-29)

The “Moral Law” was placed in the Ark. (Exodus 25:16, Deuteronomy 10:1-5, I King 8:9)

The “Ceremonial Law” was placed beside the Ark. (Deuteronomy 31:24-26)

The “Moral Law” is necessary for ordered living, pre-existed us (I John 3:8), is written in our hearts (Romans 2:15) and will stand forever. (Psalm 111:7-8)

The “Ceremonial Law” was necessary to explain the Plan of Salvation and was fulfilled by the Sacrifice of the Son of God, Jesus Christ. (Matthew 5:17-18, Matthew 27:51, Acts 15:10-11, Romans 10:4, Galatians 3:23-25, Ephesians 2:14-15, Hebrews 9:6-15)

The Sabbath

Failure to differentiate between the “Moral Law” and the “Ceremonial Law” can lead to the reverse of the Judaisers’ heresy; the idea that Christ rendered all Law obsolete.

The effective counter remains “But what about murder and adultery mentioned in the Ten Commandments?”  It’s clear that Christ’s sacrifice gave us freedom, not anarchy.

In fact, on the Sermon on the Mount, Christ took the Commandments and increased their jurisdiction beyond action and into your very thoughts and yearnings. (Matthew 5:21-30)

There is also a “Royal Law” which James says is still in effect—

If you really fulfill the Royal Law according to the Scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,” you do well; but if you show partiality, you commit sin, and are convicted by the Law as transgressors.  For whoever shall keep the whole Law, and yet stumble in one point, he is guilty of all.  For He who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said, “Do not murder.”  Now if you do not commit adultery, but you do murder, you have become a transgressor of the law.  So speak and so do as those who will be judged by the law of liberty.  For judgment is without mercy to the one who has shown no mercy.  Mercy triumphs over judgment. ~ James 2:8-13New King James Version (NKJV, some capitalization added for uniqueness)

Enterprising students of Scripture have noticed that all of the first 10 Commandments are explicitly and clearly reaffirmed in the New Testament with the exception of the 4^th.

Conversely, the listing of sins which merit damnation go beyond the 10 Commandments—

Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God?  Do not be deceived.  Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. ~ I Corinthians 6:9-10

Consequently, confusion (perhaps some rendered purposefully) still exists amongst Christians regarding the Commandment to, “keep holy the Sabbath Day”.

“Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.  Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord your God.  In it you shall do no work: you, nor your son, nor your daughter, nor your male servant, nor your female servant, nor your cattle, nor your stranger who is within your gates.  For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day.  Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it. ~ Exodus 20:8-11 NKJV

To make matters more confusing, the first Christians appeared to gather for fellowship and worship on “the first day of the week” (Acts 20:7-8) in honor of the day that Christ rose from the dead. (Matthew 28:1, Mark 16:2-6, Luke 24:1, John 20:1)

Should Christians keep the Sabbath and should it be kept on the seventh day of the week?

The first concern with that issue is, “What is the seventh day of the week?”

For some in the Christian tradition, the first day of the week is named in accordance with the creation tale in the first book of the Bible, Genesis, where one of the first things God did was say “let there be light, and there was light.”

Not every culture has Sunday as its first day, and notable exceptions are found in the Slavic languages, where Sunday is the last day of the week and is not named in honor of the sun.  For example, in Hungary Sunday is called Vasárnap and means “market day,” and in Old Russian, where Sunday was sometimes called “free day.” ~ Today I Found Out

Monday or Sunday first day of the week?

The first day of the week varies all over the world.  In most cultures, Sunday is regarded as the first day of the week although many observe Monday as the first day of the week. According to the Bible, the Sabbath or Saturday is the last day of the week which marks Sunday as the first day of the week for many Jewish and Christian faiths, while many countries regard Monday as the first day of the week.

According to the international standard ISO 8601, Monday is the first day of the week ending with Sunday as the seventh day of the week.  Although this is the international standard, countries such as the United States still have their calendars refer to Sunday as the start of the seven-day week. ~ TimeAndDate.com

The moment we begin to push a strict understanding of even when to observe the Sabbath, we are in danger of the sins of legalism and pride.

One can make the case that pride was the beginning of all sin and rebellion against God (Isaiah 14:12-14), and as a result, is the worst of sins.

The traditions of the Ceremonial Law are significant, but only in as much as they create a beautiful picture of our Savior and His Redemption for us.  Without Him, they are completely without substance.  Amongst the Ceremonial Law are the marking of Sabbath days, the strict keeping of which leads to the deadly sin of pride—

In Him you were also circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the sins of the flesh, by the Circumcision of Christ, buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead.  And you, being dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He has made alive together with Him, having forgiven you all trespasses, having wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was against us, which was contrary to us.  And He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the Cross.  Having disarmed principalities and powers, He made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them in it.

So let no one judge you in food or in drink, or regarding a festival or a new moon or sabbaths, which are a shadow of things to come, but the substance is of Christ.  Let no one cheat you of your reward, taking delight in false humility and worship of angels, intruding into those things which he has not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind, and not holding fast to the Head, from whom all the body, nourished and knit together by joints and ligaments, grows with the increase that is from God.

Therefore, if you died with Christ from the basic principles of the world, why, as though living in the world, do you subject yourselves to regulations — “Do not touch, do not taste, do not handle,” which all concern things which perish with the using — according to the commandments and doctrines of men?  These things indeed have an appearance of wisdom in self-imposed religion, false humility, and neglect of the body, but are of no value against the indulgence of the flesh. ~ Colossians 2:11-23

But are those Sabbath Days different from the Sabbath (as our Adventist brethren claim)?

If there is an important passage that needs a testimony in Scripture, we can expect it to be mentioned at least twice—for as the testimony of two or more is found, so is an issue resolved. (Matthew 18:16)

Who are you to judge another’s servant?  To his own master he stands or falls.  Indeed, he will be made to stand, for God is able to make him stand.

One person esteems one day above another; another esteems every day alike.  Let each be fully convinced in his own mind.  He who observes the day, observes it to the Lord; and he who does not observe the day, to the Lord he does not observe it.  He who eats, eats to the Lord, for he gives God thanks; and he who does not eat, to the Lord he does not eat, and gives God thanks.  For none of us lives to himself, and no one dies to himself.  For if we live, we live to the Lord; and if we die, we die to the Lord.  Therefore, whether we live or die, we are the Lord’s.  For to this end Christ died and rose and lived again, that He might be Lord of both the dead and the living.  But why do you judge your brother?  Or why do you show contempt for your brother?  For we shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ. ~ Romans 14:4-10 (NKJV)

It is an absolute fact that one can be nourished in their relationship with Christ by voluntarily keeping a Sabbath, but only if that is their intent, because that was clearly His Intent—

Now it happened that He went through the grainfields on the Sabbath; and as they went His disciples began to pluck the heads of grain.  And the Pharisees said to Him, “Look, why do they do what is not lawful on the Sabbath?”

But He said to them, “Have you never read what David did when he was in need and hungry, he and those with him: how he went into the house of God in the days of Abiathar the high priest, and ate the showbread, which is not lawful to eat except for the priests, and also gave some to those who were with him?”

And He said to them, “The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the Sabbath.  Therefore the Son of Man is also Lord of the Sabbath.” ~ Mark 2:23-27

Unfortunately, the reality of this issue appears to be that the vast majority of Christians exercise no discipline in this matter and a very small minority of Christians push a fanatical adherence to the legalistic side of it.

As with every issue of guilt and emotion where there is no clarity of thought or balance, the Dragon has stepped up to excite the paranoia of the devoted into believing that a specific, mandated day of rest will be the ultimate evil brought by her iron grip.

Given that the Inquisition never died, it was simply put into the hands of Rome’s American puppets, there are far more serious issues to be concerned about.

New Nationwide FEMA Camps Should Raise Eyebrows

_____________

Jewish Patriot Emanuel Josephson, writing in 1968, brilliantly put it all together from banking to the Bolsheviks and from Secret Societies to the Society of Loyola. Most astutely, Josephson described how Jewish bankers were used as an end-around by their crafty Vatican masters to allow the appearance of piety while still cashing in on currency manipulation. …

Rome’s successor, the Holy Roman Empire, dissimulated its interest in money and its power. This was in accord with its professed tenets of Nazarene, theistic Communism. …

Thus theistic, Nazarene Communism, and the “modern” religion that goes by the name of Communism and is supposedly atheist, both are basically super-capitalist and both mask their avid grab for money and wealth.

Title to all wealth was vested in the Church and in its champion “knights,” who at the same time assumed the role of so-called “protectors,” much like the present-day “labor leaders” of their vassals whom they mercilessly enslaved and looted.

Both Churchmen and lay knights used the despised Jews for the conduct of their usurious financial operations, in order to avoid “sinning” and the death penalty that it involved.  The Jews proved very useful and handy for that purpose.

Scapegoating Jews has been such a successful agenda that those who portend to speak against governmental tyranny are crying out for a “Final Solution”.  Rockstar-turned-2^nd Amendment defender Ted Nugent recently published this post on Facebook:

I recently had an exchange with an internet personality who came forward to me as someone who promoted and appreciated my work.  Our correspondence was eye-opening as I was exposed to the depth of this rationale—

I don’t know how familiar you are with ancient (Gnostic) cosmogony or the Nag Hammadi material (being a Christian it *should* be right up your alley): John Lash’s Metahistory site is a good place to start. Being ostensibly Abrahamic, Jews and Jesuits (and a couple of others) both spring from the same diabolical root, which I believe to be extraterrestrial/extradimensional—and the Gnostic warnings about the pernicious mind-parasitism of the ‘Archons’ matches the MO of Jew and Jesuit alike. On the Jews: there are very few ‘racial’ Jews.  Of the 13 million total, up to 90% are Eastern European Kazarians who converted from paganism in the 8th century—for an easier life.  I believe ‘true’ (shem-itic) racial Jews are not truly human, as they gave up at least part of their spiritual (soul) development WAY BACK, in favour of material acquisition (this [Faustian] surrendering allowing the demonic intrusion of alien control). Their ages-old assault on the (true) Aryan race—Iran (‘Land of the Aryans’), Yizidis, the so-called ‘Islamic Invasion’ of Europe (see Barbar Spectre), etc.—their cold, non-human Palestinian genocide, the targeting of Palestinian infants, etc., are symptomatic of an alien psychopathic psychology. The misogynistic nature of monotheism also strongly suggests that there is a greater, more metaphysical game in play than mere political manipulations (?) There are still many, many pieces to this puzzle that I confess I don’t have and, like climbing the Masonic pyramid, each step brings new revelations that overturn the preconceptions that seemed so ‘sensible’ lower down (I’m sure you know that feeling).

I have to admit that I found this rather shocking as this gentleman had posted one of my interviews on his site and the page was very professionally done.  How could he have fallen to such wild speculation culminating in such naked prejudice? I smelled the Jesuits yet again. Of course modern Israel is a Luciferian fabrication created by, for and through them for the express purpose of throwing Bible-believing Christians off the track of understanding Rome as the 4^th and Final Beast.  With a rebirth of Israel, Christians were now given the Jesuit-fabricated doctrines of Dispensationalism, Zionism and the Pre-Tribulation Rapture. Not only did I cover this in my book but I went into more detail in a recent day-long presentation at Calvary Chapel, Lima, Ohio (Pastor Mike Spaulding and his family remain a blessing me and mine). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sopHA3ICZZs Yes, many “non-Jews” were needed to be convinced they were Jews in order to populate this new Luciferian fabrication called “Israel” but instead of understanding and compassion, this information has been warped into justification for action. With the extreme and outrageous dehumanizing of “Jews” the next Holocaust is clearly on the horizon.  How we are to test for bloodline purity is something I assume the next Joseph Mengele will tell us.  At least one puff-piece from the UK Guardian was forced to admit that Mengele and his Nazi comrades escaped Europe to hide in an old Argentinian Jesuit mission, but the rest of the story is “more fiction than fact.” I’m sure we can absolutely rely on newspapers to tell us the complete and total truth, why wouldn’t they? Normally, I’d write off someone espousing such an extreme and disconcerting view but I took the time to respond and asked this gentleman if he minded me posting our exchange and he said he didn’t mind—

I’m always wary of getting too far with what I know to be the Truth as it’s quite clear from my research that the Jesuit-controlled Papacy rules the world from behind all her secret societies. If that’s true, I expect to be fully monitored and controlled and, if necessary, harassed and stopped. That’s where my “misogynist monotheistic” Faith comes in.  There is nothing I can possibly do to protect myself from an entity that controls all of the world’s intelligence agencies, banks, armies and governments.  But I can appeal to the Being who has the power to wipe them all out with a single thought based upon my relationship with His Son.  My theory is; as long as I make Jesus Christ the ultimate Authority in my life, and discipline myself from what the Bible has told me “sin” is, I can have immunity to be a legitimate Truth seeker—to poke the very Dragon, himself. To date, this theory appears to be a valid one. “Gnosticism” in its purest form is “salvation through secret knowledge” but what it has devolved into is simply “raw power by manipulating knowledge.”  As a result, gnostics (Jesuits at the top controlling the secret societies) have created a system of manipulation that reigns supreme but is built upon keeping the world’s populace asleep and oblivious to its machinations.  It works flawlessly but is also a house of cards. You have several rationalizations for your view—

* “Jews” have sold their souls * “Jews” are manipulated by extradimensional beings * “Jews” are assaulting the Aryan race * “Jews” aren’t true “Jews”

Each premise of yours is next to impossible to prove or disprove so zetetic examination is impossible.  Without zetetic examination, one can not subject this world view to the Scientific Method; observations leading to an hypothesis proven by experiments where variables are isolated and observations are found to repeat. Therefore, stripping each premise away you’re left with one thing: ugly, primordial racism.  There is no reason or rationale to prejudice, just nonsensical hatred. What stands behind my world view is volumes of names, places and dates and I am very confident in them as a result. This has been fascinating for me and because I respect the work I’ve seen from your site I’ve invested time and effort in writing back to you.  If you don’t mind, I’m going to keep you anonymous and blog this.

I immediately got a response which told me they were okay with me posting this and that my attempts to dissuade them from this very near and real future catastrophe were of no use. The Whore of Babylon, the Dragon of Rome, is closing in on her victims (any who oppose her will be close behind).

I’ve told you this before—we Christians have been intimidated and lied to about why we don’t need to fight for Truth.  We’re told “satan owns the globe” and, therefore, there’s no sense trying to stand up to him.  We should just sit in a corner and wait for the Pre-Tribulation Rapture to beam us out.

There will be no “Pre-Tribulation Rapture.”

We own the Earth.  It was given to Adam to steward as a son of God.  Adam’s sin surrendered that authority for his children (who are all sons of Adam, sons of a man) but the Son of God, Jesus Christ won it back for us—for all who surrender to Him.

If our adversary “owns” anything it is the parasitic system that he built which he uses to usurp and control our Earth.

…the devil took Him up on an exceedingly high mountain, and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory.  And he said to Him, “All these things I will give You if You will fall down and worship me.”

Then Jesus said to him, “Away with you, Satan!  For it is written, ‘You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only you shall serve.’” ~ Matthew 4:8-10 (NKJV)

Although he masquerades as an angel of light [II Corinthians 11:14], our adversary is the very father of lies [John 8:44].  His entire empire is built upon them.  Without lies, falsehoods and propaganda, the chains fall off.

It’s that simple.

As a result, he has invested a sizable portion of all the wealth he has stolen and hoarded into buying pawns and traitors to Christianity to shore up the matrix we live in.

Enter Hendrick “Hank” Hanegraaff and the “Christian Research Institute”.

I grew up (spiritually), immersed in the Matrix of the Final Beast.  I came to Christ at a Calvary Chapel—a movement that has strong ties with Rome.  I spent the next ten years of my Christian Walk learning from Dr. Chuck Missler—a man born of the military/industrial complex who has put a great amount of effort into fooling Believers with Rome’s doctrines.  These doctrines include everything from the ball-Earth, heliocentric, cosmic accident of our supposed cosmology to a future Dispensationalist role of the fabricated nation of “Israel”; from the “Pre-Tribulation Rapture” to first Russia and now Islam replacing Rome as our greatest threat (all fabricated distractions from the Whore of Babylon, the Fourth and Final Beast).

One of my first experiences with Hank Hanegraaf and the “Christian Research Institute” was in concern over their attacking my virtual Jesuit mentor, Chuck Missler.  Of course, they weren’t attacking Missler on the critical issues taught by Rome like Dispensationalism or distracting Believers from understanding the “Holy Roman Empire” to be the Final Beast, they were simply attacking “Koinonia House” on teaching the importance of prophecy.

This is an old trick.

In the field of subversion and counter-intelligence, you can plant your agents deep into the enemy’s camp by having them seem to out other agents.  In reality, CRI’s “critique” of Missler also helps Rome!  Prophecy is critical to understanding our environment and also an important factor in discerning who runs the system of Mystery Babylon—the hidden control of all banks, militaries, intelligence agencies, media and governments.

SUPPRESSED

The Company of Loyola—the Jesuits—is a military organization (their commander is the “Superior General”) that specializes in assassination, subversion and gathering intelligence.  An excellent example of this is the suppression of the Jesuits in 1773.  After 200 years of Jesuit plots in their countries, even Catholic nations were demanding the Pope disband his special forces.  Although Clement XIII attempted to in 1767, he was murdered before he could sign the concordat.  His successor was able to publish a Papal Bull—Dominus ac Redemptor on 21 July 1773—and he languished in extreme pain and even premature decomposition before finally dying of aquetta poisoning.

Were they actually suppressed?  One late author says “No!” and he has built a shockingly brilliant case.  Frederick Tupper Saussy, in his Rulers of Evil, noted that Sun Tzu’s Art of War was published in 1772.  It was “translated” by a Jesuit named Jean Joseph Marie Amiot although neither East nor West had any recollection of the nebulous “Sun Tzu”.  It is far more likely that this book (required reading in America’s war colleges) was a publicizing of a Jesuit strategy so brilliant they would emerge in total control of all world affairs.

As the fourteenth Superior General, Michael Angelo Tamburini, is reputed to have told the French Duc de Brancas, Philippe II, in 1720, “See, my lord, from this room—from this room I govern not only Paris, but China: not only China, but the whole world, without any one knowing how ‘tis managed.”

It is no coincidence that Father Amiot was Qianlong Emperor Aisin Gioro Hongli’s personal astronomer: “Don’t worry about looking up, my king.  I will tell how the Earth is round.”

In Chapter XIII of The Art of War, we learn—

The Use of Spies

…what enables the wise sovereign and the good general to strike and conquer, and achieve things beyond the reach of ordinary men, is foreknowledge. …

6. Knowledge of the enemy’s dispositions can only be obtained from other men.

7. Hence the use of spies, of whom there are five classes:

(1) Local spies;
(2) inward spies;
(3) converted spies;
(4) doomed spies;
(5) surviving spies.

8. When these five kinds of spy are all at work, none can discover the secret system. This is called “divine manipulation of the threads.” It is the sovereign’s most precious faculty.

9. Having local spies means employing the services of the inhabitants of a district.

10. Having inward spies, making use of officials of the enemy.

11. Having converted spies, getting hold of the enemy’s spies and using them for our own purposes.

12. Having doomed spies, doing certain things openly for purposes of deception, and allowing our spies to know of them and report them to the enemy.

13. Surviving spies, finally, are those who bring back news from the enemy’s camp.

MEDICI LEARNING

CRI continues to pretend-attack fellow Papal agents like Missler and his Jesuit insurgent friend Hal Lindsey.

For a public Christian, Lindsey’s personal information has been expunged from the internet.  But when you are able to pull anything up it is at direct odds with his stellar moral and ethical reputation.

Hal appears to be on his fourth wife.  The book that put him on the “planet”—The Late, Great Planet Earth—was actually written by a Lesbian, radial Left activist and United Church of Christ “minister” Carole Carkeet Carlson (she also wrote several of David Jeremiah’s books for him, too, but don’t ask Wikipedia who she is).  If you want to know where Hal’s heart is, just follow his daughters…to Jesuit Gonzaga University.

Hanegraaff’s own personal life is also invisible across the vast internet, outside of his being born in the Netherlands and having twelve children with his wife Kathy.

A “Google” search of “hank hanegraaff netherlands catholic” lists the entire first page (or subsequent pages for that matter) completely devoid of anything negative.

It sure helps to have friends in extremely powerful places.

His Wikipedia entry says volumes because it says nothing—

Personal life

Hanegraaff was born in the Netherlands and raised in the United States since childhood. He and his wife Kathy have twelve children.  They lived in Southern California^[12] but are now living in Charlotte, North Carolina.^[1]

Having twelve children is an astounding number of offspring and, certainly, a family plan that fits very much in line with Catholic doctrine.

If you follow the Wikipedia footnote, it takes you right to the Christian Research Institute!  —Certainly an objective, critical source, there.

A blog connected to alternative media investigative journalist Anthony J. Hilder claims that Kathy is Hanegraaff’s second wife and he has a daughter by his first!  Indeed, Hendrick has been a busy man.

Although Wikipedia doesn’t have much to say about Hanegraaff, it does have an interesting article on Dutch Catholicism.

The Roman Catholic Church in the Netherlands (Dutch: rooms-katholiek kerkgenootschap in Nederland (RKK)), is part of the worldwide Catholic Church, under the spiritual leadership of the Pope, Dutch Conference of Bishops, and curia in Rome.  The Metropolitan Archbishop of Utrecht, currently Willem Jacobus Eijk, is Primate (bishop) of the Netherlands.

Although the number of Catholics in the Netherlands has decreased significantly in recent decades, the Dutch Catholic Church is today the largest religious group in the Netherlands.  Once known as a Protestant country, in 2007 the Netherlands was only 16.8 percent Dutch Protestant (down from 60 percent in the early 20th century; defections primarily due to rising unaffiliation).  There are an estimated 3.992 million Catholics (31 December 2013) in the Netherlands, 23.7 percent of the population^[6] down from more than 40 percent in 1970’s.

That would put Hanegraaff’s family in midst of a burgeoning boom for Rome; perhaps eager to be sent on a mission to America or at least providing a very appealing background for Hendrick to be chosen for use after he got here.

Hanegraaff employs a powerful Jesuit tactic when arguing; having memorized vast portions of Scripture, he can throw out copious amounts in debate whether they’re related to the topic or not and the immediate reaction of any Christian is to be humbled by the reference of God’s Word.

For a “Bible Answer Man” Hanegraaff’s secret past is a dark one.  He has been accused of plagiarizing D. James Kennedy’s 1970 book Evangelism Explosion for his 1987 book Personal Witness Training, and Kennedy was a close friend.

CRI is based in Rancho Santa Margarita, California and there are some interesting articles about Hanegraaff in the Los Angeles Times.

For instance, Hanegraaff took over the Bible Answer Man from Dr. Walter Martin but after Walter’s death, the Martin family began to show public displeasure with Hanegraaff’s decisions—

Relatives of the late Walter Martin, founder of the Christian Research Institute, based in Rancho Santa Margarita, contend that Hank Hanegraaff has departed from the organization’s mission of debunking unusual religious claims.  And they are demanding his resignation.

Hanegraaff, 50, was the handpicked successor to Martin, who retired in 1979.  But in recent years, the Martin family has been troubled by Hanegraaff’s leadership.

After a public rift with Hanegraaff in 1996, Darlene Martin, the widow of Walter Martin, resigned from the institute’s board. Last October, the family sent Hanegraaff a letter detailing objections to his leadership. ~ Elaine Gale, LA Times, 15 April 2000

Do you get the feeling that Hank is a bit of an interloper?  Perhaps “insurgent” is a better word.

Doctor Martin’s wife, Darlene confirmed this in a chilling letter to the editor.

After reading your article “Casting Stones” (April 15), I am writing to clarify several issues.

First, my husband, Walter Martin, never “handpicked” anyone to succeed him at Christian Research Institute and “The Bible Answer Man” radio program.

This claim was handed to me by someone I thought I could trust as I approached the lectern at my husband’s memorial service.

I read it for the first time—aloud—while standing in front of 1,500 people.  It took me completely by surprise and put me in a very awkward position.  I wish to take this opportunity now to apologize for allowing this statement to stand for so many years.

At the time of my husband’s death, I believed Hank Hanegraaff was a man God could mold into a strong Christian leader, one who could play a positive role in leading CRI.  I supported him loyally for six years before I came to see he was not the man I believed him to be.

Secondly, one of our family’s main objections to Hanegraaff’s continued leadership is his mistreatment of fellow Christians.  He has left a trail of wounded people behind him since the takeover of CRI in 1989.  The testimonies against him include those who are his “right-hand” people, people who worked closely with him.

Hanegraaff has called repeatedly for accountability in other Christian leaders and should be held accountable himself.

DARLENE MARTIN, San Juan Capistrano

Hanegraaff Wasn’t “Handpicked”, LA Times, 30 April 2000

Hendrick Hanegraaff wasn’t acting like a very good Christian but he sure does act like an excellent Jesuit.

BANKSTERS’ RULE

Since the suppression of the Templars (the first usury bankers, founders of modern banking) in 1307, the Papists have learned to never allow their own faces/names to be placed upon their machinations—especially their criminal financial exercises.  Instead they hide behind scapegoats and their number one favorite targets are the Jews.

Sadly, they’ve always found Jews interested only in self-aggrandizement, willing to be enriched and targeted in the process, or even malignant Jews who knowingly give their own race a bad name because they are true Luciferians.

The Bank of Italy was launched by Amadeo Peter Giannini in California.  After it’s shocking success, Americans began to get angry with both Rome and Italian immigrants.

The name was changed to “Bank of America” (just like the Jesuit magazine is “America magazine”).  Giannini used his money to found 20th Century Fox but put two Jews up front: Darryl Zanuck and Joseph Schenck.  Zanuck and Schenck immediately produced a movie about the Rothschild banking dynasty called The House of Rothschild which was so effective in stirring hatred against Jews it was used in Nazi propaganda.  Were Zanuck and Schenck really that self-loathing or were they merely Jewish faces behind a Papal plot?

SWARMS OF LOCUSTS

In his 2002 book Swarms of Locusts (pp. 116-119), Michael Bunker has a lengthy section on Hank.

Hundreds of thousands of “Christians” listen to Hank Hanegraaff, specifically because he claims to have the answers when it comes to Christian doctrine. …

In CRI’s statement entitled “What Think Ye of Rome? (part 2)” on Catholicism, CRI states that Roman Catholicism only “compromises” the biblical doctrines of justification, the sufficiency of Christ’s atonement, the authority of the Bible, and total depravity!  CRI accuses the other cults of DENYING these doctrines, but allow that the Catholics only “compromise” them. How can that be?  How can TOTAL DEPRAVITY be “compromised” but not denied?  Does CRI have a problem understanding the word TOTAL or the word DEPRAVITY?  How can the doctrines of justification and the sufficiency of Christ’s atonement on the Cross by “compromised” without denying them?

CRI states that:

“…no matter how theologically deviant Catholicism might be ‑ even if in some respects apostate ‑ it certainly does possess a structural or foundational orthodoxy, reflected in its adherence to the ancient ecumenical creeds …” (ibid, CRI)

In a fundraising letter dated 6/7/95, Hanegraaff stated that any obstacles between Protestants and Catholics should not stand in the way of cooperation in areas where we share mutual interests and concerns.  Sounds like Chuck Colson’s, “Evangelicals and Catholics Together” to me.

Hanegraaff is also a self-proclaimed Charismatic.  He was ordained by Chuck Smith’s Calvary Chapel:

“Despite Hanegraaff’s 1993 anti-charismatic book, Christianity in Crisis, CRI is not to be trusted when dealing with the charismatics either.  In an interview printed in the 5/93 Charisma magazine, Hanegraaff admitted that he himself is a charismatic and that more than half of the CRI staff are charismatics as well!  He said, ‘Spiritual gifts are not an issue at CRI.  We have never made a single anti-charismatic statement on our show.’” (Biblical Discernment Ministries, article on Hank Hanegraaff, revised 3/98) …

It is easy enough to trace the Jesuitical fingerprint back from Hank Hanegraaff to Ignatius of Loyola himself.  Hanegraaff is the product of Calvary Chapel, which is the product of the Neo-Pentacostal/Charismatic movement, which is the product of the Pentacostal movement, which is the product of the Ignatian/Arminians John Wesley and Charles Finney, who are the product of Jacobus Arminius, who is the product of Luis de Molina, who is the product of Ignatius of Loyola.

Do you wonder why Hanegraaff vociferously denies that the Catholic Church is HARLOT of Romans 17, and that Rome is the city that sits on “seven mountains”?

“Rome has not changed its heretical character…  If Hank Hanegraaff wants to look upon Rome with some favor and refuse to look upon it as the great anti-christian religious harlot that it is, that is his prerogative, but he is deceiving his listeners when he claims that old-fashioned Protestant and Baptist views on this matter are ‘extremist’ or unscholarly.” (David W. Cloud, 2000, Identifying the Whore)

Can you see why the last days Great Deception is considered GREAT?  When the armies of Jesuitical evangelism swarm the globe, they have a veritable buffet of “Catholic-Light” theology to offer.  Whether a new “convert” chooses a more austere, formalistic institution to attend, or a more emotional Charismatic church to frequent ‑ he will be thoroughly indoctrinated in Arminian theology in short order.

When it comes to the official CRI position on the Catholic Church, Michael Bunker isn’t exaggerating; it’s downright cozy—

IS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH A CULT?- A Mixed Bag

While Protestants continue to disagree over the issue, CRI firmly maintains that Roman Catholicism is a religious system which includes both orthodox biblical Christianity and elements of unbiblical or “cultic” doctrine and practice.  In other words, we recognize that Roman Catholicism historically has affirmed the essential teachings of the Bible, while also teaching doctrines which are inconsistent with that affirmation and which seriously compromise the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ.  We acknowledge in Roman Catholicism the presence of many genuine brothers and sisters in the Lord, while also recognizing that many of those within Roman Catholicism worldwide appear to be lost.

“Is Roman Catholicism a Cult” is not the most important or the easiest issue to prove (which is why it’s the one CRI addressed).  But even when cornered by callers to his radio show on Catholic doctrine that is questionable, he attacks their sources and dodges the issue.  I used a short clip on my show Resistance Rising and it’s quite clear who Hank works for.

CRI is fully aware of powerful accusations that they serve Rome; the issue is avoided with the usual Christian-speak that’s as soothing as the stare of Kaa the snake from Jungle Book.

IS THE CATHOLIC CHURCH A CULT?- To Speak the Truth

We take this stand fully aware that many are going to criticize us for it. In fact, Catholics will take issue with us because we are critical of many of their teachings.  Protestants label us because we don’t strongly criticize Roman Catholicism.  In fact, there have been some Protestants that have even accused CRI of being Jesuit-controlled!  Well, our concern, is not to please men, but to speak the truth in love.  Obviously we are not in any way controlled by the Roman Catholic church…

Obviously.

LETIGIOUS LECHERY

For the “Bible Answer Man”, Hanegraaff isn’t too keen on obeying Biblical restrictions on lawsuits—

Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unrighteous, and not before the saints?  Do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world will be judged by you, are you unworthy to judge the smallest matters?  Do you not know that we shall judge angels?  How much more, things that pertain to this life?

If then you have judgments concerning things pertaining to this life, do you appoint those who are least esteemed by the church to judge?  I say this to your shame.

Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you, not even one, who will be able to judge between his brethren?  But brother goes to law against brother, and that before unbelievers!

Now therefore, it is already an utter failure for you that you go to law against one another.  Why do you not rather accept wrong?  Why do you not rather let yourselves be cheated?  No, you yourselves do wrong and cheat, and you do these things to your brethren!

~ I Corinthians 6:1-8, New King James Version

A best-selling Christian author and radio evangelist known as the “Bible Answer Man” has filed a defamation lawsuit against a longtime critic who had accused him of being under investigation for mail fraud.

Controversy surrounding Hank Hanegraaff’s Rancho Santa Margarita-based Christian Research Institute arose earlier this year after he sent out an urgent fundraising letter, saying that a “bizarre error” by postal workers caused donations to be thrown away.

Critic and former Christian Research Institute employee Bill Alnor, a journalism professor at Texas A&M University-Kingsville, posted a story on his online magazine, the Christian Sentinel, saying that Hanegraaff was the focus of a federal mail-fraud investigation.

According to Hanegraaff, that was never true. Citing Alnor’s “escalating personal attacks,” he filed suit this week in Orange County Superior Court because, he said, Alnor’s allegations have “crossed the line.”  He is seeking unspecified damages. ~ Evangelist Sues Critic Over Charge, Kimi Yoshino, LA Times, 2 April 2005

It’s not the first time someone has accused Hank Hanegraaff of illicit or illegal behavior.  In fact, previous accusations rather shockingly include criminal behavior worthy of a full law enforcement investigation—

Christian Research Institute’s Hank Hanegraaff had been accused of financial fraud and other criminal activities.  A lawsuit was filed (“wrongful termination suit”) on March 7, 1994, in Orange County Superior Court, California.  The suit alleged that Hendrik (Hank) Hanegraaff, president of CRI, was guilty of numerous ethical lapses, financial theft, tax fraud, and a shocking list of other criminal activities and deceptive practices.  The plaintiffs also charged CRI and its president and officers with violation of the federal racketeering act, defined as a criminal conspiracy or a “combination.” ~ Brad Sparks, Biblical Discernment Ministries, 22 April 1996

Amazingly, Hanegraaff was only investigated by a religious insider group and not the FBI.

After complaints from former employees, a Southern California evangelist who calls himself a theological watchdog for Christians worldwide has been chastised for his ministry’s financial practices.

Officials with the national Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability conducted an audit that has resulted in what they called a “significant reimbursement” in June to the Christian Research Institute, a ministry run by Christian author and radio personality Hank Hanegraaff.

Neither the council nor Hanegraaff, known on the radio as the “Bible Answer Man,” would say how much money was paid back to the institute or by whom. Council officials said the ministry cooperated fully with the audit.

But a group of former employees called the audit a whitewash and made its complaints public by taking the story to the magazine Christianity Today. ~ Audit’s Lesson Was “Painful” for Evangelist, William Lobdell, LA Times, 17 August 2003

After this clean bill of health, perhaps we can call Hanegraaff the Teflon Don of Christian media!

Some accusations against Hanegraaff never make it to the forefront thanks to Christians who do try to live by what Scripture says about such things but that never stopped Hank from attacking them anyway…even when they mentored him like the late Dr. D. James Kennedy—

Hank Hanegraaff is president of the Christian Research Institute, an organization located in southern California that specializes in reviewing the major doctrines of various “cults” that profess an identity with “Christianity.”  Hanegraaff is the host of a radio program, called The Bible Answer Man.  The program is broadcast daily throughout the United States and Canada.

Currently, however, the “Answer Man” is under pressure for some “answers” relative to his own ethics.  And this is not the first time the gentleman has been in legal trouble.  See: “CRI – Hank Hanegraaff Lawsuit”.

Dr. James Kennedy is “Pastor” for the Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Kennedy is widely known for his own radio and television ministry, during which he enunciates strong positions relative to certain moral and social issues.  For example, he vigorously opposes abortion, and he courageously exposes the fallacies of the theory of evolution.

For some years Kennedy and Hanegraaff were associates and close friends.  It seems that Kennedy was significantly responsible for training the “Answer Man” for the position the latter now holds with the Research Institute.  Currently, though, the two are at serious odds.

Recently, Hanegraaff, via his radio broadcast, rebuked Kennedy for some statements the minister had made relative to “astrology.”  On the other hand, Dr. Kennedy is charging that Hanegraaff has flagrantly plagiarized his writings.  Supposedly, the offense is so serious that a lawsuit would be a viable recourse were it not for Kennedy’s scruples against such a drastic action. ~ Hank Hanegraaff and the “Christian Research Institute”, Wayne Jackson, the Christian Courier

And, despite being a lightning-rod for controversy (or perhaps because of it) Hanegraaff sure seems to have some high-powered friends.

JESUIT CHLOROFORM

Since the beginning of Christianity, Believers have understood Rome to be the 4^th and Final Beast of Daniel, the Dragon of Revelation.  As I noted in my book, this was something the Pope’s Special Forces—the Jesuits—worked overtime to fix:

With Rome so clearly depicted as the 4th and final Beast of both Daniel and Revelation, Jesuits needed to disconnect Christians from that interpretation and they used Preterism and Futurism to do it.

Preterism is the idea that most of prophecy has already taken place.  It was concocted by a Jesuit. …

Preterism wasn’t accepted by large groups of Protestants and an alternative interpretation of the End Times was put forth.

Futurism is more appealing in that it acknowledges that much of prophecy is yet future but it distracts from the 4th Beast and paints the anti-Christ as a man who suddenly appears just before the Tribulation and who stands alone, apart from any organization or system.

It, too, was fabricated by a Jesuit. ~ Illuminati Unmasked, pp. 185, 186

If that weren’t enough, the Jesuits contrived a Pre-Tribulation Rapture to insure any Christian who had second thoughts would rest assured that they would be beamed out before any trouble started.

Sadly, Scripture proves that is not the case.

Every single mainstream sect of “Protestant” Christianity teaches these Jesuit doctrines as if they’ve always existed with the exception of some stalwart Seventh Day Adventists.  A little digging shows that Jesuit-influenced Protestant preachers re-wrote 1800 years of eschatology, erasing Rome from our understanding.

One of the reasons they walk in lockstep is the culture created by wealthy fiction writers like Tim LaHaye.  His Futurist/Dispensationalist Rapture series “Left Behind” is so big it now has talent like Nicolas Cage starring in the latest batch of movies.

Can you remember the last time you saw a movie depicting the Vatican as secretly ruling the entire world through the banks, militaries and intelligence agencies?  How about a movie that showed any controversy regarding Rome?

Well we already know why; just ask Daryl Zanuck.

But the Jesuits never leave good people without a false outlet.  In fact, channeling anger and frustration is what they count on; part of the Hegelian Dialectic of thesis, antithesis, synthesis.

And they take great pleasure in using the good names and resources of their enemies to do it.  Let’s return to Jean Joseph Amiot again—I’m sorry…I mean “Sun Tzu”:

II Waging War

… a wise general makes a point of foraging on the enemy.  One cartload of the enemy’s provisions is equivalent to twenty of one’s own, and likewise a single picul of his provender is equivalent to twenty from one’s own store.

One of the great Protestant martyrs was an Englishman named William Tyndale.  Tyndale bravely spoke out against Papal injustices and the crowning glory of his efforts were the breaking of the restrictions of the Council of Trent (which forbade the printing of Scripture unless expressly approved by a Vatican official) and the printing of Bibles in English.  For that, Tyndale was condemned to be burned at the stake.  In an unusual show of “mercy”, he was strangled first.  Foxe’s Book of Martyrs has volumes on Protestants who didn’t receive the same “mercy”.

Who is it that publishes Tim LaHaye’s Jesuit Chloroform?  “Tyndale House”.

Sensing a glaring monotony in their Futurist fare, “Tyndale” brought in a “true Protestant” to offer Christians a different point of view.  Opposite LaHaye’s Pre-Tribulation Jesuit Futurism, Tyndale published Jesuit Preterist fiction written by our very own Hank Hanegraaff.

Although LaHaye is making hay about his “betrayal”, he still receives the lion’s share of attention…and money.

Tim LaHaye, coauthor (with Jerry Jenkins) of the Left Behind series, is publicly airing his displeasure with his publisher.  Tyndale House is selling The Last Disciple, a novel with a distinctly different take on the Book of Revelation than that of the Left Behind series.  LaHaye says he feels betrayed and told The Dallas Morning News, “They are going to take the money we made for them and promote this nonsense.”

The Last Disciple was coauthored by Hank Hanegraaff and Sigmund Brouwer, and teaches that most prophecies in Revelation have already been fulfilled.  The Left Behind series, however, is grounded in a premillennial, dispensationalist view of the end times, which includes a pre-Tribulation Rapture.  “I guess you would say I am disappointed, perplexed, and confused,” LaHaye told Christianity Today.

Ron Beers, Tyndale’s senior vice president and publisher, said his company wants to promote healthy dialogue on eschatology.  Beers said, “We haven’t come up with a consensus on end-times issues.”

LaHaye is continuing the Left Behind series with Tyndale, having agreed with Jenkins to produce three more books. LaHaye also signed a lucrative deal with Bantam Dell, a division of Random House, to write a four-book biblical adventure series, with Babylon Rising being the first installment.  LaHaye said press reports that the deal was worth $45 million were exaggerated.  “It is less than 60 percent of that amount,” LaHaye told CT. ~ LaHaye’s Tribulation, Jim Jones, Christianity Today, 20 January 2005

Don’t worry, LaHaye’s Babylon Rising series steers well clear of connecting the dots between Rome and the first rebellion empire of Babylon…but that’s why you have me.

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED

Perhaps the most disturbing of all are the rotten fruits of Hanegraaff’s work: Protestants doing the exact opposite of what Christ told them.

And I heard another voice from Heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. ~ Revelation 18:4

I have been a Catholic now for 4 years.  I was raised in the Nazarene Church.  I wouldn’t say our family was overtly anti-Catholic but I always heard comparisons between our Church and the Catholic Church and how Catholics were wrong…

My long discovery started when I met my future wife in college.  Before I married her I went to church with her and quickly realized that Catholics did not worship Mary.  While their service (the mass) was alien, I didn’t feel that uncomfortable going to church with her.  In college, I had already moved away from the fundamentalist Nazarene faith and adopted more of a generic “mere” Christianity approach to faith (i.e. CS Lewis).  Regardless, when I got married, I told her I would never become Catholic and my wife told me she would never become Protestant.  We just agreed to disagree. (My wife proved to me that practicing Catholics were indeed Christians. Prior to meeting her most Catholics I knew didn’t really live their faith.)  We considered each other to be Christians and that was good enough.  I agreed to get married in the Catholic Church. After we were married we went to the Catholic Church most of the time.  In fact, I went with my wife for 22 years and never had any motivation to become Catholic. …

When my daughter received her first communion in 1999, I started to think about investigating the church.  Protestants cannot receive communion and thought it would be good to receive communion as a family.  Unfortunately my schedule made it impossible to research the church at that time.  Later I heard Protestant Hank Hanegraaff (The Bible Answer Man) on the radio say that the Catholic Church was a true church but a church with “issues”.  I decided that I would investigate what the Church taught and if the Church was a “true church” I would consider joining… ~ 12 Reasons I Joined the Catholic Church, Tim Cooper, Triumph of Truth, 29 July 2007

For a “Protestant” “Bible Answer Man”, Hank Hanegraaff sure is doing great work for the Beast that crucified Christ and burned alive tens of thousands of His devoted Believers.

UPDATE 31 May 2016, 10:11 AM, EST:

Catholic Crystal Cathedral: the Papal Insurgency of Robert Schuller

UPDATE 12 April 2017, 10:13 AM, EST:

Hanegraaff has made it official.

Three days ago (9 April, 2017) on “Palm Sunday”, Hanegraaff publicly submitted himself to the pagan rite of “Chrismation” at Saint Nektarios Greek Orthodox Church in Charlotte, North Carolina.

“What astounding news,” said Rod Dreher, an Orthodox Christian and author of the New York Times best-selling book The Benedict Option, in an interview with The Christian Post Monday.

“Many evangelicals seek the early church; well here it is, in Orthodoxy,” he continued.

“I am sure some will be scandalized by Hannegraaf’s [sic] conversion but I hope at least some will wonder how someone as knowledgeable about the Bible as Hank could convert to Orthodoxy, and go to a Divine Liturgy to taste and see what it’s like.” ~ The Christian Post

Actually, it’s just the opposite: Hanegraaff was chosen from the beginning as an agent of disinformation who could twist and abuse Scripture to serve the Great Whore drunk on the blood of the Saints—but Dreher (and the “Christian Post”) would certain know about such agendas.  Dreher’s just-published book is a siren’s call for right-minded Christians to believe they are served by joining themselves to the very entity who tortured them horrendously not 500 years ago.

Johnny’s soon-to-be-released book will show you how these outrages never ended, they just went underground.

TWO ISRAELS?

FANTASTIC BREAKDOWN BY DOUG BATCHELOR OF THE TONY PALMER/KENNETH COPELAND PENTACOSTAL POPEFEST

NEOCONS REPORT ON FRENCH FOREIGN MINISTER FROG WHO SECRETLY WARNED OF JESUIT POPE’S TRIUMPHAL SESSION OF CONGRESS

COMMIETARDS PROVIDE PARTIAL LIST OF FAKE RIGHT WING “SECRET SOCIETY”: COUNCIL FOR NATIONAL POLICY

KNIGHT OF MALTA, CFR, CIA PAPAL SCUM J. PETER GRACE

ANOTHER FALSE FLAG COMMITTED BY A PAPAL PUPPET OATH BREAKING PIECE OF ____

THE JESUITS IN JAPAN

THE TREASONOUS SINKING OF THE INDIANAPOLIS

THE “FEAST” OF IGNATIUS OF LOYOLA

Obama Clone of an Egyptian Pharaoh?

Akhenaton the Renegade Pharaoh

______________

Where’s Putin?

Russia is preparing for something at the Kremlin while Putin’s absence baffles everyone

Swiss media reveals more about Putin’s girlfriend, baby

PUTIN SECURITY CHIEF VIKTOR ZOLOTOV DEAD?

______________

Poking the Dragon

What REALLY Happened At Sandy Hook?

L Pozner: The Sandy Hook Pozer

Sandy Hook Shakedown: How Google & the Government are silencing alternative media.

______________

Satanism, Pompeii and the Rosary – a bizarre tale surrounds Francis’ next trip

Pompeii’s Whorehouse: Erotic Murals Re-Exposed

In this episode of “Coast 2 Coast AM” we are treated to two government agents of outrageous fables; Lear and “Richard C. Hoagland” (don’t ever forget the “C” as in “C how stupid I think you are”).

Hoagland is the same schmuck who wrote an entire book that attempted to deflect criticisms of the moon landings by creating the hoax conspiracy that went “yes, the pictures of the moon have anomalies like no stars and were touched up but it was to hide the massive structures made of glass.”

I kid you not.

In the course of researching the work and claims of former DoD historian Douglas Dietrich, I found that one of his critics was none other than John Lear.

But what fascinated me and sowed this all together was that in the same fringe blog that Lear used to discredit Dietrich he also promoted the idea that the Nazi Holocaust of the Jews was a fabrication and that “Zionists” rule the world.

The reason for the ‘holocaust myth’ is to prevent anybody thinking they, (Nazi/jewish people) would ever be allied.

As you can see from the quote, he’s also an impeccable writer.

“Divide and Conquer” is one of the oldest strategies in the book and the CIA uses it to perfection. They have rendered the Liberty/Freedom movement nearly impotent with the outrageously exaggerated reach of “Jesuits” and “Zionists”.

It was extremely instructive to learn of an SAS team caught impersonating locals and killing Iraqis in an attempt to foment internecine hatred between Shias and Sunnis in Basra, 2005. The British used armor to flatten whole buildings to recover the humiliating assets.

So next time you get sucked in to “ZIONIST PLOT!” know that someone in a sterile Langley office is laughing as they read your comments.

To be vehemently against “Zionism” is to join hands with Nazis and Islamists and that should say something.

So if the nation of Israel were completely destroyed would you then be happy? That says something as well.

To believe that “Zionists” control everything makes us in the Liberty movement look even more crazy and extreme than we’re already perceived when we talk of “conspiracy”.

In fact, that’s what many Islamists believe in a ridiculous fashion: there’s a Jewish spy hiding in that tree over there. I know, I’ve been to the Middle East.

The well-being of Israel is NOT the clear goal of the “New World Order”. The goal of the N.W.O. is to enslave all mankind, to bleed us, poison us, rob us and murder us. Israel and the conflict that involves her existence is only a bishop on that chessboard.

Here’s what I do, where-ever governments conspire to murder their own citizens for political gain, I shine a light of outrage. Inasmuch as Israeli governments, politicians and intelligence operatives have compounded the “terrorism” in their borders, they qualify for that outrage but just about every major government on the planet has done the same. Yasser Arafat was a pervert pedophile who molested little boys while making SURE that “Palestinian” refugees lived as miserable a life as possible for his political gain.

One friend recently remarked “Zionists are Nazis”. Come on, man!

No, Jewish Nazi collaborators like George Soros are Nazis.

My friends who say such things aren’t seeing clearly on this to make such a statement.

For all in the Liberty movement, please understand; “ZIONIST PLOT!!!” is losing us far more help than it is gaining us.

A few days ago he sent me a link to this story Palestinians for Boycotting Syrian, Iranian Goods having been astounded by a quote from the organization’s co-founder, Samia Shoman:

Casting aside her life-time enmity towards Israel, Shoman pleaded with the Jewish state to invade Syria and Iran and wipe out their respective Palestinian-hating ruling classes. ‘‘Only such a humanitarian intervention can have the desired effect of halting the barbaric bombardment of the Palestinians who have seen over 3,000 of their number gassed and burnt in Syria and over 25,000 turned into refugees seeking relief in Jordan and Lebanon,’’ she posited.

The story from the “Palestinian News Network” intrigued me so I decided to do some digging and this is what I found:

“It is high time we exposed the crimes against humanity committed by the modern pharoahs [sic] of the Muslim Middle East. Hosni Mubarak and Col. Muammar Gaddafi, who enslaved the long-suffering Egyptian and Libyan peoples with a 30-year dictatorship unprecedented in modern history have now been ousted, but heretical Shi’ite regimes in Syria and Iran are being ruled by merciless despots who are orchestrating the genocide of the Palestinian people ,” stated Stanford law student Omar Shakir.

This “statement” proclaiming Hosni Mubarak and Muammar Gaddafi as criminal “enslavers” could’ve been written by the CIA or Barack Obama’s press agent. Egypt and Libya are disasters because of what Barack Obama and the CIA have done treasonously wielding the American military where there was no vested interest for the American people.

Who made this statement? One “Stanford law student Omar Shakir”.

“Omar Shakir” is an Iraqi who attended Stanford on at least one scholarship and he may have started school around the same general time frame as the U.S. invasion of Iraq. The “Islamic Scholarship Fund” notes;

Born of Iraqi descent and raised in the San Francisco Bay area, Omar graduated from Stanford University in 2007 with honors in international relations. A 2007-2008 Fulbright scholar in Syria, he conducted research on contemporary Syrian economic reform and studied Islamic jurisprudence with the Dalalah Institute. Omar also studied abroad at Oxford University and in Morocco and Cairo and spearheaded humanitarian projects in Syria, Jordan, and the West Bank.

That’s the kind of resume that would make an intelligence service drool…or perhaps a resume engineered by an intelligence service.

OK, not everyone is an intelligence asset (and even fewer are intelligence operatives) but this guy is certainly well educated and well-traveled in all of the areas the CIA would find “useful”.

In the “Palestinian News Network” piece he is quoted as being Mr. Kill Gaddafi but the Stanford Daily quotes him as being against the unconstitutional Libyan war.

So which is it?

Further down the PNN piece the guy sounds like he really is getting a paycheck from the District of Corruption (a.k.a “Washington DC”).

Speaking to hundreds of Palestinians and Syrian refugees in front of the Syrian Embassy in the nation’s capital, Shakir excoriated the Syrian and Iranian regimes for plundering the wealth of the more than 520,000 Palestinians in Syria and depriving them of their basic human rights.

The award-winning law student also deplored the thousands of Palestinian civilians massacred by the Syrian Alawite security forces in the streets of Damascus, Yarmouk, Latakia and Aleppo, the unheard of brutality of which was coordinated and financed by the ayatollahs of Iran.

“It is simply incomprehensible that these bloodthirsty governments are committing genocide against our own people,” he declared.

The Stanford Daily lists him as being an anti-drone crusader, as well.

“All of the interviews were really moving to me because all of the interviewees had come such a long way and taken such a risk, braving curfews and sometimes violence to come and…spend one hour with our team telling their story,” said Omar Shakir ’07 J.D. ’13, another a member of the Stanford Law clinic behind the report.

“We hope that this report will add to the chorus of voices among society that are calling for a reevaluation of our target-killing program,” Shakir said.

And he’s acknowledged as having contributed to the report “Living Under Drones” with a similar vein.

In spite of all that, he says this:

“We are confident that the American people is prepared to support our initiative until the vicious dictatorships of Syria and Iran are overthrown and their Palestinian civilian victims in Syria are no longer subject to indiscriminate slaughter,” Shakir affirmed.

“Rulers like Assad and Ahmadinejad should be taken to the gallows, just as Col. Mouammar Gaddafi and Osama Bin Laden were so speedily dispatched. The welfare of the beleaguered Palestinian people must be our number one priority,” he stated.

“And let us not allow the freedom-denying Fatah and Hamas factions brutally oppressing the Palestinians with their deathly prisons and torture chambers to live out their days with impunity,” Shakir emphasized.

What muslim is crowing about the deaths of Gaddafi and bin Laden?! Either the PNN piece has been fabricated or something is going on here.

I wonder if “co-founder Samia Shoman” knows that Mr. Shakir was “co-founder” of a different organization that wasn’t too keen on Israel?

Stanford University’s student senate rejected a bill calling for selective divestment from Israel.

The bill originally would have committed the Senate to urge the university’s Board of Trustees to reconsider endowment investments in eight companies, including Caterpillar, Lockheed Martin and Motorola. Tuesday’s vote centered on a revised version that pared the list to two.

The failure of the SPER bill capped off several weeks of contentious debate on campus. SPER Co-President Omar Shakir, a law student, had alleged the companies listed in the proposal profit from Israel’s control of the West Bank and “commit human rights abuses and violations of international law.”

In fact, every time I pulled something up about “Omar Shakir”, he’s talking about how evil Israel is.

So which is it, is Israel their salvation or their devil?

All of my evidence against Omar Shakir is circumstantial but the guy smells like a CIA rat or at least some kind of government stooge.

If I had the resources, and if it were important enough to me, I’d dig further. But only where my concealed carry firearm permit was valid.

He may not be a puppet for the CIA but militant disaffected blacks seem to like him.

He reminds me of King Barack the Most Merciful, deep down he hates Israel with all his empty self but he’s forced by his puppet masters to continue to enable Israel because of the role she plays in the New World Order.

To be clear about myself, I’m not like the usual Libertarians in the Freedom movement. I’ve been a Born Again Christian since 1996 and I have very traditional values. I’m awake to the New World Order but I still love John Wayne movies.

I recognize that Israel is just as bought as all the other Western nations. I also concede that evil people seem to have helped Israel get where she is today. I understand that and completely discount it because I worship the King of the Jews and the Bible I read says He will return and rule the world from Jerusalem. Therefore, I am a NWO-hating, freedom-loving Zionist…and I think there’s three of us total.

First launching rockets and mortars indiscriminately into Israel’s civilian border enclaves, the Islamists then sent RPG teams into Israel to attack an armored Humm-V patrol, killing 3 Israeli soldiers and taking 2 captive back to Lebanon. A nearby tank attempted to pursue the attackers but was hit by an Improvised Explosive Device, killing all 4 of the crewmen.

Israel responded, but not in a decisive manner, launching artillery and air strikes that did more to galvanize sympathy for Hezbollah rather than weaken the organization. At the same time, an Israeli naval vessel was damaged by a missile provided to the Islamist group from Iran and hundreds of “Katyusha” rockets were fired into Israeli population centers, some landing as far south as the port city of Haifa.

MANIPULATED photo published by Reuters to make Israeli damage to Beirut look more severe (left).

Psalms 83:1-8
A Song, a Psalm of Asaph.
1 O G-d¹, do not remain quiet;
Do not be silent and, O G-d, do not be still.
2 For behold, Your enemies make an uproar,
And those who hate You have exalted themselves.
3 They make shrewd plans against Your people,
And conspire together against Your treasured ones.
4 They have said, “Come, and let us wipe them out as a nation,
That the name of Israel be remembered no more.”
5 For they have conspired together with one mind;
Against You they make a covenant:
6 The tents of Edom and the Ishmaelites, Moab and the Hagrites;
7 Gebal and Ammon and Amalek, Philistia with the inhabitants of Tyre;
8 Assyria also has joined with them;
They have become a help to the children of Lot. Selah.
New American Standard Update (capitalization and abbreviation added to correct disrespect)

If you take a few moments to look into the histories of the names mentioned, you may come to an astounding conclusion.

Certainly, the peoples who surround Israel (both then and now) despise her. But, surely, there must be differences between them all crossing so much time in human history.

The way the Bible (and the Holy Spirit) gives locations is somewhat problematic but ingenious. If you were to say, “My grandparents came from Germany,” we would all know immediately what you were talking about. But, if you were to say, “My grandparents came from Prussia,” you could be saying that (depending upon the point in history referenced), you could mean anywhere from Poland to Czechoslovakia. —Sorry, “the Czech Republic”. See what I mean? Borders change constantly.

It may be easier to say, “My grandparents were Teutons” which gives your bloodline—your “tribe”—and would tell us the location of where those people existed across the many changing borders and names of various nations.

Not coincidentally, this method would be immediately recognizable to any Middle Eastern people who also trace identity via tribes and bloodlines. Occasionally, there may be some guesswork because a tribe is not so well known to us, but if you have the resources, this is an effective technique.

The first tribal name that jumps out at us is that of “Ishmael”. Ishmael was the child that Sarah facilitated by telling Abraham to sleep with her slave (Genesis 16).

Although this made sense given the customs of the time, given that G-d had promised to make a great nation of the childless Abraham, it was not a good example of “the Father of Faith”. The child that resulted was Ishmael.

But that was not G-d’s Plan. Ishmael was not the son of Abraham and Sarah. He was the son of Abraham and Hagar. G-d would wait past even Sarah’s ability to conceive to prove the miraculous nature of their son Isaac. Soon Ishmael began to compete with Isaac and mock him out of fear for his legitimacy. Sarah would have none of it and pressured Abraham to banish both Hagar and Ishmael—certain death in the arid desert regions they were living in.

But Hagar cried out to the L-rd in her distress and He answered her, promising to make a great nation of Ishmael.

And that He did, for nearly all Arab muslims in the Middle East claim derivation from this son of Abraham.

The tribe of Midian traces its lineage from a child that Abraham had with his second wife, Ketruah (after the death of Sarah). They can be considered a sub-tribe of Ishmael even though the lines are distinct and from different mothers—Ishmael is who they identify with [Fausset’s Bible Dictionary].

“Edom” traces their lineage to Esau, son of Isaac and brother of Jacob. Moab is derived from a union between Lot (the brother of Abraham) and one of his daughters. Having just escaped from Sodom, Lot and his 2 daughters fled to a cave in fear. After several days convinced they were the last living beings on the Earth, Lot’s 2 daughters proceeded to get him intoxicated enough to give them children; Moab and Ammon (Genesis 18 & 19). Obviously, Sodom was not a good place to grow up in.

“Tyre and Sidon” are today, modern Lebanon. That one’s easy because those two, powerful port towns have kept their names through the ages.

“Amalek”—

In (Arabic: عملاق,ʿimlāq‎) is the singular of giant, and the plural is (عمالقة, ʿamāliqah) or (عماليق, ʿamālīq), suggesting the sons of this tribe were known for being unusually tall.²

Not only were many of Israel’s neighbors filled with hatred for her, but they were also lead by genetically-altered super-warriors thanks to intermingling with demons.³

There were and are spiritual forces that constantly seek the demise of Israel.

Psalms 83:11-15
11 Make their nobles like Oreb and Zeeb
And all their princes like Zebah and Zalmunna,
12 Who said, “Let us possess for ourselves
The pastures of G-d.”
13 O my G-d, make them like the whirling dust,
Like chaff before the wind.
14 Like fire that burns the forest
And like a flame that sets the mountains on fire,
15 So pursue them with Your Tempest
And terrify them with Your Storm.
NASU

Just who are “Zebah and Zalmunna”?

Zebah and Zalmunna were two kings who lead hords of Midianites through Israel around 1150 B.C. G-d selected Gideon to deliver them and he did so in miraculous fashion (Judges 7, 8).

Gideon had intended to spare their lives once they were captured, but in interrogating them, he found that they had murdered his brothers during their raids of conquest through Israel and he executed them, himself.

The Midianites were simply doing what the nomadic Middle East peoples had always done; when you’re strong enough, you raid your neighbors, slaughter their men, rape their women, enslave their children and take their valuables.

In the 7^th Century, a man named “Muhammad” codified this behavior and gave it a spiritual writ which would eventually be called “Islam”, which means … “SUBMISSION”.

There was much power in the monotheism of the Jews and Christians but which god to worship? Muhammad’s own background made him intimately familiar with the hundreds of pagan gods of the Meccan Ka’aba. It was said that there were so many you could worship a different god every day of the year.

“Hubal”, also known as “al Ilah”, the moon god was the one he eventually chose. It was a god very well known to Arabians.

Judges 8:21
21 Then Zebah and Zalmunna said, “Rise up yourself, and fall on us; for as the man, so is his strength.” So Gideon arose and killed Zebah and Zalmunna, and took the crescent ornaments which were on their camels’ necks.
NASU

But is al Ilah/Allah simply a construct? Or is this god a real spiritual force?

If you believe the Bible to be the Word of G-d, there can be no doubt for you. While the prophet Daniel was deep in fasting and prayer on behalf of his home, Israel, the L-rd sent an answer to him through an angel.

But the angel didn’t arrive as soon as he was sent. Why?

Daniel 10:12-13
12 Then he said to me, “Do not be afraid, Daniel, for from the first day that you set your heart on understanding this and on humbling yourself before your G-d, your words were heard, and I have come in response to your words.
13 But the prince of the kingdom of Persia was withstanding me for twenty-one days; then behold, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, for I had been left there with the kings of Persia.”
NASU (abbreviation added)

It would appear that angels and demons are given authority over nations; a fallen angel ruled Persia then (and certainly rules and directs Iran, now) and one of the most well-known archangels—Michael—watches over Israel.

Loyal angels humble themselves before men, refuse to be worshipped and state clearly that we all are in service to the L-rd (Revelation 19:10).

Fallen angels impersonate G-d and seek to steal worship that is rightfully His:

Deuteronomy 32:15-17
15 “But Jeshurun grew fat and kicked —
You are grown fat, thick, and sleek —
Then he forsook G-d who made him,
And scorned the Rock of his Salvation.
16 They made Him jealous with strange gods;
With abominations they provoked Him to anger.
17 They sacrificed to demons who were not G-d,
To gods whom they have not known,
New gods who came lately,
Whom your fathers did not dread.”
NASU (capitalization and abbreviation added to correct disrespect)

And this brings us to the crux of Psalm 83: it is a call upon G-d to vanquish the enemies who surround Israel. Every tribe mentioned here (and in other judgment passages of Scripture) point towards, what are today, nations governed by Islam—Turkey, Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia and even the once-Christian Lebanon is now ruled or bullied by muslim extremists.

But just as Gideon vanquished the moon-god worshipping Midianites, the Messiah of Israel will arrive (return) and vanquish her enemies when she calls upon Him.

________________

In July of 2006, in the heat of the Israel/Lebanon conflict, a construction worker made an astounding discovery near the town of Fadden More, Ireland; a medieval Christian prayer book (called a “psalter”), preserved in a bog for over a thousand years. Experts hailed it as the European version of the Dead Sea scrolls, and immediately called it a find beyond an ability to value.

The psalter was open to Psalm 83.

________________

On Monday (8 June, 2009), Obama spoke on the phone with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. While he did, he made himself thoroughly at home in the most powerful office in the world by putting his feet up on the historic, several thousand dollar Oval Office desk.

But was it more than just Obama’s “hubris” and disdain for America that prompted him to act this way? Certainly Israelis thought so. Some Israelis considered it an insult aimed at both them and their PM.⁽¹⁾

Now, what does an obscure muslim tradition have to do with Barack Hussein Obama?

Well, it seems that all of the effort the news media (you remember them, they’re the people entrusted with giving as much information as possible to Americans so that they can make the best decisions they can about their futures) put into painting Barack Hussein Obama as a “Christian” are now being altered to emphasize a different background.

On his latest good-will tour through muslim lands (also known as “The Hate America Tour, II”), Obama has rediscovered his latent muslimness.⁽²⁾

Hidden deep down in that messianic psyche are the memories of Quranic studies at the Jakartan maddrassa he attended as a child.⁽³⁾

Hiding in that god-like character are the memories of a flighty communist-sympathizing mother (Ann Dunham) who dumped him off to his “racist” grandmother and the emotional turmoil of a life with multiple step-relations through multiple living arrangements.^{(4, 5)}

Buried below the royal dark skin are the lessons learned at the feet of his radical Marxist mentor Frank Marshall Davis while he was living in Hawaii.⁽⁶⁾

Incognito in his brilliant law-professor mind are the wonderful memories of standing behind 60’s hate-America terrorist and Leftist radical Bill Ayers while Ayers wrote Obama’s memoirs for him, or of the wonderful party Ayers held for his puppet to launch his political career.^{(7, 8)}

And could the memories of 20 years of church services under the careful, loving tutelage of the Right Reverend Jeremiah Wright, stay beyond the sight of his mind’s eye for very long? I mean, who could forget such pearls of wisdom as;

* “… what’s going on in white America, U.S. of KKKA …” ⁽⁹⁾

* “Black men turning on black men – that is fighting the wrong enemy. You both are the primary targets in an oppressive society that sees both of you as a dangerous threat.” ⁽¹⁰⁾

* Wright told a moderator at the National Press club, in response to the question if Jesus Christ is the only Way to Salvation, and will muslims be Saved, Wright quoted Christ’s Own Words (perhaps the ultimate blasphemy) to say respectively, “No” and “Yes”. ⁽¹¹⁾

* “We took this country by terror” [therefore, the 3,000 dead on September 11^th are] “America’s chickens…comin’ [sic] home to roost”. ⁽¹²⁾

* “We bombed Granada and killed innocent civilians, babies, non-military personnel.” ⁽¹³⁾

* “We took Africans from their country to build our way of ease and kept them enslaved and living in fear.” ⁽¹⁴⁾

* “The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three strike law, and then wants us to sing God Bless America. No, no, no! Not God bless America, God damn America. That’s in the Bible, for killing innocent people. God damn America for treating her citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme. The United States government has failed the vast majority of her citizens of African descent. Think about this, think about this. For every one Oprah, a billionaire, you’ve got 5 million blacks who out of work. For every one Colin Powell, a millionaire, you’ve got 10 million blacks who cannot read. For every one Condoskeeza [sic] Rice, you’ve got 1 million in prison.” ⁽¹⁵⁾

Sadly, it seems that the Right Reverend Wright is experiencing some frustration when it comes to vital correspondence like warning the president of an upcoming “World Conference on Racism” and made the statement “Them Jews aren’t going to let him talk to me.”. ⁽¹⁶⁾

So these are the sum parts that make up Barack Hussein Obama. What they create is a man driven by hatred and anger.

How does this anger manifest itself? —In surprising ways, actually.

While at a “Steak Fry” for the very worthwhile cause of drumming support for the great Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), Obama was seen making a special point not to place his hand over his heart for the U.S. National Anthem. Even more shocking is that Leftists Hillary Clinton and Bill Richardson are the ones showing him the right thing to do. ⁽¹⁷⁾

While on the campaign trail, he gave a vulgar gesture to both Hillary Clinton and John McCain. ⁽¹⁸⁾

Such is the pathology of the man now steering the most powerful country in the world.

So ask yourself, again, does he have a hidden message for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu?

Perhaps more importantly, and more frighteningly; what is his message for anyone foolish enough to love and cherish the United States of America?

___________________________

(1) Some Israelis Insulted By Obama Speaking To Netanyahu With His Feet Up, THE B.S. REPORT, June 11, 2009

(2) Obama Renews Openness About His Muslim Roots Ahead of Egypt Speech, FOXNews.com, June 03, 2009

(3) “Barack Hussein Obama”, Mike Gallagher, March 07, 2008

(4) Barack Throws His Ailing Grandmother Under the Bus to Score Political Points, Gateway Pundit, March 18, 2008

(5) Obama’s Women Reveal His Secret, Spengler, Asia Times Online, February 26, 2008

(6) The Frank Marshall Davis Network in Hawaii, Andrew Walden, Accuracy in Media, July 29, 2008

(7) Experts Affirm: Ayers Wrote Obama’s Memoir, WorldNetDaily, October 29, 2008

(8) Fact Check: Obama, Clinton and the Weather Underground, FOXNews.com, April 17, 2008

(9) Wright: “U.S. of KKKA” Knew About Pearl Harbor, WorldNetDaily, March 15, 2008 [Editor’s note 7 FEB 2015: After my awakening it’s clear that Whack-a-Doodle combined Red Pill knowledge with cancerous black Communism. He’d make a great Controlled Opposition talkshow host.]

(10) ibid

(11) Jeremiah Wright’s Most Dangerous Comment, Denny Burk, April 29, 2008

(12) Reverend Wright Transcript, Brian Ross, ABC News

(13) ibid

(14) ibid

(16) Rev. Wright: “Them Jews Aren’t Going to Let Him Talk to Me”, Little Green Footballs, June 10, 2009

(17) Obama: No Hand on Heart for National Anthem, Mark Finkelstein, October 20, 2007

(18) Deja Vu: Obama Flips McCain “The Bird”, Steve Gilbert, Sweetness & Light, November 3rd, 2008