In reality, he was a traitor to all he stood for; both to Protestant Christianity and to Ireland.

Paisley worked for British MI5 and surrounded himself with pedophiles.

The Catholic Church has dominated Ireland for centuries and it steers any agenda that could bring the Irish freedom from either Rome or London.

As Norther Ireland has continued to be a flashpoint for Irish independence from England, British Intelligence (and, ultimately, Rome) has manipulated it into becoming a separate region and placing her agents like Ian Paisley as both, at varying times, “First Minister” and “Deputy Minister”.

Today the destruction of Irish independence is complete with “Northern Ireland” being managed by two corrupt Leftist females: Arlene Foster (who, for show, attends the Protestant-in-name-only “Church of Ireland”) and strongly-Catholic Michelle O’Neill.  As with all Catholics in key positions, O’Neill’s Leftist dogma is virulently pro-abortion.  With access to abortion “clinics” being mildly curtailed as a result of the world-wide “coronavirus” false flag, O’Neill has encouraged the women of Ireland to kill their babies themselves.

Ian Paisley was never a threat to Rome; he never alerted his parishioners and constituents to the grievous crimes the Vatican perpetrates through to this day.

The below article has been struck from the internet but it proves that Paisley was, at best, a protector of pedophiles and, at worst, one himself.

Whenever Paisley is promoted as a Protestant, it is with the single event of his heckling then-Pope John Paul II (who has since been “beatified”), Karol Józef Wojtyła.

The event provided nothing of substance except to humiliate Protestants and garner sympathy for a Nazi concentration camp cyanide salesman.¹

The brutal terrorist organization Sinn Féin was the Vatican’s key organization to controlling and destroying Irish independence.  It was given legitimacy as a “political party” with devout Catholics like Martin McGuinness at it’s head.  McGuinness and his family were so devout they honored “Hitler’s Pope”² Eugenio Pacelli by giving him “Pacelli” as a second middle name.

The “miraculous” or “strange” friendship between McGuinness and Paisley was further mythologized with a 2016 movie.

There is nothing “strange” nor “miraculous” about Paisley selling out Ireland to Rome and London.

Village Magazine

Kincora Survivor

The stolen life of Richard Kerr, including his account of how Ian Paisley strove to cover up child abuse.

by Joseph de Búrca
13 November, 2017, 1:50 pm 2 Comments

The Threat to “Destroy” a Whistle-Blower

The Reverend Ian Paisley, who served as First Minister of Northern Ireland (NI ), 2007-2008, was aware of the sexual abuse of boys which took place at Kincora Boys Home during the 1970s.  Paisley learnt about it from Valerie Shaw, who served as secretary of the “missionary council” of his church, on 28 October 1973.

Shaw denounced Paisley at a press conference in 1982: “I approached Dr. Paisley on at least seven occasions”, she said.  “I asked him time and time again what he intended to do about this.  My concern all along was very much for the fact that there were young boys under the threat of this man’s corruption”.

The man she was referring to was William McGrath, the “Housefather” at Kincora, and a long-time associate of Paisley before they fell out in the 1970s.  Some of the RUC officers who investigated Kincora came to refer to him as “The Beast”.  What has now emerged is that Paisley also participated in the cover-up of the scandal in the early 1980s.  Many of the residents at Kincora were raped by McGrath, Joseph Mains and Raymond Semple, all of whom were convicted in December 1981.  Others got away.  These included Paisley’s former bodyguard, John Dunlop McKeague, a sadistic Loyalist paramilitary serial killer.  Another was Pastor Willie Mullan, an Evangelical friend of Paisley.  Paisley conceded that Valerie Shaw had informed him about McGrath’s reign of terror, although not that he worked at Kincora.  “Yes, she did say – she made accusations against Mr. McGrath – and she based these on the evidence of Mr. ‘X’.  When I met Mr. ‘X’, he would not meet Mr. McGrath and I of course did the only thing I could do: I put (sic) Mr. McGrath from taking part in an Orange [Order] service in my church.  He wasn’t a member of my church but I took that discipline immediately; and I regret Miss Shaw didn’t go to police”.

Ian Paisley

Shaw, however, had gone to the RUC but had recieved no help.

Shaw also informed two senior figures at the Church who warned her Paisley would “destroy” her if she persisted in her campaign.

Shaw’s efforts to engage Paisley lasted a year and a half, after which she left his church in disgust.

Belying the distance Paisley alleged he placed between himself and McGrath, Paisley went on to officiate at the wedding of McGrath’s daughter, Elizabeth, on 22 January 1976.  It should be stressed that Ian Paisley was not a child abuser.  However, his actions were motivated by other factors, none of which can have been benign.

Mr. “X”

Mr. “X” was Roy Garland, who had served in Tara, a paramilitary organisation led by McGrath.  As part of his mission to expose McGrath, Roy Garland also informed Brian Gemmell, a conscientious British military intelligence officer about Kincora.  The information was passed along the line to Ian Cameron of MI5 who ordered Gemmell to abandon his inquiries.  Cameron gave this order because MI5 was blackmailing some of the Kincora abusers and exploiting the heinous behaviour there in other ways.³

Richard Kerr, the Witness Who Joins All the Dots

Richard Kerr is the key figure in appreciating the full extent of the scandal.  His horrific experience joins the dots between all of the key figures and developments involved in it.

Kerr was born on 12 May 1961, and lived with his family off the Botanic Gardens in Belfast until he was placed into care at Williamstown House (WH) in North Belfast on 16 December, 1966.  WH catered for Catholic and Protestant children.  Kerr was abused by Eric Witchell from the age of 8, starting one night after Witchell visited his bed.

“I was on my side, I had a teddy bear.  I was biting into that while he had his hand down my backside and fumbled around”.  Full rape commenced later.  Years later, Witchell was jailed for abusing other boys at WH.

Richard Kerr

Kerr has informed Village that Witchell became the head of WH “for the Catholics’ side in early 1975 while I was there.  Before that he was visiting it and from my memory he was working part-time.  He was living in Liverpool at a church, but had his own place in Belfast that he would go to when he would visit Williamson House”.  Witchell, he adds, arranged “for me to meet him in the Liverpool at a church; then he abused me there.  I was still in care, living in Belfast.

But please realise there were others who came to WH who abused us”.  One of the “others” who abused the children at WH was Dr. Morris Fraser.  Both Witchell and Fraser are alive and there is no sign yet that either of them will ever be prosecuted by the PSNI for the abuse of Kerr.

“My school records from Mount Vernon”, Kerr has also told Village, “were destroyed because it contained information indicating that I was being abused at Williamson House.  The staff at the school suspected I was being abused but, when asked, I would not answer their questions because I was afraid of my abusers”.

Her Majesty’s Child Brothel at Kincora

In 1975 Kerr was sent to Kincora.  He was only 14 and became its youngest resident.  He was forced to have sex with Joseph Mains, the Warden of Kincora, in the shed at the back of the home which “had a chair and a mattress in it, that’s about all”, and in a hotel and a guesthouse.  Witchell continued to abuse him.  “Eric was a good friend of Mains” and they were often on the phone together.  “Eric would call Mains and I would speak to him on the phone when I was in Kincora and [he would ask] me to come over to Williamson House; then he would abuse me.  His room was on the top floor”.  Kerr had no choice but to submit to Witchell if he wanted to see his sister at WH.

At the age of 15 Kerr was taken to the Whip and Saddle bar at the Europa Hotel by Mains and others who supplied him to men staying at the hotel.

The deeply flawed conclusion of the 2017 Hart Report was that abuse at Kincora was an isolated aberration limited to a handful of miscreants on its staff.  Significantly, while Kerr was at Kincora, he was spirited out of Ireland to Manchester, London and elsewhere.  He has supplied Village with a photograph taken of him aged 16 in London.  This photograph alone sinks the central finding of the Hart Report.

Witchell introduced him to two men who exploited him in Manchester.  Abuse took place at the Rembrandt Hotel and elsewhere.  The two men “had other boys living with them.  They took photographs of us tied up with our clothes off to put in boys’ magazines.  They said they were sending some to Amsterdam”.

Richard Kerr in England aged 16.

The Whip and Saddle Bar at the Europa Hotel

In June 1977, when he was 16, Joe Mains secured a job for Kerr at the Europa Hotel.  He was rostered to work in the “late evening”.  This was an excuse to make him available to abusers, many of whom congregated at the Whip and Saddle bar.

Harper Brown, the manager of the Europa Hotel, 1971-84, was a “very, very good friend” of Mains’ and Kerr has no doubt he “knew what was going on there”.  Kerr’s employment lasted until October 1977.

“I met Englishmen and Americans at the Europa Hotel where I was abused.  Some of these men arranged for me to meet them in England.  I was also taken to Larne many times where I was abused at the Harbour Inn Hotel.  I was also transported to Scotland from Larne and taken to the North of England and London.  This happened quite a bit.  I was taken there many times by men who were in the Orange Order.  They would come up to Kincora.  Two of these men did not abuse me but would take me to meet men that did”.  Kerr knew they were Orangemen from discussions with Mains.  “When I was in Mains’ room in the late evening and he was drinking he would tell me about his membership in the B Specials, and also about the men he knew in the Orange Order.  I met one of these men before Kincora and I met the other two when they came to Kincora.  They would take me out to places and they would become intoxicated and would have conversations about the Orange Order.  I remember one of them said that he was a member of the club behind the West Circular Road.  Mains would write down a false address of where I had been to cover-up where they would take me”.

Joe Mains and Sir Maurice Oldfield of MI6

In 1980 MI5 (which is attached to the British Home Office) carried out an inquiry into the conduct of the former Chief of MI6, Sir Maurice Oldfield, 1973-78.  MI6 is attached to the Foreign Office.  This happened because Oldfield had been caught lying about his homosexuality.  Oldfield was also an abuser of ‘rent boys’, underage male prostitutes.  MI6 reviewed their files relating to the matter in 2011.  According to the Hart Report, “Officer G” of MI6 “examined four ring binders with material relating to Sir Maurice Oldfield, including the 1980 MI5 investigation”.

Joe Mains, warden of Kincora

Officer G proceeded to describe a “relationship” Oldfield had “had with Kincora boys’ home (KBH) in Belfast”.  Oldfield was linked to Kincora “through his friendship with the KBH Head”.  Hart concluded that this was not evidence of MI6 involvement in Kincora because Officer G had made a mistake and was apparently merely referring to allegations about a relationship.  However, neither MI6 nor the Hart Report quoted a single contemporaneous report alleging a friendship between Oldfield and Joseph Mains, the only man who fits the description of “KBH Head”.  Indeed, Village can find no trace anywhere of such a report, nor one about a friendship with any of the other staff members at Kincora.

Hart Failure

There is an error at paragraph 607 of Chapter 29 of the Hart Report which was published in 2017 where it is stated that: “As we have explained, Richard Kerr has alleged that he was sexually abused by Sir Maurice Oldfield”.  This is not accurate.  Indeed, at paragraph 159 of Chapter 26 of the Report, the following appears: “Kerr did not know at the time who Oldfield was, he says, and does not suggest that he abused Kincora boys”.

Mains Makes Trouble With the RUC Vanish

Kerr came to the attention of the police in October 1977 over an incident involving a car.  He had been in the company of some older men who had left it behind, possibly after it had suffered damage to a bumper.  After they departed, Kerr was picked up by the RUC.  An investigation into the events of that night threatened to unravel the vice ring.  “I was taken to the police station in October 1977.  They allowed me to privately speak to Joseph Mains but the police officers were not in the same room.  Joseph Mains told me as long as I kept my mouth quiet about what was going on, he would get me out of the situation I was in.  There was a statement that was meant to be signed; I could not read so if I signed the statement, I did not know what I was signing.  Joseph Mains ended up signing the statement as well”.

The statement Kerr signed made him appear a full year older than he was.  Mains knew Kerr’s date of birth perfectly well, as of course did Kerr.  Kerr believes “they were trying to cover-up by saying I was the driver of the car but it was actually the older men.  I was 16, and back then you could only drive when you were 17”.

The Chairman of Belfast Corporation Welfare Committee

Two of Richard Kerr’s social workers became aware of what was going on and tried to get the authorities in Belfast to intervene but they met a blank wall because of abusers like Joshua Cardwell.  He was Chairman of Belfast Corporation’s Welfare Committee which was responsible for Kincora.  He was also a friend of Mains.  Another key figure was a legal official who helped suppress the scandal, also an associate of Mains.

Kerr knew Cardwell as “Joseph” Cardwell and recalls that he wore a “funny” hat and drove a blue minivan.  He does not believe that he “owned the minivan but one was provided for him and others as transportation for outings out of Kincora”.  Cardwell took his victims to the Adelphi Hotel in Portrush.  Kerr recalls the “evening bar” was “down the stairs back then”.  He was plied with alcohol by abusers, there.

Cardwell committed suicide in March 1982 after being interviewed by the RUC about Kincora.

John Dunlop McKeague

The Sadistic Paramilitary Serial Killer

The Park Avenue Hotel was another venue of abuse for Kerr.  Mains “went there a lot”, according to Kerr.  RUC men frequented it too, he recalls.  Significantly, Kerr has revealed that “John McKeague and other men” were patrons too.  McKeague’s group would occupy the “red seats in the bar area”.  Kerr would be sent to a room to await abuse.

McKeague was born in 1930, and originally hailed from Bushmills, County Antrim.  He came to Belfast after his parents, Isabella and Thomas, moved him and his sisters there from Portrush where they had run a guesthouse.

Over time McKeague became a sadistic sectarian serial killer, with a penchant for torturing victims before finishing them off.  He was also obsessed by the Occult, and particularly by one of its practitioners, Evan Frederick Moran, the second Viscount Tredegar.  Tredegar, who often visited Ireland, was even reputed to have been an enthusiastic and willing plaything for paedophiles at Buckingham Palace while serving there as a pageboy.  Tredegar visited Lord Louis Mountbatten in Classiebawn, County Donegal, during some of his yachting holidays.  Gemma O’Doherty speculates as to Mountbatten’s implication in paedophile rings, elsewhere in this edition.  The renowned long-serving-BBC journalist and author Martin Dillon has written that McKeague was “lean, sleazy and snake-like, his eyes slightly sunken.  When he spoke, the menace was wrapped in slyness but there was no missing his capacity for sadism”.

McKeague would become close to another UVF man, Lenny Murphy, who later achieved infamy as the leader of the Shankill Butchers.

MI5 Makes a Partial Admission About the Recruitment of John McKeague

Brian Gemmell, the conscientious British military intelligence officer mentioned earlier, attended a meeting with MI5 officers in a hotel at Buckingham Palace Road, London, in the mid- 1970s where he was told MI5 possessed a compromising film of McKeague engaged in homosexual acts.  The meeting discussed the possibility of recruiting McKeague through blackmail.  If the “compromising film” MI5 had was not shot at the Park Avenue Hotel, it means MI5 must have had McKeague under surveillance elsewhere.

MI5 acknowledged to the Hart Inquiry that a meeting had indeed taken place and that Gemmell had been at it.  They even provided a date: 10 May 1976.  MI5 also conceded that a suggestion had been made to blackmail McKeague.  Another meeting took place on 7 September 1976.  MI5 sought to place the focus firmly on London, not Belfast.  It told Hart that “one MI5 officer did put forward an operational proposal (which was never endorsed) which involved using McKeague’s homosexual activities in London in an attempt to recruit him”.

MI5 has denied possession of any actual blackmail material concerning McKeague.  This is implausible.

A Honeytrap that Ended in Fiasco

On another occasion an incident took place which looks suspiciously like it was a paedophile ‘honeytrap’ that went wrong.  Kerr was taken to a hotel.  “There was a fight [between two men].  We were outside [the hotel]…Two cars came up to the front of the hotel.  I was directed away from the two guys.  Those two guys were put into a car.  I was put into another car with three men.  I was sitting right in the middle.  One was to my right.  One was to my left and then you have the driver and then they took off.  They brought me back to Kincora by the side door.  Mr. Mains knew about this because he had [received] a telephone call.  He knew that I was coming back.  I knocked on the door and Mr. Mains opened up.  He told me to go to my room and he said not to say anything”.

Sir Maurice Oldfield (centre, with glasses), in 1974.

Two of Kerr’s close friends and fellow victims were to die young.  One of them, Stephen Waring, couldn’t take any more of the brutality and horror, and committed suicide in 1977 by jumping into the sea during a trip on the Liverpool-Belfast Monarch Ferry.  There were other victims who died.

The Anglo-Irish Vice Ring

Kerr’s social workers – who are still alive – furnished details about the abuse to Peter McKenna of the Irish Independent.  It took a while but he eventually exposed the scandal in January 1980.  By this time, Kerr had been trafficked to England by Eric Witchell.

The notorious paedophile, Sir Cyril Smith MP, was one of those who abused Kerr in Manchester.  In London he was abused at the Philbeach Hotel in Earl’s Court; raped at Dolphin Square; and brought to Elm Guest House (EGH) which was frequented by Cyril Smith, Jimmy Savile and others.  He was abused by a barrister at EGH.  Hilton Tims, Editor of the Surrey Comet, 1980- 1988, has revealed that in the 1980s one of his journalists made inquiries about EGH only to receive a national security D-Notice injunction which shut his probe down.  What possible “national security” threat was there in a story exposing a child brothel?  Why did a judge issue the D-Notice?

Sir Peter Hayman, the Deputy Chief^{4, 5, 6} of MI6

From Johnny: For more on Hayman and the trafficking of children for “Intelligence” read my book Eaters of Children.

Sir Peter Hayman, KCMG, CVO, MBE was another of Richard Kerr’s abusers.  Hayman rose to become High Commissioner to Canada and also worked for MI6.⁷  According to a slew of reports, he served as MI6’s Deputy Chief for a spell.  He was also a member of the notorious Paedophile Information Network.

Sir Peter Hayman

In October 1978 London detectives discovered his collection of child pornography: 45 of his diaries describing six years of “sexual fantasies” about children; and that he was a member of a group which swapped photographs.  One of them shared fantasies about torturing children to death, with yet another paedophile.  The police prosecuted two of them while Hayman was given a warning not to send obscene material through the post.  In March 1981, Geoffrey Dickens, a Tory MP, named him in the House of Commons.  Margaret Thatcher’s Attorney-General, Sir Michael Havers, argued that Hayman’s collection was not of an extreme nature and hence he had not warranted prosecution.

Despite all the chances he was given, Hayman failed to curb his impulses and was arrested in a public lavatory in London in 1984 with a boy and convicted of gross indecency – but let off with a caution.

The RUC Perverts the Course of Justice

Kerr has told Village how, “detectives from the RUC also interviewed me in January of 1980 in Preston, Lancaster.  I was taken out of the place and threatened when they got me to the police station.  Because of their threats I was scared to tell them anything.  I kept my mouth shut knowing that the abusers I met were still in contact with me, and the police put me in a cell and made me feel that I was responsible for what happened as if I was the guilty person”.

Kerr later moved to London where other detectives – this time not from the RUC – visited his home, “and did the same thing.  They intimidated me and wanted me to not speak any more about what happened.  So you can understand why I was scared because they always tried to make me feel I was responsible.  I knew too much about what was going on, and the people that were involved – who I became afraid of”.

A Bell Hop Who Was Able to Live Beyond His Means

In London, Kerr secured work as a “bell hop” at the Cumberland Hotel near Marble Arch in London.  As the pressure built up around the Kincora scandal in the early 1980s, the people behind the cover-up adopted a policy of carrot and stick to contain Kerr.  By way of carrot, his financial security was assured: he was able to afford to live in Flat Number 1, 44 Baker St, around the corner from Oxford Street.  Kerr has furnished Village with documentation which confirms he lived there.  There was no conceivable way a teenage “bell hop” from Belfast could have afforded such a desirable residence without considerable financial assistance.

By way of stick, the intimidation continued: a group of men came to his flat at 44 Baker St.  Some were in police uniform, others in civilian clothing.  They knocked him to the ground, told him that they were from the British “Secret Service” and that he was to keep quiet about what he knew or they would arrest him as a ‘terrorist’.

The hard-cop-soft-cop routine was also deployed: the next day he received an apology for the rough treatment he had experienced.

Paisley Throws His Weight About at The Cumberland Hotel

One evening Kerr was at the bell hops’ station at the Cumberland Hotel when a colleague from the hotel’s café strolled across and told him someone was looking for him.  The visitor turned out to be Ian Paisley.  Kerr’s recollection of what would unfold is vivid and sharp: Paisley was seated on his own at a table “near a glass area” and was “wearing a suit with a hat that was placed on the table”.  He also “carried a newspaper” which he “placed on the table”.  A pair of men sat adjacent to him “in professional dress”.  While Kerr recognised Paisley, he did not know the others.  They would not address him at any stage during the encounter that ensued.  “They created space between themselves and others”.  As Kerr recalls it: “Paisley spoke with them; they were in earshot of our conversation.  I was unable to discern if they spoke in an English accent.  I do know that they were accompanying Paisley because they joined him after our conversation was complete”.

Paisley asked Kerr “to be seated after I was speaking with him standing up”.  At the start “of the conversation I did not feel intimidated, yet as the meeting continued, I did begin to feel uneasy”, Kerr recalls.

Paisley knew he had been at Kincora and instructed him that if he was questioned by the police, he was not to “mention anything about Englishmen at Kincora”.  Kerr was dumbfounded and responded “What?” Paisley repeated the instruction and added that he was “not [to] speak of other events that occurred in Belfast”.

“I nodded my head.  No verbal communication was made”.  The encounter only lasted about ten minutes.  Paisley left with the two men.  “I then went back to the bell station slightly disturbed and I did not respond to another bell boy’s question of the encounter”.

Kerr’s impression of the other men was that they had behaved “normally [and] they didn’t appear to be threatening”.  Initially he had not been frightened by them as “they did not speak to me.  It wasn’t until later that evening after the meeting [had ended] did I begin to feel concerned as to their intentions”.

• How did Paisley know that Kerr had been in Kincora?
• Who told him Kerr was working at the Cumberland?
• Who told Paisley “Englishmen” had abused children at Kincora?
• Why was Paisley prepared to help protect English paedophiles?
• Who were the men who accompanied him?

The following week a white envelope arrived at the hotel.  It contained black-and-white photographs of Kerr, naked.  The manager of the hotel, a Mr. Gardner, showed them to Kerr who was deeply embarrassed and made an excuse that they must have been posted by a jealous ex-girlfriend.  Gardiner let Kerr know that he was not pleased but didn’t dismiss him.

Who Were the Englishmen Paisley Strove To Protect?

Clint Massey, another Kincora survivor, revealed in 2015 that “there were loads of people over from London.  I have always assumed they were senior figures from Whitehall.  I certainly heard English accents”.

The whistle-blower Robin Bryans (See Village October 2017) knew a lot of them, including Anthony Blunt of MI5.  Another was a “decidedly gay-looking” man called Peter England.  Bryans told this author in 1990 that while he knew England “very well” he “didn’t like him much”.

England was a former boyfriend of Sir Samuel Knox Cunningham QC MP and had also had a relationship with the Irish publisher, Charles Monteith, both members of the Anglo-Irish Vice Ring.

Peter England lived in London, had served in the Royal Navy during WWII and later went to work at the Ministry of Defence (MoD).  He transferred to the Northern Ireland Office in the 1970s.  Declassified files furnished to the Hart Inquiry demonstrated that some of his work involved oversight of the black propaganda activities of

the Army and intelligence services.  According to Bryans, “the main thing to do with covering up for Kincora” related to England.  This analysis makes perfect sense because England: 1) had died in 1978 and therefore could be named without fear of a libel action; 2) had a criminal record: he had been arrested and convicted for obscene behaviour in a London toilet; 3) his exposure would have blown the Kincora cover-up wide apart, for it would have demonstrated knowledge of the scandal at the highest level of the NI O and made a nonsense of the claim that Kincora was an isolated aberration.

The late Merlyn Rees, a former Secretary of State for NI , worked with England at the NI O.  In his NI memoirs, Rees described how England was: “a man of wide experience at the [MoD], whose work over the next three years [in Belfast] was to prove invaluable, though the physical stress of the job may have contributed to his tragically early death in 1978”.  Moreover, he said that England “was a hard task master but at the same time he always showed concern for those working in the office”.

Clearly, England showed more “concern” for his staff than for the children he abused.  By the time of his death, Bryans recalled that England had let himself go and had become “scruffy”.

There is more: on 23 January 2015 the late journalist Liam Clarke reported in the Belfast Telegraph that two RUC officers had told him that a Tory MP had “visited Kincora during the 1970s”.  Both officers, he reported, were “willing to help any inquiry into Kincora either here or in England.  They revealed that the MP died before they could arrange to interview him”.  There are only two MPs who match this description.  One of the officers revealed that the MP had visited NI “quite regularly…We were told by criminal records in Scotland Yard, London, that he had a conviction many years ago for indecent behaviour or something in a gen ts’ loo against another boy, but his death meant we never got a chance to question him”.

The teenaged Richard Kerr in front of Westminster.

MPs, VIPs and Celebrity Child Molesters in London

While Kerr was living in London, he continued to suffer abuse.  At the time he was a teenager, but it mattered little to the abusers that he had been groomed, brutalised and desensitised since the age of eight.

Kerr has supplied Village with the name and address of a high-profile celebrity abuser who is alive and still enjoys public acclaim and affection.  He has appeared in many successful British TV programmes, including one watched by millions of viewers in recent years.

There were other VIP abusers of Kerr including a Tory MP who, although no longer serving in Parliament, maintains a high profile.  He has endeavoured to cast doubt about the existence of a VIP vice ring during the last few years.  Village believes it is highly likely he is one of the main protagonists behind the ongoing cover-up and is acting in tandem with a dubious journalist who has done a lot to introduce misleading information to the public, all of which tends to undermine the credibility of genuine victims, like Kerr.

Returning to the 1980s: Kerr had become a serious threat to the cover-up of the truth about Kincora.  One solution would have been to have had him murdered.  Howard Smith, the then Director General of MI5, was – according to UK declassified files – an advocate of political assassination (See Village July 2017).  John McKeague would have been an ideal choice as a hit man.  However, by then Kerr’s murder would have caused too many waves because he had crossed paths with too many VIPs who hardly wanted the police knocking on their doors.  In the end the conspirators opted to spirit him out of the country.

Who Were Paisley’s Ultimate Puppet Masters?

McGrath had multiple connections to Paisley – as had McKeague.  McKeague had converted to the Paisley brand of Free Presbyterianism in 1966, and acted as Paisley’s bodyguard for a time.  He was pivotal to the UVF bombing campaign that helped topple NI PM Terence O’Neill in 1968.  He was also involved in the Ulster Protestant Volunteers, an organisation Paisley helped to set up in the 1960s.

During the 1960s while they were close to Paisley, McGrath and McKeague were involved 1) in the UVF; 2) the anti-O’Neill bomb campaign; 3) arms procurement; and 4) no end of hate crimes, not to mention child abuse.

The Cumberland Hotel incident seems to demonstrate that Paisley had been got at, most likely by incriminating information possessed by McGrath and McKeague.  Since they were British assets, it is legitimate to ask: did one or both of them turn the screws on Paisley to get him to intimidate Kerr; moreover, did they do so with the support of Ian Cameron; Sir Howard Smith, D-G of MI5 1979-81; his deputy Sir John Jones (who became D-G, 1981-85); and others in MI5; not to mention Sir Maurice Oldfield and his MI6 cronies?

The Tip of A Chilling Iceberg

For a while Richard Kerr co-operated with the Hart Inquiry to which he was a central witness.  However, in the end he withdrew.  His solicitors KRW Law said: “The State bodies/agencies that are Core Participants to the inquiry appear to have been provided with bundles of documents of up to 16,000 pages.  In contrast, Mr. Kerr was provided with around 740 pages.

“It is not clear why the inquiry wish to conceal these documents from Mr. Kerr or his legal representatives.  In the context of an inquiry that is investigating allegations that the British security forces and security services knew that abuse was and would be perpetrated on the children in Kincora and covered this up, this is inherently unreasonable”.

Richard Kerr now lives in Dallas.  He is angry at his former abusers, and the mind games they played with him as a child.  He has benefited from years of counselling and is now determined to tell his story.  Above all else he wants to achieve “a little justice” for those who died.  He has a lot more to reveal.  What appears in these pages is merely the beginning.

As I’ve shown you conclusively in my third book, Eaters of Children; the top of the Pedocracy is Rome.  But with the suppression of the Templars on “Friday the 13^th” in October of 1307, Rome learned never to act showing her real face, always to hide behind a patsy.

Her favorite patsies are Jews; it’s easy to stir hatred about them and you can always find a Jew willing to betray their country and their kindred as long as they get theirs.

This is why Hollywood has been entrusted to so many of the Jewish persuasion—it’s high visibility but has low influence.  The real power (Pentagon, CIA, FBI, etc.) is reserved for those more overtly loyal to Rome; open Catholics, usually Jesuit-trained.

But even their patsies are well taken care of.

Wein-steined Dress

For instance, to distract from how the rape and abuse of children is the gateway to power, a Jew (Hollywood Producer Harvey Weinstein) was accused of being a criminal misogynist.  It’s an accusation with lots of divisive emotion and equally as much distraction.

It is extremely rare for there to be police and / or legal action in response to any allegation of misconduct,¹ but here as well, there is no lack of corrupt insiders to take the bite out of crime.

In May, Weinstein was arrested on a single count of rape, oddly, in New York City and not Los Angeles.²

It was a quick in-and-out affair…probably not unlike his romances.

Harvey Weinstein is out on bail.  Incredible.

The allowances made at Friday morning’s arraignment — Weinstein turning himself in looking clean and bookish, rather than be taken into custody in a 4 a.m. bust — may set the tone for the entire trial.  No detail is too small, as the press, prosecutors and Weinstein himself, the ultimate showman, knows.

It’s why police sources made sure to point out that he needed extended handcuffs because he was too fat for regular ones.  It’s why Weinstein toted two books into the police precinct as if leisurely overseeing some busywork.  It’s why one of those books was a biography of director Elia Kazan, whose testimony before the House Committee on Unamerican Activities in 1952 rendered him a Hollywood pariah or martyr, depending on your view.  It’s why one of the officers leading Weinstein through his perp walk was a woman.

And it’s why Harvey Weinstein, on that very perp walk, looked down and smirked.

Really, why shouldn’t he?  What consequence has truly befallen him?  Let’s not forget that in 2015, police were ready to arrest Weinstein for sexual assault until Manhattan D.A. Cy Vance put a stop to it.  And shortly thereafter, Vance took a $10,000 donation from Weinstein’s defense attorney.

Vance, incredibly, remains the Manhattan D.A. investigating other claims against Weinstein.

How is this possible?

Weinstein’s criminal defense attorney in this case, Benjamin Brafman, infamously and successfully defended former IMF head Dominique Strauss-Kahn against charges he sexually assaulted a hotel maid in New York in 2012.  (That case ended in a reported $6 million settlement to the alleged victim.)

Brafman felt emboldened enough to imply that Weinstein’s arraignment is a result of “the movement” — too insignificant and hysterical to name — “that seems to have overtaken this case.”

Brafman was equally comfortable implying that the 80-plus women who have accused Weinstein of threats or assault are simply overreacting to boorish behavior — behavior in which they are complicit.

“Mr. Weinstein did not create the casting couch in Hollywood,” Brafman told the judge.

It’s why Weinstein strode into court knowing he’d stride right back out, handing over $1 million in bail and his passport — even though deep reporting in the New Yorker and the New York Times indicates Weinstein is a serial predator and rapist who has hired ex-Mossad to spy on his alleged victims.  And even as one alleged victim has an order of protection against Weinstein in this case, he is allowed to move freely between New York and Connecticut. ~ The New York Post

Who better to froth up the Jewish angle than a silver-spoon Irish-American aristocrat?  New York Post columnist Maureen Callahan was apparently so gifted in her journalistic talents she was recruited to work for Sassy magazine and MTV at the tender age of 17.³  One would assume such a proud, talented Irish Aristocrat would have a lot of biographical information but for one of the “Top 50 Power Women of 2016”, Maureen’s LinkedIn page looks like an after-thought.

Because Power Woman Maureen Callahan is so secretive about her private life, we’ll just have to guess that the word “Catholic” which so usually follows “Irish” can do so with her, as well.

It’s not a baseless guess when, in Ireland being Roman Catholic is more a past-time than a religious choice.

Just ask actor Liam Neeson.  Growing up surrounded by Protestant Scots in Ballymena didn’t keep him from becoming an altar boy.  Even less, his mother, for whom Catholic ritual is so ingrained she still walks to Mass at 90 years of age.

“Jesuits” Liam Neeson and Jeremy Irons in the 1986 movie “The Mission” (which also starred Knight of Malta Robert DeNiro).  It is a fanciful re-write of the Reducciones the Jesuits created in South America in order to perfect Aquinian Communism, skillfully overlaid with DeNiro portraying the Loyola-esque “Rodrigo Mendoza”.

What makes the use of key Jews such a successful tactic for Vatican puppet-masters is extreme, corrupt Jewish tribalism.  The moment the selected Jew is installed into a position of power they surround themselves with, and give advantages to, their kindred.⁴  It’s easy to stir anger over such behavior and claiming it doesn’t exist only fuels that anger.

Weinstein has not taken the accusations very well as “user-edited” Wikipedia explains. ⁵

Allegations of and charges for sexual crimes:

In October 2017, The New York Times^[46][47] and The New Yorker^[3] reported that more than a dozen women accused Weinstein of sexually harassing, assaulting, or raping them.  Many other women in the film industry subsequently reported similar experiences with Weinstein,^[48][49][50] who denied raping the women.  As a result of these accusations, Weinstein was fired from his production company,^[51] suspended from the British Academy of Film and Television Arts,^[52] expelled from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences,^[4] resigned from the Directors Guild of America,^[53] his wife Georgina Chapman left him,^[54] and leading figures in politics whom he had supported denounced him.^[55]  The Los Angeles Police Department opened a criminal investigation for alleged rape,^[56] and New York and London police are investigating other sexual assault allegations.^[57]

Notice that, of this long list of consequences, the only thing that could truly be negative is the dissolution of Harvey’s marriage to his model wife.

Judging by the looks of them together, it’s clear that she married for love.

She’s now worth $30 million so perhaps she’s had her fill of Harvey.

It was a whirlwind romance.⁶

The power couple of make-believe were attended by the most powerful of Jews, Catholics and sycophants who know how to suck up to same.

Movie stars, moguls, politicians, filmmakers and supermodels gathered in Connecticut last night for the sumptuous wedding of film studio honcho Harvey Weinstein and fashion designer Georgina Chapman.

The nuptials, at Weinstein’s Westport estate, drew more than 300 guests from the worlds of film (Cameron Diaz, Renee Zellweger, Jennifer Lopez and Marc Anthony, Eva Mendes, Kerry Washington, Anne Hathaway, Kyle Mac-Lachlan, Quentin Tarantino), government (former Gov. George Pataki and Attorney General Andrew Cuomo), fashion (Vogue’s Anna Wintour, Harper’s Bazaar’s Glenda Bailey and models Helena Christensen, Karolina Kurkova, Jacquetta Wheeler and Natalia Vo-dianova), media and entertainment (Daily News Chairman and Publisher Mortimer Zuckerman, Rupert Murdoch, Steve Schwarzman, Les Moonves, Jeff Zucker, Lorne Michaels, Graydon Carter, Brian Roberts, Jim Dolan, Brad Grey, Kevin Huvane, Rick Yorn) and law (David Boies, Bert Fields and Allen Grubman).

Among those who sent video tributes were Bill and Hillary Clinton, Mayor Bloomberg, Gwyneth Paltrow, Sean (Diddy) Combs, Heidi Klum, George Clooney and Anthony Minghella.

Guests in the heated, flower-strewn tent were treated to a meal of Dover sole and veal by Cipriani, a fireworks show, and performances by the Gipsy Kings and Sharon Jones, and a toast from Robert DeNiro.

— What’s a Hollywood wedding without fish with a special name and slaughtered baby cow served up by a luxury restaurant corporation founded by an Italian Roman Catholic (Giuseppe Cipriani).  How devout are they?  —the fourth generation heir is named after the founder of the Jesuits. —

Chicago Director Rob Marshall surprised the bride and groom with a choreographed revue in their honor to “He Had It Coming.”

The bride, 31, designed her own gown.  Her maid of honor was her partner in Marchesa, Karen Craig.  The groom, 55, was escorted by his mother, Miriam, and his brother, Bob, with whom he co-founded Miramax Films.

The couple, who had a rehearsal dinner Thursday night at the Waverly Inn in Manhattan, were married by Harvey Weinstein’s longtime friend, Judge Eugene Fahey.  A priest and rabbi also presided. The marriage was the second for Weinstein, who was divorced in 2004, and the first for Chapman.⁷

Notice how Havey’s “longtime friend” is a Christian Brothers-educated Leftist Catholic and New York Court of Appeals judge, not another Hollywood Jew!  They are so close that that Judge Fahey presided over Harvey’s wedding (which was co-presided by a Rabbi and a Priest—who we can presume was also Catholic?).  The English Georgina’s religion is either ignored by sources or listed as “NOT AVAILABLE”.  Was the extra priest for her, or for all the other Catholics in the party?  (—or for Harvey, a Jew who clearly is only too happy to kiss a Catholic ring?⁸)

If you’re concerned about poor Georgina, don’t be.  She got the kids and $20 million…more (she was really worried where her next veal would come from).⁹

Hopefully she can forget the bliss that was the conceiving of those children…

If you didn’t read Maureen Callahan’s exposé on how Harvey Weinstein was a misogynist Jew who was getting away with his outrages, “user-edited” Wikipedia picked up the slack for her and added that he used Israeli mercenaries to strong-arm his victims:

Ronan Farrow reported in The New Yorker that Weinstein hired British-Israeli private intelligence firm Black Cube in order to stop the publication of the abuse allegations against him.  Using false identities, private investigators from Black Cube tracked and met journalists and actresses, in particular Rose McGowan, who accused Weinstein of rape.  Weinstein had Black Cube and other agencies “target, or collect information on, dozens of individuals, and compile psychological profiles that sometimes focussed on their personal or sexual histories.”^[58][59][60]

The allegations precipitated a wave of “national reckoning” against sexual harassment and assault in the United States,^[61] known as the Weinstein effect.  Compounded by other sexual harassment cases earlier in the year, the Weinstein reports and subsequent #MeToo hashtag campaign, which encouraged individuals to share their suppressed stories of sexual misconduct, created a cavalcade of allegations across multiple industries that brought about the swift ouster of many men in positions of power both in the United States and, as it spread, around the world.^[62][63]

Sadly, these Roman sources are only reporting the truth; Harvey Weinstein is a despicable human being who was enthroned in Hollywood and, when he can, gives deference and perks to other Jews.

But he knows how to kiss the ring that feeds him and these are only half-truths.

What you’re not going to get from these Catholic sources is how the guns-for-hire industry was created, defined and perfected by Romans.

Perhaps the most infamous of these examples is Blackwater.

16 September 2007: …employees of Blackwater Security Consulting (since renamed Academi), a private military company, shot at Iraqi civilians, killing 17 and injuring 20 in Nisour Square, Baghdad while escorting a U.S. embassy convoy.^[1][2][3]  The killings outraged Iraqis and strained relations between Iraq and the United States.^[4]  In 2014, four Blackwater employees were tried^[5] and convicted in U.S. federal court; one of murder, and the other three of manslaughter and firearms charges.^[6] …

On August 4 2017, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit tossed [security contractor Nicholas] Slatten’s murder conviction and ordered the other defendants to be re-sentenced.^[21]  A new trial was also recommended for Slatten, on the grounds that it was unjustifiable to try him with his co-defendants, and that he should have been tried separately.^[21] ~ Wikipedia⁹²⁵

Having billionaire Edgar Dale Prince as a father provided certain “opportunities” for Erik Dean Prince, such as world travel and an appointment to the United States Naval Academy.

Prince chaffed, however, at the Plebe hazing and left Annapolis for Hillsdale.  He then joined the Navy and became a SEAL where he served in the Middle East, Haiti and the Balkans but saw no combat.⁹²⁶

Each of these locations remain a hotbed of human trafficking, Haiti, in particular (see Chapter 28).

Prince left the SEALs after a short 4-year stint⁹²⁷ and then founded one of the most infamous war profiteering organizations of all time — Blackwater — immediately after.

Clearly, he felt he had a sure thing.

Blackwater would go on to net over $1 billion in U.S. government contracts and that was despite the Nisour Square massacre of 16 September 2007.  When an Iraqi car tangled with a Blackwater-guarded convoy the response was a hail of weapons fire and explosives which killed anywhere between 17 and 28 men, women and children.⁹²⁸

Later, the U.S. military examined the carnage.  It was determined that there was no evidence of any insurgent activity — a wayward Iraqi civilian unwittingly touching off a powder-keg of undisciplined, trigger-happy mercenaries.⁹²⁹

Two months prior, the State Department was warned about Blackwater’s lawless arrogance by an investigator who had uncovered shocking levels of corruption and negligence. He was stopped, however, by the company’s lead man in Iraq — another ex-Navy SEAL named Daniel Carroll. Carroll told Diplomatic Security Special Agent Jean Richter:

that he could kill me at that very moment and no one could or would do anything about it as we were in Iraq…⁹³⁰

Either Blackwater’s top man in Iraq, Daniel Carroll,^cxxxv was unbelievably reckless or he was fully assured of the ability to murder a United States government official and get away with it.

To their surprise, the Iraqi government backed Blackwater.  Special Agent Richter and his small fact-finding delegation were immediately sent back to the United States.

Perhaps it wasn’t all that surprising given bribes totaling $1 million dollars handed to key Iraqi officials by the Papal Knight mercenaries.⁹³¹

The twist is that the bribes were sanctioned (sometimes recommended) by the same State Department that sent Richter and his team, showing that the “fact-finding mission” was never intended to find facts.⁹³²

Two months later an Iraqi mother lay burned to a crisp in their family car, clutching her infant to her — the heat from the explosions had melded their bodies together.⁹³³

Unfortunately for her relatives, monetary compensation for wrongdoing doesn’t quite flow from mercenaries as bribes do.⁹³⁴

War is business and business is good. …

The Nation’s Jeremy Scahill (one of Blackwater’s most passionate media detractors) has called Erik Prince “a reclusive right-wing evangelical Christian”.⁹³⁹

Such a characterization is amazing given that even Newsweek reported on Prince leaving his Dutch Reform Calvinism behind for Roman Catholicism.  In the piece, Newsweek’s Evan Thomas disclosed a Prince statement that implies his involvement in Templar Freemasonry:

In his occasional public utterances at security conferences, his vision emerges.  He was once quoted by a defense-industry newsletter describing why his private contractors could provide better — more effective, more efficient — “relief with teeth” in a dangerous environment than international aid organizations or even the U.S. military: “Everybody carries guns, just like Jeremiah rebuilding the Temple in Israel, a sword in one hand, a trowel in the other.”  Prince, a weapons expert and adventure seeker since he outgrew playing with lead soldiers as a boy, has seen the promised land, and it is righteous and well-armed. [sic]⁹⁴⁰

Interestingly, one of Protestantism’s most renown opponents of the Catholic Church, Baptist firebrand Charles Haddon Spurgeon (1834 – 1892), named his magazine Sword & Trowel.⁹⁴¹

Scahill is a close associate of legendary Jewish homosexual journalist and personal confidant of “whistleblower” Edward Snowden, Glenn Greenwald.  It’s difficult to imagine how he could make such a clumsy mistake as there is very little “Christian” about either Erik Prince or Blackwater.  However, both are very much the flower of Papal Knighthood.

Perhaps it was the influence of Scahill’s “longtime friend” and mentor, Jesuit Father Daniel Berrigan⁹⁴² that helped him get things mixed up. ~ Eaters of Children ¹⁰

Who finally did Harvey in?  Of the 80 women who have been mistreated by Weinstein, only one brave Italian-Filipina model came forward; Ambra Battilana Gutierrez.

Back in 2015¹¹, Battilana contacted police about Harvey’s improper advances—she said they were beneath her dignity.

However, a District Attorney in New York City couldn’t find enough evidence.

Film mogul Harvey Weinstein will not face criminal charges stemming from a gorgeous Italian model’s claim that he molested her in his Tribeca Film Center office last month, the Manhattan DA said Friday.

“This case was taken seriously from the outset, with a thorough investigation conducted by our sex crimes unit,” said Joan Vollero, a spokeswoman for DA Cyrus Vance Jr.

“After analyzing the available evidence, including multiple interviews with both parties, a criminal charge is not supported.” ~ Page Six

But it didn’t stop media from giving the brave model full coverage starting on April Fool’s Day in 2015.

—or, shall we say, “fully un-covered”.

This is not the first time Ambra’s high moral code brought down a big fish.

In 2010 she helped put a dagger into perennial Prime Minister of Italy, Silvio Berlusconi.

In some of the most lurid evidence to emerge from the sex scandal engulfing the prime minister, the two women said they were so shocked by what they witnessed at one of his so called “bunga-bunga” parties that they demanded to be taken home.

They were allegedly told by one of Mr. Berlusconi’s closest associates: “If you want to go, fine, but you can forget about entering Miss Italy or becoming TV weather girls.”

Chiara Danese and Ambra Battilana are not among the 33 women who prosecutors allege prostituted themselves with the prime minister during wild parties at his mansion outside Milan, Villa San Martino.  They said they decided to come forward to give evidence because since attending one of the gatherings they had been labelled as “escorts” in their home towns in Piedmont in north-western Italy. ~ The Telegraph

Not exactly sure what a “bunga-bunga” party is but perhaps an Italian fraternity brother can write me and explain it.

On second thought, you better not.

If that number of women victims collected by Italian prosecutors looks suspicious—33—don’t worry, the Freemasonic signal is just a coincidence.

Although Berlusconi has been convicted of a whole host of crimes from sex with a minor¹² to tax fraud¹³ he has escaped any serious punishment.

For such a high-profile femme fatale, Ambra’s past remains a mystery; nothing on her education, family or religion.  As an Italian/Filipina we can only guess what her religious roots are.¹⁴

But, hey, aren’t we lucky that a distinguished journalist like Ronan Farrow was able to step up and hand it to Harvey?

His parents christened him “Satchel Ronan O’Sullivan Farrow”.  When you find out who they are, you’ll understand why (as well as Satchel Ronan O’Sullivan’s success).

Farrow was born in New York City to actress Mia Farrow and filmmaker Woody Allen.  His father’s family is Jewish, whereas his mother’s is Catholic.^[1]  His given name honors National Baseball Hall of Fame pitcher Satchel Paige^[2] and actress Maureen O’Sullivan, his maternal grandmother.  Now known as Ronan, he was given the surname “Farrow” to avoid a family with one child named Allen amid Farrows and Previns.^[3]  In 2013, Mia Farrow raised speculation that singer-actor Frank Sinatra could have been Ronan’s biological father.^[4][5] ~ Wikipedia

Actress Maureen O’Sullivan was not only Irish Roman Catholic, she attended Sacred Heart Convent at Roehampton in Dublin.

Actress María de Lourdes “Mia” Villiers-Farrow was raised devout Roman Catholic by two Catholic parents and also educated in a Convent (through Grammar School and High School).

She is perhaps best known for her role as “Rosemary” in the movie “Rosemary’s Baby”; a twisted look into Catholic lore speculating about a literal “son of the Devil”—written and directed by two Jews, Roman Polanski and Ira Levin.

Technically, Polanski is more Catholic than Jew, having been raised that way by his Catholic mother.  It was a shoo-in for enthronement in Hollywood, as was his sexual deviancy.

Polanski was dating a good Catholic girl, Sharon Tate (in fact, shortly after the filming of Rosemary’s Baby).  Although they were a typical, “liberated” Hollywood couple, the pregnant Tate had a twinge of Catholic guilt and began heavily pressuring Polanski into making her “honest”.  Fortunately for the Jew-raised-Catholic, Charles Manson (himself, likely assaulted at the Boys Town orphanage in Omaha, Nebraska) was on hand to send several Catholic hench-women to murder her and her baby before Roman was forced to tie the knot.¹⁵

It all would’ve been idyllic had he not raped and sodomized a 13 year old girl at Jack Nicholson’s house a few years later.

That wasn’t the problem, the problem was the unbelievably bad luck finding out that the judge wasn’t going to do what he was told and, instead, was looking to actually make Polanski accountable for what he had done.

Fortunately, inside sources let him know and his loose bail restrictions allowed him to easily slip the United States to Roman Catholic France where raping and sodomizing a teenage girl isn’t that big a deal (see the case where the rape of an 11 year old girl was thrown out by a French judge because he decided that “she wanted it”).  He’s lived there safely and unmolested—himself, that is—ever since.

For all the gory details surrounding Roman the Jewish Catholic’s life of privilege (and copious citations), read my book Eaters of Children.

Also fitting right in to this narrative, Allan Stewart “Woody Allen” Konigsberg is the Jewish comedian and writer who adopted a little girl, then married her.  At what point he began to have sex with his daughter, only they can tell.

Satchel Ronan O’Sullivan isn’t faring much better, he’s recently admitted that he prefers men to women.¹⁶

When asked how someone who is barely 30 years old has already gotten choice jobs working for President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton before becoming a crack “journalist”¹⁷ who gets published by The Guardian, Foreign Policy, The Atlantic, The Wall Street Journal, the Los Angeles Times and The New Yorker, Satchel Ronan O’Sullivan reportedly responded that he likes to do things his way.

Perhaps we shouldn’t judge Farrow and The New Yorker too harshly just yet.¹⁸

During the farce that has been the nomination of yet another Roman Catholic to the Supreme Court, the team (along with silver-spoon Jewish “journalist” Jane Meredith Mayer, great, great grand-daughter of Jewish banker Mendel Lehmann, a.k.a. “Emanuel Lehman”), have put their finger on the Roman connections to Judge Brett Kavanaugh.

As Kavanaugh inches towards a Senate confirmation (a vote that has already been settled by those who pull the strings of the “Senators”), “journalists” have been cleared to reference an allegation of “harassment”, the circumstances of which are quite interesting.

Rather than de-emphasizing Kavanaugh’s Catholic religion and Jesuit school background, S. R. O. Farrow, Jane Mayer and The New Yorker (along with select other “journalists”, of course) are choosing to emphasize it as the focus of this dated complaint.¹⁹

The woman, who has asked not to be identified, first approached Democratic lawmakers in July, shortly after Trump nominated Kavanaugh.  The allegation dates back to the early nineteen-eighties, when Kavanaugh was a high-school student at Georgetown Preparatory School, in Bethesda, Maryland, and the woman attended a nearby high school.  In the letter, the woman alleged that, during an encounter at a party, Kavanaugh held her down, and that he attempted to force himself on her.  She claimed in the letter that Kavanaugh and a classmate of his, both of whom had been drinking, turned up music that was playing in the room to conceal the sound of her protests, and that Kavanaugh covered her mouth with his hand.  She was able to free herself.  Although the alleged incident took place decades ago and the three individuals involved were minors, the woman said that the memory had been a source of ongoing distress for her, and that she had sought psychological treatment as a result. …

The woman declined a request for an interview.

In recent months, the woman had told friends that Kavanaugh’s nomination had revived the pain of the memory, and that she was grappling with whether to go public with her story.  She contacted her congresswoman, Anna Eshoo, a Democrat, sending her a letter describing her allegation.  (When reached for comment, a spokesperson for Eshoo’s office cited a confidentiality policy regarding constituent services and declined to comment further on the matter.)

The letter was also sent to the office of Senator Dianne Feinstein.  As the ranking minority member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Feinstein was preparing to lead Democratic questioning of Kavanaugh during his confirmation hearing weeks later.  The woman contacted Feinstein’s office directly, according to multiple sources.

After the interactions with Eshoo’s and Feinstein’s offices, the woman decided not to speak about the matter publicly.  She had repeatedly reported the allegation to members of Congress and, watching Kavanaugh move toward what looked like an increasingly assured confirmation, she decided to end her effort to come forward, a source close to the woman said.  Feinstein’s office did not respond to requests for comment.

Feinstein’s decision to handle the matter in her own office, without notifying other members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, stirred concern among her Democratic colleagues.  For several days, Feinstein declined requests from other Democrats on the Judiciary Committee to share the woman’s letter and other relevant communications.  A source familiar with the committee’s activities said that Feinstein’s staff initially conveyed to other Democratic members’ offices that the incident was too distant in the past to merit public discussion, and that Feinstein had “taken care of it.”  On Wednesday, after media inquiries to the Democratic members multiplied, and concern among congressional colleagues increased, Feinstein agreed to brief the other Democrats on the committee, with no staff present.

On Thursday, Feinstein announced that she had referred the matter to the F.B.I. “I have received information from an individual concerning the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court,” Feinstein said.  “That individual strongly requested confidentiality, declined to come forward or press the matter further, and I have honored that decision.  I have, however, referred the matter to federal investigative authorities.”

In a statement, an F.B.I. spokesperson said, “Upon receipt of the information on the night of September 12, we included it as part of Judge Kavanaugh’s background file, as per the standard process.”

Like the college situated an underground tunnel away from the nation’s “Capitol”,²⁰ Georgetown Prep is also run by Jesuits.

The Washington Post touted Trump’s previous appointment, Neil Gorsuch, as “the first Protestant in years!”  That’s because prior to the “mishap” suffered by Antonin Scalia, the highest Court in America (a body that dictates law completely free of any oversight by the citizenry²¹) was composed of six Roman Catholics and three token far-Left Jews.

However, Gorsuch, is only technically a “Protestant”.  He’s Episcopalian; a sect that shares so much with Catholicism it is frequently called in jest “Catholic Lite”.  Not only that, he comes from the same Episcopal parish as the Ramsey family who dolled up their toddler JonBenét in full adult make-up and costume before she was ritually murdered (and almost certainly raped, although “law enforcement” and “medical examiners” ignored evidence of it²²).

Detracting even more from Neil’s “Protestant cred” is the fact that he, too, was trained by the Jesuits at Georgetown Prep.

In fact, everyone in this little vignette has an overt tie to Rome.

“Assyrian-American” Democrat Congresswoman Anna Eshoo is “Chaldean” Catholic (but frequently mislabeled “Christian” as a shortcut).²³

Perennial corrupt-o-crat and ceaseless gun-grabber Diane Feinstein is a Jew but she attended a Catholic convent.  By an odd coincidence, the name of Jewish Senator Feinstein’s Catholic Convent in San Francisco is the same as Satchell Ronan O’Sullivan’s grandmother in Dublin; “Sacred Heart”.²⁴

Interesting that far-Left Democrats like Feinstein and Biden should pull their punches on “Republican” (Catholic) Supreme Court appointments like former Monsanto lawyer Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh.  Harassment and attempted rape are behaviors that not even “Conservatives” would approve of, despite their desire to see a so-called Republican (Catholic) join the Bench.

Given the overwhelming evidence exposed in Eaters of Children, we must ask of this carefully-tailored “controversy”, “What are we not being told?”  A woman claims that, as a teenage girl, Kavanaugh brutalized her under the careful gaze and watch of his friends but never managed to violate her?  Or did he and she, as another carefully-controlled pawn, isn’t allowed to say?

But where, exactly, did Doctor Blasey (no-hyphen) Ford come from?

The blog of a military/intelligence insider gives us a clue.

Judge Kavanaugh grew up in Chevy Chase, Maryland and his family was a member of the Chevy Chase Country Club, which sits north of Mazza Gallerie and between Wisconsin and Connecticut Avenues.  Kavanaugh is still a member there.

Christine Blasey Ford is the daughter of Paula and Ralph.  They were members of the Columbia Country Club (Barack Obama is currently a member there as well).  Columbia has the reputation for being the most Catholic of the Country Clubs.  For those not familiar with old Washington, the various country clubs catered to particular ethnic/religious populations.  Most agreed on one thing—no Jews and no Blacks. ~ Sic Semper Tyrannis, Turcopolier

Who is this guy and how would he know?

Walter Patrick “Pat” Lang, Jr. (born May 31, 1940)^[1] is a commentator on the Middle East, a retired U.S. Army officer and private intelligence analyst, and an author.  After leaving uniformed military service as a Colonel, he held high-level posts in military intelligence as a civilian.  He led intelligence analysis of the Middle East and South Asia for the Defense Department and world-wide HUMINT activities in a high-level equivalent to the rank of a lieutenant general. ~ Wikipedia

And, like any good Pentagon spook, “lieutenant general” (equivalent) Lang has a “higher loyalty”²⁵—

Lang is a member of the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre, a Roman Catholic chivalric order, in which he holds the rank of Knight Commander.^[2] ~ Wikipedia

A Turcopole was a Byzantine mercenary for the Crusades and Sic semper tyrannis is what Catholic Freemason John Wilkes Booth said when he murdered President Abraham Lincoln for the Papacy.

Are you still wondering why “prejudiced” Americans of old “hated Catholics” and even forbade them the vote?

Was Christine Blasey (no hyphen) Ford a silver-spoon Catholic?  Even the CIA’s own Washington Post begrudgingly agrees—

As senators weigh Kavanaugh’s confirmation, the endless news cycle has pried into every corner of his accuser’s life to find out who Christine Blasey Ford really is.

The answer is someone very different than who she was.  In Bethesda, Ford’s life was one of cloistered advantage, with her time spent at a private school for girls, at the Columbia Country Club and at parties where she moved easily among the privileged and popular. …

Growing up, she was just “Chrissy,” and in the way of younger siblings, was often described by her relationship to someone else: sister of Tom and Ralph, daughter of the older Ralph, a golf course regular who would go on to become the president of the exclusive, all-male Burning Tree Club.  Ford’s mother, Paula, was well-liked among the kids at Columbia Country Club because she remembered their names.

There’s another Ralph Blasey golfing for the Davidson College Wildcats in North Carolina (your kids won’t be going unless you fork over $66 grand).  He’s such a devoted Catholic, he’s founded a special breakfast club for his fellow Papists—all future generals, journalists and judges, of course.

A sympathetic class-mate of Doctor Blasey (no-hyphen) Ford, Cristina King (no-hyphen) Miranda, posted a letter on her Facebook page that further fleshed this out.  She quickly deleted it but, fortunately “Paste Magazine” pasted it back:

Christine Blasey Ford was a year or so behind me, I did not know her personally but I remember her.  This incident did happen.  Many of us heard a buzz about it indirectly with few specific details.  However Christine’s vivid recollection should be more than enough for us to truly, deeply know that the accusation is true.  We are all in some way from that time, at least me, Christine, and I applaud her courage and her dignity.  The drinking ensconced in the puritanism and hypocrisy of that elite, privileged, mostly white, Catholic, Washington society, was completely out of control.  I recall having a few parties at my house and having to call the cops once on my own party.

“Hypocrisy” in “Puritan, Catholic”, racist Washington (no Jews and no blacks allowed)?²⁶

Is the Kavanaugh PsyOp showing us the ugly underbelly of a Catholic insurgency in “Washington D.C.” and Mary-land (the colony founded by Catholics, for Catholics)?

Is there an entire sub-culture of golf-playing, veal-eating Catholic Aristocrat Elites secretly running America for Rome (and living high on the hog while they’re at it)?

Kavanaugh was “just a teenager at the time” (having been taught by the Jesuits how to interact with young girls at Georgetown Prep²⁷).  Do you men remember “almost raping” a girl you fancied in high school?  How about ever?  What type of individual is capable of such behavior?

If Kavanaugh “attempted” a rape as a teenager, did he grow into the type of man who does worse?

Certainly this is exactly what the Elite look for when picking someone for a position like United States Supreme Court Justice.

The Washington Post admitted in a gas-lighting²⁸ propaganda piece that Kavanaugh has “evolved” on the “suicide” of Vince Foster.  He helped Prosecutor Kenneth Starr make sure nothing came of the investigation so expertly handled by crack members of the Washington D.C. Park Police and now he doesn’t even think a good President should have his Emperor powers interfered with.

As a staunch, hard-core Republican and Conservative, Kavanaugh has also been instrumental in keeping the abomination of America’s socialized medicine protected and intact.

Clearly, this man needs to be on the Supreme Court!

And yet, are we seeing signs that he might not make it?

Our intrepid poster-journalist for the #MeToo movement, Ronan Farrow, has uncovered another “credible witness” of Kavanaugh misconduct.²⁹

Deborah Ramirez, a Yale classmate^{30, 31} of Brett Kavanaugh, says that while she was drunk and incapacitated, Brett stuck his naked manhood in her face in front of friends and witnesses.

Ramirez said that, when both she and Kavanaugh were freshmen at Yale, she was invited by a friend on the women’s soccer team to a dorm-room party.  She recalled that the party took place in a suite at Lawrance Hall, in the part of Yale known as Old Campus, and that a small group of students decided to play a drinking game together.  “We were sitting in a circle,” she said.  “People would pick who drank.”  Ramirez was chosen repeatedly, she said, and quickly became inebriated.  At one point, she said, a male student pointed a gag plastic penis in her direction.  Later, she said, she was on the floor, foggy and slurring her words, as that male student and another stood nearby.  (Ramirez identified the two male onlookers, but, at her request, The New Yorker is not naming them.)

A third male student then exposed himself to her.  “I remember a penis being in front of my face,” she said.  “I knew that’s not what I wanted, even in that state of mind.”  She recalled remarking, “That’s not a real penis,” and the other students laughing at her confusion and taunting her, one encouraging her to “kiss it.”  She said that she pushed the person away, touching it in the process.  Ramirez, who was raised a devout Catholic, in Connecticut, said that she was shaken.  “I wasn’t going to touch a penis until I was married,” she said.  “I was embarrassed and ashamed and humiliated.”  She remembers Kavanaugh standing to her right and laughing, pulling up his pants.  “Brett was laughing,” she said.  “I can still see his face, and his hips coming forward, like when you pull up your pants.”  She recalled another male student shouting about the incident.  “Somebody yelled down the hall, ‘Brett Kavanaugh just put his penis in Debbie’s face,’” she said.  “It was his full name.  I don’t think it was just ‘Brett.’  And I remember hearing and being mortified that this was out there.”

Of course with a name like “Ramirez”, Deborah was raised devout Catholic, in Connecticut.  We certainly commend her “Puritan” dedication to not touching penises (especially Brett Kavanaugh’s) until she was married although we do question her judgment in putting herself at risk in a raunchy Yale party where she allowed alcohol to relieve her of her senses.

Will Brett Kavanaugh and his penis make it to sit under a Supreme Court bench?³²

A Rose By Any Other Name

How does Rose McGowan fit in to this distraction of depravity and deviancy?

—Perfectly.

She grew up in Italy where her father helped run a child sex cult.³³

Actress Rose McGowan has appeared in such classics as “Going All the Way”, “Devil in the Flesh”, “Monkeybone” and “The Black Dahlia”.  She also played an alluring witch on the Warner Brothers TV series “Charmed”.

McGowan’s American father ran a Children of God chapter in a well-known European location.

McGowan, the second-eldest of six children (plus two half-siblings), was born in Certaldo, Italy, the daughter of Terri, a former writer and Microsoft employee, and Daniel McGowan, who worked as a commercial artist.^[1]  Her parents were American, and she has Irish and French ancestry.^[2]  Daniel McGowan ran an Italian chapter of the Children of God, to which both he and his wife held membership until 1978.^[3]  McGowan spent her early childhood amid the group’s communes, often traveling through Europe with her parents.^[2]  When interviewed by Howard Stern in 2001, she stated she had avoided the group’s calls for members to become sexually active as children, and stated that she never personally experienced abuse as a child.^[1]  Through her father’s art contacts in Italy, McGowan became a child model and appeared in Vogue Bambini and various other Italian magazines.

Her parents returned to the United States when she was ten years old, settling in Eugene, Oregon.^[2][4] ~ Wikipedia⁹⁰³

Hollywood star Rose McGowan’s mother was a Microsoft writer in Italy and her “connected artist” father ran the Children of God chapter.

McGowan claims she was never molested.  Subsequently, she seems to have developed into perfect normalcy.

McGowan had a wayward childhood, living as a teenage runaway in Portland, Oregon and associating with a group of drag queens in the city.^[2][5] ~ Wikipedia⁹⁰⁴

___________

McGowan recalls that “[returning with family to America] was not an easy assimilation” into the mainstream way of life.  “My brothers and sisters, we thought everyone was boring.”

Many years later, she returned to the small town in Italy with her then-boyfriend, rocker Marilyn Manson.  “We created quite a stir,” she admits. ~ People⁹⁰⁵

If anyone epitomizes of “normalcy” it’s Brian Hugh “Marilyn Manson” Warner.

Manson was born in Canton, Ohio.  He is the only son of Barbara Warner Wyer and Hugh Angus Warner.^[37]  He is of German, English and Irish descent.^[38]  In an August 12, 2015 interview, Warner claimed that his Appalachian family also has “Sioux” heritage.^[39]  In his autobiography The Long Hard Road Out of Hell, he detailed his grandfather’s alleged sexual fetishes, including bestiality and sadomasochism.

As a child, he attended his mother’s Episcopal church, though his father was a Roman Catholic.^[40][41] ~ Wikipedia⁹⁰⁶

“Manson” used his Catholic father’s influence to become a “Satanist”.  His former girlfriend, Rose McGowan, claimed she was more fervent at it than he was.⁹⁰⁷ ~  ~ Eaters of Children ³⁴

Obviously, McGowan is the perfect selection to lead the charge against “male chauvinist pig Jew” Harvey Weinstein.

She continues to court extremes, having left Brian “Marilyn Manson” Warner, McGowan now prefers women…or “gender non-conforming” women—ah, I mean “non-binary persons”.

Rose McGowan puts on affectionate display with non-binary partner Rain Dove at GQ Awards—before attacking all those who “paint her as imbalanced and a whore” in fiery speech. ~ Daily Mail

Using “#MeToo” male misogyny as a distraction and smokescreen for systemic sex slavery of women and, especially, children is bad enough but the Elite add the extra rub of discrediting even the #MeToo movement with unhinged, “non-binary” spokes-persons like these.

Even this is a criminal outrage because the individuals running the show—no pun intended—are, indeed, predatory men who demand that any woman seeking power and influence (particularly in Hollywood) needs to use their body to get ahead.

Looking upon McGowan and her life, one is instinctively repulsed, but also saddened.

Still, she appears to be well-compensated for her role in this propaganda of perversion.  The Daily Mail (itself a paper of only the highest content quality) noted that the tinfoil raincoat McGowan sported for “GQ” cost over one thousand dollars.

In an era of lies and disinformation, perhaps even that is a ludicrous exaggeration (the pair look like they were dressed at Good Will).  Who knows, maybe you can also cook a Hot Pocket in the pockets.³⁵

She certainly doesn’t appear to lack any cheek (shaved as it is).

Harper was very happy to print her book on her anti-male-chauvinist-pig-bravery: “BRAVE”.  We are assured that it is a “NEW YORK TIMES BEST-SELLER!!!”

This self-destruction of hypocrisy seems ingeniously built in to any altruistic endeavor of the rich and shameless.  Women like Jennifer Lawrence are selected to be the front-runners for a movement against male chauvinism, yet Lawrence has an entire career built upon the exploitation of her own body.

This was turned into another propaganda spin for her just last year.

Lawrence Admits Nude Line-up Established Her Career, Johnny Cirucci.com

National or international, if there is glitz, there is depravity and hypocrisy.

Cuban actress Ana de Armas was elevated to “big time” with her co-starring role opposite Ryan Gosling in the 2017 movie Blade Runner 2049.³⁶

Having built her career upon a willingness to strip and do sex scenes on camera didn’t slow her down from chiming in with a “tweet” for the oppressed women of South America.

Woman of Brazil, I stand with you, I also say #elenao ! We want our leaders to protect HUMAN RIGHTS, to say NO to violence, NO to racism, NO to misogyny, NO to homophobia, NO to guns, NO… https://t.co/yCWoXQBhwc

— Ana de Armas (@Ana_d_Armas) September 25, 2018

Such hubris can’t help but illicit a response (whether you think you’ll be heard or not).

WOMEN OF BRAZIL!@Ana_d_Armas STANDS WITH YOU AGAINST THE MISOGYNY OF MEN!

NEVER AGAIN SHOULD YOU STRIP OR SLEEP YOUR WAY INTO SUCCESS!!!

NEVER AGAIN SHOULD YOU USE YOUR BODY TO GET AHEAD!

oh…wait a minute…#MeToo FRAUD#IGotMine

"DOWN WITH HOMOPHOBIA! DOWN WITH GUNS!" pic.twitter.com/JqgJ4m28m5

— Johnny Cirucci (@Johnny_Cirucci) September 26, 2018

Actress Sean Young played opposite Harrison Ford in the original Ridley Scott Blade Runner in 1982.  Since then, it’s been a life of controversy for her but she has stated that she, too, was assaulted by Harvey Weinstein.

Not satisfied with Rose McGowan and “Rain Dove” as doing enough harm to “#MeToo”, the Propaganda Masters added another wrinkle.

Rose and Rain recently “outed” their friend and fellow #MeToo-er, Asia Argento as being even more hypocritical than they are!

https://www.instagram.com/p/BeLFPJmH8h3/?taken-by=asiaargento

Argento is the daughter of Italian horror film director Dario Argento.  She started her acting career at 9 (the perfect age for abuse).  She continues to do low-budget movies that involve sex through today—another perfect spokesperson for exploitation.

CANNES — Nobody knows as well as Asia Argento how to lick her lips in a carnivorous smile.  The Italian actress, who has played many a sexual daredevil, has two top teeth that intersect cunningly, and a tattoo on her backside.  She bares both in her latest movies here at the festival.  She stars in Olivier Assayas’s “Boarding Gate,” Catherine Breillat’s “Une Vieille Maîtresse,” and has a small part in Abel Ferrara’s “Go-Go Girls.”

At 31, Argento has moved into the public eye with an assurance that is not just about being the wildest sex kitten on screen.  “Sex is part of life like eating, sleeping, or dreaming, and we shouldn’t be scared of it,” she said.  “Obviously, when it comes to acting, there are limits on what you can do.  I don’t know what they are yet, but I will find out.”

In “Boarding Gate,” shown in a midnight screening, she plays a prostitute caught in a plot to handcuff and murder an old lover, played by Michael Madsen.  In “Une Vieille Maîtresse,” in competition later this week, a period drama, adapted from a novel by Jules Barbey d´Aurevilly about a Spanish woman jilted by her aristocratic lover, she wears low-cut black lace and has circles under her eyes, and a dark frown.  In the book, she is described as extraordinarily ugly, but this is cinema and this is Asia. ~ The New York Times

When she bares her body (which is often) she shows another sign of abuse: an obsession with tattooing.³⁷

https://www.instagram.com/p/BZgs8LfnGAs/?taken-by=asiaargento

The “scandal” is that Argento had “an affair” with a 17 year old teenager who later blackmailed her for money.  It is clearly a smokescreen within a smokescreen built upon Hollywood deviancy and twisted beyond a logical trail of evidence for cover.

In 2004, Argento decided to step into the creative side of movie-making with the film The Heart Is Deceitful Above All Things, based upon the Laura Albert (“J.T. LeRoy”) novel of the same name.

It was a wonderful pick to exercise Argento’s abilities to simultaneously direct, write and act—

The stories are narrated by the boy Jeremiah, who at the age of four is taken away from his foster parents, the only family he’s known.  He is reclaimed by his mother Sarah, who had given birth to him as an adolescent but was compelled to turn him over to foster care.  Profoundly disturbed from her own life of abuse and poverty, Sarah takes him on the road with her, moving through aimless and dangerous encounters with a series of men, some of whom beat and rape Jeremiah.  She frequently instructs her son to pretend to be her sibling—sometimes her brother, sometimes her sister.  She is also abusive to him and abandons him repeatedly.

The child-welfare system sends Jeremiah to live with Sarah’s parents: Bible- and child-beating fanatics who abuse him as relentlessly as they had abused his mother.  Sarah finds him and takes him away with her, but her life continues to spiral out of control.  She becomes a lot lizard (a prostitute who works the truck stops) and eventually slides into a paranoid breakdown from crystal-meth abuse.  Jeremiah is last seen as a 15-year-old street hustler in San Francisco, paying for a gay S&M session where he relives the beatings he had submitted to as a child. ~ Wikipedia

Of course a story about abuse stemming from “Bible- and child-beating fanatics” is based upon Jeremiah 17:9 (the inspiration for the little boy who gets repeatedly abused physically, sexually and psychologically).

You’d think such a must-miss treasure wouldn’t get much help but there you’re wrong.  Jeremy Renner,³⁸ Peter Fonda and Winona Ryder leant their talents.  Argento was even able to talk Brian “Marilyn Manson” Warner into helping.

Three boys played “Jeremiah” across from Argento, one of them was James “Jimmy” Bennett.

At the time of the movie, Bennett was only 7, but we have been assured that the depth of the scandal is only with a teen just a bit shy of adulthood.  Certainly someone as well-adjusted as Asia Argento wasn’t capable of any worse.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BaehToCn4oT/?taken-by=asiaargento

Sources like the New York Times report social networking exchanges with Argento calling Bennett “my son” and Bennett calling Argento “momma”.

Was it really the idea of Rose and Rain to “out” this scandal or are they just the “non-binary” faces of a much more complex PsyOp (“Psychological Operation”)?

The tabloid TMZ claims to have an archived Bennett post expressing his “obsession” with Argento since he was 12 years old but McGowan told Fortune magazine that, at 12, Bennett was sending Argento nude pictures of himself.

One would think that would be enough to cause law enforcement to ask some questions of Asia Argento yet that hasn’t happened and not for lack of evidence.

For instance, Argento would go on to post a posed picture of herself lying in bed with her real son, Nicola, clad only in what appears to be a dress.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BZDZvtdnP2n/?taken-by=asiaargento

Who took the picture and what was going on before and after?

Other disturbing posts of her son include a shirtless, “tattooed” Nicola suggestively holding a running hose.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BGG4UJ0ow6i/?taken-by=asiaargento

Or even more bizarre and perverse is what appears to be Argento pressing a boy’s head into her naked breast.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BIF0ZLXjCIt/?taken-by=asiaargento

Yet Argento remains unquestioned by authorities as to the concern of abuse in her own household (let alone receiving any censure from Instagram).  Her and her “NO SHAME FIST” social networking avatar are the perfect symbols of the carefully crafted #MeToo implosion.

In 2016, celebrity chef Anthony Bourdain (also a Roman Catholic) met Argento in Rome where he was shooting for his CNN show “Parts Unknown”.  The equally-tattoo-obsessed chef was a fan of Dario Argento (who wouldn’t be?) and, despite the 20-year age difference the two began dating.  The relationship ended in June of this year when Bourdain apparently killed himself

Bourdain was filming on location in France (not a particularly depressing endeavor), yet sources like the New York Times accent the “odd” behavior of missing dinner the night of June 7^th and breakfast the morning of June 8^th—that’s because the chef was hanging from a rope in his hotel room.

People states that, just before Bourdain’s death, Argento posted an Instagram “story” of her t-shirt stating “FUCK EVERYONE” with the caption “You know who you are”.³⁹  It was subsequently deleted.

If there was rebellion amongst the pair against a greater power, they seem to have lost—certainly Bourdain did.

Dario Argento has also weighed in on the controversies swirling around his daughter stating that an “air of conspiracy” hangs over the events.

The greatest religious influence (perhaps, not surprisingly) in Asia Argento’s life seems to be the Roman Catholcism of her native Italy.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BUeWF3FFGWM/?taken-by=asiaargento

https://www.instagram.com/p/BSC06U6DCMn/?taken-by=asiaargento

But, for a brief time after Anthony Bourdain’s death, Asia seemed to get sincere, posting a prayer in Spanish and then an Instagram quoting Jesus Christ in John 8:32, “You shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free.”

That, too, Argento has subsequently deleted.⁴⁰

As I write, Rose McGowan has just posted a public apology for wrongly accusing Asia Argento of pedophilia.

.@asiaargento pic.twitter.com/yn96UGUJ7a

— rose mcgowan (@rosemcgowan) September 27, 2018

“Never mind.”

Two Coreys

Propping up a fatally-flawed whistleblower is not a new trick.

In March of 2010, child film star Corey Haim was found dead in his Oakwood Apartment of an apparent deadly over-the-counter drug cocktail.  Later, media claimed the 38 year old had used aliases to “doctor shop” prescription drugs that were more potent and subsequently lead to his death.

Friend and fellow actor Corey Feldman had a different take.  Feldman stated that both he and Haim had been assaulted, sodomized and abused during the filming of several movies and the toll eventually led to Haim’s death.

Feldman would later tell ABC that Hollywood was run by pedophiles and, in due time, he would name names.

Just two years later, appropriately-named Vice News covered Feldman’s “birthday party” in 2013.⁴¹  It was a debauchery-fest reminiscent of another well-known personality.  Gawker described it thus:

Goonies star Corey Feldman is attempting to transform himself into the next Hugh Hefner—complete with his own FeldMansion, a bevy of Jumbo’s Clown Room wannabes calling themselves “Corey’s Angels,” and a pervasive, weary, existential sadness.

The influence of the Prince of Porn was even more evident after Hefner’s death when it was revealed that the pornography magnate was an integral part of Feldman’s life; almost as if the child actor was Hefner’s illegitimate son.

HEF WAS LIKE A GRANDFATHER 2 ME, ESPESCIALLY AFTER MY OWN GF PASSED, WITH 1 EXCEPTION, WE OFTEN DATED THE SAME WOMEN. HE WAS A DEAR FRIEND!

— Corey Feldman (@Corey_Feldman) September 28, 2017

HE WAS @MY WEDDING 2 SUSIE, APPEARED ON THE SURREAL LIFE AS A GUEST OF MY WEDDING, EVEN GAVE ME FATHERLY ADVICE B4 THE CEREMONY. HE ALSO

— Corey Feldman (@Corey_Feldman) September 28, 2017

Perhaps even worse than Feldman’s debauched lifestyle was how he apparently immersed his young son in the same cesspool.

Father and illegitimate son? Corey Feldman (left), Hugh Hefner (right).

On “Easter” in 2012, when other families were celebrating the resurrection of Jesus Christ, Corey Feldman took his son, “Zen” to see his “grandfather”.⁴²

I AM DEEPLY SAD 2 ANNOUNCE THAT MY DEAR FRIEND OF MANY DECADES @hughhefner HAS PASSED AWAY! THIS IS A PIC OF MY SON ZEN W HEF ON EASTER 2012 pic.twitter.com/XhJiPPqFMp

— Corey Feldman (@Corey_Feldman) September 28, 2017

Right on que, Corey Haim’s mother was published by news media claiming Feldman was a liar and a “con-man”.

Unfortunately, Judy Haim best not allow too much media attention, herself.  As I have copiously documented, children immersed in the child sex slave trade are usually victimized first by their own families.  The two most dangerous places to be in the world as a child are a Hollywood stage or a Catholic orphanage.

Since then, Corey, too, has “gotten religion”.

GOD SEES ALL! THERE IS NO HIDING WHEN JUDGEMENT DAY ARRIVES! THE TRUTH'S BEING REVEALED! THE FLOOD GATES HAVE OPENED, & NOTHING CAN STOP IT!

— Corey Feldman (@Corey_Feldman) October 28, 2017

But only he and his Maker know if it’s just another act (as the “birthday parties” involving “Corey’s Angels” continue, it’s pretty obvious to us, too).

Under The Gunn

Media is now “discovering” several public figures who have made “jokes” about sexual predation.

Guardians of the Galaxy director James Gunn came under fire on Friday morning, when several deleted tweets of his resurfaced that showed him making jokes about pedophelia.  The tweets range between 2009 and 2011, and see the director say things like: “I’m doing a big Hollywood film adaptation of The Giving Tree with a happy ending – the tree grows back and gives the kid a b***job.”

Other deleted tweets see Gunn poke fun at the overly-masculine attitude of films like The Expendables, and the womanizer persona of Oscar winner Jared Leto.  “The Expendables was so manly I f**ked the s**t out of the little p**sy boy next to me!,” he wrote.  “The boys ARE back in town!”

Gunn commented on a tweet made by actor Dylan Sprouse, which read: “Yo @jaredleto now that you’ve slid into the DM’s of every female model aged 18-25, what would you say your success rate is?”  Gunn’s response: “He starts at 18 on the internet?” ~ Heavy.com

By “coincidence”, Dylan Sprouse also acted in Asia Argento’s The Heart Is Deceitful Above All Things.  He was 12 at the time and it seems he has developed to be just as licentious and perverse as his peers.  One wonders if, having been born in Italy, he was sexualized as a child to become the man he isn’t.

In 2009, Gunn was producing an internet series titled James Gunn’s PG Porn with brothers Brian and Sean which consisted of a series of pornography spoofs, with a humorous event occurring just before the supposed commencement of pornographic sexual acts.  Each episode pairs a mainstream actor with a pornographic actress or model.  The tagline is, “For people who love everything about Porn…except the sex.”

It included such “hilarious” episode titles as Nailing Your Wife and A Very Peanus Christmas, a “sequel” to the episode Peanus.

Juxtaposing childhood themes with depraved sexual references was a common source of entertainment for Gunn

Gunn, 51, also tweeted about sexual assault towards women.  “The best thing about being raped is when you’re done being raped and it’s like ‘whew this feels great, not being raped!’”, he tweeted out in February 2009.  Later that year, Gunn discussed sexual assault in relation to Disneyland, where actors are known to dress up as famous cartoon characters.  “Wondering which Disneyland character would be the worst to get raped by,” he wrote.  “I think it’s Goofy.  But Sleepy would suck too.”

In an isolated tweet from 2009, Gunn tweeted @peteralton and wrote: “I like it when little boys touch me in my silly place. Shhh!” ~ Heavy.com

Disney owns Marvel Entertainment where Gunn was hired to direct both Guardians of the Galaxy movies.

A third movie was planned but Gunn was released from directing it.

The entire cast protested in unison calling what happened to Gunn “mob mentality” based upon “conspiracy theories”.

If you please, read the statement written and signed by The Guardians of the Galaxy cast in support of James Gunn’s reinstatement as director of GOTG Volume 3. pic.twitter.com/TjNA9RF6M8

— Zoe Saldana (@zoesaldana) July 30, 2018

Not sure which “conspiracy theory” covers A Very Peanus Christmas but perhaps Hollywood actors and actresses have extra time for such things.

Star Chris Pratt continued to defend Gunn, even doing so cryptically with the words of Jesus Christ quoted from the Bible.

Mark 3:25 “If a house is divided against itself it cannot stand.”

— chris pratt (@prattprattpratt) July 27, 2018

It was an interesting choice given that the Gunns are good Roman Catholics and not wont to rely very heavily on the Bible as opposed to Catechism.

James Gunn, himself, became what he is at the hands of the Jesuits in Los Angeles where Loyola Marymount is less than 20 miles away from Hollywood.  The Jesuits left such a lasting impression upon him that he joined the Loyola University system⁴³ Alumni Association.

During this time (they’ve since divorced), Gunn was married to actress Regina Marie “Jenna” Fischer, best known for her role as “Pam Beesly” on the sitcom The Office.  Regina, too, is a good Catholic girl, educated at the posh, private Nerinx Hall High School for girls before going on to Catholic Ursuline Academy in New Orleans.

In fact, most of the faces on The Office were Catholic ones from Steve “Michael Scott” Carell to John “Jim Halpert” Krasinski.

It takes place in the Pennsylvania town of Scranton which is dominated by the public-sounding Scranton University; a Jesuit institution.

All of these Catholic connections to the show are fascinating given that the show’s creator (and co-star) Benjamin Joseph “B.J.” Manaly-Novak comes from a family so dedicated to their Judaism that parents Linda Manaly and William Novak created their own Jew-only dating service.  Perhaps B.J. learned the key to getting ahead in Hollywood (kissing the Papal ring) from his father who “ghost-wrote” several biographies including one on Chrysler CEO Lee Iacocca.

Iacocca is best known as the personality who got Congress to gift Chrysler with a $14 billion bailout from financial mismanagement.  It’s always helpful to go to a treasury now $21 trillion in the red for your money mulligans.⁴⁴

What Iacocca should be known for is being the Knight of Malta who oversaw cleaning John F. Kennedy’s limousine free of evidence after his assassination.⁴⁵

Unfortunately for the cast of Guardians of the Galaxy (who don’t seem too distressed by anything Jesuit-trained James Gunn has done or said), Disney has so far stood firm on its decision.

Not only that, but Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 3 has been put on “indefinite hold” as well.

Such a strong moral stand may seem somewhat hypocritical for a company that frequently sneaks “peanuses” into its children’s cartoons.

Still, in comparison, Gunn’s “jokes” are inane distractions compared to the systemic child sex slave abuses of the world’s Elite—and that’s just what it has been hyped to be: a meaningless distraction.

It’s rather sad to see how eager Jews are to grovel at the “Chair of St. Peter” given the way Rome uses them.

Two distractions were rolled into one when the “pedophile joke” of “comedian” Sarah Silverman was raised by media.

For Silverman, nothing is taboo which is why she’s been elevated to anger the sensibilities of Christians.

Silverman is a Jew who takes particular pleasure in doing all she can to attack and mock Jesus Christ, going so far as having an actor dressed as Jesus “feel her up” for her Showtime comedy.

In 2015, Silverman wished Christians “Merry Christmas” by adding “Jesus was gender fluid”.

MERRY CHRISTMAS! Jesus was gender fluid!
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

— Sarah Silverman (@SarahKSilverman) December 25, 2015

On the one side, Catholic dominated outlets like Netflix continue to elevate and promote Silverman and on the other, Catholic-controlled “media” like the “Media Research Center” accent her outrages to a “Conservative” audience.

Sarah Silverman, “Jesus F-ing Christ” Mock [Christians] in [advertisement promoting] Abortion ⁴⁶

However, when it comes to laughing at child abuse, prominent Roman Catholics still lead the pack, in front of their Jewish pawns.

If you’re trained by the Jesuits at Georgetown, then you’re guaranteed to have a leg-up upon your peers, like actor John Mulaney on Broadway.

You get invited onto late-night talk shows where you can “bond” with host like Leftist funny man Steven Colbert about how you were both altar boys or what your Confirmation name is, and how they met on the campus of Georgetown.

Eventually, you get promoted by Catholic venues like “Netflix” where you can laugh about abusing children.

“If you make pedophile jokes too often then that makes YOU a pedophile”

Well someone should tell John Mulaney because he had like five or six in just one Netflix special and nobody is kicking his nuts in.

Yea I’m still thinking abt James Gunn

— Cosmonaut Marcus the Carcass🦇💨 (@CinnamonGhoul) August 20, 2018

Another comedian has both been caught making pedophile jokes and supporting Jesuit-trained Catholic movie-maker James Gunn;⁴⁷ Patton Oswalt, best known for his role as “Spence” on the sitcom The King of Queens.

King of Queens was created by Jews Michael J. Weithorn and David Litt, yet it stars Catholics like Kevin James and Leah Remini, who both portray Catholics and frequently bring that Catholicism into show plots.  It co-starred Jerry Stiller, a Jew.

King of Queens often intersected with the sitcom Everybody Loves Raymond, starring Ray Romano (Catholic), Patricia Heaton (devout Catholic), the late Peter Boyle (trained to be a priest but wasn’t ordained)⁴⁸, Doris Roberts (Jew) and Brad Garrett (Jew).  It was created by Phil Rosenthal, also a Jew.  Rosenthal did manage to create work for his wife on the show as the on-again, off-again love interest of Romano’s “brother” Brad Garrett—Monica Horan, also Jewish.

2013 was a year Oswalt repeatedly “tweeted” pedophile jokes such as this play on words—

The angry "@" tweets from my hammer toed followers opened my eyes. "Pedo-phobe" shaming hurts us all. I am a PROUD pedophile!

— Patton Oswalt (@pattonoswalt) July 9, 2013

A few months later, Oswalt tweeted this—

My dong is super-friendly and loves getting rubbed by children. #CareerEndingTwitterTypos

— Patton Oswalt (@pattonoswalt) November 4, 2013

The waters around Oswalt were muddied by agents of distraction and disinformation by photo-shopping a tweet the comedian posted about his daughter.

Selfie at the #TeenTitansGoMovie premiere! Boo-yah! pic.twitter.com/OLuRjNEpPc

— Patton Oswalt (@pattonoswalt) July 22, 2018

It pays to track down supposed “screen-shots” of “deleted” social media.⁴⁹

Offensive public figures are being emphasized and sometimes framed to be over-emphasized to give cover for the real pedophiles in Rome and their pawns, puppets and agents in positions of power everywhere.

But the controversy surrounding Oswalt doesn’t end there.

Oswalt was married to “true crime” author Michelle McNamara until she died in 2016.

McNamara was a good Catholic, graduate of Notre Dame and regularly attended Mass at St. Edmund’s in Oak Park, Illinois.  Like so many devoutly Catholic men, her father considered becoming a priest but decided to raise a family instead.

On April 24^th, 2018, the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department arrested 72-year-old Joseph James DeAngelo in connection to the “Golden State” murder/rape spree over forty years prior.

DeAngelo was a former disgraced police officer⁵⁰ who had worn a badge in several locations that experienced serial crimes of robbery, rape and murder all suspected to be linked, from Exeter to Auburn, California.

Three days prior to DeAngelo’s arrest, Michelle McNamara died of “a previously undiagnosed heart condition” and “complications from prescribed medication”.  She was about to publish a book on the Golden State Killer titled I’ll Be Gone in the Dark.

The perpetrator of at least 13 murders, 50 rapes and over 100 burglaries “eluded” police for over forty years.  Did Michelle McNamara’s research force their hand, and her death?

As I’ve found and shown you conclusively, the worst crimes are being committed by the very authorities you trust to protect you from predators; perpetrated by cops, Congressmen and clergymen, judges, journalists and generals.

Patton Oswalt weathered the loss quickly enough, marrying Jewish Meredith Salenger 18 months after his wife’s “freak” death.

NOTE: Special thanks to Doc Felipe for his research.

Full Huckleberry.

UPDATE: Our new team-member Eric has disclosed that, in 1996, a Jesuit was added to the Board at Disney—Leo J. O’Donovan.  It turned out that Father Leo was a good friend of “Michael” (Eisner).  They had been talking since Michael sent his son to Georgetown⁵¹ where Father Leo was running things.

The Washington Post had all the inside details. ⁵²

Leo J. O’Donovan just completed his sixth year as president of Georgetown University.  What’s he going to do now?

He’s going to Disney World.  O’Donovan, a Jesuit priest who leads the nation’s oldest Catholic university, two weeks ago was elected to a two-year term on the Walt Disney Co.’s board of directors…

The announcement of O’Donovan’s appointment came just two weeks after the Southern Baptist Convention…passed a resolution calling for a boycott of Walt Disney theme parks, movies and merchandise.  The group censured the company for granting benefits to partners of gay employees and hosting gay and lesbian theme nights. …

O’Donovan said he wholeheartedly disagrees with this assessment of Disney.

“If I thought Disney were changing direction in any substantial way, I would, of course, have questions I would raise,” he said.  “I’ll have a responsibility to offer good advice on the moral implications of some of the company’s production, but I don’t think I’ll be the only one doing that.” …

Disney caught some heat in October when it was revealed that the director of its movie “Powder” was a convicted child molester. …

O’Donovan’s decision to join Disney’s board highlights the rift among Catholics over church doctrine and responsibilities of the clergy and church members.  The Catholic Church does not condone homosexuality, but O’Donovan said Disney is following standard industry practices in granting benefits to domestic partners, not making an “ideological decision.”  As for films such as “Priest,” O’Donovan said, “One can’t judge a company or person by a single act or production, or we’d never lead lives or have businesses.”

“I don’t want to be moralistic or talk about moral requirements,” O’Donovan said about his goals as a Disney board member. …

O’Donovan’s connection to the Walt Disney Co. dates to 1989, when he was inducted as Georgetown’s president and Disney Chairman Michael Eisner, whose son was a Georgetown student at the time, served on the college’s board.  The two became friends, and O’Donovan has served as an unofficial adviser to Eisner for several years.

Eisner holds O’Donovan in high esteem.  “He is just a wise, renaissance, all-purpose, creative, educated man.  And besides that, he has a perspective on things that bring diversity to the board,” Eisner said in a telephone interview last week.

Eisner said he wanted to ask O’Donovan to join Disney’s board earlier, but there were no openings.  When Disney’s acquisition of Capital Cities/ABC Inc. was completed in February, two new board positions were added, one of which Eisner asked O’Donovan to fill.

Eisner dismissed the notion that O’Donovan’s appointment is a public relations maneuver designed to deflect criticism by religious conservatives, especially in the wake of the Baptist boycott. …

O’Donovan will attend his first board meeting in September at Disney World near Orlando, Fla.  He will receive a $30,000 annual honorarium from Disney, be reimbursed for travel expenses to the five board meetings and given 2,000 shares of Disney stock each year — typical benefits for a board position with a large company.

You’re probably wondering why the intrepid journalists at the Washington Post didn’t bother to tell you how much “2,000 shares of Disney stock” is worth; today it would be $232,260 (remember, that’s gifted each year to every Board member).

For some reason, Father Leo being on the Board at Disney hasn’t received a lot of press and no one is stating how long he was there or if he still is.

If so, he raked in over two hundred thousand a year since 1996—but don’t worry, the Post assures us that he isn’t allowed to “own property” so he probably gave it all away.

But being on the Board at Disney did afford poor Father Leo a few nice perks, like going to the “after party” of The Human Stain (2003) with Catholic co-star Nicole Kidman, GP race-driver Giuseppe Cipriani⁵³ and movie producer Harvey Weinstein (seen below with his arm over the good Father’s shoulder).

We’re sure that if Father Leo had any $700 bottles of Dom, or the $650 Lobster Frittata crowned with caviar, he gave that away, too.

Nicole Kidman?

Although reputed child sex slave Fiona Barnett claims that her late father Antony was her chief abuser, she’s doing fine now, having been married (once again, this time) to Catholic Country singer Keith Urban by the family Jesuit, Father Paul Coleman.

Surprisingly (or, perhaps not so), Nicole isn’t afraid to get too close to Harvey.

Why not?  —Her Catholic-ness is highly prized by the Jewish Weinstein Company.

Screening of “NINE”, Penelope Cruz, Harvey Weinstein, Stacy “Fergie” Ferguson, Nicole Kidman.

I guess we have to ask, how much money does an actress (or actor) have to make to not be repulsed by Harvey Weinstein…?

If you’re a Johnny Cirucci fan (one of his “flying monkeys”), I’ll bet you were surprised to see him write that.

If you’re a Peter J. Reilly fan, I’ll bet you’re asking, “Who the heck is ‘Johnny Cirucci’?!”

About Johnny Cirucci

I ran across Peter about three years ago.  I had just published my first book, Illuminati Unmasked, and had begun doing interviews.

Invariably, the subject of Kent Hovind would come up.

Kent was slated for possible release from prison but the hearing didn’t look hopeful.  He was a hot topic for “alternative” Christian media at the time.

As a Jesuit-educated writer for Forbes, I considered Peter one of “them” and avoided corresponding with him.

But Peter is an interesting guy.  While I tend to be an excitable Italian and former Catholic, he remains an unflappable Irishman and, he assures me, a former Catholic.  He recently related his first experience outside the Church to the current troubles the Trump Foundation is having paying taxes in the state of New York.

It wouldn’t be the first time a wily Jesuit had gone undercover!

Although I write that tongue-in-cheek, I firmly believe that such was the case for a host of prominent people from the Jesuit-educated critic of Christianity, François-Marie “Voltaire” Arouet to the “former” late Jesuit priest Malachi Martin.

The Jesuits are the ultimate order in service to the Papacy and it’s a tough sell to present the idea that a Catholic priest wants to serve…but not that much.

Martin’s book, The Jesuits, sits well-highlited and noted upon my shelf.  My summary would be, “The Jesuits used to be a great bunch of guys but then they turned a bad corner and went Communist.”

By the way, that’s not hyperbole.

Though the movement has been global since its inception, it was above all in Latin America that the strange alliance between Jesuits and Marxists gathered its first practical momentum.  It was there that this new Jesuit mission, entailing as it does nothing less than the transformation of the sociopolitical face of the West, first entangled lives far more profoundly than McGovern and theoreticians like him anticipated.  Quickly, scores of Jesuits began to work with the passion and zeal that has always been so typical of them, for the success of the Sandinocommunists in Nicaragua; and, when the Sandinistas took power, those same Jesuits entered crucial posts in the central government, and attracted others to join at various regional levels.  In other Central American countries, meanwhile, Jesuits not only participated in guerrilla training of Marxist cadres, but some became guerrilla fighters themselves.  Inspired by the idealism they saw in Liberation Theology, and encouraged by the independence inherent in the new idea of the Church as a group of autonomous communities, Jesuits found that all was permitted-even encouraged-as long as it furthered the concept of the new “people’s Church.”

Such men were the dream and ideal of the true Liberation Theologians.  For they were the fighters, the cadres who took Liberation Theology from theory to what they called praxis-the implementation of the people’s revolution for economic and political liberation.  From that praxis, the Liberation Theologians insisted, from “below among the people,” would come all true theology to replace the old theology once imposed autocratically “from above” by the hierarchy of the Roman Church.¹

Apparently, the Jesuits haven’t returned from their hard Left turn.  Another “ex-Jesuit”, Greg Galluzzo, trained Barack Obama in Chicago “community organizing”.

The Catholic periodical “Our Sunday Visitor” lists Chicago as one of the “Top 10 Catholic Communities” and even takes note of its … “ethnic diversity” (code for racial unrest generously encouraged by Rome).

Chicago’s Catholic heart is based in its ethnic diversity.

As the Windy City became industrialized in the mid-19th century, immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe flocked to Chicago — joining the already present Irish and Germans — to become part of its workforce. Ethnic communities naturally formed, and ethnic Catholic parishes naturally followed. Today, more than 350 Catholic churches remain, many built in impressive European style.

It has been rumored that, once a Jesuit proves themselves truly dedicated to Rome, they are invited to take a “Blood Oath” in which they swear to have no will of their own, “perinde ac cadaver”, to be as a dead man in the strictest obedience to the Pope.

This “Fourth Vow” is said to have sold Alessandro Farnese²—Pope Paul III—on consecrating the new order for Spanish nobleman Ignacio López (later known as Ignatius of Loyola).

After a serious injury in the military and during a lengthy rehabilitation, Ignatius Loyola (b. 1491, d. 1556) turned his focus from “military enthusiasm to ghostly fanaticism.⁽²⁾  Ignatius assumed the name and office of Knight of the Virgin Mary, seeing himself as Mary’s favorite.  Ignatius wanted to start a new order, The Society of Jesus (or the Jesuits) and presented the idea to the Pope.  He told the Pope that the idea had been inspired by heavenly revelations.  At first, the Pope hesitated, but when Ignatius added a fourth vow (in addition to the regular poverty, chastity, and obedience), “absolute subservience to the pope,” promising to do whatever the Pope wanted and go wherever he wanted, the Pope agreed and sent the new order out to “invade the world.”  While other monks of other orders sought to separate themselves from the world, the Jesuits went out into the world and obeyed whatever command the Pope gave.  Often this was to win the world with the sword.  No violent act was withheld if the order came from their top “general.”⁽³⁾ ~ The Jesuit Agenda and the Evangelical/Protestant Church, Roger Oakland, Understand the Times/Lighthouse Trails Special Report

But now, a Jesuit is the Pope.  —And it raised more than one eyebrow to see that the vacancy provided for Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio was the resignation of Pope Benedict; an event that had not occurred in the previous 600 years.  Cynics began to accuse the Jesuits of mafioso skullduggery (something they are famous for…or, rather, infamous).

Bergoglio, himself, has a murky past, hidden behind Argentina’s “Dirty War”, in which a series of corrupt military dictatorships purged Argentina of their political enemies under the guise of “anti-Communism”.

Many of the victims were held for months in official institutions, where they were repeatedly tortured before being killed, their bodies “disappeared.”  Justifying the purge, which was spoken about euphemistically but carried out in secrecy, the Argentine military espoused a brand of anti-Communist ferocity that echoed Franco’s Fascist witch hunt, which had previously devastated Republican Spain — a brand of ferocity that also shared his deeply entrenched ultra-Catholic and anti-Semitic views. ~ The New Yorker

Devout Roman Catholic Francisco Franco Bahamonde had no less a spiritual advisor than Father José María Escriva de Balaguer, the founder of Opus Dei.

Franco was a monster who availed himself of both the knowledge and instruments of the Inquisition to torture any victim he felt worthy of it.

How was he able to do that?  —The Inquisition was never disbanded by the Vatican.  It quietly became the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.  In fact, before he was elected “Pope Benedict XVI”, former Nazi Youth Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was Prefect of the Inquisition.  He also helped Jesuit scholar Karl Rahner map out Vatican II.  Unfortunately, none of these “accomplishments” were enough to insulate him from an “invitation to retire early”.

It’s hard to imagine worse than Inquisition torture but Franco managed it: child trafficking.

For Whom The Bell Tolls

In Spain, hundreds of thousands of babies were stolen from their parents and trafficked by the Fascist government of Francisco Franco via the Catholic Church.

Up to 300,000 Spanish babies were stolen from their parents and sold for adoption over a period of five decades, a new investigation reveals.

The children were trafficked by a secret network of doctors, nurses, priests and nuns in a widespread practice that began during General Franco’s dictatorship and continued until the early Nineties. …

Several mothers say they were told their first-born children had died during or soon after they gave birth. …

But the women, often young and unmarried, were told they could not see the body of the infant or attend their burial.

In reality, the babies were sold…

Official documents were forged so the adoptive parents’ names were on the infants’ birth certificates. …

Journalist Katya Adler, who has investigated the scandal, says: “The situation is incredibly sad for thousands of people.”

“There are men and women across Spain whose lives have been turned upside-down by discovering the people they thought were their parents actually bought them for cash.  There are also many mothers who have maintained for years that their babies did not die – and were labelled ‘hysterical’ – but are now discovering that their child has probably been alive and brought up by somebody else all this time.”

Experts believe the cases may account for up to 15 per cent of the total adoptions that took place in Spain between 1960 and 1989.

It began as a system for taking children away from families deemed politically dangerous to the regime of General Franco, which began in 1939.  The system continued after the dictator’s death in 1975 as the Catholic church continued to retain a powerful influence on public life, particularly in social services. ~ Daily Mail⁸³

What made the scheme easy to accomplish was that the Catholic Church ran schools, orphanages and hospitals, and still does (even in “Protestant” countries like America).

In Fascist Spain, however, the power of the Catholic Church was as blatant and all-encompassing as it is in Ireland.

On April 1, 1939, Generalísimo Francisco Franco, crusading leader of the rebellious Nationalist forces, triumphantly declared the Spanish Civil War over.  The Catholic Church was the institution that most benefitted from Franco’s victory. Its hierarchy had blessed the Nationalist uprising as a crusade and had justified the war to the world as an “armed plebiscite.”  Now it reaped the reward.  Franco quickly abolished all those Republican** measures that had undermined the Church’s spiritual and social roles, and entrusted it with more power and privilege than it had enjoyed since the 18th century.

For the Church, the privileges constituted a spiritual “reconquista” complementing the political “reconquista” enjoyed by Franco and his Nationalists.  What the political “reconquista” meant was the return to Castilian centralism and the elimination of other ideologies.  The “reconquista” for the Church signified Catholic monopoly over the life of all Spaniards, a vital privilege if society was to be “re-Catholicised”.  This “re-Catholicisation” was not an easy undertaking keeping in mind that, in supporting the Nationalists during the War, the Church had alienated a large percentage of the population. …

For Cardinal Gomá, primate of Spain, the only way was to impose “divine totalitarianism”, i.e. the imposition of Catholic values on all Spanish society. Franco was only too glad to help.

The privileged status of the Church was granted immediately following the Civil War. A little later —in June 1941— its rights were outlined in an Agreement between the Vatican and the Franco government, and finally formalised in a Concordat signed in August, 1953.  Amongst the provisions were:

1. recognition of Catholicism as the official religion of the country;
2. Mandatory religious instruction at all educational levels in conformity with Catholic dogma;
3. Financial support of the church by the state (paying the salary of priests and contributing to the (re)construction of church buildings);
4. Guaranteed representation in both press and radio.

~ Spain Then And Now⁸⁴

The fact that the government of Spain, in collusion with the Catholic Church, were the institutions that kidnapped babies meant that it is impossible to account for them all.  Despite media white-washing, it is a foregone conclusion that many of the children weren’t simply “sold” to good Catholics who wanted them, they were trafficked, tortured and ritually slaughtered.

Proof is found in how Rome maintained these crimes against the Spanish people long after Franco’s death.

Generalísimo Francisco Franco was personally assisted by Father Josemaria Escriva, the founder of Opus Dei.⁸⁵

It would not be the last time Opus Dei was the vehicle by which children were trafficked, abused and murdered. ~ Eaters of Children ³

The same outrages occurred during the Argentinian Dirty War.  However, no institution of repute is daring to link Cardinal Bergoglio (now Pope Francis I) directly to child trafficking.

Below mainstream media, former Church of Canada Priest-turned-human-rights activist Kevin Annett does level the accusation.

A former civil servant in the Argentine military junta who is living in exile in Spain claims that Pope Francis engineered the kidnapping and trafficking of children of political prisoners during the Dirty War of the 1970’s.

The man bases his claim on his personal involvement in meetings between Bergoglio and senior junta members that secured the child trafficking networks using Catholic orphanages and religious bodies as covers.

A Spanish reporter who has interviewed the former civil servant states,

“This guy is genuine and has many names and dates, and notes from meetings. Apparently, Bergoglio was promised the top spot in the Argentine church if he cooperated with the junta. So it’s small wonder that as the Pope, he’s made it harder for honest catholics to report child abuse, considering his own complicity.” ~ ITCCS.org

Unfortunately, Annett and his “International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State” harm their credibility with delusions of grandeur; frequently proclaiming that an “international court in Brussels” has convicted Bergoglio of child trafficking.

That was 2014.

Exactly what law enforcement agency is going to be doing the arresting, Annett doesn’t say.  In fact, Bergoglio has never been arrested for child trafficking and, if a “trial” ever took place he was tried in absentia.

Argentina’s “Dirty War” was supposedly an “ultra-Right” purge of “Communists”, yet Pope Francis I maintains a posture that is nothing less than far-Left.⁴

From “global warming” to gun control, Papa Francisco seems to have gone to the “opposite extreme” of his Communist-hunting Cardinalcy.

Pope Francis Blames “Human Selfishness” For Global Warming, BBC

Pope Francis Scolds Congress for Gun and Weapons Sales, Breitbart.com

Pope Francis: After U.S. Gun Control Marches, Church Leader Wants Youth To Keep Shouting, Newsweek

Pope Francis Apologizes to Indigenous Peoples for “Grave Sins” of Colonialism, Indian Country Today

Pope Francis Attacks EU Over Treatment of Immigrants, The Guardian

Pope Says Immigrants No Threat to Europe’s Christian Identity, Crux Now

Pope Francis: Overcome Fear of Immigrants and Refugees, America Magazine (Official Jesuit publication)

Pope Francis to Immigrants: “Do not be Ashamed of Your Traditions”, The Washington Post

“Please do not be ashamed of your traditions,” he told the audience.  “Do not forget the lessons you learned from your elders, which are something you can bring to enrich the life of this American land.  I repeat, do not be ashamed of what is part of you, your lifeblood.  You are called to be responsible citizens and to contribute, like others who with so much strength did before you . . . fruitfully to the life of the communities in which you live.”

Francis also culled American history to underscore his remarks about the treatment of immigrants.

“We remember the great struggles which led to the abolition of slavery, the extension of voting rights, the growth of the labor movement, and the gradual effort to eliminate every kind of racism and prejudice against the earlier arrival of new Americans,” he said.

In an era of deadly terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, decades of wide-open borders are nothing less than treason.

Although “mainstream media” decries any attempt to close the borders as “racist”, the issue isn’t “race” as much as “religion”.

As in America’s past, the vast majority of immigrants pouring across those open borders are Roman Catholic.

However, in stark contrast to waves of Catholic immigrants of yester-year, simply walking across an open border means you don’t have to assimilate.

Consequently, ghettos of Spanish-speaking illegal immigrants are common to every state in the Union.  This exacerbates the refusal of U.S. officials at all levels of government to enforce immigration laws and causes natural-born citizens (at least those whose parents didn’t consider labor pains as synonymous with a starting gun) to react in anger at said Spanish-speakers.

The situation is worsened when, not only Federal, State and local governments provide Spanish-speaking service to illegal immigrants but most businesses do, as well.

One would think that encouraging “immigrants” to wear their background on their sleeves—and then reiterating the encouragement—makes a bad situation even worse.

Although the Jesuits have oft been accused of masterfully manipulating civic discontent to steer in their favor, surely Pope Francis knows not what he does.

This is all academic, of course.  Donald John Trump, who spent 2 years under the Jesuits at Fordham before transferring to the “public” University of Pennsylvania, was elected based upon his repeated theatrical vows to “build a wall”.

While sources like New York Magazine rail against Trump’s “racist immigration policy”, the truth is that, like Barack Obama on his promise to close Guantanamo Bay, ^{5, 6, 7, 8} Donald Trump has been all show and no stay.

As Trump’s Conservative constituency begins to get impatient, they are encouraged to be satisfied with real progress such as Attorney General and former ensconced 20-year United States Senator Jeff Sessions telling Justice Department bureaucrats to be sure and say “illegal alien” whenever speaking of “undocumented visitors”.

Top Jesuits are even managing to upset Conservative Catholics.

When it comes to homosexuality, Pope Francis says, “Who am I to judge?”

On eternal salvation or damnation, the Jesuit White Pope has stated that even atheists can go to Heaven and, it’s all good because Hell doesn’t exist anyway!

His counterpart in the Order, Superior General Arturo Sosa (known as the “Black Pope”^9, 10) has backed up the Jesuit disappearing of eternal damnation by telling the Spanish newspaper El Mundo that Satan is just a man-made “symbol”.

In relation to the words of Jesus Christ recorded in Mark 10:9 on the sanctity of marriage — “What God has joined, let no man separate,” — Sosa told Swiss journalist Giuseppe Rusconi that no one used a “tape recorder” to chronicle the words of Jesus and, therefore, they should be examined “in context”.

What does all this have to do with Peter J. Reilly, Kent Hovind and paying your taxes?  —Nothing.  It was just my introduction.

And Now For Something Completely Different

I’ve come a long way since 2015.

Somehow, Peter and I were connected on Twitter—I think he reached out and I was at a point where curiosity about “the other team” was overcoming my trepidation so I returned the “follow”.

That put Peter on my feed and when I saw him “like” a “tweet” from an unexpected source, I had to jump into the fray.

Her real name is Stephanie Gregory¹¹ Clifford, but that’s not what the media calls her.  She’s a pornography “actress” and the media not only plastered her and her breasts all over the airwaves (which was wonderful for your children to see) but they were always sure to use her porn name, “Stormy Daniels”.

Supposedly, “Stormy” had sex with your president just after his third wife had their latest child, “Barron”.¹²

The media has used this literal harlot to make pornography a household item for the youngest of children; who would think to put a parental block on the 5 o’clock news?

This actually could have been the ultimate motive the entire time; so much so that it’s quite possible Donald Trump never even met Stephanie Clifford.¹³

I find it particularly ironic that Vatican sources like the Catholic News Service seem to be on the forefront of this revelation.

The percentage of Americans who say pornography is morally acceptable increased more over the past year than in all other years this decade combined.

While the acceptability of porn still holds minority status in the United States, it has climbed to 43 percent, according to Gallup Poll figures released June 5.  The number increased by 7 percent from last year’s figure.

In 2011, when Gallup first started asking this question, only 30 percent said pornography was morally acceptable.  As of last year, that figure had climbed to 36 percent, a rise of 6 percent.

While acceptance of pornography had trailed other social issues earlier this decade, such as doctor-assisted suicide, same-sex relations, sex between unmarried people and out-of-wedlock childbirth, the 2017-18 surge means that porn has eclipsed all other social issues in their growing acceptance by Americans this decade, according to Gallup.

A report on the poll’s findings by Gallup analyst Andrew Dugan said that while Americans had grown more tolerant on social norms over the decade, the reason behind the steep climb on pornography is “less clear.”

One theory Dugan offered is that adult film actress Stormy Daniels, a “fierce critic of President Donald Trump, has given pornography a sense of moral credibility that it previously lacked.” ~ Crux Now

Does this just happen to be “one theory” or does the Catholic News Service have an insider source?

Unfortunately, Donald Trump is far from being unfairly wounded here.  In fact, another aspect of this contrived “scandal” is actually damage control.  Trump’s secrets are more dark and perverse than a “fling with a porn actress”.  That’s how he was selected to be “elected”: he’s a slave to the blackmail of his deviant past.

In comparison to what Donald Trump really is, the “Stormy Daniels” scandal is tame, even appealing to some with looser morals.  It’s a well-used tactic.

Hillary Rodham continued to play the role of strong-man by illegally going through the FBI dossiers of their political enemies for blackmail.  Neither the existence of the dossiers nor the activity were addressed with prosecution.

In fact, the corruptions that occurred during the Clinton Administration that were being ignored were so vast a side-show was fabricated over a sexual tryst Bill had in the Oral Office.  Meanwhile, in best Hegelian fashion, Bill’s Jesuit keepers were ordering him to keep backwards Communist China in full threat status by sending them nuclear secrets and supercomputers; all acts of high treason that were shoved under Monica Lewinsky’s stained dress. ~ Can We Finally Call Hillary A Roman? ¹⁴

If Trump hasn’t met Stephanie Clifford (or maybe she’s one of many such harlots he’s bought), why did his handlers choose her for the spotlight?  She has greatly benefited from the show.

Her recent arrest and release may give some insight.

Charges against adult film actress Stormy Daniels for allegedly touching three undercover detectives while performing at an Ohio strip club were dismissed Thursday, her attorney said.

Daniels, who gained notoriety after suing President Donald Trump following an alleged affair, had faced three misdemeanor counts of illegally touching a patron, court records show.

Daniels, whose legal name is Stephanie Clifford, posted a $6,054 bail and was released Thursday morning, and was due to be arraigned Friday, records show.

Under an Ohio law passed in 2007, an employee who regularly appears nude or seminude at a sexually oriented business is prohibited from touching patrons, except for family members.

Because Daniels does not regularly appear at the club, the charges were dismissed, according to court documents.

“I’ve determined that these crimes were not committed, based on the fact that Ms. Clifford has not made regular appearances at this establishment as required under the law,” Columbus City Attorney Zach Klein said in a statement after reviewing the case.

Daniels had planned to plead not guilty to the three misdemeanor charges, her attorney, Michael Avenatti, tweeted.

The arrest of Daniels and two others was part of a “long-term investigation into allegations of human trafficking, prostitution, & other vice related violations,” Columbus police said in a statement. ~ CNN

Not only was Clifford (whom CNN prefers to call by her porn name) released, but she admitted that two other strippers who were arrested with her were not.

Saddened to hear the other 2 dancers arrested with me last night did not have their charges dropped. All tips from my stage performance tonight at Sirens in Columbus will go towards their legal fees. Come support the working women of this city. #letussurvive

— Stormy Daniels (@StormyDaniels) July 12, 2018

Maybe she just had a better lawyer.

Michael John Avenatti has an education very similar to Donald Trump, having first received Catholic instruction at the public-sounding Saint Louis University before transferring 900 miles east to the University of Pennsylvania to be given a more overtly “public” degree.

Perhaps the clue can be found in the arrest being the result of a “long-term investigation into allegations of human trafficking…”  As I’ve already shown you conclusively, real power is sealed through the abuse of children.  That includes the power to avoid prosecution (which seems to be the case for virtually every high-profile pedophile I’ve researched).

According to Ken Wooden, a child safety expert who has interviewed more than 1,000 sex offenders and abductors, the biggest mistake parents make is to think it’s enough to tell children, “Don’t talk to strangers.”

“In the eyes of a kid, a stranger is some character who’s very scary and a monster type,” said Wooden.  In reality, though, molesters can look like ordinary, friendly, engaging adults, Wooden warned. ~ ABC News

Is Stephanie Clifford a “lure” to help bring unsuspecting children into an obviously dangerous environment?  Does she hook young girls with telling them how profitable her lifestyle is?

Funny. My bank account and trophy case say differently. https://t.co/NvWdO8GiUo

— Stormy Daniels (@StormyDaniels) July 8, 2018

Exactly what a “porn actress” puts in her “trophy case” can only be imagined but one wonders who you can or even should show off such “trophies” to.

You would think that an adulterous “porn actress” scandal would cripple someone like Donald Trump, who rode into the White House via the “Conservative”, Christian, Republican vote but not only does it appear not to have affected him, a second scandal was released by the media almost identical to the first.

President Trump’s longtime lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, secretly recorded a conversation with Mr. Trump two months before the presidential election in which they discussed payments to a former Playboy model who said she had an affair with Mr. Trump, according to lawyers and others familiar with the recording.

The F.B.I. seized the recording this year during a raid on Mr. Cohen’s office.  The Justice Department is investigating Mr. Cohen’s involvement in paying women to tamp down embarrassing news stories about Mr. Trump ahead of the 2016 election.  Prosecutors want to know whether that violated federal campaign finance laws, and any conversation with Mr. Trump about those payments would be of keen interest to them. ~ The New York Times

A single source—The Telegraph—says “Playboy Playmate of the Year” Karen McDougal “became religious” but curiously leaves out exactly what her “religion” is.

She maintains a website with her name “.com” (which one would assume would be hard to obtain) but it has no content other than a photograph of her—a somewhat decently-dressed one, fortunately.  At one point there was an “About Me” page but it has since been taken down.  What is Karen hiding about her background?

Once taking the plunge for porn, it was all smooth sailing for McDougal…or, rather, “driving”.

McDougal’s first modelling assignment was being a promotional model at a Harley-Davidson bike show in Detroit.^[8]

Playboy

In 1997, McDougal tried out and won her local Venus Swimwear swimsuit competition in Michigan, earning her place at the international final in Florida.  Her victory caught the eye of Playboy photographer David Mecey.^[4]  Soon after that she was approached by Playboy for a test shoot at Playboy Studio West which she accepted.^[6]  Upon completing her test shoot, she was promptly selected to return for a complete photo and video shoot and chosen as Miss December 1997.^[4]  Her pictorial, which was shot by photographers Richard Fegley and Stephen Wayda, has a winter theme^[1] and its outdoor portion was shot in the snowy fields near Park City, Utah.^[9]  Her video, the “Playmate Profile”, was featured on Playboy TV soon after her magazine debut.^[2]

In May 1998, she was announced to have been chosen by Hugh Hefner and fans as Playmate of the Year (PMOY) of 1998 at a luncheon at the Playboy Mansion.^[10]

As part of being named PMOY, she was awarded $100,000 and a special edition silver Shelby Series 1 convertible with a customized Michigan license plate “PMOY 98”.^[3]  McDougal’s PMOY pictorial was featured in the July 1998 issue of Playboy where she also appeared on its cover.^[11]  In contrast to her Playmate pictorial, her PMOY pictorial has a tropical theme and its outdoor portion was shot at Saint Lucia.^[3]  According to her interview in her Playmate of the Year “Video Centerfold” which was released soon after her PMOY issue debuted, she believes her physical imperfections are her “funny” smile, her crooked pinkies which she inherited from her grandfather and her “ugly feet” which she wishes others would not look at.^[5]  Because of the popularity of the VH1 television series “Pop-up Video“ at the time, one of the segments in her PMOY video was done as a Pop-up Video parody filled with factoids about her and Playboy.^[5]  During her appearance on The Magic Hour to promote her PMOY issue, McDougal demonstrated her signature pose, straddle split on TV in front of a live studio audience.^[12]

In an online chat in 2002, McDougal expressed interest in posing nude for Playboy again if offered.^[13]

Fitness Modeling

In March 1999, McDougal became the first woman to appear on the cover of Men’s Fitness magazine.^[4]  Since then she expanded her career into fitness modeling by appearing in fitness and body building magazines such as Muscle & Fitness (January 2000), Physical (June 2004) and Iron Man (October 2005, January 2006, June 2007^[14] and November 2009^[15]).^[8]  She appeared in a 10-page pictorial in the January 2006 issue of Iron Man as “Hardbody” of the month,^[16] and on the cover of its October 2005 and June 2007 issues.  McDougal returned as “Hardbody” of the month in the November 2009 issue in a pictorial together with fellow Playmate Katie Lohmann.^[15]  In interviews, she stated that her transition to fitness modeling was unintentional.^[15][17] ~ Wikipedia

Truly, the wages of sin are big money and a top-of-the-line sportscar…at least until it comes time to pay the bills.¹⁵

If McDougal is just another pair of breasts being presented to America’s children via the evening news, the next question is what we asked about Stephanie “Stormy Daniels” Clifford: why her?  Perhaps becoming “religious” was a bigger benefit than you might think…if it’s the right “religion”.

Wikipedia claims she is “of Cherokee, Scottish and Irish descent.”  You probably aren’t seeing any “Cherokee” (neither am I), and “McDougal” can bespeak of Scotland but “Irish” certainly leaves a clue that the “religion” Karen found was Roman Catholicism.

It worked for another “former” porn actress, Jenna Jameson.

Jameson also “got religious”—more specifically, she got Roman Catholic.

Interestingly, she seems to find no conflict with her past and, although she’s a “former porn actress” she told Larry King in 2013 that she wouldn’t return to porn because she’s too old for it, not because it was in any way offensive.

Perhaps the fact that Jameson “found” Roman Catholicism also explains how she had the pull to land an interview with Larry King.

We can only guess about what religion Karen McDougal became “religious” in, but no guesses are necessary for the Trump lawyer being trumpeted as the epicenter of Porn Scandal II: Michael Cohen is Jewish.

Once again, we see a Hebrew in a high-profile but low-influence position bolstering the “conspiracy theory” I maintain that willing Jews are human shields for Romans.

It was here that I noticed Peter Reilly getting involved.  He had “hearted” a “tweet” from Stephanie “Stormy Daniels” Clifford that I thought was quite obnoxious.

Only the uptight ones. Go bake your hubby a pie and then cry alone in the shower. https://t.co/gYuJ64na8n

— Stormy Daniels (@StormyDaniels) July 8, 2018

Once again I found myself on one end of an issue and Peter on another.

Being temperamental and ornery (shocking, I know), I messaged a ribbing to Peter.

Being even-tempered and reserved (might I call him “cagey”?), he side-stepped the issue and opened a dialogue.

I wanted to stay angry but, instead, I was disarmed and intrigued.  In fact, it was damn Jesuitical of him!

I realized that I had squandered three years by not reaching out to Peter sooner.

If nothing else, I could attempt to understand how a Jesuit-trained Forbes CPA sees things.  Hell, maybe I might be able to win him over in some way.

Oddly enough, the three years since Peter and I first met have seen me align perfectly with him on the subject of Kent Hovind.

I now see Hovind, not as an unsung hero, but as a reckless, selfish and incompetent father, husband and Christian steward at best and an agent of deception at worst.

Is Kent Hovind a Roman Luciferian?

To begin with, Kent is a “Creationist” like Ken Ham: a Christian who seeks to put dinosaurs in the Garden of Eden.

This tactic does more harm than good and one wonders if men like this know that.

If anything, a much more radical understanding of our cosmology does far more to validate the Bible and, if carefully examined, gives more real observational (“zetetic”) evidence.

Such an examination has been maligned as “flat Earth” but, without the labels, this community asks some serious questions the “experts” seem ill-equipped to answer.

Daring To Think The Un-Thinkable

For instance, if you make your own observations, the sun and moon appear to be nearly exactly the same size and relatively close to your position.

However, experts claim that moon has a radius of 1,079 miles while the sun has a radius 432,169 miles—roughly 400x bigger.

These same experts claim that the moon is 238,900 miles away from the Earth and that the sun is 92.96 million miles away.  By “random chance”, the sun is 400x bigger than the moon but also 400x further away giving it the “optical illusion” of being the same size.  If this weren’t the case, eclipses would be impossible.

At best this is an astounding case for “intelligent design” behind the creation of our “universe”.

According to NASA, the Earth is spinning at 1,000 mph (breaking the 767mph sound barrier) at the equator.  The Earth revolves around the sun at 67,000 mph.  The solar system moves through the Milky Way at 500,000 mph.  The Milky Way moves through the universe at 670,000,000 mph.

All that movement and yet the North Star is right there, day after day, year after year, century after century.

NASA assures us that, again, our eyes are playing tricks on us and this is another “optical illusion” created by the vast distance between the Earth and the North Star.  Just trust them…really!

In fact, until I do my own time-lapse photography at the North Pole, I don’t trust what’s on the internet.  I suspect stars move a lot less than “the experts” tell us.

However, if you seek to conduct any experiments for yourself at the “South Pole”, you’re not allowed.

In 1959 (just as nations were developing the technology to do this with little risk), all of the most powerful countries in the world agreed via the “Antarctic Treaty” to keep nosey independent researchers from doing this.  In the heat of the Cold War, the U.S. and U.S.S.R. vowed (along with, today, 53 other nations from East and West) that anyone nosing around Antarctica was cause for those two combined militaries to stop pointing guns at each other and point them at you, instead.

It wasn’t until 2011 that airlines were finally allowed to over-fly the North Pole, but the South remains firmly restricted.

What are they hiding (besides the idea that the Cold War was contrived and needless)?

Accepted “flat Earth” maps like Ferguson’s or Gleason’s give the answer: it is impossible to “over-fly” the “South Pole” because it is actually a ring of ice, not a continent.

Official NASA photograph of the “Ross Ice Shelf” named after British explorer Sir James Clark Ross who described an “icy barrier…between one hundred and fifty and two hundred feet above the level of the sea, perfectly flat and level at the top, and without any fissures or promontories on its even seaward face” in 1847.

Yet, we are assured that the Nazi who helped America leap out into space, Werner von Braun, went to Antarctica to collect moon rocks and the President of Notre Dame, Father Theodore Hesburgh was there, too.

The experts tell us that the Earth is a spinning globe with a radius of approximately 3,965 miles.  Google explains that “Using the Pythagorean theorem, that calculates to an average curvature of 7.98 inches per mile or approximately 8 inches per mile (squared).”  That means that, across 1 mile, there is an 8 inch drop to the horizon.  At 2 miles, there is a 64 inch drop (5¹/₃^rds feet).  At 10 miles the drop is 66²/₃^rds feet and at 100 miles it’s an ominous 666²/₃^rds feet.

There are many places around “the globe” where the naked eye can see far beyond any perceived “curvature” but then the “experts” say you can’t trust the ups and downs of terrain.

You can, however, trust that water always finds its own level.  If you pour coffee into a cup with hills of sugar, it’s still a flat, calm surface once you pour enough.  If you then travel to the Suez Canal you see an astounding 120-mile-long surface with no detectable drop to the horizon.

Even more interesting is how flight of either the tiniest insect or the most massive aircraft isn’t affected by the Earth’s rotation in the slightest.  If the Earth rotates from east to west, air travel in one cardinal direction should take twice as long or be twice as short in another.  Of course, this is difficult to observe as an airline passenger, thanks to crazy and seemingly inefficient connecting flights—but I’m sure there’s a logical reason for them.

The experts tell us that, no, you can’t keep water on a spinning ball or have centrifugal force negated for anything on the surface of that ball but if the ball gets really, really big, at some magical point unknown to “science” something called “gravity” cancels the effect of movement and keeps everything conveniently in place.  You can’t test this for yourself, you again have to trust the experts.

The experts tell us that the Earth’s atmosphere is composed of 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, 0.9% argon, and 0.03% carbon dioxide along with other trace elements and water vapor.  Just outside that atmosphere is the icy-cold vacuum of space.  If you were to try and duplicate that, the vacuum would instantly rip the atmosphere away but, again, we are told to trust to the magic of “gravity” and the knowledge of the “experts”.

For instance, Albert Einstein’s “Special Theory of Relativity” does explain how “gravity” makes you feel “relative” to a stable, flat plain instead of a ball spinning faster than the speed of sound…it’s just too complex for you to understand.

Consequently, “conspiracy theorists” have begun to question whether the Jewish scientist was trying to deceitfully pull the collective wool over our eyes.  The fact that his close friend was a Jesuit-trained Belgian Catholic priest named Georges Lemaître has nothing to do with it, we’re sure!

However, I must mention that Lemaître is the astronomer who rose to the occasion and provided an answer on behalf of Darwinian evolutionists for the question, “If this all happened by random chance, how did it start without God?”  Lemaître’s response can basically be summarized as “First there was nothing, and then it exploded”.  The “scientific” phrase is “Big Bang Theory”.

One wouldn’t expect a Jesuit-trained Catholic priest to be so helpful to the Darwinians but in 2014 the Jesuit Pope, himself, reaffirmed that both “evolution” and the “Big Bang” are “real”.

Jesuits have run to the aid of floundering Darwinians more than you know.

Critics of the champion of chimpanzee conjecture caused a conundrum with the query “What was the adaptive ‘link’ between apes and man?”  During the awkward silence, Father Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, S.J., thought he would help things along a bit.  When no fossil could be found to provide the evidence, he simply fabricated one; “Piltdown Man”.

What was a Father who was known as the “father of New Age spiritism” doing hoaxing archeological evidence?  Perhaps the accusation that a top priority of the “Society of Jesus” is to discredit the Bible doesn’t seem quite so inflammatory.

At this point, tinfoil-hat-types are beginning to ask in the language of Rome, “Cui bono?”  “Who benefits?”  If the Catholic Church is “Christian”, why has it been so helpful to the Darwinian atheists who manage to explain away the Creation?

Actually, Rome has been far more helpful than you’ve been told and the motive is to attack and discredit the Bible, forcing the Pope to be acknowledged as the premier authority on both “science” and “spirtuality”.

Interestingly, both Kent Hovind and Ken Ham¹⁶ join the Jesuit Pope in disregard for these criticisms of modern “science”.  In fact, they go even further and vehemently attack them.  —Odd behavior for men who claim that validating the Bible is their highest priority.

But from a “conspiracy theorist” perspective, Kent is even more appealing to “the Machine” because of the quagmire of protesting taxation.

There can be no doubt that the complexity of the tax code is a form of tyranny.  America will never see a flat tax nor will any governmental authority examine the Sixteenth Amendment despite some interesting claims that it was unconstitutionally ratified.  In fact, a really sharp pleader could even make a case against the Sixteenth Amendment based upon Original Intent of the Constitution—the idea that the Federal government is entitled to skim your paycheck before you receive it and what it skims, it arbitrates from year to year.

The very fact that we need specialized Jesuit-trained CPAs like Peter J. Reilly proves this point.  Even if the tax code isn’t weaponized to target producers and common citizens, its complexity is in-and-of-itself a bulwark that the super-rich can hide behind by hiring armies of Peter J. Reillys to help squirrel away their wealth in legendary “offshore accounts”.

When It Comes to Taxes, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton Have 1 Thing in Common, The Nation
Tax avoidance by the wealthiest Americans—including the presidential front-runners—costs the U.S. government an additional $130 billion per year.¹⁷

Encouraging citizens who are discontented and disenfranchised with a weaponized tax code to “protest” it “ghetto-style” by simply not paying it is the ultimate sucker punch.  As the old saw goes, “You can’t fight City Hall” and Kent Hovind proved that resoundingly.

Worse, Hovind failed those who depended upon him most.  He refused to provide the safety nets of health and life insurance required by law for his employees and his premeditated tactics such as “structuring” (keeping transactions under $10,000 for the purposes of tax avoidance) netted his wife, Jo, jail time as an accomplice.

She stayed with him through both their confinements but, sadly, after he was released from prison, they divorced.

As far as I’m concerned, Peter Reilly fairly destroys any defense by Hovind and his “Hovindicators”.

Kent Hovind Not A Tax Protester?

Kent Hovind adamantly maintains that he is not a “tax protester”.  I have some issues with that.  If you go to the flagship website of his supporters #FreeKent you can follow the links to Proof Number one “Letters from professionals absolve Kent Hovind from all wrong-doing”.  The first letter is from Kent to one of the professionals and starts with:

“I am writing to request your professional opinion regarding the voluntary nature of Form 1040.”

The responses are something of potpourri of tax protester arguments, that have been ruled by courts to be frivolous.  As Hovindicators often correctly point out Kent Hovind was not convicted of tax evasions, so the letters, which were clearly meant to set up what is called a Cheek defense, really have little to do with what he was convicted of.

Then there is Creation Science 103: Class 6 “Income Tax”

A bit after the two minute mark Kent says that everybody should follow the law including the government and that he has not filed in 28 years and if there is a law that requires filing, he would like to see it.  The discussion that follows has nothing to do with his status as a minister and his vow of poverty.  A bit past the six minute mark he launches into the explanation as to why trading services for money is not “income”.  At 7:30, he gives a qualified plug to Irwin Schiff, who may well have originated many of the arguments used by, for lack of a better term, tax protesters.  Irwin Schiff is also in federal prison.

One disingenuous thing Peter does do is conflate shocking aspects about the case against Hovind as synonymous with his “defense”.¹⁸

The arguments that are brought forth in defense of Kent Hovind are multifarious and include things like Jo Hovind not being allowed to put on a robe when she was arrested, a prosecutor who committed suicide when arrested as a pedophile and Judge Margaret Casey Rodgers not allowing open Bibles in the courtroom during the trial.

* Kent Hovind’s wife was treated by authorities with needless brutality unbecoming a citizen’s understanding of who their “law enforcement” is composed of.
* Kent Hovind’s (assistant) prosecutor was a pedophile.
* Kent Hovind’s judge was a vehemently anti-Christian woman.¹⁹

Of course these facts have nothing to do with whether Hovind was guilty of tax evasion.

But they absolutely add weight to the accusation of my third book that the United States is secretly controlled by a cabal of Christian-hating pedophiles based in Rome.

This may seem droll and passé to Peter because of the faulty logic used by Hovind and his “Hovindicators”—

Kent regularly brings up the fact that one of the prosecutors in his first trial was John David Roy Atchison who hung himself in a prison cell after being arrested in a pedophile sting.  My hesitancy in listening to even more interviews has to do with not wanting to, once again, hear about the doll and the jar of Vaseline that Atchison had in his possession when arrested.  The implication is that someone as wicked as Atchison must have spent his time prosecuting godly people.

—but it has nothing to do with tax evasion at the citizen level and everything to do with corruption and conspiracy at the national and (forgive me) “global” levels.

I can think of few things more foolish than fighting a war with the United States government in its own judiciary in an effort to deprive the government of your money which it claims it is entitled to.

Across the decades, politicians have over-spent twenty one trillion dollars of your money.  The numbers are actually beyond comprehension.

You can easily make a case that any politician involved in the guaranteed fiscal collapse of the United States has committed treason.

Not very long ago, those convicted of treason were executed.

To think that you can deprive the government of your money without an army of lawyers and/or accountants is beyond folly; it’s suicide.

To encourage those who trust you to do the same is a heinous betrayal of that trust.

What’s more, if you have a distrust of government, wouldn’t it follow that a corrupt court would rather frame you or simply change its rules than see you win at their own game?

A single successful “tax protester” brings down the entire system.  With “all the marbles” at stake, the side that owns all of the machine guns, armored trucks, helicopters, radios and CCTV cameras wins.

If this is common sense (and it is), there are only two explanations for why someone would willingly attempt a no-win fight like this:

1) The individual in question is not processing this information as a healthy adult.  Failure to receive and process accurate information is no excuse.  A mature adult knows that if you don’t know how to fly a plane, you don’t volunteer to take your family for a vacation flight with yourself at the helm.

2) The individual in question is an agent of deception being used to lure disenfranchised citizens into committing suicide with them.  Variations on this include a dupe who is manipulated to become even more appealing than without help, to a fully-trained operative who is in no real danger of prosecution.

At best, I can only hope that Kent Hovind is a dysfunctional dupe but it is noteworthy that, upon his release from prison, he not only jumped feet-first into the “flat Earth” debate, both on the wrong side and seemingly without proper investigation, he also has warned against understanding prophetic passages of Scripture like Daniel 2 and 7 or Revelation 17 thru 20 as having anything to do with the Catholic Church.

When I first started to question the role and power of the Vatican, the only “expert” to pop up that had reliable information was “Eric Jon Phelps”.

Phelps labels himself a “White Separatist American Freeman, Dispensational, Fifth Monarchy, Seventh-Day Baptist-Calvinist”.

Racial division is one of the most powerful “divide and conquer” weapons that has been used both repeatedly and successfully by the Elite.

Phelps also offers a 3-day course in how to litigate against the United States government.  For $2,000 you can learn to turn the “ALL CAPS” of official documents against the Leviathan!

Recently, Phelps was promoted in his local newspaper as the arch-typical “anti-Catholic white separatist”.  He dispenses information about the Vatican that is unavailable anywhere else and then he completely discredits himself with Jesuit Biblical eschatology, racism and a “solution” that is patently absurd: start his own country.

It’s great press…for the Catholic Church.

Eric Phelps’s Reformation Bible Puritan Baptist Church is Lebanon County’s only organization plotted on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s map of hate groups, but his picturesque farmhouse near Newmanstown doesn’t look like a headquarters of hate. …

While he insists he isn’t hateful, Phelps is a proud and active advocate of racial separation and anti-Catholicism — and he has big plans for Lebanon County.  His goal: a community that secedes from the United States and Pennsylvania, is devoid of Hispanics, African-Americans and Catholics, institutes the death penalty for “doing dope,” and forbids homosexuality and adultery.

“These Hispanics and these blacks that commit crime everywhere — they have reduced Lebanon to nothing but a savage war zone, for the most part.  That’s all done by the Pope — he brought them in here,” Phelps said.  “If I can’t have (racial separation) in Lebanon, I’ll move to another county where we can do it, but we have to go to a white county that’s historically Protestant.”

Phelps isn’t idle while waiting for the consummation of that dream.  He pastors his church, which meets in his home to study the Bible and eat fellowship meals of “white Protestant cuisine,” like meat and potatoes.  Attendees include his family and a few others, but his personal invitation is required to join.

He also broadcasts an Internet radio program with followers around the world and hosts “private citizenship” classes in Myerstown that have been attended by as many as 25 paying customers, he said, preaching an anti-Catholic gospel message wherever he goes.

In 2008, Phelps was a speaker at the 8^th Annual “Conspiracy Conference” or “Con-Con”.  He presented his material dressed as and speaking as, a Jesuit priest.

Again, I am reminded of the preamble reputed to be used for a Jesuit “Fourth Vow” ceremony:

My son, heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler: among Roman Catholics to be a Roman Catholic, and to be a spy even among your own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man.  Among the Reformers, to be a reformer; among the Huguenots, to be a Huguenot; among the Calvinists, to be a Calvinist; among other Protestants, generally to be a Protestant, and obtaining their confidence, to seek even to preach from their pulpits, and to denounce with all the vehemence in your nature our Holy Religion and the Pope; and even to descend so low as to become a Jew among Jews, that you might be enabled to gather together all information for the benefit of your Order as a faithful soldier of the Pope.

You have been taught to insidiously plant the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces, states that were at peace, and incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the arts and the sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace.  To take sides with the combatants and to act secretly with your brother Jesuit, who might be engaged on the other side, but openly opposed to that with which you might be connected, only that the Church might be the gainer in the end, in the conditions fixed in the treaties for peace and that the end justifies the means.

You have been taught your duty as a spy, to gather all statistics, facts and information in your power from every source; to ingratiate yourself into the confidence of the family circle of Protestants and heretics of every class and character, as well as that of the merchant, the banker, the lawyer, among the schools and universities, in parliaments and legislatures, and the judiciaries and councils of state, and to be all things to all men, for the Pope’s sake, whose servants we are unto death.

Adding to the evidence of this tactic, I have chronicled several moments in history that seem to fit my premise with sinking perfection: the repeated betrayal of oppressed Patriots in Communist tyrannies by the CIA—an organization founded and run by Roman Catholics.

Again and again, the Central Intelligence Agency has enabled the radical Left and Communism to maintain stasis and stability as an important factor in the Hegelian Dialectic of thesis, antithesis, synthesis (more colloquially known as “problem, reaction, solution”).  Communists and Communist nations were always behind the West in technology, capability and prosperity.  As a result, Roman-controlled bankers, billionaires and intelligence bureaus repeatedly betrayed their Western nations of birth to keep the Communists afloat — sometimes with vicious results.

Bohemian Grove regular Dwight Eisenhower⁴⁶² repeatedly promised in his 1952 campaign to “liberate” the Eastern European nations that were given to Joseph Stalin (reputed to be a Freemason, guaranteed to have been influenced by Freemasonry⁴⁶³ and was a Roman Catholic with Jewish heritage trained to be a Jesuit priest⁴⁶⁴) by Scottish Rite and Shriner Freemason Franklin Roosevelt⁴⁶⁵ along with Freemason Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill (Studholme Lodge 1591⁴⁶⁶).  The game was rigged from the beginning.

Eisenhower was the perfect puppet.  He somehow managed to avoid a single leadership billet throughout his entire military career (never a Platoon Leader, Company Commander, Battalion Commander, Brigade or Division Commander) until becoming Supreme Allied Commander, Mediterranean Expeditionary Force⁴⁶⁷ just prior to becoming Supreme Allied Commander, Europe.  Armchair warriors make the best yes-men.

The modus operandi of Jesuit-controlled Freemasonic Western leadership was to set up the real Communist-fighting Patriots and then pull the rug out from underneath them.

Chinese revolutionary Chiang Kai-shek had the power and popular support to guarantee barring Communists entry into China so General “Vinegar Joe” Stillwell, General George C. Marshal and President Franklin Roosevelt made sure he failed and was overthrown (particularly in prohibiting necessary supplies like small arms⁴⁶⁸) guaranteeing the advent of Mao Zedong; a true monster who murdered so many of his own people that the counts are unsure even today but they start at 60,000,000.⁴⁶⁹

The Hungarian Revolution of 1956 was another example of treason and betrayal by Rome’s intelligence puppets.  Traitors in the West had been pleading with Hungarian Patriots to revolt —

It is a well-known fact that Radio Free Europe and the Voice of America in the 1950s encouraged resistance to — if not an outright revolt against — Communist oppression.  In a 1998 interview with CNN, Hungarian Ambassador to the U.S. Geza Jeszensky, who was 15 years old at the time of the revolution, remarked: “I kept listening to Radio Europe like 10 million Hungarians did.  Radio Free Europe certainly encouraged the Hungarians to resist the Soviets.  But it was not Radio Free Europe which instigated the Hungarian Revolution.  Perhaps the Hungarians were misled, not by the radio, but by the propaganda language by the U.S. administration.  It spoke about liberation and rollback.  Eisenhower kept speaking about liberation, but as a historian put it, it proved to be only a myth.  Liberation was not meant seriously.”²  Radio Free Europe also had an impact on [Soviet] Premier [Nikolai Alexandrovich] Bulganin and his Politburo.³ ~ Thomas J. Torda, Ph.D., The American-Hungarian Federation⁴⁷⁰

Once Hungarian Patriots were convinced to commit themselves, Western traitors stepped back and Soviet brutality stepped in.  [italics suspended]

The defeat of the Hungarian revolution was one of the darkest moments of the Cold War.  At certain points since its outbreak on October 23 the revolt looked like it was on the verge of an amazing triumph.  The entire nation appeared to have taken up arms against the regime.  Rebels, often armed with nothing more than kitchen implements and gasoline, were disabling Soviet tanks and achieving other — sometimes small but meaningful — victories throughout the country.  On October 31, the tide seemed to turn overwhelmingly in the revolution’s favor when Pravda published a declaration promising greater equality in relations between the USSR and its East European satellites.  One sentence was of particular interest.  It read: “[T]he Soviet Government is prepared to enter into the appropriate negotiations with the government of the Hungarian People’s Republic and other members of the Warsaw Treaty on the question of the presence of Soviet troops on the territory of Hungary.”

…Washington’s role in the Hungarian revolution soon became mired in controversy.  One of the most successful weapons in the East-West battle for the hearts and minds of Eastern Europe was the CIA-administered Radio Free Europe.  But in the wake of the uprising, RFE’s broadcasts into Hungary sometimes took on a much more aggressive tone, encouraging the rebels to believe that Western support was imminent, and even giving tactical advice on how to fight the Soviets.  The hopes that were raised, then dashed, by these broadcasts cast an even darker shadow over the Hungarian tragedy that leaves many Hungarians embittered to this day.

Once the Soviets made up their minds to eliminate the revolution, it took only a few days to complete the main military phase of the operation.  By November 7 — coincidentally, the anniversary of the Bolshevik revolution — Soviet forces were firmly enough in control of the country that Kádár could take the oath of office in the Parliament building (even though the Nagy government had never formally resigned). ~ Malcolm Byrne, NSA Archive⁴⁷¹

To make absolutely sure Soviet armor had as much time as was needed to slaughter as many Hungarian Patriots as possible, Eisenhower had his Ambassador to the United Nations, Adlai Ewing Stevenson II, delay any possible U.N. intervention.⁴⁷²

The exact same scenario replayed itself 12 years later in Czechoslovakia.  After goading Czech Patriots into action for the 1968 “Prague Spring”, all of Western Intelligence not only went silent, it went dark.

… 27 divisions of Soviet Russians, Poles, Hungarians and Bulgarians — around 300,000 men, armed with 2,000 heavy cannons — marched into the small state of Czechoslovakia to end the experiment of “socialism with a human face.” It was the largest military operation since the World War II…

For months, the eyes of the world had been on Prague, where a group of officials around Communist Party chief Alexander Dubcek had challenged the Soviets with new civil rights for Czechoslovakia, new press freedoms and plans for privatization.  Leonid Brezhnev, General Secretary of the USSR’s Communist Party, ordered a number of threatening military maneuvers in and around Czechoslovakia starting in May. 

But when the maneuvers grew serious, the American, British and German governments seemed to look the other way, judging by documents from the NATO archive in Brussels as well as intelligence files seen by SPIEGEL.  “Not a single evaluation” managed to predict the Soviet invasion of Prague, according to the NATO Military Committee, the alliance’s highest military authority.  ~ Der Spiegel⁴⁷³

Western media pushed the laughable idea that — despite Western leaders being given daily (probably hourly) briefs on Czechoslovakia — a WWII-sized Soviet invasion force was simply “lost” to the combined efforts of Allied intelligence operations.

Seven years earlier, in 1961, a similar treason was conducted on the Patriots of Cuba.  These Cuban exiles, however, had direct interaction with the CIA in their training, organization, equipping and transportation.

They received everything except what they needed most; a flight of 6 A-26 Invaders as air support.  National Security Advisor McGeorge Bundy (Skull and Bones 1940) personally saw to this betrayal as has been noted by Air Force Colonel and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chief of Special Operations for President Kennedy, Leroy Fletcher Prouty.⁴⁷⁴

Bundy would go on to blame John F. Kennedy for sabotaging the Bay of Pigs leading up to his assassination by the Jesuit-run CIA⁴⁷⁵ as well as see to it that CIA fingerprints were covered up.⁴⁷⁶ ~ Secret History ²⁰

What’s my solution?  —It certainly isn’t to fight the government at its own game.

There is deep wisdom in the way Jesus dealt with the issue—but keep in mind that it was presented to Him as a trap with no right answer.

Then the Pharisees went and plotted how they might entangle Him in His talk.  And they sent to Him their disciples with the Herodians, saying, “Teacher, we know that You are true, and teach the way of God in truth; nor do You care about anyone, for You do not regard the person of men.  Tell us, therefore, what do You think?  Is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar, or not?”

But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, “Why do you test Me, you hypocrites?  Show Me the tax money.”

So they brought Him a denarius.

And He said to them, “Whose image and inscription is this?”

They said to Him, “Caesar’s.”

And He said to them, “Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.”

When they had heard these words, they marveled, and left Him and went their way. ~ Matthew 22:15-22, New King James Version

It’s not a stretch to interpret Jesus’ words to mean, “The game is rigged so stop trying to beat the dealer.”

The Roman Empire of Christ’s time ruled overtly by tyranny and military occupation but the Roman Empire of our time can only rule by hiding itself behind the illusion that we’re still in control.

If that curtain of deception is ripped away, one can easily see those who were fooled into serving the Fateful City, turning upon her.

Then he said to me, “The waters which you saw, where the harlot sits, are peoples, multitudes, nations, and tongues.  And the ten horns which you saw on the Beast, these will hate the Harlot, make her desolate and naked, eat her flesh and burn her with fire.  For God has put it into their hearts to fulfill His Purpose, to be of one mind, and to give their kingdom to the Beast, until the Words of God are fulfilled.  And the woman whom you saw is that great city which reigns over the kings of the Earth.” ~ Revelation 17:15-18

The history of “religion”, more specifically, Christianity, is powerful, surprising and even shocking.

“Shocking” because so much of it has been erased by a hidden hand.

Biblical Christianity teaches that Judaism was given by God to prove the fallen state of mankind and its need for a Savior.  As a religion, it is impossible to follow perfectly and, therefore, showed that no one can be right before God, or earn their way into Heaven.

Romans 3:10-12
¹⁰ as it is written:

“None is righteous, no, not one;
¹¹  no one understands;
no one seeks for God.
¹² All have turned aside; together they have become worthless;
no one does good,
not even one.”

English Standard Version (ESV)

The Bible teaches that the perfect Son of God became imperfection so that, through Him, those that loved Him could attain the perfection necessary to stand in the Presence of God.

II Corinthians 5:21
He made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, so that we might become the Righteousness¹ of God in Him.

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

Jewish leadership betrayed their nation and colluded with their Roman tyrants to put one of their own to death.

Astoundingly, it is a relationship that remains to this day: traitor Jews in positions of prominence who turn their backs on the people in order to be empowered by their Roman masters.  Rome is only too eager to have her Jewish minions grovel to receive both the limelight and the blame for her tyranny and corruption.

As the military empire of Rome declined, a religious empire took its place.

In 313 A.D., Emperor Constantine (along with his temporary rival, Licinius) signed the Edict of Milan ending the persecution of Christians.

In 380 A.D., Emperor Theodosius I made Christianity the state religion of the Roman Empire with his Edict of Thessalonica.  This caused a great many pagans to intermingle their practices with Christianity such as prayer to the dead, holy pilgrimages, and reliance upon “religious experts” (clergy).

Justinian I reigned as Byzantine Emperor from 527 to 565 A.D.  In 534 A.D., he instituted what has become known as “Justinian’s Decree” or “Justinian’s Code” which firmly cemented the Bishop of Rome as, “Pope”, “Bishop of Bishops” and “Corrector of Heresies”.

In 538 A.D., Justinian broke the siege of the Goths around Rome, deposed their Pope—Silverius—and emplaced his own—Vigilius—via military escort, as Pontifex Maximus.

As the power of the Roman religion grew under the guise of “Christianity”, Christians who still had access to the Scriptures decried it as heretical with the reinstitution of a priesthood (now required to be celibate), prayer to angels, the supplanting of Messiah Jesus with His mother and “indulgences” (release from certain sins by payment).

The Sword Arm of the Whore of Babylon: U.S. Military Burns Bibles In Afghanistan

Christians like the Albigensians, the Waldensians and the Vaudois were, in turn, horribly persecuted by Rome.  The target of Rome’s original Crusades, they were chased into the Alps and, when caught, brutally tortured and murdered; men, women and children.  Any Bibles found were immediately burned.

The Papacy outlawed the Word of God, only allowing it to be kept by clergy in Latin.  Christianity remained in darkened ignorance of its own Scriptures for a thousand years until the Protest of Augustinian monk, Martin Luther in 1517 A.D.

Prior to this, when Christians were found with Bibles, they were eradicated in flames.  Such was the end of men like Jan Hus, Jerome of Prague and many of John Wycliffe’s dedicated Lollards.

However, what made Luther’s protest infinitely more powerful than those of Wycliffe or Hus was an invention that occurred just a few years before and a few days ride southwest of him: that of Johannes Gutenberg’s movable type printing press.

It was caused by Pope Leo X (Giovanni de Medici) exploiting the ignorance of the people and bilking them out of wealth they didn’t have, under the guise of saving their souls!  He sent his most dedicated servants (at that time), the Dominicans, to frighten the masses with hellfire, then tell them they could pay their way out of it for themselves and even their dead loved ones via an “indulgence” that went to fund the Medici Pope’s lascivious and licentious parties.  While peasant parents, devastated by sickness and disease that claimed the life of their little boy gave Dominicans their last ducats thinking Leo would accept them as Vicar of Christ and release their boy from Purgatory, he was actually releasing naked little boys from the deserts of his parties to be enjoyed by his guests.

In response to this, an outraged Father Martin Luther posted a referendum on such “indulgences” with 95 pointed paragraphs.

When he submitted his 95 Theses, which he had nailed to the doors of All Saints Cathedral in Wittenberg on All Saints Day (November 1^st, 1517), to his leadership in Rome, copies had arrived well before his original!

Luther’s benefactor, Frederick the Wise, Elector of Saxony, knew his favorite monk was in danger of mercenaries paid by the Vatican to murder him.  Frederick shut Luther up in Wartburg Castle for his own protection, and Luther was forced to pass the time using the manuscripts of his friend Desiderius Erasmus to translate the Bible into colloquial German in order to give the Word of God back to the people.

But much to the consternation of the Inquisition (at the time led by the Dominicans, but turned over to the Jesuits a few years hence), these Bibles could not be burned faster than the Gutenberg press was able to print them.

To make matters worse, Luther’s example was being followed by other upstart priests such as William Tyndale, who wrote his translation in his native English.  Although Tyndale was betrayed and executed by Henry VIII for his “crimes” against a Church Henry eventually broke from, Tyndale’s dying exclamation, “Lord, open the King of England’s eyes!” would be shown by how Henry later ordered the Tyndale Bible to be chained to the altars of every church in England.

Now, to the Papacy, the Bible was more dangerous than ever.

A new tactic was arrived at and coined by Henry’s Lord Chancellor, Archbishop of York and Primate of England, Thomas Wolsey, as “learning against learning”.  This new approach sought to discredit the Bible and all who revered it.

It was an agenda to re-write our very reality and it has had nothing less than fiendish success.

“Science” mocks Christianity and the Bible by indoctrinating students everywhere with that which doesn’t even qualify as “science”.

An entire spectrum from Darwinian evolution to astronomy overtly defies the Scientific Method—

* make an observation
* compose an hypothesis about the observation
* isolate the variables and conduct an experiment in a sterile environment to replicate the observation
* have a trusted peer replicate the experiment to prove or disprove

Humanity has turned over both its past and its cosmology—its very reality—to “experts” who refuse to adhere to their own disciplines.  As a result we are all oblivious slaves with the key to our freedom sitting right in front of us, yet no one reaches for it.  It is an invisible key which only reappears through the power of skepticism: refusal to trust anyone in “authority”.

Within 15 years of Martin Luther’s revolution to reform Christianity, a “Counter-Reformation” was born to undo and discredit the effort.

It was spear-headed by a Spanish Basque nobleman and Templar² mystic called Íñigo López de Loyola who would later become known as Ignatius Loyola.

Loyola’s fanaticism shocked even the most dedicated Catholics and he was twice imprisoned by the Inquisition but Alessandro Farnese (Pope Paul III) shrewdly saw Loyola’s usefulness.  By 1540, Loyola (along with fellow Spaniard Francisco de Jasso y Azpilicueta—later “Francis Xavier”—and Frenchman Pierre Lefevre—“Peter Faber”) had organized the Knights of the Virgin Mary which Farnese cunningly ordained as the “Society of Jesus”.

They were and are unrivaled in their dedication to the Papacy and, in fact, have put many a Pope to death for failing to maintain their ruthless standards.  Manipulation, murder, extortion, sexual deviancy, toppling governments, instigating or betraying revolutions, exploitation of the confessional—the ends justify the means for Pope Paul’s shock troops.  They were soon given the sarcastic nickname “Jesuits” for jesuita or “Are you Jesus-like?”

Disguise and infiltration are their specialty, as is shown by the re-branding of Guy “Guido” Fawkes as the embodiment of rebellion against tyranny, illustrates.  A Jesuit plot to blow up the House of Lords on the 5^th of November, 1605, in order to murder Protestant King James I, his queen and his son, was betrayed (some suggest by the Jesuits, themselves, in a Machiavellian move for sympathy).  Under the instruction of Jesuit Provincial Henry Garnett, Fawkes was found guarding the entrance to the basement where the gunpowder had been stockpiled.

The use of Fawkes’ visage as the representation of resistance also shows just how much the Jesuits manipulate the very fabric of our existence.

But the examples of Jesuit control don’t end there.

Jesuit-trained Roman Catholics hold the key positions of power all over the world from the U.K. to the E.U. to the U.S.  The list is so expansive and extensive it staggers the mind and makes examples hard to sift through.  Here are just a very few—

* Donald John Trump, current U.S. President, trained by the Jesuits at Fordham before he transferred to the clandestine “public” Jesuit college, the University of Pennsylvania.
* Trump’s predecessor, President Barack Obama, was trained in Chicago to be a “community organizer” by Jesuit Father Greg Galluzzo.
* Emmanuel Macron, President of France, is Catholic; he ran against “far Right xenophobe” Marine le Pen who was taught by her father Jean-Marie le Pen to blame all of Roman Catholic France’s woes on the Jews.  Jean-Marie learned this while at Saint Francis Xavier boarding school in Vannes.
* Macron was sexualized by his 6^th grade teacher while attending La Providence Jesuit high school in Amiens.  He would go on to marry her.
* Speaking of deviant sex and corrupt control, the current Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau, is the far-Left Catholic son of a previous far-Left Jesuit-trained Catholic Prime Minister, Pierre Trudeau.  There’s an excellent chance that he’s actually the biological son of thrice-Jesuit-trained Communist Catholic, Fidel Castro.
* José Manuel Barroso; 11^th President of the European Commission, was trained by the Jesuits at Georgetown as was former President Bill Clinton.
* Former President of the European Council (plans European policy), staunch Dutch Leftist Roman Catholic Herman Van Rompuy, was raised from his youth at Jesuit Sint-Jan Berchmanscollege (Grammar School) in Brussels.
* In fact, the entire European Unification movement is an overt attempt to reinstitute the medieval “Holy Roman Empire” and was founded by Jesuit Seminarian (as was the secret Bilderberg power meetings) Jozef Retinger.
* America wields her terrible military might through Jesuit-trained Roman agents from Secretaries of State like Alexander Haig through Leftist Roman Catholics like Leon Panetta who held both Secretary of Defense and Director of the CIA.
* The Pentagon is a mirror image of the Farnese family castle in Caprarola, Italy and its foundation was laid on September 11^th, 1941—just a few months prior to the “surprise attack” of Pearl Harbor.

* When truth-seekers ask Google “Which families secretly control the world?” Google answers, “DuPont, Astor, Kennedy³, Rockefeller and Rothschild”.  Carefully omitted from any search are the names Farnese, Orsini, Borgia, Aldobrandini, Breakspeare, Colonna and Medici.  Each have held positions in Rome as Bishops, Cardinals and Popes.  This becomes less of a surprise when you find out that Google was “ordained” the same day Alessandro Farnese ordained the Jesuits: September 27^th.
* Donald Trump was put into office by Jesuit-trained Goldman Sachs strategist Stephen K. Bannon who got his marching orders directly via a Vatican visit in 2014.
* Trump has installed even more Jesuit-trained Roman Catholics than his Jesuit-trained predecessor (no mean feat); from his Chief of Staff and former Secretary of “Homeland Security”, Marine Corps General John Francis Kelly (Georgetown) to the current Secretary of “Defense”, Roman Catholic Marine Corps General James Mattis.  Mattis is known as the “warrior monk” because he’s gone his entire life without getting married.  Normally, this is just a personal oddity but, given the role of sexual deviancy in the halls of power, quite disconcerting.
* The Central Intelligence Agency was founded by a Roman Catholic Knight of Malta, William Donovan, and often run overtly by Catholics from Walter Bedell Smith to William Casey to William Colby to the “Drone Executioner”, John O. Brennan.
* The same is true of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; founded by devout Roman Catholic Charles Joseph Bonaparte (great grand-nephew of Napoleon Bonaparte) and its many Catholic Directors from Opus Dei member Louis Freeh to James Comey, infamous for giving both Hillary Clinton and suspected pedophile John Podesta a clean bill of health.
* The Pentagon is dominated by Roman Catholics (many of them Jesuit-trained) from former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Army General Martin Dempsey to the current Chairman, chosen by “Democrat” Barack Obama and maintained by “Republican” Donald Trump, Marine Corps General Joseph Dunford (Georgetown).
* Even the Texas (Connecticut) Bush ruling dynasty has its Jesuits in the woodpile, despite claiming to be Protestants—from Knight of Columbus and former Governor of Florida, John Ellis “JEB” Bush to maternal patriarch George Herbert Walker (namesake for both Bush Presidents), who lived with the Jesuits at Stonyhurst in England.
* Whether Democrat or Republican, the Jesuits rule behind the scenes and few choke-holds evidence this better than Speaker of the House of Representatives.  Far-Left Jesuit-mentored Catholic Nancy Pelosi resided over the ram-rodding of socialized medicine and her successor, Jesuit-trained (Xavier) “Conservative” John Boehner did nothing to jeopardize it.  His Roman Catholic successor, former altar boy Paul Ryan has also stayed the course.
* When plausible deniability is needed by Rome, her agents wait until they step down from office to “convert” to Catholicism; from former British Prime Minister Tony Blair to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.
* Although Newt’s “conversion” may be presented as a “surprise” the Catholicism of his third wife, Callista, isn’t.  She’s such a stalwart Catholic she was made Ambassador to the sovereign city-state of the Vatican.

In 2012, “converted” Catholic Newt Gingrich was filmed receiving the very rare honor of a Papal Mass.

The man sitting right next to him (conveniently edited so that only his back was shown in the above video) was none other than “Evangelical” Televangelist Benny Hinn.

Few have done more harm to “Protestant” Christianity than Hinn.  Consequently, both the news media and Congress are proud to out him.

Only after they have done great harm to Christians do these Roman insurgents make headlines, such as frequent guest of conspiracy host Alex Jones, “Baptist” preacher Steven Anderson.

Given Anderson’s pull to put Christians to shame, it’s not a huge leap to call him an incognito Jesuit priest (and likely homosexual).

Equally, Benny Hinn and Rome go way back, as well.

Hinn has turned in his signature white suit for a high-collar black jacket, with a window for his white shirt underneath at the center.  He is also a very vociferous supporter of Jesuit-trained President Donald Trump.

Trump’s “Spiritual Advisor” is another Prosperity Gospel Preacher and Televangelist, Paula White (who lists her name as “Paula White-Cain”).

White was chosen to give Trump’s inaugural prayer, over which the Washington Post lamented—

White is known for embracing the prosperity gospel — the theology that God will bless true believers not just with eternal salvation but with material wealth here on Earth.  To many believers, the prosperity gospel offers hope and promise.  But to other Christians, it’s heretical; and to some, prosperity gospel preachers’ motives are suspect, especially when they seem to be enriching themselves by asking for money from their followers.

Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) launched an investigation in 2007 into spending by White and several other televangelists, but ended it three years later without reaching any conclusions.

Given how both Congress and these Televangelist charlatans answer to the same authority, we shouldn’t be surprised that Senator Grassley’s “investigation” ended “without reaching any conclusions”.

As I’ve chronicled for you in my latest book, the surest sign of corruption is when police, prosecutors and judges all refuse to do their jobs and politicians then provide smokescreens with “Commissions” and “Committees”.  If even Sherlock Holmes, himself, (the creation of Roman Catholic Freemason Sir Arthur Ignatius Conan Doyle) were to conduct a “Congressional Investigation” the end result would still be the same: nothing.  Legislatures write legislation.  They are bodies that have nothing to do with law enforcement.

From the very beginning, the seat of American power was owned by Catholics and named after Catholics.  The “Capitol” (named after Capitoline, one of the infamous seven hills of Rome) isn’t called “White House” for its color but in honor of Father Andrew White of the Society of Jesus.  Before it was “Washington, D.C.” it was known as “Little Rome on the Potomac” given that it’s gnostic architecture came from Catholic Freemason Pierre Charles L´Enfante.

Tying it all together in depravity, Hinn and Paula White were spotted in Rome holding hands, despite their respective marriages to other people.

Unfortunately, neither Charles Grassley nor the Washington Post were available so the reporting fell to the National Enquirer where it was sure to get it’s due respect.

No major news outlet thought the story was worth carrying but California’s Orange County Weekly did.

Perhaps, the reason media founded and run by Papal Knights like Henry Luce, William Randolph Hearst, John Paul Getty and Rupert Murdoch wasn’t interested in the explosive story was because of the even bigger story beneath it—

They found themselves in Italy because both were meeting independently with Vatican officials, according to White, who reportedly added, “We were never alone and were in the constant company of staff and other associates.” ~ OC Weekly

In an effort to cover up the very “un-Christian” adultery, two of Christianity’s most embarrassing and harmful “Protestants” admitted they go to Rome to receive instruction from the Jesuit Pope!

When invited to sit with another embarrassment to Christianity, Jim Bakker⁴ Paula White said that opposition to Donald Trump was opposition to God.

This is quite a statement from a Christian woman preacher given that Donald Trump is a pedophile who enables other pedophiles and has likely gone as far as to have sexually abused his daughter Ivanka (who is now a foundational part of American government).

Does Paula White believe in what she does?  Is she oblivious to the great harm she is being used to commit?

It’s certainly possible.  She, herself, is a victim of child sex abuse, apparently by her father, who committed suicide.

This report was initiated by the outstanding research of “Doc” Felipe Robles.

UPDATE FROM DOC, 31 December 2019:

Pentecostal Benny Hinn Says Catholics Have More Miracles, Credits Eucharist

Controlled Opposition

Are the Jesuits powerful enough to both create and control their own opposition?

The most ubiquitous symbol of resistance to the New World Order is the Guy Fawkes mask.  From the hacker collective known as “Anonymous” to “Occupy Wall Street”, anyone who wishes to strike a blow for freedom while in public demonstration is wearing one.

The masks were popularized by the 2005 movie “V for Vendetta.”

Starring Natalie Portman and Hugo Weaving, it’s another dystopic future set in England.

The movie was written by the brother/brother (sister) team of Andy and Laurence/Lana Wachowski (before Larry’s “gender reassignment”).  The Wachowskis also masterminded The Matrix and wrote, rather appropriately, Assassins starring Sylvester Stallone and Antonio Banderas.

“V for Vendetta” portrays an odd love/hate dynamic with Christian and Crusader imagery.  The setting was a dark fantasy future but the person of Guy Fawkes comes from a real English past.

In the movie, “Evey Hammond” (Portman) states;

“Remember, remember, the Fifth of November, the Gunpowder Treason and Plot. I know of no reason why the Gunpowder Treason should ever be forgot…” But what of the man? I know his name was Guy Fawkes and I know, in 1605, he attempted to blow up the Houses of Parliament. But who was he really? What was he like? We are told to remember the idea, not the man, because a man can fail. He can be caught, he can be killed and forgotten, but 400 years later, an idea can still change the world. I’ve witnessed firsthand the power of ideas, I’ve seen people kill in the name of them, and die defending them… but you cannot kiss an idea, cannot touch it, or hold it… ideas do not bleed, they do not feel pain, they do not love… And it is not an idea that I miss, it is a man… A man that made me remember the Fifth of November. A man that I will never forget.

This vague reference is all we get to help us answer the question: Who was Guy Fawkes?

The Gunpowder Plot of 1605 was an effort by a Jesuit cabal of Catholics¹²²², led by Fawkes to assassinate James I of England¹²²³.  Jesuit priests Henry Garnet and John Gerard were implicated during the subsequent investigation.¹²²⁴

It was just one of many targeting Protestant England.

The Babington Plot [of 1580] was probably the greatest of the many plots of the pope and the Jesuits during the reigns of Queen Elizabeth I and [King] James I designed to bring about the downfall of Protestant England, the overthrow of the Reformation in England, Scotland and Ireland, and to place some other claimant upon the Throne who would be acceptable to Rome, and committed to bring the English in submission to the sovereignty of Rome.

Between 1569 and 1605 (of Gunpowder Plot infamy) there were no less than eleven great plots against Elizabeth and English Protestantism, working toward assassination, rebellion and invasion. Each is known by the name of the leader of the treachery: Ridolfi, Sanders, [Pope] Gregory XIII, [Jesuit priest] Campion, [Jesuit priest Robert] Parsons, the Duke of Guise, [Cardinal] Allen, Throgmorten, Parry, [Anthony] Babington, [Pope] Sixtus V, [King] Philip II of Spain, Yorke, Walpole, Southwell, and Guy Fawkes.

…There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the Pope of Rome was very much interested as well as vitally involved in all of these attempts.

…The Babington Plot [to invade England, to assassinate Queen Elizabeth I, to incite rebellion, and then to place Roman Catholic Mary Stuart on the throne] took its name from Anthony Babington, a young English gentleman…but the real brains behind the conspiracy were the pope [Gregory XIII], Cardinal Allen, the Jesuits, and the Roman Catholic priest named John Ballard… ~ The Babington Plot, J.E.C. Shepherd¹²²⁵

Every protestor that dawns a Guy Fawkes mask unknowingly glorifies Jesuit assassination—almost certainly by their design. ~ Illuminati Unmasked, Johnny Cirucci, CreateSpace (January 27^th, 2015), pp. 409-411

F. Tupper Saussy, in his vitally-important exposé on Jesuit machinations made the powerful claim that the failure of the Gunpowder Plot of 1605 was used so well by Rome that it is entirely possible that the conspirators were betrayed by their own for just that end-state.

…as Garry Wills in his book Witches & Jesuits points out, Macbeth is an elaborate condemnation of the Jesuits as satanists, murderers, witches.  Macbeth is one of many of its period’s “powder plays,” a genre in which certain buzz words, well understood by contemporaries, memorialize the guilt and execution of eight Jesuits for having schemed the Gunpowder Plot of November 5, 1605. The Plot aimed to blow up the entire government of Great Britain, including the royal family, in a single catastrophic explosion under the Houses of Parliament.

How could a play defaming Jesuits be of service to the Jesuit agenda?  As we shall see, warfare in defense of the papacy requires extravagant measures.  In fact, both the Gunpowder Plot, which failed, and the celebration of its detection, which lives on in Macbeth, served Rome abundantly.  King James I, who declared himself the Plot’s divinely-illuminated discoverer, blamed the Plot on “Jesuits and papists.”  But at the same time, James exonerated “less fanatical Catholics.”⁶  According to Wills, “the Plot gave [James] his best opportunity to separate loyal and moderate Catholics from the mad extremists of the Plot.”  In short, the Plot secured England for “loyal and moderate” Roman Catholicism.  In the reasoning of a Superior General, particularly the General of the Gunpowder Plot and Shakespearian theatre, Claudio Acquaviva, the sacrifice of eight Jesuits was a small tactical price to pay for moving the King of England to express confidence in the pope’s British subjects, estimated at half the population of the realm. ~ Rulers of Evil, F. Tupper Saussy, Osprey (November 1999), pp. 68-69

On the 412^th anniversary of the Gunpowder Plot, an incident occurred that is officially described thus—

On November 5, 2017, there was a mass shooting at the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas, about 30 miles (48 km) east of the city of San Antonio.^[1]  The gunman was 26-year-old Devin Patrick Kelley of nearby New Braunfels, who killed 26 and injured 20.  He was shot twice by a local civilian as he exited the church, then fled in his vehicle.  His vehicle crashed after a high-speed chase, and he was found with a self-inflicted gunshot to the head.

It was the deadliest mass shooting by an individual in Texas,^[2] as well as the deadliest shooting in an American place of worship in modern history, surpassing the Charleston, South Carolina church shooting of 2015^[3] and the Waddell, Arizona Buddhist temple shooting of 1991.^[4] ~ Wikipedia

It targeted the apparent heart of American Protestantism: Texas.

Truth-seekers have learned, however, it is prudent to question the “official story”.  As we have shown, not only is it usually inaccurate, official stories almost always conceal avenues that lead back to the secret power that is the Vatican.

If the shooting was a Roman Catholic conspiracy, having a devout Catholic Governor almost certainly was helpful.  Governor Greg Abbott is a devout Roman Catholic.  Conveniently (especially for a border state), Abbot is married to a bilingual “Mexican-American” Catholic.

The high treason that is decades of open borders is a key Roman agenda.  It’s nation-killing success is proof of how many agents the Vatican has (and has had) in government and media.  Jesuit-trained pedophile President Donald Trump rode into the Father Andrew White-House on American anger towards this treason yet he has no intention of changing the agenda of his masters.  Allies in media ludicrously propagandize the warfare as “altruism verses populism”.

False flags are now occurring in America every three weeks.

As far as New World Order enablers go, “fundamentalist” muslims have been the soup du jour for decades.  They are the wild card of chaos who appear to be unfettered by any semblance of compassion or decency. Muslims used as pawns for power players is a little-disputed fact.

But what may come as a bitter, horrifying surprise to most Americans, is that it is an agenda whose ace-in-the-hole has been for intelligence agencies and puppet masters to murder their own citizens to further a political agenda.

False flag (or black flag) describes covert military or paramilitary operations designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities, groups or nations than those who actually planned and executed them. ~ Wikipedia

The historical examples are legion.

• In 64 AD, Rome suffered a terrible fire that burned for nearly a week and destroyed 75% of the proud city. Citizens suspected that brutal emperor Nero had started it but instead, he scapegoated the troubling and burgeoning population of new Christians.
• At the turn of the century, Cuba was an allure to American business for trade in sugar and iron. The Elite were eager to rid the hemisphere of Spanish influence, and the death of the U.S.S. Maine (along with 266 sailors) was the catalyst for war.  However, controversy swirls around the grave of the warship to this day and the original government explanation of a Spanish mine no-longer holds water.
• In May of 1915, a German U-boat sank the ocean liner RMS Lusitania and she lost an astounding 1,195 passengers to the icy waters of the Atlantic. It was an outrage that echoed repeatedly until America joined WWI less than 2 years later.  What was discovered much later, was that it was the American and British governments that put those passengers at risk by loading the Lusitanian with arms for the war.
• In 1932, Germany’s political landscape was strewn with schisms caused by competing parties and interests. In January of the following year, German President Paul von Hindenburg appointed the powerful Nazi Party’s Adolph Hitler, Chancellor.  Hitler was extremely ambitious but had learned from his attempted strong-arm coup of a decade earlier.  Less than two months after becoming Chancellor, Germany’s building of parliament—the Reichstag—burned to the ground.  German communists were blamed and the furor was a wave of emotion that Hitler rode into becoming Führer.  Few now dispute that Nazis started the blaze.
• Success breeds success and 6 years later der Führer had his eyes on Poland. In late August of 1939, the German Secret Police (Gestapo) located an isolated radio outpost along the Silesian border near the town of Gleiwitz.  The three operators were subdued by “Poles”, the radio station taken over, broadcasting a message of Polish resistance that likely no one heard because it was only a relay station, and Polish sympathizer was dragged by the Gestapo in a drugged state to the location where he was executed as “proof” of the “aggression”. A few days later, in September, Germany invaded Poland.
• At the close of WWII, an ugly skeleton lay hidden in the closets of Britain and America: their two respective governments had created the Soviet beast that threatened to engulf Europe. It was the greatest general America had ever created—George S. Patton—who threatened to disclose the annoying fact.  Author Robert Wilcox made the chilling accusation that America’s new intelligence service, the Office of Strategic Services (precursor to the Central Intelligence Agency) grievously wounded him in a staged car accident and then enabled Soviet Army Intelligence (the NKVD, precursor to the KGB) to finish the job.
• “Remember the Maine!” In 1962, members of the United States military recommended to President John F. Kennedy that innocent Americans be murdered and Communist Cubans could be blamed as provocation for war with Cuba. In the most perverse sense of irony they even offered to blow up a U.S. warship in Guantanamo Bay, creating a new take on Spanish philosopher Jorge Santayana, “Those who are oblivious to real history are doomed to repeat it.” Some have pondered whether Kennedy’s refusal contributed to his assassination.
• In 1964, American aid to South Vietnam was only in the form of “advisors” and Special Operations units. After a series of attacks on the Navy destroyer U.S.S. Maddox in the Gulf of Tonkin, Congress gave Lyndon Johnson carte blanche to send tens of thousands of young men to be maimed and killed for a massive new “military/industrial complex”. Later it was found, no such attacks ever occurred.
• In 1967, Johnson would again be implicated in the Israeli attack on the U.S.S. Liberty—an intelligence-gathering vessel busy keeping tabs on Egypt/Israel “6-day war”. On June 8^th the Liberty was attacked by both Israeli aircraft and torpedo boats.  Over the course of the attack, 34 sailors were killed and 174 were wounded.  Plenty of firepower was nearby but ordered to “stand down”. Later, an astounding accusation surfaced that Lyndon Johnson had ordered the men of the Liberty be sacrificed so that he could plunge the nation into a nuclear war with Egypt and her surrounding allies.  It was averted with only minutes to spare when it became apparent that too many other nations (such as the Soviet Union) were aware of Israel having caused the damage to the Liberty.
• In 2005 a group of contractors from the Zapata Corporation fired at a United States Marine Corps outpost in Fallujah, Iraq. This odd occurrence was chalked up to the “fog of war”…until one digs deep enough to find that the “Zapata Corporation” is a CIA front company founded by former CIA Director George H.W. Bush.
• Allies shooting at allies may come as an awful shock, but a very high-profile example cropped up later that same year when two British operatives were apprehended by Iraqi police for shooting up the police station in Basra. The two commandos were dressed as Iraqi civilians and at least one Iraqi minister accused them of fomenting sectarian violence in the Shiite-dominated southern province that bears the same name.  Basra police suddenly became crazed “militia” requiring an astounding force of tanks and helicopters to quickly rescue the two offenders.  This was in sharp contrast to the 15 sailors and Marines captured by the Iranian navy whom British Elites felt were no high priority.

With incidents like these all well-established in the historical record, my recent claim that current Attorney General Eric Holder sits as the most powerful law enforcement officer in the world because he is a gatekeeper of similar treasons tracing all the way back through Oklahoma City to Waco, isn’t quite so unbelievable.  Nor is it any wonder that the Attorney General (a man who alerted the public in 1995 to his desire towards anti-gun “brainwashing”) was found to have visited the Leftist Democrat Connecticut governor only two weeks ahead of the Newtown School shooting to talk about “gun control”. ~ From Boston to the New World Order, Johnny Cirucci, JohnnyCirucci.com

That the incident at First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas was manufactured is beyond doubt.

“Twenty Six” [hat/tips REPLY-ALL GEORGE, Jim-Bo Drake]

Numerology can be used as a signature of those who manipulate events; taking a number they deem “significant” and making sure to highlight it.

The apparent perpetrator, Devin Patrick Kelley, was purported to be 26 years old and purportedly murdered 26 people at Sutherland Springs First Baptist.  CNN very specifically tells you this—

Devin Patrick Kelley, 26, killed 26 people at a Texas church, police say.

* It is the same supposed number of dead from the Sandy Hook Elementary false flag.
* Timothy McVeigh was 26 at the time of the Oklahoma City bombing.
* John Wilkes Booth was supposedly killed on April 26^th, 1865.  He was an agent of the Papacy and it is likely the story of his death was fabricated.  He was 26 at the time of that supposed death.
* The Italian government just announced it had recovered 26 bodies of teenage girls attempting to flee the chaos of Libya in the wake of the illegal war waged by Jesuit-trained community organizer, Barack Obama in 2011.

One numerology blog states this about “26”—

It is the number of generation from David to Christ according to the evangelist Luke and also the number of generations between Moses and Adam.  The genealogy of Sem comprises twenty-six descendants.

In the Psalms, the God of Israel promises to the nations the iron rods and in chapter XXVI of the Leviticus, an avalanche of curse is pronounced against his people among which “a sky of iron”.  The atomic number of iron is 26. …

The number 26 is used only once in the Bible.

The word “Beloved”, representing the Lord, appears 26 times in the Song of Songs.  The words prescription and baptism are used 26 times in the Bible. The word “merciful” is used 26 times in the NRSV.

“Iron” is the metal that signifies the “Fourth and Final Beast” from the Book of Daniel: Rome.

A noteworthy mention to these numbers is Micah Xavier Johnson, the former Army soldier who supposedly murdered 5 Dallas police officers in 2016 to “protest” their “racism” with yet another “AR-15”.

Francis Xavier co-founded the Jesuits.  Micah Xavier was 25 at the time and media states police responders were able to kill him during the ensuing stand-off with a remote-controlled bomb.  Orwellian, indeed.

Regarding the propensity for “mass shooters” to prefer the AR-15, the New York Post blared with its headline on the Sutherland Springs incident—

Texas church gunman used same rifle as Las Vegas, Newtown, Aurora, San Bernardino mass shooters

USA Today posted an interview which explained how the AR-15 isn’t the most deadly weapon available, but it does seem to be the most targeted.

Controlled

The point man for the carefully-planned exploitation of this particular incident is far-Left Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy.

Murphy is still riding the waves of tyranny from Sandy Hook; to date one of the worst false flags committed by agents of treason and subversion.

What REALLY Happened At Sandy Hook?

---

Lenny Pozner: the Sandy Hook Pozer

---

Sandy Hook Shakedown: How Google & the Government are silencing alternative media.

If you miss connecting Murphy to Sandy Hook, CNN makes sure to re-connect you by calling the Democrat the “Sandy Hook Senator”.

Despite his Irish/Polish ancestry, neither Wikipedia nor the Notable Names Database admit to any Vatican connections.

Murphy married a career lawyer who kept her maiden name after their public ceremony (whirlwind romance?).

Murphy may not have any overt connections to Rome but he is very loyal to key Vatican agendas like wide-open American borders.  Interestingly, Breitbart.com spins Murphy’s treason towards Muslims and not the tens of millions of Roman Catholics streaming up from the south.  Perhaps it’s not very surprising given leadership at the supposedly “Conservative” media outlet that includes men like Stephen Kevin Bannon.

Bannon was conveniently in the wings to take over after the untimely death of Andrew Breitbart (the murder of his coroner notwithstanding).  As others raised concern over the circumstances of Breitbart’s demise, Bannon assured them there was nothing unusual going on.

Bannon, a Jesuit-trained Roman Catholic, visited the Vatican in 2014.  Two years later, he would become Donald Trump’s chief strategist.  Both are Jesuit-trained and Bannon had the extra appeal to trump: he’s a Goldman Sachs man.  In fact, Bannon compared his time at Goldman to being in the “Society of Jesus”.

Murphy is so adamant to exploit controlled and contrived mass shootings that he doesn’t care who he offends.  After “terrorists” Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik supposedly killed 14 in San Bernadino, California in 2015, Murphy jumped in front of the media to proclaim he was tired of hearing about “prayers” and ready to start confiscating guns.

According to mainstream media, Devin Kelley was wounded as he fled the scene by a local NRA instructor.

A good guy with a gun, along with his National Rifle Association training, stopped a bad guy with a gun, according to the NRA.

On his show this week, Grant Stinchfield, a conservative talk show host on the NRA’s online television network, commended longtime NRA member Stephen Willeford for using his NRA training to conceal himself and find a flat platform to fire off shots at Devin Patrick Kelley, who killed dozens inside the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Tex.

“The tiny town of Sutherland Springs needed a brave, calm-headed gun owner, an NRA instructor to stop the rampage of a deranged monster,” Stinchfield said, referring to Willeford. ~ Washington Post

Although “the NRA found its hero” in Stephen Willeford, defenders of 2^nd Amendment right of private citizens to partake of coercive force best not get their hopes up.  The National Rifle Association is equally infiltrated by Roman Catholics from CEO and VP Wayne LaPierre to “gun lobbyist” and former seminarian John Snyder.  The boogeyman of the far-Left has an unexpected tendency to fold just when American gun owners need them most.  Catholic insurgents like NY Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy don’t even attempt to hide the source of their agendas such as the 2002 “Our Lady of Peace Act” which sought to bribe local authorities into giving personal identification information of American citizens to the Central government when they attempt to buy a gun (currently it remains dead but can be brought back at any time).

Less than one month ago, “gambling multimillionaire Stephen Paddock” supposedly killed 58 and injured 546 on the Las Vegas Strip—a feat not accomplished by Arnold Schwarzenegger in his best attempts.

When the media claimed that Paddock had some 33 weapons equipped with so-called “bump-stocks” (a specialized stock that enables rapid fire in semiautomatic weapons) the organization leading the charge for the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms to restrict them was the NRA.

The purpose of the 2^nd Amendment has nothing to do with what the NRA promotes—either sporting, hunting or even “personal defense”.  It is in the Bill of Rights to guarantee citizens have protections against tyrannical government which means they are to have access to the same military small arms that might someday be used against them.

It is extremely telling that the vaunted “National Rifle Association” has never defended the 2^nd Amendment on its original intent.

This ability of the common citizen to stand up to a standing army has been slowly eroded to almost nothing.

Despite this, the media and the far-Left continue to compare 16” barreled semi-automatic rifles like the AR-15 to much shorter select-fire weapons available to the Praetorians of government such as the M4.

Each new mass tragedy is another assault on what few arms citizens have left to them.

Method to Their Madness

The methodology of false flags allows for a number of different strategies to be executed, especially when agents of insurgency control at all levels; government, law enforcement, judicial, media.

The easiest method is to employ trained “crisis actors” to feign a disaster where there is actually no loss of life.  This isn’t preferred due to the compassion of the insurgents, but as a result of their desire to keep angry, grieving loved ones from digging too deep.  It also makes it easier to convince their agents and assets that they’re really not doing anything wrong.

However, real damage has its advantages.  There are many cogs in the Machine and the carnage of an actual event easily convinces them of the necessity of Luciferian agendas like “gun control” and the completion of an Orwellian Police State where warrantless surveillance is common.

This may be what has happened in Sutherland Springs.

To conduct a false flag with real casualties, sometimes a hapless patsy is placed on the scene of the crime but then true bloodthirsty killers conduct the harm.

An alternative is to select, train, control and enable a chosen agent of chaos and then turn him lose upon unsuspecting victims.

If mainstream media is to be believed, Devin Kelley was just such an asset.  He bullied and brutalized all innocents in his orbit; abused his dog, beat his wife and cracked the skull of his toddler step-son.  He appears to have been carefully enabled by traitors in the government, military and law enforcement for just such a terrible end.

The gunman who killed more than two dozen people in a small church outside San Antonio on Sunday had a string of troubling episodes in recent years, including an escape from a mental health facility in 2012 after he was caught sneaking guns onto an Air Force base “attempting to carry out death threats” against military superiors, according to a police report.

Devin P. Kelley’s young life was riddled with warning signs, mounting during and after his time in the Air Force, including a conviction for beating his then-wife and stepson, charges of animal cruelty, mental health concerns, investigations for domestic assault, threats against his family members and a motorcycle crash that left him with lingering physical pain.

Interviews and police and military documents depict Kelley as a distressed — and at-times, violent — man in the years before authorities said he walked into the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Tex., and fired round after round into the congregation gathered for Sunday morning services.

Police in El Paso, reported that five years before the church massacre, officers were dispatched to a bus terminal after Kelley escaped from a nearby behavioral facility. Officers wrote they were told Kelley, who was serving in the Air Force, “was a danger to himself and others” at the time and “was also facing military criminal charges.” While it is unclear why Kelley was at the behavioral facility and whether he ever faced military discipline for the threats, he was court-martialed that same year and convicted of abusing his wife and stepson.

But the Air Force has acknowledged that it did not tell federal authorities about the domestic violence conviction, which should have prevented him from buying firearms, and the revelations about Kelley’s stint in a mental health facility and making threats against his superiors raised new questions about the service’s handling of Kelley and his discharge. ~ Washington Post

Perhaps most disturbing are the rape and sexual assault committed by Kelley yet not acted upon by law enforcement.

Comal County Sheriff Mike Reynolds admitted that a failure to investigate a sexual assault case involving Devin Patrick Kelley was a disservice to the alleged victim.

Reynolds, who was not in office when the alleged crime occurred, said he promised to find out why detectives never followed through.

During the investigation, Reynolds said, Kelley moved to Colorado, but he doesn’t know why that seemed to stop the investigation’s progress.

“I know that we had gone out of state to question suspects before.  I don’t know why it wasn’t done at this particular time,” Reynolds said.

In February 2014, when Kelley returned to Texas, deputies received a domestic disturbance call to Kelley’s Comal County residence alleging that a woman was abused in a separate incident, but no charges were filed. …

The sexual assault investigation from 2013 was never picked back up, even though Kelley was in reach.  Reynolds wants to know why.

“Those are, of course, questions I can’t answer because we had a previous administration and a different commander in our criminal investigations section at that time,” Reynolds said.

Reynolds wonders, if Kelley had been charged in the sexual assault case, would that have prohibited him from buying guns legally.

“You think about it, you do.  What could’ve happened?  Not saying what would’ve happened.  But what could’ve happened to prevent all this?” Reynolds said. ~ ABC KSAT 12

It is interesting to note that the KSAT anchor for that story was “Isis Romero”. [hat/tip and apologies, REPLY-ALL GEORGE]

As has been conclusively proven in Eaters of Children, the Pedocracy has a shocking level of influence and seems able to shield the most powerful predators in power.

What is somewhat less intuitive is how that protection seems to extend even to predators not in power.

In 1993, three 8 year old boys were found naked and murdered in a West Memphis, Arkansas drainage canal.  One of the boys, Christopher Byers, had been castrated.  Three ne´er-do-well teenagers — Charles Baldwin, Jessie Misskelley and Michael Wayne “Damien” Echols — were arrested for the heinous crime.  In the wake of their conviction, a media and entertainment frenzy surrounded Catholic-turned-witch “Damien” Echols.  He had been given the death penalty.  Echols remained cause celebre through 18 years on death row and was finally released via intercession by Arkansas Supreme Court.

Lost to onlookers was how the step-father of Christopher Byers, Mark Byers, escaped official attention of any sort despite overwhelming forensic evidence, some of which provided by one of those media documentary crews.

What was noteworthy was that the film crew was given a “memento” from (John) Mark Byers, the adoptive father of Christopher Byers: a folding knife.  When the crew realized the knife had blood on it, they sent it to the West Memphis Police.

All three boys had received lacerations and Christopher was mutilated with a knife.

The blood tested human — O+. Both Byers and, by coincidence, his adopted son had O+ blood.

Mark Byers and his wife Melissa (Christopher’s biological mother) had been in trouble with the law. In 1994, they were arrested for stealing $20,000 of antiques from a neighbor’s house and trying to sell them at a pawn shop. When Byers happened upon a fight between two boys, he forced them to finish with his knife while he held them at gunpoint. One boy required hospitalization.

During their interviews by HBO, the Byers were the most vocal in their hatred for the three suspects.

While the court appearance for their burglary was still pending in 1996, Melissa Byers died “mysteriously”.  Paramedics were dispatched to their home in Cherokee, Arkansas to find her naked, on her bed with her arms at her sides, unresponsive.

When she was pronounced dead at the hospital, Sharp County Sheriff Sonny Powell called Arkansas State Police Investigator Stan Witt to report it as suspicious. ~ Eaters of Children, Johnny Cirucci, CreateSpace (September 11^th, 2017), p. 515

Family of child sex abuse victims are often involved in the crime, especially if there is an animus towards the child because he/she has different biological parents.

Conflicting Reports

Supposedly, Kelley parked across the street from Sutherland Springs First Baptist, approached on foot, opened fire outside then walked inside.

NBC highlighted this supposed witness and then acknowledged that First Baptist records all services but didn’t show any footage of the actual shooting.

In another clip, supposed shooting survivor Rosanne Solis claimed that shots rained down upon the parishioners from the roof.

It’s difficult to imagine powerful tyrants in government and media having access to video footage of a gun-wielding mass murderer slaughtering church-goers as they prayed and not at least sharing a disturbing few seconds to push the next level of the gun-confiscating Police State.

If innocents really did die in Sutherland Springs, did Devin Kelley kill them or was it a team of murderers working for the very people we pay and employ to protect us?

As is so often the case with mass tragedies, after the incident, after supposedly being wounded, the apparent perpetrator, Devin Kelley, committed suicide.  He “self-destructed”.

On the rare occasions that a patsy perp is caught, he is disappeared in a thoroughly corrupt penal system.  When supposed Aurora, Colorado mass shooter James Holmes was shown for his court appearances, he did not seem to even know where he was.

Remember, Remember the 5^th of November

It is significant that First Baptist “Pastor” Frank Pomeroy and his wife Sherri were absent from church on the day of the shooting, yet their 14 year old daughter Annabelle is listed amongst the dead.

Was she voluntarily sacrificed by a father who didn’t love her?

Annabelle was adopted.  Perhaps that allowed the callousness necessary to “offer” her up for sacrifice.

Pomeroy’s presence on the internet is predominantly a recent one.  Video uploads of his church services only go back 3 years.

The first one shows the married Christian Pastor wearing no jewelry on either hand (no wedding ring on his left).

In July of 2017, Pomeroy began wearing a ring on his right hand.

Noteworthy was his sermon on “addictions” where Pomeroy admitted to having been addicted to undisclosed habits, and that “powerful people try to tell you that is who you are”.  He also stated that he was abused as a child but dared his congregation to ask any of his eight children if he had abused them.  Instead, I’d ask why a “non-Catholic Pastor” had such a seemingly large Catholic family.

It wasn’t until his October 22^nd, 2017 sermon that he began being seen with a very noticeable ring on his left hand (where his wedding ring should be, but isn’t).

The ring on his right appears to be a Texas university ring.

The ring seen recently on his left is less easy to decipher.  It is not a traditional wedding ring.  He is photographed here woodenly hugging “Evangelical Catholic” Vice President Mike Pence.

The design of the ring barely splits the difference between a traditional Christian cross and the symbol of fealty towards Rome: an equidistant Maltese cross.

Particularly disturbing is the picture of Pomeroy with a small child (listed by “Heavy.com” as one of his grandchildren) on his lap in a very sexual pose.

If that image isn’t reversed, Pomeroy appears to be wearing the more robust class ring on his wedding finger.

As has been fully detailed in Eaters of Children: The Pedocracy Exposed, the surest way to seal a conspiracy is with the suffering of a child.

At least one YouTube channel is drawing attention to hand gestures made by Frank Pomeroy during one of his services.

Incidental hand gestures are a difficult clue to prove (perhaps that’s why many questionable “investigators” make so much out the topic).

What is more significant is where the images come from.

The internet has been scrubbed of any evidence regarding the life of Frank Pomeroy save videos of his church services.

The service in question was this year’s “Easter” service.

Although claiming to be a “Baptist” institution, Frank Pomeroy’s church celebrated “communion” in true Catholic fashion save the vestments.

It is a ceremony that has nothing to do with either Christianity or Judaism.

Below is a screenshot capturing Pomeroy with clasped his hands in an unorthodox manner during this “Easter service”.

The “diamond” hand gesture has also been called the “Sign of Practicus”, supposedly rooted in Kabbalah.

Here it is demonstrated by Haile Selassie, “Emperor” of Ethiopia from 1930 to 1974.  The photo is provided by Knight of Malta¹ William Randolph Hearst’s “Life magazine”.

Selassie was a product of both Roman Catholicism and Freemasonry.

Angela Merkel, the Chancellor of Germany since 2005, is so fond of the gesture, media is forced to lampoon it.

It is also the way one describes female genitalia in sign language so perhaps the well-entrenched Chancellor is repeatedly telling everyone she is female…or she likes females.

Perhaps far more telling than Pomeroy’s momentary hand clasping is his unique tie; it bears a striking resemblance to Roman Catholic “Stations of the Cross”.

Langendorff and Peacetrucker

That’s not a Woodstock folk duo…although they could be.

As the official story goes, after “hero” Stephen Willeford wounded “lone gunman” Devin Kelley, he flagged down “hero” Johnnie Langendorff who followed Kelley at speeds of up to 95 mph until he hit a stop sign and drove into a ditch.

Langendorff is, to say the least, an unusual character.

But for all his unorthodoxy, he certainly seems enamored with an ancient symbol of fidelity towards Rome: a Maltese cross.

He has it on his hatband.

And a multiplicity of neck-ware.

This look we might call “Confederate Homie”.  We’ll see more “white power” from a different source below.

When he does accompany them with a “Christian” cross, it still has a Templar flare to it.

For that matter, so do the “grave markers” set up by local towns-people to commemorate their loss.

Interestingly, the pop culture blog “Heavy.com” has “5 Facts You Need to Know” about several key players from Johnnie Langendorff to Frank Pomeroy.

The Heavy piece on Pomeroy includes embedded social media from some surprising sources such as the Instagram of discredited Tel-evangelist Rod Parsley.

Using frauds and insurgents to destroy the credibility of Christians remains a high priority for the Counter-Reformation.  It seems to be a priority for “Heavy.com” as well.

Also included is a “tweet” from “Arthur Peacetrucker” a.k.a. @IndictedArthur.

Mr. Peacetrucker doesn’t say what he’s indicted for but he does describe himself this way—

obergruppenmemer • uncuckable beating heart of the #maganationalism aesthetic • filthy rich boomer who can outbench you

“obergruppenmemer” seems to be a not-particularly-humorous alluding to Obergruppenführer—the second-highest rank in the Nazi SS.

“uncuckable beating heart” appears as metaphorically perverse and deviant as Mr. Peacetrucker’s profile pic.

Indicted Arthur has only been on Twitter for 6 months yet has “tweeted” 7,308 times and has 3.164 followers to include:

* TTA Mädel, “When you’re white there’s no upgrade.”

* Michelle Obama has a huge Cock @LmfaoMikeHunt

* Peekay Truth (a “Truther” YouTube personality)

* Rev Mike Londen, a Catholic priest from Texas who just joined Twitter November 2017

* Lucius Crassus, @TradWhiteLucius, “Alt-Right. Pro-White. All Night. #HailVictory”—another Roman racist?

* Squints McCuck, @FemzHaveBalls whose header states “It’s OK to be White” in style of the large white HOLLYWOOD letters.

* Snow White, @Blue_Santorelli, “just white girly things as well as family and friends. xoxo”—an Italian racist who joined Twitter in July.

* Hunter S Randolph, @PunctumGladio, “TradWorker. NatSoc. 2016-2017 Meme War Veteran. MAGA. Shitposting.”—a Roman Nazi who seeks to “MAGA” (Make America Great Again) with “National Socialism.

* Brant Law, @law_brant, “Single. White. Trad. Nationalist.”—joined Twitter February 2017

* Kay Rander, @K4y_R4nd3r, “Nationalist White American”—joined Twitter November 2017

Do you get the sense that forces friendly to Rome are stirring racial hatred as hard as they can?

When Indicted Arthur tweeted his support of Sutherland Springs First Baptist—

Pastor Frank Pomeroy’s First Baptist Church of #SutherlandSprings is a beautiful loving family of patriotic Texans. pic.twitter.com/ROu3nYTO76

— Arthur Peacetrucker (@IndictedArthur) November 5, 2017

—he got an immediate response from Gays Against Guns, @GAGnoguns, “The Official Twitter Account Of Gays Against Guns. GAG is an inclusive, nonviolent direct action group of LGBTQ+ people committed to ending gun violence.”  They shared an “unlikely” repartee with each other.

Indicted Arthur links his profile to the “tragicomedy” novel Joan of Iraq by Arthur Angell.  The cover sports interesting Catholic imagery.

When you click on his #maganationalism you only come up with the tweets of Mr. Peacetrucker and one other profile; Jorge Arturo, @actanonverba147.

“Jorge Arturo” just happens to be the first names of the “White” and “Black” Popes (both happen to be Jesuits); Jorge Mario Bergoglio, “Pope Francis” and Arturo Sosa, the Superior General of the “Society of Jesus”.

It’s probably not a leap to say that, even in Texas, all roads still lead to Rome.

In the Province of Ontario, Canada, parents are infuriated over the latest push by educrats to inundate their small children with materials that will sexualize and confuse them.

Conservative Catholics are (rightfully) up in arms.

After winning a Liberal majority, Premier Kathleen Wynne reintroduced a very similar radical Sex Ed Curriculum from the one she developed as Education Minister, and which outraged parents back in 2010.  In spite of multiple protests, student strikes, and petitions, the Ontario government disregarded the concerns of parents and began to implement the controversial curriculum in the summer of 2016.  According to many reports, schools only began teaching the new curriculum during the last 2 weeks in June, after report cards were finished and when there was nothing left to grade.  Effectively, 2016/2017 is the first school year in which it was implemented.

In 2010, parents and religious leaders came out angrily against Liberal plans to teach early grades about age-inappropriate topics like masturbation, anal intercourse, oral sex, vaginal lubrication, and the idea that being male or female is merely a “social construct”.  So strong was the backlash that McGuinty “shelved” the curriculum after only 3 days of public outcry.

At the time, CLC warned that the curriculum was only “temporarily” shelved and would return.  Kathleen Wynne proved us right by putting this at the top of her agenda at a time when it cannot hurt her at the voting booth.  She announced the reintroduction in October 2014, but refused to let the public see the document for months.  She even held a farcical “public consultation” in which hand-picked parents were invited to give feedback on the curriculum – without actually being allowed to see the “new” curriculum.

Months of parental protests against the curriculum, across the province, have ensued.  Despite having been implemented in the Spring term of 2016, parental opposition continues to grow.  In the meantime, Premier Wynne continues to obstinately ignore the voices of parents who are demanding a repeal of the curriculum and that the government start over with a legitimate consultation process. ~ Campaign Life Coalition

• 6-year-olds are given graphic descriptions of genitalia and told how to give “consent” for sex.
• 8-year-olds are told that gender is an interchangeable “construct” and extreme sensitivity and openness to homosexuality is pushed.
• 9-year-olds are encouraged to date romantically.
• 11-year-olds are encouraged to masturbate.
• 12-year-olds have oral sex and sodomy described to them.  They’re also encouraged to explore sex because it’s “pleasurable”.
• 13-year-olds are taught to plan out their sexual activity (like one would plan a day at an amusement park).  They’re also taught to keep a condom on them at all times, “just in case”.

If you don’t live in Canada and didn’t make the connection, the “Liberal Party” masquerades as “centrist-Leftists” but are clearly far-Left.  The same is true all over the West from “Labour” to “Democrats”.

Would that those Conservative Catholics knew their own hierarchy was responsible.  In fact, some of their leaders do know and they are using those outraged Catholics as pawns in their Hegelian game of chess.

For anyone aware of the “Devil’s Simulation” that I describe in my book, there’s no mystery to any of this.  — It’s simply another criminal act by the Pedocracy to warp and sexualize children so that they can become the next generation of sex slaves and victims.

Confirming it all is the Deputy Education Minister, Ben Levin.  Levin was the central planner involved in Ontario’s “change” in “sex education”.  Levin was arrested and in March of 2015, arraigned in court.

Benjamin Levin, who was also a university professor, entered a guilty plea for making written child pornography, counselling a person to commit a sexual assault, and possession of child pornography. ~ National Post

Canadian government is filled with pedophiles but Levin was selected as a scape-goat because he’s a Jew.

Again, we told you so.

_________________________

Chapter 1

The Devil’s Simulation

~29 AD: The Temptation of Christ.

Again, the devil took Him up on a very high mountain and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and their grandeur, and said to Him, “All these things I will give You if You will fall down and worship me.”

Then Jesus said to him, “Be gone, Satan!  For it is written, ‘You shall worship the Lord your God, and Him only shall you serve.’”

Then the devil left Him, and immediately angels came and ministered to Him. ~ Matthew 4:8-11 (Modern English)

Certainly, in our spinning-globe-Earth-modern-reality, such Bible passages seem quaint, perhaps even ridiculous.

But what if some version of the devil’s narrative (remembering that he is the very “father of lies”, [John 8:44]) were accurate?

Perhaps he has utilized whatever advantages he retained as an inter-dimensional entity, along with those loyal to him, and conducted a malignant version of the game “Sims” — slowly building empires from the ground up and giving his most trusted lieutenants control over principalities. (Daniel 10:13)

Perhaps God allowed this to take place for several reasons:

• He places restrictions upon His interventions to guarantee free will is granted His created beings.
• The malignancy of the empires created by the devil are used by God to test and refine His Children; to perfect them as companions for His Son. [Romans 8:29]
• He has pity for the angelic beings that do not receive the opportunity for redemption that human souls have. [Matthew 25:41; II Peter 2:4]
• He is giving those who choose to participate “enough rope to hang themselves” as a Testimony to His Justice.

Screenshot from the Microsoft video game Age of Empires.
(Wikimedia Commons/Fair Use)

If true, does this put the words of Jesus to Pontius Pilate in a different light, “My Kingdom is not of this world”? [John 18:36]

The Greek κόσμου (“kosmou”) translated as “world” has an interesting double meaning to include “adornment” or “trappings”.  Is there a hidden metaphor that implies a malignant system at work; the devil’s empire-building simulation?

How can Christ be “King of kings and Lord of lords” (Revelation 19:16) and yet not rule “in this world”?

Was Jesus giving Pilate a false sense of security by actually saying “That which empowers Me is not the system which has elevated you…”?

This further makes sense in light of the assertion that all of Creation was made through Christ and for Him. (Colossians 1:16)

If true, then the Devil’s Simulation would be a tenuous parasite, controlling God’s Creation.  As a fallen angel, he has the handicap of needing to co-opt human hands to do the work for him.  He would need a system that insured the loyalty of anyone he empowered.  It would be a system that guaranteed any human he used would someday share in his judgment.

Those who choose loyalty to God would be known by partaking of His Nature; compassion and selfless love. (I John 4:7-21)  The devil would force his followers to show their allegiance by going as far in the opposite direction as possible: lust of any kind, feeding self-interest, creating a callous, inhuman monster.

This is exactly what history shows.

*****

Chapter 16

Who Took Johnny?¹

5 September 1982: 12 year old John David “Johnny” Gosch disappears while on his paper route in Des Moines, Iowa.

In recounting the disappearance, John Gosch, Senior, stated that he always accompanied his son every Sunday morning for his paper route, but that morning he didn’t.  Supposedly, Johnny took his wagon filled with papers and the family dachshund to go it alone.

By 6 a.m., neighbors began calling the Gosch residence to complain that they hadn’t received their paper.  John Senior drove the route and found Johnny’s wagon and the family dog still tied to it, but no sign of the boy.

John Senior, along with his wife (Johnny’s mother) Noreen, called the Des Moines Police but they were disturbingly unresponsive.  They took 45 minutes to arrive (Headquarters was 10 minutes away) and distressed the Goschs by suggesting that Johnny had run away from home.  Johnny was well-adjusted and happy.  He had just bought himself a dirtbike with his paper route money.  The Goschs quickly dismissed the assertion that he had run away.

*****

The Left always has fun with exposing the sexually-perverted underbelly of the pseudo-Right but it quickly leads to the inner workings of the Devil’s Simulation so it never receives the coverage one would expect.

The same is true for a similar scandal in the 1980’s but it, too, was quickly buried as the Reagan / Bush “call boy” story which lead to the “Franklin” Cover-up (more in Chapter 21).

However, “alternative media” did follow up on the Gannon / Guckert / gay escort story.

In late January a conservative journalist in Washington D.C. was found to have gained access to the White House press pool despite using a fake name, and despite the fact that he once worked as a high-priced homosexual escort.

Jeff Gannon was a White House correspondent for Talon News who regularly attended White House press briefings and at least four press conferences with President George W. Bush.  On Jan. 26, 2005, Gannon asked a question of the president that was so friendly and factually inaccurate that some of his colleagues began looking into his background.

Talon News, it was learned, is a barely disguised tool of the Republican Party, and Gannon’s credentials as a journalist consist solely of a training course at the Leadership Broadcast School of Journalism.  After two days of training that cost $50, Gannon was officially a graduate of a journalism school and on his way to the White House press pool.

It was soon discovered that Gannon’s real name is Jeff Guckert and that he has also gone by the nickname “Bulldog” when listing himself on the Internet as a homosexual escort and personal trainer charging $200 per hour for his “discreet” services.

Gannon was removed from the White House and resigned from Talon News on Feb. 8 “Gannongate” quickly became the presidential scandal of the hour, though the story faded from public view as politicians and the media eagerly turned their attention to such pressing matters as steroids in baseball and the Terri Schiavo² situation.

 — “Christian Conservative” politicians hiring out the services of sodomites is nothing much of a story, anyway. —

But before long, Internet bloggers had picked up the story and began to think back to the administration of President Bush’s father, which was rocked by a scandal that allegedly involved a high-level official giving private, late-night tours of the White House to teenage, male prostitutes.  The New York Times and the Washington Post both wrote about the story and the eventual death of Washington lobbyist Craig Spence, who reportedly arranged the visits.  Spence, it has been suggested, was preparing to admit publicly that he was using the teenage boys to blackmail high-powered politicians in the beltway.  He committed suicide before he had the opportunity to do so. …

Private investigator Sherman H. Skolnick posted a story about the Gannon debacle on www.rense.com, a site known for its conspiracy theories, and publicly stated on Feb. 19 that Gannon is Johnny Gosch.

Andy Stephenson, a blogger from Seattle familiar with the details of the Johnny Gosch case and the child sex rings in Nebraska detailed in the Book, “The Franklin Cover-Up,” began, with a group of other writers and investigators, to ponder the claim.  They looked at markings on Gannon’s body and compared them to those reported on Johnny Gosch.  They considered the lack of personal information about Gannon’s early years.  They considered that Johnny was alleged to have been used as a gay prostitute for blackmail purposes.  They considered that the high-powered people alleged to have kidnapped and brainwashed children as part of the government’s Monarch Project and MK-Ultra program, including Johnny, did so to use them in a variety of ways to advance their own agendas.  And they contacted Noreen Gosch and discussed the idea with her — the first she’d heard of the theory — and they, too, came to the conclusion that Jeff Gannon is none other than Johnny Gosch.

The Internet has been abuzz with the theory ever since.  And, in a way, it makes perfect sense.  You’ve got a kid abducted and brainwashed into doing the bidding of government officials as part of top-secret mind-control programs, so now that he’s older why not put him into the White House to soften press briefings to make the president look better?  The suggestion from many is that Gannon is a Monarch Program child-turned-adult operative. ~ Pointblank Des Moines³

Alternative media then received “spokesmen” for the issue: gatekeepers who carefully steered the conversation clear of Roman implications.  These included men like Nebraska State Senator John DeCamp (a Roman Catholic seminarian and former aid to CIA Director William Colby, the “warrior monk” — also a devout Roman Catholic).  Also making the rounds was Theodore L. “Ted” Gunderson, former FBI Special Agent in charge of the high-profile Los Angeles office.  Gunderson helped destroy the creditability of child sex-slave trafficking with his appearance alongside “Satanist” Michael Aquino (who attained Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army, ludicrously waxed “horned” eyebrows and all) for the comic relief that was daytime television and the Geraldo Rivera show.  Geraldo is a Puerto Rican Roman Catholic.

Another is retired Jewish NYPD Detective James “Jim” Rothstein.

Each played their part in blaming nebulous and nefarious “Satanists” with clownish pawns like Colonel Aquino portraying one.

Rothstein “investigated” the disappearance of Johnny Gosch and provided a “confidential report” for Noreen which she posted on her web site “The Johnny Gosch Foundation”.⁴

As a dutiful “Papal Court Jew”, Rothstein covered for his masters by claiming that the CIA’s James Jesus Angleton “compromised” the Vatican and allowed pedophiles to “get a foothold” there.

If ever there was a man who embodied the fraud of needless war and proved its genesis was in Rome, it was James Jesus Angleton.

Angleton held the vital position of Chief of Counterintelligence for the critical Cold War decades of 1954 to 1974.  From there, he kept those in the CIA who were serious about their work cowering in fear from the seeming paranoia of his persecutions while devastating moles like MI6’s Harold Adrian Russell “Kim” Philby — a friend of Angleton’s — sent reams of sensitive information to the Soviets.

Angleton, in his relentless pursuit of Soviet agents, questioned the loyalty of many of the agency’s best analysts of Soviet affairs, and ruined the careers of more than a few.  The CIA only recently completed the painful business of restoring the reputation of those Angleton besmirched.

During Angleton’s tenure as chief of counterintelligence from 1954-74, the CIA’s ability to decipher the politics and military strategy of the Soviet Union was often crippled by his byzantine investigations.

Oddly, Angleton insisted that he never suspected Kim Philby, the British intelligence officer who provided Moscow with a stream of British and American secrets while a friend and close associate of Angleton. ~ New York Times⁵

In a similar “PsyOp” (Psychological Operation), the Leftist magazine Mother Jones also claimed the CIA manipulated the hapless Vatican but, in the process, admitted the shocking revelations that Angleton was a Knight of Malta, was in position to be screened for his treasonous future by working in Rome during World War II and had ran the supposedly “non-existent” Vatican and Israel Desks for “the Company”.⁶

The SMOM had given a different prestigious award in 1946 to another high-level CIA operative, James Jesus Angleton.  “It had to do with counterintelligence,” Angleton told Mother Jones, when asked why he was chosen for such a distinction.  During World War II, Angleton was head of the Rome station of the OSS.  Later, on his return to Washington, he ran what was tantamount to the “Vatican desk” for the CIA.  According to Angleton, the agency does not have a Vatican desk.  Nor does it have an Israel desk, for that matter, yet Angleton also covered that area.  The extreme sensitivity associated with Israel and the Vatican required that work relating to them be buried among Angleton’s counterintelligence staff, which was well-suited for such assignments.⁷

Angleton’s work on the unacknowledged “Israel Desk” shows the Zionist quagmire is cunningly woven by Rome through Western Intelligence.

“Jesus” Angleton is also reputed by at least one Vatican insider to have directly fed information to the KGB resulting in the death of agents working in Russia.⁸

In his “Confidential Report”, Detective Rothstein admitted that the CIA was involved in commercial-grade pedophilia.

A notorious homosexual pedophile and procurer … Ben Rose was arrested after an investigation by the New York Police Department at his residence on St. Mark’s Place in New York City during the summer of 1972.  At the time of the arrest, he had in his possession three young boy ages 14-15 years, who had been transported by him from Baltimore to New York City for the specific purpose of sexual exploitation.

— Baltimore is a city as openly-controlled by the Catholic Church as Boston.  It was founded in honor of Cecil Calvert, 2^nd Baron Baltimore whose Roman Catholic father, George Calvert secured the colony of Mary-land for the Vatican. —

Upon his arrest, he agreed to cooperate with the New York City Police Department and an investigation was begun under the code name GAFF.⁹  This investigation uncovered the commercial part of pedophilia and child abuse.

The commercial group includes child pornography, prostitution, pimping, extortion, and human intelligence.  Child pornography, prostitution, and pimping are well organized and promoted throughout the pedophile community.  Because of Ben Rose’s cooperation with investigators, many of the rumors and information under investigation were verified.  He informed the New York City Detectives that in November of 1971, three boys, ages 14-15 years, were sexually abused and then murdered in his apartment on East 64th Street in New York City by three men he identified as Dr. (name deleted) (a surgeon), (name deleted) (OPEC), and (name deleted) (CIA).  The bodies were then transported to Connecticut by car and then buried on a farm.  Under the GAFF investigation these murders were to be assigned to other investigators in the New York City Police Department, but then disappeared in the hierarchy of the Department.

A second investigation conducted in the mid 1970’s, by the Police Department during which thirteen homicides, plus the murder of these 14-15 year old boys at Ben Rose’s apartment, were investigated under the code name OPERATION TOGETHER.  This investigation was under the command of Deputy Inspector John Colin.  At a critical point in the investigation, it was stopped.  Inspector Colin was demoted and forced into retirement.

The third investigation was done by the New York State Select Committee on Crime.  This Committee served subpoenas on both (name deleted) and (name deleted).  When (name deleted) was served with the subpoena and questioned by the detectives, he informed them that because he worked for the CIA, the subpoena would be quashed, invoking National Security.  He was correct, because before the detectives returned to their offices, the subpoena was withdrawn.  One wonders what part of the National Security Act allows the murder of children.

How is it that America’s international intelligence agency should be her most heinous enemy, kidnapping her children off the street to torture, rape, abuse and sell them?  — Because the CIA doesn’t work for the American people, it works for Rome and serves the Devil’s Simulation.

Rothstein also admitted that Cardinal Francis Joseph Spellman (1889 – 1967) was an arch pedophile who remained free during his lifetime to rape children at will, thanks to protection from Roman Catholics in New York State government and law enforcement.

…from the days of Cardinal Spellman (nicknamed “NELLIE”, a known pedophile) in New York City to the present, no scandals have been made public.  There is no way that these hidden scandals will be made public as long as (name deleted) or someone like him is the District Attorney in New York City.  Any District Attorney or Prosecutor who routinely covers up these crimes against children by politically connected pedophiles, assures these crimes against children will remain hidden from the public.

This bears out our contention that Cardinals and Bishops who protect pedophile priests are, themselves, child predators who remain protected and anonymous in their crimes.  Neither “mainstream” media, “alternative” media, nor any government institution is allowed to bring them down or even out their status.

New York has always been owned by either Roman Catholics or “Papal Court Jews” and she has suffered for it.  On the heels of the Sandy Hook false flag in Connecticut, far-Left Catholic Governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo (son of Leftist Catholic Governor of New York Mario Cuomo), over-nighted a bill which destroyed what was left of New York gun rights.  In violation of the New York State Constitution, Cuomo forced his inversely-named SAFE Act through the legislature in a closed door session without any committee hearings.  In hours it was passed and Cuomo immediately signed it in a bold show of lawless Leftist Catholic tyranny.  Cuomo was required by the Constitution of New York to allow law-makers and citizens three days to examine proposed legislation and he simply ignored the requirement.  To date, no citizen, lawyer or advocacy group (such as the highly-publicized “National Rifle Association”) has attempted to bring this outrage into court where only the most corrupt and debased judge would dare to uphold it.

Detective Rothstein also acknowledged that the Pedocracy takes care of its own.

In most investigations into pedophilia and child abuse, the investigators, federal and local, will initially do an honest and in-depth investigation, but when a certain level of progress is attained, the investigations are stopped or compromised.  Again one asks the question, “Why is this?”  To this date there is no high profile case that has ever been investigated to the fullest extent and then prosecuted in the court of the United States.  Why?  Three examples of this can be found in the following cases: a) The Finders – Florida and Washington D.C.; b) Franklin Cover-up – Nebraska; c) St. Johns Abbey – Minnesota.

In segments of the family, homosexual, commercial, serial killer, and the occult, the pedophile and child abuser feel that they are above the law.  They believe that because of their contacts, position in society, or the secrecy of their actions, if caught, they can use these connections to cover-up their criminal activities.  In most cases this is true and known throughout the pedophile subculture.

High-profile pedophiles even use this protection as validation and vindication.

In 2017, four men accused Seattle Mayor Ed Murray of sexually abusing them when they were boys.  One of the men was in Murray’s care as a foster child.  Murray is an overt “married” homosexual and remains tightly tied to the Catholic Church.¹⁰  He arrogantly used lack of criminal prosecution as the reason why he refused to step down as Mayor in light of the accusations.¹¹  How an overt homosexual is able to care for foster children is, itself, a heinous crime of the Pedocracy.¹²

For a high-profile big-city Mayor, Ed Murray’s past is apparently “hands off” to the “secular” media.  However, if one digs deep enough, one finds that, like California’s once-and-future Governor Jerry “Moonbeam” Brown, Ed Murray was trained in a Jesuit seminary. ^{13 14 15}

Depressed

Independent investigative reporter Tim Schmitt of the now-defunct news outlet Pointblank Des Moines linked the apparent suicide of famed journalist Hunter Stockton Thompson to the “outing” of White House press reporter “Jeff Gannon”, a.k.a. “James Guckert” and supposedly a.k.a. John Gosch, Jr.

Shortly after the theory was presented, Gannon posted an article titled “Hiding in Plain Sight,” and has posted a column entitled “Fear and Loathing in the Press Room,” which some suggest is a reference to the recently deceased Hunter S. Thompson, who also was accused of involvement in pedophile, child slavery rings in the 1980s …

Others suggest that his name itself is a clue to his real identity.  Both Jeff Gannon and James Guckert share the same initials as Johnny Gosch.  Furthermore, shortly after Johnny’s disappearance, Noreen made a personal plea to the editor of The Des Moines Register, Johnny’s employer.  The editor printed her letter in the paper and mocked it by allowing the police department to dissect it.  The editor’s name was James Gannon. …

The Gannon/Gosch connection was first made public early in the morning on Feb. 20.  Later that same day, Hunter S. Thompson was found dead in his home, the victim of an apparent self-inflicted gunshot.

Few people would ever have thought to connect Thompson and Gosch, but those familiar with the tales of child abuse and pedophilia documented in “The Franklin Cover-Up,” a book first released in 1994 by former Neb. State Sen. John DeCamp, understand the association.

In his book, DeCamp relates many interviews and discussions with Paul Bonacci, the young man who claims to have been involved with the kidnapping of Johnny Gosch.  Bonacci told horrific tales of being forced into sex with adults and other children.  In one case he recalls being flown into Nevada with another young boy whom he did not know.  They took on another passenger there and headed to a secluded location where Bonacci says he was forced to have sex with the younger boy.  The young boy, Bonacci claims in this book, was also forced to have sex with adult males, who then killed the boy with a gunshot to the head.  Bonacci says he was then forced to have sex with the corpse.

The passenger they took on in Nevada filmed the entire thing, and Bonacci recalled that his name was Hunter Thompson.¹⁶

Thompson was an anti-American muck-raker who was an important part of Jesuit “counter-culture”.  He disguised his yellow journalism with a new name: “gonzo journalism”.  However, raw, emotion-filled diatribe is the same it has always been before or since: propaganda.

As a result of being an active agent for the Devil’s Simulation, Thompson was lionized by fellow deviants in Hollywood.

The work he remains best known for, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas: A Savage Journey to the Heart of the American Dream (1971), constitutes a rumination on the failure of the 1960s counterculture movement.  It was first serialized in Rolling Stone, a magazine with which Thompson would be long associated, and was released as a film starring Johnny Depp and Benicio del Toro and directed by Terry Gilliam in 1998. …

In accordance with his wishes, his ashes were fired out of a cannon in a ceremony funded by his friend Johnny Depp and attended by friends including then-Senator John Kerry¹⁷ and Jack Nicholson. ~ Wikipedia¹⁸

Schmitt also connected the CIA to Johnny Gosch.

George Paul Bishop (often known just as Paul Bishop) claimed he was a “CIA asset” and arrived in Des Moines in July of 1984 to offer his assistance to the Goschs.  Before he left, he provided, through his investigation, a detailed map of the kidnapping scene.  Bishop, according to Noreen’s book, often called the Gosch home from the Washington D.C. office of Sen. Charles Grassley, with whom Noreen had worked on Johnny’s case.

“Many times Paul Bishop would call me from Sen. Grassley’s office and, when finished speaking with me, he would hand the phone to one of Grassley’s aides who I was familiar with,” Noreen recalled in her book, published in 2000.  “That convinced me Paul was an accepted visitor on the Hill in Washington.”

Based on this, Noreen believed that Bishop was responsible for securing her invitation to testify before Sen. Arlan Specter’s Hearing on Organized Crime and its Relationship to Kidnapping at the U.S. Capitol.  Bishop, in fact, picked Noreen up from her D.C. hotel and accompanied her to the hearings.

Bishop became close to Noreen, even referring to her as “Mom,” but suddenly, in 1985, he disappeared from the scene.  The phone number he’d left was no longer valid and no one knew how to contact him.  No one had seen or heard from him in almost 20 years, until he was suddenly arrested on Feb. 4 of this year in Virginia, after police allegedly found an explicit video of a 16-year-old boy in his home.

Detectives searched Bishop’s home and found the tape after receiving a complaint that he was allowing teenage boys to drink and use drugs on the premises.

Noreen wonders now if Bishop was on the wrong side of Johnny’s case all along.  Was he involved in the kidnapping and merely running a smokescreen at the time to prevent discovery?  Was his recent arrest an effort to keep him quiet about the larger story?  A threat? …

Either way, Bishop seemed to know a lot about Johnny’s disappearance in 1982, and his sudden reappearance on the scene coinciding with the outing of Jeff Gannon [and] the death of Thompson … is too much of a coincidence for some to accept.¹⁹

From its founding through today, the CIA has been so overtly Catholic that the Catholic Herald sheepishly admitted to its nickname “the Catholic Intelligence Agency”, or alternatively “Catholics In Action”.²⁰

Many of its Directors have been devout Catholics (most of them, Jesuit trained or mentored) and Knights for the Vatican; OSS founder William Donovan, the CIA’s first Director Walter Bedell Smith, John McCone, William Colby, William Casey, Michael Hayden, Leon Panetta and John Brennan.  Many more can be found in key positions and those who aren’t overt Catholics are still tied to the Church.  They have engineered America’s most grievous treasons.  Examples include Allen Dulles and the murder of sitting Jesuit-trained Roman Catholic President John F. Kennedy or George Tenet and 9/11.  Dulles was the brother of John Foster Dulles, Kennedy’s Secretary of State who later committed suicide under odd circumstances.  John’s son, Allen’s nephew, Avery Dulles, subsequently became one of the most powerful Jesuit Cardinals in the United States.  This is in spite of the claim that the Dulles family was the same religion that married the Catholic homosexual pedophile Mayor of Seattle Ed Murray; Episcopalian.

“Orthodox” George Tenet was trained by the Jesuits at Georgetown.  Even if the ludicrous official story of 9/11 was true, Tenet should have been dragged from office in disgrace and prosecuted for criminal negligence that caused the death of over 3,000 Americans and billions of dollars of damage resulting in a modern Police State.²¹  Instead, President George W. Bush (Yale Skull and Bones ’68), son of President George H. W. Bush (Yale Skull and Bones ’48) gave him the highest civilian honor, the Medal of Freedom.

_________________________

As of 12 September, the far-Left, “married” homosexual, would-be Jesuit priest, Mayor of far-Left Seattle, Ed Murray, has finally vowed to resign.

The revealing that the “married” homosexual adopted a foster son in order to sodomize and abuse him wasn’t enough, nor was the 4 other open complaints against the Jesuit seminarian.  However, when Murray’s cousin came forward alleging that the Seattle Mayor assaulted him 4 decades ago, he finally decided to call it quits.

In California, another Jesuit seminarian, Jerry “Moonbeam” Brown, is finally making it official: rather than being satisfied that all of California’s big cities brazenly disobey un-enforced Federal immigration laws, Brown is making the entire Democrat-dominated state a haven for Roman Catholic illegal aliens.

In Lanark, Scotland a grisly discovery was made.  The little bodies of hundreds of children (400 and still counting) were found in a mass, unmarked grave outside the Smyllum Park Roman Catholic Orphanage.

In the heart of Protestant firebrand John Knox’s homeland, a malignant parasite was fast at work eating the children of Scotland.

The Orphanage was started in 1864 and run by the inversely-named Daughters of Charity.  The prominence of nuns in the great harm done to children via the Devil’s Simulation thoroughly buries the subterfuge that systemic abuse comes from male-dominated patriarchies.

Former First Minister of Scotland, Jack McConnell (a “Labour” Leftist) apologized to victims “care home” abuse.  As has been the case in Ireland, Australia and elsewhere, the Catholic Church dominates “secular” government responsibilities, abuses them like an enemy insurgency, then lets the junior partners in government take the blame.  It is a story chronicled repeatedly in Eaters of Children: The Pedocracy Exposed.

Young, single mothers, unwanted children, illicit sex between priests and nuns — the victims were given into the tender care of Catholic clergy.  Their little bodies dumped in a pile outside the doors.

Pol Pot, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, “Papa Doc” Duvalier: all pale in comparison to the systemic mass murder of the Devil’s Simulation (but they are all a part of it).

Scotland’s healthcare facilities were socialized in 1947 with the National Health Service Act and it made things much easier for Rome to pull the strings and help herself to Scotland’s vulnerable.

As word got out over how child sex abuse controls power behind the scenes, it collapsed the government of Iceland.

Iceland’s ruling three-party coalition has fallen in the wake of public outcry following the discovery of Prime Minister Bjarni Benediktsson’s links to a convicted pedophile.

On Thursday, it was revealed that the prime minister’s father signed a letter recommending “restored honor” —a provision within the Icelandic judicial system that allows convicted criminals to apply for some jobs in some professions and join a company board —for Hjalti Sigurjón Hauksson, a convicted pedophile.  Hauksson had served a five-and-a-half-year jail term for repeatedly raping his stepdaughter over a twelve-year period.

Hauksson’s victim told the Icelandic newspaper Stundin that he continued harassing her even after his release, pursuing her with phone calls and messages to this day. ~ Foreign Policy

What will happen as American wake up to the same reality?

The Billionaire Pedophile Who Could Bring Down Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton

Doctors kill 2,450% more Americans than all gun-related deaths combined — Natural News

JAMA stats tell the tale: Doctors kill more people than guns and traffic accidents — The Idaho Observer

CHUMP “ADVISOR” KKKRIS KOBACH HAS AND WANTS TO CONTINUE TO CATALOGUE MUSLIMS

OSU “ISIL TERRORIST” WAS TRAFFICKED INTO THE U.S. BY CATHOLIC CHARITIES

MITCH McCONNELL’S FAMILY ASIAN DRUG TIES

OPUS DEI RICK SANTORUM IS SAM BROKEBACK’S ROMAN DADDY

BRIGITTE GABRIEL: ROME’S PREMIER ANTI-MUSLIM AGITATOR RECEIVES HER REWARD

JOHN WAYNE’S SAD JOURNEY FROM PRESBYTERIAN TO ROMAN

“DEATHBED CONVERSIONS”…TO ROMANISM

WHO CONVERTED TO ROMANISM ON THEIR DEATHBED?

“GEORGE WASHINGTON DIED A CATHOLIC”

Let That Be Your Last Battlefield

CONTROLLED CATHOLIC OUTLET DR. ALAN KEYES IS PLACED AS OUR IMPOTENT ANTI-OBAMA

They should be.

Hillary Rodham was born in the Jesuit capital of radical Leftist “community organizing”: Chicago.  The Jesuits have a long history of radicalizing minorities there.  It’s where the man who is likely Obama’s biological father, black Communist, pornographer and pedophile Frank Marshall Davis worked on the same Communist newspaper (the Chicago Defender) as Vernon Jarrett, the father-in-law of Obama’s top advisor, Valerie Jarrett—a woman so powerful she has her own secret service detail, courtesy of the American taxpayer.  A “former” Jesuit named Greg Galluzzo would show young Barry the ropes of organizing the minority community in Chicago and Roman Catholics would later fund both Obama and the “secular” Jesuit vehicle for that radicalization; “ACORN”.

Hillary Rodham would walk a similar path.  In 1974, Rodham was on the staff of John Andrew Droar, the lawyer hired by Congress to investigate the Watergate Hotel Democrat National Convention break-in which had CIA hit-man Everett Howard Hunt at the heart of it.  Hunt had done it all for the CIA, from overthrowing the administration of Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala in 1954 to the Bay of Pigs invasion to the murder of John F. Kennedy.  Rumor has it that fellow conspirator Frank Angelo Fiorini (who later changed his name to “Frank Anthony Sturgis”) made a death-bed confession claiming Jesuit-trained FBI Special Agent George Gordon Battle Liddy was the one who murdered Dallas Police officer JD¹ Tippit, not Lee Oswald, with the rationale being that Tippit was “dirty”.  One might call that a “Jesuitical” rationale in light of Tippit’s murder being used to further frame a Patriot who tried to warn the FBI through Special Agent James Hosty that there was a plot to murder the President.

The irony of Hillary asking Richard Nixon “What did you know and when did you know it?” has not been lost on the politically astute.

A year later, in 1975, Hillary Rodham would become Hillary Rodham-Clinton.

The media very strongly proclaims that Bill Clinton is a “Southern Baptist”, which is interesting because at each turn of his life, there has been either a Roman Catholic or a Jesuit holding his hand.

Clinton was born “William Jefferson Blythe, III” although his biological father is said to be a travelling salesman who died in a car accident just after his birth.

It was a rather sophisticated name coming from mother Virginia Dell who dumped William Jefferson off on her parents while she went to nursing school.  She apparently didn’t do well as she was subsequently named in the wrongful deaths of at least two of her patients as an anesthesiologist.

Officially, Virginia was married to four different men and may have “known” a few more.

One of them might have been the son of John Davison Rockefeller, Jr., Winthrop Aldrich Rockefeller, the 37^th Governor of the State of Arkansas.

A transplant from New York who had no roots in Arkansas (the striking reverse of Hillary Rodham’s political career), Rockefeller was a reputed homosexual who lived with a black friend and had “the world’s largest porn collection”.²

Perhaps “sexual deviant” would be a more appropriate descriptor rather than “gay” if one believes Winthrop Aldrich to be Bill Clinton’s father and, given the lifestyles of the rich and shameless, not a far stretch.

Nor does the connection end there.  Winthrop is said to have been the one who engineered the famous meeting between Bill and Jack Kennedy just a few months before Kennedy was brutally murdered.³

It was Winthrop Rockefeller who stepped up and made sure that Bill got a Vietnam draft deferment and an internship with J. William Fulbright that lead to an all-expenses-paid tour of Communist Europe and Asia.

Another oddity regarding the “blue collar” upbringing of William Jefferson Blythe-Clinton is that he was a member of the Jacques de Molay Society, named after the final (overt) Grand Master of the Knights Templar.

If the Rockefellers gave Bill Clinton life, it was the Jesuits who trained him.

After getting his ticket from Winthrop out of Vietnam (known as “Spelly’s War” because it was co-ordinated by NY Cardinal Francis Joseph Spellman⁴), Hippie-Communist Jesuit Richard McSorely helped train Bill as he protested the war he didn’t have to go die in while in England then received special training in then-Communist Prague and Moscow.

Later, Bill would complete his training under the tutelage of men like Professor Carroll Quigley while at Jesuit Georgetown.

Bill’s hidden silver spoon would soon get him to sit where his benefactor (and father?) once sat; in the Arkansas Governor’s mansion.

There, Bill and Hillary joined hands with the Bush family and they all built dynasties on a mountain of cocaine flown in to Arkansas courtesy of the Central Intelligence Agency.

That Jesuit guidance continued through a full 8 years of punishing the American people hard and it included shooting up a separatist family in Idaho in which a Japanese Roman Catholic FBI sniper named Lon Horiuchi⁵ slaughtered a mother with an infant in her arms⁶; a trial run false flag on the World Trade Center in 1993 killing 6 and injuring 1,000; burning alive 80 men, women and children in the Seventh Day Adventist compound at Waco (what the Inquisition does to “heretics”—you may not believe that this was part of the tactical decision-making process but it was) and slaughtering 168 people, including 19 small children and then blaming it on a “right-wing Constitutional Christian fanatic”, Timothy McVeigh.

While this was going on, both Bill and Hillary were living large as debauched sexual predators, both raping and defiling as they pleased and when victims came forward, Hillary Rodham lowered the boom.

An alleged rape victim said in an interview Friday that Mrs. Clinton “took me through hell,” during her early days as a lawyer. The woman was referring to Mrs. Clinton’s major criminal case at age 27, in which she defended Thomas Alfred Taylor. The man, then age 41, was accused of raping a 12-year-old girl in 1975, and ultimately plead guilty to lesser charges.

Audio tape of Mrs. Clinton talking about the case was provided by the Washington Free Beacon on June 15. During the tape, the former Secretary of State seems to suggest that her client was guilty.

“I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs,” she says in an interview archived at the University of Arkansas in Fayetteville. Mrs. Clinton laughs at the remark and does so again after discussing DNA evidence that was accidentally destroyed by a crime lab.The interview was conducted by Arkansas reporter Roy Reed.

In her interview with the Daily Beast, the victim addressed Mrs. Clinton directly: “I would say [to Clinton], ‘You took a case of mine in ‘75, you lied on me… I realize the truth now, the heart of what you’ve done to me. And you are supposed to be for women? You call that [being] for women, what you done to me? And I hear you on tape laughing.” ~ The Washington Times

Hillary Rodham continued to play the role of strong-man by illegally going through the FBI dossiers of their political enemies for blackmail.  Neither the existence of the dossiers nor the activity were addressed with prosecution.

In fact, the corruptions that occurred during the Clinton Administration that were being ignored were so vast a side-show was fabricated over a sexual tryst Bill had in the Oral Office.  Meanwhile, in best Hegelian fashion, Bill’s Jesuit keepers were ordering him to keep backwards Communist China in full threat status by sending them nuclear secrets and supercomputers; all acts of high treason that were shoved under Monica Lewinsky’s stained dress.

After Clinton dodged his impeachment the way he dodged the draft (with help from his handlers), “bulldog” Republican investigator Kenneth Starr opinioned how he would’ve liked to have had dinner with the Clintons.  This was in 2005 so he very well may have by now.

But after Bill stepped down into retirement (with a Jesuit “job well done!”) Hillary stepped up.

With no political experience what-so-ever, she ran for United States Senate in a state she’s never lived in; New York—the exact opposite of Bill’s father, Winthrop Rockefeller.

New York is a state owned by Rome; the “Pope of America”—the Archbishop of New York—sees to it that Leftist Catholic Democrats always reign supreme even when they claim to be “Methodists” like Hillary.

Timothy Cardinal Dolan with the far-Left Roman Catholic Mayor of New York City, Bill de Blasio.

Timothy Cardinal Dolan with the far-Left Roman Catholic Governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo (son of former far-Left Roman Catholic Governor of New York, Mario Cuomo). “Free elections”, indeed.

The Pope of America and the Pope of Rome.

In 2008, Hillary put her political career on hold…to seek higher political office.

Unfortunately for her, she was informed that the Jesuits had a better candidate in Barack Hussein Obama.

As much as the “press” is corrupted and controlled, they aren’t on board enough (at least at the lower levels) to be privy to a Bilderberg meeting so they were tricked and basically kidnapped.

The Bilderberg Group is a regular meeting of the Power Elite where they get instructions on how to push the enslaved masses towards unification under the Holy Father.  The founder of the Bilderberg movement (and of European unification) was a former Jesuit seminarian, some say full ordained Jesuit priest, Józef Retinger.

If you know how to pick through the smokescreens of blaming Jews, claiming the Vatican was alright until it was “infiltrated” and promoting Freemasons as “enemies of Rome”, sources like Jan Van Helsing’s⁷ Secret Societies and Their Power in the 20th Century can be illustrative.

The Vatican’s secret service has always been the Society of Jesus, whose members are called Jesuits.  I would like to open the eyes a bit of those who believe that Jesuits were just another harmless religious organization.  The initiation oath for the 2nd degree demands the death of all Protestants…  They were the leading force behind the massacre of the Huguenots and were also responsible for the beheading of countless Protestants … in England during the 16th and 17th centuries.  The Society of Jesus was founded in 1534 by Ignatius Loyola…

The power of the general of the Jesuits is such that he is called the Black Pope.

… The P2 is the strongest of the Italian Masonic Lodges.

Within the P2 is the Great Vatican Lodge, which was at the root of the P2 scandal in 1976, when a list surfaced in the Vatican with the names and entry dates of 121 high Church dignitaries, among them cardinals of the Curia, archbishops, bishops, prelates and laymen. …

Among the names on the list were also those of the secretary of state cardinal Jean Villot, the Vatican’s Foreign Minister Agostino Casaroli, cardinal Sebastiano Baggio, cardinal Ugo Poletti and the head of the Vatican Bank, Bishop Marcinkus. …

By the end of World War II … Allen Dulles, head of the CIA … had a secret meeting with the SS leader Gehlen.

They made arrangements to smuggle SS officers under the cover of the Catholic Church into Switzerland.  Some SS officers took their vows and were posted in other countries, predominantly Argentina, Paraguay, and the U.S.  After the war it was Gehlen’s task to organize the station Radio Free Europe.  After the war a large section of the SS was directly taken over by the CIA.

Another interesting member of the Committee of 300 was Joseph Retinger.  After the war the CIA supported him in making contracts with the Vatican.  For instance, he won over Dr. Luigi Gedda, the medical advisor of Pope Pius VII and leader of Catholic activities.  With Gedda’s help he succeeded in strengthening for the future the connection with Pope Paul VI who had already collaborated with the OSS (Office of Strategic Services).

Retinger also met with Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, the Italian prime minister, Sir Colin Grubbin, director of the SOE (Special Operations Executive, British Secret Service), and CIA director General Walter Bedell.

Before the war Prince Bernhard was with the SS and then held a position at I.G. Farben.  He married Juliana, who in 1948 became queen of the Netherlands, and he took up a post with Shell Oil.  This group was the core that met at the hotel De Bilderberg in Oosterbeek, Holland for the first time in May 1954 and later became known as The Bilderbergers.  Committee of 300 member Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands became the first director of the Bilderbergers. …

One of the CIA members with a strong influence in the Vatican was Cardinal Spellman.  He helped the CIA with the overthrow of democracy in Guatemala in 1954.  It was also Spellman who introduced Father Paul Marcinkus from Chicago to the Pope.  In 1971, Marcinkus became archbishop and head of the Vatican Bank.  Marcinkus developed close links with Masonic P2 lodge members Michele Sindona and Roberto Calvi.  The grand master of the P2 was Licio Gelli.  Calvi who headed the Banco Ambrosiano helped the Vatican to transfer more than 100 million U.S. $ to the Polish Solidarnose movement.  Later he was involved in the huge Banco Ambrosiano scandal.  In 1982 his body was found hanging from the London Blackfriars bridge.  He had bricks in his left and right pockets and his legs were tied at a right angle.  This a Masonic ritual murder.  This peculiarity was never written about in the newspapers.  Sindona became advisor to the Vatican Bank.  The P2 lodge had many links with the Vatican, Opus Dei and the CIA.  Many of its members held high offices in the Italian government.⁸

Here is another source that claims Retinger was an ordained Jesuit and not just a seminarian who didn’t graduate.

The Committee of 300, although in existence for over 150 years, did not take on its present form until around 1897.  It was always given to issuing orders through other fronts, such as the Royal Institute for International Affairs.  When it was decided that a super-body would control European affairs, the RIIA founded the Tavistock Institute, which in turn created NATO.  For five years NATO was financed by the German Marshall Fund.

Perhaps the most important member of the Bilderbergers, a foreign policy body of the Committee, was Joseph Rettinger⁹, said to have been its founder and organiser, whose annual meetings have delighted conspiracy-hunters for several decades.

Rettinger was a well-trained Jesuit priest and a 33rd Degree Freemason.

Mrs. Katherine Meyer Graham who is suspected of having murdered her husband in order to get control of the Washington Post, was another ranking member of the Club of Rome, as was Paul G. Hoffman of the New York Life Insurance Company, one of the largest insurance companies in the United States and a leading Rank company, with ties directly to Queen Elizabeth of England’s immediate-family.  John J. McCloy,^{10 11} the man who attempted to wipe post-World War II Germany off the map and last but not least, James A. Perkins of the Carnegie Corporation, were also founding-members of the Bilderbergers and the Club of Rome.¹²

If you had any doubt, just look at the Papal Knight symbolism on this Bilderberg Hotel in Apeldoorn, Netherlands.

As apparently vehement as the campaign was, Hillary Rodham would later accept the position as President Obama’s Secretary of State where she oversaw matters of high treason such as an illegal 8-month war to oust the sovereign of Libya—and oust him they did.

Oddly, in an interview with CBS, Rodham quoted Julius Caesar in his letter to the Senate after his victory against Pharnaces II of Pontus, Veni, vidi, vici, adding her own perverse sociopath twist.

It was an unusually Roman thing to say for a gloating Methodist.

Clinton would help to insure the treasonous humiliation of purposefully allowing a CIA arms hub and interrogation center to be over-run, sacrificing her own ambassador along with several security experts who courageously attempted to intervene.

The end-state for such unbelievable treason was to arm the CIA-trained “rebels” in Syria with Russian-made man-portable surface-to-air missiles and it has been a sickening success.

Rumors that Hillary Rodham prefers women over men continue to fly as the result of the role played by her close aide, Huma Abedin.

In the crass, tabloid sensationalism of the Village Voice, Michael Musto wrote—

As I recently said on MONICA CROWLEY’s radio show, whisper campaigns are claiming that HILLARY CLINTON is GAYLE KING–ing her aide de camp, the glamorous HUMA ABEDIN, an Indian/Pakistani goddess from Kalamazoo, Michigan.  In other words, Hillary may be putting Huma out there in the press and purposely making her more visible as a pre-emptive strike that amounts to her hiding in plain sight.  This way, no Republican can later say, “Who is this gorgeous babe who spends so much intimate time with Hillary that the Observer called her Hill’s ‘body person’?  Was GENNIFER FLOWERS’s book right about Hillary’s sexual taste?”  And does either of this couple have the balls to bottom?

Of course that whole scenario can’t possibly be true, since Bill and Hill have been so lovey-dovey lately for the cameras, and besides, whenever he’s been serviced by an intern—or by anyone—he’s clearly been thinking of his wife.  (They’re that close.)  But suddenly, Huma—a sort of Muslim SALMA HAYEK—has that spread in Vogue and the accompanying write-up notes that she “oversees every minute of Senator Clinton’s day.”  Every single minute?  Even Gayle King takes a break now and then!

The Observer noted that Abedin has an opulent lifestyle (one that doesn’t comport with a staffer’s salary):

According to a friend, her favorite designers are Mr. de la Renta, Catherine Malandrino, Charles Nolan and Prada.  “And she has a weakness for Marc Jacobs bags,” said the friend.  “She is known for her bags.”

Robert Barnett, the Clintons’ longtime attorney, said that in 11 years of knowing her, he has never seen her wear the same outfit twice.

Although there are “Christian” web sites like that of the Shoebat family who draw attention to connections Abedin supposedly has with the Saudi Royals, the Shoebats are clearly incognito Papal insurgents, masquerading as “Christians” who frequently attack Protestants and draw focus away from Rome with calls for a new Crusade against Islam.  There are a great many just like them (because Rome owns all of the media resources) and it takes a despicable individual to wage such a psychological operation of misrepresentation specifically designed to fleece Christians.

Abedin has been with Hillary Rodham since 1996 but was married to former Congressman and former NYC mayoral candidate Anthony Weiner in 2010.

It is not, apparently, a fulfilling marriage as Weiner was forced to leave Congress and step away from the mayoral campaign as a result of repeatedly getting caught sending lewd pictures of himself (“sexting”) to women other than his wife.

Perhaps the marriage is as convenient to the Weiners as Hillary’s is to Bill.  Another Washington blog confirmed the special relationship between Hillary Rodham and Mrs. Weiner.

In 2015 it was discovered that, as Secretary of State, Clinton had made extensive use of private e-mail servers for official communication; a grievous breach in national security.  Hundreds, perhaps thousands of State Department e-mails could either have been intercepted or sent to hostile entities on purpose without an official record or Federal Government security mechanisms (which would be the reason why Clinton sent them from an outside server, if treason was, once again, her intent).

The Director of the FBI, however, said that after a “thorough examination”, no wrong-doing was conducted.

But in 2010, the FBI was able to keep Russian spy Cynthia Murphy from getting “too close” to Clinton, although what exactly that meant was left to the imagination.

The current Director, James Comey, is a Roman Catholic raised in a very devout Catholic family; much as the founder of the FBI was, Charles Joseph Bonaparte, great grand-nephew of Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte.

In 2009, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visited the shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe at the basilica of the same name in Mexico City, to see first-hand the mural of the Virgin Mary.  The scant media accounts of the visit all mock Clinton’s non-Catholic couth at not knowing the image was miraculously imprinted on the cloak of St. Juan Diego in 1531 as the Virgin had been communicating to him her desire for a church to be built in that location in her name.  But is Hillary Clinton really that oblivious to the ways of the hands that feed her?

Now in 2016, Hillary Rodham is again on the campaign trail for President of the United States.

She’ll be running against Donald Trump, who spent two years at Jesuit Fordham before transferring to the incognito Jesuit facility—the University of Pennsylvania.  Trump’s son, Eric, received a full degree at Jesuit Georgetown and is now on the board of the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown.

Is Hillary Rodham Roman Catholic?

One doesn’t need to be Roman Catholic to be powerfully used by Rome (just ask Knight of Malta, recipient of the Order of St. Gregory, Rupert Murdoch) to the detriment of the American people—it just helps to have that added bit of loyalty.

Yet there’s no question that Hillary gets her marching orders from Rome and that the relationship is kept hush-hush.  Recently Clinton had a “private” meeting with American Pope¹³ Timothy Cardinal Dolan, which the media played off as just a “candidate” reaching out to the “Catholic community for votes”.  Why this would happen “in private” and without any pictures of Clinton and Dolan together does leave one to question.

The deciphering of who handles Hillary can perhaps finally be ascerted beyond doubt with the selection of her vice presidential running mate; Tim Kaine.

Kaine is, you guessed it, a devout Roman Catholic.  He is a United States Senator for the Commonwealth of Virginia—a state which also boasts a Jesuit-trained Roman Catholic Governor; Terence Richard “Terry” McAuliffe.

Kaine went to Rockhurst; an all-boys Jesuit prep school in Kansas City, Missouri.

But more than a Jesuit prep school, Kaine spent a year with the Company while on mission in Honduras.

How did that shape the United States Senator and possible future Vice President?

Professor of Political Science at the University of Virginia, (and devout Roman Catholic) Larry Sabato, says of Kaine—

People are cynical about politicians, but in Tim Kaine’s case, faith and service really have driven his life. There’s a lot of Jesuit in him

— Larry Sabato (@LarrySabato) July 23, 2016

At this point, we can throw out any vestiges of Hillary’s “Methodist” background.

Perhaps we should simply rename her “Hillary Roman-Clinton”.

UPDATE 26 July 2016, 01:37 PM, EST:  Tim Kaine, the Democrat with “a lot of Jesuit in him” has promised at the Democrat National Convention in Philadelphia to legalize America’s invading army of Hispanic Roman Catholic illegal immigrants within the first 100 days of a Hillary Roman Clinton administration.

Given that flooding Western nations with Catholic and muslim immigrants (either legally or illegally) is a top priority for the Jesuits, we can say more than just “Kaine has a lot of Jesuit in him”.

Most Papal operatives work very distantly from their masters, receiving positive and negative reinforcement for their behavior.

It’s clear, however, that Kaine is trusted enough to be receiving direct communication from America’s Inquisitors.

Alone in a sea of minority faces at Mass. This couldn’t have been a photo op, could it?

As time is running short for what the Book of Revelation calls “the Whore of Babylon” (Revelation 17-18) expect the Jesuit puppets on the far Left to pick up the torch from Barack Obama rather than the Jesuit puppets on the pseudo-Right come this November.

Editor’s notes: Martin Luther was an exceptional man for his age, perhaps in all of the history of Christendom.  He is often slandered as being an anti-Semite when, in truth, he responded with his usual energy and emotion to Jewish theological attacks upon the Gospel.  This treatise is clear proof of that, as is Luther’s human flaws.  He maintained some Catholic doctrines until very late in life (such as transubstantiation) and others he held to his death (such as the perpetual virginity of Mary).  These are easily forgiven in light of his critical role as a unique and learned Doctor of Theology.

Biblical Passages are linked in the New Living Translation which, although a flawed “paraphrase” renders the most readable English.  All students are required to dig deeper, use multiple translations and do original language word studies as often as possible.

“Therefore, I will cite from Scripture the reasons that move me to believe that Christ was a Jew born of a virgin, that I might perhaps also win some Jews to the Christian faith.  Our fools, the popes, bishops, sophists, and monks — the crude asses’ heads — have hitherto so treated the Jews that anyone who wished to be a good Christian would almost have had to become a Jew.  If I had been a Jew and had seen such dolts and blockheads govern and teach the Christian faith, I would sooner have become a hog than a Christian.”

“They have dealt with the Jews as if they were dogs rather than human beings; they have done little else than deride them and seize their property.  When they baptize them they show them nothing of Christian doctrine or life, but only subject them to popishness and monkery.  When the Jews then see that Judaism has such strong support in Scripture, and that Christianity has become a mere babble without reliance on Scripture, how can they possibly compose themselves and become right good Christians?  I have myself heard from pious baptized Jews that if they had not in our day heard the Gospel they would have remained Jews under the cloak of Christianity for the rest of their days.  For they acknowledge that they have never yet heard anything about Christ from those who baptized and taught them.”

A new lie about me is being circulated.  I am supposed to have preached and written that Mary, the mother of God, was not a virgin either before or after the birth of Christ, but that she conceived Christ through Joseph, and had more children after that.  Above and beyond all this, I am supposed to have preached a new heresy, namely, that Christ was [through Joseph, the physical] the seed of Abraham [again, to imply Christ’s conception was a mundane joining of Joseph and Mary].  How these lies tickle my good friends, the papists!  Indeed, because they condemn the Gospel it serves them right that they should have to satisfy and feed their heart’s delight and joy with lies.  I would venture to wager my neck that none of those very liars who allege such great things in honor of the mother of God believes in his heart a single one of these articles.  Yet with their lies they pretend that they are greatly concerned about the Christian faith.

But after all, it is such a poor miserable lie that I despise it and would rather not reply to it.  In these past three years I have grown quite accustomed to hearing lies, even from our nearest neighbors.  And they in turn have grown accustomed to the noble virtue of neither blushing nor feeling ashamed when they are publicly convicted of lying.  They let themselves be chided as liars, yet continue their lying.  Still they are best Christians, striving with all that they have and are to devour the Turk and to extirpate all heresy.

Since for the sake of others, however, I am compelled to answer these lies, I thought I would also write something useful in addition, so that I do not vainly steal the reader’s time with [200] such dirty rotten business.  Therefore, I will cite from Scripture the reasons that move me to believe that Christ was a Jew born of a virgin, that I might perhaps also win some Jews to the Christian faith.  Our fools, the popes, bishops, sophists, and monks — the crude asses’ heads — have hitherto so treated the Jews that anyone who wished to be a good Christian would almost have had to become a Jew.  If I had been a Jew and had seen such dolts and blockheads govern and teach the Christian faith, I would sooner have become a hog than a Christian.

They have dealt with the Jews as if they were dogs rather than human beings; they have done little else than deride them and seize their property.  When they baptize them they show them nothing of Christian doctrine or life, but only subject them to popishness and monkery.  When the Jews then see that Judaism has such strong support in Scripture, and that Christianity has become a mere babble without reliance on Scripture, how can they possibly compose themselves and become right good Christians?  I have myself heard from pious baptized Jews that if they had not in our day heard the Gospel they would have remained Jews under the cloak of Christianity for the rest of their days.  For they acknowledge that they have never yet heard anything about Christ from those who baptized and taught them.

I hope that if one deals in a kindly way with the Jews and instructs them carefully from Holy Scripture, many of them will become genuine Christians and turn again to the faith of their fathers, the prophets and patriarchs.  They will only be frightened further away from it if their Judaism is so utterly rejected that nothing is allowed to remain, and they are treated only with arrogance and scorn.  If the apostles, who also were Jews, had dealt with us Gentiles as we Gentiles deal with the Jews, there would never have been a Christian among the Gentiles.  Since they dealt with us Gentiles in such brotherly fashion, we in our turn ought to treat the Jews in a brotherly manner in order that [201] we might convert some of them.  For even we ourselves are not yet all very far along, not to speak of having arrived.

When we are inclined to boast of our position we should remember that we are but Gentiles, while the Jews are of the lineage of Christ.  We are aliens and in-laws; they are blood relatives, cousins, and brothers of our Lord.  Therefore, if one is to boast of flesh and blood, the Jews are actually nearer to Christ than we are, as St. Paul says in Romans 9[:5].  God has also demonstrated this by His Acts, for to no nation among the Gentiles has He granted so high an honor as He has to the Jews.  For from among the Gentiles there have been raised up no patriarchs, no apostles, no prophets, indeed, very few genuine Christians either.  And although the Gospel has been proclaimed to all the world, yet He committed the Holy Scriptures, that is, the law and the prophets, to no nation except the Jews, as Paul says in Romans 3[:2] and Psalm 147[:19-20], “He declares His Word to Jacob, His Statutes and Ordinances to Israel.  He has not dealt thus with any other nation; nor revealed his ordinances to them.”

Accordingly, I beg my dear papists, should they be growing weary of denouncing me as a heretic, to seize the opportunity of denouncing me as a Jew.  Perhaps I may yet turn out to be also a Turk, or whatever else my fine gentlemen may wish.

Christ is promised for the first time soon after Adam’s fall, when God said to the serpent, “I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her Seed; He shall crush your head, and you shall bruise His Heel” [Genesis 3:15].  Here I defer demonstrating that the serpent spoke possessed of the devil, for no dumb beast is so clever that it can utter or comprehend human speech, much less speak or inquire about such exalted matters as the commandment of God, as the serpent does here.  Therefore, it must certainly have been a rational, highly intelligent, and mighty spirit which was able to utter human speech, deal so masterfully with God’s commandments, and seize and employ human reason.

Since it is certain that a spirit is something higher than a [202] man, it is also certain that this is an evil spirit and an enemy of God, for it breaks God’s Commandment and acts contrary to His Will.  Therefore, it is undoubtedly the devil.  And so the Word of God which speaks of crushing the head must refer also to the devil’s head; though not to the exclusion of the natural head of the serpent, for with a single word he speaks of both devil and serpent as of one thing.  Therefore, he means both heads.  But the devil’s head is that power by which the devil rules, that is, sin and death, by means of which he has brought Adam and all Adam’s descendants under his control.

This Seed of the woman therefore, because He is to crush the devil’s power, that is, sin and death, must not be an ordinary man, since all men have been brought under the devil through sin and death.  So He must certainly be without sin.  Now human nature does not produce such seed or fruit, as has been said, for with their sin they are all under the devil.  How, then, can this be?  The Seed must be the natural child of a woman; otherwise, it could not be or be called the seed of the woman.  On the other hand, as has been pointed out, human nature and birth does not produce such seed.  Therefore, the solution must ultimately be that this Seed is a true natural son of the woman; derived from the woman, however, not in the normal way but through a special act of God, in order that the Scripture might stand, that He is the Seed only of a woman and not of a man.  For the text [Genesis 3:15] clearly states that he will be the Seed of woman.

This is thus the first Passage in which the mother of this child is described as a virgin.  She is his true natural mother; yet she is to conceive and bear supernaturally, by God, without a man, in order that her Child may be a distinctive man, without sin, yet having ordinary flesh and blood like other men.  This could not have been the case had he been begotten by a man like other men because the flesh is consumed and corrupted by evil lust, so that its natural act of procreation cannot occur without sin.  Whatever conceives and bears through an act of the flesh produces also a carnal and sinful fruit.  This is why St. Paul says in Ephesians 1 [Ephesians 2:3] that we are all by nature children of wrath. [203]

Now this Passage [Genesis 3:15] was the very first Gospel message on Earth.  For when Adam and Eve, seduced by the devil, had fallen and were summoned for judgment before God, Genesis 3 [:9], they were in peril of death and the anguish of hell, for they saw that God was against them and condemned them; they would gladly have fled from him, but could not.  Had God let them remain in their anguish, they would soon have despaired and perished.  But when, after their terrible punishment, He let them hear his comforting promise to raise up from the woman’s Seed one who would tread upon the serpent’s head, their spirits were quickened again.  From that promise they drew comfort, believing firmly in that blessed seed of the woman which would come and crush the serpent’s head, that is, sin and death, by which they had been crushed and corrupted.

The fathers, from Adam, on, preached and inculcated this Gospel, through which they acknowledge the promised Seed of this woman and believed in Him.  And so they were sustained through faith in Christ just as we are; they were true Christians like ourselves.  Only, in their day this Gospel was not proclaimed publicly throughout the world, as it would be after the coming of Christ, but remained solely in the possession of the holy fathers and their descendants down to the time of Abraham.

The second promise of Christ was to Abraham, Genesis 22 [:18], where God said, “In your Seed shall all the Gentiles be blessed.”  If all the Gentiles are to be blessed, then it is certain that otherwise, apart from this Seed of Abraham, they were all unblessed and under a curse.  From this it follows that human nature has nothing but cursed seed and bears nothing but unblessed fruit; otherwise, there would be no need for all of them to be blessed through this Seed of Abraham.  Whoever says “all” excludes no one; therefore, apart from Christ, all who are born of man must be under the devil, cursed in sin and death.

Here again the mother of God is proven to be a pure virgin.  For since God cannot lie, it was inevitable that Christ should be the Seed of Abraham, that is, his natural flesh and blood, like all of Abraham’s descendants.  On the other hand, because He was to be the blessed Seed which should bless all others, He could not be begotten by man, since such children, as has been said, [204] cannot be conceived without sin because of the corrupt and tainted flesh, which cannot perform its function without taint and sin.

Thus the Word, by which God promises that Christ will be the seed of Abraham, requires that Christ be born of a woman and be her natural child.  He does not come from the earth like Adam [Genesis 2:7]; neither is He from Adam’s rib like Eve [Genesis 2:21-22].  He comes rather like any woman’s child, from her seed.  The Earth was not the natural seed for Adam’s body; neither was Adam’s rib the natural seed for Eve’s body.  But the virgin’s flesh and blood, from which children come in the case of all other women, was the natural seed of Christ’s body.  And she too was of the seed of Abraham.

On the other hand, this Word by which God promises his blessing upon all Gentiles in Christ requires that Christ may not come from a man, or by the act of a man; for work of the flesh (which is cursed) is incompatible with that which is blessed and is pure blessing.  Therefore, this Blessed Fruit had to be the fruit of a woman’s body only, not of a man, even though that very woman’s body came from man, indeed, even from Abraham and Adam.  So this mother is a virgin, and yet a true natural mother; not, however, by natural capacity or power, but solely through the Holy Spirit and Divine Power.

Now this Passage [Genesis 22:18] was the Gospel from the time of Abraham down to the time of David, event to the time of Christ.  It is a short saying, to be sure, but a rich Gospel, subsequently inculcated and used in marvelous fashion by the fathers both in writing and in preaching.  Many thousands of sermons have been preached from this Passage, and countless souls saved.  For it is the Living Word of God, in which Abraham and his descendants believed, and by which they were redeemed and preserved from sin and death and the power of the devil.  However, it too was not yet proclaimed publicly to all the world, as happened after the coming of Christ, but remained solely in the possession of the fathers and their descendants.

The Spirit extols this virginity, however, because it was needful for the conceiving and bearing of this Blessed Fruit.  Because of the corruption of our flesh, such blessed fruit could not come, except through a virgin.  Thus this tender virginity existed in the service of others to the Glory of God, not to its own glory.  If it had been possible for him to have come from a woman, he would not have selected a virgin for this, since virginity is contrary to the physical nature within us, was condemned of old in the Law, and is extolled here solely because the flesh is tainted and its built-in physical nature cannot bestow her fruit except by means of an accursed act.

Hence we see that St. Paul nowhere calls the mother of God a virgin, but only a woman, as he says in Galatians 3 [Galatians 4:4], “The Son of God was born of a woman.”  He did not mean to say she was not a virgin, but to extol her virginity to the highest with the praise that is proper to it, as much as to say: In this birth none but a woman was involved, no man participated; that is, everything connected with it was reserved to the woman, the conceiving, bearing, suckling, and nourishing of the child were functions no man can perform.  It is therefore the child of a woman only; hence, she must certainly be a virgin.  But a virgin may also be a man; a mother can be none other than a woman.

For this reason, too, Scripture does not quibble or speak about the virginity of Mary after the birth of Christ, a matter about which the hypocrites are greatly concerned, as if it were something of the utmost importance on which our whole salvation [206] depended.  Actually, we should be satisfied simply to hold that she remained a virgin after the birth of Christ because Scripture does not state or indicate that she later lost her virginity.  We certainly need not be so terribly afraid that someone will demonstrate, out of his own head apart from Scripture, that she did not remain a virgin.  But the Scripture stops with this, that she was a virgin before and at the birth of Christ; for up to this point God had need of her virginity in order to give us the promised blessed seed without sin.

The third Passage is addressed to David, II Samuel 7[:12-14], “When your days are fulfilled, and you sleep with your fathers, I will raise up your Seed after you, who shall come forth from your body, and I will establish His Kingdom forever.  He shall build a House for My Name, and I will establish the Throne of His Kingdom forever.  I will be His Father, and He shall be My Son.”  These words cannot have been spoken of Solomon, for Solomon was not a posthumous son of David raised up after his death.  Neither did God after Solomon (who during David’s lifetime was born and became king) ever designate anyone as His son, give him an everlasting kingdom, or have him build such a house.  Consequently, the whole Passage must refer to Christ.  We will let this Passage go for the present because it is too broad and requires so much in the way of exegesis; for one would have to show here that Christ accordingly had to be the son of a woman only in order to be called here God’s Child, who neither should nor could come out of an accursed act.

The fourth Passage is Isaiah 7[:14], “God himself will give you a sign.  Behold, a virgin is with child, and shall bear a son.”  This could not have been said of a virgin who was about to be married.  For what sort of a marvelous sign would that be if someone who is presently a virgin should bear a child within a year?  Such is the ordinary course of nature, occurring daily before our eyes.  If it is to be a Sign from God, therefore, it must be something remarkable and marvelous not given by the [207] ordinary course of nature, as is commonly the case with all God’s Signs.

It is of no help for the Jews either to try to evade the issue here and come up with this way of getting around it, namely: the Sign consists in the fact that Isaiah says flatly that the child shall be a son and not a daughter.  By such an interpretation the Sign would have nothing to do with the virgin but only with the prophet Isaiah, as the one who had divined so precisely that it would not be a daughter.  The text would then have to speak of Isaiah thus, “Behold, God Himself will give you a Sign, namely, that I, Isaiah, will divine that a young woman is carrying a son, and not a daughter.”  Such an interpretation is disgraceful and childish.

Now the text forcefully refers the sign to the woman, and states clearly that it shall be a sign when a woman bears a son.  Now it certainly is no sign when a woman who is no longer virgin bears a child, be it the mother of Hezekiah or whatever woman the Jews may point to.  The Sign must be something new and different, a marvelous and unique work of God, that this woman is with child; her pregnancy is to be the Sign.  Now I do not deem any Jew so dense that he would not grant God sufficient power to create a child from a virgin, since they are compelled to acknowledge that he created Adam from the earth [Genesis 2:7] and Eve from Adam [Genesis 2:21-22], acts which require no less power.

But then they contend that the Hebrew text does not read, “A virgin is with child,” but, “Behold, an almah is with child. [208]  Almah, they say, does not denote a virgin; the word for virgin is bethulah, while almah is the term for young damsel.  Presumably, a young damsel might very well have had intercourse and be the mother of a child.

Christians can readily answer this from St. Matthew and St. Luke, both of whom apply the Passage from Isaiah [7:14] to Mary, and translate the word almah as “virgin.”  They are more to be believed than the whole world, let alone the Jews.  Even though an angel from heaven [Galatians 1:8] were to say that almah, does not mean virgin, we should not believe it.  For God the Holy Spirit speaks through St. Matthew and St. Luke; we can be sure that He understands Hebrew speech and expressions perfectly well.

But because the Jews do not accept the Evangelists, we must confront them with other evidence.  In the first place, we can say, as above, that there is no marvel or sign in the fact that a young woman conceives, otherwise, we would have a perfect right to sneer at the prophet Isaiah, and say, “What women would you expect to conceive if not the young ones?  Are you drunk?  Or is it in your experience a rare event for a young woman to bear a son?”  For this reason that strained and farfetched answer of the Jews is just a vain and feeble excuse for not keeping silent altogether.

In the second place, grant that bethulah means virgin and not almah, and the Isaiah here uses almah, not bethulah.  All this too is still nothing but a poor excuse.  For they act as if they did not know that in all of Scripture almah nowhere designates a woman who has had intercourse (a fact of which they are perfectly well aware).  On the contrary, in every instance almah signifies a young damsel who has never known a man carnally or had intercourse.  Such a person is always called a virgin, just as St. Matthew and St. Luke here translate Isaiah.

Very well; to please the Jews we will not translate Isaiah thus: “Behold, a virgin is with child,” lest they be confused by the word “virgin,” but rather, “Behold, a maiden is with child.”  Now in German the word “maiden” denotes a woman who is still young, carries her crown with honor, and wears her hair loose, so that it is said of her: She is still a maiden, not a wife (although “maiden” is not the same word as “virgin”).  In like manner also, the Hebrew elem is a stripling who does not yet have a woman; and almah is a maiden who does not yet have a man, not a servant girl but one who still carries a crown.  Thus the sister of Moses is called an almah in Exodus 3 [Exodus 2:8] as is Rebekah in Genesis 24[:16, 43], when they were still virgins.

Suppose I say in German, “Hans is engaged to a maiden,” and someone should comment, “Well, then he is not engaged to a virgin.”  Why, everyone would laugh at him for vainly disputing about words if he thinks that virgin and maiden are not the same thing because they are different words.  This is true also in the Hebrew, when the Jews argue with respect to this Passage in Isaiah [7:14] and say, “Isaiah does not say bethulah, but almah.  I submit that among themselves their own conscience tells them this is so.  Therefore, let them say what they please, bethulah [210] or almah; Isaiah means a damsel who is nubile but still wears her crown, whom in the truest German we call a maiden.  Hence, the mother of God is properly called the pure maiden, that is, the pure almah.

And if I should have had to tell Isaiah what to speak, I would have had him say exactly what he did say, not bethulah, but almah, for almah is even more appropriate here than bethulah.  It is also more precise to say, “Behold, a maiden is with child,” than to say, “A virgin is with child.”  For “virgin” is an all-embracing term which might also be applied to a woman of fifty or sixty who is no longer capable of childbearing.  But “maiden” denotes specifically a young woman, nubile, capable of childbearing, but still a virgin; it includes not only the virginity, but also the youthfulness and the potential for childbearing.  Hence, in German too we commonly refer to young people as maidens or maidenfolk, not virginfolk.

Therefore, the text of Isaiah [7:14] is certainly most accurately translated, “Behold, a maiden is with child.”  No Jew who understands both German and Hebrew can deny that this is what is said in the Hebrew, for we Germans do not say “concepit, the woman has conceived”; the preachers have so rendered the Latin into German.  Rather, the German would say in his mother tongue, “The woman is with child,” or, “is heavy with child,” or, “is pregnant.”

But here in the Hebrew it does not say, “Behold, a maiden shall be with child,” as though she were not as yet.  It says rather, “Behold, a maiden is with child,” as though she has the fruit already in her womb and nevertheless is still a maiden, in order that you will have to notice how the prophet himself is amazed that there stands before him a maiden who is with child even before she knows a man carnally.  She was of course going to have a husband, she was physically fit and mature enough for it; but even before she gets to that she is already a mother.  This is indeed a rare and marvelous thing.

This is the way St. Matthew [1:18] construes this Passage when he says, “When Mary the mother of Jesus had been [211] betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found to be with Child of the Holy Spirit,” etc.  What does this mean other than that she was a young maiden who had not yet known a man although she was capable of it, but before she knew the man she was with child, and that this was an amazing thing since no maiden becomes pregnant prior to intercourse with a man?  Thus, the Evangelist regarded her in the same light as did the prophet, and set her forth as the sign and wonder.

Now this refutes also the false interpretation which some have drawn from the words of Matthew, where he says, “Before they came together she was found to be with Child.”  They interpret this as though the Evangelist meant to say, “Later she came together with Joseph like any other wife and lay with him, but before this occurred she was with child apart from Joseph,” etc.  Again, when he says, “And Joseph knew her not until she brought forth her first-born son” [Matthew 1:25], they interpret it as though the Evangelist meant to say that he knew her, but not before she had brought forth her first-born son.  This was the view of Helvidius which was refuted by Jerome.

Such carnal interpretations miss the meaning and purpose of the Evangelist.  As we have said, the Evangelist, like the prophet Isaiah, wishes to set before our eyes this mighty wonder, and point out what an unheard-of thing it is for a maiden to be with child before her husband brings her home and lies with her; and further, that he does not know her carnally until she first has a son, which she should have had after first having been known [212] by him.  Thus, the words of the Evangelist do not refer to anything that occurred after the birth, but only to what took place before it.  For the Prophet and the Evangelist, and St. Paul as well, do not treat of this virgin beyond the point where they have from her that Fruit for whose sake she is a virgin and everything else.  After the Child is born they dismiss the mother and speak not about her, what became of her, but only about her Offspring.  Therefore, one cannot from these words [Matthew 1:18, 25] conclude that Mary, after the birth of Christ, became a wife in the usual sense; it is therefore neither to be asserted nor believed.  All the words are merely indicative of the marvelous fact that she was with child and gave birth before she had lain with a man.

The form of expression used by Matthew is the common idiom, as if I were to say, “Pharaoh believed not Moses, until he was drowned in the Red Sea.”  Here it does not follow that Pharaoh believed later, after he had drowned; on the contrary, it means that he never did believe.  Similarly when Matthew [1:25] says that Joseph did not know Mary carnally until she had brought forth her son, it does not follow that he knew her subsequently; on the contrary, it means that he never did know her.  Again, the Red Sea overwhelmed Pharaoh before he got across.  Here too it does not follow that Pharaoh got across later, after the Red Sea had overwhelmed him, but rather that he did not get across at all.  In like manner, when Matthew [1:18] says, “She was found to be with child before they came together,” it does not follow that Mary subsequently lay with Joseph, but rather that she did not lie with him.

Elsewhere in Scripture the same manner of speech is employed.  Psalm 110[:1] reads, “God says to my Lord: ‘Sit at My Right Hand, till I make Your enemies Your Footstool.’” Here it does not follow that Christ does not continue to sit there after His enemies are placed beneath His Feet.  Again, in Genesis 28[:15], “I will not leave you until I have done all that of which I have spoken to you.”  Here God did not leave him after the fulfillment had taken place.  Again, in Isaiah 42[:4], “He shall not be sad, nor troublesome, till he has established justice in the earth.” [213]  There are many more similar expression, so that this babble of Helvidius is without justification; in addition, he has neither noticed nor paid any attention to either Scripture or the common idiom.

This is enough for the present to have sufficiently proved that Mary was a pure maiden, and that Christ was a genuine Jew of Abraham’s seed.  Although more Scripture Passages might be cited, these are the clearest.  Moreover, if anyone does not believe a clear saying of His Divine Majesty, it is reasonable to assume that he would not believe either any other more obscure Passages.  So certainly no one can doubt that it is possible for God to cause a maiden to be with child apart from a man, since he has also created all things from nothing.  Therefore, the Jews have no ground for denying this, for they acknowledge God’s Omnipotence, and they have here the clear testimony of the Prophet Isaiah.

While we are on the subject, however, we wish not only to answer the futile liars who publicly malign me in these matters but we would also like to do a service to the Jews on the chance that we might bring some of them back to their own True Faith, the one which their fathers held.  To this end we will deal with them further, and suggest for the benefit of those who want to work with them a method and some Passages from Scripture which they should employ in dealing with them.  For many, even of the sophists, have also attempted this; but insofar as they have set about it in their own name, nothing has come of it.  For they were trying to cast out the devil by means of the devil, and not by the Finger of God [Luke 11:17-20].

In the first place, that the current belief of the Jews and their waiting upon the coming of the Messiah is erroneous is proved by the Passage in Genesis 49[:10-12] where the holy patriarch Jacob says: “The Scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a teacher from those at his feet, until the Siloh comes; and to him shall be the gathering of the nations.  He will bind his foal [214] to the vine, and his ass to the choice vine.  He will wash His Garments with wine, and His Mantle with the blood of grapes.  His Eyes are redder than wine, and His Teeth whiter than milk.”  This Passage is a divine promise, which cannot lie and must be fulfilled unless heaven and earth were first to pass away.  So the Jews cannot deny that for nearly fifteen hundred years now, since the fall of Jerusalem, they have had no scepter, that is, neither kingdom nor king.  Therefore, the Shiloh, or Messiah, must have come before this fifteen hundred year period, and before the destruction of Jerusalem.

If they try to say that the Scepter was also taken away from Judah at the time of the Babylonian captivity, when the Jews were transported to Babylon and remained captive for seventy years, and yet the Messiah did not come at that time, the answer is that this is not true.  For during the whole period of captivity the royal line continued in the person of King Jeconiah, thereafter Zerubbabel and other princes in turn until Herod became king.  For “scepter” signifies not only a kingdom, but also a hegemony, as the Jews are well aware.  Furthermore, they still always had prophets.  So the kingdom or hegemony never did disappear, even though for a time it existed outside of its territorial boundaries.  Also, never during the captivity were all the inhabitants driven out of the land, as has happened during these [215] past fifteen hundred years when the Jews have had neither princes nor prophets.

It was for this reason that God provided them at that time with the prophets Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Haggai, and Zechariah, who proclaimed to them that they would again be freed from Babylon, in order that they would not think that this word of Jacob was false, or that the Messiah had come.  But for these last fifteen hundred years they have had no prophet to proclaim that they should again be free.  God would not have permitted this state of affairs to continue for such a long time, since He did not on that occasion permit it for such a short time.  He thereby gives ample indication that this prophecy [Genesis 49:10-12] must have been fulfilled.

In addition, when Jacob says here that the scepter shall endure until the Messiah comes, it clearly follows that this scepter not only must not perish but also that it must become far more glorious than it ever was previously, before the Messiah’s coming.  For all the Jews know full well that the Messiah’s Kingdom will be the greatest and most glorious that has ever been on Earth, as we read in Psalms 2, 72, and 89.  For the promise is also made to David that his throne shall endure forever [Psalms 89:4, 29, 36-37].  Now the Jews will have to admit that today their Scepter has now been nonexistent for fifteen hundred years, not to speak of its having become more glorious.

This prophecy can therefore be understood to refer to none other than Jesus Christ our Lord, who is of the Tribe of Judah and of the Royal Lineage of David.  He came when the Scepter had fallen to Herold, the alien; He has been King these fifteen hundred years, and will remain King on into Eternity.  For His Kingdom has spread to the ends of the Earth, as the prophets foretold [Psalms 2:8, 72:8-11]; and the nations have been gathered to him, as Jacob says here [Genesis 49:10].  And there could not possibly be a greater King on Earth, whose Name would be exalted among more nations, than this Jesus Christ.

It is true that some Jews do indeed feel how persuasive and [216] conclusive this Passage really is.  This is why they hunt up all sorts of weird ways of getting around it.  But if you will notice, they only ensnare themselves.  For example, they say that in this instance Shiloh does not signify the Messiah or Christ, and that therefore this Passage does not carry any weight with them.  It matters not whether he is called Messiah or Shiloh; we are concerned not with the name, but with the person, with the fact that he shall appear when the scepter is taken away from Judah.  No such person can be found except Jesus Christ; otherwise, the Passage is false.  He will be no mere cobbler or tailor, but a lord to whom the nations will be gathered; that is, His Kingdom will be more glorious than the Scepter ever was before, as has been said.

Equally futile is another subterfuge, when they say: The nations which are gathered to Him may well be only the Jewish nation, and Shiloh means a lord.  Be that as it may; I will not quarrel over what Shiloh means, although it does seem to me that it signifies a man who is prosperous, well-to-do, has plenty, and is generous.  From this comes the little word salve, which means copia [riches], felicitas [good fortune], abundantia [prosperity], an ample sufficiency of all good things, as it says in Psalm 122[:7], “Et abundantia in turribus suis” [“and prosperity within your palaces”]; that is, everything is full and sufficient and prospering, so that in German I might call shiloh well-being.

Now whether it signifies lord or whether it signifies well-being, prosper [prosperous], or felix [fortunate], at any rate it cannot be said to mean one of the former kings, princes, or teachers.  For “the Scepter of Judah” certainly comprises all those of the Tribe of Judah who have been kings or princes with the exception of this Shiloh, who here is singled out and preferred above all those who have wielded the scepter of Judah as someone [217] special, because Jacob says [Genesis 49:10] the Scepter of Judah shall endure until Shiloh.  What kind of talk would that be for me, to try make of Shiloh one of them who have held the Scepter of Judah and the nations, when the Passage here means that the Shiloh will come after all those others as a greater and more glorious King, and that He will have no successor.  Why would he not otherwise have said, “The Scepter of Judah shall endure forever, and not wait upon Shiloh”?

Therefore, it is the Kingdom of Christ which is here described in masterly fashion, namely, that before him many should wield the Scepter of Judah until He should come Himself and take it in His Own Hands forever, and that He would have no successor, nor would there ever be another king of the Tribe of Judah.  Thereby it is made clear that His Kingdom would be a spiritual kingdom, following upon the temporal kingdom; for no person can have an eternal kingdom who is himself mortal and reigns temporally.  Therefore, the Scepter of Judah did indeed endure from David down to Shiloh as something temporal, having a succession of mortal kings.  But now that Shiloh is come, the Scepter remains forever in the Hands of one Person; no longer does it involve a succession of kings.

From this it necessarily that this Shiloh must first die, and thereafter rise again from the dead.  For since He is to come from the Tribe of Judah [Genesis 49:10], He must be a true, natural man, mortal like all the children of Judah.  On the other hand, because He is to be a special king, distinguished above all who have held the Scepter of Judah before Him, and He alone is to reign forever, he cannot be a mortal man, but must be an immortal man.  Therefore, He must through death put off this mortal life, and by His resurrection take on immortal life, in order that He may fulfil this prophecy and become a Shiloh to whom all the world shall be gathered.  He is to be a truly living man, a king of the Tribe of Judah, and yet immortal, eternal, and invisible, ruling spiritually in faith.  But such sweet speech is still too exalted and difficult for the Jews.

But if they say: Well this Jesus of yours has never done what Jacob later says of this Shiloh, namely, “He will bind his foal to the vine, and his ass to the choice vine; he will wash his garments [218] in wine, and his mantle in the blood of grapes” [Genesis  49:11], then answer: A simpleton might perhaps take this to mean that this Shiloh would be so rich a king that in his day wine would be as common as water, used for washing clothes, etc.  From the foregoing, however, we have observed that this Shiloh is to reign forever, a single person, and that He has no heirs to follow Him.  All the prophets too say this.  Therefore, His Kingdom cannot be a temporal one, consisting essentially of mortal and perishable goods.

And if this does not compel the interpretation that the wine and vine must be spiritual, then the very manner and nature of the words and language must compel it.  For what sort of praise would it be to laud such a glorious kingdom above all kingdoms on these four grounds, namely, that its ruler binds his foal to the vine, his ass to the choice vine, and washes his garments with wine, and his mantle with the blood of grapes?  Could Jacob find no other praise than that which has to do with drinking?  Must such a king have nothing else than wine?  Again, is there nothing else praiseworthy in him but the fact that his eyes are redder than wine and his teeth whiter than milk? [Genesis 49:12].  What does it benefit a kingdom that its ruler has white teeth, red eyes, and binds a foal to a vine?

Assuming for a moment that these things are said concerning superfluous riches, why doesn’t Jacob say much more, such as: He will wash His Garments in balsam and myrrh?  That would be even more luxurious.  Who ever heard of anyone longing to wash his clothes in wine?  Again, why doesn’t he say: He will pasture his horses in the wheat?  Who ever heard of anyone wanting to tether his ass to a vine?  What is the point of an ass at the vine, and clothes in the wine?  The whole thing is sheer nonsense.  Wine ruins clothes, and the ass is better off with thistles than with a vine.  A vine would be better suited to a sheep; it could eat the leaves.  This seemingly ridiculous talk therefore forcibly compels a spiritual interpretation.

Then too, why does he praise him for his red eyes and white teeth?  Is there nothing else beautiful about his body than red eyes and white teeth?  What kind of praise is that for so glorious and great a king?  We usually praise great kings for their strong [219] and splendid physique, and above all for their great spirit, wisdom, graciousness, fortitude, power, and glorious deeds and virtues.  But in this case, only his eyes and teeth are praised; this sounds more like praise of a woman than of a man, let alone of such a king.

There can be no doubt that in these words the Spirit through Moses portrayed this person for us in the setting of a spiritual kingdom as it was to come into being and be governed.  This is not the time, however, to discuss this at length.  We have enough to do for the present in forcefully asserting against the Jews that the true Shiloh or Christ must have come long ago, because they been long since bereft of the kingdom and hegemony, and of prophets as well.  Here the clear text stands firm and testifies that the Scepter shall remain with the Tribe of Judah until the True King comes, when for the first time it shall really hold sway.

Thus, the Kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ squares perfectly with this prophecy.  For there was a hegemony among the Jews until He came.  After His coming, however, it was destroyed, and at the same time He began the Eternal Kingdom in which He still reigns forever.  That he was of the Tribe of Judah is unquestionable.  Because as regards His Person He was to be an Eternal King, it could not be that He should govern in a temporal and secular sense, because what is temporal will pass away.  Conversely, because He had to be David’s natural seed, it could not be otherwise than that He should be a natural, mortal, temporal, perishable man.

Now to be temporal and to reign eternally are two mutually contradictory concepts.  Therefore, it had to turn out that He died temporally and departed this life, and again that He arose from the dead and became alive in order that He might become an Eternal King.  For He had to be alive if He were to reign, because one who is dead cannot reign; and He had to die too if He were to shift from this mortal life, into which He necessarily had to enter to fulfil the Scripture which promised He would be the natural blood of David and Abraham.

So now He lives and reigns, and holds the exalted office of binding His Foal to the vine and washing His Garments in the red wine; that is, He governs our consciences with the Holy Gospel, [220] which is a most gracious preachment of God’s loving-kindness, the forgiveness of sins, and redemption from death and Hell, by which all who from the heart believe it will be comforted, joyous, and, as it were, drowned in God with the overwhelming comfort of His Mercy.  The Jews, however, will not listen to this interpretation until they first accept and acknowledge the fact that Christ must have come in accordance with this prophecy.  Therefore, we will let the matter rest until its own good time.

On the basis and testimony of this Passage [Genesis  49:10-12], another sensible argument is also to be proved, namely, that this Shiloh must have come at the time our Jesus Christ came, and that He can be none other than that selfsame Jesus.  The prophecy says that nations shall be gathered to or be subject to this Shiloh.  Now I ask the Jews: When was there ever such a man of Jewish ancestry to whom so many nations were subject as this Jesus Christ?  David was a great king, and so was Solomon; but their kingdom never extended beyond a small portion of the land of Syria.  This Jesus, on the contrary, is accepted as a Lord and King throughout the world, so that one may consider as fulfilled in him the prophecy from the second Psalm [v. 8], where God says to the Messiah, “I will give You the Gentiles for Your Possession, and the uttermost parts of the Earth for Your Inheritance.”  This had indeed come true in the person of our Jesus since the time when the Scepter was taken from the Jews; this is quite apparent and has never yet happened in the case of any other Jew.  Because Shiloh was to come when Judah’s Scepter was ended, and since that time no other has fulfilled these prophecies, this Jesus must certainly be the real Shiloh whom Jacob intended.

The Jews will have to admit further that the Gentiles have never once yielded themselves so willingly to a Jew for their lord and king, as to this Jesus.  For although Joseph was certainly a great man in Egypt, he was neither its lord nor its king [Genesis 41:40].  And even if he had been, Egypt was a mighty small thing compared to this kingdom which everybody ascribes to this Jesus.

Again, neither in Babylon nor in Persia was either Daniel [Daniel 5:29; 6:1-3] or Mordecai [Esther 10:3] a king, although they were men of power in the government.

It is amazing that the Jews are not moved to believe in this [221] Jesus, their own flesh and blood, with whom the prophecies of Scripture actually square so powerfully and exactly, when they see that we Gentiles cling to Him so hard and fast and in such numbers that many thousands have shed their blood for His Sake.  They know perfectly well that the Gentiles have always shown greater hostility toward the Jews than toward any other nation, and have been unwilling to tolerate their dominion, laws, or government.  How is it then that the Gentiles should now so reverse themselves as to willingly and steadfastly surrender themselves to this Jew, and with heart and soul confess Him King of kings and Lord of lords, unless it be that here is the true Messiah, to whom God by a great miracle has made the Gentiles friendly and submissive in accordance with this and numerous other prophecies?

The second Passage is Daniel 9[:24-27], where the angel Gabriel speaks to Daniel in the plainest terms about Christ, saying, “Seventy weeks are determined concerning your people and your holy city, that transgression may be finished, forgiveness sealed, iniquity atoned for, and everlasting righteousness brought in, and vision and prophecy fulfilled, and the most holy anointed.  Take notice therefore and know: from the going forth of the word to rebuild Jerusalem are seven weeks and sixty-two weeks until Messiah the Prince; the streets and the wall shall be built again in a troubled time.  And after sixty-two weeks Messiah shall be cut off, and they shall not be His.  But the people of the prince who is to come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary.  Its end shall come with violence.  And after the end of the war there shall remain the appointed desolation.  And He shall confirm the Covenant with many in one week; and in the middle of the week sacrifice and offering shall cease,” etc.

God help us!  This Passage has been dealt with so variously by both Jews and Christians that one might doubt whether anything certain can be derived from it!  Well this much at least we [222] will derive from it, namely, that the true Messiah must have come over one thousand and five hundred years ago, just as we hold that our Jesus Christ did.  The computation and exegesis we will postpone to the last, and for the first simply say: Neither Jew nor anyone else can deny that the angel Gabriel is speaking here of the rebuilding of Jerusalem after the Babylonian captivity; this took place under Nehemiah.

In the second place, Gabriel can surely be referring only to that destruction of Jerusalem which subsequently took place under the Roman emperor Titus about the thirtieth year after the ascension of our Lord.  For after Jerusalem was rebuilt there was no other destruction of the city, although it had been captured at the time of the Maccabees.  From this we draw the assured and incontrovertible conclusion that the Messiah of whom Gabriel here speaks must have come before the destruction [by Titus].  That, I think, is quite certain and sufficiently clear.

It is true that the Jews long ago began to feel the pressure of this mighty flood of evidence, and have anxiously defended their position with all manner of preposterous glosses.  They make of this Messiah something other than the true Messiah, as for example King Cyrus of Persia, whom Isaiah in chapter 45 [Isaiah 45:1] calls a Messiah, and who was slain by Tomyris, the Scythian queen. [223]  This and similar efforts are worthless excuses, capricious and unwarranted evasions, and therefore quickly disposed of as follows: These seventy weeks (says Gabriel) are to extend to the time of a Messiah of such a sort that in his time, when the weeks have elapsed, sin and iniquity shall be finished, forgiveness and everlasting righteousness brought in, and vision and prophecy fulfilled.

Now I ask them both, Jews and everyone else: Did such things come to pass in the days if Cyrus?  In the time of Cyrus and after him no more special righteousness was brought upon Earth than what existed before and since under other kings.  Moreover, in the days of David and Solomon the level of righteousness was much higher than at the time of Cyrus, but Scripture does not designate this as everlasting righteousness.  The righteousness of which Gabriel speaks must therefore be far superior to that which prevailed in the time of David, the most holy king, let alone to such righteousness as the pagan Cyrus had in his day.

And further, when Gabriel says here that the city of Jerusalem shall be rebuilt in seven weeks, and that afterward the Messiah shall be cut off after sixty-two weeks, how can that apply to King Cyrus, who was slain before the seven weeks began, or — if their calculation is correct — at any rate before Jerusalem was rebuilt?  How can the Messiah be someone who was slain before the rebuilding of Jerusalem, and then was cut off sixty-two weeks later after Jerusalem was rebuilt?

So now we have it; their defense is fallacious, and the Passage cannot be interpreted in terms of Cyrus.  Since Scripture designates no one as Messiah after Cyrus except the only One, and since such great and exalted qualities cannot be attributed to any temporal king, we conclude — and thus mightily overcome the error of the Jews — that the true Messiah came after the rebuilding of Jerusalem and prior to its destruction.  For no Messiah was put to death before the destruction of Jerusalem except our Lord Jesus Christ, whom we call Messiah, that is, Christ, or the Anointed One.  For this reason we will now examine the text, and see how exactly it conforms to our Lord Jesus Christ.

Now among those who are well versed in Scripture there is no doubt whatever that Gabriel is speaking here not of the normal week of seven days, but of year-weeks, in which seven years comprise one week.  Scripture commonly employs such terminology.  Therefore, the seventy weeks [Daniel 9:24] amount altogether to four hundred and ninety years.

If we now reckon from Christ’s thirtieth year [Luke 3:23] backward through the Greek and Persian kingdoms for four hundred [225] and ninety years, we arrive exactly at the twentieth [Nehemiah 2:1] and last year of Cambyses, the third king or the second king in Persia after Cyrus, that Cyrus who permitted the building of the Temple at Jerusalem, II Chronicles 36[:22-23], and Ezra 1[:1-3].  However, more than forty-six years later Cambyses, and after him Darius Longimanus (who had previously vowed to do so [I Esdras 4:43]), permitted the building of the city of Jerusalem, which was done under Nehemiah.  All this is set forth in the books of Nehemiah and Ezra.  Thus, if we take the seventy weeks as beginning with Nehemiah’s departure from Persia [Nehemiah 2:1-11], that is, about the seventh year of Darius Longimanus, it corresponds exactly with our Christ.

Now Gabriel says [Daniel 9:24], “Seventy weeks (that is, four hundred and ninety years) are determined concerning your people [226] and your Holy City.”  This is as if we were to say: Your Nation of the Jews and the Holy City of Jerusalem have yet four hundred and ninety years to go; then they will both come to an end.  As to what shall actually transpire, he says that transgression will be finished and forgiveness sealed and iniquity atoned for and everlasting righteousness brought in, and vision and prophecy fulfilled, that is, that satisfaction will be made for all sins, forgiveness of sins proclaimed, and the righteousness of faith preached, that righteousness which is eternally valid before God.  This it is to which all the prophets and the whole of Scripture bear witness, as Paul in Romans 1[:17] and Peter in Acts 2[:38-39] testify.  For before it there has been nothing but sin and work-righteousness, which is temporal and invalid in the Sight of God.  I know of course that some invariably interpret the little Hebrew word “Hathuth” here as “sins”; I have taken it to mean “forgiveness” — as Moses sometimes does, and as it is used in Psalm 51[:7] — not without reason.

Next he shows when the period of seventy weeks begins, saying [Daniel 9:25], “From the going forth of the word to rebuild Jerusalem (that is, at the time of Nehemiah, in the twentieth year of Cambyses), until Messiah the Prince (that is, until the baptism of Christ in the Jordan), are seven weeks (that is, forty-nine years, during which Jerusalem was rebuilt in a troubled time, as the book of Nehemiah [2-6] teaches) and sixty-two weeks” (that is, 411 years after Jerusalem was rebuilt).  This makes altogether [227] sixty-nine weeks, that is 483 years.  There is still lacking one week, that is, seven years, to make the total of seventy weeks, or 490 years.  He then shows what is to happen in that selfsame week, saying [Daniel 9:26]: “And after sixty-two weeks (note that this if after the first seven weeks of troubled rebuilding) Messiah shall be cut off (this did not happen at the beginning of the last week, but right in the middle of it, for Christ preached for three and one-half years, and Gabriel uses the term ‘cut off’, that is, taken from this life into the immortal life through death and His resurrection).  And they shall not be His” (that is, those who crucify Him and drive Him from this world will no more belong to Him and be His People, but He will make unto Himself another people).  Gabriel explains this and tells how they will not go unpunished for it, saying [Daniel 9:26]: “And the people of a prince who is to come (that is, Titus, the Roman emperor) shall destroy the city and that which is holy, and its end shall come with violence (that is, it shall be destroyed with force and fury, as by a flood).  And after the end of the war there shall remain the appointed desolation.”  (All of this happened just that way.  Jerusalem and the temple were destroyed with frightful severity, and to this time have never come into the hands of the Jews or been restored to the former position of power despite the earnest efforts made in that direction.  The [228] city today is still the ruin it was before, so that no one can deny that this prophecy and the actual situation before our eyes coincide perfectly.)

“And He shall confirm the Covenant with many in the one week” [Daniel 9:27].  (This is the period of three and one-half years during which Christ himself preached, plus the succeeding three and one-half years of apostolic activity).  During these seven years the Gospel (which is God’s covenant with us, that through Christ he will be merciful toward us) received its greatest impetus.  Since that time it has never been so pure and mighty, for shortly thereafter heresy and error came to be mingled with it.  “And in the middle of the week the sacrifice and offering shall cease” [Daniel 9:27] (that is, the law of Moses will no longer prevail), because Christ, after preaching for three and one-half years, will fulfill all things through his suffering, and thereafter provide for the preaching of a new sacrifice, etc.

Now let someone tell me: Where will one find a prince, or Messiah, or king, with whom all this accords so perfectly, as with our Lord Jesus Christ?  Scripture and history agree so perfectly with one another that the Jews have nothing they can say to the contrary.  They certainly are painfully conscious of their destruction, which is immeasurably greater than any they have ever endured.  They cannot point to any transgression so great that they would have merited such punishment (because they feel it is not a sin that they crucified Jesus, and that they committed greater sins before that but suffered less punishment).  It would be unthinkable that God would leave them so long without prophets unless they were finished and all Scripture fulfilled.

But there are still more prophecies, as for example in Haggai 2[:9], where God says of the rebuilt Temple, “The splendor of this latter house shall be greater than that of the former,” which is also very conclusive; and Zechariah 8[:23], “In those [229] days ten men of all languages of the Gentiles shall take hold of the robe of a Jew, saying: We want to go with you; for we have heard that the Lord is with you,” etc.  There are many more, but it would take too long to discuss them all clearly and at length.  For the present the two prophecies just cited are enough for a beginning.

If the Jews should take offense because we confess our Jesus to be a man, and yet true God, we will deal forcefully with that from Scripture in due time.  But this is too harsh for a beginning.  Let them first be suckled with milk, and begin by recognizing this man Jesus as the true Messiah; after that they may drink wine, and learn also that he is true God.  For they have been led astray so long and so far that one must deal gently with them, as people who have been all too strongly indoctrinated to believe that God cannot be man.

Therefore, I would request and advise that one deal gently with them and instruct them from Scripture; then some of them may come along.  Instead of this we are trying only to drive them by force, slandering them, accusing them of having Christian blood if they don’t stink, and I know not what other foolishness.  So long as we thus treat them like dogs, how can we expect to work any good among them?  Again, when we forbid them to labor and do business and have any human fellowship with us, thereby forcing them into usury, how is that supposed to do them any good?

If we really want to help them, we must be guided in our dealings with them not by papal law but by the law of Christian love.  We must receive them cordially, and permit them to trade and work with us, that they may have occasion and opportunity to associate with us, hear our Christian teaching, and witness our Christian life.  If some of them should prove stiff-necked, what of it?  After all, we ourselves are not all good Christians either.

Here I will let the matter rest for the present, until I see what I have accomplished.  God grant us all his mercy.  Amen!

I call it “crowd-sourcing intelligence” and I liken these operatives of mine to Flying Monkeys that have been turned into detectives.  As Scotland Yard has its Flying Squad, I have Johnny Cirucci’s Flying Monkey Squad.

I give my Flying Monkey Constables signs to look for in order to detect how prominent people may be used by the 4^th and Final Beast: Rome.

* Are they professing or devout Roman Catholics?
* Were they raised Catholic (regardless if they are currently practicing)?
* Do they have close relatives who are Catholic or Catholic clergy?
* Did they receive a Catholic education?
* Did they receive a Jesuit education?
* Are they a member of a Catholic secret society; Knight of Malta, Knight of the Equestrian Order, Knight of Columbus, Opus Dei, etc.?
* Are they a member of any secret society or civic order (nearly all of which are secretly controlled by Rome but not directly connected for plausible deniability); Skull and Bones, Rotary Club, Freemason, etc.?  Although some clubs are seemingly harmless, apparently philanthropic or have the appearance of operating in the open, all organizations of this nature are used to give preferential treatment to insiders and, being an “insider” means having knowledge the Elite have decided can not be shared with the general public.

One of my top tasks in elucidating this point is to review movies and point out that it’s not the Jews who control Hollywood, it’s the Jesuits who are hiding behind puppet Jews they’ve emplaced for just that purpose (because that’s how malignant cowards operate).

The number of movies that propagate Papist propaganda are as preposterous as the personalities that secretly pander to the Pope.

Russell Crowe’s Catholic Cred

On my show, I have reviewed several movies that have a surprising connection to Rome.

Some of them aren’t even so “surprising”, such as the 2014 movie Deliver Us From Evil which promoted a hip Jesuit priest who smoked and drank alcohol, partnering with a non-practicing Catholic cop to take down a supernatural demon-possessed killer.  Deliver Us From Evil is “loosely based” on “true events” and stars Eric Bana, the star of another film “based on real events”, the Steven Spielberg movie Munich.

As a quick aside, I’m sure it was just a coincidence that the very first terrorist the Mossad goes after in retaliation for the Munich murders was based in Rome and spoke fluent Italian.

Interestingly, there is controversy over Spielberg’s attempt to create dialogue over state-sponsored assassination in the “Global War on Terror”.  The premier Jewish director has quite accurately noted that many of the actions of Western governments in prosecuting the “Global War on Terror” actually produce more terrorists then they “take out”.  What Spielberg either doesn’t say out of ignorance or doesn’t admit because he’s an insider is that is precisely the goal of the traitors who run the GWoT in the West for Rome and her financiers.

As a result of several excellent reports from more than one Flying Monkey Constable, I am forced to take up pen and paper—ah…keyboard—and convey their findings to you.

The first is a personality (not a movie) and a tough one to trace back to Rome; Russell Crowe.

Crowe doesn’t have any of the direct links to the Vatican that one usually finds in a quick, cursory search, which is why the work of Flying Monkey Constable Felipe is so good (if I haven’t done it before, I’m doing it now, Felipe—you are hereby promoted to Flying Monkey Sergeant, skipping the rank of Corporal, as your work is that good).

At the Christianity Today archives, under the headline Southern Baptists Break Ties With Roman Catholic Church, runs the sub-heading, Russell Crowe was a Seventh-Day Adventist minister before he was a gladiator.

Given that Rome now rules the world from behind the scenes, and that the only remaining Protestant sect that vehemently opposes her are the Seventh Day Adventists, this is an astounding thing to read (especially just a few months before 9/11)…except that it’s pure deception.

“Christianity Today” is Billy Graham’s flagship “Protestant” publication—

Christianity Today magazine is an evangelical Christian periodical that was founded in 1956 and is based in Carol Stream, Illinois.  The Washington Post calls Christianity Today, “evangelicalism’s flagship magazine.”^[2]

Christianity Today magazine has a print circulation of approximately 118,000, of which approximately 36,000 is free, and readership of 260,000,^[1] as well as a website at ChristianityToday.com.^[3]  The founder, Billy Graham, stated that he wanted to “plant the evangelical flag in the middle-of-the-road, taking the conservative theological position but a definite liberal approach to social problems”.^[4]  Graham started the magazine as counterpoint to The Christian Century, the predominant independent periodical of mainline Protestantism, and as a way to bring the evangelical Christian community together.^[4][5] ~ Wikipedia

Sadly, Billy is not all he seems to be.

In his book The Deadly Deception, Jim Shaw recounts the Luciferian ceremony that made him a 33° Freemason.  On page 103, Shaw recounts becoming a “Grand Inspector General” which sounds an awful lot like the supreme commander of the Company of Loyola—the “Superior General”.

I’m sure it’s just a coincidence…along with each candidate wearing a black robe and black trousers.

Then came the ceremony.

WINE IN A HUMAN SKULL

When it was time for the final obligation we all stood and repeated the oath with the representative candidate, administered by the Sovereign Grand Inspector General. We then swore true allegiance to the Supreme Council of the 33^rd Degree, above all other allegiances, and swore never to recognize any other brother as being a member of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry unless he also recognizes the supreme authority of “this Supreme Council.”

One of the Conductors then handed the “candidate” a human skull, upside down, with wine in it.

With all of us candidates repeating after him, he sealed the oath, “May this wine I now drink become a deadly poison to me, as the Hemlock juice drunk by Socrates, should I ever knowingly or willfully violate the same” (the oath).

He then drank the wine.  A skeleton (one of the brothers dressed like one — he looked very convincing) then stepped out of the shadows and threw his arms around the “candidate.”  Then he (and we) continued the sealing of the obligation by saying, “And may these cold arms forever encircle me should I ever knowingly or willfully violate the same.”

The Sovereign Grand Commander closed the meeting of the Supreme Council “with the Mystic Number,” striking with his sword five, three, one and then two times.  After the closing prayer, we all said “amen, amen, amen,” and it was over.

PROMINENT MEN TOOK PART

There were some extremely prominent men there that day, including a Scandinavian King, two former presidents of the United States, an internationally prominent evangelist, two other internationally prominent clergymen, and a very high official of the federal government, the one who actually presented me with the certificate of the 33rd Degree.  Some made only brief appearances; others stayed much longer.  However, they didn’t do much mixing or socializing with us, except for those whom they already knew.  Even though these celebrities weren’t extremely “brotherly,” it was still quite an experience for me just to be associated with them.  It was easily the largest gathering of such prominent and influential men of which I have ever been a part.

The third day there was a banquet to celebrate our becoming “Grand Inspectors General, 33^rd Degree.”  The banquet was a little anticlimactic, at least for me, and I was anxious to get it over with so I could return home.  It was good to be a 33^rd at last.  But it wasn’t as exciting or fulfilling as I had thought it would be during all those years in the Craft.  I guess this was because of the profound changes going on down deep within me.

I returned home as soon as the 33rd Degree award and related social functions were finished, for it was time for my next appointment with the doctor.  After he had examined my eyes he said that they were healing fine, that he felt good about the way they were looking, and as usual he spoke with me about the Lord.  I told him that I planned to come to his church the next Sunday and that I had been reading the Bible.

Obviously pleased, he said, “Good.  Keep studying, and your sight will soon be much better.”  By this time I knew what he meant — he was speaking of my spiritual sight. ~ The Deadly Deception, Jim Shaw, pp. 104-105

It is widely understood by researchers that the “internationally prominent evangelist” was Knighted “Defender of the Realm”, William Franklin “Billy” Graham, Jr.

Graham would go on to whisper into the ear of Ronald Wilson Reagan that, after America cut ties to the Vatican in 1866 for her murder of President Abraham Lincoln (usually a nation run by Patriots would’ve went to war over such a revelation but fortunately for her, Rome had so many insurgents in American government they instituted a military tribunal instead of a civilian court to try the conspirators in a way that minimized Rome’s role), it was time to open them back up again.

After 117 years, America’s “great Patriot” (more government, more illegal aliens, more gun control) Ronald Reagan officially reconnected America to the Dragon of Rome.

Was Russell Crowe a Seventh Day Adventist minister prior to becoming a Hollywood superstar?  —You have to read on (again, from Billy Graham’s Christianity Today):

A little-known fact: one of the earliest works by Russell Crowe, the Australian who won Best Actor in last night’s Academy Awards, was a pastoral recruitment video for the Seventh Day Adventist Church.  In the film, the 18-year-old Crowe played a farm worker who decides to devote his life to the church.  Crowe says he did A Very Special Person only because he needed the acting experience: “I didn’t have anything official showing I had studied this art form.” The film’s director of photography, Russell Gibbs, says the film was influential: “It was shown in colleges and high schools to encourage people to become priests.  He actually spoke to real ministers in researching for the role and admitted he found the whole thing very interesting.”  Weblog is sure there’s a joke about Christians and gladiators in here somewhere, but he’s past deadline …

So the reality is that Crowe was simply holding his nose to get some acting on his resumé—something about as close to being an Adventist minister as staying overnight in a Holiday Inn Express.

This was excerpted from an Ananova.com piece that has since been taken down.  Even so, I am not aware of any “Christians and gladiators” jokes…but I am aware of the unbelievable suffering early Christians had at the hands of the Roman empire, from being wrapped in animals skins and torn apart by abused wild predators to being dipped in pitch and burned alive to light Nero’s gardens.  Hilarious.

It’s quite a shocking bit of disinformation but not a surprise coming from a headline which reads, Southern Baptists Break Ties With Roman Catholic Church.  Given the proclivities of prominent Southern Baptist preachers like Rick Warren, I don’t think these two close friends are in any way at risk of “breaking ties”.

Evangelical [that’s a laugh] Pastor Rick Warren Speaks at Catholics’ World Meeting of Families, The Christian Post

Rick Warren Joins Pope Francis in ‘Common Mission’, Newsmax

He even had an exclusive two-part interview with EWTN’s Raymond Arroyo—

For Rick Warren’s ties to Rome through Robert Schuller, read my column, here.

Putting up shockingly deceptive headlines isn’t a surprise coming from the “Christian” magazine that puts copious effort into bolstering Freemasonic false flags like the Charleston Mother Emanuel AME Church shooting by “Dylann [two n’s] Storm Roof”.

The Roof, The Roof, The Roof Is On Fire!

As I told you in my previous column, when the Jesuit World Order needs an army to spin a web of lies, it uses Freemasonry.

The story goes (and I do mean “story”) that on June 17^th, 2015, Dylann Storm Roof entered Mother Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church on Calhoun Street in Charleston, South Carolina and proceeded to shoot 19 people including Mother Emanuel’s Pastor, Clementa Pinkney.

Pinkney was a Democrat State Senator for Ridgeland and was also (and still is) a Freemason. [hat/tip to the Parables blog which, although accepts too much of this false flag as real, pointed me towards some great leads]

Chapter 1 in the Jesuit playbook of distraction and destruction is to stoke the flames of racial hatred and Charleston’s black Freemasons are the front lines for this effort.  Not to worry, stoking the flames of racial hatred is an equal-opportunity event for Freemasonry that included the white North Charleston cop Michael Slager (scroll through my previous column to the photo of Slager with his pant leg rolled up like when he was initiated into Freemasonry).

Clementa was there when the Freemasons rededicated “sister” African Methodist Episcopal Church; Campbell Chapel in 2004—planting another seed of black hatred, racial divide and Luciferianism.

He was riding high as the pastor of the “oldest African Methodist Episcopal Church in the South” which, thanks to his absence (a permanent vacation in Tahiti sitting next to Antonin Opus Dei Scalia sipping Mai Tai’s) now sports a double surnamed woman as pastor (the Right Reverend Doctor Betty-Deas-Clark)…not that Scripture ever got in the Luciferian’s way.

Clearly, the Dylann Storm Roof shooting was the culmination of a combined effort by National, State and local traitors to take racial hatred and the Roman fascist Police State to the next level—

The 200-year-old church has played an important role in the history of South Carolina, including the slavery era, the 1960s Civil Rights Movement, and the Black Lives Matter movement in the 2010s.^[9]  The church was founded in 1816 and it is the oldest African Methodist Episcopal Church in the South, often referred to as “Mother Emanuel”.^[10][11]  It is the oldest historically black congregation south of Baltimore.  When one of the church’s co-founders, Denmark Vesey, was suspected of planning a slave rebellion in Charleston in 1822, 35 people, including Vesey, were hanged and the church was burned down.^[12][13]  Charleston citizens accepted the claim that a slave rebellion was to begin at the stroke of midnight on June 16, 1822, and to erupt the following day; the shooting in 2015 occurred on the 193rd anniversary of the thwarted uprising.^[14]  The rebuilt church was formally shuttered with other all-black congregations by the city in 1834, meeting in secret until 1865 when it was formally reorganized, acquired the name Emanuel (“God with us”),^[15] and rebuilt upon a design by Denmark Vesey’s son.^[14]  That structure was badly damaged in the 1886 Charleston earthquake.^[16][17]  The current building dates from 1891.^[14][15]

The church’s senior pastor, the Rev. Clementa C. Pinckney, had held rallies after the shooting of Walter Scott by a white police officer on April 4, 2015, in nearby North Charleston, and as a state senator, he pushed for legislation requiring police to wear body cameras.^[18]  Several observers noted a similarity between the massacre at Emanuel AME and the 1963 bombing of a politically active African-American church in Birmingham, Alabama, where the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) killed four black girls and injured fourteen others, an attack that galvanized the 1960s Civil Rights Movement.^[17][19]

A number of scholars, journalists, activists and politicians have emphasized the need to understand the attack in the broader context of racism in the United States, rather than seeing it as an isolated event of racially motivated violence.  In 1996, Congress passed the Church Arson Prevention Act, making it a federal crime to damage religious property because of its “racial or ethnic character”, in response to a spate of 154 suspicious church burnings since 1991.^[20][21]  More recent arson attacks against black churches included a black church in Massachusetts that was burned down the day after President Barack Obama was inaugurated in 2009.^{[22][23][24][25]} ~ Wikipedia

It’s interesting that even Mother Emanuel’s home page is careful to note that it is the “oldest African Methodist Episcopal Church south of Baltimore”.

That’s important because George Calvert, the 1^st Baron of Baltimore was a devout Roman Catholic who founded Mary-land as the foundational toe-hold for the Papacy.  It is no coincidence that “America” would create her capital close by (“Little Rome on the Tiber”, later to be re-nicknamed “Little Rome on the Potomac”)

If it creeps you out to see a “Christian” church called “Mother Emanuel” it should.  “Mother” is Luciferian the title for a supreme Freemasonic lodge—

In Great Britain, the term mother lodge is used to identify the particular Lodge where the individual was first “made a Mason” (i.e. received his Entered Apprentice degree).  “Mother lodge” may also refer to a lodge which sponsors the creation of a new lodge, the daughter lodge, to be warranted under the jurisdiction of the same grand lodge; specific procedures pertaining to this vary throughout history and in different jurisdictions.  Lodge Mother Kilwinning No 0 in the Grand Lodge of Scotland is known as the Mother Lodge of Scotland, having been referred to in the Schaw Statutes of 1598 and 1599, and having itself warranted other lodges at a time when it did not subscribe to a grand lodge. ~ Wikipedia

MOTHER LODGE: SHORT TALK BULLETIN — Vol. XI, January 1933, No. 1

The tenderest of Masonic affections cling around this phrase; men away from home have a longing for their Mother Lodge, indefinable in words, as etherial as a flower-scent, as actual as the good standing cards they carry in their pockets.

But what is this that men call Mother Lodge?  Ritual-istically, a Lodge is a legal number of brethren, assembled with a Charter, or Warrant of Constitution, and the Three Great Knights of Masonry properly arranged.  Legally, it is all the brethren whose names are carried on the rolls, formed into an organization by recognition from the Grand Lodge which gave them — or those they succeeded — life as a part of the Grand Lodge family of Lodges.  Physically, a Lodge seems, to the brethren who compose it, to be the room in the Temple in which they meet.  Yet none of these definitions satisfy the thoughtful as complete. ~ Masonic World.com

Charleston is a key city to the Freemasons and has been since the beginning of their satanic influence in America.

The “Mother Supreme Council, Scottish Rite (Southern Jurisdiction, USA)” — frequently abbreviated “SJ” but no relation to the “Society of Jesus”…no, really — was also birthed in Charlestown.

The Supreme Council was founded in Charleston, South Carolina in 1801.^[4] In 1911 the Mother Supreme Council began construction of a national headquarters of the Supreme Council in the District of Columbia, called the House of the Temple.  Finished in 1915, the House of the Temple remains their headquarters to this day.  It is located at 1733 Sixteenth Street, NW.^[4]  The House of the Temple also contains the remains of Albert Pike, the author of Morals and Dogma. ~ Wikipedia

Christopher Edward Harle Story (1938-2010) was an Intelligence insider which means he worked for Rome.

Narrator: The Americans’ strongest ally inside Guatemala [for the overthrow of populist Jacobo Arbenz on behalf of the United Fruit Company] is the Catholic Church.  The CIA contacts Cardinal Spellman in New York to take part in their psychological warfare against Arbenz…

Everett Howard Hunt: We had gotten the OK from Cardinal Spellman to go ahead with this and I wouldn’t presume to trace the lines of authority within the Catholic Church—how they get their information, but they do!  We’ve always said in an admiring way that the Jesuits form the greatest intelligence service in the world and they always have.

Story was quite the propagandist with an eclectic mix of topics—each one having the effect of creating a boogeyman that is not the Roman Catholic Church.

* The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States (1997) — “The Soviet Union was secretly in bed with Germany in an effort to bring Lenin’s goals to fruition via the European Union.”  José Manuel Barroso, EU President from 2004-2014—Jesuit-trained Roman Catholic.  Barrosso was replaced by Jean-Claude Juncker of Catholic-dominated Luxemburg, he’s Catholic private school-educated Roman Catholic.  Juncker was Prime Minister of Luxemburg and was replaced by homosexual Xavier Bettel who has since married another man.  Herman Achille, Count Van Rompuy; Jesuit-educated Roman Catholic, President of the European Council 2009-2014, replaced by Donald Franciszek Tusk, Polish Roman Catholic educated at Nicolaus Copernicus High School No. 1, which is interesting.  What is also interesting is that neither Wikipedia nor Britannica lists Tusk’s religion.  For that you have to go to KidzSearch.
* The Perestroika Deception: Memoranda to the Central Intelligence Agency — “Please!  Someone help!  The CIA is asleep and the Communists have taken over!  The collapse of the Soviet Union was a Trojan Horse!!!”  There was so much information on what a ridiculous Intelligence PSYOP (Psychological Operation) this was I filled an entire column with it.
* Red Cocaine: The Drugging of America and the West (1999) — “It’s the Soviet Union and Communism that was trafficking in narcotics and putting hard drugs on American streets to destabilize U.S. cities.”  This is quite ridiculous as it has always been the Jesuit/Catholic-dominated Central Intelligence Agency that has destroyed America with narcotics. [Compromised by Terry Kent Reed, Dark Alliance: The CIA, the Contras, and the Cocaine Explosion by Gary Stephen Webb]

* The New Underworld Order: Triumph of Criminalism the Global Hegemony of Masonic Intelligence — “Commies aren’t selling anymore as the boogeyman so now we’ll pull a Fritz Springmeier and say ‘IT’S THE SATAN WORSHIPPERS!!!’”

The funny thing is that this last piece of near-fiction actually has the most truth mixed in with it, as that is the foundation of the religion that comes from the City of the Dead.

Since the suppression of the Templars it’s been Rome’s tactic to prop up Jews to hide behind and partner with, but to make the smokescreen believable there always has to be an appetizer of truth mixed in.

syn·cre·tism: noun; 1. the amalgamation or attempted amalgamation of different religions, cultures, or schools of thought.

This is exactly what we see from Christopher Edward Harle Story—

GERMAN JEWISH ORIGINS OF THE AMERICAN SCOTTISH RITE

The ‘Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite’ originates from the rite called Scottish of Perfection or of Heredom, having 25 Degrees, which was ‘worked’ in Europe in the 18^th century by Masons devoting themselves to occultism.  Albert Pike says that ‘in 1761, the Lodges and Councils of the superior Degrees being extended throughout Europe, Frederic II (Frederick the Great), King of Prussia, as Grand Commander of the Order of Princes of the Royal Secret, or 32 Degrees, was by general consent acknowledged and recognized as Sovereign and Supreme Head of the Scottish Rite’56.

‘On the 25th October 1762, the Grand Masonic Constitutions were finally ratified in Berlin and proclaimed for the government of all Masonic bodies working in the Scottish Rite over the two hemispheres; and in the same year they were submitted to the Jew, Stephen Morin, who had been appointed… in August 1761, Inspector General for the New World by the Grand Consistory of Princes of the Royal Secret, convened at Paris, under the Presidency of Chaillon de Joinville, representative of Frederick (the Great) and Substitute General of the Order…. The 33rd Degree was not then created; and under Frederic the Great, there was no rank higher than the 32nd Degree…’57.

This statement definitively affirms the supremacy of Berlin as the central authority governing Scottish Rite Freemasonry in both Europe and America, and its seniority over the Political Action Centre established by Giuseppe Mazzini, of Jewish extraction, in Rome (The Vatican).  Morin travelled to Santo Domingo, where he was joined by two fellow Jews, Moses M. Hays and Henry Andrew Francken, who founded a branch of the rite in Jamaica, while Hays was entrusted with founding Lodges in North America.  Hays duly established a ‘Sublime Lodge of Perfection’ in Boston, of which he constituted himself Grand Master, and charged a fellow Jew and Mason, one Isaac Dacosta, who had founded the St. Andrew Lodge in Boston, with the mission of introducing Masonry into South Carolina.  On 27th August 1766, Brother Morin’s patent was revoked by the Grand Body in Paris for ‘propagating strange and monstrous doctrines’, and handed to a Brother Martin.  [But] Morin continued constituting chapters with Dacosta, a full 17 years after his Freemasonic patent had been annulled.  In 1783, he inaugurated ‘The Grand Lodge of Perfection’ in Charleston, with Dacosta as its Grand Master — this unofficial, unauthorised behaviour thus accounting for the strange, subsequent ‘parallelism’ of the ideological centre consolidated in 1870 by Albert Pike in Charleston, after the American Civil War, with its countervailing revolutionary Vaticanbased Political Action Centre.

Morin was succeeded by another Jew, Joseph M. Meyers.  It suited the Jews concerned to continue with the Jerusalem connection, and when the Grand Council of Princes of Jerusalem was established at Charleston on 20th February 1788, Meyers was one of the Deputy-Inspectors who established it.  The two Masonic powers at Boston and Charleston created numerous Lodges and inner shrines in the United States, and each gave themselves the titles of Mother Lodges of the United States⁵⁸.

A Lodge at Albany, New York, was transmitting reports to Berlin, the seat of the Prussian Monarchy, as early as 1770.  It is clear that the Prussians were using the New World’s burgeoning Masonic network for espionage operations, and were employing Jews for that purpose.  Pope Clement XII had excommunicated Freemasons as early as 1738.  But the Jewish Masons, who obviously did not belong to the Catholic Church, continued promoting the cult in the United States in pursuit of their secret Kabbalistic agenda.  On 15th May 1781, at a convention of Deputy-Inspectors called by Hays and Meyers at Philadelphia, Moses Cohen was named Deputy Inspector of Jamaica, as Francken, originally appointed by Stephen Morin to found Lodges there, had neglected his mandate.  It was not long before another Jewish Freemason, Hyman Isaac Long the son of a Dutch writer called Isaac Long arrived in Jamaica, having derived his ‘powers’ from Morin.  In addition to Francken, Hays and Moses Cohen, there was another prominent Jewish Mason associated with them at the time, called Spitzer.  All seemed to be bent on spreading (anti-Christian) Masonry in North America, as though motivated by the ‘seething powers’ of Lucifer, and driven by them to cut short the Christian heritage of the earlier American fathers.  Thus the claims of Samuel Oppenheim concerning the importance of Jews within early U.S. Masonry, cited on pages 274-276, are indisputable. ~ The New Underworld Order: Curse of Criminalism: Dark Actors Playing Games: The Luciferian German Fascist llluminati Criminal Revolution Conspiracy to Control the World By means of A global coup d’etat by instalments by Christopher Story pp. 297-298, 300

It’s beyond humorous for Story to contend that a Jewish Freemason had his “patent revoked” because he was pushing a satanist agenda given that such is the very foundation of Freemasonry!  What is far more important, however, is that Story admitted to direct involvement with the Freemasons and their installed Jewish patsies by Rome.

Freemasonry hasn’t always been so equal-opportunity, however.  When free black man Prince Hall petitioned to become a member of St. John’s Lodge in Boston prior to the Revolutionary War, he was turned down.  But whomever was behind the Revolutionary War (and it’s not who you were taught) found black Freemasons useful and Prince Hall was initiated into Lodge No. 441 of the Grand Lodge of Ireland in 1775 and from there went on to found the first “African” lodge in the City of Brotherly Love, Philadelphia.

From there, “African” lodges grew “like weeds” and in 1797, African Lodge #459 of Philadelphia was founded.  Absalom Jones was entitled “the Worshipful Master of the Lodge” and Richard Allen was the first Lodge treasurer.  Jones and Allen would then go on to found the African Methodist Episcopal Church.

As a quick aside from the aside we’re already on, it’s fascinating to see how many Freemasons like tying themselves to the Roman Catholic order of the Knights Templar, like Prince Hall Freemason Luther Alexander Townsley (1878-1939) who, according to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Centennial Encyclopaedia of the African Methodist Episcopal Church—

…has been elected four times as delegate to the general conference, and is now the chairman of the delegation from Georgia. He is a thirty-third degree Mason, Knight Templar, Royal Illustrious Imperial Potentate of the Mystic Shrine, R. W. Grand Chaplain of the M. W. Union Grand Lodge of Georgia, Past Chancellor Commander and U. R. K. of P.; member Grand Council G. U. O. of O. F., P. M. W. Governor H. H. of Ruth and Worthy Deputy Grand Master P. B. and S. of Light. Dr. Townsley is one of the leading ministers of the A. M. E. connection, and eminently qualified to fill any place in the Church.

Although I couldn’t verify ParablesBlog’s assertion that the Templar cross-in-crown image was in a Mother Emanuel stained glass window, it does make sense.

—which brings us back to the Jewish-birthed black Freemasons of Charleston and the series of false flags they committed there.

Black Magick Woman

So Russell Crowe isn’t a Seventh Day Adventist…but is he a Roman Catholic?

According to Russell Crowe: From growing up in his father’s pubs to brawling, bristling and brilliance, Paul Giamatti, Interview magazine, May 2005 [cited in the “Notable Names Database”] Crowe’s mother was forced to attend Catholic Mass by her step-father but she wanted him to make up his own mind.  Given the effort Crowe put into showing how the new Jesuit Pope approved of his 2014 gnostic rendition of Noah, I think we have a winner.

He’s tweeted at him, sent him numerous messages and even turned up to mass at the Vatican.

But Noah star Russell Crowe’s dreams of meeting Pope Francis were finally realised, and he was more than a little charmed by the pontiff.

“Look I’m not Catholic and I’ve never felt any connection with any previous Pope, but I like this guy,” he told Good Morning America.

“I like what he says… He’s changing the tone of the way you regard the Pope and I think it is a magnificent thing.  I was very privileged and humbled to be in that environment.” ~ Jenn Selby, the Independent

Although there were several aspects of Noah that I liked, the biggest re-write of the Biblical narrative was the most Luciferian.  Genesis 6 remarks that an intermingling of the sons of God with the daughters of men produced a race of “fallen ones” called Nephilim.

In Noah, the fallen ones are re-written to, not only be the “good guys” who make the Herculean task of building an ark big enough for Noah’s mission but also stave off the hordes of evil men until Noah can get out.  In the end, the fallen are redeemed and rise to Heaven in their deaths—a plot that hasn’t a shred of Biblical evidence but is everywhere in Luciferian and gnostic writing.

Through pages 50 to 70 of Helena Blavatsky’s Isis Unveiled, Volume II, she accuses Rome of practicing black magic and being gnostic Luciferians (which she says is different from her Luciferianism because, to her, satan doesn’t exist).  Did the Jesuits feed Noah’s kabbalistic writer/director Darren Aronofsky these ideas?

This despoiling of the human genome seems to have been a primal factor in the Divine action of the Flood (something that makes perfect sense if the world is flat and surrounded by a 200 to 300 foot high barrier of ice).

NASA image “from space” (dried precipitation on the camera lens, included) of the Ross ice shelf…which is actually much, much more than just a “shelf”.

The re-writing of our reality is the deception of all time, birthed by the Counter-Reformation as the ultimate satanic tactic of, rather than attempting to suppress Scripture, simply discredit it.

If this seems like an interesting topic, don’t worry, Lord willing I’ll be hitting it up again soon.

Tinsle-Töe

Well, talk about rabbit holes…

Where was I?

Oh yes, movie reviews and their ties to Rome!

So I have been reviewing all forms of entertainment (TV, movies, internet streaming) that don’t have the reputation of being Papist or having Papist actors but they damn well should; movies like—

* Body of Lies (2008), directed by the CIA’s very best, Ridley Scott, starring Rome’s very best, Russell Crowe and Leonardo “I Visited the Pope and All I Got Was This Lousy Oscar” Dicaprio.
* The Last Witch Hunter (2015), with Vin Diesel, Elijah Wood and Michael Caine.
* The Hateful Eight (2015), a movie XXX should be prosecuted for and then charged with all modern hate crimes and punished accordingly.
* The TV sitcom Frasier and it’s sickening connection to Rome and 9/11.
* Broken City (2013) starring, Rome’s favorite bellhop bully, Russell Crowe, and Boston’s favorite racist son, Mark Robert Michael Marky-Mark Wahlberg.

Marky-Mark was recently the mark of one of my best investigators, FMS (Flying Monkey Sergeant) Graham.  FMS Graham sent me an outstanding report that wonderfully completmented the information I dug up on Marky-Mark for Resistance Rising Episode 95.

As I noted on my show, Wahlberg was a good Boston Roman Catholic and quite the racist ruffian.

By age 13, Wahlberg had developed an addiction to cocaine and other substances.^[13][14]  At 15, civil action was filed against him for his involvement in two separate incidents of harassing African-American children (the first were siblings of each other, and the second incident was a group of black school children on a field trip), by throwing rocks and shouting racial epithets.^[15]  At 16, Wahlberg approached a middle-aged Vietnamese man named Thanh Lam on the street, and using a large wooden stick, knocked him unconscious while calling him a “Vietnam fucking shit”.^[16][17]  That same day, Wahlberg also attacked a second Vietnamese man named Hoa “Johnny” Trinh, punching him in the face.  He believed he had left his victim permanently blind in one eye.^[15][16][18] Trinh was interviewed in December 2014 by the Daily Mail; he revealed that he had already lost that eye during the Vietnam War, and did not know the identity of his assailant prior to being contacted by the media.^[19]  According to court documents regarding these crimes, when Wahlberg was arrested later that night and returned to the scene of the first assault, he stated to police officers: “You don’t have to let him identify me, I’ll tell you now that’s the motherfucker who’s (sic) head I split open.”^[18]  Investigators also noted that he “made numerous unsolicited racial statements about ‘gooks‘ and ‘slant-eyed gooks’.”^[16][18]

For these crimes, Wahlberg was charged with attempted murder, pleaded guilty to assault, and was sentenced to two years in Suffolk County Deer Island House of Correction.  He ultimately served only 45 days of his sentence,^[16][20] but carries a permanent felony record.  In another incident, then 21-year-old Wahlberg fractured the jaw of a neighbor in an unprovoked attack.^[21]  Commenting in 2006 on his past crimes, Wahlberg has stated: “I did a lot of things that I regret, and I have certainly paid for my mistakes.”  He said the right thing to do would be to try to find the blinded man and make amends, and admitted he has not done so, but added that he was no longer burdened by guilt: “You have to go and ask for forgiveness and it wasn’t until I really started doing good and doing right by other people, as well as myself, that I really started to feel that guilt go away.  So I don’t have a problem going to sleep at night.  I feel good when I wake up in the morning.”^[20]

After prison, he decided to improve his behavior.  Of this he has said,

As soon as I began that life of crime, there was always a voice in my head telling me I was going to end up in jail.  Three of my brothers had done time.  My sister went to prison so many times I lost count.  Finally I was there, locked up with the kind of guys I’d always wanted to be like.  Now I’d earned my stripes and I was just like them, and I realized it wasn’t what I wanted at all.  I’d ended up in the worst place I could possibly imagine and I never wanted to go back.  First of all, I had to learn to stay on the straight and narrow.

Wahlberg first relied on the guidance of his parish priest to turn his back on crime.  He told his street gang that he was leaving them and had “some serious fights” with them over it.^[22]

On November 26, 2014, Wahlberg filed an application in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts requesting a full and unconditional pardon^[23] from his prior convictions.^[24]  His pardon application engendered some controversy.^[16]  According to the BBC, the debate about his suitability for a pardon is still ongoing with the arguments on both sides being far-reaching and complex.^[25]  One of Wahlberg’s victims, Trinh, pledged in December 2014 to make a written statement supporting a pardon.^[19]  Also, a petition to the Massachusetts governor to deny Wahlberg’s pardon is ongoing.^[26] ~ Wikipedia

45 days for assault and attempted murder?  I don’t think Wahlberg can really say “I’ve paid for my mistakes” and keep a straight face but he is an actor!

It seems like the system was looking out for Marky-Mark, perhaps it had use for a vehemently racist Roman Catholic (and it did).  I’m unaware of any Christian doctrine that generally states “ask for forgiveness” (“forgiveness comes from the one you’ve injured and the One keeping track of your sins) or that doing right “by other people, as well as myself” absolves guilt—but then again, Hollywood money can re-write any doctrine you keep in your head.

FMS Graham confirmed in his e-mail to me that Marky-Mark was being looked out for…or at least used for propaganda purposes; “Mark Wahlberg must have a horse shoe up his ___.”

On September 11th, 2001, the 43-year-old Transformers star was actually booked on the doomed American Airlines Flight 11 that left Boston’s Logan Airport and flew into the North Tower of the World Trade Center killing all 92 passengers on board. ~ Daily Mail

Sadly, as I reported to you previously, Frasier creator and writer David Angell, along with his wife Lynn, did get on AA Flight 11 that fateful day.  Would you believe they ended up sitting right across from Mohammad Atta, himself!

David was also a writer for the Boston-based sitcom Cheers, and he got his start like all Hollywood writers do—first serving at the Pentagon.

I’m sure this is a coincidence, as well, but David’s brother is Roman Catholic Bishop Kenneth Anthony Angell, the Papist prelate responsible for burying reports of several pedophile Priest predations.  Normally, one would consider such behavior criminal activity worthy of prosecution but, miraculously, Bishop Ken remains the Teflon Don.

Perhaps the best part of all concerning David and Lynn Angell’s “death” was how it was predicted in a 1997 episode of Fraiser when guest star Linda Hamilton left a message on Frasier answering machine that she’d be coming in to Seattle on American Airlines Flight 11.

The coincidences are flying thick and heavy here, folks!

Graham wrote to share a video that contained “9/11 truth” hidden in plain sight in the movie Shooter, starring Mark Wahlberg (it has been removed by YouTube).

I wrote Graham back and noted that it would seem the Whore of Babylon had taken key actors and movie-makers into her confidence in order to make sure her propaganda got out there.  Only the knowledge that 9/11 was a fraud could fill Marky-Mark with such ridiculous bravado that he would claim he’d wished he’d made it onto Flight 11 so he could’ve taken the plane over and saved the day.

There are a great number of Hollywood names that have been bandied about as members of the Order of Knights of the Hospital of Saint John of Jerusalem, Rhodes and Malta (the Knights of Malta).  The roles of secret societies are very difficult to validate so you have to rely on insiders outing their friends—usually as part of a PSYOP (Psychological Operation) designed to get you to believe a lie by first seeding it with the truth.

Just such an operative is my neighbor, Eric Jon Phelps, author of Vatican Assassins; a phenomenal source of information if you can get past the purposefully wrong dates and the distractingly bad writing (all Jesuit tactics to discredit the truths that were given up).  Printings are nice and scarce so hard copies of this book don’t usually go for anything under $100 (again, by design to mitigate its circulation).

My book, by the way, is both affordable and available!

According to Eric Phelps (not his real name), the following Hollywood names are Knights of Malta:

NOTE: being that Phelps is an incognito Jesuit, part of his schtick to discredit his work and divide the anti-Jesuit camp is vicious race-baiting, some of which I’ve included here in his “list”—

• Walt Disney
• Frank Capra
• Anthony Quinn
• “Black race-mixer Sammy Davis, Jr.”
• Jack Nicholson
• “another Black race-mixer Sidney Poitier”
• Sylvester Stallone
• Tom Cruise
• Stanley Kubrick
• Robert De Niro
• George Clooney [who recently met with his boss, the Jesuit Pope]
• “Nicolas Cage (who played the part of a fornicator with African Black women in ‘Lord of War’)”
• John Malkovich
• Arnold Schwarzenegger

Employing six degrees of separation, FMS Graham then switched from Marky-Mark Wahlberg to the writer/director/producer for his 2012 crass comedy Ted, Hollywood cartoon animator Seth MacFarlane—another Boston native and another Hollywood personality that “should’ve” been on AA Flight 11.

Narrowly Escaped Death on 9/11

MacFarlane had been scheduled to fly on the doomed American Airlines flight from Boston that was hijacked by terrorists and deliberately crashed into the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001.

Instead, he arrived late at the airport — after partying hard the night before and getting the departure time wrong — and missed the flight.  “I was generally late for flights,” MacFarlane told Piers Morgan in 2011.  “In that moment, we’re all the same.  I’m not a fatalist.  I was not shaken to the core.”

Ironically, MacFarlane’s “Ted” co-star Mark Wahlberg had also been scheduled for Flight 11 but canceled his ticket at the last minute. ~ ABC News

It’s easy to see why he’d be a favorite for the Whore of Babylon—MacFarlane (flanked by the ever-present Roman-propped Jewish men of Hollywood, David Goodman and David Zuckerman) frequently rides his erudite “adult cartoon” Family Guy into the deepest recesses of anti-Christian hatred that he can find, such as his special “Jesus the 2000 year old virgin” episode.

“Do I have that much contempt for Christianity?  I guess maybe I do…The Big Bang has got a lot of support, live with it,” he added in the Family Guy Season 4 commentary. ~ Christian Today

That’s really quite convenient: a Jesuit-controlled mouthpiece uses the fabricated stupidity of “first there was nothing, and then it exploded” created by a Jesuit-educated Catholic priest, friend of the puppet fraud Jewish “genius” who helped the Whore re-write our reality with his “theory of relativity” that is purposefully convoluted—

It’s not possible to give a very satisfactory answer without going into a lot of detail about what General Relativity is and how it works.  But that would take a book rather than a few paragraphs… ~ Physics.StackExchange.com

—to mock true scientific reality made by Almighty God, the King of kings and Lord of lords.

MacFarlane said in an October 2011 interview that as a child he was always “weirdly fascinated by the Communion ceremony”.  He created a strip with a character kneeling at the altar taking Communion and asking “Can I have fries with that?” ~ Wikipedia

There’s a lot of support for the fact that one out of one people will die at some point in their lifetime and be judged by their Maker…have fun dealing with that, you skidmark on the shorts of satan.

In the year 533, Justinian issued a decree in which he united all the priests “in the Orient” to the Apostolic See of Rome.

The emperor’s letter must have been sent before the 25^th of March, 533.  For in his letter of that date to Epiphanius he speaks of its having been already dispatched, and repeats his decision, that all affairs touching the church shall be referred to the Pope, “Head of all bishops, and the true and effective corrector of heretics.” [“Vel eo maxime, quod quoties in his locis haeretici pullularunt, et sententia et recto judicio illius venerabilis sedis correct! sunt.”]¹ …

The Vandals in Africa were defeated 534-­535 by Belisarius, Justinian’s general.  The Ostrogoths were defeated, and surrendered their supremacy over the Catholic Church, 538 A.D.; and this is the only logical and authentic date for the beginning of the supremacy of the “little horn” of Daniel 7, for that year marked the union of the Western Catholic Church, with the pope at its head, to the imperial Eastern Catholic Church, thus making the “little horn” organically complete, never again to be separated for 1260 years.

For generations, those who protested Rome’s iron teeth and claws understood Daniel 2 and 7 and Revelation 13, 17 and 18 to be speaking of Rome and the terrible system she built to rule and control the entire plane of our existence.

It was common knowledge that the great statue in Nebuchadnezzar’s dream and the Four Beasts translated thusly—

1. head was of fine gold/lion with eagle’s wings: Babylon, who conquered with the power of a lion but the swiftness of an eagle
2. chest and arms of silver/bear raised up on one side: Medo/Persia whose partnership first favored the Medes but later the Persians took control
3. belly and thighs of bronze/leopard with four wings and four heads: Greece who conquered even faster than Babylon and whose territory was carved by four generals after Alexander’s assassination (Lysimachus, Cassander, Ptolemy and Seleucus)
4. legs of iron, feet of iron and clay¹/dreadful beast with teeth of iron, different from those before it: Rome first as a military power like the others but then transforming into an invisible parasitic system of control which is able to appropriate the money and power of other nations without their knowledge

Rome has always been the Fourth and Final Beast and, as a result, she has used her satanic Special Forces—the Jesuits—to erase her from Protestant eschatology and they have been demonically successful!

I intend to go into more detail regarding the two beasts of Revelation 13 in subsequent writing, but for a thousand years after the Roman Empire transforming into the Holy Roman Empire², this Whore/Beast system ruled supreme, having buried the Word of God along with untold multitudes of true Christians—but not before horribly torturing most of them first (Daniel 7:21, Revelation 13:7).

The “shot heard ‘round the world” was fired on October 31^st, 1517 as a former Augustinian monk and university professor posted a notice of meeting to his peers regarding the outrages of the Mother Church in wrenching what little wealth the poor had for spiritual “indulgences” that would allow the Medici Pope (Leo X) to finish St. Peter’s Cathedral.  Luther never intended his 95 Theses to be dispersed amongst the parishners but he was the victim of his own popularity.  His students adored him and they quickly snatched the notice from the door of Wittenburg All Saints Cathedral (not that any of Martin Luther’s peers had the courage to respond—they didn’t), translated it into German and utilized the new Guttenberg printing press to disseminate it amongst the townspeople.

It was an instant success.

The revolt against Rome spread like a wild fire and put the young monk in danger of going the way of previous Pro Testari—being burned at the stake.  His benefactor, Frederick III, Elector of Saxony, kidnapped Luther and locked him in Wartburg castle.  This gave the Reformer a lot of time on his hands and he put it to good use; translating the New Testament into vernacular German.  He would later go on to translate the Old Testament as well.

Again, the Guttenberg press was put to powerful use and soon the Word of God was being spread and read faster than Rome could burn it.

It was too late.  The Truth was out.  There would be no way of containing it again as Canon law had dictated for centuries.

A new tactic was needed; one that would not only infiltrate and subvert the Reformation but re-weave the very fabric of human reality.

Footsoldiers of Fabricated Falsehood

Although they probably aren’t the founders of all secret societies, the Knights Templar sure showed how to get it done.

Servants of the Pope, they vowed to win him Jerusalem in the Crusades (which they didn’t).

What they did do, was get filthy rich as a result of their conquests which lead them into discovering the usefulness of usury in hording and utilizing wealth.  As a result, the Templars invented modern banking.

Freemasonic lore traces the “first mason” to “Hiram Abiff”, the supposed architect of the Temple of Solomon—

Hiram Abiff (also Hiram Abif or the Widow’s son) is the central character of an allegory presented to all candidates during the third degree in Freemasonry.  Hiram is presented as the chief architect of King Solomon’s Temple, who is murdered in the Temple he designed by three ruffians during an unsuccessful attempt to force him to divulge the Master Masons’ secret passwords.  The themes of the allegory are the importance of fidelity, and the certainty of death. ~ Wikipedia

It is no coincidence that the proper name for the Templars is “The Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon”.

Although there is great debate about whether or not the Freemasons were created by Rome or simply taken over, there can be little doubt whom they serve now.  Even the official historian of the Freemasons, Albert Mackey, admits in his Encyclopedia of Freemasonry that Catholic James II, while in exile from England (it’s always better to just go “off with the head”) conspired with the Jesuits of Clermont college in France to create the first 25 degrees of Freemasonry.

When it comes to weaving webs of lies and fabricating a false reality, the footsoldiers of Rome are her Freemasons.

From astronauts to cops, you can always count on a Freemason to break all other oaths and loyalties to serve the higher evil—and when they have second thoughts and try to send messages to non-Masons (like Gus Grissom’s hanging a lemon on his moon lander) they get made an example of (like Gus being burned alive along with Ed White and Roger Chafee who appeared to have been “collateral damage” to the satan worshippers).

The top play in the book of Rome is racial hatred and strife.  Nothing gets people disconnected from facts quicker than some racial hatred.  If you need a false flag phony shooting of a black man by a white cop, who better to betray everything they stand for than a Freemason?

Later, when “debriefing” his superior, officer Michael Slager made sure to roll up his left pant leg—

—just like he did in his initiation—

Rome was never able to murder Martin Luther.  This, apparently, made her all the more determined to destroy his legacy and she continues to undermine and destroy Protestant churches all over our open flat plains.

The Whore of Babylon immediately sent her best insurgents—the Jesuits—to infiltrate all other sects and religions.  They’d already done as much to their sister orders!

Making sure not to put all her eggs in one basket, she then proceeded to fabricate new sects that had serious flaws or were designed to embarrass and humiliate true Believers in Jesus Christ.

The biggest push for this effort occurred in the 19^th century with Mormonism.  All of the early Mormon leaders were Freemasons and they were guided behind the scenes by Jesuits like Pierre-Jean de Smet.

The Jesuit/Mason connection is always good for murder and mayhem and it’s not a stretch to imagine Brigham Young’s friend Pierre-Jean whispering in his ear before he urged fellow Mormons to massacre an innocent wagon train full of men, women and children at Mountain Meadows, Utah.

When you realize that the Jesuits were behind the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, it’s not so surprising to find that the Mountain Meadows massacre occurred on September 11^th, 1857.

Another example is that of William Miller, the founder of the Seventh Day Adventist Church.  Miller was an active Freemason until he needed credibility as a Christian and then he “resigned” (which, if you know Freemasonry, is often just as much a ruse as it is for “former” Jesuits like Malachi Martin).

Miller humiliated Adventists at home and Protestants everywhere with his prediction that Christ would return in 1844.

It was all by design.

But what the Luciferian Jesuit/Freemason cabal didn’t take into account is something we learned at the very beginning of the “MDMP” (the “Military Decision-Making Process”): “the enemy gets a vote”.

In this case, the “enemy” is YHWH, and He voted with His usual sense of sweet irony and payback; He chose the Adventists to be the guardians of the Reformation and, today, they remain the last true Protestant sect.  While every other sect of “non-Catholic” religions now teach Jesuit-fabricated heresies like the Pre-Tribulation Rapture, Preterism or Futurism, a prophetic role for modern Israel as well as many other eschatological fallacies, the SDA Church has stayed on course and on target.  They’re far from perfect, mind, and have their own misguided ideas about who the Archangel Michael is, how the Saturday Sabbath is the Seal of YHWH and how the soul isn’t immortal, but all told, they get far more right than they get wrong and they prove the Lord has a “wicked” sense of humor toward the wicked.

Can I Get A Witness For Jehovah?

If you ask Google whether or not the founder of the Jehovah’s Witnesses—one “Charles Taze Russell”—was a Freemason, the first hit you get is a JW apologetics site and the second site you get is Wikipedia which compassionately says this—

Use of Masonic symbolism

Some have claimed that various symbols Russell employed in his published literature are Masonic in nature, and that such associations implied he engaged in occult activity.  In later editions of the Studies in the Scriptures series a winged solar disk was stamped on the front cover, a symbol that is also associated with Freemasonry.^{[citation needed]}  However, Russell’s use of the winged solar-disk originated from his understanding of Malachi 4:2, which denotes a sun with wings, as a symbol that Christ’s millennial Kingdom had begun to emerge.^[103]  Some critics also claim that the pyramid near Russell’s gravesite is Masonic,^{[63][104][105][106]} because of its shape and its use of the Cross and Crown symbol, although this remains disputed.^[107][108]  The Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon has officially said that Russell was not a Freemason,^[109][110] and notes that these symbols under discussion used are not exclusive to Masonry but pre-date the fraternity.^[111]

In June 1913, during a transcontinental speaking tour, Russell lectured in a Masonic hall in San Francisco, saying:

“Although I have never been a Mason … Something I do seems to be the same as Masons do, I don’t know what it is; but they often give me all kinds of grips and I give them back, then I tell them I don’t know anything about it except just a few grips that have come to me naturally.”^[112]

Throughout his ministry he said that he believed Christian identity is incompatible with Freemasonry.^[113]  He described Freemasonry, Knights of Pythias, Theosophy, and other such groups as “grievous evils” and “unclean”.^[114][115]

Well I couldn’t have said it better if I was a JW myself!

Although Wikipedia may have been especially kind (along with Google) as to the origins of the JW’s, when it comes to calling them out on what embarrasses them (and, by association, all Protestant Christians), they get their own special entry; “Criticism of Jehovah’s Witnesses”—along with a special section on the number of prophecies that didn’t come true (so many, they make William Miller look like Nostradamus).

They even have their own pedophile sex scandal problems.

But before we leave the question of Russell’s Freemasonry, there’s been a whole book written on the subject!

The answer to where JWs receive their strange beliefs, strange doctrines, and attitudes comes primarily from two men.  Because primarily only two men, Charles Taze Russell and Joseph F. Rutherford made all the decisions of the Watchtower Society for the beginning 60 years.²  It is important to understand their overwhelming contribution. …

Charles T. Russell’s father was Joseph L. Russell.  Joseph L. was a Prebyterian and married one.  Joseph L. left Ireland, and immigrated directly to Allegheny, PA in 1846.³  He left during the Potato Famine.  It was a time when every village in Scotland and Britain had a Masonic Lodge.⁴  Also during the years just prior to Joseph L. immigrating to the U.S., Joseph L. experienced along with his Presbyterian churches the atonement heresies that broke out in 1841 and lasted for several years.  The heresies concerned the extent of Christ’s atonement, along with some leaders adopting the Arian view of Christ.  Several synods were cut off and some offenders disfellowshipped.⁵  The author hasn’t confirmed which side of the disputes Joseph was on, but there are indications.

The author (who we’ll divulge shortly) got this mostly right except for one very interesting change: a “Wikia Fandom” page notes that the Russell family may very well have been on the receiving end of Presbyterian “religious cleansing” and also notes that Roman Catholics were very high on that list.

What about the route Russell took?  First, he rejected his Presbyterian Church for the more liberal Congregational Church.  There was just one in town, a Welsh Congregational Church.  Then he rejected the Congregational Church when he tried to convert an “infidel” friend (one source says “pool hall friend”).  He was unable to defend his religion to his friend, especially why a just God would torment people in hell.  This caused him to question his minister and a Professor from the Allegheny Theological Seminary about the Bible’s reliability.  They did not answer him to his satisfaction, so he rejected Christianity and requested a letter of dismissal from the church.¹⁵ …

During C.T. Russell’s early years, there was a group which his upbringing exposed him to which had just the type of religious knowledge that Russell had a penchant for—that was the Masonic Hall located near his father’s Dry Good’s store on Federal St. Another eight blocks south across the St. Clair Street Bridge was another Masonic Hall.¹⁶  In 1851, in the Pittsburgh-Allegheny area there were 52 lodges of various kinds of Freemasons and Oddfellows, including a Scottish Rite lodge.¹⁷  By 1856, the Allegheny Lodge had moved their Hall a short distance from Federal St. to Water St. near Federal.  Two lodges met there, Allegheny Lodge No. 223 and Jefferson Lodge No. 288.¹⁸  By 1858, Pittsburgh had its own Masonic Knights Templar Commandery (more on this later).¹⁹

Clearly the author has done his homework!  He even isn’t afraid to connect the Masons to the Templars (but will he note that both serve Rome?).

Seventeen Presidents have been Masons: and all of these seventeen had English or Scot-Irish ancestry.  These seventeen are Washington, Madison, Monroe, Jackson, Polk, Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, Garfield, McKinley, both Roosevelts, Taft, Harding, Truman, Lyndon Johnson, Gerald Ford, and Ronald Reagon [sic].  Seventeen Vice-presidents have also been Masons.  Note that the first three presidents were affiliated with the Episcopal church and the next three Masons to become U.S. Presidents were Presbyterians.²⁷  Presidents are not the only Scot-Irish Freemason leaders.  Joseph Smith’s Masonic membership is proven,²⁸ and Mary Baker Eddy’s close ties with the Freemasons are documented.  Her first and beloved husband died and left her a widow.  He was a Freemason.  The Freemasons took care of her as a widow, and after that kindness she very close to them her entire life.  She had material published in the Freemason’s Monthly Magazine.²⁹

More good information…yet Rome remains free and clear.

It is clear Russell rejected the Presbyterian and the Congregational Churches that he belonged to, because they believed in hell, and not because they allowed Freeemasons within their congregations.  A study of Russell’s life, shows no interest on his part of joining the anti-Masonic campaign.   The worst enemy of the Masonic Lodge was the Catholic Church.  In modern times, the Masons have successfully obtained supporters and a few members from their long time opponent, the Catholic Church.³⁷  When Russell was a 33, Pope Leo XIII made it anathema for Catholics to join the Masons.  This act drew no acclaim from Russell.  Russell refers to the Catholic Church as the Jezebel of 2 Kgs. 9 in his second volume, p. 256.  And Russell does seem to echo the Masons Albert Pike, Mazzini, and others in his strong anti-Catholic attacks, who also, like Russell, branded the Pope and his hierarchy as agents of the Antichrist.  Both Russell and these men call the Catholic church “Babylon the Great.”  Considering Russell rejected the Protestant doctrines, it seems rather Masonic-like that he dislikes the Catholics to such an extreme.³⁶

Well, it seems the author has finally outed himself as a militant Roman Catholic who has either bought or gone all in for selling the idea that Rome and Freemasonry are mortal enemies.  As I prove in my book, this is the simplest diametric subterfuge.  I’ll give you one of many examples; Pierre Charles L’Enfant, the devout Roman Catholic colonial who answered directly to George Washington, designed the layout of Washington, DC which is acknowledged to be one of the most Masonically-esoteric architectures of any major city.  L’Enfant was also a member Holland Lodge No. 8 in New York City.  Mortal enemies?

I’ll give one more (and then you should just buy my book).

Wikipedia has an interesting entry regarding the location of the Grand Lodge of Italy—

On April 21, 1901 the Grand Orient opened its new headquarters in Palazzo Giustiniani in Rome.  A disagreement over secularism in elementary schools led in 1908 to the secession of the Supreme Council of Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite. The stated reason for dissention was increasing politicisation of the Grand Orient. On March 21, 1910 this body established the Grand Lodge of Italy, with Protestant pastor Saverio Fera, a former adherent of Garibaldi, as Grand Master.  From its headquarters it became known as the Grand Lodge of Piazza del Gesù.^[4][5]

A “Protestant pastor”?  That’s an interesting remark.  What’s missing here is who the Grand Lodge’s neighbors are; also in the Piazza del Gesù is who the Piazza is named after—della Compagnia di Gesù (the “Company of Jesus”, a.k.a. the Jesuits).  Oh, and that’s not some outpost, that’s the headquarters for the entire order.

This is too much fun, I have to do one more (especially as how this propaganda regarding Rome’s “vehement hatred” of the Freemasons is so insidious).

The “Southern Jurisdiction” of the Scottish Rite in America claims full supremacy over all other Freemasonic bodies—

The Supreme Council, Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, Southern Jurisdiction, USA (commonly known as the Mother Supreme Council of the World) was the first Supreme Council of Scottish RiteFreemasonry.  It claims that all other Supreme Councils and Subordinate Bodies of the Scottish Rite are derived from it.^[1] Its official full name is “The Supreme Council (Mother Council of the World) of the Inspectors General Knights Commander of the House of the Temple of Solomon of the Thirty-third Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry of the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States of America.”^[2] It is also commonly known as The Supreme Council, 33°, Southern Jurisdiction, or by some other varying degree of complete titulage.  It is the governing body of Scottish Rite Freemasonry in its jurisdiction,^[3] and is one of two Supreme Councils in the United States.  It oversees the Scottish Rite in 35 states^[4] (the other states fall within the Northern Jurisdiction, which is an independent body).

The Scottish Rite is one of the appendant bodies of Freemasonry that a Master Mason may join for further exposure to the principles of Freemasonry.  To join the Supreme Council, one must attain the 32° of the Scottish Rite, and then be conferred the honorary 33°.

In the Southern Jurisdiction of the United States, the Supreme Council consists of no more than 33 members, and is presided over by a Grand Commander.  Other members of the Supreme Council are called “Sovereign Grand Inspectors General” (S.G.I.G.), and each is the head of the Rite in his respective Orient (or state).  Other heads of the various Orients who are not members of the Supreme Council are called “Deputies of the Supreme Council.” ~ Wikipedia

“Inspectors General”?  That sounds an awful lot like the highest office in the Jesuits—the “Superior General”.  It’s probably just a coincidence, though…just like the Southern Jurisdiction will often simply abbreviate, “SJ”.

Mystery Guest

So who is our devout Catholic fighter of Freemasons?

—None other than author of Bloodlines of the Illuminati and frequent guest of alternative media, Fritz Artz Springmeier (we’ve been quoting from Fritz’ book The Watchtower and the Masons).

Fritz is a popular man, he’s been on the Hagmann and Hagmann Report, Sean Stone’s Buzzsaw on The LipTV, and has spoken at the “Free Your Mind Conference” (a supposed source of forbidden knowledge)—

Springmeier is also a very frequent guest of Alex Jones.

In fact, Jones has called Springmeier a framed political prisoner—

Did Fritz spend time in jail because he was giving away “Illuminati bloodline secrets”?!

No.

But Victor Earl Schoof has been arrested for drug manufacture and distribution, bank robbery, and ties to a radical Catholic white separatist terror group called the “Army of God”.

Federal agents and Clackamas County sheriff’s deputies arrested a Corbett couple Thursday as part of an ongoing investigation into the activities of a white separatist group.

Fritz A. Springmeier, 45, also known as Victor E. Schoff [either this journalist didn’t get the name “Schoof” correct or it’s cover to throw other investigators off track], and his wife, Patricia Springmeier, 46, are accused of first-degree manufacture and distribution of a controlled substance, and conspiracy to manufacture and distribute controlled substances.  They are being held in the Clackamas County Jail.

Agents from the FBI and the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms as well as sheriff’s deputies searched the couple’s home on Groce Road for several hours Thursday, said Deputy Angela Blanchard, spokeswoman for the Clackamas County Sheriff’s Department.

Blanchard said police seized equipment used to grow marijuana, several weapons and white separatist literature. …

Fritz Springmeier was known for writing books and tracts on the beliefs of the Christian Patriot Association, an ultra-right-wing group based in Boring.  “He does a lot of public speaking and proclaims himself to be a self-employed author,” Blanchard said.

Last month, police arrested three people in a Sandy-area home and seized military-style weapons and 50 marijuana plants.  Two of the people were released, but a third suspect, Forrest E. Bateman Jr., 29, is being held at the Justice Center Jail in Portland on outstanding warrants for previous charges of assault and illegal possession of an AK-47 assault rifle.

In the Feb. 9 raid, agents also seized a small amount of ammonium nitrate and fuel oil, and literature affiliated with the Army of God, a white supremacist group connected to the 1997 bombings of an abortion clinic and a gay nightclub in Atlanta.

Blanchard said Fritz Springmeier and Bateman met at a Christian Patriot Association meeting several years ago.

“We think that part of their supplemental income came from selling marijuana,” she said.  “We believe they were very close and worked in concert together to operate a marijuana grown operation.”

In November, federal agents arrested six members of the Christian Patriot Association on accusations of operating a $186 million “warehouse bank” scheme in Clackamas County that allowed 900 people across the nation to hide their money from the Internal Revenue Service.  The case has not yet come to trial. ~ Deputies, Feds Arrest Corbett Couple, Stuart Tomlinson, The Oregonian, 2 March 2001 [archived by Johnny here]

Please take special note of the date—March, 2001.

This was clearly part of an ongoing agenda of false flag preparation that really got into swing during the Jesuit-trained at Georgetown Clinton Administration—

FALSE FLAGS FOR FASCISM

From his position as leader of the South Florida Drug Task Force, former CIA Director and (at that time) vice president Bush was able to more thoroughly effect the unhindered importation of hard narcotics to poison America and fuel CIA operations. A key location for this activity was a little town called Mena in Arkansas, then governed by Bush’s successor (chosen before-hand by the Cocaine Importation Agency).

It was during the reign of William Jefferson Blythe Clinton that the cabal of billionaires, banksters, Bilderbergers and Intelligence Bureaus fast-tracked the destruction of America through a series of bold, in-your-face staged events where Americans were entrapped, encircled, shot in the face, burned alive and blown up. ~ The Clinton Years: When Traitors In Government Perfected The False Flag On Americans, Johnny Cirucci

—and climaxed on September 11^th—

Behind the All-Seeing Eye

The attacks of September 11th ushered in the Orwellian Police State for America, and the foundation of that Police State was the treasonously misnamed “Patriot Act”.  If a citizen ever has a question about what a piece of legislation does, simply invert its name in best Gaslighting fashion.

The “Patriot Act” was written by Vietnamese Catholic Professor Viet D. Dinh.⁶³⁸

Professor Dinh teaches at Georgetown. ~ Illuminati Unmasked ³

Fritz/Victor isn’t just a run-of-the-mill protestor, Fritz/Victor was plugged in to some serious circles; circles that got him C4 and AK-47s (real automatic AK’s that Ronald Reagan outlawed, not the fake semi-automatic ones you can buy at Cabela’s or Walmart).

PORTLAND — A list of possible terror targets compiled by an ultra-right wing group, including government buildings and other facilities were made public Thursday as a federal judge sentenced a Portland area man for his part in a 1997 bank robbery.

After the sentencing of Fritz Springmeier, a self-described religious author, Clackamas County Sheriff deputies revealed a loose-leaf binder seized in 2001 as a part of the case.

Springmeier, a white separatist known for his anti-government writings will serve 9 years in federal prison.  Federal Judge James Redden characterized the robbery that included the detonation of a pipe bomb as a diversion as “vicious.”

Among the locations handwritten in the binder entitled “Army of God, Yahweh’s Warriors, were the federal building, FBI offices, and KATU studios in Portland.

Floor plans to the FBI offices were also a part of the evidence seized in a raid on property near Corbett on February 9, 2001.

In the raid, federal agents also seized a cache of military-style assault weapons, including an AK-47, hand grenades, C-4 explosives, and bomb-making ingredients that included ammonium nitrate and fuel oil.

“We take it (the target lists) very seriously,” says Steve Thoroughman, a detective with Clackamas County, and the lead investigator of the U.S. government’s case against Springmeier and his accomplice Forrest Bateman, who was convicted and sentenced earlier this year in connection with the bank robbery.

Thoroughman says agents of the FBI and ATF have reviewed the hand-written notes and have followed up on those leads.

“They had the means to do almost anything they wanted to,” said Thoroughman.  They had fully automatic AK-47’s, they had night vision, they had ceramic body armor, anything they needed to carry out an assault.”⁴

When it comes to Vatican (Jesuit)-controlled government false flag terror operations, there are the players they protect and sneak off before the fireworks start (“operatives”) and then there are the patsies who get blown up with the fireworks or are left behind to take the blame (“assets”).

An example of an “operative” that gave the Federal Bureau of (terror) Instigation plausible deniability is Andreas “Andy the German” Strassmeir.  Strassmeir was the German Intelligence operative who “infiltrated” the Timothy McVeigh “terror cell” then disappeared just before the death and destruction on April 19^th, 1995, leaving Special Forces “sheep-dipped” McVeigh holding the bag.

Was Fritz/Victor a McVeigh or a Strassmeir?

Well, given the fact that he’s still alive and making all the rounds in “alternative media”, ‘sure looks like he’s a Strassmeir…German cover name included!

Not even a shooting in 1996 seemed to slow him down.  In fact, he seemed to draw on it to make a nefarious name for himself.

In 1996, Portland, Oregon resident Patricia Sweany called for help claiming she had been poisoned.  The fire department, paramedics and police arrived.  Sweany told them that she worked for the CIA and FBI and that she had inside information on corruption but had been poisoned.  The firemen, seeing that their services weren’t needed, left.  When Sweany recognized paramedic Kurt Ream, she blurted out, “I know you.  You were at that place last night!  I’m not going anywhere with you!”

According to the official release, Sweany then shot Ream, forcing officer Scott Westerman to shoot and kill her.  Sweany was obviously mentally unstable and distraught.  A special Portland PD Crisis Intervention Team negotiator was dispatched but Officer Westerman had dispatched Patricia Sweany before he could get there.

Interestingly, Ream was later reported “not seriously injured”, which doesn’t usually happen when someone gets shot.

Officer Westerman, however, is well known to Portland community watchdogs for his “shoot first” tactics and Patricia Sweany was not his first victim.

Here’s where it gets even more interesting: five years later, in 2001, just before 9/11, Victor Schoof (a.k.a. “Fritz Sringmeier”) made sure to get on law enforcement radar by asking journalist John Stevens for Scott Westerman’s home address, claiming that he had murdered Sweany to keep her quiet.  Boy, if you’re going to make a “terroristic threat” to a police officer, a journalist is the best person to do it to, huh?!

Interestingly, Scott Westerman was later given a “Meritorious Medal for Valor” by the Portland Police Department.  Was the firefight with little Patricia Sweany that hairy, or was this the Machine saying “Thank you for a risky assassination!” [see below for source material]

FBI Probes Alleged Threat to Officer, Jim Redden, The Portland Tribune, 6 April 2001 [archived by Johnny, here]

Shots Fired: Portland, Oregon 12/14/1996, Police Magazine [there might be a teeny-weeny bias here against Patricia Sweany and for Scott Westerman]

Four Civilians Shot by Portland Police; Fifth Dies in Fire, Portland CopWatch.org

Rapping Back #14, Portland CopWatch.org

Framing Protestant “Evangelicals”

Speaking of journalists, we know that Fritz/Victor is a militant Roman Catholic, but journalists that reported on his terroristic proclivities only wanted to describe—

Springmeier [as] a fundamentalist Christian who has written several books charging that satanic forces are conspiring with corrupt government officials to take over the world.  During a radio interview, he described his job as “exposing the New World Order agenda.”

That’s right—these aren’t connections to real people with names, places and dates that lead to the bloody hand of Jesuit-controlled Rome, it’s just the nebulous forces of “satan”.  Nothing to be done about that but pray and wait for the “Pre-Tribulation Rapture”!

The press has also conveniently disconnected the Catholic ties to the “Army of God”—

The Army of God “are anti-abortion religious zealots who believe in using explosives to get their point across,” said Gary Perlstein, a nationally recognized terrorism expert who teaches criminal justice classes at Portland State University.

In 1993, Army of God soldier Rachelle “Shelley” Shannon shot 3^rd Trimester abortion “Doctor” George Tiller in both arms.  Was this a carefully-designed trial run for his later execution in 2009 by Scott Roeder?  Roeder was a “Lutheran” who was also a member of the “Freemen” militia group.

In 1998, Army of God soldier James Charles Kopp murdered abortion “Doctor” Barnett Slepian.  Kopp was another Lutheran terrorist…until he converted to Roman Catholicism.

When it comes to finding Lutheran, Protestant or Evangelical “terrorists” where they don’t exist, the Southern Poverty Law Center is on the job!

The SPLC very gleefully lumps Timothy McVeigh and Fritz Springmeier together under the banner of “Terror From The Right”.

They are very proud partners with the Federal Bureau of (terror) Instigation, although a false report claimed the FBI was distancing itself from them as a result of their blatant, radical-Leftist, muck-racking.

They didn’t.

That’s the kind of sophistry Knight of Malta, Order of St. Gregory, Rupert “I Like ‘Em Blonde” Murdoch’s Fox News plays up all the time.  Sadly, tricking the American Right with empty promises is an old Roman game.

Oh, and let’s not forget the “white separatist” angle.  Pitting the races at each other’s throats is an important distraction tactic Rome has learned well, which is why Black Communist malcontent Barack Hussein Obama was trained to be a “community organizer” by Greg Galluzzo, aJesuit priest, before being enthroned as Rome’s hand-selected President (it’s also one of the many proofs that back up my contention that white supremacist, Jesuit expert Eric Jon Phelps is an incognito Jesuit).

Connecting The Dots

Recently, Fritz/Victor did an interview [hat/tip to a dear friend of Resistance Rising; DJ Kyte Kutter in Australia] with “TradCatKnight” who is self-described as “the most followed traditional catholic page on the Internet. (over 300,000 worldwide)” and “HOME of the New Crusade” where TradCatKnight holds “the message of Fatima near to my heart as I help individuals to understand the Vatican II apostasy and prepare those for the great chastisements coming foretold in the 3rd secret.  I am devoted to the Immaculate & Sacred Hearts.”

I’m not really sure why so many Conservative Catholics are upset over Vatican II, it was written by a Jesuit (Karl Rahner) and a Pope (Joseph Ratzinger).

Actually, I am.

The “Vatican II apostasy” is also a Jesuit ruse that keeps Conservative Catholics loyal to Rome when it’s clear her machinations are just so bloody evil.

Sadly, it works as good as Rupert Murdoch’s puppet act.

I hope that most of what I do exposes the leadership of Rome but there are some beliefs that I wish to address as well: being “devoted to the Immaculate & Sacred Hearts” is actually an ancient custom that traces to Babylonian paganism and Chaldean sun worship where the adherent is alleviated from having an intimate relationship with a living Redeemer and, instead “worships” the Redeemer’s Body Parts, or mother or attending angels.  It’s the difference between Salvation and damnation.

During the interview, Fritz admitted that he isn’t a Protestant, that he attacks all the Christian religions (except Rome, of course), and that Protestantism was taken over early on by some nasty Freemasons.

If you don’t want to endure the entire interview, I’ve got the pertinent clips here—

I would never accuse Fritz/Victor of this but if one were suspicious enough, one would see this as a brilliant scheme to discredit Protestants that was literally centuries in the making, with this final chapter also taking over a century to come to fruition: use Freemasonry to fabricate flawed Protestant sects, then out how you fabricated them with Freemasons (conveniently leaving out the nasty Roman bit), claim that it stands for all of Protestantism and use an “Evangelical terrorist” Papal insurgent to do it!

Clearly, this isn’t something Fritz/Victor is capable of coming up with all on his own, but if I were him, I’d really worry about the kind of power that could…or would.

UPDATE 25 May 2016:  I sure can’t match the power of Rome, she has appropriated everything; all the wealth, all of the intelligences agencies, all the technology, all of the militaries, banks, multinational corporations, organized crime…everything!  I can’t compete, so I don’t.  Instead, I just reach out to my audience.  Unlike all of the other Nephilim hucksters and paranormal variety show snake oil salesmen, I’m a real person and I put a lot of effort into responding to anyone who reaches out to me (except for the stalkers who want to know what I’m wearing right now…an old BDU t-shirt and a really comfy pair of terry-cloth shorts…happy?!).

Scotland Yard has its Flying Squad.  As a result of my show, Resistance Rising, I have my own investigators, detectives and constables, whom I call Johnny Cirucci’s Flying Monkey Squad.  I’ve trained them to look for what I look for, and then to report it to me in a concise, referenced way similar to what you see above you.

This requires a candidate training period, especially given that Rome has so many insurgents and coadjutors, quite a few of them, she has sent my way.  The training period is also a screening period.

One of my most recent candidates seems very promising.  Flying Monkey Constable JayRan has already given me some good intelligence.  Sometimes I need my Monkeys simply to jar my memory (there’s a lot of stuff up there and sometimes it likes to hide and play tricks on me).  FMC JayRan kicked out just such an important piece of information for me after reading this column.

In 2011, Americans were fed a story that quickly surpassed 9/11 in its disconnect from reality; the supposed killing of Osama bin Laden.  Neither official narrative seemed anything short of ludicrous—

In 2007 former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto told David Frost on his program Frost Around the World, that bin Laden was already dead158.  Russia’s state news agency Pravda was incredulous that Frost obliviously rolled over the announcement without follow-up.¹⁵⁹

Bhutto, herself, quickly fell victim to assassination after attending an event for the Pakistani Peoples Party in late December of that same year.

Another Russian source—Russia Today—interviewed former NSA Analyst-turned-independent-journalist Wayne Madsen who asserted that Bhutto’s death was a hit initiated by the CIA.¹⁶⁰

The SEAL Team that conducted the raid to get bin Laden executed him on sight, although he was surrounded only by his wife—depending upon which official story you read.¹⁶¹

Americans were first told that the SEALs fought their way through withering fire from al Qaeda to get to where bin Laden was hiding. This was later retracted. It turned out that there was no firefight.¹⁶²

The body of whomever it was that the SEALs shot on sight was brought back to the USS Carl Vinson where it was dumped into the ocean without a single sailor witnessing the event.¹⁶³

In 2012, Navy SEAL Matt Bissonnette claimed in his book No Easy Day that he shot bin Laden.  Two years later, Navy SEAL Rob O’Neill would claim he shot bin Laden¹⁶⁴.  O’Neill now says his life is in danger.¹⁶⁵

Is America being betrayed and misinformed by even her Special Forces operators?

The supposed mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, was waterboarded no fewer than 183 times to “break” him¹⁶⁶.  He was Osama bin Laden’s lieutenant.

Bin Laden, himself, can rightly be called the greatest intelligence asset of the entire “War on Terror” yet he was shot on sight and dumped in the ocean.

Photos released which purportedly showed the dead terrorist had to be retracted when it was proven that they were faked¹⁶⁷.  A Freedom of Information request demanding to see the real photos was denied by a Federal Judge.¹⁶⁸

The sensational White House Situation Room photo featuring National Security Advisor, now Director of the CIA John Brennan, Barack Obama, then Secretary of Defense Robert Gates (a Bush appointee), Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullins and Vice President Joe Biden along with an aghast Hillary Clinton was also admitted to be staged¹⁶⁹.  The media proclaimed this suspenseful photo depicted America’s leaders watching every step the SEALs made but it was later disclosed there was no “live feed” of the raid.¹⁷⁰ ~ Illuminati Unmasked ⁵

The Roman-controlled presstitute media dutifully accepted every bit of this ridiculous story and even went further, later putting out fluff pieces to bolster the fabrication like, “Oh, here are some interesting books that bin Laden was reading.  We found them in his apartment after he was shot on sight.”

WASHINGTON — Osama Bin Laden kept close tabs on 9/11 conspiracy theories and warned followers not to forget about attacking America, according to documents, letters and books found at his compound in Pakistan.

The material, released Wednesday by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, included a list of more than three dozen English-language works at the compound, many of them focused on America’s efforts abroad. ~ Tops on Osama bin Laden’s Reading List: Illuminati, U.S. Foreign Policy, Noam Chomsky, NY Daily News

You will never guess what one of the books CIA asset Tim Osman, a.k.a. Osama bin Laden, was reading; Fritz Artz Springmeier’s Bloodlines of the Illuminati.

I guess the “Office of the Director of National Intelligence” thought Fritz needed some cred as he blamed “the Illuminati” for the War on Terror.

UPDATE 26 May 2016:  It pays to be your own critic.  I will frequently listen to my shows (usually as background noise while answering comments on YouTube) and was listening to the show embedded above, Resistance Rising 101, when I realized that our friend DJ Kyte Kutter had sent me something I forgot to include in this article—that Victor Earl Schoof was given an appointment to West Point by Kansas Republican Senator Robert Dole.

   Sen. Bob Dole Appoints Victor E. Schoof to West Point by Johnny_Cirucci

Remember the Army of God has a big footprint in Kansas.

I’d love to tell you that Fritz/Victor went into Army Intelligence or even the Special Forces but I have no evidence of that.  Anatoli’s nose tells me that Fritz/Victor never made it but it is an intriguing connection to the military/industrial complex.

Anatoli

I’d also like to address the so-called “Illuminati Bloodlines” Fritz/Victor writes of in Bloodlines of the Illuminati.  According to Fritz/Victor they are—

1. Astor
2. Bundy
3. Collins
4. DuPont
5. Freeman
6. Kennedy
7. Li
8. Onassis
9. Reynolds
10. Rockefeller
11. Rothschild
12. Russell
13. Van Duyn

I’m thinking that half of these he used because the uneducated expect to see them and the other half he just made up.

The real names that rule the world behind the scenes are—

• Orsini
• Breakspear (or “Breakspeare”)
• Aldobrandini
• Farnese
• de Medici
• Borgia

—as well as—

• Somaglia
• Conti
• Colonna

Researchers and historians will notice many of these names were also Popes—and that’s no coincidence.

What this proves is that Fritz/Victor is a willing instrument of disinformation for Rome, and not just some investigator that doesn’t know his ass from an Illuminist.

He, like all other agents of disinformation, will reap what they have sown.

—For those who continue to sin willfully after having received knowledge of the Truth, there no-longer remains sacrificial forgiveness of their sin, but the sure and terrifying expectation of judgment and fiery wrath which will devour them and all adversaries. ~ Hebrews 10:26-27

If the world was controlled by a malignant, Luciferian cabal (and it is) intent on keeping track of and blackmailing as many human beings as possible—especially dangerous, awake ones—“social networking” would be an intelligence-gathering apparatus unparalleled in human history.

And it is.

If there’s one thing people want, it’s for other people to pay attention to them; “to be loved”.

Prior to social networking, intelligence-gathering was an extremely laborious and intensive undertaking requiring armies of skilled operatives and assets tailing and trialing their quarry—and there were never enough even to gather on “really important” people.

Today, all it takes are unskilled computer operators (or very skilled computer programs) to simply sit back and record all of the personal information people willingly give up themselves on “social networking”.

One Twitter user boldly proclaimed—

i will now be tweeting my every move

— Drew Dempsey (@WinnieTheDrew3) November 9, 2015

And he did (and then he disappeared…hope he’s alright).

At best, the company you work for can mine your personal networking account and posts and, if it finds something there it doesn’t like, you will pay the consequences.

There are even companies who go so far as demand the ability to log in to your personal networking account!

It gets more dangerous from there.

There are so many pictures of you guys floating around the internet, thanks to “Facebook selfies” that one expert boldly proclaimed to his audience, “I can find you anywhere”.

Professor Alessandro Acquisti of Carnegie Mellon, who researches how technology impacts privacy, stunned [Leslie] Stahl [of CBS] with an experiment.  He photographed random students on the campus and in short order, not only identified several of them, but in a number of cases found their personal information, including social security numbers, just using a facial recognition program he downloaded for free.  Acquisti says smart-phones will make “facial searches” as common as Google searches in the future.  And nearly everybody can be subject to such prying, even those who are careful about their Internet use.

“One of the participants, before doing the experiment, told us, ‘You’re not going to find me because I’m very careful about my photos online.’  And we found him,” says Acquisti, “Because someone else had uploaded a photo of him.” ~ “Big Brother” Is Big Business? CBS News

Oh, and let me remind you that Shriner Freemason Franklin Roosevelt promised Americans that their Social Security numbers would never be used to identify them.

For many years, Social Security cards carried an admonition that they were to be used “for Social Security and tax purposes—not for identification.”

That assurance rings hollow today.  Congress has authorized so many uses of the nine-digit number, and Americans use it for so many unauthorized purposes, that it has just about become a national identifier.

For the Clinton Administration, which is considering assigning all Americans a health-care identification number, the slow, steady march of the Social Security number from secrecy to all-purpose identifier may be a cautionary tale. ~ The Nation; Not for Identification Purposes (Just Kidding), Robert Pear, The New York Times, July 26, 1998

Now even grocery store bonus shopper programs ask you for your SSN…oh, and they’re used to track how you feed your family and whether or not you’re “prepping” against government orders.

Of course, the big sharks on social networking are government agencies.  But those agencies have graduated from simply digging for dirt on you, they now actively participate in networking dialogue to take hot news items that have been leaked to you outside of “mainstream” sources and discredit them.

Perhaps one of the most shocking and under-reported revelations came from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden via his Pulitzer Prize-winning lawyer/journalist outlet, Glenn Greenwald.

Apparently, the “signals intelligence” branch of the British government—Government Communications Headquarters, or “GCHQ”—has been using its “Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group” (JTRIG) to destroy truth-seekers.  Its methods include sexual seduction (which I’ve proven includes children, both boys and girls), denial of service attacks, impersonating and/or co-opting truth-seekers and planting government operatives (“trolls”) in key discussions throughout the internet.

One of the many pressing stories that remains to be told from the Snowden archive is how western intelligence agencies are attempting to manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of deception and reputation-destruction. It’s time to tell a chunk of that story, complete with the relevant documents. …

Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums. ~ Greenwald, The Intercept

As a result of all this, I don’t stay on “Facebook” very long.

I stay on it even less when I see how infuriatingly easy it is to manipulate Western and American “Conservatives”.

The injustices we all suffer today should have us in the streets with torches and pitch forks—from mass, warrantless surveillance, to a militarized police force aimed at us, to endless wars that eat our children up and spit them out minus arms, legs and marriages (yet leave us even less “secure”), to confiscatory taxes that don’t even come close to staving off a debt that is guaranteed to fiscally collapse the nation.  We won’t even bring in the “conspiracy” efforts to poison us by the very air that we breath and water we drink; from the cancer industry to the prison-industrial complex—we have less freedom today than ever.

But give a “Conservative” a good meme on Facebook and they think they’ve taken America back overnight!

Darrell Issa: FBI Director Wants ‘to Indict Both Huma and Hillary’ Over Email Scandal!

“Lindsey Graham Destroyed Eric Holder!”

Trey Gowdy Probe Claims ‘Big Wins’ In Getting Benghazi Info

Each one of them (and the rags that put them out for exactly this purpose) is hilarious.  They don’t have a hen’s tooth of substance to ‘a one of them.

A better headline would read, Eric Holder Blissfully Retires on $11,500,000.00 After Scandals That Would Make Benedict Arnold Look Like George Patton!

It reminds me of a similar ridiculous assertion; that then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was going to lose her position because she claimed she wasn’t read in on CIA torture when she was.  Sean Hannity from “Fox News” lead the way on this smokescreen.

That’s Irish Catholic Sean Hannity working for Knight of Malta, Order of St. Gregory, “I Like ‘Em Blonde” Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News, claiming that Jesuit-trained Italian Catholic Nancy Pelosi was going down over Catholic/Jesuit-dominated CIA Inquisition-style torture.  As shocking as this may sound…it never happened.

Another powerful trick is misdirection; build up the threat that doesn’t exist while masking the threat at the front door.

I just saw a great example of this on Facebook today—

Paul Ryan Tells Sean Hannity He Will Not Support Any Cuts To Muslim Immigration: ‘That’s Not Who We Are’—Breitbart.com

Wow.  Where to begin?!

It’s always good to start a psychological operation (“PSYOP”) with a false assumption or four.

For instance: muslims are the source of America’s greatest threats.

At the very least, there is information from a very respectable source (ex-Jesuit Alberto Rivera) which says Islam as a religion was created by Rome to win her back the Holy Land.

But the easily-verifiable path leads to a collaboration between Rome and Western Intelligence with such stand-out examples as Polish Catholic National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski working with CIA asset “Tim Osman” to create “al Qaeda”.  You probably know Tim better as “Osama bin Laden”.

When the fizz from al Qaeda began to go flat, creating “ISIS” was easy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORYL8jPtpQU

Not to be outdone by the CIA, British Intelligence continues to contribute their fair share to the jihadi scare (great work by my friend Jon Ryman).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bca7soVu4zE

When running out of actual terrorist events, the CIA began fabricating beheadings (and some of them weren’t even very good).  They got a lot of help from their friends in “Jesuit theater” like Jesuit-trained journalist James Foley, who volunteered to get beheaded.  It actually just stung a little.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AF6jDlPCEsU

The latest ridiculous rub is Fox News perennial clown favorite, “The Donald” (both he and his spawn are Jesuit-trained), exploiting the deluge of illegal immigrants to switch focus from the tens—perhaps hundreds—of millions of low-income, Hispanic Catholic illegal aliens and focus on the dreaded muslim hoards.

Proving how equally-ridiculous and depraved the United Kingdom is (where there are more CCTV cameras per capita than anywhere else in the world), the rainbow mayor of Londonistan—Sadiq Khan (no relation to Genghis…we think)—got into the clown act.

The reality is that Rome has filled every key position in America—from the Teleprompter-in-Chief to your local police chief—with her agents to insure that the waves of Catholic Hispanic illegals never cease.

When you get tired of being played, perhaps you’ll start looking around for some pitch forks.

I’ve already stocked up on torches.

My personal relationship with “Eric” ended in my conviction that he is an undercover Jesuit, the details of which I shared on my show in October of 2015.

In February of that year, I published Illuminati Unmasked as the culmination of the shocking information “Eric” had shown me via his mission as an undercover agent.

In the best example of self-immolation, Phelps gives up a chilling amount of detail about the Jesuits before sowing it with disinformation and discord.  One such detail is what really happened in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Rome and her satanic Special Forces have completely woven a matrix of lies for us to live in, one of those lies was concocted over the “bombs” that were dropped to punish the “heretic Buddhists”.  They were more likely placed in secret as the technology to air-drop a nuclear munition was impossible in 1945.

In 1540, Alessandro Farnese—Pope Paul III—consecrated the “Knights of the Virgin Mary”, founded by a fanatical Basque nobleman named Ignacio Lopez, and turned them into “the Society of Jesus”.  Immediately the zeal of this new Company showed itself as they sent their missionaries all over the globe.  Within a matter of months they had landed in Japan where, contrary to popular belief they were well-received…unfortunately for the poor Japanese.

These missionaries found a powerful protector in [Daimyo Oda] Nobunaga, the military dictator of Japan (1573-82).  He was anxious to check the political power of a certain movement of Buddhist soldier-priests, but also held a genuine sympathy for the work of the “Christians” who were newcomers.  He encouraged them by granting them the right to propagate their religion throughout the Empire.  He donated them land in Kyoto itself and even promised them a yearly allowance.  Thanks to this, in no time the Catholic missions had spread throughout the country, converts were made by the thousands, establishing sizable Catholic centers in various parts of Japan.

Had the Catholic missionaries confined themselves exclusively to preaching religious principles, it is likely that Japan would have yielded them tremendous spiritual rewards.  But once a Catholic community was established the juridical-diplomatic-political domination of the Vatican came to the fore.  As is explicit in her doctrines, the Japanese converts could not remain the subjects only of the Japanese civil authorities.  The mere fact that they had entered the Catholic Church made them also the subjects of the Pope.  Once their loyalty was transferred outside Japan, automatically they became potentially disloyal to the Japanese civil rulers.¹

As a result of their espionage and subversions, Daimyo Toyotomi Hideyoshi put severe restrictions on the Jesuits.  Ultimately, they were completely successful in damning Japan because Shogun Tokugawa Ieyasu eventually banned all foreigners and Christian missionaries from the islands in 1641.  He made the same mistake many do today; mistaking Jesuits for “Christians”.

As is customary when a nation attempts to protect itself from the Company, the Jesuits soon set their sights on unspeakable evil in recompense, although it took just over 300 years to accomplish it.

Payback time had now come for Japan.  The American Army Air Force firebombed the island and totally destroyed Nagasaki and Hiroshima.  The future Jesuit General, Pedro Arrupe was near Hiroshima at the time of its destruction.  Could he and his Jesuits have been involved in a nuclear detonation on the ground, as no tested atomic device had ever been detonated in the air while in motion?

“At 8:15½ that August morning, every window in Arrupe’s residence at Nagatsuka was shattered by a roaring shockwave, and the sky was filled with a light he later described as [“a gigantic flare, like a magnesium flash” {52} being] ‘overwhelming and baleful’!  By the time he and his community of Jesuits ventured out some thirty minutes later, a firestorm driven by a scorching 40 mph wind had enveloped Hiroshima … That evening, one of the first survivors to reach his house in Nagatsuka was a theological student sent by a fellow priest, Father Wilhelm Kleinsorge, who had somehow survived the blast in the middle of Hiroshima [???].  From him, Arrupe got his first eyewitness accounts.” {53}²

(Whether the atomic bomb detonated in mid-air – a technical feat which was unknown to human history as of August 1945 – or secretly on the ground (the device having been carefully constructed inside a closed building), the future Jesuit General knew all about it.  For Pedro Arrupe greatly contributed in the laying of the “Nuclear War Hoax” – it being the foundation for that greatest of Jesuit Inquisitions called “the Cold War” – for which genocidal reason he became the Jesuit General in 1965!)³

Nearly 150,000 Japanese perished in the two incidents at Hiroshima and Nagasaki and many, many more died horrible deaths as a result of the war crimes ordered by their Freemasonic puppet General Curtis Emerson LeMay, “father” of the United States Strategic Air Command—a despicable butcher on par with Himmler or any other mass-murdering monster.

As a result of these horrors, the Japanese psyche was permanently scarred.  Survivors found solace in fictional musings over the terror the Jesuits had unleashed upon them.

In 1954, Toho Limited created Godzilla—the longest-running cinematic film series.  The second-longest running series was equally birthed by Jesuit machinations.

Dumble-dalf 007

If you’ve never heard of Dr. John Dee, you should have.  He was advisor to Elizabeth I and an advanced occult adept.  He was the impetus for the Harry Potter character of “Dumbledore” and the Tolkien magician “Gandalf” in Lord of the Rings.

Henry VIII was King of England from 1509-1547 and, although a licentious autocratic tyrant, his 6 marriages actually helped England break free of the power of Rome.  His son Edward VI was the first English king to be raised Protestant but he died at the young age of 15.

As England’s first true Protestant King, Edward was most certainly a Jesuit target for assassination.  Author Susan Higginbotham brings up the astounding accusation that, not only was Edward poisoned, his body was switched before burial to hide the evidence.¹⁴⁷⁵

Edward tried to have his cousin Jane Grey rule instead of Mary I but Lady Jane was quickly deposed and Bloody Mary took over the throne.  She and her husband Philip of Spain immediately repealed the protections Henry and Edward had extended to Protestants.  She reaffirmed England’s subservience to the Pope and then began a reign of terror that saw nearly 300 Protestants executed, most by being burned alive.

Even as “reformers”, both Henry VIII and Edward VI did little to help Protestants.

Protestants were martyred during persecutions against Protestant religious reformers for their faith during the reigns of Henry VIII (1509-1547) and Mary I of England (1553–1558).  Radical Protestants were also executed during the reigns of Edward VI (1547-1553), Elizabeth I (1558-1603) and James I (1603-1625).  The excesses of this period were recorded in Foxe’s Book of Martyrs.

Protestants in England and Wales were executed under legislation that punished anyone judged guilty of heresy against the Roman Catholic faith. ~ Wikipedia¹⁴⁷⁶

Mercifully, Mary died in 1558 after only a brief rule and her half-sister Elizabeth I, whom she had had imprisoned, ascended to the throne as a Protestant Queen.

While in prison, Elizabeth had made the acquaintance of a magician who had fallen out of favor with Bloody Mary; John Dee.

Once on the throne, the Jesuit threats to Elizabeth’s life were very real and a cordon of British Royalists formed around her lead by Francis Walsingham.  They created an intelligence network to ferret out Papists with designs against their Queen and Dr. John Dee was part of their network.  When he wrote to her, he knew she had an eye fetish so he signed his name in code to resemble eyes: “007”. ~ Illuminati Unmasked ⁴

Ian Lancaster Fleming was a journalist and Naval Intelligence officer during WWII (which means he worked indirectly for Rome, perhaps even directly).

The juxtaposition of those two occupations helped Fleming create the world’s most well-known fictional spy, James Bond, starting with the novel Casino Royale in 1953.  In less than a decade, a powerful Italian Catholic with connections from 20^th Century Fox to Howard Houghes—Albert Romolo Broccoli—would put Fleming’s Bond in cinema.  Of course the Romans never do something popular or public without first putting a Jewish face to their machinations and Broccoli brought in Harry Saltzman as his partner for the first three Bond films.

But Harry wasn’t just a name and a face, like Fleming he too was an Intelligence Officer—one who worked for the Papacy’s own Knight of Malta, William Donovan and his Office of Strategic Services during WWII.  This is the same OSS that murdered America’s greatest field commander, George Smith Patton in 1945 just after the war’s conclusion.

The Broccoli family have maintained an absolute lock on the Bond franchise and Albert Romolo’s daughter Barbara now oversees exactly what the world’s most famous spy does…whether or not she pets a fluffy white cat during her board meetings is still up to speculation.

Barbara Broccoli doesn’t M-handle Bond alone, she has another Broccoli to help; half-brother Michael Wilson.

Barbara Broccoli and Michael G Wilson – children of the franchise’s creator – keep all of Bond’s secrets.  They open up about wooing Daniel Craig, the next Bond, and life after SPECTRE

There’s a definite rhythm to the lives of James Bond producers Barbara Broccoli and Michael G Wilson.  “Bond never quite goes away,” says Wilson, stepson of the legendary Albert “Cubby” Broccoli, sitting in the opulent Piccadilly offices of Eon productions, creators of the 007 franchise.

“But now we’re just about to peak,” chimes in Broccoli, his half-sister, with her trademark cheery laugh. ~ Julia Smith, The Telegraph

“Keep all of Bond’s secrets?”

This super-successful super-spy franchise has a tighter bloodline lock on its content than the Crown of England, herself…which, by the way, they work hand-in-hand with.

In 2012, Daniel Craig appeared as Bond, “parachuting” in with QE2 to open the London Olympics with the garish panache of a Bond sportscar.

Tragically, less than a year later, the stuntman who portrayed Craig in the jump would be killed in a wing-suit accident.

It’s all terribly patriotic…unless you understand that absolutely everything is as fake as a movie, from Elizabeth II dutifully watching over the best interests of Britons, to MI6 doing the same, to the Olympics being about ethical sportsmanship and not glorifying satan worship.⁵

Elizabeth I boldly established the Church of England to be a Protestant breakaway from all-powerful Rome.  Her current namesake is anything but.  Elizabeth 2 was born Elizabeth Alexandra Mary.  300 years post the great Protestant Virgin Queen, Rome yet again has complete control over England via her proxies like Elizabeth II, Dame of Malta.

The Knights of Malta

One Order of particular interest is the Knights of Malta.  According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, the Order of the Knights of Malta is, “The most important of all the military orders, both for the extent of its area and for its duration.  It is said to have existed before the Crusades and is not extinct at the present time.”ⁱⁱ

The Knights of Malta wore similar costumes to the Knights Templar before them.  The stylized cross we see on their uniforms is known today as a Maltese cross.

The Maltese cross is a common feature of the Pope’s garments, reminding us that he is the head of these Orders.

A Protestant branch of the Knights of Malta is the Order of St. John of Jerusalem.  Queen Elizabeth II is the Sovereign Head of the Order of St. John,ⁱⁱⁱ as we can see from her costume in the photograph.

The Queen’s participation in this Order, which brings with it required obedience to the Pope, is an example of how King John’s ancient concession of the crown to the Papacy is still in effect today. ~ The Pope’s Knights, Amazing Discoveries.org

With a franchise as “plugged in” as James Bond is, I fully expected to get hidden meaning imparted to me in “SPECTRE”, I just hadn’t expected it to be nearly as bold and open as it was.

Exodus

In my review of the 2014 Ridley Scott movie Exodus: Gods and Kings, I noted this, first remarking about confusion in whether the young boy in the movie was “God” or an angel—

We’re never really sure about the boy/God because after he proclaims to a buried-in-mud Moses “I AM” Moses later shouts in exasperation that he’s tired of dealing with a messenger.  Which is it?

There’s no confusion about what the boy wants, however.  He tells Moses he needs a general to fight.

…it’s the depiction of Moses as the insurrectionist general being rescued in his slow war of attrition by miracles, that doesn’t match well with the Biblical narrative.  This seems less an accurate account of the Exodus and more a cry for insurrection against the Luciferian world order…but the Luciferians make the movies so what’s going on here?! …

Another grievous departure from Scripture was what happened after the Hebrews were released.  Moses then attempted to lead them back through the desert wilderness trying to recall his trek from his family to Memphis.  He thinks he can remember but he’s deeply distraught.  He wants to bring them to a safe and tactically-secure location as soon as possible but not only does God ignore his pleas for help, Moses ineptly leads them to the Red Sea and a dead end as Pharaoh’s army comes crashing down on them—but not before losing many chariots through a dangerous mountain pass.

Not only is this not in Scripture, it actually contradicts the Word!

Moses never had to rack his brain for a route through the wilderness, wondering desperately how to stand in leadership for his people—the Lord made it powerfully clear with a massive plume of smoke by day and a terrifying column of fire by night guiding them the entire way.  When they reached the Red Sea, the column of fire switched positions and kept the Egyptians from bearing down on them before they were through crossing.

Again, what we are seeing is that it was much more important to the film-makers to encourage the rise of a future Moses than to honor the original story.

Those who rule the world over you are far from monochrome.  Only a very, very small number at the top are all in for satan and know full well that there’s no hope for them.  The vast majority of the rest of them have been seduced or co-opted into the system of Mystery Babylon out of their own lust for power, wealth, fame and/or just lust, period.  There are a large number that eventually feel remorse or concern over their involvement in rebellion.

Beyond them are the hapless pawns and system bureaucrats who fumble around.  They rub shoulders with the Luciferians in their dealings and gain insight as a result.  Sometimes they wish to send information out like messages in a bottle, hoping an alert hero will read it and have the courage to use it because they could not.

There are also the truly evil people who flaunt their control with open admission of who they are in mocking derision of humanity’s inability to either recognize them or bring them to justice.  They are wrong on both counts and their arrogance could very well be their undoing.

There’s a reason why Mystery Babylon is a system that relies entirely on secrecy—were humanity to be made aware of exactly who is in control, how they are in control and just how much they harm, hate and fear us, the end would be swift and terrible for the Whore of Babylon.

In fact, it’s predicted by the Bible to happen in just that way.

“The ten horns which you saw are ten kings who have received no kingdom [sounds like Popes to me!], but they receive authority for one hour as kings with the beast.  These are of one mind, and they will give their power and authority to the beast.  These will make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them, for He is Lord of lords and King of kings; and those who are with Him are called, chosen, and faithful.”

Then he said to me, “The waters which you saw, where the harlot sits, are peoples, multitudes, nations, and tongues.  And the ten horns which you saw on the beast, these will hate the harlot, make her desolate and naked, eat her flesh and burn her with fire.  For God has put it into their hearts to fulfill His Purpose, to be of one mind, and to give their kingdom to the beast, until the words of God are fulfilled.  And the woman whom you saw is that great city which reigns over the kings of the Earth.” ~ Revelation 17:12-18, NKJV (some capitalization added for respect and clarity)

One World Paganism

Catholic beliefs are a syncretistic mix of Christian doctrines terminally intertwined with the legends of the first rebellion against YHWH; Babylonian demonism and Chaldean sun worship.

In fact, Roman Catholicism has nothing to do with spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ and everything to do with abusing the worst of spiritual concerns over sin, guilt, salvation and damnation to exploit them for the purposes of subjugating mankind.

The Sacrifice of Jesus Christ was the most freeing event in human history.  It instantly rendered all religion—even the religion dictated by YHWH, Himself, to Moses—obsolete.

And Jesus cried out again with a loud voice, and yielded up His Spirit.

Then, behold, the Veil of the Temple was torn in two from top to bottom; and the Earth quaked, and the rocks were split, and the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised; and coming out of the graves after His resurrection, they went into the Holy City and appeared to many.

So when the centurion and those with him, who were guarding Jesus, saw the earthquake and the things that had happened, they feared greatly, saying, “Truly this was the Son of God!” ~ Matthew 27:50-54, NKJV (some capitalization added for respect and clarity)

Within 500 years, the very Beast that had executed Christ had used His Sacrifice to rebuild a new religion that mixed the Levitical priesthood with Rome’s Babylonian pagan beliefs and wrapped them in the trappings of Christianity—

It is known as “syncretism” and Rome’s Special Forces—the Jesuits—have been on the leading edge of this agenda since their founding.

Some of the best sources of information from the enemy’s camp are the enemy’s disaffected allies.  Helena Petrovna Blavatsky was a true Luciferian—a spiritist and medium who taught that the Devil didn’t exist and that demons could be friendly and helpful.  Once you isolate those ideas as spurious, her writing (particularly against Rome and the Jesuits) was nothing short of a revelation.

In Volume II of Isis Unveiled, Blavatsky makes a shocking statement that predated a Jesuit war by 120 years: the Papacy gave aid and comfort to muslim jihadists (who were, themselves, created by Rome) in order to see them commit unspeakable atrocities against Slavic Christians in Serbia.  They were able to do so because of the kindred doctrines shared by Catholics and muslims.

But is it merely Pagans and heathen that the Catholics persecute, and about whom, like Augustine, they cry to the Deity, “Oh, my God! so do I wish Thy enemies to be slain”?  Oh, no! their aspirations are more Mosaic and Cain‐like than that.

It is against their next of kin in faith, against their schismatic brothers that they are now intriguing within the walls which sheltered the murderous Borgias.  The larvæ of the infanticidal, parricidal, and fratricidal Popes have proved themselves fit counsellors for the Cains of Castelfidardo and Mentana.  It is now the turn of the Slavonian Christians, the Oriental Schismatics — the Philistines of the Greek Church!

His Holiness the Pope, after exhausting, in a metaphor of self-laudation, every point of assimilation between the great biblical prophets and himself, has finally and truly compared himself with the Patriarch Jacob “wrestling against his God.”

He now crowns the edifice of Catholic piety by openly sympathizing with the Turks!  The vicegerent of God inaugurates his infallibility by encouraging, in a true Christian spirit, the acts of that Moslem David, the modern Bashi‐Bazuk; and it seems as if nothing would more please his Holiness than to be presented by the latter with several thousands of the Bulgarian or Servian “foreskins.”  True to her policy to be all things to all men to promote her own interests, the Romish Church is, at this writing (1876), benevolently viewing the Bulgarian and Servian atrocities, and, probably, manoeuvring with Turkey against Russia.  Better Islam, and the hitherto‐hated Crescent over the sepulchre of the Christian god, than the Greek Church established at Constantinople and Jerusalem as the state religion.  Like a decrepit and toothless ex-tyrant in exile, the Vatican is eager for any alliance that promises, if not a restoration of its own power, at least the weakening of its rival.  The axe its inquisitors once swung, it now toys with in secret, feeling its edge, and waiting, and hoping against hope.  In her time, the Popish Church has lain with strange bedfellows, but never before now sunk to the degradation of giving her moral support to those who for over 1200 years spat in her face, called her adherents “infidel dogs,” repudiated her teachings, and denied godhood to her God!

SACRILEGIOUS TRICKS OF CATHOLIC CLERGY

The press of even Catholic France is fairly aroused at this indignity, and openly accuses the Ultramontane portion of the Catholic Church and the Vatican of siding, during the present Eastern struggle, with the Mahometan against the Christian.  “When the Minister of Foreign Affairs in the French Legislature spoke some mild words in favor of the Greek Christians, he was only applauded by the liberal Catholics, and received coldly by the Ultramontane party,” says the French correspondent of a New York paper.

“So pronounced was this, that M. Lemoinne, the wellknown editor of the great liberal Catholic journal, the Debats, was moved to say that the Roman Church felt more sympathy for the Moslem than the schismatic, just as they preferred an infidel to the Protestant.  ‘There is at bottom,’ says this writer, ‘a great affinity between the Syllabus and the Koran, and between the two heads of the faithful.  The two systems are of the same nature, and are united on the common ground of a one and unchangeable theory.’  In Italy, in like manner, the King and Liberal Catholics are in warm sympathy with the unfortunate Christians, while the Pope and Ultramontane faction are believed to be inclining to the Mahometans.”⁶

When Rome hates an enemy, it is a fire that lasts for centuries.  That was 1876.  120 years later, she would again use proxies—this time, her minions running the terrible military might of the United States—to again murder Slavic Christians wholesale.

In December of 1998, Congress began impeachment proceedings against William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.

In January of 1999, [Jesuit-educated at Georgetown] William Jefferson Blythe Clinton committed the American military to a 500 year old religious conflict between Bosnian muslims and Serbian Christians in the former Yugoslavia…aiding the Islamists against their Orthodox foes. …

The Bosnian War didn’t do much for Christian Serbs but it was a tremendous boon to the Religion of Peace—by the way, National Guardsmen that should be home digging citizens out of weather emergencies are still deploying on this mission today!

Mike Scruggs noted for the Tribune Papers (archived here) that this was a war that created a terrorist haven in the heart of Europe:

For 78 days in 1999, we bombed Christian Serbia and their forces in Kosovo, ostensibly as a humanitarian move to prevent Serbian ethnic cleansing of Kosovo’s Albanian population.  Our real motive was to cripple the troublesome anti-multiculturalist Serbs and to enhance our standing with the oil-rich Muslim world.  We bombed bridges, selected buildings, railroads, even passenger trains, and other targets in the Serbian capital of Belgrade.  Unfortunately, the Chinese Embassy was also hit.  According to John Pilger, writing in the Guardian, many of the bombs dropped from a relatively safe altitude (for us) of 15,000 feet, also hit schools, hospitals, and homes. Total Serbian dead amounted to about two thousand. Pope John Paul II described the bombing as an “act of diabolical retribution.” Many conservative and liberal American leaders agreed, but the Serbs eventually had to yield to our more advanced technology and vastly superior force. …

The results of our alliance with the KLA and establishing an Albanian base of Muslim power in Kosovo have been horrific.  The Albanians have driven 277 thousand Serbs from Kosovo.  Hundreds have been murdered.  Thousands have been robbed and brutalized as their homes and property were destroyed.  Muslim multiculturalists have destroyed 135 Orthodox churches, monasteries, and shrines.  All this was done under the noses of UN security forces.

Bill Clinton’s great military achievement was a humanitarian disaster, and it established a dangerous Muslim foothold in Europe that is exporting terror and crime.

~ Known By His Enemies, Johnny Cirucci, JohnnyCirucci.com

It’s not a “humanitarian disaster” if it was designed from the very beginning to be as vicious and horrific against the “heathen” enemies of Rome—and this time, Rome need not raise up an army for her brutal agenda, she can (did and still does) use yours, America.

The Mouth of Sauron

Because they have a reputation for being subversives and assassins, some of the best work for the Jesuits in ecumenical syncretism is done (again) by puppets and proxies—they take particular delight in using faux “Protestants” like John B. Cobb Jr.  Having been raised in Japan by Methodist missionaries, Cobb was selected at an early age by the same cabal of Jewish leadership and Roman muscle that has stood against Christ since His execution:

After his graduation from high school, Cobb attended Emory College in Oxford, Georgia before joining the U.S. Army in 1943.^[16]  He was chosen for the Japanese language program, which was filled mainly with Jewish and Catholic intellectuals who helped make him aware of the narrow, parochial nature of his Georgia Protestantism.^[17] ~ Wikipedia

In 1944, Cobb joined the US Army where he was exposed to the intellectuals such as academic-minded Jews and Irish Catholics who revealed a wonderful world of different perspectives expressed by them to Cobb. ~ The Boston Collaborative Encyclopedia of Modern Western Theology

The Jesuits and kabbalists would put Cobb on the forefront of ecumenical syncretism.  This is critical to the Luciferian agenda as when it comes to combining world religions those who dig in their heels the most are Protestant Christians—

As John Cobb (2002), a theologian in Buddhist–Christian dialogue, has observed, it is easier to have multiple religious belonging in some contexts than it is in others.  While it is possible for a Christian to adopt Buddhist meditation, it is harder for adherents of the monotheistic Abrahamic faiths to cross over.  He also thinks that even if a Christian adopts some Buddhist practices, it is difficult to live out both the Christian and Buddhist ways of being and commitments in the fullest sense.  Although he supports the experimentation of multiple belonging, which he says may have appeal to those individuals who find it difficult to identify fully with one tradition, he prefers to be rooted in a single tradition, while seeking its constant transformation by the inspiration of others.

Cobb’s position is different from that of advocates of the complementarity and convergence of Christianity and other religious traditions.  It was for advocating such radical views that Jesuit priest Jacques Dupuis (1997) was investigated by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith of the Vatican.  Citing the example of Henri Le Saux (with an Indian name Abhishiktananada) and the concept of Christ the Omega in Teilhard de Chardin, Dupuis (2002) is open to the possibility that double religious belonging can be a partial anticipation of the full recapitulation in Christ of all religions, which will only be disclosed at the end of time.  His fellow Jesuit, Aloysius Pieris of Sri Lanka, shares his view of the complementarity of religious traditions, but does not subscribe to the notion of teleological convergence.  A leading voice in Buddhist–Christian dialogue, Pieris says Buddhism and Christianity represent two different poles of experience – gnosis and agape, or wisdom and love – each of which is incomplete without the other…⁷

On my show, I repeatedly state the necessity of discernment—a Gift of the Holy Spirit (I call it “Anatoli’s nose” after a character from the SciFi movie The Chronicles of Riddick).  Discernment can help us glean important information from an organization like the “Cult Research Center”.  Despite claiming to be dedicated to the purity of the Christian Gospel, the CRC makes some very New Age declarations that show it to be far from theologically trustworthy.

The CRC, however, seems to have little love for the Catholic Church (although it wouldn’t be the first time a seeming enemy of Rome worked for her ultimate aims as a secret ally—it’s in the Jesuit 4^th Vow Blood Oath).

We are grateful to the CRC for showing the connection between Zoroastrianism and Catholicism as found in the mutual use of swastikas.

What does Catholicism have to do with Buddhism?  In Plaošnik (Sveti Kliment Pantelejmon), a Catholic Church in Macedonia, there is a mosaic floor with a Buddhist swastika next to a cross.  There are even swastikas on the Tombstone of Abbot Simon De Gillans (Paris, France 1345), and swastikas on the robes of the Catholic clergy of Rogier Van der Weyden’s “The Seven Sacraments” altarpiece.

Seeing this identical symbol, begs the question, “Why are Catholicism and Buddhism so alike?”  This is not a question that can come up just because of their identical swastikas; a symbol of their religion, it can be found in their temples and rituals, but no other religion has so much similarities like Catholicism and Buddhism. …

Then, why is this symbol of Aryanism found in Catholicism?  The Roman Catholic Church was mostly influenced by Zoroastrianism.  This influence that began from Persia continued to spread in Greece and Rome.  Especially the Romans were fanatic about this mithra god of Zoroastrianism, and many customs and rituals related to this religion started to settle in people’s lives.  The problem is, these religious Romans were accepted by the Roman Catholic Church of Christianity.  The Catholic Church absorbed a lot of paganistic customs to solidify their position.  This was how the Catholics started to carve the swastikas of Buddhism, Hinduism, and Zoroastrianism on the temples of God.₁₀

Because the Catholics’ and Buddhists’ roots are the same, they really resemble each other, such as the paintings and statues associated with the sun. …

Not only do they resemble each other in decorations, but Catholicism and Buddhism look incredibly alike.  Their faith of polytheism, the idea of venerating relics, repeating certain sentences while praying, the use of rosaries, and the ascetics’ celibacy all resemble each other.

Can we really say that Catholicism is a religion that believes in God, established by Jesus? ~ Catholicism and Buddhism – Aren’t we so alike?, Cult Research Center

The ecumenical syncretistic melding of world religions steamrolling over the complaints of the Reformation Pro Testari is so important to the Jesuits that they even seek to redefine the language of their machinations.

The Jesuit Mission Superior of Nigeria and Ghana, Peter Schineller, wrote a very revealing paper on the subject entitled Inculturation And The Issue Of Syncretism: What is the Real Issue?

What is the real issue?  Is syncretism always wrong?  Can there be good syncretism?  Is syncretism  inevitable?  Are syncretism and inculturation incompatible?  Is there any clear, agreed upon definition of syncretism?  Is syncretism a necessary step in the slow process of inculturation?  These are some of the questions that are raised when syncretism and inculturation come face to face.

My own judgment, conclusion, and thus strategy, as we will see, is that the employment of the word  “syncretism” is no longer helpful or constructive, because the word itself has so many contrasting connotations, meanings.  Many of these are pejorative. …

In light of this deep seated ambiguity, and in spite of attempts at redefining the word, my view is that the word cannot be redeemed, and it might be better not to enter into the controversy surrounding the word. …

Both in the history of its usage, and in contemporary usage, the word syncretism has had varied meanings.  Originally it was applied to political alliances in ancient Greece, to the cities of Crete which came together.  Then it described the way the Old Testament assimilated elements from surrounding cultures.  In the age of the Reformation it pointed to the links between Christianity and humanism, and to the need for Protestant and Catholic churches to come together…

In fact, syncretism has never been used in the need for Protestants and Catholics to come together.  This is known as “gaslighting”; flipping reality completely on its head simply by asserting a lie boldly as if it’s fact and using repetition, reputation and normalcy bias to bolster the lie.

Schineller also noted that his brother Jesuit Karl Rahner—the mind behind Vatican II—considered the Council of Jerusalem to have been the first step towards syncretizing Judaism and Greek culture.  This is a twisting of the Council’s determination so perverse as to be truly called “Jesuitical”.

The Jerusalem Council didn’t rid Believers of Mosaic Ceremonial Law in order to make it easier for Gentiles to combine their old with the Jewish new, they did so because the Ceremonial Law was an impediment to the simplicity of the Gospel.

If that isn’t clear enough, Scripture makes it so!

The Jerusalem Council

Now the apostles and elders came together to consider this matter.  And when there had been much dispute, Peter rose up and said to them: “Men and brethren, you know that a good while ago God chose among us, that by my mouth the Gentiles should hear the word of the Gospel and believe.  So God, who knows the heart, acknowledged them by giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He did to us, and made no distinction between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith.  Now therefore, why do you test God by putting a yoke on the neck of the disciples which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?” ~ Acts 15:6-10 (the NKJV adds headings)

Not to be outdone, Schineller then uses “Christ-mas” as an example of Catholic “Christian” victory of “inculturation” (syncretism) over paganism.

He ends by channeling the Jesuit founder of the New Age, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, by showing how the Gospel must transform and mutate like a living organism in order to absorb all other faiths—

In conclusion, we have discussed the question of inculturation and syncretism by commenting on the various, ambiguous meanings of the word syncretism, and then by suggesting that we avoid that word, and move rather to the real issue, namely the criteria and attitudes for discerning correct or adequate inculturation.  There is no simple answer, no simple criteria because we are dealing with complex realities, with a rich Christian tradition, and marvelously diverse and rich human cultures.  It is even more complex because we are dealing with changing cultures.  No longer is it simply a traditional culture in Nigeria that we must try to inculturate the gospel into.  Rather it is a traditional culture that is changing rapidly, influenced by the march of modernity, of modern science and technology.  This is all the more reason for theology to be creative and prophetic.  It cannot simply protect the past, maintain the old.  It must move, develop, grow, like a living organism.

But after the “organism” is done transforming…what will it finally look like?

Día de Muertos

There are two very important things to remember when dealing with the Roman Catholic “Church”:

1. It is not “Christian”.
2. It’s primary purpose is to exploit and abuse spiritual issues for the purpose of coalescing power over mankind.

That is why, when Rome moved into a new geographic location where the population has a strong pagan culture, it doesn’t compete with those pagan beliefs, it absorbs them.

One such example is the “Day of the Dead”.

Day of the Dead (Spanish: Día de Muertos) is a Mexican holiday celebrated throughout Mexico, in particular the Central and South regions, and by people of Mexican ancestry living in other places, especially the United States.  It is acknowledged internationally in many other cultures.  The multi-day holiday focuses on gatherings of family and friends to pray for and remember friends and family members who have died, and help support their spiritual journey.  In 2008 the tradition was inscribed in the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity by UNESCO.^[1]

The holiday is sometimes called Día de los Muertos^[2][3] in Anglophone countries, a back-translation of its original name, Día de Muertos.  It is particularly celebrated in Mexico where the day is a public holiday. Prior to Spanish colonization in the 16th century, the celebration took place at the beginning of summer.  Gradually it was associated with October 31, November 1 and November 2 to coincide with the Western Christian triduum of Allhallowtide: All Saints’ Eve, All Saints’ Day, and All Souls’ Day.^[4][5]  Traditions connected with the holiday include building private altars called ofrendas, honoring the deceased using sugar skulls, marigolds, and the favorite foods and beverages of the departed, and visiting graves with these as gifts.  Visitors also leave possessions of the deceased at the graves.

Scholars trace the origins of the modern Mexican holiday to indigenous observances dating back hundreds of years and to an Aztec festival dedicated to the goddess Mictecacihuatl.  The holiday has spread throughout the world, being absorbed within other deep traditions for honoring the dead.  It has become a national symbol and as such is taught (for educational purposes) in the nation’s schools. Many families celebrate a traditional “All Saints’ Day“ associated with the Catholic Church. ~ Wikipedia

Given that Rome rules the world from behind the scenes, she uses her whores, proxies and puppets in foreign governments to invade whole nations without a single shot being fired.

One such example is America’s wide-open borders.  Not a single American leader at the national, state or local level—not executive, legislative, judicial nor law enforcement—dares raise a hand to stem the tide.  Each and every one has been cowed into treason as millions upon millions of illegal immigrants stream into the United States; a very, very large percentage of them are Latino Catholics.

I have a very long list of examples in my book, Illuminati Unmasked, but here are a few more—

Catholic Charities Provides Aid to Families Entering U.S. Illegally

KSAT, ABC Channel 12, San Antonio, Texas

SAN ANTONIO—Catholic Charities operates various centers in Texas to help the influx of women and children from Central America entering the country illegally.

Sacred Heart Parish Hall in McAllen has been turned into a relief center for families that have crossed the border.

Members of the community have donated their time and resources, such as clothing and toys, to the cause.

“Everyone is a volunteer here. The solidarity you have seen in this humanitarian outreach has been so uplifting,” said Brenda Riojaso of Catholic Charities.

The city of McAllen has also provided hundreds of thousands of dollars in aid to keep the center open, with the expectation the government will pay them back.

The faith-based effort also extends to the Alamo City, where Archbishop Gustavo Garcia-Siller recently called on parishes to collect donations.

Parishioners have responded to the call and on Tuesday, Catholic Charities in San Antonio will be receiving the donations collected over the weekend.

Taxpayer-Funded Catholic Charities on Hiring Spree to Provide for Illegal Immigrants

Kristin Tate, Breitbart.com

HOUSTON, Texas–Catholic Charities in Texas is helping fulfill the needs of the thousands of illegal immigrants that continue to flood the U.S.-Mexico border.  Breitbart Texas has learned that Catholic Charities’ St. Jerome’s Home for Children, located in Fort Bend County, is providing many benefits including financial support, English classes, legal assistance, and release services to youths in the U.S. illegally.  The charity is looking to hire several staff members to help accommodate the influx of migrants.

St. Jerome’s webpage reads, “While the youth are living in this home, evaluations are provided to assess all their needs (medical, psychiatric/therapeutic, educational, vocational, social, familial, legal) with the development of an initial service plan.”

“After these assessments are completed, a decision about a long-term placement is made in the best interest of the youth,” it continues.  “If appropriate, the youth moves to live with an individual foster family.  Otherwise, the youth remains in the agency foster home. If a youth is not able to maintain the foster family placement, he or she returns to the agency home to live until discharge.”

The programs administers “financial assistance” for the foreigner’s housing, food, clothing, and other necessities.  It additionally provides case management by social workers, vocational training, English lessons, and legal assistance.

Romanizing America Through Illegal Immigration

Ian Paisley.org
Pastor Ralph Ovadal

In recent weeks, the advocates of the “rights” of illegal Mexican immigrants, accompanied by and even led by Roman Catholic priests, have staged rallies, protests, and parades all across the United States of America.

On 25th March, 500,000 people took to the streets of Los Angeles, flying Mexican flags and chanting slogans such as “Viva Mexico!”  Another 500,000 marched in Dallas on April 9, waving Mexican flags with “Our Lady of Guadalupe” emblazoned in the center.

On May 1, a favorite Communist holiday, illegals staged a nationwide work stoppage and boycott of businesses and schools.  The alien lobby also once more staged marches and rallies nationwide.  As reported by NBC News, some of those activities were launched from local Roman Catholic parish churches.  This outburst of protest is a response to several immigration and border reform measures working their way through the U.S. Congress.  According to current estimates, there are as many as twenty million illegal aliens in the United States of America. [today’s numbers are many times that]

Rome aiding and abetting

It is unfortunate that very few Americans have been concerned with the religious aspect of this issue.  The Roman Catholic Church is aiding and abetting the criminal invasion of America from Mexico, working both legally and criminally to bring as many illegal Mexican immigrants into my country as possible.  In this, Rome has one goal in mind—the pope and his henchmen are seeking to turn America, founded and still a Protestant country, into a Roman Catholic country.

This is criminal activity yet Catholic clergy and organizations such as “Catholic Charities” continue on as immune from prosecution as any of America’s mayors who also aid them by autocratically-declaring their fiefdoms to be “sanctuary cities”.  So total is the control of Rome in this effort that not even local law enforcement dares question the status of obvious non-English speaking illegal aliens.  I know, I’ve spoken to an officer directly about this.

Thanks to this invasion, now where America’s small towns used to celebrate Veteran’s Day and Memorial Day, instead they celebrate the Day of the Dead.

With its grinning skeletons dressed in feathered hats and gowns, jewel-eyed sugar skulls and colorful paper garlands, the Nov. 2 “Día de los Muertos,” or Day of the Dead, might appear to many Americans like a Mexican Halloween.  But this centuries-old tradition interwoven with Catholicism is much more than a night of ghouls, ghosts and goodies.

The day gets its name from an ancient Aztec belief that the dead could return home to visit their families one day a year.  In today’s Catholic Mexico, the Day of the Dead is a time for families to gather, remember their ancestors and pray for the souls of the deceased.

“It’s not a sad occasion,” said Prisciliano Maya, faith formation director at Sacred Heart in St. Paul.  “It’s a time to remember and celebrate their [ancestors’] lives.  It’s also about family coming together.”

Maya recalled how his family celebrated the Day of the Dead when he was growing up in central Mexico. Early Nov. 1, his father would lead him and his siblings in reciting the rosary.  Later that day the family would gather for a meal.  Then on Nov. 2 they would spend the day at the cemetery praying and sharing memories of their loved ones.

Memorial altars

Like all immigrant groups, Mexicans brought some of their traditions with them to the U.S.  Today, it is not uncommon to find Day of the Dead altars, or “ofrendas,” in Catholic churches around the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis on All Saints and All Souls days.

Every year at Sacred Heart and other majority Latino churches in the archdiocese, parishioners place pictures of their dead loved ones, flowers, candles and other symbolic items on multi-tiered Day of the Dead altars. ~ Julie Carroll, Catholic Spirit.com

Día de Muertos has even become popular in Hollywood.  It was used to convey all sorts of Luciferian hidden messages in the movie Batman vs. Superman.

It’s also how SPECTRE opens—

“The dead are alive.”

NOTE: There has been a copyright battle between Ian Fleming and screenwriter Kevin McClory over “Spectre/SPECTRE” causing what may have been a proper name to later become an acronym; Special Executive (for) Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge, and Extortion.  The battle, lasting several decades, was settled in 2013 just prior to the making of this movie but for the sake of simplicity I will maintain the spelling which implies an acronym.

This was no minor scene—it was something the film-makers expended great resources to extravagantly portray.

Mexico’s first Bond girl has spoken of her pride at filming SPECTRE in her country, and her anger at the insults heaped on her people by Donald Trump.

Stephanie Sigman, the 28-year-old model who became an international star after sitting next to Arctic Monkeys frontman Alex Turner on a plane, and then featuring in a music video, said shooting the film was a joy.

“The scenes in the streets of Mexico City were just incredible,” she told The Telegraph, speaking ahead of the world premier in London on Monday.  Sigman plays Estrella, and joins Bond on a spectacular Day of the Dead march through the city – the 11 minute opening sequence to the £200 million film.  Involving 1,500 extras, it brought the capital to a standstill, as helicopters swooped overhead and Daniel Craig’s stunt double hurtled above the Zocalo main square.

Michael Wilson, the co-producer, said the scene was the biggest opening shot they had ever done, while Sam Mendes, the Oscar-winning director, said Mexico provided the drama he sought. ~ Mexico’s First Bond Girl on Filming In Her Homeland, The Telegraph

As the movie progresses, we find that Bond’s mission in Mexico was an unsanctioned assignment!

He utilizes a sound-conducting laser weapon site to hear men in a room speaking Italian and planning a terrorist bombing.

It turns out that there is to be a big merger between England’s international intelligence agency, MI6 (the British counter-part to the CIA) and MI5 (Britain’s FBI).

Once merged, they will become the “Joint Security Service” under young rising star Max Denby, code-named “C”.  Bond gives “C” a frosty and formal reception when they meet.

Next we see a really poor facsimile of a picture depicting Bond’s “adopted” family when he was a boy, standing alongside his “father” and “brother”—whose head has been burned out of the picture due damage caused in the previous movie, Skyfall.

We then see a massive new building complex that will become the “Center for National Security” and we soon find out that it isn’t even built with taxpayer money but instead the funds have been donated by outside civilian sources!

There are terrorist incidents occurring all over the world and they are causing a heightened fear that is helping to centralize the world’s intelligence agencies into one monstrous enterprise named “Nine Eyes” and “C” is all for it.

During a meeting of the world’s security officials in Tokyo, “C” makes an impassioned speech for “Nine Eyes” whilst “M” quietly notes from the audience the resultant power will be “an unelected one”.

M’s Chief of Staff, Bill Tanner (Rory Kinnear), tells Bond with irony that it will usher in a “New World Order”.  Not quite sure how that phrase is even utterable in “mainstream” entertainment.

Because of Bond’s “unsanctioned assignment” in Mexico, he is injected with “smart blood”; “cutting edge nano-technology” to track his every move.  He willingly subjects to the procedure and the truth is that all of the West’s highly-trained operators have similar leashes on them…or in them.  They need to know it’s because they’re not trusted to fully obey masters who are traitors in sheep’s clothing.

Later, after “M” comes around to seeing the import of Bond’s rogue mission, he orders the Quartermaster—“Q”—to “erase all of the smart blood files”.

I’m afraid it’s not that simple.

Fiennes First

With Bond in the doghouse, friends are needed.  Lois Maxwell outlasted several different Bond actors in her role as Eve Moneypenny, M’s secretary, but the Daniel Craig genre apparently felt color was needed.  This is the same series that cast the Jewish Joseph Wiseman as the Oriental Dr. Julius No of SPECTRE in the film of the same name; Dr. No (1962).  Remember, whenever someone Jewish does something surly, there’s always a Roman standing behind him, egging him on.

So Bond calls in the new, minority Moneypenny (played by Naomie Harris) to read her in on his unsanctioned assignment.  The old “M” (played by Dame Judi Dench⁸) left a video recording for Bond stating, “If you’re watching this, I’m dead and you need to kill Marco Sciarra.”

UPDATE, 18 July 2016, 12:22 PM, EST: It’s amazing the things you learn when you uncover hidden history.

“Kill Sciarra!”

Giacomo “Sciarra” Colonna was a son of one of the most powerful families in Rome at the turn of the 14^th century (1300’s) or today.  “Colonna” is a name that should be coming up when one wants to find out who is ruling the world from behind the scenes (along with de Medici, Aldobrandini, Orsini, Farnese and Breakspeare).  Instead, we get names like “Soros”, “Rockefeller” and “Rothschild”.

Why do we need to “kill Sciarra”?  —Because Sciarra Colonna joined Philippe le Bel’s emissary Guillaume de Nogaret and confronted Benedetto Caetani, Pope Boniface VIII, in the ongoing feud between Philip IV and Boniface.  Caetani lost the confrontation and was slapped in the face by Colonna—a slap that resounded through history as schiaffo di Anagni (“the Anagni slap”—the confrontation took place at Caetani’s palace in Anagni.)

PC M

Speaking of political correctness, Dench was brought in to be the female “M” at the beginning of the Pierce Brosnan age of Bond.  Feminizing the character played so well by Bernard Lee in previous Bond movies was the second most annoying reason I haven’t seen any of the Brosnan Bond movies.  Picking Brosnan was the first.

It’s nothing against Brosnan’s ability as an actor, I despised his casting for the very reason he was cast: his previous work on a cheesy 80s TV show, Remington Steele.

Truth-be-told, it’s the same logic that brought Roger Moore but at least The Saint was somewhat more serious of a show.

Once allowed to age, Brosnan’s cheese has grated off—especially when he plays a bitter, grizzled ex-spy as he did in November Man (for more, read my review, here).

Dench was killed off in Skyfall (something she says she cried over) and replaced by Ralph Fiennes, whose full name is Ralph Nathaniel Twisleton-Wykeham-Fiennes to make sure we fully understand the depth of his blue-blood breeding.  Fiennes is known for work in Schindler’s List, The English Patient, The Avengers (1998) and was nominated for an MTV “best villain” award as Harry Potter’s “Lord Voldemort”.

Ralph’s brother Joseph Alberic Twisleton-Wykeham-Fiennes has an equally established acting career having worked or starred in such films as Shakespeare in Love, Enemy at the Gates, Luther (where he played the title role of the great Reformer), The Escapist and Hercules (2014).  His most recent accomplishment is to star as Clavius in the “Easter” movie blockbuster Risen, promised to pick up where Mel Gibson’s Passion of the Christ left off.  In fact, the two movies share a key expert—editor Steven Mirkovich.

Gibson played a special role, himself, as the man demonized by a decadent Hollywood because he dared make Passion but was he?  Passion was hugely successful (bringing back nearly $400 million with $30 million in cost) starring talent like devout Roman Catholic Jim Caviezel and Monica Bellucci who was raised Catholic but claims to be agnostic (we’ll see shortly what that really means to the Romans who run all).  Caviezel rode his stardom right into the presence of Rome’s Jesuit Pope Francis, Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

Mel is so ultra orthodox Catholic that he even built his own church in order to hear a pre-Vatican II Latin mass (not quite sure what he’s upset about, Vatican II was written by Jesuit mastermind Karl Rahner).

Do the Jews run Hollywood?  There sure was a lot of propaganda and publicity over Jewish outrage regarding Passion but the man standing behind Mel was a Jesuit named William J. Fulco.  He even did all the translating from English to Arabic to make sure the movie told you what the Jesuits wanted it to—much as another Jesuit (Edmund Walsh) did all the translating at Nuremburg to insure the world was left wonderfully ignorant over the Jesuit role behind the Third Reich.

Jesuit Georgetown’s School of Foreign service is named after Walsh and boasts having trained many of the world’s power players (or, rather, “puppets”).

The Jews are said to run Hollywood but I don’t see a Jew picking the island of Malta to film Risen on—and it was.  That should give a great boost to the fools who fight as today’s Crusaders for Rome like former Green Beret Tim Kennedy who recently went on the Alex Jones show to frighten everyone about the ISIS menace; making sure to prominently display his Crusader t-shirt.

So what has been the key to the success of the Twisleton-Wykeham-Fiennes clan?

Ralph isn’t a “religious” man, though Joseph is said to be drawn to “faith-based” movies.  Perhaps even blue-blooded Britons groveled at the feet of Jewish patrons to land important roles…or are there Jesuits in the woodpile here, too?

Ralph Fiennes was born in Ipswich, Suffolk, England.  He moved around quite a bit while growing up, living in several places in England and Ireland.

Fiennes grew up in a Catholic household, and says that his mother was quite devout,¹ but he says he “chucked it all in before I was confirmed.”² ~ Hollowverse.com

The boys got good Catholic educations, too.  Ralph went to St. Kieran’s College (a Catholic high school) and Joseph was educated by the Sisters of La Retraite at Leehurst.  For a “non-practicing” Catholic, Joseph certainly thought enough of his mother’s faith to be married in a Catholic ceremony.  I wonder what Martin Luther would’ve thought (“Couldn’t the Hollywood Jews have found a Lutheran to portray me?!”).

Fiennes, too, got to meet the superstar Jesuit Pope (oh, purely by “accident” during a “general audience” with His Holiness, of course).

I’ll bet when prominent people joke as Ralph did that he “chucked” his Catholicism “before [he] was confirmed” he didn’t “chuck” as much as he thought…and the real power in Hollywood (and everywhere else) knows it.

Besides the Pope, Fiennes was/is⁹ friends with billionaire Jew pedophile provider Jeffrey Epstein and a frequent visitor to his “rape island” via his “Lolita Express” flights.

I did notice one thing in my research—that a young Ralph looked a lot like the sketch Fleming drew of Bond years ago; far more than who Fleming thought he was drawing actor/composer Howard Hoagland “Hoagy” Carmichael.

Ralph Bond…?

All Roads…

After the catastrophic show-down in Mexico City, Bond must continue to go rogue and travel to the heart of the conspiracy: ROME.

He was successful in killing Sciarra but not the organization behind the man.  For that, he would need to meet and (of course) seduce his wife.

M’s recorded directions were “don’t miss the funeral” and Bond didn’t.  It was carried out in tasteful Roman fashion.  In fact, the cross wasn’t even a gory crucifix as is so wont the traditional depiction of the empire that executed Christ.

Bond does, indeed, connect with Lucia Sciarra…in more ways than one.  And who better to play a shapely, desirable 50 year old widow than Mel Gibson’s Mary Magdalen; Monica Bellucci?

During the encounter she warns Bond of the unspeakable power her dead husband’s organization wields.

Bond asks Lucia about a name he’s heard; the “Pale King”.  It’s a name that connects perfectly with Rome.

As it turns out, the organization is meeting that night and Bond has Sciarra’s ring for identification and entry.

Before he goes, Sciarra’s widow warns him that he is about to cross over to a place where there is no mercy.

Bond travels to Rome and infiltrates the SPECTRE meeting.  The head of SPECTRE sits in the dark and is treated with such reverence that underlings actually bow to him.

Does this remind you of anything?

Bond listens in as SPECTRE “Provincials” from all of their respective nations check in; reports are good—the shadowy organization has infiltrated everything from the military to banks to the oil industry (just like the Jesuits).

Did you know that the United States was divided into 10 Jesuit provinces governed by their own “Provincials”?

They are like kings ruling over their invisible kingdom, unknown to the subjects whose wealth, well-being, even their very sons feed into.

“After this I saw in the night visions, and behold, a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, exceedingly strong.  It had huge iron teeth [much as Nebuchadnezzar’s visionary statue with its legs of iron—Rome!]; it was devouring, breaking in pieces, and trampling the residue with its feet.  It was different from all the beasts that were before it [because it rules all nations in secret, as the system of Mystery Babylon], and it had ten horns.  I was considering the horns, and there was another horn, a little one, coming up among them, before whom three of the first horns were plucked out by the roots.  And there, in this horn, were eyes like the eyes of a man, and a mouth speaking pompous words.” ~ Daniel 7:7-8

There can be no confusing “horns” as nations.  Allow me to again quote Revelation 17—

“The ten horns which you saw are ten kings who have received no kingdom as yet, but they receive authority for one hour as kings with the beast.  These are of one mind, and they will give their power and authority to the beast…” ~ Revelation 17:12-13

If there ever was an organization that worked for evil “as one mind” it is the Company of Loyola.  Jesuit Provincials work tirelessly without an obvious “kingdom” and even the implication in Revelation 17:12 that they do not have a kingdom “yet” may not be an accurate Greek-to-English translation as that word οὔπω (oupó) can be translated “yet not” or “but are still without” as it is here—

Now the disciples had forgotten to take bread, neither had they in the ship with them more than one loaf.  And he charged them, saying, “Take heed, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod.”  And they reasoned among themselves, saying, “It is because we have no bread.”  And when Jesus knew it, he saith unto them, “Why reason ye, because ye have no bread?  Perceive ye not yet, neither understand?  Have ye your heart yet hardened?  Having eyes, see ye not?  And having ears, hear ye not? And do ye not remember?  When I brake the five loaves among five thousand, how many baskets full of fragments took ye up?”  They say unto him, “Twelve.”  “And when the seven among four thousand, how many baskets full of fragments took ye up?” And they said, “Seven.”  And he said unto them, “How is it that ye do not understand (οὔπω νοεῖτε οὐδὲ συνίετε)?” ~ Mark 8:14-21 (KJV)

Gnostic Cuckoos

During the meeting, we learn that Marco Sciarra departed with unfinished business—assassinate the “Pale King”.  The shadowy “Superior General” asks who will take Sciarra’s place?  “Guera” (Spanish actor Benito Sagredo), an assassin seated at the opposite end of the table volunteers until a massive man strides in, gouges out his eyes and breaks his neck.

The first two Daniel Craig James Bond movies (Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace) were masterful—gritty, tough and, above all, realistic.  They set the Craig movies apart from the comical, cheesy, tongue-in-cheek caricature he had become (particularly in the Roger Moore era).

Sadly, Barbara Broccoli would have Craig revert to that foolishness in his second two movies (Skyfall and SPECTRE) although not completely.

The assassin “Mr. Hinx” could be considered as part of this “return” but that is not the feeling I walked away with after watching the brutal bloodsport scene (given that the Jesuits are the world’s foremost assassins dedicated to lay down their very lives for the slightest trifle of their leadership I’m sure such things have been conducted in their circles).

Although Richard Kiel (“Jaws”) was a massive 7’2” his ridiculous steel teeth kept him out of the realm of reality and squarely in Bond-land.

However, Kiel never brutally blinded someone on screen and, despite Dave Bautista’s career in the aptly-renamed “World Wrestling Entertainment”, Bautista has trained with the Gracie clan in Brazilian jiu jitsu and even fought and won a single mixed martial arts match.  His 6’6”, 289lb stature spoke instantly to me of one thing: genetically-engineered killer.

Bond thought he had infiltrated SPECTRE in anonymity but there was a dramatic moment where the shadow-general reveals himself to be fully aware of Bond’s presence and he must make a hasty exit with “Mr. Hinx” fast on his heels.

The movie reverts to Bond-land as the two race through Rome in 6-figure sports cars (because that’s what spies and assassins drive, right Barbara?).

The Bondian ludicrous extravagance again takes a serious turn (preceded by a very dramatic soundtrack score) as the two race right through St. Peter’s square.

Bond eludes his would-be killer and makes it to the “Pale King” first who turns out to be “Mr. White” (Jesper Christensen) whom the audience has known from all four Daniel Craig movies; clearly a pivotal character.

A disheveled Pale King tells Bond that he became disenchanted with SPECTRE when the organization began sex trafficking women and children which was where Mr. White drew the line—slaughtering untold hundreds of innocents and repeatedly threatening to bring the world to extinction via a variety of weapons of mass destruction was all fair game.

The Jesuit Superior General is known as the “Black Pope” because of the terrible power he wields while still impersonating a humble black-cassock-wearing priest.  What is fascinating is how many “White Popes” the Jesuits have reputedly murdered because they, too, failed to get with the program.

Although “Mr. Hinx” is close behind Bond to kill them both, the Pale King has already been given cancer due to a thalium-impregnated cell phone.  Such a demise is a Jesuit specialty.

Mr. White then bargains with Bond for the only thing left that he cares about; his daughter, “Madeleine Swann” (Léa Seydoux).  If Bond will protect her, the Pale King will tell Bond how to get at SPECTRE.

Meanwhile, “Nine Eyes” is fast becoming a reality.  The lone holdout on the Security Council—South Africa—has been victimized by several deadly terrorist attacks and now all nations are onboard.

We later find out that Max Denby/C is actually a member of SPECTRE so what this means is that false flags were conducted in textbook Hegelian fashion: the organization claiming to protect citizens murdered them in order to frighten them into giving up rights for the enabling of that same organization.

Bond finds Swann who wants nothing to do with him until an attempt on her life convinces her otherwise.  The two then try to retrace the steps of the Pale King to strike at the heart of SPECTRE.

Bond and Swann must return to the hotel where the Pale King went regularly with his wife before they divorced along with a young Madeleine in Tangiers—L’Américain … “The American”.

So, too, have the Jesuits made America the lynchpin in all their machinations.  Their official publication is “America Magazine”.

In a drunken stupor, Madeleine whispers “to liars and killers everywhere” then drifts into sleep.

Never were the Jesuits more accurately described.

As the fetching Mr. White’s daughter and Secret Service spy get to know each other, young Madeleine asks Bond how a man ends up choosing to become a paid assassin?  Bond’s seemingly humorous response is, “Well it was either that or join the priesthood.”

Why compromise when you can have both?  Be a Jesuit!

It turns out that the leader of SPECTRE is actually Bond’s adopted brother, Franz Oberhauser.

The two travel to the hotel and discover White left evidence directing them to Oberhauser’s operations base in the desert.  After an encounter with Hinx that sees the assassin killed, Bond and Swann are escorted to Oberhauser’s base.  There, Oberhauser reveals that Spectre has been funding the Joint Intelligence Service while staging terrorist attacks around the world, creating a need for the Nine Eyes programme.  In return C will give Spectre unlimited access to intelligence gathered by Nine Eyes, allowing them to anticipate and counter-act investigations into their operations.  Bond is tortured as Oberhauser discusses their shared history: after the younger Bond was orphaned, Oberhauser’s father, Hannes, became his temporary guardian.  Believing that Bond supplanted his role as son, Oberhauser killed his father and staged his own death, subsequently adopting the name Ernst Stavro Blofeld and going on to form Spectre. ~ Wikipedia

So the ultimate villain turns out to be our hero’s brother—just as the gnostics teach that “Lucifer” is the wrongfully-wounded brother of Christ, cast out of Heaven like Prometheus for trying to give men the knowledge that would empower them.

This is why the floors of Freemasonic lodges always have black and white tiles—because darkness is light and light is darkness.

Messaging Us or Mocking Us?

SPECTRE is little different from any number of recent movies that seem to telegraph the truth of who is ruling the world in secret.  Why have they produced a movie like this?  Is it a private joke amongst the Elite at our expense or are they trying to wake the sleeping giant?

As I said at the beginning of this article—in any massive endeavor of malignant secrecy, those who rule tell those who carry out the orders very little.

From Cinema to the CIA, everything is carefully compartmentalized.

In his prologue to S. K. Bain’s The Most Dangerous Book in the World, Peter Levenda said this about the bureaucracy under the dark powers that commit false flags like 9/11—

There are other forces at work, forces that are unacknowledged by the state, the church, the media because to admit their existence is to admit failure.  Thus, when things go wrong terrorists are blamed, or communists, or witches.  This serves to rally the citizens around the government once again, instead of stopping to insist that explanations be given, that evidence is properly analyzed, that the guilty are apprehended and punished.  And we once more go to war, against …someone, somewhere.  Paranoia becomes institutionalized.  It is appropriated by the government as its own prerogative.  The state determines the nature and quality of the paranoia: it creates intelligence agencies whose sole purpose is to give a form to paranoia, to enshrine paranoia as one of the necessary qualities of an observant and caring state.  To prove that paranoia is an acceptable characteristic of the paternalistic regime.  The citizens are not allowed to become paranoid unless it is at government direction and sanction.  Individual cases of paranoia are frowned upon.  The state tells us that if we are not paranoid the way it is paranoid—and about the same things—it’s because we don’t have all the facts: about terrorism, fundamentalism, communism, foreign countries, weapons of mass destruction, sleeper cells.  The state has all the facts: classified documents, wire-tap transcripts, intelligence feeds, high-altitude reconnaissance images, none of which the citizen is permitted to see.  It does not realize that the logical conclusion of all this paranoia is suspicion of the state apparatus itself.  What the conspiracy theorist often fails to realize, however, is that those working for the state are often just as clueless as the average citizen when it comes to the origin and function of the forces at work to subvert it.  The strength of a conspiracy, after all, rests in the limited number of persons who are aware of its existence and parameters.  No one has the entire picture.  Each member of the state apparatus only has possession of a single piece of an enormous jigsaw puzzle.  Putting together all these disparate pieces—particularly when one does not have the original picture to work from—is a soul-destroying enterprise that consumes decades of work and years of one’s life.  This is especially true when the state has in its arsenal of lies the techniques of disinformation and misdirection, of false testimony and planted documents.

When movies like SPECTRE have films such as Exodus: Gods and Kings being released before it and Mad Max: Fury Road being released the same year (another deeply Luciferian movie that seemed to cry out for a hero), it sure seems like even the Machine is yearning for release from the chains of its cruel master.

NOTE: For related sound clips from the movie and a reading of this article, listen to my show—Resistance Rising, Episodes 087 & 088—on the embedded players below.