It’s perhaps the most trafficked web site right of center.
13 years ago, “the Drudge Report” was earning $3,500 a day. One can just imagine what it does now.
Ans-wer.com states that Drudge—
—has a worth of over a million dollars per year thanks to his talk show and the advertising revenues generated from his website. It is estimated that his net worth is $90 million. According to recent statistics, Drudge has 87,000 twitter followers and 42,000 facebook fans. He also published a book in 2000 called Drudge Manifesto adding to his career versatility. Despite his life as a public image, Drudge’s sexuality is still a matter of controversy for the world media. He is rumored to be gay. However he has dismissed these claims every time in spite of the fact that Hilton has an exclusive video of Drudge holding the lip lock with an unidentified man in London.
Of his origins, Wikipedia states that he was raised in the Catholic colony of Maryland (granted to devout Roman Catholic George Calvert—Lord Baltimore—by “Protestant” King Charles I) by Leftist Democrat Jewish parents whose mother was a lawyer for Ted Kennedy. The entire Irish Catholic Kennedy clan was carefully controlled by master Jesuit manipulators like Richard McSorely.
Matthew Drudge was raised in Takoma Park, Maryland, near Washington, D.C. His parents are Reform Jewish Democrats who both worked for the federal government, and he is their only child. His father, Robert Drudge, a former social worker who owns the reference site refdesk.com, and his mother, a former staff attorney for U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy, divorced when he was six. Drudge went to live with his mother. He had few friends and was an avid news reader and radio talk show fan. In his book Drudge Manifesto, Drudge says that he “failed his Bar Mitzvah”, and graduated 341st out of a class of 355 from Northwood High School in 1984, giving himself, in his words, a “more than adequate curriculum vitae for a post at 7-Eleven”.
In the 1980s, Drudge worked as a telemarketer for Time-Life Books.
But what put little Jewish Matt Drudge on the map was insider scoops.
Drudge’s website gained in popularity in the late 1990s after a number of stories which he reported before the mainstream media. Drudge first received national attention in 1996 when he broke the news that Jack Kemp would be Republican Bob Dole’s running mate in the 1996 presidential election. In 1998, Drudge gained popularity when he was the first outlet to break the news that later became the Monica Lewinsky scandal. ~ Wikipedia
In the 80’s and 90’s, All-Star NFL quarterback Jack Kemp was ubiquitous in all of the “Conservative” political circles. What no one knew at the time was that, like Drudge, he has been implicated as a homosexual (which means blackmail).
One of the researchers who did the implicating was author Nick Bryant.
Bryant is best known for his work on the Nebraska CIA pedophile ring titled The Franklin Scandal. He implicates Kemp and corroborates my claim (Illuminati Unmasked pp. 454-458) that the source for many of the boys kidnapped, tortured and turned into sex slaves by the United States government was the Catholic orphanage for boys known as “Boys Town”.
In a massive 1987 column for the NY Times, Leftist Maureen Dowd called Kemp “the Savonarola of supply side”.
Girolamo Savonarola (1452 to 1498) was a Dominican friar who decried the corruption of Rome and her exploitation of the poor and prophesied there would come a “Cyrus from the north” who would reform it all. He was excommunicated, imprisoned, tortured and burned at the stake. Less than 20 years later, an Augustinian monk in Wittenberg, (875 miles north of Rome) would protest Medici Pope Leo X’s exploitation of the poor through indulgences by posting 95 bullets, or “theses”, on the door of All Saints Cathedral on All Saints Day (November 1st) in 1517.
At the end of Chapter VI in The Prince, Machiavelli laments that Savonarola did not have the weapons to insure his revolution as did “Moses, Cyrus, Theseus, and Romulus”—he therefore succumbed to those who did; the children of Romulus.
Only an Irish Catholic girl educated at Immaculata High School and Catholic University of America would get such a reference (or give it) but what was she trying to say about Kemp?
Other Catholic media outlets were also lifting Kemp up at the time. Dowd noted that Kemp was raised in the cult of Mary Baker Eddy as a “Christian Scientist” in California but that he “converted” to being a Presbyterian with his wife, Joanne.
In 1996, Crisis Magazine (“A Voice For Faithful Catholic Laity”) stated that Kemp’s political doctrines spoke with “a Catholic voice”.
Dowd also made note of something extremely odd in Kemp’s office—an 18” statue of Don Quixote. Secret society insiders and Roman Catholic knights know the fictional figure to be a caricature of the founder of the Jesuits, Ignatius Loyola. Miguel de Cervantes, who penned Don Quixote, was a Catholic Spaniard who lived just as the Jesuits were becoming known (1547 to 1616).
Interestingly, Dowd even mentioned Kemp being implicated in a “homosexual ring” — not in Nebraska in the 1980’s — but in the administration of the Governor of California where Kemp worked as an aid in 1967 … for Ronald Wilson Reagan.
Dowd painted the Kemps as such strong “Born Again Christians” that wife Joanne was conducting “Bible study groups for Congressional wives every Friday.” Yet, after Jack Kemp passed in 2009, the family asked close friend Chuck Colson to do his eulogy. Colson was Richard Nixon’s legal “hatchet man” who was one of the fall guys for Watergate, spending a whole 7 months in a federal penitentiary (many soldiers have spent twice that on deployment).
Although he claimed at some times to be a “Baptist” and at others an “Episcopalian”, Colson’s top endeavors were the creation of Roman Catholic-dominated “Prison Fellowship” and an endless push for ecumenicalism—the uniting of all Christian denominations. Once all the denominations are united, they would be forced to follow the authority of the one that was most powerful: Rome.
In the early 1990s, Colson joined with his close friend, Father Richard John Neuhaus, to begin the project known as Evangelicals and Catholics Together (ECT). Catholics and evangelicals were, and remain, the two largest faith communities in North America. Increasingly, they found themselves drawn together in what I described at the time as “an ecumenism of the trenches,” especially in defense of the sanctity of life from conception to natural death.
Evangelicals and Catholics shared much in common, but there was little understanding or cooperation, and all too often deep hostility between the two groups. It is hard to imagine now the virulent reaction provoked by the ECT initiatives some two decades ago.
While Father Neuhaus received some critical comments from the Catholic side, reactionary evangelicals exploded with anger, bombast and recrimination.
Colson was excoriated by some of his fellow evangelicals for having betrayed the Gospel. Prison Fellowship lost $1 million in donations from some disaffected supporters. But Colson never wavered from what he believed was a summons from the Holy Spirit.
At the outset of ECT, Colson asked, “Dare we believe that God is calling us to make a bold statement that could influence the course of his church in the decades to come?”
The work of ECT still continues. Our most recent statement, “In Defense of Religious Freedom,” was published in the March 2012 issue of First Things. Bereft now of both of our founders, the ECT project moves forward, building on the initial statement drafted by Colson and Father Neuhaus (who died in 2009): “We thank God for the discovery of one another in contending for a common cause. Much more we thank God for the discovery of one another as brothers and sisters in Christ.” ~ Charles Colson’s ‘Ecumenism of the Trenches’, National Catholic Register
When Colson wrote his epithet for Kemp, it was promoted by sites like “the Catholic Exchange”.
Today, Rome is in complete control of all major governments via her agents and insurgents, but it wasn’t always so. In the age of kings, Royals frequently kicked against their masters as they were intent on being true sovereigns and not proxies for the “Vicar of Christ”. This didn’t make those kings any less ruthless or evil, just equally filled with a lust for power.
One such king was Philippe le Bel of France (1268-1314)—also known as “Philip IV” or “Philippe the Fair”.
Philippe was the only king in history to control the Papacy and even forced it to move to France where it stayed for 75 years before returning to Rome.
Realizing that the actual power of Rome laid in her knights, Philippe sought a way to reign in the Papacy’s special forces—at that time, it was the Knights Templar.
The Templars were founded in 1119 to fight in the First Crusade but they very quickly exploited their experiences in the Holy Land and branched out into anything from diplomacy to mercantilism to finance. They became protectors of pilgrim valuables and developed a system of seals and cyphers by which a traveler to the Holy Land could give their wealth to a Templar in one location, receive a cyphered receipt, and pick up their wealth in another location for a fee.
As a result, they developed modern usury banking and quickly surpassed most kingdoms in wealth and influence. They even joined hands with battlefield foes like the Muslim Assassins, pooling their knowledge of how to murder without trace.
During the next hundred years the Templars became a power with international influence. They were constantly engaged in high-level diplomacy between nobles and monarchs throughout the Western world and the Holy Land. In England, for example, the Master of the Temple was regularly called to the king’s Parliament, and was regarded as head of all religious orders, taking precedence over all priors and abbots in the land. Maintaining close links with both Henry II and Thomas a Becket, the Templars were instrumental in trying to reconcile the sovereign and his estranged archbishop. Successive English kings, including King John, often resided in the Temple’s London preceptory, and the Master of the Order stood by the monarch’s side at the signing of the Magna Carta.”
Nor was the Order’s political involvement confined to Christendom alone.
Close links were forged with the Muslim world as well the world so often opposed on the battlefield and the Templars commanded a respect from Saracen leaders exceeding that accorded any other Europeans. Secret connections were also maintained with the Hashishim or Assassins, the famous sect of militant and often fanatical adepts who were Islam’s equivalent of the Templars. The Hashishim paid tribute to the Templars and were rumoured to be in their employ.
On almost every political level the Templars acted as official arbiters in disputes, and even kings submitted to their authority. In 1252 Henry III of England dared to challenge them, threatening to confiscate certain of their domains. “You Templars … have so many liberties and charters that your enormous possessions make you rave with pride and haughtiness. What was imprudently given must therefore be prudently revoked; and what was inconsiderately bestowed must be considerately recalled.” The Master of the Order replied, “What say est thou, O King? Far be it that thy mouth should utter so disagreeable and silly a word. So long as thou dost exercise justice, thou wilt reign. But if thou infringe it, thou wilt cease to be King.” It is difficult to convey to the modern mind the enormity and audacity of this statement. Implicitly the Master is taking for his Order and himself a power that not even the papacy dared explicitly claim the power to make or depose monarchs.1
Secrecy was the most powerful Templar weapon and they developed dual personalities—one face they put towards those outside their ranks, and another towards those inside. They adopted the Roman eagle as their insignia but gave it two heads to exemplify this.
Freemasons trace their lineage through the Templars which is likely true but Freemasonic leadership then attempted to cover their subservience to Rome by claiming that both they and the Templars are the enemies of the Papacy (which is ridiculous). Humorously, for their part, Rome does the same; claiming to be mortal enemies with their loyal Freemasonic footsoldiers.
Templars, Freemasons and Catholic high clergy are all gnostics who revel in ancient “secret knowledge”. While in the Holy Land, Templars connected with what they considered to be the remnant of the Essenes who convinced them that Jesus of Nazareth was a fraud and the real messiah was John the Baptist; a belief system known as Johannism.
The Templars, or Poor Fellow-Soldiery of the Holy House of the Temple … took as their models, in the Bible, the Warrior-Masons of Zorobabel, who worked, holding the sword in one hand and the trowel in the other.
Therefore it was that the Sword and the Trowel were the insignia of the Templars,2 who subsequently, as will be seen, concealed themselves under the name of Brethren Masons. …
The trowel of the Templars is quadruple, and the triangular plates of it are arranged in the form of a cross, making the Kabalistic pantacle known by the name of the Cross of the East. The Knight of the East, and the Knight of the East and West, have in their titles secret allusions to the Templars of whom they were at first the successors.
The secret thought of Hugues de Payens [founder of the Templars], in founding his Order, was not exactly to serve the ambition of the Patriarchs of Constantinople. There existed at that period in the East a Sect of Johannite Christians, who claimed to be the only true Initiates into the real mysteries of the religion of the Saviour.
They pretended to know the real history of Yesus the Anointed, and, adopting in part the Jewish traditions and the tales of the Talmud, they held that the facts recounted in the Evangels are but allegories, the key of which Saint John gives, in saying that the world might be filled with the books that could be written upon the words and deeds of Jesus Christ; words which, they thought, would be only a ridiculous exaggeration, if he were not speaking of an allegory and a legend, that might be varied and prolonged to infinity.
The Johannites ascribed to Saint John the foundation of their Secret Church, and the Grand Pontiffs of the Sect assumed the title of Christos, Anointed, or Consecrated, and claimed to have succeeded one another from Saint John by an uninterrupted succession of pontifical powers. He who, at the period of the foundation of the Order of the Temple, claimed these imaginary prerogatives, was named Theoclet; he knew Hugues de Payens, he initiated him into the Mysteries and hopes of his pretended church, he seduced him by the notions of Sovereign Priesthood and Supreme royalty, and finally designated him as his successor.
Thus the Order of Knights of the Temple was at its very origin devoted to the cause of opposition to the tiara of Rome and the crowns of Kings, and the Apostolate of Kabalistic Gnosticism was vested in its chiefs. For Saint John himself was the Father of the Gnostics, and the current translation of his polemic against the heretical of his Sect and the pagans who denied that Christ was the Word, is throughout a misrepresentation, or misunderstanding at least, of the whole Spirit of that Evangel.3
As a result of their Johannism, Templar degree rituals included spitting upon and defacing a crucifix (Roman Catholicism was the only “Christianity” they knew) which lead to rumors of satan worship. This was later aided by a propaganda smokescreen fabricated by a French Roman Catholic priest named Alphonse Louis Constant. Constant, masquerading as a Jew called “Éliphas Lévi” created the hermaphroditic goat gargoyle known as “Baphomet” and claimed that was what the Templars were worshipping.
These efforts were aided by another Catholic Frenchman—this time a Jesuit—named Marie Joseph Gabriel Antoine Jogand-Pagès. Jogand-Pagès also wrote his propaganda via a pseudonym; “Léo Taxil”. Jogand-Pagès then proceeded to thoroughly muddy the waters by claiming that Freemasons worshipped Baphomet in a series of pamphlets which he eventually stated were hoaxes encouraged by the Vatican’s mindless, vicious crusade against the poor hapless Freemasons (who derived themselves from Templars and are some of Rome’s most loyal footsoldiers).
The Templars being exceedingly wealthy and secretive also lead to sexual perversion. Soon this gave enemies like Philippe le Bel their opportunity. With the Papacy secured at Avignon, Philip moved to crush the Vatican’s special forces. He forced Pope Clement V to rubber-stamp his actions and then he moved quickly to arrest the Templars and confiscate their wealth and holdings.
This was done on Friday, October 13th, 1307—“black Friday” or “bad luck Friday”.
Many Templars were captured, tortured and burned at the stake (the form of execution created by the Inquisition), including their Grand Master, Jacques de Molay. However, many more went underground and learned to masque their machinations. No longer could they operate in the open, using their own names and faces. They needed scapegoats to hide behind and they found the perfect victims: Jews. As long as they elevated their target Jew to a position of wealth and prominence, they were always willing to be a target and make a spectacle of themselves.
An older sister of the Templars (only by about 20 years)—the Sovereign Military Hospitaller Order of Saint John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta, also known as “the Knights of Malta”—adopted and adapted many of their brother Knights. This included, as the name applies, the practice of Johannism.
Like the double-headed eagle, the Maltese Cross worn by these Knights (then and now), is a cunning ruse. Yes, it is a type of cross but it isn’t the traditional Christian cross, it predates the crucifixion of Jesus Christ in its pagan significance.
All Popes and most Cardinals and Bishops wear the Maltese cross to show their Knights who they answer to.
The official emblems and insignia of almost every major public and private organization anywhere have either a double-headed eagle or Maltese cross somewhere in them; for instance the flag of the Russian Federation is adorned with a double-headed eagle and the insignia of Russia’s intelligence agency—the FSB—is over top a massive Maltese cross poorly disguised with red outside instead of inside the cross. For more, read my column, here.
This process has been in place ever since and was responsible for the Communist anti-Semitic purges as well as the Nazi Holocaust. Today, an ugly undercurrent of anti-Semitism is always ready when called upon by Roman operatives to cloud investigations with racial hatred as Jewish frontmen have been cunningly emplaced in all walks of power from Hollywood to banking, politics to news media—Jews like Matt Drudge.
Despite his $90 million net worth, Drudge continues to get help from Rome from her media operatives like Catholic Peggy Noonan who proclaims for all her duped Right-wing faithful that, in 2013, Drudge “discovered prayer” (although one never knows where prayer hides itself from Jews these days).
Drudge has been a frequent guest on the Alex Jones show.
Jones is a very important Roman operative whose job it is to bring in, expose and mislead truth-seekers who don’t trust the obviously-controlled mainstream media.
Like Drudge, he was emplaced by being given the insider scoop of a sanitized view inside Bohemian Grove—the satanic sexual deviant “retreat” for Rome’s Republican elite like Joseph Coors, both Bush 41 and 43, James Baker, John Bolton, Dwight Eisenhower, William Randolph Hearst, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, Henry Kissinger, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, David Rockefeller, Clinton “prosecutor” Ken Starr, Teddy Roosevelt, George Shultz, Caspar Weinberger, Patrick Wayne (son of John Wayne), and many, many others.4
In the Jones version, no sexual perversion is shown or even implied and the child sacrifice ritual, “Cremation of Care” is portrayed as a silly play.
The reality is much more perverse and satanic.
Reputed victim of CIA mind-control and sex slavery (years of involuntary rape, sodomy and torture for both her and her young daughter) Cathy O’Brien paints a satanic picture of what America’s top personalities do at the Grove.
WARNING: DISTURBING NARRATIVE
I was programmed and equipped to function in all rooms at Bohemian Grove in order to compromise specific government targets according to their personal perversions. “Anything, anytime, anywhere with anyone” was my mode of operation at the Grove. I do not purport to understand the full function of this political cesspool playground as my perception was limited to my own realm of experience. My perception is that Bohemian Grove serves those ushering in the New World Order through mind control, and consists primarily of the highest Mafia and U.S. Government officials. I do not use the term “highest” loosely, as copious quantities of drugs were consumed there. …
Bohemian Grove is reportedly intended to be used recreationally, providing a supposedly secure environment for politically affluent individuals to “party” without restraint. The only business conducted there pertained to implementing the New World Order, through the proliferation of mind-control atrocities, giving the place an air of “Masonic Secrecy”. The only room where business discussions were permitted was the small, dark lounge affectionately and appropriately referred to as the Underground.2
Sex slaves were not routinely permitted in the Underground for security reasons, leaving the lounge’s small stage as the only source of “entertainment”.
This entertainment ranged from would-be talents such as Lee Atwater, Bill Clinton, and George Bush to CIA Operative entertainers such as Boxcar Willie and Lee Greenwood, On one occasion I was instructed to meet with former President Gerald Ford in the Underground where Lee Atwater was picking and singing. …
My purpose at the Grove was sexual in nature, and therefore my perceptions were limited to a sex slave’s viewpoint. As an effective means of control to ensure undetected proliferation of their perverse indulgences, slaves such as myself were subjected to ritualistic trauma. I knew each breath I took could be my last, as the threat of death lurked in every shadow. Slaves of advancing age or with failing programming were sacrificially murdered “at random” in the wooded grounds of Bohemian Grave, and I fell it was “simply a matter of time until it would be me”. Rituals were held at a giant, concrete owl monument on the banks of, ironically enough, the Russian (rushin’) River. These occultish sex rituals stemmed from the scientific belief that mind-controlled slaves required severe trauma to ensure compartmentalization of the memory, and not from any spiritual motivation.
My own threat of death was instilled when I witnessed the sacrificial death of a young, dark-haired victim at which time I was instructed to perform sexually “as though my life depended upon it”. I was told, “…the next sacrifice victim could be you. Anytime when you least expect it, the owl will consume you. Prepare yourself, and stay prepared.” Being “prepared” equated to being totally suggestible, i.e., “on my toes” awaiting their command. …
The club offered a “Necrophilia” theme room to its members. …
Other perversion theme rooms at the Bohemian Club included what I heard Ford refer to as the “Dark Room”. When he not so cleverly said, “Let’s go to the Dark Room and see what develops,” I understood from experience that he was interested in indulging in his perverse obsession for pornography. In the Dark Room, members had sex with the same mind-controlled slave they were viewing in porn on a big screen television.
There was a triangular glass display centered in a main through way where I was locked in with various trained animals, including snakes. Members walking by watched elicit [sic] sex acts of bestiality, women with women, mothers with daughters, kids with kids, or any other unlimited perverse visual display. …
There was a room of shackles and tortures, black lights and strobes, an opium den, ritualistic sex altars, a chapel, group orgy rooms including poster beds, water beds, and “kitten” houses. I was used as a “rag doll” in the “toy store,” and as a urinal in the “golden arches” room.
From the owl’s roost to the necrophilia room, no memory of sexual abuse is as horrifying as the conversations overheard in the Underground pertaining to implementing the New World Order. I learned that perpetrators believed that controlling the masses through propaganda mind manipulation did not guarantee there would be a world left to dominate due to environmental and overpopulation problems. The solution being debated was not pollution/population control, but mass genocide of “selected undesirables.”5
A priest, of all unlikely people, holds the honor of being the only person to be the subject of two Grove plays. He is the Patron Saint of Bohemia, Saint John of Nepomuck (pronounced NAY-po-muk), a man who lived in the thirteenth century in the real Bohemia that is now part of Czechoslovakia. Saint John received his unique distinction among latter-day Bohemians in 1882, when his sad but courageous story was told in a jinks “sired” (the club argot for master of ceremonies) by the poet Charles Warren Stoddard.
Saint John was a cutup in his youth, but had forsaken ephemeral pleasures — or at least most of them — for the priesthood. One of his first assignments was as a tutor to the heir apparent to the kingship of Bohemia. John soon became fast friends with the fun-loving prince, often joining him in his spirited and amorous adventures. When the prince became king, he made Saint John the court confessor.
All went well for Saint John until the king began to suspect that his beautiful queen was having a love affair with a local nobleman. To allay his suspicions, the king naturally turned to his loyal friend and teacher, Saint John of Nepomuck, demanding that this former companion in many revelries reveal to him the most intimate confessions of the queen. Saint John refused. The king pleaded, but to no avail. Then the king threatened him, which had no effect either. Finally, in a fit of rage, he ordered Saint John hurled into the river to drown. John chose to die rather than reveal a woman’s secrets. Here, truly, was a remarkable fellow, and his story appealed mightily to the San Francisco Bohemians of the nineteenth century.
Several months after the poet Stoddard introduced Saint John to his fellow Bohemians, a small statue of Saint John arrived at the clubhouse in San Francisco from faraway Czechoslovakia. It seems one of the people present for Stoddard’s talk had been Count Joseph Oswald Von Thun of Czechoslovakia, who had been much taken by the club and its appreciation of his fellow countryman. Upon his return to Czechoslovakia be had commissioned a woodcarver to make a replica of the statue of Saint John which adorns the bridge in Prague near the place of his drowning.
This unexpected gift still guards the library room in the Bohemians’ large club building in San Francisco — except during the encampment at the Grove, that is. For that event the statue is carefully transported to a hallowed tree near the center of the Grove, where Saint John, with his forefinger carefully sealing his lips, can be a saintly reminder of the need for discretion.
The legend surrounding Saint John of Nepomuck became part of the oral tradition of the Bohemian Club. New members inevitably hear the story when they happen upon the statue while being shown around the city clubhouse or the Grove. But oral tradition is not enough for a patron saint, and the good man’s legend was therefore enacted in a Grove play in 1921 under the title St. John of Nepomuck. It was retold in 1969 by a different author under the title St. John of Bohemia.6
Sadly, there is nothing “unlikely” about “Saint John” being the patron of Bohemian Grove.
Once Jones was established as the place to go when one questions mainstream media, he then went to work discrediting himself and all who subscribe to him.
In 2010, Jones was alerted to a pro-Second Amendment rally by Texans for Accountable Government—a sincere, anti-tyranny organization—taking place in Austin. He spoke about the rally on his program, then showed up to the engagement already in progress. He used a bullhorn and constant loud histrionics to disrupt and humiliate the participants.
Like Drudge, Jones is not clearly connected to Rome which gives his masters plausible deniability. His father-in-law (Edmund Lowe Nichols), however, was U.S. Agricultural Counselor to Italy and was so important to the Italian government they awarded him with their highest civilian honor; Cavaliere Commendatore (Knight Commander) of the Order of Merit.
Matt Drudge serves a similar role, though not so obviously antagonistic to the cause of Patriotic Americans.
Like Knight of Malta Rupert Murdoch, a recipient of the Order of Saint Gregory, and his “Fox News”, Drudge is there to redirect Right-wing anger at all of the wrong sources; minorities, Muslims, Jews—whatever best causes division instead of allowing “Conservative” Americans to see that all of their woes come from Rome.
On any given day, one can see the best of Roman distraction, fear-mongering, misplaced focus and wholly-fabricated lies.
My friend Alan, host of Restoring America, sent me notice on September 21st that Drudge was promoting something particularly disturbing: Roman Catholics flocking to venerate the supposed petrified heart of “Saint Padre Pio” in Lowell, Massachusetts.
Worship and veneration of “relics” like the body parts of “Saints” is an ancient pagan rite.
Nothing is more characteristic of Rome than the worship of relics. Wherever a chapel is opened, or a temple consecrated, it cannot be thoroughly complete without some relic or other of he-saint or she-saint to give sanctity to it. The relics of the saints and rotten bones of the martyrs form a great part of the wealth of the Church. The grossest impostures have been practised in regard to such relics; and the most drivelling tales have been told of their wonder-working powers, and that too by Fathers of high name in the records of Christendom. Even Augustine, with all his philosophical acuteness and zeal against some forms of false doctrine, was deeply infected with the grovelling spirit that led to relic worship. Let any one read the stuff with which he concludes his famous “City of God,” and he will in no wise wonder that Rome has made a saint of him, and set him up for the worship of her devotees. Take only a specimen or two of the stories with which he bolsters up the prevalent delusions of his day: “When the Bishop Projectius brought the relics of St. Stephen to the town called Aquae Tibiltinae, the people came in great crowds to honour them. Amongst these was a blind woman, who entreated the people to lead her to the bishop who had the HOLY RELICS. They did so, and the bishop gave her some flowers which he had in his hand. She took them, and put them to her eyes, and immediately her sight was restored, so that she passed speedily on before all the others, no longer requiring to be guided.”7
The learned Pareus proceeds in a different way to prove that Peter was never at Rome. He shows from different parts of the Acts of the Apostles and the Epistle to the Galatians, that Peter was in Judea at the time when tradition declares that he was at Rome. Peter was in Judea when Paul was converted, Acts 9; and three years after this — that is, in the year 38, Galatians 1:8. He was in Judea in the year 45, when he was imprisoned by Herod, Acts 12, and in 49, fourteen years after Paul’s conversion, Acts 15, Galatians 2:1-9. Had he been to Rome during this time, some account of such a journey must surely have been given. After this time we find that he was at Antioch, Galatians 2:11. If it be asked, where did he afterwards exercise his ministry? Where more likely than among the Jews, as he had hitherto most clearly done; for he was the Apostle of the Circumcision, and among those to whom he sent his Epistles. The dating of the first at “Babylon,” has led some to conjecture that it was a figurative term for Rome; but why not for Jerusalem, or for Antioch? for Christians were at that time treated everywhere like captives or aliens, and especially in the land of Judea.
What then are we to say as to this tradition? The same, according to the just remark of Pareus, as what we must say of many other traditions of that age, that it is nothing but a fable, which, like many others, would have passed away, had it not been allied to a growing superstition. With respect to what Eusebius says of the testimony of a presbyter, named Caius, that about the beginning of the third century he saw the graves of Peter and Paul at Rome, it may be easily accounted for: it was the age of pious fraud, when the relics of saints could be found almost everywhere; and, in the next century, the wood and the nails of the Cross were discovered! Those who can believe these things, may have a credulity large enough to swallow up the testimony of Caius.8 8
The germinating superstition of the times,—owing principally to the prevalence of the Platonic philosophy, from the subtile disquisitions and specious reasonings of which Christianity suffered far more than she did from the persecuting edicts of emperors and pro-consuls,—likewise aided the advance of the Papacy. This superstition, which was in truth, as we have already explained, nothing but the revived Paganism of a former age, continued to increase from an early part of the third century and onward. The simplicity of the Christian faith began to be corrupted by novel and heathenish opinions, and the worship of the Church to be burdened by ridiculous and idolatrous ceremonies. When the Church exchanged the catacombs for the magnificent edifices which the wealth, the policy, and sometimes the piety of princes erected, she exchanged also the simplicity of life and purity of faith, of which so many affecting memorials remain to our day, for the accommodating spirit of the schools, and the easy manners of the court. Already, in the fourth century, we find images introduced into churches, the bones of martyrs hawked about as relics, the tombs of saints become the resort of pilgrims, and monks and hermits swarming in the various countries. We find the pagan festivals, slightly disguised, adopted into the Christian worship; the homage offered anciently to the gods transferred to the martyrs; the Lord’s Supper dispensed sometimes at funerals; the not improbable origin of masses; and the churches filled with the blaze of lamps and tapers, the smoke of incense, the perfume of flowers, and the goodly show of gorgeous robes, crosiers, mitres, and gold and silver vases; reminding one of the not unsimilar spectacles which might be witnessed in the pagan temples. “The religion of Constantine,” remarks Gibbon, “achieved in less than a century the final conquest of the Roman empire; but the victors themselves were insensibly subdued by the arts of their vanquished rivals.” 9
No less a source than the Catholic Encyclopedia admits that many of these “relics” were frauds—
…it remains true that many of the more ancient relics duly exhibited for veneration in the great sanctuaries of Christendom or even at Rome itself must now be pronounced to be either certainty spurious or open to grave suspicion. To take one example of the latter class, the boards of the Crib (Praesaepe)— a name which for much more than a thousand years has been associated, as now, with the basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore—can only be considered to be of doubtful. In his monograph “Le memorie Liberiane dell´ Infanzia di N. S. Gesù Cristo” (Rome, 1894), Mgr. Cozza Luzi frankly avows that all positive evidence for the authenticity of the relics of the Crib etc., is wanting before the eleventh century. Strangely enough, an inscription in Greek uncials of the eighth century is found on one of the boards, the inscription having nothing to do with the Crib but being apparently concerned with some commercial transaction. It is hard to explain its presence on the supposition that the relic is authentic. Similar difficulties might he urged against the supposed “column of the flagellation” venerated at Rome in the Church of Santa Prassede and against many other famous relics.
These skills would come in quite handy for later operatives like Jesuit Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (1881 – 1955).
Chardin was a busy priest—known as the “Father of the New Age”—he was also into archeology.
Teilhard spent most of the next 20 years in China. In early 1929 he joined the National Geological Survey of China and took part in the excavations, in December 1929, that uncovered a Homo erectus skull, known as Peking man. As the stratigrapher (a geologist who studies layers of the rock record), Teilhard played a major role in dating the discovery. ~ Kahn Academy
The Piltdown Man was a paleoanthropological hoax in which bone fragments were presented as the fossilised remains of a previously unknown early human.
In 1912 amateur archaeologist Charles Dawson claimed he had discovered the “missing link” between ape and man. After finding a section of a human-like skull in Pleistocene gravel beds near Piltdown, East Sussex, Dawson contacted Arthur Smith Woodward, Keeper of Geology at the Natural History Museum. Dawson and Smith Woodward made further discoveries at the site which they connected to the same individual, including a jawbone, more skull fragments, a set of teeth and primitive tools.
Smith Woodward reconstructed the skull fragments and hypothesised that they belonged to a human ancestor from 500,000 years ago. The discovery was announced at a Geological Society meeting and was given the Latin name Eoanthropus dawsoni (“Dawson’s dawn-man”). The questionable significance of the assemblage remained the subject of considerable controversy until it was conclusively exposed in 1953 as a forgery. It was found to have consisted of the altered mandible and some teeth of an orangutan deliberately combined with the cranium of a fully developed, though small-brained, modern human. ~ Wikipedia
In reconstructing the recollections of de Chardin in his role with his friend Charles Dawson, paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould discovered that de Chardin had misrepresented exactly when he claimed to have been shown Piltdown specimens which conflicted with when he was conscripted into WWI to be a stretcher-bearer for the French Army. The implication was that—
Teilhard and Dawson planned the Piltdown 2 discovery before Teilhard left England. Forty years later, Teilhard misconstructed the exact chronology, forgot that he could not have seen the specimens when they were officially “found,” and slipped in writing to [English physical anthropologist, palaeontologist and geologist Kenneth Page] Oakley [(1911-1981) who proved that the Piltdown bones had been chemically stained to mimic great age, the teeth artificially filed to simulate human wear, the associated mammal remains all brought in from elsewhere, and the flint “implements” recently carved].
Since the founding of the Counter-Reformation shortly after 1517 and the founding of the Jesuits unofficially in 1534 and then officially in 1540, the Company of Loyola had been fast at work on a project of unbelievable scope and satanic success: to re-write all of human cosmology to include ancient pre-humans, the “Big Bang”, dinosaurs and Darwinian evolution. The matrix-weavers needed a “missing link” to shore up their lies so Teilhard created one.
Unbelievably, he remains a respected archeologist, along with his other “discoveries” like “Peking Man”, even amongst paleontologists who are aware of his skuldugery.
Blind to reality or to the matrix that has been woven for them, neither “scientists” nor laymen stop to consider the staggering question of why anyone who subscribed to empiricism via the Scientific Method—record an observation, formulate an hypothesis, attempt to replicate the observation via experiment which isolates all perceived variables, thereby replicating the observation and proving the hypothesis, submit the results for peer review—would possibly have any impetus what-so-ever in corrupting this process.
That “impetus” is the agenda to completely fabricate an alternative reality that calls into question the assertions of the Bible and the Jesuits have been so successful it’s apparent they’ve had interdimensional aid.
Part of this matrix is the propaganda promoted by “Papal Court Jews” (persecuted but allowed status in a Royal or Roman Catholic Court because they served a purpose) like Matthew Nathan Drudge.
On September 21st “Drudge” was a cornucopia of Catholic casuistry:
* Headline pushing Jesuit-educated Donald Trump.
* A story about Roman Catholic Leonard DiCaprio, a popular face to push the sophistry of “global warming” that Rome is using to lower the common standard of living and return humanity to feudalism. In January of this year DiCaprio publicly met with Pope Francis on this issue. A month later he was awarded his first Oscar.
* Multiple side-stories pushing Trump.
* Stories lionizing Hillary Clinton (neither she nor Trump are in any way controlling their destinies).
* A predominance of stories promoting fear over “ISIS” and Islamic jihad terror (all fabricated by Western Intelligence who answer to Rome).
* Frothing of anger over unimpeded waves of illegal immigrants; an agenda insured by the Papacy and then highlighted so that frustration leads to a Roman-selected fascist demagogue.
* Fear over manipulated threats in North Korea or Russia.
* Catholic faithful venerating what appears to be a petrified human organ.
Upon waking up from his transformation out of the Matrix and into reality, Morpheus welcomed Neo with, “Welcome to the real world.”
- Holy Blood, Holy Grail, Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, and Henry Lincoln, Dell Trade Paperbacks (2004), pp. 59-60
- The renowned “Protestant” expositor Charles Spurgeon had an official magazine which frequently published his writing. It was titled “The Sword & Trowel”.
- Morals and Dogma, Albert Pike, [not in copyright] (1872), pp. 816-817
- Incomplete lists of personalities abound across the internet from Wikipedia to Wikileaks, although somewhat reputable sources like those have been scrubbed of names like Nixon and Eisenhower, both of whom can be found in this excellent article by University of California, Santa Cruz Sociology Professor George William “Bill” Domhoff.
Trance Formation of America, Cathy O’Brien and Mark Philips***, Reality Marketing (2005), pp. 171, 172, 173 [digital page numbers may not match with paper copy]
Somewhere around 1 hour 40 minutes, Cathy’s “rescuer” Mark Philips admits to being a “temporary” Knight of Malta.
—Almost certainly Philips’ role is to continue “handling” O’Brien and keep her from understanding where Rome fit in to her terrible victimization although, as a Roman Catholic, she recounted many of her experiences having a Catholic connection.
- Professor George William “Bill” Domhoff, University of California, Santa Cruz
- The Two Babylons, Alexander Hislop, Presbyterian Free Church of Scotlan (1853), p. 146 [digital page numbers may not match with paper copy]
- Commentary on the Book of Romans, John Calvin, public domain (1540), p. 6
- The Papacy, Its History, Dogmas, Genius, and Prospects, Rev. James Aitken Wylie, Johnstone and Hunter, 15, Princes Street, London (1852) , p. 25