by Rob Hase and Johnny Cirucci
One of today’s greatest deceptions is that the common citizen must drastically reduce their already heavily-burdened standard of living to compensate for “global warming”.
As with many other deceptions, it is wrought with fraud from “science”—a community that is supposedly above deception, dedicated to a strict code devoid of any bias.
The best example of this has already been expunged from the internet: “Climate-Gate”.
Columnist James Delingpole wrote a scathing series of articles for Britain’s Daily Telegraph (which have since been taken down but archived here).
The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth … has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka CRU) and released 61 megabytes of confidential files onto the internet. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)
When you read some of those files – including 1079 emails and 72 documents – you realise just why the boffins at CRU might have preferred to keep them confidential. As Andrew Bolt puts it, this scandal could well be “the greatest in modern science”. These alleged emails – supposedly exchanged by some of the most prominent scientists pushing AGW theory – suggest:
Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.
One of the alleged emails has a gentle gloat over the death in 2004 of John L Daly (one of the first climate change sceptics, founder of the Still Waiting For Greenhouse site), commenting:
“In an odd way this is cheering news.”
But perhaps the most damaging revelations – the scientific equivalent of the Telegraph’s MPs’ expenses scandal – are those concerning the way Warmist scientists may variously have manipulated or suppressed evidence in order to support their cause.
The very premise is thin as the “scientific community” has only been keeping very detailed methodical thermometer-based records since the 1880’s.
As a result, blaming the internal combustion engine for radical or dangerous changes in the Earth’s temperatures is the purest sophistry.
In the United States, as of August 1989, there has been little to no temperature change.
Even more disturbing then “scientists” doctoring data to shame common citizens out of their air conditioners and automobiles are government agencies joining the charade.
One wouldn’t expect the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to be involved in the “Global Warming” debate but, apparently, they have a lot of time and money on their hands. Perhaps “space exploration” isn’t as difficult as it seems.
NASA lent it’s rocket muscle to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in also cooking the books—
Right after the year 2000, NASA and NOAA dramatically altered US climate history, making the past much colder and the present much warmer. …NASA cooled 1934 and warmed 1998, to make 1998 the hottest year in US history instead of 1934. This alteration turned a long term cooling trend since 1930 into a warming trend. ~ Steven Goddard
As the “alarming increase” in temperatures became more and more difficult to prove, the threat was re-branded to “Climate Change” which now includes any noticeable alteration in temperature, hot or cold (which we used to call “weather”).
In lock-step, politicians, “scientists”, “journalists” and the greatest experts of all—moviestars—continue to sound the Chicken Little alarm that is the tolling of the bell on your standard of living (but not theirs).
Being an A-list actor is an exhausting business — and Leonardo DiCaprio has a diary so full it would make a lesser playboy weep.
There are parties and premieres around the world and engagements with everyone from UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to the Pope.
As the Mail reported yesterday, only last week he took a day trip from France, where he was at the Cannes Film Festival, to New York, where he received a ‘green’ award.
And back again the following day.
The round trip of 7,942 miles was reportedly completed by private jet — a notoriously environmentally unfriendly way to travel.
It is rather embarrassing for DiCaprio, 41, as he used his Oscar acceptance speech in February to demand action on climate change.
His charitable foundation recently pledged £10 million for various green projects. He sits on the boards of two eco pressure groups and has made his own environmental documentary — The 11th Hour, which sank like a stone at the box office. However, DiCaprio doesn’t always practise the carbon footprint aware lifestyle that he preaches. In the past five months alone, he has travelled at least 90,606 miles by plane in 18 separate trips. Where private jets are used, the carbon dioxide emitted goes up hugely — between seven and 20 times, depending on the plane. ~ Daily Mail
DiCaprio then took his Climate Change road show to the seat of all world power—Rome—and kissed the ring of the Jesuit Vicar of Christ.
As Rome continues to seek the total enslavement of all mankind, the fraud of “Climate Change” is a top priority for Pope Francis.
In May of 2015, Francis released a special encyclical on the dangers of Climate Change. In it he harkens to the Gaia worship of “Mother Earth”—
“LAUDATO SI’, mi’ Signore” – “Praise be to you, my Lord”. In the words of this beautiful canticle, Saint Francis of Assisi reminds us that our common home is like a sister with whom we share our life and a beautiful mother who opens her arms to embrace us. “Praise be to you, my Lord, through our Sister, Mother Earth, who sustains and governs us, and who produces various fruit with coloured flowers and herbs”.
He referenced Pope Paul VI calling your cars and air conditioners “unchecked human activity” and Pope Benedict (who so kindly made way for Francis by stepping down—he got a Jesuit offer he couldn’t refuse) in stating that “the natural environment has been gravely damaged by our irresponsible behavior.” This was all caused by too much freedom which the Vatican is very eager to rectify.
These statements of the Popes echo the reflections of numerous scientists, philosophers, theologians and civic groups…
—all of which are run by insiders who use altered date to bolster fraud.
Bergoglio then quoted the pantheism of Francis of Assisi whom he claims is his Papal namesake (not to be confused with Francis Xavier, one of the founders of the Jesuit Order) on how important it is to stop wanting things like the ability to drive a car or keep temperatures in our tiny Agenda 21 domicile livable—
If we approach nature and the environment without this openness to awe and wonder, if we no longer speak the language of fraternity and beauty in our relationship with the world, our attitude will be that of masters, consumers, ruthless exploiters, unable to set limits on their immediate needs.
Perhaps best of all was the Jesuit Pope’s connecting of our “climate emergency” with the need to “redistribute goods”—
Climate change is a global problem with grave implications: environmental, social, economic, political and for the distribution of goods.
Although this sounds extremely appealing when one looks at the wealth of Google, Microsoft, Blackwater/Xe/Academi, Haliburton, HSBC, Bank of America and many, many other Leviathans, this is not the Vicar’s intent as most of those venues are already owned or run by his trusted knights like Blackwater’s Erik Prince.
No, it’s we in the Middle and Lower classes who are the target of the Pontifex Maximus.
Leonardo DiCaprio’s visit must’ve worked. Exactly one month later the actor received his very first Oscar.
“…all the nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, the kings of the Earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the Earth have become rich through the abundance of her luxury.” ~ Revelation 18:3
Although DiCaprio’s environmental cheek is bold, it’s nothing compared to the High Priest of high temperatures—Al Gore (also known as ManBearPig).
The Gores used about 191,000 kilowatt hours in 2006, according to bills reviewed by The Associated Press spanning the period from Feb. 3, 2006, to Jan. 5. That is far more than the typical Nashville household, which uses about 15,600 kilowatt-hours per year. ~ CBS News
It’s hard to figure which came first, Pope Francis or Global Warming, but the ManBearPig is a big fan. In fact, Al Gore is so impressed with Bergoglio’s dedication to deception that he’s ready to become Roman Catholic.
But there’s no such thing as “too much cheek” as was shown by Roman Catholic John Forbes Kerry (Yale Skull & Bones ’66) when he contrasted one Machine boogeyman to another, insisting in July of 2016 that your air conditioner was as frightening a threat as an ISIS terrorist.
But Pope Francis is far from done when it comes to joining hands with “science” to attack Christians and the Bible. He recently made the bold proclamation that—
The theories of evolution and the Big Bang are real and God is not “a magician with a magic wand”…
This should be no surprise to those who know that the brilliance of the “Big Bang theory” (first there was nothing and then it exploded) came from a Jesuit-trained Roman Catholic priest, or that “evolution” was bolstered by the hoaxes of Jesuit Pierre Teilhard de Chardin.
When the basis for “science” is science fiction (stop and think about just how many movies there are depicting “aliens” and/or “space travel”) it’s easy to plant what Lenin called a “useful idiot” in the top post at NASA—someone who’s all-in for “aliens” and even mashes them into his distorted view of Christianity.
“You know, the universe is a big place. I’m a practicing Christian, so in my faith, I learn about omnipotent, omnipresent God, which means he’s everywhere. He’s all-knowing. He does everything. And I just cannot bring my little pea brain to believe that a God like that would pick one planet of one of millions of suns and say that’s the only place in the vast universe that I’m going to put any kind of life. And so the problem is I haven’t been far enough away.” ~ A Conversation With Charles Bolden, Council on Foreign Relations.org
But perhaps NASA’s first black Administrator isn’t such a fool after all. He at least knows that his masters cherish the strife caused by the manipulated “clash of cultures” and has needlessly added to it with the proclamation that “Muslim outreach” is a top NASA priority. While Christians, Muslims and Jews fight contrived battles amongst themselves there’s little attention paid to the Papa behind the curtain.
As we become more skeptical of this farce, “the Church” may feel the need to exercise a little force powered by the same Jesuit Communism that has already overturned many nations.
Before the days of Avtomat Kalashnikov rifles and Schmeisser submachine guns, large groups of prisoners were hard to handle with just a few Jesuit priests. The Company needed to use brains over brawn. Later, they would be able to appropriate the “brawn” of whole nations.
The appeal of wealth redistribution is that recipients can live a somewhat easier life, though it is a utopia that has always disappointed.
In South America, “social justice” would become the cry for taking from “the rich” and giving to “the poor”. What usually happens, however, is that the super-rich exploit the poor to bleed the few real producers in the Middle Class.
If this seems like the perfect weapon to be used in the Counter-Reformation, it’s not by coincidence.
The phrase “social justice” was coined by the Jesuit theologian and mentor to Pope Leo XIII, Father Luigi Taparelli D’Azeglio.
Pope Leo XIII’s social encyclical Rerum Novarum, published in 1891, drew on insights from his former teacher, Taparelli. ~ Real Social Justice, Ryan Messmore935
The utility of Communism was immediately seized upon by the Vatican.
Taparelli’s influence on Leo XIII is evident in the encyclical Aeterni Patris (1879) on restoring Thomistic philosophy and in the Magna Charta of Catholic social thought, Rerum Novarum (1891),4 the last draft of which was written by Taparelli protégé Matteo Liberatore. The Jesuit Nell-Breuning employed Taparelli’s principles of sociality (or solidarism, as rephrased by Heinrich Pesch, SJ) and subsidiarity in the drafting of Pius XI’s Quadragesimo Anno. Indeed, Pius XI believed that Taparelli’s writings could “never be studied enough” (Divini illius magistri, 1939) and ranked him in importance for Catholic thought right after Saint Thomas. ~ Thomas C. Behr, University of Houston936
Professor Behr betrays his ideological blindness by comparing Rerum Novarum to the Magna Carta as they couldn’t be more diametrically opposed in their intent.
In the interests of full disclosure, Vincenzo Gioacchino Raffaele Luigi Pecci (Pope Leo XIII) published Rerum Novarum on May 15th, 1891 when the industrialist Robber Barons were strip-mining humanity in their unbridled lust. Nor did Leo XIII endorse the full confiscation of property nor the complete redistribution of wealth and goods.
However, he most certainly did channel his Communist Jesuit mentor, Taparelli with terms like “proletarian” and phrases like “…the spirit of revolutionary change…”. ~ Illuminati Unmasked, Johnny Cirucci, CreateSpace (2015), pp. 315-316
Now Francis can call upon his “Global Catholic Climate Movement” to seek “climate justice”.
Hopefully enough of the sheep wake up before they’re voted into the pot.
UPDATE 15 January 2017, 06:41 AM, EST
Marc Morano of Climate Depot found something of interest in the e-mails of Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff, Barack Obama’s lawyer and Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign Chairman, John Podesta. No, not the veiled language of child rapists, murderers and sex slave traffickers—
Did you leave a handkerchief From:email@example.com To: firstname.lastname@example.org CC: email@example.com Date: 2014-09-02 17:54 Subject: Did you leave a handkerchief Hi John, The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems pizza-related. Is it yorus? They can send it if you want. I know you're busy, so feel free not to respond if it's not yours or you don't want it. Susaner From: Kathryn Tate [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 10:04 AM To: Sandler, Susan Cc: Sandler, Herbert Subject: You left something at the Field house Susan & Herb I just came from checking the Field house and I have a square cloth handkerchief (white w/ black) that was left on the kitchen island. Happy to send it via the mail if you let me know where I should send it. I also meant to inquire yesterday about the pillows you purchased. I can send them as well, if you let me know where they are in the house. Safe travels to all Kate
Apparently, Podesta (who trained to become a Jesuit priest) has “Jesuit friends” who are pleased with the Jesuit Pope’s emphasis on using “climate change” to enslave mankind.
Despite leaked emails showing members of Hillary Clinton’s team expressing contempt for Catholics, Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta is apparently fond of Pope Francis because his “Jesuit friends” think the pope is “the real deal” on climate issues.
In an email exchange released by WikiLeaks, Podesta spoke to New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio after de Blasio’s trip to Rome. Podesta took the opportunity to applaud Pope Francis because Podesta claims “all my Jesuit friends say the Pope is the real deal”:
I’m kind of tight. Could you do 2:00 or 2:30? If not, I’ll get on your calendar for when I get back. John PS Great work on climate. Impressive event. As all my Jesuit friends say the Pope is the real deal. Are you going to go to LA for the US China cities climate meeting in the fall?
While de Blasio was Rome, he participated in a conference, sponsored by the Vatican, on how to fight climate change. Pope Francis has actively spoken out against climate change, even reportedly calling it a “sin.”
Although Podesta expressed he is fond of the pope because of the pope’s actions on climate change, other leaked emails show the Clinton chairman involved in email chains that call Catholicism “backwards” and urge a “Catholic spring” to move the religion away from a “Middle Ages dictatorship.” ~ Climate Depot