Pay your taxes!
If you’re a Johnny Cirucci fan (one of his “flying monkeys”), I’ll bet you were surprised to see him write that.
If you’re a Peter J. Reilly fan, I’ll bet you’re asking, “Who the heck is ‘Johnny Cirucci’?!”
I ran across Peter about three years ago. I had just published my first book, Illuminati Unmasked, and had begun doing interviews.
Invariably, the subject of Kent Hovind would come up.
Kent was slated for possible release from prison but the hearing didn’t look hopeful. He was a hot topic for “alternative” Christian media at the time.
As a Jesuit-educated writer for Forbes, I considered Peter one of “them” and avoided corresponding with him.
But Peter is an interesting guy. While I tend to be an excitable Italian and former Catholic, he remains an unflappable Irishman and, he assures me, a former Catholic. He recently related his first experience outside the Church to the current troubles the Trump Foundation is having paying taxes in the state of New York.
It wouldn’t be the first time a wily Jesuit had gone undercover!
Although I write that tongue-in-cheek, I firmly believe that such was the case for a host of prominent people from the Jesuit-educated critic of Christianity, François-Marie “Voltaire” Arouet to the “former” late Jesuit priest Malachi Martin.
The Jesuits are the ultimate order in service to the Papacy and it’s a tough sell to present the idea that a Catholic priest wants to serve…but not that much.
Martin’s book, The Jesuits, sits well-highlited and noted upon my shelf. My summary would be, “The Jesuits used to be a great bunch of guys but then they turned a bad corner and went Communist.”
By the way, that’s not hyperbole.
Though the movement has been global since its inception, it was above all in Latin America that the strange alliance between Jesuits and Marxists gathered its first practical momentum. It was there that this new Jesuit mission, entailing as it does nothing less than the transformation of the sociopolitical face of the West, first entangled lives far more profoundly than McGovern and theoreticians like him anticipated. Quickly, scores of Jesuits began to work with the passion and zeal that has always been so typical of them, for the success of the Sandinocommunists in Nicaragua; and, when the Sandinistas took power, those same Jesuits entered crucial posts in the central government, and attracted others to join at various regional levels. In other Central American countries, meanwhile, Jesuits not only participated in guerrilla training of Marxist cadres, but some became guerrilla fighters themselves. Inspired by the idealism they saw in Liberation Theology, and encouraged by the independence inherent in the new idea of the Church as a group of autonomous communities, Jesuits found that all was permitted-even encouraged-as long as it furthered the concept of the new “people’s Church.”
Such men were the dream and ideal of the true Liberation Theologians. For they were the fighters, the cadres who took Liberation Theology from theory to what they called praxis-the implementation of the people’s revolution for economic and political liberation. From that praxis, the Liberation Theologians insisted, from “below among the people,” would come all true theology to replace the old theology once imposed autocratically “from above” by the hierarchy of the Roman Church.1
Apparently, the Jesuits haven’t returned from their hard Left turn. Another “ex-Jesuit”, Greg Galluzzo, trained Barack Obama in Chicago “community organizing”.
The Catholic periodical “Our Sunday Visitor” lists Chicago as one of the “Top 10 Catholic Communities” and even takes note of its … “ethnic diversity” (code for racial unrest generously encouraged by Rome).
Chicago’s Catholic heart is based in its ethnic diversity.
As the Windy City became industrialized in the mid-19th century, immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe flocked to Chicago — joining the already present Irish and Germans — to become part of its workforce. Ethnic communities naturally formed, and ethnic Catholic parishes naturally followed. Today, more than 350 Catholic churches remain, many built in impressive European style.
It has been rumored that, once a Jesuit proves themselves truly dedicated to Rome, they are invited to take a “Blood Oath” in which they swear to have no will of their own, “perinde ac cadaver”, to be as a dead man in the strictest obedience to the Pope.
This “Fourth Vow” is said to have sold Alessandro Farnese2—Pope Paul III—on consecrating the new order for Spanish nobleman Ignacio López (later known as Ignatius of Loyola).
After a serious injury in the military and during a lengthy rehabilitation, Ignatius Loyola (b. 1491, d. 1556) turned his focus from “military enthusiasm to ghostly fanaticism.(2) Ignatius assumed the name and office of Knight of the Virgin Mary, seeing himself as Mary’s favorite. Ignatius wanted to start a new order, The Society of Jesus (or the Jesuits) and presented the idea to the Pope. He told the Pope that the idea had been inspired by heavenly revelations. At first, the Pope hesitated, but when Ignatius added a fourth vow (in addition to the regular poverty, chastity, and obedience), “absolute subservience to the pope,” promising to do whatever the Pope wanted and go wherever he wanted, the Pope agreed and sent the new order out to “invade the world.” While other monks of other orders sought to separate themselves from the world, the Jesuits went out into the world and obeyed whatever command the Pope gave. Often this was to win the world with the sword. No violent act was withheld if the order came from their top “general.”(3) ~ The Jesuit Agenda and the Evangelical/Protestant Church, Roger Oakland, Understand the Times/Lighthouse Trails Special Report
But now, a Jesuit is the Pope. —And it raised more than one eyebrow to see that the vacancy provided for Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio was the resignation of Pope Benedict; an event that had not occurred in the previous 600 years. Cynics began to accuse the Jesuits of mafioso skullduggery (something they are famous for…or, rather, infamous).
Bergoglio, himself, has a murky past, hidden behind Argentina’s “Dirty War”, in which a series of corrupt military dictatorships purged Argentina of their political enemies under the guise of “anti-Communism”.
Many of the victims were held for months in official institutions, where they were repeatedly tortured before being killed, their bodies “disappeared.” Justifying the purge, which was spoken about euphemistically but carried out in secrecy, the Argentine military espoused a brand of anti-Communist ferocity that echoed Franco’s Fascist witch hunt, which had previously devastated Republican Spain — a brand of ferocity that also shared his deeply entrenched ultra-Catholic and anti-Semitic views. ~ The New Yorker
Devout Roman Catholic Francisco Franco Bahamonde had no less a spiritual advisor than Father José María Escriva de Balaguer, the founder of Opus Dei.
Franco was a monster who availed himself of both the knowledge and instruments of the Inquisition to torture any victim he felt worthy of it.
How was he able to do that? —The Inquisition was never disbanded by the Vatican. It quietly became the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. In fact, before he was elected “Pope Benedict XVI”, former Nazi Youth Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was Prefect of the Inquisition. He also helped Jesuit scholar Karl Rahner map out Vatican II. Unfortunately, none of these “accomplishments” were enough to insulate him from an “invitation to retire early”.
It’s hard to imagine worse than Inquisition torture but Franco managed it: child trafficking.
For Whom The Bell Tolls
In Spain, hundreds of thousands of babies were stolen from their parents and trafficked by the Fascist government of Francisco Franco via the Catholic Church.
Up to 300,000 Spanish babies were stolen from their parents and sold for adoption over a period of five decades, a new investigation reveals.
The children were trafficked by a secret network of doctors, nurses, priests and nuns in a widespread practice that began during General Franco’s dictatorship and continued until the early Nineties. …
Several mothers say they were told their first-born children had died during or soon after they gave birth. …
But the women, often young and unmarried, were told they could not see the body of the infant or attend their burial.
In reality, the babies were sold…
Official documents were forged so the adoptive parents’ names were on the infants’ birth certificates. …
Journalist Katya Adler, who has investigated the scandal, says: “The situation is incredibly sad for thousands of people.”
“There are men and women across Spain whose lives have been turned upside-down by discovering the people they thought were their parents actually bought them for cash. There are also many mothers who have maintained for years that their babies did not die – and were labelled ‘hysterical’ – but are now discovering that their child has probably been alive and brought up by somebody else all this time.”
Experts believe the cases may account for up to 15 per cent of the total adoptions that took place in Spain between 1960 and 1989.
It began as a system for taking children away from families deemed politically dangerous to the regime of General Franco, which began in 1939. The system continued after the dictator’s death in 1975 as the Catholic church continued to retain a powerful influence on public life, particularly in social services. ~ Daily Mail83
In Fascist Spain, however, the power of the Catholic Church was as blatant and all-encompassing as it is in Ireland.
On April 1, 1939, Generalísimo Francisco Franco, crusading leader of the rebellious Nationalist forces, triumphantly declared the Spanish Civil War over. The Catholic Church was the institution that most benefitted from Franco’s victory. Its hierarchy had blessed the Nationalist uprising as a crusade and had justified the war to the world as an “armed plebiscite.” Now it reaped the reward. Franco quickly abolished all those Republican** measures that had undermined the Church’s spiritual and social roles, and entrusted it with more power and privilege than it had enjoyed since the 18th century.
For the Church, the privileges constituted a spiritual “reconquista” complementing the political “reconquista” enjoyed by Franco and his Nationalists. What the political “reconquista” meant was the return to Castilian centralism and the elimination of other ideologies. The “reconquista” for the Church signified Catholic monopoly over the life of all Spaniards, a vital privilege if society was to be “re-Catholicised”. This “re-Catholicisation” was not an easy undertaking keeping in mind that, in supporting the Nationalists during the War, the Church had alienated a large percentage of the population. …
For Cardinal Gomá, primate of Spain, the only way was to impose “divine totalitarianism”, i.e. the imposition of Catholic values on all Spanish society. Franco was only too glad to help.
The privileged status of the Church was granted immediately following the Civil War. A little later —in June 1941— its rights were outlined in an Agreement between the Vatican and the Franco government, and finally formalised in a Concordat signed in August, 1953. Amongst the provisions were:
1. recognition of Catholicism as the official religion of the country;
2. Mandatory religious instruction at all educational levels in conformity with Catholic dogma;
3. Financial support of the church by the state (paying the salary of priests and contributing to the (re)construction of church buildings);
4. Guaranteed representation in both press and radio.
~ Spain Then And Now84
The fact that the government of Spain, in collusion with the Catholic Church, were the institutions that kidnapped babies meant that it is impossible to account for them all. Despite media white-washing, it is a foregone conclusion that many of the children weren’t simply “sold” to good Catholics who wanted them, they were trafficked, tortured and ritually slaughtered.
Proof is found in how Rome maintained these crimes against the Spanish people long after Franco’s death.
Generalísimo Francisco Franco was personally assisted by Father Josemaria Escriva, the founder of Opus Dei.85
The same outrages occurred during the Argentinian Dirty War. However, no institution of repute is daring to link Cardinal Bergoglio (now Pope Francis I) directly to child trafficking.
Below mainstream media, former Church of Canada Priest-turned-human-rights activist Kevin Annett does level the accusation.
A former civil servant in the Argentine military junta who is living in exile in Spain claims that Pope Francis engineered the kidnapping and trafficking of children of political prisoners during the Dirty War of the 1970’s.
The man bases his claim on his personal involvement in meetings between Bergoglio and senior junta members that secured the child trafficking networks using Catholic orphanages and religious bodies as covers.
A Spanish reporter who has interviewed the former civil servant states,
“This guy is genuine and has many names and dates, and notes from meetings. Apparently, Bergoglio was promised the top spot in the Argentine church if he cooperated with the junta. So it’s small wonder that as the Pope, he’s made it harder for honest catholics to report child abuse, considering his own complicity.” ~ ITCCS.org
Unfortunately, Annett and his “International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State” harm their credibility with delusions of grandeur; frequently proclaiming that an “international court in Brussels” has convicted Bergoglio of child trafficking.
That was 2014.
Exactly what law enforcement agency is going to be doing the arresting, Annett doesn’t say. In fact, Bergoglio has never been arrested for child trafficking and, if a “trial” ever took place he was tried in absentia.
Argentina’s “Dirty War” was supposedly an “ultra-Right” purge of “Communists”, yet Pope Francis I maintains a posture that is nothing less than far-Left.4
From “global warming” to gun control, Papa Francisco seems to have gone to the “opposite extreme” of his Communist-hunting Cardinalcy.
Pope Francis Scolds Congress for Gun and Weapons Sales, Breitbart.com
Pope Francis Apologizes to Indigenous Peoples for “Grave Sins” of Colonialism, Indian Country Today
Pope Francis Attacks EU Over Treatment of Immigrants, The Guardian
Pope Francis: Overcome Fear of Immigrants and Refugees, America Magazine (Official Jesuit publication)
Pope Francis to Immigrants: “Do not be Ashamed of Your Traditions”, The Washington Post
“Please do not be ashamed of your traditions,” he told the audience. “Do not forget the lessons you learned from your elders, which are something you can bring to enrich the life of this American land. I repeat, do not be ashamed of what is part of you, your lifeblood. You are called to be responsible citizens and to contribute, like others who with so much strength did before you . . . fruitfully to the life of the communities in which you live.”
Francis also culled American history to underscore his remarks about the treatment of immigrants.
“We remember the great struggles which led to the abolition of slavery, the extension of voting rights, the growth of the labor movement, and the gradual effort to eliminate every kind of racism and prejudice against the earlier arrival of new Americans,” he said.
In an era of deadly terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, decades of wide-open borders are nothing less than treason.
Although “mainstream media” decries any attempt to close the borders as “racist”, the issue isn’t “race” as much as “religion”.
As in America’s past, the vast majority of immigrants pouring across those open borders are Roman Catholic.
However, in stark contrast to waves of Catholic immigrants of yester-year, simply walking across an open border means you don’t have to assimilate.
Consequently, ghettos of Spanish-speaking illegal immigrants are common to every state in the Union. This exacerbates the refusal of U.S. officials at all levels of government to enforce immigration laws and causes natural-born citizens (at least those whose parents didn’t consider labor pains as synonymous with a starting gun) to react in anger at said Spanish-speakers.
The situation is worsened when, not only Federal, State and local governments provide Spanish-speaking service to illegal immigrants but most businesses do, as well.
One would think that encouraging “immigrants” to wear their background on their sleeves—and then reiterating the encouragement—makes a bad situation even worse.
Although the Jesuits have oft been accused of masterfully manipulating civic discontent to steer in their favor, surely Pope Francis knows not what he does.
This is all academic, of course. Donald John Trump, who spent 2 years under the Jesuits at Fordham before transferring to the “public” University of Pennsylvania, was elected based upon his repeated theatrical vows to “build a wall”.
While sources like New York Magazine rail against Trump’s “racist immigration policy”, the truth is that, like Barack Obama on his promise to close Guantanamo Bay, 5, 6, 7, 8 Donald Trump has been all show and no stay.
As Trump’s Conservative constituency begins to get impatient, they are encouraged to be satisfied with real progress such as Attorney General and former ensconced 20-year United States Senator Jeff Sessions telling Justice Department bureaucrats to be sure and say “illegal alien” whenever speaking of “undocumented visitors”.
Top Jesuits are even managing to upset Conservative Catholics.
When it comes to homosexuality, Pope Francis says, “Who am I to judge?”
His counterpart in the Order, Superior General Arturo Sosa (known as the “Black Pope”9, 10) has backed up the Jesuit disappearing of eternal damnation by telling the Spanish newspaper El Mundo that Satan is just a man-made “symbol”.
In relation to the words of Jesus Christ recorded in Mark 10:9 on the sanctity of marriage — “What God has joined, let no man separate,” — Sosa told Swiss journalist Giuseppe Rusconi that no one used a “tape recorder” to chronicle the words of Jesus and, therefore, they should be examined “in context”.
What does all this have to do with Peter J. Reilly, Kent Hovind and paying your taxes? —Nothing. It was just my introduction.
And Now For Something Completely Different
I’ve come a long way since 2015.
Somehow, Peter and I were connected on Twitter—I think he reached out and I was at a point where curiosity about “the other team” was overcoming my trepidation so I returned the “follow”.
That put Peter on my feed and when I saw him “like” a “tweet” from an unexpected source, I had to jump into the fray.
Her real name is Stephanie Gregory11 Clifford, but that’s not what the media calls her. She’s a pornography “actress” and the media not only plastered her and her breasts all over the airwaves (which was wonderful for your children to see) but they were always sure to use her porn name, “Stormy Daniels”.
The media has used this literal harlot to make pornography a household item for the youngest of children; who would think to put a parental block on the 5 o’clock news?
This actually could have been the ultimate motive the entire time; so much so that it’s quite possible Donald Trump never even met Stephanie Clifford.13
I find it particularly ironic that Vatican sources like the Catholic News Service seem to be on the forefront of this revelation.
The percentage of Americans who say pornography is morally acceptable increased more over the past year than in all other years this decade combined.
While the acceptability of porn still holds minority status in the United States, it has climbed to 43 percent, according to Gallup Poll figures released June 5. The number increased by 7 percent from last year’s figure.
In 2011, when Gallup first started asking this question, only 30 percent said pornography was morally acceptable. As of last year, that figure had climbed to 36 percent, a rise of 6 percent.
While acceptance of pornography had trailed other social issues earlier this decade, such as doctor-assisted suicide, same-sex relations, sex between unmarried people and out-of-wedlock childbirth, the 2017-18 surge means that porn has eclipsed all other social issues in their growing acceptance by Americans this decade, according to Gallup.
A report on the poll’s findings by Gallup analyst Andrew Dugan said that while Americans had grown more tolerant on social norms over the decade, the reason behind the steep climb on pornography is “less clear.”
One theory Dugan offered is that adult film actress Stormy Daniels, a “fierce critic of President Donald Trump, has given pornography a sense of moral credibility that it previously lacked.” ~ Crux Now
Does this just happen to be “one theory” or does the Catholic News Service have an insider source?
Unfortunately, Donald Trump is far from being unfairly wounded here. In fact, another aspect of this contrived “scandal” is actually damage control. Trump’s secrets are more dark and perverse than a “fling with a porn actress”. That’s how he was selected to be “elected”: he’s a slave to the blackmail of his deviant past.
In comparison to what Donald Trump really is, the “Stormy Daniels” scandal is tame, even appealing to some with looser morals. It’s a well-used tactic.
Hillary Rodham continued to play the role of strong-man by illegally going through the FBI dossiers of their political enemies for blackmail. Neither the existence of the dossiers nor the activity were addressed with prosecution.
In fact, the corruptions that occurred during the Clinton Administration that were being ignored were so vast a side-show was fabricated over a sexual tryst Bill had in the Oral Office. Meanwhile, in best Hegelian fashion, Bill’s Jesuit keepers were ordering him to keep backwards Communist China in full threat status by sending them nuclear secrets and supercomputers; all acts of high treason that were shoved under Monica Lewinsky’s stained dress. ~ Can We Finally Call Hillary A Roman? 14
If Trump hasn’t met Stephanie Clifford (or maybe she’s one of many such harlots he’s bought), why did his handlers choose her for the spotlight? She has greatly benefited from the show.
Her recent arrest and release may give some insight.
Charges against adult film actress Stormy Daniels for allegedly touching three undercover detectives while performing at an Ohio strip club were dismissed Thursday, her attorney said.
Daniels, who gained notoriety after suing President Donald Trump following an alleged affair, had faced three misdemeanor counts of illegally touching a patron, court records show.
Daniels, whose legal name is Stephanie Clifford, posted a $6,054 bail and was released Thursday morning, and was due to be arraigned Friday, records show.
Under an Ohio law passed in 2007, an employee who regularly appears nude or seminude at a sexually oriented business is prohibited from touching patrons, except for family members.
Because Daniels does not regularly appear at the club, the charges were dismissed, according to court documents.
“I’ve determined that these crimes were not committed, based on the fact that Ms. Clifford has not made regular appearances at this establishment as required under the law,” Columbus City Attorney Zach Klein said in a statement after reviewing the case.
Daniels had planned to plead not guilty to the three misdemeanor charges, her attorney, Michael Avenatti, tweeted.
The arrest of Daniels and two others was part of a “long-term investigation into allegations of human trafficking, prostitution, & other vice related violations,” Columbus police said in a statement. ~ CNN
Not only was Clifford (whom CNN prefers to call by her porn name) released, but she admitted that two other strippers who were arrested with her were not.
Saddened to hear the other 2 dancers arrested with me last night did not have their charges dropped. All tips from my stage performance tonight at Sirens in Columbus will go towards their legal fees. Come support the working women of this city. #letussurvive
— Stormy Daniels (@StormyDaniels) July 12, 2018
Maybe she just had a better lawyer.
Michael John Avenatti has an education very similar to Donald Trump, having first received Catholic instruction at the public-sounding Saint Louis University before transferring 900 miles east to the University of Pennsylvania to be given a more overtly “public” degree.
Perhaps the clue can be found in the arrest being the result of a “long-term investigation into allegations of human trafficking…” As I’ve already shown you conclusively, real power is sealed through the abuse of children. That includes the power to avoid prosecution (which seems to be the case for virtually every high-profile pedophile I’ve researched).
According to Ken Wooden, a child safety expert who has interviewed more than 1,000 sex offenders and abductors, the biggest mistake parents make is to think it’s enough to tell children, “Don’t talk to strangers.”
“In the eyes of a kid, a stranger is some character who’s very scary and a monster type,” said Wooden. In reality, though, molesters can look like ordinary, friendly, engaging adults, Wooden warned. ~ ABC News
Is Stephanie Clifford a “lure” to help bring unsuspecting children into an obviously dangerous environment? Does she hook young girls with telling them how profitable her lifestyle is?
Funny. My bank account and trophy case say differently. https://t.co/NvWdO8GiUo
— Stormy Daniels (@StormyDaniels) July 8, 2018
Exactly what a “porn actress” puts in her “trophy case” can only be imagined but one wonders who you can or even should show off such “trophies” to.
You would think that an adulterous “porn actress” scandal would cripple someone like Donald Trump, who rode into the White House via the “Conservative”, Christian, Republican vote but not only does it appear not to have affected him, a second scandal was released by the media almost identical to the first.
President Trump’s longtime lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, secretly recorded a conversation with Mr. Trump two months before the presidential election in which they discussed payments to a former Playboy model who said she had an affair with Mr. Trump, according to lawyers and others familiar with the recording.
The F.B.I. seized the recording this year during a raid on Mr. Cohen’s office. The Justice Department is investigating Mr. Cohen’s involvement in paying women to tamp down embarrassing news stories about Mr. Trump ahead of the 2016 election. Prosecutors want to know whether that violated federal campaign finance laws, and any conversation with Mr. Trump about those payments would be of keen interest to them. ~ The New York Times
A single source—The Telegraph—says “Playboy Playmate of the Year” Karen McDougal “became religious” but curiously leaves out exactly what her “religion” is.
She maintains a website with her name “.com” (which one would assume would be hard to obtain) but it has no content other than a photograph of her—a somewhat decently-dressed one, fortunately. At one point there was an “About Me” page but it has since been taken down. What is Karen hiding about her background?
Once taking the plunge for porn, it was all smooth sailing for McDougal…or, rather, “driving”.
McDougal’s first modelling assignment was being a promotional model at a Harley-Davidson bike show in Detroit.
In 1997, McDougal tried out and won her local Venus Swimwear swimsuit competition in Michigan, earning her place at the international final in Florida. Her victory caught the eye of Playboy photographer David Mecey. Soon after that she was approached by Playboy for a test shoot at Playboy Studio West which she accepted. Upon completing her test shoot, she was promptly selected to return for a complete photo and video shoot and chosen as Miss December 1997. Her pictorial, which was shot by photographers Richard Fegley and Stephen Wayda, has a winter theme and its outdoor portion was shot in the snowy fields near Park City, Utah. Her video, the “Playmate Profile”, was featured on Playboy TV soon after her magazine debut.
In May 1998, she was announced to have been chosen by Hugh Hefner and fans as Playmate of the Year (PMOY) of 1998 at a luncheon at the Playboy Mansion.
As part of being named PMOY, she was awarded $100,000 and a special edition silver Shelby Series 1 convertible with a customized Michigan license plate “PMOY 98”. McDougal’s PMOY pictorial was featured in the July 1998 issue of Playboy where she also appeared on its cover. In contrast to her Playmate pictorial, her PMOY pictorial has a tropical theme and its outdoor portion was shot at Saint Lucia. According to her interview in her Playmate of the Year “Video Centerfold” which was released soon after her PMOY issue debuted, she believes her physical imperfections are her “funny” smile, her crooked pinkies which she inherited from her grandfather and her “ugly feet” which she wishes others would not look at. Because of the popularity of the VH1 television series “Pop-up Video“ at the time, one of the segments in her PMOY video was done as a Pop-up Video parody filled with factoids about her and Playboy. During her appearance on The Magic Hour to promote her PMOY issue, McDougal demonstrated her signature pose, straddle split on TV in front of a live studio audience.
In an online chat in 2002, McDougal expressed interest in posing nude for Playboy again if offered.
In March 1999, McDougal became the first woman to appear on the cover of Men’s Fitness magazine. Since then she expanded her career into fitness modeling by appearing in fitness and body building magazines such as Muscle & Fitness (January 2000), Physical (June 2004) and Iron Man (October 2005, January 2006, June 2007 and November 2009). She appeared in a 10-page pictorial in the January 2006 issue of Iron Man as “Hardbody” of the month, and on the cover of its October 2005 and June 2007 issues. McDougal returned as “Hardbody” of the month in the November 2009 issue in a pictorial together with fellow Playmate Katie Lohmann. In interviews, she stated that her transition to fitness modeling was unintentional. ~ Wikipedia
Truly, the wages of sin are big money and a top-of-the-line sportscar…at least until it comes time to pay the bills.15
If McDougal is just another pair of breasts being presented to America’s children via the evening news, the next question is what we asked about Stephanie “Stormy Daniels” Clifford: why her? Perhaps becoming “religious” was a bigger benefit than you might think…if it’s the right “religion”.
Wikipedia claims she is “of Cherokee, Scottish and Irish descent.” You probably aren’t seeing any “Cherokee” (neither am I), and “McDougal” can bespeak of Scotland but “Irish” certainly leaves a clue that the “religion” Karen found was Roman Catholicism.
It worked for another “former” porn actress, Jenna Jameson.
Jameson also “got religious”—more specifically, she got Roman Catholic.
Interestingly, she seems to find no conflict with her past and, although she’s a “former porn actress” she told Larry King in 2013 that she wouldn’t return to porn because she’s too old for it, not because it was in any way offensive.
Perhaps the fact that Jameson “found” Roman Catholicism also explains how she had the pull to land an interview with Larry King.
We can only guess about what religion Karen McDougal became “religious” in, but no guesses are necessary for the Trump lawyer being trumpeted as the epicenter of Porn Scandal II: Michael Cohen is Jewish.
Once again, we see a Hebrew in a high-profile but low-influence position bolstering the “conspiracy theory” I maintain that willing Jews are human shields for Romans.
It was here that I noticed Peter Reilly getting involved. He had “hearted” a “tweet” from Stephanie “Stormy Daniels” Clifford that I thought was quite obnoxious.
Only the uptight ones. Go bake your hubby a pie and then cry alone in the shower. https://t.co/gYuJ64na8n
— Stormy Daniels (@StormyDaniels) July 8, 2018
Once again I found myself on one end of an issue and Peter on another.
Being temperamental and ornery (shocking, I know), I messaged a ribbing to Peter.
Being even-tempered and reserved (might I call him “cagey”?), he side-stepped the issue and opened a dialogue.
I wanted to stay angry but, instead, I was disarmed and intrigued. In fact, it was damn Jesuitical of him!
I realized that I had squandered three years by not reaching out to Peter sooner.
If nothing else, I could attempt to understand how a Jesuit-trained Forbes CPA sees things. Hell, maybe I might be able to win him over in some way.
Oddly enough, the three years since Peter and I first met have seen me align perfectly with him on the subject of Kent Hovind.
I now see Hovind, not as an unsung hero, but as a reckless, selfish and incompetent father, husband and Christian steward at best and an agent of deception at worst.
To begin with, Kent is a “Creationist” like Ken Ham: a Christian who seeks to put dinosaurs in the Garden of Eden.
This tactic does more harm than good and one wonders if men like this know that.
If anything, a much more radical understanding of our cosmology does far more to validate the Bible and, if carefully examined, gives more real observational (“zetetic”) evidence.
Such an examination has been maligned as “flat Earth” but, without the labels, this community asks some serious questions the “experts” seem ill-equipped to answer.
Daring To Think The Un-Thinkable
For instance, if you make your own observations, the sun and moon appear to be nearly exactly the same size and relatively close to your position.
However, experts claim that moon has a radius of 1,079 miles while the sun has a radius 432,169 miles—roughly 400x bigger.
These same experts claim that the moon is 238,900 miles away from the Earth and that the sun is 92.96 million miles away. By “random chance”, the sun is 400x bigger than the moon but also 400x further away giving it the “optical illusion” of being the same size. If this weren’t the case, eclipses would be impossible.
At best this is an astounding case for “intelligent design” behind the creation of our “universe”.
According to NASA, the Earth is spinning at 1,000 mph (breaking the 767mph sound barrier) at the equator. The Earth revolves around the sun at 67,000 mph. The solar system moves through the Milky Way at 500,000 mph. The Milky Way moves through the universe at 670,000,000 mph.
All that movement and yet the North Star is right there, day after day, year after year, century after century.
NASA assures us that, again, our eyes are playing tricks on us and this is another “optical illusion” created by the vast distance between the Earth and the North Star. Just trust them…really!
In fact, until I do my own time-lapse photography at the North Pole, I don’t trust what’s on the internet. I suspect stars move a lot less than “the experts” tell us.
However, if you seek to conduct any experiments for yourself at the “South Pole”, you’re not allowed.
In 1959 (just as nations were developing the technology to do this with little risk), all of the most powerful countries in the world agreed via the “Antarctic Treaty” to keep nosey independent researchers from doing this. In the heat of the Cold War, the U.S. and U.S.S.R. vowed (along with, today, 53 other nations from East and West) that anyone nosing around Antarctica was cause for those two combined militaries to stop pointing guns at each other and point them at you, instead.
It wasn’t until 2011 that airlines were finally allowed to over-fly the North Pole, but the South remains firmly restricted.
What are they hiding (besides the idea that the Cold War was contrived and needless)?
Accepted “flat Earth” maps like Ferguson’s or Gleason’s give the answer: it is impossible to “over-fly” the “South Pole” because it is actually a ring of ice, not a continent.
Yet, we are assured that the Nazi who helped America leap out into space, Werner von Braun, went to Antarctica to collect moon rocks and the President of Notre Dame, Father Theodore Hesburgh was there, too.
The experts tell us that the Earth is a spinning globe with a radius of approximately 3,965 miles. Google explains that “Using the Pythagorean theorem, that calculates to an average curvature of 7.98 inches per mile or approximately 8 inches per mile (squared).” That means that, across 1 mile, there is an 8 inch drop to the horizon. At 2 miles, there is a 64 inch drop (51/3rds feet). At 10 miles the drop is 662/3rds feet and at 100 miles it’s an ominous 6662/3rds feet.
There are many places around “the globe” where the naked eye can see far beyond any perceived “curvature” but then the “experts” say you can’t trust the ups and downs of terrain.
You can, however, trust that water always finds its own level. If you pour coffee into a cup with hills of sugar, it’s still a flat, calm surface once you pour enough. If you then travel to the Suez Canal you see an astounding 120-mile-long surface with no detectable drop to the horizon.
Even more interesting is how flight of either the tiniest insect or the most massive aircraft isn’t affected by the Earth’s rotation in the slightest. If the Earth rotates from east to west, air travel in one cardinal direction should take twice as long or be twice as short in another. Of course, this is difficult to observe as an airline passenger, thanks to crazy and seemingly inefficient connecting flights—but I’m sure there’s a logical reason for them.
The experts tell us that, no, you can’t keep water on a spinning ball or have centrifugal force negated for anything on the surface of that ball but if the ball gets really, really big, at some magical point unknown to “science” something called “gravity” cancels the effect of movement and keeps everything conveniently in place. You can’t test this for yourself, you again have to trust the experts.
The experts tell us that the Earth’s atmosphere is composed of 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, 0.9% argon, and 0.03% carbon dioxide along with other trace elements and water vapor. Just outside that atmosphere is the icy-cold vacuum of space. If you were to try and duplicate that, the vacuum would instantly rip the atmosphere away but, again, we are told to trust to the magic of “gravity” and the knowledge of the “experts”.
For instance, Albert Einstein’s “Special Theory of Relativity” does explain how “gravity” makes you feel “relative” to a stable, flat plain instead of a ball spinning faster than the speed of sound…it’s just too complex for you to understand.
Consequently, “conspiracy theorists” have begun to question whether the Jewish scientist was trying to deceitfully pull the collective wool over our eyes. The fact that his close friend was a Jesuit-trained Belgian Catholic priest named Georges Lemaître has nothing to do with it, we’re sure!
However, I must mention that Lemaître is the astronomer who rose to the occasion and provided an answer on behalf of Darwinian evolutionists for the question, “If this all happened by random chance, how did it start without God?” Lemaître’s response can basically be summarized as “First there was nothing, and then it exploded”. The “scientific” phrase is “Big Bang Theory”.
One wouldn’t expect a Jesuit-trained Catholic priest to be so helpful to the Darwinians but in 2014 the Jesuit Pope, himself, reaffirmed that both “evolution” and the “Big Bang” are “real”.
Jesuits have run to the aid of floundering Darwinians more than you know.
Critics of the champion of chimpanzee conjecture caused a conundrum with the query “What was the adaptive ‘link’ between apes and man?” During the awkward silence, Father Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, S.J., thought he would help things along a bit. When no fossil could be found to provide the evidence, he simply fabricated one; “Piltdown Man”.
What was a Father who was known as the “father of New Age spiritism” doing hoaxing archeological evidence? Perhaps the accusation that a top priority of the “Society of Jesus” is to discredit the Bible doesn’t seem quite so inflammatory.
At this point, tinfoil-hat-types are beginning to ask in the language of Rome, “Cui bono?” “Who benefits?” If the Catholic Church is “Christian”, why has it been so helpful to the Darwinian atheists who manage to explain away the Creation?
Actually, Rome has been far more helpful than you’ve been told and the motive is to attack and discredit the Bible, forcing the Pope to be acknowledged as the premier authority on both “science” and “spirtuality”.
Interestingly, both Kent Hovind and Ken Ham16 join the Jesuit Pope in disregard for these criticisms of modern “science”. In fact, they go even further and vehemently attack them. —Odd behavior for men who claim that validating the Bible is their highest priority.
But from a “conspiracy theorist” perspective, Kent is even more appealing to “the Machine” because of the quagmire of protesting taxation.
There can be no doubt that the complexity of the tax code is a form of tyranny. America will never see a flat tax nor will any governmental authority examine the Sixteenth Amendment despite some interesting claims that it was unconstitutionally ratified. In fact, a really sharp pleader could even make a case against the Sixteenth Amendment based upon Original Intent of the Constitution—the idea that the Federal government is entitled to skim your paycheck before you receive it and what it skims, it arbitrates from year to year.
The very fact that we need specialized Jesuit-trained CPAs like Peter J. Reilly proves this point. Even if the tax code isn’t weaponized to target producers and common citizens, its complexity is in-and-of-itself a bulwark that the super-rich can hide behind by hiring armies of Peter J. Reillys to help squirrel away their wealth in legendary “offshore accounts”.
When It Comes to Taxes, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton Have 1 Thing in Common, The Nation
Tax avoidance by the wealthiest Americans—including the presidential front-runners—costs the U.S. government an additional $130 billion per year.17
Encouraging citizens who are discontented and disenfranchised with a weaponized tax code to “protest” it “ghetto-style” by simply not paying it is the ultimate sucker punch. As the old saw goes, “You can’t fight City Hall” and Kent Hovind proved that resoundingly.
Worse, Hovind failed those who depended upon him most. He refused to provide the safety nets of health and life insurance required by law for his employees and his premeditated tactics such as “structuring” (keeping transactions under $10,000 for the purposes of tax avoidance) netted his wife, Jo, jail time as an accomplice.
She stayed with him through both their confinements but, sadly, after he was released from prison, they divorced.
As far as I’m concerned, Peter Reilly fairly destroys any defense by Hovind and his “Hovindicators”.
Kent Hovind Not A Tax Protester?
Kent Hovind adamantly maintains that he is not a “tax protester”. I have some issues with that. If you go to the flagship website of his supporters #FreeKent you can follow the links to Proof Number one “Letters from professionals absolve Kent Hovind from all wrong-doing”. The first letter is from Kent to one of the professionals and starts with:
“I am writing to request your professional opinion regarding the voluntary nature of Form 1040.”
The responses are something of potpourri of tax protester arguments, that have been ruled by courts to be frivolous. As Hovindicators often correctly point out Kent Hovind was not convicted of tax evasions, so the letters, which were clearly meant to set up what is called a Cheek defense, really have little to do with what he was convicted of.
Then there is Creation Science 103: Class 6 “Income Tax”
A bit after the two minute mark Kent says that everybody should follow the law including the government and that he has not filed in 28 years and if there is a law that requires filing, he would like to see it. The discussion that follows has nothing to do with his status as a minister and his vow of poverty. A bit past the six minute mark he launches into the explanation as to why trading services for money is not “income”. At 7:30, he gives a qualified plug to Irwin Schiff, who may well have originated many of the arguments used by, for lack of a better term, tax protesters. Irwin Schiff is also in federal prison.
The arguments that are brought forth in defense of Kent Hovind are multifarious and include things like Jo Hovind not being allowed to put on a robe when she was arrested, a prosecutor who committed suicide when arrested as a pedophile and Judge Margaret Casey Rodgers not allowing open Bibles in the courtroom during the trial.
* Kent Hovind’s wife was treated by authorities with needless brutality unbecoming a citizen’s understanding of who their “law enforcement” is composed of.
* Kent Hovind’s (assistant) prosecutor was a pedophile.
* Kent Hovind’s judge was a vehemently anti-Christian woman.19
Of course these facts have nothing to do with whether Hovind was guilty of tax evasion.
But they absolutely add weight to the accusation of my third book that the United States is secretly controlled by a cabal of Christian-hating pedophiles based in Rome.
This may seem droll and passé to Peter because of the faulty logic used by Hovind and his “Hovindicators”—
Kent regularly brings up the fact that one of the prosecutors in his first trial was John David Roy Atchison who hung himself in a prison cell after being arrested in a pedophile sting. My hesitancy in listening to even more interviews has to do with not wanting to, once again, hear about the doll and the jar of Vaseline that Atchison had in his possession when arrested. The implication is that someone as wicked as Atchison must have spent his time prosecuting godly people.
—but it has nothing to do with tax evasion at the citizen level and everything to do with corruption and conspiracy at the national and (forgive me) “global” levels.
I can think of few things more foolish than fighting a war with the United States government in its own judiciary in an effort to deprive the government of your money which it claims it is entitled to.
Across the decades, politicians have over-spent twenty one trillion dollars of your money. The numbers are actually beyond comprehension.
You can easily make a case that any politician involved in the guaranteed fiscal collapse of the United States has committed treason.
Not very long ago, those convicted of treason were executed.
To think that you can deprive the government of your money without an army of lawyers and/or accountants is beyond folly; it’s suicide.
To encourage those who trust you to do the same is a heinous betrayal of that trust.
What’s more, if you have a distrust of government, wouldn’t it follow that a corrupt court would rather frame you or simply change its rules than see you win at their own game?
A single successful “tax protester” brings down the entire system. With “all the marbles” at stake, the side that owns all of the machine guns, armored trucks, helicopters, radios and CCTV cameras wins.
If this is common sense (and it is), there are only two explanations for why someone would willingly attempt a no-win fight like this:
1) The individual in question is not processing this information as a healthy adult. Failure to receive and process accurate information is no excuse. A mature adult knows that if you don’t know how to fly a plane, you don’t volunteer to take your family for a vacation flight with yourself at the helm.
2) The individual in question is an agent of deception being used to lure disenfranchised citizens into committing suicide with them. Variations on this include a dupe who is manipulated to become even more appealing than without help, to a fully-trained operative who is in no real danger of prosecution.
At best, I can only hope that Kent Hovind is a dysfunctional dupe but it is noteworthy that, upon his release from prison, he not only jumped feet-first into the “flat Earth” debate, both on the wrong side and seemingly without proper investigation, he also has warned against understanding prophetic passages of Scripture like Daniel 2 and 7 or Revelation 17 thru 20 as having anything to do with the Catholic Church.
When I first started to question the role and power of the Vatican, the only “expert” to pop up that had reliable information was “Eric Jon Phelps”.
Phelps labels himself a “White Separatist American Freeman, Dispensational, Fifth Monarchy, Seventh-Day Baptist-Calvinist”.
Racial division is one of the most powerful “divide and conquer” weapons that has been used both repeatedly and successfully by the Elite.
Phelps also offers a 3-day course in how to litigate against the United States government. For $2,000 you can learn to turn the “ALL CAPS” of official documents against the Leviathan!
Recently, Phelps was promoted in his local newspaper as the arch-typical “anti-Catholic white separatist”. He dispenses information about the Vatican that is unavailable anywhere else and then he completely discredits himself with Jesuit Biblical eschatology, racism and a “solution” that is patently absurd: start his own country.
It’s great press…for the Catholic Church.
Eric Phelps’s Reformation Bible Puritan Baptist Church is Lebanon County’s only organization plotted on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s map of hate groups, but his picturesque farmhouse near Newmanstown doesn’t look like a headquarters of hate. …
While he insists he isn’t hateful, Phelps is a proud and active advocate of racial separation and anti-Catholicism — and he has big plans for Lebanon County. His goal: a community that secedes from the United States and Pennsylvania, is devoid of Hispanics, African-Americans and Catholics, institutes the death penalty for “doing dope,” and forbids homosexuality and adultery.
“These Hispanics and these blacks that commit crime everywhere — they have reduced Lebanon to nothing but a savage war zone, for the most part. That’s all done by the Pope — he brought them in here,” Phelps said. “If I can’t have (racial separation) in Lebanon, I’ll move to another county where we can do it, but we have to go to a white county that’s historically Protestant.”
Phelps isn’t idle while waiting for the consummation of that dream. He pastors his church, which meets in his home to study the Bible and eat fellowship meals of “white Protestant cuisine,” like meat and potatoes. Attendees include his family and a few others, but his personal invitation is required to join.
He also broadcasts an Internet radio program with followers around the world and hosts “private citizenship” classes in Myerstown that have been attended by as many as 25 paying customers, he said, preaching an anti-Catholic gospel message wherever he goes.
In 2008, Phelps was a speaker at the 8th Annual “Conspiracy Conference” or “Con-Con”. He presented his material dressed as and speaking as, a Jesuit priest.
Again, I am reminded of the preamble reputed to be used for a Jesuit “Fourth Vow” ceremony:
My son, heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler: among Roman Catholics to be a Roman Catholic, and to be a spy even among your own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man. Among the Reformers, to be a reformer; among the Huguenots, to be a Huguenot; among the Calvinists, to be a Calvinist; among other Protestants, generally to be a Protestant, and obtaining their confidence, to seek even to preach from their pulpits, and to denounce with all the vehemence in your nature our Holy Religion and the Pope; and even to descend so low as to become a Jew among Jews, that you might be enabled to gather together all information for the benefit of your Order as a faithful soldier of the Pope.
You have been taught to insidiously plant the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces, states that were at peace, and incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the arts and the sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace. To take sides with the combatants and to act secretly with your brother Jesuit, who might be engaged on the other side, but openly opposed to that with which you might be connected, only that the Church might be the gainer in the end, in the conditions fixed in the treaties for peace and that the end justifies the means.
You have been taught your duty as a spy, to gather all statistics, facts and information in your power from every source; to ingratiate yourself into the confidence of the family circle of Protestants and heretics of every class and character, as well as that of the merchant, the banker, the lawyer, among the schools and universities, in parliaments and legislatures, and the judiciaries and councils of state, and to be all things to all men, for the Pope’s sake, whose servants we are unto death.
Adding to the evidence of this tactic, I have chronicled several moments in history that seem to fit my premise with sinking perfection: the repeated betrayal of oppressed Patriots in Communist tyrannies by the CIA—an organization founded and run by Roman Catholics.
Again and again, the Central Intelligence Agency has enabled the radical Left and Communism to maintain stasis and stability as an important factor in the Hegelian Dialectic of thesis, antithesis, synthesis (more colloquially known as “problem, reaction, solution”). Communists and Communist nations were always behind the West in technology, capability and prosperity. As a result, Roman-controlled bankers, billionaires and intelligence bureaus repeatedly betrayed their Western nations of birth to keep the Communists afloat — sometimes with vicious results.
Bohemian Grove regular Dwight Eisenhower462 repeatedly promised in his 1952 campaign to “liberate” the Eastern European nations that were given to Joseph Stalin (reputed to be a Freemason, guaranteed to have been influenced by Freemasonry463 and was a Roman Catholic with Jewish heritage trained to be a Jesuit priest464) by Scottish Rite and Shriner Freemason Franklin Roosevelt465 along with Freemason Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill (Studholme Lodge 1591466). The game was rigged from the beginning.
Eisenhower was the perfect puppet. He somehow managed to avoid a single leadership billet throughout his entire military career (never a Platoon Leader, Company Commander, Battalion Commander, Brigade or Division Commander) until becoming Supreme Allied Commander, Mediterranean Expeditionary Force467 just prior to becoming Supreme Allied Commander, Europe. Armchair warriors make the best yes-men.
The modus operandi of Jesuit-controlled Freemasonic Western leadership was to set up the real Communist-fighting Patriots and then pull the rug out from underneath them.
Chinese revolutionary Chiang Kai-shek had the power and popular support to guarantee barring Communists entry into China so General “Vinegar Joe” Stillwell, General George C. Marshal and President Franklin Roosevelt made sure he failed and was overthrown (particularly in prohibiting necessary supplies like small arms468) guaranteeing the advent of Mao Zedong; a true monster who murdered so many of his own people that the counts are unsure even today but they start at 60,000,000.469
The Hungarian Revolution of 1956 was another example of treason and betrayal by Rome’s intelligence puppets. Traitors in the West had been pleading with Hungarian Patriots to revolt —
It is a well-known fact that Radio Free Europe and the Voice of America in the 1950s encouraged resistance to — if not an outright revolt against — Communist oppression. In a 1998 interview with CNN, Hungarian Ambassador to the U.S. Geza Jeszensky, who was 15 years old at the time of the revolution, remarked: “I kept listening to Radio Europe like 10 million Hungarians did. Radio Free Europe certainly encouraged the Hungarians to resist the Soviets. But it was not Radio Free Europe which instigated the Hungarian Revolution. Perhaps the Hungarians were misled, not by the radio, but by the propaganda language by the U.S. administration. It spoke about liberation and rollback. Eisenhower kept speaking about liberation, but as a historian put it, it proved to be only a myth. Liberation was not meant seriously.”2 Radio Free Europe also had an impact on [Soviet] Premier [Nikolai Alexandrovich] Bulganin and his Politburo.3 ~ Thomas J. Torda, Ph.D., The American-Hungarian Federation470
Once Hungarian Patriots were convinced to commit themselves, Western traitors stepped back and Soviet brutality stepped in. [italics suspended]
The defeat of the Hungarian revolution was one of the darkest moments of the Cold War. At certain points since its outbreak on October 23 the revolt looked like it was on the verge of an amazing triumph. The entire nation appeared to have taken up arms against the regime. Rebels, often armed with nothing more than kitchen implements and gasoline, were disabling Soviet tanks and achieving other — sometimes small but meaningful — victories throughout the country. On October 31, the tide seemed to turn overwhelmingly in the revolution’s favor when Pravda published a declaration promising greater equality in relations between the USSR and its East European satellites. One sentence was of particular interest. It read: “[T]he Soviet Government is prepared to enter into the appropriate negotiations with the government of the Hungarian People’s Republic and other members of the Warsaw Treaty on the question of the presence of Soviet troops on the territory of Hungary.”
…Washington’s role in the Hungarian revolution soon became mired in controversy. One of the most successful weapons in the East-West battle for the hearts and minds of Eastern Europe was the CIA-administered Radio Free Europe. But in the wake of the uprising, RFE’s broadcasts into Hungary sometimes took on a much more aggressive tone, encouraging the rebels to believe that Western support was imminent, and even giving tactical advice on how to fight the Soviets. The hopes that were raised, then dashed, by these broadcasts cast an even darker shadow over the Hungarian tragedy that leaves many Hungarians embittered to this day.
Once the Soviets made up their minds to eliminate the revolution, it took only a few days to complete the main military phase of the operation. By November 7 — coincidentally, the anniversary of the Bolshevik revolution — Soviet forces were firmly enough in control of the country that Kádár could take the oath of office in the Parliament building (even though the Nagy government had never formally resigned). ~ Malcolm Byrne, NSA Archive471
To make absolutely sure Soviet armor had as much time as was needed to slaughter as many Hungarian Patriots as possible, Eisenhower had his Ambassador to the United Nations, Adlai Ewing Stevenson II, delay any possible U.N. intervention.472
The exact same scenario replayed itself 12 years later in Czechoslovakia. After goading Czech Patriots into action for the 1968 “Prague Spring”, all of Western Intelligence not only went silent, it went dark.
… 27 divisions of Soviet Russians, Poles, Hungarians and Bulgarians — around 300,000 men, armed with 2,000 heavy cannons — marched into the small state of Czechoslovakia to end the experiment of “socialism with a human face.” It was the largest military operation since the World War II…
For months, the eyes of the world had been on Prague, where a group of officials around Communist Party chief Alexander Dubcek had challenged the Soviets with new civil rights for Czechoslovakia, new press freedoms and plans for privatization. Leonid Brezhnev, General Secretary of the USSR’s Communist Party, ordered a number of threatening military maneuvers in and around Czechoslovakia starting in May.
But when the maneuvers grew serious, the American, British and German governments seemed to look the other way, judging by documents from the NATO archive in Brussels as well as intelligence files seen by SPIEGEL. “Not a single evaluation” managed to predict the Soviet invasion of Prague, according to the NATO Military Committee, the alliance’s highest military authority. ~ Der Spiegel473
Western media pushed the laughable idea that — despite Western leaders being given daily (probably hourly) briefs on Czechoslovakia — a WWII-sized Soviet invasion force was simply “lost” to the combined efforts of Allied intelligence operations.
Seven years earlier, in 1961, a similar treason was conducted on the Patriots of Cuba. These Cuban exiles, however, had direct interaction with the CIA in their training, organization, equipping and transportation.
They received everything except what they needed most; a flight of 6 A-26 Invaders as air support. National Security Advisor McGeorge Bundy (Skull and Bones 1940) personally saw to this betrayal as has been noted by Air Force Colonel and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chief of Special Operations for President Kennedy, Leroy Fletcher Prouty.474
Bundy would go on to blame John F. Kennedy for sabotaging the Bay of Pigs leading up to his assassination by the Jesuit-run CIA475 as well as see to it that CIA fingerprints were covered up.476 ~ Secret History 20
What’s my solution? —It certainly isn’t to fight the government at its own game.
There is deep wisdom in the way Jesus dealt with the issue—but keep in mind that it was presented to Him as a trap with no right answer.
Then the Pharisees went and plotted how they might entangle Him in His talk. And they sent to Him their disciples with the Herodians, saying, “Teacher, we know that You are true, and teach the way of God in truth; nor do You care about anyone, for You do not regard the person of men. Tell us, therefore, what do You think? Is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar, or not?”
But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, “Why do you test Me, you hypocrites? Show Me the tax money.”
So they brought Him a denarius.
And He said to them, “Whose image and inscription is this?”
They said to Him, “Caesar’s.”
And He said to them, “Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.”
When they had heard these words, they marveled, and left Him and went their way. ~ Matthew 22:15-22, New King James Version
It’s not a stretch to interpret Jesus’ words to mean, “The game is rigged so stop trying to beat the dealer.”
The Roman Empire of Christ’s time ruled overtly by tyranny and military occupation but the Roman Empire of our time can only rule by hiding itself behind the illusion that we’re still in control.
If that curtain of deception is ripped away, one can easily see those who were fooled into serving the Fateful City, turning upon her.
Then he said to me, “The waters which you saw, where the harlot sits, are peoples, multitudes, nations, and tongues. And the ten horns which you saw on the Beast, these will hate the Harlot, make her desolate and naked, eat her flesh and burn her with fire. For God has put it into their hearts to fulfill His Purpose, to be of one mind, and to give their kingdom to the Beast, until the Words of God are fulfilled. And the woman whom you saw is that great city which reigns over the kings of the Earth.” ~ Revelation 17:15-18
- The Jesuits, Malachi Martin, Simon & Schuster (1987), pp. 17-18
- “Farnese” is one of the names that should be coming up when you research who really rules the world behind the scenes; as well as Medici, Orsini, Aldobrandini, Colonna, Borgia and Breakspeare. Instead, “Rothschild” and “Rockefeller” are delivered to you, courtesy of the search engine whose birthday is the same as the Company of Loyola. However, there have never been any Rothschild Bishops, Cardinals or Popes whereas those other names have been staples in Roman clergy.
- Eaters of Children, Giovanni Augustino Cirucci, CreateSpace (September 11th, 2017), pp. 74-76
- Perhaps there is something, after all, to the rumored “Fourth Vow of Extreme Unction” as it acknowledges “You have been taught to insidiously plant the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces, states that were at peace, and incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the arts and the sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace. To take sides with the combatants and to act secretly with your brother Jesuit, who might be engaged on the other side, but openly opposed to that with which you might be connected, only that the Church might be the gainer in the end, in the conditions fixed in the treaties for peace and that the end justifies the means.”
- Although this might seem to be a Left-wing agenda, it would’ve been a healthy move towards stemming the “Global War on Terror”. Holding “terrorists” offshore provides the United States military and the Central Intelligence Agency with loopholes regarding humane treatment of victims. It’s no coincidence that the facility is in the nation of America’s vehement Communist “enemy”, Cuba.
- Fidel Castro learned tyranny and Communism through three separate Jesuit institutions while growing up; Colegio Lasalle and the Colegio Dolores, in Santiago and the Colegio Belen, a Jesuit preparatory school in Havana.
- The mistreatment of prisoners guarantees that, if they ever leave Guantanamo, if they weren’t “terrorists” coming in, they were going out. Obama’s CIA Director, Jesuit-trained Roman Catholic John Brennan did the same. His indiscriminate drone attacks, in blatant disregard for any nation’s sovereign airspace, guaranteed more, rather than fewer, enemies of the United States.
- The agenda may even be more sinister than that. During the September 11th 2012 attack on the CIA waystation in Benghazi, Libya, a former Guantanamo detainee was there and may even have lead the raid. The CIA has been accused of doling out weapons to jihadis out of Benghazi and it has been rumored that Ambassador Chris Stevens arrived because someone at the State Department had qualms about including surface-to-air missiles in the plan. Not only was Stevens captured, tortured and murdered (insuring that his mission was not accomplished), his escape to a “safe room” was thwarted by terrorists who had inside information. Was that information given to the likes of Sufian bin Qumu during his “visit” to Guantanamo Bay?
- Jesuit admirers say this nickname derives from the humble black priest’s cassock the Superior General always wears while detractors say it stems from the dark, evil, all-encompassing power wielded by Loyola’s successor.
- They may even make the accusation that the Clinton Administration attack on Waco (where 80 men, women and children were burned alive, Inquisition style) and the blowing up of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal building in Oklahoma city “commemorate” Loyola’s Generalship. All three happened on April 19th. For more terrible events on or about April 19th, read my book Illuminati Unmasked!
- A “porn actress” with a man’s middle name? This implies parental misconduct of a perverse nature. Unfortunately, when children grow up to be involved in perversion, the roots usually run through the parents.
- Hey, it sounds good when you’re breathing the rarefied air of a billionaire with his super-model Catholic wife—although, I guess not “super-model” enough.
- That’s just a conjecture to open your mind to the plausibility of the “scandal” being contrived. Unfortunately, it’s just as plausible that a billionaire pervert bought himself nookie with a porn star. I’m sure it was more distasteful than her usual “co-stars” but also a lot quicker.
- Can We Finally Call Hillary A Roman? Johnny Cirucci, JohnnyCirucci.com, 25 July 2016
- As I’m fond of quoting from the Luciferian movie produced by Disney and Marvel, Dr. Strange, “The bill comes due.” For the wages of sin is death, but the Gift of God is Eternal Life in Christ Jesus our Lord. ~ Romans 6:23
- By a “quirk” of serendipity, both men share the initials “K.H.” —or is there something more at work here…?
- Even here the Leftists at “the Nation” spin this important story in the wrong direction: the issue isn’t how much “people’s candidate” frauds like Trump and Hillary “cost the government”. The issue is that the rules are always different for the Elite. The bloated, parasitic government syphons your life blood but those who rule over you are insulated from the bloodletting.
- To his credit, this is unlike the gallant CPA and, perhaps we’ll just write it off to being “unclear”. So-called “Hovindicators” have offered up these facts as conflated with Hovind’s defense and Peter simply parroted them rather than be clear. He may have little reason to but it’s all a smoking gun for me!
- If you’ve heard my show, I frequently mock the far-Left culture of women in authority positions they often show evidence of not being qualified for, inserting their maiden name without a hyphen to confuse those around them.
- Secret History, Johnny Cirucci, CreateSpace (November 24th, 2016), pp. 524-529